Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
August 1, 2018
pickering.ca Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 10 Date: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Lesley Dunne T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 Email ldunne@pickering.ca Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, August 1, 2018 7:00 pm Council Chambers Page Number (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from July 11, 2018 1-8 (III) Reports 1. P/CA 58/18 P. Dalglish 358 Rosebank Road 9-16 2. P/CA 59/18 & P/CA 60/18 Mattamy (Seaton) Limited Part of Blocks 83 and 90, Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-13, Phase 2 17-24 3. P/CA 61/18 K. Campbell & D. Coleman 565 Whitevale Road 25-32 4. P/CA 63/18 E. Bouchard 1006 Vistula Drive 33-37 5. P/CA 64/18 1692 Central Street 38-43 6. (Deferred at the May 30, 2018 Meeting) P/CA 42/18 to P/CA 44/18 M. Malik Qasim/10221058 Canada Ltd. 560 & 562 Marksbury Road 44-57 (IV) Adjournment -Ct%t>f- p](KERJNG -Cdpof- Pl KERJNG Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland -Vice-Chair David Johnson -Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle . Sean Wiley Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary-Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer · (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton . Secondeq by Tom Copeland 1 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 11, 2018 7:00 pm Main Committee Room That the agenda for the Wednesday, July 11, 2018 meeting be adopted . . Carried Unanimously (II) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the minutes of the 8th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, June 20, 2018 be adopted. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 8 2 (Ill) Reports 1. PICA 37/18 2414660 Ontario Limited 1712 Central Street Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes · Wednesday, July 11, 2018 7:00 pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06: • to permit an "automobile service station" that includes a gas bar having minimum facilities to include a sales office, one enclosed service bay, and one hydraulic hoist; whereas the by-law requires "automobile service stations" to include a gas bar or any gasoline outlet having, as an integral part thereof and contained within an enclosed building, minimum facilities to include a sales office, two enclosed service bays, and one hydraulic hoist • to permit a one-way aisle used to gain access to a parking stall to have a minimum width of 3.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires the minimum width of a one-way aisle used to gain access to a parking stall to be 3.8 metres • to permit a minimum landscaped open space of 32 percent; whereas the by-law requires a minimum landscaped open space of 50 percent • to permit a minimum of 9 parking spaces; whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 12 parking spaces • to recognize a combined entrance and exit for an automobile service station having a width of 29.1 metres; whereas the by-law requires the width of any entrance or exit or combined entrance and exit for automobile service stations measured at the lot line to not be greater than 10.7 metres The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain site plan approval for the expansion of the commercial use within the existing building and recognize existing conditions on the site. · · The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to t,onditions. Written comments received from the City's Engineering Services Department indicated that there are no comments on the application. Written comments received from a resident of 5015 Old Brock Road in objection to the application. Gil Shcolyor, applicant, was present to represent the application. Glenda Winterstein of 5015 Brock Road was present in objection to the application and David Barton of 501.2 Brock Road was present to obtain clarification and additional information on the application. Gil Shcolyor stated that the proposed construction would be within the existing footprint. He also indicted that there will be improvements to the site's landscaped areas and to the management of the site's drainage. Page 2 of 8 -Cd;J 0f- p](KER]NG 3 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 11, 2018 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Glenda Winterstein spoke in objection to the application and outlined her concerns that were contained in her written comments submitted prior to the meeting. Glenda Win,terstien expressed a concern with having the parking lot so close to the gas meter,. which is located on the south side of the apartment building that could potentially damage the gas line. Ms. Winterstein would like to see a barrier/bollard put in place to prevent potential damage to the gas meter. She also expressed a concern with. the drainage and having the p.sphalt parking area of the automobile service station so close to the apartment building that may lead to flooding of her building. Would like to see a drainage system/swale situated along the south side of. her building to allow for proper drainage onto Old Brock Road. David Barton expressed a concern with the light pollution from the subject property and would like to have all proposed lighting directed downwards to stay within the subject property. In response to questions from a Committee Member and concerned residents, Gil Shcolyar stated that he is agreeable to having two metal posts installed on the automotive service ·station site to protect the gas line; and that the photometric plans submitted as part of the site plan process demonstrated that the proposed lighting will stay within the subject property. Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 37/18 by 2414660 Ontario Limited, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the· general intent and purpose bf the- Official Plan a·nd the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1 . That these variances apply only to the gas bar and retail store, as generally sited . and outlined on the applica.nt's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in Committee of Adjustment report, dated July 11, 2018). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 13, 2020, ·or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 3 of 8 4 -Ctqjof-Committee of Adjustment , Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 11, 2018 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Pl KERJNG 2. PICA 55/18 A. Pesic & K. Dawson 854 Modlin Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended: • to permlt a minimum front yard setback of 7.3 metres to an attached garage, whereas the by-law requires minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent · • to permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 3.0 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard · • to permit a covered second"'.storey balcony to project a maximum of 2.2 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding l.O metre in height to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the construction of a two-storey addition to the existing dwelling · · The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments received from the City's Engineering Services Department indicated that are no comments on the application. Aleksander Pesic, applicant, was present to represent the application. Michael Glyn-Williams of 856 Modlin Road was_ present in favour of the application. Michael Glyn-Williams stated he is in support of the application however is concerned with the placement and the number of windows being proposed. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Michael Glyn-Williams stated he has received a copy of the drawings. In response to questions and concerns, Aleksander Pesic stated that,· as the window layout has not been he is willing to consult with the neighbour over window locations. A Committee Member clarified, with the applicant, that there will be a bedroom on the upper floor at the rear of the dwelling, and explained that the Ontario Building Code requires all bedrooms contain a window. · · Page 4 of 8 -Cdt)of- p](KERJNG 5 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 11, 2018 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Due to hearing the applicant is willing to meet with the neighbour on the concerns with the window layout, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 55118 by A Pesic & K. Dawson, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the detached dwelling and attached garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in Committee of Adjustment rep.art, dated July 11, 2018). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 13, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant demolish the existing shed located in the rear yard, immediately following the complete construction of the attached garage or by July 13, 2020, whichever is earlier, or this decision shall become null ahd. void. 3. PICA 56118 A Tortorici & L. Zapl~tal ·1414 Old Forest Road Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended: • to recognize a covered platform (porch and steps) not exceeding 0.9 of a metre in height to project a maximum of 4.0 metres into the required front yard; whereas the by-law_ requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not mor~ than 1.5 metres into any required front yard. · The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to recognize an existing porch. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressed no comments on the application. · Lenka Zapletal, applicant, was present to_ represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Page 5 of 8 6 -C~of- p](KERJNG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 11,-2018 7:00 pm Main Committee Room In response to questions from Committee Members Lenka Zapletal explained that the contractor had poured the foundation incorrectly and that if they had known of the error that they would have had it corrected. Lenka Zapletal also stated there is no change to the design. · Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application PICA 56/18 by A. Tortorici & L. Zapletal, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping·with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance apply only to the existing porch and steps, as generally sited· and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in Committee of Adjustment report, dated July 11, 2018). 4. P/CA57/18 J. Connell 722 Kingfisher Drive Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended: • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent; whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit a covered platform (porch) not exceeding 0.5 of a metre in height above grade, to project a maximum of 1.2 metres into the required front yard; whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard nor 1.0 metre into a~y side yard • to permit an uncovered platform (deck) not exceeding 1.2 metres in height above grade, to project a maximum of 1.3 metres into the required rear yard; whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard nor 1.0 metre into any side yard The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct an addition to the existing single detached dw_elling. Page 6 of 8 -Cd:f6f- p](KERJNG 7 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 11, 2018 7:00 pm Main Committee Room The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressed no comments on the application. Written comments received from the residents of 724 Kingfisher Drive indicated supp~rt of the application. Correspondence received from the residents of 724 Kingfisher Drive indicates the proposed addition is a great combination of added space and a thoughtful design that will blenc;l in with the existing neighbourhood. The comments also state that the application should be approved as it meets the community's needs for expansion while keeping control of over-development in the area. Nikita Furtado-Connell; applicant; was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Nikita Fu.rtado-Connell submitted a letter of support for the Committee Members to review, explained the application and the,need for more space. Moved by Tom Copeland· Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 57/18 by J. Connell; be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: , 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed addition to the detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in Committee of Adjustment report, dated July 11, 2018). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 13, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant demolish the existing shed located in the rear yard, immediately following the complete construction of the attached garage or by July 13, 2020, whichever is earlier, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 7 of 8 8 -Cdpof- p](KER]N (IV) Adjournment Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Denise Rundle Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 11, 2018 7:00 pm Main Committee Room That the 9th meeting of the 2018 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:28 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, August 1, 2018. · Carried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretary-Treasurer . Page 8 of 8 --C~of- p](KERJNG From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 58118 Date: August 1, 2018 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 58118 P.Dalglish 358 Rosebank Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18: • to permit a minimum front yard setback of 6.35 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres • to permit a covered platform (porch) to project a maximum of 0.91 of a metre into the requ_ired front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard The applicar:it requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the construction of an addition and covered porch in the front yard of the property. · Recommendations The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the_general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the construction of a front addition and covered porch, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2). · 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construdion by August 3, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By"law . -Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas" Zoning By-law 3036 -"R4" -Fourth Density Residential Zone 9 1 O Report PICA 58/18 Appropriateness of the Application August 1, 2018 Page 2 Front yard setback and projection of a covered platform (porch) The intent of the zoning by-law provision requiring a minimum front yard setback is to provide for adequate amenity and landscaped space, to ensure safe sightlines for entrance of exit of vehicles and pedestrians and to ensure enjoyment of personal space and privacy by achieving a consistent streetscape. The intent of requiring maximum projections into the required front yard for any platforms . (porches) or decks is to ensure that any additions/structures can be appropriately maintained without having to encroach onto abutting properties, to minimize any adverse impact on · adjacent neig~bours such as privacy and to ensure that an adequate outdoor amenity area is provided within the front yard. The applicant has requested to construct an addition to the existing house in the front yard to be used as a front foyer and to permit a minimum front yard setback of 6.35 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres. The applicant has also requested to construct a covered platform (porch) in front of the addition and to allow for the covered porch to project a maximum of 0.91 of a metre in the· required front yard. Although an uncovered platform is permitted to project 1.5 metres into the required front yard, this proposal does not meet the-by-law requirement because it is a covered porch and is not considered to be an uncovered platform. The by-law does not permit any encroachments for covered platforms (porches). . )n total, the front addition and covered porch will project 275 metres (9 feet) from the main wall of the house into the front yard. If the variances are approved, the impact of the requested reduced front yard i$ expected to be minimal. Though the front yard setbacks vary along the street, this proposal would not be out of character and is appropriate scale for the residence. A public-park is directly across the subject property. As such the requested variances are considered minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 25, 2018 Comments prepared by: f:1/?i/lktl/;;. Elizabeth Martelluzzi Planner II, Heritage EM:DW:ld • · no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:\Documents\Deve/opment\0-3700\2018\PCA 58-18\Report\PCA 58-1 B Report.doc Attachments Exhibit 1 ------------------------------------......... ~ -. ~o/- PJ(KERJNG City Development Department H II a, ·f L c 0 I ;;: ~ IT C rr St h a~ orn Road t I ::, I 0 0 <I) ~ a:: I I. I I Ii 1 2 Exhibit 2 nACJ (22,09 M) ' ~,- ~ °' °' ~ :0 LOT 2 _, °' N ·' ·, ll'-10 1/2" l/(3.62 M,) . , / ~ ::Q ~ ui °' ~ EXISTING SINGLE co 'st ti ~ ,,10•-4 uz~, FAMILY DWELLING b, co -st °' (3.16 M.) / / 1/~J PROPOSED ~ ~ ADDITION .r ',_ '- PROPOSED /~ ~ ORCH \[) b 2: ~ l ~ ~ --~ ' ' / '-· 7< .50' (21.49 M) ~ To permit a front yard of 6.35 metres To permit a covered Rose bank Road platform (porch) to project a maximum of 0.91 metres into the required front yard ~~ Submitted Plan CdtJbf File No: P/CA 58/18 PICKERING Applicant: P. Oalglish City Development Property Description: Part Lots 1 and 2 Plan 283, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-2519 Department (358 Rosebank Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING I DATE: July 16, 2018 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Exhibit 313 I I LJ I I I GAS FIREPLACE I CY I 0 I 0 -I 0 CJ) I DINING ROOM · ~ J I I --' r I2'-I" X I0'-10" UJ I b I ,· °' LIVING ROOM I 12'-I" X 17'-5" I I I ,---- I I ( 4'-0" X . FR. 3·-0· . 6'-0" I 8'-o· l l I ISLAND r=F I I r- 1 --------------PEAK OF CEILING-~: ( I I AT 12'-I" I L_ I I I I I I I fZl ( KITCf-iEN i I 95''1'5' •J I , NEW RAILING I ( I I I D] I I I I I t- i I I I I L-----..... ~~ FOYER I -r- r---9'-5' X 6'-1" I I I I I I I I I ST. __ __J R'Y: PANTRY -- ' I I I I I Sf-1ELVES LIN. CJ 01 rn ~~ 1---I I L_ ------------~ -C~o/- p](l(ER]NG City Development Department '\ ,I I I I I BATl-l1 I I ENS::=f~ BEDROOM 3 I 9'-5" X 9'-5" ,:.__ 0 I/ II ~ -D f-- )- ,, MASTER BEDROOM 13'-6" X 15'-I" ' BEDROOM 2 12'-IO" X I0'-7" ,. Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 58/18 Applicant: P. Dalglish Property_ Description: Part Lots 1 and 2 Plan 283, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-2519 (358 Rosebank Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: July 16, 2018 14 ' 9'-0" l I l REMOVE BRICKWORK AT SIDES OF FIREPLACE AND MAKE -GOOD j ] REC. ROOM 12'-0' X 17'-2" Exhibit 4 I lj OFFICE I l'-10" X 13'-2" ~ BATH 0~ LSLAB ON GRADE Wln-J PERIMETER U) 8 § ' LAUNDRY '-T 0 GRADE BEAMSl ~ . ] 8tGJtl• -04;bl- PICKERING City Development Department [ Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 58/18 Applicant: P. Dalglish STRAP AND DRYWALL __j LAUNDRY WALLS AND CEILING t MAKE GOOD GARAGE 24'-3" X 21'-I I' . Property Description: Part Lots 1 and 2 Plan 283, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-2519 (358 Rosebank Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVA.ILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. l DATE: July 16, 2018 Exhibit 515 TOP_ OF LO~ Pl T. Existing East Elevation EXTEI-D CHIM!sEY--§-==f F1N._BASEM8if R.R. Rosebank Road r---------------.---------------------- 1 I I I I I L ________________ J FUSION STONE FACING Proposed East Elevation City Development Department Rosebank Road Existing and .Proposed Elevations File No: P/CA 58/18 Applicant: P. Dalglish Property Description: Part Lots 1 and 2 Plan 283, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-2519 (358 Rosebank Road) · FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: July 16, 2018 1 6 Exhibit 6 -nn · • ~=~ TOP Cll" UPPER £:LI,_ ~ ~~ _J:s)P_ OF LOWE..!3 PLT. I b co I b FIN. UPPER FLR. ------co 9 I== FIN, GROU\'D FLR. -'I.-,----- " FIN. GROl..l',O FLR. ----~ u --=-= W=, N co - FIN. BASEMENT FLR. -..------ Proposed South Side Elevation nn ~ ~ TOP q' UPPER £:L ~,- b ,, <D ~ U_!:'PER FLR:_ _ b 4 FIN. GROUND FLR. ----~ i==r=7 Proposed North Side Elevation ~Cdpof Side Elevations File No: PICA 58/i 8 PICKERING Applicant: P. Dalglish City Development Property Description: Part Lots 1 and 2 Plan 283, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-2519 Department (358 Rosebank Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING I DATE: July 16, 2018 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. .. 17 Report to -C~0f- p](KER]NG Committee of Adjustment From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Application Numbers: PICA 59118 & PICA 60118 Date: August 1, 2018 Principal Planner, Development Review Subject:· Committee ·of Adjustment Application PICA 59118 & PICA 60118 Mattamy (Seaton) Limited Part of Blocks 83 and 90, Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-13, Phase 2 Applications The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364114, as amended: PICA 59118 (Block 83, Unit 7): To permit a minimum flankage yard setback of 1.78 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 2.4 metres. · PICA 60118 (Block 90, Unit 8): To permit a minimum flankage yard of 0.80 of a metre, whereas the by-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 2.4 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to-obtain a building permit for the construction of street townhouse dwellings with integrated private garages, accessed by a lane. · Recommendations PICA 59118 (Block 83, Unit 7, Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-13 (Phase 2)) The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the-general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subjed to the following condition: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed.townhouse dwelling,' as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (referto Exhibit 2) . . PICA 60118 Block 90, Unit 8, Draft Approved Plan of subdivis_ion SP-2009-13 (Phase 2)) The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed townhouse dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 3). 1 B Report PICA 59118 & PICA 60118 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Mixed Use Areas -Mixed Corridors" . PICA 59118: Zoning By-law 7364114 -Mixed Corridor Type 1 (MC1-2) PICA 60118: Zoning By-law 7364114 -Mixed Corridor Type 2 (MC2-1) Appropriateness of the Applications Flankage Yard Variance August 1, 2018 Page 2 The intent of the minimum flankage yard is to ensure a dwelling is adequately setback from street activity and a sufficient landscaped area is maintained between a dwelling and the adjacent street. · ·' · The applicant proposes to construct a street townhouse on Block 83, Unit 7 (PICA 59118). The zoning by-law requires a minimum flankage yard s.etback of 2.4 metres. The applicant has requested a reduction in the minimum flankage yard setback from 2.4 metres to 1 :78 metres. The applicant also proposes to construct a street townhouse on Block 90, Unit 8 (PICA 60118). The zoning by-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 2.4 metres. The applicant hcts requested a reduction in the minimum flankage yard setback from 2.4 metres to 0.80 of metre. The proposed reduction in the flankage yard setback is necessary due to the irregular shape of the properties. The lot line rounds at the corners where the garage entrances open onto the · lanes, which reduces the distance between the corner of the proposed townhouses and the closest point of the corner lot lines. The proposed townhouse dwellings will maintain the required setbacks at all other points on the property. The requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 25, 2018 Comments prepared by: f.Jlac/c#/?# . Elizabeth Martelluzzi . Planner II, Heritage EM:DW:ld J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2018\PCA 59-18 & PCA 60-18\Report\PCA 59-18&PCA 60-18 Report.doc Attachments . • no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review -~t,/- PICKERING City Development Department Subject Lands PICA 60118 Taunton Road Subject IDlll-•"111(11-----Lands · Exhibit 1 PICA 59118 Location Map File: PICA 59118 & PICA 60118 Applicant: Mattamv (Seaton) Limited Property Description: Part of Blocks 83 & 90 Phase 2 SP-2.009-13 Date: Jul. 17, 2018 r"-' ,.,e t;Orporation o the Llfty or t-'I~ enng t'nHl!JC'(!IJ {n part) unaer 1cense rrom:Q\.lU-eens t'nnter, untano M!Otstry 01 Natural ttesources, SCALE: 1 :5,000 I o\11 rfghls reseived,;© Her Majesty lhe Queen In Right or Canada, Department of Ualural Resources. Al righhi reserved,; ~Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its supplte~ a!l rights reseNed.;© Mun!clpal Property Assessment Corporation and 11.s suppRers a!l rights reseNed.; THIS rs tlOT A PLAtl OF SURVEY. to permit a minimum flankage yard of 1.78 metres -~of-P](KERJNG City Development Department L:IPlanning\Core~Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 ----------------------------------------------~ 179.13 .1n.os C.S!t 11179.15 o.s,:; ·c:. "' -~ . ~ SAPPHIRE SAN 176.42 SlM 176.70 Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 59/18 DRIVE SAN 176,45 SAN 178,-W SAN 176,51 SlM 176.76 STM 176,76 $TI,( 176.82 ® 0 BRLC BRLE Ve vc V .., 179.30 3R 3R 179.30 __ © ____ UFR•1TI.81 UFR•177.B4 • 178.99 0.5:t .17_9.05 HOLLOW OAK MEWS Applicant: Mattamy (Seaton) Limited .179..25 SAN 176,54 SAN 176.56 SAN. 178,50 STM 17s:az STM 176.BB STM 176,BB UFF•17B.1B UFF•17fJ,18 @ ® (j) BRLE BRLC BRW vc . vc vc (REV) (REV) (REV) V .., .., 179.32 3R .1R 179.35 UFR•177,87 1 9.1 o.sx ,.179.15 Property Description: Part of Blocks 83 & 90, Phase 2 SP-2009-13 Block 83, Unit 7 FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 0.57.'. • SAN SIM 0.5 UFR•1 179. Exhibit 2 DATE: July 17, 2018 -C~(Jf-P](KER]NG City Development Department L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 T T T T 179.90 2R JR © UFR-178.40 UFR•178.J7 9.00 0.5% 11 179,6~~ 1( 179.69 0.15%" ll 179,B-J HOLLOW OAK MEWS ©l ----©-------------© 178.80 1R 179.80 1R 179,80 1R 1R 179.80 ... ... 179.80 lR ... ... BRLC BRLE ... BRI.E BRLE CR CR BRLA CR (REV) CR (REV) CR CR (REV) 0 0 0 ® ® 0 UFf•178-Z1 ~ <., ·~«-< ·~ l!l 161.# ----------------------------------------SAN 176,-1-7 SThl 176,B-1-Submitted Plan· SAN. t7e".50 Sl1d 170.07 SAN 176.52 STM 176,97 File No: P/CA 60/18 SN-1 176.54 SThl 176.9J SAN 176,5B SlM 177.0D SAN 178'..!58 STM 178,94 SAN 176.!39 STI.! 176.97 SAN 176,63 SThl 177.00 .ns.17~ "179.21 o.a::c. FALL HARVEST CRESCENT SAN 176.59 SThl 177.0~ 3.00 SAN 176.62 SThl 177.07 3.00 SAN H6 • .fi5 Slld 177.10 Applicant: Mattamy (Seaton) Limited BRLF CR (REV) ® Property Description: Part of Blocks 83 & 90, Phase 2 SP-2009-13 Block 90, Unit 8 FULL SCALE COPiES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. © . :r:~ o .. r" ~~ ;:,;;: Exhibit 3 To permit a minimum flankage yard of 0.80 metres DATE: July 17, 2018 C 0 -Cdt;o/-P](KER]NG City Development . Department L:\Planning\Core~Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 I~ C E s s 0 N / Draft Plan of Subdivision File No: PICA 59/18 and P/CA 60/18 Applicant: Mattamy (Seaton) Limited Property Description: Part of Blocks 83 & 90, Phase 2 SP-2009-13 FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. . Exhibit 4 I DATE: July _17, 2018 RGI-ff SID::. ::L::Vt..TJOI\. "<.EAR ' ur-1-5'tl.D uJ"I-IJ'I!_:: [ 1.1JT!IRLI! (~~~~~~~ ®~;-~~) "¢,, I 0=~\t", · _':::FT SIDE ':::LEV AT O'-J F"<.01\.T E_:C:\/A-IC, BLOC<: 83' -Cdt}of-P](KER]NG Subrnitted Elevations File No: P/CA 59/18 Applicant: Mattamy (Seaton) Limited ' ] .,,r eR.c ·· 1 ~:'5i::l"~Tci;;) l ...:...•a.~v. •J'C! ' Property Description: Part of Blocks 83 & 90, Phase 2 SP-2009-13 City Development Department L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 Block 83, Unit 7 FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. I l ,J I ~,r !IR-" , (;'/G5!t...TO~C:} [ ~~~-~./C feV ..... ,.~-' ........ --.. . . , ' t ~ Exhibit 5 --------~ ········. t-:J.,l C) ---~-_ ... -·-· ( .... 1<-~ " ' DATE: July 17, 2018 =========L========::::::=1==============:: ,,r..1-IJ'll!..F c~:~~T~-;~., Submitted Elevations File No: P/CA 60/18 ! -~of-Pl(KERJNG Applicant: Mattamy (Seaton) Limited IJNIT ~FU.C ~(.:1!:R .. :TU~) ~1.. Recommendations The City Development Department recommends that Minor Variance Application PICA 61118 be Tabled until Heritage Planning staff and the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee have reviewed the application and a heritage permit is obtained. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Rural Settlements -Rural Hamlet" · Zoning By-law 3037, Amended by 2677188 -"HMR3" -Hamlet Residential Zone. Background The subjed property is located within the Whitevale Heritage Conservation District, on the south side of Whitevale Road, east of Golf Club Road. The owners of the-property have recently completed construction to renovate and add to the existing house. A building permit and heritage permit were obtained for the house renovations. · A garage on the property has since been demolished and rebuilt. The owners of the property . are requesting a minor variance to permit a maximum height of 4.38 metres for an existing detached garage, whereas the zoning by-law permits a maximum height of 3.5 metres. 26 Report PICA 61/18 August 1, 2018 Page 2 Through the circulation of this minor variance application, it was identified by staff that a heritage permit was not obtained for the construction of the garage, which is required in order for a building permit to be issued. The owners have since applied for a heritage permit which will be brought forward at the next Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee meeting. Staff recommends that the Committee of Adjustment table this Minor Variance application until a heritage permit is reviewed by the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee and Heritage Planning staff, and a Heritage Permit is obtained. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 25, 2018 Comments prepared by: Elizabeth Martelluzzi Planner II, Heritage EM:DW:jc • no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2018\PCA 61-18\Report\PCA 61-18 Report.doc Attachments -0 ro &. € 0 z -Cftr>/- Pl(KERlNG City Development Department Location Ma File: PICA 61/18 · Subject Lands Whitevale Road bell & D. Coleman Exhibit 1 Now Part 1 RP Date: Jul. 03, 2018 SCALE: 1 :5,000 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. -Cdpof-PJ(KERJNG City Development Department L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\201 B 22.30 22,56 I I I L ---·--------------------_J @ Deck Site Plan Whitevale Road 1: 200 SITEPLAN WAS PREPARED FROM CLIENT SUPPLIED DRAWINGS AND SITE MEASUREMENTS. IT IS NOT A SURVEY AND DIMENSIONS APPROXIMATE Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 61/18 Applicant: K. Campbell & D. Coleman Property Description: Part Lot 30 Concession 4, Now Part 1 RP 40R4309 (565 Whitevale Road) ·FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE Cl1Y OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Exhibit 2 To permit a maximum height of 4.38 metres DATE: July i 6, 2018 -C~o/-p](KER]NG City Development Department L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCAVl.018 Submitted Elevation File No: P/CA 61/18 Applicant: K. Campbell & D: Coleman Property Description: Part Lot 30 Concession 4, Now Part 1 RP 40R4309 (565 Whitevale Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. -Exhibit 3 DATE: July 16, 2018 ,, 12.24 ·r-. :_ .. , -~ •' . · .. , ,•• ~ ··: .. ····._·' .... :-.· •·:, ,:1 1·.·: .'I · I ·,.:1 .··1 ·'j ,·1 I ::i ·-I EXISTING THICKENED SLAB FOUNDATION TO REM/IJN I: 1.: 1:-1. i: I 1: 1·.:· 1: 1:. :~ .. · .. -·:. ~·· .. -....... • ... -... ~-: : '.-.. ·· ... __ ..-1.: I ~~~~'-=~--~~~------~~~'-""~~---'......C........,_-"-'-'-~--'-.......1 3 f-F:....O.c..O.cc..Tc....lc.c..Nc.cG;.._ _________________________ _ 1 : 100 CD GRADE 1 : 100 -C4;of-P](KER]NG 12.24 11.68 2 2XS Submitted Floor Plans File No: P /CA 61 /18 Applicant: K. Campbell & D. Coleman ~_Roof Plan ~ 1 : 100 @ Second Floor 1 : 100 0.27 Property Description: Part Lot 30 Concession 4, Now Part 1 RP 40R4309 City Development Department L:\Planning\Core~Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 (565 Whitevale Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 3.02 Exhibit 4 27 7~114"LVL ---~ ------------, I I I I I I I I : qi"-! ()• _I'\,'\,+ ':-' DATE: July 16, 2018 North Elevation E ~ -04of-p](KER]NG Submitted Elevations File No: P/CA 61/18 ..M]g£o!rJ.t ~~~; ~ --~~go; ~ ®~!~~SIDE Applicant: K. Campbell & D. Coleman TO R'=O-;aO':=-F~.---~'i<----6.25 0 IYVI ~ Seco!l,l~ ~ ~.2.79 ---2.44 ~-TO RO"'°OF~..,__,,,_ --6.25 Property Description: Part Lot 30 Concession 4, Now Part 1 RP 40R4309 City Development Department L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 (565 Whitevale Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Exhibit 5 DATE: July 16, 2018 South Elevation 2X12 RIDGE (2) 7-1/4" LVL RAFTER SUPPORTING DORMER WALL (2) 14h LVL HEADER _1__-1-, _! ,_,-. -ij -1 I i--!l 1·-11,·-·,11··1. ,: I.-.,-., -.. -. 1-, .-., I -.. -, · (D Section 1 · 1 : 100 -C~oj-Pl(KER]NG Submitted South Elevation and Cross Sections· File No: P /CA 61 /18 Applicant: K. Campbell & D. Coleman TO ROOF ----~6.~2~5-----_ _ MidpoinLRo=o~f_,....,...._____,___ 4.38 _..c. ___ RW 3.93 _ _ Second..flo~ 2.79 ---~~ 2.44 2XBRAFTER Exhibit 6 J_-1 11-' I 1-111:,___,__ _____ ---1·'!1-1 I i-111-1 ! T -, --, ,----i --i l -' -,_ -1 I --1 --: 11--111---1 I l-111---· '1--1 I ---1-I 1-1 I 1-1 I 1·-1·; 1--111--1 I 1---1I!-'--111-1 l 1-~: If-@ Section 2 1 : 100 Property Description: Part Lot 30 Concession 4, Now Part 1 RP 40R4309 City Development Department L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 (565 Whitevale Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: July 16, 2018 -Cdg6f.- p](KER]NG From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review 33 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 63118 Date: August 1, 2018 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 63118 E. Bouchard 100~ Vistula Drive Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended, to permit a minimum west side yard width of 1.3 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres. · The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an addition (garage) to a detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a west side yard width of 1.3 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of t,he land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed addition (garage), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed constructio.n by August 3, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2520, as amended -"R4" -One Family Detached Dwelling Fourth Density Zone 34 Report PICA 63/18 Appropriateness of the Application August 1, 2018 Page 2 The intent of minimum side yard width requirement is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties, provide sufficient space to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services, and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. The zoning by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres on both sides, where a garage is erected ·as a part of the main building. The applicant has requested a variance to permit a minimum west side yard width of 1.3 metres. The garage is proposed to replace an existing one-storey carport currently located 1.3 metres from the west lot line. The applicant is proposing to use the existing concrete piers of the carport for the foundation and frame of the proposed garage. The garage addition is proposed to be one-storey in height to match the height of the existing dwelling. Numerous properties along Vistula Drive have similar one-storey attached garages. The proposed side yard width will provide an adequate separation between the dwelling and the property line to accommodate pedestrian access, grading, drainage, and residential utility services. It appears that the proposed side yard width will have minimal impact on the 9djacent property to the west. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 26, ·2018 Rory McNeil Planner I RM:DW:ld J:\Documents\Development\D•3700\2018\PCA 63· 18\Report\PCA 63· 1 B Report.doc Attachments • no comments on the app.lication ~ Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review .__ ro TI t---+-~ > OJ :, 0 OJ (!'.) .f=t---+-~ ............. _ .... 01---+-~ OJ 0 Breda Avenue ~ -{jj (/) OJ filt-----+------1 1--1-+-l-+-1---l (/)t-----+------1 s 11 Vicki Drive I I TI ro 0 o:'. ?' :, ..0 ~ (/) .__ I I 11 ,------,,----. ~ Oklahoma Drive _· ~o/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department ill OJ ~ ro .> 0 Th Location Map File: PICA 63/18 Applicant: E. Bouchard Property Description: Lot 549 Plan M18 (1006 Vistula Drive) ,,,e t;orpora on 01 u,e LUY or t'Jc.Mnng t'roouce 1 {In partJ urnier tense rrom: ~UIX!ens t'nlllir,urta o Mlrisll)'ol Natlll"il/ttesoU"Ces. t.J! rights reseived.;© Her Majesty the Queen In Rlghlof Canada, Dep,ulmentofNallnlResoaees.Ail riglts resel\'1:!d.: f:ITeranel Enterprises Ina. and Its supptlers all rights reserved.;© Mun!dpal Property AssessrneriCorporatlonard Its s4=1pUers an rigtta resenoed.; Exhibit 1 Date: Jul. 06, 2018 SCALE: 1 :5,000 I THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. LOT550 30.5m -.Ji-------------------,------------~------ir--------~ SITE PLAN PLAN OF SURVEY OF LOT 549 PLAN M.18 LAND TITLES WHITBY TOWNSHIP OF PICKERING .....l.. / GRASS ___/ g ~ CONCRETE CURB ASHPALT _/ / DRIVEWAY Submitted Plan 1.3m -Cdpof-Pl(KERlNG File No: P /CA 63/18 Applicant: E. Bouchard ------------------7----7 1.8m "--PROPERTY LINE I -Pro osed Addition EXISTING 1 STOREY BRICK & VINYL SIDING FRAME DWELLING NO. 1006 , .. ' .. ·. ', ' .... : I I I I I s!sm I I I oc I ~ I~ I lli_ I~ I I-I t; / GRAS~ ____/ I I : -~ I I I \ I I I I I l 15'-0" k 1 ~ _r-WOODEN RETAINING WALL I _J ____ L ________________ ~----To permit a minimum west side yard width of 1.3 metres 1 I I Property Description: Lot 549 Plan M18 (1006 Vistula Drive) Exhibit 2 City Development Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: July 16,2018 L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\201 B -+--------------------------L 111~1 I I 111 111 111~1 I I 111 111 111,, ,1J+1, ,, 111, ,, I I I,, , 111, 11-l !-11 1-1 I 1-1 I 1-l I -l I 1-l I 1-JJ l-----· -G) Pror;>osed Side Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" ~ © ® I I I I ~-r----. --,-~ 1--< -' a-1J ~ EB \ -EB ' ~ < ' ± \ "' ;::= [!] ~ ' I+ '\. -&, +-r---• -!--/ i--to a,-.l. / / b $ i ' I ·c, ; I ~ I +---_ I -'-I ,--\.. ,-,-f-,_l ,--~-.L I+ I I9REI_E\ 8'~ §r~ O' --•u---\...P' _Tor;>PI ~ 8' - 011 b "' n ~11 1~.U;:.I I 1~11 ~111~111 1~11 1~11 1~11 1~111F1 1~111~111~111±.:111~ ® Pror;>osrd Entry Elevation 1/4" = '-0" 1 -Cdpo/-PJ(KERJNG City Development · Department L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 Submitted Elevations File No: P/CA 63/18 -Applicant: E. Bouchard Property Description: Lot 549 Plan M 18 (1006 Vistula Drive) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. --1 ~====t-=tl~~·-1-1--· ----+---+---t-H I -b ' "' / / / ,__, ' ' Exhibit 3 "[gp..ELA"\ g, .:-•11\J' TQP ELAlf\ 8'-•"-'-..111' ..... ~=-":t=---t-'11tt-:--l-~ltl'--""'i±',~!l"'!"F-;;;;;t-G...[ad~ O'-~ F!g,_.f"'\ -4'-611\J DATE: July 16, 2018 38 / -C£%ofJ- p](KERJNG From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 64118 Date: August 1, 2018 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 64118 S .. lkovlena 1692 Central Street Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By~law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106: • to permit a minimum of 9 parking spaces; whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 15 parking spaces • to permit a minimum lot area of 691 square metres for an accessory dwelling unit; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 695 square metres for an accessory dwelling unit . . • · to permit a minimum exterior side yard of 0.6 of a metre; whereas the by-law requires a · minimum exterior side yard of 18 metres • to permit a minimum flankage yard of 0.6 of a metre; whereas the by-law requires a minimum flankage yard of 4.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 44 percent; whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent, • to permit a minimum landscaped open space of 18 percent; whereas the by-law requires a minimum landscaped open space of 50 percent • to permit an accessory structure located in the rear yard to be setback a minimum of 0.0 metres from the west lot line and setback a minimum of 0.8 of a metre from the north lot line; whereas the by-law requires that accessory structures greater than 10.0 square metres in area shall be setback a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines • to permit the existing building to the south to be setback 10.0 metres from the centerline of Brock Road; whereas the by-law requires that no building or structure be erected closer than 19.5 metres to the centerline of Brock Road • to permit a parking area abutting Central Street to be setback 0.0 metres; whereas the. by-law requires that where a parking area abuts a road allowance there shall be a 3.0 metre setback therefrom Report PICA 64/18 39 August 1, 2018 Page 2 . • to permit an entrance and exit to a parking area to be paved for a minimum distance of 0.0 metres from the front lot line where it abuts a street; whereas the by-law requires that all entrances and exits to parking areas shall be paved for a minimum distance of 15.0 metres from the front lot line where it abuts a street The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for renovations in the northerly building and to recognize the existing site conditions. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing garage and two existing mixed-use . buildings containing a total of four residential units and two commercial units, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans, and existing as of the date of this report (refer to Exhibit 2). Background The subject property currently contains two buildings and one accessory structure (garage). The southerly building contains three residential units and one commercial unit. The northerly building contains one residential unit and one commercial unit. In a letter dated February 7, 2017, City Staff formally reco'gnized the uses in the southerly building as legal non-conforming, consisting of three residential units and one commercial unit. The applicant has· since submitt.ed evidence to recognize the northerly building as legal non-conforming; however, the provided materials have not been sufficient to establish the building as existing prior to 1965 when Zoning By-law 3037 came into effect. Staff notes that the Zoning by-law permits a range of commercial uses and one Accessory Dwelling Unit on the property. As the residential units in the southerly building have been recognized as legal non-conform.ing, the residential unit in the northerly building is considered to be an Accessory Dwelling Unit, and meets the other provisions for Accessory Dwelling Units in the Zoning · By-law. The use of the northerly building for one Accessory Dwelling Unit and one commercial uriit is permitted in the Zoning By-law. · However, in order to obtain a building permit for renovations to the northerly building the site must be able to accommodate sufficient parking for a tota.1 of four residential units and two commercial units. As such, the applicant has reque~ted these variances to ensure that any future building permit applications for renovations to existing structures are not held back due to issues of zoning non-conformity. . 4 0 Report PICA 64/18 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law August 1, 2018 Page 3 Pickering Official Plan -"Oak Ridges Moraine Rural Hamlets" within the Claremont Settlement Area · Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06 -"ORM-C2" Appropriateness of the Application Minimum Parking, Parking Setback and Entry/Exit Variances The intent of regulating the minimum number of parking spaces is to ensure that parking demand can be accommodated on-site. The intent of regulating a parking area setback and a minimum paved distance for entries/exits is to provide sufficient controls to. allow vehicles to ingress and egress a site safely without adversely impacting traffic operation and to ensure appropriate internal vehicular circulation. The applicant has requested relief to reduce· the total number of require parking spaces from 15 to 9 which will accommodate residents, employees and customers. Parking on the site is currently unmarked and located less than a metre from the Central Street lot line. Parking . areas located on the northeast and southwest corners of the property have access .from · Brock Road and. Central Street, respectively. The Zoning By-law requires parking spaces to have a minimum width of 2.3 metres and a minimum rength of 5.3 metres. Accessible parking spaces have a width of 3.4 metres, a length of 5.3 metres and an additional access aisle width of 1.5 metres. Based on the width and length of the unmarked parking areas, the applicant is able to accommodate at least 9 parking spaces, including 1 accessible space, on the property. In addition to the existing 9 parking spaces, there is sufficient on-street parking on Brock Road and Central Street to accommodate the'existing uses. There does not appear to be any adverse impacts on traffic operations due to the location of the parking areas on the site. · · · Lot Area, Exterior Side Yard Width, Flankage Yard Width, Lot Coverage and Landscaped . Open Space, Accessory Structure Setback and Brock Road Setback Variances The general intent of performarice standards in a zoning by-law is to ensure that individual properties maintain appropriate lot sizes, building height and massing and building setbacks where buildings can be appropriately sited, and to ensure the developed lot is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. · The property currently contains two mixed..:use buildings and one detached garage. The · . southerly mixed-use building fronting onto Brock Road, appears to have been constructed in its current location in the late 1800s and the use of which has been recognized as legal non-conforming. The northerly mixed-use building and the garage may have been constructed in the 1960s before or around the time that Zoning By-law 3037-came irito effect. Report PICA 64/18 41 August 1, 2018_ Page 4 The applicant is requesting variances to recognize the existing lot area, existing exterior and flankage yard width, existing lot coverage, existing landscaped open space area, existing garage setbacks and the existing setback of the buildings to the centre line of Brock Road. Numerous properties in the immediate vicinity of the site do not meet the minimum lot sizing, setback or coverage requirements of the Zoning By-law, including the properties at the northwest and southwest corners of Central Street and Brock Road. Zero metre setbacks and high lot coverages appear to be common for the neighbourhood. The siting of the existing · buildings and garage are in keeping with the character of the neighbourhood. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances, even when considered together, are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. · Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 25, 2018 Rory McNeil Planner I RM:DW:ld J:\Documenls\Development\D-3700\2018\PCA 64·18\Report\PCA 64-18 Report.doc Attachments · · • no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP · Principal Planner, Development Review . Exhibit 1 q [_..,/ !Y ~ ~0 I I ·-"' I .I!_~ .___ I ._ .___ V -----V h G} Q) , () ~ C 0 E CJ) cu I ~ I llH L I I r~ '~ -~ --3 >--- I U!r -(¥ffic:Ji I 15) I-\)) '---cl -I-----iii" '< ~ (/) "{" (D - r---/ V' m. ~ Central Street [B-~UEB~ G} ~ t--i~ l'-L_J \ l Subject ~ _We. ing on Street \ Lands _l ~'-Gl ~ . --~ > ] I <"! 0 -u 0 ti. .._ CJ) ->-----..'!! C 1 §j cu .____ /-"./ 0 r---...___ ~ e. C (J(ly C ~ // vt==,'y I=== ) r-,...__ Acorn Lane I'-- ½' ,, V v:::,__ I / ~ I / '7 Location Map -~DI-File: PICA 64/18 P1CKER1NG Applicant: S. lkovlena City Development Property Description: Part of Lot 1 Plan 12 Department 1692 Central Street• Date: Jul. 06, 2018 > J ne l.orporation o: me 1ty or PJci<enng Pro uce {1n part) un er license om: 19 Uueem Pruter, Untano Mll'151;yof Nab..ral Resou-ces, SCALE: 1 :5,000 I W1 rfgh!s reserved,;© Her Majesty the Queen In Righi of Canada, Departmert oft/ah.rat ResoLEces. Al rights reserved.; ti Teranel Enterprises Inc. and /!s suppliers all rights reserved.; e Munlclpat Property Assessment Corporation ard 11s st,.:ip!iets an righ!.s reserved.; THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. to permit an accessory structure located in the rear yard to be setback a minimum of 0.0 metres from the west lot line and setback a minimum of 0.8 of a metre from the north lot line "'I ~I ' ~ in-.:_-~------.......... ✓;:)' . ~ , -~ ~ ~ o. II')' • ~ -~ ~ INST. 0, . :t BE:TWESN N"' to perrnit a minimum of 9 parking spaces to permit a. minimum lot area of 691 square metres for an accessory dwelling unit Exhibit 243 to permit an entrance and exit to a parking area to be paved for a minimum distance of 0.0 metres from · the front lot line where it abuts a street ~ to permit a ... tm e maximum lot • ~3M ~f ~ . ~------..!Ill coverage of "' I I -,y--,:=:t=::=::;;:::::::;""~~£~ 44 percent • ✓ ·1:1 2 Storey Fram!'! 8ti1/d/llg t-: ,, to permit a minimum flankage yard of 0.6 of a -41,..~-.:.-...... ......11....i!'--~"-~~--------..;... ...... '11-~i..--tJJ.:W metre to permit a parking area . abutting Central Street to setback 0.0 metres -Oi;J/)I~· - PICKERING City Development Department minimum landscaped open space of 18 percent to permit a minimum exterior side y;:1rd of 0.6 of a metre Central Street Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 64/18 Applicant: S. lkovlena Property Description: Part of Lot 1 Plan 12 (1692 Central Street) to permit the existing building to the south to be setback 10.0 metres from the centerline of Brock Road FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ' DATE: July 19, 2018 44 / -Cd:Jo!J- p](KERJNG Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: PICA 42118, PICA 43118 & PICA 44118 Date: August 1, 2018 From: Subject: Applications Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Committee of Adjustment Applications PICA 42118, PICA 43118 & PICA 44118 M. Malik-Qasim '& 10221058 Canada Ltd. 560 & 562 Marksbury Road PICA 42118 (560 Marksbury Road) Revised The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610118: · • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 14.2 metres, whereas the.by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum north side yard setback of 1.:2-metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent PICA 43118 (562 Marksbury Road) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610118: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 14.7 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum south side yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a minimum flankage yard setback of 3.5 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 4.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the flankage yard, whereas the by-law does not permit uncovered steps or platforms to project into the flankage yard PICA 44118 (Proposed Lot 3) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610118: • to permit a minimum east side yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit a maximum building height of 9.25 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 9.0 metres Report PICA 42118, PICA 43118 & PICA 44118 45 August 1, 2018 · Page 2 The applicant requests approval of these minor variance applications in order to facilitate the creation of one additional lot through the Region of Durham's Land Division Committee (Flle Numbers LD 042118 & LO 043118) and to obtain building permits for the construction of three single detached dwellings .. Recommendation PICA 42118 The City Development Department considers a minimum lot frontage of 1.4.2 metres to be minor 1n nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance subject to the following condition: 1. That the applicant obtain a final clearance for Land Division Applications LO 042118 & LO 043118 by May 3, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void.· and The City Development Department considers a minimum north side yard setback of 1.2 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances subject to the following conditions: · 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by May 3; 2021, or this decision shall become null and void .. PICA 43118 The City Development Department considers a minimum lot frontage of 14.7 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore . recommends Approval of the proposed variance subject to the following condition: 1. That the applicant obtain a final clearance. for Land Division Applications LO 042/18 & LO 043118 by May 3, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void. · and The City Development Department considers a minimum south side yard setback of 1.2 metres, a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent, a minimum flankage yard setback of 3.5 metres, and a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum .of 2.0 metres into the flankage yard to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, _and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances subject to the following .conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 4). · 2. That the.applicant obtain a.building permit for the proposed construction by May 3, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. 46 Report PICA 42118, PICA 43118 & PICA 44118 PICA 44/18 August 1, 2018 Page 3 The City Development Department considers a minimum east side yard setback of 1.2 metres, a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent and a maximum building height of 9.25 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the· general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan_ (refer to Exhibit 6). 2. That a minimum west side yard setback of 1.8 metres is provided. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by May 3, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Background On May 5, 2018, the applicant submitted Minor Variance Applications PICA 42118, PICA 43118, and PICA 44118, which requested a maximum building height of 9.15 metres for 560 Marksbury Road, 9.28 metres for 562 Marksbury Road and 9.5 metres for the proposed lot fronting Surf Avenue. At the request of City staff, the applicant revised the proposals for 560 and 562 Marksbury Road in order to reduce the overall building height to conform to the 9.0 metre restriction prescribed by the zoning by-law, while maintaining a height of 9.5 metres for the proposed lot fronting Surf Avenue (Lot 3). In the Report to Committee of Adjustment dated May 30, 2018, Staff recommended approval of all proposed variances. At the May 30, 2018 Committee of Adjustment Meeting, the Committee moved that the applications be deferred until the August 1, 2018 meeting to allow the applicant and the neighbours sufficient time to meet and discuss the neighbourhood's concerns. Since May 30th, the applicant has been in contact with repre$entatives of the Fairport Beach Neighbourhood Association and has consulted with members of the local community. As a result of consultation, the applicant has requested that the variance application PICA 44118 for the proposed lot fronting Surf Avenue be revised to permit a maximum building height of 9.25 metres, whereas the by-iaw permits a maximum building height of 9.0 metres. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas" within the West Shore Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610118 -"R4" -Residential Fourth Density Zone Report PICA 42118, PICA 43118 & PICA 44118 Appropriateness of the Applications Frontage Variances (PICA 42118, PICA 43118) 47 August 1, 2018 Page4 The intent of the minimum lot frontage requirement is to ensure a usable lot size that is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood. · The zoning by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres. Currently, 560 and 562 Marksbury Road have lot frontages of 13. 7 metres and 15.2 metres, respectively. Through Land Division Applications LD 0421~ 8 & LD 043118, the applicant is proposing to convey a portion of 562 Marksbury Road to 560 Marksbury Road, which will result in a minimum lot frontage of 14.7 metres for 562 Marksbury Road and a minimum lot frontage of 14.2 metres for 560 Marksbury Road. · The applicant's proposal will result in two adjacent lots fronting Marksbury Road that will be similar in size as opposed to a wider and more narrow lot that currently exist. The relocation o·f the mutual property line will assist in making both properties _at 560 and 562 Marksbury Road a more usable size while continuing the established lot frontage pattern along Marksbury Road, which ranges between 9.0 metres and 20.0 metres .. Increased Coverage Variances (PICA 42118, PICA 43118 & PICA 44118) The intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings are appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot. The by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant has requested to increase the maximum lot coverage to 37 percent for all three lots. All 3 detached dwellings proposed will maintain both the required front and rearyard setbacks of the zoning by-law, which is a minimum of 7.5 metres. Therefore, a generous amount of usable amenity space will be maintained on all 3 lots within the front and rear yards. The requested increases in coverage from 33 percent to 37 percent does not negatively impact the usable amenity space provided on all 3 lots. The front, rear, side and flankage yard setbacks proposed for the properties at 560 Marksbury Road, 562 Marksbury Road, and proposed Lot 3, will ensure that the size and location of the-proposed dwellings are appropriate for their respective lot size. Accessory buildings are not proposed on any of the three lots. Side Yard Setback Variances (PICA 42118, PICA 43118 & PICA 44118) The intent of the minimum side yard setback requirement is to ensure an appropriate separation distance between structures on abutting properties is maintained for pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading, drainage_ and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters, and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. · 48 Report PICA 42118, PICA 43118 & PICA 44118 August 1, 2018 Page 5 The by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres on both sides, where a garage is erected as part of the detached dwelling. The applicant has requested a minimum north side yard setback of 1.2 metres for the _future dwelling at 560 Marksbury Road, a minimum south side yard setback of 1.5 metres for the future dwelling at 562 Marksbury Road and a minimum east side yard setback for the future dwelling on proposed Lot 3. The north and south side yard setback proposed to be reduced on the properties at 560 and 562 Marksbury Road, respec:tively, will directly abut one another. Therefore, the reduced setbacks will not result in a negative privacy or visual impact on the abutting property immediately south of the subject properties. Additionally, the reduced east side yard setback proposed for Lot 3 will directly abut the rear yards of 560 and 562 Marksbury Road. This variance is required as, the applicant is providing an increased setback of 1.8 metres ori the west side in order to give a greater buffer between the new development on the subject lands and the existing residential dwelling to the west. Therefore, the proposed setbacks will not result in a negative visual or privacy impact on the abutting property immediately west. The proposed side yard setback of 1.2 metres within one side yard of each of the dwellings will ensure an appropriate separation distance is maintained between abutting structures to accommodate pedestrian access to the rear yard as well as grading, drainage and residential services. The proposed dwellings at 560 Marksbury Road and proposed Lot 3 will maintain the required side yard setback of 1.5 metres where the yards abut existing lots and will maintain the front yard and rear yard setbacks. The proposed dwelling at 562 Marksbury Avenue will maintain the required rear and frontyard setbacks of the zoning by-law. Previous variance applications to reduce the minimum side yard setback requirement from 1.5 metres to 1.2 metres have been approved for properties along Marksbury Road and in the immediately surrounding area. As a result, the proposed dwellings will maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. Flankage Yard Setback and Covered Porch Projection Variances (PICA 43/18) The intent of the minimum flankage yard setback and limiting projections into the flankage yard is to ensure an adequate buffer space between buildings and street activity is provided, a sufficient landscaped area within the flankage yard is maintained, and a consistent building setback is provided to maintain the character of the surrounding area. The appJicarit has requested a reduction in the minimum flankage yard setback from 4.5' metres to 3.5 metres and h_as requested a maximum projection of 2.0 metres in order to accommodate a covered porch and associated steps for a second entrance to the property at 562 Marksbury Road. The proposed flankage yard setback represents a reduction of 1.0 metre from the requirements of the zoning by-law. The proposed reduction will be consistent with the character of the surrounding area, as other dwellings within the immediately surrounding area have been approved to have a reduced flankage yard setback of less than 3.5 metres. Report PICA 42118, PICA 43118 & PICA 44118 49 August 1, 2018 Pag~ 6 The.covered porch and associated steps are proposed to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the proposed 3.5 metre flankage yard setback. Therefore, a 1.5 metre setback will be maintained between the flankage lot line and the edge of the porch steps. The 1.5 metre setback proposed will provide an appropriate setback from the street activity and the covered. porch and will not result in a significa~t loss of landscaped space within the flankage yard. The existing landscaped municipal boulevard abutting the property immediately to the. north is approximately 5.0 metres in width, which will provide an additional buffer for the dwelling and covered porch from the street line and street activity. Increased Height Variance (PICA 44/18) -Revised The intent of the maximum building height is to minimize the visual impact of the main building on abutting properties and on the streetscape, and to ensure that the size and scale of the building is compatible with the character of the surrounding area. The by-law permits a maximum building height of 9.0 metres. The applicant has requested a revised maximum building height of-9.25 metres for the future dwelling proposed on Lot 3. The applicant has requested this variance in order to accommodate a two-storey dwelling that includes a useable loft space located above·the second floor. The zoning by-law outlines that building height shall be calculated from the established grade . to the mid-point of the roof, in the case of a peaked roof. The established grade of a property is determined by taking the average elevati9n of the ground where it meets the front exterior of the building. The applicant has outlined that the grade at the front of the property is not flat but rather slopes west to east and that the grade difference between the west corner of the future dwelling and the east corner is 0.75 of a metre. The applicant has identified that as a result of the significant grade difference, the established grade is calculated to be much lower than what actually exists, which in turn results in a dwelling height that exceeds the 9.0 metre restriction. The proposed variance will provide for the proposed dwelling, without having to significantly alter the grade along the east side of the lot. The requested increase in building height represents a difference of 0.25 of a metre from 'the permitted maximum of the zoning by-law. The proposed increase in building height will not result in a negative visual impact on the streetscape as the proposed dwelling will appear to be a two-storey dwelling from the streetline and will maintain the required front yard setback. The applicant has proposed a west side yard setback of 1.8 metres, which exceeds the minimum required setback of 1.5 metres. Additionally, the proposed dwelling will maintain the minimum required rear yard setback. Therefore,. the proposed dwelling will not result in a negative visual impact on the abutting property immediately to the west or south. The proposed revised building height of 9.25 metres will be compatible with the character of the surrounding area as the dwelling abutting the property immediately to the west is two- storeys in height while the dwelling located directly to the north, on the north side of su·rf Avenue is 10.2 metres in height. The proposed building height is also similar to zoning. performance standards applied to the newer development directly to the west, which front onto portions of Park Crescent and Cliffview Road, which range from 9.0 metres to 10.7 metres in height. 50 Report PICA 42118, PICA 43118 & PICA 44118 August 1, 2018 Page 7 Based on the foregoing, staff are. of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintain the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Representatives of the Fairport Beach Neighbourhood Association Residents of Park Crescent, Marksbury Drive, Vicki Drive, Surf Avenue, Leaside Street and Sandcastle Court Date of report: July 26, 2018 Comments prepared by: • no comments on the applications • an agreement between the applicant and representatives of the Neighbourhood Association has been received in support of the revised variances • the signatories indicate their support for a revised application where all balconies are facing the front yards only, and where the building height proposed for the new lot fronting Surf Avenue is 9.25 metres • a petition containing signatures from residents of 21 properties in West Shore Neigbourhood has been received in opposition to the revised variances ~ . Rory McNeil Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Principal Planner, Development Review RM:DW:ld J;\Documents\Development\0•3700\2018\PCA 42-18 to PCA 44-18\Report\REVISED PCA 42-18, PCA 43-1.B & PCA 44-18 Report.doc Attachments -04;-c/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department Exhibit 1 - Sunrise Avenue ~ ,------,-,----'-'--'--'-'-'--'-=-=---------l <ll iii :5 .____ _ _,----, 0 ro 1----r-------J ~ 1----i--____, 0 ..c t-----+-----1 Cf) >--------+------------<) Lake Ontario Date: Mci . 17, 2018 SCALE: 1 :5,000 THIS IS I/OT LAU OF SURVEY. 51 5.73 8.37 [27'-5 i/2''] tN 26311-0807(L n 1' -C:~4-PlCKERlNG City Development Department L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 · To permit a minimum north side yard setback of 1.2 metres 7.96 @4.27% ¢ ·15_34 ESTABLISH GRADE I ~ -I-~ n lO I .j I -----1>.6' [24'..c.7 1/21 3.16% Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 42/18 9.37 To permit a maxirnum lot coverage of 37 percent Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 (560 Marksbury Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. C -u 0 'S 0 w 0 n C ;o b:I n C -i Cl C -l -I fTI . :;:o c, Cl r:-: C To permit a minimum lot frontage.of 14.2 metres 0, Exhibit 2 N ·~so Ui-z <( 2 w 0:: "O co g ro "': (D 0 r--0:: a::: ::J u >, (') ,_ z ::s i= ..a (/) Cl) X: ~ lJJ ,_ 0 I-ro lJJ::i 2: ~u ""'-0.. (D ~ 0 0:: .,f 0:: ::i o..u DATE: May 16, 2018 -Cdt;of-P](KERJNG City Development Department L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 10-HIGH ?RECAST CONC. HEADER WI KEYS.TONE I I r1-----· -------~ . I I I I I -1 TL 10 I I I ', I . I I -~-~----~-----------._ Submitted Elevation File No: P/CA 42/18 Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 (560 Marksbury Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. AACKITEC1 RAL r., '[ STONEY ' R ~ SJ J;:il!i. Exhibit 3 .___!9POF_RO_O_F ___ _ U,S.LOFTCEILINCi LOFT FLOOR FlN. SECOND FlOOR DATE: July 18, 2018 c:, 01 co To permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent 7.64 -O~o/-p](KER]NG City Development Department . L:\Planning\Coiel\Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 To permit a . flankage yard setback of 3.5 metres N7 4 .. 00100"'E(P) N71°40150..,ECMe~ Surf Avenue . . . !86.35! · LOT GRADING: -~ 4R -Exhibit4 To permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the flankage yard AREA J9, REMA UNDIST~RBED r=~~==;;;;;;:;.;==-==~18~6.6~01~ ~~~Htr;-=l-;;;;.;;;a~=a;;i;;;;;;~ rn:rnJ !86.681 PROPOSE[P 2 STOREY l::;;_;;;;;;;;;:;;;;;;;;;./,1 YI G DWELL!NGI d,\ No.562 I L( 2R 187.001 FIN. GRNDt 187.201 I FIN. BSMN 184.101 I I (,,-I ! ~J==~\ I. ..,. I ~ I 3R 11 I (!) , I Lri \ n v 86.7• 1186.55 I I '<. ''"IR L ______ _J_~ _ __J L _ _j Submitted Plan File No: PICA 43/18 To permit a minimum south side yard setback of 1 .2 metres Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 (562 Marksbury Road) · FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE Cl1Y OF PICKERING . Cl1Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5.64 To permit a minimum !cit frontage of 14.7 metres H b::J " g DATE: May 16, 201.s SHINGLE ROOF ----------t------PREF[N. /JflAl. FASCIA, GUTTER a VENTED SOFFIT (IYP J TRIM ANDSURROUNIG---t-------.1 ARCHITTCTURAL-----1--STONEVENEffi ·/ ' i I \ I t \ \ I >I~ t::'.I'::_ -~L_ -316-'!i i-'c ~ ~ -:I<-10" HIGHPRECAST CONC. HEADER WI KEYSTDN~ if==============li -~ TDPOFRD0F ~ U.s.LOFT CEILING 'I' ~L_ .. ---i---'lc----"=D.Dl.J:QfTHEROOF ,M!D.Di:.EQQL.._ " LDFTA.DOR ~e ;; fl; ~ "'-FIN. SECOND FLOOR _ AN:GRDUND @ -i--==-= ESTABUSHEDORADE @ Exhibit 5 '----'---'------1---'l< REFRENCE (MM\ --City oif--P J (KER J NG City Development Department L:\Planning\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\2018 · rL 10 Submitted Elevation File No: P/CA 43/18 Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 (562 Marksbury Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE·AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. DATE: July 18, 2018 Cl( w 1--1--::::J L:J -Cdpof-p](KER]NG City Development Department L:\Planning\Corel\Plannirig\Apps\PCA\2018 J:I:l Cl( ::::J u To permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent L8"9 <a: 09"L O'.'.: (!) :r Cf) :::J ~~ ill . Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 44/18 Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 . (560 & 562 Marksbury Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE Cl1Y OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. [.Z-Jt] To permit a minimum east side yard setback of 1.2 metres t0'9 ~ z <( r-Br 0 ~ m 0 0::: _J <( ::::J a,: 1--~ (/1 1--0 0 z .....l ::::J BUSH t "L SHED Exhibit 6 p:r w . Cl ![l 0 '¢ . ~ !,' D:J I <D C'-1 ~ l() '---' ' I CT 3,05----rn&Meo.s) 7.1 To permit a maximum building height of 9.25 metres DATE: July 18, 2018 ?flEFJN, MET~L FASCIA, GUTTER & VEJ,l]EJ somr [TYP.J --t--~ --~ir--_J ll 1--. _.,.....============S II r-J ~1 I . Ii I .,,.,, 10 c=======================:'...,,.,, -Ctt:Jof-P](KER]NG City Development Department L:\Plannlng\Corel\Planning\Apps\PCA\201 B Submitted Elevation File No: PICA 44/18 Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 (560 & 562 Marksbury Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Exhibit 7 TOP OF ROOF M1£:.0FR.QQL_ FIN,l•FTFLOO~ FIN,SECON_G_FLO_Occ.R ___ _ FIH. GROUND FLOOR EsTA!!USH Gf<AOE REFRENCE ~ ____ B_ASEM_ ENTFLOOR @ DATE: July i 8, 2018