HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLN 16-18ori
DICKERING
Report to
Executive Committee
Report Number: PLN 16-18
Date: .lune 18, 2018
From: Kyle Bentley
Director, City Development & CBO
Subject: Proposed Telecommunication Towers
Seaton Community
File: D-1110-005
Recommendation:
1. That City Council endorse in principle the placement of telecommunication towers within City
parks in the Seaton Community,
Executive Summary: Bell Mobility has approached the City to discuss deploying its
telecommunication towers to provide wireless service to future residents and businesses in the
Seaton Community. Seaton parks provide suitable locations for wireless network infrastructure.
The distribution of parks within Seaton is optimal for the carriers to provide wireless service, as
their infrastructure would be spatially separated from surrounding residential areas and sensitive
land uses. Parks typically have access to services nearby such as hydro and fiber optics able to
support the tower and antenna facilities. Community parks can accommodate the larger macro
towers, while the smaller macro (smacro) towers can be located in Neighbourhood Parks and
Villages Greens. The current process of seeking Council approval of all lease agreements with the
telecommunications providers will remain. Staff recommends that Council endorse in principle the
siting of telecommunication towers within City parks in the Seaton Community,
Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of this Report.
1. Background
As the first phase of Seaton development moves closer to occupancy, the major cellular
and wireless carriers have contacted the City to discuss opportunities to deploy their
telecommunication towers to address residential and business wireless needs.
2. Bell's Proposal
In early 2017, Bell Mobility approached the City to discuss locating its telecommunication
towers in the Seaton Community. The location of various community parks, neighborhood
parks and villages in Seaton has been pre -planned pursuant to the Seaton Master Parks
Agreement dated May 1, 2017 (approved by Council Resolution #279/17). Staff advised
that these parks would provide Bell suitable locations for its wireless network.
Report PLN 16-18
Subject: Proposed Telecommunication Towers
June 18, 2018
Page 2
Bell has proposed locating its telecommunication towers within the Seaton parks as a
means to accommodate theft wireless network across Seaton. Bell's proposal includes the
following tower designs and locations:
Macro towers located in Community Parks
• multi -carrier tower
• 40-50 metres in height
• shrouded H -Mast style tri -pole tower
■ strongest, non -lattice, type tower, less need
for reinforcement later
• tends to retain its aesthetic look as more
carriers co -locate
• no risks of tower getting wider — unlike
shrouded monopoles
Smaller macro towers (smacro) located in Neighbourhood
• single -carrier tower
• 15-20 metres in height
• shrouded H -Mast style tri -pole tower
• strongest, non -lattice, type tower, less need for
reinforcement later
• tends to retain its aesthetic look as more carriers
co -locate
• no risks of tower getting wider — unlike shrouded
monopole
3. Number of Communication Towers
Parks and Village Greens
Bell has provided a map denoting locations and numbers of telecommunication towers in
Seaton (Seaton Long Range Wireless Plan, Attachment #1)_ Three macro towers are
proposed in the large Community Parks and seven smacro towers are proposed in village
greens and neighborhood parks.
The large macro communication towers would permit multiple carriers and Emergency
Services such as EMS or Durham Police Services. Bel! is coordinating meetings with the
other carriers to work on a standard design for the macro towers as well as the srnacros.
Once there is carrier agreement on the design, information outlining specific locations and
design options will be submitted to staff for review. The smaller macros can only
accommodate a single carrier so others carrier may require their own smacro sites in
Seaton.
Report PLN 16-18 June 18, 2018
Subject: Proposed Telecommunication Towers Page 3
4. Discussion
4.1 The City's parks are appropriate locations for telecommunication towers
Staff have considered the locational and siting requirements of the telecommunication
towers and have determined that the City's parks are appropriate for these structures as
they offer the following benefits:
• provides good distribution within the Seaton Community thereby providing optimal
wireless coverage
• streamlines and improves the telecommunication tower siting process
• avoids sensitive land uses
• ensures adequate separation from residential homes
• enables site review process that ensures style, screening, access, equipment shelters,
colors, lighting, signage are designed in concert with other City infrastructure planning
i.e., park benches
• site services available i.e., hydro, fiber optics; and
• leasing or revenue opportunities
4.2 Consultation with the telecommunication industry will streamline the
telecommunication tower siting process
Telecommunications and related facilities are regulated by the Federal Government
(specifically Industry Canada) under the Radiocommunications Act. Proponents of wireless
facilities are required to consult with local government and the public as part of the approval
for proposed antenna installation prior to construction.
Consultation is one of the most important elements in the tower siting process as it
generally occurs at a point before the proponent is committed to a site or design. As a
result, it represents the best opportunity to influence the siting decision since the proponent
will more likely become committed to a site once the detailed engineering work has been
completed.
The telecommunication industry's willingness to engage in discussions with the City in the
placement of telecommunication towers as early as possible is appreciated. By initiating
early consultation, a more streamlined and improved telecommunication tower siting
process should result that minimizes public concerns. The current process of seeking
Council approval of all lease agreements with proponents will remain.
5. Recommendation
Staff are supportive of Bell's proposal and therefore are recommending that Council
endorse in principle the placement of telecommunication towers within designated parks in
the Seaton Community.
Report PLN 16-18 June 18, 2018
Subject: Proposed Telecommunication Towers Page 4
Attachment
1. Seaton Long Range Wireless Plan
Prepared By:
f}e0a,
Approved/Endorsed By:
/Pc A4
Grant McGregor, MC1P, RPP Kyl- :entley, P.Eng.
Manager, Strategic Initiatives & Sustainability D' ecto City Development & CBO
GM:Id
orate Services & City Solicitor
Recommended for the consideration
of Pickering City Council
Tony Prevedel, P.Eng.
Chief Administrative Officer
City of Pickering - Seaton Long Range Wireless Plan — Bell Mobility 2017
el 9 -i -
r
+i:
= i-
.
—0 %
6 - — __ 1
s
■•
Yi
tl P _ 1-9 ,� ViJi
h :... - a ►
1' ! {
dOd
r
• i1.1--�.r\ 6
/.•---
ICP- Macro
1
,
ti
e
r
•
rrr
r
CP — Macro
- 3 Standard Telecommunication Towers
proposed (40 -50m in height) in the larger
Community Parks (CP)
-These would permit multiple carriers and
Emergency Services
VG & NP — Smacro
- 7 small macro sites (smacros) proposed in
the Village Greens (VG) and
Neighbourhood Parks (NP)
- These are single carrier (Bell Mobility) sites
integrated into smaller park spaces
NP-Smacro