Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 28, 2018DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 4 Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 pickering.ca cry oh DICKERING Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, March 28, 2018 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from March 7, 2018 1-8 (III) Reports 1. (Deferred at the March 7, 2018 meeting) 9-14 P/CA 13/18 K. Ngo 862 Fairview Avenue 2. P/CA 18/18 A. Genno 1445 Parkham Crescent 3. P/CA 19/18 M. Khan 552 Rodd Avenue 4. P/CA 20/18 Mattamy (Seaton) Limited 2635 Toffee Street 5. P/CA 21/18 to P/CA 23/18 Averton (Brock) Limited 1701, 1703 & 1705 Huckleberry Crossing 6. P/CA 24/18 to P/CA 26/18 Averton (Brock) Limited 2481, 2483, & 2485 Mayapple Crossing (IV) Adjournment 15-20 21-29 30-33 34-38 39-43 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Lesley Dunne T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 Email Idunne@pickering.ca Ci/g 4 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 7, 2018 7:00 pm Library Auditorium Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland — Vice -Chair David Johnson — Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary -Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary -Treasurer (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the agenda for the Wednesday, March 7, 2018 meeting be adopted. Carried Unanimously (11) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the minutes of the 2nd meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, February 14, 2018 be adopted as amended. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 8 GGa oii DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 7, 2018 7:00 pm Library Auditorium (III) Reports 1. P/CA 12/18 N. Ryan 1355 Uxbridge -Pickering Townline Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended: • to permit an accessory structure (detached garage) to have a maximum height of 5.0 metres, whereas the by-law does not permit accessory buildings to exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone • to permit an accessory structure (detached garage) which is not part of the main building to be erected in the east side yard, whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings, which are not part of the main building, to be erected in the rear yard The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the construction an accessory structure (detached garage) in the side yard. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Neither the applicant nor agent were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Denise Rundle That application P/CA 12/18 by N. Ryan, be Approved on the grounds that the accessory building (detached garage) with a maximum height of 5.0 metres and to be located in the east side yard are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed detached garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 9, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 2 of 8 Ci/g 4 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 7, 2018 7:00 pm Library Auditorium 2. P/CA 13/18 K. Ngo 862 Fairview Avenue The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 5.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to construct a one -storey addition to the detached dwelling currently under construction. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Diana Balanyuk, agent, and Nuno Barbosa, agent, were present to represent the application. Jacqueline Smart of 829 Fairview Avenue, Evelyn Dunning and Tony Timperio of 853 Fairview Avenue and Andrew Barkhouse of 856 Douglas Avenue were present in objection to the application. Diana Balanyuk explained the proposed addition is to provide extra dining space and will be a three season enclosed deck, with no heating or plumbing. Jacqueline Smart provided a background on the previous three variances that were approved on February 15, 2017, and is concerned that due to a change in address from Douglas Street to Fairview Avenue the previous variances are misleading to the surrounding neighbours on Fairview Avenue and now they are requesting an additional variance. Jacqueline Smart also expressed a concern with the height of the wooden fence. Evelyn Dunning expressed several concerns with construction vehicles and that the home is too large for the area. Evelyn Dunning also stated she has been a long time resident of Pickering, and provided a photo for the Committee to review that shows a mature tree that she is no longer able to view from her home. Andrew Barkhouse expressed several concerns with the proposed addition by adding an extra dining space that it will be turned into a four season enclosed deck, the shadowing onto his property and that the dwelling is too large for the lot and feels the lot is over developed. Andrew Barkhouse also provided photos for the Committee to review that shows the size and shadowing of the dwelling currently under construction. Page 3 of 8 Ci/g 4 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 7, 2018 7:00 pm Library Auditorium In response to concerns raised by area residents and questions from Committee Members, Diana Balanyuk stated the lot coverage is under the maximum 33% that is permitted by the zoning by-law, the deck will be raised for aesthetic reasons and to be in line with the existing patio doors. Diana Balanyuk also stated the patio doors were included in the original building permit drawings and that the house is just under 2,000 square feet. Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 13/18 by K. Ngo, be Deferred to the next Committee of Adjustment meeting to allow the Committee Members to visit the subject property. Carried Unanimously 3. P/CA 14/18 S. Kerr & A. Cillo 1904 Glenview Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended to permit a covered platform (porch) and associated steps not exceeding 1.5 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.9 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law requires that uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade may project not more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an addition to the existing detached dwelling. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were also received from residents at 1908 Glenview Road and 1910 Glenview Road in support of the application. Stephen Kerr, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Tom Copeland That application P/CA 14/18 by S. Kerr & A. Cillo, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: Page 4 of 8 Ci/g DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 7, 2018 7:00 pm Library Auditorium 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed covered porch and associated steps, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 9, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 4. P/CA 15/18 Nuteck Homes Ltd. 1827 Appleview Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres • to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of the detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of the detached dwelling The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the construction of a two-storey single detached dwelling. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Robert Khan, agent, was present to represent the application. Brenda Adams of 1832 Appleview Road and Kendell David of 1829 Appleview Road were present in objection to the application. Robert Khan stated that Appleview Road is a street in transition and is in character with the surrounding neighbourhood, and in his opinion the application is minor in nature. Brenda Adams expressed several concerns with the size of the homes that are being developed, shadows, removal of trees, loss of privacy and drainage. Brenda Adams also questioned why they require variances. Kendell David questioned why they require variances. Kendell David stated in his opinion the surrounding neighbourhood is not in transition and he also expressed a concern with the number of homes that have been developed and being too close to the property line. Page 5 of 8 Ci/g DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 7, 2018 7:00 pm Library Auditorium In response to a question from a Committee Member, the Secretary -Treasurer provided clarification that the lot frontage was created through a previous Land Division and is an existing situation. The Secretary -Treasurer also confirmed that the requested variances are identical to the ones previously approved in September 2014 and subsequently lapsed in September 2016. Denise Rundle stated given that the lot already exists and that this is a reaffirmation of the variances that were already granted in 2014 and that the four tests of the Planning Act, are met, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Tom Copeland That application P/CA 15/18 by Nuteck Homes Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed two-storey detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Carried Unanimously 5. P/CA 16/18 S. & K. Penton 958 Timmins Gardens The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended; • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 39 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the construction of a detached garage in the rear yard. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Shane Penton, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Page 6 of 8 Ci/g DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 7, 2018 7:00 pm Library Auditorium Shane Penton stated the detached garage will be used for storage only and there will be no commercial business use. In response to questions from Committee Members, Shane Penton explained the location of the two existing sheds in the rear yard, which will be removed, he also stated there are similar garages in the surrounding neighbourhood. Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 16/18 by S. & K. Penton, be Approved on the grounds that the maximum lot coverage of 39 percent is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the detached garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant remove the two existing sheds in the rear yard, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 9, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 6. P/CA 17/18 D. Cillo 1910 Glenview Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended to permit an accessory building to be located in the side yard, whereas the by-law requires that all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building shall be erected in the rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an accessory building in the side yard. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were also received from residents at 1904 Glenview Road and 1908 Glenview Road in support of the application. Justin Harris and Daniela Cillo, applicants, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Page 7 of 8 Ci/g DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 7, 2018 7:00 pm Library Auditorium In response to questions from Committee Members, Justin Harris stated the square footage of the proposed garage is approximately 108 square metres. Justin Harris also stated there is an existing attached garage on the subject property. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application P/CA 17/18 by D. Cillo, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed accessory building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 9, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously (IV) Adjournment Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Sean Wiley That the 3rd meeting of the 2018 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:53 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, March 28, 2018. Carried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretary -Treasurer Page 8 of 8 DICKERING cdy Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 13/18 Date: March 7., 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 13/18 K. Ngo 862 Fairview Avenue Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 5.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth. of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to construct a one -storey addition to the detached dwelling currently under construction. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the one -storey addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 9, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Background Minor Variance Application P/CA 12/17 was approved for the subject property on February 15, 2017 to permit a front yard depth of 4.6 metres (7.5 metres required), a minimum flankage yard depth of 6.6 metres (7.5 metres required) and to recognize an existing uncovered platform and steps (deck) 0.6 metres in height projecting 3.5 metres into the required rear yard. The applicant is now proposing an addition (sunroom) in place of the existing uncovered platform (deck) in the rear yard. Report P/CA 13/18 March 7, 2018 Page 2 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential — Low Density Areas" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2520, as amended — "RM1" Appropriateness of the Application Reduced Rear Yard Depth Variance The intent of the minimum rear yard setback is to ensure adequate amenity space is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting property owners and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage. The by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant has requested a minimum rear yard depth of 5.0 metres to accommodate a proposed one -storey addition. The proposed development will maintain a lot coverage of 32.6 percent, meeting the maximum lot coverage requirement of 33 percent and leaving an appropriate amount of the property uncovered by structures. An appropriate amount of useable amenity will be maintained in the rear and flankage yards, a portion of the flankage yard is proposed to be fenced to accommodate a sizeable private amenity area. The proposed variance will have minimal impact on the privacy of abutting property owners as the addition is one -storey in height, backs onto the side yard and driveway of the adjacent property to the west, abuts an accessory building located in the rear yard of the adjacent property to the north and will maintain the existing side yard setback. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From' Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: February 28, 2018 Comments prepared by: Flory McNeil Planner 1 RM:DW:bs J:1Documents\Devetopmenl\D-3700t2018'PCA 13.18'Report'PCA 13-18 Reportdoc Attachments ® no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Exhibit 1 • J Radom Street Subject Lands i Tatra Drive a 0 0 `m Z Patmore Lane -a 0 0 0 0 0 c • 0 co 1 rl. Brown ng Avenue .rept -a 0 0 0 0 0 Haller Avenue Old Orchard Avenue Monica Cook Place I Waterpoint Street Ilona Park Road Gull C Location Map File: P/CA 13/18 of PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: K. Ngo . Property Description: Plan M16 Lot 1248 (862 Fairview Avenue) Date: Feb. 01, 2018 9The CorporaSon of the Clly of Pickenno Produced In part) under license from: b Omens Porter, Ontario MuvstyofNatural Resoucos. All rights reserved ;CS Her Majesty the queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Aesmaces. Woltz reserved.: 9 Teranet Erderpdses !no. and its suppliers all rights reserved.; 0 Municipal Prop arty Assessmerl Corporation and lis mgPlers al rights resened4 SCALE: �:5 r��� THI515 NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. 3 (N 3 A V SVTOAOG 0 U F 0 0 0 n. a 0 09L91 Z O Pi- co WOwM 0wad- -a- z0 0 0 zJ I Z0)- X O] W O O 0) OZZI- 2599 09L N 0 Z£6S„ w W I- Z 0 ¢ Z� Pw V) CC W5- £699 59Z 6Z Id. CO 0 40 %) 14 .11403 « -A Y -z -..,.->!x ..z ,z,ogarss i -x - N) 0 00 wJw wo . -1 O 0 W W z W i}- tis Q R Y'1'V6 00 m 0 ix m m 0 CD N0 5555 (0 z z 0:55 i= O l • CL W w 0 N it z d¢ J W Q� 0 OF QF OP co Z U W U W w Q W Q 1 Submitted Plan co co 0 6 O Z LL O Z crs Y6 DATE: Feb. 21, 2018 `J C Q OE W D0 a • a 0 • U N U 3 0 Z Z z a J 05 0 U z z z d J • Oor� • wwN Womo �a w " m O - d Utz w 0 0 Y O W 7 woa.z oZ o O W w w< 041Ud' O co 0 0 K 0 a View from Fairview Avenue Submitted Elevation P/CA 13/18 z cu LE N C 0 0 L cO DATE: Feb. 21, 2018 LJ C Z a) E C a 0 E >V a) a o a) U ., o E. U L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLANNING\APPS\PCA\2018 Y U 0 41 O Z la - O ON til ice— CC = 0 U 41 O K W 0 GI UO H Cl CC 0 CCCC ti // �\\\// o V) ce 0OQ W J Q a•� 0LI Li O _ 0 C O Fo o)n d O 0 0 0 1-000 W 0 m 0 EL W 0 I-dd o - _ p W 0 0 Y U C j W w0az O Z W o 0 W H W V) CC Q 0 0 0 i 0 no 0U d 0 Submitted Elevation co (Y) 0 0 z a1 LL O z W a) 0) LL N CO co DATE: Feb. 21, 2018 0 z • w 0 00 w F- a O z w 0 w. -J m J W Z Jw EL I-1 W 0 00 wW n- EC O 0 UO V1 0 J } JF - LL 0 0 d 1 d 0 z z a J 0 0 0 U z Z z Gty DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 18/18 Date: March 28, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 18/18 A. Genno 1445 Parkham Crescent Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended, to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 6.6 metres to a one -storey addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the construction of a single -storey addition in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a minimum rear yard depth of 6.6 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the one -storey addition in the rear yard, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 30, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential - Low Density Areas" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2520 - "RM1" - Multiple Family Dwelling First Density Zone Report P/CA 18/18 March 28, 2018 Page 2 Appropriateness of the Application Rear Yard Depth Variance The intent of the by-law requiring a minimum rear yard depth is to ensure adequate amenity space is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting properties and to allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage. The by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres, whereas the applicant has requested a minimum rear yard depth of 6.6 metres to accommodate a one -storey addition. The one -storey addition is currently under construction. The proposed development will maintain an appropriate amount of useable amenity space left uncovered by buildings in the rear yard. The existing grade within the back yard largely slopes downward towards the rear lot line, which provides for an existing basement walkout access from the dwelling. The addition will be an extension of the first floor and will be elevated, therefore useable amenity space will also be maintained underneath the addition. The proposed reduction in the rear yard depth will have minimal impact on the privacy of abutting properties to the east and west, as the addition is one storey in height and will maintain the required side yard setbacks, which are 0 metres from the interior side yard and 2.4 metres from the exterior side yard. The lands abutting the subject property immediately to the rear are a natural open space area that will remain undeveloped. The requested rear yard depth will also provide adequate space for appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage. The requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Toronto & Region Conservation Authority • no comments on the application • no comments on the application Date of report: March 21, 2018 Comments prepared by: Cody • rriso Planner I CM:DW:bs JADocuments\Development\D-3700\2018'PCA 18-18 A. GennoV2eport'PCA 18-18 Repo l.doc Attachments Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Exhibit 1 111111111w WWI WON 1111.100 goltill umwm %t p!a$tI ' 0 `� �� itt Alyssum Street e a) ■ ttiiiiiii1111111111111 laN I tD tD Krosno Boulevard 111111111111111 MI I I I 11111 III. - II-_ J, v > 0 0 CO • 0 (0 0_ L N (0 LL O CO #4* Colmar Avenue .11 4*' N O U • Parkham Crescent Wil Subject Lands owside C. CEY Location Map File: P/CA 18/18 o,1 PICKERING City Development Department(1445 Applicant: A. Genno Property Description: Part of Lot 41, Plan M106 W now Part 1, RP WR275 Parkham Crescent) Date: Feb. 15, 2018 9 l he Corporation of Me City of I,1enng Produced(In part)under (cense hom:CaOmens ennter, ()Mario Aon soy of Nahaal Resossces. al Reso. AA rights resented.; AU ryhts reserved.p Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natuvices 9 Tetanal Enterpdses Inc. and its scepters all rights reserved.;® Municipal Property Assessmert Corporation and its atgplers al dgHs reseed; SCALE: 1:Jr000 TH IS Is NOT A PIAN OF SURVEY. 860ZW0d\SddV\ONINNV1d\lal00\`JNINNVld\rl 0 0 CD 0 m (DB nm F D Om -Eln 0 M m —1CO 00 Mm -/ ACO m� HZ P1 m 0) w m 0 m z m 0 -n 0 m m 0 81-0Z `60 'YEW :31` CI -13 -t 0 D (D 0 0 0 Q- ) O r O Q O Q- ) 30 30 N 01 -a -a a) D (D 0 I1 0 uuId pauu!wgns N O (D 0 0 O 3 CL (D CD -a (D 3 N O v 0 (D i 1N3S3}1O INVHNEIVd 91217 1 1 1 AVM3AIH0 ONIISIX3 9Z60 OEIVA 1NOUd 1 1 m x CO y c7K Z mM0 Z Z D m 0=C') m0 m x co ci) Z mm0 Z m 0=� omw0 m { w 3 01 o � 3 3 3 L:\PLANNING\CO R EL\PLAN N I N G\HP PS\PCA an :2 K W L:\PLANNING\C O R E L\PLAN N I N G\AP PS\PCA\2018 DICKERING C4 cg Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 19/18 Date: March 28, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 19/18 M. Khan 552 Rodd Avenue Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 5092/97 to: • permit a minimum interior side yard width of 1.2 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard width of 1.5 metres • permit a maximum building height of 10.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a maximum building height of 9.0 metres The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a single detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a maximum building height of 10.0 metres and a minimum interior side yard width of 1.2 metres to be major variances that are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and are not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variances. Background In November 2016, City Council adopted Resolution 236/16 to commence a community engagement process to establish guidelines to encourage developers and builders to be mindful of established community character. Through community consultation, maximum building height was identified as one of the key criteria in ensuring compatibility of replacement housing in established neighbourhoods. In 2017, the City initiated a Zoning By-law Amendment to add a height limit of 9.0 metres for lands zoned "R3" and "R4" within Zoning By-law 2511. Council endorsed the by-law on March 5, 2018. The subject lands are zoned "R4-10" under Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 5092/97. The key difference between the general "R4" Zone under Zoning By-law 2511 and the "R4-10" Zone is that the "R4-10" Zone has had a maximum height limit of 9.0 metres since it came into effect in 1997. Prior to the passing of By-law 5092/97, the lands were zoned "R4". Report P/CA 19/18 March 28, 2018 Page 2 By-law 5092/97 was a City initiated Zoning Amendment for lands along Rodd Avenue which was passed with the stated purpose of ensuring that new dwellings constructed in the neighbourhood would be in keeping with the character of the area as it evolves. One of the key recommendations for maintaining the character of the area was to add a maximum height of 9.0 metres. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential — Low Density Areas" within the Rosebank Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 5092/97 — "R4-10" Appropriateness of the Application Maximum Height Variance and Reduced Interior Side Yard Width Variance • the intent of the maximum building height is to minimize the visual impact of the main building on abutting properties and on the streetscape, and to ensure that other abutting properties are not significantly obstructed by the proposed main building • the intent of a minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties, provide sufficient access to rear yard, and accommodate grading, drainage, and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the general intent of performance standards in a zoning by-law is to regulate development in order to ensure compatibility with the pattern of development in the area and to maintain the character of the neighbourhood • the Pickering Official Plan contains policies pertaining to protecting and enhancing the character of established neighbourhoods by considering such matters as height, yard setbacks, lot coverage, access to sunlight, and the context of the existing adjacent buildings • City Initiated By-law 5092/97, which added the height limit of 9.0 metres to most properties along Rodd Avenue, came into effect with the stated purpose to ensure new dwellings constructed along Rodd Avenue are in keeping with the character of the area • the applicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum building height from 9.0 metres to 10.0 metres and a variance to reduce the minimum interior side yard width from 1.5 metres to 1.2 metres • the applicant has requested these variances in order to construct a new detached dwelling with rooftop amenity space; the increased height is requested to accommodate the parapet wall/guard for the amenity space Report P/CA 19/18 March 28, 2018 Page 3 • building heights in the immediate area along Rodd Avenue are generally 9.0 metres in height or less, with two exceptions: 544 Rodd Avenue has a height of approximately 11.0 metres, which is permitted as a special exception in Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 5092/97; and 545 Rodd Avenue has a height of approximately 9.2 metres, as permitted through a variance application • interior side yard widths in the immediate area along Rodd Avenue appear to meet or exceed the required minimum interior side yard width of 1.5 metres, with the exception of 550 Rodd Avenue which was approved with a west side yard of 1.0 metre for an existing one -storey carport • the proposed detached dwelling with a height of 10.0 metres and reduced side yards may cast shadows onto the rear yard and west side yard amenity area of the adjacent property to the east (554 Rodd Avenue), and the rear yard amenity area of the adjacent property to the west (550 Rodd Avenue) • the proposed increased height combined with a wider building fa9ade as result of reduced side yard widths, will substantially increase the visual impact of the proposed dwelling on the streetscape • a maximum building height of 10.0 metres and minimum interior side yard width of 1.2 metres will result in a development out of scale with adjacent buildings, and will neither protect nor enhance the character of the neighbourhood along Rodd Avenue • a maximum building height of 10.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres is not in keeping with the character of the established neighbourhood • staff are of the opinion that the requested variances are major variances that are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and are not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variances Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the variances • ensure that any proposed garage is above finished grade as the City does not support garages below grade with a reverse driveway due to liabilities associated with flooding during major storm events Residents of 548 Rodd Avenue • opposes the proposed variances • the existing lot is large enough to accommodate a large home without pushing the limits of the by-law • a building built within the requirements of the zoning will be more in keeping with the neighbourhood and more considerate to the neighbours • other sufficiently large houses have been built within the requirements of the by-law in the neighbourhood, including 548 Rodd Avenue Report P/CA 19/18 March 28, 2018 Page 4 Residents of 554 Rodd Avenue • opposes the proposed variances • new development should be compatible with and respect the unique character of the established Rodd Avenue neighbourhood that the local residents bought into when they purchased their homes • the majority of residents in the immediate neighbourhood oppose the variances, as seen on the provided petition • the proposal is in effect a "monster home" due to both its height and width and will have a lasting negative impact on residents' lives • concerned that the proposed dwelling could accommodate a duplex • concerned that the height and width of the building will block sunlight onto adjacent properties reducing enjoyment of the land, and allowing moisture to more easily accumulate on adjacent rooftops • privacy and safety concerns regarding the rooftop terrace; items falling from that height could be fatal and it will provide a direct view into rear and side yards • concerned the proposal will impact the view of the surrounding conservation lands • concerned that reduced side yards will cause drainage issues in an area already experiencing flooding problems • concerned that 18 mature trees are being removed to facilitate the development; City tree removal policies need to be updated • concerned that a reduced side yard will negatively impact the row of trees on the east side of the property • considers the requested variances to be unnecessary and undesirable; the existing zone provisions are quite reasonable • although the reduction in side yards appears minor, it adds approximately 1,200 square feet of additional area to the dwelling, especially considering the boxy nature of the building • the variances are not minor, are not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law and are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land Residents of 550 Rodd Avenue • oppose the proposed variances Report P/CA 19/18 March 28, 2018 Page 5 Resident of 549 Rodd Avenue Resident of 547 Rodd Avenue Resident of 546 Rodd Avenue Resident of 538 Rodd Avenue Resident of 537 Rodd Avenue Resident of 531 Rodd Avenue Residents of 529 Rodd Avenue Resident of 527 Rodd Avenue Resident of 523 Bella Vista Drive Resident of 519 Bella Vista Drive Date of report: March 22, 2018 Comments prepared by: Rory McNeil Planner I RM:DW:jc J:tDocumentstDevelopmenllD-3700120181PCA 19-18\Report\PCA 19-18 Report.doc Attachments • opposes the proposed variances • opposes the proposed variances • opposes the proposed variances • opposes the proposed variances • opposes the proposed variances • opposes the proposed variances • oppose the proposed variances • opposes the proposed variances • opposes the proposed variances • opposes the proposed variances Deborah Wyli=, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Exhibit 1 > 0 s 1�l agho n Road 0 0 U Rougemount Drive Cowan Ci cle Gillmoss Road 0 MOMU Vsi I. mp NI rnor 0 Petticoat Creek Conservation Area Subject Lands 11111111 m11 r rn I Lake Ontario C4 4 Location Map File: P/CA 19/18 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: M. Khan Property Description: BFC Range 2, Pt Lot 30 (552 Rodd Avenue) Date: Feb. 28, 2018 5 theCorporatenoftheedyofPtckenngProduced(Inpart)underfcensefom:r9UlcersPnrter,UtadoMnstryofNatralResources. Resources. A6 ngHs resed.; All rights reserved.A Her hla(esty the Queen In Right of Canada, Cepadnnert of Hellcate 5 Teranet Enterprises Inc. and IN suppliers a11 rights reserved.;® Municipal Property Assessment Corporation unfits scppSers al netts resened; g SCALE. I.JG,000 THIS IS NOT A PIAN OF SURVEY. Exhibit 2 R 37 3o' 15.29 t 35.40m a t) 12.60 0 1126 PROPOSED TWO STOREY DWELLING 0 12.59m PLANTER WALKWAY 12. t0' 55.24 EC N Z pa Bg 5.15 Rodd Avenue To permit a minimum interior side yard width of 1.2 metres To permit a maximum building height of 10.0 metres T Cts4 PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 19/18 Applicant: M. Khan Property Description: Part of Lot 30, Broken Frontage Concession Range 2 (552 Rodd Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Mar. 8, 2018 Exhibit 3 MEM W000 FAONG GLASS RAILING To permit a maximum building height of 10.0 metres 42" WGH // PAAAPT FASCIA F/G FKCX FACING is= r 7 STONE RCM 42. HISN GLASS RANG EH GRAD View from Rodd Avenue CN PAE SLAB TOP OF W000 t FIN 2N0 FLOOR FIN 1ST FLOOR AVG. GRADE FIN SLAB Ct44 PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Front Elevation File No: P/CA 19/18 Applicant: M. Khan Property Description: Part of Lot 30, Broken Frontage Concession Range 2 (552 Rodd Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Mar. 8, 2018 Exhibit 4 PFEFIN W000 GLASS ROLM NIGH PARAPET FAC ,....„,./-.- — FASCIA mP of _ WOW IL i g.■. �� ■y fall IIIIIIIIIII III 1111111111 STOS1gNNE E 1111111 111111 Idil111t1 RN 2ND FLOOR \ 8' SOLID OR1CK '_1 SlASO AVSOMif CHER TYPICAL ' i •-e s(' 7 IIIIIIIIIIIL 11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII • • IIIIIIIII Ili IIIMI111 IIIIIIIIIIII MIIIIIII VASFAILNG FIN — u 1ST FLOOR � o ... I 1 r GRACE I- w. �, _u -r r f-- nu Da Submitted Rear Elevation C tp 4 File No: P/CA 19/18 PICKERING Applicant: M. Khan City Development Property Description: Part of Lot 30, Broken Frontage Concession Range 2 Department (552 Rodd Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Mar. 8, 2018 C4 �a DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 20/18 Date: March 28, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 20/18 Mattamy (Seaton) Limited 2635 Toffee Street Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364/14, as amended: • to permit a minimum flankage yard setback of 1.4 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 2.4 metres • to permit a private attached garage, associated with a main building to be located no closer than 0.5 metres to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law permits private attached garages, associated with a main building on a lot, provided the wall of the private garage facing a lane is located no closer than 0.6 metres to the rear lot line The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the construction of a townhouse dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed townhouse dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 30, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Mixed Use Areas — Mixed Corridors" Zoning By-law 7364/14 — "MC2-1-3" — Mixed Corridor Type 2 Zone Report P/CA 20/18 March 28, 2018 Page 2 Appropriateness of the Application Flankage Yard Setback and Garage Setback Variance The intent of the minimum flankage yard setback and garage setback requirements are to ensure a dwelling is adequately setback from street activity and a sufficient landscaped area is maintained between a dwelling and the adjacent street. The zoning by-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 2.4 metres and permits private attached garages, associated with a main building on a lot, provided the wall of the private garage facing a lane is located no closer than 0.6 metres to the rear lot line. The applicant has requested a reduction in the minimum flankage yard setback from 2.4 metres to 1.4 metres and has requested a private attached garage, associated with a main building to be located no closer than 0.5 metres to the rear lot line in order to accommodate a townhouse dwelling. The proposed reduction in both the flankage yard setback and the setback of the garage are necessary due to the irregular shape of the property. The lot line rounds at the north-east corner of the property, which reduces the distance between the most northeasterly corner of the proposed townhouse and the closest point of the north and east lot lines. The proposed townhouse dwelling will maintain the required setbacks at all other points on the property. The proposed flankage yard and garage setbacks of 1.4 metres and 0.5 metres, respectively, will provide an adequate distance between the dwelling and street activity. Additionally, a sufficient landscaped area will be maintained between the proposed dwelling and the adjacent streets. The minimum landscaped area requirement of the zoning by-law will be maintained with this proposal. The requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Toronto & Region Conservation Authority • as of the writing of this report, no comments have been received Date of report: March 21, 2018 Comments prepared by: Cody Morris Planner -L_.. CM:DW:bs 2) J:1Documents\Development'D-3700120181PCA 20-18 Mattamy (Seaton) LlmitedU2eport1PCA 20-18.doc Attachments t Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review iii°iinui Exhibit 1 Taunton Road � , 1 Subject Lands iiriiiiriii 111111111111111111111111 1 OWN ams— OM RIM ONE ME rat MIMS nom mem mum MIN mum mum SWIM Gaeta C44 Location Map File: P/CA 20/18 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: Mattamy (Seaton) Limited Property Description: Unit 1, Block 96, SP2009-13 (Phase 1) (2635 Toffee Street) Date: 09, 2018 'b The Corporalon of the Cdy of Ptckenng Pre duced On part) under license horn: a.m. Pnrter, Mrnstry of Naive] Resources. All rights reserved,iC Her !Aaksty the Queen In Right of Canada. Cep admert of Natural Resources, Al dgtts reserved.; C Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers all rights reserved.;® Municipal Property Assessrrert Corp oration and its ssppfiersafi rights reserved,; .Mar. SCALE. I..r7�000 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. 11 N N R CO CO N CO W V V"1 CO td I.F. I— ar LTJ (A En LLl i— Cf) co co Y�1 �� W L_ a LL 0 i r3: �r N (4H a (0 4) .c U 3 co al a 0 0 ' � 0 ambo O 1— a0.)(o O C 0) (0 U O x179,35 ELMCREEK WS "II' 8.5D 79 n 179 55 ri 1R 179.75 1J e5 179.47 1 44 17 17•.+ 17 :2 2.5a- 4.0 .504.4 0 179.04 178.89 2,8% 178.85 18.5014-3 EN 179.00 HYDRO EASEMENT u., N LL1 777 aNVECTE0 f Mime(cattcrar nLUwnex 2.0% 179.39 Ki p YY CO 6 d 17 W LTJ 2 4- Er 17 ii 4 r" !' W a 24 18 7 17 0 17 Submitted Plan P/CA 20/18 O z a) LL DATE: Mar. 12, 2018 U' z w 0 0 0 0 S F - Q (7 w 0 W Ja J z 3W ag c� I - w U_ w 00 CO z aw 0 0 °- 0 Qw CO0 J J U -U L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLANNING\APPS\PCA\2018 DICKERING c4 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: P/CA 21/18 to P/CA 23/18 Date: March 28, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications P/CA 21/18 to P/CA 23/18 Averton (Brock) Limited Plan 40M-2568, Block 2, Building 13, Units 1, 2 & 3 (Module 126 within Block 13) 1701, 1703 & 1705 Huckleberry Crossing Applications The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7444/15, as amended: to permit a vehicular entrance for an enclosed private garage to be located a minimum of 3.9 metres from the private street that provides vehicle access to the private garage, whereas the by-law states that any vehicular entrance for an enclosed private garage shall be located a minimum of 6.0 metres from the private street that provides vehicle access to the private garage The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning compliance for the second phase of a mixed-use residential -commercial development consisting of a variety of townhouse unit types (stacked, back-to-back and stacked back-to-back). Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance apply only to 1701, 1703 & 1705 Huckleberry Crossing (Module 126 within Block 13), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Mixed Use Areas — Mixed Use Corridor" within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 7444/15 — "MU -MD -1" — Mixed Use Medium Density 1 P/CA 21/18 to P/CA 23/18 March 28, 2018 Page 2 Background The applicant received Final Site Plan Approval for Phase 2 of their development on October 26, 2017. Through the building permit process, it was identified that the corner rounding on Huckleberry Crossing created a zoning non-compliance for Module 126 within Block 13. Appropriateness of the Applications Minimum Setback from a Private Street to the Vehicle Entrance of an Enclosed Private Garage Variance The intent of this Zoning By-law requirement is to ensure that adequate space is provided on the driveway to accommodate a parking space. The applicant has requested to reduce the minimum setback from 6.0 metres to 3.9 metres on Module 126 within Block 13 on the Final Approved Site Plan. The requested variance is a result of the applicant addressing the City's engineering requirements for a corner rounding on Huckleberry Crossing. Zoning By-law 7444/15 outlines a site specific resident parking ratio of 1.5 spaces per back—to-back dwelling unit and 1.0 space per stacked dwelling unit. With these parking ratios, a total of 126 resident parking spaces is required. The applicant will be providing 204 resident parking spaces, which is 78 spaces more than the by-law requires. Additionally, the applicant will be providing a total of 26 visitor parking spaces, which is 5 more spaces than the required by the by-law. Given that the applicant is providing well over the minimum requirement for parking, it is Staff's opinion that the requested variance to reduce the minimum setback from a private road to the vehicle entrance of an enclosed private garage for Module 126 within Block 13 is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: March 21, 2018 Comments prepared by: Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:DW:bs • no comments on the applications Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:tDocuments\DevelopmenttD-3700\2018\PCA 21-18 to PCA 23-18\RepodlPCA 21-18 to 23-18 Repod.doe Attachments Exhibit 1 Zents Drive Subject Lands Brock Road -ri' o titWIWI WOO MI ��w Tally Street 7.1..s.FoosIiii 1411 111111In 16. ° VA Ime INNft ca aw 111 IIIIIIIIIIII11 _ler k Vial'III! IIIIIIIIIIII R 0 Huckleberry Crossing Heath Drive renwic v _rfl7iTi ••G Q) 0 0 U f0 E Liatris Drive a) c c `Kalmar Avenue r [ o n C4 Location Map File: P/CA 21/18 to P/CA 23/18 o11 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: Averton (Brock) Limited Property Description: Units 1, 2, 3, Building 13, Blk 2, 40M-25681 (1701, 1703 & 1705 Huckleberry Crossing) Date: Mar. 07, 2018 orperaoana dye •te enng •m.uce• (apart u •er cense .om: a • ens •neer.. a rrnar,yeMyra •esetrces. ghts reserved.; er[ of Naal Resas. Al rights All ryhts reserved ,0 Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Cep arimNuca Tenant Enterprises Inc. and Hs supplcrs all rights reserved.; 0 Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its sspp5ers Wefts reserved,; SCALE: 1:3,500 THIS IS NOTA PLAN OF SURVEY. MAILBOXES (60 BOXES) J 0 LL P P OZ N N LO r 0 9 NIG D � 4W v � L- r -15D'Z Ill 4 LLI 0 0�� o N 49x4; m LL w r, r L L ■I i rte N u, 0 D J d ❑ w W 1 @) ❑ 1 Z coon ii rro$ry LL u u o c7D co co re CO 0 n 0 4 oXm -__1 `i .34 Le rL"--'LO'9 m cF/%'' L LL 111 4'4 4�o FSE, a m �D © T CqD N LL J nv z" r'N� V HPSN In ❑ W w w o CL ❑ m vo'o£l =odsn 4 O • 0 X h_ 1 ;;- 1 66'60 1,6'661 0 3.56 P(j TILL, N 66 El X 1.01_ _ _ 00-001 di o %0co 91'0£1 1.061 90'0E1 10.021 LO-OEldlim -X--- 0 O _ N _c N N � . _c -.-0 4) 0) O) (ll 0) cu 0 0 _o O E O>� L O ca CO } 0) CD E 4- U) U) ° 0) �a a� L m a) m m cam ern U c +, U QJ U) + Q-�>a Ca)>O'o0c>a °>°a.0EEaaccaa £0'0 1.7 66'6( 66'61 go 1 Submitted Plan P/CA 21/18 to P/CA 23/18 O Z ILL 0) E J 0 2 c 0 0) Q co 'W L / N 2 d' N Y 0 O 0) m N r Ct0) c O Q 1 0) L 0) Q O L a DATE: Mar. 07, 2018 () EE W 0 U a 0 U W (7 LLI z 0 0 W 3 W -6 Q z 3W EL =04 2 Q • a 0 W 0 W W a� oa U 0 W J W Lu (l U J 0 U z U Q.. E a O Tll 0 6) 0 L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLANNI NG\APPS\PCA\2018 11 ve- gal ao NOSNOVr WVIIIIM r � f i• lij �ii%s o!- 0?w uL l'eXF 4f"3 Sm1 F at 11 rEHt '• ptlOT13IVARid tai F2 F z : 4) y a( i A i r1as �� IS`1 • (31(toa 3el X59) •• " avoaaivAI d i 1 tri; �`'���i;.,• I�1 li3i 1� iil 11,, 1 11� Qr1/4il1-/�f 1 y i j yy J'l . yllrmyo✓I��(��il- I t o P 1/4 ■, I•_{31ne Hai"441 • Q o ( aVOa iivna1 11num !rrr■na sal rajpj•yLd I ;I li1d I a9• €t �trrrrr ow •WI rr \ ■ I l « O rp Hl®■rel 111111111 t,• Submitted Plan P/CA 21/18 to P/CA 23/18 z LL DATE: Mar. 07, 2018 L:\PLANNING\CO REL\PLAN NIN G\APPS\PCA\2018 DICKERING c4 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: P/CA 24/18 to P/CA 26/18 Date: March 28, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications P/CA 24/18 to P/CA 26/18 Averton (Brock) Limited Plan 40M-2568, Block 2, Building 15, Units 16, 17 &18 (Module 143 within Block 15) 2481, 2483 & 2485 Mayapple Crossing Applications The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7444/15, as amended: • to permit a vehicular entrance for an enclosed private garage to be located a minimum of 5.4 metres from the private street that provides vehicle access to the private garage; whereas the by-law states that any vehicular entrance for an enclosed private garage shall be located a minimum of 6.0 metres from the private street that provides vehicle access to the private garage The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning compliance for the second phase of a mixed-use residential -commercial development consisting of a variety of townhouse unit types (stacked, back-to-back and stacked back-to-back). Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance apply only to 2481, 2483 & 2485 Mayapple Crossing (Module 143 within Block 15), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Mixed Use Areas — Mixed Use Corridor" within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 7444/15 — "MU -MD -1"— Mixed Use Medium Density 1 P/CA 24/18 to P/CA 26/18 March 28, 2018 Page 2 Background The applicant received Final Site Plan Approval for Phase 2 of their development on October 26, 2017. Through the building permit process, it was identified that the corner rounding on Mayapple Crossing created a zoning non-compliance for Module 143 within Block 15. Appropriateness of the Applications Minimum Setback from a Private Street to the Vehicle Entrance of an Enclosed Private Garage Variance The intent of this Zoning By-law requirement is to ensure that adequate space is provided on the driveway to accommodate a parking space. The applicant has requested to reduce the minimum setback from 6.0 metres to 5.4 metres on Module 143 within Block 15 on the Final Approved Site Plan. The requested variance is a result of the applicant addressing the City's engineering requirements for a corner rounding on Huckleberry Crossing. Zoning By-law 7444/15 outlines a site specific resident parking ratio of 1.5 spaces per back-to-back dwelling unit and 1.0 space per stacked dwelling unit. With these parking ratios, a total of 126 resident parking spaces are required. The applicant will be providing 204 resident parking spaces, which is 78 spaces more than the By-law requires. Additionally, the applicant will be providing a total of 26 visitor parking spaces, which is 5 more spaces than the required by the By-law. Given that the applicant is providing well over the minimum requirement for parking, it is Staffs opinion that the requested variance to reduce the minimum setback from a private road to the vehicle entrance of an enclosed private garage for Module 143 within Block 15 is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: March 21, 2018 Comments prepared by: Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:DW:jc • no comments on the applications 7,-(P Deborah Wyli=, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:tDocuments\Development\D-3700\2018\PCA 24-1810 PCA 26-18 'Report'PCA 24-18 to 26-18 Reporl.doc Attachments Exhibit 1 Zents Drive Brock Road lire rim al I 1 . . 1 11/1111/ Ii$ Mug 7,7Tally Street Nom a som•Subject .W Lands11111* : IIIIIIIIIIII111 111111111111 11411‘ Huckleberry Crossing Rex Heath Drive Iv renwic V • 5 0 c 0 U E Liatris Drive Kalmar Avenue (min 1111 C m J T c EL 11-11‘111 C44 Location Map File: P/CA 24/18 to P/CA 26/18 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: Averton (Brock) Limited Property Description:Units 16, 17, 18, Building 15, Blk 2 , Plan 40M-2568 (2481, 2483 & 2485 Mayapple Crossing) Date: Mar. 07, 2018 The Corporator of the city of P,ckenng Produced On part)under leen se from:2 Queens Pn,er, elan Mn shy of Natural Resotrces. All r'ghts reservedMajesty,® Her Majesty Queen In Right of Canada. Cepartmert of Nah al Resources. AI netts reserved.; Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.;® Municipal Pmpeny Assessmert Carporaton and its sspplers al rinks reserved; SCALE: 1:3,500 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. O (Q O a) a)"J."(i)U a) p O 1) a) co = Q) a) a) fn — 0 E ) -a cn O .O > 0 a) . O Q� a a co 129,97 130.02 29.87 29.92 GAS UFrt0.S 9Wgt•=t { ' ` 131 129.83 104309,,`-..1q Wets 6. 0 111 0 0 co rN m m d'O m LL! csi it LL coo it Z7ILI Fk Z LL LL LL 30 so -,16 p 2�� 1 m �i 6.0...:7-7- 43.-- 41.= 1 i N� �� LL 11 to v, N 1 L�'�® II N Z I I r--- WAW z 2 u r'n LL r _ i' a LLLLLL m 1 11-4, Qr N r1�� I 1 J 1 L �-cid Kn 17 L W I 8 =1 a W F- 1 r" -- r I 1 O p N 1JJ 1 _y! LL� 1 ''c o O 0 .i r ' O 4 d Pv o C I I _ 1 o W O m Il�lc '- W � 5 =D I cq 1.---, ' zo o O � Z ■ 2.°4 11 PI N4P--!''!f°' 111111 ml - VIVIm�I X y qV0 m ce ""' C Y� 1 AW-- �o ���'?in li t� z LL -'" i 1. 1 1'N� om �a�,r h? W z 11 AN=127.02 r -D n 129.58 1 - -- _ / "0 >a a IDNLp > -' �1/ °{ D �> I D I.co!'!-^ -- 0 - c.Y- Udo - D 1 Jy�� o cr.. i 1 �_ r! <"�/ c. ea P 1 t >I i Q C LL N' X { CD \ •••----• I^ 11111 11- csi CC In 0 i ^ s. I 1 IJ.-'' `'! rrrrrrru ■rre■ (�\J i N 1--110Gf,.21.°,S� r,rrrrr}4Crrrrrrr■ t Jni .�,.'� �n°I ■Mrrc�r�rry �ir 1 I<1) c�7 K N to I 5« 1 Submitted Plan P/CA 24/18 to P/CA 26/18 z 0) c .7) 0) O U a) O_ as 2 03 N co C) co N co N DATE: Mar. 07, 2018 z 10 LU LL O U W 1- ID W 10 O LL W CaJ b L:\PLANNING\C OR EL\PLA N N I N G\AP PS\PCA\2018 --ems - .'� - .� ..0111.WID D u19st1I io.F�,aa-c3nI- Oy6u I -'rea � ao NOS I3Vr wdmNn ftlIN tltl tlPP ?www 4107:; er C yltt rul 11L�It II��i I 6A' A6/ 1s;/ ni\m\Zt'. aVON 3lVn11.1 9 • n 1 OVON 31Vnlad �' ° ;t 7 rest � 7/ Vit c t -4-fi 54 "(fit 4' -I i • • q0 w a lel 90a • yl I i � r. ��ai l I 1 Ll T r_i_41 i L 71.__\ L_ L. ail ■ I� f° Sainsu_imew.0 ■ ❑ l oboa A1VAlad limits PEPiPPPn®PPPp PIy i-- 1 -.1 ^ I! 4 _1I I 1 � eeeesson IPPiee 41 . j 01E- 4:1 i tc tl tlpPPtlgPnPPPietlisP tat Ai 1 1' Submitted Plan P/CA 24/18 to P/CA 26/18 Z li D U) J 0 O m 0 t a) C) co 10 N 0 N 0 O OD 1. 0) co (D 0) 0 0 V wo a) CI 4- 0) 0 O a 0) C .0) 0) 0 U a) 0 (13 0 2 10 co N COceS CO N CO N DATE: Mar. 07, 2018 0 z uJ O a 0 O w F- F - 5 a O w K 0 co3 zZ gw ELrEg xQ Ha W 0 4 co W z a W O� Ua J t j � o} J F- L:\PLANNING\CO REL\PLANN ING\APPS\PCA\2018