HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 7, 2018DICKERING
Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Meeting Number: 3
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018
pickering.ca
PICKERING
city4
Agenda
Committee of Adjustment
Wednesday, March 7, 2018
7:00 pm
Central Library Auditorium, 2nd Floor
Page Number
(I) Adoption of Agenda
(II) Adoption of Minutes from February 14, 2018 1-6
(III) Reports
1. P/CA 12/18 7-12
N. Ryan
1355 Uxbridge -Pickering Townline Road
2. P/CA 13/18 13-18
K. Ngo
862 Fairview Avenue
3. P/CA 14/18 19-23
A. Cillo & S. Kerr
1904 Glenview Road
4. P/CA 15/18 24-29
Nuteck Homes
1827 Appleview Road
5. P/CA 16/18 30-33
S. Penton & K. Penton
958 Timmins Gardens
6. P/CA 17/18 34-37
D. Cillo
1910 Glenview Road
(IV) Adjournment
For information related to accessibility requirements please contact:
Lesley Dunne
T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024
Email Idunne@pickering.ca
Ci/g
DICKERING
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
7:00 pm
Council Chambers
Pending Adoption
Present
Tom Copeland — Vice -Chair
Eric Newton
Denise Rundle
Sean Wiley
Also Present
Deborah Wylie, Secretary -Treasurer
Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary -Treasurer
Absent
David Johnson — Chair
(I) Adoption of Agenda
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Denise Rundle
That the agenda for the Wednesday, February 14, 2018 meeting be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
(II) Adoption of Minutes
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Denise Rundle
That the minutes of the 1st meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday,
January 24, 2018 be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
Tom Copeland, Vice -Chair stated that he will abstain from voting on all applications
heard for the Wednesday, February 14, 2018 Committee of Adjustment meeting in order
to prevent a tie vote.
Page 1 of 6
Ci/g 4
DICKERING
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
7:00 pm
Council Chambers
(111) Reports
1. P/CA 07/18
C. Paparafiou & A. Salbian
525 Cliffview Road
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended to recognize an
existing accessory structure (shed) greater than 1.8 metres in height to be setback a
maximum of 0.6 of a metre from the rear (east) lot line and 0.6 of a metre from the north
side lot line, and to permit a maximum lot coverage of 41.6 percent; whereas the by-law
permits accessory structures greater than 1.8 metres in height to be setback a minimum
of 1.0 metre from all lot lines and a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to bring the existing
accessory structure (shed) into conformity with the zoning by-law.
The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development
Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were
also received from the City's Engineering Services Department requesting the
accessory structure be setback a minimum of 0.6 of a metre from all lot lines.
C. Paparafiou, applicant, was present to represent the application. Brian Hawke of
527 Cliffview Road was present in objection to the application.
C. Paparafiou stated weather permitting the shed will be relocated to 0.6 of a metre
from the north lot line as recommended by the City Development department. In
response to a questions from Committee Members, C. Paparafiou stated a fence will be
erected in the future in coordination with surrounding neighbours, will ensure drainage
remains on his property and indicated there will be enough space between the fence
and shed for maintenance. C. Paparafiou also stated he is unable to move the shed to
the required 1.0 metre zoning by-law setback due the electrical wiring.
Brain Hawke stated he contacted the City and spoke with the contactor during the early
stages of construction indicating the shed was too close to the property line. Brian
Hawke expressed several concerns including that the eaves will be too close to the
property line and the size and location of the shed will decrease his property value.
Brian Hawke also expressed a concern with the location of the post holes once the
fence is erected. Brian Hawke explained this is a new subdivision and is concerned this
may set a precedence that zoning by-laws may be ignored.
Page 2 of 6
Ci/g
DICKERING
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
7:00 pm
Council Chambers
Moved by Denise Rundle
Seconded by Sean Wiley
That application P/CA 07/18 by C. Paparafiou & A. Salbian, be Approved on the
grounds that the existing accessory structure (shed) with a height of 3.0 metres,
setback 0.6 of a metre from the east and north lot lines and a maximum lot coverage of
41.6 percent are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land,
and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning
By-law, subject to the following condition:
1. That these variances apply only to the existing accessory structure (shed), as
generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans and relocate the
accessory structure (shed) by July 1, 2018, or this decision shall become null and
void.
2. At the Owner's expense erect a 6 foot high wood privacy fence along the north
side lot line by July 1, 2018, from the rear northeast corner of the dwelling to the
rear lot line together along the east rear lot line, or this decision shall become null
and void.
Carried
2. P/CA 08/18
D. DiDonato & P. Bonavitacola
1910 Pine Grove Avenue
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6578/05:
• to permit a minimum east side yard width of 1.2 metres; whereas the by-law requires
a minimum side yard width of 3.0 metres
• to permit a minimum west side yard width of 1.0 metre; whereas the by-law requires
a minimum side yard width of 3.0 metres
• to permit a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent; whereas the by-law requires a
maximum lot coverage of 20 percent
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a Building Permit
to construct a two-storey detached dwelling.
The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development
Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were
also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no
comments on the application.
Page 3 of 6
Ci/g
DICKERING
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
7:00 pm
Council Chambers
Paola Bonavitacola, applicant, and Rakesh Gupta, agent, were present to represent the
application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the
application.
Rakesh Gupta explained the application. In response to a question from a Committee
Member, Rakesh Gupta stated the driveway is located on the east side and that is the
distance between the existing house and side lot line.
Moved by Sean Wiley
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 08/18 by D. DiDonato & P. Bonavitacola, be Approved on the
grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the
Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed two-storey detached dwelling and
existing accessory building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's
submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a Building Permit for the proposed construction by
February 14, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried
3. P/CA 09/18
Mattamy (Seaton) Limited
2408 Moonlight Crescent
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364/14, as amended:
• to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 5.3 metres; whereas the by-law requires a
minimum rear yard depth of 6.0 metres
• to permit a deck to encroach a maximum of 2.1 metres into the required rear yard;
whereas the by-law permits a deck to encroach into any required rear to a maximum
of 2.0 metres
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a Building Permit
for the construction of a detached dwelling and rear yard deck.
The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development
Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were
also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no
comments on the application.
Page 4 of 6
GGa oii
DICKERING
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
7:00 pm
Council Chambers
Anson Wong, agent, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
In response to a question from a Committee Member, Anson Wong explained the lands
at the rear of the subject property are currently zoned Agricultural and the City has
received a rezoning application to rezone the lands to Natural Heritage System.
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Denise Rundle
That application P/CA 09/18 by Mattamy (Seaton) Limited, be Approved on the
grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the
Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed single detached dwelling and
deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a Building Permit for the proposed construction by
February 14, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried
4. P/CA 11/18
C. & J. Cann
458 Oakwood Drive
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a
minimum front yard depth of 6.7 metres to an attached garage, whereas the by-law
requires a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a Building Permit for
the construction of a single -storey addition in the rear yard and an attached garage in
the south side yard.
The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development
Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were
also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no
comments on the application.
Linda Rendulich, agent, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Page 5 of 6
GGa oii
DICKERING
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
7:00 pm
Council Chambers
Linda Rendulich stated the applicants are long term residents of Pickering and are
relocating to a smaller home due to health and mobility issues. Linda Rendulich also
stated the garage is to accommodate a wheelchair lift at the rear of the garage and a
parked car. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Linda Rendulich
indicated the existing carport will be removed and the garage will be constructed on a
similar footprint.
Moved by Denise Rundle
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 11/18 by C. & J. Cann, be Approved on the grounds that the
minimum front yard depth of 6.7 metres is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the
Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed attached garage, as generally sited
and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a Building Permit for the proposed construction by
February 14, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried
Adjournment
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Sean Wiley
That the 2nd meeting of the 2018 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at
7:40 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on
Wednesday, March 7, 2018.
Carried Unanimously
Date
Vice -Chair
Assistant Secretary -Treasurer
Page 6 of 6
CJS a�
DICKERING
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: P/CA 12/18
Date: March 7, 2018
From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 12/18
N. Ryan
1355 Uxbridge -Pickering Townline Road
Application
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended:
• to permit an accessory structure (detached garage) to have a maximum height of
5.0 metres, whereas the by-law does not permit accessory buildings to exceed a height
of 3.5 metres in any residential zone
• to permit an accessory structure (detached garage) which is not part of the main
building to be erected in the east side yard, whereas the by-law requires all accessory
buildings, which are not part of the main building, to be erected in the rear yard
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the
construction an accessory structure (detached garage) in the side yard.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers an accessory building (detached garage) with a
maximum height of 5.0 metres and to be located in the east side yard to be minor in nature,
desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent
and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval
of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed detached garage, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
March 9, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void.
Report P/CA 12/18 March 7, 2018
Page 2
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan — Countryside Areas
Zoning By-law 3037 — "ORM-A" - Oak Ridges Moraine Agricultural Zone
Background
Although the Rural Agriculture zone does not have a maximum height restriction for accessory
buildings, it has been the City's interpretation that should a Rural Agricultural zoned property
function solely as a residential property, with no agricultural or agriculturally related operations
taking place on that property, that the residential height requirements for accessory structures
apply.
Appropriateness of the Application
Accessory Structure Height Variance
The zoning by-law does not permit accessory buildings to exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any
residential zone. The intent of the maximum building height of accessory buildings is to
minimize the visual impact of accessory buildings on abutting properties and on the
streetscape and to ensure other yards are not significantly obstructed by these structures on
the property.
The applicant is requesting to permit an accessory building (detached garage) with a maximum
height of 5.0 metres. The applicant's original proposal sought a maximum height of 7.0 metres.
Staff had expressed their concern with the possible conversion of the accessory structure into
"livable space" and the applicant agreed to lower the height of the garage to 5.0 metres. No
human habitation is intended within the garage. The applicant's rationale for the increase in
height is to allow the storage in the garage rafters of exotic woods used for a home industry.
A Home Industry is a permitted use within "ORM" - Oak Ridges Moraine Zones.
The proposed detached garage having a height of 5.0 metres will not create a visual impact on
the surrounding streetscape as the garage is setback approximately 30 metres from the front lot
line and in design mimics the existing residential building on the property. The subject property
is surrounded by agricultural operations with the closest structure being a barn over 30 metres
away and another residential dwelling over 80 metres away.
A sufficient separation is proposed between the side lot line and the proposed detached
garage. Additionally, the location of the proposed garage will not obstruct access between the
front and rear yards.
The requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the
land and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law.
Report P/CA 12/18 March 7, 2018
Page 3
Accessory Building in Side Yard Variance
The Zoning By-law requires all accessory buildings, which are not part of the main building, to
be erected in the rear yard. The intent of this requirement is to minimize the visual impact of
these accessory buildings on the streetscape and adjacent properties and to ensure that they
act as accessory to the principal use of the property.
The subject property currently does not have a garage. As such, the applicant is requesting to
permit a 101 square metre accessory building (detached garage) to be located in the east side
yard. The intended use of this garage is for the storage of vehicles, machinery, wood and will
be accessory to the existing residential dwelling on the property.
The proposed detached garage will have a minimal visual impact on the streetscape as the
front yard setback and architectural design of the proposed accessory building is similar to that
of the existing residential dwelling on the property.
The requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the
land and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law.
Input From Other Sources
Engineering Services
Date of report: February 27, 2018
Comments prepared by:
Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP
Planner 11
AE:DW:bs
J:Documents1Development1D-3700\2018\PCA 12-18 N. Ryan\Report\PCA 12-18 Repod.doc
Attachments
• no comments on the application
Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Exhibit 1
Township of Uxbridge
Uxbridge -Pickering Townline Road
Sideline 22
Subject
Lands
Sideline 20
Cts 4
Location Map
File: P/CA 12/18
PICKERING
City Development
Department
Applicant: N. Ryan
Property Description: Con 9 N PT Lot 22
(1355 Uxbridge -Pickering Townline Road)
Date: Jan. 31, 2018
The Corparafion of the Clty of Pidenng Produced On part)under license from. 0 Cheers Ynrter,(Mano P rvstryof Na4ral Resovices.
All rghtsreserved., Her Maiesy the Queen in Right of Canada, cepa rtmert of Natual Resosces.A9rigtts reserved.;
D Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.;QMunicipal Property Assessmert Corporation and its suppiets al lights reserved.;
SCALE. �•�Or�O�
THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY.
T C
O "o
O O co -
i
o .c U
O 0 O CO
co CO T
co -0 7
Q)
O • U 0)
CO
Ca L
F9- O)�
1p, .9&
t
� o
o
u '4-
o (1)coO
c (3 c 9)
C O c
a�-0)Si 2 ._co CO Cllo
a.
F-cn�EE
L',es
Submitted Plan
FILE No: P/CA 12/18
cc
zz
z
0
J
a
a
N
N
0
z
0)
O
U
z
0
1-
a
c
w
c
W
a
O
c
a
DATE: Feb. 27, 2018
0
EEz
w
w
U
0
U
2
F
U
z
w
0
k
�w
0 w
OD
W Z
LJ
oa
U
w
UW
w
U
L:\PLANNING\CO REL \ PLANNING'APPS\PCA\2018
EXHIBIT 3
L:\PLANNING\C O R E L\ P LA N N I N G\A P P S\PCA\2016
6,/yo�
DICKERING
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: P/CA 13/18
Date: March 7, 2018
From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 13/18
K. Ngo
862 Fairview Avenue
Application
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended to permit a minimum rear
yard depth of 5.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to construct a one -storey addition to
the detached dwelling currently under construction.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature,
desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent
and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval
of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the one -storey addition, as generally sited and outlined on
the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
March 9, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void.
Background
Minor Variance Application P/CA 12/17 was approved for the subject property on
February 15, 2017 to permit a front yard depth of 4.6 metres (7.5 metres required), a minimum
flankage yard depth of 6.6 metres (7.5 metres required) and to recognize an existing
uncovered platform and steps (deck) 0.6 metres in height projecting 3.5 metres into the
required rear yard.
The applicant is now proposing an addition (sunroom) in place of the existing uncovered
platform (deck) in the rear yard.
Report P/CA 13/18 March 7, 2018
Page 2
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential — Low Density Areas" within the Bay Ridges
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 2520, as amended — "RM1"
Appropriateness of the Application
Reduced Rear Yard Depth Variance
The intent of the minimum rear yard setback is to ensure adequate amenity space is provided
within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting
property owners and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage.
The by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant has requested a
minimum rear yard depth of 5.0 metres to accommodate a proposed one -storey addition.
The proposed development will maintain a lot coverage of 32.6 percent, meeting the maximum
lot coverage requirement of 33 percent and leaving an appropriate amount of the property
uncovered by structures. An appropriate amount of useable amenity will be maintained in the
rear and flankage yards, a portion of the flankage yard is proposed to be fenced to
accommodate a sizeable private amenity area.
The proposed variance will have minimal impact on the privacy of abutting property owners as
the addition is one -storey in height, backs onto the side yard and driveway of the adjacent
property to the west, abuts an accessory building located in the rear yard of the adjacent
property to the north and will maintain the existing side yard setback.
Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the
appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan
and Zoning By-law.
Input From Other Sources
Engineering Services
Date of report: February 28, 2018
Comments prepared by:
Rory McNeil
Planner I
RM:DW:bs
JaDocuments\Development0D-3700\2018\PCA 13-18\Report\PCA 13-18 Reped.doc
Attachments
• no comments on the application
Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Exhibit 1
log
figior
i
/
Subject
Lands
Radom Street
1)
ew Avenue
Browning Avenue
a
Waterpomt
co
0
0
0
0
LL
St
a>
a>
Q
0
0
Haller Avenue
Old Orchard Avenue
Tatra Drive
to
Naroch Boule
Patmore Lane
-o
co
0
0
Monica Cook Place
eet
Ilona Park Road
Gull
•
m
0
'c
0
i
Luna Court
IR fa
4
Location Map
File: P/CA 13/18
PICKERING
City Development
Department
Applicant: K. Ngo
Property Description: Plan M16 Lot 1248
(862 Fairview Avenue)
Date: Feb. 01, 2018
The Corpotattan of the City of Prckenng Producad(in part)under lkense from:ca Omens Pnrter,Qizda Merl stry of Natural Resources.
All rights reserved. O Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Rep admen of Natural Resources. AA dglts reserved .;
E)Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its supplkrs elf rights reserved.;® Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and Its stpplers al iigts reserved.;
SCALE. 1.5 n�0�
THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY.
3n1v3nV sd]onoa
0
U
r
w
F-
a.w
Z
a_ J
(II
D Q)
L L
E
C_
EeL
+'
Ea)
4.5 -c3
Q -2
o
—Y—Y—Fri—F
09L9
1
09L1
10
Z
U O
Wz2O ,AA\`
W 001 W 0> W M ,
04W 6 crzar \�
Ow0-4- PI
W o w x 0 0 0 'i
m
N W \O
. \2\,\`•
k. '::
/ 0 OO (I
a O
o -o
a qit
-- 1 •
OZZL
Z999
ZL8L
x x x
l8t
£699
99Z
6Z LL
(0
0
9Y 14rv4.4.4 T 4 .Y) i�pJ
•
9Y 7 4 . .Y)
Z£64;
li ars 1— Dw WO WJ
nfvc 1 0 0 0 M WI -
w0 Zw 1—
z Om 00
0m ce co ix
Q
00 0 0 a
0WO
0 N H
N Na
0 0 W W
0 Cl W
W OZ
Z
oW
M
z�
0
z
>-
z
0 Q
a cc
J W
0
a1—
Q 1-
0 0
Z U
(i)
X 0
W 0
1
Submitted Plan
co
a)
U
0
O
z
a)
1-
co
N
O
J
2
co0
0
0.
U)
0)
0
O
L
0
a)
a)
co
LL
N
co
DATE: Feb. 21, 2018
0
w
w
0
0
U
w
O
w
Z
gW
ag
C01
xa
00
00
-w
a_
02
UO
Lij
UW
(0 0
J
J
LLO
L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLANN ING\APPS\PCA12018
C
� z
=
tri
.o-.0
Lai
0 CC
I-oLa-
lrn
80.25 GRADE
IXISDNG FOUNDATION
-u
O 0
?Oo
W
0 m 0
CC 0_ w
ECO
U z 01-
z LJ 7
U
U CC W
wo aZ
0 Z O
0 W r W
�
W W Q
O w O W
CC d 0
View from Fairview Avenue
Submitted Elevation
z
as
DATE: Feb. 21, 2018
0
Z
w
0
ET_
LL
O
U
H
O
z
w
0
O
LL
w
0
W
Z
J
EL
u -a
LL W
O❑
wz
a
Oa
UO
UJ
w
i
0 UJ
N❑
J -
LL U
L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLAN N IN G\APPS\PCA \2018
,C ,C
O lal 0 O
O
H fY = U F- O
N
N
S -,t
/
/
./
CC
0 CC
w0a
~a0
W Q
Y 0
0 (7
W W
O N -
0 CC
N
O �
0 0
CC CL
as
N
0
cco
0
w
U)
0
00
�?O0
0 0 0
d W
lf
O rX
�3Z
W 0 0
Y U W
0
W
0 Z p
0wW
CC 0
(f)
O W U CC
o0U
CC 0
Submitted Elevation
P/CA 1 3/1 8
z
0
0)
z
c
0
a
DATE: Feb. 21, 2018
O
z
EC -
w
U
O
U
w
2
0
z
cc
w
0
O
w
3
w
zZ
-Jw
ag
co
2 a
I- w
0 0
00
wW
2
oa
wO
W
d) 0
J-
J -
u. 0
0
W o a
o a>
Uo
0
L:\PLANNING\C O R E L\P LA N N I N G\A P P S\PCA\2018
DICKERING
c4
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: P/CA 14/18
Date: March 7, 2018
From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 14/18
S. Kerr & A. Cillo
1904 Glenview Road
Application
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended to permit a covered
platform (porch) and associated steps not exceeding 1.5 metres in height above grade to
project a maximum of 1.9 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law requires that
uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade may project not
more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to
construct an addition to the existing detached dwelling.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature,
desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent
and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval
of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed covered porch and associated steps, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
March 9, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void.
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas - Low Density Areas" within the Liverpool
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036, as amended — "R3" — Detached Dwelling Third Density Zone
Report P/CA 14/18 March 7, 2018
Page 2
Appropriateness of the Application
Covered Platform (Porch) and Steps Projecting into the Required Front Yard Variance
The intent of the zoning by-law in permitting a maximum porch projection into the required front
yard is to ensure an adequate buffer space between the buildings and street activity is
provided, and to ensure an adequate landscaped area within the front yard is also maintained.
The bylaw permits uncovered steps and platforms not exceeding 1,0 metre in height above
grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard. The requested variance
is required to permit a covered porch and associated steps not exceeding 1.5 metres in height
to project a maximum of 1.9 metres into the required front yard.
The proposed covered porch and associated steps will leave 5.6 metres between the steps
and the front lot line, The proposed porch without the steps will be set back a minimum of
6.0 metres from the front lot line. Due to landscaping and a grade change, only the southerly
portion of the proposed covered porch will have a maximum height of 1.5 metres. The majority
of the porch and steps will be Tess than 1.0 metre in height.
The proposal will provide sufficient buffer space between the dwelling and Glenview Road,
maintain an adequate landscaped area within the front yard and will enhance the streetscape.
Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the
appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan
and Zoning By-law.
Input From Other Sources
Engineering Services • no comments on the application
Resident of 1908 Glenview Road • supports the minor variance application
Resident of 1910 Glenview Road • supports the minor variance application
Date of report: February 27, 2018
Comments prepared by:
Rory McNeil
Planner
RM:DW:bs
41*///1
Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
J;H]neumanlsDevelapinenK3.37o0.20181PCA 14.113 8, Karr & A. C111051UportlPCA 14.1a Rapan.aaa
Attachments
Exhibit 1
0
0
O
O
J
0
O
0
•
a
Brands Court
'O
0
0
O
J
Q
0.
O
a..
211111111111
011111111
imun11e�111111
ll�
11111111 I I 11111111
I1'
Subject
Lands
O
0)
.>
(0
0
0
O)
0
0
■■1 t
1111111111111111
1111111111111111111
11E11.1
MI
0
co
mum mug
2 . • . miv•• I.Aw
•
°aa 1�
a
(0
0
E
(0
u_
a
0
a
Diefenbaker Court
I ON
G.Y 4
Location Map
File: P/CA 14/18
P1CKE R1 NG
City Development
Department
Applicant: S. Kerr & A. Cillo
Property Description: Plan 509 Lot 38
(1904 Glenview Road)
Date: Feb. 08, 2018
s) fhe Corporation 0 the City of Plckenng Produced 0 pad)under license from: 0 Queens Prater, Ortano M3nstry 0 Natural Resources.
r)ghts reserved, 0 Her Majesty the Qua n In Right of Canada, Department of Natt al Resources. Ag rigHs reserved ;
0 Tenant Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers all tights reserved.; 0 Mutdelpal Property Assessment Corporation end its srppSers a® rigtts resessed,;
SCALE. 1:5,000All
THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY.
EXHIBIT 2
L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLANNING\APPS\PCA\201 B
M
1—
co m
W
L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLAN NING\APPS\PCA\2016
DICKERING
6461
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: P/CA 15/18
Date: March 7, 2018
From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 15/18
Nuteck Homes Ltd.
1827 Appleview Road
Application
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended:
• to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a
minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres
• to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part
of the detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of
1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of the detached dwelling
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the
construction of a two-storey single detached dwelling.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature,
desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent
and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval
of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed two-storey detached dwelling, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
Background
On September 24, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment conditionally approved Minor Variance
Application P/CA 68/14. The variances approved by the Committee permitted a minimum lot
frontage of 15.2 metres and minimum side yard setbacks of 1.5 metres for the subject
property. As a result of not fulfilling the required conditions by September 23, 2016, as set forth
in the Committee's September 24, 2014 decision, conditional approval of the application
lapsed. The property owner has submitted a new application requesting identical variances as
those approved by the Committee on September 24, 2014.
Report P/CA 15/18 March 7, 2018
Page 2
On. December 8, 2014, the Region of Durham Land Division Committee conditionally approved
Land Division Application LD 102/14. On June 27, 2016, the Region of Durham confirmed that
the applicant satisfied the required conditions of LD 102/14 and the lot at 1827 Appleview Road,
having a 15.2 metre lot frontage, was created. Subsequently, as noted above, the Committee
of Adjustment's conditional approval of Minor Variance Application P/CA 68/14 to permit a
15.2 metre lot frontage lapsed as the applicant did not fulfil the required conditions by
September 23, 2016.
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Dunbarton
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036 — "R3" — Third Density Residential Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Minimum Lot Frontage and Side Yard Setback Variances
The intent of the minimum lot frontage requirement of the zoning by-law is to ensure a usable
lot size that is compatible with the neighbourhood. The intent of the minimum side yard
setback requirement is to ensure an appropriate separation distance between structures on
abutting properties is maintained for pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading,
drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters.
The by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard setback
of 1.8 metres, where a garage is erected as part of the detached dwelling. The applicant has
requested a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard setback of
1.5 metres for both side yards.
Properties currently fronting along Appleview Road have lot frontages ranging between
15.0 metres and 45.0 metres. The proposed lot frontage of 15.2 metres will be in keeping with
the range of established frontages along Appleview Road. The proposed lot is appropriately
sized and will allow for the construction of a detached dwelling that is compatible and in
keeping with the character of the established neighbourhood.
The requested variance to reduce the minimum side yard setback from 1.8 metres to 1.5
metres will provide for appropriate separation distances between structures on abutting
properties in order to maintain pedestrian access, and accommodate grading, drainage and
residential services.
The requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the
land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
Report P/CA 15/18 March 7, 2018
Page 3
Input From Other Sources
Engineering Services
Date of report: February 27, 2018
Comments prepared by:
Cody
Planner I
CM:DW:jc
J:Documents\Development\D-3700@018'PCA 15-18\Report\PCA 15-18 Repod.doc
Attachments
• no comments on the application
Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Exhibit 1
VoocerAv Avenue
Strouds Lane
Wingarden Crescent
0
2
in
Welrus Street
tk
ookshire Squ. 4_
Bonita Avenue
0
0
Goldenndge Road
Rushton Road
O
CC
0
0
0
c
U
a)
m
CMN
NNW
MEE
MN_
_=
'474 747•74T4
Subject
Lands
WIN
0
U
c
as
as
0
Q
0)
0
U
O
d
0
O
1111 -Ina
IGlenanna Road
11112
10011.5/1111=
- _111111.
a)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0)
J
ammommom
- //1111E
LW=
aka.
.100
.4=
p
0)
(6
Ra hmore Cresce
c
a)
E
0
0
c
0
0
C4'4
Location Map
File: P/CA 15/18
PICKERING
City Development
Department
Applicant: Nuteck Homes
Property Description: Plan 1051 RCP Part of Lot 18 Now 40R28881 Part 1
(1827 Appleview Road)
Date: Feb. 20, 2018
bThe Corporation of the CAT of Pokenng Produced On port) under license from:t> Queens Pieter, Ortano !Mosby of Natural Nesovces.
AF rights reserved.;® Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Halve! Resources. A8 rights reserved.;
CTeranet Enterprises Inc. and ds suppers all rights reserved.;® Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and Its stpp!els el rfgHs reserved.;
SCALE. 1.5 r0��
THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY.
Exhibit 2
1827 APPLEVIEW RD
RCP 1051, PART 1
To permit a minimum
side yard setback of
1.5 metres
1.52m
1.52m
12.2m
.
Y
6
h
20.57m
PROPOSED TWO
STOREY HOME
LOT AREA= 1114.8 m2
GROUND FLOOR AREA= 245 m2
GROSS FLOOR AREA= 418 m2
LOT COVERAGE= 22%
1.52m
1.52m
14
Om
12.17m
To permit a minimum
lot frontage of 15.2
metres
APPLEVIEW
15.24
ROAD
Submitted Plan
C4
6'01
File No: P/CA 15/18
PICKERING
Applicant: Nuteck Homes
City Development
Property Description: Plan 1051 RCP Part of Lot 18 Now 40R28881 Part 1
Department
(1827 Appleview Road)
FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING
CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
DATE: Feb. 16, 2018
Exhibit 3
I000LT SIIIf1FS
TOP OF PLATE
lil
8,8 101051--
MICt VI.EM lt1) •8101061--
0
01In090R109)
FIN. SECOND FLOOR
_ FIN. fiR5T FLOOR_
FIN. GRADE
10' RUED CUC. MIN. V1)0
L16 m[. STRIP Kal14S
111)1. 4.-0. ¢E1[® GRCE
EOM
1
D OC �1
EWA
1
ISI
TOP OF SLAB
OP OF PLATE
FN, SECOND FLOOR
FIN, FIRST FLOOR
FIN. GRADE g
10' F41® ONO. F016 8416
61 %•61' ON.. 618IP FM1)0
TOP OF SLAB
32'-0"
o °d
PICKERING
City Development
Department
Submitted Elevation
File No: P/CA 15/18
Applicant: Nuteck Homes
Property Description: Plan 1051 RCP Part of Lot 18 Now 40R28881 Part 1
(1827 Appleview Road)
FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING
CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: Feb. 16, 2018
CGa o�F
DICKERING
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: P/CA 16/18
Date: March 7, 2018
From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 16/18
S. & K. Penton
958 Timmins Gardens
Application
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended;
• to permit a maximum lot coverage of 39 percent, whereas the by-law permits a
maximum lot coverage of 33 percent
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the
construction of a detached garage in the rear yard.
Recommendations
The City Development Department considers a maximum lot coverage of 39 percent to be
minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore
recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the detached garage, as generally sited and outlined on
the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 9, 2020,
or this decision shall become null and void.
Additional Information
There are two accessory structures (sheds) currently located on the subject property. The
applicant has advised that should the requested variance be approved to facilitate the new
detached garage, the two existing accessory structures will be removed.
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan— "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas"
Zoning By-law 2520 — "R4" — Residential Fourth Density Zone
Report P/CA 16/18 March 7, 2018
Page 2
Appropriateness of the Application
Maximum Lot Coverage Variance
The intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing
of a dwelling and accessory buildings is appropriate for the lot size and ensure an adequate
amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings. The zoning by-law permits a
maximum lot coverage of 33 percent.
The applicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum lot coverage to 39 percent in
order to account for the existing dwelling and attached carport, while allowing for the
construction of new detached garage in the rear yard.
The existing dwelling and attached carport currently have a combined lot coverage of almost
33 percent, therefore any additional structure on the property would exceed the maximum
permitted lot coverage. The proposed maximum lot coverage, which includes the existing
dwelling and carport and the new detached garage, will total 39 percent of the lot area.
The proposed garage will maintain the required setbacks from all lot lines and will not exceed
the maximum height requirement of the by-law, for accessory structures, which will minimize
any visual impacts on abutting property owners. The garage will be located entirely within the
rear yard, which will be in keeping with the character of the surrounding area as various
properties have detached garages located within the rear yard.
The proposed increase in lot coverage will not impact the scale or massing of the existing
detached dwelling or carport and the property will maintain a sufficient amount of outdoor
amenity space left uncovered by buildings within the rear yard.
The requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the
land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
Input From Other Sources
Engineering Services
Date of report: February 27, 2018
Comments prepared by:
Cody
Planner I
CM:DW:jc
J:tDocuments\Development\D-3700t2018\RCA 16-18\Report\PCA 16-18 Report.doc
Attachments
• no comments on the application
Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Exhibit 1
Kingston Road
N\ghfra`I 4p1
Hillcrest Road
Greycoat Lane
Sanok Drive
Vicki Drive
4*
Subject �, ..
Lynx AvenueLandsinn444
,
Ba shore • �
m y Court 'O, 4w
o�1kt 1
♦I �r
,.Sit
I•
�
Breezy Drive
64 4
Location Map
File: P/CA 16/18
PICKERING
City Development
Department
Applicant: S. & K. Penton
Property Description: Plan M17 Lot 428
(958 Timmins Gardens)
Date: Feb. 09, 2018
D The Corporaban el the Ctty ofPraire nng Produced On par) under license from ®Queens Fret er, Carbine hon stry of Natval Resevices.
Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Pep of Natural Resoces. AB Hefts reserved
AMI rights reserved.O vi
CTerenet Enterprises Inc, and its suppliers all rights reserved.;0 Municipal Property Assessrnert Corporation and Its svppters 0 dgtls reserved.;
SCALE. �.5 ����
THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY
N
t
K
W
L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLAN NING\APPS\PCA\2018
Cts �h
DICKERING
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: P/CA 17/18
Date: March 7, 2018
From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 17/18
D. Cillo
1910 Glenview Road
Application
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended to permit an accessory
building to be located in the side yard, whereas the by-law requires that all accessory buildings
which are not part of the main building shall be erected in the rear yard.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to
construct an accessory building in the side yard.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature,
desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent
and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval
of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed accessory building, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
March 9, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void.
Background
The applicant has confirmed that the proposed accessory building is intended for a personal
workshop/general storage and not intended for the parking of motor vehicles. As such, no
curb cut or driveway is proposed through the north end of the property. Parking is provided in
an existing attached garage on the south end of the property.
Report P/CA 17/18 March 7, 2018
Page 2
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Liverpool
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036, as amended — "R3" — Detached Dwelling Third Density Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Accessory Building in the Side Yard Variance
The intent of the requirement for accessory buildings to be located in the rear yard is to
maintain a visually attractive streetscape, maintain adequate buffer space between buildings
on a property and street activity and avoid adverse impact on the streetscape.
The proposed accessory building will have the same front yard depth as the existing detached
dwelling (10.5 metres) and a side yard width of 1.6 metres; exceeding the minimum setback
requirements for accessory buildings and maintaining a consistent front yard setback. The
proposed accessory building will have minimal impact on the streetscape as it is partially
screened by mature trees located in the front yard.
Based on aerial photography, it appears that numerous properties along Glenview Road have
accessory buildings located in side yards including 1904, 1908, 1922 and 1926
Glenview Road. An accessory building located in the side yard is in keeping with the character
of the neighbourhood.
Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the
appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan
and Zoning By-law.
Input From Other Sources
Engineering Services
Resident of 1904 Glenview Road
Resident of 1908 Glenview Road
Date of report: February 28, 2018
Comments prepared by:
Rory McNeil
Planner I
RM:DW:bs
J:\Documents\Development0-3700 \2018WCA 17-18 D. Ci11o\ReportPCA 14-18 Repon.doc
Attachments
• no comments on the application
• supportive of the minor variance application
• supportive of the minor variance application
1
/i
Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner, Development Review
Exhibit 1
Everton Street
Brands Court
as
O
'O
N
CI)
0
O
as
0
0
o
J
-11111111111111
as
0
0
0)
a)
Subject
Lands -
-
fd
0
he
Diefenbaker Court
dim
CIL', 4
Location Map
File: P/CA 17/18
PICKERING
City Development
Department
Applicant: D. Cillo
Property Description: Plan 509 Lot 36
(1910 Glenview Road)
Date: Feb. 09, 2018
H The Corpotaton of the Crty of Prckenng Produced On part) under hcense (Tom: 0 Queers Pnrter, (Marto Kra shy of Natural Resovices.
Ail tights reserved ,, Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resaurtes. All rigid: reserved
0Teranel Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.;® Municipal Property Assessment Corporetcnard its styptersat rolls reseed;
SCALE. 1.5�00�
THIS IS tIOT A PLAN OF SURVEY
Exhibit 2
•
%M
4
/7, ,
(30,
rn 9
4
a,
To permit an
accessory building
(detached garage)
to be located in the
sideyard
'n 1
3• Sm
/o „5-0,.)
.z.....;
64
Submitted Plan
4
PICKERING
City Development
Department
File No: P/CA 17/18
Applicant: D. Cillo
Property Description: Plan 509 Lot 36
(1910 Glenview Road)
FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING DATE: Feb. 16, 2018
CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.