Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNovember 6, 2017CZy PJCKER1NG Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, November 6, 2017 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Butt Present: Mayor Ryan Councillors: K. Ashe M. Brenner S. Butt I. Cumming B. McLean D. Pickles Also Present: T. Prevedel P. Bigioni C. Rose J. Brooks N. Surti L. Harker D. Jacobs K. Power D. Wylie L. Roberts - Chief Administrative Officer - Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor - Chief Planner - Manager, Policy & Geomatics - Manager, Development Review & Urban Design - Deputy Clerk - Principal Planner — Policy - Principal Planner - Policy - Principal Planner, Development Review - Committee Coordinator (1) Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. (II) Part "A" Information Reports Councillor Butt, Chair, gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Meeting under the Planning Act. He outlined the notification process procedures and also noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City before the by-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. 1 CZy PJCKER1NG Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, November 6, 2017 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Butt C. Rose, Chief Planner, appeared before the Committee to act as facilitator for the public portion of the meeting, explaining the process for discussion purposes as well as the order of speakers. 1 Information Report No. 09-17 Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 17-002/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 02/17 2388116 Ontario Inc. Part of Lot 5, and Lots 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Plan M-89 (1280, 1288, 1290, 1292 and 1294 Wharf Street, and 607 Annland Street) A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to the above -noted application. D. Wylie, Principal Planner, Development Review, appeared before the Committee, and through the aid of a power point presentation, provided an outline of the proposed application. She noted the application is proposing an 8 storey condominium apartment building consisting of 118 dwelling units with an overall height of 27.5 metres. She also provided an overview of public comments received to date. John McDermott, McDermott & Associates Limited, appeared before the Committee representing the applicant, in support of the application. He noted that the re- development of the Wharf Street properties would not contribute to urban sprawl or adversely impact the economic base, and that it would assist in creating a sustainable and complete community. He also stated that they had looked at the Natural Heritage features, assessments and guidelines and had determined no negative impacts. He stated that it meets the transit density targets within the Provincial guidelines, as well as long term planning studies conducted. David Steele, 988 Timmins Garden, Pickering, appeared before the Committee on behalf of the Pickering West Shore Community Association, to outline a number of strong objections with regards to the proposed development. He outlined them as follows; • More appropriate in a location where high density already exists; • Substantial investments have been made in the construction of Progress Frenchman's Bay Park, nautical themed streetscape and waterfront along Annland Street and Liverpool Road, Millennium Square, Beachfront Park and related parking facilities; • 9 Million in investments by the Federal and Provincial Governments in the safe harbor entrance to Frenchman's Bay; • Ensure the continued marina uses; 2 CZy PJCKER1NG Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, November 6, 2017 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Butt • Appropriateness of intensification in waterfront places; • Must be sensitive to the natural environment. In closing, Mr. Steele stated that residential development should only be allowed here if the applicant can demonstrate how marina uses and the economic viability of the Nautical Village will be maintained. Gary Peck, 591 Liverpool Road, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, noting that the Liverpool Road Waterfront Development guidelines are being ignored. He stated that this proposal does not protect the character of the historic village, and does not meet the defined criteria, noting buildings south of Annland Street should be limited to three storeys. He questioned what would happen with the Port Restaurant if the applicant is successful, whether it would fall below the minimum area requirements for a marina. He also noted concerns for a loss of boat storage, marine fuel, seasonal boat slips and other amenities associated with a marina. He also noted concerns with respect to height restrictions and how this would impact air traffic. He stated there were a number of errors and inconsistencies with the traffic impact study, noting the studies should be conducted during the busiest summer months. He felt the applicant should commission an evacuation study as well. Kevin Tate, 1278 Commerce Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, stating concerns with respect to parking and safety. He stated that a number of residents had moved here in order to avoid over -crowding. He also noted the development should be limited to 3 storeys with a minimum of 2 parking spaces per unit, with visitor parking taken into consideration as well, and that the number of residents opposed to this development should be recognized. Tammy Mackey, 1278 Commerce Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, stating that the 8 storey development does not respect the street pattern and is out of character with the existing area. She felt it would negatively impact the current amenities, and does not allow sufficient greenspace, and noted concerns for tree preservation. She also noted her concerns with respect to privacy, safety, parking, volume of traffic and noise. Lynn Dunning, 853 Fairview Avenue, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, noting her disagreement with larger homes on small properties and concerns over property values. She also questioned what would happen once the school property gets built up and the increase in traffic. Terry Allen, 1280 Commerce Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, stating this was a bad location for this development, noting 3 PJCKER1NG Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, November 6, 2017 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Butt the creation of a waterfront task force in 1999, where millions had been spent on developing the nautical village. He also stated the density was too high. Sylvain Trepanier, 822 Douglas Avenue, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, stating that while he is not opposed to development, he felt the traffic study should have taken into consideration resident's routes, and been expanded beyond Liverpool Road. He also noted the development did not fit into the existing character, and that the area should be kept low density. Jeff O'Donnell, #4-1295 Wharf Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, noting Frenchman's Bay is a Provincially significant wetland and should be protected. He stated that all levels of government had spent millions protecting the Bay, and that some marina uses have already been lost. He felt this application would set a bad precedent and felt that marina use should be a priority. He also noted concerns with respect to evacuation procedures and a lack of parking, as residents would use the Port Restaurant parking, which is already filled to capacity, and worsen the parking issues in the area. He felt there should be 2 parking spaces for each unit with .5 for visitor parking per unit. He also stated this development would drastically reduce the enjoyment of their homes and negatively impact their quality of life. Jacqueline Smart, 829 Fairview Avenue, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, stating her objection to the fact that this application has gone before the Ontario Municipal Board prior to receiving all public comments. Cleveland Gervais, 1309 Wharf Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, noting his agreement with respect to parking concerns, and also noting the lack of dedicated bike lanes. He also questioned why such a high population was allowed in Pickering within the 3 km zone of a nuclear power plant. Anthony Timperio, 853 Fairview Avenue, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, noting concerns for the number of cars, questioning what would happen once the school property is developed and traffic increases. Jill Adams, 1285 Commerce Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application and requested a copy of Mr. McDermott's presentation. Thomas Dalzell, 1285 Commerce Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, stating that consideration should be given to the fact that this area benefits all of Pickering. He also noted concerns over the location for vehicle access. 4 PJCKER1NG Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, November 6, 2017 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Butt Sedat Asimi, 661 Front Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, stating he was in agreement with previous concerns, and questioned what will happen once digging begins. He noted he resides across the street and stated concerns over disruption of the water table. Terry Allen returned to question where the lay down area for construction would be located. He stated this development would require building materials, construction trailer, equipment and questioned where this would this be located. He stated this development could not be built on this footprint, and that it would completely disrupt the entire neighbourhood for many years. Ning Zhao, 1204 Monica Cook Place, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, stating she is involved with Dragon Boating at the Bay and noted concerns over parking. Frank, a Pickering resident, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application. Gwyneth Dalzell, 1285 Commerce Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, noting she felt this would alter the community in a way that would make it unrecognizable, stating that youth are concerned with the direction the City is taking, and that they should ensure a place for youth in the community. Cleveland Gervais returned to state concerns with respect to groundwater, given the proximity to Frenchman's Bay which is below groundwater level. Paul Demczak, 655 Annland Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, noting his agreement with respect to the concerns noted by previous delegates, stating he felt this development is making no effort to integrate into the built form of the surrounding community, and felt the developer needs better design. David Wallace, 681 Pleasant Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application. Barry Farquharson, 675 Front Road, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in opposition to the application, questioning the timing of next application on the agenda dealing with height restrictions. A discussion period ensued with respect to the main areas of concerns noted by residents which were identified as parking, density, urban design, shadowing, water table and construction plans. Comments were also noted with respect to the perception 5 PJCKER1NG Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, November 6, 2017 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Butt residents had at the October public meeting held by the developer. Also questioned were growth targets, the timeframes involved with respect to this going before the OMB prior to the completion of public consultations. Members also questioned how this proposal would support marine use. Staff were requested to look into addressing what the intent was with respect to the marine use designation and the nautical village during the 2006 discussions, ensure what criteria went into the planning, interpretation of "waterfront place", incorporate the pending studies and how they could impact this proposal, as well as previous studies underway. Staff were also requested to clarify parking ratios and traffic studies. The Committee took a ten minute recess and reconvened at 9:15 pm 2. Information Report No. 10-17 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP -2017-04 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP -2017-02 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 07/17 Madison Brock Limited Part of Lot 19, Concession 3; Parts 2,3,4 and 5, 40R-26764 Part 40, 40R-6934; and Part 2, 40R-29605 (2480 and 2510 Brock Road) A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to the above -noted application. D. Wylie, appeared before the Committee and through the aid of a power point presentation, provided an outline of the proposed application, noting that no public comments had been received to date. Jennifer Mastry, KLM Planning, appeared before the Committee on behalf of the applicant, in support of the application. She noted she was in attendance to answer any questions raised. No members of the public appeared in support of or in opposition to the application. Discussion ensued with Members seeking clarification on the location of the sales site, number of parking spaces, sidewalk location and whether the School Board was aware of the proposal. 3. Information Report No. 08-17 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 09/17 City Initiated: Maximum Building Height 6 CZy PJCKER1NG Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, November 6, 2017 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Butt A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to the above -noted application. K. Power appeared before the Committee and through the aid of a power point presentation, outlined the proposed amendments to By-law 2511 in order to regulate the maximum building height in established neighbourhoods that currently do not have regulations. She noted the maximum building height being proposed is 9.0 metres in "R3" and "R4" zones which would incorporate the Rosebank, West Shore and Bay Ridges neighbourhoods. She outlined the notification procedures which were completed, explaining the rationale for the amendments. She also provided an outline of the comments raised at the October 30th open house. David Steele, 988 Timmins Garden, Pickering, was not in attendance for his delegation, but provided a copy of his submission. Paul White, 507 Cliffview Road, Pickering, appeared on behalf of the Fairport Beach Resident's Association, commenting on the various different rooflines. He referred to character studies conducted by Halton Hills, where large home re -builds are taking place in mature neighbourhoods, noting this would be a good example for the City to follow. He stated that 9.0 metres is a good start and noted it should move along as quickly as possible. He also noted that he supports development, but would like to see some controls to allow for staff input. Marie Hardie -Beaudoin, 734 Leaside Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee, noting that after attending the Open House in October, she discovered that West Shore is covered by By-law 2520 which has a height restriction of 10.5 metres, whereas the amendment to By-law 2511 is proposing 9.0 metres. She felt standardized height restrictions should be implemented to 9.0 metres at grade level, noting they should be built according to existing structures. She also commented on the number of homes being built above grade. She also requested that consideration be given to the environment impacts on the area. Craig Marshall, 714 Simpson Avenue, Pickering, appeared before the Committee to recommend a maximum height of 10.5 metres, and to maintain 2 storey dwellings. He also noted that people want 9 and 10 foot ceilings and also stated that 9.0 metres could have a negative impact by decreasing property values. Paul White returned to state a desire to see a policy or by-law implemented to regulate building height. 7 CZy PJCKER1NG Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, November 6, 2017 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Butt Marie Hardie -Beaudoin returned to remind Members of Durham Region's Age -Friendly community plan and requested that Pickering look into the scope of an age -friendly community as well when reviewing by-laws. Jacqueline Smart, 829 Fairview Avenue, Pickering, appeared before the Committee stating that a number of new homes by the Bay were flooded this year, and that homes in the area should not have basements. She stated that builders should do their due diligence when building in areas such as this. Susan Bullock, 669 Pleasant Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee, stating the maximum height should be 8 or 9.0 metres and noted that some residents plan to stay in their neighbourhood and are not concerned with resale values. Rick Gayford, 916 Cecilia Court, Pickering, appeared before the Committee in support of the 9.0 metre height for all areas, and also in agreement with two storey limits. He also agreed there should not be basements and noted his concerns with shadowing and flooding. He noted this requires careful consideration, as this could be a precedent setting decision. He questioned how it is measured, and felt inspections should be conducted part way through the building process. Thomas Dalzell, 1285 Commerce Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee noting his concerns for property values with the change in height restrictions. He noted this is a unique area of homes and felt the 9.0 metre restriction would not protect the area. He also noted concerns for diminished views. Paul Demczak, 655 Annland Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee, noting that Oakville had updated their Official Plan policies and zoning by-laws similar to what this report is proposing in order to mitigate monster homes, and saw mixed results, noting that residents want higher ceilings. He also recommended that Council implement an interim control by-law at 10 — 10.5 metres until such time as the character study has been completed. Terry Allen, 1280 Commerce Street, Pickering, appeared before the Committee noting there seems to be some confusion on where the height is measured from. A discussion period ensued with Members seeking clarification on how the height is measured and the term "interim control by-law". Staff noted the objective is to get controls in areas where they currently do not exist. (III) Part "B" Planning & Development Reports 8 CZy PJCKER1NG Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, November 6, 2017 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Butt 1 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 17-17 Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 15-004/P Amendment 27 to the Pickering Official Plan Informational Revision 22 to the Pickering Official Plan City Initiated Official Plan review: The Environmental and Countryside Carolyn Molinari, CM Planning Inc., appeared before the Committee on behalf of Fourteen Estates to request a modification to the definition of "landscape industry" within Amendment 27 of the Pickering Official Plan's to allow for an increase in size and to allow for a retail business. Staff were requested to follow up with the applicant prior to the next Council meeting. Recommendation Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Mayor Ryan 1. That the Region of Durham be advised that Pickering Council concurs with the proposed modifications to Amendment 27 to the Pickering Official Plan, as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 17-17; 2. That Council approve the modifications to Informational Revision 22 to the Pickering Official Plan, arising from related modifications to Amendment 27, as set out in Appendix II to Report PLN 17-17; 3. That the Region of Durham be requested to defer the identification of a portion of the significant wetlands and a portion of the significant woodlot on the lands located west of Church Street and north of Bayly Street, on Schedules I (Sheet 1), IIIA, IIIB and IIIC to Amendment 27, as identified on Attachments #1 to #4 to Report PLN 17-17, to allow for further discussion between the landowner, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Region of Durham, and the City of Pickering; and 4. That a copy of Report PLN 17-17 and Council's Resolution be forwarded to Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Region of Durham, Triple Properties, and Geranium Corporation. (IV) Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 10:35 pm. 9 Carried