Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 24, 2016 pickering.ca Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 10 Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Lesley Dunne T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 Email ldunne@pickering.ca Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, August 24, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from August 3, 2016 1-9 (III) Reports 1. (Deferred at the August 3, 2016 meeting) P/CA 36/16 R. David 435 Foxwood Trail 10-14 2. P/CA 45/16 OPB Realty Inc. 1809 Liverpool Road 15-21 3. P/CA 47/16 G. & K. Dennis 1738 Greenvale Crescent 22-26 4. P/CA 48/16 & P/CA 49/16 A. & G. Snyders 1885 Appleview Road 27-31 (IV) Adjournment ----------------------------------- -C~o~­ PJCKERJNG Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland-Vice-Chair David Johnson -Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle Also Present Melissa Markham, Secretary-Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Absent Sean Wiley (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes VVednesday,August3,2016 7:00pm Main Committee Room That the agenda for the Wednesday, August 3, 2016 meeting be adopted. (II) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Denise Rundle . Carried Unanimously That the minutes of the 8th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, July 13, 2016 be adopted. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 9 1 2 (Ill) Reports 1. (Tabled at the April 20, 2016 meeting) PICA 15116 A. Sparks 1885 Spruce Hill Road Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes VVednesday,August3,2016 7:00pm Main Committee Room That application PICA 15116 by A. Sparks be lifted from the table. Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum north side yard width of 1.2 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent; whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed parcel (fronting Grayabbey Court) through Land Division application LD 029116. · The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no objections to the proposed development. Written comments were also received from Deborah & .Jamie Holbrook of 1809 Grayabbey Court in objection to the application. Written correspondence received from Deborah & Jamie Holbrook. stated that, . with the large lot frontage, 2 large homes can be accommodated without any vari?nces being granted; side yard setbacks between the subject properties and the increase in lot coverage are not necessary and is not in keeping with the current neighbourhood design and could potentially impact property values on Grayabbey Court. Deborah & Jamie Holbrook also expressed a concern with the first floor drawings that include guest bedrooms that could potentially be used a multiple family dwelling. Page 2 of 9 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, August 3, 2016 7:00pm Main Committee Room Amanda Lazaridis, agent, was present to represent the application. Michael Mahoney of 1813 Grayabby Court and James Dutkiewicz of 1811 Grayabbey Court were present in objection to the application. Amanda Lazaridis stated that conceptual site plans were prepared and submitted to the City and concerned residents that were in attendance at the last meeting. Michael Mahoney expressed a concern with the conceptual plans that where provided by the agent prior to the meeting and feels there will be changes during the building process and questioned the architectural control of the proposed dwellings. In response to concerns from residents, Amanda Lazaridis stated there is no intent to build modern dwellings. The dwellings are intended to be in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. The Secretary-Treasurer explained that these applications will not be heard by the Site Plan Committee, only Building Permits will be required. James Dutkiewicz questioned why minor variances are considered on properties where standards have been set and feels these are not minor variances. Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 15/16 by A. Sparks, be Approved on the grounds that the minimum north side yard width of 1.2 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent, are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed two-storey detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application LD 029/16 by May 29, 2017 or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by. August 3, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 3 of 9 3 r------- 1 4 2. (Tabled at the April 20, 2016 meeting) PICA 16116 S. & H. Sparks 1891 Spruce Hill Road Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes VVednesday,August3,2016 7:00pm Main Committee Room That application PICA 16116 by S. & H. Sparks be lifted from the table. Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum south side yard width of 1.2 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent; whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed parcel (fronting Grayabbey Court) through Land Division application LD 030116. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written- comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no objections to the proposed development. Written comments were also received from Deborah & Jamie Holbrook of 1809 Grayabbey Court in objection to the application. Written correspondence received from Deborah & Jamie Holbrook stated that, with the large lot frontage, 2 large homes can be accommodated without any variances being granted; side yard setbacks between the subject properties and the increase in lot coverage are not necessary and is not in keeping with the current neighbourhood design and could potentially impact property values on Grayabbey Court. Deborah & Jamie Holbrook also expressed a concern with the first floor drawings that include guest bedrooms that could potentially be used a multiple family dwelling. Amanda Lazaridis, agent, was present to represent the application. Michael Mahoney of 1813 Grayabby Court and James Dutkiewicz of 1811 Grayabbey Court were present in objection to the applications. Page 4 of 9 -C~of­ PJCKERJNG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes VVednesday,August3,2016 7:00pm Main Committee Room Amanda Lazaridis stated that conceptual site plans were prepared and submitted to the City and concerned residents that were in attendance at the last meeting. Michael Mahoney expressed a concern with the conceptual plans that where provided by the agent prior to the meeting and feels there will be Changes during the building process and questioned the architectural control of the proposed dwellings. In response to concerns from residents, Amanda Lazaridis stated there is no intent to build modern dwellings. The dwellings are intended to be in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. The Secretary-Treasurer explained that these applications will not be heard by the Site Plan Committee, only Building Permits will be required. James Dutkiewicz questioned why minor variances are considered on properties where standards have been set and feels these are not minor variances. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That application PICA 16/16 by S. & H. Sparks, be Approved on the grounds that the minimum south side yard width of 1.2 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent, are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed two-storey detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application LD 030/16 by May 29,2017, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 3, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 5 of 9 5 6 3. (Deferred at the July 13, 2016 meeting) PICA 36/16 R. David 435 Foxwood Trial Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, August 3, 2016 7:00pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6987/09, to recognize: o an existing accessory structure (Shed A) with height of 2.5 metres, setback 0.4 of a metre from the south lot line and 0.3 of a metre from the west lot line; whereas the by-law requires accessory structures, greater than 1.8 metres in height to be setback a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines o an existing accessory structure (Shed B) with height of 2.5 metres, setback 0.4 of a metre from the south and east lot line; whereas the by-law requires accessory structures, greater than 1.8 metres in height to be setback a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to recognize the location of two existing accessory structures (sheds) in the rear yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending refusal. The applicant/agent was not in attendance. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by· Eric Newton That application PICA 36/16 by R. David, be Deferred to the next meeting to allow the applicant to be present to answer questions from Committee Members. Carried Unanimously Page 6 of 9 -C~o~­ PJCKERJNG 4. PICA 43/16 Chaldishur Investments Inc. 1144 Kingston Road Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes VVednesday,August3,2016 7:00pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7432/15 to permit a parking area to be setback 0.0 metres from side lot lines, whereas the by-law requires parking areas to be setback a minimum of 1 .5 metres from side lot lines. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain site plan approval for a two-storey medical/commercial building. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no comments on the application. Adrian Litavski, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Adrian Litavski provided an overview of the application. He stated that the zoning by-law for the proposed development was approved in 2015. He stated that the proposed development has not changed from the original concept, however the setback to parking areas was included in the zoning by-law in error. He explained thatthe location of the proposed development only allows for a right-in entrance along Kingston Road, all traffic exiting the site will be through an access easement across the property to the east, to Walnut Lane. This access easement to the rear of the property has no setback from property lines, and therefore a variance, from the approved site specific zoning by-law, is required. Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 43/16 by Chaldishur Investments Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the parking area to be setback 0.0 metres from the side lot lines, is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed two-storey medical/commercial building and parking areas, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Page 7 of 9 ------------------------------ 7 8 -C~()f­ pJ(KERlNG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes VVednesday,August3,2016 7:00pm Main Committee Room 2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed development by August 3, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. 5. PICA 44116 S. Stavrev & E. Cooney 1430 Rosebank Road Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, to permit a minimum north side yard setback of 0.7 metres to an unenclosed covered carport, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an unenclosed covered carport. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no comments on the application. Steve Stavrev, owner, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Steve Stavrev stated that the purpose of the application is to replace an existing unenclosed covered carport. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Tom Copeland That application PICA 44116 by S. Stavrev & E. Cooney, be Approved on the grounds that the minimum north side yard setback of 0.7 metres to an unenclosed covered carport, is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the unenclosed covered carport, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 3, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 8 of 9 -Cdf;of- .PJCKERJNG (IV) Adjournment Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Denise Rundle Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, August 3, 2016 7:00pm Main Committee Room That the 9th meeting of the 2016 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:41 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on VVednesday,August24, 2016. Carried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretc;~ry-Treasurer Page 9 of 9 9 From: Subject: Application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 36116 Meeting Date: July 13, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 36116 R. David 435 Foxwood Trail The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6987109, to recognize: o an existing accessory structure (Shed A) with height of 2.5 metres, setback 0.4 of a metre · from the south lot line and 0.3 of a metre from the west lot line; whereas the by-law requires accessory structures, greater than 1.8 metres in height to be setback a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines o an existing accessory structure (Shed B) with height of 2.5 metres, setback 0.4 of a metre from the south and east lot line; whereas the by-law requires accessory structures, greater · than 1.8 metres in height to be setback a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to recognize the location of two existing accessory structures (sheds) in the rear yard. Background The Notice of Public Hearing, which was sent to residents within 60 metres of the subject site on June 28, 2016, stated that accessory structures (sheds) are required to be setback a minimum of 0.6 of a metre from all lot lines. However, the existing accessory structures · (sheds) are 2.5 metres in height, and therefore the By-law requires all accessory structures greater than 1.8 metres in height to be setback a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines. Recommendation The City Development Department considers an existing accessory structure (Shed A) with a height of 2.5 metres, setback 0.4 of a metre from the south lot line and 0.3 of a metre from the west lot line, and an existing accessory structure (Shed B) with a height of 2.5 metres, setback 0.4 of a metre from the south and east lot line, to be major variances, that are not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variances. Report PICA 36/16 July 13, 2016 11 Page 2 or If the applicant were to request that the application be amended to permit accessory structures with a maximum height of 2.5 metres to be setback 0.6 of a metre to all lot lines the following recommendation would apply: The City Development Department considers an existing accessory structure (Shed A) with a height of 2.5 metres, setback 0.6 of a metre from the south and west lot line, and an existing accessory structure (Shed B) with a height of 2.5 metres, setback 0.6 of a metre from the south and east lot line, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land; and in ke·eping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following condition: 1. That the applicant obtain zoning compliance through the relocation of the shed by September 13, 2016. Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as Urban Residential -Low Density Areas. · Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6987/09-"S-SD-4"-Single Residential Semi Detached Appropriateness of the Application Reduction of the Minimum Setback Requirement for Accessory Structures • the intent of the minimum 1.0 metre setback requirement for accessory structures, · greater than 1.8 metres in height, is to ensure that adequate space is available for maintenance, that the eaves/overhangs .do not encroach on adjacent properties, that roof drainage stays on the subject property, and that the visual impact on adjacent prope~ies is minimized • the owner is requesting to allow for an existing accessory structure.(Shed A) setback 0.4 of a metre from the south lot line and 0.3 of a metre from the west lot line, and an existing accessory structure (Shed B) setback 0.4 of a metre from the south and east lot line • the existing pool was constructed in 2014 and Shed A and B were both completed in the Spring of2016 • following the construction of the sheds an adjacent landowner expressed concern to the City's By-law Enforcement Division regarding the height of the existing sheds • a By-law Officer conducted a site visit and determined that the two sheds met the City's height requirement for accessory structures, however, noted that the sheds did not maintain the appropriate setbacks to the lot lines and had advised the owner that the sheds must be brought into compliance with the Zoning By-law • the current location of the sheds does not appear to provide for adequate space to maintain the accessory structures 1 2Report_ PICA 36/16 July'13, 2016 Page 3 o . the existing setbacks and eaves/overhangs do not ensure that roof drainage stays on the subject property o the existing height of the accessory structures has a visual impact on the adjacent property which coulq be minimized by increasing the setbacks. o staff is of the opinion that a minimum 0~6 metre setback from all property lines would ensure adequate space is available for maintenance and that eaves/overhangs would not encroach on adjacent properties _ o there is an existing wood privacy fence that has been erected along the perimeter of the rear and side yards, which minimizes the visual impact on adjacent property owners o staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are not minor in nature, do not meet the intent of the Zoning By-law, and are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department M. Rezvannia 1580 Autumn Crescent J. & C. Ferrari 433 Foxwood Trail S. & E. Facchini 437 Foxwood Trail Date of report: July 7, 2016 Comments prepared by: Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:Id J:\Documenls\Development\D-3700\2016\PCA 36-16\Report\PCA 36_16.doc Attachments . o staff have concern with the requested variance o engineering standards state that a minimum 0.6 of a metre from the property line is to remain undisturbed to allow for proper drainage of rainwater o no objection to location of the two sheds o no objection to the location and dimensions of the two·sheds o no objection to the location and dimen$ions of the two sheds Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP · Principal Planner-Development Review ·~ City Development Department Location Map SEPARATE SCHOOL LANE Wl:-----t--1 ~t==::t=j :::;;:J:-----t--1 ROSEBANK RESERVOIR := ....... f-+-,-----,-1. ~~===j L---1 oc·J:------1_.- ~-----r------~~ \------+------1~1-----L___I 'r-----+-----1~ 1------l '----,-----l~·t----L-.J FILE No: P/CA 36/t6 APPLICANT: R. David . HIGHBUSH PUBLIC SCHO AMBERLEA PARK PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part of Lot 3, Plan 505 and Part Block 166, Plan 40M-181 0, Part 2 and 9, 40R-25976 (435 Foxwood Trail) DATE: June10,2016 SCALE 1 :5000 PN-11 13 EXISTING llr'---~--+-- 1Lr-0.6m 1 I I I r ____ _j . EXITING 2 STOREY -DWELLING r_:m __ . GAZEBO c-. --t---1--b-.,.. E CD '-=--=------' (") 3.6m EXISTING POOL E C\1 (") (") : to recognize an existing :.,' accessory structure (Shed B) setback 0.4 of a metre 1 from the south and east lot line i 0.3m -----------------.. i L SHEDA SHED~· 0.4m to recognize an existing accessory structure (Shed A) setback 0.4 of a metre t from the south lot line and 1------' E 0.3 of a metre from the '!'::t west lot line 0 Submitted Plan Citq,~ FILE No: P/CA 36/16 APPLICANT: R. David 12.7m --~ , t E "": 0 ~ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part of Lot 3, Plan 505 and Part Block 166, City Development Department Plan 40M-1810, Part 2 and 9,40R~25976 (435 Foxwood Trail) FULL scALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING . j DATE: June 24,2016 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. . -Ct4o/- PJCKERJNG From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP 15 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 45116 Date: August 24, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Application Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 45116 OPB Realty Inc. 1809 Liverpool Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5994102 to permit a minimum building setback of 3.0 metres from Liverpool Road, whereas the by-law requires a minimum building setback of 9.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this application in order to obtain Site Plan Approval and a building permit to construct a free standing commercial building for a restaurant use. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a minimum building setback of 3.0 metres from Liverpool Road, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed building by August24, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 24, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. Background The Notice of Public Hearing included an additional variance to permit a structure (patio) to be erected a minimum of 17.5 metre to the centre line of Liverpool Road, whereas the by-law states that no building or structure shall be erected closer than 19.5 metres to the centre line of Liverpool Road. After further review, staff have determined that this variance is not required for the proposed development and has therefore been removed from the application. 1 6 Report PICA 45116 August24,2016 Page 2 On March 20, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment conditionally approved a previous Minor Variance application (PICA 17113) for the subject lands to permit a minimum building setback of3.0 metres to Liverpool Road. The application became null and void on March 20, 2015 since the conditions of approval were not completed. · Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as "Mixed Use Areas -City Centre" within the City Centre Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5994/02-"MCA"-Main Central Area, permits a wide range of commercial and retail uses. Appropriateness of the Application Building Setback from Liverpool Road Variance • the use of building setbacks within the implementing Zoning By-law is intended to provide an appropriate and functional setback for development of the subject lands and to ensure future buildings do not conflict with surrounding land uses • the by-law requires all buildings to be setback a minimum of 9.0 metres from Liverpool Road • the applicant is requesting a minimum 3.0 metre building setback from Liverpool Road to allow for the construction of a 960 square metre restaurant use • · the proposed building setback will provide an appropriate and functional building setback for the development of the subject lands • the application is in keeping with the Official Plan by locating the building closer to the street to create a direct and accessible relationship between the sidewalk and the building, and encourage pedestrian activity • there will be minimal adverse impacts on surrounding lands as other restaurant and commercial buildings have been approved to have reduced setbacks along Liverpool Road (Moxies Restaurant), Pickering Parkway (Beer Store), and Kingston Road (Jack Astor's Restaurant) • an adequate buffer space between the proposed building and the street will be maintained • the proposed development will provide for additional commercial development in the City Centre • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of · the land and maintain the intent of the Pickering Official Plan and zoning by-law Report PICA 45/16 Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department Region of Durham (Public Works Department) Date of report: August 18, 2016 Comments prepared by: August24,2016 17 Page 3 • no comments on the application • no objection to the variance application Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP Planner I Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review LP:MM:so J:\Documents\DeveJopment\D-3700\2016\PCA 45-16\Report\PCA 45-16.docx Attachments 18 --Ol:JI)I-- P1CKER1NG City Development Department Location Map _J 0 0 Q_ n:: w > ::J 0 <{ 0 n:: _J 0 0 Q_ n:: w > ::J FILE No: PICA 45/16 ~sUBJECT PROPERTY APPLICANT: OPB Realty Inc. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part of Lot 22. Concession 1 s. Plan 816 (1809 Liverpool Road) DATE: July 15, 2016 0Tho~olf>o0tyof---l.,P"'1-i<>n••O.:..: 00uoiOI-,OrotiMMmsl:yofNOIInlft,......,...loll __ , ~~:...~:..c::"'=::::a....Dop"':':...:=;::.~AII--::::.=' ....cl.,..,.h._.... .. __ .lHlSISI«lTAPI.N<Ot'SJP!VU. SCALE 1:5000 PN-14 - ~ o ~ ­ PJ ( K E R J N G Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t 0 ~ . -- . ~I' --- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' '" " ,·1 "~. '· '· )' • , '·, , " " " - - - ~ :, . , ~ C$: s ... . f) IC!!I ! I I I ! I I I . " ! ! I ! I I I I J : " I : I I I ! ! . " I I ! ! I I ! I ! I I ! I I I I ! I I I ! I . J J I I I I I I I : ~ -... _ ~ ~ ' <> t . , K R R I N O PA R I < W A V Ov e r a l l Si t e Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 45 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : OP B RE A L T Y IN C . PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Pa r t of Lo t 22 , Co n c e s s i o n 1 S, Pl a n 81 6 (1 8 0 9 Li v e r p o o l Road) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CIT Y OF PIC K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . 1' DATE: August 2, 201c!i:> @ !S T 1E~A T I O N - ~ o / ­ PJ C K E R J N G Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t ~S C M E : 1-1 ~ @_ !~- ~ ~ A l l O N Su b m i t t e d El e v a t i o n s FI L E No : P/ C A 45 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : OP B RE A L T Y IN C . PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Pa r t of Lo t 22 , Co n c e s s i o n 1 S, Pl a n 81 6 (1 8 0 9 Li v e r p o o l Road) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T DATE: August2,2016 ~ 0 (\J N' 1ii ::J Ol ::J <( w ~ c ........... "0 <U 0 a: 0 0 Q.. OV'OtJ lOOdH3/\Il ..... (].) > :..:::i 0) 0 co -r--c:.o -r-co c <U a.. Cf) -r- c .Q en en 0 (].) z (.) 0:: c w ~ 0 () () 0:: LJ._ 0 C\1 >-f-C\1 0 -w 0 I f-_J !;;: -0 0 z t:: ~ w <U > () a.. 0:: 0 z LJ._ z w ~ ...J 0 co :5 i= ~ <( c. <.: w w c:.o a: 0:: a: ..: -r-z~ -0 LO en ::iw r::: ""'" a.. en a.:;; ~ (§ 0 w ~~ c I<{ f-a_ c. t=-= LJ..W -r: oo "'C a.. z cnf--wz Cl) <( -w 0 a: a.:;; E 0 Oa_ z w uo E :::i c. W...J ...JW w 0 <.:> .0 c. uw ...J cno :::::1 c. a: g~ en U: <( c. u._() lJ ..... c z Q) ..... E c -Q.CD ~~ 0 E ~UJ rot > co I~ Q) a. 0 Q) >.0 ..... G 22 From: Subject: Application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 47116 Date: August 24, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 47116 G. & K. Dennis 1738 Greenvale Crescent The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1837184 & 1964185 to permit a rear yard depth of 5.8 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a one-storey ad_dition in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a minimum rear yard depth of 5.8 metres, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed one-storey addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 24, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain zoning compliance for the existing shed, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans by February 24, 2017. Additional Information During the review of the minor variance application, staff identified an existing shed in the rear yard which does not comply with the minimum setback requirements of the zoning by-law. The owner has agreed to move the existing shed 1.0 metre from all lot lines, to comply with the zoning by-law. Report P /CA 4 7/16 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law August 24, 2016 23 Page 2 Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Amberlea Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1837/34 & 1964/85-"S1"-Single Residential Zone. Appropriateness of the Application Reduction in Required Rear Yard Setback Variance • the intent of the minimum rear yard setback is to ensure adequate amenity space is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting property owners and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage • the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres • the applicant has requested a minimum rear yard depth of 5.8 metres to accommodate a proposed one-storey addition • the proposed development will maintain an appropriate amount of useable amenity space left uncovered by buildings in the rear yard • the proposed variance will have minimal impact on the privacy of abutting property owners as the addition is one storey in height and will maintain existing side yard setbacks • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department • no comments on the application Date of report: August 17,2016 Comments prepared by: Jt//1 .!JY/JdkrYL Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP . Principal Planner-Development Review CM:MM:so J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2016\PCA 47-16\Report\PCA 47-16.docx Attachments 24 t--Jl II r--t--r-- t--~\ ~~ - t--- t---t--- t--)---t-- t--1---t-- f-0 z z ::s w u t--- ~ (/) <( w 0 ~ u II II r--- t--t-- t-- -r--- WOODSMERE t-- t-- ll ll WOODS MERE ALTONA FOREST PARK PUBLIC SCHOOL 0 r-------~----------~6 ST. ELIZABETH SETON SEPARATE SCHOOL LANE Location Map ~ t----r---.. ,__L....I--;':;-;::::-:;::-'-V' FILE No:P/CA 47/16 APPLICANT: G. & K. Dennis HIGHBUSH PUBLIC SCHOOL --Cdt; ti-- PJCKERJNG PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 2o, Plan 40M-1402 (1738 Greenvale Crescent). City Development Department cn..c...-. ... ~ ... ay.,;PI<I~ .._il",...,.,._.,.,.,e...,. oa....,, __ ,....,....,.."Y"'~"...,.~.........,. ... ~~..-.· ~=~:.:.'::':. .. .::.or.:=:.~..::,·:.~~/.1"::~._.., .. ,..~ ............. ...,...-._-THmiSMOTO ......... OFSUA\>£¥. DATE: July 25, 2016 SCALE 1 :5000 PN-11 to pe r m i t a mi n i m u m re a r ya r d de p t h of 5. 8 me t r e s - ~ 6 1 - Pl C K E R l N G Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t · Ho. " " ' ;2 5 ' T O I < O ' I ' ER l G K DIE U . I N 5 EXI 5 T I N G SN I M M I N G PO O L 14 q , 1 SG ! ' T . , I o9 1 '1 - ) : - • / G \ ~ ' I I \ \J . I j _ ' IO O i i f . l S G . F T . ~ I • \, I Il l , , <c ' VI I '" J l l I/ \ \ ~~, , /' ~~~ \ ~/ ~ I L \\ 1 / N o . I T : l b 2 ST O R E Y - I I 6R J G K DrE I J . I N S srR e ~ . I~ G ARc H ~ ll~o ._ , L i N E ._ re e n v . - '1 . 8 4 · ' I ~· alec ~ V es e n t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 47 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : G. & K. De n n i s . PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Lo t 20 , Pl a n 40 M 1 4 0 2 (1 7 3 8 Gr e e n v a l e Cr e s c e n t ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CIT Y OF PIC K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . ~~ DATE: Ai,Jgust 2, 20tltl ~ - - -- AN I S H G E I L i t t : i --- , - , : : ~ = = = r = = = r = s = = = r = = = : ; = = = ~ C : = = = = = = ~ ; : : : r ~ - - FIN . :2 N D FL O O R 'il . n 2 e . l 1 L ~ - ­ PIN . l 5 T FL O O R I ex1 s n ~ 1 I ._ _ r G O N O R e T E I I I I l'( l ( . I O A n O N I I I I I I 'iZ~f,[ , [ J " . . , . , --- - t = = = = = = = = = = = c ~ - = = = = = = = = = = = = 5 : : : = = = = = = = = = = : 5 - - - - O f ; ; o / - PJ C K E R J N G Su b m i t t e d El e v a t i o n s FI L E No : P/ C A 47 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : G. & K. De n n i s EX I S T I N G RO O f '" " " ' - " " " ' DE G K ~ ~F L O O R - - - t;: - - - - :t t ! E 5 t 112 1 0 AS P t i - ' 1 - T ~ -== - = - - SI< I N O U ! S = II ~ EX I S n ~ i'I X J O D E G K EXI!rntttG '-./E5R.JCK flt>ISH ---- "l . = . . = _ :r~ m- -- - ---·----- Fit t . I S T R . O O R I ... I I . PIN I S H 6 A A D E I I I I EKI$11NS ._ _ r C O > t ; R f l " E Rit.!NDATTON I I ~ - - - _. - - - ~= = I ' - = = = = = = = = = = = · - - - - - @ ~~~ ~ H . (~If . ~ ~ -~~ E V A T I O N Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Lo t 20 , Pl a n 40 M 1 4 0 2 (1 7 3 8 Gr e e n v a l e Cr e s c e n t ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VIE W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . DATE: August 2, 2016 From: Subject: Applications Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to 27 Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: PICA 48116 & PICA 49116 Date: August 24, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Applications PICA 48116 & PICA 49116 A. & G. Snyders 1885 Appleview Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum lot fro~tage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres. The applicant requests approval of these minor variance applications in order to create one additional lot through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee to permit the construction of a detached dwelling on both the retained and severed parcels. Recommendation (PICA 48116 & PICA 49116) The City Development Department considers a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate ·development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtains final clearance for a future land severance by February 24, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void 3. That the applicant obtain building permits for the proposed construction by August 24, 2018, or this decision affecting the reduced side yard widths shall become null and void. 28 Report PICA 48116 & PICA 49116 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law August24,2016 Page 2 Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2423/87 -"R3"-Residential Third Density and "S2" -Single Detached Residential. Appropriateness of the Applications Reduced Lot Frontage and Side Yard Width Variances • the intent of a minimum lot frontage requirement is to ensure a usable lot size that is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood • . the intent of a minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate separation distance between structures on abutting properties in order to ensure compatibility with the existing neighbourhood, provide appropriate pedestrian access between dwellings, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters • the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres, however the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines permits a mi11imum lot frontage of 15.0 metres on existing roads • the applicant is proposing to sever the subject lands and create two lots, fronting Appleview Road, having a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1 .5 metres • the existing lot pattern surrounding the subject lands consist of minimum lot frontages of 15.0 metres and reduced side yard widths of 1.5 metres • the requested variance to reduce the minimum lot frontage and side yard width will create lots that are appropriately sized and will allow for the construction of two detached dwellings that are compatible and in keeping with the character of the established neighbourhood • the requested variances are minor in nature and maintain the intent and purpose of the Official Plan, the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines and the Zoning By-law Report PICA 48116 & PICA 49116 August24,2016 29 Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department • no comments on the application Date of report: August 17, 2016 Comments prepared by: Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP ·Planner II AE:MM:so 1/!Y[_. rn/(~ Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review J:\Documents\Development\0~3700\2016\.PCA 48-16 & PCA 49-16\Report\PCA 48-16 & PCA 49-16.docx Attachments Page 3 30 I R ~ - -H =\ -\ -\ -r-------~------~ ==r----~~---~ --Ofgci~-­ P1CKER1NG City Development Department ,....,_ 0 <( w 0 u 0:: ::::J l?f:Delf?D 0:: _J :;;: (L _J w Ul 2 :> Ul w ~ _J z 0 ::::J <( 0:: w w I Cf?r:s ~-m Cttvr Ul_ ~ FORESTBROOK P,t GLENANNA A JE Location Map Fl LE No: P /CA 48/16 and P /CA 49/16 APPLICANT: A. & G. Snyders PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: RCP Part Lot 4, Plan 1051 ,Part 3 Plan 40R-13746 (1885 Appleview Road) DATE: July 25, 2016 ~Tl>o~oi ... Ck>'ofP!cO"'"v P-lfnOO•I.-IoonooJ!t>m: !IO.Oont_,.,._....,.."Y .. ~-.i~CI-.... 11" • ..........., :~"*;!":."..~ .... ~;~ .. o.;:~:a!:;:.~;: ... ~-r.~~-.. '"-.... , ..... .._.:T>IIStS>IO!~!'V.>la'SI.IIl\<£Y. SCALE 1 :5000 PN-11 /} to pe r m i t a mi n i m u m si d e ya r d wi d t h of 1. 5 me t r e s ft - 1 C) L i N7 '2 9 ' 2 0 " E ( M s a 11\l jC : " - 0 r r - N '5 5 ' t o " E ( P } '!I E n 0 )> v v r fT l .• ~ (~~~OS) ~, ~---- - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ Kl_~ -~ ~ .& N I I ,· · - - - . ";: > " ~, ? ! I J ~ - o < fT l ~ ~ I - , No . 1~ I i ~ I 1 ST O R E Y 1 t' -~ BR I C K L c 10 . S t ( P ) 1 --n ::: : 0 ~10 . S 7 ( 1 d e a s ) - - - - - - - - )I it I )> 3 SIB !! I l~L . 0 I .._ . . E 'I L{' ) 1.. . . . . : ~. - L.O T () i P r- - - - T - - t ·. . : N7 2 ' 3 1 ' 3 0 " E ij -' rr= ; : : : : : : . :.:: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : , =·· · - = - - - . _.,.... . . , , _ . - ·--~ ~ = - ~ ~ - - - ~) ~ ... . . . p1 .. . :!.-~ t ; ; ' ~J jf ~,. o . : . : t l v ~---~- H7 2 ' 5 5 ' 1 0 " E ~) N7 2 ' 2 9 ' 2 0 " E IA a o a ) ~ PA R T 1 AR E A .. 11 4 4 . 1 ld 2. ... . . . . . E !L { ' ) f. . . . . . : to pe r m i t a mi n i m u m lo t fr o n t a g e of 15 . 2 me t r e s ~' 1 - - - - - • to pe r m i t a mi n i m u m si d e 1 ~ C d p o f ­ PJ C K E R J N G ya r d wi d t h of 1. 5 me t r e s Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 48 / 1 6 an d P/ C A 49 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : A. & G. Sn y d e r s "'0 F r~t CJ ~ ~ -l f- -·c ? r o )~· () l ~!: _.P A f ! T ~- AR E A • 1 1 . . a . , M r.: > L A h L . . . . 75:oa~M~as) ::.=c 75.12P) I 75.08 --&:jji ' !g ~ --\ .?? ~ .... 7a.OB{P<li:ldtKtR) --1' Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : RC P Pa r t Lo t 4, PL A N 10 5 1 , PA R T 3 Pl a n 40 R - 1 3 7 4 6 ( 1 8 8 5 Appleview Road) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . -~ QO 1 DATE: August 3, 201.S.