HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 28, 2015---~---------------------------
Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Meeting Number: 15
Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2015
(I) Adoption of Agenda
(II) Adoption of Minutes from October 7, 2015
(Ill) Reports
1. PICA 106115
J. Lynch
1971 Bowler Drive
2. PICA 107115
1864832 Ontario Limited
1300 Bayly Street
(IV) Adjournment
Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
Page Number
1-8
9-13
14-20
Accessible •--For information related to accessibility requirements please contact:
Lesley Dunne PICKE~G T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024
TTY 905.420.1739
Email ldunne@pickering.ca
Pending Adoption
Present:
Tom Copeland-Vice-Chair
David Johnson -Chair
Eric Newton
Denise Rundle
Also Present:
Amy Emm, Planner II
Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Absent:
Sean Wiley
Melissa Markham, Secretary-Treasurer
(I) Adoption of Agenda
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Tom Copeland
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
That th~ agenda for the Wednesday, October 7, 2015 meeting be adopted.
(II) Adoption of Minutes
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Tom Copeland
Carried Unanimously
That the minutes of the 13th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held
Wednesday, September 16, 2015 be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
Page 1 of 8
1
2
(Ill) . Reports
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
1. (Deferred at the September 16, 2015 meeting)
PICA 99115
J. Gatto & A. Siegel
4810 Brock Road
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended, to permit an
accessory building (detached garage) that is not part of the main building to be
located in the side yard; whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings that
are not part of the main building to be erected in the rear yard.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit to construct a detached garage to be located within the side yard.
The Planner II outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development
Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments
were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department
expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from the
Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee expressing no objection to the requested
variance.
Written comments were also received from Transport Canada expressing no
objection to the requested variance, as the proposed accessory structure is
located within an area subject to the Pickering Airport Site Zoning Regulations
(PASZR).
Joshua Gatto and Alexandra Siegel, owners, were present to represent the
application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to
the application.
In response to a question from a Committee Member, Joshua Gatto stated the
material used for the detached garage will match the main dWelling. Joshua
Gatto also stated he is working with the Pickering Heritage Committee to
determine the style of garage doors in order to receive a Heritage Permit.
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Tom Copeland
That application PICA 99115 by J. Gatto & A. Siegel, be Approved on the
grounds that the accessory building (detached garage) that is not part of the
main building to be located in the side yard, is minor in nature, desirable for the
appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and
purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following
conditions:
Page 2 of 8
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed accessory building (detached
garage), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by
October 6, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void.
2. PICA 101/15 to 103/15
A. & R. Agraso
523 Rougemount Drive
PICA 101115-Part 3 (Part Lot 46, Plan 350)
Carried Unanimously
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a
minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres
where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, whereas the by-law
requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of
1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling.
PICA 102115 -Parts 4 & 5 (Part Lot 46, Plan 350)
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a
minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres
where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, whereas the by-law
requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of
1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling.
PICA 103115-Part 6 (Part Lot 47, Plan 350)
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a
minimum lot frontage of 15.6 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.6 metres
where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, whereas the by-law
requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of
1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling.
The applicant requests approval of these minor variance applications in order to
create three lots fronting the future extension of Mountain Ash Drive through
Region of Durham Land Division Applications LD 121/15 to LD 124/15, and
obtain a building permit to construct a detached dwelling on each of the proposed
new lots.
Page 3 of 8
3
4 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
The Planner II outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development
Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments
were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department
expressing no concerns. ·
Written comments were received from Richard Amero of 534 Mountain Ash Drive
in objection to the applications. Written comments were also received from
Stephen Parent of 512 Oakwood Drive expressing a concern that smaller lots
and lot frontages will negatively change the character of the neighbourhood, will
decrease property values and the wildlife in this area would be forced out due to
encroachment.
Grant Morris, agent, and Ricardo Agraso, owner, were present to represent the
application. Marion Brayiannis of 532 Mountain Ash Drive, Terri & Steve Dougall
of 529 Mountain Ash Drive, Darlene & Richard Amero of 534 Mountain Ash
Drive, Laura Mclennan of 512 Oakwood Drive, Clarisa De La Cruz of 530
Mountain Ash Drive and Linda Tsoulis of 543 Mountain Ash Drive were present
in objection to the applications. Mike Brock of 524 Oakwood Drive was present
to obtain information and clarification on the applications.
Planner II provided information and clarification on the on-going construction and
location of the cabana, issuance of building permits and tree removal process.
Grant Morris explained that an arborist report is being prepared and has no
objections to provide compensation or replant trees that will be removed. Grant
Morris stated that the temporary turning circle on Mountain Ash Drive will be
extended further to the south. He stated that the variances are being requested
in order to permit 3 additional lots with a reduced lot frontage and side yard
setbacks to front along the future extension of the road.
Marion Brayiannis expressed several concerns with the height of the. existing
cabana, disruption and length of time for the construction, driveway
reconfiguration due to the future extension of Mountain Ash Drive and the current
condition and poor quality and drainage of the temporary turning circle.
Mike Brock supports the development and the extension of Mountain Ash Drive
and questioned the servicing capacity for future development. ·
Terri Dougall expressed a concern that the elevation of the proposed dwellings is
not in keeping with the surrounding neighbourhood. Terri Dougall also wanted to
obtain information and clarification on the impact the development will have on
the existing sewer capacity.
Page 4of 8
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
Richard Amero expressed concerns that the proposed dwellings are not in
keeping with the surrounding neighbourhood. He also raised concerns related to
the safety of residents during construction and the length of time the construction
will impact the neighbourhood. Richard Amero also expressed a concern with
the loss of trees.
Laura Mclennan stated the property next to hers is for sale and is concerned the
extension of Mountain Ash Drive will facilitate more land severances. Laura
Mclennan also expressed a concern with a decrease in property value as a
result of the creation of smaller lot sizes and frontages.
Clarisa De La Cruz expressed several concerns with the construction of the
dwellings and the road extension including garbage, safety and impacts on
existing drainage.
Linda Tsoulis wanted to obtain information and clarification on the tree removal
process and criteria for tree compensation.
Grant Morris stated the property does not fall within the tree protection by-law
area however an arborist report is being prepared .. Grant Morris stated a
drainage plan will be submitted to the City for review, and anticipates
construction to begin by spring 2016. In response to questions from Committee
Members, Grant Morris stated the existing cabana located on the property
fronting Rougemount Drive has a walk out, the road will be built prior to the
dwellings and agreed to meet with surrounding neighbours to address concerns.
Moved by Denise Rundle
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application PICA 101/15 by A & R. Agraso, be Approved on the grounds
that the minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of
1.5 metres where a garage is erected· as part of a detached dwelling are minor in
nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with
the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject
to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration for the
proposed parcel (Part 3), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's
submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application
LD 121/15, or this decision shall become null and void:
Page 5 of 8
5
6 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
7:oopm
Main Committee Room
3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction on
the proposed parcel (Part 3) by October 6, 2017, or this decision affecting the
minimum side yard width shall become null and void. ·
Moved by Denise Rundle
Seconded by Eric Newton
Carried Unanimously
That application PICA 102115 by A. & R. Agraso, be Approved on the grounds
that the a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of
1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling are minor in
nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with
the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject
to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration for the
proposed parcel (Parts 4 & 5), as generally sited and outlined on the
applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application
LD 122115 and LD 124115, or this decision shall become null and void.
3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction on
the proposed parcel (Parts 4 & 5) by October 6, 2017, or this decision
affecting the minimum side yard width shall become null and void.
Moved by Denise Rundle
Seconded by Eric Newton
Carried Unanimously
That application PICA 103115 by A. & R. Agraso, be Approved on the grounds
that the minimum lot frontage of 15.6 metres and a minimum side yard width of
1.6 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling are minor in
nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with
the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject ·
to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration for the
proposed parcel (Part 6), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's
submitted plans.
Page 6 of 8
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application
LD 123/15, or this decision shall become null and void.
3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction on
the proposed parcel (Part 6) by October 6, 2017, or this decision affecting the
minimum side yard width shall become null and void.
3. PICA 104/15
I. & C. Vienneau
1736 Walnut Lane
Carried Unanimously
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
4402/73 and By-law 843/78, to permit an accessory building (detached garage)
with a maximum height of 4.1 metres; whereas the by-law does not permit
accessory buildings to exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain a building permit to construct a 53.5 square metre accessory building
(detached garage) with an increased maximum building height in the rear yard.
The Planner II outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development
Department recommending refusal of the application. Written comments were
also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing
no concerns.
Peter Barton, agent, and Ivan Vienneau, owner, were present to represent the
application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to
the application.
Peter Barton stated that the height of the proposed detached garage would not
have an impact on surrounding properties due to the location of the subject
property beside a commercial plaza. In response to questions from Committee
· Members, Peter Baron stated the proposed detached garage would store small
vehicles (such as snowmobiles, lawn tracker etc.) and an antique car.
Planner II explained a new site plan has been submitted to the City Development
department and a further review is required before moving forward with the
application.
Page 7 of 8
7
8
Moved by Tom Copeland
Seconded by Eric Newton
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
That application PICA 104/15 by I. & C. Vienneau, be Deferred to allow the
applicant to revise the application and to allow City staff to review the revised
application.
Carried Unanimously
(IV) Adjournment
Date
Chair
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Denise Rundle
That the 14th meeting of the 2015 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at
8:07 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on
Wednesday, October 28, 2015.
Carried Unanimously
Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Page 8 of 8
From:
Subject:
Application
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PICA 106115
Meeting Date: October 28, 2015
Principal Planner-Development Review
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 106115
J. Lynch
1971 Bowler Drive
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4402173
and By-law 843/78, to recognize an existing accessory structure (shed) greater than
1.8 metres in height to be setback a minimum of 0.1 of a metre from the rear lot line and
0.2 of a metre from the south side lot line; whereas the by-law requires all accessory
structures greater than 1.8 metres in height to be setback a minimum of 1.0 metre from
all lot lines.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to recognize the location of an
existing accessory building (shed) in the rear yard.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers an existing accessory structure (shed) to
be setback a minimum of 0.1 of a metre from the rear lot line and 0.2 of a metre from
the south side lot line to be a major variance that is not considered to be desirable for
the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and
purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed
variance.
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as Urban Residential-Low
Density Areas.
The subject property is currently zoned "SA"-Single Attached Dwelling within Zoning
By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4402/73 and By-law 843/78.
9
10 Report PICA 1 06/15
Appropriateness of the Application
OCtober 28, 2015
Page 2
Reduction of the Minimum Setback Requirement for an Accessory Structure
• the intent of the minimum 1.0 metre setback requirement for accessory structures
greater than 1.8 metres in height is to ensure that adequate space is available for
maintenance, that the eaves/overhangs do not encroach on adjacent properties,
that roof drainage stays on the subject property, and that the visual impact on
adjacent properties is minimized
• the owner is requesting approval to allow for an existing shed in the rear yard to
be located 0.1 of a metre from the rear lot line and 0.2 of a metre from the south
side lot line
• the existing pool and accessory structure (shed) were constructed in 1994 by the
previous home owner
• the owner has stated that the original shed was dilapidated and was replaced
with a new shed in the same location with similar dimensions (a height of
1.8 metres and a total area of 5.2 square metres)
• during the reconstruction of the shed the owner was advised by the City's By-law
Enforcement Division that the existing shed must be brought into compliance with
.the Zoning By-law
• the current location of the shed appears to have a negative impact on the
adjacent neighbours and the existing drainage patterns for the subject lands
• the existing setbacks do not ensure that roof drainage stays on the subject
property and· any proposed eaves/overhangs would encroach onto adjacent
properties
• staff is of the opinion that a minimum 0.6 metre setback from all property lines
would ensure adequate space is available for maintenance and that
eaves/overhangs would not encroach on adjacent properties, however the owner
has stated th~t due to the existing landscaping around the pool the shed cannot
be relocated
• there is an existing wood privacy fence that has been erected along the perimeter
of the rear yard, which minimizes the visual impact on adjacent property owners
• staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is not minor in nature, does not
meet the intent of the Zoning By-law, and is not desirable for the appropriate ·
development of the land
Report PICA 106/15 October 28, 2015
Page 3
Input From Other Sources
Engineering & Public Works Department • staff does not support the requested
variance
M. Stephens
(previous owner of 1971 Bowler Drive)
G. Arnold and H. Jefferys
(1973 Bowler Drive)
D. Bryans (1969 Bowler Drive)
Date of report: October 22, 2015
Comments prepared by:
Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP
Planner I
LP:MM:df
• engineering standards state that a
minimum 0.6 of a metre from the
property line is to remain undisturbed
when any changes in grading take
place
• the minimum distance of 0.6 of a metre
is to allow for the proper drainage of
.rainwater and to provide for a drainage
swale to direct water either to the front
or rear of the property
• no objection to the proposal
• lived at 1971 Bowler Drive from
approximately 1992 until 2010
• confirmed that he constructed the
original shed in .1994 in the south east
corner of the property
• no objection to the requested variance
• existing shed is located 0.1 of a metre
from their property line
• existing sheds in the area with similar
setbacks
• no objection to the requested variance
• existing sheds in the area with similar
setbacks
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner-Development Review
J:\Oocuments\Development\0-3700 Committee of Adjustment (PCA AppiJcations)\2015\PCA 106-15 J. Lynch\Report\PCA 106_15.doc
Enclosures
1 1
VAUGHAN
·wiLLARD
PUBLIC
SCHOOL
Location Map
FILE No: P/CA106/15
APPLICANT: J. Lynch
w f------l;q!
0 L__l.-----1 z w 1------ij
CT
fiTlES
GLENDALE
PARK
f-----
f-----
City Development
Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan M1038 Pt Lot 443, 40R3922 part 3,10,14
(1971 Bowler Drive) DATE: Sept. 25,2015
Octo Sources: Teronl!t Enterprises Inc. ond its suppliers. All rl9hts Reserved. Not a plan of survey. 2013 MPAC and its ~uppllers. All ri hts Reserved. Not o plan of Surve . SCALE 1:5,000 PN-12
ill > '· a: 0
a:
ill
_J
$
0
0)
City Development
Department
Submitted Plan
FILE No: P/CA 106/15
APPLICANT: J. Lynch
to recognize an existing
accessory structure (shed) greater
than 1.8 metres in height to be
setback a minimum of 0.1 of a
metre from the rear lot line and 0.2
of a metre from the south side lot
line
EXISTING
SHED
E N
0
E .......
o)
I
....
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan M1038 Pt Lot 443, 40R3922 part 3,10,14
(1971 Bowler Drive)
FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING
CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Oct. 9, 2015
14
From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Report to
. Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PICA 107115
Meeting Date: October 28, 2015
Principal Planner-Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 1 07115
1864832 Ontario Ltd.
1300 Bayly Street
Application
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, amended, in order to obtain Site
Plan Approval to construct a gas bar with an accessory retail store, and an automatic
car wash. The table below outlines the By-law requirements and the requested
variances:
By.-law Requirement Relief Applied For
an automobile service station must
contain, within an enclosed building, a to permit an automobile service station
minimum of two enclosed service bays that does not contain enclosed service
and one hydraulic hoist and does not bays or a hydraulic hoist and permits a
permit a gas bar or an accessory retail gas bar and an accessory retail store
store
minimum width of a lot for any automobile to permit a minim!Jm width of a lot for an
service station shall be 38 metres automobile service station to be 37 metres
minimum front yard depth of 18.0 mefres to permit a minimum front yard depth of
3.0 metres
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers the requested variances to permit an
automobile service station that does not contain enclosed service bays or a hydraulic
hoist and permit a gas bar With an accessory retail store; a minimum width of a lot for an
automobile service station to be 37 metres; and, a minimum front yard depth of 3.0 metres,
to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in
keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law,
and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the
following conditions:
Report PICA 107/15 October 28, 2015
Page2
1. That the variances apply only to the proposed, gas bar with an accessory retail
store, and automatic car wash, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's
submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed gas bar with an
accessory retail store, and automatic car wash by April 30, 2016, or this decision
shall become null and void.
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
The subject property is designated "Mixed Use Areas -Mixed Use Corridor" in the
Official Plan.
The subject property is currently zoned "C3"-Highway Commercial under Zoning
By-law 2520, as amended, which permits automobile service stations, motels, hotels,
place of amusement, open air farmers market, Type A restaurants, service stores and
parking stations.
Appropriateness of the Application
Automobile Service Station Definition Variance
• the existing definition of an "automobile service station" applicable to the subject
property reflects the nature and type of automobile service station that operated
at the time Zoning By-law 2520 was enacted in 1961
• automobile service stations that operate today function differently, and typically
no longer offer automobile repair services, but includes accessory retail stores
• the removal of the required service bays and hydraulic hoist from the existing
definition of "automobile service station" and to permit a gas bar with an
accessory retail store recognizes the current function of automobile service
stations
• staff are of the opinion that the requested variance to modify the definition of an
"automobile service station" is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent of the Official
Plan and Zoning By..:law
Minimum Width of a lot for an Automobile Service Station Variance
• the intent of having a minimum width of a lot for an automobile service station is
to ensure that the lot is of sufficient width to accommodate the various buildings,
landscaped area, building setbacks vehicular access, on-site vehicular/truck
circulation, and any other requirements associated with the operation of a gas
bar
• the by-law requires a minimum width of the lot to be 38 metres; whereas the
applicant is requesting to recognize the existing lot width of 37 metres
15
16 Report PICA 1 07/15 October 28, 2015
Page 3
• the reduced lot width is of sufficient width to accommodate the proposed
buildings, pump islands, building setbacks, drive-through facility, vehicular
access, landscaping and on-site vehicular and truck turning movements
• the requested variance to recognize the existing lot width is minor in nature,
desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lands and is in keeping
with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Front Yard Setback Variance
• the applicant is requesting a reduction in the minimum front yard setback to
3.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of
18 metres
• the City's current urban design objectives is to create a quality urban streetscape
by encouraging the placement of buildings to define the street edge
• the proposed canopy, attached to the main building of the automobile service
station, will be setback a minimum of 3.0 metres from the Liverpool Road
• the requested variance to reduce the front yard setback will provide an
appropriate and functional setback along Liverpool Road
• staff are generally satisfied with the proposed site plan
• the requested variance to reduce the minimum front yard setback is minor in
nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lands and is in
keeping with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By~law
Date of report: October 22, 2015
Comments prepared by:
Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP
Planner II
AE:MM:Id
J:\Documents\Development\0-3700\2015\PCA 1 07-15\Report\PCA 1 07-15.docx
Enclosures
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner-Development Review
I I
-
'"1
"=:t;
City Development
Department
Location Map
FILE No: P/CA107/15
APPLICANT: 1864832 Ontario Limited
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan M16 Blk FZ and Con 1 Pt Lot 23
40R-11781 Part 1, 2 (1300 Bayly Street)
Data Sources: Teronet Enterprises Inc. and Ita euppllens. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of survey. 2013 MPAC end Ita suppliers. All rl hta Reserved. Not a len of Surve •
DATE: Oct. 8, 2015
SCALE 1 :5,000 PN-8
17
To permit an automobile service
station that does not contain
enclosed service bays or a
hydraulic hoist and permits a gas
bar and an accessory retail store
To permit a
minimum width of a
lot for an
automobile service
station to be 37
metres
Submitted Plan
FILE No: P/CA 107/15
APPLICANT: 1864832 Ontario Limited
To permit a minimum front yard
depth of 3.0 metres
1'
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan M16 Blk FZ and Con 1 Pt Lot 23
City Development
Department 40R-11781 Part 1, 2 (1300 Bayly Street)
FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING
CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Oct. 9, 2015
""'rRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION
9 I j~j_ I I r---·-~----· .. --T . -·-··'
! ' ' ! i IIIIII --l
,/ i
.. ' .. ·., ..... tl -..... .....
LEFT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
Submitted Plan .
FILE No: P/CA 107/15
APPLICANT: 1864832 Ontario Limited
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan M16 Blk FZ and Con 1 Pt Lot 23
City Development
Department 40R-11781 Part 1, 2 (1300 Bayly Street)
FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING
CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Oct. 9, 2015
19
SOUTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
Submitted Plan
FILE No: P/CA 107/15
APPLICANT: 1864832 Ontario Limited
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan M16 Blk FZ and Con 1 Pt Lot 23
City Development
Department 40R-11781 Part 1 , 2 (1300 Bayly Street)
FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING
CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Oct. 9, 2015