HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD 40/00� - � . ,�yOFP/�
tw .
,-
. ,
REPORT TO COUNCIL
FROM: Neil Carroll DATE: luly23, 2000
Director, Planning and Development
PLANNING REPORT NUMBER: PD 40•00
SUBJECf: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2000-01
Parkmount Building Corporation
Part of Lots 1 to 3, Plan 505
(Rear portion of lands on the west side of Rosebank Road,
south of Foxwood Trail and east of Autumn Crescent)
City of Pickering
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That Draft Plan of Subdivision 3P-2000-01 submitted by Ms. Helen Lepek of
Templeton-I.epck Limit..f on behalf of Parkmount Buiiding Corporation, on lands being
Part of Lots 1 to 3, Plan 505, City of Pickering, to pertnit thc extcnsion of Pineview Lanc
eastcrly to accommodate the devclopment of 20 rcsidcntial lots providing minimum lot
frontages of 10.0 metres to support detachcd dwcllings, bc APPROVED, subjcct to thc
conditions outlined in Appcndix 1 to Planning Rcport Numbcr PD 40-00.
ORIGIN:
Drafl Plan of Subdivision SP-2000-01 submittcd to thc Rcgion oFDurham and cicculated to the
City of Pickcring Cor commcnt.
AU'f'HORITY:
Thc Plonning Ac7, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13
FINANCIAL IMPL[CATIONS:
No dirccl costs to the Town are anticipated as a result of the proposed development.
EXECUTNE SUMMARY:
Thc applicant proposes to extrnd Pineview Lane casterly and develop 20 new residential lots
providing a minimum lot frontage of 10.0 metres. The proposed lots are intcnded to support
detached dwellings.
The proposed Plan of Subdivision represents good planning as the proposed developmcnt
complies with current zoning requirements, confortns to the policies of the Pickering Ofiiciul
Plan, and accomn:odates the future completion of the local road network. All interests oC thc
City will be approp�:ately addressed through an associated subdivision agrcement.
REPORT NUMBER PD 40-00 Date: July 27, 2000
Subject: DraR Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2000-01 Page 2
BACKGROUND:
1.0 lnformation Matina
A Public Information Meeting for this development proposal wos held on J►me I5, 2000.
Information Report No. 15-00, which summarizes the applicant's proposal and outlines the
issues and comments idrntified to that date through circulation of the application, was
prepared 1'or that meeting. The text of the Information Report is provided for reforence (sce
Attachment #3).
Prior to the Public Infortnntion Meeting, comments were received from the Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority, the Durham District Scheol Board, and the Durham
Catholic District School Board, ail expressing no objection to this proposal.
A comment was received hom Veridien Connections, exprcssing no objection to this
proposal, end rcquesting a copy of the proposed civil design to prepare an estimate to
srnice the proposed subdivision. A comment was rcceived from Bcll Canada, requesting
various conditions of dralt approval be imposed respecting the installation of underground
services (see Attachmrnt #4).
A comment was received from Canadian National Railway, recommending a warning
clause be inserted in any fuwre agrecments and on the tiUe of cach future lot, noting the
proximity of the existing rail cortidor to the proposcd dcvelopmcnt. C.N.R. also requires a
noise and vibration analysis be completed by thc applicunt, including recommended
abatemrnt mcasurcs, where appropriate (scc Attachment #5). Canada Post requires
conditions of draR npproval bo cstablishcd respecting thc Iocation and installation of a
Community Mailbox serving lhe proposcd dcvclopment (sec Atwchment �6).
At the Public lnfortnation Meeting, the applicant was present to respond to questions
rcgarding the proposal. The npplicant notcd thal thc proposed rond pattcm is anticipated
through the OtTicial Plnn, and that the existing zoning npplicuble to the subject lands
pertnits thc developmcnt they are proposing (and although nat sought by the applicant,
would also allow thc establishmcnt of semi-dctached dwelling units). 7'he applicant furiher
noted that the proposed development would be compatible with devclopment in the
surrounding area.
Four area residents commrnted at the Public InCortnation Mceting. Mr. J. Stavropoulos of
410 Pineview Lanc noted that he purchased his property (at the end of the temporary
Pineview Lane lerminus) bccausc of the adjacent vacant lands and tne fact that
Pineview Iane "dead-ends" at his property. He noted his concem with thc extension of
Pineview Lane, and noted that the proposed devclopment will change the character of the
area and negntively affect his property value. Mr. N. Vickovic of 1752 White Cedar Drive
noted that when he purchaced his property, he was advised that no further development
would occur in the neighbourhood. Hc expressed conc om with the adjacent lands to the
north (conditionally approved by the Durham Land :`-� � ion Committee to support detached
dwellings on lots fronting onto Foxwood Trail) and their maintenancc, and qurstioned when
Autumn Crescent is planned to extend northward to Foxwood Trail.
Ms. J. Donaughey of 1764 Rosebank Road and Mr. E. Gwiner of 1752 Rosebank Road
(two of the three owners conveying lands being assembled for this proposed subdivision)
both spoke in support of the proposed application, noting that the proposed dcvelopmrnt
would eventually occu:, and that the current lands have becomo more difficult to maintain.
��..: 4 REPORT NUMBBft PD 40-00
�ubjcet: DreR Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2000•Ol
2,0 Additionallnformation
Datc: luly 27, 2000
Page 3
Following the Public Infotmation Meeling, written comments were received from
Hydro One Netwotks Inc., expressing no objection to lhis proposal, and the City's
Development Control Supervisor. The Development Control Supervisor provided
recommended conditions to be incorporated into any future draR approval of this proposal,
and noted that the applicant's proposal would ensure that sufficient land remains east of this
proposal to wmplete the extensions of Autumn Crescent and Pineview Lane tivough a
futute viable draR plan of subdivision application (see Attachment #7).
3.0 Discussion
3.1 Appropriateness of the Proposed Development
The proposed development is compatible with ihe chazacter of existing surrounding
development. A Property Location Map nnd the Applicant's Submitted Plan — Stafi
Recommended Pian a:e included as Attachments N! and il2 respcctively, to this Reporl.
Existing lots currently fronting Pinevicw Lnne provide a minimum lot frontage of 11.0
metres, a minimum lot depth of approximately 33.5 mctres, and support detnched dwellings.
The proposed lots provide minimum lot frontages of 10.0 metres, maintain thc samc general
lot depth, and will support detached dwellings. The subject lands are curtently zoned to
pertnit the proposed developmcnt. No zoning chunge is proposed to accommodata the
proposed development.
A siting and architectural design statement is requircd to ba submitted and approved by the
Planning & Development Department, ensuring ihat thc resultant dwcllings on the proposed
lots maintain the similar stylc and character of surrounding existing dwellings.
The Amberlea Neighbourhood Plan in the Pickering Official Plan idcntifies Cuwre road
conncctions within the neighbourhhood, including thc extension of Pineview Lane easterly
connecting with a futurc north-south cxtension to Autumn Crescent meeting Foxwood Trail.
Thc proposcd dcvelopment will result in Pineview Lane cxtending casterly in thc same
gcneral pattem anticipated in thc Amberlea Neighbourhood Plan, temporarily tertninating
until the remaining easterly-abutting lands are devcloped. The applicant submitted to the
City a conceptual lotting plan for thc eazterly-abutting lands, and en estimated construction
plan forecnsting dcvelopment costs and projected rntes of retum for future development on
those lands. This submission satisCactorily shows that the remaining lands to the east arc of
an adequate size to support an economically viable subdivision supporting future residential
development, and associated road infrastructure.
This analy�is was requested in ordcr to satisfy Staff that the remaining lands to the east are
of an adequate size to support economically viable development, and to ensure that the
completion of the road network in this neighbourhood will not be jeopardized.
3.2 Technical Matters
The City's Development Control Supervisor has commented that additional lends will be
required for the proposed temporary tuming circle, and must be designated as blocks end
dedicated as road allowance. These blocks would ba conveyed back to tha owners of the
affected lots when Pincview Lane is continued. The applicant has exprcssed cuncem with
this condition, end wishes to explore altemative development stnndards Cor the tuming
circle so that none of the proposed lots in the draR plan become temporarily undevelopable.
A condition requiring the applicant to satiafy the Dircctor, Planning & Dcvelopment with
reapect to thc installation of a new temporary tuming circle is recommended, and includcd
in Appendix I to this Report.
' � REPORT NUMBER PD 40-00 Date: July 27, 2000 5
'Subjxt: Draft Plan of Subdivieion Application SP-2000-01 Page 4
A fpture subdivisian agreement between thc City end thc owner of the lends will be required
to cnsure that all matters of interest to tha Ciry sra protxted. This required agreemrnt, and
several other development implementation matters, are incorporated into the recommended
conditions of approval for lhis proposal found in Appendix I to this Report.
4.0 AonlicanPs Comments
The applicant hns reviewed and concurs with thc recommendations outlined in this Repon.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Property Location Map
2. Applicant's Submittcd Plan - Staff Recommended Plan
3. Infonnation Report No. 15-00
4. Agency Comment - Bell Canndn
5. Agency Commcnt - Canadian National Railway
6. Agency Commcnt - Canada Post
7. Staff Comment - Dcvclopment Control Supervisor
prep� gy; Approved / Endorsed by:
. �
Ron Taylor Neil Carto , CI , P �
Planner 1 Director, Plamm�g & Development
-_1����!�� Du�
Q�i.ynda D. Taylor
�f�'� Manager, Curtent Operations
RST/LDT/ph
Adachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of Pickering
Ciry Council
, �� .i
i/
Th J. Qu , C icf Admt ' ' e �cer
. . , APPENDIX I TO
I'' . s� PLANNING REPORT NUMBER: PD 40-00
RECOMMENDED CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
DRAFT PLANS OF SUBDNISION SP-2000-01
;,
;�.
% -.� t`
�t. ',}._ �. .�._. . �.'�...� , > .� , �,,. ... .-'3 . , . ... . � ,. _ . . . .
. Appu�dix I to Planning Report Number PD 40-00 pag� � 7
0
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
DRAFf PLAN OF SUBDIV SION SP-2000-01
1.0 CENERAI. CONDITIONS
1.1 That this recommendation apply to the draft pian prepared by J. D. Bames Limited, dated
March 7, 2000 (Reference No. 99-25-948-00), for DraR Plan of Subdivision Application
SP-2000-01 submitted by Ms. Helrn Lepek of Templeton-I.epek Limited on behalf of
Pazkmount Building Corporation, on lands being Part of Lats 1 to 3, Plan 505, City of
Pickering, to permit lhe development of 20 lots with minimum lot frontages of ]0 meUes
for the development of detached dwellings, bearing thc Citys recommendation stamp.
2.0 PRIOR TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE PLAN:
2.1 That the owners submit a Draft 40M-Plan to be approved by the City Planning &
Development Department.
2.2 That tha owners enter into a subdivision agcement with and to the satisfactian of the
Ciry which shall include, but not nccessarily bc limited to the following:
2.2.1 Storm Draina¢e
(a) satisfnction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting a
stortnwater drninage and management systcm to service all the lands in the
subdivision, and any provisions regarding eazements;
(b) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department that stortnwater
managcment techniqucs comply with tha stortnwatcr management requiremrnts
set by the dcvelopment of the adjaccnt Bramalea Inc. and Woodsmere Properties
Limited developments.
2.2.2 GradineControl and Soils
(a) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Devclopment Department respecting
submission and npprovel of a grading and control plan, with special emphasis on
co-ordinating grades with adjacent lands and any proposed tree removal rosulting
from proposed grade changes;
(b) satisfaction of the Director, Planning and Development Department respecting tho
submission and approval of a geotechnical soils analysis.
2.2.3 Road Allowances
(a) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Depattment respecting
construction of intemal roads wilh curbs, storm sewers, sidewalks and boulevard
designs to maximize front yard space without impeding services or the safe operation
of Ihe streets;
(b) satisfnction of the Director, Planning & Devclopment Depwtment rcspecting the
removal of the existing temporary tuming circic tertninating Pineview Lanc, and
installation of a pertnanent road including all rcstoration of pertnenent road secvices
fronting Lots 42, 43, 44, 46, 47 end 46, Plan 40M-1810;
(e) satiefaction of the Director, Planning 8c Development rcspeeting the installation of a
new tempornry tuming circle at thc east limit of thc Pinevicw Lanc extension.
' ,8 .
Appendix I to Planning Report Number PD 40-00 Pa�; 2
2.2.4 'd s
(a) that the owners construct a sidewalk along the new and restored sectio,�s of Pineview
Lane to the satisfaction of the Director, Plunning end Development Department.
2,2.5 Construction/Installation of Citv Works & Services
(a) satisfaction of the City respecting azrangements for the provision of all scrvices
required by the City;
(b) satisfaction of the appropriate authorities respecting artangements Cor the provision of
wderground wiring, street lighting, cable television, natural gas and other similar
services;
2.2.6 Dedications/1'ransfers/Conveyances
(a) the dedication of all road allowances with thc proper comer roundings and sight
triangles to the City;
(b) lhat the owners convey to the Ciry:
(i) Block 21 as n 03 metre road reserve block with the right-of-way of Pinaview
Lane at the proposed easterly limil; and,
(ii) anyothercasementsasrcquircd.
2.2.7 Construction Mnnngement Plan
(a) that the owncrs make satisCactory urmngements with lhe City respecting a
construction managcment plan.
2.2.8 Pnrkland Dedication
(a) that the owncrs make satisfactory arrangements with lhe City regarding cash-in-lieu
for the required parkland dedication.
2.2.9 Existin¢ Buildines
(a) satisfactory amangements with the Ciry regarding the demolition o1' all swctures on
tha subjxt property.
2.2.10 Development Charges
(a) satistaction of the City financially with rcspect to the Development Charges Act.
2.2.11 Co-ordinated Development
(a) satisfaction of the City with respect to arrangements necessary to provide for co-
ordination of secvices and roads with adjacent lands and any phasing of developmrnt
that may be required;
(b) satisfaction of lhe City with respect to the provision of temporary fencing along the
entire proposed east lot lines of Lots 10 and 20, and along the proposed eastem limit
of Pineview I.ane;
(c) satiefaction of the City with respect to the proviaion oCprnnenent fencing on Lots 10
end 20 prior to the occupancy of dwelling unite on those Lots;
(d) saUefaction of the Ciry with rospcet to tho provision of temporary frncing end
eiltadon controls prior to tho commencemcnt of any works;
� � ,..., . ...., _. ... :.. . .. .... � ,. - .. . . . .
Appcndix I to Planning Rcpoct Number PD 40•00 Page 3 9
(e) iho aubmission of a trcc preservation and street planting program to the eatisfection of
lhc City.
2.2.13 Aesian Plannina
(a) the satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Depaztment respxting a
report outlining siting and architectural design objectives tor lhe devolopment, and
the submission of site plans nnd architectural drawings idrntifying how each unit
mats the objecdves of the report, prior to the issuance of any building prnnit for the
consWction of a residential unit on the lands;
(b) the report outlining siting and architectural daign objectives tor the devclupment
must address building envelopes, house designs, siting, and streetscapes as well as
garage designs, locations, massing, and projection hom the main dwelling;
(c) the report outlining siting and architectural design objectives for the developmrnt
must place special emphasis on building elevntions nnd unit siting that is in keeping
with the character of cxisting development located on Pineview Lane;
(d) the repori outlining siting and architectural duign objectives for the developmenl
must address driveway placement and curb cut location on the extension of Pineview
Lane to ensuro adequate room is maintained to accommodate street fumiture and
boulevard Inndscaping.
2.2.14 Noisc Attenuation
(a) that thc owners satisfy the requirements ot the Ministry of tha Environment and
Canadian National Railway regarding the approval of a noise and vibration study
rccommending noise control fcatures satisfactory to thc Region of Durhnm, the City
of Pickering und Canadian National Railway.
��
,� -
''
�, .
�,
. � � ATTACHA!EpT � � Tp
. . ,
REPORi i PD_ �TO -OO
. ,
APPIJCAf�TS PROPOSED SUBDMSION PLAN
SP-2000-01
PARIQulOUNT BUILOINd CORPORATION
(3TAFF RECOMMENDED PLAN)
�� q� q� � �-------� te � �-��_
n
I � � � I �19 � nrr '[smw �
_1_1 �j� � � � � �w-mm �
`—_ �i--'� I
��i-------�N
ron000 � � e�oac tae 1 I
r---r----------- aoac iu���` j=�.��� � 1 � I
-- _-----
-----------Qi--ll
I I � �
I I.�� �. o..n � �. �. .�� � � ., .m� ,.a, �
I " j �or
mx sw n+a. � R+m.w I
I � nu� aot rrr imw � I
�- � � �
� — — — — — — — — — — --- � --��.: � --------I
��2 1 2 3 � 6 8 7 8 B �10 � �
maua wo� a.w n � I
i il YI YI oiW IW W YI W YI YI YI i RNIfIm O�pl
[
L L_ �.� .� ,w., �� I �
IM� 1 �� I
� ' 11M IO.MIN ��* `� y
� (
' ���������������� �_ ����������� � � � �
� ������
T� �
iY �o W YI Yl YI W W W W KO401N V�'�f O�m �'I ��pp AQ'
l0f '9R' 1 I
��e 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 � 1B 19 20 �
I uss aau r.r, om�w I
� �� I
� I � I � I �
iiiiii
iiiii�
-_1_Ll�_L1
rrcasmuo
LAND USE SCHEDULE
L41LOfNStt acsocxrou
LO15 I TO t0
. (s.ot auom o�ai.a�
aax ai
ms. �7
ROA05 �
I I � I I I I � I I I I� I�— A
I I � I I � I I I I�' j W--- °7 �
� � � � �-___.
� i� i i i i�� i i i� i i as
i i.,,i i i i,�.. i i i�..� i__`
L1_LL�_L1J_L1_LL�.�� —
wnnn attsaHr 69
`� �
� +ou-taio �� �-,,.
1015 I1H1S ARCA
70 IO 0.67E fw
aoai na
0.t01 Aa
. TOTAI APfA 0.EE0 ho.
� �
a
�
11
N
A/S 1NP 1111t PF�(D BY pL O!Y p' F7t'lII7i�1C
A'MMMN' d AMIGYM4T'7lXfWPACN7, ,R.hE JI. AaP4
ATTACNMENT I 3 TO
, ��2 REPORII PD UI —oo __�
� �.� OF P���
�
INFORMATION REPORT N0.15-00
FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETlNC OF
June15,2000
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS
OF THE PLANNING ACI', RS.0.1990, chepter P.13
SUBJECT: Drafl Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2000•O1
Parkmount Building Corporation
Part of Lots I to 3, Plan 505
(Rcar portion of lands on the wcst sidc of Ros�bank Road,
south of Foxwood Tmil and enst of Autumn Crescent)
City of Pickcring
1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTIOIV
- the subject lands are locnted on thc west side of Roscbank Rond, south of Foxwood
Trail und cast of Autumn Crcsccnt, surroundcd by nn existing residential subdivision;
- n property location map is providcd for rcfcrcncc (scc Attachment #1);
- thc subjcct Innds currcntiy support thrcc dctnchcd residcntinl dwcllings (one locuted
on cnch subjcct lot) oricnted towards Rosebank Road;
- all thrce lots are subjcct to land scverance npplicntions proposing to sever the rear
portion of thesc lots, intcndcd to support futurc infill residential development.
2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
- the applicunt proposcs to cxtcnd Pinevicw Lane castcrly, and devclop 20 new
residcntial lots providing a minimum lot Gontagc of 10.0 mctres (see Atlachment #2);
- the proposed lots ure intcndcd to support detnched rcsidential dwellings;
- thc existing threc dctachcd dwellings located on thc subject properties would be
retained on resultant largcr lots fronting onto Rosebank Road.
3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING
3.1 Durham Reeional Oftictal Plen
- the subject lands fell within the "Living Area" designation;
- this designation pertnits residential land uses to be cstablishcd;
- the application uppears to conform;
3.2 P(ckerine Ofttclal Plan
- the subject lands fell within an "Urban Residentiel — Low Density Area" in thc
Amberlea Neighbourhood;
- permissible uses within this designation include residcntial uses, including thc
establishment ofdetachcd dwellings;
- the Plan establishes a maximum density of up to, and including, 30 dwelling units per
net hectare;
- the proposed devclopment would provide n net sitc density of 19.5 units per net
hectare;
�
ATTACHMENTI � TO
REPORT/ PD_ �/o-Oo
13
Infortnation Raport No. I 5-00 Page 2
- within Urban Residential Areas, Council shall havc pnrticular regard to protecling and
enhancing lhc character of established neighbourhoods;
- the Amberlea Neighbourhood Plnn identifies anticipated future road connections
within that neighbourhood, including the extension of Pineview Lane eastcrly,
connecting with a future north-south road connecting Autumn Crescent to Foxwood
Trail;
- lhe applicant's proposal conforms to thc policies of the Pickering O�ciul Plan;
3.3 Zonine Bv-law 3036
- the portion of lands subject to this application are currenlly zoncd "S-SD-SA-1" —
Residential Detachcd, Semi-Detached and Single Attached Dwclling Zone, by Zoning
By-law 30?6, as amendcd by By-law 4286l93;
- this zoning pertnits detached dwellings on lots providing a minimum lot frontage of
9.0 metres and a minimum lot arca of 250 squnrc mctres;
- the applicait's proposnl confortns to ihc rcquircmcnts of By-law 4286/93, and
thercforc, no rezoning application is requircd to implement the proposed
development.
4.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULATION
4.1 Resident Comments
- no resident commcn►s hnvc bccn rcccivcd to-dntc;
4.2 Aeencv Comments
- no ugcncy commcnts havc bccn rcccivcd to•datc;
4.3 Staff Comments
- in reviewing the epplicution to-date, the following matters have been idcntified by
stuff for futlher rcvicw and considcrntion:
• ensuring that thc proposcd lotting nnd resultant residcntinl development is
compatible with surrounding residentinl devclopment, particularly existing
residential development fronting onto Pineview Lane;
• ensuring that thc future completion of Pineview Lane and the nnticipated Autumn
Crescent extension norihwerd to Foxwood Trail is not jeopardized, and can be
accomplishcd through a futurc viable plan of subdivision;
• ensuring that the boundarics of 1he draR plen arc appropriate to pertnit orderly
futurc development to occur,
• reviewing the appropriate method of temporarily terminating Pineview Lane at
the eastem edge of the proposed development.
5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATlON
- written comments regerding this proposal should be directed to the Planning and
Development Department;
- orel comments may be mndc at thc Public Infortnation Mecting;
- all comments received will bc noted and used us input in a Itecommcndetion Report
prepared by thc Planning and Dcvclopmcnt Department for n subsequcnt mceting of
Council or a Commtttcc of Council;
- if you wish to be notified af Council's dccision regarding this proposel, you must
roquest such in writing to the City Clerk;
: ": _ ATTACHMENTI 3 'TO _ . _ "-
'� � REPORT r PD �r• _. o � :
Information Report No. I 5-00 Pagc 3
- if a person or public body that files an eppeal of a Jecision oC the Regional
Municipnlity of Durham in respcct of tho proposcd plan of subdivision does not makc
oral submission at the public mecting, or make writtcn submissions to thc Rcgional
Municipaliry of Durham beforc the proposed plan of subdivision is approvcJ or
rePosed, thc Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss the appeal,
6.0 OTHER INFORMATION
6.1 Informatlon Received
- full-scnle copies of the Applicant's submitted plan ure available for vicwing at the
offices of the Ciry of Pickcring Planning and Dcvelopment Dcpartment;
6.2 Comuanv Prfnctoal
- the applicant, Ms. Helen Lepik, advises that the principnl of Parkmount Building
Corporntion is Mr. David Brand.
ORIdINAL SIONED BY ORIGINAL SIQNED By
Ron Taylor Lynda Taylor
Planner I Managcr, Current Operntions
RST/pr
Copy: Ncil Carroll, Dircctor, Pinnning nnd Dcvclopmcnt
,,
,
�°�;
ATTACHMENT /__�TO
` • • REPORT/ PD_.f4}-np ' 9 �,J
J.
___ . .. ._ , � • ': REo E�VEb:� .
. -� �_:�,--� � .. . ,� ' : � � JUN 2 6 2000 . . .
B�'S CLERK'S DIVISION
Right of Way •
Fl 3- 100 Bor�ugh Drive D�^�D��
Scarborough, dntario �("
M1P 4W2
Tel: 416 296-6291 JUN 2 61QOO
Fa:s: 416 296-0520
June 15, 2000 C�pTM �R�Na!�KERING
ONTqq�p
The Corporation of the City of Pickering
Adminietration Department
Pickering Civic Complex -,...
One the Eaplanade `� y��O�J;
Pickering, Ontario . �
L1V 6K7 %yj ,� i0 ,/J I ���'� 2%?OCU
'(�av l��.�,,.s�r
ATTENTION: Bril Or , ' ' ' �' PICKE^ . ..
. s.r:.,!:xi�an��o '
_. ._ N-+V
•_ �� DR3►FT PLAN pF Subdivieion
File No: 3P-2000-01
Weet eide of Rosebank Rd eouth of Foxwood Trail
Parkmount Building Corporation
Pickering
Thank you tor your letter of May 16, 2000 concerning the
above propoaed Subdiviaion.
Would you pleaee eneure that the Eollowing paragraphs are/
have been included as conditione oP Draft Plan Approvals
1- Hell Canada ehall confixm that eatiefactoxy arraaqementa,
financial and otherwiae, have been made with Hell Canada
for any eell Canada facilitiea eerving thie draEt plan of
. aubdiviaion which ara required by. the Municipality to be
� inatalled underground; a cop�f o� asc,'� eur.Plrmation ehall
be fozwarded to the Municipality.
2- The Owner ahall be requeated to enter into an agreement •
(Letter of underatanding) with Bell Canada complying with any
underground servi.cing conditione impoaed by the municipality
and iE no auch conditions are impoeed, Cha owner ehnll adviee
the municipality of the arrangement mnde Eos euch eerviciag.
IE there are any confllcCa with exieting Be11,Caaada facilitiea
or eaeamenta, the Owner/Developer ehall be reeponeible ior re- �
arrangemante or ralocation.
,Tf,you have any questiona,, please contact: Janice Young 296-6291.
Y��ru Y� �� .
c oung
Manager - RighC of Way �
�
�
ATTACHMENT I ''� TO
, ' REPORT I PD—t/o-oo
. .�S _._
JLN 09 '00 11�SSAM CPRP Tq20ryT0
�
�A FAX: (90S) 420•9886
Mt. Bruee T IorJ�iC7
Cily
e Corporalton of tho Cfty of Plckerinp
Pickedng Civlo Complex
Ona ihe Eepienade
Pkkertng, Onterfo
L1 V 8K7'
--...__._ .__ __
� - D/�� P.fil
�r-� v
8" Floor
277Front6VeatWeel R�CEIVED
Toronlo, Ontarlo CITY OF PICKERINa
M6V 2X7
a duno 200o JUN - tl 2000
CLERK'S DIVISION
Your FUe; SP-2000-01
Our Flle: TZ�4500
ECEIVED
• JUN � 2 2000'
CITY OF PICKERINO
OEVELOPME��EPMiL'EM
Ooar Mr. 7ayla:
Re; Proposed Plan of 8ubdivieion
Part ot Lots 1 to 3, Plan 505 (RCar portion of lande on thc wost slde of Rosebank Road,
Soulh of Foxwood Troll and aast of Autumn Cresco�t
We have roviowed your leller daled 24 May 2000 reparding Ihe a6ovo noted application qnd requesl lhat Ihe
foilowing comment be InGuded in lho Draft Condltiona, to be cloared by CN:
t. The followfng waming dause shall be Included in lho Subdivision AAreemenl end Inserted in all Agreements of
Purchase ond 3elo or Lease for each dwollinp unif. Provieions muel bo tncluded in the Subdivtaton llgreement
lo ensuro thal lhe wamtng clnuso survives the releaae of Iha OwnaPe obllgaUons under lhe Su6divtaton
APreemenl anJ remafn on tlUe.
'Waming: Ceradlan Natianal Reihvay Company or ile asefgns or successors tn Inlerest has or
havo a right•of•way wiUiin 300 metros from Ihe land Ihe subJect hereoL 7here mey bo aiterallons to
or expansbns of tho rell facfliGea on such right-ol•way In the fulure includinp Ihe posaiblfty Ihat Ihe
roiiwey or fls aseigna or sucrassors as atareaafd may expand IIS operaUons, which expanalon may
aHect lhe Iiving environment of Iha residenls in Iho vic(nity, nohvithetandfng Ihp �nclusion o( any
nofse and vlbraUon attenuaUng measurpy In lhe deaign of Ihe dovclopment and Indivfdual
dwelling(s). CNR wiil nol bo roaponsible for any wmplalnls or clalms aris(ng from uso of such
fac5itfes andlor operotions on, over or under Ihe aforasaid right•of•way."
2. fia Owner Is required to enpapo a consultanl to underiako nn analyafa of notse end v@ralinn end to
recommnnd abetumenl measurea neceeeary lo ochiovo Ihe meximum Ievo1 Ilmits sat by lhe Minislry o►
Environmenl and CanadWn Nalional Reilway lo the saliefaclion of lho �rlunkipality, Canad�an NaUona� Raihvey
and the Minislry of Environment.
We would appreciute tho oppa»uniry W review Iho draft condittona prior to approvai, antl ullimalety, we request
receiving a copy of the Approved Dreft Condittons.
Should Ihe appifcalian bo approved wlthout Incorporaling Iho above requlremenla, wo havo no aitemative but lo
requost that Ihia epplicallons bo reforred lo Ihe Onfario Mun�dpal Board pursuant to Ihe prov(oinna oI the Plannfng
Atl, R.S.O. 1880, C.P.13.
Should you have eny further quesllons, plcase do not heaitale lo conlaat tho underttpned al (416)217-84gg,
Youre tru!y,
�tlarer��'��
Koren Fraser .
Manager, Property Ptannfng end Dovelopment
ATTACHMENT I ` TO
REPORTI PQ 'y0-� _._
� DELIVERY PLANNING �-------J --- .. - (416)285-5383 (1')
�-� , 1860 MIDLAND AVE 2ND FL. (416)285-7624 (i�
SCARBOROUGH ON MIP SAI
JUNE 7, 2000
MR. N. CARROLL
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
CITY OF PICKERING
l THE ESPLANADE
PICKERING ON LIV 6K7
ItE: APPLICATION FOR MPROVAL OF A PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
DURIIAM ItECION FILE NO.: 5-P-2000-01
MPLICANT: PARKMOUNT BUILDING CORPORATION
LOT: 31 CONCFSSION l
.- CITY OF PICKEItING
REF. NO.: 64797
Denr Mr. Carroll,
17
o ������ �
JUN 1 3 Z000
�'
JUN 1 3 2000
CITY OF PiCKEqINO
OEVELOP�M MD PMTMF.M
Thank yau for thc opportunity to commcnt on thc ubovc notal applicntion. Plcasc note our new
condiUons bclow.
As u condition oComR approval, Canudn Post rcquires thnt thc owncr/dcvcloper comply with thc
following conditions:
- Thc owncr/dcvcloper ngrccs to includc on nll offers of purchase und snlc, a statcment which
ndvises the prospeclivc purchuscr thnt mail dclivery will be from n designated Community
Mailbox.
- Thc owncddevcloper will bc responsible for notifying the purchascr of thc exect Community
Mailbox locntions prior to the closing of any home sale.
- The owneddeveloper will wnsult with Canada Post Co�poration to detcmiine suitable
locations for the placement of Community Muilbox and lo indiwtc thcse locations on lhe
nppropriate servicing plans.
�,
, ATTACHMENT / 6 TO
� p HEPORT I PQ _ Yo -oo y
� , �O• •
. �
c
'Z'
The owner/devcloper will provide the following for each Community Mailbox site and include
thesc requirements on the appropriate servicing plans;
- An appropriately sizal sidewnik secdon (concrete pad) ns per municipal stnndards, to place the
Community Mailboxes on. .
- My required wulkway across the bouicvard, as per municipal standerds.
- My requircd curb depressions for wheelchair ecccss,
The owneddeveloper further egcccs to dctemiinc ond provide n suitnbla temporary Community
Mailbox location(s), which may bc utilizcd by Conadn Post until thc curbs, sidewalks arid final
` grading have been complctal at thc permnnent Community Muilbox locations. This will cnnble
Canada Post to providc mnil dclivery to new residencc aa soon as the homes arc occupiai.
I Vust that this information is su�cicnt, howcvcr, should you rcquirc furiher infortnalion, plcasc
Jo not hesitnle lo contnct me thc above numbcr or mailing addrcss.
Sinccrcly,
l•�.
Dcbbic Grcenwood
Delivcry Planning Officcr
c.c. R. Szarck, Durham Region
p.s. We may be able to accommodate some of the new lots in an existing mailbox site in the
immcdietc erca.
A:UI'ILDRAWSAM
�s��sr � . . . . .. . . . _ . _ , .
. + '
�
ATTACNMEN7 i_�_TO
REPORTI pp ✓a-eo ___
��
RECEIVEtJ
JULU5?000
July 5, 2000 CITY OS' P;GKERiNti
.;,�.,�;.�,J��
� I:CVEICi��r�:lll J:PAF:F�-Nf
IIVTERDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
PLANNING A1VD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: Ron Taylor FROM: Robert Starr
Pianner 1 Supervisor, Dr,velopment Control
itE: Drait Plen of Subdivision Applica6on SP-2000-01
Pazkmount Building Coiporation
Part of Lots 1 to 3, Plan 505
(Rcar portion of lands on the west side of Rosebank Road, -
soul6 of Foxwood Trail and east of Autumn Crescent)
. City of Pickering
We have reviewed the ubove-notcd applicatiou and provide the following comments:
1. The development of thue lands must comply with the stortnwater menagement
requitemrnts set by the development of the adjacent Bramalea Inc./Woodsmere
Properties Limited Dcvelopmcnt. �
2. All easements required by the City for stormwatcr management purposes must bc
providcd.
3. Removnl of the tcmporary tuming circle and installation of pem�ancnt road
services franting lots 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, and 48 (40M-1810), is a requirement of
this developmcnt and must be completcd to the satisfaction of the City.
4. A temporary turning circic built to pennanent tuming circle standerds must be
installed at the proposed east limit of Pineview Lane es pact of the condaua6on of
Pineview I.ane. �
Additional lands required for lhe tuming circla will need to be designated as
blocks and dedicated as road allowance. (They can be conveyed back to the
owners of the affected lots when Pineview Lane is continued.)
r
....continued
... �J. . _- . .
A17ACHMENTI- 7 TO .
' '• 2 Q ' REPOfli I PD_ �o-ou
— �r _ _.—. . __._ � _ __
.2_
� 5. A sign will need to be posted at the new east limit of Pinoview Lane indicating
thxt tlus road will con6nue in Wa future. This sign will be required to be placed
following completion of base course asphalt (prior to building permits) end must
remain and be maintained during the maintenance period.
6. 13e Engineering dravrings for City services, roads, atorm sewere, sidewallcs, lot
Brading, atreetlights, fencing ete. and financial.obligations with respect to
securitics for these reqwremenls must be to the satisfaction of ihe Director of
Plauning & DevelopmenG � •
7. The developer will be required to enter into a Subdivision Agrament to sadafy
the requiremeats of the City. ,
8. Conditions ohould be implemented in the Draft Plan conditions, detailing the
requirements to the City, necusary to permit any tree removal, pro-gn, cling or
'" other construction activiry on the site.
9. A soils rcport conlaining geotechnical informud'on is required.
10. Foncing along lhe east lot line of Lot 10, Lot 20 (SP-2000-01) and across the road
allowanco ahould be a requircment; e) temporary fencing nnd sillation control
prior to the atart of any work, and b) pertnnnrnt fencing prior to the occupancy of
Lot 10 or 20 (SP-2000-01).
1 i. Temporary frncing ahould ¢lso be rcquircd along thc west boundary of Lot 1 and
Lot i l(SP-2000-01) to protect the cxisting lots during construction,
12. We have reviewcd thc cost estimate provided for the proposed development of the •
remainingJands to the cast, to enaure thut thcre is sufficient devclopment potenlial
— for the completion of Autumn Crescent end although some items such es noise
attcnuation, fencing, and engincering the fill material do not appear to be
accounted for, they may be covered in the contingency itcm. Thcrefore, there
does appear to be sutficienl allowance to ensure futurc development of these lends
' and completion of Autumn Crescent to Foxwood Trail.
�P�� Robert Starr
Copy: Developmont Contro] Co-ordinator
n