HomeMy WebLinkAboutENG 14-15 City' 00 Report to
Executive Committee
PICKERING
Report Number: ENG 14-15
Date: July 6, 2015
From: Richard Holborn
Director, Engineering & Public Works
Subject: Proposed All-way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road
File: A-1440
Recommendation:
1. That Report ENG 14-15 of the Director, Engineering & Public Works regarding the
proposed installation of an all-way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank
Road and Toynevale Road be received;
2. That the attached draft by-law be enacted to amend Schedule "7" to By-law
6604/05 to provide for the regulation of stop signs on highways or parts of
highways under the jurisdiction of the Corporation of the City of Pickering,
specifically to address the proposed installation of an all-way stop control at the
intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road; and
3. That the existing school crossing guard station on Rosebank Road in front of
Rosebank Road Public School be relocated to the intersection of Rosebank Road
and Toynevale Road commencing September, 2015.
Executive Summary: Area residents requested City of Pickering staff to
investigate the installation of an all-way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank
• Road and Toynevale Road. Safety concerns have been expressed, specifically in
regards to-vehicle and pedestrian volumes and sightlines at the intersection.
In response to these concerns, Engineering & Public Works staff have completed a
review of the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road, including collection
of pedestrian and vehicle volumes, completion of municipal all-way stop warrants at the
intersection, observations of vehicle and pedestrian traffic, review of existing signs and
pavement markings, and review of the location of the school crossing guard station for
Rosebank Road Public School.
Staff recognizes that the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road has a
grade on the north leg such that southbound vehicles approaching the intersection
_ travel uphill.
Observations were completed at the intersection in January 2015, including stopping on
the hill during snowy conditions. It was determined that southbound vehicles are able to
118
1
ENG 14-15 July 6, 2015
Subject: Proposed All-way Stop Control, Rosebank Road
and Toynevale Road Page 2
stop and start on the grade on Rosebank Road when there is snow on the roadway, if
required to so. •
Area residents of the Rosebank Neighbourhood were informed of the proposed all-way
stop control and were given an opportunity to provide comments. Overall there was 27
responses received with 14 residents in support and 13 residents opposed.
Based on the investigation, the City's warrants for all-way stop controls were met with
Warrant 2: Minimum Vehicle Volume being satisfied for both the June 12, 2014, and
January 21, 2015 traffic counts.
Overall, based on the results of the vehicle and pedestrian count with the City's All-way
Stop Warrant being met, Engineering & Public Works staff recommend the placement of
an all-way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road.
Engineering & Public Works staff also recommend that the existing school crossing
guard station in front of Rosebank Road Public School be relocated to the intersection
of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road to assist children crossing the intersection over
to Rosebank Road Public School. This will come into effect in the new school year
commencing September 2015.
Financial Implications: The installation of stop signs, advance warning signs, and
stop bar and pavement markings at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale
Road can be accommodated within the 2015 Roads Current Budget.
Discussion: Area residents requested staff from the City of Pickering to
investigate the installation of an all-way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank
Road and Toynevale Road. Safety concerns have been expressed, specifically in
regards to vehicle and pedestrian volumes and sightlines at the intersection.
In response to these concerns, Engineering & Public Works staff have completed a
review of the intersection at Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road. City staffs review of.
the intersection included the following:
• collection of pedestrian and vehicle volumes
• completion of municipal all-way stop warrants at the intersection
• observations of vehicle and pedestrian traffic
• review of existing signs and pavement markings
• review of the location of the school crossing guard station for Rosebank Road Public
School
CORP0227-07/01 revised
119
p
ENG 14-15 July 6, 2015
Subject: Proposed All-way Stop Control, Rosebank Road
and Toynevale Road Page 3
The results of the review and recommendations are presented in the following sections.
Review of pedestrian and vehicle volumes at the intersection indicate that an all-
way stop control is required based on the City's all-way stop warrant
To determine if an all-way stop control is required at the intersection of Rosebank Road
and Toynevale Road staff completed municipal all-way stop warrants, in accordance
with the City's Safer Streets Traffic Management Strategy. The City's All-way Stop
Warrant calculates whether an all-way stop control is required, taking pedestrian and
vehicular volumes, reported collision history and sightlines into consideration.
Eight-hour vehicle and pedestrian turning movement counts were completed at the
intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road on Thursday, June 12, 2014 and
again on Wednesday, January 21, 2015. The specific time periods counted were 7:00
am to 9:00 am,11:00 am to 1:00 pm and 2:00 pm to 6:00 pm. The peak hour for both
vehicular and pedestrian traffic for the morning and afternoon periods at the intersection
of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road are as follows:
• June 12, 2014: 7:45 am to 8:45 am and 5:00 pm to 6:00 pm
• January 21, 2015: 8:00 am to 9:00 am and 5:00 pm to 6:00 pm
The City's warrants for ali-way stop controls were met with Warrant 2: Minimum Vehicle
Volume bring satisfied for both the June 12, 2014, and January 21, 2015 counts. This
warrant is a reduced standard approved in the City's Safer Streets Traffic Management
Strategy 2003 and is 70% of the Provincial All Way Stop Warrant. The June 12, 2014
and January 21, 2015 all-way stop warrants for the intersection can be found in
Attachment 1 and Attachment 2.
Although a warrant has been met, City staff had concern about other factors listed in the
City's Safer Streets Traffic Management Strategy where all-way stop controls should not
be implemented, including:
• Where the protection of pedestrians, school children in particular, is a prime
concern
• Where traffic would be required to stop on grades
Staff recognize that when travelling southbound on Rosebank Road from Granite Court
approximately 40 metres, which then
travel up a 9.35 percent grade for rox y ,
motorists must t p p g pp
transitions into a 2.3 percent grade for approximately 50 metres as it levels out at the
intersection with Toynevale Road. Staff also recognize that there is a hidden
intersection warning sign at the bottom of the hill for southbound travelling vehicles. It is
because of the hill on the north leg that City staff have maintained the position in the
P all-way past, not to install an all-wa stop at the intersection.
CORP0227-07/01 revised
120
ENG 14-15 July 6, 2015
Subject: Proposed All-way Stop Control, Rosebank Road
and Toynevale Road Page 4
Knowing that the intersection is now warranted for installation of an all-way stop control
based on vehicle volumes, observations were completed at the intersection in January
2015, including the ability of vehicles to stop and start on the hill during snowy
conditions. It was determined that, although not ideal, a southbound vehicle could stop
and start on the grade on Rosebank Road from a queue approaching the intersection,
when there is snow on the roadway.
Also, City staff recognizes that there are other locations in the City of Pickering where
vehicles are required to stop on grades, examples of these include:
• Major Oaks Road and Duberry Drive: eastbound all-way stop (5.5 percent grade)
• Third Concession Road and Brock Road: westbound traffic signals (6 percent grade
for approximately 205 metres)
An All-way stop control would not be warranted based on collision history or
sightlines at the intersection
The reported collision history for the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale
Road indicates that there were six reported angle/turning movement collisions during
the previous five year period that are correctable by the installation of an all-way stop
control, which is an average of 1.2 collisions per year.
The City's All-way Stop Warrant requires there to be an occurrence of three or more
reportable collisions per year, averaged over three years, correctable through the
installation of all-way stop controls. Therefore, an all-way stop control is not warranted
based on collision history.
Although there is a grade on the north leg of the intersection, sightlines are sufficient for
the posted speed limit of 40 km/h provided that a turning vehicle from Toynevale Road
to Rosebank Road waits a few seconds to allow for southbound vehicles at the bottom
of the hill on Rosebank Road to reach the top of the hill. Therefore, an all-way stop
control is not warranted based on sightlines.
Feedback from residents received by City staff indicates a split among residents
on the installation of an all-way stop due control to the grade on the north leg of
the intersection
A letter dated March 31, 2015 was sent to all residents, approximately 900 homes,
within the Rosebank Neighbourhood. The letter indicated that City staff were proposing
an all-way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road, and
provided area residents an opportunity to review and provide comments on the
proposed all-way stop control, as well as to indicate their support or opposition.
CORP0227-07/01 revised
121
•
ENG 14-15 July 6, 2015
Subject: Proposed All-way Stop Control, Rosebank Road
and Toynevale Road Page 5
The letter to residents generated only 27 replies. A summary of those that were in
support and those that were opposed are as follows:
• replies that were in support of an all-way stop control: 14
• replies that were opposed to an all-way stop control: 13
Residents that were in support of-the all-way stop control at the intersection of
Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road indicated the following:
• better for sightlines especially for motorists turning off Toynevale Road
• pedestrians, especially 1 children going to Rosebank Road Public School, will be safer
p P Y 9 9
if vehicles have to stop at the intersection
• will slow traffic making it safer for all users of the roadway
Residents that were opposed to the all-way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank
Road and Toynevale Road indicated the following:
• will make it more difficult to get up the hill in the winter, especially if there is a queue
at the intersection
• an increase of rear-end accidents for traffic on Rosebank Road will occur due to
motorists accelerating up the hill towards the stop and running into the back of
another vehicle
• a back-up of traffic will occur in the morning and afternoon when motorists are
entering and exiting the neighbourhood via Rosebank Road, Granite Court, Whites
Road to Highway 401
In summary, based on the results of the vehicle and pedestrian count with the City's All-
way Stop Warrant being met, Engineering & Public Works staff recommend the -
placement of an all-way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and
Toynevale Road.
Engineering & Public Works staff also recommend that the existing school crossing
guard station in front of Rosebank Road Public School be relocated to the intersection
of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road to assist children crossing the intersection over
to Rosebank Road Public School. This will come into effect in the new school year
commencing September 2015.
The proposed all-way stop control can be seen in Attachment 3. The proposed by-law
amendment to Schedule 7 of By-law 6604/05 is presented in Attachment 4.
CORP0227-07/01 revised
122
ENG 14-15 July 6, 2015
• Subject: Proposed All-way Stop Control, Rosebank Road
and Toynevale Road Page 6
Attachments:
1. All-way Stop Warrant, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road, June 12, 2014
2. All-way Stop Warrant, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road, January 21, 2015
3. Location Map - Proposed All-way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale
Road
4. Proposed By-law 6604/05 Amendment— Schedule 7, Stop Signs
Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By:
Nathan Emery Rich- d Holborn, P. Eng.
Coordinator, Traffic Operations Dire tor, Engineering & Public Works
Selsky, CET, CMM III
/fr-Dall
Manager, Capital Projects & Infrastructure
NE:mjh
Recommended for the consideration
of Pickering Ci Council
VT 2-0 IS
Tony Prevedel, P.Eng.
Chief Administrative Officer
CORP0227-07!01 revised
123
ATTACHMENT#, TO REPORT#
of_—
off° All-Way Stop Warrant
(Local and Minor Collector Streets)
Study Date: June. 12, 2014
Intersection Type: 4-way
INTERSECTION COUNT DATA
Road Legal Road
Direction Speed Class
Major Road: Rosebank Road n/s 40 Collector
Minor Road: Toynevale Road e/w 40 . Collector
Hour Major Minor Total Exceeds Major Minor Exceeds Exceeds
Ending Volume Volume Volume 245 % % 75/25 split 65/35 split
8:00 245 112 357 Yes 68.6% 31.4% Yes
9:00 339 179 518 Yes 65.4% 34.6% Yes
12:00 232 106 338 Yes 68.6% 31.4% Yes
13:00 261 92 353 Yes 73.9% 26.1% Yes
15:00 262 87 349 Yes 75.1% 24.9% Yes
16:00 373 149 522 Yes 71.5% 28.5% Yes
17:00 444 220 664 Yes 66.9% 33.1% Yes
18:00 531 293 824 Yes 64.4% 35.6% No
Peak Hours Ending
8:45 363 164 527 Yes 68.9% 31.1% Yes
12:45 276 94 370 Yes 74.6% 25.4% Yes
18:00 531 293 824 Yes 64.4% 35.6% No
Warrant Evaluation
Warrant 1 Traffic Control
Traffic control signals are warranted but cannot be implemented immediately No
Warrant 2 Minimum Vehicle Volume
Total vehilce volume on all approaches exceeding 70%of 350 (245)for highest hour Yes
recorded;and .
3-way intersection volume split not exceeding 75/25 for highest hour recorded.
OR
4-way intersection volume split ratio not exceeding 65/35 for highest hour recorded. Yes
Warrant 3 Collision History
Occurance of 3 or more reportable right-angle collisions of a type correctible through the No
installation of an all-way stop in a 12 month period averaged over 3 years.
There were 6 reported angle/turning movement collisions during the last 5 years. (Avg. 1.2 per year)
1 of 2
124 •
ATTACHMENT# 1 -TQ REPORT# E FJ E'1 j11—/S-
22-- of 2
City a A, All-Way Stop Warrant
taLCNisplUi (Local and Minor Collector Streets)
NONNMINOC
Warrant 4 Sightline Requirments
The minimum stopping sighjt distance at this intersection is less than the applicable criteria for No
wet pavement as specified in the Stopping Sight Distance table below
Design Speed (km/h) Stopping Sight Distance Required(m)
40 50
50 60
60 85
70 110
The stopping sight distance varies,vehicles can be seen on Rosebank at Granite Court when
looking from the Toynevale intersection but cannot been seen in the area just south of the Granite
Court until close to Toynevale.The blind spot is<50m from the intersection of Toynevale
Note: For the multi-way stop to be technically justified, any individual warrant must be satisfied.
All-Way Stop Warrants Met: Yes
2of2
125
ATTACHMENT# 2 i EPORT= S�-
af.
C`'y All-Way Stop Warrant
fataiil
= (Local and Minor Collector Streets)
Study Date:' January. 21,2015
Intersection Type: 4-way
INTERSECTION COUNT DATA
Road Legal Road
D irection Speed Class
Major Road: Rosebank Road n/s 40 Collector
Minor Road: Toynevale Road e/w 40 Collector
Hour Major Minor Total Exceeds Major Minor Exceeds Exceeds
Endinq Volume Volume Volume 245 % % 75/25 split 65/35 split
8:00 225 115 340 Yes 66.2% 33.8% Yes
9:00 442 251 693 Yes 63.8% 36.2% No
12:00 171 77 248 Yes 69.0% 31.0% , Yes
13:00 158 63 221 No 71.5% 28.5% Yes
15:00 155 80 235 No 66.0% 34.0% Yes
16:00 317 119 436 Yes ' 72.7% 27.3% Yes
17:00 218 119 337 Yes 64.7% 35.3% ' No
18:00 309 146 455 Yes 67.9% 32.1% Yes
Peak Hours Ending
9:00 442 251 693 Yes 63.8% 36.2% No
12:00 171 77 248 Yes 69.0% 31.0% Yes
18:00 309 146 455 Yes 67.9% 32.1% Yes
Warrant Evaluation
Warrant 1 Traffic Control .
Traffic control signals are warranted but cannot be implemented immediately No
Warrant 2 Minimum Vehicle Volume
Total vehilce volume on all approaches exceeding 70%of 350 (245)for highest hour Yes
recorded;and
3-way intersection volume split not exceeding 75/25 for highest hour recorded.
OR
4-way intersection volume split ratio not exceeding 65/35 for highest hour recorded. Yes
Warrant 3 Collision History
Occurance of 3 or more reportable right-angle collisions of a type correctible through the No
installation of an all-way stop in a 12 month period averaged over 3 years.
There were 6 reported angle/turning movement collisions during the last 5 years. (Avg. 1.2 per year)
1of2
126
T�FtEPQ °F# illC--
ATTACHMENT#2 0
CIEs All-Way Stop Warrant
e=`'. _ `-. (Local and Minor Collector Streets)
•
���C1�1C,I1�C
Warrant 4 Sightline Requirments
The minimum stopping sighjt distance at this intersection is less than the applicable criteria for No
wet pavement as specified in the Stopping Sight Distance table below
Design Speed(km/h) Stopping Sight Distance Required (m)
40 50
50 60
60 85
70 • 110
The stopping sight distance varies,vehicles can be seen on Rosebank at Granite Court when
looking from the Toynevale intersection but cannot been seen in the area just south of the Granite
Court until close to Toynevale.The blind spot is<50m from the intersection of Toynevale
Note: For the multi-way stop to be technically justified,any individual warrant must be satisfied.
All-Way Stop Warrants Met: Yes
• 2of2
127
. ....
• ..
... .
---- ,
• . - L----/V /V—/
S
P,TIACti—M ENT#....._- S.._TO. ,R,IE PO Tr#,..._._
,___/ w'_.--l----
• 1!)IL .
• •
•
___, ,m77,;,•::.;•:.Lc,„T:,::,,17,...•f,;,, z,.;,.--, _,,...-. -,..w..';:: -•"--1. 'z''''.'4'-', ' 0.;,.17'
' -.•.,.' ...- • :.•• :..,•' fz-i44;-• :- .a-',:en- --7-' it7:4,:!•.:.;:.7-_, ez.....--,•,-4.- ',''•-i":--- : .'&i„• 44-0,' If.:•‘"•;7-,:,'•••;,•,"7•4
'...,,:',.•.- .,. :" ... .v.,ri;.:,-4,7,-.7,--•;,:::,: f.•.;•,, - :7:-,;::.:•.„ ,•• ,- .,...-•,„,. ,..:•" tie, A -...,„ --- ,!.,(f•U.k.I^`,.''''''::
itr...;-4,
'',•".' ,".: ..i ..': ,.",...:..-,..'::•>':-.,:,::F•=•,,rP., ::::..'4'"-•L ,":-. ..;,..:•,.,; f.W ..e.1-';',. i "4. .. I- ,-:, .`•-;.•1 ' ''s.''--‘,.',4'
. - :••••••• • '-",'",---. -z_=,.,,n,Z..i, ' t'ik".e•- "T.: ::.t , ''- , -. p"-...4•A'.,..-
. '7,?J',',.:.:,:.; ' ': - T':' '''':''.--'1,..c,-.,:',..''Z' .,•t,fir,-aii7.,.."74-f-,14.•,''-• 7„..-.-: •.:',...4-, .?, '14.';'..t'. - ::-.'"'..,''''''!: 4..- -..-...„,....,'t;." :.-Ift,'' -tr.''1'1.1' ''.:1,?1
(
''',' -:.—'":"'-',...: •:„..":•;:':.::.:41,:',t0t.4737,`,...-.1ri.:;:',.:".','; '7,-Z,-.;;,..,..-..,..4.7,.'5",''.:M. :ikie,,i7tr:-.51, 4.,.'■ i'",''4;'4::=1 ,,,,-.:#.'s.-0'A-.1"::-7„,":.-',:,...t.; .'--.,f,.;:...
'..,:'''..„.":- if.-'. :::•'.;:4:::1,;;.%-5:.;'-;*:;:':i'... s..%,:..,';VR..",tt';' ;;!•03'...;),:•"..!,.,;`'.,..4-F,'„%-ir',,....-V•.'.- ..,. ' '-..;'7.4:;i77,;,Iri7,.„4.....-- ,„,:,:i.
i•.:1'. .::. -':j..,-„:',"',-.i.:::.:7;:•:7",--"-'-',::-- 71 ..,:-•• ,.:..2":4:4717.!-::..1',„i.. ....".,'...1 ., 7("•.'..'"4.:.::',-,',,,It..„.. :._%,.: . ,-- ..,‘. . ,k .0„::,,c-4
' :::-::..:..',.:•: •....,,..:q-fl...',1-,...'::‘rt.":. ..1.7.1.i.4. ..- . .y,:.•• a" I.:'1:::,';'4..r '1''''14'. '...r ''''' - " ,., ..4.4..ii:1.*: ,..... ''
7". .::4. .1,44'. 4K, '. ' :-.. .. •,! .-'...'i4,14'. 0.-'7.-,.!,--z--. :,,.;-.0
.'". . -'2.. .-- 7..' -'''-'''. ';''''''-- -,,'"%;, .''..--::.' ''-•...,''. :.%,=.;• 0 :::,-f,: . :;:1...-}k..,. :.-i.": ::.:,,,,,,.Tr,'..::.=r,.,.::,•,:i., ... :,; ..-,..,% ,.
6;.::,,.1-4:9 : ' t•-•'• -7.'': 'i-i, -, '"ii;:-: ''''?..'_(.1..?;11. ,(/) 'r.-]; ',1,:•- -:::-.:':-".' '''r" '''" - — ''E"'": ',.' '
2.4s,--,•.:.::::: -.--- ..„....-4::,,,,...4.:
' ' -,:..-:::' '''..: •:' :-:: '-':!'•-'4,i-,i :'e•-'-- . :1.;;210...,c,•::'-*.e,fr.,'' r-2.:4,'",,::'' Proposed
: . ....... •
. '' '''• -,4:1-':', •-• -' -'.: ::•••„'..-.A-.;:,....it -.....:.- •:'••,f-', .All-way Stop Control
•-;,,•• • ',•-• .•:..,, ,C.-'.,';:. . -..':..',--.7.i4,:i.-> ",-.•:,.: '"",'• :,',._:ri!.-.1:',";
-S' .':•:;.•,;:.„ ': ',4 tio' ' •...."' ..:T.I7,7-...,:!',"'- •,.., '' '.-st:'," ...:;•7'Q ,—..AV-'- .::,:•- '..,iii f' ' :...,..... ''R''''il;,;°'•'; -- ,4`,...;
tr.''''. '• :AP''' -..,_ ,,,,-•';',..".•.= -7-'' ','''''.-. .:''':''''.';:-,Ii..:.:".;4P ,:' ' t.,'.,i,-;';,-,,'- ''','', ,Z1b.=:.i.:4,1,'!j:.. ,:;;,,,,,,ift),$:
. '....- ''''':..:4r4H— . '- :'':-'-',:i''',. ...;--..,,'-17..7+:, rs..°14,•''4,1 q A t,..,,"2-`,...,;, :-',''''' -''',1-„-•,.1.',7'...:.,A,,f1,,,;-,,, ..!:-..•.;7. .• .,,'.',"-....;, ...,..,,t i,;.
iv
'-‘0.4''.,:,ti7'..; ,....'',-.'''7': -•',1:.1',-;"' -'••:-.-,.- - . -:-' .':•'
IFil).,
_T.' --- --- ;- . •••-t; .. , - *.•,
" 1 •Tod: .
1111//411t- '
Toynev a
e:! -4
a --,i .- *.:;-,, .k. ''.,5 tf ..;,,,,., ''..-' ,— ...,•:': `• , •.- ' " .
. ..-':4'.=,,-;‘4,,,,. -. .':.,--.,nv7,;11:-•;:7,...-",:i. ...9.:1::i...,- . '..,''''.-'''.: : . ' - ' '
P4'-''''''''''' ' ' ' '' ' '''' '1:..k;''''''.1.: '''. .,:r-7: •-,' '' . ' .. „ .— ' : „ ; 1 .
roposed Relocation pe7,4,-:,-.. :-'!-,... .-:•.c: .'-'..-1-: . , ,... . .
''-::4-•:: -. of Crossing Guard
:-:'.,,f1::.:-.-=:::::::,.:,,.7....I-,„,:•,..,,,..,...,,i,,,...i.,.- ...,:.,:-‘- ':-.:.7:4'..1 -7.:'''.1.'.°4r..1 1.1'1:''t°" ''''''''.14:14.:.::'-:,.:::4'ii-.t.-'f'''- .
Existing Cro s' s-'1ing'''F'4.;'',',',;'":..'s.,.*''7'''.'.•. • .'-Roseb nc PO 6z'.;;;
.,.
;=::1.5' ' '''; ' Guard Location , --f.: •..1° P, I: . Sc
.:'''':'... '-'.. . .-• .'•••' :,.., , ,,--ji-f' ,...7.•-•1:-•-,. :-: .. : .,;,•',.-: ::,:,:--i'l . ,...• l,• •
-. ..' ---:..,..:-;.....-.14,-.- . . ' :-. .;,:-...-- ,::-!,. -,' -:,'''' •. „_-_, -4' .:-:' ': i_ . :•.
..J'.,-,, -,-. ...--,•,.c,..1-..-.'..?:'...,.--..,,-:- .- "; 7:'`7''''''''. .-i"!?'' '!'' .:-;'54!..i-..'''' ''' Ti;': '-•;i' .-.: , . . • : . • .
. .
: 1:7.`,2=-,,' ''':..„44., 4)...-.7..-•-...-'f.."; ,::::"....7, . .- "y.:-."4',... r':-.1,i - - , ',-,,•,i,: *, ,-... '4'1 1: " ' '
',..T t 7!..V :';'.,Z 4.::,'•.'77,44 'A*?...: :.:VI ''', ' 4.':' " 0 1 :. ; . '...''7 .":l'i : ' „
*
V.
■ *14...V''' ... ;';.... - 'J." ':•'il'. .. . 1 ' :,:'''.....''''..1:' '..' ..". ': ' . :. ' . ''. .
r'''.'';.' %,''...= '7,•,:',•iit•-•,"''''.- - ..':.-..'..-4'7.-''''.4 ..--::•,• . -.7- ''' a,,::.,..;: ,. . - i ‘• .
. ,..::.'. - ..,1, C13 '- ,.._..-:.:.- -`,•. .. - 2-•.‘.-t-s" t-A. -:',K-....:..."..~..• -...: . -, •-•,:::-•:' .:::..,;•:' : • : - - . . .
.:lit. , '-' ..•.,'`
•
•
•
•
•
. .
•
Cif,'00 0.
Public Works Department Proposed All
Control
. .
Engineering &
d 1111113atilvel
•
1 Rosebank Road a
sep.L
I
N.T.S.
-wnadyToSytnoevpalCe Roonat
128 • . .
A TACF4MENT# _ TO REPORT#_t'J7 iY�-/�
The Corporation of the City of Pickering
By-law No.
Being a by-law to amend by-law 6604/05
providing for the regulating of traffic and
parking, standing and stopping on highways
or parts of highways under the jurisdiction of
the City of Pickering and on private and
municipal property.
Whereas, By-law 6604/05, as amended, provides for the regulating of traffic and parking
on highways, private property and municipal property within the City of Pickering, and
Whereas, it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule 7 to By-law 6604/05 to establish
an all-way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road.
Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as
follows:
1. Schedule 7 to By-law 6604/05, as amended, is hereby further amended thereto •
by the following:
Schedule 7
Stop Signs
Column 1 Column 2
Highway Compulsory Stop Facing Traffic
Add
Rosebank Road @ Rosebank Road, northbound and southbound
Toynevale Road
•
•
129
ATTACHMENT# L TD REPORT# 51/6
By-law No. Page 2
2
2. This By-law shall come into force on the date that it is approved by the Council of
the City of Pickering and when signs to the effect are installed.
By-law passed this 13th day of July, 2015.
David Ryan, Mayor •
Debbie Shields, City Clerk
•
130