HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 21, 2002
Statutory Public Information Meeting Minutes
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Thursday, February 21,2002
7:00 P.M.
Chair: Councillor Holland
PRESENT:
Councillor Holland
STAFF:
C. Rose
G. McGregor
R. Pym
P. Korouyenis
G. Romanowski
D. Kearns
- Manager, Policy
- Principal Planner, Policy
- Principal Planner, Development Review
- Planning Technician
- Planning Technician
- Committee Coordinator
The Manager, Policy, provided an overview of the requirements of the Planning Act and the Ontario
Municipal Board respecting this meeting and matters under consideration there at.
(I)
2.
(II)
2.
3.
4.
ZONING BY - LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 29/01
PINE RIDGE PROPERTIES INc.
PART OF LOT 21, CONCESSION 1
PART 2 TO 12, PLAN 40R-12896
1465 PICKERING PARKWAY
(SOUTH SIDE OF PICKERING PARKWAY. WEST OF VALLEY FARM RD.)
1.
Ross Pym, Principal Planner, Development Review, provided an explanation of the application,
as outlined in Information Report #03-02.
Robert Oldman, 555 Kingston Rd., Ajax, Principal Proponent, advised that he was present to
answer any questions.
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 22/01
1381190 ONTARIO LIMITED
BLOCK T, PLAN M15
(701-711 KROSNO BOULEVARD)
1.
Perry Korouyenis, Planning Technician, provided an explanation of the application, as outlined
in Information Report #09-02.
Maureen Charlton, 867 Hillcrest Road, stated that this application should not be permitted as
there are enough businesses in the area properly zoned to service the neighbourhood. She stated
her concerns with respect to the proposed or existing propane tanks. She advised that lottery
tickets and large food items are being sold at this establishment without proper zoning. The area
is not large enough to support two similar businesses.
Agnes Deutsch, owner of the property adjacent, stated that this application conflicts with the
development presently taking place in her plaza. She stated her strong opposition to this
application.
Brent Copin, Fairview Ave., advised that he frequents both establishments and believes in
competition.
- 1 -
Statutory Public Information Meeting Minutes
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Thursday, February 21,2002
7:00 P.M.
Chair: Councillor Holland
5.
At resident at 1295 Wharf St., advised that he also purchases items at both stores and sees no
problem with competition.
6.
Joanne Key, 1303 Luna Court, advised that she sees no problem with the proposal and also
frequents both stores. She is anxious to have a dry cleaning facility in the area.
7.
Sylvain Trepanier, 1218 Monica Cook Place, questioned if market research has been done in the
area to ensure sustainability from the Bay Ridges area. He questioned if the applicant is opposed
to building one or the other or must they both be built together.
8.
Danny Murphy, 804 Helen Cres., stated that allowing the gas station to sell lottery tickets and
large items prior to rezoning circumvents good faith.
9.
George Vlachos, 724 Annland St., stated is agreement with the application and is in favor of
competition.
10.
Nick Devalis, representing the applicant, advised that this is a two point plan to redevelop the
property, develop a first class station eventually to enhance the area and improve the site.
11.
Kash Joshi, 196 Joseph Aaron Blvd., applicant, stated that he is not going to ask for all the items
sold by a convenience store but wishes to sell only the items other gas stations carry.
12.
Cathy Rose, Manager, Policy, advised that Council may choose to approve either the
convenience store or the dry cleaning depot or both. She further stated that a review of the
circulation of this item will be undertaken.
(III)
REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION OPA 01-008/D
PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION OPA 01-005/P
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 25/01
FIRST SIMCHA SHOPPING CENTRES LIMITED
(METRO EAST TRADE CENTRE)
PART OF LOT 18. CONCESSION 1
1.
Grant McGregor, Principal Planner, Policy, provided an explanation of the application, as
outlined in Information Report #04-02.
2.
Michael Goldberg, Planning Consultant, representing the applicant, advised that a market impact
study has been provided as well as a planning analysis and transportation analysis. He further
advised that in 1999 uses were proposed and approved and these are the same uses that are being
proposed with this application. Elimination of the trade center and better efficiency of the area is
what is proposed with a net overall increase of 100,000 sq. ft. Unit size restrictions were placed
on this property in the 1999 By-law and no changes will be made. Refinement of the previous
approvals is what is anticipated.
3.
Nina Kontrara, stated her concern for the heritage of Pickering, advising that small businesses
should not be displaced for large box businesses.
4.
Mark Resnick, representing the Pickering Town Centre, advised of his representation of the
Pickering Town Centre.
- 2 -
Statutory Public Information Meeting Minutes
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Thursday, February 21,2002
7:00 P.M.
Chair: Councillor Holland
6.
7.
9.
(IV)
2.
5.
Leslie Blackmore, 640 Simcoe St., Oshawa, advised that she is a vendor at the Flea Market
which is held in the Metro East Trade Centre and has patrons from all over not just Pickering.
She questioned if visitors to the flea market have been asked how they feel about this
application. She also inquired whether or not vendors will have first rights to leasing if the new
facilities.
Chad Baptiste, advised of his presence and representation of Canadian Tire.
A vendor at the Flea Market stated that the market is profitable enough and there is no need to
demolish it. He suggested that new proposal include maintaining the Metro East Trade Centre.
8.
Paul Feldman, 965 Mountcastle Cres., vendor, advised that the market runs at high capacity.
More specialty stores are not needed when they are available within a short distance.
Grant Morris, 289 Starview Crt, suggested that Council take a position to ensure a location for
vendors.
10.
Ron Halliday, 427 Taunton Road, advised of his presence and representation of Cougs
Development.
11.
A resident of Scarborough stated that the flea market has a personnel touch and vendors provide
personnel service.
12.
Jack Weisz, co-owner of Brock Plaza, stated his objection to the application. He advised that
tenants are struggling to make ends meet and this application will destroy them as well as the
City core.
13.
John Liska, 700 Amaretto Ave., stated his opposition to the proposal, advising that people from
far and wide know of the market.
14.
Andy Payne, vendor, advised that it is the Council's responsibility to know the thousands of
people who will be affected by this application.
15.
Sylvain Trepanier, 1218 Monica Cook Place, stated that staff have not considered revenue
generated by this market. He questioned if direct impact has been investigated by the City. He
stated that if this application is to go forward, he hoped that the applicant would work with the
vendors to ensure they have a location or give them first lease opportunity.
16.
Michael Goldberg, Planning Consultant, representing the applicant, stated that they have the
utmost sensitivity and regard for those affected by this application. He stated that the METC is
privately owned and the tenants are on a month to month basis. He further stated that they would
take the previous comments into consideration.
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 23/01
WILLIAM WADDELL
PART 1 TO 8, PLAN 40R- 7348
WHITE V ALE PARK. WHITE V ALE ROAD
1.
Ross Pym, Principal Planner, Development Review, provided an explanation of the application,
as outlined in Information Report #05-02.
William Waddell, 56 Peace Dr., Scarborough, thanked Mr. Pym for his assistance and advised
that he was present to answer any questions.
- 3 -
Statutory Public Information Meeting Minutes
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Thursday, February 21,2002
7:00 P.M.
Chair: Councillor Holland
3.
Janet Mehak, 360 Whitevale Road, stated her concern with respect to possible noise from the
Blacksmith Shop, increased traffic along Whitevale Road and the possibility of a precedent being
set by allowing a business within a community park. She questioned if there are plans for the
other vacant building on the site.
4.
Chris Spiers, 35 Robertsfield Road, Toronto, stated that he would like to reserve the right to
comment later.
5.
William Waddell, applicant, advised that he has been in contact with the Whitevale Comm.
Assoc. and has addressed many questions and will continue to use that medium to deal with
future concerns.
(V)
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 03/01
SEAN AND ANN REGAN
1911 VALLEY FARM ROAD
PART OF LOT 20. CONCESSION 1
1.
Ross Pym, Principal Planner, Development Review, provided an explanation of the application,
as outlined in Information Report #06-02.
2.
Sean Regan, 1911 Valley Farm Road, applicant, advised that when they purchased the property it
was their intention to build two luxury homes but were advised that the zoning was for medium
density, townhouses. He stated that he is proposing 2,000 sq. ft. luxury, freehold townhouses
and intends to live in the last unit.
3.
Wendy Lee Fisher, 1915 Valley Farm Rd., stated that the plans being presented are not the ones
she previously viewed. She questioned what changes could be made after approval is given. She
further questioned why the change to townhouses when the street is single family dwellings. She
requested this not be approved but that the present standard be maintained.
4.
George Ashe, 28 Courtice Road, stated that he owns property on Finch Ave. and is hoping to
also present a similar plan for his property. He stated his support of this application.
5.
Mr. Sarwatsky, 1934 Valley Farm Road, stated his opposition to this application.
6.
Mr. Regan, applicant, advised that these homes will be full brick, Georgian Homes with elegant
doors. He stated that what he is building is far superior to what he is presently living in.
(VI)
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 26/01
689629 ONTARIO LIMITED
SOUTH PART OF LOT 31, CONCESSION 1, (PART 2, 40R-17618)
420 SHEPPARD AVENUE
1.
GeoffRomanowski, Planning Technician, provided an explanation of the application, as outlined
in Information Report #08-02.
2.
Grant Morris, applicant and owner, 289 Starview Court, stated he was present to answer
questions.
- 4 -
Statutory Public Information Meeting Minutes
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Thursday, February 21,2002
7:00 P.M.
Chair: Councillor Holland
3.
Norm Barraclough, 407 Sheppard Ave., advised that he owns the property directly diagonal and
want to see single family dwellings maintained. He stated his opposition to this application. He
questioned if permits were applied for and granted for the basement which was built. He stated
his concern with respect to increased traffic and possible accidents. If a residence is built on top
of the barn, privacy will be taken away from the neighbouring residents.
4.
Gail Dobson, 418 Sheppard Ave., submitted a letter from Mr. & Mrs. Hancock at 440 Sheppard
Ave. She stated that the existing dwelling has not yet been completed and they are already
asking for changes. She stated her concerns with respect to parking, noise, safety, playing area
for kids and dogs, and privacy. She stated her opposition to this application.
5.
Tony Mechelly, 414 Sheppard Ave., advised that he shares the concerns as the previous
speakers. Compatibility with surrounding area should be maintained, it is not appropriate to
have three dwellings on one site. Stated his concern with respect to on street parking, front yark
parking, impact on neighbours, impact of noise from CNR and appropriateness of location of
garage.
6.
Al Sacco, 1498 Old Forest Road, stated that he concurs with previous speakers and does not
want to see this happen in their neighbourhood.
7.
Grant Morris, applicant, advised that this home was moved from the south of Sheppard Ave.
This proposal will not devalue the neighbourhood. He stated that he intends to build two homes,
approximately 3,400 sq. ft., on the south side of Sheppard Ave. He stated his concern for the
Dobsons and is considering moving the garage and lowering the ramp. He has engaged a
consultant concerning the noise from the CNR. He advised that other residence in the
neighbourhood have apartment units and all renters for these units will be screened. He further
advised that pets will not be allowed.
(VII)
RESOLUTION OF DEFERRAL 36 TO THE PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION SP-2001-06
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 21/01
ALCORN & ASSOCIATES LIMITED ON BEHALF OF E. & E. TAYLOR
PART OF LOT 29, CONCESSION 2
(WEST SIDE OF WHITES ROAD. NORTH OF FINCH A VENUE)
1.
Ross Pym, Principal Planner, Development Review, provided an explanation of the application,
as outlined in Information Report #07-02.
2.
Randy Alcorn, representing the applicant, advised that he is present to answer any questions.
3.
John Liska, 700 Amaretto Ave., Whites Grove Community Assoc., stated their concern with
respect to building 149 units on 4.25 hectares, increase in traffic, safety of children, pond depth
and lack of sidewalks. He further stated their concern that this development will take away from
their area and the new development across the street. He questioned if a report on storm water
impact on the pond has been submitted. He also questioned if Amaretto and Whiskey Gate
would be used as a shortcut to Finch to avoid the lights. He stated concern with respect to lane
reductions due to construction, debris left from construction and environmental concerns.
4.
Randy Alcorn, representing the applicant, advised that townhouses are not to be built, only semi-
detached, a storm water report has been submitted and no additional storm water will go into the
pond, traffic will increase and the Region will tend to adjusting the lights at the corner of Finch
Avenue and Whites Road. He further advised that technical reports were submitted to the
Planning Department in September.
- 5 -
Statutory Public Information Meeting Minutes
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Thursday, February 21,2002
7:00 P.M.
Chair: Councillor Holland
5.
Cathy Rose, Manager, Policy, advised that Information Reports are ready for pick up on Friday
prior to the Statutory Public Information Meeting.
(VIII) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
- 6-