HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 15, 2014 Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
C tit 0 90 In"SI
ii ii ii~_- .r ��ii'ii„�ii�`L
/ ?• �''' a uI iiI — �-
-17'x::1'
Meeting Number: 1
Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2014
Cifq °ye Committee of Adjustment
�frm
Agenda
P ` C , Wednesday, January 15, 2014
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Page Number
(I) Adoption of Agenda
(II) Adoption of Minutes from December 18, 2013 1-10
(III) Reports
1. P/CA 01/14
M. & P. Beagan 11-15
122 Secord Street
2. P/CA 02/14 to P/CA 03/14
M. Gaffney 16-21
1832 Fairport Road
(IV) Other Business
1. Appointment of Secretary-Treasurer
(V) Adjournment
Accessible For information related to accessibility requirements please contact:
Lesley
P I C K E fN G T. Dunne 905.420.4660, extension 2024
TTY 905.420.1739
Email Idunne @pickering.ca
City o¢► = Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, December 18, 2013 01
RAMC 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Pending Adoption
Present:
Tom Copeland
David Johnson —Chair
Eric Newton •
Bill Utton
Shirley Van Steen —Vice-Chair
Also Present:
Melissa Markham, Principal Planner— Development Review
Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
(I) Adoption of Agenda
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Eric Newton
That the agenda for the Wednesday, December 18, 2013 meeting be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
(II) Adoption of Minutes
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Eric Newton
That the minutes of the 15th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held
Wednesday, November 27, 2013 be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
Page 1of10
•
Uhl 0 = Committee of Adjustment
02 - = Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
(Ill) Reports
1. P/CA 57/13
2143087 Ontario Limited
2055 Brock Road
The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036,
as amended by By-law 7085/10, to permit a minimum of 68 percent of the length
of a build-to-zone to contain a building or part of a building; whereas the by-law
does not permit a building, part of a building, or structure to be erected within the
"RH/MU-3"zone unless a minimum of 85 percent of the length of the build-to-zone
contains a building or part of a building.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain site plan approval for a new commercial building.
Principal Planner— Development Review outlined staff recommendation from the
City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions.
The applicant/agent was not in attendance to speak about the application.
Maureen Schorn of 1760 Finch Avenue was present and asked questions to
seek clarification of the application and expressed concern with the removal of
trees.
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P/CA 57/13 by 2143087 Ontario Limited, be Tabled to the next
meeting to allow the applicant to be present to answer questions from Committee
Members and residents.
Carried Unanimously
Page 2of10
City eq = Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
MOO 1161 7:00 pm 03
Main Committee Room
2. P/CA 58/13
H. Hamam
1725 Echo Point Court
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
1998/85, to permit an unenclosed covered platform (deck) to project a maximum
of 3.7 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered
platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and to project a
maximum of 1.5 metres into any required rear yard.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance in order to obtain a
building permit to construct an unenclosed covered platform (deck) with a total
area of 31.4 square metres in the side and rear yard.
•
Principal Planner—Development Review outlined staff recommendation from the
p P
City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions.
H. Chahine, Renosense General Contracting, agent, was present to represent
the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection
to the application.
Moved by Tom Copeland
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
That application P/CA 58/13 by H. Hamam, be Approved on the grounds that
the projection of an unenclosed covered platform (deck) to a maximum of
3.7 metres into the required rear yard is minor in nature, that is desirable for the
appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and
purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the unenclosed covered platform (deck)
attached to the main building, as generally sited and outlined on the
applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
December 18, 2015 or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
•
Page 3 of 10
Clef 4 Committee of Adjustment
Ind {4� Meeting Minutes
iiZ �.
' Wednesda December 18, 2013
11.3711NIZE Y� 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
3. P/CA 59/13
J. & S. McQuaid
1800 Pine Grove Avenue
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit an
existing 15.0 square metre cabana to be located in the side yard, whereas the
by-law requires all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building to
be erected in the rear yard.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order recognize the existing
cabana in the side yard.
Principal Planner— Development Review outlined staff recommendation from the
City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions.
Robin McKenna, agent, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P/CA 59/13 by J. & S. McQuaid, be Approved on the grounds
that the existing 15.0 square metre cabana located in the side yard is minor in
nature that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in
keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning
By-law, subject to the following conditions:
•
1. That this variance apply only to the existing cabana, as sited and outlined on
the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the existing cabana by
December 18, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
•
Page 4 of 10
1
Utq 00 = Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
� 7:00 pm 05
Main Committee Room
4. P/CA 60/13
D. Mandarello
569 Rougemount Drive
The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 2511:
• to permit a minimum front yard depth of 7.0 metres; whereas the zoning
by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres
• to permit a minimum gross floor area for an existing 1 storey dwelling of
83 square metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum gross floor area
for a 1 storey dwelling of 95 square metres
• to permit an accessory building with a maximum height of 4.1 metres in a
residential zone; whereas the zoning by-law does not permit an accessory
building to exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain a building permit to construct an 80.5 square metre detached garage in
the rear yard. The applicant also seeks a reduction in the minimum required
front yard depth and minimum gross floor area to bring the existing 1 storey •
dwelling into compliance with the zoning by-law.
Principal Planner— Development Review outlined staff recommendation from the
City Development Department recommending the application be tabled.
Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works
Department indicating that the applicant will have to alter the existing grading on
the lot to direct flow to the front of the lot, as the catch basin for the adjacent
subdivision to the east are not meant to accommodate additional drainage from
lots on the west side of Rougemount Drive. The applicant will have to submit a
grading and drainage plan to the satisfaction of the City.
Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Department
indicating the northern wall of the proposed detached garage does not comply
with the minimum separation standards in order to permit a glazed opening.
Written comments were received from M. & M. Ferrari of 573 Rougemount Drive
in objection to the application, including a petition signed by 14 surrounding
neighbours in objection to the application. Written comments were also received
from M. Ferrari of 575 Rougemont Drive in objection to the application.
•
Page 5 of 10
City ‘7,0 Committee of Adjustment
.,,. r Meeting Minutes
` ' Wednesday, December 18, 2013
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Domenic Mandarello, owner, was present to represent the application. Chris Ma
of 546 Lekani Court, Michael Ferrari of 573 Rougemount Drive, Oliver Tutte of
579 Rougemount Drive and Marisa Ferrari of 575 Rougemount were present in
objection to the application.
Chris Ma expressed concerns with the location and height of the proposed
garage and the loss of natural sunlight onto his property.
Michael Ferrari stated his objection to the variances for the existing dwelling as it
is currently derelict and rundown and he would like it to be removed. He also
stated his objection to the proposed garage as he believes that the height is too
tall and will be a towering structure in the neighbourhood.
Oliver Tutte expressed concern with the size of the garage and would like it to be
built to meet current standards.
Marisa Ferrari is also concerned with the width and size of the proposed garage.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P/CA 60/13 by D. Mandarello, be Tabled to allow the owner to
explore alternative designs for the accessory structure addressing the City's
concerns regarding overall size, height, and setbacks to the rear and side lot
lines and to review and approve a grading and drainage plan.
Carried Unanimously
5. P/CA 61/13
T. Jean-Baptiste & P. Keeler
545 Rodd Avenue
The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 2511,
as amended by By-law 5092/87:
• to permit a maximum building height of 9.2 metres, measured between the
established grade and the highest point of a flat roof surface, whereas the
by-law requires a maximum building height of 9.0 metres, measured between
the established grade and the highest point of a flat roof surface or parapet
wall
Page 6 of 10
City 00 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
a- _�=^,•gig Wednesday, December 18, 2013 Q 7
KIM_ r 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
• to permit uncovered steps and platforms with a maximum height of 2.2 metres
above grade to project a maximum of 5.2 metres into the required front yard,
whereas the by-law requires all uncovered steps and platforms not exceeding
1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into
any required front yard
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building
permit to construct a raised two-storey detached dwelling and associated
uncovered steps to project into the required front yard.
Principal Planner— Development Review outlined staff recommendation from the
City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions.
Written comments were received from Alexander Morr of 540 Rodd Avenue in
objection to the application.
Peter Vishnovski, agent, was present to represent the application. Alexander
Morr was present in objection to the application.
Alexander Morr stated his opposition to the variances and expressed concerns
with the removal of trees, the proposed setback of the encroachment from the
pavement and the impact that the proposed development will have on the
conservation lands and the waterfront trail.
In response to concerns, Peter Vishnovski explained that the proposed steps will
be approximately 9.0 metres from the asphalt and landscaping will be used to
screen the development. He also stated that one tree will need to be removed
and new landscaping will be provided along the development.
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by.Shirley Van Steen
That application P/CA 61/13 by T. Jean-Baptiste & P. Keeler, be Approved on
the grounds that the maximum building height of 9.2 metres, and uncovered steps
and platforms with a maximum height of 2.2 metres above grade to project a
maximum of 5.2 metres into the required front yard are minor in nature that are
desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed two storey detached dwelling
and associated uncovered steps and platforms, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
Page 7of10
Cali 00 Committee of Adjustment
_ °°- ��� Meeting Minutes
�a ll_r.n• w Wednesday, December 18, 2013
�8 / ���� 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
December 18, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
6. P/CA 57/13
2143087 Ontario Limited
2055 Brock Road
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 57/13 by 2143087 Ontario Limited, be lifted from the table.
Carried Unanimously
The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036,
as amended by By-law 7085/10, to permit a minimum of 68 percent of the length
of a build-to-zone to contain a building or part of a building; whereas the by-law
does not permit a building, part of a building, or structure to be erected within the
"RH/MU-3"zone unless a minimum of 85 percent of the length of the build-to-zone
contains a building or part of a building.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain site plan approval for a new commercial building.
Principal Planner— Development Review outlined staff recommendation from the
City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions.
Harry Kohn, agent, was present to represent the application. Maureen Schorn of
1760 Finch Avenue was present to obtain clarification on the application.
In response to concerns, Harry Kohn explained the size of the buffer zone and
stated that the flood plain will be preserved. Harry Kohn also indicated a height
of 3-storeys for the proposed building.
Page 8 of 10
oce Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
7:00 pm 09• .
Main Committee Room
Moved by Tom Copeland
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
That application P/CA 57/13 by 2143087, be Approved on the grounds that the
length of the build-to zone to contain a building or part of a building to be reduced
to 68 percent is minor in nature and desirable for the appropriate development of
the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan
and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed commercial building, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed development by
December 18, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
• 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed development by
December 18, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
(IV) Other Business
1. Appointment of Chairperson
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
That David Johnson be appointed as Chairperson for the 2014 term.
Carried Unanimously
2. Appointment of Vice Chairperson
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Bill Utton
That Shirley Van Steen be appointed as Vice Chairperson for the 2014 term.
Carried Unanimously
Page 9 of 10
Citq o0 == Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
A-`"� '•'S
Fu
`' '° Wednesday, December 18, 2013
.0 itV[ 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
(V) Adjournment
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Tom Copland
That the 16th meeting of the 2013 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at
7:48 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on
Wednesday, January 15, 2014.
Carried Unanimously
Date
Chair
•
Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Page 10 of 10
city
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
KINVIVW 11
Application Number: P/CA 01/14
Meeting Date: January 15, 2014
From: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review & Urban Design
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 01/14
M. & P. Beagan
122 Secord Street
Application
The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036, as
amended by By-law 4271/93:
• to permit an accessory structure with a height of 3.1 metres to be set back a
minimum of 0.5 of a metre from the rear and side lot lines, whereas the by-law
requires an accessory structure greater than 1.8 metres in height shall be set
back a minimum of 1.0 metres from all lot lines
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit
to construct an accessory structure 0.5 of a metre from the rear and east side of lot line.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers the accessory structure with a maximum
height of 3.1 metres at a minimum of 0.5 of a metre from the rear and side lot line to be
minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping
with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and
therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed accessory structure, as generally
sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That no openings are permitted on the accessory structure walls facing the rear and
east side lot line.
3. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by January
15, 2016 or this decision shall become null and void.
Report P/CA 01/14 January 15, 2014
12 Page 2
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residential—Low Density Areas"within the Highbush
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4271/93 —"S3"—Single Residential Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Accessory Structure Setback Variance
• the intent of the zoning by-law for accessory buildings to provide a minimum
1.0 metre setback from lot lines is to ensure that adequate space is available for
maintenance, that the eaves/overhangs do not encroach on adjacent properties,
that roof drainage stays on the subject property, and that the visual impact on
adjacent properties is minimized
• the proposed setback of 0.5 metres to an existing shed provides adequate space
for maintenance, and ensures overhangs and roof drainage stays on the property
• the proposed setback of 0.5 metres does not appear to have any adverse impact
on adjacent properties
• the requested variance is minor in nature and maintains the intent of the zoning
by-law
Date of report: January 9, 2014
Comments prepared by:
\14\ . < .''
Deepak Bhatt, MCIP, RPP Nilesh •urti, CIP, RPP
Planner II Manager, Development Review& Urban Design
DB:NS:Id
J 1DocumentstDevelopnentO-370012014TCA 01.14'Report WCA 01-14.doc
Enclosures
13
PARK .
z,
o�
M
SANDCH�=, PINE GROVE AVENUE z
ION w
/ o
m iii.ial ec;op
LIJ
, Q MN��111
11.111111 o
O THICKET CRESCENT re IMOI
O w H __
1-]:=3 U
w` �
COPLEY STREET
U, w w --
o--w PROHILL ST.
I SECORD STREET -_
w■
Y SU► C��
U PRO III_
I-
THICKET CRESCENT IMME
3
= o
PRI (_.( 1 I I w
WHITE PINE = p 3
O __
MEMEi•
CRESCENT WEST LANE ==3
o
w z-
j MI'
STREET
OP GP�����11
I-
s ,, SWEETBRIAR CRT.
• OODwE -
,� ,OT LOT ,
(w), Ewa
MiNIMMIIIII
. I . I , l
TWYN RIVERS DRIV
Location Map
City oil `' FILE No:P/CA 01/14
uTk _ �mm.'- •. APPLICANT: M. & P. Beagan
:Kira N N IO C PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 122 Secord Street(Lot 28, Plan 40M-1762)
City Development
Department DATE: Dec.4,2013
Data Source.: n
Ttrpnet EnterpRaea Inc. tl Ita .'rro era. NI rights Reaervetl. Not a plan p! vurvey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN•10
4073 A1PAC entl Re auppllera. All nghta Reserved. Net a plan e! Survey. �
14
0.5m
1 12.9m i • 1
1 ro
PROPOSED
SHED '` 4-0.5m
1 \ .
0
CA
To permit an accessory
structure with a height
of 3.1 metres to be
o�//// / , /,/ setback a minimum of
0.5 metres from the
/
/ / rear and side lot lines
/
/ / P
O / EXISTING
c6
co / 2 STOREY E
/ DWELLING / o
M
/ / M
//
. 1..�1 /
/
/
////////1.30_
CE M
C!J Cfl
180 1
12.9m
SECORD STREET ,
1
h
Submitted Plan
City' - FILE No: P/CA 1/14
''LLLL''- 4-- APPLICANT: M. & P. Beagan
•VM N U N I IZC PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:122 Secord Street(Lot 28, Plan 40M-1762)
City Development
Department
DATE:Dec.18,2013
15
•
M
0
2.9m 2.4m
SOUTH(FRONT) ELEVATION EAST(SIDE) ELEVATION
•
Submitted Plan
City'l FILE No: P/CA 1/14
• - •4 - APPLICANT: M. & P Beagan
Ot PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:122 Secord Street(Lot 28, Plan 40M-1762)
City Development
Department
DATE:Dec.18,2013
Cast o�
- •-- - -- Committee fA
w-.1.,u=wyp_ ..
Report to
ll�l
16
ommi ee o Adjustment
IC_KERIN
Application Number: P/CA 02/14 & P/CA 03/14
Meeting Date: January 15, 2014
From: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review& Urban Design
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications P/CA 02/14 & P/CA 03/14
M. Gaffney
1834 Fairport Road
•
Applications
P/CA 02/14 (Proposed Retained Parcel)
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended to permit a minimum
lot frontage of 14.9 metres and a minimum north side yard width of 1.4 metres, whereas
the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard
width of 1.8 metres.
P/CA 03/14 (Proposed Severed Parcel)
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended to permit a minimum
lot frontage of 14.9 metres and a minimum south side yard width of 1.4 metres, whereas
the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard
Y q 9
width of 1.8 metres.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain zoning compliance
to reduce the minimum lot frontage requirement to facilitate the future severance of the
property and to permit a reduction in minimum side yard depth to the existing and
proposed dwellings.
Recommendation P/CA 02/14 (Proposed Retained Parcel)
The City Development Department considers the minimum lot frontage of 14.9 metres,
a minimum north side yard width of 1.4 metres to an existing two-storey detached
dwelling to be minor in nature that are desirable for the appropriate development of the
land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the
Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That the variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration and north side yard
width affecting the existing dwelling on the proposed retained parcel as generally
sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
Report P/CA 02/14 & P/CA 03/14 January 15, 2014
Page 2 17
2. That the applicant demonstrates, via calculations, that the location of the proposed
property/severance line will meet the spatial separation requirements of the Ontario
Building Code to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official prior to receiving final
clearance for a future land severance.
3. That the applicant obtains final clearance for a future land severance (coordinated
with P/CA 03/14) by April 24, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
Recommendation P/CA 03/14 (Proposed Severed Parcel)
The City Development Department considers the minimum lot frontage of 14.9 metres
and a minimum south side yard width of 1.4 metres to a proposed two-storey detached
dwelling on the proposed severed parcel to be minor in nature that are desirable for the
appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose
of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variances, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration and the south side
yard width affecting the future dwelling on the proposed severed parcel, as generally
sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant submits an Architectural Design Statement(ADS) to the
satisfaction of the City. The ADS should address matters in compliance with the
Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines concerning, but not limited to,
building setbacks, height, front elevations, garage projections, driveway widths and
landscaping effecting the future dwelling.
3. That the applicant obtains final clearance for a future land severance (coordinated
with P/CA 02/14) by April 24, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
4. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction on the
proposed severed parcel by January 15, 2016, or this decision affecting the
proposed detached dwelling shall become null and void.
Background
The applicant intends on submitting a Land Division Application to the Region of
Durham Land Division Committee for the subject property to create two residential lots
with a minimum frontage of 14.9 metres along Fairport Road.
Approval of this Minor Variance Application will allow the owner to retain the existing
dwelling in its current location and ensure zoning compliance is achieved if a future land
division application is approved by the Region of Durham Land Division Committee.
Report P/CA 02/14 & P/CA 03/14 January 15, 2014
18 Page 3
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as "Urban Residential— Low
Density Areas"within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood.
The property is also subject to the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines.
The Guidelines provide direction on neighbourhood development at a more detailed
level than the Pickering Official Plan, including recommendations on lot sizes, lot areas,
dwelling types and building setbacks. The Guidelines require new lots along existing
roads to have a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres, a minimum lot depth of
approximately 40.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres. The proposed
lots will generally conform with the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines.
The subject property is presently zoned as "R3"—Third Density Residential Zone within
Zoning By-law 3036, as amended.
Appropriateness of the Application
Reduced Lot Frontage Variances
• the intent of the minimum lot frontage requirement is to ensure a usable lot size
that is compatible with the neighbourhood
• existing lot patterns along Fairport Road north and south of the subject property
either permits reduced lot frontages or have generally received zoning approval
to establish lot frontages of approximately 15.0 metres in the immediate area
• the reduced lot frontages of 14.9 metres would ensure a usable lot size that is
compatible with the neighbourhood character established along Fairport Road
• the proposed severed parcel will have sufficient depth and frontage to allow for
the construction of a detached dwelling that is in keeping with the existing
dwellings along Fairport Road
• the proposed lot frontages will be consistent with the existing lotting pattern
established along Fairport Road
• the requested lot frontages are minor in nature and meet the intent and purpose
of the Official Plan, the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines and
the Zoning By-law
Side Yard Width Variances
• the intent of a minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate separation
distance between structures on abutting properties in order to maintain
pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential
services such as air conditioning units and utility metres
• the proposed 1.4 metre side yard width provides an appropriate separation
distance between the dwellings and will maintain sufficient pedestrian access
and accommodate grading, drainage and residential services
Report P/CA 02/14 & P/CA 03/14 January 15, 2014
Page 4 19
• the requested side yard variances are minor in nature and meet the intent and
purpose of the Official Plan, the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development
Guidelines and the Zoning By-law.
Input From Other Sources
Doug Dickerson • supports both minor variance
City Councillor—Ward 2 applications
Noel N. Williams • objects to the creation of a new lot
1836 Fairport Road which supports a proposed two-storey
detached dwelling
• proposed dwelling will be too close to
the existing dwelling located at
1836 Fairport Road
• proposed development will also
negatively impact side views, natural
sunlight, spatial separation between
dwellings and property values
Date of report: January 9, 2014
Comments prepared by:
ey Y , MCIP, RPP Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP •
Planner II Manager, Development Review & Urban Design
AY:NS:Id
J1Doc mentsZevelopmenl0-3700120111PCA 02-14 to PCA 03.14'ReponWCA 02.14&PCA 03-14.00c
Enclosures
•
20
ROAD I I 1 + I I i H i''.'' '' I I-' 4
W
CRESCENT
ui
C-_J W
. r---a
N r—�
O I la
' 41111 III
R_, I ' COURT R 1 `n��
l• Y-J imor C3,,
l CC o- I
Q r
n, w — VOYAGER A'vc _ I I -�'
F I BONiTA AVENUE
F v 1 BO/�lTA N 1
w
c-)OM _� 1 PA-I a o�
•
p.� -
-
I o
N\l''' li o ,
• o III.111;
o
,I'' STROUDS LANE 11_I
a
It,G� J w
, • ` WINGARDEN CRESCENT .
Mk 7 ) • —
EROW PL. 1. ;a FM:4 III ■
■
• .�!,0I*2 B• I II o �i P 1 jy •
—o 1 I o \ —
OK — l 1 I — 1
LJ U MI
CC
CL w CC /
CA CC d
'�/TE - m•
-TOOL d •
d m■
_z _ ii cc,
< .
.,- m
,_in
w �F• ,I01 BEN CRESCENT. ,_ GOLDENRIDGE i. le AM OM
JACQUELINE P,I ,// a _A •
Illr WELRUS STREET a I o �
n------�I Ifilowori 1
ki:i
i��o�� �� . - I l
Location Map
Citg 00 :> FILE No:P/CA 02/14 to P/CA03/14
—_u = .,m;�a . APPLICANT: M. Gaffney
ri ca �/�t���� PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1834 Fairport Road(Part Lot 22, Plan 819,
City Development Part 5, 6, 7, 40R-20788) DATE: Dec. 17,2013
Department oats �a�rae.
$T roost Enterp.iaes Inc. and Its ...ppliars. All rights Rea d. Not a plan at survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN-7
20t3 MPAC and ;to .uopliera. All rights Rosored. Nat a elan of Sunray.
I
. 21
P/CA 03/14
P/CA 03/14 To permit a minimum
To permit a minimum required lot frontage of
side yard width of 1.4 14.9 metres
metres to the proposed E
south lot line co. 46.5m _____ . - -/- -
PROPOSED
E 2 STOREY
op. 04
v
PROPOSED DWELLING
SEVERED
PARCEL
, 1 411Cti
%E E // 11e
� Nt .. /, I-
E PROPOSED EXISTING � � _O
0)
RETAINED , E
PARCEL / 2 STOREY j// a, a
DWELLING j v Q
II. %/./%////i'////////////7///i/�%////�
. 1e f t •
E 46.5m
c
,.
P/CA 02/14
To permit a minimum
side yard width of 1.4
metres to the proposed P/CA 02/14
north lot line To permit a minimum
required lot frontage of
14.9 metres
I\
N
Submitted Plan
Citq 4 - _ FILE No: P/CA 02/14 to P/CA 03/14
''-"""'":.:1-.1i:7----'.' APPLICANT: M. Gaffney
a«�� N FO C PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:1834 Fairport Road(Part Lot 22, Plan 819,
City Development
Department Part 5, 6, 7, 40R-20788)
DATE:Dec.18,2013