HomeMy WebLinkAboutNovember 6, 2013 Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
C oh" 0
pu[cKERING
Meeting Number: 14
Date: Wednesday, November 6, 2013
City 00 Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
PI 'EffliT Wednesday, November 6, 2013
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Page Number
(I) Adoption of Agenda
(II) Adoption of Minutes from October 16, 2013 1-6
(III) Reports
1. P/CA 51/13
A. & P. Jevnisek 7-11
1034 Mountcastle Crescent
2. P/CA 52/13
P. Rose 12-17
1973 Woodview Avenue
3. : P/CA 53/13
A. Judefredrick 18-23
750 Sunbird Trail
(IV) Other Business
1. Adoption of the 2014 Meeting Schedule 24
(V) Adjournment
Accessible For information related to accessibility requirements please contact:
Lesley Dunne
P I C K S W G T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024
TTY 905.420.1739
Email Idunne @pickering.ca
Cat/ o0 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes 01
Wednesday, October 16, 2013.
��� IL C 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Pending Adoption
Present:
Tom Copeland
David Johnson—Chair
Eric Newton
Bill Utton
Shirley Van Steen —Vice-Chair
Also Present:
Melissa Markham, Principal Planner—Development Review
Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer •
(I) Adoption of Agenda
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Eric Newton
That the agenda for the Wednesday, October 16, 2013 meeting be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
(II) Adoption of Minutes
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Eric Newton
That the minutes of the 12th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held
Wednesday, September, 25 2013 be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
Page 1 of 6
•
City Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
02 Wednesday, O b 16, 2013
*NINO",_A ' ` ""' '- ctoer� 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
(III) Reports
1. P/CA 46/13
Emix Ltd.
1101 Kingston Road
The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036,
as amended by By-law 6777/07:
• to permit a minimum setback of 5.0 metres from the north lot line; whereas
the by-law requires any buildings and structures to comply with the minimum
setbacks as shown on Schedule I to By-law 6777/07, which requires a
minimum setback of 10.0 metres from the north lot line
• to permit a minimum of 18% of the length of the build-to-zone to be occupied
by a building; whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 50% of the length of
the build-to-zone to be occupied by a building
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain site plan approval for a new commercial building.
Principal Planner— Development Review outlined staff recommendation from the
City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions.
Written comments were also received from the City's Development Control
expressing no concerns.
Mike Pettigrew, agent, Christian Hepfer, owner, were present to represent the
application. Bill McLean, Regional Councillor—Ward 2 was present for the
application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to
the application.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P/CA 46/13 by Emix Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the
minimum setback of 5.0 metres from the north lot line and the minimum of 18%
of the length of the build-to-zone to be occupied by a building are minor in nature,
desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed commercial building, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
Page 2 of 6
City o¢► =- Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, October 16, 2013 n1
1111:11t4110C 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed development by
October 16, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed development by
October 16, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
2. P/CA 48/13
M. & M. Weatherbee
1425 Finch Avenue
The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036,
as amended:
• to permit an unenclosed covered porch and uncovered steps to project a
maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard; whereas the by-law
permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height
above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into any required front or
rear yard
• to permit a maximum lot coverage of 16 percent; whereas the by-law requires
a maximum lot coverage of 10 percent
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain a building permit to construct an unenclosed covered porch and
uncovered steps in the front yard. The applicant also seeks relief from the
maximum lot coverage for the proposed unenclosed covered porch and existing
detached garage.
Principal Planner—Development Review outlined staff recommendation from the
City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions.
Written comments were received from the City's Development Control
expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from the Region
of Durham Health Department expressing no objection to the application.
Michael Weatherbee, owner, was present to represent the application. Heidi
Behrends and Erika Behrends of 1433 Finch Avenue were present in favour of
the application.
Staff responded to questions related to the future road widening along Finch
Avenue.
Page 3 of 6
Cali 00 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
04 x,sue;, , ,,•s .- is —::.:F
[111141[ Wednesday, October 16, 2013
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Moved by Tom Copeland
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 48/13 by M. & M. Weatherbee, be Approved on the
grounds that the projection of an unenclosed covered porch and uncovered steps
to a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard and a maximum lot
coverage of 16 percent are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of
the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed unenclosed covered porch
and uncovered steps attached to the main building and the existing detached
•
garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
October 16, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
• Carried Unanimously
3. P/CA 49/13
D. Hansen & C. MacMillan
717 Breezy Drive
The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 2520,
as amended:
• to permit a minimum front yard depth of 5.0 metres along Essa Crescent;
whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres along
Essa Crescent
• to permit an unenclosed covered porch to project a maximum of 2.0 metres
into the required front yard along Breezy Drive; whereas the by-law permits
uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade
to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into any required front yard, and
• to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 6.0 metres; whereas the by-law
requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain a building permit to construct an unenclosed covered porch along Breezy
Drive, a two storey addition along Essa Crescent, and a two storey addition in the
rear yard.
Page 4 of 6
•
Citq 00 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
2013 r
Wednesday, October 16, n r
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Principal Planner— Development Review outlined staff recommendation from the
City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions.
Written comments were also received from the City's Development Control
expressing no concerns.
Dennis Hansen, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application:
Staff responded to questions related to the interpretation of the front yard for the
property.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 49/13 by D. Hansen & C. MacMillan, be Approved on the
grounds that the minimum 5.0 metre front yard depth along Essa Crescent, the
encroachment of an unenclosed covered porch to project a maximum of 2.0 metres
into the required front yard along Breezy Drive and the minimum 6.0 metre rear
yard depth are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the
land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and
the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed development, as generally
sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
October 16, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
David Johnson, Chair, acknowledged students in attendance from Seneca
College, Civil Engineering and opened the floor to answer any questions they
may have on the Committee of Adjustment process.
(IV). Adjournment
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Eric Newton
That the 13th meeting of the 2013 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at
7:16 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on
Wednesday, November 6, 2013.
Page 5 of 6
City 00 T Committee of Adjustment
_, , Meeting Minutes
-
��u�` - _� 2013
G
� - A Wednesday, October 16,
1 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Carried Unanimously
Date
Chair
Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Page 6 of 6
aI Report to
� -= Committee of Adjustment 07
_MN - ai Application Number: P/CA 51/13
Meeting Date: November 6, 2013
From: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review & Urban Design
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 51/13
A. & P. Jevnisek
1034 Mountcastle Crescent
Application
The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036, as
amended:
• to permit an uncovered platform (deck) with a maximum height of 0.4 of a metre
above grade to project a maximum of 5.0 metres into the required rear yard;
whereas the by-law permits uncovered platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height
above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into any required rear yard; and
• to permit an uncovered platform (deck) to project a maximum of 0.9 of a metre into
the required flankage yard setback; whereas the by-law permits uncovered
platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of
0.5 metres into any required side yard
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a
building permit to construct an uncovered platform (deck) in the rear yard.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers the projection of an uncovered platform
(deck)to a maximum of 5.0 metres into the required rear yard and to a maximum of
0.9 of a metre into the required flankage yard to be minor in nature, desirable for the
appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose
of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variances, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed uncovered platform (deck) attached
to the main building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted
plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
November 6, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
Report P/CA 51/13 November 6, 2013
08 Page 2
•
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan - Urban Residential— Low Density Areas within the Liverpool
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by By-Law 1826/84 "S2"—Single Residential Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Uncovered Platform Projecting into the Required Rear Yard and Flankage Yard
Setbacks
• the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in
height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front or
rear yard and a maximum of 0.5 metres into the required side yard
• • the intent of this provision is to ensure an adequate outdoor private amenity area
is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the
privacy of abutting property owners, and allow for appropriate access for
maintenance, lot grading and drainage
• the proposed uncovered platform (deck)will maintain an adequate outdoor
private amenity area within the rear yard
• the proposed uncovered platform (deck) projection into the required flankage
• yard setback will be screened from the adjacent streetline by a 1.8 metre high
fence and will maintain adequate separation
• the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent of the Official
Plan and Zoning By-law
Date of report: October 31, 2013
Comme is prepared by:
f y
Am y Emm, MCIP, RPP esh Surti, MCIP, RPP
Planner II Manager, Development Review
& Urban Design
AE:Id
J:1DOCUments\Developnent D-370011D131PCA 51-131Repo,WPCA 51-13 ciao(
Enclosures
•
1
. 09
; uuu"� WIN``_U_�w 1111—_ mini�z-p 111#481111 ���1ll► �",DRIVE ,III �� 1111
�� 11� 4 /GHTS BENTpj� arm
PARK
411b, all ft:
FO"
iF o Is Will= I o= in IIIII
w 11101111111/ ...11'
1 i SUBJEC 6... .til
ucil e _ CREs 1
1k-
PROPER ea a
FINCH AVENUE
QR ao1 BIBLE
iiikCHAPEL
,iia , , Mp44 till
! 11
111r
TLE
TAPLIN DRIVE .*Q, Ii
1RR1/ 111i1► `I
Ili IIM � —°--o11Iwai £NT 0///il//I� �� ■
EM W..— // ////� I
0
NE=i am= oe�
Lt�m a mow='1/ ///// R� ''''4 rim w w.:LI_ / �R////////�� �
�_-J� ,///// iSClei ,, ` FORESTBRO•
_ —GLENANNA pR/F Ilk 11111
� \ ,,,' , ` SILVERTHI
a \\\ GABLEHURST ',',,, — --
�� E ���I�j���
I I ''�� OUNBAR — EIII'
Iror�r T ,., Cril IAPF
Location Map
City 4 FILE No:P/CA 51/13
APPLICANT: A. & P. Jevnisek
0�� / �,111 L PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1034 Mountcastle Cr. (Plan 40M-1325, Lot 57)
City Development
Department DATE:Oct.11,2013
•
Dptp Sources: /� C
0 2013 t Enterer It Inc. ne its i,Ight(t. MI Aghta Rea plan Not a Plon of eur.-py. SCf1LE 1:J,QQ� PN-11
�2013 AIPAC end Ila suppliers, All rights Reaerve0. Net a plan of Survey.
10
MOUNTCASTLE DRIVE
11.0m
E E
u0
v v
2.2m_.
5.3m.
EXISTING
TWO STOREY
DWELLING
L
2.7m _- tom
1.Om
PROPOSED
N DECK
?_4m_ To permit an
To permit an unenclosed uncovered
unenclosed uncovered deck to project a
deck to project a e maximum of 5.0
maximum of 0.9 of a N metres into the
metre into the required required rear yard
flankage yard
•
Submitted Plan
Chi
FILE No: P/CA 51/13
APPLICANT: A. & P Jevnisek
WRII i 1 1I C PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1034 Mountcastle Cr. (Lot 57, Plan 40M-1325)
City Development
Department
DATE:Oct.18,2013
11
_.._ ..:__..----__ --- _L ...._..._-- _ �_:_._:: _ -_. _�___1
ll ' . ,
• '� I r: I ,i t 1 , — , ,, : t I
,• I.,' ,1. rI ;l „!' i !. . 1 ,; � i. i t ; 7
•
�
f, , I I ; t -
t ' , l. l I; i, I ,1 ,! , l,
i' I I I I .1., I i , , 1 l
('. : h ' *II 11 I i il II I IFi'li.1.1 II I: 1 t ' 'li j ' ' 1 '- 1 1 1
III 111 II f HHIH '
�,1 i I 1 t
1:,i.1,.d, _ ! . IrH. il.r I. - . I. 1 1 I , •' i .-M ',I •I I,II I ! '-. . I
1.:I 1I 7I ' c_.=- :.-.?..:_ 11 .1 , : !--1. Ti 1 1 4I :I -�,',L =I: 11 , I. ' 14•
,T11.i ir 1. .1 ....� _.w..-� ._w t tI`� _ t� ,____---� -i- /11----.---I ■ 1 I 1 I I 1
I
REAR (SOUTH) ELEVATION
• N
Submitted Plan
Cliq 4 FILE No: P/CA 51/13
--°r.:7:;...,:....--;,:-!, APPLICANT: A. & P Jevnisek
G(4 X011 N I OC PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1034 Mountcastle Cr. (Lot 57, Plan 40M-1325)
City Development
Department
DATE:Sept.29,2013
•
city 4 Report to
12
Committee of Adjustment
ICKERING Application Number: P/CA 52/13
Meeting Date: November 6, 2013
From: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review& Urban Design
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 52/13
P. Rose
1973 Woodview Avenue
Application
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-laws
6537/05 and 7060/10 to permit an uncovered deck with a maximum height of 1.2 metres
above grade to project a maximum of 3.5 metres into the required rear yard, whereas
the by-law allows uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above
grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into any required rear yard.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to
construct an uncovered deck in the rear yard.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers the proposed uncovered deck with a
maximum height of 1.2 metres above grade to project a maximum of 3.5 metres into the
required rear yard to be minor in nature that is desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the
Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the
,proposed variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed uncovered deck, as generally sited
and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
November 6, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan— Urban Residential, Low Density Areas within the Rouge Park
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by By-laws 6537/05 and 7060/10—"S1-14"—Single
Residential Zone
Report P/CA 52/13 November 6, 2013
Page 2 13
Appropriateness of the Application
Uncovered Platforms Projecting into required Rear Yard Variance
• the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in
height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear
yard
• the intent of this provision is to ensure an adequate outdoor private amenity area
is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the
privacy of abutting property owners, and allow for appropriate access for
maintenance, lot grading and drainage
• the subject property's rear yard is approximately 20 metres wide and irregular in
shape
• a useable rear yard outdoor private amenity area will be maintained within the
north and south areas of the rear yard
• an appropriate distance between the uncovered deck and the property lines will
maintain access for property maintenance as well as lot grading and drainage
• the proposed deck will be no more than 1.2 metres above established grade and
will not impact the privacy of adjoining property owners due to its significant
setback from the north and south side property lines
• the abutting property to the east are environmentally sensitive lands zoned as
"OS-HL"—Open Space Hazard Lands and are owned by the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority
• the proposed deck will maintain a setback of 2.5 metres from the "OS-HL"
Zone/environmentally sensitive lands •
• the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the lands and maintains the intent of the zoning by-law and
Official Plan
Input From Other Sources
Toronto and Region Conservation • no objections to the proposed
Authority (TRCA) uncovered deck •
• subject property is partially located
within the TRCA Regulated Area of the
Duffins Creek Watershed
• on October 22, 2013, TRCA issued a
permit for the proposed uncovered
•
deck attached to the rear of the
dwelling
• the drawings approved by TRCA
correspond with those submitted with
P/CA 52/13
•
Report P/CA 52/13 November 6, 2013
14 Page 3
Date of report: October 31, 2013
Co dap ts prepared by: {
` �Arwac( /
4 \rwood CIP, RPP Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP
Planner II Manager, Development Review & Urban Design
AY:NS:Id
J;t Documents lDevelapmemlD-3700)120131PCA 52-13\epoIOPCA 52-13.doc
Enclosures
•
C.P.R.
NATURE HAVEN
F4✓EN
TOT LO N Uli
''1"
_BEN CRES
NATURE \* M
:'1'i'f'3
FINCH AVENUE
0
wily;
W
O
g'
It All
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
—
3
w
0 •
O
RR\OOR
G s
N
Location Map
C FILE No:P/CA 52/13
APPLICANT: P. Rose
aMt/E41\C. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1973 Woodview Ave. (N. Pt, Lt. 18, Plan 329,
City Development Pts. 4 &5, 40R-27103) DATE:Oct.11,2013
Department a2e 0 r7p M A
erapnd eia q Ins< a,.i t,A l r gb R,e,rvepdn.,N Re o e pop. Nf o t Sa rvwn SCALE 1.5,000 PN-14
•
16
•
•
28.5m
W i 1
Z
J / 2.5m
EXISTING PROPOSED To permit Q TWO STOREY UNCOVERED p mit an
DWELLING DECK - uncovered deck to
N 4.6m project a maximum of itt
• _3.5 metres into the
0 required rear yard
O --
O
1
20.4m
N
Submitted Plan
Cit FILE No: P/CA 52/13
APPLICANT: P Rose
Ve RI E,1 0r PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1973 Woodview Ave. (N. Pt. Lt. 18, Plan 329,
City Development Pts. 4 & 5, 40R-27103)
Department
DATE:Oct.18,2013
17
DOOR
- EXISTING
DWELLING
PROPOSED
DECK
N
K
N
N
• 4.3m
H - H
0.3m 3.7m 0.3m
I I 4.3m
I I
0.3m 3.7m • 0.3m
SECTION 'A'
DOOR
ALUMINU
GLAS
RAILINe E
0.
o
FLOOR
4: I
N
• GMkdE J
— .._.- �l_
1\„.
•
Submitted Plan
City 4 . FILE No: P/CA 52/13
•-°• = APPLICANT: P. Rose
(S`i 4 t1 I 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1973 Woodview Ave. (N. Pt. Lt. 18, Plan 329,
City Development Pts. 4 &5, 40R-27103)
Department
DATE:Oct.18,2013
Ca == Report to
��_ _ �.
18 �-_- Committee of Adjustment
I RI Application Number: P/CA 53/13
Meeting Date: November 6, 2013
From: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review& Urban Design
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 53/13
J. Judefredrick & K. Mahendran
750 Sunbird Trail
•
Application
The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036, as
amended:
• to permit an unenclosed covered platform (deck)with a maximum height of 0.6 of
a metre above grade to project a maximum of 3.0 metres into the required rear
yard; whereas the by-law permits uncovered platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in
height above grade.to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into any required front or
rear yard; and
• to permit a maximum lot coverage of 55 percent; whereas the by-law permits a
maximum lot coverage of 50 percent
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to recognize
an existing unenclosed covered platform (deck) in the rear yard.
Recommendation
•
The City Development Department considers the projection of an unenclosed covered
platform (deck) to a maximum of 3.0 metres into the required rear yard and a maximum
lot coverage of 55 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the
Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: .
1. That these variances apply only to the existing unenclosed covered platform (deck)
attached to the main building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's
submitted p lans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the existing platform (deck) by
November 6, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void.
Report P/CA 53/13 November 6, 2013
Page 2 19
Comment
• Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan - Urban Residential— Low Density Areas within the Amberlea
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by By-law 6176/03 "S-SD-3"—Single and Semi -
Residential Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Unenclosed Covered Platform Projecting into the Required Rear Yard & Increase in Lot
Coverage
• the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in
height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear
yard
• the intent of this provision is to ensure an adequate outdoor private amenity area
is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the
privacy of abutting property owners, and allow for appropriate access for
maintenance, lot grading and drainage
• the intent of the zoning by-law related to lot coverage is to maintain an adequate
outdoor private amenity area that is uncovered by buildings or structures
• due to the fact that the platform (deck) is covered, the deck area contributes to
the overall lot coverage calculation
• the existing unenclosed covered platform (deck) maintains an adequate outdoor
private amenity area within the rear yard
• . the increase in lot coverage to 55 percent is to bring the existing platform (deck)
into conformity with the zoning by-law
• the increase in lot coverage will not alter the character of the subject property or
the surrounding neighbourhood
• the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent of the Official
Plan and Zoning By-law
Date of report: October 31, 2013
Comments prepared by:
my Emm, MCIP, RPP Nilesh Surti,‘MCIP, RPP
Planner'll Manager, Development Review
& Urban Design
AE:Id
J:tDocuments\DevelopmentlD-37o0t2013'PCA 53-13V2eport%PCA 53-13.doa
Enclosures
20
�Y�RO
CORRIDOR
COLLINGSBROOK
`or COURT
11` 1 COURT
GRA�GNURSj
PROPERTTY 1111111,1„"'
530���������� 00
• 4•
kit 111
imme ENE
ill11111i
iiuiiiiiii11
411 _ sing
,%.
►�� ,�. !gyp�� • =i
11Illl�1111 -1"—°-' IIfiffIlllllli��:w
' _ C OGNAC SWAN PLACE•_ _�Ii� NI Mk 1111111111111 I//IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII0 ..-
FINCH
AVENUE
ammo.— • -w�� �",11I„T�I 1 1 Ow Oink MN
Location Map
Clig°If FILE No:P/CA 53/13 •
v i�;, la', APPLICANT: J. Judefredrick& K. Mahendran
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 750 Sunbird Trail (Plan 40M-2208, Pt. Lot 47
City Development 40R-23163, Part 4) DATE:Oct.11,2013
Department pate Sources:
eTeranet Enter rises Inc. nd its suppliers. NI fights Reserved. Nat a plan of survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN-11
2013 UPAC d its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of Sarvey.
21
SUNBIRD TRAIL
7.6m
I ' I
1
I 0,E1
I `°i I
IGNRAGZ!. Pry-
. . . .
I .
To permit a maximum I ; • I
lot coverage of 55
percent I I
It i i
I ?
EXISTING I
M I DWELLING I,1
I
1.2
I
LI To permit an
e=PROPOSED==== unenclosed covered
I :2"/ COVERED-
DECK deck to project a
____ maximum of 3.0
metres into the
I 1 required rear yard
. a ,
Ic
7.6m
IT\
Submitted Plan
'¢ _ • FILE No: P/CA 53/13
APPLICANT: J. Judefredrick & K. Mahendran
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 750 Sunbird Trail (Part Lot 47, Plan 40M-2208
City Development Part 4, 40R-23163)
Department
DATE:Oct.18,2013
22
•
,•i. :
ti:I: ,...:
i Et
t ;
; I
EXISTING BASEMENT
4
T1
re'F,ale.d15.75.1 es ,s'•or: .I c!
:..,:, ,,,.:.:,:,::,.,2,,,,,!> :,3.:'; ',:,,::::.''. . -;.:: F-fk2::._:g=,-4:._Fp------i
FOUNDATION PLAN
I ■
2,C m j
if.391y
1' 1'
1 1
Ti';q
-.
1 .
k
Z.
?-,
‘..->
EXISTING DWELLING "
r1/4, i
1 1 ----' ', : H ' --. .
11!.
„2 ::,..,,,,g ?...-_,0,.,1.1,,, ... ., zii 7.
1 I
____
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
Submitted Plan
I City 4
FILE No: P/CA 53/13
APPLICANT: J. Judefredrick & K. Mahendran
CiCORMNIIN PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 750 Sunbird Trail (Part Lot 47, Plan 40M-2208
City Development Part 4, 40R-23163)
Department
DATE:Oct.18,2013
?3
ii 1i '� ~:ll ill t
' i: , t
r*, �, ;
i i. ; ii;;;,! ,
.irr wit rr;, ,,,, 0 r ,
.. iiiiil 1 1
,_. ��; "
r.,_ : I :,... .- • 1
SOUTH(REAR) ELEVATION
I
1
I
j
. i
-.i�,,,r1�' 1 Vfli:3-c�'-r:J .T.ii is
r�Cf;f1 S•3� Y`� x 1_,
J."
1;111 .; l_,r iit; „rli
C�/T/'r.i��3��3.iti�.l��I�'�L�z3'�z`:ry=1
,,S 3TY i�3.'1• 44,,? ,;3'il
'Y..Gi.'z3 r�
'i- ii;r 0,:=2i' ;i`i'i `_
t=ii�t�ilC-4-III r
K.i, s -1;= -4 i
r , 1111 III .�.;
y ,
I '
,
WEST(SIDE) ELEVATION
Submitted Plan
City 4 FILE No: P/CA 53/13
-L--1=---='1;-. :-q...,.'; -' APPLICANT: J. Judefredrick & K. Mahendran
IJ COI R mI N FOC PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 750 Sunbird Trail (Part Lot 47, Plan 40M-2208
City Development Part 4, 40R-23163)
Department
DATE:Oct.18,2013
City � _- 24
is-� T:i�z
iiEr11 tillE
Committee of Adjustment
Tentative Meeting Schedule for 2014
1
.i QQ ,ice i -'1 r_y:BC ¢ 3° '* ":
; � �v � ,,Y�'�i� `� �� ��a✓. � � �' , • faa.y, � �� R S'' D .nJ�F
Friday, December 13 Thursday January 3 ,Jan-
January 2 ��;.�,,,, .4,4_,.. .„.....,,' .-
Friday, January 10 January 22 January 24 li ,,s.t w,, : ,
Friday, January 31 February 12 February 14 ua
Friday, February 21 March 5 March 7M , 9 „4�_F
' L N G' '
Friday, March 14 March 26 March 28 ;
Tuesday Thursday
Friday, April 4 ,z; ;ri '
April 15 April 17 -,Wit,,„ 'F4
Friday, April 25 May 7 May 9 i '0 " F
7}� � Y FFf mfi
Friday, May 16 May 28 May 30 hJ1 :: ,}
Friday, June 6 June 18 June 20 u x� '.,*�; �
Friday, June 27 July 9 July 11 1,:b.,j' i.L �'� A
Friday, July 18 July 30 August 1
tr,,Aq47.4ntiz ,,,"
u
Friday, August 8 August 20 August 22 Se 1 ea �• z
Friday, August 29 September 10 September 12 g ,,
Friday, September 19 October 1 October 3 - '` } 4
Friday, October 10 October 22 October 24 e ' .0 4 s
Friday, October 31 November 12 November 140 { !t]• ;`