HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 17, 2012Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Meeting Number: 13
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2012
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
Page Number
(I) Adoption of Agenda
(II) Adoption of Minutes from September 26, 2012 1-10
(Ill) Reports
1. PICA 56/12-L. Cirone 11-16
1759 Woodview Avenue
(Part of Lot 8, Plan 282, Parts 31 & 32, Plan 40R-11207)
City of Pickering
(IV) Adjournment
Accessible •--
PICKEP~_G
For information related to accessibility requirements please contact
Lesley Dunne
T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024
TTY 905.420.1739
Email ldunne@pickering.ca
Pending Adoption
Present:
Tom Copeland
David Johnson -Chair
Eric Newton -Vice-Chair
Bill Utton
Shirley Van Steen
Also Present:
Ross Pym, Secretary-Treasurer
Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
(I) Adoption of Agenda
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Bill Utton
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes :11
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
That the agenda for the Wednesday, September 26, 2012 meeting be adopted.
(II) Adoption of Minutes
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
Carried Unanimously
That the minutes of the 11th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
1
I' ··z I .I
•.J
(Ill)
1.
Committee of Adjustment
Me~ting Minutes
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
Reports
(Deferred from September 5, 2012 meeting)
PICA 50112 -R. Ramos
2026 Erin Gate Boulevard
(Lot 6, 40M-1969)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
5493199 to permit a side yard width of 0.5 metres and a rear yard depth of
0.9 metres to a newly constructed shed, whereas the by-law requires a minimum
accessory structure setback of 1.0 metre to all lot lines.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain zoning
compliance for the shed.
Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering
Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to
conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Development
Control Manager indicting all runoff from storm events must be contained on the
applicant's property. Written comments were also received from the Owners of
2024 Erin Gate Boulevard indicating no objections to a shed with a less than
1.0 metre from their shared lot line.
Ruel Romas, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application PICA 50112 by R. Ramos, be Approved on the grounds that the
side yard width of 0.5 metres and a rear yard depth of 0.9 metres to a newly
constructed shed are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of
the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the accessory shed, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant installs eaves that direct the runoff away from adjacent
neighbours and ensures that all runoff from storm events will be contained on
the applicant's property by December 17, 2012, or this decision shall be null
and void.
Carried Unanimously
2
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
2. PICA 51/12-CMC Homes Inc.
4 78 490 Kingston Road
(Part Lot 161 and Lot 162, Plan 816, Part 1, 40R-4158)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
2457/87 to permit a front yard depth of 3.0 metres, a flankage side yard width of
3.0 metres, a building height of 11.2 metres, 20 parking spaces and a canopy lot
coverage of 11 percent, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth
of 14.0 metres, a flankage side yard width of 14.0 metres, maximum building
height of 10.0 metres a minimum 47 parking spaces and a maximum canopy lot
coverage of 3 percent.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain site plan
approval and building permits.
Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering
Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to
conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Development
Control Manager expressing no concerns. Written comments were received
from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority expressing no objection.
Written comments were received from the Site Plan Committee indicating the
Committee endorsed the proposed variances on August 22, 2012 at the Site
Plan Committee meeting. Written comments were also received from Bill Getsos
of 512 Kingston Road and Joanne Dunsford of 1386 Old Forest Road in
objection to the application.
Correspondence received from Bill Getsos of 512 Kingston Road indicated
concerns with the reduced front yard depth and flankage side yard width as they
do not provide enough room for landscaping, the reduced parking spaces will
worsen the existing illegal parking issues at 512 Kingston Road, and by
permitting additional retail convenient store uses this will cause existing retail
stores to struggle as Highway 2 is already overloaded with retail. These are
major variances, not minor.
Correspondence received from Joanne Dunsford indicated concerns with the
setback of the proposed development to the existing four homes to the north and
the impacts on those homes included lighting that will be coming off the
development, loss of privacy, increased traffic, and noise and emissions from the
drive through and convenience store. Joanne Dunsford has also requested a
minimum of 2.5 metres high noise barrier fence buffered with large spruce trees
and would like a consistent buffer of 4.0 metres blocking any lighting, sounds
and emissions that will be produced.
3
···.'4 i A
''
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
Scott Pomeroy, agent, was present to represent the application. Joanne
Dunsford of 1386 Old Forest Road, Bill Getsos of 512 Kingston Road, Linda
McNeil of 1424 Rosebank Road and Mary Jane Lloyd of 1384 Old Forest Road
were present in objection to the application.
In response to questions and concerns Scott Pomeroy indicated a traffic study
has been done, the office building will have approximately five suites, through
the site plan process there will be a landscape plan, and will address any light
pollution from the development. Scott Pomeroy also explained the main street
design for Kingston Road is to promote a pedestrian friendly image.
Linda McNeil indicated concerns with increased traffic and noted the library
adjacent to the subject property has recently installed speed bumps in the
parking lot.
Mary Jane Lloyd indicated concerns with increased traffic, light pollution onto her
property, noise pollution from cars and questioned what type of noise barrier
fence will be installed.
In response to a question from a Committee member, the Secretary Treasurer
explained the meaning of the main street design for Kingston Road.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Tom Copeland
That application PICA 51/12 by CMC Homes Inc., be Approved on the grounds
that the front yard depth of 3.0 metres, a flankage side yard width of 3.0 metres,
a building height of 11.2 metres, 20 parking spaces and a canopy lot coverage of
11 percent are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of
the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed office building, gas station
and convenience store, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's
submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
September 26, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
3. That the applicant consolidate existing Roll Numbers, Property Identification
Numbers (PINs) and Addresses into one number for each by September 26, 2013,
or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
4
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
3. PICA 53112-S. Ebejer & J. De Silva
1914 Glenview Road
(Lot 35, Plan 509)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to permit a front yard
depth of 6.5 metres to a proposed covered front porch and stairs, whereas the
by-law requires a front yard depth of 7.5 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit for a proposed detached dwelling with a covered front porch.
Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering
Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to
conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Development
Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Steven Ebejer, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application PICA 53112 by S. Ebejer & J. De Silva, be Approved on the
grounds that the front yard depth of 6.5 metres is a minor variance that is
desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the covered front porch and stairs, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
September 26, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
5
r· ·.·
!. d
4.
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
PICA 54112-M. & L. Gertsen
1929 Glenview Road
(Lot 20, Plan 509)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to permit a front yard
depth of 5.4 metres and a side yard width of 1.2 metres to the existing dwelling
and proposed addition and covered porch, whereas the by-law requires a front
yard depth of 7.5 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building
permit for the proposed addition and covered porch.
Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering
Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to
conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Development
Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Martin Gertsen, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application PICA 54112 by M. & L. Gertsen, be Approved on the grounds
that the front yard depth of 5.4 metres and side yard width of 1.2 metres to the
existing dwelling and proposed addition with a covered porch are minor
variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in
keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning
By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the existing dwelling and proposed addition
and covered porch, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted
plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
September 26, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
6
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 -t '1
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
5. PICA 55/12-D. McAulay
178 Thicket Crescent
(Lot 46, Plan 40M-1778)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
4271/93 to permit a proposed shed in the side yard with a side yard width of
0.6 metres, whereas the by-law requires all accessory structures to be located in
the ree~r yard and a minimum accessory structure setback of 1.0 metres from all
lot lines.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain zoning
compliance.
Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering
Planning & Development Department recommending refusal. Written comments
were also received from the City's Development Control Manager expressing no
concerns.
Donald McAulay, owner, was present to represent the application. Charles
Battist of 368 Morrish Road and Rebecca Purnwasie of 178 Thicket Crescent
were present in favour of the application. Laurin Jeffrey of 474 Woodmere
Crescent and Karen Forbes of 180 Thicket Crescent were present in objection to
the application.
Donald McAulay explained the proposed shed will be well constructed and not
preassembled from a store, will provide storage for lawn and garden tools and
the height of the shed can be reduced if needed. Donald McAulay submitted
four letters from surrounding neighbours in support of the application.
Charles Battist indicated the shed will be well constructed and can be reduced in
height if needed and it will be set back far from the street so it will not create a
visual impact to the streetscape.
Laurin Jeffery indicated concerns with the location of the shed in the side yard
and the visual impact.
Karen Forbes indicated concerns with the location of the proposed shed, the
visual impact and the affect it may have on resale.
7
08
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bill Utton
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
That application PICA 55112 by D. McAulay, be Refused on the grounds that the
proposed shed in the side yard with a side yard width of 0.6 metres are major
variances that are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and
not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law.
6. PICA 57112-A. & J. Haggarty
5048 William Street
(Lot 19, Plan 40M-1482)
City of Pickering
Carried Unanimously
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law
6640106 to permit a side yard width of 0.0 metre to a proposed addition for the
installation of an elevator on the side of the existing dwelling, whereas the by-law
requires a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit for the proposed side yard elevator addition.
Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering
Planning & Development Department recommending refusal. Written comments
were also received from the City's Development Control Manager indicating the
applicant must be made aware that the property line swales that provide lot
drainage which may be affected by this addition and the final grading must ensure
proper drainage away from the structure and not adversely affect the neighbouring
property and the roof drainage must not be directed into the neighbouring
property.
Written comments received from Colin Barrand of 5046 William Street indicating
no objection to the variance submitted. Written comments received from Aleta &
Rodney Voss of 5045 William Street indicating they are in full support of the
application to construct an elevator on the south side of the house. Written
comments were received from Lucy Singh of 5074 William Street in support of
the application. Written comments were also received from Joe Dickson, MPP,
Ajax-Pickering in full support of the application.
8
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
7:00pm ·3
Main Committee Room
David Johnson, Committee Chair acknowledged the presence of Peter
Rodrigues, Regional Councillor-Ward 3.
Alan Haggarty, owner, Randy Sora, agent, were present to represent the
application. Seven area residents were present in support of the application.
Alan Haggarty explained his son is in a wheelchair and the installation of an
elevator will assist him to access all levels of their home safely. Alan Haggarty
submitted six letters in support of the application.
Randy Sora explained he is an accessibility consultant and has worked with the
Haggarty family for the past few years to make their home accessible for their
son. Randy Sora explained multiple options for the elevator were considered
and due to limited interior space and configurations these areas were not
suitable.
Peter Rodrigues, Regional Councillor-Ward 3 explained he is familiar with the
Hamlet of Claremont and this community has larger lots and the elevator will not
impede on the surrounding neighbours and is in full support of the application.
Moved by Tom Copeland
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application PICA 57/12 by A. & J. Haggarty, be Approved on the grounds
that side yard width of 0.0 metre is a minor variance that is desirable for the
appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and
purpose of the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to a proposed addition for the installation of an
elevator on the side of the existing dwelling, as generally sited and outlined
on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by
September 26, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
3. That the applicant obtain and enter into an encroachment agreement with the
owner of the abutting property to the south (5046 William Street) for the
purpose of maintenance of the addition by September 26, 2013, or this
decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
9
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
]_ 0 Wednesday, September 26, 2012
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
(IV) Adjournment
Date
Chair
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Eric Newton
That the 12th meeting of the 2012 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at
8:06 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on
Wednesday, October 17, 2012.
Carried Unanimously
Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
10
From:
Subject:
Application:
Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PICA 56112
Meeting Date: October 17, 2012
Manager, Development Review & Urban Design
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 56112
L. Cirone
1759 Woodview Avenue
(Part of Lot 8, Plan 282, Parts 31 & 32, Plan 40R-11207)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a
maximum lot coverage of 38 percent for the lands to be severed, whereas the by-law
permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for
the construction of a new two-storey single detached dwelling on a future parcel of land
to be severed.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department considers a maximum lot coverage of
38 percent on a future parcel of land to be severed to be minor in nature and
appropriate. Furthermore, the requested variance is in keeping with the general intent
and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. For these reasons, Staff
recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the future severed lot fronting Oakburn Street,
created through Land Division Application LD 103112, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That final approval is granted by the Region of Durham Land Division Committee
respecting Land Division Application LD 1 03112 for the creation of the severed lot
fronting Oakburn Street and that the Land Division application is final and
binding.
3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
October 17, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
Report PICA 56/12 October 17, 2012
12 Page2
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan-"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Highbush
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036 -"R4" -Fourth Density Residential Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Lot Coverage Variance
• the intent of a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent is to maintain an appropriate
amount of yard space (amenity area) uncovered by buildings on a lot and to
regulate the maximum size and mass of buildings on a lot
• the proposed lot coverage of 38 percent will provide the proposed parcel of land to
be severed with an adequate amount of amenity area and will comply with the
minimum required yard setbacks in the zoning by-law
• the proposed parcel of land to be severed will have a similar lot frontage and area
dimensions as other surrounding properties in the neighbourhood
• the proposed size and height of the dwelling would be compatible with other
dwellings in the neighbourhood
• the intent of the zoning by-law would be m,aintained
Date of report: October 11, 2012
Comments prepared by:
' ~~ (
) &$~
ley_~ ood, MCIP,y.PP
nner II -"~~/
---~--
AY:NS:Id
cofa/reports/2012/pca56~ 12. doc
Enclosures
Su i, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review & Urban Design
13
-_f-----1
-f-------1
-
...,Jr-----+---18 t----+---1 ~ 1----...r--------. _1_---t=~ 0 E; t-----r-'-1-----l I 3:: o f-------
-r-----f-----1::.:: 01------11---
t-----L,-1_-1 ~t------'----13:: ...__ _ __._r_--1 r--f-------1
1--f-r-.--...-----l f--lit-
EST LANE
-II -
-
t-------1~
'T-----ji---J 1---
w -I
~------~~ r--I~ t=j ~
r--l)--STREET -\ ~~~l L -~o"~ L
II I I r-AswEETBR/AR ~
~I II ITW~~D~~~
~ ln<IIIJ
~v
:s d B.ll =cr ~'--'--L-'-L-'---l-L.J.--L..L-L...L..l..._L__!__L-L..L_..Ll._LL.__L.__-L...j
RR(JH :n,,, 1
n LJ ~ r--T"D_RI,_V_E-r-~-.r---' ..... w r-----r~~~~=~===T~W~YSN~~~=:=~-;R~IV~E;R:;:S:-1---huU...LU_l_lJ_j_l--:Dl-:RJt-dE I 1 I I ~-----~ w & J_ ~-----~---1'--~~L-t-t-+-+-~_j ~ 0 1----I--
F l? ~ t-t-t-t--+-il----t--1--'--'-----''-----l 1----_-ST. MONICA'S .____
I SEPARATE SCHOOL ~ BRIMWOOQ-ot------.-----1 t-----+~-HOWELL !----
..;.;;..;.;.:. --,.....:c CF>!OURT ~~Io • = 1--------1~ ~[IT l
-
0
Rlc\-\ARDSON STREET
\
)\
City of Pickering
1-----~ CRESCENT ~ I I :=
/'il[l""L~ITit::::"-:LE='=~~O-::-R~D ..L...J......J
I--Ct: f----t---1
t--0 f----t---1
1----r-
-
-
I I
vi-~STREET ~ EH Nj ~ == OUR 1--J
,---t--r-
ROUGE
VALLEY
PARK
1----I---
(:j f----t---1 ffi t--1 r---o ~ -::l @) <(I-
;; o ---1 STOVER CRESCENT ~ 1--
I __ /f w-
l'===i===l ;i '-
01---
l ~r-
'--...,H..,..O!:-O::lV-:::E!:R:-'I.. ........... -'-;D::l;:R::-;:IVL:;E:1--1-L.....Ii1 r-
~\ I f-
1--
-~ f----t---1
-:::J -~t--t---1
Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Pt. lot 8, Plan 282, 40R·11207, Part 31,32
OWNER L. Cirone
FILE No. PICA 56/12
g<a a _,:o_aur'c:ea:
Ter-anet Enterp,.laea Inc. and Ita aupplle,... All r-IQhta Reae~!'d. Not a plan of aurvey.
2012 MPAC and Ita auocllenl. All ric hte Reeerved. Not a plan of Survey,
DATE Sept. 6, 2012 DRAWN BY JB
SCALE 1 :5,000 CHECKED BY MY
PN-10
,. I L':t
Information Compiled From
Applicant's Submitted Plan
PICA 56/12-
L. Cirone
PROPOSED
LOTTO BE
SEV RED
To permit a maximum
lot coverage of 38
percent, on a future
severed lot
1-w w
0:::
1-
(/)
z
0:::
::J ca
~
<(
0
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning & Development
Department, Planning Information Services Mapping and Design,
Oct 2, 2012.
-y-
1
[
El -', "' d llN.<I.<ONl~ j j
J Nl
J~r.,tPl.Sif~
""=:J
Information Compiled From
Applicant's Submitted Plan
PICA 56/12-
L. Cirone
---m
WEST(REAR) ELEVATION
EAST(FRONT) ELEVATION
15
E
1'--
N
This map was produced by the City of Pickertng Planning & Development
Department, Planning Information Services Mapping and Design,
Oct 2, 2012.
i9
I
''f' -~~' .... ' ,.,.
,~-,., .
Information Compiled From
Applicant's Submitted Plan
PICA 56/12-
/ /
L. Cirone
/' ----·--·------·--·"
[I]
:m:
NORTH ELEVATION
ill
SOUTH ELEVATION
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning & Development
Department, Planning Information Services Mapping and Design,
Oct 2, 2012.