HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 25, 2012 City 00
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
•
1 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Present:
Tom Copeland
David Johnson — Chair
Eric Newton —Vice-Chair
Bill Utton
Shirley Van Steen
Also Present:
Mila Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
(I) Adoption of Agenda
Moved by Tom Copeland
Seconded by Bill Utton
That the agenda for the Wednesday, July 25, 2012 meeting be adopted with an
amendment to move application P/CA 35/12 so that it will be the first application
•
to be heard.
Carried Unanimously
(II) Adoption of Minutes
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bill Utton
That the minutes of the 8th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held
Wednesday, July 4, 2012 be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
•
1
Committee of Adjustment
Cali °� Meeting Minutes
- ; Wednesday, July 25, 2012
( it4I [ 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
(Ill) Reports
1. (Deferred from the July 4, 2012 meeting)
P/CA 35/12 —Winster Investments Limited
415 Toynevale Road
(Part of Lots 64 to 66, Part 1, Plan 40R-19738)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law
1399/81 to permit a maximum of 73 children in a Day Nursery facility for the
daytime care of children and a total of 300 children and students enrolled in
either a day nursery or a private non-residential school at any one time, whereas
the by-law permits a day nursery facility for the daytime care of not more than
40 children at any one time and a maximum total of 150 children and students
enrolled in either a day nursery or a private non-residential school at any one time.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning
compliance to receive site plan approval.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer notified the Committee that written
correspondence-was received by the applicant on July 20, 2012 requesting the
application be deferred to the next meeting on August 15, 2012. Written
comments were also received from Todd & Kim Smith of 448 Rougemount Drive
in objection to the application.
Correspondence received from Todd & Kim Smith indicated concerns with the
traffic and noted there are only two options to enter or leave this neighbourhood
(Whites Road via Granit/Rosebank or onto Kingston Road via Rougemount Drive).
No representation of the application or the public spoke on the application at the
meeting.
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P/CA 35/12 by Winster Investments Limited, be Deferred on the
grounds that a community meeting will be held on August 1, 2012 by the Ward
Councillors.
Carried Unanimously
2
Committee of Adjustment
City °¢ Meeting Minutes
= 141 a, �' Wednesday, July 25, 2012
co 21 7:00 pm
•
Main Committee Room
2. (Deferred from the July 4, 2012 meeting)
P/CA 29/12 — M. & L. Raponi •
334 Fiddlers Court
(Part of Lot 18, Plan 228, Parts 1 & 2, Plan 40R-15374)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to recognize a north side
yard width and an east rear yard depth of 0.6 metres to an existing shed and to
permit a south side yard width and an east rear yard depth of 0.6 metres to a
newly constructed shed, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 1.0 metres
setback to all lot lines for all accessory structures.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning
compliance.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending refusal to
the south side yard width and an east rear yard depth to a newly constructed
shed. The Planning & Development Department recommended approval for the
variances related to the north side yard width and an east rear yard depth to an
existing shed subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from
Bill Coons of 339 Fiddlers Court in support of the application.
Correspondence received from Bill Coons indicated the newly constructed shed
appears to be well constructed and of high quality and the visual appearance is
in keeping with the surrounding neighbourhood. Bill Coons also noted that the
shed does not appear to affect adjacent properties drainage, accessibility,
environmental or health and safety.
Mario & Linda Raponi, owners, were present to represent the application.
Robert Banik on behalf of Josiv Stevanoski of 336 Fiddlers Court and Maria
Graefe of 1408 Rougemount Drive were present in objection to the application.
Mario Raponi outlined the application, his professionalism in Municipal
engineering, and briefly explained the history and relationship with the residents
at 336 Fiddlers Court and 1408 Rougemount Drive. Mario Raponi indicated
meeting with City Staff to discuss an amendment from 0.4 metres to 0.6 metres
for the newly constructed shed and if it would be supported. Mario Raponi
explained that with the proposed setback of 0.6 metres, he will ensure the
drainage is contained on the property and maintenance of the shed will be
provided. In response to questions from Committee Members, Mario Raponi
noted that if the shed is relocated to 1.0 metre it will encroach onto the existing
stonework that surrounds the swimming pool. He also indicated that he would
be willing to deal with water runoff by installing eaves troughs on the shed.
3
Cli o¢ Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
_' 'i _�=� - Wednesday, July 25, 2012
larallE 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Robert Banik notified the Committee Members that he was there to represent his
client Josiv Stevanoski of 336 Fiddlers Court who is currently out of the country.
Robert Banik indicated his client's concerns that the location of the newly
construction shed is too close to the fence line which will impact the
maintenance, the drainage and water runoff that may affect the movement of soil
towards his lot and the visual impact which affects the enjoyment of his
backyard. Robert Banik noted the applicant, as an engineer, should have been
aware about the need to comply with the Zoning By-law before building and that
there is no reason to not comply with the 1.0 metre setback as outlined.
Maria Graefe indicated concerns with the location of the shed being too close to
the fence. Maria Graefe also provided more pictures for the Committee
Members to review and they show how close the shed is to the fence.
Moved by Bill Utton
•
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 29/12 by M. & L. Raponi, be Deferred until the
September 5, 2012 meeting in order to give the Committee Members an
opportunity to visit the site and the opportunity for the applicant to meet with the
neighbours.
Carried Unanimously
3. P/CA 37/12 — E. Kerr & S. Parks
691 Front Road
(Lot 51, Plan M90)
City of Pickering
The applicants request relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to recognize an existing
north side yard width of 0.6 metres to the existing carport attached to the detached
dwelling and to permit a proposed 2 storey detached garage with a height of
5.3 metres in the rear yard, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard
width of 2.4 metres and a maximum accessory structure height of 3.5 metres for
all accessory structures within a residential zone.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building
permit for the proposed detached garage.
4
Committee of Adjustment
City 4 Meeting Minutes
1 -�-�7 Wednesday, July 25, 2012
istrii-ankr 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending refusal to
the height of 5.3 metres to the proposed 2 storey detached garage located in the
rear yard. The Planning & Development Department recommended approval for
the variances related to the north side yard width of 0.6 metres to the existing
carport subject to conditions.
•
Written comments were received from the City's Development Control Manager
indicating the height of the proposed garage may have a negative impact on the
existing trees surrounding the property. Written comments were received from
Camilla & Hugh Arnold of 1250 Ilona Park Road, Judy Carey of 1280B
Commerce Street, Mary Ladisa-Allen & Terry Allen of 1280 Commerce Street,
Victor Pliuskaitis of 1252 Ilona Park Road, Reinhold & Cindy Klinger of 1280A
Commerce Street and Nancy Vichert, Rebecca Campbell & Jeffrey Campbell of
1254 Ilona Park Road in objection to the application. A form letter was also
received signed by 2 residents in support of the application.
Correspondence received from Camilla & Hugh Arnold indicated concerns with
the height of the proposed garage impacting the view of the lake which would
decrease their property value. •
Correspondence received from Judy Carey indicated concerns that the proposed
2 storey garage will block the view of the natural waterfront and prevent the
neighbourhood from enjoying the view of the mature trees and wildlife. Judy
Carey also expressed the possibility of car maintenance and repair shop and the
potential of car waste runoff into backyards and gardens.
Correspondence received from Mary Ladisa-Allen & Terry Allen indicated
concerns that the proposed garage will block surrounding neighbours view of
Frenchman's Bay and natural features in this residential area and fear this
residentially zoned area is becoming an unlegislated business area.
Morri Edelstein, agent, Eugenne Kerr & Sandra Parks were present to represent
the application. Rebecca Campbell of 1254 Ilona Park Road, Victor Pliuskaitis of
1252 Ilona Park Road and Reinhold Klinger of 1280A Commerce Street were
present in objection to the application.
Morri Edelstein explained the application and provided pictures for the
Committee Members to review showing the grading on the subject property. In
response to residents' concerns, Morn Edelstein noted the window is permitted
and has considered the drainage to surrounding properties.
5
•
Committee of Adjustment
C` Meeting Minutes
_-� -- Wednesday, July 25, 2012
iI* iiEU [►� Main Committee Room
• Rebecca Campbell outlined comments received and indicated concerns that the
proposed height of the garage would block a large amount of the afternoon sun
and negatively affect the view of the Bay for surrounding neighbours.
Victor Pliuskaitis outlined comments received and indicated concerns the
proposed height of the garage will obstruct the view of Frenchman's Bay and will .
drastically decrease property value.
Reinhold Klinger outlined comments received and indicated concerns with the
decrease in property value, removal of trees (especially on their property), and
•
the loss of enjoyment and privacy in their backyard.
Moved by Tom Copeland
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
That application P/CA 37/12 by E. Kerr & S. Parks, be Refused on the grounds
that the height of 5.3 metres a proposed 2 storey detached garage located in the
rear yard is a major variance that is not desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose
of the Zoning By-law.
And
That application P/CA 37/12 by E. Kerr & S. Parks, be Approved on the grounds
that the existing north side yard width of 0.6 metres to the existing carport is a
minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and
in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning
By-law, subject to the following condition:
1. That this variance apply only to the existing carport, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
• Carried Unanimously
6
Cat/ 00
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
� Wednesday, July 25, 2012
icsisrmar 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
4. P/CA 38/12 — H. Weber
962 Vistula Drive
(Lot 391, Plan M-17)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, to permit a reduced rear
yard depth of 5.5 metres to a proposed one-storey addition onto the rear of the
existing detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard
depth of 7.5 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit for the proposed addition.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Hans Weber, owner, and Karen Walker were present to represent the
application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to
the application.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Tom Copeland
That application P/CA 38/12 by H. Weber, be Approved on the grounds that the
rear yard depth of 5.5 metres to a proposed one-storey addition onto the rear of
the existing detached dwelling is a minor variance that is desirable for the
appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and
purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed one-storey addition, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
7
Cali 00 • Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
I :; :::::::::::-: Wednesday, July 25, 2012
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
5. P/CA 39/12 — 1685404 Ontario Ltd.
1023 Brock Road
(South Part of Lot 18, Concession 1, Part 2, 40R-18713)
City'of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, to permit a north side yard
width of 1.5 metres and to permit a maximum of 50 percent (8 parking spaces) of
the required parking spaces in the front yard of a proposed new building for an
automotive repair garage use, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard
width of 4.5 metres and a maximum front yard parking of 20 percent (4 parking
spaces).
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain Site Plan
approval and a building permit for the proposed development.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Morri Edelstein, agent, and Mark DePass, owner, were present to represent the
application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to
the application.
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P/CA 39/12 by 1685404 Ontario Ltd., be Approved on the
grounds that the north side yard width of 1.5 metres and a maximum of 50 percent
of the required parking spaces to be located in the front yard of a proposed new
building for an automotive repair garage use are minor variances,that are
desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed parking layout and proposed
one storey building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's
submitted plans.
8
Carl o0 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, 25,July 25 2012
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan approval and a building permit for the
proposed construction by July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null
and void.
Carried Unanimously
6. P/CA 40/12 — E. McKinnon
669 Front Road
(Part Lot 3, Plan 65, Block E, Part 2 & 3, 40R-5378)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit a front yard
depth of 4.5 metres and a south side yard width of 0.5 metres to a proposed
raised deck attached to the front of the existing dwelling, whereas the by-law
requires a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres and a minimum side yard
width of 1.5 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit for the proposed raised deck.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns. Written comments were
also received from Mel & Maureen Metcalfe of 667 Front Road in objection to the
application.
Correspondence received from Mel & Maureen Metcalfe expressed a concern
with the negative impact of the proposed raised front deck would have on the
privacy of their home.
Elizabeth McKinnon, owner, and Chris Knight were present to represent the
application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to
the application.
Moved by Tom Copeland
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
That application P/CA 40/12 by E. McKinnon, be Approved on the grounds that
the front yard depth of 4.5 metres and a south side yard width of 0.5 metres to a
proposed raised deck attached to the front of the existing dwelling are minor
variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in
keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning
By-law, subject to the following conditions:
9
Ca o¢� • Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
-0 "— Wednesday, July 25, 2012
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed deck, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
7. P/CA 41/12 — J. & L. Varga
717 Hillview Crescent
(Lot 96, Plan 331)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit a north side yard
width of 0.8 metres and a south side yard width of 1.1 metres to a single storey
addition with an attached garage onto the existing detached dwelling, whereas
the by-law requires minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres.
•
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit for the proposed addition with an attached garage.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending refusal to
the south side yard width of 1.1 metres to the proposed attached garage. The
Planning & Development Department recommended approval for the variance
related to the north side yard width of 0.8 metres to a single storey addition
subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Jake & Laura Varga, owners, were present to represent the application. No
further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Jake Varga explained the application. In response to a question from a
Committee Member, Jake Varga explained the new attached garage will
maintain a consistent building wall as the existing detached garage.
10
Committee of Adjustment
C` 00 Meeting Minutes
AMU. l
= - I Wednesday, July 25, 2012
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P/CA 41/12 by J. & L. Varga, be Approved on the grounds that
the south side yard width of 1.1 metres to the proposed attached garage onto the
proposed dwelling addition and the north side yard width of 0.8 metres to a single
storey addition onto the existing detached dwelling are minor variances that are
desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the existing dwelling and proposed dwelling
addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
8. P/CA 42/12 — 1473714 Ontario Ltd.
875 Bayly Street
(Part of Block B, Plan M-20, Part 1, 40R-5876)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520 to recognize an existing
south side yard width of 4.3 metres to an existing one-storey commercial plaza
and to permit a reduced number of required parking spaces to 48 in order to
permit a new 38 square metre outdoor patio, whereas the by-law requires a
minimum side yard width of 4.5 metres and a minimum of 50 parking spaces.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain Site Plan
approval.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns. Written comments were
also received from Ken Fuller of 918 Marinet Crescent in objection to the
application.
•
11
Calf 00 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
; ;' Wednesday, July 25, 2012
V _ 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Correspondence received from Ken Fuller expressed concern with potential
noise issues related to loud restaurant patrons in the late evening hours.
Barry Ramphal and Ron Barsi, agents, were present to represent the application.
Betty Lam of 893 Bayly Street Unit #2 and Tony Giorgios of 893 Bayly Street
Unit #5 were present in objection to the application. Andy Gay of 905 Bayly
Street and Ron Metzger of 864 Boxworth Place were present in favour of the
application.
Barry Ramphal explained their involvement within the community and feels the
patio will bring more business to the restaurant as well as other business within
the plaza.
Betty Lam owns a business next door to the restaurant and expressed concerns
with the walkway being blocked by the patio and safety concerns for the patrons
going to the her salon.
Tony Giorgios owns a business next door to the restaurant and expressed
concerns with the removal of the 2 parking spaces in front of his store and the
effects it will have on the patrons coming and going from his business.
Andy Gay indicated the patio will encourage smokers to use the patio instead of
the walkway.
Ron Metzger noted the parking is not an issue, he has never seen the parking lot
full. Ron Metzger also noted that the patio will encourage smokers to use the
patio instead of the front walkway.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 42/12 by 1473714 Ontario Ltd., be Approved on the
grounds that the existing south side yard width of 4.3 metres and to permit
48 parking spaces for the commercial plaza with a new 38 square metre outdoor
patio are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of
the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan
and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the commercial plaza with a proposed
38 square metre outdoor patio, as generally sited and outlined on the
applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed construction by
July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
12
Ca o0 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
I goil --- -1111 Wednesday, July 25, 2012
1J -sc� n or 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
9. P/CA 43/12 — T. & H. Somwaru
628 Sunbird Trail
(Part Lot 69, Plan 40M-2208, Part 8, 40R-23011)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
6176/03 to permit a rear yard depth of 3.8 metres to a covered deck attached to
the rear of the existing detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a
minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit for the rear yard deck and cover.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending refusal.
Written comments were received from the City's Development Control Manager
indicating all runoff must be contained on the applicant's property.
Tajpaul & Hansrani Somwaru, owners, were present to represent the application.
No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the
application.
Hansrani Somwaru explained the application. In response to a question from a
Committee Member, Hansrani Somwaru indicated the roof line would be just
above the fence.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P/CA 43/12 by T. & H. Somwaru, be Approved on the grounds •
that the rear yard depth of 3.8 metres to a covered deck attached to the rear of
the existing detached dwelling is a minor variance that is desirable for the
appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and
purpose of the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the rear yard depth to a covered deck, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
13•
Ca o0 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
WSW IK 7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Carried
Vote
Tom Copeland opposed
David Johnson in favour
Eric Newton opposed
Bill Utton in favour
Shirley Van Steen in favour
10. P/CA 44/12 — C. & K. Coppolino
936 Redbird Crescent
(Block 226, Plan 40M-1325, Part of Block 63
Plan 40M-1415, Parts 5, 6, 25, 26, 28, 40R-9899)
City of Pickering
The applicants request relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
1998/85 to permit a rear yard depth of 4.0 metres to an existing deck and to
permit a rear yard depth of 4.0 metres to a proposed roof covering the existing
deck attached to an existing dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum
rear yard depth of 7.5 metres.
The applicants request approval of these variances in order to obtain zoning
compliance for the existing deck and a building permit for the proposed roof.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's
Development Control Manager indicating all runoff must be contained on the
applicant's property. A form letter was also received and signed by 32 residents
in support of the application.
Clifton Coppolino, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 44/12 by C. & K. Coppolino, be Approved on the grounds
that the rear yard depth of 4.0 metres to an existing rear yard deck and a
proposed roof covering the existing deck are minor variances that are desirable
for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general
14
Ca 00 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the existing rear deck and proposed roof
covering the existing deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicants
submitted plans.
2. That the applicants obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
11. P/CA 45/12 — K. Selimovski
1756 Woodview Avenue
(Lot 17, Plan 40M-1692)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to permit a rear yard
depth of 6.0 metres to a proposed 2 storey deck onto the rear of the existing
detached dwelling, to permit a total lot coverage of 37 percent and to recognize a
west rear yard depth of 0.4 metres and a south side yard width of 0.2 metres to
an existing shed, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of
7.5 metres, a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent and a minimum of 1.0 metres
setback to all lot lines for all accessory structures.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building
permit for the proposed 2 storey deck and zoning compliance for the existing
shed.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's
Development Control Manager indicating all runoff must be contained on the
applicant's property. A form letter was received from five neighbouring residents
indicating no objection to the proposed 2 storey deck. Written comments were
also received from Qurban Ali of 1754 Woodview Avenue indicating no concerns
with the existing shed location or size as it has been there for over 10 years.
• Muamet Selimovski, agent, was present to represent the application. Qurban Ali
of 1754 Woodview Avenue was present in favour of the application. Ian
Glynwilliams and Michelle Ardron of 1639 Valley Ridge Crescent were present in
objection to the application.
15
•
Cluj o0 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
J�-,ice, z,
Citit 00
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
,=; ,g1 -1