The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAugust 15, 2012Com m ittee of Ad j ustment Agenda Meeting Number: 10 Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 ..,,�.. _��r — w=w„��-- � � :; - . � -. �� :_ �_�!I --�.�� Committee of Adjustment Agenda Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number �I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from July 25, 2012 1-17 (III) Reports 1. Deferred from #he July 25, 2012 meeting 1$-24 P/CA 3�/12 - Wintser Investments Limited 415 Toynevale Road (Part of Lots 64 to fi6, Part 1, Plan 40R-19738} City of Pickering 2. P/CA 46/12 - P. 8� M. Gujol 1710 Greenvale Crescent (Lot 6, Plan 4QM-14p2) Ci#y of Pickering 25-29 � 3. P/CA 47/12 - l.. Moran 30-35 626 Park Crescent (W. Part Lot 33, Plan 331, Now 40R-7555 Part 2) City of Pickering 4. P/CA 48112 - D. 8� M. De Kerpel 1105 Ridgewood Court (Lot 39, Plan 40M-1 �07) City of Pickering 5. P/CA 49/12 - R. Koeder 661 Pleasant Street (Blk D, Part Lot 1, Plan 65) City of Pickering (IV) Adjournment 36-40 41-46 ACCE55t�}�E * For information related to accessibility requirements please cantact Lesley Dunne P I C K E I� L�N G T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 TTY 905,420.'l739 Email idunne@pickering.ca C�� o� Committee of Adjus#ment ,�� Meeting Minu�es � � �'� � � Wednesday, July 25, 2{�72 7:Ufl pm Main Committee Room Pending Adoption Present: Tom Copeland David Johnson — Chair Eric Newton — Vice-Chair Bill Utton Shirley Van Steen Also Present: Mila Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Lesley Qunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer {I) Adop#ion of Aqenda Mo�ed by Tom Copeland Seconded by Bill Utton That the agenda for the Wednesday, July 25, 2012 meeting be adopted with an amendment to mo�e applica#ion P/CA 35I12 so that it will be the first appfication to be heard. Carried Unanimvusfy (II} Adoption of Minutes Moved by Shirley Van Steen �econded by Bill Utton That the minutes of the 8th meeting af the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, July 4, 2012 be adopted. Carried Unanimously �� o� Committee of Adjustment �� Meeting Minutes � r►�`. . �"�' ' � � Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:4Q pm Main Committee Room (Ili) RePorts (Deferred from the July 4, 2012 meeting) P/CA 35/12 -- Winster Investments Limited 49 5 Toynevale Road (Part of Lots 64 to 66, Part 1, Plan 40R-19738} City of Pickering The applicant requests refief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 1399181 to permit a maximum of 73 chiidren in a Day Nursery facility for the daytime care o# children and a total of 300 children and stuclents enrolled in either a day nursery or a private non-residential schooi at any one time, whereas the by-law permits a day nursery facility for the daytime care of not more than 40 children at any one time and a maximum t�tal of 150 children and students er�rolled in either a day nursery or a private non-residential school at any one time. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zaning compliance to receive site plan approval. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer notified the Committee that written correspandence was received by the applicant on July 20, 2012 requesting the application be deferred to the next rneeting on August 15, 2012. Written comments were also received from Todd & Kim Smith of 448 Rougemount Drive in objection to the application. Correspondence received from Todd & Kim Smith indicated concerns with the traffic and noted there are only two options to enter or leave this neighbourhood (Whites Road via Granit/Rosebank or on#o Kingston Road via Rougemount Drive). No representation of the application or the public spoke on the application at the meeting. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Bill Utton That application P/CA 35/12 by Winster Investments Limited, be Deferred on the grounds that a community meeting wiil be held on August 1, 2012 by the Ward Councillors. Carried Unanimously 2 �� o� Committee of Adjustment �� Meeting Minutes � � __ Wednesday, July 25, 2012 � 3 7:00 pm Main Committee Room 2. (Deferred from the July 4, 2012 meeting} P/CA 29/12 — M. & L. Raponi 334 Fiddlers Court (Part of Lot 18, Plan 228, Parts 1 8� 2, Plan 40R-15374} City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 303fi to recognize a north side yard width and an east rear yard depth of 0.6 metres to an existing shed and to permit a south side yard width and an east rear yard depth of 0.6 metres to a newly constructed shed, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 1.0 metres setback to all lot lines for all accessory structures. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning compliance. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received fram the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending refusal to the south side yard width and an east rear yard depth to a newly constructed shed. The Planning 8� Qevelopment Department recommended approval for the variances related to the north side yard width and an east rear yard depth to an existing shed subject to conditians. Written comments were also received from Bil! Coons of 339 Fiddlers Court in support of the application. Cvrrespondence received from Bill Caons indicated the newly constructed shed appears to be well constructed and of high quality and the visual appearance is in keeping with the surrounding neighbourhood. Bill Coons also noted that the shed does not appear to affect adjacent proper#ies drainage, accessibility, environmental or health and safety. Mario & Linda Raponi, owners, were present to represent the application. Robert Banik on behalf of ,losiv Stevanaski of 336 Fiddlers Court and Maria Graefe of 1448 Rougemount Drive were present in objection to the application. Mario Raponi outlined the application, his professionalism in Municipaf engineering, and briefly explained the history and relationship with the residents at 336 Fiddlers Court and 1408 Rougemount Drive. Mario Raponi indicated meeting witfi City Staff to discuss an amendment from 0.4 metres to 0.6 metres for the newly constructed shed and if it would be supported. Mario Raponi explained that with the proposed setback of 0.6 metres, he will ensure the drainage is contained on the property and maintenance of the shed wifl be pro�ided. In respanse to questions from Committee Members, Mario Raponi noted that if the shed is relocated tv 1.0 metre it will encroach onto pavers that surround the swimming pooi, wilf gladEy contain all water runoff and drainage by installing eaves troughs on the shed. 3 C�� o� Committee of Ad�us#ment ,�, Meeting Minutes �� `"` ' �� Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:OQ pm Main Committee Room Robert Banik notified tl�e Committee Members that he was there to represent his client Josiv Stevanoski of 336 Fiddlers Court who is currently out of the country. Robert Banik indica#ed his client's concerns that the location of the newly construction shed is too close to the fence iine which will impact the maintenance, the drainage and water runoff that may affect the movement of soil towards his lot and the visual impact which affects the enjoyment of his backyard. Robert Banik noted the applicant, as an engineer, should have been aware about the need to comply with the Zoning By-law before building and that there is no reason to nat comply with the 1.0 metre setback as outlined. Maria Graefe indicated concerns with the location of the shed being too ciose to the fence. Maria Graefe also pravided more pictures for the Committee Members to review and they show how close the shed is to the fence. Mo�ed by Bill Utton Seconded by Eric Newton That applicatian P/CA 29/12 by M. & L. Raponi, be Deferred until the September 5, 2012 meeting in order to give the Committee Members an opportunity to visit the site and the opportunity for the applicant to rneet with the neighbaurs. Carried Unanimously 3. P/CA 37/12 -- E. Kerr & S. Parks 691 Front Road (Lot 51, Plan M90) City of Pickering The applicants requests relief from Zoning By-law 251 � to recognize an existing north side yard width af 0.6 metres #o the existing carport attached ta the detached dwelling and to permit a proposed 2 sto�ey detached garage with a height of 5.3 metres in the rear yard, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 2.4 metres and a maximum accessory structure height of 3.5 metres far all accessory structures within a residentia{ zone. The applicant requests approval of these variances in orde� to obtain a building permit for the proposed detached garage. 4 L�� o� Committee of Adjustment �� Meeting Minutes `� "�, � � Wednesday, J u ly 25, 2012 �� . 7:00 pm �- � IVlain Committee Room M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommentling refusal ta the height of 5.3 metres to the proposed 2 storey detached garage located in the rear yard. The Planning & Development Department recommended approval for the variances refated to the north side yard width of 0.6 metres to the existing carport subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Development Control Manager indicating the height of the proposed garage may have a negative impact on the existing trees surrounding the property. Written comments were received from Camilla & Hugh Arnold of 125p Ilona Park Road, Judy Carey of 128QB Commerce Street, Mary Ladisa-Allen & Terry Allen of 1280 Commerce Street, Victor Pliuskaitis of 1252 Ilona Park Road, Reinhold & Cindy Klinger of 1280A Commerce Street and Nancy Vichert, Rebecca Campbelt & Jeffrey Campbel! of 1254 Ilona Park Road in abjection to the application. A form letter was also received signed by 2 residents in support of the application. Correspondence received from Camilla & Hugh Arnold indicated concems with the height of the proposed garage impacting the view of the iake which would decrease their property value. Correspondence received from Judy Carey indicated concerns that the proposed 2 storey garage will block the view of the na#urai waterfront and prevent the neighbourhood from enjoying the view of the mature trees and wildlife. Judy Carey also expressed the possibifity o# car maintenance and repair shop and the potentiai of car waste runoff into backyards and gardens. Correspondence received from Mary Ladisa-Allen & Terry Allen indicater} concerns that the proposed garage will block surrounding neighbours view of Frenchman's Bay and natural features in this residential area and fear this residentially zaned area is becoming an unlegislated business area. Morri Edelstein, agent, Eugenne Kerr & Sandra Parks were present to represent the application. Rebecca Campbelf of 1254 Ilona Park Road, Victor Pliuska+tis of 1252 Ilona Park Road and Reinhold Klinger of 128QA Commerce Street were present in objection to #he application. Morri Edelstein explained the application and provided pictures for the Committee Members ta review showing the grading on the subject property. in respanse to residents' concerns, Morri Edelstein noted the window is permitted and has considered the drainage to surrounding properties. E �� o� Committee of Adjus#ment �� Meeting Minutes �- � IT � � Wednesday, July 25, 2Q12 7:00 pm IVlain Committee Raom Rebecca Campbell outlined comments received and indicated concerns that the proposed height af the garage would block a large amount of the afternoon sun and negatively affect the view of the Bay for surrounding neighbours. Victor Pliuskaitis outlined comments received and indicated concerns the proposed height of the garage wilf obstruct the view of Frenchman's Bay and will drastically decrease praperty value. Reinhold Klinger outlined comments received and indicated concerns with the decrease in property value, removal of trees (especially on their property), and the loss of enjoyment and pri�acy in their backyard. Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Shirley Van Steen That application P/CA 37/12 by E. Kerr & S. Parks, be Refused on the grounds that the height of 5.3 metres a proposed 2 storey detached garage locatec! in the rear yard is a major variance that is not cfesirable for #he appropriate development af the iand, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. And That application P/CA 37/12 by E. Kerr & S. Parks, be Approved on the grounds tha# the existing north side yard width of 0.6 metres to the existing carport is a minor variance #hat is desirable for the appropriate development of the fand, and in keeping with the general in#ent and �urpose of the �fficiaf Plan and the Zaning By-law, subject to the f�llowing condition: 1. That this variance apply only to the existing carpart, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Carried Unanimously 0 City o¢� Committee of Adjustment �; � Meeting Minutes F � F`° `� "� '� � � Wednesday, July 25, 2012 -� 7:00 pm Main Committee Room 4. P/CA 38112 — H. Weber 9fi2 Vistula Dri�e (Lot 391, Pian M-17) Ci#y of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2�2Q, to permit a reduced rear yard �epth of 5.� metres to a proposed one-storey add'+#ian onto the rear af the existing detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approva! of this variance in order to ob#ain a building permit for the proposed addition. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Develapment Department recommending approval subject to conditions, Written comments were also received from the City's Development Control Manager expressing no concerns. Hans Weber, owner, and Karen Walker were present to represent the a{�plication. No further representation was present in favour of or in abjection to the application. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Tom Copeland That application P/CA 38112 by H. Weber, be Appro�ed on the grounds that the rear yard depth of 5.5 metres to a proposed one-storey additian anto the rear of the existing detached dwelling is a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the generaf int�nt and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the fol4owing conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed one-storey adclition, as generally sited a��d outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void. Ca�ried Unanimously 7 C�� o� Committee af Ad�ustment � � , ,�, Meeting Minutes _ x � � Wednesday, July 25, 2412 7:00 pm Main Committee Room 5. P/CA 39/12 -- 1685404 �ntario L.td. 1023 Brock Raad (South Part of Lot 18, Concessian 1, Part 2, 40R-18713) City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, to permit a north side yard width of 1.5 metres and to permit a maximum of 50 percent ($ parking spaces} of the required parking spaces in the front yard of a proposed new building for an automotive repair garage use, whereas the by-law requires a minirnum side yard width af 4.5 metres and a maximum front yard parking of 20 percent (4 parking spaces). The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain Site Plan approval and a building permit for the proposed developrnent. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outfined comments received from the City af Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. VVritten comments were also received from the City's De�elopment Control Manager expressing no concerns. Morri Edelstein, agent, and Mark DePass, owner, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Eric Newton Secanded by Bili Utton Tha# application PICA 39I12 by 16854a4 4ntaria Ltd., be Approved an the grounds that the north side yard width of 1.5 metres and a maximum af 5Q percent of the required parking spaces to be Iocated in the front yard of a proposed new building for an automotive repair garage use are minor �ariances that are desirable far the appropriate development of the iand, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Qfficiaf Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances appfy only to the proposed parking layaut anc! proposed one storey building, as generally sited and outfined on the applicant's submitted plans, 0 0 , . = -- ,,,..:. '�=t�s� €�-...�, 1�.�.__-� •- ,;�— ,;,� �= •�:�:�:, ::. ■ — ° 's,.�e�-..�a.. �:.��ra:3�1. � ��•_�_��. �� . Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, Juiy 25, 2012 t--� � 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Z. That the applicant obtain Site Plan approval and a building permit for #he proposed construction by July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void. PICA 40/12 — E. McKinnon 669 Front Road (Part Lot 3, Plan 65, City of Pickering Carried Unanimously Block E, Part 2& 3, 40R-5378) The applicant requests refief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit a front yard depth of 4.5 metres and a south side yard width of 0.5 metres ta a proposed raised deck attached to the front of the exis#ing dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 me#res and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed raised deck. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer out{ined commen#s received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were recei�ed #rom the City's Development Control Manager expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from Mel & Maureen Metcaife of 667 Front Road in objection to the application. Correspondence received from Mel & Maureen Metcalfe expressed a concern with the negative impact of the proposed �aised front deck would have on #he pri�acy of their home. Elizabeth McKinnon, owner, and Chris Knight were present to represent the application. �10 further representation was present in favour of ar in objection to the application. MoWed by Tom Copeland Seconded by Shirley Van Steen That application P/CA 40/12 by E. McKinnon, be Approved on the grounds that the front yard depth of 4.5 metres and a south side yard width of 0.5 metres to a proposed raised deck attached to the front af the existing ttwelling are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the generaf intent and purpose of the Officia! Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following canditions: �� o� Committee of Adjustment ,�r Meeting Minutes ., �"� � � Wednesday, July 25, 2012 =� 7:�Q pm Main Committee Room 1. That these �ariances apply only to the proposed deck, as generafly sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Un�nimausly 7. PICA 41/12 — J. & L. Varga 717 Hillview Crescent (Lot 96, Plan 331 } City af Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit a north side yard width of 0.8 metres and a south side yard width of 1.1 metres to a single storey addition with an attached garage onto the existing detachec! dwefiiing, whereas the by-law requires minimum side yard widths of 1.� metres. The applicant requesfs approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed addition with an attached garage. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending refusal to #he sou#h side yard width of 1.1 metres to the proposed attached garage. The Pfanning & Development Department recommended approval for the variance related to the north side yard width of 0.8 metres to a single storey additian subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Development Control Manager expressing no concerns. Jake � Laura Varga, owners, were p�esent to �epresent the applica#ion. No further representation was present in favour of or in 4bjectian to the application. Jake Varga explained the appiication. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Jake Varga explained the new attached garage will maintain a consistent building wall as the existing detached garage. 1Q �� o� Committee of Adjus#ment �� Meeting M�nutes °� "� ° r � Wed nesday, J u ly 25, 2012 7:04 pm �� IVlain Committee Room Mo�ed by Shirley Van Steen Secanded by Bill Uttan That application PlCA 41112 by J. & L, Varga, be Approved on the grounds that the south side yard width of 1.1 metres to the proposed attached garage on#o the praposed dwelling addition and the north side yard width of 0.8 metres to a single storey addition onto the existing detached dwelling are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the #ollowing conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing dwelling and proposed dwelling addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by .iuly 25, 2014, or this decision shall become nufl and void. Carried Unanimousfy 8. PlCA 42112 — 1473714 Ontario Ltd. 875 Bayly Street (Part of Block B, Plan M-20, Part 1, 40R-5876) City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-faw 2520 to recognize an existing south side yard width of 4.3 metres to an existing one-storey commercial plaza and to permit a reduced number of required parking spaces to 48 in order to permit a new 38 square metre outdoor patio, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 4.5 metres and a minimum of 50 parking spaces. The applicant requests approval of this variance in arder to obtain Site Plan approvaL M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received fram the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Development Contral Manager expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from Ken Fufler of 918 Marinet Crescent in abjectian to the application. 11 �� o� Commi#tee of Adjustment �� Meeting Minutes ', `� rt F-- � � Vllednesday, July 25, 2Q12 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Correspondence received from Ken Fuller expressed concern with potentiai noise issues related to laud restaurant patrons in the late evening haurs. Barry Ramphal and Ron Barsi, agents, were present to represen# the applicatian. Betty Lam of 893 Bayly Street Unit #2 and Tony Giorgios of 893 Bayly Street Unit #5 were present in objection to the application. Andy Gay of 9Q5 Bayly Street and Ron Metzger of 864 Boxworth Place were present in favour of the application. Barry Ramphal explained their invalvement within the community and feels the pafio will bring more business to the restaurant as weli as other business within the plaza. Betty Lam owns a business next door to the restaurant and expressed concerns with the walkway being blocked by the patio and safety concerns for the patrons going to the her salon. Tony Giargios owns a business next door to the restaurant and expressed concerns with the removal of the 2 par4cing spaces in front of his store and the effects it will have on ihe patrons coming and going from his business. Andy Gay indicated the patio will encourage smokers to use the patio instead of the walkway. Ron Metzger noted the parking is not an issue, he has never seen the parking lot full. Ron Metzger also noted that the patia will encourage smokers to use the patio instead of the front wafkway. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Eric Newton That applicatian P/CA 42/12 by 1473714 4ntario Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the existing south side yard width of 4.3 metres and to permit 48 parking spaces for the commercial pfaza with a new 38 square metre outdoor patio are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate deveiopment of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zonir�g By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1_ That these variances apply Qnly to the commercial plaza with a proposed 38 square metre outdoor patio, as generally sited and autlined an the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the praposed construction by July 25, 2014, ar this ciecision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimousiy 12 �� o� Committee of Adjustmen# �� Meeting Minutes � + � Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:00 pm :� � Main Committee Room 9. P/CA 43/12 — T. & H. Somwaru 628 Sunbird Trail (Part Lot 69, Plan 40M-2208, Part 8, 40R-23a11} City of Pickering The applicant requests re{ief from Zoning By-faw 3036, as amended by By-law 817fi103 to permit a rear yard depth of 3.8 metres to a covered deck attached to the rear of the existing detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit far the rear yard deck and cover. M. Yeung, Assis#ant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending refusal. Written comments were received from the City's Development Control Manager indicating alf runoff must be contained on the applicanYs property. Ta�paul & Hansrani Somwaru, owners, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favaur of or in objection to the application. Hansrani Somwaru explained the application. In response to a question frorn a Committee Member, Hansrani Somwaru indicated the roof line would be just above the fence. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Bill Utton That application P/CA 43/12 by T. & H. Somwaru, be Approved on the grounds that the rear yard depth of 3.8 metres to a covered deck attached to the rear of the existing detached dwelling is a minor variance tha# is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Z�ning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the rear yard depth to a covered deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void. 13 . ---- ,,, ,� ;�,�i�- - �� =: . ., �. a ��r. � �a.�i� 1'��•��!�� Vote Tom Copeland apposed David Johnson in favour Eric Newton opposed Bill Utton in favour Shirley Van Steen in favour Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Carried 10. P/CA 44/12 — C. & K. Coppalina 936 Redbird Crescent (Block 226, P4an 40M-1325, Part of Block 63 Plan 40M-1415, Parts 5, 6, 25, 26, 28, 40R-9899} City of Pickering The applicants request rekief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1998/85 to permit a rear yard depth of 4.0 metres to an existing deck and to permit a rear yard depth of 4.0 metres ta a proposed roof covering the existing deck attached to an existing dwelling, whereas the by-!aw requires a minimum rear yard depth af 7.5 metres. The applicants requast approval of these variances in order to obtain zoning campliance for the existing deck and a buifding permit for the proposed roof. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City af Pickering Planning & Development Department recammending approvai subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Development Control Manager indicating all runoff must be cantained on the applicant's property. A form ietter was also received and signed by 32 residents in suppo�t of the application, Clifton Coppolino, owner, was present to represent the application. No further representa#ion was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Bill Utton S�conded by Eric Newton That application P/GA 44/12 by C. & K. Coppolino, be Approved on the grounds that the rear yard depth af 4.0 metres to an existing rear yard deck and a proposed roof covering the existing deck are minor variances that are desirable fo� the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose �f the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 14 �1� �� Gommittee of Adjustment �� Meeting Minutes �`�' * � 1 ._ Wednesday, July 25, 2012 �� 7:00 pm V IVlain Committee Room 1. That these variances apply only to the existing rear deck and proposed roof covering the existing deck, as generally sited and outiined an the applicants submitted plans. 2. That the applicants obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 11. P/CA 45/12 — K, Selimovski 17�6 Woodview Avenue (Lot 17, Plan 40M-1692) City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to permit a rear yard depth of 6.0 metres to a proposed 2 storey deck onto the rear of the existing detached dwelling, to permit a total lot coverage af 37 percent and to recognize a west rear yard depth af 0.4 metres and a south side yard width of 0,2 rnetres to an existing shed, whereas the by-law requires a m�nimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres, a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent and a minimum of 1.Q metres setback ta all lot lines for all accessory structures. The applicant requests approval vf these variances in order to obtain a building permit far the proposed 2 storey deck and zoning compliance for the existing shed. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & De�elapment Department recommending appraval subject to conditians. Written comments were received from the City's Development Control Manager indicating afl runoff must be contained on the applicant's property, A form ietter was received from five neighbouring residents indicating no objection to the praposed 2 storey deck. Written comments were also received from Qurban Ali of 1754 Woodview Avenue indicating no concerns with the existing shed Iocation or size as it has been there for over 10 years. Muamet Selimovski, agent, was present to represent the application. Qurban Aii of 1754 Wood�iew Avenue was present in favour of the appiication. lan Glynwilliams and Michefle Ardron of 1639 Valley Ridge Crescent were present in objection ta the application, 15 �l� a� Committee of Adjustment ,�� Meeting Minutes t� � �- �: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Muamet Selimovski explained there is na access to the top deck it is only to provide shade for the Iower deck. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Muamet Selimovski indicated he has no problem removing the upper deck railings which will then be a roaf covering the low�r deck. lan Glynwilliams expressed several concerns with the existing 2 storey deck and explained the structure is extremely large and high, has been built without a permit and wauld like to see the entire structure removed, and then apply for a building permit to ensure it is built to Code, lan Glynwilliams noted the subject property is a corner lot that is the gateway into the community and the existing 2 storey deck provides a negative impact on the surrounding neighbourhood. Michelle Ardron expressed a concern with the number of personal vehicles and commercial vehicles parked in the driveway. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Bill Utt�n That application P/CA 451'I2 by K. Selimovski, be Approved on the grounds that the rear yard depth of 6.d metres to a propased covered deck, a totaf lot caverage of 37 percent and a west rear yard depth af 0.4 metres and a south side yard width of 0.2 metres to an existing shed are minor variances that are desirable for the apprapriate developrnent of the 1and, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing shed and the proposed covered deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted p#ans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed covered deck that ensures railings are removed on the 2 storey deck by July 25, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 'I 6 �� o� Committee of Adjustment �� Meeting Minutes `��° � � Wednesday, July 25, 2012 i� . 7:00 pm � Main Committee Room (IV) Adiournment Moved by Bili Utton Seconded by Eric Newton That the 9th meeting of the 2012 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 9:06 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, August 1 �, 2012. Garried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretary-Treasurer ��l .. �,,,.,_ -- �-,�-�h_r au,. T aiuuL i cT_:�,k� _— C-;�.-'J�= � ,,�_�.. �rm .1 +4-rz+� �� 4 �� Report ta Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 35/12 Meeting Date: August 15, 2Q12 (Deferred from July 25, 2012 meeting} From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 35/12 Wintser Investments Limited 415 Toynevale Road (Part of Lots 64 to 66, Part 1, Plan 40R-19738} City of Pickering Application; The appficant requests relief from Zoning By-iaw 2511, as amended by By-law 1399/81 to permit a maximum of 73 children in a Day Nursery facility for the daytime care of children and a total of 300 children and students enrolled in either a day nursery or a private non-residential school at any one time, whereas the by-law permits a day nursery facility for the daytirne care of not more than 4Q children at any one time and a maximum total of 150 children and students enrolled in either a day nursery or a private non-residential school at any one time. The applicant reques#s approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning compliance to receive site plan approval. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Departrnent cansiders a maximum of 73 children in a Day Nursery facility for the daytime care of children and a tatal of 300 children and students enrolled in either a day nursery or a private non-residentiaM school at any ane time to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the day nursery and private non-residential school, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the owner provide detailed building plans or information to ensure the buiiding complies with the Ontario Building Code related to the propased number of children and students to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official prior to the issuance of any building permit for ihe property. Report PICA 35/12 (Deferred from July 25, ZQ12 meeting} Application History: August 15, 2012 Page 2 � � Qn July 4, 2012 and July 25, 2012, the Committee of Adjustment heard this application, but in both meetings the application was deferred. The first time the deferral was made by the Committee of Adjustment, to allow the owner/applicant time to hold a community meeting with the immediate neighbours far public consultation. The second deferral was requested by the applicant to allow a community meeting to be held by the Ward 1 Councillors with the facilitation of City Staff. On August 1, 2012, a C�mmunity mee#ing was held by the Ward 1 Councillors. A presentatian was made by City Staff representing the Planning & Development Department. The meeting was well attended by residents with four Councillo�s and three Committee of Adjustment members. City Staff explained the application and pro�ided the Planning & Development's recommendation to the Commi#tee of Adjustment. At the meeting, various concerns regarding the application were raised by the residents. The concerns were predominately related to traffic impac#s, naise impacts and the City's by-law enforcement pracess for #he subject property owner. The meeting provided cfarification on the Committee of Adjustment application process, but consensus between the City Staff's recommendation to the Committee of Adjustment and what the residents want, was not reached. Property Background: The Committee of Adjustment previously approved an application for the subject property to permit 150 tota� number of children and studen#s enrolled in either a day nursery or a private non-residential school at any one time by Committee of Adjustment Decision P/CA 78/86 on October 15, 1986. kn 2U10, a minor variance application P/CA 10110 was submitted by the owner of the subject property to permit 0 bus parking spaces on site and a side yard width of 3.9 metres to a proposed school addition to the existing building. The Cornmittee af Adjustment's decision on May 19, 2010 approved the 0 bus parking spaces and refused the side yard width of 3.9 metres to the proposed school addition to the existing building. This Decisi�n was then appealed to the �ntario Municipal Board (�MB} by the applicanUowner. The OMB held a hearing on August 30, 2010 artd issued its Decision on September 9, 2010. The Board granted ap�roval vf these variances subject to a site plan application that included an appropriate landscaping plan. The applicant has since submitted a site plan application for the construction of the proposed new addition and a proper landscaping plan. In the City's review of the site plan applica#ion, the p#ans indicated the toial number of students being 297 and thereby, do not comply with the by-law. Consequentiy, tfi�is minor variance application is required to recognize the existing number of students attending the school. The applicant indicated that the school has been functioning at the 297 student capaci#y for the past 4 years and is seeking to obtain zoning compiiance for site plan approval. Report P/CA 35/12 (Deferred from July 25, 2012 meeting} ;� �; ^ August 15, 2012 Page 3 It is noted that the only actual construction proposed is the addition that was approved by the OMB as a result of Committee of Adjustment applica#ion P/CA 10/10. Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residential Area — Low Density Area" within the Rosebank Neighbourhood Zoning By-!aw 2511 as amended by 1399/81 —"R4(DN)" and 1862/84 Appropriateness of the Application • the intent of limiting the number of children permitted within a day nursery is to ensure that there is adequate area within the building and #hat adequate parking spaces, amenity area and drop-offlpick-up area is pravided on-site for the permitted use • there appears to be adequate building area, parking space, amenity area and drop-off/pick up area provided on-site • the praperty pravides the zoning by-!aw required number of parking spaces for the increased student yield • there have been no negative impacts regarding the overall site function and opera#ion of the day nursery • the Day Nursery and Non-Residential School uses are permitted uses on the property • the lands and premises of the subject property are duly licensed pursuant to the regulations of the Ministry of Education and #he Day Nurseries Act • the student capacity is an existing situation that needs to be recognized • the intent of the zoning by-law is maintained Input Fram Other Sources ApplicantlOwner • requests that the application be deferred un#il a Traffic study and a Noise study be produced when the Blaisdale Montessori Schao! is in full operation Regional Councillar, • objection to the application as the application is Jennifer O'Connell, Ward 1 not minor in nature • that the minor variance application is not appropriate for this neighbourhood Report P/CA 35112 (Deferred from July 25, 2012 meeting) Regional Councillor, Jennifer 4'Connelf, Ward 1 (continued) August 15, 2012 Page 4 a � • identified numerous resident concerns with the property being in non-compliance with the zoning by-law for numerous years, the increased traffic impacts, the increased noise impacts and the inaction of the property owner/applicant in addressing the neighbours' concerns aboui landscaping and vegetatio� on-site Engineering Services . Toynevale Raad is designated as a Collector Road in the City's Official Plan • Collector Roads can carry up to 8,OQ0 vehicles per day • 2010 Traffic counts for Toynevale Road were collected late August/early September over a 3 day period • the peak hours on Toynevale Road is 8 to 9 am in the morning and 5 to 6 pm in the evening • the 2�1 D traffic caunts for the number of vehicles travelfed on Toynevale Road just west of Chantilly Road are as foilows: Traffic Vol. Da 1 Da 2 Da 3 Eastbaund 1695 1679 1754 Westbound 1833 1882 1813 Total 3528 3561 35fi3 • New 2012 Traffic counts will b� taken befare September and in September/Uctober of 2012 for a comparison on, before, and after the 20'E2 schaol year begins • in 2012 City of Pickering Budget, the Preliminary Engineering and Design for the upgrading of Toynevale Road (Rougemount Dri�e to Rosebank Road} was approved; Preliminary Engineering and Design included engineering components of topographical survey, soif chemical analysis and geotechnicai analysis, storm sewer inspection, vegetation survey and assessment and streetline needs analysis - 120 Signatures of Summer • Commitment Statement to driving under the School Parents at Blaisdale speed limit, obey all traffic signals, and to l�e Montessori School respectfui and courteous to the neighbours surrounding the Schoo! and in #he community at large Report P/CA 35/12 August 15, 2012 (Deferred from July 25, 2012 meeting) F� �, Page 5 �_ � Signatures of Property • in opposition to the application Qwners from 90 Households . that Blaisdaie Montessori should be required to restrict their numbers to those presently allowed in order to reduce traffic ta a safer level Date of report: August 9, 2012 Commen#s prepared by: �'-�,�1�..�- Mila Yeung Planner II MY:CR:Id calelreponsrzol7Jpca3S12- tleferrea zdoc Enclosures • that City of Pickering should monitor and ensure that �y-law is complied with -�.��-�..� �- oss Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review e� �Y �' � Information Compiled from Applicant's Submitted Plan PlCA 35112 Wintser In�estments Ltd. lo permrt a mawmum of 73 chiidren in a facility for ihe daytime care of chiidren 7o permit a maximum of 300 chifdren and students in a building to be used as a day- nursery and private non-residenfial school � 3.7rn TOYNEVALE ROAD .�� .,ro.. . � � .--�.: �� _._ __.._ . � ,. _ T _.... _.' ...� — f . r. i r - — — --- '..c,— , r..� �_.,.vi_ ..�-�_� �--�—�-- -�.� '_... . .. . _.. �-_... ._ , �1ai�i _ �.��.:��.� ;; ��; ;�Q ' 0 �� PLAY F1ELD i � ; ' �� ]; �m: ' ;�i � �� I;�� i i ; �� i�•,\ �� ` -- --- --� \` k: ' �i I� � , , . � � _.__,�� .� _.�,.. . f� r � T _ —'� � _ I :� '. i � . / _ ... _ I' , � I : � . � I � � � '.�,r--L. _ 1 _ ,.t'�.',� /i.�� m.. ..-.�._, • , ,� �' � __ i �-- __ - ! i,�- 4- 'c, r_ � j _. i? �- i _ .. . 9�_.. � -i ; � •;.._._. , _....� ��. ; � ; S `_ —� -r -i t n . � � f � � f- � �t � _ �'t�' r -- — �? � � � s �� EXISTING ` ��' % � -? `" _ �` BUILDING � ,� - _: _ I � —,.► ; ' _� , - -- —� • - � , — � � �; � }' � �^ � _ Q., I' Z� -�, � 3.9m� 'S � a � i ; Y. , (' � `. '1 - . i j . i i .. . A i — �i � � A . i '_'._ . _ _ —' _. �. ..""" �\ ` i i I i 1 - This map was produced by the Ciiy of Pickering Planning 8 �evelopment Department, Planning Information Services division Mapping and Design, Juna 19, 2012. City o� Report to ,' ; Committee of Adjustment �, I I ERI Application Number: P/CA 46112 `" � Meeting Date: August 15, 2012 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 46/12 P. & M. Gujol 1710 Greenvale Crescent (Lot 6, Plan 4QM-1402} City of Pickering Application: The app►icant requests reiief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended t�y By-!aw 1837I84, to permit a rear yard depth of 5.3 metres to a proposed sunroom and a lot coverage of 41 percent, whereas the by-law requires a rear yard depth of 7.5 metres and a maximum {ot coverage af 38 percent. The applicant requests appraval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for #he proposed sunroom. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Department considers a rear yard depth of 5.3 metres to a proposed sunr�om and a lot co�erage of 41 percent to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-iaw, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed sunroom, as generally sited and outfined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 15, 2014 or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 46/12 �� Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law August 15, 2Q12 Pickering Official Plan —"Urt�an Residential Areas — Low Density Area" within the Amberlea Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 as am�nded by By-law 1837184 —"S1" Appropriateness of the Application Rear Yard Depth Variance Page 2 • the intent of the minimum 7.5 metre rear yard depth is to ensure that a useable amount of amenity space is pro�ided in the rear yard and to provide an appropriate buffer space between the dwellings • #he praposed rear yard depth of 5.3 metres will still provide a significan# amount of useable amenity space in the rear yard and an appropriate buffer space between dwellings • the proposed rear yard depth of 5.3 metres only affects part of the lot; the remainder of the lat cvmpiies with the rear yard depth requirement of 7.5 metres • the prop�sed variance appears to ha�e minimaf adverse impact on the abutting neighbours as an acceptable amount of buffer space will remain • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Lat Caverage Variance • the intent of the maximum lot coverage requirement is to ensure the rnaintenance of an appropriate amount of amenity area not covered by buildings, and to regulate the amount af ground floar area constructed on the lot • the proposed 41 percent lo# coverage would provide an appropriate iot coverage to accommadate the proposed sunroom addition • an acceptable amount of amenity space and building floar area will be provided • the intent of the zoning by-law woufd be maintained Date of repor#: August 8, 2012 Comments prepared by: �ti�� Mila Yeung Planner II MY:CR:jf oofafrepoRSl201]lpra4fi-12.doc Enclosures % �_ �''u'a� Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP �t�- Principal Pianner — Development Review �? � Information Compiled from Applicant's Submitted Plan P/CA 46I12 P. & M. Gujol EXISTING COVERED DECK £ , M � v i�---- 5.3rn r � �� To perrnit a rear yard depth of 5.3 metres 33.Orn ��• ��.��, �; - 'T'�� ::�:''�_«:.:� �:��. :.�''b;.. � � _ :, � ;:. �� ~ �� EXISTING `� �tst,,:�:,�.�.�h� �� DWELLING � . � �..�-.�a.,.t-._.._.. � ;� 3.3m ` � ! � � � � w� �:y'�'.� j��'��,�f.u'��:.A:.�' �'WWie�3i�.+11�1.1� ..��Lts�i_.`K.S��l/P � ,...,�...._,.��,�.-��,�:,�.:,�,_.�..� - - -.�.�:,.. 33.Om To permit a total lot coverage of 41 per� fi.1 rn 6.1 m � . .rt E ' +� M � � :, � z rW� :.J W � C� W Q � W � �..J N This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning 8 Devefopmenl Department. Planning Iniorma[ion Services Mapping end Design, Ju3y 27, 2012. Information Compifed from Applicant's Submitted Pian PICA 46/12 P. & M. Gujol S----_ ___._. _.__ ; � 4 f____.._._.. _. ___. ! t � . F^ . ... . . ...... _.�_�__...E S I ♦ I � ,, _. .._ - -- , � - -. _. ,.. ----- i •�� - -�_._._, � i i � � i � 1 . 1 � � .. � � �........._.._.-...... .._.:t � ~ i � � � N ......_ _.... � . , �-.. . . . . . . . . ; " , i � , � . , F f ; j ; . � .. ; _ :. � �_. .. ... .. _.,_ . _ . . . � . ,'r. ti 7.4m . WEST ELEVATION h .�. i i � , n c�i 4� «. �,.... � _ .� � . . .. _ . ... . __ . . . . . .. . . . . .. .� f i � { f _. . . ...... _ . . .. . j i _ .----..._ . ----3 . ....._ . .. . ... ...._........ � 3.3m - - ; SOUTH ELEVATION � `' 9 � This map was produced by fhe City ot Pickering Planning & Development Department. Planning Information Services Mapping and Design, Juty 27. 2012. �lt� °� Report to ; ' Committee of Adjustment I Application Number: PiCA 47t12 Meeting Date: August 15, 20'f2 �� From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Develapment Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applicatian P/CA 47112 L. Moran 626 Park Crescent (West Part af Lo# 33, Plan 331, Part 2, 40R-7555) City of Pickering Appiica#ion: The applicant reques#s relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit a front yard depth of 3.fi rnetres, ea�es and sills to project 1.0 metre into the required yards and a lot coverage of 42 percent to a proposed 2 storey detached dwe!{ing, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 5.98 metres, maximum projection of eaves and sills into a required yard o# 0.4 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed dwelling. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Department considers the front yard depth o# 3.6 metres, eaves and silfs to project 1.0 metre into the required yards and a lot coverage o# 42 percent to a praposed 2 storey detached dwelling to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose af the �fficiaf Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances appfy only to the proposed 2 storey detached dweiling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 15, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void. Report PICA 47/12 Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law August 15, 2012 �� Page 2 Pickering Official Pfan — Urban Residential Area — Low Density Areas within the West Shore Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511 — "R4" Appropriateness of the Appfication Front Yard Depth Variance • the intent of the front yard depth of 7.5 metres is to pro�ide an adequate buffer space between buii�ings and street activity, and to provide an adequate landscaped area at the front of the prop�rty • the variance for the fron# yard depth of 3.6 metres to a propased cove�ed porch would apply only to the east corner of the propased dwelling • the subject property is an irregular lot; therefo�e, on the west side of the property the front yard depth of 9.3 metres complies with the by-law, bu# on the east sicfe front yard depth of 3.6 metres does not comply • the proposed variance would maintain the neighbourhood character on Park Crescent, pro�ides an appropriate buffer space and provides an adequate landscaped area within the front yard of the property • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Eaves and Silfs Projection Variance •#he intent of the maximum eaves and sills projection is to ensure that the proposed building is containetf within the property boundaries • the proposed eaves and sills projection of 1.0 metre will be contained within the property boundaries • proposed eaves and sills projec#ion of 1.4 metres into rear yard depth requirement Qf 7.5 metres is a slight projection into the rear yard • the requested front yard depth variance of 3.6 metres in this application is made to the proposed covered porch and accommodates the eaves and sills projectian • the proposed 1.Q metre projection into the proposed 1.5 metres minimum side yard width results in a 0.5 metres distance between the side lo# line and the raof, providing atfequate distance between property line and roof line • there appears to be no adverse impact on the proposed eaves and sills projection of 1.Q metre into the required yards � the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Report P/CA 47/12 �� Lot Coverage Variance August 15, 2012 Page 3 • the intent of the maximum 33 percent building lot coverage �equirement is to maintain an appropriate amaunt af yard space (amenity area} uncovered by buildings on a lot and to regulate the maximum size and mass of buildings on a lot • the proposed lot coverage of 42 percent provides an appropriate amount of yard space uncovered by buildings • there appears to be no adverse impact on the proposed variance • the intent o# the zoning by-law would be maintained Date of report: August 8, 2012 Comments prepared by: ��W�� Mila Yeung Planner II MY:CR:jf co(a�reportsrz 017/pce47-72.tla c Enclosures � - G�z>� ��/ ��,` Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review i Q 0 n � • == � ,� __ ,1 I�,��.. � � -- i� ��•�� ,,. � �� . � �� ' �� 1�' �'IR� �� : � • - �� 1 . i ` ��■ �■� �� '' : �� 1 �� -- � �� r�� i�� .�. �.. .... ..� �� • �� • �� ■� �� -� '�� , =:�� . �� .� . �� " �� , �� S �� ', �� -�� ._�� ', �� i! �� I /�� . �rra � ��= . � - 'r � � '�� , ■ . r.� ;� �.�� .. r� . -� ��. _� . „11'� ,11"� � SUNRISE A a' � Im 33 P.4RK, ri � � � � o l m COURT a � SUBJECT �r PROPERTY ' TULLO STREET . Z � o pROM�NApE U Y � j 0�� SURF AVENUE �{ d 3 C�ty o# Pickering Planning & Development Departmeni PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Plan 331, West Part Lot 33, 40R7555 Part 2 � OWNER L. M01'811 DATE .lUly 25, 2072 DRAWIV BY .�M FEl.E No. P/CA 47J12 SCALE 1:5,000 CHECKED BY MY N ureea: e�7�ra �t Entarprl��• Inc. nd le� •uppli.n. NI r�qht� Rss�rwQ. Not o Pfan o} .�rv.,,. PN-2 c 2012 AIPHC and Ita •uoolt�I�. All �Cht: Ra�arvatl. Not a olan o} Survsr. �� L OT 63 � E 0 1 � � L 0 T 64 �or s5 � O cG � �D � � �� o r 6s � � �� Information Compiied from Applicant's Submitted P1an PICA 47112 L. Moran LC�T 14.fi3m 1 1.634m 1 NEIN TW� STQREY HOUSE .-- � � � PRdPOSEQ EAVES � � To permit the eaves 8� �- sills to project 1.0 metre into the required � yards • �� E 1 To permit a lot � coverage of 42°l0 ^ ENTRY � ,�'— STAIRS N � �p . - � . ,- �� R�5 �� Pp,R To permit a front yard depth of 3.6 metrss � 7his map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning 8 Development DepartmeM, Pianning Informetion Services Mapping and Design, July 27, 2012. SOl1TH ELEVATION EASi ELEVATION NOFtTH ELEVATION �5 Information Compifed from Applicant's Submitted Plan PlCA 47112 L. Mor�n This map was produced by ihe City of Pickering Planning & Development DepaRment, Planning Information Services Mapping and Design, Juiy 27. 2012. ��`� °� Repart to ; ; Committee of Adjustment I ERI Application Number: P1CA 4$I12 Meeting Date: August 15, 2012 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PlCA 48/12 D. & M. De Kerpel 1105 Ridgewood Court (Lot 39, Plan 40M-1607) Gity of Pickering Appfication: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2864l88, ta permit a rear yard dep#h of 5.9 metres to a proposed second storey deck, whereas the by-law requires a rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed deck. Recommendation: The Planning & Developmer�t Department considers #he rear yard depth of 5.9 metres to be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the #olfowing conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 15, 2014, or this decision shalf become null and void. Report PICA 48/12 August 15, 2012 Page 2 � ? Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering 4fficial Plan —"Urban Residential Area — Low Density Area" within the Liverpool Neighbourhood Zoning By-faw 3036 as amended by 2864/88 —"S3" Appropriateness of the Application Rear Yard Depth Variance • the intent of the minimum 7.5 metre rear yard depth is to ensure that a useable amoun# of amenity space is provided in the rear yard and to provide an appropriate buffer space between dwellings • the proposed rear yard depth o# 5.9 metres will provide a significant amount af useable amenity space in the rear yard and an appropriate buffer space between the west and east abutting dwellings • the subject property abuts the Kitley Ravine open space to the rear of the property • the prop�sed deck is on the main floor of the property, but from a �ear elevation perspective, the proposed deck is on the second storey of the dwelling • the proposed rear yard depth of 5.9 metres only affects part of the lot; the remainder of the lot complies with the rear yard depth requiremen# of 7.� me#res • the proposed variance appears to have minimal adverse impact on the abutting neighbours to the wes# and east as an acceptable amount of buffer space will remain • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Date of report: August 8, 2012 Comments prepared by: �'�,� Mila Yeung Planner II MY:CR:jf cofalreportsl2012/pca48-12. doc Enclosures f'/ �� --- Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review r � � � m Z � � � } � W C3 � � 0 � � � U CRES. � �' q Z7 .$�T. /$.�%� �T1 JOGUES � m � Sr /SAA SEFARATE � JQGUES U CRES. � cArHO�I scHOa[ o gRiDGE x GHURCH � o m � FINCH AVENUE /REHALL No. 6 GLOUCESTER w cn � � � � � D � � Z m cn CR7 ERWOR" U W � � � � ULAlU Z Z TOT � -1 U m tor � �cCE � � Q � �'F �ULMUF CRT � o � � o U FORESTBRD K PARK RIDGEWOOfl p�1�-F'� CANBQROUGH 6 SILVERTHORN o A�F,NUE MA�DEN a ° KfTLEY x W WILUAM a !?UNBAR U PUBLIC SQUARE Z � 5GHDOL � a- � a S J RO Et NONEYWOOD � � r� � C) f�l z � F �AUGHAN p �� x WIL LARD R�`F PUBL/C E- � X SCHOOL z � CRESCEN � o DAl//D FARR P K w � ° � R 0,40 �l�Eri1A��A � w City of Pickering Planning & Development Department t'ROPERTY DESCRIPTIpN Plan 40M1607 Lot 39 OWNER D& M De Kerpel bATE �uly 25, 2Qi2 DRAWN BY JM � FILE No. P/CA 48/12 SCALE 1:S,O00 CHECKEfI BY MY N a a �o�rcas: c Tera e[ EntarpN�e� Ine. antl ib �uppl{sn. AI7 Aqht� R��rv�d. Net e plcn ef .�,.�,,. pJy�12 c 2012 MPAC and It� auppller�. All Nqhh Resarved. kot a pian o( Survey. � Information Compiled from Applicant's Submitted Plan P/CA 4$!12 D. and M. De Kerpel RIDGEWOOD COURT . �: � . - �. . . , � � � � � � -:� �a�� •:� � EXISTING '� , DV1tELLiNG O O � � � � � PROPC)S DECK � � E �� 6,r � To permit a rear yard depth of 5.9 metres � This map was Qroduced by the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department, Planning Iniorma[ion Services Mapping and Design, July 27, 2012. 4� Information Compiled from Applicant's Submitted Plan PICA 48112 D. and M. De Kerpel REAR ELEVA7XON This map was produced by [he City of Pickenng Plannirtg & Development Department, Planning Information Services Mappng and Design, July 27, 2ot2. ��t� °� Report to ; ' Committee of Adjustment � � � K 1 Application Number: P1CA 49112 Meeting Date; Augus# 15, 2012 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PlCA 49/12 R. Koeder 661 Pleasant Street (Part Lot 1, Block D, Plan 65) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit a flankage side yard width of 5.7 metres and a rear yard depth of 1.0 metre to a proposed detached garage, whereas the by-law requires a flankage side yard width of 7.5 metres and a rear yard depth of 3.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the propased garage. Recomm�ndation: The Planning & Development Department considers the flankage side yard width of 5.7 metres and a rear yard depth of 1.0 metre to a proposed detached garage to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Pian and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances appEy only to the proposed garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the appficant o�tain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 15, 2Q14, or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 49112 . �. 4G Background: August 15, 20'#2 Page 2 The applicant had submitted a previous application (PICA �9112} for a dweliing addition and proposecf garage that was heard and approved by the Committee of Adjustment an March 21, 2012. The variances required for the proposed garage, howe�er, were not included in the pre�ious minor variance application. This application is required ta request relief from the by-law to permit for the location af the proposed garage. The proposed loca#ion of the garage was ilfustrated on the sketch included with the previous application. No comments were made on the garag� location du�ing the processing o# that application. Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Zaning By-law 2511— "R4" Appropriateness of the Applicati�n Fiankage Side Yard Width Variance • the intent af the flankage side yard width requirement is to provide an adequate buffer space befinreen street activity and to provide an adequate landscaped area in the flankage side yards of the property • the proposed #iankage side yard width of 5.7 metres to the proposed garage will allow f�r the parking af a vehicle in front of the garage, since it complies with the City's standard parking space leng#h of minimum 5.3 metres • the flankage side yard width of 5.7 metres will pravide adequate buffer space in the flankage side of the property • adequate landscaped area is provided onsite along Pleasant Street and Annland Street; the space between the flankage lot line and the proposed garage is proposed for a driveway • the intent of the zoning by-law will be maintained Rear Yard Depth Variance • the intent of the minimum 3.4 metres rear yard depth for accessory structures on a corner lot is to maintain an established character of openness and to provide an appropriate buffer space between structures on abutting properties Report P/CA 49/12 August 15, 2012 Page 3 t� � • the proposed rear yard depth of 1.0 metre to the proposed detached garage will maintain an adequate buffer space in the rear yard of the subject property • a useable amenity space will be provided in the rear yard between the proposed addition and the proposed detached garage • a visual character of openness wil! be maintained should the proposed detached garage not exceed the zoning by-law requirement of maximum accessary building height of 3.5 metres • the intent of the Zaning By-!aw would be maintained Date af report: August $, 2012 Comments prepared by: �-�� Mila Yeung Planner II MY:CR:jf cofalreports/20121pca49-12. d oc Enclosures ��%r��.t �.. Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP '�"' Principal Planner — Development Review 0 Q 0 � � � > � Q �� 0 � � WA . � .- -. �'111„"- � - ��1�� ► , . ,. NING AVE. � 0 z � � "11",,,, 11,1",�„ .�:� COMMERGE PRO ESS � � FRENC N' �, � eA Y sr °, Z a P.�I a FRENCHMAN'S �' B AY sue�ECr� PROPERTY I LAKE ONTARI� City of Pickering ?ROPERTY DESCRIPTION PI8n 65 BIOCk D Pert LOt 1 OWNER R. Koeder FILE No. P/CA 49/12 e a ource�: c T�ran�t Enterprl�w Ine. and it� •uppll�n. NI rIQhL R.s.rv�e. Hot a p e 2012 MP�C antl Ib •uooller�. NI Nahts R•.arvad. Not a plen o! Surv� af .urv.y. STREET ANN WHARF �'�III� � �i�ii�r = iii�i� - :�� _ LUNA CRT. FQXGLQVE HDL Y REDEEMER SEPARATE SCHQOL PARK �� • �r �� . ��""„� � • . ■�i■��I�� ; �.1111111��1�� . :-�•� ��1�1�1�� '„"","„�'�� _J J Q � Q Q' W � J STREE� Planning & Development Department DATE �JUIy 25, 2Q12 QRAWN BY JM � SCALE 1:5,OOU CHECKED BY MY N PN-3 -L7 r � D � --� -"� �1 ""'� N cp f I l�_ 9.1 � Information Compifed From Revised Applicant's Submitted Plan P/CA 49112 - R. Koeder �o.�s Q o n� a I � rn� D f!(iST1NG HOME J J� a�� No. 66f �r 1 v � � � 1.21! � I 12.19 "_""'w i i--•-----+�.�o � 14 EXISTING DECK 30.48 � \ \ +j�l�� m ''w a.�g o � _ Approved Extension . .r .w r,r r« ww rs , � �� To permit a rear yard depth of 1.0 metres o c � � � � � � � � � � .27 � N ,ti I � � � � u � �+ �. � � EXIS?1NG— CURB CUi permit a flankage side yard Ith of 5.7 metres ��. This map was produced by the city of Pickering Planning 8 Development Department, Planning Information Services Division Mapping and Design, Jufy 27. 2012. �$ �_i � _ _ __....... .-"�-- �_ , � ; � i � f f , , st ! ' � � f . � L . '� � ' � ,� � . �}., � � J s J. y'r'i / ; . . .'. .�. . ..� ,.. � _..—_.._..—.__�._.'_.........,.........�.._._..._ __+' information Compiled From Appiicant's Submitted Pian P/CA 49J12 - R. Koeder -- � ___ � � � � i � t ., � , � 3 � _� � F PR{�POSED GARAGE ELEVATION FROM ANNLAND STREET This mep was produced by Ihe city of Pickering Planning 8 Development Department, Planning IMormation Senrices Division Mapping and Design, July 27, 2012.