The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutJune 13, 2012Cam m ittee of Ad j ustment Agenda Meeting Number: 7 Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 . . . ,..�,,,.. . ��,-„—=`� ' �r-_;- -�,_ � i _ �:�;.. . ,� .—_.i� ._ �.:R,:; � --. �i� .;.� = _..� �� Cammittee of Adjustment Agenda Wednesday, June 13, 2Q12 7:Q0 pm tUlain Committee Room {I} {II} (I!!) ��v� Adoption of Agenda Adoption of Minutes frvm May 23, 2012 Reports 1. P/CA 17112 — L. Saunders 817 Fairview Avenue �Plan 814, Lot 19) City of Pickerir�g 2. P1CA 22112 — R. Persaud 712 Aspen Raad {Lot 1, 40M-171 i ) City of Pickering 3. P/CA 23/i2 — P. & F. Wreglesworth '! 15 Secord Street {Lot 1 Q, Rlan 44M-'E 762) City of Pickering 4_ PICA 24/'f 2— M. 8� S. Wetzel � �44 Meadowlane Crescent (Lat 68, Plan M1222} City of Pickerin� 5. P1CA 25/12 — N_ BhaEoo 1355 Srands Couri (Block F, Pfan M998, Part 10, 40R-2015} City of Pickering 6. P�CA 281�i2 to P/CA 281�2 Geranium Homes �evelapment Inc. 434 & 429 Staghorn Road and 562 Maitland Drive (Lots 9, 2 8� 11, Plan 40M-2474} City af Pickering Adjournment Page Number 1-11 12-18 19-23 24-2$ 29-33 34-38 39-50 A�cessible For information related to accessibility requirements piease con#ac� � LesJey Qunne P I C K E F� [�N G T� 9��.424.4fi60, ex#ension 2024 TTY 9D5.424.1739 Emai! ]dunne@pickering.ca „ r� Nb�y _ � � •�� u� �r�f:;��:. )8—'7�—� � . S� � ' ,�.._�,� �:t::- :::::::::::::.::� V�-�J< �3'Tl\► � �..�� / �..�� Pending Adoption Present: Torn Copeland David Johnson — Chair Eric Newton — Vice-Chair Bill Utton Shirley Van Steen Also Present: Mila Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Jean Finn, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Commifitee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm Main Committee Room David Jahnson, Committee Chair acknowledged the presence of PetEr Rodrigues, Regional Councillar Ward 3. David Johnson, Committee Chair acknowledged the presence of Doug Dickerson, City Councj�aor Ward 2. (I) (fE} Adoption af Aqenda Moved by Bill Utton Secanded by Eric Newtan That the agenda for the Wednesday, May 23, 2012 meeting be adopted. Carried Unanimously Adoption of Minutes Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Eric Newton That the minutes of the 5th meeting of the Cammittee of Adjustment held Wednesday, May 2, 2012 be adopted. Carried Unanimously 1 ��: � _ .� . -- flh.. �Til'—�-.�L�bLI�_ p� ,�?!� �� .`.. �-.s�- ��_-.3�t �es+;1��+rti`�►� - .. �_�� • �—��!_� � {�1�} Re�orts Committee of Adjustment 1. (Tabled at the February 29, 2012 meeting} P1CA 4&!�2 — Norris Holdings Limited 17tJ5 Wellington Street {Part Lot 16 & 17, Plan 43, Part 6, 40R-18850) City of Pickering Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Eric Newtan Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm Main Cammittee Room That application PICA 08/12 by Narris Holdings be lifted from the table. Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief frvrn Zaning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law ffi40106 to permit an existing lot frontage of 15.0 metres, a Iot area of �35 s�uare metres, a west side yaed width of 1.2 metres, a lot co�erage of 38 percent and a rear yard depth of 2.5 metres to permit the con�ersion of the existing building into a 3 storey detached dwelling with a second storey rear yard deck, whereas the by-law requires a fot frontage of 22.0 metres, a lot area of 1,390 square metres, a minimum side yard width of 1.$ metres, a maximum lot coverage of 20 percent and a minimum rear yard depth of 9.0 metres. The applicant requests apprflval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Qevelopment Qepartment recommending refusal. Written comments were received from the Region of Durham Health Department �ndicatir�g no objection to the applECation and also noteci this is not granting authorization for the constructian of a private sewage system. Written comments were a�so received from the City's Chief Building Official indicating the applicant must retain a structural engineer to evaluate the capacity of the existir�g building structure, a geatechnical ir�vestigatian and associated bearing capaci#y is necessary, there is an existing cistern below the existing garage, the plans do not identify any inforrnation for Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems and additional building permit requirements wifl need to be actdressed during the building permit application process. 2 �� Q� Committee of Adjustment �,. � Meeting Minutes ` � � Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm IlAain Cammittee Room � � Wr'�tten comments received from Dawna Dearing of 4864 Victoria Street, Shelagh 8� Ken Mulveney of 4g51 Old Brock Raad, Bernie MacDonald & Nathalie O'Raurke vf 4968 Qld Brock Road, Peter Sternberg & Wai-Ching Yip of 49�0 �Icf Brack Road and Adam McKay & Nathalie Sabourin of 4959 Old Brock Road in object+on to the app�ication. Correspondence received from Q. Dearing indicated concerns with the proposed development being used for HVAC business, the size of the propased structure on such a sma�l lot, water run-off, the plan nat in keeping with the surrounding area, the variances requested are major, and no room for proper septic system. Correspandence received fram S. and K. Mulveney, indicated concerns with the propased development will decrease praperty values, high water table, availability of potable water and stress an a shared well, sewage disposal, c#isbursement of run-off water, precedent setting, vehicle parking and the praposed use for a home based business. Written comments were received from Jim Doyle, Claremont and DEStrict Community Association in opposition of the application as there are many concerns and will set a bad precedent in the Harnlet of Claremont. Correspondence received from B_ MacDonald 8� N. O'Rourke, indicated can�erns with the proposed development that there is insufficient land ava€lable to adequately support the proposed expansian af the existing structure, negatively impact on praperty values, loss of pri�acy, home based business and dwelfin� will affect the septic system and cause sewage issues that will jeopardize the health and safety of neighbours and does not respect the a�chitecture of the community of Claremont. Carrespondence received from P. Sternberg & W. Yip indicated concerns with the propased development being uncharacteristic within the Hamlet of Claremont, insu�cient land available to adequately support the proposed expansion of the existing structure, decreased property values, precedent setting, not in keeping with the architecture of the Hamlet of Claremont and the effec#s of drainage, sewage and septic issues. Correspondence received from A. McKay 8� N. Sabourin, indicated concerns with the prapased develapment that the variances requested are major not minor in nature, the location af the septic tank/field bed, the shared well and loss of privacy for all surrounding neighbours, water run-off, holding tank, the property being used for business use, and that the proposal is not in keeping wifh the exESting neighbourhood_ 3 � Committee of Adjustment Mee#ing Minutes Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm Main Committee Room Todd iVorr"rs, owner, was present to represent the applicatian. Cauncifor Peter Rodrigues was present in oppasition to the application. Q. Dearing of 4$64 Victoria Street, S. Mul�eney of 4951 �!d Brock Road and A. McKay of 49�� t�ld Brock Raad were present in objection to the application and spoke to the comments received on file. Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by BiE� Utton That application P/CA 08/12 by Norris Holdings Limited, be Refused on the graunds that the existing lot frontage of 15.0 metres, a lot area of 535 square metres, a west side yard width of 1.2 metres, a lot coverage of 36 percent and a rear yard depth of 2.5 metrES to permit the conversion of the existing building into a 3 storey detached dwelling with a second storey �ear yard deck are major variances that are not desirable for the appropria#e development of the land, and nat in keeping with the general intent and purpase of the Zoning 6y-law. Carriec� Unanimously 2. P1CA 1$112 — R. 8� R. Cariaso 52� Laurier Crescent (�ot 112, Plan 40M-1242) City of Pickering The applicant requests relie� #rom Zoning By-law 303fi, as amended by By-law 1289181 to permit a rear yard depth of 3.3 metres to a proposed grade related covered deck attached to the existing detached dwelling whereas the by-faw requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests appro�al of this variance in order to obtain a building permit_ M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments receiveci from the Cjty of Pickering Planning 8� De�elopment Department recommending appro�al subject ta conditions. Written comments were also recei�ed from the City's Qevelopment ControM Manager indicating iot drainage may be affected by the canstruction of the deck; acceptable drainage should be maintained to ensure i� does not negatively impact adjacent properties. Written comments were received from Councillor Ke�in Ashe in support of the staff recommendation. No representation was present to represent the application. . 4 �� o� _ Committee af Adjustment ,�, Meeting Minutes � � Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm � � Main Committee Room Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Eric Newtan That application PlCA 18/12 by R. � R. Cariasa, be Approved on the grounds that the rear yard depth of 3.3 metres #a a proposed grade related covered deck attached to the existing detached dweiEing is a rninor variance #hat is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the genera! inten# and purpose of the Officia) Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following canditians: That this variance apply only to the prapased grade related covered deck attached ta the existing dwelling, as generally sitec! and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. Ti�at the applicant receive a building perrnit for the proposed covered deck by May 23, 2014, or this decision shall become null and �oid. Carried Unanimously 3. P1CA 1�l12 — OPB Reafty Inc. 1355 Kingst�n Road tPart Lo# 21, 22, Concession 1) City of Pickering The aAplicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5994l02 to perrnit an open air community market as a temporary use to be aperated once a week fram June #o Octaber af 2012, whereas the by-law does not specifically allaw an open air community market as a permitted use on the subj�ct property. The applicant rEC�uests approval of this variance in order to operate the open air communit}r market in 2012. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer autlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subjec# to conditians. Written comments were aEso received from the City's Development Contral Manager expressing no concerns. Written comments were received from Councillor Ke�in Ashe in support of the staff recornmendation Lorna fVl�rphy, agent> was present to represent the applica#ion. No further re�resentation was presenf in favour of or in abjection to the application. 5 4. ,. - �,,,,., _ �� •�= �Ej� .�-;:i:;==:� . � - ��-� ,--�`---`-�,E;,:�,::�.- . .._ � « ..s L�—.�..�� .. � ��. �•.� �� .� � � Moved by ErEC Newton Seconded by Tom Copelancf Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm Main Gommittee Room That applicatian P1CA 19112 by OPB Realty, be Approved on the grounds that the request to permit an open air community rnarket as a temporary use, to be operated ance a week from June ta Octaber of 2012, is a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the generaf intent and purpose of the Qfficial Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject ta the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to t�e open air community market, as generally si#ed and outlined on the applicant's submi##ed plans with this application. 2. That the variance shaEl apply from a period between June 2012 to October 2012, and that this DecFSion shall become null and void on November 1, 2012. 3. That far the purpose of this variance an open air cammunity market shall be defined as an open area in which stalls, tent canopies, or sales areas are set aside and rented o� otherwise provided where graups af indi�idual sellers offer goods and produce, for sale ta the pubfic and will focus on food, arts and eulture. Car�ied Unanimously PICA 20/12 — C. & G. Colombo 5271 Brock Road (North Part of Lat 18, Concession 9, Part 4&7, 44R-1855fi3) City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zaning By-law 3037 to permit an existing Iot frontage of 23.6 metres, an existing lot area of 0.4 hectare, a front yard depth of i 1.6 metres �nd a north side yard width of 1.8 me#res #o a propased detached dwelling and the conversian af an existin� bam into a detached ga�age with a maximum building height of 7.3 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot front�ge of 60 metres, !at area of a.8 hectare, front yard �epth of � 2.0 metres, side yard width of 3.0 metres and maximum building height of 3.5 metres for accessary structures. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed detached dweifing and garag� conversion. : .. �L� �� Committee of Adjustment r�� Meeting Minutes ""' � � Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm �� a Main Committee Room `� M. Ye�ng, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer autlined cornments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Qev��opment Department recommending approval subject to condittons. Written comments were also received fram the City's Development Cor�trol expressing no concerns. The drainage whether surface flow or from pipes fol{ows the existing drainage pattem flowing to the drainage swale which ultimately reaehes the cross cuivert in the road. A grading plan is required as part of the buiEding permit process to ensure additional drainage from the property wili not affect r�eighbouring praperties or alter any existing condi#iorts. Written comments were received from .iohn Hickman of 5287 Brock Road expressing his concerns with the application. He stated concerns regarding current and future water drainage, run-off water, and requested if the application is approved that the property owner of 5271 and 5273 Brock Road remove the drain tiles during excavation and that the awner rehabilitate the property. He also has concern that Brock Road should be co�rected to be named Old Brock Road. Christina Colombo, owner, was present ta represent #he application. John and Cory Hickman of 5267 & 5269 Brock Road and Jennifer Gani of 527'3 Brock Raad were present in suppart of the application. Tracy Goodwin of 5290 Brock Road was present and requested ciarification on the application. J. Hickman stated as long as the drainage situation and weeping #iles and grading issues are solved he is in suppar# af the application. He stated that Brock Raad shou�d be carrected to be named Qld Brock Rvad. C. Hickman nated that he is pleased to see rteFghbours rehabilitate the property. T. Goocfwin questioned the height of the barn, expressed concerns with the ioss of green space in the front yard and presented pictures to the Committee. Moved by BiEI Utton Seconded by Eric Newtan That applicatian P/CA 20�12 by C. 8� G. Colombo, be Approved on the grounds that the existing lot frontage af 23.6 metres, existing lot area of �.4 hectare, a front yard depth of 11 _6 metres and a north side yard width of 1.8 metres to a propased detached dwelling, the conversion of an existing barn into a de#ached gara�e with a maximum building height af 7.3 metres are minor �ariances that are desirable far the appropria#e devefopment of the land, and in keeping wi#h the general intent and purpose of the Officiaf Plan a�d the Zoning By-law, subject to tt�e following conditions: 7 � U Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm Ma i n Com m ittee Room 1. That these variances apply oniy to the proposed d�tached dwelling and barn conversion, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the a�aplicant obtain a demolition permit for the accessory structure beside the exis#ing barn by May 23, 2013, ar this decision shal! become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction and building conversion by May 23, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void. 4. That the appl�cant submit a letter requesting that the currently tabied Comm+ttee of Adjustment application P/CA 25/10 be closed as it is no longer required by September 26, 2012. 5_ Tha# the applicant submit a grading pian satisfactory to the City of Picicering as a part af the Building Permit process. Carried Unanimously 5. P1CA 21112 — 1700�39 Ontaria Limited 1 � 01A Kingston Road (Part of Lot 24, Concession 1, Part of Part 4, Part 5, Plan 40R-12fi78) City of Pickering Tt�e applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6777107 ta permit a proposed commercial b�ilding that will have frontage or�to an existing private right-of-way that cannects to a municipal street, and pro��des a narth building setback of 1.a metre, a west building setback of 0.5 metres, and an east parking lot setback af 1.7 metres from the limits of the "MU-22" Zone, whereas the by-law requires all buildings or structures on a lot to front onto an opened and maintained public street, a minimum north and west building se#back of 3.0 metres from the property line and a minimum at grade parking kat setback of 3.a metres from the limits of the "MU-22" Zone. The applicant requests approvai of these variances in order to obtain Site Plan Approval. E�3 �� o� Committee of Adjustment �� Il�leefing Minutes � E Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm f�� IVlain Committee Room ` M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Picker�ng Planning & Qevelopment Department recommending appro�al subject to conditions. Written comments were afso recei�ed from the City's Developmen# Control Manager expressing no concerns. Written comments were received from Christian Hepfer, Emix Ltd., 1004 Eglinton Avenue West, in objection to the application. In his correspondence he stated concerns with private right-of-way, proposed truck traffic encraachrnent onto his property, siting of the building and the multiple �estricti�e covenants on ti#le. Councilar poug Dickerson was present in support of the application. Ailan Windrern, agent, was present to represent the application. He indicated that he agrees with Staff s recommendations and that there are no requirements in the By-law for the siting af buildings and the locatian of landscaped areas. He explained that the owner will provide a landscape buffer at the sauth property line to ensure that truck traffic does not encroach on the abutting neighbour's property and that all the concerns of the abutting neighbour would be address during the site plan applicatian process. Christian Hepfer was present in objectian to the application and he expressed his concerns to the Committee as stated in his correspondence. Allan Vttindrem showed the proposed site plan ta Christian Hepfer and the Committee. Discussions af the site plan deiails were said to be discussed in the site plan application. Allan lN�ndrem explained that the restrictive covenants on title are between two property owners and shouEd not afFect the Committee's decisian_ In respanse to the Committee's ques#ivn af should the application be tabled or deferred to allow the finro owners time to resofve their differences, Allan explained that the owner requests a decision from the Committee on the minor variance applications tonight because all of Mr. Hepfer's concerns are unrelated to the minor variance application and will be res�lved between the two owners. Barry Brawning, the ir� house legal counsel for 1700539 Ontario Limited suggested to Christian Hepfer that he should reserve his right to appeal because all issuss between the two owners wifl be resolved or addressed during the site plan application process. E . . � F��la�� • �� '�� ' �::.r .�iL �� :,::o:;"�S j,w_�ti�-�'r�`1 a: �p �-�.,_.... :.,�,-,T .-s - -.,,�,:� : :::...:....... ■ a �...��c.. ��,��!�� 1 Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Bilf Utton Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm Main Committee Room That applieation P1CA 21l12 by 1700539 Ontaria Limited, be Approved on the grounds #hat the praposed commercial building having frontage onto an existing private right-of-way that cannects ta a municipal street, a north buildir�g setback of 1.0 me#re, a west building setback of �.5 metres, and an east parking lot setback of 1.7 metres are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the genera! intent and purpose of the Official Plan anct the Zaning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the praposed commerciaf building and parlcing lot, as generaiEy sited and outlined on the applicani's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant receive Final Site Pfan Approval for the proposed development by May 23, 2a14, or this decision shall become null and void. Vote Tom Copeland David Jahnson Eric Newton Bill Utton Shirley Van Steen opposed in favour in favaur in favour in favour Carried 10 . - -- . . �.,,,,.: . � ��::, :.-.` . �ii1� .3L .tlE. k,.S�_�r_;� �.:. �` 7"�h�� ` �� creE1'..: ...... ....� - -��-<. ��. � �•. _�. !.� (IV} Adiaurnment Moved i�y Bill Utton Seconded by Eric Newion Gommittee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:03 pm Nlai n Com m ittee Room That the 6th mee#ing of the 2012 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:06 pm and the next mee#ing of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, June 13, 2Q12. Carried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretary-Treasurer 11 �� t� °� Repo�t to ,` ; Cam m ittee of Ad justment � Application Number: P/CA 17/12 i� Meeting Date: Jun� 13, 2012 �rom: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Prineipal Planner — Develapment Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 17l12 L. Saunders 817 Fairview Avenue {Plan 814, Lat 19} City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to p�rmit an existEng lot frontage of 7.6 metres, an existing lot area of 295 square rnetres, a front yard depth of 1.6 metre to a propased attached garage, a north side yard width of 0.5 metres, a south side yard width of 0.� metres, a proposed lot coverage of 42 percent, a setbacic of 0.9 metres to an existing accessory building, and an existing total accessory building lot coverage a# 6 percent to allow for the canstruction af the proposed 3 storey dwelling that will be buift behind the existing dwelling and canverting the existing dwelling into an attached garage whereas the by-law requires a minimurn lot frontage of 15.0 rnetres, a minimum lot area of 4fia square metres, a frant yard depth of 7.5 metres, north side yard wid#h of 1.5 metres, south side yard of 2.4 metres, a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent, accessory building setback of 1.0 metres to afl lot lines and maximum iot co�erage af 5 percent for ai! accessory buildings. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building pe�mit for the constructions of the propased 3 storey dwelling and garage. Recommendation: The P�anning & DevelQpment Department considers a front yard depth of 1.6 metres to an attached garage of a proposed 3 storey dwelling to be a major variance that is not desirable for the appropriate develapment of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent artd purpose of the Zaning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. And The Planning & Development Qepartment recammends an amended front yard depth of fi.a metres to the propased garage_ Report PlCA 17/12 June 13, 2012 Page 2 i � The Planning & Develapment Departm�nt cansiders the existing lot frontage of 7.6 metres, existing lat area of 29fi square metres, an amended frant yard depth of 6.0 me#res, north side yard width of 0.5 metres, south side yafd width of Q_9 metres, accessory buildirtg setback of 0.9 metres, accessory building lot coverage of 6 percent and a lot coverage of 42 percent to be minor variances that are desirabl� for #he appropriate deveiopment a� the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpase of #he 4fficia! Plan and #he Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the propvsed variances, subject to the foklowing conditions: 1. That these variances apply anly ta the proposed detached dwefling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans subject to the revised front yard depth. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 13, 2014, or this decision shall become null ant� void. Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Pian — Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Zoning By-Eaw 2511 — "R4" Appropriateness of the App�ication Lot Frontage and Lot Area Variance • the intent of the minimum lot frontage and minimum lot area requirement is to ensure a usable iat size that is compatible with the surrounding area • the subject property is an existing fot of record with a fronta�e of 7.6 metres and a lot area of 2�6 square metres that has been in existence for a Iong time • the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law wQUld be maintained Front Yard Qepth Variances the intent of the front yard depth of 7.5 metres is to provide an adequate buffer space between buildings and street activity, and to provide an adequate landscaped area and parking space at the fron# Qf the property parking spaces in frant of garages are required to be campfetely on private praperty and not encroach anta the City's boule�ard given that the applicant propases to construct a new dv►relfing, the applicant should be abie to design to comply with the City's requirement for front yard parking on the private property Report P/CA 17112 �. �S June 13, 2012 Page 3 • the recommended 6.0 metres frant yard depth provides adequate buffer space �etween buildings and street activity, and p�ovides adequate space for the parking of one vehicle � the recammended variance would maintain ihe neighbourhood character on Fairview, provide an appropria#e bu�fer space and prvvide an adequate landscaped area withir� the front yard af the property • the requested 1.8 metre frant yard depth is not desirable for the redevelopment of the praperty, wauld not maintain the intent of the zoning by-law and is considered a ma�or vanance � the revised front yard depth af G.4 metres would meet the intent of the zoning by-law Side Yarc} Variances • the intent of #he side yard width requirement is to maintain an appropriate bufFer space between dweflings and adjacent lots, and to provide adequate access to the rear yard of iots • the prapased north side yard wid#hs of 0.5 metres and south side yard of �.9 metres are existing situa#ions � the proposed side yards widths to the proposed dwelling is designed to comply with the existing side yard widths of 0.5 metres and 0.9 metres = the intent of the zaning by-!aw would be maintained Accessory Building Setback Variance • the intent of the zoning by-law for accessory buiidings to provide a minimum 1.0 metre setback from lot lines is to ensure that ade�uate space is availabie for maintenance, that the eaveslo�erhangs do not encroach on adjacen# properties, that roof drainage stays on the property, and that the visual impact on adjacent praperties is minimize � the proposed setback a# 0.9 metres to an existing shed prvvides adequate space for maintenance, ar�d ensures overhangs and roaf drainage stays on the property • the setback daes not appear to have any adverse impact on adjacent properties • the in#ent of the zonirtg by-law is maintained Accessory Suilciing Lot Coverage Variance • the intent of the � percent maximum accessory building Iot co�erage is to ens�re the maintenance af an appropriate amaunt af amenity area unco�ered by buildings and #o regulate the amount of building floor area occupied by of accessory buifdings on a lot • the proposed fot coverage of 6 percent for the existing accessory building is an existing situatian • the intent of the zoning by-law wouid be maintained Repart PICA 17/12 Lot Coverage Variance June 13, 2012 Page 4 : � • the intent af the maximum lat coverage requirement is to ensure the maintenance of an appro�riate amaunt of amenity area not covered by buiidings, and to regulate the amount of ground floor area canstructed on the lot • given the size of the lot, the proposed 42 percent lot coverage would accommada#e the canstruction of a moderately sized dwelling and is not considered overdeveloprnent given the existing small lot � an acceptable amount of ameni#y space uncovered by buildings and building floor area will be provided relative to the size of the lot •#he intent af t�e zaning by-law wauld be maintained Date of report: .��ne 6, 2012 Comments prepared by: �� a�er Mila Yeung Planner II MY=RP:Id toFatropo�s+20,?/pcA, �.,�.da Enclosures c� Ross Pyrn, MC , RPP Principal Planner — Development Re�iew , � rt 0 To recog�ize an existing frontage of 7.6 metres lnformation Compiled From Applicants Submitted Plan P/CA 17(i2 - L. Saunders To recognize an existing Iot area of 296 square metres To recognize an existing north side yard width of Q.5 metres � � Z�y'�� ' ~ ' � .� ... _—ra� ^ —_._. L;�'•30.��1 +�r..rr. � + - ---= ' '-' '. � ` i��..'w.. '; . Z ' .� O E � a��. _,. . , PRO OSED o a � � EXfSTifVG � BUI DING� �� Z`$"� j DWELLING i AD lTION ! £°' n C °` 1 �, a � �- �---�..�,_......_.. *� ; 38:9m.. ci. . . . ---....---o. 1 _6m � To recognize an existing front yard depth of 1.6 metres E rn 0 To recagnize a south side yard width of 0.9 metres To recognize an existirtg accessory structure lot coverage of 6 percent o permit a lot coverage f 42 percent �7 � N v I � z� cn i i ; x� .. w �. ��; � � 1.2m 0 To recognize a setback oi 0.9 metres to the south lai line THIS MAP 4VAS PRODUCED B'f THE CITY OF PiCKERiNG PLANNING & DEVELQPMENT DEPARTh4ENT, PLANN�NG ItJFORMATION SERViCES DIVISION MAPPINGA}JD DESIGN, APRIL 27, 2012.. ! i Infarmation Compiled Fram Applicants 5ubmitted Plan P/CA 17/12 - L. Saunders � .�� - -� — �� Front Elevation THiS MAA WAS PROOUCED BY THE C;TY OF PICKERING PLHNNlNG 8 OEVELOPMENT DEPARTRIENT, PLANNiNG INFORMATION SERVtCES DIVISIOP! MAPPlNG AND DES�GN, APRIL 27, ZOi2.. �� °� Report to f � ' ,' Cammittee of Adjustment �RI Applicatian Number: P/CA 22/12 Meeting Date; June 13, 2012 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principaf Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 22112 R. Persaud 712 Aspen Road {Lot 1, 40Nl-9711) City of Pickering Application: The agplicant req�ests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 3477I90 to permit a proposed second starey deck resulting in a rear yard depth of '� 7.1 metres, wi�ereas the by-law requires a rear yard depth of 18.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed deck and dwelling additions. Recommendation: The Pianning 8� Development Department cansiders the rear yard depth of 17.1 metres to be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate cfevelopment af the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the O�cial Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to #he foilawing conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed second storey deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 13, 2014, ar #his decision shall become null and �oid. Report PlCA 22112 June 13, 2Q12 �. � Page 2 � Comment: Official Plan and Zaning By-law Pickering fJfficial Plan —"Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Amberlea �leighbourhood Zoning By-faw 3038 as amended by 3477/90 —"S1-7" Appropriateness of the App�icatian Rear Yard Dep#h Variance • the intent af the minimum 18.0 metre rear yard depth is to ensure that a useable amount of amenity s�ace is pravided in the rear yard and to pra�ide an appropriate buffer space between the dweflEng and Whites Road • the proposed rear yard depth of 17.1 metres will still provide a significant amount of useable amenity space in the rear yard and an appropriated buffer space between the dwelling and Whites Raad • the praposed variance appears to have minimal adverse impact on the abutting neighbours as an acceptable amount of buffer space will remain • the intent of the zon�ng by-law would be maintained Date af repart: June 6, 2012 Comments prepared by: c,�o4� � �` �°rMila Yeung Planner �l MY:RP:Id W,u��o,��.,z.d� Enclosures G✓3r� Rass Pym, MC , RPP Principai Pfanner — Development Review � � � � � lnfarmation Compiled From Applicant's Submitted Plan PtCA 022/12 - R. Persaud � permit a rear yard depth of 7.1 metres 45.7 m , PROPOSEO � SECOND STOREY DECK .o—= 17.1 m �}wU ' iqn g �� ` EXISiING SECOND PROPOSED SECpND STOREY � I N �--- STOREY � t PROPOSED N � SECOND T E 5TOREY pROPOSEC pROPOSED � SECOND ` � EXISTING r STOREY SECOND �` ; SHED STOR£Y �xI�TiN � � � � SHED � �_ � . �_ _� ... � 45.7 m � .� � � .�. � — — — J � Q O � W � Q THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CiTY OF PiCKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. A�ANNING INFORMATION SERVICES D1VIS�ON MaFpiNG AND QESIGN, MAY 2S, 2D12. �� Informatian Compiled From Applicant's Submitted Plan P/CA 022112 - R. Persaud SOUTH ELEVATION THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CtTY OF PICKERING PLANNING R DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN7, p�ANNiNG iNFORMA7ipN SERViCES DiVISION FAqPPtNGANO DES�GN. MAY'S, 20�2. �� t � �w °� ' Report to ' �, Comm�ttee of Adjustment I KE Application Number: P/CA 23/12 � Mee#ing Date: June 13, 2Q12 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Pianner — Development Review Sub�ect: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 23/12 P. & F. Wregleswarth 11 b Secvrd Street {Lat 10, Plan 40M-1762) City of Pi�kering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zaning By-law 303fi, as amended by By-law 4271/93 to perrnit a rear yard depth of fi.a metres, whereas the by-law requires a rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this �ariance in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed rear yard second storey deck. Recommenda#ion: The Planning & Development Department considers the rear yard depth af 6.0 me#res to be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate developmen# of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose af the Official Plan and the Zoning 8y-law, and tt�erefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: That this variance apply anly to the proposed rear yard secand storey deck, as generally sited and oUtlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permi# for the proposed construction by June 9 3, 2014, or this decision shall become nufl and void. Report PlCA 23112 June 13, 2012 Page 2 �� , �� Comment: 4fficial Plan and Zoning By-law Pickerirtg Of#icial Plan —"Urban Residential Area — Low Density Area" within the Highbush Neighbourhoad Zoning By-1aw 303f as amended by By-law 4271/93 —"S4" Appropriateness af the Application Rear Yard Depti� Variance • the intent of the minimum 7.5 metre rear yard depth is to ensure that a useabie amount of amenity space is provided in the rear yard and to provide an appropria#e buffer space between dweflings on abutting properties • the proposed rear yard depth of 6.a rnetres will pro�ide a useable amount of amenity space in the rear yard and an appropriated buffer space between dwellings on abuttEng properties • the propased variance appears to have minimal adverse impact on the abutting neighbaurs as an acceptabie amaunt of buffer spaces will remain • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Date of report: .�une 6, 2012 Comments prepared by: �� .�drMila Yeung Rlanner II MY:RP:Id cofahepats2012lpca2Yt2 doc Enclosures a/�/.� �` Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Re�iew r � � o � > � � 0 a � O � H U ` ��Q i' PINE GROVE PARK _ • i 1 _� ,� � 111` ..�■�■ � �11� �� f lIIII• '�. �I��IIIIIl11 ' �� I� lllllllill�llllllil �� lIIIIlil�flllllllll �s IIliII1111E111111111 �� IIII�IIIlIIIIIIIIIII. �� . -, ,�� Illlllll�lllllllllll ,��' Illl�,llllflilllll �� ;��1llllill �� `��t�iil��llIIIIIIIII _ �� , ,,,�� _ �Ilill�ll�lllll �� . = Ilillllllilllll �III� Illllilllllill� : 11� � �- : _ � �. � �= w� �■■� T PfNE GROVE A :�� :� ' �t� ,� . ...� .� � C: � SWEETBRIAR CRT. ooDV�E OT LD i�` � ` ., .... � _ � .' � a ��= , �_ �= i= ... � � �� ' � � � � �� , �:! � �� ■■� . � � ��■ ,., �� : i �� = �� N Z � � m Y d City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERN DESCRIPTION Lot 10, Plan 40M-1762 � OWf�tER P. & F. Wreglesworth DATE May 23, 2012 DRAWN BY �� FlLE No. PfCA 23/12 SCALE 1:5�Oi3U CHEGKED BY MY N i p au��p: T�rpnK EnL�rpA�� InC. Ond it� fupDll�ry. Al! e1phL• R��ev�0. NnS O Pbn �* .�rv•�- PN-1 b TOt2 MPAC and It� �uoDil�rt. All AGM� R��rv�tl. Not O olon oT SurY�r. Information Compited From Applicants Submitted Plan PICA23/12 - P. � F. Wregieswarth S�CORD STREET � �� THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY 7HE C17Y OF PICKERIMG PLANNING & OEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT, PLANN�NG IPdFORh4ATION SERVICES MAPPING ANR DESIGN, MAl' 28, 2012. r1 iL Information Compiled From Applicants Submitted Plan PICA 231'� 2 - P. 8� F. Wreglesworth 7.4m Rear Elevation THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BYTHE CITY OF PICKERiNG PLAPlNING 8 DEVELOPMEhfT DEPARTMENT. PLA�INING INFOftMATION SERVICES idAPPINGANd DESIGN. MAY 28, 2012. c�� Report to ' ; Committee of Adjustment � � Application Number: P/CA 24/12 � � Meeting Date: June 13, 2012 from: Rass Pym, MGIP, RPP PrincipaE Planner — Development Review Subjec#: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 24112 M. & S. Wetzel 1144 Meadowlane Crescent (L.ot 68, Plan M1222) City o# Pickering AppEication: The appiicant requests reiief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1228/81 to permit a rear yard depth of 1.2 metres and a south side yard width of 0.5 metres to a proposed and existing multiple level deck, whereas the by-law requires a rear yard dep#h of 7.� metres and side yard widths of 1.2 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances in vrder to ob#ain a bui�ding permit for the proposed multiple level deck_ Recommendation: The Planning 8� Development Department considers the rear yard depth o� 1.2 metres to be a majar variance that is not desirable far the appropriate de�elopment of #he land, and r�ot in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-iaw, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. And The Planning & Develapment Department considers sauth side yard width of a�.5 metres to an existing deck and stairs to be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose af the Zoning By-law anci Official Plan, and therefore recommends Approval o# the proposed variance, subject to the following condition: 'f . That this var�ance apply only ta the existing deck and stairs, as generally si#ed and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans_ Report P1CA 24112 �� Comment: �fficial Plan and Zoning By-law June 13, 2012 Page 2 Pic�Cering �fficial Plan —"Urbart Residential Areas —�.ow Density Areas" within the Liverpoo! Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3fl36 — "S1" —1228/81 Appropriateness of the Application Rear Yard Depth Variance • the intent of the minimum 7.5 metres rear yard depth is to ensure that a useable amount of amenity space uncovered by structures is pravided in the rear yard and ta provide an appropriate buffer space be�vvee� buildings and abutting praperties • the praposed rear yard depth of 1.2 metres ta the proposed deck and pool does not pravide an appropriate buffer space between buildings and abutting properties • the praposed rear yard deptt� to a propQSed deck with a height of Q.9 metres appears to negatively impact the privacy of abutting properties to #he east and south of the subject property • the intent of the by-iaw would not be maintained Side Yard Widtt� Variance • the inte�t of the1.2 metres side yard width requirement is to maintain an appropriate buffer space between dwellings and acljacent lots, and to pro�ide adequate access ta the rear yar� of lots • the proposecf south side yard width of �.5 metres appear to provide an appropriate buffer space between dwellings and adjacent lots + unobstructed access to the rear yard of the lot is pro�ided on the north side yard of the property • the intent af the zoning by-law would be maintained Date of repart: June 6, 2Q12 Comments prepared by: ��.. � Mila Yeung Planner II MY:RP:Id cota�reportsf2017JyC82412.00t Enclosures o-�� Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review �2 `' Information Compiied From Applicant's Submitted Plan PICA 24/12 M. & S. Wetzel . �"�� ..� � , _-- � .�-- � _.-- � �- , .�-- � 3� �� --' ` �----- � c ' .�—� " o � � � c�'i !,�- . , _ f . / � r" PROPOSED � � � 1 DECK , W + � 1 Poo� J� � � �� f EXISTING � � � f aWELLING � % � _ � r 4� f , , �� / PROPOSEO i`� ; ` / '" I,•�� DECK '� � / . i � f / , Q � *{ x .�� ' ExIS71NG/ -.._.. ; .. :.. / � � DECKS . _. _ _. _ _ _ . . • L-----____ _______-- - ----_.-- _� 34.Om � � � o Q To permit a rear yard depth of 1.2 metres To permit a side yard width of 0.5 metres � Q � THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BYTHE CIN OF PiCKER1NG PLANlJING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLAt3NiNG INFORMATION SERVICES MAPPING ANO DESIGN, MAY 29, 2012. 0 Information Compiled From Applicant's SubmEtted Plan P/CA 24112 M. 8� S. Wetzet I su��"y . - , .:.. _:...-. � 'dID�(Gf ; , . ' -...�. I I :�i�� -. :�.�. . �i — Pet� leveti ' " � �approz.7'�tio'off tomd+eval " � uoprcz. 235 5!! - B s�eFs above 0 k Level 2 - O+ret1 axess 4o main Roar Of h0u5¢ 4 4.2r Sl�nig: . � ". P31i��Cic��r �� r_--- -�---�' �'-�, 'I �I .. � Oeck Level 2- Pool Sida �- apprcx. J6' 09 of prauod level � - approx. 321 sq ft. - t step up ircm ck Level � 8 steps dowrt 1�0 �� OB[k I.�I i Onground Pool REAR ELEVATIC�N �� - SOUTH SIDE ELEVATIQN TFIIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY 7HE CIT'f OF PIL'KERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTPAENT, P�P.NNING INFORMATION SEl2VtCES ��qpPiraGAND OESlGN, MAY 2B. 20�2. �� °� Report to , , Commit#ee of Adjus�ment I Appiication Number: P/CA 25/12 Meeting Date: June 13, 2012 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Pianner — Developmer�t Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 25I'�2 N. Bhaloo '1355 Brancis Court (81ock F, Pfan M998, Part 14, 4QR-2015} Cfty of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by 6y-Eaw 4325173 to permit the canstruction of a cover over an existing deck resulting in a lot coverage of 47 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. ihe applicant requests ap�raval of this variance in order to obtain a buifding permit and zoning compliance for the existing cover on a deck. Recommendation: The Planning 8� Development Departme�t considers a 1ot coverage of 47 to permit the construction of a cover over an existing deck to be a minor variance that is desirable fvr the appropriate development af the land, and in keeping w�th the general intent and purpose of the Officiaf Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Appraval af the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the existing covered deck, as generally sited and ou#lined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2_ That fhe applicant obtain a building permit for the covered deck construction by June 13, 2014, or this decision shall become null ar�d void. Report P1CA 25/12 Comment: O�cia! Pian and Zoning By-law June 13, 2012 Page 2 � � PickerEng O�cial Plan —"Urban Residential Areas — Medium Density Areas" within the Livarpaol NeigE�bourhood Zonin� By-law 3�36 as amencled by By-faw 4325/73— "SA" Appropr�ateness of the Application Lot Coverage Variance • the intent of #he maximum 33 percent builcEing lot coverage requirement is to maintain an appropriate amount of yard space (amenity area} uncovered by buil�ings on a lot and to regulate the maximum size and mass of buildings on a lot • the propased lot coverage af 47 percent for the existing covered deck provides an appropriate amount of yard space uncovered by buildings • the proposal appears to have na adverse impact • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Date of report: June 6, 2�12 Comrnents prepared by: �� ar Mila Yeung Planner II MY: RP:Id �q�.��o,u,�.��,z ao� Enciosures CJ�/� � Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principa! Planner — Developmen# Review 37 Inforrr�ation Compiled From Applicant's S�bmitted Plan PICA 025112 - N. Bhaloo 6RANDS GOURT � THIS MAP WAS PRQDUCED SY THE CITY OF PICKERINr, p�qNNING 8 DEVELOPMEN7 DEPARTAAFNT, PLANNING INFORMATIDN SERVICES piVISiON MAPPINGAND DESIGN. MAY 2E, 2912. �g Information Compiled From Applicant's Submitted Plan PlCA 025/12 - N. Bhaloo EAST ELEVATiON C7 z J J W � ❑ TH1S MRP WAS PRODUCED BY 7HE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT D£PAR7MENT, PLANN�NG INFORMATION SERVICES DIVI510N MAPPING AND DESIGN, MAY 8. ?012. �t� a�' Report to '; Com m ittee of Ad�ustment 3� I'I � KERI Application Number: P/CA 2fi/'f2 to P1CA 2$/12 Meeting Date: ,lune 13, 2Q12 From: Ross Pym, MClP, RPP Princip�l Pianner — Develapment R�view Subject: Committee o# Ad3ustment Applications PICA 26l12 to PICA 28/12 Name A licatian # Address Le al Descri tion PCA 26/12 434 Staghorn Road Lot 9, Plan 40M-2470 Geranium Homes �CA 27/12 562 Maitland Drive Lot 11, Plan 4QM-2470 Development Inc. PCA 28/12 429 Staghorn Road Lot 2, Plan 40M-2470 Applicatton: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 6993109 to permit: P1CA 2fit11 a front yard depth of 3.5 metres to a cQVered porch at#ached to a proposecf two-storey detached dwelling, whereas the by-!aw requires a minimum front yard depth of 4.5 metres. 2. P1CA 27/11 a front yard depth af 3.1 metres to a cavered porch attached ta a proposed two-storey detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum #ront yard depth of 4.5 metres. 3. P/CA 28111 a front yard depth of 3.3 metres to a covered porch attached to a proposed two-storey detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth af 4.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of these �ariances in order to obtain building permits for three proposed cavered porches. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Qepartment considers the front yard depth of 3.5 metres (P/CA 28/12), 3.1 metres �PICA 27112} and 3_3 metres (PICA 28112) for #hree proposed �overed porches to be minor variances tF�at are desirable far the appropria#e development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose o� the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Appro�al of the proposeci variances, subject to the foi�owing conditions: 1. That this variance ap�ly only to the proposec! co�ered porch, as generafly sited and outiined on the applicant's submitted plans. Report P/CA 26112 to PICA 28112 �� June 13, 2012 Page 2 2. That the app�icant o�itain a b�ilding permit for the prapased construction by June 13, 20'!4, or this decFSion shall become null and void. Comment: Qfficial Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residential — Low Density Areas" within the Rosebank Neighbourhood Zoning By-iaw 2511 as amenc�ed by By-law 6993109 —"S2-1fi" — Single Detached Qwelling Appropriateness af the Application Front Yard Depth Variance • the intent of the frant yard depth requirernent is to provide an adequate bufFer space between street activity and to provEde an adequate landscaped area within the front of fhe property • the proposed frortt yard depths will pro�ide an adequate buffer space between street activity and the buildings • t�e propased front yard depths will compliment the streetscape • the intent of the zoning by-iaw would be maintained Date of report: June 6, 2012 Comments prepared by: - ' �- Ashle arwood, M , RPP Pfanner II AY:RP:Id Colefropor1Y101YpCa 2& 1210 yta 2b12.tlot Enclasures a� � Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — De�elopment Review 4� �r � Informatian Compiled From Applicant's 5ubmitted Plan P/CA 26112 Geranium Homes Inc. PROPC COVEF PaRCF TNIS MAP WAS PRODUCED 8Y THE CITY OF PICKERlNG PLANMING 8 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLAPlNING �NFORMATION SERViCES MAPPINGAND DESiGN, MAY 2E. 2012. Information Compiied From Appficant's Submitted Plan P1CA 26112 �eranium Homes �n�. � . ,, � . h i � ��• 1. . - E , ,'l� �.. ,_.ti � !_ -�. ' �- / ✓. t� \ �� .�. ' ,, s,! . �`t\\ J -�, ..��_;,.'.: . i , • ��.. ` � � `� `� -,�� ' ! � , , :► � f � ;`: �i : , �:�� ,:� �i�? f ; � � � " j~' �; �, � � ' - �� i I f � . � r�.' I L�.�1 � - j�_ . � 4�L � . . -�� . - _____,�_ ..... . . . . _ ;.. r _ . . , r . . ' . . .. . . . . �� J.� � . � �, � �L�3;��]�� - �� 0^ 5 � � L� ,- � �� -//� � I�, __.Y.11T Y , 1-�[.i� �� I ,� �_ li � _ _ �I' I�.`i_��,�- . r.-:�-. ;_,,. -� ;� .r - _ ��`r -�t.._..�:r-^�-. �I i .,-� �.rT �'- ` T� FRQNT ELEVATION �� THiS MAP WAS PRODUCED BYTHE CIN OF PlCKERING PLANNING & DEVEIOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNlNG �NFORMATION SERVICES MAPPIIJG AND DESI �N, MAY 28, 20t2, �t � Information Compifed From ApplicanYs Submiited Pfan PICA 26/12 Geranium Homes Inc. -- � �=:__; — _�- - ��—� � a; ^' �y : � _ — - --- • � � _�. �. � i � ,I li T _::......�, _ _ ._. __ ....o � _ , _ , :.� '��---.: ... - :..: --.- ._...... ..--- --_ .- ..:. . . ... ... .. ,�: .._._ _ _- -- .._ . . _ -��- ..'. . �::- .. -.: . .. . ..__.. . ... _. ::._...:. � - .. --- � -...-- - - - :: _ — , :.; _ .. : ,.... . ......-._-,: . _. —.. , ...:._.._... � .: -.w - . �::::,. ----�-. __ --= : _,. . ._ :: :,. _:: -- - - - °. : . -. - - _ - _ — -- -- - .. . . -- - - - �- ----�- :...:� ......... -- - --- - ...._.,.,.._._ - . . _-- -- -. - - - .... . . .. = _.._..... � - - ,...---�----.. . - .:. ... ---- �- - --- �` -- - - — -. ... -- --- .. ... . ... . `f ..� _ _. , ; ; i —'- ° -._.. �. '.- - . . _.._ . ... ..... � . � - ---- ' -- � ..: . -'---" . � .. .. .. .. . . . . � . r � . . : � .. . _ _ .. � .. --�.:� � .. . . . .. .�..r_.. . �,�....... y'.}.. -.. � _. - . _ "_ .. . . . . : r" _' ' �.... . ."_ ' "-' . - i � ' ' '-_ -_ �_ _ -. ._._._. _. . .. .� _.'".. . �.. � I ..� . . WEST SIDE ELEVATI4N �, ; : : �� '`��.�� . �� ,�, .___,_ :� �_.- __ :.� 1 X . -_ -- - , ,. �-.�.r , T�- � ' , �- , — � ;� '�, �� , �� . . ; � �� ; ,� . � �� , � .� ,� . � ; . , +`� �. ; � ' ��l � ,. _ , . .. G _,i -,_- , ,- _ _ ._.... _ ..-__ � .;. -- _ � _ � � �: � - �.�� ' _ . � . .k � ... . .... ... 'W?.—.. T �.- �. � r' � fr � s f . � I. .�. rl I � � .. . � . � I 6 . I � � / — �....:: '' -- � . � i � : ,, �.; . :: , �i _ ;s �_ � !� I•j ' -f= _ __ . . � ; . ' . �. —, - : �i. << _ _ ' � _ .__. __. �� _. _..'�'��.�._. EAST SIDE ELEVATION 7HIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITV O� PICKERlNG PLANNING & DEVELQPMENT i7EPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERV�CES MAPPING AND DESIGN, MAY 28, 20�2. OPEN SPACEI HAZARD LANDS _ _._ 2�,3m .... Informatian Compiled From Applicant's Submitted Plan P/GA 27J'i 2 Geranium Homes Inc. N � �� PRQPOSED C�VERED PORCH ; �l � �� . PROPOg - Q I 7 __� _.. Zw7-111L1.E r, i ' DVIlELLING ; 7.5m 18.2m � J . -.. -°--._ .... �_ �-- - �-�r-r -- ..--,-,-� ;.. � � .. � 1 ti _A'� _. .._ � . " �,- ..- �.:�-. ':_ I . � � � Il �� To permit a front yard depth of 3.1 metres �� 5 � j � .f,�+r � + � !! �? +r 11l � r 1;` � 1r' �� r r �r1 � �+ , J 11 �1 �� i[__. �Y THI5 MAP WAS PRODIJCED BY THE CIN OF PIGKERING PLANNIfJG & OEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNiNG INFORMATION SERVICES MAPPINGAND DESIGN. MAY 28. 2012. r� � Information Compifed From Applicant's Submitted Plan P1CA 27112 Geranium Homes fnc. , �.+�� .:;\ = -< �. . � - : �. � . �o� � � � � �, � �. ,� � ...� - -,:� - � . ; . : � _ � , 7 �.: . + '-�� _ ., :, �� .� ;:,:. ;�,1 _ . , � .,� . l, . � � : t__,_ . . . :.; . . ,�_,_ . ` .� , ;. _ . . s. �r' : � i � �`� . '� . . . . ... . . y.� "i - f. '•,Z: 1 �. , _. � : �j� _-- --:.�;- - �. -� � -- �_.. I _-_ _:.: ;_: _ _ � ;� _ . , _ -... � �L;��1-•� _.__ f' ' t}jT1- a- f: 'l._ i�-a.:T�.�i-� '� . if i �.: =' ` � r zT -_ �'�i�r� _ ._, , { .,--�=�� . �i I . ,.�... .� �� =�:.- :.:,,�.:�.- � I � ��w� ��, ��,�,�� ;____;_ � �� :�� I L� . . . ....�_�T�... � ��. I _ _ . � �. �_ : q� ��_r_ __ _ � L�� FRONT ELEVATI4N �� .�"�"�J L_1 V L� � V L.,_...1 � � 7HIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BYTH� CITY OF PICKERIIJG PLANNifJG & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMA710N SERVICES MAPAING AND DESlGN, MAY 28, 2012. Information Compiled From Applicant's t� '� Submitted Plan PICA 27112 Geranium Homes Inc. � :�� 1 :� :�_= _ � � _ �� _ _ - _ ._ ; _ I �� .. _ - ..... � � - -- - � —. ' -� �� - _. �._ � �� 1.. _=- �. ... -. - ---- - -- •. . l t "- '- I __ - ' _' � � .._ _._.� __ -� t. - - _-- _ . : . - �: : � � - _ _ :.: _ �- .__=:- - = _-- _�.�� - -_- - - = = = - _ ' -. � ��-_. --- : � . , ;�: - ._ _- - - ._ ._ . . .. __ - ; _ _ - -- - - . _ �_ -; -. , . _-__ _ - - -_ _.r . _ - _ _ _ ..� . - _:_ ... - �- -- - -- - -- = �----� - _ .�.� �{:--- -r - f: ,� . ...:__.: � _ - ``--_ _= _ ' --_ _ — _ - __ _ -- _ _ _ - ,.t�� _ _ : . � �. , �a -- - � — ��'=3~: - - �^� _-- — — - — �:I - ._-- , ,.. . . . > � : _ „ . = — - _ .: : iE , _ ; -� .'i !�-- __..- ._ � - � �f� _ + , _ - � _ _ � ji-_.-_ , ; __ _ _ _ , — _ .. ., - �� .'� _I��► , :: � � , `;� _ :_ ;� ji - -_ _ -_ - �� __i� _. . , - :_ -� � �� - � - - - _ - , � _ ,. � , _ - - . . _: rI ,. iF.,s'. �� ., � � t - - `.-_ il � - - .. _— ._- - - - 'r , -- �= �',-.: .. ,.i: t-� -°- '=_ _.. __ _� := . �C�L-_ -- ---' — C .� ` . �- NORTH S1DE ELEVATI � _ �1'�! `� - � — - ��---� := �� _ : . � � � li � � � - � !I !' - -�` I -- 4 - � _ �. _ - I . -.. _.. _ —. - -�,_ _— - • � ' _ .. � _ -� _ - __! _I!t _ -�—= - . - -- : - _ _ . _ - , . ,_. _:_ - __ . __ _ :- _ - __. _._ � _ _ _ . ... _. _ . . _ __. - - - {..: _ -- - - -- - - _ _ _ _ ;— -:_ _ ,. _ _ ,:. - _..:_ _. _ _. _ , � . _.,_ -: :_.: = - - — �.,,_ . � ' � :.,_.i �_ _ � — � — � , �, -- � _ -� -�� _ � - :_ , � , � : . � r , - — -ro , � �r T � . -f -� r r;, � � - . �I � �; - - �-T �� t � - - :�T;_ �� :._>�,�_ _. , �— = ��-�' �� u � j { ,�,. '' - _- — _ , ; -- -- — _ '- �-- �,i.�.� .. .;_. ...__ � .�� ...�.. � � �� _��.� � i=� S _ �``�� '� � ��,�r �_7 {�I �-.i. rL. /� -='. . .:. � : � -�::... ..-.. � ; � . .=.--��. '_.:' ..--- - _ - - - -- . r,.°'7-� f : 4�- ' ��,� }�-� T. � ��.. �� ,� .� . . �-- -� � � .� � � - --- � .. �-- - .... � . � - . ..� .. . . :.. .... _. . .. � . . � � � �� = '- ... . . .. - . . �.:� �1 � N� �l�_ . .. ._ . :. . :::.. _... __:... ..-. _ . - - _ .... ._. ._.. ... . �.. .�. ..�� ..; 1 �� P . ._ . . . � .': .' .. ..'_'-- ' " - ' _ . -'_ _- _- _ . � .... . __ ..,.... ' ..... .... ,.." .- �:.._ _ � ' J � r ��`•�T '�"�{,. ;r _.. — '_ ` �. — __ �j r, — ,,_._,___I i,: _ _ r - — • .— -- -- -- _ -- - _ __.._ _ ' � ..._ .. ---�- �� -- � ..... . __.�:�-'�-..-:� � � `.� .:�_ � .... : .,�� --L....� � .`'-.�� T. SaUTH SIDE ELEVATION THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFOfiMATION SERVICES MAPPING AND DESIGN, MAY 28. 2012. r= $ Information Compi[ed From Applicant's Submitted Plan PROPOSE COVERED PORCH PlCA 28112 Geranium Homes Inc. S7AGI-�� ROAD THIS MAP WAS PRODUCE6 BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & OEVE�OPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNiNG INFORMATiON SERVICES MAPPING AND DESIGN, FAAY 28, 2012. Information CompiEed Fram Applicant's r`i Submitted Plan P/CA 28112 Geranium Hames Inc. FRONT ELEVATI�N THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY DF PICKERING PLANNING & pEVELOPMEN7 OEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES MAPPING AND DESIGN, MAY 28, 2017. � �� Information Comp'rEed Fram Applicant's Submitted Plan P1CA 28112 Geranium Homes Inc. ; _---__-_- -� _- �:�=:-_---=-_- �� `� � �� =- .__ �_- �T � ', INEST SIDE ELEVATION -- ,� _ _ . � _ �� - _ . �-::�,��r�. _ ---� �I.J - _ ..� �]�_ - = _ -: . =�: �� . .. ------ - ._ .. . . ...__..._....--- , . . 5LL CT7P� �-� --� . — r- _�— .— � � �� - ` ' � _- , � _ -; �, ,-- y � 1 ;1� { , _ __. -_. �__._ r=_ -___ -,� � =� � �l -- �. __:- _ . , - - -, - _ ---�_��1��-- ,�,_�.__., ��,: ==�-,� ,, ;� ,:� ; �� :'� , , .. �� I__J�L_ � �-____, -_ �� = 1 ; -= - : {.'��=. � - . --= �,�}__ _ __ — -- —n¢�0. Y1D8--��------yy AA::-�,,r--,,-�--�� _ �.. !� ' � . .� _ -_ � �`. ..�- _ . :WtR'.= w V'�� -� —� _ _ ___ -:– – ' �- n� -. . . . � -- _ �i -- — _ � I - ... .. .. _: �--- w. crwi- ...---. ;�, � � � .� � � .: .:. . __ .... _ -, – _- _ - - i!-----�--•:� � _ - -: - -. �I _ �,I ��I � --- - - :l� _ : _ - - r� � 1 - '� -- _ - - - � �� i _ - � -: _ _ _. .. - i F-- . - - _. _. _ - . _ - - _ � �;I _ _ _- : _ : ; •��;� ': - _ _ , .._ --- =- ' - - --- _:,. _ . -- _ _ _-- _- _ --- . _ . _ _ _ _. _. _ _ _. . -. - �:.:�.'Z �� EAST SIQE ELEVATI4N ;I i � �; �� ', , � i _;�� :�:_- THIS MAP WAS PRODUCEO BY THE CITY OF PICKER�NG PIANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATIQN SERVICES MAPPING AND DESIGN, MAY 28, 2012.