HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 8, 2012Cammittee of Adjustment
Agenda
Meeting Number: 1
Date: Wednesday, February 8, 2012
.
,,,
,.,�=k,�u+���'��� = � �-
-:iy, � � ��y��.:�l�+�ti3� �
�
Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
7:Oa pm
Main Committee Room
Page Number
(I) Adoption of Agenda
�II) Adoption of Minutes from December 21, 2411 1-7
(III) Reports
1. P/CA 011'I2 — SR & R Bay Ridges Ltd 8-11
1215-1235 Bayly Street
{North Part Block Y, Plan M 16, Part '123-125 & 257-259,
40R-25699}
City of Pickering
2. P/CA 02/12 — J. 8� S. Ralph 12-16
24$5 Linwood Street
(Part Lot 23, Plan 40M1267, Part 7, 40R-7676)
City of Pickering
3. P(CA 03/12 — S. Klair
1524 Sandhurst Crescent
(Lot 33, Plan 40M-1831)
City Qf Pickering
4. P1CA 04J12 — L. & L. D'Silva
2001 Tilson Court
(Lot 12, Plan 40M 2119)
City of Pickering
(IV� Adjournment
17-21
22-27
A��������� For information related to accessibility requirements please con#act
• Lesley Dunne
P`� ��� �� T. 905,42Q.4660, extension 2024
�. TTY 905.420.1739
Email ldunne@pickering.ca
. , - --
�,,,.
�, ��,�- �,�. i ...
��-,�, __�:���.
.
_ _ ,�
__ _����������
Pending Adoption
Present:
Tom Copeland
David Johnson — Chair
Eric Newton — Vice-Chair
Bill Utton
Shirley Van Steen
Also Present;
Neil Carroll, Directar, Planning & Development
Lesiey Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Absent:
Ross Pym, Secretary-Treasurer
Mila Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
��)
(II)
Adoption of Aqenda
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, December 21, 20'�1
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
That the agenda for the Wednesday, December 21, 2011 meeting be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
Adoption of Minutes
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Tom Copeland
That the minu#es of the 15th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held
Wednesday, November 9, 2011 be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
1
�� �
. , --
,
,�,�,. � � ==
�.�,..:��j� �ii: _ .,
,ra-,•ia..;. . � -.i'n�i;j�=:;:�:::':::::�
�;�----� - ,.�.��
���_�����I��
(III} Reports
Gommittee o# Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
PICA 6Q/11 -- Sapphire Swan Ventures Co�p.
1865 Clements Road
(Lot 25, Part Lot 22, 23, 26 & 27, Plan M1040, Part 40 & 41, 40R-13079)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-kaw 2511 to permit 76 percent of
the total required parking to be located in the front yard af the proposed industrial
building, whereas the by-law permits a maximum af 20 percent of to#al required
parking to be located in the front yard.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain site plan
appraval and a building permit.
The Directar, Planning & Devefopment outlined comments received from the City
of Pickering Planning 8� Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Don Manlapaz, agent, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favaur of or in objection to the application.
Dan Manlapaz outJined the application and indicated the praposed development
will bring many new jobs and economic benefit to the community.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bil! Utton
That application P/CA 60/11 by Sapphire Swan Ventures Corp, be Approved on
the grounds that the 76 percent of the total required parking to be located in the
front yard of the proposed industrial building is a minor variance that is desirable
for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general
intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed building, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
December 20, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
�
C�� o� Committee of Adjustment
� Meeting Minutes
°� ��� � i�i Wednesday, December 21, 2011 '���
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
2. P/CA 61/11 — M. Lisiecka & S. Vaclavinek
735 Abingdon Court
(Part Block 5, Plan M-1221, Part 19, 40R-6575)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-faw 2511, as amended by By-law
1309/81 to permit a side yard width of 0.4 metres and a rear yard depth of
0.9 metres to a newly constructed shed with an attached covered porch,
whereas the by-law requires that al! accessory structures greater than 1.8 metres
in height have a minimum setback of 1.0 metres from all Iot lines.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a bui4ding permit.
The Director, Planning & Development outlined comments received from the City
of Pickering Planning 8� Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's
Devefopment Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Maria Lisiecka, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Maria Lisiecka noted that she was aware of the requirement to construct an
eaves trough and gutter and would comply with this requirement.
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Bifl Utton
That applicatian P/CA 61111 by M. Lisiecka 8� S. Vaclavinek, be Approved on
the grounds that the south side yard width of 0.4 metres and a rear yard depth of
0.9 metres are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of
the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the newly constructed shed, as generally
sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant construct an eaves trough and gutter off the south side of
the raof within the property 4imits to ensur'e that rainwater runoff from the
shed's roof is contained on the subject property and directed away from the
south side lot line.
3
�� �� Committee of Adjustment
� � k ��� Meeting Minutes
=° � � Wednesday, December 21, 201'[
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
June 22, 20'12, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
3. P/CA 62/11 — K. Tobias
887 Regan Place
(Lot 693, Plan M11)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520 to permit a west side yard
width of 1.7 metres to an existing carport, a north yard setback of 0.1 metres and
a west yard setback of 0.6 metres to a newly constructed tin shed in the rear
yard and ta recognize an existing shed located in the side yard having a west
yard setback of 0.1 metres whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard
width of 2.4 met�es, all accessory structures to be located in the rear yard, and a
minimum accessory structure setback of 1.0 metre to all lot lines.
The applicant requests appraval of this variance in order to obtain a zoning
compliance far the existing structures and a building permit for the newly
constructed tin shed.
The Director, Planning & Developrnent outlined comments received from the City
of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending refusal to the
west side yard setback of 0.1 rnetres to an existing shed and recommends that
the application be amended to request a west side yard setback of 0.3 metres to
the existing shed in the side yard. The Planning & Devefopment Department
recammended approval for the variances related to the newly constructed shed
in the rear yard, subject to conditions.
Written comments were received from the City's Development Control Manager
expressing na concerns. Written comments were also received from Alois
Stubits of 885 Regan Pface in objection to the application.
Ken Tobias, owner, and Stacey Ross were present to represent the application.
Linda Hawkins of 889 Regan Place was was present in objection to the
application.
Ken Tobias explained the application and noted that the location of the new shed
optimizes the yard space and is in charac#er with the surrounding neighbourhood.
The shed will be used to store patio furniture and supplies, and provide
protection from weather conditions. In response to a question from a Committee
Member, Ken Tobias and Stacey Ross noted they do not have a problem moving
the existing shed in the west side yard to a Iocation 0.3 metres fram the lot line.
4
��� o� Committee of Adjustmenfi
��� Meeting Minutes
ry°�� � � � Wednesday, December 2'i, 2011 ��
- - .�
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Linda Hawkins expressed concern with the requested north yard setback of
0.1 metre to the newly constructed shed and questioned if there will be any
additional building along the west side yard that may be visible from her kitchen
window_
In response fram a Committee Member, the Director, Planning & Development
advised that setback distances are measured from the lot line and not from the
fence line. The Director also indicated the site plan information is compiled from
plans received from the owner at the time of application submissian.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P/CA 62/11 by K. Tobias, be Refused on the grounds that the
west setback of 0.1 metres to the existing shed in the side yard is a major
variance that is not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and
not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law.
And
That application P/CA 62/11 by K. Tobias, be Approved on the grounds that the
existing west side yard width of 1.7 metres to an existing carport, a north setback
of 0.1 rnetres and a west setback of 0.6 metres to a newly constructed shed in
the rear yard, and 0.3 metre setback to be provided by a relocated existing shed
in the west side yard are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of
the Official Plan and the Zoning gy-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the existing carport and accessory
structures on the property as generally sited and outlined on the appficant's
submi#ted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the tin shed by December 20, 2012,
or this decision shall becorne null and void.
Carried Unanimously
5
C�ty o¢� � Committee of Adjustment
(� � �. �z- . �a��
Meeting Minutes
� � Wednesday, December 21, 2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
4. P1CA 63/11 — R. Alli
1601 Baggins Street
(Lot 35, P1an 40M-1441)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-1aw 3036 as amended by By-{aw
2024/85, to permit a rear yard depth of 5.6 metres to a newly canstructed roof
extension over an existing basement waikout of a detached dwelling unit and to
permit a maximum lot coverage of 39 percent for a proposed 9.3 square metre
shed in the rear yard, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of
7.5 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit and receive zoning compliance for the proposed shed.
The Director, Planning 8� Development outfined comments received from the City
of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were alsa received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Ramzan Alli, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Tam Copeland
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application PJCA 63/11 by R. Alli, be Approved on the grounds that the rear
yard depth of 5.6 metres to a newly constructed roof extension over an existing
basement walkout of a detached dwelling unit and to permit a maximum lot
coverage of 39 percent for a proposed 9.3 square metre shed in the rear yard
are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the
land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the OfFicial Plan and
the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the newly constructed roof extension and
proposed 9.3 square metre shed, as generally sited and outlined on the
applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the roof extension remain unenclosed, or this decision shall become null
and void.
3. That the applicant obtain a building permit #or the newly constructed roof
extension and basement stairwell by April 20, 2012, or this decision shall
become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
0
.
/,Nn 1
1��' �
�-- i�_ -_
�II' �� �, �.,'��,.�!
� _ _ __,._.�_:.
����•_������
(IV) Other Business
1
�
Appointment of Chairperson
Moved by Eric Newton
Secanded by Shirley Van Steen
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
That David Johnson be appointed as Chairperson for the 2012 term.
Carried Unanimously
Appointment af Vice Chairperson
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Tom Copeland
That Eric Newton be appointed as Vice Chairperson for the 2012 term.
Carried Unanimously
(V) Adiournment
Date
Chair
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
That the 16th meeting of 2011 the Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at
7:36 pm and the next meeting of the Committe� of Adjustment be held on
Wednesday, January 18, 2012.
Carried Unanimously
Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
7
E? ?
elfy °� Repor� to
; ; Committee of Adjustment
�� � I KER
Application Number: PICA 01/12
Meeting Date: February 8, 2012
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
Subject: Cammittee of Adjustrnent Application P1CA 01112
SR & R Bay Ridges Ltd
1215-123a Bayly Street
(North Part Block Y, Plan M 16, Part 123-125 & 257-259, 40R-25699)
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended by By-law 6786107
to permit a retail parking ratio of 2.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross
leasable floor area of commercial uses resulting in 54 parking spaces being proposed
whereas the by-law requires 3.0 retail parking spaces per 100 square metres gross
leasable area of commercial uses resulting in a requirement of 65 parking spaces for
commercial uses.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain site plan approval for
the development.
Recommendatian:
The Pfanning & Development Departrnent considers the retail parking ra#io of 2.5 parking
spaces per 100 square metres af gross leasable floor area of commercial uses resulting
in 54 parking spaces to be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the
Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to subject property municipally known as
1215-1235 Bayly Street, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's
submitted plans. -
2. That the applicant obtain site plan approval for the proposed development by
February 7, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void.
Comment:
Officiaf Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Officiaf Plan — Mixed Use Areas — Mixed Carridors within the Bay Ridges
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 2520 as amended by By-law 6786/07 —"RHIMU-2"
Report P/CA 01/12
Background:
February 8, 2012
Page 2 �? �
The applicant submitted a detailed Parking Considerations Report by BA Group
Transportation Consultants dated December 2011. The report pravides an analysis of
the praposed parking demand for the site and a recommended supply for the proposed
mixed use residential and retail development.
Appropriateness of the Application
Parking Ratio Variance
the intent of the parking ratio of 3.0 parking spaces per 100 square metres of
gross leasable floor area of �etail use is to ensure adequate parking is provided
onsite to support the site uses
the proposed parking ratio of 2.5 parking spaces per 140 square metres of gross
leasable floar area of commercial uses appears ta be adequate and appropriate
for this specific development for #he following reasons:
• the peak demands of retail parking spaces and residential visitor parking
spaces differs, therefore the sharing of the proposed parking spaces beiween
both uses is an efficient use of parking provided on the property
• there will be adequate amount of parking space5 provided onsite with the
sharing of the propased retail spaces and residential visitor parking spaces
• the site is easily accessible by a number of Durham Region Transit routes
along Bayly Street which encourages users living and using the site to use
public transit reducing the dependence on personal vehicles and the need for
the abundance of parking spaces
no adverse impacts are anticipate on the function and operation of the site
the intent of the zoning by-law will be maintained
Date of repQrt: January 30, 2012
Comments prepared by:
G��VC"
Mila Yeung
Planner I
MY:RP:Id
co(alre portsl2012�pca01-12.doc
Enclasures
�
Rass Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Devefopment Review
�., :�..
�
!
1�
�.Y.. .,. ,N
�.�+
�i
Information Compiled From Applicant's
Submitted Pian
P/CA 01112 -
SR � R Bayridges Ltd.
. _.____.__ _ .___._ . __ ..__
BAYLY STREET � -
. . _,._.
.�� , �.��:�w�:�,�:��.��; �.� i
_ __
. _ .: -ukr ,�n-��.rv. .. '� .�,!ti 'r _ � . .�� _
-; - - r
n � �.-as.� L�ia.. , ;-.> �- .�, ..,--�;,""r� '� � , ii - _ .."'_".-- ' "'v"t ..
e 4�, , . � '
e4w � � �7 " � � ' ! � . '� : �
�; �,r
I g,,.., � Q: �F , x� , i':
� s .; � , �� �,.,,M � �, /' N
�
��
g ,
,., ,xea+a+ � ,a. ; Y -:? � � .,, . , rt
w;
� � 3, .�w ' ,� � :� � r �- '�� ` .aw �.�
- '" �� ...__—__ ' , I � i �� �
•, s
_ �,.. - -��: � __,.i � ` �
_
,
a; � i
1 _: -- - _ � . _ . r
; �� �
, , - �..
� 7 . tr . _
, �I .� . ��-- ; �l ; �_ ; ,. .
}Y;
, ._ ..., , �,� e,— _ _ ____� E � ,�:
.
; . � , __ __ aA , (
. .
,�
..� •
_ �� , _ . , , : ; . ..>-�._ _.��� , .. ... � , � ��
� :. .� � , r.
, ��.
- Y`} k�+11„ . I I y �. ... ,_� I ! '�<
r : �
�� , �, , .. � j � -- - �,.,,.�. , � ,�n,...� ,` i
�. _. � �'`� , � I
_ . �
y .�- .s � �� . . i � � � ..
' `
ti �// �J) / �
�..�.''y`S, ' / ' % 1� .'/ � � �,�y ' t!.?
fii f ';�i ��' � J r. � .1/
v� *;x � . ! �.sp � / ' 1 . _ �'� �� . /
_ „ � : � � . f- ,� 1� ' ; .�
�� �� ,, ,��r' � � � � j � �
i ( �.�: � � .�� y�. �i...�
�" Y�f� ��l�e� �� � tt .,'-' .\\`ry /I�;
A � � 1 � �� ` Y � ��l ��i `� ,� � li �, .,i � �� r�
�;�, � : f . `� � , � f,
ia
� r;� Y , � ..•� � �ti , � �
� p �
� � `y ' ` � > �" ��� .y ' i
,e. i i j � r� v
% d ,t ' � i A� �Y . 1 i�` �"� ; ' �� '�' .
" . , �' . � � ��`:- � �r;r �3N§ � ; / ��� � !a
n ^� � ; f
'�` .� { i.;_ et l,1 / �. �� ,
_�;� I� i ; �,,i 1 � �
:` 3 �� ��; , �
t,;. � ti, i._� � _ %. ��! �x,� %
�n.,.,r�;���� ��
��� 8
� :
.�
rj
Ai /
� /
/
�
�
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BYTHE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPM£NT DEPARTMENT, PIANNING INFORMATIaN SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, AUG 1, 2007.
,.
„
./W (,1I1111L'`I����;I �,
,� -
b ;� ,,�,��u..� ��.�.��:�
���I �i�
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PlCA 02/12
Meeting Date: February 8, 2012
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 02/12
J & S. Ralph
2485 Linwood Street
(Part lot 23, Plan 40M1267, Part 7, 40R-7676)
City of Pickering
Appiication:
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1103/80
to permit a lot caverage of 40 percent to allow for a proposed ane storey sunroom
addition onto the rear of the existing detached dwelling, whereas the by-law permits a
maximum lot coverage of 3$ percent.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to abtain a building perrnit for
the proposed sunroom.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department considers the lot coverage of 40 percent to
allow for a proposed one storey sunroorn addition onto the rear of the existing detached
dwelling to be a minor variance #hat is desirable for the appropriate development of the
land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the
Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject
ta the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed sunroam, as generally sited and
outlined an the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
February 7, 2Q14, or #his decision shall become null and void.
Report P/CA 02/12
February 8, 2012
Page 2 � �
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering �fficial Plan — Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas within the
Liverpool Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3�36 as amended by 11 �3/80 —"SD"
Appropriateness of the Application
Lot Coverage Variance
• the intent of a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent is to maintain an appropriate
amount af yard space (amenity area) uncovered by buildings on a lot and to
regufate the maximum size and mass of buildings on a lot
• the proposed 40 percent lot caverage provides an appropriate amount of yard
space uncovered by buildings
• the intent of the zoning by-law wauld be maintained
Input From Other Sources
Development Control
• no concerns with regard to the relief as requested
• the applicant should be advised that the installation
may affect the iot drainage as our records indicate
that the lot drains back to front and the proposed
installation may affect the apron swale that directs
the drainage ta the side yard swales
Date of report: February 1, 2012
Comments prepared by:
v� l/��
Mila Yeung
Planner I
MY: RP:Id
cofe/feport5/2012/ pce02-12. doc
Enclosures
QJ.�
Ross Pym, M , RPP
Principal Pianner — Development Review
��
�� �
��
MAPLE
PUBLlC
�IAPLE
RJDGE
PARK
..�
������t
���1���1
.
FINCN
0
Q �
� PINE RlOGE
� SECONDARY
SCHOOL
•-
���
• � , , �'',/
• �� � �� �� • . ',
�� � � ' �� �
�� . �� �� � -,� ` �
���� . ������ �� :. ��� �
11111111111�'�� 111111 : i
�������t����r �:�� �;:����i_
� �����`
KINGDOM
HALL
. ,_ ---
�•
( � ��������������������������
CORR��OR
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
�
a
�
�
■ •�� � �� - =, = �«�� � �� .
-
C����-=��._ �'
, � �� , = =, _ !lIII IIII�IIIIIlIIIIIII � ;
:��-�
�
! ' i i� �� � • ,�� � � ' � � :
� �� �� ; � . � _liil Illlilllllltllltll � :
� �� �� � " ,� - == � = - ��Illli� .
� �� � = -� .-= = � ►
� � �� � �
, � S_ ! � � �� ��� • � • �"'"
_ �� � �
� � . . _ _ �� .:_ � ' =i11lli� � 11�����
� �� � .■■■■■........�i� • �� �
• ' • ' � : �- - •• �-..
-�- � • •� . ��-
� � ��� �
. � � ��� � n
-- _ - �
Information Compi{ed From Applicant's
Submitted Plan
P1CA 02/12 -
J. & S. Ralph
LINWOOD STREET
�.,� s.ogrn —�
T,
� ,�
� . 9 oa�. ._ . �
.� �
�
This map was produced by the city of Pickering Planning & Develapment
Departmeni, Planning Infamation Services Division Mapping and Design,
Jan 2Q 2012.
_�. �
...�
i� ,:i i
,�_.__
Information Compiled From Applicant's
Submitted Plan
P/CA 02/12 -
J. & S. Ralph
r. � ........ ..... _..... _... __ ._
� _. _ .._ _
. . ...
f . :_ - � �
s
, -._-_ C _�� -„�
� � - � F�xF�n
j GI d5�
�
��rc ", t ir.,xr
� y _ f ,,oe
li 5 � '.I lCxhy
wvf�t)x
Mf , k��
� • f' `,' •
�)�Va �
� S��iC��
I tr�
. rl-�
�`�
... . _ ' �; 3 �r-T--
WrS � ELEVF�TI�N
f11�� klRkil � ��:.�
,rtn cinr. �ty�'��
��� ii �t cin;°.
..� -- . _ __ . � ,� , f ,� :;����
yfY
I'IXEi: t�l%1:11 �� S�,Iwt+r.
GLAY:ti CI_A;r's .. w.�op�x
.. ��
.::e:. . .���.... � . �.. Y... ... _... �_ ....... .:.
_
5i1{',,� ' -. �(� I �T1CK
�VILi „ � �UILt I t1UIL.�i
_—'_.__...__. 1 -r-._ __.. � ...'—"_..._..�_...�i
REAR ELEVATIUN(SOUTH)
__. _ I �
_. J ;
�,�,�
� _;�.� � Sa � �fi flAS'�� �
,1� � � � �"��.
,r .(� ���:
li � �; ,�� , F, •
� inai�lf�� � ...:.��
, �, a
„ �,:� �
, ��l .. . 1�. It.l
�. �
i ��
� �
� •1
.. ,.. _....... f'"- .��:f:'
.. ....__: .,> .. _.... ....._.
_. _.r S, _.._ _ ___
SIDE ELEVATIONS
�
- �---
� . __.
�ns-r �i FvarfoN �;
;
� --- .__ _ _._.__
i
I ;
L
� �.:;.fa �
� I i > � . . _ _.. � ...-�..]5 3� E .'.::.. � � ' -j
..
. .
�� i
� r:
���; .��� � ►�, '
� i, � � i �.
� � I � ,; I
, , �
� ..
I K � ;
f ili i' I ;. .. .., _. ....,.. .. . _ I'.;`i I
I.. �, n . .... � �
� 1 � ... �.. ..
.. . ...... . . ..... �... ... .
..._._ ... ....... i`J � _._.} � a.:. .... ... .. . .... ....
f
,,,
_ . _ .__ � _..... _ _.._
, 5.
This map was produced by the city of Pickering Pla�ning & Development
Departrnent, Planning Informafion Services Division Mapping and Design,
Jan 20,2012.
City a� Report to '� 9
I I �
, , Committee of Adjustment
_ KERI Application Number: P/CA 03112
Meeting Date: February 8, 2012
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Develapment Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 03/12
S. Klair
1524 Sandhurst Crescent
{Lot 33, Plan 4pM-1831)
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4502/94
to permit a rear yard depth of 6.2 metres and a lot coverage of 41 percent to a proposed
sunroom addition onto the rear of the existing detached dwelling, whereas the by-law
requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7,5 metres rear yard depth and a maximum Iot
coverage of 38 percent.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit far
the proposed sunroom.
Recommendation:
The Planning 8� Development Department considers the rear yard depth of 6.2 metres
and a lat coverage of 41 percent to a proposed sunroom addition onto the rear of the
existing detached dwelling to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the
Official Plan and the Zoning By-faw, and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variances, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed sunroam addition, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
February 7, 2014 or this decision shall become null and void.
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering afficial Plan — Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas within the
Highbush Neighbourhood
Zaning By-law 3036 as amended by 4502/94 —"S4"
Report PlCA 03/12
�.
Appropriateness of the Application
Rear Yard Depth Variance
February 8, 2012
Page 2
the intent of the minimum 7.5 metre rear yard requirement is to ensure that a
useable amenity space is provided in the rear yard, and to provide an appropriate
buffer space between dwellings on abutting properties
the proposed rear yard depth of 6.2 metres to the praposed one storey sunroom
addition will maintain an adequate amenity space in the rear yard and maintain
the existing established character of openness
the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Lot Coverage Variance
• the intent of the maximum 38 percent building lot coverage requirement is to
maintain an appropriate amount af yard space (amenity area) uncovered by
�uildings on a lot and to regulate the maximum size and mass of buildings on a lot
an appropriate amount of yard space uncovered by buildings is proposed
the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Input From Other Sources
Development Control • no concerns with regard to the relief as requested
• the applicant should be advised that the installation
may affect the !ot drainage as our records indicate
that the lo# drains back to front and the proposed
installation may affect the apron swale that directs
the drainage to the side yard swales
Date of report: February 1, 2012
Comments prepared by:
G���
Mila Yeung
Planner I
MY:RP:Id
co(e/repohs/2012/pceD3-12.tloc
Enclosu�es
�� �
Rass Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
GRQVE
_ FI N C H AvFN � ��
City of Pickering
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LQt 33, Plan 40M-1831
OWNER S. Klair
FILE No. P/CA 03/12
7�ron�t Entarprl�s� Ine. and ib �uppll�n. All NQht� R�e�rvW. Not a plan o1 •urv�y.
0
a
0
�
Q
z
0
�
J
Q
SPARROW
IC
��
���
Planning & Development Department
DATE Jan. 12, 2012
SCALE 1:5,000
DRAWN BY JB �
CHECKED BY MY �
PN-10
,�•. �
a';
Information Compiled From Applicant's
Submitted Plan
P/CA 03/12 -
S. Klair
PROPOSED
SUNROOM
ADDITION
0
N
r"
9.9 m
�
o �
�
�
si
. �6.2 m
To permit a rear yard depth of 6.2
metres to a proposed addition
33.2 m
0
N
EXIST(NG
DWELLING
33.2 m
�
�
a
�
6.Om
To permit loY coverage of 41
percent
�
Z
W
U
�
W
�
U
H
�
CY
�
2
�
Z
Q
(/�
jY
This map was produced by the city of Pickering Planning &�evelopment
Department, Planning Information Services Division Mapping and Design,
Jan 20, 2072.
� �.
Informatian Compiled From Applicant's
Submitted Plan
P/CA 03112 -
S. Klair
vey
REAR ELEVATION
, .
r- _.- --.. --- : _— _. - 1
i ,�_ ___ _ _ _.
LEFT ELEVATION r`:-='�'
w.� __ _� __. � �
_._. _ .
: .__ _,�_ _._ �__�_ .m .: _ __ ._ _...., �
_' � _," " . _.. . �:: .. ._ . ..._. .... .. . ... ... . .. _.._ _. _. ..F
This map was produced by the city of Pickerinq Planning & Development
Departmenf, Planning Information Services Division Mapping and Design,
Ja� 2Q 20]2.
� 2 C��% °� Report to
' '' Committee of Adjustment
I f
I KERI Application Number: P/CA 04112
Mee#ing Date: February 8, 2012
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 04/12
L. & L. D' Silva
2Q01 Tilson Caurt
(Lot 12, Plan 40M 2119)
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicant requests relief fram Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5892/01
to permit a rear yard depth of 4.0 rnetres to a proposed sunroom addition onto the rear
of the exis#ing detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard
depth of 7.5 metres.
The applicant requests appraval of this variance in order to obtain a building perrnit for a
proposed sunroom.
Recommendation:
The Planning 8� Development Department considers the rear yard depth of 4.Q metres
to a praposed sunroom addition onto the rear of the existing detached dwelling to be a
major variance that is not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not
in keeping with the general intent of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends
Refusal of the proposed variance.
•�
If the applicant were to request that the application be amended to allow a rear yard
depth of 5.5 metres to the proposed sunroom addition the following recommendation
would apply:
The Planning & Developrnent Department. considers the rear yard depth of 5.5 metres
to a proposed sunroom addition to be a minor variance that is desirable for the
appropr'tate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose
of the OfFicia! Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variance, subject to the follawing conditions:
Report P/CA 04l12
February 8, 2012
Page 2 � �
1. That this variance apply only to a proposed sunroom addition onto the rear of
the existing detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the
applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
February 7, 2014 or this decision shall become null and void.
Comment:
4fficial Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering �fficial Plan — Urban Residential A�ea — Medium Density Area within the
Highbush Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by By-law 5892l01 —"S4"
Appropriateness of the Application
Rear Yard Depth Variance
• the intent of the minimum 7.5 metres rear yard depth is to ensure that a useable
amenity space is provided in the rear yard, to maintain an established character
of openness and to pravide an appropriate buffer space between structures on
abutting properties
• the proposed rear yard depth of 4.0 metres to the proposed sunroom addition will
not maintain an adequate amount of amenity space in the rear yard of the subject
property
• given that the rear of the subject property abuts the side o# abutting a residential
dwelling, a 4.0 metre rear yard depth does not pr�vide an acceptable amount of
openness and buffer between structures of abutting properties
• if the application was amended to request a rear yard depth of 5.5 metres to a
proposed sunroom addition, and considering that the subject property is on a
corner lot the concern of providing insufficient amenity area and buffer space
would be reduced
• a rear yard depth af 4.0 metres wifl not maintain the intent of the zoning by-law
• a recommended rear yard depth of 5.5 metres will maintain the intent of the
zoning by-law
d� 1'
!� �
Report P/CA 04/12
Input From 4ther Sources
Development Control
February 8, 2012
Page 3
• no concerns with regard to the relief as requested
• the applicant should be advised that the
installation may affect the lo# drainage as our
recards indicate that the Iot drains back to front
and the proposed installation may afFect the apron
swale that directs the drainage to the side yard
swales
Date of report: February 1, 2012
Comments prepared by:
C� ��G`�'"
Mila Yeung
Planner I
MY:RP:Id
oora��euon5na�yv�Baa-i a.a��
Enclosures
a
C}•Q/,
Rass Pym, M , RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
,; �,
, �
F--
�
�
a
U
Z
O
tn
�
M ~�
�
7.7
Infarmation Compiled From Applicant's
Submitted Plan
P/CA 04/12 -
L. 8� L. D'Silva
3�,�� �.
a�
... --
..- �-°� '"� __..,--�rr7Tii%�
�N IW
\ � ;�o
. l� �
-� _ �.
—`��� GHE�HCME
SfN��� f AMILY OETA
29'fpREYS �._r
� 27.2 m z�,2s"
STR�lJDS LANE
� ��
1�
��
'Pp4DIT ON
4.�-
� �.
� � 0
� � �T 23
� � !
To permit a rear yard depth of 4.0
metres to a proposed addition
iY
This map was produced by fhe city of Pickering Planning & Devalopment
Oepartment, Planning Infamation Services Divisio� Mapping and Design,
Jan 20, 2012.
Information Gompiled From Applicant's
Subrnitted Plan
P/CA 04112 -
L. 8� L. D'Silva
_ .,�
��z, � ' - ,�_ �� r;4.—oos �i. =l
r i1578s4
� ���� ._ � �
rc�r ��� �9�-- ._':�
i�iS ��r":IT 15'.73;L'-.—___..._._._....__ �
- - �'�� EXISTING HOUSF
� �: 3aiCK vENGER ��
�~''— ``�-_-�`
�`
/ f ,<c e, s� i '
C ---.. r._ --__ � --
:K 1--�-�� ! __
M1 .... . . __ ! ._��..��- _"__.
uir Pf�O SED.o � r,' t�
=s ! / II -GCaie � �ij/�,II i // � �i iiC� j
? /l �il�. i�� //�iflj �� � � ifI 7rlll �
'It 4��� �; . � ° j1 _ � ,. � .--�� � � I�_�' __ .�
__ i
� �� . fl;,.. -„ -..R_- .� ,.AI
i
�
.� � \ . . _._ ._. � �l�l
n I.,_,� ��I �
J -�'r-v-vx� ;;s:r ia�...
�'XIS'iPw:.--C .Sc .I '..I I �I �
�i n �' i ; '"_ �_ A _, �_
I� , f� Y,sr� , f aHO b�t� �� .� =-r =-
�' I I I'.� "no"�ou
1 ,, �. I� a
�...... ,ll.,�..� � I I�i 5'W �� �`�'Y�\
L, L ! I!
LEFT ELEVATION
NE-VSE f.%IiT!NG +xE-(AB
CGNCFI'L ��1N5 1l�'01l Su
I �0 C�nOC
�6�
�
�7 �
7his inap was produced by ths city of Pickenng Planning & Development
Department, Planning Information Services Division Mapping and Design,
Jan 2a, 2012.