The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDecember 21, 2011Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 1fi Date: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 ., ,,, ��j�� a"' sy.`"�"u� ;=— � i .=. :�� -�. - ..i+ra� .r _ � (1) Adoption of Agenda Committee of Adjustment Agenda Wednesday, December 21, 2011 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number (11) Adoption of Minutes from November 9, 20'f 1 1-6 (III) Reports 1. P/CA 60/11 — Sapphire Swan Ventures Corp. 7-11 1865 Clements Road (Lot 25, Part Lot 22, 23, 26 8� 27, Plan M1040, Park 40 & 41, 40R-13079) City of Pickering 2. P/CA 61/11 — M. Lisiecka & S. Vaclavinek 12-16 735 Abingdon Cou�t (Part Black 5, Plan M-1221, Part 19, 40R-6575) City of Pickering 3. PICA 62/11 — K. Tobias 887 Regan Place (Lot 693, Plan M 11) City of Pickering 4. P/CA 63/11 — R. Alli 1601 Baggins Street (Lot 35, Plan 40M-1441) City of Pickering (IV) Other Business 1. Appointment of Chairperson 2. Appointment of Vice Chairperson (V) Adjournment 17-23 24-30 Accessib�e � For information related to accessibility requirements please contact PI� V e �� Lesley Dunne �� C��- T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 TTY 905.420.1739 Email Idunne@cityofpickering.com . , -- , ,,,, _ a�=4��f� ��! .7� 7��"_ 5� -c,r,��El - �1 "_ _t -��-�,-:.�_.��3� �� • �� ` . Pending Adoption Present: Tom Copeland David Johnson — Chair Eric Newton — Vice-Chair Bill Utton Shirley Van Steen Also Present: Mila Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer (I} (II) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Bill Utton Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, November 9, 2011 7:42 pm Main Committee Room That the agenda for the Wednesday, November 9, 2011 meeting be adopted. Carried Unanimously Adop#ion of Minutes Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Eric Newton That the minutes of the 14th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, October 19, 2011 be adopted as amended. Carried Unanimously 1 "� ��ty �� Committee of Adjustment �� Meeting Minutes �- � i Wednesday, November 9, 2011 � � 7:02 pm Main Committee Room (111) Reports P/CA 57/11 — OPB Realty Inc. 1355 Kingston Road (Pa�t Lots 21 & 22, Concession 'I ) City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 amended by By-laws 5994/02, 5806/41, 2472/87 and 1581/82 to permit a proposed restaurant in the southwest corner of Kingston Road and Glenanna Road that will provide a Kingston Road setback of 7.2 metres and a Glenanna Raad setback of 4.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a rninimum Kingston Road setback of �4.0 metres and a minimum Glenanna Road setback of 9.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit and site plan approval. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City af Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. W�itten comments were also received from the City's Deveiopment Control Manager expressing no concerns. Jim Katsopoufos, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Jim Kotsopoulos outlined the application and pravided coloured elevation drawings and the site plan for the Cornmittee Members ta review. In response to questions from Committee Members, Jim Kotsopoulos expiained a Phase 1& 2 Environmental Site Assessment will be submitted during the Site Plan approva! process and the location of the patio is on the west side of the proposed restaurant. Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 57/11 by OPB Realty Inc., be Approved on the grounds that a Kingston Road setback of 7.2 metres and a Glenanna Road setback of 4.0 metres are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the O�cial Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following canditions: E C�t� d¢� Committee of Adjustment �� Meeting Minutes _ �- � Wednesday, Novem ber 9, 2011 7:02 pm � � Main Committee Room That these variances apply only to the proposed restaurant, as generally sited and outlined on the appticant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by Navember 8, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void. Garried Unanimously 2. P/CA 58/11 — S. & R. Fillingham 1820 Pine Grove Avenue (Part Lot 22, Plan 410) City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to permit an existing shed to be located in the south side yard, whereas the by-law requires all accessory structures to be located in the rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning campliance. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Development Control Manager expressing no concerns. Robin Fillingham, owner, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Secanded by Tom Copeland That application P/CA 58/11 by S. & R. Fillingham, be Approved on the grounds that the existing shed located in the south side yard is a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the �fficial Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance appiy only to the existing shed located in the south side yard, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Carried Unanimously 3 �� o� Committee of Adjustment �� Meeting Minutes °� �� Wednesday, November 9, 20'I1 � � 7:02 pm Main Committee Room 3. PIGA 59/91 — William Peak Co-Operative Homes Inc. 7 99Q Whites Road (Part of Lot 29, Cancession 1, Part 1, 40R-12467) City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2911l88 to permit a maximum of 75 children within a day nursery and to permit 181 parking spaces on the subject property, whereas the by-law permits a maximum of 40 children within a day nursery and requires a minimum of 186 parking spaces on the subject property. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain permanent zoning compliance as a previous temporary variance for the expanded day nursery will expire. M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to canditions. Written comments were received from the City's Development Control Manager expressing no concerns. Written comments were received from the City's By-!aw Enforcement Manager indicating no complaints or concerns were expressed regarding the changes implemented in 2008 and it would not cause any problems to permit the continuance of the approval previously granted. Writ#en comments were also received from Evelyn E. of Granceland Court suppo�ts the application if the increase in the number of children in the daycare bene#it those living directly in the co-operative hausing complex. Lori Carrall, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Lori Carroll, Supervisor of the day nursery, provided enrollment projections analysis for the Committee Members to review. Lori Carrall indicated busing fram five additional schaols has been added since 2008 and the drop off location for three of the schools is along Finch Avenue which will not impact traffic flow within the Go-Op. Lori Carroll explained the 181 parking spaces on the subject property, 40 spaces are designated to visitor parking and the remainder is reserved for the residents within the Co-Op. During day nursery operation hours (off peak visiting hours) 13 parking spaces are being occupied by day nursery staff {there is a total of 14 staff members, 5 are part-time). 4 e�� a� Commit#ee of Adjustment �,�� Meeting Minutes _:�. �`�` �� f" Wednesday, November 9, 2011 7:02 pm �� Main Committee Room Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Bill Utton That application P/CA 59/11 by William Peak Co-Operative Homes Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the maximum of 75 children within a day nursery and 181 parking spaces on the subject property are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only #o the existing day nursery facility, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the,activity room floor area on the second floor be fimited to a maximum of 84 square metres for a day nursery use. 3. That the combined activity raom floor area for the day nursery on the site be limited ta a maximum of 254 square metres. 4. That the applicant provides evidence to the City of Pickering that appropriate up-to-date approvals and/or a license from the Ministry of Community and Social Services to recognize a maximum of 75 children within the daycare facility by Navember 9, 2012, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously (IV} Other Business Adoption af 2412 Meeting Schedule Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Eric Newton That the Committee of Adjustment Meeting Schedule for 2012 be adopted. Carried Unanimously 5 ., , �im , f�+ �s-��Ji� � �� 1 :..,:. a �.,,::. , S �+;�.� � ��I�� (V) Adiournment Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Shirley Van Steen Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, November 9, 2011 7: 02 pm Main Cammittee Room That the 15th meeting of 2011 the Committee of Adjustmen# be adjourned at 7:24 pm and the next meeting of the Gommittee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, November 30, 2011. Carried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretary-Treasurer C� �=t� �� Report to ; ; . Committee of Adjustment I KERIN `� ? Application Number: PICA 6Q/11 � Meeting Date: December 21, 2011 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Cammittee of Adjustment Application P/CA 60/11 Sapphire Swan Ventures Corp 1865 Clements Road (Lot 25, Part Lot 22, 23, 26 & 27, Plan M1040, Part 4Q & 41, 4QR-13079) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-iaw 2511 to permit 76 percent of the total required parking to be located in the front yard of the proposed industrial building, whereas the by-law permits a maximum of 20 percent of totai parking to be located in the front yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain site plan approval and a building permit. Recommendation: The Planning & Developrnen# Department considers the 76 percent of the total required parking ta be located in the front yard of the proposed industrial building to be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to fhe following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by December 2Q, 2013, or this decision shafl become null and void. Report P/CA 60/11 � Comment: OfFicial Plan and Zoning By-law December 2'1, 2011 Page 2 Pickering afficial Plan —"Employment Areas — Genera! Employment" within the Brock Industrial Neighbourhood Zoning By-!aw 2511 —"M2S" — Heavy Manufacturing Appropriateness of the Application Front Yard Parking Variance • the intent of the by-law limiting parking to 20 percent of the total required parking to be located in the front yard is to maintain the streetscape character of the area • the subject property is surrounded by industrial uses; the proposed industrial building will maintain the character of the area • the proposed 7fi percent of the total required parking to be located in the front yard of the proposed industrial building is a design to separate the parking for the office employees so they are Iocated in close proximity to the office entrance and there#ore reducing the conflict of office employees walking through the loading/truck traffic areas that will occur in the side and yard areas of the property • the proposed building meets all other setback requirements in the by-law • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Date of report: December 14, 2011 Comments prepared by: �� Mila Yeung Planner 1 MY:RP:Id cofalrepoAs12D111pca60-tt.doc Enciosures 6�J Ross Pym, MCIP, PP Principal Planner — Development Review Q� �� oi�' 1 C INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN P/GA 60/11 - SAPPHIRE SWAN VENTURE CORP. CLEMENTS ROAD , s ; __�. _ � - . , - ---�- —..._... _ _ , - , a�t-- ,.__,_..._._.;_...,_:-� � � _ - ^- -� _� -- � — , . ' ��_ �� _ , 'I . � i __`�''�_ '�� _ " _ "' i � � x y� ...J.___- � �� s � ..- N � .. ��._.� .. , m -, � � , � i __�___,. ,_ -- _.._ r __ .__._......._. � —� - - -- - � - .� �� 1 t � -�— i -� t I __.�...._._;..__;,,._.` � � : ; � , : , !. . _S.. 1 = t - � i 1 I i � �, g �r :��Ja s I t ' ' � ��Lu� „ P ...... � ..'. k T y��y4T'c�� : ; a -- ��g � .i i�,: J r _.. ., y :: a�� ! � -- �' �,�� / 1 � .� Y� 3: ��` �`� % l E """''� _ e $� R��,,: ��n� �,�„_ a -;�~ -� ,�:!�j"i% � -s -�-�.�'� : •�--�; �,.; �'�: , a � � ;�,�`��x�� ,, � � � H: , �-" � ,, �; ,;__ .��, _� �� `�� ,. � � ... � , \�' ��, �, )� �� ._ ,. , . �� ; _ _ � �- � Ka . . . ,� _. � r� , ,,� .. _..,. . . `"""-_; .._. :_�.. s o �� •i I permit 76 percent of the al required parking be ated in the front yard i � —i � � -j-,- _i ; � m� �i THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BYTHE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT �EPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES �IVfSION MAPPING AND DESIGN, NOV, 30, 2011. 11 INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN P/CA 60/11 - SAPPHIRE SWAN VENTURE CORP. � �'t � l� � � �(�� , ; � t i i f � � ._ � S i � � �, d 'J�� '� s, � � �,►� � � ,,� � rn,. , _� -�- �,� , � � �,A�� << � �t , � ,�� ,. r . � ,„,.�, ti _. w �v I � �; °'�1A � P € i `�I � .._. . k � i' � „ ,t � ��._,t � � � + p .� �� ' �.� �r� �.;� ,_ . , , . �, , , �, ,. � � �. � . � , . NORTk1 Cl.E:VF�fI(iii �or amu EA3T E1.EVRT,�JYt j.r, 4' .:"rti ,. ...... . . . . �� W� _k_� Y"' r��ti � � � � �' � � ,�� E ��r� � � � ' i � � � �'i o, � � i,�� x �F�� ' S. i�M,� � 4 h�� 3 i s i��a��k��'''� aa �( ,�i � � � � � �u� �p�� i �� ` i'� �� ,��'' 7, +� ' h',i 21�t�� {��i �;y'" � I ' �� ? P��, ��t ' � ��Y��!•� �p ,.._ � � � � �, I � i ! SOUI-H ELEYA'CION �.. _.: . '._.;_.., uv�ti i'— THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT DEPAR7MENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, NOV. 30, 20t1. C�ty o� Report to �� ' ' Committee of Adjustment �� I KERIN Application Number: PICA 6'f/11 Meeti ng Date: December 21, 2011 From: Rass Pyrn, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 61/11 M. Lisiecka & S. Vaclavinek 735 Abingdon Court (Part Block 5, Plan M-1221, Part 19, 40R-6575) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 1309/81 to permit a side yard width of 0.4 metres and a rear yard depth of 0.9 metres to a newly constructed shed with an attached covered porch, whereas the by-law requires that all accessory structures greater #han 1.8 metres in height have a minimum set back of 1.0 metres from all lot lines. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Department.cansiders the south side yard width of 0.4 metres and a rear yard depth of 0.9 metres to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the praposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the newly constructed shed, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant constructs an eaves trough and gutter off the south side of the roof within the property limits to ensure that rainwater runoff from the shec!'s roof is contained on the subject property and directed away from the south side lot line. 3. That the appiicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by June 22, 2012, or this decision shall becorne null and void. Report P/CA 61/11 Comment: Official Plan and Z�ning By-law December 21, 2011 Page 2 � 3 Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residential — Low Density Area" within the West Shore Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511 as amended by By-law 1309/81 —"S-SD-SA "— Single Detached, Semi-Detached and Single Attached Zone Appropriateness of the Application Accessory Structure Setback Variances • the intent of the zoning by-law in requiring accessory structures to provide a minimum 1.0 metre setback from lot lines is #o ensure that adequate space is available for maintenance, to ensure that the eavesloverhangs do not encroach on the adjacent properties, ensure roof drainage stays on the subject property, and to minimize the visual impact that their location may have on adjacent properties • the south side yard tapers northerly towards the southeast corner of #he shed causing a "pinch-paint" • the south side yard and west rear yard can be maintained • the newly constructed shed daes not appear to create a visual distraction • the applicant will be required to install an eaves trough and gutter on the south side of the roof to ensure rainwater runaff is contained on the property • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Date of report: December 14, 2011 Comments prepared by: c�c.E�- � ��..x - Ashley Ye ood, MCIP, RP Planne AY:RP:Id cotfl/reports/2011/pca67-t l.doc Enclosures � Ross Pym, MCIP, PP Principal Planner — Development Review � R5 INFORMATI4N COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN P/CA 61/11 — M. LISIECKA & S. VACLAVINEK _ _ �.........�_.ri,._ _.,_. _ . , ._...,_, . ._...�:.,_.,.:,a.1�,x a:��.--�.��-�� , . � ,, .. _ __ .�,. _ �.� �.-�--� . — --_____.._.._. _ ._�.,_____. ._ __ �- � . � � �� ' � � EXISTING 2 STOREY 1 �., : ABINGDON � DETACHED DWELLING f �~, COURT i � e EXISTING SHED AND - � COVERED� PORCH �. `''� 3.7�m � � 0. 9 m —� ♦- � �� .,; , o �� ' .� { '.'� R Q.4 m � ," y � r To permit a side yard width of 0.4 metres and a rear yard depth of Q.9 metres to a shed with a covered .-. ,f. ' � �,! -.�.�.�- --- - � 6 s' �,�� Y THIS MAP WAS PRO�UCE� BYTHE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNiNG 8 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MRPPING AND DESIGN, NOV. 30, 2011. 0� � INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN PlCA 61 i11 - M. LISIECKA & S. VACLAVINEK NORTH ELEVATION �.. �� v _ .._ .__... ,-------� ' �------ I � � ' � , I N � i _I COVERED ;PORCH � C�' �. ,� i i � - � �� , ,, ; . a_ _ . ___....____________..___.__ _ . �--- 3.0 m 1.0 m---► EAST ELEVATION _ _ --._... _ __ __� i . , ...:� � � � � SOUTH ELEVATION 11T TS1�5 MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE GITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & �EVELOPMENT OEPARTMENT. PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPlNG AND DESIGN, NOV. 30, 2011. �� Report to ; ; Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 62/11 o� Meeting Date: December 21, 2011 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Cammittee of Adjustment Application P/CA 62/11 K. Tobias 887 Regan Place (Lat 693, Plan M 1 'I ) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520 to permit a west side yard width of 1.7 metres to an existing carport, a north yard setback of a.1 metres and a west yard setback of 4.6 metres to a newly constructed tin shed in the rear yard and to recognize an existing shed located in the side yard having a west ya�d setback of 0.1 metres whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 2.4 metres, all accessory structures to be located in the rear yard, and a minimum accessory structure setback of 1.0 metre to all lat lines. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a zoning compliance for the existing structures and a building permit for the newly constructed tin shed. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Departments considers the west setback of 0.1 metres to the existing shed in the side yard to be a major variance that is not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. And The Planning & Develvpment Departmen# recommends that the application be amended to request a west side yard setback of 0.3 metres to the existing shed in the side yard. The Planning & Development Department considers the existing west side yard width of 1.7 metres to an existing carpork, a north setback of 0.1 metres and a west setback of 0.6 metres to a newly constructed shed in the rear yard, and a west side yard setback of d.3 metres to an existing shed located in the side yard to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping wi#h the general intent and purpose of the �fficia! Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval af the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: Report P/CA 62l11 1� December 21, 2011 Page 2 1. That these variances apply only to the existing carport and accessory structures on the property as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the tin shed by December 20, 2013, or this decision shalf become null and void. Background: Since the mailing of the public notification, the applicant has amended the application to request firva addition variances, an exis#ing shed to be located in the side yard and a west side yard af 0.1 metres to an existing shed. Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residential - Low Density Area" within the Bay Ridges neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2520 —"R4" — Fourth Density Zone Appropriateness of the Application Accessory Structures Setback Variance • the intent of the zoning by-law for accessory structures to provide a minimum 1.0 metre setback from lot lines is to ensure that adequate space is available for maintenance, that the eaves/overhangs do not encroach on adjacent properties, that roof drainage stays on the subject property, and to minimize their visual impact on adjacent properties • the proposed west setback of 0.6 metres to a newly constructed shed provides adequate space for maintenance and does not encroach onto the adjacent property • the proposed north setback af 0.1 metres to a newiy constructed shed allows for the existing mature maple tree on the subject property to be undisturbed, the shed abuts a landscaping area of the abutting property and is located in a well screened area of the lot, therefore there is no visual impact, onto the abutting property to the north • the proposed west side yard setback of fl.1 metres setback to the existing shed in the side yard would not meet the intend of the by-law • an amended west side yard setback of 0.3 metres to the existing shed provides space for maintenance and lot drainage to be provided between property line and existing shed • the intent of the zoning by-law is maintained Report PICA 62/11 Side Yard Variance December 21, 2011 Page 3 � � • the intent of a 2.2 metres minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate buffer space between structures on abutting properties • the side yard width of 1.7 metres to the existing carport is a lor�g standing condition • a side yard width of 1.7 metres provides for adequate buffering between the existing s#ructures on abutting prope�ties •#he intent of the zoning by-law will be maintained Accessory Structure in #he Side Yard Variance • the intent of the requirement to locate detached accessory structures in the rear yard is to maintain the character of the area and to ensure adequate access between the front yard and the rear yard of the lot is provided • a relocated existing side yard shed wauld not obstruct access between the front and rear yards and does not appear to have any adverse impact on the surrounding neighbours or character of the neighbourhood • the intent of the zoning by-law will be maintained Date of report: December 14, 2011 Comments prepared by: � �'�� ;� Mila Yeung `' Planner I MY:RP:Id cofalreparts/2011 /pcafi2-11.tloc Enclosures Ross�, M�P Principal Planner — Development Review C� o permit a west side yard idth of 0.1 to an existing hed 0.1 rn� To pennit a shed to be located in the side yard 1.7 m�— o permit a west side yard idth of 1.7 to an existing rport INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS SUBMITTED PLAN P/CA 62/1'I - K. TOBIAS To permit a 0.6 metre setback to an existing shed To permit a o.1 metre setback to an existing shed �0.6 m 0.1 m Tin �rts�ra o t� !G x 1� x 7"' �orOen o�' Wi�e � � nep�s trra {�ar �u�ztl wn? �w�Ft �Future RarseSho4 � ptS' r IEXISTING �SHED � I �� EXISTING CARPORT EXISTING DETACHED DWELLING ��v�way $.0 fll � REGAN PLACE ��, : �wtj° .. x�a 6m � THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, DEC 5, 2011. �� INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS SUBMITTED PLAN P/CA 62J11 - K. TOBIAS 0 M _ 1, 4.0 m _.��.m.M,....w„____�......�.. �'f Vk 5 T�J� ��l�i �0.6 m� 0.9 m� 0.9 m 0.6 m. �--��,__._____�� _.�_.T.�, ...�_..:. �.,� �..,�-.��..�.._.�.. ---- -,� �iC�� Vi�"� THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BYTHE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVIGES OIVISION MAPPING AND OESIGN, DEC 5, 2011. E 0 c� INFORMATI�N COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN � � P/CA 62/'11 - K. TOBIAS 4.0 m -------- - --- ----� Top Vie�u Q6.m�.._..0.9_m � 0.9 m_ .` 0.6_m, --- __.._.. � ./� � ` . �� ,_..__... � . Sid� Vi�w� THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERIMG PLANNING 8 6EVELOPMENT DEPARTMENF. PL.4NNING INFORMATION SEftVECES DIVISION MAPPlNG ANp DESIGN, DEC. 5, 2011. el�� Report to ; ; Committee of Adjustment 1 KERIN Application Number: P/CA 63/11 '� � Meeting Date: December 21, 2011 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Pfanner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA fi3/11 R. Alli 160'1 Baggins Street (Lat 35, Plan 40M-1441) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zaning By-law 3036 as amended by By-law 2024/85, to permit a rear yard depth of 5.6 metres to a newly constructed roof extension over an existing basement walkout of a detached dwelling unit and to permit a maximum lot coverage of 39 percent for a proposed 9.3 square metre shed in the rear yard, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit and receive zoning compliance for the proposed shed. Recommenda#ion: The Planning & Development Department considers the rear yard depth of 5.6 metres to a newly constructed roof extension over an existing basement walkout of a detached dwelling unit and to permit a maximum lot coverage of 39 percent for a proposed 9.3 square metre shed in the rear yard to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate develapment of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. Thai these variances apply only to the newly constructed roof extension and proposed 9.3 square metre shed, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the roof extension remains unencEosed, or this decision shall become null and void 3. That the applicant obtains a building permit far the newly constructed roof extension and basement stairwell by April 20, 2012, or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 63111 � • �� OfFicial Plan and Zoning By-law December 21, 2011 Page 2 � 5 Pickering (�fficial Plan —"Urban Residential —�ow Densify Area" within the Brock Ridge Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by By-law 2024/85 —"S3" -- Single Detached Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application Rear Yard Depth Variance • the infent of the minimum 7.5 metre rear yard requirement is to ensure that a useable amenity space is provided in the rear yard, and to provide an appropriate buffer space between dwellings on abutting properties • the roof extension over the newly cons#ructed basement walkout will maintain an adequate amenity space in the rear yard of the subject property • the roof extension provides an appropriate buffer space between dwelEings on abutting properties • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Lot Coverage Variance the intent of the maximum building lot coverage requirement is to maintain an appropriate amount of yard space (amenity area) uncovered by buildings on a lot and to regulate the maximum size and mass of buildings on a lot an appropriate amount of yard space uncovered by buildings will continue to be maintained the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Date of report_ December '14, 2011 Comments prepared Ashley r1 AY:RP:Id wfalrepoMS2011/pca63-11 tloG Enciosures .. O,J�/'� Ross Pym, MCIP, PP Principal Planner — Development Review �� MAJ�R OAKS PARK � ALPINE LANE �( U 0 Q � w � 0 U z Q � a. Q _ U City of Pickering PROPERTY DESGRIPTION Lot 35, P18n 40M-1441 OWNER R. Alli F��E tvo. P/CA 63/11 Teranst Entqrpri�s� Inc. onC fb wppll�r�• All rlQhb RN�rv�d. Na Iz w 0 0 w z � � m r r m � O O � � a plan et wnsy. CE/V TENNlAL GARK � � � �I � AVENUE 0 a O � Y U O � m PARK PlCKEFs BAP ilS COMML CHURC ��, ROAr—�— �—r—r—� I Planning & Development Department �ATE NOV 30, 2011 ORAWN BY JB � SCALE 1:S,OOQ CHECKED BY Rp N PN-t 3 INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN P/CA 63/11 - R. ALLI �? BAGGINS STREET �„�� r ..-u.... . _ 10.2 m � � w � � � Q U � � Q � W � -� 2.7 m �� F � 11 �, 5.6 m � � To permit a maximum lot coverage of 39 percent EXISTING ROOF EXTEIVSION THIS MAP WAS PRODUGED BYTHE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPINGAN� DESiGN, NOV, 30, 2011. �� INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN P/CA 63/11 - R. ALLI M,,.._.....�_._..__......__.._.,.....,........._.__.; ...�_. I , EKISTING BASEMEN WALKOUT I�--2,4 m --�i E � � EXISTING ROOF EXTENSION 7HIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, P�ANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING AND pE51GN, NOV. 30, 2011. INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLiCANT'S SUBMITTED PIAN P/CA 63/11 - R. ALLt �., .... :;� _... ... _...�i ( _. ; +. ; l.,�i I i , i E � I N ! I � i j i � I i, ��+..., �._ I , I ' f � � , i � ; � �y ..._.i 1 ��.. . . .,...> .�_...,..... i `i S � ----- 2.4 m -� � EXISTiNG RQOF EXTENSION EXISTING POST �� THIS•MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE GITY OF PIGKERING PLAtJNING 8 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNlNG INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, NOV. 30, 20�1. 3� 1NFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN P/CA 63/11 - R. ALLI h . - �` - _,. �... ... i" �� ...-'" ,......,.�., „a,. �. .%' .�'r l � �. . .. !"`� �. .� SHED ELEVATION `f.` 1.9 m N THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVEL6PMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING tNFDRMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING ANO DESIGN, NOV. 30, 2011