The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMay 4, 2011�m m �ttep �t � . Committee of Adjustment Agenda Wednesday, May 4, 2011 7:00 pm Main Committee Room (I) ��) Adoption of Agenda Adoption of Minutes from April 13, 2011 (III) Reports 1. P/CA 13/11 — J. & J. Ross 1843 Woodview Avenue (Part Lot 12, Plan 282, Part 1, 40R-16115) City of Pickering 2. P/CA 14/11 — Chirolion Urban Corporation 1505 —1525 Kingston Road (Block 36, Plan 4�M-2089) City of Pickering 3. P/CA 15/11 — PLVB. Inc. 503 Kingston Road (Part Lot 30, Broken Front Concession, Range 3, Part Lot 30, Part 1, 40R-4825) City of Pickering (IV) Adjournment Page Number 1-6 7-10 11-14 15-19 ACC�551�J�e For information related to accessibility requirements please contact + Lesley Dunne P I C K E F� L�N � T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 TTY 905.420.1739 Email Idunne@cityofpickering.com ��i o¢� Pending Adoption Present: Tom Copeland David Johnson Eric Newton Bill Utton Shirley Van Steen Also Present: Ross Pym, Secretary-Treasurer Mila Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer (I) (II) Adoption of Aqenda Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Shirley Van Steen Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:00 pm Main Committee Room That the agenda for the Wednesday, April 13, 2011 meeting be adopted. Carried Unanimously Adoption of Minutes Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Tom Copeland That the minutes of the 4th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, March 23, 2011 be adopted. Carried David Johnson, Committee Chair acknowledged the presents of Bill McLean, Regional Councillor Ward 2. Councillor McLean welcomed the new Committee Members and wished them all the best for the next four years. 1 �? 1 C�� o� Q2 (III) Reports 1. P/CA 10/11 — T. Kerr 1731 Spruce Hill Road (Part Lot 30, Plan 820, Part 1, 40R-9425) City of Pickering Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:00 pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to permit an existing north side yard width of 0.3 metre and a proposed south side yard width of 1.0 metre to a proposed addition onto the detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval for the existing north side yard width subject to conditions and refusal for the proposed south side yard width. Written comments were also received from the City's Chief Building Official expressing several concerns with the application; the appropriateness, feasibility and practicality of saving the south wall of the existing one storey garage through underpinning of the south wall to suit the proposed rear basement, the proximity of the neighbouring building and the potential of undermining adjacent foundations, a professional engineer must be retained to address all building design and construction which exceeds the scope of Part 9 of the Ontario Building Code and the applicant should provide full details regarding the existing site conditions and the proposed construction procedures where adjacent properties may be impacted. In the absence of this information, it would be inadvisable to approve this application for a building permit or a minor variance Kevin Washington, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Kevin Washington explained the existing south wall of the garage will be maintained and will be using the existing garage foundation for the proposed addition. 2 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:00 pm Main Committee Room In response to questions from Committee Members, the Secretary-Treasurer indicated all Committee of Adjustment Notices are circulated to Fire Services for comment. Fire Services also reviews building permits and the building permits must meet Fire Code requirements. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Bill Utton That application P/CA 10/11 by T. Kerr, be Approved on the grounds that the existing north side yard width of 0.3 metre is a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and zoning by-law, subject to the following conditions: 1 'r_: That this variance apply only to the existing dwelling unit, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this applicati�n. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by April 12, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void. And That application P/CA 10/11 by T. Kerr, be Refused on the grounds that the south side yard width of 1.0 metre to the proposed addition onto the detached dwelling is a major variance that is undesirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-�aw. Vote Tom Copeland David Johnson Eric Newton Bill Utton Shirley Van Steen in favour in favour in favour in favour opposed Carried [c3 Q� i� � C�� o� 2. P/CA 11/11 — N. Williams 1614 Burnside Drive (Lot 10, 40M-1603) City of Pickering Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:00 pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by By-law 2922/88 to permit a lot coverage of 47 percent and a rear yard depth of 4.3 metres to a proposed house addition, whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent and a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the new detached dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval for the existing lot cover and refusal for lot coverage and rear yard depth to a proposed house addition. Written comments were received from the City's Development Control Manager expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority having no objection to the application. John Lewandowski, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. John Lewandowski explained the proposed addition will be a glass enclosure to the existing desk and the enclosure will not be heated. John Lewandowski also indicated there is a similar enclosure just west of the subject property. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Bill Utton That application P/CA 11/11 by N. Williams, be Refused on the grounds that the lot coverage of 47 percent and a rear yard depth of 4.3 metres to a proposed house addition are major variances that are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. And That application P/CA 11/11 by N. Williams, be Approved on the grounds that the existing lot coverage of 40 percent to the existing dwelling is a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. Carried Unanimously :� C�� o� 3. P/CA12/11 — H. Kok 673 Front Road (Part Lot 4, Block E, Plan 65) City of Pickering Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:00 pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit an existing lot area of 361 square metres and a front yard depth of 6.0 metres to a proposed stairway of a proposed detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 460 square metres and front yard depth of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the new detached dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Helen Kok, owner, was present t� represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Tom Copeland That application P/CA 12/11 by H. Kok, be Approved on the grounds that the existing lot area of 361 square metres and a front yard depth of 6.0 metres to a proposed stairway of a proposed detached dwelling are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1 2 That these variances apply only to the proposed new dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this application. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by April 12, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 5 Q� n� (IV) Adiournment Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Eric Newton Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:00 pm Main Committee Room That the 5th meeting of 2011 the Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:18 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, May 4, 2011. Carried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretary-Treasurer 0 ,,,.. , w ��i; _�� , _� , . ,.� , ,,,, s-� �� ,_.��! �_��_ From Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 13/11 Meeting Date: May 4, 2011 Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 13/11 J. & J. Ross 1843 Woodview Avenue (Part Lot 12, Plan 282, Part 1, 40R-16115) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to permit a front yard depth of 5.1 metres to a proposed covered porch, whereas the by-law requires 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed house addition and covered porch. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Department considers the proposed front yard depth of 5.1 metres to a proposed covered porch be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this apply only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this application. 2. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by May 3, 2013 or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant prepares, to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering, a tree preservation/tree planting plan for the trees in the front yard of the subject property by November 4, 2011. �� Report P/CA 13/11 Background: May 4, 2011 Page 2 The notice of the public meeting indicated that the applicant requested a relief from the by-law for a front yard depth of 4.1 metres to a proposed addition onto the side and front of the existing detached dwelling. Since the mailing of the notice, the Planning & Development department has deterrnined that the proposed steps to the proposed covered porch is permitted under a encroachment provision of the by-law. Therefore, the revised front yard depth is 5.1 metres to the proposed covered porch rather than the initial 4.1 metres to the proposed steps projecting from the porch. Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residential Area — Low Density Areas" within the Highbush Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 —"R4" — Fourth Density Residential Appropriateness of the Application • the intent of the front yard depth requirement is to provide an adequate bufFer space between street activity and to provide an adequate landscaped area in the front of the property • the proposed 5.1 metre front yard depth to the proposed covered porch would maintain the neighbourhood character on Woodview Avenue, provide an appropriate buffer space and provide an adequate landscaped area within the front yard of the property • it is noted that the neighbourhood character on the east side of Woodview Avenue is well treed therefore, the owner should do all things possible to preserve the existing front yard trees • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained with a 5.1 metres front yard depth Date of report: April 28, 2011 Comments prepared by: �� Mila Yeu Planner I MY:RP:Id �o�arewn:rzoi v�.� a� i i. m� Enclosures � O-� � Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Go��o�� o�o P1NE GROVE PARK 777 � PINE WEST LANE > 0 0 0 � GRCVE SANDHURST AVENUE w� > � 0 0 0 0 � Y U O .7 � 0 w z � � m Y Q O J PWE GROVE u� �� w �9 o� TRANQUIL CRT Y W � �7 �CREEK � �DRIVE WESTCREEK �%4LLEYI/IEI� PUBUC SCHOOL PARK . 1 II I BUTTERNUT CRT � O V— NIIIIIIII �� . �i 11 11�� 111 City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Part Lot 12, Pian 282. 40R-16115, Part 1 w OWNER .1. & J. ROSS DATE April 11, 2011 DRAWN BY �B �/� FILE No. P/CA 13/11 SCALE 1:5,000 CHECKED 8Y RP � Te�on�elr�En[erpneea Ine Ond iti euppli!/S. All �igM1b Reamved. Not a plan o! ,�.��r. PN-10 2�05 MPAC antl I[s fu0011e�e. NII np�ta RaseN00. Na[ a plan al Survey____ _ �� W � W � � w � � � � , , Information Compiled from ApplicanYs Submitted Plan P/CA 13/11 J. 8� J. Ross To permit a front yard depth of 5.1 metres 1 5.1m�� PROPOSED ADDITION ,. _. , -,�' �.�� + � i v i I ; � ' ; � '�'� � ` i� ' � .� �' I �° N �; � ' � ,��, - 1 "� � i k , i � � :i��i�;'� ' �I � i�i„.; � � � �, _ --; - 67.1 m � EXISTI NG DWELLING 66,S�n _ _ ca � =�li � � This map wes produced by the Ciry oi Pickering Planning 8 Development Depariment, Planning Information Services Mapping and Design, Apr. 13, 2011. Reporfi to Committee of Adjustment � � Application Number: P/CA 14/11 Meeting Date: May 4, 2011 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 14/11 Chirolion Urban Corporation 1505 — 1525 Kingston Road (Block 36, Plan 40M-2089) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5891/01 to permit a condominium apartment building with a portion of the building having a maximum building height of 10.0 metres and 3-storeys and a portion of the building having a maximum building height of 35.0 metres and 12-storeys, whereas the by-law requires a minimum building height of 16.0 metres and 6-storeys and a maximum building height of 35.0 metres and 10-storeys. The applicant also requests relief to amend the definition of "Multiple Dwelling — Vertical" to allow a townhouse building containing three or more dwelling units attached horizontally but not all of which are attached vertically and to allow a minimum building height of 10.0 metres and 3-storeys for a portion of the townhouse building, whereas the by-law defines "Multiple Dwelling — Vertical" as having a building containing three or more dwelling units attached horizontally and vertically by an above grade wall or walls, or an above grade floor or floors or both. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain Site Plan approval. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Department considers a minimum building height of 10.0 metres and 3-storeys and a maximum building height of 35.0 metres and 12-storeys to a proposed condominium apartment building and a minimum building height of 10.0 metres and 3-storeys to a partially stacked townhouse block, and the definition of "Multiple Dwelling — Vertical" to allow a townhouse building containing three or more dwelling units attached horizontally but not all of which are attached vertically to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: �� Report P/CA 14/11 May 4, 2011 Page 2 1. That these variances appiy only to the proposed condominium apartment building and a partially stacked townhouse block, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this application. 2. That Minor Variance Application P/CA 02109 becomes null and void. 3. That the applicant obtains a Site Plan Approval and a building permit for the proposed construction by May 4, 2014, or this decision shall become null and void. Background The Committee of Adjustment in January 2009 approved application P/CA 02/09 for the subject property that was based on a different development design. The Committee authorized minor variances to recognize a height reduction to 13.1 metres and 5-storeys and to permit portions of a proposed 6 and 10-storey condominium apartment building to have a 0.0 metre setback from the main wall of the building along Kingston Road. Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan —"Mixed-Use Areas — Downtown Core" within the Town Centre Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by By-law 5891/01 — RMM-3 — Multi-Residential Mixed Use Zone Appropriateness of the Application Reduction in Height Variance • the intent of the minimum height requirement is to help ensure the provision of the required residential density, building massing and to establish a "downtown" character for the site • the height reduction to 10.0 metres and 3-storeys will not compromise the site's potential to meet the density objectives of the zoning by-law as it only applies to a small portion of the front of the main building • the proposed 3-storey height to the partially stacked-towrihouse block provides a more appropriate transition between the proposed 12-storey building and existing low-rise residential buildings along Avonmore Square Rep�rt P/CA 14/11 May 4, 2011 Page 3 � 3 • the location of the partially stacked-townhouse block at a reduced minimum height of 3-storeys will not negatively impact the intended character of the neighbourhood • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Increased Number of Stories Variance • the intent of maximum storey requirement is to ensure the residential density and building massing is adhered to as well as avoid site overdevelopment • despite increasing the number of stories from 10 to 12, the applicant proposes to maintain the maximum building height of 35.0 metres • the proposed 12-storey building will not negatively impact the intended character of the neighbourhood • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained "Multiple-Dwelling Vertical" Definition Variance • the intent of the definition of "Multiple-Dwelling Vertical" is to ensure a variety of built form and to encourage multi-storey development associated with mid rise development projects • a portion of the townhouse block will provide stacked townhouses and therefore comply with the definition, while some of the townhouse units will not be stacked townhouses are commonly integrated with mid rise development projects the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Date of report: April 28, 2011 Co�nments prepared by: Planner I AY:RP:Id r�r�reponsizoi vp�eia-i i eo� Enclosures � � / �. G/�� _ � Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Information Compiled from Appiicant's Submitted Plan P/CA 14111 Chirolion Urban Corporation _, � ' To permit a minimum -- ^ building height of 10 metres �_ _ . ` ard 3 storeys �5 �t��ST�N R�,�'�t T - - : s _. ..�,.:.;.�. _._._ K.. � . . ��n r ... . . '_. _.; �_ � . .�i�' _'' - . , _. . �, . '.:_ _... J'-U�. a.;.�,-;' . - " �p' a —. �� .r� �1^9 � �,!'� � A �i�tl�`•�?, J% . �^,+[ �r ., �- _+.- _. . .. ��.�. ..-- " .. . � , �.�+�''�� "� � Y.�� F ywo��/'� ...-.. e' .:-�- ��+ �i n - '� .. _.lr �__ _ ... . . " . � �� t � �r _ �y' ..... "�� ';- .�-. - +'"' I � -''�� ...,w'��^' " �" `r ' �� - .0 �!• .._��`°�+ Y�."�c��' �� g Y�: �-~'`"-- L ,�� „�Y---t�' :�.�« „ 3 STOREYS ,�, ��y�^ �. } le-� � t :i 1 i). A. y��d �'$�.%. �w�€ N•.'.E $ Y'� 3i �..�1�" =.^'�:.Fr`.-.�' l .'3..0�� .. . . O•� �. "� �•�k..e:F �otg, � � �. , �.- /i� ` {� '. ,�`�,r ,� r � , �: ,. . � _ � .., ._ ,� c _ a�� - �9.. � dr�p C!7 .. . . _. . ` , _ .,. � To permit a minimum building height of 10 metres and 3 storeys •. f.'."lJxY , J -'� " / t c� , � ! A i.-� � .. i `�/ , X,` v �� "_- ' To permit a maximum ^"` building height of 35 "`,�� , .�-� � metres and 12 � r, Rr � � , storeys �'Nk � � . � Q . � , � ',,.:A ; r� , '� �6� To permit Multiple Dwelling- �;r Vertical containing three or � `� � more dwelling units attached ^ horizontally but not all of '-' which are attached vertically , jY This map was produced by Ihe City of Pickering Planning 8 Development Department, Planning Information Services Mapping and Design, Apc 7$ 2017. �� Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PlCA 15/11 Meeting Date: May 4, 2011 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 15/11 PVLB Inc. 503 Kingston Road (Part Lot 30, Broken Front Concession, Range 3, Part Lot 30, Part 1, 40R-4825) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2030/85: • to permit a front yard depth of 7.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 13.5 metres • to permit a flankage side yard width of 7.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires minimum flankage side yard width of 12.0 metres • to permit a parking requirement of 3.0 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross floor area, whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 5.5 parking spaces for each 93 square metres of gross floor area • to permit a minimum parking space area of 13.7 square metres (2.6 metres by 5.3 metres), whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking space area of 15.95 square metres • to permit a gravel surface parking area, whereas the by-law requires all parking areas to be paved The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit and site plan approval for the proposed site expansion. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Department considers the front yard depth of 7.0 metres, a flankage side yard width of 7.0 metres, a parking requirement of 3.0 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross floor area, and a minimum parking space area of 13.7 square metres (2.6 metres by 5.3 metres), to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed site expansion, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans with this application. Report P/CA 15l11 May 4, 2011 Page 2 � 7 2. That the application obtains a site plan approval for the proposed development by May 3, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by May 3, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void. . � The Planning & Development Department considers a gravel surface for parking areas to be a major variance that is not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan —"Mixed Use Areas — Mixed Corridors" within the Rougemount Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by By-law 2030/85 —"CA3-1" Appropriateness of the Application Front Yard Depth and Flankage Side Yard Width Variances • the intent of the front yard and flankage side yard setback requirements are to provide an adequate buffer space between street activity and to provide an adequate landscaped area in the front and side yards of the property • the 7.0 metre front yard depth and flankage side yard width will have no adverse impact on the streetscape • the front yard depth and flankage side yard width of 7.0 metres will provide adequate buffer space and an landscaped area within the front and side of the property • the intent of the zoning by-law will be maintained Parking Ratio and Parking Space Variances • the intent of the parking ratio is to ensure adequate parking is provided onsite to support the site uses • the intent of the minimum parking space area is designed to allow a vehicle to move in and out easily of a space in order to promote safe and efficient vehicular movement on the private property Report P/CA 15/11 � May 4, 2011 Page 3 • the proposed parking ratio of 3.0 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross floor area appears to be adequate and appropriate for this specific development of a vehicle sales or rental establishment use • the proposed parking space area of a minimum 13.7 square metres (2.6 metres by 5.3 metres) represents the current requirement of a minimum parking space area of 2.6 metres by 5.3 metres, and therefore will have no adverse impact on the site function and operation • the intent of the zoning by-law will be maintained Gravel Surface Parking Area Variance • the intent of the paved parking area is for the protection and preservation of infrastructures, such as sewers, and to better control fugitive emissions from impacting the natural environment • a paved parking area allows for the ease of maintenance and the maintenance of an attractive site appearance • the gravel surfacing is easily moved by the natural and human forces into infrastructures and onto other properties, therefore the proposed gravel surface parking area would not allow for the protection and preservation of infrastructures and properties • the intent of the zoning by-law will not be maintained Date of report: April 28, 2011 Comments prepared by: r��" � Mila Yeung Planner I MY:RP:�d cofa/reports/2�11 i pce15-11.tlac Enclosures ��J� � Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review 1� z� � � H b ,r •� d� � �g�� . *� � d� � a QQ�f. N Information compiled from applicants submitted plan - PCA 15/11 PLVB Inc. A' `J�fi • op,0 ��'- sr s` �R „` � �__� � <' � � �' . �9 yo° �„ a9¢ / 5� � N51. � 1 ' Q To permit afront 8�� °sy9 �- � `9 '�s� 4�� g 4 sy� 4°' 9g` yard depth of 7.0 To p�1'mit a ,°"`�-""`�� flankage side '~ �rd width of 7.0 �� a metres � \ 0 \ �l I 0 W Iu � I � �� ul G o �I � � 91I � k '" �W d �V I " 4T li B�' V " m° �� p u" °� q ii l ¢, To permit parking ' spaces of 2.6. met�es + by 5.3 metres(13i78 � �L square metres) b a u a m i� " W � 0 �, � � s �� d N _--�� a �Q s > � m � �� p n✓ � a N u �� u � � w�1, pF � u u � � N u- X II Y 0 iV � � p� n / 5 �S N • � \� vEWUiE. �-� �"mf y / / !,{MI✓J � VY�"(N� GAIEPOSI .� ; � � � �� .,,,n.,� � :;, � � � ,� LA��R�..,e��, � q� �----G1�S�'CAY AREA / i x r � l � i � � 5 / I T �+ �`,"p+'� � � I 'S«�� , � rza. I __°�`____—. � �_s �_ II— �' �—�_ � �k �--- �°' �� , �--� i i x-'� — �. �--� i g ' �iI .i:; �-- i � �� I___ j �`�� . � � a _— � .s.�w� " �rdRose — — � � A I--- � ��p�ICKfRINGVOtKSYJAGON � i I Y%lSUNG CONCNGIE 6UILDINf � — �� I _ f o � -� � , o I—__ 'l � � ( -- � r; _�� -- � � �� 1 Y��jj/�� ' �--- � 6£W.y1MM•IW.6} I� 1 . . � a., I �--- a . . ,,. I___ �E � q �___ � , �--- i i i i i i i i I__ (�� i i i i i i i i i i�i �;'� v,:9 i i i i i i i i i i is G;A�—�-- � � i_ i__i i_�_�_1 1 ��9 i�qi'�r r � � i-r� i i i � ��r �a �-- C�J I I I I I I""V°z".°Y�SL°�M I I � �8 JJ I I i I I I I"i T" I I I � � I I I I I I I I I I I.I � �/ I--- -� , ,� � � 1- � �.; , o� I U �� - � � MPOUND � yta� `�oi�� a" � � P�l NZGN �oi � To permit a gravel � surfaceforthe proposed automotiv� compound area I e �' / / To permit a parking standard of 3 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross floor area � � 7hls moo wvs piaduced by the Clty o/ Plckenng, P/anning & Oevelopment Oeparfinenf, /nlcrmoGan & Suppoif Services. Apr ]5, 2011