Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD 29-11 Ctrs 00 Report To Council PICKERII V Report Number: PD 29-11 Date: September 19, 2011 59 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 11-001/P Proposed. Neighbourhood Plan for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 .Ontario Realty Corporation Part of Lots 19, 20 and 21, Concession 3 Part of Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21, Concession 4 Part of Lots 17-34, Concession 5 City.of Pickering Recommendations: 1. That Council endorse the Neighbourhood Plans for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21, as set out in Appendix I to this Report, subject to the City being satisfied with the completion of the Fiscal Impact Study, the Amendment (Update) to the Master Environmental Servicing Plan, the Neighbourhood Functional Servicing and Stormwater Reports and the Staged Servicing and Implementation Strategy; 2. That staff be authorized to continue to work collaboratively with Infrastructure Ontario and its consultant, planningAlliance, to address any new issues that arise respecting the Neighbourhood Plans; and should any substantive . refinements be made to any of these Plans, that staff be directed to again seek Council's endorsement of that Plan; and 3. Further, that the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PD 29-11 to Infrastructure Ontario, the Ministry of Infrastructure, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Regional Municipality of Durham, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and the Seaton Landowners Group. Executive Summary: The Minutes of Settlement for the Seaton Conformity Amendment entered into on February 7, 2011, between the Seaton Landowners, the Province of Ontario, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the City of Pickering required Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) now known as Infrastructure Ontario (10) to submit Neighbourhood Plans for their lands within Seaton, being Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 (see Attachment #1). Report PD 29-11 Date: September 19, 2011 Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 11-001/P Page 2 1 y 1 i In March 2011, 10 submitted an amendment to incorporate Neighbourhood Plans 17, 20 and 21 into the Pickering Official Plan. The three Neighbourhood Plans use a similar approach to the policies and schedules as Seaton Neighbourhood Plans 16, 18 and 19 endorsed by Council on April 26, 2011. Minor revisions were incorporated to: add 2031 population and employment targets; delete unnecessary policies that duplicate the parent Seaton Conformity OPA; revise the Seaton Natural Heritage System designation on the Schedules to encompass all features, buffers and corridors; and add new policies to reflect provincial, regional and agency comments. Accordingly, Neighbourhood Plans for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 are attached to this Report. It is recommended that Council endorse the three Neighbourhood Plans at this time, subject to the completion of various other reports and on-going consultation with 10. Should any substantive refinements to any of these documents be needed, staff will again seek Council's endorsement of that document. Financial Implications: None from adopting the recommendations. Sustainability Implications: The three Neighbourhood Plans are consistent with the Neighbourhood Plans and City's Conformity Amendment previously endorsed by Council on April 26, 2011. Collectively, the Neighbourhood Plans in concert with the Sustainable Place-Making Guidelines will result in development that reflects a higher level of sustainability than generally occurs in suburban greenfield development. 1.0 Background: 1.1 Council executed the Minutes of Settlement and entered into an Agreement Respecting the Conformity Amendment On February 7, 2011, Council executed Minutes of Settlement with the Seaton Landowners Group, ORC, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH). The parties to the i Settlement have agreed to seek the approval of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) of the Seaton Conformity OPA at a hearing currently scheduled for January 16, 2012. As part of the Minutes of Settlement, 10 agreed to submit Neighbourhood Plans for their main land holdings within Seaton, being Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 (see Attachment #1). The City, with the assistance of its multi-disciplinary consulting team led by Sorensen Gravely Planning Associates Inc., has prepared Neighbourhood Plans for developer-owned lands being Seaton Neighbourhoods 16, 18 and 19. Report PD 29-11 Date: September 19, 2011 Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 11-001/P Page 3 61 1.2 Council endorsed the Neighbourhood Plans for Seaton Neighbourhoods 16, 18 and 19, as set out in Report PD 14-11 On April 26, 2011, Council considered the recommendations of Report PD 14-11, which in part dealt with Seaton Neighbourhoods 16, 18 and 19. As part of the Report's consideration, discussion ensued respecting matters of Regional infrastructure and land uses around the Hamlet of Whitevale. Subsequently, Council endorsed the Neighbourhood Plans 16, 18 and 19 and added a new clause as follows: "3.b) that staff be directed to further explore: refinements further limiting or relocating uses presently proposed in the Hamlet Heritage Open Space to lands outside the Hamlet Heritage Open Space; including the western extension and bridge over West Duffins Creek for the Whitevale By-pass in the first phase of the Seaton development; and discuss opportunities for sanitary sewers for Whitevale residents." Correspondence has been forwarded to the MMAH and the Region of Durham requesting a meeting to discuss these matters. At this time, Council's Resolution would not effect 10's Neighbourhood Plans. Staff will be reporting back on the provincial and regional responses. 2.0 Comments received on the Draft Amendments 2.1 At the June 6, 2011 Information Meeting (see text of Information Report 12-11 and Meeting Minutes, Attachments #2 and #3) No members of the public appeared in support or opposition to the application. 2.2 Agency Comments Ministry of Municipal Affairs . no objection and Housing . revisions to the Neighbourhood Plans suggested (see Attachment #4) Toronto and Region . no objection (see Attachment #5) Conservation Authority Bell • no objection • revisions to the Neighbourhood Plans suggested (see Attachment #6) Durham District and Catholic no objection (see Attachment #7) School Boards Durham Region Planning no objection Department • revisions to the Neighbourhood Plans suggested (see Attachment #8) ~Ryort PD 29-11 Date: September 19, 2011 Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 11-001/P Page 4 3.0 Discussion: 3.1 Draft Neighbourhood Plans 17, 20 and 21 have been prepared in conformity with the Seaton Conformity OPA and are consistent with the policy and schedule approach used for the other Seaton Neighbourhood Plans The draft Neighbourhood Plans prepared by 10's consultant, planningAlliance has used the City's Neighbourhood Plan format as a template to prepare its draft Neighbourhood Plans. A consistent policy and schedule approach has resulted in a similar block plan level of detail that, among other matters include: • policies addressing mixed use areas gateways, high intensity employment nodes, variations in minimum and maximum residential densities and housing form, significant cultural resources, and Regional facilities, and • schedules identifying the location of village greens, neighbourhood park, district park, trail network, elementary schools, high school, recreational centre, pedestrian prominent streets, potential transit stations, District Energy location and stormwater ponds 3.2 Revisions have been incorporated into the draft Neighbourhood Plans 17, 20 and 21 to address the comments received Staff has been working collaboratively with 10 and its consultant plan ningAlliance to refine the Neighbourhood Plans to address the comments received from circulation as well as the comments made by Council at the June 6th public meeting. In addition, general revisions to the Neighbourhood Plans have been incorporated to be consistent with the approach used in Neighbourhood Plans 16, 18 and 19 and include: adding 2031 targets for population and employment; deleting policies that duplicate the parent Seaton Conformity OPA; revising the Seaton Natural Heritage System designation on the Schedules to encompass all features, buffers and corridors; adding policies respecting road access, pedestrian and bicycle systems. Further, staff and 10 have agreed to specific policy revisions in the Neighbourhood Plans as follows: Neighbourhood 17: • revision to policy 12.19(a) recognizing that the precise location of the future GO Train Station has yet to be finalized through an environmental assessment; and therefore, requires that Metrolinx be consulted in regards to any development in the Mixed Corridor blocks located south of Taunton Road • revision to policy 12.19(b) modifying the Mixed Corridor Type 2 policy to be consistent with other similar Neighbourhood Plan policies and, as a result, will require a higher density vertical multi-residential housing form along Taunton Road • revision to policy 12.19(g) requiring the locations of local roads constructed through the Seaton Natural Heritage System to be subject to an environmental assessment process ~I j Report PD 29-11 Date: September 19, 2011 Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 11-001/P Page 5 63 Neighbourhood 20: • revision to policy 12.220) requiring a proponent, prior to submitting draft plans of subdivision on lands adjacent to the Brougham Pioneer Christian Cemetery, to seek confirmation from the Brougham United Church to acquire additional lands in the area of the current cemetery, or not, as described in the Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) • new policy 12.22(k) recognizing that the location of a District Energy facility within Neighbourhood Plan 20 is conceptual and will be confirmed through a feasibility assessment study in consultation with the landowners and utility providers • revision to the Schedule to change the Mixed Corridor Type 1 to Mixed Corridor Type 2 to permit higher density housing forms • revision to the Schedule to relocate the elementary school from the northwest portion of the Medium Density Area to the east side of "Old" Brock Road • revision to the Schedule to adjust the local and collector road network to reflect the Region's proposed road realignment in the north end of the neighbourhood Neighbourhood 21: • revision to policy 12.23(e) requiring the City to cooperate with the Province and the Region of Durham in identifying appropriate sites for a future regional works depot and a transit depot outside of the first phase of lands designated Prestige Employment Area. The location of these facilities within the first phase would establish an undesirable urban tone for these strategic lands. Alternate employment locations are more appropriately considered outside the first phase of employment land development. The waste transfer station was deleted as this use is specifically prohibited within the Prestige Employment Area policies of the Seaton Conformity OPA With the above revisions, staff is recommending that Council endorse these plans for Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 subject to the City being satisfied with the completion of the Fiscal Impact Study, the Amendment (Update) to the Master Environmental Servicing Plan, the Neighbourhood Functional Servicing and Stormwater Reports and the Staged Servicing and Implementation Strategy. This recommendation is consistent with Council's previous endorsement of Neighbourhood Plans 16, 18 and 19. 3.3 Infrastructure Ontario has submitted a draft plan of subdivision application for a portion of the Prestige Employment lands With Council's endorsement of Infrastructure Ontario's Neighbourhood Plans, staff will now be in a position to consider the draft plan of subdivision that has recently been submitted by 10 for 80 hectares of prestige employment land located between Sideline 26 and Sideline 22 as the first phase of employment development. A public meeting on the application will be scheduled for later this year. Report PD 29-11 Date: September 19, 2011 Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 11-001/P Page 6 4.0 The OMB has scheduled the hearing of the Seaton appeals on January 16, 2012 The Seaton Landowners have appealed their official plan amendment, draft plan of subdivision, and zoning by-law amendment applications to the OMB. It is expected that 10 will also appeal their Neighbourhood Plans to the OMB to consolidate these appeals with the Landowner appeals. The hearing of the Seaton appeals is currently scheduled to commence on January 16, 2012. A phased hearing is anticipated. Phase One will determine conformity of the Seaton OPA to the CPDP and approval of the six Neighbourhood Plans. Subsequently, Phase Two will determine approval of the proposed Plans of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendments. Appendix: Appendix I: Neighbourhood Plans for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 Attachments: 1. Map of Seaton Neighbourhoods 2. Text of Information Report 12-11 3. Minutes from June 6, 2011 Planning & Development Committee Meeting 4. Agency Comments - the Ministry of Ministry Affairs and Housing 5. Agency Comments - the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 6. Agency Comments - Bell 7. Agency Comments - Durham District and Catholic School Boards 8. Agency Comments - Region of Durham Planning Department Report PD 29-11 Date: September 19, 2011 Official Plan Amendment Application O.PA 11-001/P Page 7 65 Prepared By: Approved / Endorsed By: Grant McGregor, MCIP, Y P Neil Carr nini', RPP Principal Planner. - Policy Director, g & Development Catherine Rose, MCIP, PP Manager, Policy GM:jf Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Coun '1 /Z' 2-011 Tony Prevedel Chief Administrative Officer 66 Appendix I to Report PD 29-11 I Neighbourhood Plans for Seaton. Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 1 7.22 Adding Policies and Schedule for Neighbourhood 17: 67 Brock-Taunton as follows: III NEIGHBOURHOOD 17: BROCK-TAUNTON Description • Is bound by the Seaton Natural Heritage System to the north, west and east, and the C.P.R. railway to the south • Is in the southeast corner of the Seaton Urban Area • Is planned to have a range of uses and land use densities, including the potential for commercial, and a variety of residential built-forms with densities ranging from mixed use to high density • Taunton Road and Brock Road are the main spines running through the neighbourhood • A future GO Train Station, on the Belleville CP Rail line, is proposed to be integrated into the Neighbourhood • The Mixed Corridor at Taunton Road and Brock Road forms the heart of the neighbourhood. This intersection is to be designed as a compact, dense area comprised of gateway residential sites on three of the four corners of the intersection, with at grade commercial uses. This area shall serve the day-to-day commercial needs of nearby residents, and of travelers who pass along Taunton Road and Brock Road Neighbourhood Population Target 2031 Population Target 5,500 CITY POLICY Brock-Taunton Neighbourhood Policies 12.19 City Council, (a) recognizes that the precise location of the GO Train Station has yet to be finalized through an environmental assessment. As such, City Council shall encourage development in the Mixed Corridor blocks south of Taunton Road to proceed in consultation with Metrolinx and be coordinated with the Environmental Assessment; j Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 2 68 (b) shall as per section 11.5, establish and apply one of two. additional subcategories (Mixed Corridors Type 2) to those set out in Tables 2 and 6 in the Mixed Corridors subcategory as follows: (i) Mixed Corridors Type 2 with a minimum density of 60 units net hectare and a maximum density of 180 units per net hectare provided the overall density of lands within the Mixed Corridors Type 2, within each draft plan of subdivision, is no more than 140 units per net hectare; (c) shall, as per section 11.6, identify Gateway Sites within the Mixed Corridors Type 2 subcategory, which shall: (i) be reserved for apartment buildings at or near the highest density and height permission; (ii) have the maximum height and density determined at the site plan approval stage after submission of appropriate massing and sun-shadow drawings to demonstrate compatibility with adjacent housing; (iii) permit interim uses as per section 11.8; (iv) require applicants to submit a development concept and intensification plan illustrating interim and final plans to accommodate intensification over time and ultimate build-out, in accordance to section 11.8; and (v) require the size of Gateway sites to be determined at the draft plan stage; (d) shall, along Taunton Road and Brock Roads which are both Type A Arterial roads, not permit direct access to lots but will encourage the Region to allow for full movement intersections at the locations shown on Schedule X Neighbourhood 17: Brock-Taunton and allow for right-in/right-out intersections at a shorter intersection spacing in order to promote walkability and connectivity; (e) shall require applicants for draft plan of subdivision approval to. identify and integrate appropriate setbacks from buildings to utility and rail corridors; Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 3 69 (0 shall establish a pedestrian and bicycle systems Plan for the neighbourhood which is illustrated on Schedule X Neighbourhood 17: Brock-Taunton and consists of the road network, bikeways, trails and trailheads. Further detail on how cyclists will be accommodated in the road network shall be set out in the Sustainable Place-Making Guidelines; (g) shall recognize that the locations of: (i) local roads constructed through the Seaton Natural Heritage System will be subject to satisfying the Environmental Assessment process; (ii) local roads and village greens may be refined though the draft plans of subdivision without an amendment to this Plan provided the location, size and layout are consistent with . the design intent shown on Schedule X Neighbourhood 17: Brock-Taunton and the policies of this Plan; and (iii) the number, size and location of stormwater management facilities will be confirmed through the Neighbourhood Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report and may change without an amendment to this Plan; and (h) shall require applicants for draft plan of subdivision, rezoning or site plan approval to submit to the satisfaction of the City: (i) a Sustainability Report that demonstrates how the proposal ranks against the sustainable checklist in the Sustainable Place-Making Guidelines; and (ii) a Design Brief that demonstrates how the proposal is consistent with the urban design components of the Sustainable Place-Making Guidelines. h l i O• i ••i ••i •Li1~~ f• O O • ••i m cn p \ \ O a G •i w ~ esp. ~ ~ \ ~ llll~~~~~ •f O i ~ - n f •'f tttt~ i • I ~ •r 4 1 BROCK ROAD . • Ir i . 1\ *1 SII V. GiV l`"Iy a • .........i • ~ D 2 • • X Z • 1 '.•••t••t•■•..•..........t•••.•1••••Y.\.+ z O z V V I i I /J f} n Z ® 0° 0G rrI O m N 0 Cn y x g< n v G D m O ~ ~ ~ m Iii I C O S D O m W n rn 2 p D r 3 C', Z Z nm 7 p O< 4 4 Z nO 0 D n Z I 7n to 2 m p m r m O m C (D C O O v Z G~ O Z D lJ CJ O 0 A CO m N r m O r" C O -i _ J_ m oo ti to Z D m r"" ~ r 11 0 O D 3 T' p O Z m ZZ N y z >D DZ r D -I r m DO v ~ m D y t~ii 0 m O \n z w ~ m Z -4 r Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 1 71 7.25 Adding Policies and Schedule for Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corners as follows: NEIGHBOURHOOD 20: THOMPSON'S CORNERS Description • Is bound by the Seaton Natural Heritage System to the west including Urfe Creek; Sideline 16 and the Town of Ajax to the east; Highway 7, Hamlet of Brougham and. Federal lands to the north; and the Seaton Natural Heritage System to the south • Is the eastern most neighbourhood in the Seaton Urban Area • Is adjacent to the existing Hamlet of Brougham including the Brougham Pioneer Christian Cemetery • Is planned to have a broad range of uses and land use densities, including commercial, and a variety of residential built-forms with densities ranging from low density to mixed use • Brock Road, Whitevale Road and Highway 7 are the main spines running through the neighbourhood • Highway 407 ETR/Transitway bisects the prestige employment lands portion of the neighbourhood • The Community Node on Brock Road shall be the heart'of the neighbourhood. The neighbourhood centre is planned to be a compact, walkable area, with a mix of commercial and residential uses. This centre shall serve the day-to-day commercial needs of . nearby residents, and of travelers who pass through along Brock Road. The Community Node shall also connect the residential areas -on the east and west sides of Brock Road and shall provide a transition from the prestige employment area to the north Neighbourhood Population and Employment Projection 2031 Population Target 6, 000 2031 Em to ment Lands Target 8,500 ~I ~ t i i l Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 2 CITY POLICY Thompson s Corners Neighbourhood Policies 12.22 City Council, (a) shall, as per section 11.5, establish and apply one of two additional subcategories ( Low Density Area Type 1) to those set out in Tables 2 and 10 in the Low Density Area subcategory as follows: (i) Low Density Area Type 1 with: (A) a full range of unit types within the permitted density range for Low Density Area as per section 11.2, but consisting predominantly of single and semi-detached housing forms; (b) shall provide greater direction on housing types within Medium Density Area designation by permitting single detached and semi-detached dwellings to comprise no more than 25% of all unit types within the designation; (c) shall as per section 11.5, establish and apply one of two additional subcategories (Mixed Corridors Type 2) to those set out in Tables 2 and 6 in the Mixed Corridors subcategory as follows: (i) Mixed Corridors Type 2 with a minimum density of 60 units net hectare and a maximum density of 180 units per net hectare provided the overall density of lands within the Mixed Corridors Type 2, within each draft plan of subdivision, is no more than 140 units per net hectare; (d) shall, as per section 11.6, identify Gateway Sites within the Mixed Corridors Type 2, which shall: (i) be reserved for apartment buildings at or near the highest density and height permission; (ii) have the maximum height and density determined at the site plan approval stage after submission of appropriate massing and sun-shadow drawings to demonstrate compatibility with adjacent housing; (iii) permit interim uses as per section 11.8; (iv) require applicants to submit a development concept and intensification plan illustrating interim and final plans to accommodate intensification over time and ultimate build-out, in accordance to section 11.8; and (v) require the size of Gateway sites to be determined at the draft plan stage; 73 Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 3 (e) shall provide greater direction on employment uses and densities in the Prestige Employment Area designation by applying two subcategories to the Prestige Employment Area land use category set out in Tables 2 and 8 as follows: (i) Prestige Employment General: . (A) in addition to the prohibited uses in section 11.32, warehousing shall be prohibited except for warehousing accessory to a permitted use; (ii) Prestige Employment Node: (A) in addition to the prohibited uses in section 11.36, warehousing, and light manufacturing, assembly and processing of goods shall be prohibited; (B) a minimum density of 2.0 FSI shall be required; however, interim development of no less than 0.5 FSI may be permitted provided a development concept and intensification plan is submitted demonstrating how the property can be intensified including: 1. the siting and orientation of buildings which do not preclude future intensification; 2. the location of parking for the initial development and changes to parking to accommodate the intensification process; and 3. the phasing of the intensification of the site to realize the ultimate built form; (f) shall require appropriate transitional design, compatibility and buffering from the Prestige Employment Area to the Hamlet of Brougham and its existing character through the implementing draft plan of subdivision, zoning by-law and site plan approval. The implementing draft plan of subdivision shall also provide for adequate road and pedestrian connections between Brougham and the surrounding Prestige Employment Area lands; (g) shall facilitate the long-term intensification of the future Highway 407 ETR/Transitway station located at Brock Road and Highway 407 ETR/Transitway based on the underlying land use of Prestige Employment Node; Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 4 74 (h) shall require the proponent prior to submission of draft plans of subdivision for development adjacent to the Brougham Pioneer Christian Cemetery to seek confirmation from the Brougham United Church to acquire additional lands in the area of the current cemetery, or not, as described in the Central Pickering Development Plan; (i) shall, along Type A and Type B Arterial Roads, as shown on Schedule II, not permit direct access to lots but will encourage the Region to allow for full movement intersections at the locations shown on Schedule X Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corners and allow for right-in/right-out intersections at a shorter intersection spacing in order to promote walkability and connectivity; (j) shall along Collector Roads require direct access to be minimized, due to traffic volumes and built forms, through a range of alternatives including rear lanes, slip lanes, shared drives, hybrid local roads, connector lanes or other means to limit direct access to individual lots. Where direct access is proposed, Council shall require applicants to demonstrate through appropriate transportation studies that direct access can be supported; (k) shall establish a pedestrian and bicycle systems plan for the neighbourhood which is illustrated on Schedule X Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corners and consists of the road network, bikeways, trails and trailheads. Further detail on how cyclists will be accommodated in the road network shall be set out in the Sustainable Place-Making Guidelines; (1) shall identify the location of existing Heritage Lots on Schedule X Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corners and require Heritage Lots to be integrated into the design of the surrounding employment area through appropriate landscaping and built form transition as per the polices set out in sections 11.62, 11.63 and 11.64 where applicable; (m) shall recognize that the locations of- (i) Type A and Type B Arterial Roads are currently the subject of an environmental assessment and the road alignments will be confirmed through that process which may require further refinements to Schedule X Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corners; Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 5 7J. (ii) local roads may be refined through the draft plans of subdivision without an amendment to this Plan provided the location, size and layout are consistent with the design intent shown on Schedule X Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corners and the policies of this Plan; and (iii) the number, size and location of stormwater management facilities will be confirmed through the Neighbourhood Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report and may change without an amendment to this Plan; and (iv) a district energy facility on Schedule X Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corners is shown conceptually and its location is to be determined by a feasibility study that demonstrates such a facility can be successfully operated and integrated into the community in consultation with the landowners and utility providers; and (n) shall require applicants for draft plan of subdivision, rezoning or site plan approval to submit to the satisfaction of the City: (i) a Sustainability Report that demonstrates how the proposal ranks again the sustainable checklist in the Sustainable Place-Making Guidelines; and . (ii) a Design Brief that demonstrates how the proposal is consistent with the urban design components of the Sustainable Place-Making Guidelines. k i i f i SCHMULL To ! I-IE PICKERING OFI=iCIAL PLAN HIGHWAY •PP►s•~•"•••yu • ieu .euDDge■9 HAMLET OI BROUGHAM /•o° P ~■■■■.■■D➢PYPDPDPCcoe DDe! / ~ IrI • ~IiDDD IIl ■ / / .0 1 HIGlIWA1 ~0~,!ETjt/TRANS)TWAY / h ■ i ~u■a•wws+w..uD■■u•ue % * : N19 I, I, I f 10- ono DE • o ~ c • x ES z 2.4 ha f ' l1f I r, E5 • / t~ RC - a.2ha ' NEIGHBOURHOOD 20: I HS FHONiPSON'S CORNERS 6.7ha Q NEIGI-180U12HOOD PLAN W-HITEVAIERQ/~LT ' O SEATON NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM j SWIM FACILITY Q TRAILHEADS COMMUNITYPARK NEIGHBOURHOOD PARK I % VILLAGE GREEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL l HIGH SCHOOL • RECREATION CENTRE R r O LOW DENSITY AREA TYPE 1 / ' • i MEDIUM DENSITY (Z MIXED CORRIDORSTYPE 2 I ' ~Nl COMMUNITY NODE ® PRESTIGE EMPLOYMENT NODE I I / ! I r PRESTIGE EMPLOYMENT GENERAL ' ® s GATEWAY SITE ~ 11 ~ I HERITAGE LOTS o FUTURE TRANSITWAY STATIONS `oE) DISTRICT ENERGY LOCATION m ® POTENTIAL CEMETERY EXTENSION • (-'--1 HIGHWAY 407/ETR/TRANSITWAY . c = PEDESTRIAN PREDOMINANT STREET TOWN ® PRIMARY N'HOOD CONNECTING TRAILS I : OF AJAX PRIMARY RECREATIONAL TRAILS I ~~a.••••"•■1 SECONDARY RECREATIONAL NETWORK I O PRIMARY BIKE ROUTE SECONDARY BIKE ROUTE I NEIGHBOURHOOD BOUNDARY O 0 100 300 500 METERS Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 1 77 7.26 Adding Policies and Schedule for Neighbourhood 21: Pickering Innovation Corridor as follows: NEIGHBOURHOOD 21: PICKERING INNOVATION CORRIDOR Description • Is bound by Duffins Creek to the west, the Federal lands (generally Highway 7) to the north, the Seaton Natural Heritage System east of Sideline 22 to the east, and the Seaton Natural Heritage System to the south • Is planned to contain a broad range of employment uses as well as Hamlet Heritage Open Space, adjacent to Green River • Highway 407 ETR/Transitway runs through the middle of the neighbourhood with two interchanges planned at Sideline 22 and Sideline 26 • the two proposed transitway stations at Sideline 22 and Sideline 26 will be located south of Highway 407 Neighbourhood Employment Projection 2031 Employment Lands Target 14, 300 CITY POLICY Pickering Innovation Corridor Neighbourhood Policies 12.23 City Council, (a) shall provide greater direction on employment uses and densities in the Prestige Employment Area designation by applying two subcategories to the Prestige Employment Area land use category set out in Tables 2 and 8 as follows: (i) Prestige Employment General: (A) in addition to the prohibited uses in section 11.32, warehousing shall be prohibited except for warehousing accessory to a permitted use; . Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 2 78 (ii) Prestige Employment Node: (A) in addition to the prohibited uses in section 11.32, warehousing, and light manufacturing, assembly and processing of goods shall be prohibited; (B) a minimum density of 2.0 FSI shall be required, however interim development of no less than 0.5 FSI may be permitted provided a development concept and intensification plan is submitted demonstrating how the property can be intensified including: 1. the siting and orientation of buildings which do not preclude future intensification; 2. the location of parking for the initial development and changes to parking to accommodate the intensification process; and 3. the phasing of the intensification of the site to realize the ultimate built form; (b) in addition to the uses as set out in Table 14, shall identify a District Park within the Hamlet Heritage Open Space designation north of Green River, and allow the use of the buffer within the adjacent Seaton Natural Heritage System for associated passive recreational uses. As per section 11.17, adequate buffering and transition shall be incorporated into the design of the park adjacent to the existing residential homes along Highway 7 including directing lighting downwards and away from residential properties; (c) shall facilitate the long-term intensification of future transitway stations located at Sideline 26 and Sideline 22 based on the underlying land use of Prestige Employment Node; (d) shall require applicants for draft plan of subdivision approval to identify and reserve a location for a future fire station to the satisfaction of the fire chief generally along Highway 7 in the vicinity of the-District Park; Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 3 79, (e) shall identify the location 'of existing Heritage Lots on Schedule X Neighbourhood 21: Pickering Innovation Corridor and require Heritage Lots to be integrated into the design of the surrounding employment area through appropriate landscaping and built form transition as per the polices set out in sections 11.62, 11.63 and 11.64 where applicable; (f) shall cooperate with the Province and the Region of Durham to identify appropriate sites for a future regional works depot and transit depot outside of the Phase 1 Prestige Employment Area lands; (g) shall, along Type A and Type B Arterial Roads, as shown on Schedule II, generally discourage direct access to parcels but will encourage the Region to allow for full turning movement intersections at the locations shown on Schedule X Neighbourhood 21: Pickering Innovation Corridor and allow for right-in/right-out intersections at a shorter intersection spacing in order to promote walkability and connectivity; (h) shall establish a pedestrian and bicycle systems plan for the neighbourhood which is illustrated on Schedule X Neighbourhood 21: Pickering Innovation Corridor and consists of the road network, bikeways, trails and trailheads. Further detail on how cyclists will be accommodated in the road network shall be set out in the Sustainable Place-Making Guidelines; (i) recognizes that the locations of- (i) Type A and Type B Arterials Roads are currently the subject of an environmental assessment and the road alignments will be confirmed'through that process which may require further refinements to Schedule X Neighbourhood 21: Pickering Innovation Corridor; (ii) local roads may be refined through the draft plans of subdivision without an amendment' to this Plan provided the location, size and layout are consistent with the design intent shown on Schedule X Neighbourhood 21: Pickering Innovation Corridor and the policies of this Plan; and (ii) the number, size and location of stormwater management facilities will be confirmed through the Neighbourhood Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report and may change without an amendment to this Plan; and Amendment X to the Pickering Official Plan Page 4 r 80 (j) shall require applicants for draft plan of subdivision, rezoning or site plan approval to submit to the satisfaction of the City: (i) a Sustainability Report that demonstrates how the proposal ranks against the sustainable checklist in the Sustainable Place-Making Guidelines; and (ii) a Design Brief that demonstrates how the proposal is consistent with the urban design components of the Sustainable Place-Making Guidelines. I k~ f f i C) % x O S O I 1 1 m Cl) No ° O O N _ E30 O O D. ~ A V slneuNt za A ' Ite L. Z SIDELINE 26 i r ~Z2 Z ; - \ SIDELINE 22 1 i~ ' SIDELINE 20 { ~Ln m f-1 r~ F n i • i C co i CJ _ o 2 o C _ z D z D= A -i 1~ X r T p %7 rJ W Z 7o z v m D Ll Gl fl m D 7 z p o< O<{ m m m Q D D Z O O R_ c p w A r m m> r_ D T. < o O m-0 D O r o co Z --I -I 00 w O D D 0 3 = -'Q N O O - i o c z p N z z Z R' OZ D Z D C1 Z D z z r- ICI >D p N z 0 m (-1 z D A m vri m m 0 D a m < ~ r N-I ,-ice 1 0 Q O 9t ATTACHMENT# l --_TO 82 n R h Q r Y ~ ~ off Rao arvo/m ♦ Q Mfg ~ g w q ROU z J MIaHWAY r z 3 F O < Q Y. a Q Y. ~ g Q O z VMITEVAL E a O wHnevA~a nrm F- ~ n z Li e a Y Ue B ARE x Aug a ,a aaH, rAURrdI Row Ra ty a 4 RR o I @ a 1 0 00RR10 R F_ rAUrrtoR '"RO aQr 00 ttimo Raw nxRO con. Rao R` O 0 1 E OOD RO z 0 HYDRO RR OR O $$M 0 4 U ~ HYpR OpRa~oOp OORRIpp AK O Rp EF T ~751 City of Pickering Planning & Development Department Seaton 11 20 1 and Nuombe od Boundaries Data s : O Teranat En . Inc. and It. "pp"'- ® Subject to OPA 1 1 -001 /P AM ll r 1g ht. R..200-9 MNot c ..an of u q. A, AM pp 200 and Ite .upptlern. ,Y All Hght. Reserva ed. Not ot c plan of Survey. ATTACHMENT# 'TO Cis o~ REPORT# PD Information Report 8 3 Report Number: 12-11 For Public Information Meeting of PICKERING Date: June 6, 2011 In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 11-001/P Proposed Neighbourhood Plan for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17, 20 & 21 Ontario Realty Corporation Lots 19, 20 and 21, Concession 3 Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21, Concession 4 Lots 17-34, Concession 5 City of Pickering 1.0 Background • the Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) identifies 15 separate residential neighbourhoods and a large employment area along both sides of Highway 407 together with an extensive Nature Heritage System (NHS) within the Seaton Urban Area • the City was in the process of undertaking the Seaton Neighbourhood Planning Review during 2010 when the major developers (the Seaton Landowners) appealed their neighbourhood plan, subdivision plan and rezoning applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). Subsequently, the Office of the Provincial Development Facilitator became involved • the facilitation resulted in the execution of Minutes of Settlement between the Seaton Landowners, the Province of Ontario (including Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC)), the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and the City of Pickering. The Minutes of Settlement resulted in the preparation of a Conformity Amendment to the Pickering Official Plan. This amendment would bring the POP into Conformity with the CPDP • the Seaton Conformity Amendment (which is the subject of an upcoming Ontario Municipal Board hearing for approval) established new boundaries for the purpose of preparing Neighbourhood Plans; these new boundaries combined the smaller residential areas, together with the employment area and the NHS; six urban neighbourhoods are identified (see Seaton Urban Area Neighbourhoods - Attachment #1) • as part of the Minutes of Settlement ORC agreed to submit Neighbourhood Plans for their lands within Seaton, being Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 ATTACHMENT 2 Information Report No. 12-11 REPORT# PD a9-!~ Page 2 84 2.0 Location and Description An amendment to the Pickering Official Plan was submitted by ORC for the following three neighbourhoods within the Seaton Community: Seaton Neighbourhood 17 • the neighbourhood is located at the junction of Taunton Road and Brock Road in the southeast corner of the Seaton Urban Area and is approximately 48.5 hectares in area (see Location Map - Attachment #2) • the Seaton NHS surrounds the neighbourhood on three sides • the area is currently largely undeveloped with a few existing rural residential properties and a concrete recycling site on the west side of Brock Road, north of Taunton Road • the surrounding land uses are: north - Seaton NHS south - the CP Rail line and the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood west - a large area of Seaton NHS and Neighbourhood 16 east - the Town of Ajax, with a large natural area to the east Seaton Neighbourhood 20 • the neighbourhood is generally located south of the Hamlet of Brougham in the northeast corner of the Seaton Urban Area and is approximately 155 hectares in area (see Location Map - Attachment #3) • Brock Road is the main north-south arterial road through the area with Highway 407/ETR crossing east-west in the northern part of the neighbourhood, and Whitevale Road providing the main east-west access in the southern part • the area is largely undeveloped the surrounding land uses are: north - existing Hamlet of Brougham and Highway 7 south - a large area of Seaton NHS and Neighbourhood 17 west - eastern edges of Neighbourhoods 19 and 20 east - rural lands abutting Sideline 16 and East Duffins Creek Seaton Neighbourhood 21 • the neighbourhood is generally located along the north and south sides of Highway 407/ETR in the northern portion of the Seaton Urban Area and is approximately 688 hectares in area (see Location Map - Attachment #4) • the area is currently largely undeveloped and most of the lands have been used for agricultural purposes • the surrounding land uses are: north - the Federal airport lands south - a large area of Seaton NHS and Neighbourhoods 18 and 19 west - West Duffins Creek and rural lands east - Seaton NHS and Neighbourhood 20 Information Report No. 12-11 ATTACHMENT#_0? Page 3 REPORT# PD 9- 85 3.0 Applicant's Proposal • the applicant is proposing a range of urban land use designations in the three . Neighbourhood Plans as follows: Seaton Neighbourhood 17 • the neighbourhood plan includes the following land use designations: "Natural Heritage System", "Mixed Corridor Type 2" and "High Density Area" • other symbols shown on the neighbourhood plan include a "Village Green" located within a development block southeast of Taunton Road and Brock Road; three "Gateway" sites at the northwest, northeast and southeast corners of Brock Road and Taunton Road; a "Stormwater Management Pond (SWM Pond)" located at the northern edge of the Urfe Creek east of Brock Road, a "GO site" location west of Brock Road; a "Potential Pedestrian Overpass" at the CPR Rail line west of Brock Road; and a "Green Street" located within the "Mixed Corridor Type 2" between Taunton Road and the CP Rail line • the "Mixed Corridor Type 2" designation proposes a density range of between 100 to 140 units per net hectare that would permit predominantly ground related multi-residential housing forms such as stacked and back to back townhouses • the "High Density Area" located at the southwest corner proposes a density range of between 141 to 250 units per net hectare that would permit a combination of low-rise walk-up apartments and mixed-use residential apartments • the "Green Street" designation proposes a visual and physical "green" link connecting the residential areas to the natural areas located north and south; and would permit a limited amount of commercial serving the immediate area (see Draft Amendment for Neighbourhood Plan 17 - Attachment #5) • various implementing policies are also proposed Seaton Neighbourhood 20 • the neighbourhood plan includes the following land use designations: "Natural Heritage System",. "Employment Prestige General", "Employment Prestige Node", "Mixed Corridor Type 1", "Medium Density Area", "Low Density Type 2 Area" and "Community Node" • the neighbourhood plan shows a new easterly alignment of Brock Road to by-pass the Hamlet of Brougham, the new by-pass will have an interchange with the proposed Highway 407/ETR • other symbols shown on the neighbourhood plan include two "Village Greens" with one located in the centre of the "Medium Density Area" and the other within the "Low Density Area" in the southeast part of the neighbourhood; two "Gateway" sites at the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of Whitevale and Brock Roads; ten "SWM Pond" locations; a "Potential Transit Station" location west of the realigned Brock Road; a "Green Street" located within the "Medium Density Area" area on the west side of realigned Brock Road; ~TO Information Report No. 12-11 ATTACHMENT# REPORT# PD Page 4 86 two "Elementary School" locations, one to the north west of the "Medium Density Area" and the. other east of the realigned Brock Road; a "High School" location, just east of Brock Road; a "Recreation Centre" location on the east side of Brock Road, adjacent to the High School; two "Neighbourhood Parks" and a "Potential District Energy Location" located within the "Seaton Natural Heritage System" along Sideline 16 • the east-west "Pedestrian Predominant Street" forms the spine for the "Community Node" and is proposed as a pedestrian oriented mixed use street that links the residential areas on either side creating a focal point for the neighbourhood • the "Medium Density Area" designation located in the central portion of the neighbourhood proposes a density range of between 40 to 80 units per net hectare • the "Mixed Corridor Type 1" designation located along the south-central portion of the neighbourhood proposes a density range of between 65-180 units per net hectare • the "Low Density Type 2 Area" designation in the southeast part of the neighbourhood proposes a range of 35 units per net hectare up to an including 50 units per net hectare that would permit predominantly ground related residential housing forms such as single detached and semi-detached housing forms • the two "Gateway" sites propose a maximum density of 250 units per net hectare but are intended to be designed to accommodate intensification over time • the "Community Node" designation located in the east-central portion of the neighbourhood serves as the major focus of the community and integrates a mix of retail, commercial and residential; and provides for between 10,000 square metres to 20,000 square metres of gross leasable floor space for the retailing of goods and services (see Draft Amendment for Neighbourhood Plan 20 - Attachment #6) • the uses proposed in the "Employment Prestige General" designation include light manufacturing, assembly and processing of goods, light service industries, research and development facilities, corporate offices, business parks, hotels, limited personal services, community, and cultural recreational • the uses in the "Employment Node" designation are the same as in the "Employment Prestige General" designation except that warehousing, light manufacturing, and assembly and processing of goods is prohibited • various implementation policies are also proposed Seaton Neighbourhood 21 • the neighbourhood plan includes the following land use designations: "Seaton Natural Heritage System", "Hamlet Heritage Open Space" "Employment Prestige General" and "Employment Prestige - Node" • other symbols shown on the neighbourhood plan include sixteen "SWM Ponds", two "Potential Transit Station Areas" located south of Highway 407/ETR at Sideline 26 and Sideline 22 and a "District Park" in the Hamlet Heritage Open Space north of the Hamlet of Green River ATTACHMENT#-2--TO Information Report No. 12-11 REPORT# PD 22 - /1 Page 5 • the uses proposed in the "Employment Prestige General" designation include light manufacturing, assembly and processing of goods, light service industries, research and development facilities, corporate offices, business parks, hotels, limited personal services, community, cultural recreational and transfer stations • the uses in the "Employment Node" designation are the same as in the "Employment Prestige General" designation except that warehousing, light manufacturing, and assembly and processing of goods is prohibited • the uses in the "Hamlet Heritage Open Space" designation propose a range of social, institutional, open space and recreational uses provided that they demonstrate, appropriate transitional design and compatibility with the area's existing character • the draft policies require prior to approving a draft plan of subdivision, land to be identified and reserved for a future fire station generally along Highway 7 in the vicinity of the proposed District Park • the draft policies also require prior to approving a draft plan of subdivision, land to be considered for a future regional works depot, a waste transfer station and transit depot (see Draft Amendment for Neighbourhood Plan 21 - Attachment #7) 4.0 Official Plans 4.1 Durham Regional Official Plan • the Regional Official Plan designates lands within: • Neighbourhood Plan 17 - "Employment Areas" and "Regional Centres" Neighbourhood Plan 20 - "Employment Areas" • Neighbourhood Plan 21 -"Employment Areas" • Special Policy Area A (Seaton) in the Regional Official Plan specifies that conformity amendments to implement the CPDP will be considered • Regional Official Plan Amendment No. 128 (ROPA 128), which implements the Provincial Growth Plan, was modified by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing to add population and employment allocations for Seaton, add the natural heritage provisions from the CPDP to Specific Policy Area A and insert a new symbol for the CPDP area; the amendment is currently under appeal . 4.2 Pickering Official Plan • the Pickering Official Plan designates Seaton as the "Seaton Urban Study Area" • as part of the City's implementation of the CPDP, the City, Province of Ontario, Ontario Realty Corporation, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Seaton Landowners have reached an agreement on an amendment to the Pickering Official Plan that will delete the "Seaton Urban Study Area" and replace it with the necessary policy framework through the Seaton Conformity Amendment • the Seaton. Conformity Amendment designates lands within: I Information Report No. 12-11 ATTACHMENT#~_TO Page 6 REPORT# PD 8S • Neighbourhood Plan 17 - "Seaton Natural Heritage System", "Mixed Corridors" and "High Density Areas" • Neighbourhood Plan 20 - "Seaton Natural Heritage System", "Community Node", "Medium Density Area", "Low Density Areas" and "Prestige Employment Lands" • Neighbourhood Plan 21 - "Seaton Natural Heritage System" and "Prestige Employment lands".(see Seaton Conformity OPA for Neighbourhood Plans 17, 20 & 21 - Attachment #8) • within the Seaton Urban Area, the following residential densities apply: • "Low Density Area": over 25 and up to and including 40 • "Medium Density Area": over 40 and up to and including 80 and • "High Density Area": over 140 and up to and including 250 • "Mixed Corridors" are required to be developed with a mix of multiple housing types and have a residential density of over 40 and up to and including 140 units per net hectare • despite the Mixed Corridor density range, neighbourhood plans may establish a land use subcategory with a residential density of over 60 and up to and including 180 units per net hectare, provided the overall maximum density for the Mixed Corridor is not exceeded • "Community Nodes" are required to be mixed use nodes containing commercial and residential uses that will intensity over time • two transit stations are shown south of Highway 407/ETR on Sideline 22 and Sideline 26 • a future GO Transit Station is conceptually shown along the CP Rail line in Neighbourhood 17 on Brock Road, south of Taunton Road 5.0 Results of Circulation 5.1 Resident Comments • none received in response to the circulation to date 5.2 Agency Comments • none received in response to the circulation to date 5.3 Staff Comments • in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review: • ensure the symbols and land use designations in the Neighbourhood Plans for Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 are consistent with the Neighbourhood Plans previously endorsed by Council for Neighbourhoods 16, 18 and 19 as part of the Seaton Neighbourhood Planning Review • ensure the proposed uses in the "Prestige Employment General" designation in the Neighbourhood Plans are consistent with the Seaton Conformity Amendment; the Conformity Amendment prohibits waste transfer stations ®TO Information Report No. 12-11 ATTACHMENT# Page 7 REPORU PI) 9 • refine the population and employment figures for Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 for the year 2031 • evaluate the proposed future Transit Station location within Neighbourhood 20 and the potential adverse impact on surrounding residential and institutional uses and the local road network • finalize the alignment of the Brock Road By-pass within Neighbourhood 20 and any resulting land use changes in light of the Highway 407/ETR Environmental Assessment Amendment once it has been concluded • evaluate the policy requiring land to be considered for a future regional works depot, a waste transfer station and transit depot prior to approving a draft plan of subdivision within the Prestige Employment lands • clarity the inconsistent policy interpretation for the density range in the "Mixed Corridor Type 2" designation • review the "Green Street" concept and whether polices are required in the Neighbourhood Plans to address it • correct various Conformity Amendment section references, and • eliminate redundant policies 6.0 Procedural Information • written comments regarding this proposal 'should be directed to the Planning & Development Department • oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting • all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council • any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal .Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal • any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk 7.0 Other Information 7.1 Appendix No. I • list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing report 7.2 Information Received • in addition to the copies of the OPA Applicant's Submitted Plan, the following document is available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department: • Planning Rationale Report Information Report No. 12-11 ATTACMIVIENT R TO Page 8 DEPORT#PD o?9-// g n ORIGINAL SIGNED BY ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Grant McGregor, MCIP, RPP. Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner - Policy Manager, Policy GM:Id Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development I ATTACHMENT# a TO 9 1 REPORT# PO o79 Appendix No. I to Information Report No. 12-11 Commenting Residents and Landowners (1) none received to date Commenting Agencies (1) none received to date Commenting City Departments (1) none received to date ATTACHMENT# TO City q REPORT# PD Excerpts from Planning & Development 9 2 PICXERNG Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, June 6,,2011 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor O'Connell (II) Part `A' Information Reports Marg Wouters, Manager, Development Review & Urban Design gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Meeting under the Planning Act. She outlined the notification process procedures and also noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City before the by-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. 1. Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 11-001/P Proposed Neighbourhood Plan for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17, 20 & 21 Ontario Realty Corporation Lots 19, 20 and 21, Concession 3 Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21, Concession 4 Lots 17-34, Concession 5, City of Pickering A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to the above noted application. Grant McGregor, Principal Planner - Policy, provided an overview of OPA 11- 001/P, the proposed neighbourhood Plan for Seaton Neighbourhoods, outlining Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 through the aid of a power point presentation. John VanNostrand of Planning Alliance, a representative for the property owners, provided a more detailed overview of the proposed plans through the aid of a power point presentation. He provided details on construction timelines, densities, building types; residential, commercial, retail and employment lands. A question and answer period ensued with clarification being provided on the proposed schools with the possibility of clustering the schools to encourage shared facilities. Councillor O'Connell suggested Mr. VanNostrand provide Council with the maps outlining the details of the future timelines and projected numbers for residents and jobs in the development. No members of the public appeared in support or opposition to the application. 1 ATTACHMENTS -TO REPORT# PD-c-22- 93 Ministry of Ministere des Municipal Affairs Affaires municipales and Housing et du Logement •j' Municipal Services Division Division des services municipaux ,r• - 777, rue Bay, 2 ° stage Ontario 777 Bay Street - 2nd Floor j/ Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Telephone: 416 585-6226 Telephone: 416 585-6226 Fax: 416 585-6882 Te1ecopieur: 416 585-6882 Toll-Free: 1-800-668-0230 Sans frail: 1-800-668-0230 June 2, 2011 CONFIDENTIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Grant McGregor, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner - Policy City of Pickering Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Dear Mr. McGregor, Subject: Seaton Draft Neighbourhood Plans Comments on Draft Neighbourhood Plans 17, 20 and 21 Thank you for providing the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing the opportunity to review and comment on Draft Neighbourhood Plans 17, 20 and 21. We have reviewed the Draft Plans for conformity to the Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) and the proposed Pickering Official Plan Amendment (OPA). Our comments relate to the Draft Plans prepared by planningAlliance on behalf of the Ontario Realty Corporation and are as follows: Neighbourhood 17 - Brock-Taunton • The proposed land use designations conform to Schedule I - Land Use Structure of the proposed Pickering OPA (Schedule 1). • The last sentence of the seventh bullet point in the proposed amendment reads: "This central area shall serve the day-to-day commercial needs of nearby residents, and of travelers who pass along Taunton Road, as well as along the major north-south arterial roads." This last sentence should be amended to read: "This central area shall serve the day-to-day commercial needs of nearby residents, and of travelers who pass along Taunton Road and Brock Road." given Brock Road is the only north-south arterial road in this area. • The proposed amendment identifies an ultimate population target of 6,704 and an ultimate employment target of 585. The proposed amendment should identify the number of people and jobs the neighbourhood will accommodate by 2031 as well as the number of people and jobs the neighbourhood will accommodate through long-term intensification given Policies II ATTACHMENT, V ,...~.TO REPORT, PD- a9-// _ 94 2.13 a) and b) of the proposed Pickering OPA identify the number of people and jobs the Seaton Urban Area will accommodate by 2031. Neighbourhood 20 - Thompson's Corners • The lands east of Brock Road between the "Active Recreational Areas" and "Prestige Employment" land use designations are designated "Community Node" when they are designated "Mixed Corridors" on Schedule I. We recall that planningAlliance noted this. discrepancy on January 27, 2011 when the Minutes of Settlement were signed. I believe Paul Lowes had intended to amend the designation to "Community Node" after he met with planningAlliance on January 25, 2011. Ministry staff confirmed that such an amendment would conform to the CPDP given a Retail Evaluation has been completed to justify a larger Community Node in this area. • Brock Road should be designated "Arterial Road" as shown on Schedule II - Transportation System (Schedule II) of the proposed Pickering OPA. Brock Road appears to be designated "Collector Road" on N20 Figure 5 Neighbourhood Plan. • The road west of Brock Road that loops through lands proposed to be designated "Medium Density Areas" should be designated "Collector Road" as shown on Schedule II. The proposed Neighbourhood Plan appears to designate this road "Local Road". • For clarity, we suggest that the underlying land use designations be shown for the proposed elementary and high school sites. • We suggest that the "Employment Prestige Node" and "Employment Prestige General" land use designations be renamed "Prestige Employment Node" and "Prestige Employment General" for consistency with the proposed Pickering OPA. • It is unclear how the proposed "Open Space" land.use designation relates to the hierarchy of parks established in Section 11.13 of the proposed Pickering OPA. It is also unclear why two of the proposed "Open Space" designations appear to be located within the Natural Heritage System (NHS) east of Brock Street, south of Whitevale Road. • The sixth and seventh bullet points in the proposed amendment reference "the industrial portion of the neighbourhood" and "the industrial area to the north". We suggest that both industrial references be removed and replaced with references to prestige employment which is what is contemplated by Section 4.7 of the CPDP and Section 11.31 of the proposed Pickering OPA. • Section 12.18 (c) references "High Density Areas" when it should reference "Medium Density Areas". No lands within Neighbourhood 20 are designated "High Density Areas". • The proposed amendment identifies an ultimate population target of 8,128 and an ultimate employment target of 9,757. The proposed amendment should identify the number of people and jobs the neighbourhood will accommodate by 2031 as well as the number of people and jobs the neighbourhood will accommodate through long-term intensification given Policies 2.13 a) and b) of the proposed Pickering OPA identify the number of people and jobs the Seaton Urban Area will accommodate by 2031. ~I ATTACHMENT#...'ro - 9 5 REPORT# PD - -12 Neighbourhood 21 - Pickering Innovation Corridor The Neighbourhood Boundary should be amended to exclude the Hamlet of Green River. • The District Park symbol should be added to the Neighbourhood Plan Legend. • The road that is proposed between Highway 7 and Highway 407 ETR should be designated "Collector Road" as shown on Schedule II. The proposed Neighbourhood Plan appears to designate this road "Local/Service Road". • Section 4.8.5 a) of the CPDP requires the preparation of a bicycle systems plan based on the overall network of the Master Environmental Servicing Plan (MESP). The proposed Neighbourhood Plan does not identify the primary and secondary bikeways shown on Schedule II. We suggest that the "Employment Prestige Node" and "Employment Prestige General" land use designations be renamed "Prestige Employment Node" and "Prestige Employment General" for consistency with the proposed Pickering OPA., • It is unclear how the proposed "Open Space" land use designation relates to the hierarchy of parks established in Section 11.13 of the proposed Pickering OPA. It is also unclear why some of the proposed "Open Space" designations appear to be located within the NHS. • The proposed amendment identifies an ultimate employment target of 14,948. The proposed amendment should identify the number of jobs the neighbourhood will accommodate by 2031 as well as the number of jobs the neighbourhood will accommodate through long-term intensification given Policy 2.13 b) of the proposed Pickering OPA identifies the number of jobs the Seaton Urban Area will accommodate by 2031. Section 4.8 Policy 5 (c) of the CPDP requires Neighbourhood Plans identify the drainage boundaries and stormwater management system/facility locations, type, preliminary sizing and discharge quantity, quality and sedimentation targets based on the findings of the MESP and functional servicing plans. The Draft Plans for Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 identify the location and preliminary sizing of the proposed stormwater management ponds. We recognize, and are satisfied, that the MESP identifies the drainage boundaries, type and discharge quantity, quality and sedimentation targets. Note, a number of section references throughout the proposed amendment appear to be incorrect. We suggest municipal staff cross-reference all of the section references for accuracy. Do not hesitate to contact me at 416 585 6331 should you have any questions. Regards, Gmcm.wtto Melissa Clements, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner ATTACHMENT# ' TO REPORTS PD a 9 -i/ 96 c. c..: Paula Dill, Office of the Provincial Development Facilitator Glenn Higgins, Ministry of Transportation Tom Farrell, Ministry of Natural Resources Nisha Shirali, Ministry of Environment Christy Doyle, Ministry of Infrastructure TORONTO AND REGION "Y . , y~ ■ ATTA1"m1NT# -s o ~1 / s e r V a! REPORT# PO 97 for The Living City, June 7, 2011 CFN 45725.01 XREF CFN 40550 BY E-MAIL AND MAIL RECEIV Grant McGregor, MCIP, RPP Planning and Development,JUN N City ~of Pickering ®9 Zr~J~ One The Esplanade CITY pLNNIN s Q'v KEFn ING ..Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 pEP IFcop AF rMeNr MF Dear Mr. McGregor: Re: Official Plan Amendment Application Nos. OPA11-001/P Seaton - Neighbourhood Nos. 7, 20 and 21 City of Pickering Ontario Realty Corporation Thank you for circulating the above referenced Official Plan Amendment, received by TRCA on April 14, 2011. We understand that the applications are deemed complete under Section 22(4) of the Planning Act. There a number of comprehensive planning studies that must be completed prior to the consideration of the OPA, per the Central Pickering Development Plan. These planning studies include completion of the Master Environmental Servicing Plan Amendment, the Region of Durham EA and the City's Neighbourhood Planning process, among others. We understand through the Memorandum of Oral Decision of the OMB issued on May 16, 2011 that an appeal of the Ontario Realty Corporation with respect this OPA will be consolidated with the other appeals in Seaton. TRCA staff is committed to continuing our collaborative work with the proponents, the Region of Durham and the City of Pickering to review the MESPA and the NFSSRs, per the Minutes of Settlement. However, until these studies are complete we cannot provide meaningful review of the proposed Official Plan Amendment. We trust this is of assistance. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sinc rely, H Z6chrt., MCIP, RPP, MRTPI anager, Development Planning and Regulation Planning and Development Extension 5311 cc. Larry Clay, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Bruce Singbush, Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure Dorothy Skinner, Region of Durham Graham Martin, ORC John van Nostrand, Planning Alliance Carolyn Woodland, TRCA Jon Wigley, Gardiner Roberts GAHome\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\Pickering\cpdp_22.doc Member of Conservation Ontario 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview Ontario M3N 1S4 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on.ca ATTACHMENT# REPORT# PD a9z_i 98 WiEc 4's Bell ~gGKI~l~@3~3C-~ CITY June 10, 201.1 p~,.p,WN1NG & 7E" OPMENT DEPARTMENT Mr. Grant McGregor, MC1P, RPP Planning & Development Department City of Pickering . One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7 Re: Proposed Neighbourhood Plan for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17, 20 & 21- OPA 11/001/P Ontario Realty Corporation Dear Mr. McGregor, Bell Canada thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Proposed Neighbourhood Plans for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21. (Official Plan Amendment 11/001/P) to implement portions of the Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP). Bell has been actively involved in monitoring the development of the Seaton Neighbourhoods and has provided comment letters to the City on August 15, 2005, in relation to the City's Draft Amendment 05-002/P, and October 3, 2008, regarding the preparation of the neighbourhood plans. As you are aware, Bell. Canada is Ontario's principal telecommunications infrastructure provider. The Bell Canada Act, a federal statute, requires that Bell manage and operate most of the trunk telecommunications system in Ontario. Bell is also responsible for the infrastructure that supports most 911 emergency services in the Province. I The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Places to Grow) both strongly support the integrated planning of communities, including telecommunications infrastructure. The PPS specifically requires that "planning for infrastructure and public service facilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs" (Section 1.6.1). Furthermore, the PPS states that infrastructure should be. located to support the delivery of emergency management services (Section 1.6.3). We note that the definition of infrastructure in the PPS includes communications/telecommunications. In light of Provincial policy, it is critical to understand the complexity of expanding and enhancing the telecommunications network to accommodate growth, both through outward expansion of an urban area and through intensification, infill and redevelopment. All types of growth and development place demands on the telecommunications network and its associated support infrastructure. Beyond simply extending fibre or copper cable, growth and development can precipitate the need for reinforcement and replacement of the Bell Canada Development and Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 BLUE, 100 Borough Drive Toronto. Ontario MIP4W2 Telephone 905-853-4044 Fax 905-895-3872 john.lachapelle @bell.ca ATTACHMENT#.-4-._TO -4- 99 REPORT# PD .22-_11 June 10, 2011 2 support infrastructure. Reinforcement and replacement of the telecommunications network can represent an extensive and costly undertaking, which needs to be managed to avoid disruption of public services. This is particularly critical in relation to the provisioning of 911 emergency services and the services essential to the City of Pickering'.s businesses operating in a global economy. One of Bell's main objectives is to become involved in the planning process. This allows us to coordinate with the City on the provisioning of appropriate telecommunications infrastructure for new growth and development in a timely fashion. It also allows for greater consideration of the size and locational needs of large telecommunications infrastructure and equipment that house key electronics. We have reviewed the Proposed Neighbourhood Plan for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17,.20 & 21 - OPA 11/001/P and would like to provide the following comments. Proposed Neighbourhood Plan for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17, 20 & 21 The Proposed Neighbourhood Plans contain policies primarily related to land use, density, and the transportation network. We recognize that policy direction for public and private infrastructure is provided at the City-wide level through the City of Pickering Official Plan (Chapter 7 - Community Services); however, we note that the Neighbourhood Plans (Draft Official Plan Amendment OPA 11-00 UP) do not specifically address the provisioning of public and/or private utility infrastructure. The Neighbourhood Plans require that applicants for draft plan of subdivision, rezoning or site plan approval, submit to the satisfaction of the City: i) a Sustainability Report that demonstrates how the proposal ranks against the sustainable checklist in the Sustainable Placemaking Guidelines; and, ii) a Design Brief that demonstrates how the proposal is consistent with the urban design components of the Sustainable Placemaking Guidelines. We are pleased to note that Section 4.2.1 (General Guidelines K) 5) of the Sustainable Placemaking Guidelines address .Bell's comments, as outlined in the October 3, 2008 letter. This section relates to clustering, grouping or incorporating service utility areas within streetscape furniture, where possible in order to minimize impact; requires utility providers to consider innovative methods for containing utility services on or within streetscape features; and the location and design of large above ground utility infrastructure should be compatible with the.environment and streetscape. We understand that the Sustainable Placemaking Guidelines have been endorsed by Council in April 2011 based on a negotiated settlement at the Ontario Municipal .Board, to which Bell was not a party. It is also our understanding that the Seaton Conformity Official Plan Amendment will be part of this negotiated agreement, and it will be brought forward to the Ontario Municipal Board for approval later this year without further public .ATTACHMENTS L_TO REPORTS PD--2!9 - 00 June 10, 2011 3 consultation. Without having the formal opportunity to review and comment on the draft Sustainable Placemaking Guidelines or the Seaton Conformity Official Plan Amendment, we request that the adequate provisioning of telecommunications and other utility infrastructure for new development and future growth areas be considered by the City through their negotiated settlement on the Sustainable Placemaking Guidelines and the Seaton Conformity Official. Plan Amendment. More specifically, we request that the Seaton Conformity Official Plan Amendment include specific policies that address the following: • Ensuring that adequate utility networks are, or will be, established to serve the anticipated development through discussions with public and/or private utility providers; • Encouraging all utilities to be planned for and installed on a coordinated and integrated basis in order to be more efficient, cost effective and minimize disruption; and • Ensuring that appropriate locations for large utility equipment and cluster sites have been determined and that consideration be given to the locational requirements for larger infrastructure within public rights of way. We request that an additional policy be incorporated in the Neighbourhood Plans to ensure the adequate provisioning of telecommunications and other utility infrastructure for new development and future growth areas. Accordingly, we would request that the following policy be added to Neighbourhood Plan 17 (Section 12.18 g), Neighbourhood Plan 20 (Section 1.2.18 m), and Neighbourhood Plan 21 (Section 12.23 i): City Council shall require applicants for draft plans of subdivision, rezoning or site plan approval to submit to the satisfaction of the City: iii) Confirmation that adequate utility networks are, or will be, established to serve the anticipated development through discussions with public and/or private utility providers. ATTACHMENT# - 6 __M 101 IEPORT# PD a 9^ Z/ June 10, 2011 4 We thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Proposed Neighbourhood Plan for Seaton Neighbourhoods 1.7, 20 & 21 - OPA 11/001/P. Please advise Bell of any further meetings, reports, decisions, etc. related to proposed Official Plan Amendments in the Seaton Community. We would ask all documents and information be forwarded to our Development and Municipal Services Control Centre: Mr. John La Chapelle, MCIP, RPP Manager - Municipal Relations Access Network Provisioning, Ontario Development and Municipal Services Control Centre Bell Canada Floor 5 BLUE, 100 Borough Drive Toronto, Ontario M1P4W2 If you have any questions, please direct them to the undersigned. Yours truly, John La Chapelle, MCIP, RPP Manager - Municipal Relations Access Network Provisioning, Ontario cc: Wayne Corrigan - Associate Director - Access Network - Bell Canada Robert. McKay - Associate Director - Access Implementation - Bell Canada Chris Tyrrell - MMM Group Ltd ATTACHMENT#-Z. O E W REPORT# PD 102 June 13, 2011 'CITY OPICKING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT The City of Pickering ~0\,c ors Planning Department T~ZPickering Civic Centre `0 One The Esplanade a °o Pickering, Ontario ~o L1V 6K7 0 ova Attn.: Mr. Grant McGregor 650 Rossland Rd. W. O.ghawa, Ontario Dear Mr. McGregor L1J 7C4 RE: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 11-001/P Telephone (905) 576-6150 Proposed Neighbourhood Plan for Seaton Neigbourhoods 17, 20 & 21 Ontario Realty Corporation Fax (905) 576-1981 Lots 19, 20 and 21 Concession 3 Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21, Concession 4 Lots 17-34, Concession 5 City of Pickering Staff members of the Durham District School Board and the Durham Catholic District School Board are in receipt of your letter dated April 19, 2011 regarding the above noted Official Plan Amendment application. The number and location of school sites shown within the information is satisfactory to both School Boards. However, the size of each site will be determined through Draft Plan of OUR/Y_ _ Subdivision, as the total number of units proposed, based on unit type, will determine the physical size of each the school, which in turn dictates the size of each school site. v Regards, G'T sCH00\' f 400 Taunton Rd. E. Christine Nancekivell Lewis Morgulis Whitby, Ontario Senior Planner Manager, Planning and Admissions L1 R 2K6 Durham District School Board Durham Catholic District School Board Telephone (905) 666-5500 Fax (905) 666-6439 ATTACHMENT#_TO 0 3 REPORT# PD 2 9 - RECEIVED June 13, 2011 JUN 2 0 2011 _ CITY OF PICKERING Grant McGregor, MCIP+ RPP PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Principal Planner-Policy City of Pickering Planning & Development Department The Regional Pickering Civic Complex Municipality One The Esplanade of Durham Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Planning and Economic Development Department Dear Mr. McGregor: Planning Division Re: Regional Comments for Pickering Official Plan Amendment 605 RossLAND RD. E. Application OPA 11- 0011P - Proposed Neighbourhood Plans iTH FLOOR PO BOX 623 for Seaton Urban Area Neighbourhoods 17, 20 & 21 WHITBY ON L1 N 6A3 _ Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) CANADA 905-668-7711 Lots 19, 20 and 21, Concession 3 1-800-372-1102 Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21, Concession 4 Fax: 905-666-6208 Lots 17-34, Concession 5 Email: plan ning@durham.ca City of Pickering www.durham.ca A.L. Georgieff, MCIP, RPP We have reviewed the above-noted application to amend the City of Commissioner of Planning Pickering Official Plan. The proposed amendment seeks to add three new and Economic Development neighbourhood plans (Seaton Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21) to the Pickering Official Plan. According to the May 16, 2011 Memorandum of Oral Decision issued by the'Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), the applicant, Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC), intends to request consolidation of this application with the Seaton land exchange developers' appeals related to their planning applications for Seaton's other three new neighbourhoods, namely Neighbourhoods 16, 18 and 19. As you are aware, the proposed application does not conform to the Durham Regional Official Plan (ROP), and the application is not exempt from Regional approval. The subject lands are designated "Specific Policy Area A (Pickering)" in the current in force ROP. This designation specifies that development is to be in accordance with the CPDP, and that conformity amendments to the ROP to implement the CPDP will be considered at a later date. Consequently, the ROP does not contain the upper-tier official plan policies required by the Planning Act to enable approval of the lower-tier official plan amendment to the Pickering Official Plan that is being proposed by ORC and the Seaton land exchange developers. "Sets; 4" i,1 1110nce fcr co,,'i oinrnuriities" x 100% Post Consumer ATTACHMMI'#~~TO REPORT# PD-- / 1 04 Moreover, the Region's Growth Plan conformity amendment (ROPA 128) was modified by the Province to introduce specific policies, and population and employment forecasts for Seaton, which conflict with those contained in the proposed Pickering Official Plan amendment. As you know, ROPA 128 is currently before the OMB. In addition, please note that a CPDP Class Environmental Assessment for Regional Services (CPDP Class EA) is underway, and depending on the outcome of that process, it is anticipated that all the Neighbourhood Plans will likely require revisions and resubmission to the Region for review. Further, the Master Environmental Servicing Plan Amendment (MESPA) has not yet been completed, which may have bearing on the final configuration and Neighbourhood Plan policies. Finally, we note that the financial aspects of Seaton's development have not yet been fully addressed, as required by the CPDP, as the Fiscal Impact. Study on Regional services has not been finalized. Notwithstanding, we have circulated ORC's proposed Neighbourhood Plans 17, 20 and 21, associated policies, and Planning Rationale Report to our internal Regional Departments, including Durham Region Transit, for review and comment. Our comments on draft Neighbourhood Plans 18 and 19 were provided to the City on March 18, 2011. At this stage, Regional staff have not been requested to comment on draft Neighbourhood Plan 16. Despite this, please be advised that many of the comments provided below also apply to proposed Neighbourhood Plans 16, 18 and 19. Based on the'information that-we have received to date, the following preliminary comments are offered for your consideration. General Comments on Neighbourhood Plans. Population and Employment Forecasts 1. None of the ORC Neighbourhood Plans provide population and employment forecasts for 2031 - they provide "ultimate" figures, which are beyond the 2031 timeframe of the Growth Plan, which guides the ROP, Pickering Official Plan and the CPDP. Also, we continue to have concerns regarding the job forecasts that are being advanced for Seaton's Prestige Employment Lands. Insufficient details have been provided to confirm.that the forecasts are reasonable, and can be implemented, within the 2031 timeframe. -2- ATTACHMENT#-.-,TO 105 REPORT# PO -29 - Financial Impact 2. Given that the Fiscal Impact Study for Regional services has not yet been finalized, the Region would like to ensure that there will be opportunity in the future to comment on the financial aspects related to the servicing of these Neighbourhoods, and any financial impact related to meeting the Sustainable Placemaking Guidelines established by the City of Pickering. Trail System 3. It is recommended that the on-road trails proposed on Type A Arterial roadways through Seaton (i.e. Taunton, Whites and . Brock) generally be located off-road, given that these roads are expected to carry high traffic volumes. 4. Although we recognize that the trail and trail head symbols do not have to be as detailed in the Neighbourhood Plans exactly as they are in the Seaton NHS Management Plan and Master - Trail Plan, it is suggested that the Neighbourhood Plans identify the Primary Neighbourhood Connecting Trails as a separate symbol. These Primary Neighbourhood Connecting Trails provide practical pedestrian linkages between neighbourhoods, and are intended to help facilitate transit service access and school walking trips year-round with potential illumination, whereas the other trail types are more recreational than utilitarian. Adding a new symbol for these trails would also tie the Neighbourhood Plans to the proposed Pickering Official Plan CPDP amendment (Schedule VII). We also note that the Trail System hierarchy illustrated on the ORC Neighbourhood Plan Schedules differ from the Trail System hierarchy presented on the Schedules for Neighbourhoods 16,18 and 19. Consideration should be given to having all of Seaton's Neighbourhood Schedules presented in a consistent manner. Neighbourhood Plan Schedules and Terminology 5. We note that ORC's Neighbourhood Plan Schedules denote features that are not accompanied by policy, and that different terminology is used, when compared to proposed Seaton Neighbourhoods 16, 18 and 19. For example, the Seaton Natural Heritage System is detailed by ORC to identify "Woodlots" and "Wetlands", yet the Neighbourhood Plan policies do not provide any additional policy direction. We note that -3- ATTACHMENT#-L -TO REPORT# PD 106 Neighbourhood Plans 16, 18 and 19 do not make this distinction. It should be clarified that the "Woodlots" and "Wetlands" are a sub-set of Seaton's Natural Heritage System (not separate). All of Seaton's Neighbourhood Plans should be consistent in delineating Seaton's Natural Heritage System. Other features denoted on ORC's Neighbourhood Plan Schedules that should perhaps, be accompanied by policy direction or clarification, include "Potential Pedestrian Overpass", "Green Street", "Potential District Energy Location" and "Railway Buffer Zone". Further, it is noted that the ORC Neighbourhood Plan Schedules refer to "Cultural Heritage Sites" and "Gateway" whereas the proposed Seaton Neighbourhood Plans 16, 18 and 19 refer to "Heritage Lots" and "Gateway Site". Consistent terminology should be used for all of Seaton's Neighbourhood Plans. Finally, we note that the ORC Neighbourhood Plans attempt to - delineate and-label Seaton's transportation system, whereas the proposed Neighbourhood Plans 16, 18 and 19 do not. There should be a consistent approach for illustrating the road network for all of Seaton's. Neighbourhood Plans. Roads/Laneways and Accommodation of Regional Services 6. We note that the Seaton Sustainable Place Making Guidelines refer to several (local) types of roads/laneways, specifically: • 8.5 metre road on a 15.35 metre right-of-way; 6 metre road on a 12.85 metre right-of-way; • 5.5 metre road on a 8.5 metre laneway; and • 7 metre road on a 10 metre lanew.ay. Since the Neighbourhood Plans do not provide right-of-way details, we cannot ascertain which streets are planned for these widths, -or how these narrower right-of-ways are intended to accommodate Regional services (if any). Please note that the Region is on record as not allowing Regional services within such laneways, with a few minor exceptions. It would appear that cross sections will not be provided until the draft plans of subdivision are submitted by ORC in the case of Neighbourhoods 17, 20 and 21 and when the plans of subdivisions for Neighbourhoods 16, 18 and 19 are revised and re-submitted by the Seaton land exchange developers. As such, the City should be aware that the right-of- -4- ATTACHMENT_E...,...,_TO REPORT# PD 22-L 107 way widths being proposed for these laneways will not be conducive to accommodating Regional services. Additional details regarding the provision of Regional municipal services will be provided once we have had the opportunity to review the Functional Servicing Reports associated with all of Seaton's Neighbourhoods. Local Road Connections and Access Spacing 7. Consistent with the Region's Arterial Corridor Guidelines, local roads generally should not intersect arterial roads, as they can result in operation/safety issues and complaints from residents having difficulty accessing the arterial, or issues associated with pedestrians crossing the arterial from the local road. Access restrictions will be required for specific local road connections (i.e. right-in, right-out access) as well as driveways to adjacent land uses which will be subject to future traffic studies to implement the Neighbourhood Plans. Neighbourhood 17 (Brock-Taunton) 1. In the "Description" portion of the text, the 1St and 3rd bullet appear to be repetitious with respect to the Seaton Natural Heritage System. 2. Policy 12.18(a) - The policy states that City Council "shall provide greater direction on the location and siting of the GO Transit station based on the results of an environmental j assessment..." Although the neighbourhood planning process identifies a location for the GO Transit station consistent with the CPDP, a future EA study, presumably conducted by Metrolinx, would ultimately determine the location. Therefore, it is not understood how City Council could provide greater direction on the location and siting of the station. It is therefore suggested that this policy be reworded to state that City Council: • strongly encourages Metrolinx to conduct an EA study for the extension of GO Rail services to serve Seaton; supports transit ridership in Seaton and surrounding areas; and • supports the station location and siting identified in this neighbourhood plan. It should be noted that based on recent discussions with Metrolinx, the GO Station for Seaton is in the very long term plans, and likely beyond the 2031 planning horizon of the Pickering Official Plan. A Corridor Study/EA would be required, -5- ATTACHMENT#~--To REPORTS PD 2 Z involving the entire rail line back to Union/Summerhill Stations, including additional station locations, in order to make the line feasible. 3. The intersection spacing from the Taunton Road/Brock Road intersection should meet appropriate minimum standards at this high volume intersection. As the proposed Neighbourhood Plans are conceptual in nature, it is difficult to determine whether acceptable intersection spacing is being proposed. It is anticipated that more precise details will be provided in future planning submissions (i.e. functional servicing reports, plans of subdivision). 4. The Trail crossing on Brock Road, north of Taunton Road, should be planned as an above or below grade crossing, or moved to cross Brock Road at a signalized intersection. Brock Road will carry very high volumes of traffic. For both safety and traffic flow reasons, a pedestrian signal is not appropriate at this - location. - - 5. Water Supply System - This Neighbourhood is within the Zone 3 water pressure district for the City of Pickering. Water supply will be fed from the Zone 4 feedermain with a pressure reducing valve to the Zone 3 pressure district. The location of the feedermain and system layout will be confirmed upon completion of the CPDP Class EA. Easements and/or additional right-of-ways for feedermains are dependant on the findings of the CPDP Class EA. 6. Sanitary Sewer Servicing - The development areas within this Neighbourhood can be serviced by the future sub-trunk sanitary sewer along Brock Road, which will eventually connect to the Central Duffin Collector. The Central Duffin Collector is to be constructed up to the south side of the C.P. Rail in the current budget year. Easements and/or additional right-of-ways for sanitary sewers are dependant on the findings of the CPDP Class EA. Neighbourhood 20 (Thompson's Corners) 1. Policy 12.18(a) - The policy outlines two sub-categories for Low Density Areas (i.e., Type.1 and Type 2), yet the Neighbourhood Plan Schedule only illustrates Low Density Type 2 Areas. This should be reconciled. Further, the policy incorrectly refers to the "Lamoreaux" Neighbourhood rather than the "Thompson's Corners" Neighbourhood. -6- ATTACHm't'#, .9 ....._T0 1 0 Q REPORT# PD 24 2. Policy 12.18(d) - The policy outlines two sub-categories for Mixed Corridors (i.e., Type 1 and Type 2), yet the Neighbourhood Plan Schedule only illustrates Mixed Corridor Type 1 Areas. This should be reconciled. 3. To be consistent with the Schedule for Neighbourhood Plan 17, Brock Road should be identified as a Type A Arterial road on the Neighbourhood Plan 20 Schedule. Similarly, Whitevale Road should be identified as a Type B Arterial road. As an alternative, given that Schedule `B' to the proposed Pickering Official Plan CPDP amendment already designates the transportation system, perhaps road classification details need not be displayed on the Neighbourhood Plans. We note that proposed Neighbourhood Plans 16, 18 and 19 do not provide road classification details. 4. We note that Policy 11.19 of the proposed Pickering Official Plan-CPDP amendment requires that the Highway 407 ETR - transitway be shown in Neighbourhood Plans 20 and 21, along with transitway stations at each of the planned interchanges, and that provision be made for commuter parking areas, park and ride and car-pooling areas adjacent to the transitway stations. However, Neighbourhood Plan 20 neither illustrates the Highway 407 ETR transitway on the Schedule, nor does the Plan incorporate policies regarding commuter parking areas, park and ride or car-pooling areas adjacent to transitway stations. Accordingly, it is suggested that the City ensure that all of the proposed Pickering Official Plan CPDP amendment policy directives for Neighbourhood Plans are addressed. 5. It is our understanding that the final plan will reflect the adjustments made to the Sideline 16 connection (i.e., the Pedestrian Predominant Street) and the signalized intersection at Brock Road. Further, based on our.discussions with ORC and Pickering staff on Monday, April 11th, the local road through the Employment Prestige Node located within the Highway 407 ETR Transitway station area should be shifted to the south for better intersection spacing with Brock Road, and become the Collector road that connects to Old Brock Road with the signalized intersection. Please see the attached diagram showing a proposed road realignment scheme. These road realignments would improve the spacing between the Pedestrian Predominant Street and the Collector to the north (closer to the optimal 500 metres, rather than 400 metres) for better signal timing progression. This would also allow the I -7- ATTACHMENY# -TO REPORT# PD a L 110 spacing of the Collector and the Highway 407 ETR eastbound off-ramp signalized intersection with Brock Road to also be closer to 500 metres as well. The Collector road could also provide all-moves access to the transitway station and would allow for deeper Prestige Employment Land lots, if and when the transitway station area is developed. 6. As stipulated in the Region's Arterial Corridor Guidelines, ideally, local roads should not intersect arterial roadways. However, we recognize that these local roads provide important pedestrian connections to access transit and the planned commercial development along Brock Road. As such, we would consider restricting the minor intersections along Brock Road to right-in, right-out movements, to allow for good transit and vehicular progression along Brock Road. As you are aware, Brock Road will generate a significant amount of traffic to/from Highway 407 ETR, is designated as a Strategic Goods Movement Corridor in the Regional Official Plan (ROP), and is - being planned as a bus rapid transit corridor-by the ROP, - CPDP, Long Term Transit Strategy (LTTS) and the CPDP Class EA process. 7. It is recommended that the Old Brock Road/New Brock Road intersection operate as a % access, prohibiting outbound lefts, due to the curvature of the new alignment. 8. The proposed trail crossing north of Old Brock Road should be planned as an above or below grade crossing of Brock Road, or moved to adjacent signalized intersection. Brock Road will carry very high volumes of traffic. For both safety and traffic flow reasons, a pedestrian signal is not appropriate at this location. 9. The Region has prepared "School Site Access and Operations Guidelines", which were previously provided to the City as input to the Neighbourhood Planning Review process. School Site Access Guidelines #2 and #3 do not recommend secondary schools have their main or sole frontage on an arterial road (particularly a major arterial road). The proposed secondary school abutting Whitevale Road should be oriented so its primary access for cars is on the north-south road, and transit access on Whitevale Road. 10. Water Supply System - The majority of this Neighbourhood is within the Zone 4 water pressure district, and will be fed from the Zone 4 feedermain. A small parcel of Prestige Employment -8- ATTACHMENT#TO REPORT# PD land at the northwest corner of the Neighbourhood is in the Zone 5 water pressure district. This area is expected to feed from the Zone 5 watermain or alternatively, future grading may be able to lower the ground elevation to enable Zone 4 service. Easements and/or additional right-of-ways for feedermains are dependant on the findings of the CPDP Class EA. 11. Sanitary Sewer Servicing - This Neighbourhood can be serviced by connection to the future sub-trunks along Brock Road. Easements and/or additional right-of-ways for sanitary sewers are dependant on the findings of the CPDP Class EA. Neighbourhood 21 (Pickering Innovation Corridor) 1. The road alignments of Sidelines 22 and 26 are subject to the CPDP Class EA for Regional Services, which has not yet been completed. Although the Highway 407 ETR interchange locations have been set, it is anticipated that the road alignments +Ilustrated on the Neighbourhood Plans may need to be adjusted on the south side of the interchange areas, once the CPDP Class EA is completed. 2. The east-west local road proposed north of the Brock Road and Whites Road interchanges should be shifted northerly, to maximize the intersection spacing with the north ramp terminal. However, with a northerly shift, the proposed east-west local road alignment may not be feasible as a full intersection with Sideline 26. The intersection will be constrained by the interchange ramps and grading, and the Highway 7/Sideline 26 intersection. Further, the proposed east-west local road access onto Sideline 22, south of Highway 7, may not be- feasible as a full moves or right-in, right-out intersection, as it is immediately north of the interchange (where grading will likely be an issue) and is very close to the Highway 7/Sideline. 22 and Highway 407 ETR westbound off-ramp/Sideline 22 intersections. 3. Not all of the local road intersections with Highway 7 will likely be permitted due to proper access spacing requirements along a Provincial Highway corridor and., when transferred to the Region, a Type A Arterial corridor. A similar comment was made at the time of the Highway 407 (Seaton Lands) Economic Development Study prepared by Hemson Consulting. 'Of particular note are the intersections west of Sideline 26, and the i -9- ATTACHMM.-91 --TO REPORT# PD 24_:762 112 spacing between the existing leg of Sideline 26 north of Highway 7 leg, and the local road proposed to the west. 4. It would be prudent to push for access to/from the Transitway Station from the service road versus direct access to/from the Arterial road. This would significantly improve operations on the north-south arterial roads. 5. We note that Policy 11.19 of the proposed Pickering Official Plan amendment requires that the Highway 407 ETR transitway be shown in Neighbourhood Plans 20 and 21, along with transitway stations at each. of the planned interchanges, and that provision be made for commuter parking areas, park and ride and car-pooling areas adjacent to the transitway stations. While Neighbourhood Plan 21 illustrates the Highway 407 ETR transitway on the Schedule, the accompanying policies doe not incorporate policies regarding commuter parking areas, park and ride or car-pooling areas adjacent to transitway stations. Accordingly, it is suggested that the City ensure that all of the proposed Pickering Official Plan amendment policy directives for Neighbourhood Plans are addressed. 6. We strongly support proposed Policy 12.23 (g), which recognizes the need to accommodate a number of Region facilities, including a regional works yard, waste transfer station, and a transit maintenance yard within Seaton's Prestige Employment Land designation. In order to receive assurance that opportunity for the Region's requested Police/Health/Social Service facility and a transit transfer station at the intersection of Whites and Taunton Road are secured, we recommend that a similar policy be included in the Neighbourhood policies for proposed Neighbourhoods 19 (Wilson Meadows) and 16 (Lamoreaux). We note however that proposed Policy 11.32 (c) of the proposed Pickering Official Plan CPDP amendment prohibits waste transfer and recycling facilities to locate within Seaton's Prestige Employment Area designation. Accordingly, in order to provide Seaton with appropriate facilities, the prohibition of such uses should be deleted from Policy 11.32. 7. Water Supply System - This Neighbourhood is situated in both Zone 4 and Zone 5 water pressure districts. The development area north of Highway 407 ETR is within the Zone 5 district, and the area south of Highway 407 ETR is within the Zone 4 district. Both water districts require their own feedermain to supply their -10- ATTACHMENTS TO REPORT# PO, ' 25 I~ 113 respective zone. Easements and/or additional right-of-ways for feedermains are dependant on the findings of the CPDP Class EA. Water supply infrastructure, including a Zone 4 reservoir and a Zone 5 water storage elevation tank are also required to provide service to this Neighbourhood. The Zone 4 reservoir is expected to be located near Sideline 26, north of Highway 7, on the Federal land holdings. As such, locating the reservoir will be subject to successful land acquisition from the Federal government. The Zone 5 water storage tank is expected to be located near Sideline 28, south of Highway 7. As such, the Neighbourhood Plan should be revised to reserve a block of land for the water storage site. It should be noted however, that the exact location and amount of land for the Zone 4 reservoir and the Zone 5 water storage tank are dependant on the findings of the CPDP Class EA. 8. Sanitary Sewer Servicing - This Neighbourhood is expected to be serviced by multiple sub-trunks in a north-south direction. The northwest corner of the Neighbourhood, north of Highway 7, may have to utilize a local pumping station to lift sewage to the closest sub-trunk on North Road. Easements and/or additional right-of-ways for sanitary sewers are dependant on the findings of the CPDP Class EA. Planning Rationale Report 1. Chapter I I. (Brock-Taunton Neighbourhood 17), Page 17, Section 5.1.2 - this section states that "in accordance with the CPDP, Type A arterial roads must be protected for a 4-lane cross section." This statement is not accurate. Policy 9 of Part 4.5 of the CPDP states that Type A arterials must be protected for six-lane cross-sections, of which two are dedicated transit lanes. Further, this section of the Planning Rationale report states that Brock Road and Taunton Road, as Type A arterials, "must have a 36 mri9ht-of-waY width. Policy 9 of Part 4.5 of the CPDP identifies that the right-of-way ranges should, where feasible and appropriate, be at the lower end of the ranges identified in the Regional Official Plan, which is 36-45 metres for a Type A arterial. 2. Chapter III (Thompson's Corners Neighbourhood 20), Page 17, Section 5.1.2 - similar to the previous comment, Brock Road is to be protected for a six-lane cross section and a 36-45 metre right-of-way, including two dedicated transit lanes. ATTACHMEN #~To REPORT# PID 114 3. Chapter III (Thompson's Corners Neighbourhood 20), Page 17, Section 5.1.2 - Whitevale Road, as a Type B arterial road, should be indicated to have a 30-36 metre right-of-way, not 30 metres. 4. Both Chapters II and III (Brock-Taunton Neighbourhood 17 and Thompson's Corners Neighbourhood 20), Sections 3.5, Transportation and Transit, note that "The objective is to ensure that all residents will be within a 5-minute walking distance of a transit stop." We could find no discussion in the report on whether this objective has been achieved for Neighbourhoods 17 and 20. -Please provide us with further information in this regard. 5. Chapter IV (Pickering Innovation Corridor Neighbourhood 21), Page 15, Section 5.1.2 - similar to comment #1 above, Type A arterials must be protected for six-lane cross-sections, of which - _two are dedicated transit lanes, and-36-45 metre right-of-way. Also, Type B arterial roads should be indicated to have a 30-36 metre right-of-way, and Type C arterial roads should be indicated to have 26-30 metre.rights-of-way. 6. Chapter IV (Pickering Innovation Corridor Neighbourhood 21), Section 3.5, identifies a less rigorous transit access objective, as compared to Neighbourhoods 17 and 20. Page 9 states "Careful attention is paid to the planned location of transit routes and transit stops in order to ensure that all workers in this area will have the opportunity to get to work by transit." We suggest this be replaced by "All workers will be within a 5 minute-walking distance of a transit stop." This objective is more consistent with. those used for Seaton Neighbourhoods 17 and 20. 7. Chapter IV (Pickering Innovation Corridor Neighbourhood 21), Section 3.5, Page 9, also notes that general transit route and stops are "identified on the Transportation Network Plan in Section 5." Although Section 5 contains a brief discussion of possible transit routes, we could find no discussion of transit stop locations. Please provide us with further information in this regard. Again, in the absence of the completed MESPA, Fiscal Impact Study, and CPDP Class EA for Regional Services, and without complete information on the 2031 population and employment forecasts for all of Seaton's proposed neighbourhoods, we may have additional -12- ATrACHlVlENT#,-S----.TO 9EPORT# PD- 227/-Z 115 comments. We also await the opportunity to review the functional servicing plans associated with all of Seaton's Neighbourhoods. I Please contact me, or Steve Mayhew, Manager, Transportation Infrastructure, Works Department (re: transportation/ roads) should you have any questions regarding the above comments. I Yours. truly, Dorothy Skinner, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Strategic Planning Attachment - Proposed Realignment of Collector and Local Roads - North End of Neighbourhood 20 (Thompson's Corners) via e-mail only cc: Brian Bridgeman, Director, Current Planning Mary Simpson, Director, Financial Planning & Purchasing Susan Siopis, Director, Transportation & Field Services John Presta, Director, Environmental Services. Jacqueline Weber, Senior Solicitor Martin Ward, Deputy General Manager, Durham Region Transit -13- ATTAMMEN"I° . PTO DEPORT# PD. 16 For Discussion purposes Only Proposed Realignment of Collector and Local Roads North End of Neighbourhood 20 (Thompson's Corners) New or realigned road section (alignments are conceptual) Deleted road section Deleted road section s "o ; Becomes (shown by hatching) allows ' Collector Road - for deeper employment lots with Signalized Intersection at Brock Road , r Becomes Local Road Signalized - - - - p Intersection I - % .I i • S Note: Non-signalized intersections along Brock Road should be restricted to right-in, right-out turning movements, but provide important pedestrian connections to commercial development and higher order transit on Brock Road.