The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPD 20-11 cial 00 Report To Council PICKERING Report Number: PD 20.11 Date: July 11, 2011 60 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Transport Canada Response to City Concerns Regarding the Demolition of Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Recommendation: 1. That Report PD 20-11 of the Director, Planning & Development dated July 11, 2011 entitled "Transport Canada Response to City Concerns Regarding the Demolition of Heritage Structures on Federal Lands", be received; 2. That the Federal Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities be requested to: a) allow City staff sufficient time and access to document the listed heritage structures on Transport Canada's updated demolition list; b) allow the City to investigate and potentially implement a limited program to assist with the private acquisition of the heritage structures for relocation to private lands; c) allow the City to retrieve elements of value from any heritage structures not relocated to private lands; and d) retain specialty heritage salvage companies to demolish the buildings to facilitate re-use of building materials as much as possible in order to divert materials from landfill sites; 3. That the Federal Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities be requested to refrain from demolishing any buildings in Brougham until the details respecting the future use of the Pickering Lands Site are determined, and work with City staff to identify suitable tenants for buildings that have potential for rehabilitation; 4. That the Federal.Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities be requested to provide the City with sufficient time to investigate the implications to the City of leasing structures of heritage interest in Brougham; 5. That the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PD 20-11 and Resolution to the Federal Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, the Regional Director, Programs and Pickering Lands Branch, Transport Canada, the Region of Durham, the Region of York, the Towns of Markham and Uxbridge, MP Chris Alexander and MPP Joe Dickson and the MPs and MPPs for Markham and Uxbridge; and 6. Further, that-the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto. Report PD 20-11 July 11, 2011 Subject: Transport Canada Response to City Concerns Regarding the Demolition of Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 2 Executive Summary: In August 2010, Transport Canada notified the City of its intention to demolish a number of structures, including several of heritage interest, on the Pickering Lands Site. In January 2011, Council considered a staff report which summarized the findings of detailed heritage assessments undertaken for the heritage structures, and provided recommendations for a response to Transport Canada. Based on the recommendations of the staff report, the City issued a response to Transport Canada requesting that the federal government provide funding for the costs of past and future heritage assessments, and reconvene the Local Heritage Steering Committee to complete its mandate to develop a heritage strategy for locally significant heritage buildings. In addition, the City requested a list of all vacant structures to be demolished in the future. The Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, in his March 22, 2011 response to the City, indicated that Transport Canada is not prepared to fund local heritage assessments or reconvene the Local Heritage Steering Committee. The Minister did indicate a willingness to lease properties of heritage interest to the City for non-residential purposes only, at the City's cost. Transport Canada is continuing to plan for the demolition of all vacant structures on the Pickering Lands Site, and provided a list identifying the vacant properties, an additional 17 of which are of heritage interest. The Minister has requested a decision by the City with respect to possible leasing of the properties by September 15, 2011. The City has limited options, given the Minister's response. The City does not have the funds to conduct professional assessments of the additional 17 heritage structures or to lease all of the significant heritage properties. However, the City should use the limited resources available to minimize the impact of the proposed demolitions through the following means: • documentation of all of the heritage properties by staff and Heritage Pickering • assisting in making the heritage structures available to private interests for relocation (through advertising and acting as liaison with Transport Canada), and • undertaking a salvaging program for City purposes, and encouraging Transport Canada to retain specialty salvaging companies to facilitate re-use of building materials as much as possible Staff are very concerned about the magnitude of demolition planned in the Hamlet of Brougham. A total of 26 currently vacant addressed structures are proposed to be demolished, representing approximately 37 percent of the total remaining addressed buildings in Brougham. Eight of the 26 vacant buildings are listed on the Heritage Register. Report PD 20-11 July 11, 2011 62 Subject: Transport Canada Response to City Concerns Regarding the Demolition of Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 3 Brougham is the historic centre of Pickering. Beyond the loss of the eight potential heritage buildings, such an extensive demolition initiative will create significant gaps in the fabric of the community and undermine the physical and social sense of place and cohesion of the Hamlet. In an effort to preserve the Hamlet, staff recommend that Transport Canada be requested to refrain from demolishing all buildings in Brougham until the details respecting the future use of the Pickering Lands Site are determined, and work with City staff to find suitable tenants for buildings that have potential for rehabilitation. In an effort to save, at minimum, buildings of heritage value, and given the planned leasing of the Bentley House for municipal offices, as well as the proximity of the Hamlet to the future Seaton community, the City could explore the possibility of leasing the. heritage structures in Brougham, with the intent to sub-lease to non-residential tenants. It is therefore further recommended that Transport Canada be requested to extend its September 15, 2011 deadline for demolition of the heritage structures in Brougham to allow staff sufficient time to report to Council on the structural, financial and, administrative implications to the City of leasing structures of heritage interest in the Hamlet. Funding for a potential leasing program would have to be considered as part of the 2012 Budget, as there are no funds available in the 2011 Budget for such a program. Financial Implications: Modest costs are anticipated for staff members to photograph the interiors and exteriors of the 17 additional structures listed on the heritage register and to pursue a short term assistance program for relocation of structures (other than those in Brougham) by private interests. Costs would be incurred if the City pursues a lease arrangement with Transport Canada in order to preserve heritage buildings in Brougham. There are no funds available in the City's 2011 Budget for this undertaking. Review of a potential lease program in Brougham will require evaluation of projected costs for consideration in the 2012 Budget. Sustainability Implications: This report provides information relating to the objective of preserving buildings having cultural heritage value as an integral part of a sustainable City. In addition to the historical physical value of the buildings, the buildings also have a social value in that they form part of the community of northwest Pickering and Brougham. Preservation and re-use of the buildings retains energy embedded in the existing structures and also diverts materials from landfill sites. 1.0 Background: The purpose of this report is to outline the federal government's response to the City's concerns regarding the planned demolition of vacant structures of heritage interest on the Pickering Lands Site, and to recommend a further course of action. nort PD 20-11 July 11, 2011 Subject: Transport Canada Response to City Concerns Regarding the Demolition of Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 4 1.1 City Council provided a response to Transport Canada's 2010 notice of intention to demolish nine structures of heritage interest on federal lands In August 2010, Transport Canada informed the City of its intention to demolish . 41 structures on the federally owned lands within the Pickering Lands Site. Staff arranged for the detailed assessment of 9 of these structures that are listed on the City's Heritage Register, and in January 2011 brought forward a report to Council which-summarized the findings of the assessments and provided recommendations for a response to Transport Canada (see Attachment #1). The staff report recommended that, given the level of cultural heritage significance of seven of the nine buildings, the then Federal Minister of Transportation be advised of Council's concern regarding the destruction of local cultural heritage resources, and that Transport Canada refrain from demolishing the buildings until a decision regarding the future plans for the Pickering Lands Site has been made, and the potential for preservation of these structures could be fully considered. The report further recommended that the Federal Minister be asked to: reimburse the City for costs ($27,000) incurred in conducting the detailed heritage assessments on the nine structures • to fund future assessments of the remaining additional (100) Pickering Lands Site structures included on the Heritage Register (estimated at approximately $300,000-$400,000), and • to reconvene the Local Heritage Steering Committee to complete its mandate to develop a heritage strategy for buildings deemed locally significant on the Pickering Lands Site The City's letter to the Minister, dated January 18, 2011, reflected these recommendations (see Attachment #2). In addition, the City requested that Transport Canada provide a list of all vacant structures and the order in which they are likely to appear in future demolition plans. 1.2 The Minister's March 2011 response includes a refusal to fund. heritage assessments, and an offer to lease the properties of heritage interest to the city In his response to the City dated March 22, 2011 (see Attachment #3), the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities indicates that: • the current demolition program is based on a need to remove vacant structures that pose a health and safety risk to the public • Transport Canada will not provide funding for local heritage activities, including past or future assessments, as local heritage is strictly a local matter • the seven local heritage structures identified in the first round of demolitions are vacant because they have become excessively costly to maintain and yielded very low rent; Transport Canada will not expend funds for rehabilitation or restoration of structures that have reached the end of their economic life Report P.D 20-11 July 11, 2011 64 Subject: Transport Canada Response to City Concerns Regarding the Demolition of Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 5 • Transport Canada has an ongoing program to repair viable occupied properties • Transport Canada had anticipated that the City would have completed its local heritage research, documentation and salvaging of materials at the previously agreed date of January 31, 2011, allowing for subsequent demolition • a list of all vacant structures listed for future demolition is provided; the City is asked to advise Transport Canada of any additional structures of local heritage value as soon as possible, and Transport Canada expects no concerns with proceeding with the demolition program for those structures not having heritage value • for those structures with local heritage value, Transport Canada is prepared to offer to lease those properties to the City according to certain terms (e.g., leasing only for non-residential purposes, and City assumption of all operational, restoration, security and liability costs) • Transport Canada is prepared to contribute an amount equivalent to.the cost of demolition of a building to assist the City in relocating that building to a site off the federal lands; the City would be required to pay any remaining costs and manage all aspects of permanently moving the structure off the federal lands • if the City chooses not to accept the principles and terms of this proposal, Transport Canada will proceed with demolition of all the structures • a City decision with respect to the above proposal is requested by September 15, 2011 1.3 34 structures have been demolished with the City's approval, including 2 assessed heritage structures not considered worthy of retention Of the 41 structures on the initial demolition list, demolition permits for 32 structures not listed on the Heritage Register were immediately granted by the City. Based on the assessments of the nine structures of potential heritage merit (as identified in the January, 2011 staff report), the City granted demolition permits for two additional structures, one of which was determined to not be of heritage interest, and another which was in a severely deteriorated condition. 1.4 An updated list of vacant structures to be demolished has been provided An updated list of vacant structures to be demolished (most recently revised on May 16, 2011) includes a total of 52 structures on 50 properties (see Attachments #4, #5 and #6). Twenty-four of these structures (including the 7 previously assessed structures) are listed on the Pickering Heritage Register. Twenty-six of the structures are located in the Hamlet of Brougham. An additional vacant structure in Brougham, located at 1622 Highway 7, is not -included on the list. This structure, known as the Miller House, is designated as having Federal Heritage significance, and is therefore not intended for demolition. Report PD 20-11 July 11, 2011 Subject: Transport Canada Response to City Concerns Regarding the Demolition of Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 6 2.0 Discussion: The City has limited options, given the Minister's response. The updated version of the list of vacant structures to be demolished provided with the Minister's letter includes an additional 17 properties that are listed on the Heritage Register. The City does not have the financial resources to complete heritage assessments for all 17 structures of heritage interest within Transport Canada's timelines. The City also does not have the financial resources to lease all of the significant heritage structures for non-residential uses indefinitely. In addition, the nature and location of the structures may not be suitable for non-residential uses. However, the City should use the limited resources available to minimize the impact of the proposed demolitions through the following means: • documentation of all of the heritage properties • assisting in making the heritage structures available to private interests for relocation, and • undertaking a salvaging program for City purposes 2.1 The additional 17 buildings of heritage interest should be documented by staff and Heritage Pickering The City does not have funds available for a professional assessment of the 17 additional structures on the demolition list that are on the Pickering Heritage Register (estimated at approximately $50,000-$70,000.00). It is therefore recommended that the City secure permission from Transport Canada for Planning & Development and other City staff to record the interiors and exteriors of those structures photographically. It is anticipated that the time required by staff to complete the work would represent a modest financial cost to the City, and could be completed within Transport Canada's timelines. Historical research on the affected properties might be undertaken by Heritage Pickering members at a later time. As an ongoing initiative, Heritage Pickering should continue with the assessment and historical research of currently occupied buildings of heritage interest on the Pickering Lands Site, as resources permit, so that notification of any future demolitions can be dealt with by Council in a timely manner. Report PD 20-11 July 11, 2011 66 Subject: Transport Canada Response to City Concerns Regarding the Demolition of Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 7 2.2 Providing assistance for private acquisition of the heritage structures for relocation to private. lands Although relocation of heritage structures is not considered to be a preferred strategy for preservation purposes, in this case it may be the City's only alternative to saving at least some of the structures in question and keeping the demolition waste out of landfill sites. However, the City does not have the land, the funds nor the expertise to undertake such a program. Therefore, staff recommend further discussion with Transport Canada to implement a limited program to assist with making the heritage structures available to private interests for relocation.off the federal lands. The City's responsibilities under this proposed program could include advertising the properties (in print and on the City's website) and acting as liaison between prospective purchasers and Transport Canada. 2.3 For structures that will not be relocated, the City should retrieve elements of value to the City, and request that demolition of the remaining heritage structures be undertaken by specialty heritage salvage companies Buildings of heritage vintage contain materials, such as trims, fixtures and especially old growth wood, having notably superior moisture and insect resistant properties, that are no longer available today. These materials are valuable and specifically sought after in heritage restoration projects. Beyond the value of the materials themselves, existing structures are repositories of energy; energy that was employed in the extraction of the raw materials, the refinement of the raw materials and in the actual construction process. This `embedded energy' is partially lost when structures are dismantled and fully lost if all of the materials are deposited in a landfill site. New energy must be expended when replacing structures and discarded materials that could have been re-used for new purposes. Staff are therefore recommending that Transport Canada be requested to allow the City to remove materials of value to the City, and thereafter that Transport Canada retain specialty heritage salvage companies to remove the heritage structures in order to save at least a percentage of the embedded energy of the materials in the structures, and to divert materials from landfill sites as much as possible. 2.4 Demolition of heritage and non-heritage buildings will have substantial impact on Hamlet of Brougham Staff are very concerned about the magnitude of demolition planned in the Hamlet of Brougham. A total of 26 currently vacant addressed structures are proposed to be demolished, representing approximately 37 percent of the total remaining addressed buildings in Brougham. Eight of the 26 vacant buildings are listed on the Heritage Register. I Rep~rt PD 20-11 July 11, 2011 Subject: Transport Canada Response to City Concerns Regarding the Demolition of Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 8 Brougham is the 'historic centre of Pickering and functioned as the seat of municipal government in Pickering Township for over 120 years. Beyond the loss of the eight potential heritage buildings, such an extensive demolition initiative will create significant gaps in the fabric of the community and undermine the physical and social sense of place and cohesion of the Hamlet. The hamlet is located at the southeast limit of the federal lands, abutting the employment lands of the future Seaton community. The hamlet can remain a viable community with or without an airport. Staff are willing to work with Transport Canada to find suitable non-residential tenants to occupy as many buildings as possible. Staff recommend that Transport Canada be requested to refrain from demolishing all buildings in Brougham until details regarding plans for the Pickering Lands Site are known, and work with City staff to find suitable tenants for the buildings that have potential for rehabilitation. In an effort to save, at minimum, buildings of heritage value, and given the planned leasing of the Bentley House for municipal offices, as well as the proximity of the Hamlet to the future Seaton community, the City could explore the possibility of leasing the heritage structures in Brougham, with the intent to sub-lease to non-residential tenants, as an interim measure. It is therefore further recommended that Transport Canada be requested to extend its . September 15, 2011 deadline for demolition of the heritage structures in Brougham to allow staff sufficient time to report to Council on the structural, financial and administrative implications to the City of leasing structures of heritage interest in the Hamlet. Funding for a potential leasing program would have to be considered as part of the 2012 Budget, as there are no funds available in the 2011 Budget for such a program. 3.0 Recommendations: It is recommended that that the City pursue the following initiatives as a response to the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities: . • documentation of the structures listed on the Heritage Register by staff • assist with the relocation of the structures by private interests off the federal lands • retrieval of building materials or features from heritage interest of value to the City • request that Transport Canada engage heritage salvage companies to undertake the demolition of remaining structures of heritage interest • request that Transport Canada refrain from demolishing any buildings in Brougham until the details respecting the future use of the Pickering Lands Site are determined, and work with City staff to find suitable non-residential tenants to*occupy buildings that have potential for rehabilitation. • investigate the possibility of the City leasing heritage properties in Brougham, for sub-lease to non-residential tenants, as an interim measure Report PD 20-11 July 11, 2011 68 Subject: Transport Canada Response to City Concerns Regarding the Demolition of Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 9 Attachments: 1. Report PD 02-11 to Planning & Development Committee of January 4, 2011 2. Mayor's letter to Transport Canada, dated January 18, 2011 3. Letter from Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities dated March 22, 2011 4. Updated Annex "A": Vacant Structures Inventory, May 2011 5. Location Map of properties on demolition list from Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities 6. Location Map of structures to be demolished in Brougham Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Isa James, MCIP, RPP Neil Carro ,RPP Planner II Director, P ng & Development Marg Wouters, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design IJ:Id Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering y Council ' i 2q, Zo Tony Prevedel, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer I ATTACHMENT #ITO 6 AIC REPO R1 #i PQ Report To Planning & Development Committee ERING Report Number: PD 02-11 Date: January 4, 2011 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Recommendation: 1. That Report PD 02-11 of the Director, Planning & Development respecting the proposed demolition by Transport Canada of nine structures listed on the Heritage Register, be received for information; 2. That the Federal Minister of Transportation be advised that the City of Pickering is concerned about the destruction of cultural heritage resources on the Pickering Lands Site; 3. That the Federal Minister of Transportation be requested to refrain from demolishing seven listed structures of heritage value, and particularly the two structures at 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road and 5245 Sideline 28 noted within this report as having a high level of cultural heritage significance, until a decision regarding future plans for the Pickering Lands Site has been made and the potential for preservation of these structures can be fully considered; 4. That the Federal Minister of Transportation be requested to fully. reimburse the City for its costs to undertake detailed heritage assessments of the nine buildings which are the subject of this report, and to fund future assessments required for the additional (100) buildings identified on the City of Pickering Heritage Register that are located on the Pickering Lands Site; 5. That Transport Canada be asked to reconvene the Local Heritage Steering Committee to complete its mandate to develop a heritage strategy for buildings deemed locally significant; and 6. Further, that the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PD 02-11 and resolution to the Federal Minister of Transportation, the Regional Director, Programs and Pickering Lands Branch, Transport Canada, the Region of .Durham, the Region of York, the Towns of Markham and Uxbridge, MP Mark Holland and MPP Joe Dickson and the MPs and MPPs for Markham and Uxbridge. Executive Summary: In August 2010, Transport Canada informed the City of its intention to demolish 41 structures on the federally owned lands within the Pickering Lands Site (see Attachment #2). ATTACHMENT # , TO January 4, 2011 Report PD 02-11 REPORT # PD Zo -I Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands . Page 27 0 Nine of the 41 structures identified for demolition are listed on the City of Pickering Heritage Register as being of cultural heritage value or interest (see Location Map - Attachment #1). At the City's request, Transport Canada agreed to refrain from demolishing the nine historical structures until the end of January, 2011 to allow staff to undertake a detailed. assessment of the structures, and to allow City Council the opportunity to review the assessment and provide further direction to staff (see Attachments #3 and #4). Staff appreciate the cooperation of Transport Canada in notifying the City of its demolition plans, and agreeing to. delay the demolition of buildings of local heritage interest. In November 2010, the City retained a consulting team consisting of Martindale Planning Services in association with John Sabean and Gordon Zimmerman, to undertake an assessment of the nine heritage structures to identify their structural and historical significance. The assessments concluded that two of the nine buildings listed on the Heritage Register do not warrant preservation, but that seven buildings merit preservation. The original sections of the remaining seven houses are considered sound and could still be restored. Two houses in particular (635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road and 5245 Sideline 28) are considered to be of sufficient cultural heritage significance to warrant in-situ preservation., Given the level of cultural heritage significance of these seven buildings, and particularly the two noted buildings, staff recommend that the Federal Minister of Transportation be advised of Council's concern regarding the destruction of local cultural heritage resources and request that Transport Canada refrain from demolishing the buildings until a decision regarding the future plans for the Pickering Lands Site has been made. In addition to the nine properties considered in this report, there are approximately 100 more structures within the Pickering Lands Site that are listed on the City's Heritage Register as buildings of heritage interest. Staff recommend that the City request that Transport Canada reinstate the Local Heritage Steering Committee or equivalent, and fully fund future assessments necessary to gain a greater understanding of the cultural heritage resources existing on the Pickering Lands Site. In the meantime, it is recommended that Heritage Pickering continue with the ongoing assessment of the heritage buildings on the Pickering Lands Site, as resources permit, so that notification of any future demolitions can be dealt with by Council in a timely manner. Financial'implications: Consultants were retained to undertake a cultural heritage assessment of the nine properties identified for demolition by Transport Canada that are included on the City's Heritage Register. The study was funded from the Planning & Development Department's 2010 general consulting budget as approved by Council, and in accordance with the City's purchasing standards. Staff recommend that Transport Canada fully reimburse the City for the costs it incurred to undertake detailed heritage assessments of these nine buildings. Re qrt PD 02-11 ATTACHMENT # TO January 4, 2011 I REPORT # PD__ QF7 1-1 - Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 3 Additional costs will be incurred by the City should it undertake assessments for an additional 100 identified heritage properties within the Pickering Lands. Staff recommend that Transport Canada be requested to fully fund the City's costs for these assessments. Sustainability Implications:. This Report provides information relating to the. objective of preserving buildings having cultural heritage value as an integral part of a sustainable City. In addition to the historical physical value of the buildings, the buildings also have a social value in that they form part of the community of northwest Pickering.. Preservation and re-use of the buildings would also divert materials from landfill sites. 1.0 Background: 1.1 Nine structures of heritage interest situated on the federally owned Pickering Lands Site property have been identified. by Transport Canada for demolition In August 2010, Transport Canada informed the City of Pickering of its intention to demolish 41 structures on the federally owned lands within the Pickering . Lands Site. The Pickering Lands Site consists of lands in north Pickering that are being reserved by the federal government for a possible future airport. It is staffs understanding that this demolition contract is one of a series of demolitions to be undertaken in the future. Nine of the 41 structures identified for demolition are listed on the City of Pickering Heritage Register. Transport Canada's position with respect to the. treatment of heritage structures is that they are bound to recognize only buildings having federal historical significance. For buildings with local heritage significance, Transport Canada will allow the documentation of the structures, and the removal of,parts or all of the structures for preservation elsewhere (e.g. Pickering Museum), with the understanding that any of these strategies for preservation would be undertaken by municipalities or local interest groups at their cost. Vacant heritage buildings not removed by others are scheduled for demolition even if found to have local heritage value. At the City's request, Transport Canada agreed to refrain from demolishing the nine historical structures until the end of January, 2011 to allow staff to undertake a detailed assessment of the structures, and to allow City Council the opportunity to review the assessment and provide further direction to staff. Demolition permits were recently issued for the 32 non-heritage structures. Staff appreciate the cooperation of Transport Canada in notifying the City of its demolition plans, and agreeing to delay the demolition of buildings of local heritage interest. ATTACHMENT# TO January 4, 2011 Report PD 02-11 - REPORT # Po_ 2j:2-11 i 72 Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 4 The nine heritage structures are located at the following addresses: • 429 Eighth Concession Road • 140 Seventh Concession Road • 5165 Sideline 22 • 5050 Sideline 24 • 1095 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road • 840 Eighth Concession Road • 5245 Sideline 28 • 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road • 5413 Sideline 30, 1.2 Heritage assessments have been undertaken In November 2010, the City retained a consulting team consisting of Martindale Planning Services in association with John Sabean and Gordon Zimmerman, to , undertake an assessment of the nine heritage structures to identify their structural and historical significance. The consultants were asked to provide the following for each of the properties having heritage interest: • a description of the property • a statement of the Cultural Heritage Attributes of the property including: o. Historical and Associative Value o Contextual Value o Physical Value o Significant Architectural Attributes • a map showing the context of the property • photographs of the structure within its setting and photographs and descriptions of the interior as appropriate Site visits took place during the last week of November, 2010. 2.0 Discussion: 2.1 Two of the nine buildings listed on the Heritage Register do not warrant preservation The buildings identified for demolition at 425-429 Eighth Concession Road and 5413 Sideline 30 do not warrant preservation. Two houses are located on the single property at 425 -.429 Eighth Concession Road. The structure identified for demolition (429 Eighth Concession Road) was found to have no heritage value (see Attachment #5). The house at 425 Eighth Concession Road is the structure identified in the Heritage Registry as being of heritage interest. It is currently tenanted and is not proposed to be demolished at this time. i ATTACHMENT ~ January 4, 2011 RepcJrt.PD 02-11 REPORT # N - TO 4 Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 5 With respect to 5413 Sideline 30, the investigation concluded that significant external and internal renovations and high levels of internal mould and physical damage have made the house unworthy of preservation (see Attachment #6). 2.2 Seven of the nine buildings listed on the Heritage Register merit conservation and potential future designation The remaining seven buildings were found to merit preservation and potential future designation. Two of the seven (635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road and 5245 Sideline 28) were found to be of high cultural heritage value. The following are summaries of the assessments for each property. The complete assessment reports are available at the Planning & Development Department: 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road This house is one of a set of six "workers" houses that together form the eastern gateway into the hamlet of Altona. The houses are rumored to have been built for the six sons of the original settler. The set of houses together form a cultural heritage landscape of a type that is very rarely found in rural Ontario and that is identified in architectural heritage resource documents as warranting further research and evaluation. The original part of this house is still sound. The later one-storey addition to the rear is in disrepair and for.safety reasons and longer term preservation of the original structure, should be removed. This house is very important as an integral part of this cultural heritage feature (see Attachment #7). 5245 Sideline 28 This house is of plank-on-plank construction, a construction form that was infrequently employed in North America in the mid 19th Century. It is quite large for the style of construction and although all of the cladding has been removed from the exterior, only a small section of the exterior lumber wall is showing signs of rot. Although the front of the house is of a centre hall (three bay) plan, the rear was originally divided into two rooms (two bays).. Two doors; possibly original, led to a side veranda. Very early renovation of the main floor resulted in changes to the rear partition wall locations, but the interior finishes and trim are quite unique in design and profile, and remain very largely intact. The uniqueness of- the structure, its original high quality construction and current soundness underscore its tremendous value'as a permanent structure in the community. This building should be retained and restored (see Attachments #8 and #9). 1095 Uxbridge Pickering Town Iine Road This small residence may have been the home of the local blacksmith. The original building is still structurally sound. A later back addition is in disrepair and should be removed for long term preservation of the original structure and for safety reasons (see Attachment #10). ATTACHMENT #-P TO January 4, 2011 Report PD 02-11 REPORT # PD LO -I I Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 6 5050 Sideline 24 A building of very significant heritage value with high quality exterior and interior finishes and few alterations affecting the heritage elements of the structure is located on this property. This building sustained fire damage in recent years. The rear kitchen addition is in extremely poor shape and should be removed and preferably replaced, but areas of the original main house are still sound and the structure could be restored despite the fire damage. Valuable salvageable material maybe removed from the structure for use at the Pickering Museum if the building is to be demolished.(see Attachment #11). 5165 Sideline 22 A unique construction technique and floor plan were discovered in the house at this location. The building was originally built as a one-storey plank-on-plank house (see Attachment #9) having two doors located in the centre of the north and south facades each of which were connected to vestibules leading into two large rooms on the east and west sides of the house. The house was subsequently modified with a second storey and back kitchen additions. Due to structural compromises occurring through the renovation process, the exterior walls are considerably bowed. Restoration to the original house would still be possible, however. The Pickering Museum may also find some useful salvageable materials in this structure for display and maintenance purposes (see Attachment #12). 840 Eighth Concession Road This residence has only recently been vacated. It has floor to ceiling front room windows and a less than common fan light window above the front door. The cellar stairs have been removed and the interior rear of the house has undergone significant renovation, but the house is still considered sound and could be restored with a relatively small financial investment (see Attachment #13). 140 Seventh Concession Road The house at this location is in good condition with the exception of later front and side deck additions. The interior has undergone some renovation. Attractive, possibly original barge boards and a centre gable finial as well as original interior trim still speak to its former quality. Still structurally sound, this building could be restored (see Attachment #14). Given the level of cultural heritage significance of these seven buildings, and particularly the two buildings at 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road and 5245 Sideline 28, staff recommend that the Federal Minister of Transportation be advised of Councirs concern regarding the destruction of local cultural heritage resources and request that the Transport Canada refrain from demolishing the buildings until a decision regarding the future plans for the Pickering Lands Site has been made. Delaying demolition of heritage structures until the land needs of a future airport are known would prevent the unnecessary destruction of valuable heritage resources if the properties are ultimately returned to private ownership. Report PD 02-11 ATTACHMENT # To January 4, 2011 7 REPORT # PD D' it . Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures o.n Federal Lands Page 7 2.3 Proposed strategy for assessing additional heritage structures on the Pickering Lands Site In addition to the nine properties considered in this report, there are approximately 100 more structures within the Pickering Lands Site that are listed on the City's Heritage Register as buildings of heritage interest. While some are still occupied, a number of the buildings are vacant and boarded and are not being maintained. The City does not currently have a strategy for dealing with these buildings. Although Heritage Pickering is working through the properties listed on the Heritage Register to identify those worthy of designation under the Ontario Heritage Act, funding and resources are limited. In addition, the current Transport Canada position regarding certain demolition of locally significant heritage structures limits the City's strategy to documentation and salvage only, in the absence of funding and alternative sites for relocation of the building. Transport Canada, in response to concerns from local heritage groups and Municipalities in 2005, had indicated a willingness to work with municipalities through the creation of a Local Heritage Steering Committee to develop a. strategy for structures determined to have local heritage significance. This action resulted from the proposed demolition of the Tullis Cottage (also.known as the Barclay House) in Pickering at the time. The Steering Committee had representation from the City of Pickering and the Towns of Markham and Uxbridge. Transport Canada provided funding at that time to undertake the assessments of some of the identified structures. Although a working sub-committee met on several occasions to prioritize a list of heritage resources and begin to undertake evaluations, the work was never completed, and the Steering Committee has never re-convened. Staff recommend that the City request that Transport Canada reinstate the Local Heritage Steering Committee or equivalent, and fully fund future assessments necessary to gain a greater understanding of. the cultural heritage resources existing on the Pickering Lands Site. In the meantime, it is recommended that Heritage Pickering continue with the ongoing assessment of the heritage buildings on the Pickering Lands Site, as resources permit, so that notification of any future demolitions can be dealt with by Council in a timely manner. ATTACHMENT #----L_To Report PD 02-11 REPORT # PD_2 Q.:I I January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 8 7 6 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Letter from Transport Canada advising City of proposed demolitions 3. Staff's request to Transport Canada to defer demolition of structures having heritage interest 4. Transport Canada's agreement to.the City's requests 5. 429 Eighth Concession Road - Photo 6. 5413 Sideline 30 - Photo 7. 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road - Photo 8. 5245 Sideline 28 - Photo . 9. Illustration of plank=on-plank construction technique 10. 1095 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road Photo 11. 5050 Sideline 24 - Photo 12. 5165 Sideline 22 Photo 13. 840 Eighth Concession Road - Photo 14. 140 Seventh Concession Road Photo Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Isa J 's, MCIP; RPP Neil Carrol , C , RPP Planner II Director, PI ing & Development Marg.Wouters, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design IJ:Id Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering C' Coun it 20, 2610 Tony Prevedel, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer 77 i ATTACHMENT # r0 RPURT # PDrZU-► 'DMH@H0P QXF MDDDDD i 635 1095 63 1 arsm off 5245 5165 505 a o p fl--A me 429 o o , 140 D Land Use Subject Property LJ Ot of Pickering Plannin & Development De artment PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Various Properties OWNER: Transport Canada FILE No- Heritage Demolitions DATE: Oct. 19,2 010 tm cbwl6srrrpesilrc artlrta suppl ns NnpMs RessreE. NOtspbndswey SCALE: 1.34,639 eaYY NPAC SMisa rs AO KRsceroO Nma anal5ws. PN-RLIR Transport Canada Transpor?s Canada 7 Ontario Region Region de I'Gntaric i Programs and Pickering Lands Programmes et oiens•fonds de Pickering Ontario Region Regicn de I'Ontaric 4900 Yonge St., 4:" Floor 4900, rue Yonge. 4ierne etage ATTACHMENT # I TO Toronto. Ontario Toronto. Ontario REPORT # PD b-l) N12N 6A5 M2N 6A5 . August 19. 2010 Debbie Shields City Clerk, Legal & Legislative Services Division City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering. ON L1V fiK7 Dear Ms. Shields: Please be advised that Transport Canada intends to undertake demolition activity on numerous structures situated on the federally owned Pickering Lands Site property, located within the municipal boundaries of the City of Pickering. The structures in question are all currently vacant, each having access restriction barriers in place to prevent vehicle access, however, each remains accessible by. foot. The structures pose. obvious hazards to individuals who frequently, whether authorized or illegally, attempt to access the properties or view them from close proximity. Transport. Canada is committed to ensuring that structures on the Pickering Lands Site do not compromise the safety of tenants; members of the general public, Transport Canada's employees or agents. For this reason, I recently had the opportunity to meet with the City's Chief Administrative Officer as well as the City's Director of the Planning & Development Department, to discuss the aforementioned, as well as our intentions of proceeding with this imminent demolition undertaking.* It is our understanding that seven (7) locations may be of local interest to the City. As a result we will delay the removal of these structures until the latter stages. of. the project this fiscal year, thereby allowing the City the opportunity to undertake any internal assessments it deems necessary. Transport. Canada continues to support information sharing and working in a collaborative manner with our neighbouring municipal partners such as the City of Pickering. To this end I have enclosed a listing (Annex "A"), outlining each location where structures are scheduled for removal this fiscal year. Should you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours-truly, Perry Papadatos, Regional Manager, Pickering Site Operations c.c. Neil Carroll. Director. Planning & Development Department. City of Pickering End: Annex 'A" I , Canada tll1 79 Transport Canada Transports Canada Ontario Region Region de I'Ontano L ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PD a- II --Annex "A" I J a PIN ! Municipality Address Roll Number 614247.10. Pickerin 13725 Sideline 28 030-0103-185-00 VA272.10 Pickering _ 3855 Sideline 32 030-003-15300 ;614289.00 lPickeri_in;3825 Y..)rk/Durham Line 030-003-15600 6'14291.00 ;Pickering 3845 York/DLirham I. me 030-003-15400 614309.00 Pickering ;1620 Concession-7 030 009-04600 ;614335.00 ;Pickering _ ;1405 Concession 8 030-001-34100 614337.00 PicF enng - 1375 Concession 8 03fl-001-34300 ! . ;814351.00 Pickenng 4120 Sideline 24 030-003-026no ' . 614382.00 Pickering '4300 Sideline 28 _ 030-001-39200 614385.00 Pickering y :4370 Sideline 28 030-001-38900 .614386.00 Pickerng 4380 Sideline 28 030-001-38800 x'614397.30 Pickering A29 Concession S 030-001-40600 '614404.00 Pickering ;315 Concession 8 :030-001-41300 i....._ 814413 00 Pickering 1180 Concession 7 _ WO-003-06410 614414.10_ Pickering 140 Concession 7 X030-003-06400 614424.10 Pickering '4780 Brock Road 030 002 10000 614450.00 (Pickering 4975 Sideline 24 030-001-18100 614464 00 Pickering 4965 Sideline 28 '030-001-19800 _ '614477.00 Pickering 4950 Sideline 28 030-001-20000 _'614516 00 Pickering 4655 York/Durham Line :030-001-33200 614517.00 Pickering X4665 York/Durham Line 030-001-33100 :614518 00 Pickering A675 York/Durham Line '030-001-33000 :030-001-32700 - `4705 `614521.00 Pickerinc York/Durham Line 1614531.10 Pickerin `95 Concession 9 030 001-22200 _:614538.10 Pickering ;5165 Sideline 22 :030-001-10810 614553.10 Pickering {5050 Sideline 24 _ :030-001-11510 614560.00 Pickering 11095 U/P Townline - .030-001-02100 . 614566.00 Pickeriny. 15255 Sideline 26 '030-001-03300 _....__...,_._.__....r. 614.56800 _ Pickering '5315 Sideline 26 :030 001-03100 614586.00 Pickering X5115 Sideline 28 030 001-12400 _ _ 614597.00 Pickering _ 5450 Sideline 28 _ .030-001-05100 614599.00 Pickering__ 6480 Sideline 28 `030-001-04900 614610.00 Pickering !5255 Sideline 30 - 030-001-06700 _ 614616.00 iPickering :5455 North Road__ _ _ 030-001-06200 ;614061.00 P ckerin 3505 Brock Road y030-009-27100 Canada" ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PQ_~ Transport Canada . 1 ransperts ;anaoa Ontario Region Region de I'Ontaric C3 U 614695:010 Pickering 3645 Bro~ham Road '030-009-18200 "Pickerin Barn Only G3C OC1.34'OG_ 614339 , 614458 34 iPic!cern !840 Concession S 030 001 25700 614588 Pickering i5245 Jideltrn 30 uC1-12 iC0 a o 1635 U/P Townline 030-0'01 OS OQ _6145..8.10 lPickerinn( 614611 10 Ptckering 5413 Sideline 30 030-001-06400 END. Canada - --•-----o -""r. L_i l 'Y One he Esplanade Pickering, Ontario ATTACHMENT # I TO Canada L1V6K7 - - REPURT # PO Diiecf access 905.420.4660 TCKERING Toll Free 1.86b.i.com citvofpickering.com P j' NNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTIMENT r;ment 905.420.4617 Eac_i"nile 905.420.7648 905.420.1739 pla:-,&-devl@citvofpickering.com September 29, 2010 Perry Papadatos Regional Manager, Pickering Site Operations ' Programs and Pickering Lands Transport Canada, Ontario Region 4900 Yonge Street, 4th Floor. Toronto, ON. M2N 6A5 Subject: Transport Canada Notification of Intention to Demolish 41 Structures - File: A-3300-005 We have had an opportunity to review your letter of August 19, 2010, advising the City Clerk of Transport Canada's intention to demolish 41 structures situated on the federally owned Pickering Lands Site property. The letter also indicates that the demolition of seven structures identified as being of local interest to the City will be delayed until the latter stages of the demolition project, in order to give the City time to undertake any necessary assessments. Nine of the 41 structures listed in your August 19, 2010 letter are included in the Pickering Heritage Register. These nine properties are identified on the listing attached to this letter. At our meeting on August 12, 2010, Transport Canada advised that it would be applying. to the City for demolition permits for all structures. to be demolished, and would follow Provincial legislative protocol with respect to notification prior to demolishing the structures listed on the Heritage Register. The Ontario Heritage Act provides for a 60 day notification period to allow municipalities to review demolition requests. In this case, the 60 day notification period would lapse in mid-October 2010. We respectfully request that Transport Canada refrain from demolishing the nine structures in question until the end of January 2011 in order for City staff to undertake a detailed assessment of the nine structures, and to allow City Council the opportunity to review the assessment and provide further direction. Due to the upcoming municipal election, City Council will not have the opportunity to formally comment respecting these nine structures until mid-January 2011. Transport Canada's Advisement of Intention to Demclish September 29, 2010 ATTACHN ENT #IL-TO 13 Page 2 Should retention of the structures in their original state not be a viable option, we further request permission for City staff or its agents to enter onto the lands in order to document the structures and to be granted salvage rights so that significant structural and decorative elements that may be identified be made available to the Pickering Museum. We thank you for your consideration and look forward to your response. Yours truly Neil Carrol , FI-PRPP Director, Planning & Development Department IJ:jf J:\STAFFUjsmes\Hen1apeWeny ?apadatos Sept 23 Fed demos.doe Attachment Copy: Mayor Ryan Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Director, Operations.& Emergency Services City Clerk Supervisor, Building Permits ATTACHMENT #0 8 3 REPORT # PD~~ D - Structures on. Heritage Register to be Demolished by Transport Canada PIN Address Roll Number 614397.30 425-429 Eighth Concession Road 030-001-40600 614414.10 140 Seventh Concession Road 030-001-06400 614538.10 5165. Sideline 22 030-001-10810 614553.10 5050 Sideline 24 030-001-11510 614560.00 1095 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road 030-001-02100 614458.30 871 Eighth Concession Road (840) 030-00.1-26700 614588.00 5245 Sideline 28 (not Sideline 30) 030-001-12100 614598.10. 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road 030-001-05700 614611.10 5413 Sideline 30 030-001-06400 JASTAFFVjameslHerRage~Attachment 'A' Transport Canada. Transports Canada Ontario Region Region de I'Ontano AT ACHIENT # I TO84 Neil Carroll RPOR7 # PD_ 26- ►1 Director, Planning and Development Department r . L Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade _ Dir•Lcrinn nil , ~~--L1V 6K7 October 12, 2010 Dear Mr. Carroll, Thank you for your correspondence of September 29, 2010, regarding Transport Canada's plan'to demolish 41 vacant structures situated on the Pickering Lands within the City of Pickering. We are happy to comply with your request to delay the demolition of the nine structures identified in the Pickering Heritage. Register until the end of January, 2011. However, as. it will not be possible to delay the demolition beyond this point, we would urge you to move forward with your assessment of the properties well before this time. Demolition or removal of these structures must take place before March 31, 2010; therefore appropriate lead time must be set aside to complete preparatory work. Transport Canada.is certainly amenable to allowing City staff or City agents on to federal property to inspect the structures in order to document and salvage materials if desired. Again, please proceed with any inspections well before January 2011. Please contact Perry Papadatos, Regional Manager, Pickering Site Operations, at 416-952- 4068 for all questions or concerns related to accessing these structures. Yours sincerely, Rob Berge n Regional or,-.Programs and Pickering Lands Branch Ontario Region Transpart. Canada ATTACHMENT #_-[--TO --TO # TO REPORT # PD # PG Ca' - I I r t 4 ~ 4 1, tS 1 ~ ~',.r rt ~ ~ rr _ w . t . -r. - r Yf if r-, S~ \ l/ • , too. n. 'paw : qx:....;:L . . rvau-~F ..Yds'PM3 9•~.'' •r7 a. OWN 901 $4.141462="='. ry Y S tae.,-i ~f3, R. =4 , . W 429 Eighth Concession Road J ♦ ~ i. w F♦ A Pi 'S ~ x~ , t w. r , ~'t ►,t i , i j ' li ' ♦ re , VIA! ♦ i t r ~ i ~r 1 •r. {~,1f ~ ` fin♦~ r ' t y tits +E`'y4 ~ :1 t 1 , ! r : x r •w \ 7 A' I S t{ / Ssy,'1f F s ,F \ r -.'wry 3 I 1~ t.'. ~y 4 ~ l Ir. r w - n 4 ~i~3~}j 1{~~(~:~~!¢ It t ~ +*'S, c ! ~n „rf v, r ~ ~t~ljlil`, `~;i 9 ( 1/ ~ rol '~i h y v y t i ~t{ r t t~ • r(1~QtijP ld~ *t. ~~r's.~~.~~ ~f lad tl ...rte F \i~: n > ab -CJ Rf! pp l' 7f{ ~1 1 ~~1 1 > r jf~, ,fit 1 T{ 'OA Al\' 'j~'f'.T,t lub; Jr., 7 J \ it } ?t 1 ¢t+f,', ~r f,~ ;~C ;x•t.;)~+~'l~iii~.x.:s~, i _ a, ~ `~.,y ~.~r'Sy~ 1 t r 4 31" 1" Z 1. &476CHPAENT TO REPORT # PQ L ^ -~y N;bl { a.- a I {j. i. . 4 x J k t j r i-o-•'x Pickerin Townline Road 635 Uxbridge g A 4 top wo, ,.,,l;; Z Ta' \ t h wI...,-"""' ; fit i 4 ~ , 9 V > ~ 1, * Z ~ ` Y} ~ t~ . IM I¢ VI P 14 A• ~ e *.F, of T~~6>R. 'LK ~r'e.r ,I~~~.; SR~~!.' r i"~:~,.f ~ `4., .44 L s r r1, wp "`~rrsz v" s 1 .74. 'S k~ ~J',•: w►T.`.^, t w A, tli kr4` y s j _4 s : u a CA' pyy % rr({M1,Y ~6{ r) 1 Y i 1 a.a ' rr4 y t b+ >4.., a "Utlst r i y - ~ ~A?, 1 a.du•.~~:La»..e:saw '7}~ y+~. ~ "~1 . ,`~?`!~~+~l a • ~~t" r ~ ~.:Y rr 'fir y -A w 'Se Id 9 ~r . ~ mfr 5~ W 4` •-7 ~`M►~ _ 4 r~'~~' ~ ~ i ~y< K3 ~ J~'`;'r~'¢'.~ fly+1?L }~3 w , NIP #°~~i ~~+yL y~j,-,y" 1?~.f~.•~~"; qty y~• ~y'' 1 AV,.,i'l~t,"~`-A4' t o ;r. 4 r. ATTACHMENT # f -_TO~ M_ gREPORT # PD_ I rl IVI ry slalh.,r~ P,kr t r :,n. ( NJ.'!rr ' re;rcr r a, cr i r rr lti~i 1.Jr J.A i it x r,1t:a ttTll ''r.l lf, I rl p,n Irv r*r + ~s , - r`•~ is ,srrrx~_I -r. r. a+r~ :erlss7iti:rttt~• ^ <crr l1r'.;! 11 rrrrur a 1 i ~i~i I ~,v :rt' Ye-, r ~ ~"I f•al>.~ irrfn•~six ' l.r iI:C -rhl; ;r, {,n 1 tSa~,l: na, t;r`' 6 f 1 :.T~. .''aJ1.14. I.~:5f.9 t7:11ia1 :C'7. n:lf.S~.- Ix . t 1`y II i~'.1 rllal ILti.'ry l,r• rY Yl,l !l lh Nh,,. - ' ~ i I.u 11._ ell ~lc~rqr r,t ,c:.,, ,t tsmtr~r, uggis Ln:rJ,l ["N.ni trs. _;ao a~lr, Il`nt~+~r,., r~ w•. I,'Ift C4 r, ,~'r+rj~ Rnfi, €:+1+r.h 3w1i4.-wlst - ii .>rtrr: ia.t l.X.ilr*i., {'n'wirxir tt A .d.'alr q~ir,cPaJ( 1 , h tr Fa.r .r> 1r: s,~ I nl a:n ± m ar.V.AIaa 10Teak, r:srrrexl:AA a, bf i:r., u f•:. ~_,I: nt.uw_ Lyrsr, rl:,i± (i ft.ai~xas5}•~,rl~o;,rnla r7.rtr ui,i.I~.k crr.~:irr,.rrl a L3vxYSfwithAlsnlcHottseY rsmTna:.rt cic'r'iccrsg•u[t•I h r~~ ri.f.forWtvr.;ttit i ror4tiYMFMM.:iN TIN;?:CAVIVx..uiirwa jrl..•rr~hn.siiW,ll~ri r.nr xL&l+,f Revi-va:mitna l_r. j ;~ttIJ1 1rLCaJrril3:Jl,rYIt SFr L: 3I.CUaiexiII! Rirl; »L hrJhYlr ficasst..>I~rs Jsr fiend swslt hE_e r l ae> hx s+' 1rg wa In i rge C: rir 1~n 4i tirr7r.1',hsnrr, :n riu. rru t.i e E r.t;r eevhu~t Ex-L.;•'rrcrrtll i r.ht i>-.lsrn7ex',x ~~.L..:.1lw+r~ilr.3.arrrni,r, S~Iai Lytrl.l.v.S?Wr,x smpltwAviy,-rr,tllr,ta,eAr,r: L; :f.l, r<u earl`, hive am ss.s.a i,.: rhr. a s..ls. fir r t 7Sm" eacl,;n1,:+risr vs l w alr in > :14ivesT[I rS:l 'All,. P<sii rr , I r { ryr- rte(' H' l: tT._\73.'r" ' I L } :71 1 II y ! - J, t'%, :I INv i ►M1: yr' L 4' . Al. j 1 ' KilJ r'C I 1 Fs:rr~ ,)r.<~ T3 1 vwN i. feu 'ria~.. 40 /L f< , ATTACHMENT ~fo REPORT # PD 7T:-) -I 90 t C/ S . T~ S ~ ~ mfr R R e~ ~ j ~ + r. ~ ~ ~ ' 4"- X 2"f ' A Y.' )C, i ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ` - i~>~,(~y;:.'~r'~• ~'3 '`fit i r YJ Y i 1 l~ r, ' ..mot (c ; 1095 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road r r ~ t` , 4 t E r i 4 t z , ~14 VK, 17 :4c'F fir.--+.~t.' 1,~'."".~.'"'s ~ /QQ..'F~ t. •3` p~ ^ _ °v 'eh~ z~J~ j ryy~ '.'*Lz"`• ~E... - ;r~ -~v tt j~~ f~ ~ r [ ,:j t 1 y t Kf- 14, }°~~,r,~{d~ia ~ 4.',` ifA... ~~i - ( ~ w✓ ~ ~ Somas ~,r'T-~ip 'd ni; ~ .s kf kar''bz~-a { wms ~„apS 'r2 s'2i t y 1. r( ~ v t~'d~`. "'Y•z'. r - i r3 f~'r« r xg'^:%m~i~~j vii; ° i , g n H r r.FM r \ S rr ~ -~g~,,,~ a r ~f} '1rd"'~ ~val y ^~t~,,3fi rW a.F~"3 f r z t F ° _ r ~ ~ ~n~~ ~ --•w ' 1~'l :'.e s~, S _.t f~ ~F .'~rdr i s~~ Z r ✓ { x~~' ~ eyt~ .1~"y ra 0 ~ ,r~ > )t aCJ~~~~ Kn ~~,~r"" ~i , ~ h U$ i~i~pq~ ri -t,,.~}Fy a° a 3AmjJ' ?,y(r, J -0~itr a~ Y 'Y l ~+•.K; - `9 P' ly ' f~`'b. ~£"r~ f F .7 9 S , 4 S 4 .Y ti~ -u'jfF• ,5 +f Y~ s° fA - i! ;~.•r~ ? - v S> 4Y t ~ .ter i ,,~t c~' e ;;h a r rib ° rF C f t a i. W, ?;y { yt j j . } '',t ,Y'c d f) ~~s y s' ~ r R~ r4 ':e+t ~ } ~ a&r.... t-- P • v ~y~ ~ ~ "cam, ~,y. "!,f 1 e y.~t } `rs. r r e, ` ,~,,,i' { f. ^ ..~•c ~ s ~ 7~r { A`4 ~ '`~x °t~r~v-• ~h l.r },z' ~ ' ,-'~i `i"si'y ~4 ; p`~:. i_ ~ eT r''' •t~ ~A.'4. ~A .y'•j, , r.- p i. a {".yam i '7' .:.p { ) s v...,{,''^ 4" y'~''^P,".-:'rF y',S_.,~ r. v. iy7 1 k r, .1^+..-., i. lr f > t 411?. #c. + '~9 it '~l L -C~ y( ~'ie'yfi!$' >'~~G~}~kI1F/5 43n'l Y .Y 1 S . s ; ryF.~•• i,}` ~ ~ +rF ~t~t'`, ¢s ~.~iw~4 K;~yy~ .1. § v* z f r ;;aas.Pr,,~•n°a-nr'u ~'3~rr . tr• a"e+ r~l - n.r - i s •M.d r,. d e n .t- • r+^ n P 1k~,.7 i d s+' ,~4 1 s x d: 9 r 5. A V .a t 4 ` ~ .N1JE,y~vtyj'~;3'~S~Y~u x6 t !v~, M,s~ zr3~"f '"~~Y~ 7Jr 'fr 1 ~v,• .Ok" + Y T {'"1" ARr L r m Sy.~r."' L 1#•,r% > .t •x-. ' '~r+t. j f ~ v( ~ r! ~fasd,~'~ ~z~,'~'b:~~,` r,'`$'>~. .r rid t aav s ~y:,rjy ~ FS C k t F"": t 's7' , N,f A'7fr r .a, wj. t '~'r• y4`~r~ 71 Y]r 3syx - - ~ ~i yr~l~..'1 F~yy7 ~'"xGx+; Z ~a ATTACHMENT # REPORT # PD 92 r. h i ~ t a - ✓ r x ss r ~ ~ a ~ ~ rg F , ~ 4 A . t i% G t Y C ~ _ ~ Ups. i r a Y 1 r 1r 5165 Sideline 22 n ;n t ~ ' LE'~aMt" k Im tTi ~ ~3F ~ A ar ~ n J S a P r D Y ~ r } s h ' # f {jF%xx3 y zo, t 4 3„ fi t yka yt3.Ek R' . 5 ~ j ~ ~ ^ y " ..E ®+r:3.~ f ~ y A• j 'y r aF~° t i, t S'" i:5 t a 'f WAI gg- , s y>~ tr xy~~ ✓ i~~y a ..r' ~yt le er k 7111 vi W- y- i . k TJ ! i S \T lM~. 7 '-7 yam, ; Y~ , t yjX •N 'S~ t+y nL li"'~L13 A M" ~~~i6.~ ~~x ix- ~-s.'W 'a~~- 3~f x. i x jd f I` l p--, x ~tb { x~ti t r 'u ~r ~ id lyc~ ; G ~h !i - y ek ~ a [ 3 ~ f 4 & k d At, 70 1 ''I ,tea. •.y t' car+ir t~" cop", r it -A r _ Air TO 477 ".777 /Y REPORZ # PD~ :77_....._ .ff 94 7tA f 1 z SI ! 1 rr ~ ri •y. .h 140 Seventh Concession Road .f ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # The Corporation of the City of Pickering Pickering Civic Complex PICKER I N G One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 1811 BICENTENNIAL 2011 cityofpickering.com Office of the Mayor T. 905.420.4600 Toll Free 1.866.683.2760 TTY 905.420.1739 Fax 905.420.6064 Email mayorpcityofpickering.com Delivered by Courier January 18, 2011 The Honourable Chuck Strahl Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities Tower. C - 330 Sparks. Street Ottawa, ON K1A ON5 Subject: Transport Canada Intention to Demolish Structures on the Pickering Lands Site File: A-3300-005 On January 17, 2011, City Council considered a report (attached) on the cultural heritage assessments of nine buildings of heritage value on the Pickering Lands Site that are scheduled for demolition by Transport Canada. These nine buildings are included in the City's Heritage Register and are among 41 structures that are in the process of being demolished on the Site. The cultural heritage assessments concluded that seven of the nine structures have retention and local cultural value, with two considered to have particularly high cultural. heritage significance. While Council appreciates Transport Canada's cooperation in delaying demolition and providing access to the properties in order to conduct these assessments, we are extremely concerned about the destruction of our heritage resources and implore you to take immediate action to prevent the demolition of these seven structures. The City of Pickering is celebrating its bicentennial this year, It is very disconcerting that it should also be the year in which the community loses many of its culturally significant heritage resources due to the actions of Transport Canada. As a community with a strong agricultural and rural history, the City's heritage building stock derives mainly from vernacular homestead structures often designed and built:by early settlers. A large proportion of Pickering's valued cultural heritage is located on the Pickering Lands Site. We remind you that demolition of the heritage structures is not in keeping with the federal government's previous commitments to work together with local communities through the Transport Canada Heritage'Steering Committee and Working Group formed by Transport Canada in 2005. The mandate of the steering committee was to develop a Transport Canada Intention to Demolish January 18, 2011 ATTACHMENT # To page 2 REPORT PD 2D heritage conservation strategy for lands in the Pickering Lands Site. At that time Transport Canada assisted in the review of a number of heritage structures. A sub- committee was formed, several meetings were held and site evaluations were begun, however no further correspondence regarding the committee was received after 2005. We are also very concerned about the cost of preparing heritage assessments in a short time frame for all of the identified properties on the Pickering Lands Site. In addition to the nine structures recently assessed, there are approximately 100 additional Pickering Lands Site buildings on the City's Heritage Register that are threatened with future. demolition and require cultural heritage assessment. The recently completed assessment of the nine heritage structures was not contemplated in our 2010 budget. Due to Transport Canada's demolition timelines, the assessments were undertaken in a compressed time period with the use of consultants, resulting in a significant unbudgeted cost of $27,000. Council requests that Transport Canada reimburse the City for these costs. Further, heritage assessments should also be undertaken for the 100 remaining properties on the Heritage Register. The City requests that Transport Canada fund these future assessments, priced by heritage consulting firms at between $3,000 and $4,000 per property. To assist in prioritizing these assessments, the City would like to be advised.of the future scheduling of structures for proposed demolition. To summarize, Pickering City Council respectfully requests: • that immediate action be taken to prevent demolition of the seven locally significant structures (and especially the two structures identified as having a very high cultural heritage significance) until a decision regarding future plans for the Site has been made and the potential for preservation of these structures can be fully considered • that action, be taken to secure these seven structures and to undertake necessary works to prevent their further deterioration • that, given Transport Canada's previous commitment to the local heritage structure review process, the Minister reimburse the City for the $27,000 expenditure to complete assessments of the nine heritage structures, and commit to funding the future assessments required for the remaining structures on the City's Heritage Register • that, in order for the City to prioritize the review of structures on the Heritage Register in the future, Transport Canada provide the City with a list of structures that are currently vacant and the order in which they are likely to appear in future demolition plans • that the Minister reconvene the Heritage Steering Committee to complete its mandate to develop a heritage strategy for buildings deemed locally significant If, despite our objections, the Honourable Minister determines that the seven structures identified as having local heritage value cannot be saved, we request that demolition be Transport Canada Intention to Demolish January 18, 2011 9 /7 ATTACHMENT # 2 To REPORT # PD 2©-1 Page 3 delayed until the end of March 2011 to provide the.City with additional time to arrange for salvage of valuable building elements from these properties. We thank you for your consideration and, in view of demolition timelines established by Transport Canada staff, respectfully request a response to this letter by January 31, 2011. Yours,,quly ` Dave Ryan Mayor, City of Pickering IJ:jf JASTAFF\ijames\Heritage\Fed Her DemoUnister Translnfra&Communities Jan 18 Fed demos.doc Attachment Copy: Dan McTeague, MP, Pickering-Scarborough East Mark Holland, MP, Ajax-Pickering Wayne Arthurs, MPP, Pickering-Scarborough East Joe Dickson, MPP, Ajax-Pickering Bev Oda, MP, Durham Paul Calandra, MP, Oak Ridges-Markham Helena Jaczek, MPP, Oak Ridges-Markham John O'Toole, MPP, Durham Rob Bergerin, Regional Director, Programs and Pickering Lands Branch Transport Canada Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Director, Operations Emergency. Services Director, Planning & Development City Clerk Chief Building Official I 20--11 9 8 Minister of Transport, Ministre rips TranT_r Infrastructure and Communities de I'InOR14CEOGRITHEIl AMOR l^ ,r F` ,mot: DECEIVED Ottawa, Canada K1AON5 FILE MAR 2 2 ZQ11 =oLLOw UP OPY FWD His Worship Dave Ryan CAO COUNCIL Mayor DIRECTORS CORP SERV City of Pickering OES OFFICE SUST Pickering Civic Complex C&R PLAN &.DEV One The Esplanade ENG SERV LEGAL & LS Pickering, ON LIV 6K7 FIRE CLERK OPER & FAC HUMAN RES " Dear Mayor Ryan: . First, let me thank you for providing the opportunity for Transport Canada staff to meet with senior staff of the City of Pickering on February 15, 2011. It is my understanding that at the conclusion of the meeting it was committed that Transport Canada would communicate its final position on the matter of the vacant structures on the Federal Lands in Pickering that. the City of Pickering considers to be of local heritage value. The current demolition program is based upon the need to remove vacant structures that pose a health and safety risk to the public and to first responders, such as firefighters. Despite taking extensive and costly measures to secure the structures including security patrols, people continue to break into these buildings. Social media sites, such as YouTube and others, display videos of `urban explorers' trespassing inside many of these structures, putting themselves at great risk. You are also aware that arson events have occurred in the recent past and remain a persistent threat. Therefore, it is necessary for Transport Canada to continue, this demolition program in. order to eliminate the very real threat to public safety. The City of Pickering has made requests to me with regard to local heritage which are contrary to Transport Canada's position that local heritage is. strictly a local matter. This includes conservation, planning, liability, and cost. Transport Canada cannot replace "local responsibility in this regard. Consequently, while I understand the value of a local heritage committee to the community, I do not believe that Transport Canada should play a role. For this reason Transport Canada will not provide funding for local heritage activities, including'assessments, whether already completed or contemplated. The seven local heritage structures at issue are vacant because they became excessively costly to maintain and yielded very low rent. Transport Canada will not expend funds for the rehabilitation or restoration of structures that have reached the end of their economic life. Transport Canada has and will continue to make decisions based on its transportation policies and on the best economic outcome for all Canadian taxpayers. That said, the Department.has over recent years completed extensive repairs on the majority of occupied structures across the Pickering Lands Site and has an ongoing program to repair viable occupied properties. Canada 2 ATTACHN4ENT 3 ___,_TO 9 9 2 REPC)RT # PD_ZO-II At the February 15`" meeting, the urgency in resolving this matter was discussed through what I understand to be a productive dialogue of the issues. I remain very concerned about the threat to public safety posed by these buildings. My officials had anticipated that the City would have completed its local heritage research, documentation and salvaging of materials by the previously agreed date of January 31, 2011, allowing for subsequent demolition. Once again, Transport Canada appreciates that the City of Pickering sees local heritage value in a number of vacant properties on-the Federal lands, including the seven discussed at the meeting. To this end, Transport Canada has attached, as Annex A, a list of all vacant structures intended for future demolition. Should the City identify any additional. structures as having local heritage value, Transport Canada should be notified as soon as possible. We expect that there would be no concerns with proceeding with the demolition program for those structures not having local heritage value. For those structures identified as having local heritage and in keeping with the principals outlined above, Transport Canada is prepared to cooperate by offering to lease those properties to the City according to the terms discussed by our officials, and found in the attached Annex B. If the.City chooses to pursue the option of leasing, all liabilities previously mentioned would be transferred to the City. Alternatively, Transport Canada is prepared to contribute an amount equivalent to the cost of demolition of a building to assist the City in relocating that building to a site off the Federal Lands. The City would be required to pay any remaining costs and manage all aspects of permanently moving the structure off the Pickering Lands Site. Transport Canada recognizes that the City will need to thoroughly consider the above proposal before making a final decision. Having said this, these vacant structures cannot remain in their present state for an indefinite period. I therefore ask that you relay your decision with respect to these structures to Transport Canada by September 15, 2011. In the interest of public health and safety, if the City chooses not to accept the principles and terms of this proposal Transport Canada will have no alternative other than to proceed with demolition. Sincerely, A L I Chuck Strahl Eric: Annex A: Vacant Structures Inventory Annex B: Lease Provisions 3 ATTACHMENT # 3 TO REPORT # PD 100 Annex "All: Vacant Structures Inventory PIN Municipality, Address Roll Number. 614216 Pickering 3970 Brock Rd. 1801 030 009081-00 0000 614221 Pickering 1608 Highway 7 1801 030 009 231-00 0000 614224.1 Pickering 1580 Highway 7 1801 030 009 233-00 0000 614227 Pickering 1480 Highway 7 1801 030 003 160-00 0000 614237.1 Pickering 1150 Highway 7 1801 030 003 175-00 0000 614261.2 Pickering 3630 Sideline 28 1801 030 003 200-20 0000 614302.1 Pickering 4355 Brock Rd. 1801 030 009 014-00 0000 614324 Pickering 4130 Sideline 30 1801 030 003 002-00 0000 614334.3 Pickering 4475 Sideline 22 1801 030 001-344-00 0000 614341.2 Pickering 1180 Concession 7 1801 030 003 018-00 0000 614377 Pickering 4190 Sideline 28 1801 030 003 044-00 0000 614380 Pickering -barn and 4250 Sideline 28 1801 030 001 394-00 0000 chicken coo only 614390 Pickering 570 Concession 7 1801 030 003 055-00 0000 614397.3 Pickering .429 Concession 8 1801 030 001 406-00 0000 614403 Pickering 350 Concession 7 1801 030 003 060-00 0000 614414.1 Pickering 140 Concession 7 1801 030 003 064-00 0000 614417 Pickering 115 Concession 8 1801 030 001 421-00 0000 614458.3 Pickering 840 Concession 8 1801 030 001 267-00 0000 614461.1 Pickering 835 Concession 9 1801 030 001 195-00 0000 614478 Pickering 575 Concession 9 1801 030 001 204-00 0000 614486 Pickering 4690 Sideline 30 1801 030 001 288-00 0000 614538.1 Pickering 5165 Sideline 22 1801 030 001 108-10 0000 614542.1 Pickering 1345 Uxbridge/Pickering 1801 030 001 001-00 0000 Townline 614544 Pickering 5170 Sideline 22 1801 030 001 109-00 0000 614553.1 Pickering 5045 Sideline 24 1801 030 001 115-10 0000 _ 614560 Pickering 1095 Uxbridge/Pickering 1801 030 001 021-00 0000 Townline 614588 Pickering 5245 Sideline 28 1801.030 001 121-00 0000 . 614590.2 Pickering 670 Concession 9 1801 030 001 130-00 0000 614598.1 Pickering 635 Uxbridge/Pickering 1801 030 001 057-00 0000 Townline 6.14600 Pickering 695 Uxbridge/Pickering . 1801 030 001 053-00 0000 Townline 614602 Pickering 675 Uxbridge/Pickering 1801 030 001 055-00 0000 Townline 614606 Pickering 520 Concession 9 1801 030 001 133-00 0000 614612 Pickering 565 Uxbridge/Pickering 1801 030 001 059-00 0000 Townline 614613 Pickering 5411 Sideline 30 1801 030 001 066-00 0000 614629 Pickering 5250 Sideline 30 1801 030 001 139-00 0000 614632 Pickering 5460 Sideline 30 1801 030 001 069-00 0000 614646 Pickering 1725 Highway 7 1801 030 009 240-00 0000 614656 Pickering 1689 Spring Gate Blvd. 1801 030 009 260-00 0000 ? 1 O ATTACHMENT # 3 4 REPORT # PD TO 614663 Pickering 3570 Brock Road 1801 030 009 274-00 0000 614669 Pickering 3553 Donnalea Ave. 1801 030 009 287-00 0000 614676 Pickering 1637 Highway 7 1801 030 009 249-00 0000 614677 Pickerin 1631 Highway 7 1801 030 009 250-00 0000 614679 Pickering 1607 Highway 7 1801 030 009 253-00 0000 614683 Pickering 1636 Orchard Heights 1801 030 009 292-00 0000 614684 Pickering 1632 Orchard Heights 1801 030 009 293-00 0000 r 614691 Pickering 1629 Orchard Heights 1801 030 009 300-00 0000 614694 Pickering 3649 Brougham Road .1801 030 009 181-00 0000 614698.3 Pickering - south 3629 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 185-00 0000 building only 614702 Pickering 3724 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 187-00 0000 <614703 Pickering 3712 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 188-00 0000 T 614707 Pickering 3700 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 192-00 0000 614708 Pickering 3688 Brougham Road 1801 030 009195-00 0000 614712 Pickering 3668 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 199-00 0000 614713 Pickering 3664 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 200-00 0000 614715 Pickering 3656 Brougham Road 1801030 009 203-00 0000 614717 Pickering 3648 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 205-00 0000 614721 Pickering 1682 Tisha Road 1801 030 009 211-00 0000 614723 Pickering 3632 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 212-00 0000 614727 Pickering 1690 Hi hwa 7 1801 030 009 216-10 0000 614731 Pickering 1646 Highway 7 1801 030 009 224-00 0000 . 5 ATTACHMENT #__3 TO 0 2 REPORT # PD Z©_ ANNEX B February 2011 LEASE PROVISIONS - VACANT STRUCTURES OF LOCAL HERITAGE INTEREST Definitions: , HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA as represented by the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities (referred to as the "Lessor" or "TC") THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING (referred to as the "Lessee or 'the City„) Generally as follows: 1. Both Transport Canada (TC) and the City of Pickering (the City) acknowledge that the Pickering Lands Site (PLS) was expropriated for potential aeronautical development. 2. All PLS land and structures remain the property of TC. 3. The. City acknowledges that they have entered into a `Net lease' to the Landlord, therefore the City assumes all operational/restoration costs, and liabilities related to the premises. 4. ' The lease term will commence once the City advises TC that a structure is to be preserved, or once the City requests that TC refrain from demolition. 5. The City shall remit rent to TC, per month, per site (PIN), at an amount TBD. 6. Similar to other executed leases between the City and TC, Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) shall be waived,.or the proportionate annual PILT value added to the monthly base rent. 7. The City is responsible for all aspects relating to security, including immediate remedial action in the event of a breach. 8. The Lessee is responsible for any / all damage, loss, injury, death to persons or property accessing or using the property, regardless if lawful / unlawful use or action. 9. Upon completion of restoration, properties may be sub-leased solely for commercial purposes, and only with the approval of TC. TC reserves the right to deny sub-lease proposals, assignments, or terminate established sub-leases which conflict or are incompatible with TC business, the environment, etc. 10. Sub-tenants to provide proof of comprehensive general liability insurance in an amount of not less than $5,000,000 per occurrence, and include HER MAJESTY as named insured. 11. The City is responsible for all costs relating to local heritage assessments. 12. The lease may be terminated by either party with a minimum of 12 months written notice. 6 ATTACHMENT # "ITp 103 REPORT 13. Should the City choose to relocate a structure to an alternate location off of the PLS, TC will permit the activity based on three conditions: i. Within a pre-determined time limit; ii. That TC formally transfer ownership / title of the asset to the municipality, and to no other (third) party or individual; iii. The asset is assumed in "as is" condition, and that TC makes no warrantee claims on the soundness, environmental, safety or other aspect of the asset. 14. TC may contribute an amount equal to the cost of demolition, to the City in their effort to relocate the structure. 15. Whether the City chooses to relocate a structure or execute a lease to preserve and restore a structure, environmental provisions require that the surrounding site (land) remain in a clean, natural state at all times. If negative impacts are identified following the term of the lease which are attributed to actions of the Lessee or subtenant during their tenure, the Lessee will be responsible for any necessary environmental cleanup or remediation. 16. The City is solely responsible to comply with all applicable Federal, Provincial and Municipal acts and regulations during term of the lease. 17. Should the City wish to erect signage at the leased site, it must do so via detailed written request to TC. TC-must provide written approval prior to the display of the signage. 18. If TC determines that the City is not undertaking corrective action in a timely manner (EXAMPLE: security breach, illegal dumping, graffiti, etc.), TC may proceed to remedy the item and obtain reimbursement of all costs from the City, up to and including lease termination with 30 days written notice. 19. The City shall identify a single point of contact (City staff) with authority to resolve disputes and exercise financial authority to discharge.payments, etc. ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PD 104 Annex "A" : Vacant Structures Inventory (May 2011) No PIN MUNICIPALITY ADDRESS N ROLL NUMBER ote 1 614216 Pickering 3970 Brock Rd. ✓ 1801 030 009 081-00 0000 2 614221 Pickering 1608 Highway 7 ✓ 1801 030 009 231-00 0000 3 614224-1 Pickering 1560/1570/1580 Highway 7 1801 030 009 233-00 0000 4 614227 Pickering 1480 Highway 7 ✓ 1801 030 003 160-00 0000 5 614237-1 Pickering 1150 Highway 7 ✓ 1801 030 003 175-00 0000 6 614261-2 Pickering 3630 Sideline 28 1801 030 003 200-20 0000 7 614302-1 Pickering 4355 Brock Road ✓ 1801 030 009 014-00 0000 8 614334-3 Pickering 4475 Sideline 22 ✓ 1801 030 001 344-00 0000 9 614341-2 Pickering 1180 Concession 7 ✓ 1801 030 003 018-00 0000 10 614383 Pickering 4320 Sideline 28 sheds 1801 030 001 391-00 0000 11 614390 Pickering 570 Concession 7 1801 030 003 055-00 0000 12 614414-1 Pickering 140 Concession 7 1801 030 003 064-00 0000 13 614417 Pickering 115 Concession 8 1801 030 001 421-00 0000 14 614458-3 Pickering 840 Concession 8 1801 030 001 267-00 0000 15 614461-1 Pickering 835 Concession 9 ✓ 1801 030 001 195-00 0000 16 614478 Pickering 575 Concession 9 ✓ 1801 030 001 204-00 0000 17 614486 Pickering 4690 Sideline 30 ✓ 1801 030 001 288-00 0000 18 614538-1 Pickering 5165 Sideline 22 1801 030 001 108-10 0000 19 614544 Pickering 5170 Sideline 22 ✓ 1801 030 001 109-00 0000 20 614553-1 Pickering 5050 Sideline 24 1801 030 001 115-10 0000 21 614560 Pickering 1095 Uxbridge/Pickering 1801 030 001 021-00 0000 Townline 22 614588 Pickering 5245 Sideline 28 1801 030 001 121-00 0000 23 614598-1 Pickering 635 Uxbridge/Pickering Townline 1801 030 001 057-00 0000 24 614600 Pickering 695 Uxbridge/Pickering Townline ✓ 1801 030 001 053-00 0000 25 614602 Pickering 675 Uxbridge/Pickering Townline ✓ 1801 030 001 055-00 0000 26 614612 Pickering 565 Uxbridge/Pickering Townline ✓ 1801 030 001 059-00 0000 27 614613 Pickering 5411 Sideline 30 ✓ 1801 030 001 066-00 0000 28 614632 Pickering 5460 Sideline 30 ✓ 1801 030 001 069-00 0000 29 614646 Pickering 1725 Highway 7 ✓ 1801 030 009 240-00 0000 30 614656 Pickering 1689 Spring Gate Blvd. ✓ 1801 030 009 260-00 0000 31 614663 Pickering 3570 Brock Road ✓ 1801 030 009 274-00 0000 32 614669 Pickering 3553 Donnalea Ave. 1801 030 009 287-00 0000 33 614676 Pickering 1637 Highway 7 ✓ 1801 030 009 249-00 0000 34 614677 Pickering 1631 Highway 7 ✓ 1801 030 009 250-00 0000 35 614679 Pickering 1607 Highway 7 ✓ 1801 030 009 253-00 0000 36 614683 Pickering 1636 Orchard Heights Blvd. 1801 030 009 292-00 0000 37 614691 Pickering 1629 Orchard .Heights Blvd. 1801 030 009 300-00 0000 38 614694 Pickering 3649 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 181-00 0000 39 614698-3 Pickering 3629 Brou ham Road ✓ 1801 030 009 185-00 0000 40 614702 Pickering 3724 Brou ham Road 1801 030 009 187-00 0000 41 614703 Pickering 3712 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 188-00 0000 42 614707 Pickering .3700 Brou ham Road 1801 030 009 192-00 0000 43 614708 Pickering 3688 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 195-00 0000 44 614713 Pickering 3664 Brougham Road 1801 030 009 200-00 0000 45 614715 Pickering 3656 Brougham Road 1801 030009 203-00 0000 46 614717 Pickering 3648 Brougham-Road 1801 030 009 205-00 0000 47 614721 Pickering 1682 Tisha Road 1801 030 009 211-00 0000 r ATTACHMENT TO 105 REPORT # PD_ 7O-I I No PIN MUNICIPALITY ADDRESS See ROLL' NUMBER Note 48 614723 Pickering 3632 Brougham Road ✓ 1801 030 009 212-00 0000 49 614727 Pickering 1690 Highway 7 1801 030 009 216-10 0000 50 614731 Pickering 1646 Highway 7 1801 030 009 224-00 0000 Note: ✓ Properties on Heritage Register Properties on Heritage Register and on previous demolition list bold Properties in Brougham I ATTACHMENT ~ TO REPORT # PD 20-Ia 40O ~]~G~]~G°~ OO M~ G°~~D~~~ 0 6 5 5 5 5 4 0 a O 7 O Land Use 8 3 Subject Property 1 Heritage Q No Heritage Value ® Heritage City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Properties to be Demolished on Federal Lands OWNER: Transport Canada FILE No: Heritage Demolitions DATE: June 9, 2011 Daw s-. c Tm,nel Emery -.f w d Its wPPI:r All rvedghls Reee,,,ed. Not a plan el survey. SCALE: 1 :46, 14 41 c 2008 MPAC end Itl eu Ien. A r hs Resed. Nat, lea M Surve . l PN-RUR II 1 0 7 ATTACHMENT # ! TO REPORT # PD 0 68 BROUGHAM 66 64 'SHA OA 1560 1580 64 1 H GFWAy T RC HARD 'GHTS i R E o 1 0 ~oH STRE T Land Use Subject Property Heritage No Heritage Value Heritage City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Properties in Brougham to be Demolished OWNER: Transport Canada FILE No: Heritage Demolitions DATE: June 9, 2011 D,~ Sou c ennet rderpdaee Ine. Intl its Mgol en. M dphb Reserved. N°t s pan of survey. SCALE: 1:8,500 c 2006 MPAG and ib a tiers. M n b Reserved. Nel s Ian °f S_ . PN-RLIR