Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCS 08-10 City b~ Report To Executive Committee PICKERING Report Number: CS 08-10 Date: May 10,'2010 18 From: Gillis A. Paterson Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Subject: LAS Energy Procurement Program Recommendation: 1. That Report CS 08-10 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That the Commodity-Hedge Pricing Policy attached to this report be approved; 3. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be authorized to execute Agency Appointment Agreements with Local Authority Services (LAS) and any other related documents to provide for the hedging of energy prices; 4. That Council authorizes Local Authority Services, through its appointed agent, to have access to electricity consumption data from the local electrical utility on an as needed basis, in order to compile load profile information for the procurement program; and, 5. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to give effect thereto. Executive Summary: Adoption of the above recommendations will allow the City of Pickering to participate in the LAS Electricity Procurement Program. LAS purchases bulk electrical power for its many municipal customers in a forward market through a competitive bid process to obtain the best possible price. Purchasing of commodities such as electricity in a forward market requires the municipality to have a "Commodity Hedge Pricing Policy." Therefore, Council approval is required to adopt the necessary Commodity Price Hedging Policies. The objectives of the LAS bulk hedging program are generally synonymous with our municipal objectives: a. Facilitates Budgeting - purchasing blocks of electricity will produce stable prices for budgeting b. Competitive Pricing - provide savings on required purchases c. Maximize Purchasing Power - pooling requirements can leverage better pricing than individually. Report CS 08-10 May 10, 2010 Subject: LAS Electricity Procurement Program Page 2 LAS requires the following Council actions: 1. Adopt the attached Commodity Hedge Pricing Policy as required under the Municipal Act, 2001. 2. Adopt the Recommendationauthorizing the enrollment in the program. Sustainability Implications: By joining the LAS program, the City will reduce its electricity costs that in-turn will continue to assist the City in maintaining its financial sustainability objectives. Financial Implications: Adoption of the recommendations will allow the City to participate in the LAS "bulk" electricity.purchasing program resulting in savings to the City. The 2010 electrical utilities budget was based on the assumption that the City would participate in a bulk purchase program. A major cost saving opportunity through this program is that the City will now be able to obtain "off-peak" power rates for its streetlights. (Off-peak power rates are usually a minimum of 10% lower). In 2009, the streetlight electricity costs were $551,022 and the 2010 budget was reduced to $501,000 resulting in a projected savings of $56,500. It is possible actual savings may exceed this projection. Background: Since 2005, Pickering has paid electricity rates as set out by the Ontario government's Regulated Price Plan (RPP). Currently, Ontario municipalities can choose to purchase electricity through one of the alternatives listed below: 1. The Regulated Price Plan (RPP); the rate the City's pays with a fixed price set by the Province that is reset semi-annually, which has resulted in savings and rebates. 2. Market pricing for interval metered accounts or larger volume municipal accounts post May 2009: Weighted Average hourly Price (WAP) will apply to conventional meters; and Hourly Ontario Electricity Pricing (HOEP) will apply to interval meters. 3. A Retail Contract: where the price is set now for the future supply of electricity such as the LAS program - (recommended) Local Authority Services Electricity Procurement Program There are several vendors in the de-regulated marketplace selling fixed price contracts. The Municipal, Universities, School Boards and Hospitals (MUSH) sector is large enough to support its own dedicated approach. As our Local Distribution Company (LDC) Veridian Inc., does not earn its revenue based on where electricity is purchased, they will continue to earn their revenues through the "wires business" - by distributing the power. Purchasing electricity from LAS or any other retailer will not affect Veridian's Report CS 08-10 May 10, 2010 . . . Subject: LAS Electricity Procurement Program Page 3 20 financial performance. Veridian will still be responsible for the distribution of electricity to the City. LAS isa wholly owned subsidiary of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO). This organization has developed an electricity procurement program to assist municipalities in achieving cost savings on electricity purchases by leveraging the advantages of bulk purchasing power. This program is similar in operation to their longstanding Natural Gas Procurement Program and as a point of information, the City of Pickering has had an agreement with LAS for the purchase of natural gas for the last three years. LAS has offered the Natural Gas Program since 1992 and have consistently provided savings for program members. Due to low gas prices the City is roughly breaking even on this arrangement which will be renewed in October, 2010 under the above Recommendation. The LAS program provides strategic advice related to purchases, effective program oversight, and ongoing accountability. Regular program oversight is provided by the LAS Energy Advisory Committee and LAS Board of Directors, both of which are comprised of municipal representatives. While LAS functions as a retailer for electricity in conjunction with Shell Energy North America, this program is offered as a service to AMO/LAS member municipalities and is not operated under the same expectations for profit as other retailers. In addition, the LAS Energy Services Division offers a range of conservation and demand management services to members of the LAS procurement programs. LAS is paid a fixed fee of 0.10/kWh (75% to the program administrator and 25% to LAS) for all electricity hedged on behalf of the municipality, as well as 0.05¢/kWh for required billing services. LAS is required to account for all amounts paid under the agreement and any consumption left to the spot market is not charged an administration fee. Ontario is progressively adopting time based electricity pricing. This government is committed to ensuring energy conservation through the true cost of electrical power and has instructed related regulatory agencies to ensure this is the case. Using cost saving opportunities by switching some of our electricity requirements to off-peak hours, such as at the Recreation Complex, the City has helped reduce Ontario's on-peak electricity demand and reliance on purchasing power outside the province from non-sustainable sources. The LAS program takes a blended approach to purchasing electricity. They purchase up to 75% of our electricity requirements from the forward market (fixed for terms from 6 months up to 1.5 years) and the remaining 25% (or more) is left to the spot market. LAS will acquire blocks of electricity based on the requirements of the program load profile for each program purchasing pool. All LAS program tenders are competitive and involve as many as five pre-qualified suppliers. The balance of the load requirements will be purchased on the spot market at the Hourly Ontario Energy Price (HOEP) and we can choose our desired hedging level. LAS does not allow for a hedging level of more than 75%, however, we may customize - I Report CS 08-10 May 10, 2010 Subject: LAS Electricity Procurement Program Page 4 21 our own lower hedge level if desired - the 75% hedge ensures that there is no over- buying for any program. members and leaving 25% of usage to the spot market provides flexibility and avoids claims of speculation. Street lighting accounts are treated differently in the LAS program, as there is more opportunity for savings on the spot market for these accounts because most consumption is during "off-peak" hours. After we enroll, LAS will move our street lighting accounts to the spot market (we cannot do this on our own) and they will charge a $6 per account fee for this service as a cost recovery. Current LAS program members are realizing streetlight savings of upwards of 20% - 25% (depending on the month) for `off-peak' street lighting accounts. These figures are inclusive of the program fees paid to LAS. There are currently 78 Ontario municipalities enrolled in the LAS Electricity Procurement Program. A complete list of members is included as an attachment to this report. Hedging Policy The Municipal Act, 2001 Ontario Regulation 653/05, s 6(1) states: "Before a municipality passes a by-law authorizing a commodity price hedging agreement, the council of the municipality shall adopt a statement of policies and goals relating to the use of financial agreements to address commodity pricing and costs." As per the legislation, the City must first adopt a Commodity Price Hedging Policy as indicated in the Municipal Act. A Commodity Hedge Pricing Policy is attached to this report. The purpose of a hedging strategy is to maintain price stability with volatile commodities by entering into a fixed price and volume contract. Price hedging agreements are frequently used for the acquisition of natural gas and electricity. The confirming By-law for the Council meeting at which this report's Recommendations are approved will be used to satisfy that requirement of the Regulation. Attachments: 1. Commodity Hedge Pricing Policy 2. LAS Electricity Program - Pricing Details - 2010 3. List of Current Municipal Members of LAS Electricity Program 4. Excerpt from Municipal Act, 2001, Ontario Regulation 653/05 Report CS 08-10 May 10, 2010 Subject: LAS Electricity Procurement Program Page 5 22 Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: i B -6b Ku ma Gillis A. Paterson Senior Purc sing Analyst Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Prepared By: Prepared By: Stan Karwowski Vera Felgemacher Manager, Finance & Taxation Manager, Supply & Services GAP:t Ik Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering CZhief ity P J. Quin D , CMM Administra e Officer try 000 ATTACHMENT#.LTO REPORT# ' ` - /o City POIICy PICKERING Policy Title: Commodity Price Hedging Policy Policy Number: FIN 060 Reference' Date Originated: Date Revised: Municipal A, ct, 2001 April 1, 2010 Approval: Chief Administrative Officer Point of Contact: Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Policy, Objective The purpose of this policy is to conform to the requirements of the Municipal Act, 2001 (and any regulations passed thereunder) as it relates to Commodity Price Hedging Agreements. Section 6(1) of O. Reg 653.05 of the Act requires the adoption of this policy before the City may enter into a Commodity Price Hedging. Scope This policy applies to all commodity price hedging agreements and provides the framework for the consideration of commodity hedge pricing by the City. Index 01 (Definitions 02 'Statement of Commodity Hedging Policies and Goals 03 Authority 04 Responsibility, 05 (Reporting Requirements 01 Definitions 2 4 01.01 Contract Agent - means an individual or organization acting on behalf of the City as an independent contractor, external to the City to provide advice on a price hedging strategy and/or to execute agreements and transactions to acquire a Commodity. 01.02 Commodity - means, a product or products bought and sold in commerce, including but not limited to electricity, natural gas and foreign currencies. 01.03 Price Hedging Agreement - means a financial agreement to provide price stability and/or minimize the cost, financial and other risks associated with the procurement of a Commodity. 01.04 Hedge - means, the purchase of a commitment to acquire a specified quantity of a commodity, at a specific price, at some future point in time. 02 Statement of Commodity Price Hedging Policies and Goals The City will consider commodity price hedging agreements as a means of fixing, directly or indirectly, or enabling the City to fix the price or range of prices to be paid by the City for the future delivery of some or all of the commodity or the future cost to the City of an equivalent quantity of the commodity, where it is advantageous for the City to do so. The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer is responsible for determining whether a particular commodity price hedging agreement is advantageous for the City, whereby the following considerations will be taken into account: (i) any and all projects of the City are projects for which commodity price hedging agreements will be appropriate; (ii) if, at the time, it is the opinion that fixed costs and estimated costs of the City will be reduced by virtue of the use of such an agreement; (iii) if, at the time, it is the opinion that the future price or cost to the City of the applicable commodity will be lower or more stable than it would be without the agreement; (iv) if, at the time, the project includes a detailed estimate of the expected result of using such an agreement; (v) if, at the time, it is the opinion that the financial and other risks to the City that would exist with the use of such an agreement, will be lower than the Policy Title: Commodity Price Hedging Policy Page 2 of 3 Policy Number: FIN 060 I { 25 financial and other risks to the City that would exist without such an agreement; (vi) if, at the time, it is the opinion that the agreement contains adequate risk control measures relating to such an agreement, such as: a) limited credit exposure based on credit ratings and/or on the degree of regulatory; b) oversight and/or on the regulatory capital of the other party to the agreement; c) a standard agreement; or d) ongoing monitoring with respect to the agreement. 03 Authority The, Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, or designate, is authorized to enter into contracts for the purpose of engaging a Contract Agent to acquire a Commodity. 04 Responsibility The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer or Manager, Supply & Services, in conjunction with the Senior Purchasing Analyst, are responsible for the application, implementation and interpretation of this policy. 05 Reporting Requirements The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer shall report to Council at least once each fiscal year with respect to any and all commodity price hedging agreements in place. The report shall contain, as a minimum, all requirements as set out in O. Reg. 653/05 of the Municipal Act. Policy Title: Commodity Price Hedging Policy Page 3 of 3 Policy Number:) FIN 060 ATTACHMENT# TO REPORT#_L_og- (0 ~ 26 November 2009 L A C Local Authority J-~~ Services Ltd. LAS Electricity Program Pricing Details for Pool 1/2/3 Purchase Calendar Year 2010 This purchase included 58 municipalities for a 12 month term, commencing on January 1, 2010 and continuing to December 31. Of the 58 municipalities, 6 are new members of the LAS program and 52 are current members with hedges ending at December 31, 2009. This purchase reflects the blending of our Pool 1, 2 & 3 groups into a single aggregated group. The only other LAS purchasing group (Pool 4 with 17 municipalities) will be rolled into the larger group at the end of their current purchase term in December 2010, resulting in additional buying power for all program members. The purchase price was $37.55/MW (7x24 block). Unless a different hedge amount has been chosen, LAS has hedged 75% of each program member's electricity requirement at the above noted price; this leaves a minimum of 25% of total exposure to the spot market, which provides municipalities with flexibility in terms of consumption and prevents any claim of speculation. For all hedged electricity - 75% of total requirements unless advised otherwise: The new contract cost of power for members for 2010 is $39.05/MWh or 3.9050/kWh; this price includes all program fees as outlined in the Agency Agreement between each municipality and LAS. For usage left to spot market - 25% or greater, depending on municipal choice: It is impossible to predict this figure given that it is dependant on the supply and demand of electricity on a day by day basis, but spot market (HOEP) prices have averaged 4.2820/kWh over the past 24 months - November 2007 to October 2009. Similar HOEP pricing during this purchase term should produce commodity only cost savings of 2.60/kWh compared to the Regulated Price Plan (RPP). Although there will be points during the purchase term when the HOEP cost of electricity may be lower than the hedge contract, LAS program members are ensuring budgetable and predictable commodity pricing by hedging a portion of required electricity. In addition, some spot market exposure for all accounts ensures that these savings opportunities are being leveraged. Expected Commodity Savings (7x24 usage) Block, ; Volume Price (c/kWh) Hedge Purchase Price (including program fees) 3.905 75% of Load 2.93 Avg. HOEP (1) 4.282 25% of Load 1.07 Expected Cost = Purchase Price + Spot (2) 100% of Load 4.00 RPP (3) 6.60 Expected Commodity Only Savings (cents/kWh) 2.60 Notes: 1) The HOEP price is reflective of the average HOEP from November 2007 to October 2009. Past averages are not always indicative of future performance. 2) This does not include any Provincial Benefit (charges/credits). 3) The RPP presented is an average price of the two-tiers based on typical municipal account usage. Page 1 27 Streetlight Accounts: The streetlight accounts of all program members will settle at the prevailing HOEP rate as this is the best cost saving option for program members. The reason for low market prices for streetlight accounts is that these lights are in operation when demand for power is typically low, and with a low demand comes advantageous "off-peak" power prices. For the November 2007 to October 2009 period the average streetlight commodity price was 3.330/kWh (see note 4 below). Similar pricing for the purchase term would result in commodity only savings of 3.270/kWh compared to current RPP prices. Expected Streetlight Savings HOEP (c/kWh) Avg. HOEP (4)(5) 3.33 RPP (6) ; 6.60 Expected Commodity Only Savings (cents/kWh) 3.27 Notes: 4) Average HOEP price is reflective of the average streetlight cost based on the Hydro One Networks OEB approved streetlight profile for November 2007 to October 2009. Savings within different LDC service areas may vary. 5) This does not include any Provincial Benefit (charges/credits) or OPG Rebate dollars. .6) The RPP presented is an average price of the two-tier price based on a typical streetlight account usage. Current RPP Price - at November 1, 2009: The new RPP rate for non-residential consumers (including municipalities) is: - Up to 750 kWh - 5.80/kWh - Additional Usage - 6.70/kWh This new RPP price represents an increase of 0.1 cents/kWh for both pricing tiers compared to the May-November 2009 period price. Note that the RPP ended at November 1, 2009 for municipal accounts with annual consumption of greater than 250, 000kWh. Accounts that exceed this volume threshold, and which are not enrolled with a retailer program (like the LAS program), will now be billed at less budgetable spot market rates. The LAS program is unaffected by changes to the RPP, and was created specifically to help municipalities proactively exit the RPP and take control of their energy costs by providing budgetable energy commodity costs. Page 2 I 28 5x16 Hedge - Only for members .with identified interval meter accounts: The cost of the "peak load" (5x16) power purchase was $48.20/MWh or 4.820/kWh; this price includes all program fees as outlined in the Agency Agreement between each municipality and LAS. The hedge provides designated interval meters with a 75% level of coverage for "peak period" consumption (Monday-Friday - 7am to 11pm). Usage over and above the 75% level in peak hours will be settled at the HOEP. It is impossible to predict the spot price as noted above, but the peak HOEP price averaged 5.270/kWh from November 2007 to October 2009. All Usage outside of this peak period (i.e. nights and weekends) is "off-peak", and will be settled 100% at the prevailing HOEP. The average off-peak HOEP average for the same period was 3.270/kWh.. Similar HOEP pricing during this purchase term would produce savings of approx. 2.26¢/kWh for all interval meter usage compared to the RPP. Across all enrolled interval metered accounts, the 5x16 hedge purchase represents 36% total usage coverage (all hours). Expected Commodity Savings 5x16 usage) Block Volume Price c/kWh Hedge Purchase Price (including program fees) 4.82 36% of Total Load 74 (75% of Peak Load) Avg. HOEP (7) 4.06 64% of Total Load 2.60 Expected Cost = Purchase Price + Spot (8) 100% of Load 4.34 RPP (9) 6.60 Expected Commodity Only Savings (cents/kWh) 2.26 . Notes: 7) The average (HOEP) price is reflective of the blended on/off peak weighted spot market price for the period of Nov 2007 to Oct 2009. Past averages are not indicative of future performance 8) This does not include any Provincial Benefit (charges/credits). 9) The RPP presented is an average price of the two-tiers based on typical municipal account usage. I Page 3 2 9 ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # C S a T' / U t° m v Y c m fa m ~ O -FO u Y L c LL m C C N O O N N L= E E O _ .aL d N -O_ O C Y m E O O O N S 4 co u i oD « J J N W E mL N N 00 C N C L ~J C m m am+ in w -o O L L O..C -O g o o u co w u c~ E H c c_ -c u o L a o 3 voi voi Y o °0 3 m C 6 O T w w 6 w .T O w w C L >m Ol o o 0 0 0 o = o o 0£= - m 0 a 2 ai J m m ~ n z n 'o n a 0 v m - U a 0 -j c c o c c a c -c -c c c c •n c c v o n o c c J N O 3 3 y 3 3 3 3 3 3 s n 3 0 3 3 L. 0 a °O "v i°- fo- to- H H vii o H Z) U ~c H o ~n ~ n w m o ' v v b ~ ~ rv m G O z m }A N m O T 1 m n C ~ O u i 2 Y Z a N G/ K •C N u r O c m w w V O N 0 t/'1 C7 2 cc N in in > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n n o- : a a p- L L L L L L L L C C C C C C C C m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CNJ C Q x 12 Y ~ >V N N O~'~`~~ Y E m o 2 aci > c °C m = u v `l Y oo - o ~ - v d N E y E U m Y O Y L p v o m v - c m L u" 3 y c° o o j-° > m °1 0 •o v c v o c i E m G N N F d y> Y N O M N p> i' >.o v E °c c n Se N Y m 0 m u u w O MO m 7 m i m m y 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m a a n n n n V a n .Q n So 0 0 0 0 0 1'8 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 J:E s JL L m I:E = c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c LLI 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 LLI 2 2 2 2 2 H H H F H t°- F FO- FO- H 10- H N b N op T O N M p b 1~ ap O1 O N M Q In b -I~ e0 O~ O Q N N N N M M M M M M M ~'f M M C O R Q V er e} er O V ut ' J v ~ c v v~ O _ C O1 7 Q C m C -O -O C S O c m o ~n w O w w t! 0 p t M= C C C u m w T O E U a+ N W O 2 O C 2 O Ol m C J N m Y .II OD n v 7 v m x ur c L Q m U G 0 2 J p_ 'j C N y p N i c w c o o o o o o o o E u v f0 v c c m w U o a 3>> 86 m` o Y 0 U v H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o F a S. S.°° a .L .L O O o O O O o - u u u V u u u u O C C C C c c c c f6 .C 'C c c C C c c +T+ aT+ Y ate. aT+ +T+ +T. ° 7 3 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 7 7 7 uuvvu'vv'vvuuU, UOUOuu N M V H b n b T O ti ff C ~l b n n ti N N N N N N ATTACHMENT #-.4.-TO REPORT #-a5-.0 S Excerpt from Municipal Act, 2001, Ontario Regulation 653/05 30 Debt-Related Financial Instruments and Financial Agreements COMMODITY PRICE HEDGING AGREEMENTS Commodity price hedging agreements 5. (1.) A municipality that has entered, or plan to enter, an agreement under Part 11 of the Act for the supply of a commodity required for a municipal system may enter into one or more financial agreements to minimize the cost or financial risk associated with incurring debt for the commodity. O. Reg. 653/05,s 5(1). (2) The financial agreement must fix, directly or indirectly, or enable the municipality to fix the price or range of prices to be paid by the municipality for the future delivery of some or all oflthe commodity or the future cost to the municipality of an equivalent quantity of the commodity. O. Reg. 653/05,s 5(2). (3) Subject to subsection (4), the municipality shall not sell or otherwise dispose of the financial agreement or any interest of the municipality in the agreement.. O. Reg. 653/05,s 5(3). (4) The municipality may sell or dispose of the financial agreement or an interest of the municipality in the agreement, if in the opinion of the Treasurer of the municipality, the sale or disposition is in the best interests of the municipality and if either of the following conditions is satisfied: 1. The sale or disposition is part , of a transaction for the sale of real property by the municipality relating to a change in the use of the property by the municipality. 2. The municipality has ceased to carry on any activity relating to the municipal system for which the commodity was being acquired. O. Reg. 653/05,s 5(4). Statement of Commodity Price Hedging Policies and Goals 6. (1) Before a municipality passes a by-law authorizing a commodity price hedging agreement, the council of the municipality shall adopt a statement of policies and goals relating to the use of financial agreements to address commodity pricing and costs. O. Reg. 653/05,s 6(1) (2) The council of the municipality shall consider the following matters when preparing the statement of policies and goals: i 1. The types of projects for which commodity price hedging agreements are appropriate. 2. The fixed costs and estimated costs of the municipality resulting from the use of such agreements. 3.' Whether the future price or cost to the municipality of the applicable commodities will be lower or more stable than it would be without the agreements. 4. A detailed estimate of the expected result of using such agreements. 5. The financial and other risks to the municipality that would exist with and without the use of such agreements. 31 6. Risk control measures relating to such agreements, such as: (i) credit exposure based on credit ratings and on the degree of regulatory oversight and on'the regulatory capital of the other party to the agreement, (ii) standard agreements, and (iii) ongoing monitoring with respect to the agreements. O. Reg. 653/05,s,6(2). Report on commodity price hedging agreements 7. (1) If a municipality has any subsisting commodity price hedging agreements in a fiscal year, the of the Treasurer of the municipality shall prepare and present to the municipal council once in that fiscal year, or more frequently if Council so desires, a detailed report on all of those agreements. O. Reg. 653/05,s 7(1). (2) The report must contain the following information and documents: 1. A statement about the status of the agreements during the period of the report, including a comparison of the expected and actual results of using the agreements. 2. A statement by the Treasurer indicating whether, in his or her opinion, all of the agreements entered during the period of the report are consistent with the municipality's statement of policies and goals relating to the use of financial agreements to address commodity pricing and costs. 3. Such other information as the council may require. 4. Such other information as the Treasurer considers appropriate to include in the report 0. Reg. 653/05,s 7(2). I