Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 3, 2010 Citq 00 Planning & Development Committee Agenda Monday, May 3, 2010 PICKERIN Council Chambers 7:30 pm Chair: Councillor Johnson PART "A" PAGES PLANNING INFORMATION MEETING Information Report No. 07 -10 1-8 SUBJECT; Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/10 Loblaw Properties Limited 1792 Liverpool Road (Part Lot 23, Concession 1 South) City of Pickering PART "B" PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORTS 1. Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 09-10 9-21 Licence Agreement Extension - Ontario Parcel Agreement -Supply of Digital Mapping RECOMMENDATION 1. That Council approve entering into an extension of the agreement with the Region of Durham for the supply of digital parcel mapping of Pickering for a five year period at a total cost of $29,245.00 (plus applicable taxes) with an annual payment of $5,849.00 (plus applicable taxes) to be funded from the current budget of the Planning & Development Department; 2. The Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute any subsequent renewals or extensions of this agreement on substantially similar terms and conditions acceptable to the Director, Planning & Development, and; Accessible For information related to accessibility requirements please contact P I C K E ~NG Linda Roberts Phone: 905.420.4660 extension 2928 TTY: 905.420.1739 Email: Iroberts(cDcitvofpickerina.com Ctq o0 Planning &Development Committee Agenda Monday, May 3, 2010 M tKERI Council Chambers 7:30 pm Chair: Councillor Johnson 3. Further, that the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to give effect thereto. 2. Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 11-10 22-40 Growth Strategy Program (Part of the Pickering Official Pan Review) and the Province's Draft Decision on. Region of Durham's OPA 128 RECOMMENDATION 1. That Report PD 11-10 of the. Director, Planning & Development respecting the Pickering Growth Strategy Program and the Province's Draft Decision on the Region of Durham's OPA 128, be received for information; and 2. Further, that Report PD 11-10 be forwarded to Ministries of Municipal Affairs, Housing and Energy and Infrastructure and the Region of Durham. 3. Director, Planning.& Development, Report PD 12-10 41-45 West Rouge Canoe Club Request for Extension of Lease Agreement with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for Paddlinq Facility on West Spit of Frenchman's Bay RECOMMENDATION 1. That the request of the West Rouge Canoe Club to extend its lease agreement with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for three years on an annual basis commencing with the period November 1, 2009, to October 31, 2010, and expiring October 31, 2012, to accommodate a temporary compound on the west spit of Frenchman's Bay for the storage, within trailers, of canoes and kayaks associated with the club's paddling facility, be supported by Council, and 2. Further, that the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PD 12-10 to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (II) OTHER BUSINESS (III) ADJOURNMENT i City o~ Information Report Report Number: 07-10 For Public Information Meeting of PICKERING Date: May 3, 2010 0 In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter PA3 Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 4/10 Loblaw Properties Limited 1792 Liverpool Road (Part Lot 23, Concession 1 South) City of Pickering 1.0 Property Location and Description - the subject property is generally located behind the southwest corner of Kingston Road and Liverpool Road; - a property location map is provided for reference (see Attachment #1); - the subject property is approximately 4.7 hectares in area (see Applicant Submitted Plan Attachment #2); - an existing commercial complex consists of a variety of retail stores types and sizes with the major retail anchor being the Loblaw's Superstore; - a total floor area of approximately 14,332 square metres occupies the site; - the surrounding land uses are: north - a commercial plaza and Kingston Road; west - vacant land contains an open channel of Pine Creek; south - vacant; east - Liverpool Road and commercial retail centre. 2.0 Applicant's Proposal - the applicant has requested to amend the zoning by-law to permit additional commercial uses, specifically a commercial recreational establishment (a fitness club) and a commercial school use (see Applicant's Submitted Plan - Attachment #2); - the proposed additional commercial uses would be operated within the existing commercial structure that is currently on site, no exterior changes to the building are proposed; - no changes to the surface parking and parking layout are proposed. Information Report No. 07-10 Page 2 02 3.0 Official Plan and Zoning 3.1 Provincial Growth Plan Places to Grow (the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe) requires intensification of land uses within municipalities build boundaries; the subject lands are within the Urban Growth Centre of the City of Pickering; Urban Growth Centres are to be planned as focal areas for investment, to support major transit infrastructure, to serve as high density employment centres, and to accommodate population and employment growth; 3.2 Durham Regional Official Plan - the Regional Plan designates the subject property "Regional Centre";. - lands in this designation shall be developed as the main concentration of urban activities within a municipality providing a fully integrated array of community, office, service and shopping, recreation and residential uses; - the proposal appears to conform to the Durham Region Official Plan; 3.3 Pickering Official Plan - the City of Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Mixed Use Areas - Mixed Corridors"; - permissible uses within the "Mixed Uses Areas - Mixed Corridors" designation include, among others, retailing of goods and services, residential uses and community and cultural uses as well as limited office commercial uses; - these areas are intended to have the widest variety of uses and highest levels of activities in the City; - the subject lands are within the Town Centre Neighbourhood of the Official Plan, polices in this neighbourhood encourages the highest mix and intensity of uses and activities in the City; - Schedule II of the Pickering Official Plan - "Transportation Systems" designates, Kingston Road and Liverpool Road, the roads the subject property have access to as "Type B - Arterial Roads"; - Type B Arterial Road are designated to carry moderate speeds, within a municipality;- - the proposal appears to conform with the policies of the Official Plan; 3.4 Compendium Document to the Official Plan 3.4.1 Pickering Downtown Core Development Guidelines: - the subject property is within the Pickering Downtown Core Development Guidelines; - the urban design objectives for the downtown core encourages a destination downtown, a strong civic and cultural focus, an identifiable public realm and a mix of uses for housing, employment, retail and entertainment; Information Report No. 07-10 Page 3 03 the development guidelines indicates the subject property as a mixed use zone, with emphasis on residential rather than office uses on the upper floors; 3.4.2 Kingston Road Corridor Urban Design Development Guidelines: - the subject property is within the Downtown Core Precinct of the Kingston Road Corridor Urban Design Development Guidelines; - objectives for the Downtown Core Precinct include: • to create a regional landmark and destination area; • to establish the highest intensity of cultural, residential and economic activity, and the greatest density and diversity of land use mix; • to,create the highest zone of pedestrian activity in the City, that functions as a true "main street" for Pickering; • to establish Liverpool Road as a "portal" to Kingston Road; • to recognize Liverpool Road as local gateways into the Downtown Core; • to encourage pedestrian activity along Kingston Road with amenity zones and strong north-south links at Liverpool Road; • the option for future transit/HOV lane should protected; 3.5 Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by 1608/83 the subject property is currently zoned TT - General Commercial; the existing zoning permits a variety of commercial uses but specifically excludes the requested uses of a commercial recreational establishment and a commercial school use; an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to allow for a commercial recreational establishment and a commercial school use as permitted uses. 4.0 Results of Circulation 4.1 Resident Comments - none received to date; 4.2 Agency Comments none received to date; i 4.3 Staff Comments in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: • ensuring that the proposed application complies with the Pickering Downtown Core Development Guidelines and the Kingston Road Corridor Urban Design Development Guidelines; • ensuring that the proposed use is compatible with surrounding existing land uses; Information Report No. 07-10 Page 4 • reviewing the application in terms of its level of sustainable development components; • determining the appropriateness of the proposed commercial uses in the existing building on the subject lands; • site plan matters, including, but not limited to, parking, vehicle and pedestrian movements, and landscaped areas and features. 5.0 Procedural Informatiori - written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning . & Development Department; - oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; - all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council; - any member of the public who wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal; - any member of the public who wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk. 6.0 Other Information 6.1 Appendix No. I list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing report; 6.2 Information Received full scale copies of the Applicant's submitted plan are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department: • Planning Justification Letter; • Sustainable Development Report; • Parking Study; Information Report No. 07-10 Page 5 05 6.3 Company Principal - the owner of the subject lands is Loblaw Properties Limited; - the applications have been submitted by Zelinka Priamo Ltd on behalf of Loblaw Properties Limited. G-~o Mila Yeung Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Planner I (Acting) Manager, Development Review MY:ld Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development 06 Appendix No..I to Information Report"No. 07-10. Commenting Residents and Landowners (1) none received to date Commenting Agencies (1) none received to date Commenting City Departments (1) none received to date ATTACHMENT#-I....TO IfLFORWA,TION REPORT #0 7-7 07 w ~ w Q O O Z O Cn ~ co w ~ N z S~ J 0 w J U GF~~ C" U GRAS 9'Q~0-~~E S~O~R\NG~ON 0 0 APO R D SUBJECT PROPERTY o a Li J m H\ONw PY G 40A PY H HEN~~ GO TRANSIT STATION STREET BAYLY (777M77T17 City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Concession 1 South Part Lot 23 OWNER Lobiaw Properties Limited DATE Mar. 29, 2010 DRAWN BY JB FILE No. A04/10 SCALE 1:5000 CHECKED BY MY h caTera etrcEnterprieea Inc. onC it, -ppliere. All right, R--ed. Not a plan of e~n.ey. PN-13 11c 2005 A. and il, ,vpplier,. All rights R-e-d. Not a plan of S.-y. ATTAC 9A,4ENU-1-. INFORMAT ON REP=#,, 08 Information Compiled-from Applicants Submitted Plan A 04/10 Loblaw Properties Limited r , ~?OpQ EXISTING C~ t! i ~~l ~ IN ~At r x:11 ar b 11 i 0 ON .r<~✓ 7 'AKKI..PROVIN D 1,08 CAI? C < - _u nllaxs / nl t..~ I i! 11 i t I O !/1 O VP EXISTIN p BUILDING I~ DU 1ny 1 hYJn ~ ~ r~ , 11 ,ice ii i Ar; 1 58-C, ]E71 ill, FT I ~ I To amend the zoning ~.i1 U I I by-law to permit ` additional commercial uses , I a it l r t i, r.', S c E IS IN / 'jnM v G RETAIL - , RETAIL RET L I 1 EXISTIN /y ni: trl zinrl ra .arnvr RETAIL;// - EXISTING j -t RETAIL A i / r / UNI I 1,11 /LANINi ANUVI i 4 s ! This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department, Planning Information Services division Mapping and Design, Mar 29, 2010. Report To Planning & Development PICKERING Committee Report Number: PD 09-10 Date: May 3, 2010 09 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Licence Agreement Extension - Ontario Parcel Agreement - Supply of Digital Mapping - File: L-4100-001 Recommendation: 1. That Council approve entering into an extension of the agreement with the Region of Durham for the supply of digital parcel mapping of Pickering for a five year period at a total cost of $29,245.00 (plus applicable taxes) with an annual payment of $5,849.00 (plus applicable taxes) to be funded from the current budget of the Planning & Development Department; 2. The Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute any subsequent renewals or extensions of this agreement on substantially similar terms and conditions acceptable to the Director, Planning & Development, and; 3. Further, that the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to give effect thereto. Executive Summary: The City recently completed a five year contract with the Region of Durham for the delivery of data provided by Teranet Land Information Services Inc. The data included Digital Parcel Mapping, and Transfer, PIN and Easement Reports. With approval of the Licence Agreement Extension, the City will continue to receive all of this data plus Registered Plan Images with regular updates under a subscription service. Digital mapping is an essential element of many City operations. The integrity of this digital mapping helps ensure the City will continue to make informed decisions where land based data is required. It is recommended that the City participate in the Region of Durham's Ontario Parcel Agreement Extension. Financial Implications: Funding for the acquisition of digital parcel mapping is provided on an annual basis in the Planning & Development Department Current Budget. Report PD 09-10 May 3, 2010 Subject: Licence Agreement Extension Page 2 ~n Entering into this agreement with the Region of Durham will commit the City to an expenditure of $29,245.00 (plus applicable taxes) over the five year contract period, with an annual payment of $5,849.00 (plus applicable taxes). Appropriate funding exists in the approved 2010 Current Budget (account number 2610-2678 Miscellaneous Equipment Rental) to cover the 2010 payment. The Treasurer has certified that the financial commitment reflected in this agreement, extending beyond the present term of Council, is within the City's annual debt and obligation repayment limit. Sustainability Implications: Not applicable. Background: The City has recently completed a five year contract with the Region of Durham for the delivery of data provided by Teranet Land Information Services Inc. The Region has recently approached Durham municipalities offering a five year extension to the licence agreement. The City's parcel mapping is an essential resource to our corporate operations and is fundamental to the activities of most departments. Spatial location of property is a core element of the majority of municipal services and is fundamental to many of the City's processes. It is necessary for the City to continue acquiring its mapping from Teranet to meet its present and future operational challenges. Recommendation #1 provides for the extension of the agreement and Recommendation #2 provides for subsequent renewal by the City upon confirmation of terms and conditions by the Director, Planning & Development. Entering into this agreement with the Region of Durham will commit the City to an expenditure of $29,245.00 (plus applicable taxes) over the five year contract period, with an annual payment of $5,849.00 (plus applicable taxes). The previous five year contract cost was $19,000.00 (plus applicable taxes) and included Digital Parcel Mapping, and Transfer, PIN and Easement Reports. With approval of the recommended Licence Agreement Extension, the City will continue to receive all the data provided under our past. contracts plus Registered Plan Images with regular updates under a subscription service. The Region of Durham is the primary licencee of the data from Teranet Land Information Services Inc. Under its agreement, the Region is permitted to sublicence the same data to local municipalities at a significant cost :saving to all involved. Under the pricing structure set out by Teranet, the greater the number of parcels purchased by the primary licencee, the lower the cost per parcel. With the broader parcel base of the Region, parcel data can be acquired at approximately $0.20 per parcel as compared to approximately $1.20 per parcel under a 'Pickering only' scenario. The product received is identical to the product that we have received under our past contracts and usage restrictions will be the same that have applied to Pickering over the past ten years. The agreement being offered by the Region will provide significant cost savings to the City and is recommended by staff. Report PD 09-10 May 3, 2010 Subject: Licence Agreement Extension Page 3 11 This report has been reviewed by the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer who concurs with the content and recommendation. Attachments: 1. Region of Durham Report to finance and Administration Committee 2009-A-57 2. City of Pickering Ontario Parcel Master Agreement - Letter of Intent 3. Region of Durham Extension of Sublicence Agreement Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: is op Neil Ca P, UP Supervisor, Information & Support Services Director, anning & Development IB:ld Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City it Th J. ui D RCM C ie Administrative fficer ATTACHMENT # TO 2 REPORT # PD i The Regional Municipality of Durham ' To: The Finance and Administration Committee From: Ray Briggs, CIO Report No.: 2009-A-57 Date: December 9, 2009 SUBJECT: Renewal of Ontario Parcel Master Agreement Products RECOMMENDATIONS: THAT the Finance and Administration Committee recommends to Regional Council that: a) The Regional Chair and Clerk be authorised to execute the amendment and extension letters for the End User Data Licence Agreement, OPMA Products Delivery Agreement, the General Municipal Licence Agreement - OPMA Ownership Mapping Data Products and the Value Added Relicensor ("VAR") Agreement between Teranet Enterprises Inc. and the Region; b) The Regional Chair and Clerk be authorized to execute-'the amended General Municipal Licence Agreement - OPMA Assessment Mapping Data Products between Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and the Region; I c) The Regional Chair and Clerk be authorized to execute a renewal of the Region of Durham OPMA partner cost sharing agreement between the previous participating lower-tier municipal partners and the Region, in a form satisfactory to the Commissioner of Finance and the Regional Solicitor; d) The Regional Chair and Clerk be authorized to execute a Region of Durham OPMA partner cost sharing agreement between.the City of Oshawa and the. Region, in a form satisfactory to the Commissioner of Finance and the Regional Solicitor,. e) The Regional Chair and Clerk be authorized to execute a renewal for the Region of Durham OPMA partner agreement with both Veridian Connections and Enbridge Inc. and the Region, in a form satisfactory to the Commissioner of Finance and the Regional Solicitor, 63 ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PD_ Oq %Q Report No.:2009-A-57 Page No 2 3 f) The Finance Department be authorized to issue purchase orders in the amount of $772,830.00, plus applicable taxes to Teranet Enterprise Inc. for the purchase of Ontario Parcel Master Agreement Products as detailed in the executed agreements. The cost of the purchase order in the first year and each consecutive year of the five-year contract is $154,566.00, plus applicable taxes; g) The Region's share of financing be provided from the 2010 and future year's Corporate Information Services department program budget for GIS. REPORT: 1. Backcround- The Rgglonal Municipality of Durham The Region currently has a five-year data maintenance contract with Teranet Inc. for monthly deliveries of the Ontario Parcel Agreement data which is due to expire on' Dec 14"', 2009 as outlined in Report 2004-A-40. This data includes Ownership and Assessment parcel polygons, Transfer Report data and in year one Easement data. Under the current agreement the local municipalities have the same rights and privileges to the data as the Region of Durham with the exception of the City of Oshawa as they did not participate. The City of Oshawa has indicated that they are participating under the renewal of the agreement. Durham Region Police Services, Durham Non-Profit Housing Corporation, libraries, school boards and conservation authorities have access only to Ownership and Assessment parcel polygons as stipulated in the Ontario Parcel Alliance Agreements. The Region of Durham and local municipalities all have in place Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The Ontario Parcel Datasets are the foundation that provides the spatial reference to link regional, municipal and MPAC assessment information within the GIS. The products and services being offered provide the Region of Durham and the lower-tier municipalities stakeholders with Parcel Ownership Polygons, Parcel Assessment Polygons, and a Transfer Report provided on a monthly basis. The Parcel Ownership Polygons provides a geographical location of parcels with ownership. The Parcel Assessment Polygons provide a geographical location of parcel assessment numbers. The Transfer Report provides title information such as the owner, previous 64 ATTACHMENT # j TO 4 REPORT # PD Report No.:20094-57 Page No 3 owner and the sale amount of the property. A one-time delivery of an Easement Report provided an easement description to a parcel. The Transfer and Easement report can be linked to the parcel polygons allowing G IS users to query individual parcels or multiple parcels efficiently. Subsequent to this agreement the Region purchased Easement data' and PIN-plan index with Scanned images from Teranet on a monthly basis for the region's own purposes which is linked via the Ownership parcel polygons. Subsequent discussions with the local municipalities identified that these datasets would also be beneficial so these datasets have been incorporated into the five year agreement. 2. Cost: The Ontario Parcel Master Agreement Products for the Region of Durham have been identified in Table 1 with their respective costs. The increase in costs is directly attributable to an increase in parcel counts over the last five years as well as increases in operation costs from Teranet. All costs are subject to applicable provincial and federal taxes. Table is Proposed Costs for OPMA Products each year for five years Products Current Renewal OP CAD $ 7,818 $ 8,736 OP GIs $ 12,683 $ 13,479 Transfer Re Dort $ 22 842 $ 26,629 PIN Owner Re rt $ - $ 4,392 Easement Report $ 22.633 $ . 25,661 PIN-Plan Index $ 18,012 $ 28,937 Registered Plan lma es $ 3,416 Tots! . $ 83 988 $ 111,250 Enbrid a and veridian VAR $ 37,128 $ 43,316 Annual Fee $ 121 116 $ 154,566 2.1 Cost Sharina The Region's main role in the project was to establish cost sharing partnerships to fund the total cost of the project as previously undertaken. Table _0 depicts the proposed listing of Durham partners and their cost contribution to ft project. All costs are subject to applicable provincial and federal taxes. 05 ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PD 09 Report No.:2009-A-57 Page No' 4' 5 Table 2: Proposecd Data Sharing Costs each year for five years Yearly Costs . Financial Partners Commitment Region of Durham $53,919 Ci of Pickering $5,849 Town of Ajax $5,774 Town of Whitb $6,976 C' of Oshawa $9,081 Municipality of Clarin ton $6,953 Township of Scu o $2,380 Township of Uxbridge $1,849 Township of Brock $1,465 OTAL k: , $8425Q Value Added Reseller to Utilities $60,316 REG'ION,MDURHAM 01'AL COSTS k $154, 556 i The negotiation between Enbridge and the GIS Services Group resulted in a pricing structure requiring Enbridge to submit payment to the Region in the order of $31,648 per year plus applicable taxes. This pricing structure is consistent with those of the other primary licensees for cost recovery for administrative services. The negotiation between Veridian and the GIS Services Group resulted in a pricing structure requiring Veridian to submit payment to the Region in the amount of $28,668 annually plus applicable taxes. The Region will retain a portion of the fees billed to Enbridge and Veridian as its share of resellers fees. i 2.2 Financial Commitment The Region of Durham, as a participant in the five year contract, is responsible for a total gross cost of $772,830, but through cost sharing with lower-tier municipalities and the resale of data to strategic partners Veridian Connections and Enbridge Inc., the Region is able.acquire additional datasets for a lower cost. 66 ATTACHMENT -TO Re Dort No.:2009-A-57 REPORT # PD- Dpi-IQ 1 Pa a 0. 5 In 2008/2009 the Region of Durham solely and separately purchased the Easement Report and the PIN/Plan Index with Registered Plans under separate agreements at a cost of $40,645. The Region's share of the Ontario Parcel Agreement in 2009 was $28,051. The total cost of these contracts is $68,696 which under this agreement for the same data would be a cost of $53,919 providing an annual savings of $14,000 per year. The Region of Durham's $269,600 portion and the participating partner organizations costs are outlined in Section 2.1. Table 5: Fiore-Year Financial Commitment for Data Sharing Partners Data Sharing . Partners A regiment Region of Durham $269,600 City of Pickering $29,245 Town of _Ajax $28,870 Town of Whitby $34,880 City of Oshawa $45,405 Municipality of Clarin ton $34,765 Township of Scu o $11,900 Township of Uxbridge $9,245 Township of Brock $7,340 $i47Z1,250 Value Added Reseller to Utilities $301,580 TDTAL COST' ~ $772,830 I 3. OFinancim The Region will bill the partners and utilities for their share of the annual cost. Funding for the Region's share of the contract in the net annual amount of $53,919. will be included in the 2010 and future years CIS/GIS Budget, Computer Maintenance and Operations (2009 Budget included an amount of $X). 4. Legal Agreements: All costs are subject to the stakeholders participation to purchase the Products offered by Teranet and MPAC for the amounts stated in this report, subject to the Region finalizing agreements with MPAC and Teranet as well as agreements with the participants. 67 ATTACHMENT # REPUR7 # PD ,TO '1 Report No.:2009-A-57 Page No. 6 5. Timing: 1 The Region will enter into the negotiated Agreement with Enbridge, in a form satisfactory to the Commissioner of Finance and the Regional Solicitor. 2 The Region will finalize and sign the Agreements with Teranet, in a form satisfactory to the Regional Solicitor. If the Region and Enbridge cannot negotiate an Agreement above, then the Region will amend it's Agreements with Teranet to indicate such and remove Enbridge from the Teranet Agreements, in a form satisfactory to, the Commissioner of Finance and the Regional Solicitor. 3 The Region will finalize and sign all Agreements with parties who have hereto signed Letters of Intent, in a form satisfactory to the Commissioner of Finance and the Regional Solicitor. 6. Recommendations: 'it is respectfully requested that the Finance and Administration Committee recommend to Regional Council that the OPMA Products Deiivery Agreement between Teranef Enterprises Inc. and the Region of Dunham be renewed in the amount of $722,830.00 for five years be approved and the Regional Chair and Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement. It is respectfully requested that the Finance and Administration Committee recommend to Regional Council that the Region of Durham renew the OPMA Partner Agreement between the Region of Durham 'and each local- tier municipality be approved in the amount of $29,245 for the City of Pickering, the Town of Ajax in the amount of $28,870, the Town of Whitby in the amount of $34,880, the Municipality of Clarington in the amount of $34,765, the Township of Scugog in the amount of $11,900, the Township of Uxbridge in the amount of $9,24 and the Township of Brock in the amount of $7 340 for a five year contract and that the Regional Chair and Clerk be. authorized to execute a Region of Durham OPMA Partner Agreement with each participant. It is respectfully requested that the Finance and Administration Committee recommend to Regional Council that a Region of Durham OPMA Partner Agreement between the Region of Durham and The City of Oshawa be approved in the amount of $45,405 for a five year contract and that the Regional Chair and Clerk be authorized to execute a Region of Durham OPMA Partner Agreement with the City of Oshawa. 68 ATTACHMENT # ~ TO REPORT # PD 1 deport No.:2009-A-57 Page No 7 It is respectfully requested that the Finance and Administration Committee recommend to Regional Council that a Region of Durham renew the OPMA Partner Agreement with Veridian Connections in the amount of $143,340 plus applicable taxes be approved and the Regional Chair and Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement. It is respectfully requested that the Finance and Administration Committee recommend to Regional Council that a Region of Durham renew the OPMA Partner Agreement with Enbridge Inc. in the amount of $158,240 plus applicable takes be approved and the Regional Chair and Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement. It is respectfully requested that the Finance and Administration Committee recommend to Regional Council that the Regional Chair and Clerk be authorized to execute a renewal of the OPMA Value Added Reseller Agreement between Teranet Enterprises Inc and the Region of Durham. Ray Briggs, Chief Information Officer Corporate Information Services Department RECOMMENDED FOR PRESENTATION TO COMMITTEE G.H. Cubitt, M.S.W. Chief Administrative Officer . I 69 Pickering Civic Complex Call 00 One The Esplanade 2 Pickering, Ontario I I _ AT T ACHw1s=NT # TO Canada L1V 6K7 I ' I KPORI # PD Q1d Direct Access 905.420.4660 PICKERING Toll Free 1.866.683.2760 cityofpickering.com PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Department 905.420.4617 Facsimile 905.420.7648 TTY 905.420.1739 plan&devl@cityofpickering.com November 17, 2009 James Silburn Director Business Solutions Corporate Information Services Regional Municipality of Durham 605 Rossland Road East, PO Box 623 Whitby ON L1 N 6A3 Subject: Ontario Parcel Master Agreement- Letter of Intent File: D-9500-004 Please accept this letter as the City of Pickering's intent to participate in the Region of Durham's 2009 renewal of the'Ontario Parcel Master Agreement project. Our participation is subject to renewal support by Region of Durham Council, and budget approval from Pickering City Council in early 2010. 1 will be supporting approval of this project funding in the 2010 budget process and anticipate Council support. The products to be provided under the Region of Durham 2009 OPMA renewal are Ownership and Assessment Polygons, Easement/Transfer Reports, Pin/Plan index tables and scanned registered plans delivered monthly for our geographic area. We understand that our contribution to the project is $5,849.00 each year over five years (plus applicable provincial and. federal taxes). Yours truly Neil Carro , IP, RPP Director, Planning & Development B:Id J:tDocumentstDevelopmenttD-9000\D-9500tOPA November 12 2009.doc Copy: Supervisor, Information & Support Services ATTACHMENT # 3 TO 20 REPORT # PD CQ-ib The City of Pickering Ian Bishop Supervisor, Information & Support Services Planning & Development Department City of Pickering Municipal Office I The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1 V 6K7 March 8, 2010 . Re: Extension of Sublicense Agreements between the Regional Municipality of Durham and the City of Pickering Dear.Ian Bishop, The Regional Municipality of Durham extends to The City of Pickering a 5 year extension to the Sublicence Agreements dated December 14, 2004 for data provided under the General Municipal Licence Agreement-OPMA Ownership Products; OPMA Delivery Agreement-Assessment Products; End User Data Licence Agreements; and Value Added Relicensor Agreement with Teranet Enterprises Inc; and the 1 General Municipal Licence Agreement-OPMA Assessment Products with the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation. The Products to be provided under the extension to the Sublicence Agreements are the Digital Ownership Parcel Fabric in CAD and GIS formats; the Digital Assessment Parcel Fabric in CAD and GIS formats; the Transfer, PIN Owner and Easement Reports; the Registered Plan Images; and the PIN-Plan Index and New Plan Image Subscription Service for your geographic area. The extension to the delivery term set out in the applicable Product Sheets shall be effective on December 15, 2009. The delivery and support fees for the Products are being paid by the Municipal Licensee (as defined below) under the following agreement: _ ..............................Payment Period._....._..---..... Payment Due Date ....,.........Amount of Delivery _......and or _ t_ Fees C N$ -Supp December 15, 2009 to December 14, 2010 May 15,_ 2010 5, . _ $5,849.00... December 15, 2010 to December 14, 2011 1 May 15, 2011 - _ - - $5,849.00... December 15, 2011 to December 14, 2012 May 15, 2012 _ $5,849.00 _ . December 15, 2012 to December 14, 2013 May 15, 2013 $5,849.00 . December 1 2013 to December 14.. . $5...849.00...: ember 2014 ' May 15, 2014. _ . Total Delivery and Support Fees $29,245.00 exclusive of_a.I?.Plicable taxes) The delivery and support fees payable for the extended delivery term for the Products are exclusive of applicable taxes. To confirm The City of Pickering's acceptance of the foregoing extension, please arrange for The City of Pickering to sign both copies of this letter and return 1 signed copy to the Region of Durham Contract Administrator as shown below: ATTACHMENT 'JJ TO 2 REPUR P # PD-_ ! q - ►0 The Regional Municipality of Durham. 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 ,Attention: Cindy Boyd, Legal Department Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event you require more information, please do not hesitate to contact Jim Silburn accordingly at 905-668-4113 ext 2153 or james.silburn@durham.ca. Yours truly, The Regional Municipality of Durham. - AGREED AND ACCEPTED THIS day of , 2010. THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM. FOR THE MUNICIPAL LICENSEE Signature/ritle/Date - I have authority to bind Licensor Signature/ritle/Date - I have authority to bind the Municipal Licensee Signature/Title/Date -1 have authority to bind Licensor Signaturefritle/Date - I have authority to bind the Municipal Licensee City 00 Report to Planning & Development PICKERING Committee Report Number: PD 11-10 22 Date: May 3, 2010 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Growth Strategy Program (Part of the Pickering Official Pan Review) and the Province's Draft Decision on Region of Durham's OPA 128 File: D-2000-012 Recommendation: 1. That Report PD 11-10 of the Director, Planning & Development respecting the Pickering Growth Strategy Program and the Province's Draft Decision on the Region of Durham's OPA 128, be received for information; and 2. Further, that Report PD 11-10 be forwarded to Ministries of Municipal Affairs, Housing and Energy and Infrastructure and the Region of Durham . Executive Summary: The Pickering Growth Strategy Program is intended to inform the City's Conformity Amendment that will establish a policy framework directing residential intensification and employment growth to appropriate places at higher densities. Public consultation intended to engage the public, development industry and commenting agencies, was initiated with a first round of information open houses held in February 2010. A second round of Growth Strategy Program open houses are tentatively scheduled for June 2010. The Region of Durham's Growth Plan Conformity Amendment 128 was adopted by Regional Council on June 3, 2009 and submitted to the Province for approval. On March 12, 2010 the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing released a draft decision on Regional Amendment 128 (see Letter, Attachment #1). The draft decision contains draft modifications to address the Province's concerns and ensure conformity with the Growth Plan and other applicable provincial plans and policies such as the Central Pickering Development Plan. A copy of the draft modifications was forwarded to Council via email on March 23, 2010. The delay in approval of the Region's amendment has implications for Pickering's Growth Strategy Program and conformity amendment. Staff recommends that this Report be forwarded to the Ministries of Municipal Affairs and Housing and Energy and Infrastructure informing the Ministry of the City's intention to continue with its Growth Strategy Program and to prepare an amendment once the Region's amendment is approved. Report PD 11-10 May 3, 2010 Subject: Pickering Growth Strategy Page 2. 23 Financial Implications: No direct implications from reporting on the status of the Growth Strategy Program and the Region of Durham Official Plan Amendment 128. Sustainability Implications: The Pickering Growth Strategy Program supports the City's economic, environmental and social lenses by utilizing land more efficiently within the built-up areas of the City in order to accommodate significant population and employment growth. 1.0 Background 1.1 The City is implementing the Province's Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe through the study entitled "Growth Strategy Program" The Pickering Growth Strategy Program is intended to inform the City's Conformity Amendment that will establish a policy framework directing employment growth and residential intensification at higher densities to appropriate places. On October 19, 2009, Pickering Council authorized the use of Young+Wright/IBI Group Architects to assist City staff leading the Growth Strategy Program in demonstrating through illustrations, pictures and images, the recommended densities in ROPA 128 for regional centres and corridors. In accordance with the Provincial Growth Plan, ROPA 128 requires on a Region- wide basis, by 2015 and each year thereafter, that a minimum 40 percent of Durham's total residential growth occur within the defined built boundary. ROPA 128 requires the City to accommodate a total of 36,163 new units between 2015 and 2031, of which 14,354 units (or 40 percent) is to be intensification within the City's built boundary. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. have been retained to investigate and evaluate the characteristics of Pickering's future housing demand, in an effort to ensure a suitable supply and range of housing types within the built-up area to meet Pickering's intensification target of 40 percent. 1.2 First round of Pickering's Growth Strategy Program open houses were held on February 17th and 18th, 2010, and the study is proceeding with Phase 2 Public consultation engaging the public, development industry and commenting agencies, was initiated with a first round of information open houses held February 17th and 18th at the Civic Centre and the Agape Temple, respectively. There were over forty visitors who attended the two open houses. In addition, an open house was held for students from Dunbarton High School in the grade 11 Urban Watershed Science Course on March 8th at the Library Auditorium. Exhibit boards displaying maps, architectural renderings and conceptual site plans outlined the objectives of the Growth Strategy Program, described issues and opportunities of intensification, and identified areas within Pickering that are considered at this early stage to be most appropriate for intensification. Copies of these exhibit boards are available on the City's webs i to Report PD 11-10 May 3, 2010 Subject: Pickering Growth Strategy Page 3 24 Visitors to the open houses were asked to complete comment sheets. Overall, the comments were supportive of the intensification in the Downtown and Kingston Road areas (see Attachment #2). Other comments included the need for improved public transit and recreation facilities, infrastructure improvements supporting intensification, and ensuring a transition between existing low density residential and future intensification areas. A second round of information open houses. is planned for June where comments and/or issues raised at the first public open house will be addressed. Also to be available at the open house will be the preliminary findings of the housing and demographic review underway by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. and preliminary policy directions prepared by Young+Wright/IBI Group Architects. 1.3 Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing has issued a draft decision on the Region of Durham Official Plan Amendment 128 identifying concerns with the Amendment Region of Durham Official Plan Amendment 128 (ROPA 128) was adopted by Regional Council on June 3, 2009 and submitted to the Province for approval. On March 12, 2010 the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) released a draft decision on ROPA 128 (see Letter, Attachment #1). The Province's draft decision states that while ROPA 128 contains many policies which help the Region achieve the Growth Plan's vision, there are several fundamental issues which are of concern. A key concern is that the land budget overestimates the amount of land needed to accommodate the growth forecast for the Region and is based on assumptions inconsistent with the Growth Plan. Other concerns include: • ROPA 128 and its analyses are based on employment numbers in excess of what is forecast in the Growth Plan; • adding employment lands without justification; • employment numbers for Seaton are lower than what is forecast in the Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) (i.e. 35,000 jobs); • certain existing designated and approved residential lands have been excluded from the land supply analysis; • certain infrastructure have been netted out of the greenfield density calculations; • the proposed proportion of single and semi-detached housing in the designated greenfield areas appears high to achieve compact, transit-supportive built form; and • a comprehensive infrastructure and fiscal analysis of the recommended growth scenario was not undertaken (the Region's infrastructure and fiscal analysis is in preliminary stages). Report PD 11-10 May 3, 2010 Subject:. Pickering Growth Strategy Page 4 25 Given the above concerns, MMAH does not support the proposed urban expansion areas. Modifications are proposed to remove urban area expansions in Pickering, Oshawa and Clarington; a reduction of 25,000 jobs; and the allocation of 35,000 jobs in Seaton by 2031. The draft decision contains draft modifications to ROPA 128 to address the Province's concerns and ensure conformity with the Growth Plan and other applicable provincial plans and policies such as the CPDP. Upon receipt of the Region's input regarding the proposed draft modifications, the Ministry will. be in a position to finalize its approval of ROPA 128. The Ministry's decision is appealable to the Ontario Municipal Board. 2.0 Discussion 2.1 MMAH's proposed modifications have implications for Pickering The following proposed modifications have implications for Pickering (MMAH's comment for the modification is provided in the parenthesis): • delete northeast Pickering expansion area (the Region overestimated the need for additional living area lands); • allocate 35,000 jobs instead of 16,500 jobs to Seaton in accordance with the CPDP (Region's land budget must be revised to match the forecasts in the CPDP); • delete the additional 25,000 jobs forecasted from the land budget methodology (the Region's land budget must be revised to match the forecasts in Schedule 3 of the Growth Plan); • add phasing and intensification policies (results in sequential and orderly development of existing greenfield areas prior to approving of draft plans of subdivision in new greenfield areas); • requiring a minimum density target across the entire Region (achieves the objective of creating compact and transit supportive communities); and • add Seaton Natural Heritage System policies and roads/transportation system (implements, in part, the CPDP). 2.2 The Region is reviewing MMAH's draft decision and will be reporting to Regional Planning Committee A brief overview by Regional planning staff of the Ministry's letter was provided at the March 16th Regional Planning Committee meeting. Regional planning staff will complete their review of the draft decision and engage in further dialogue with the Province to provide clarity on key aspects of ROPA 128. Report PD 11-10 May 3, 2010 Subject: Pickering Growth Strategy Page 5 26 Regional staff propose to meet with Provincial staff at the end of April after which the Region will convene meetings with the area municipalities. Regional planning staff intends to report to Regional Planning Committee in June with a response to the Minister's proposed draft modifications to ROPA 128. City staff will continue monitoring, this matter and report to Council as more information becomes available. 2.3 Implications of the draft decision for the City's Growth Strategy Program The Province required both the Region"and City to bring their Official Plans into conformity with the Growth Plan by June 16, 2009. Pickering's conformity amendment is required to be in conformity with both ROPA 128 and the Growth Plan. Due to the timing of Regional Council's adoption of ROPA 128 in June 2009, the Minister of Energy and Infrastructure (MEI) extended the submission deadline for Pickering's conformity amendment to June 16, 2010. While there is a. recent draft decision on ROPA 128, the delay in approval of ROPA 128 makes the completion of Pickering's conformity amendment problematic. Approval of ROPA 128 is expected sometime after Pickering's deadline of June 16, 2010. An amendment containing only the principles of the Growth Plan (such as: minimum population, employment and intensification targets; identification of the built boundary, the urban growth centre, and intensification corridors; and general policies to facilitate and promote intensification) could be prepared for City Council adoption. However, such an amendment would not provide Pickering with direction regarding specific density targets, identification of intensification areas, the appropriate type and scale of development, and appropriate minimum density targets tailored for intensification areas and the urban growth centre. This level of detail is essential to the ability of the public and other stakeholders to understand and comment effectively on the amendment. Greenfield areas in Pickering such as Duffin Heights and Seaton are already planned or are being planned to comply with the Growth Plan's minimum density target of 50 persons and jobs combined per hectare. 2.4 Staff will monitor the approval of ROPA 128 and recommend that this Report be forwarded to the Ministries of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Energy and Infrastructure and the Region of Durham City staff is working toward the second round of Growth Strategy Program open houses tentatively scheduled for June 2010. More detailed - information regarding appropriate densities, heights and built form, housing demand and demographics will be presented. Report PD 11-10 May 3, 2010 Subject: Pickering Growth Strategy Page 6 27 Following the approval of ROPA 128, staff will prepare a draft conformity amendment for a statutory open house and public meeting. Staff is targeting early 2011 for this meeting. The Municipality of Clarington and the City of Oshawa have both requested an extension to their conformity amendment submission deadline. Staff recommends that a copy of this Report be forwarded to MMAH, MEI and the Region of Durham, informing them of the status of the City. Attachments: 1. Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing draft decision, Region of Durham Amendment No. 128, March 13, 2010 2. Public Open House and Information Session #1, Comment Chart Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Deborah Wy e, P, RPP Ne Carr P, RPP Senior Planner - P licy Director, P anning & Development Catherine Rose, MCIP, P Manager, Policy DW:Id Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Coun ' T s J. Quinn, R MR, MM III Chief Administrative Officer i ATTACHMENT # TO _ 28 Ministry of Ministers des tvlun;eipal Affairs Af sires nluniciPales and Housing el du L€ Bement mun4iPaRts. Ontario TI . t a 77, B ON r'ii l } Top t 2F-0!,,r:,. , 4`C-ciIqI_f2116 belep[mne: 4ib S~!6 22 4x Toll F ee: F$ dl Sans irais'< C? uz 9010 March 12, Mr. Alex GeorgEeff, MCIP, RPP Cornrrn!ssicner of Plannin The Regional Mut,fcipality of Durham ?1,a -tints Departrt - rat 605 Ro sland Foai i L- 'Floor P.O. Box 624 WNttbyON UN 6A3 Clear Mr, Georgieff; Subject: Growing lW wrham Study and Amendment No. 120 to the Du; barn Regional Official Flan (adopted June 3, 2009) F'il'e Flo,- 18-OP-10012-08C,02 The, Vlinistty of Municipal Affai~s and Housing is in receipt of the proposed Durham Regional Official Plan r'' mendmew No. 128 ("ROPA 128"), %,,rhich v. as adopted by Regional: Cauncii cn June. 3, 2109. Ministrv staff have re iek .erd and assessed ROPA I 2R aaa;nst the requirements of the GrovAh Part jcr the Greater Golden Horseshoe's ("Grotvih Plan") policies and objectives, and tither applicable provincial plans and policies such as the Central Pickering Development Plan and recent Lake imcoe F; ~`Pction Plan. Please find encased a cf 'aft de-is=on page fo your r _ attached to this fetter as Attachment "I", Upon re-cepi of the Pegion's inpw. gardmg the pr )pose.,d draft to ificuticns. tree Ministry ;,,till be in a positi is r" cv ' forviarti to finalize its epprt~val of ROPA A 28. The adapted amendment contains many policies which will help the Region achieve the Grv'~Ah Plan's vision. This includes polici s ',VhiCh provide guidance on appropriate densO'es and built form in ; orr'dors and ce-itres to support existing and planned tr. r7sit infrastructure, prorr atu lntensif cation, and provide greater clarity planning for ernpiovrner t. He vever. there, remain several fundamental issues which are of concern to us. These issues were detailed in previous correspondence to the Region throughout the. Growing. Durham study; in particular the letter dated May 25, 2009. A detailed 'sage I of ATTACHMENT # TO _ REPOR? # PD- 29 description of our outstanding concerns and additional policy requirements are listed in the Appendix to this letter. A key concern i that the land budget overestimates the amount of land needed to accommodate the growth forecast for the Region and is used on assumptions inconsistent with the Growth Plan-s policies, For example: The amendment and analyses provided in the Growing Durham reports are based on employment numbers in excess of what is forecast in the Growth Flan; Additional employment lands have been included without justification; The amendment and analyses for Seaton is based on employment numbers lower than what is forecast in the Central Pickering Development Plan; Certain existing designated and approved residential lands have been excluded from the land supply analysis; Certain infrastructure have been netted out of the greenfield density calculations; • The proposed proportion of single- and semi-detached housing in the designated greenfield area (approximately 70%) appears high to achieve a compact, transit-supportive built form; The amendment was adopted without having completed a comprehensive infrastructure and fiscal analysis of the recommended growth scenario. The Minis" is concerned that the sole of the proposed urban expansion areas, resulting urban form and densities based on the above-noted assumptions will undermine the Growth p'lan's policy-objective of creating compact, complete communities for future generations. Moreover, it will also undermine the Region's own efforts to make efficient use of existing land and infrastructure and build and sustain good transit services. The Province is committed to the development and realization of its vision for Seaton as a sustainable, compact„ walkable, and complete community. This innovative new community will contain, as planned, a range and nlix of housing types, access to transportation choices, high-quality employment opportunities, complemented by a network of parks and natural spaces. We recognize that both Durham Region and the City of Pickering share this interest and are key partners in realizing the vision for Seaton. In light of the foregoing, the Ministry is proposing draft modifications in order to address the above-mentioned matters and ensure conformity with the Growth Plan and other applicable provincial plans and policies. The modifications will also ensure that orderly and sequential development occurs. page, 2 of 6 ATTACHMENT # TO RERURI # PD /D 30 Pe se contact e directly a {416} 585-7284 if you would kke to discuss these rnatter~ further prior to proceeding to Regional Gouncii. We I- k for).vard in proceeding ~v,fl, this final stage and impoilant compcsr:ent of the Regional Official Ran Revie"Al th"ough to approval, Yours truly, el- far fay f R Tonal Director Municipal Services Office - Central c. PAI, Macy'!' Regional Clerk Tija D.rk , D rector; Gromn, Poi=c i, Plam„ing and Ana;ysi's, J 'age 3 of ATTACHMENT # REPORT # PD I/'Id 31 APPENDIX irovvt Plan's Employment Forecasts and Employment Land. Deeds The Region°s employrnent growth forecast plans for 25,000 more jobs than the 50,00 jobs forecast in Schedule 3 of the Growth Plan. As advised repeatedly, the Region of Durham, as with all municipalities within the Greater Golden horseshoe, must use the population and employment forecasts in Schedule 3 of the Growth Flan as the basis for planning and managing growth. The Region has also allocated 16,500 jobs to Seaton whereas the Central Pickering Development Plan allocates an emplcymant forecast of 5,000 jobs. Th s has implications in prematurely overestimating the proposed new growth area in. northeast Pickering as it relates to employment land jobs. Further, the Region proposes an urban expansion for an additional employment area in Clarington which is riot justified by the Growing Durham study land budget analysis, Therefore, modifications to remove `he additional 25,000 fobs forecasted, remove the additional employrient area in Clarington and to allocate 5,000 jobs to Seaton are proposed. This is to ensure the Region's land budget is revised to match the forecasts in Schedule of the Growth Plan and the Central Pickering Development Plan. Living Area Land Needs and Proposed Regional Structure The derision by the Req on to exclude some existing designated and approved resldontial lands, particularly in 0sha,"Va any Clarington, from not being considered as available supply to 2031 results in the excess designation of lands for living area. All lands and opportunities for development currently designated and available for development need to be included within the supply estimates prior to considering further ufban ex:pansioms in accordance vAth section 2.2.8 of the Growth Plan. This sh uld also include existing designated low density residential lands wilt liri the built- up area.. if near greenfield lands are required, the location of the new lands should align with the Region°s growth management objectivas and reinforce the current regional structure. The regional land use structure as shown in the proposed amendment is substantially different than the historic and current structure shown in the Region's Official Plan. The nevi greenfield lands being :proposed in northeast Pickering without the employment area lands (which cannot be justified) result its a new living area that is not contiguous to any existing urban areas or a sr;guential extension of growth In addition. there has been no detailed analysis done of the costs associated with servicing these lens's. Therefore, a modification is proposed to remove the northeast . Pickering expansion. arc,a as it i premature at this tirne. Designated Greenfield Area density target The policies in the Growth Plan relating to designated greenfield areas, including the identification of a minimum density target, are meant to achieve the objective of creating complete, compact, and transit-supportive communities, The Growth Flan Page, 4 (if 0 Z ATTACHMENT # TO J 2 REPORT # PD /Z-/0 intends cities and towns to develop as walkable Communities with a diverse mix of land uses, a range and mix of emplc,irrtent and housing types, high quality public open spaces and easy access to transit, local stores and services. The Region's designated greenfnetd area land-budgeting methodology nets out a number of land use and infrastructure features beyond those identified in the Growth Plan's policies. The resaufting density will undermine the policy objective of creating compact, complete communities and the legion°s own efforts to make getter use of existing land and infrastructure and build and sustain good transit services. Policy 2.2.7.3 of the Grove-tit Plan explicitly lists those features that can be excluded in measuring the designated green}field area density target. The Crowing Durham study has specificalty excluded infrastructure proposed in existing and new greenfield areas from the application of the designated' greenfleld area density target. Therefore, modifications are proposed to remove the proposed northeast Pickering expansion area as rioted above fo be consistent with the policies of the Growth Plan as the legion has overestimated the need for additional living aria lends. Phasing Strategy While the amendment mclue es policies for the phasing of development, modifications are proposed to enhance the phasing and intensification strategy for the urban area. This wi~l ensure that the growth management objectives of the Plan are achieved and that the Region's land supply and infrastructure are used efficiently to provide for sequentiaE and orderly development of existing Greenfield areas prior to approval of development in new growth areas. Complete, Compact Communities While the overall housing mix across the Region to the year 2031, including the built- up areas will consist of 0% single and semi-detached low-density units, the existing and proposed nev, designated greenfield area appear to be ptarnned with a housing mix of about 70% sinale and semi-detached low-density. The additional netting out discussed in the previous sectiOrn facilitates the development of a reiatively high percentage of love density housing in the greenfield areas. Further, the designated greenfield area density target should be applied across the entire Region and not just to the take Ontario shore ine municipalities. The designated greenfield area density target is intended to shift the housing mix to a greater mix and balance of ioyv-, medium- and high-density units. As stated previously, the proposed large proportion of low-density development will undermine both the Growth Plain's and the Region's stated policy objectives of creating compact, complete communities: Moreover, it v ifl also undermine the Region's own efforts to make getter use Qf existing land and infrastructure and to build transit- supportive develorrns.rt. Infrastructure and Fiscal Analysis As rioted previously.. the Gro+,ving Durham study and the determination of the recommended grev,;th scenaariej was undertaken without a review of the infrastructure and financial irnplic:ations. While the Ministry understands that the Region has now initiated such are analysis to understand the actual impacts of the fina€ growth option, concerns remain, in articufar, relating to the proposal for significant urban Page 5 of 6 . ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PQ 11-10 .33 expansion areas which have been determined without analyses of capital infrastructure and related costs for water, sewage, roads, etc, required to service and pay for the final growth option and operating costs relating to the new infrastructure. The lack of this detailed fiscal analysis as well as the land budget estimates to accommodate the growth forecasts remain as outstanding concerns related to the timing and scale of certain of the proposed urban expansions, including northeast Pickering. Designating land for development beyond 2031 The Region's forecasting and land bUdgetFrg exercise goes beyond the 2031 horizon established by the Oro'.-vth Plan, to identify future nand needs to the 2056 time horizon. The identification of future living areas and future employment areas to 205 as set out in Schedule F of the draft amendment is not in keeping with Provincial policies. Therefore, new policy no. 13.2.4 and the future growth arras shown on Schedule 'F' are proposed to be removed from the amendment. Lake Sirs coe Protection Plan The Lake Simcoe Protection Plan ("LSPP") was released June 2, 2009 and. established under the authority of the Lake Simcoe Prote>ltion Act, 2000 The LSPP generally applies to the lake Simcoe watershed of which a portion of Durham Region lies within, The effective date of the LSPP is June 2, 2009 and according to the transition runes, the LSPP applies to Rt PA 123 as it was adopted On June 3,. 2009, As a result, the Ministryt'needs to ensure that the Region implements the LSPP as part of its current five-year ROP Revf evv, including incorporating the applicable policies and shoeing the watershed boundary on Schedule A. Central Pickering Development Plan. The Central Pickering Dc veU oprnent Plan ("CPDP") is another Provincial plant prepared under the pravisions of the Ontario Planning and Development Act, 1994 which was released on May 3. 2006.. The GPDP establishes a comprehensive new vision for Central Pickering: that of a sustainable urban community in Seaton integrated with a thriving agricultural cornmunity in the Muffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve and an extensive Natural' Heritage System. The CFDP is a m#ernerrtary ele-ment of the Grc'A+ h Plan focussed on Pickering and therefore forms a key Consideration for ROPA 128 and Durhamr s growth management to 2031. .Certain modifications are proposed to ensure that the amendment Emp!ements the OPDP, in particular that the employment forecasts allocate 35,000 jobs to Seaton in accordance with the GPDP'. Other Policy Modifications While overall supportive of the majority of the policies in the amendment to implement Provincial policy, certain technical modifications are proposed its the draft decision to provide additions.! clarity and direction for growth management and, further Greenbelt Plan implementation, e6of6 Rap ATTACHMENT # 2- TO 4 REPORI # PD //'/6 3 O o = co 5 3 L C U .V C C A-_ 3: -0 :3 r 0 CU '°p 0 =3 -0 Q- 0 -0 O O cn 0 . L - 0 C C t0 = 0 0 0 C 0 E.- cu c -0 CU cu 0 0 ca ~ ~ cn L- E c 0 0 ca v C-13 0 °~n•-cUa0 0 3 =a°i n~~~ CL -0 > a) O U-5 O O cv F- > C O C O N U C U p a)cn -c (n C) N N O O. cn 0 XO. U N U) O p) C C `O U o c m :3 0-0 ° = 3 3~ _ F- ca 0 0-,_ rn O 00 m U t 'Ad ca 0 O ° _ co cn o•q? > cu -0v a)~ c c 0 a) 0 c: c c v) •p c a t 3~ U t 'a 0 o cn ° 5. m o ca o E o N N c~M N.0 CU -0 0 c O o a) cu 0 r- E c -0 c = • -a E 32 c 4-- CL Ea) o~~E301 _oE~ ~C. co ~0 0 C20 CL co ° cn ° ° ° a) ° n =a o o C ~o 0 N O O f6 Y C f6 C Q O 0 E O C O Q O p O O 'O E ca ~ co N p p p O O p •0 ca _ a) 0 c c o- O D j p 3 -p U O , E -p cm O 0 0 "O U C' U c CD a) CL E O 00-00 a- ~CPU i 0E~o`n0 0 00 Y~YC~c0 mm V X X 0 i 0 O 0 U U Q O M M 'C C 0 0 p p 0 0 0 -~C U U E E 0 Q Q U- U U 6- 6- 0- E L 0 0 O ~ a Y L n aa) c Edo U) 0 05 -0 N ~ 0 C cn U ~ N ±O E ~v-0 0 v ATTACHMENT # 2 TO REPORT # PD f-/T 3504 a) to o ) o E c>, Q ca .a3 s c ° ° _ d Cu (n o O O Cu cn E c U a) Q. 0 p CL Ln a) c .p (n~ p E ° a a) c c c E O (n a) -0 O O E m T cu Z. -~c 0 -c Cu a) c ~ a)W =L- >cc •L C o .6..' 0) +r 0 a) c o U A FuC CU o O UM +-N ULa E a) a) c a c a) L o r Cn Cu o° aci M c o CL c L o 0 o °c Cn Cu o 3 v c L 0 Q~ Y 00-5 CU- cu -Fu V- c ca) 2 -0 _0 E oCu 3: 'a n °L Cu ~ o 2: a~ -0 ~ Q 0(D a) ) a) "a :3 (D L 'p C L U c t c a- O) a) a) N O a) O V- E cy c6 cn L a) -c c a) -p N 0 L O O rn E -c =3 a) (n CU -0 Cn U ca f6 0) 3: O p C (n m N p U D O .6.1 CL W a) O c N Cu _ c -p O M 2 c m p .c "O p C a) O Q Aa) -0 C U p rn -0 c Qj = E m =3 m 4. -O O -c Cu a) Q p 3 O U a) Q- 'p "a c mm ~p cn 3 0 E ° occ-a m 2~ ~c x °Cn m ° cnm Nt c -aca>~ (n Cu m -~e 4- x a) a) U- ~ ° c a m m M> O p U cn~ o ~ c M CL -E co a) -0 =3 m U) c CU °o c -co m CL c m c m m m o v tr_ L N _.E • (n 0 M 4- L t cB a) O 4- ca O U a) O V a) yr a] N L c E Q) >1 :3 L i+ O L (n -Mc _ c O 0 O-0 -0 U N t p°' U Q N O) a) C a) C Y Rc c Co L 4- a) 4- y ° _0 a) a) o Cn a) a) m "a ?N C^^n`` a) M 4- (n Cu c 0 :3 CU v c 0) > CL Q 00 m m U)i 0) > cn Y° w c CU W c c c N a) a) O "O .r Cu O ~ - Lj v- Q L Q -O c > N -p a) O - N 4- L) c o Cu c~ ° C c O a0) c N° p c~ Cn CU Q -0 u w a) -0 `n E O o o -0 ~ 0 0 0) - c V/ 6- > -0 c ° o a m a) 0) (n CU cn ac) -ow ca a~ Co ° 0 a) W C'O O E o 0)o E a) cn o a) a E rn 0 E c~ Q)-ca 0 m E ca E m a) Cna)aCl) ).0U c E Cn p: U m 0) Q- a~ o a) c M O c'xs,~ -c= a) m o m m w r aEi~~ - E ~''x E o° c° ~ N a) 4- c 4 U C -0 -C -0 .r Fu 3 in Y a) m . r c -O 42 O y"i L .O a) a) 0) 0) C c L C M a) 0 .N N O>+~ C U 0.9 (L) 0 L 5 0 a) I= 0 U U) O Cu U N 0) -c _0 N ATTACHMENT # 2 TO REPORT # PD ll D 36 M (D C x Q- a O O U) N 0 a) O O Q O O c X C 75 U O c~ N O c 3 -c c) p 3 0 -c cu E O 3 o O a) c ) c a) 41 - U) a) -c c0 U O CU V E U Q N a) 0 L Y cm - =3 -c a c6 C V) -a U a) 3: ~ 0 co cm a) m O O V c c -C a) c ~-c a co E a- O co o) " N L L V O 4- -0 a) CU Z cu 4- 0 c a) c AA`` cu c L cn (n 0 cu a) cu 0 .0 70 U) 0 0 a) c CL a) cu E j ~ O = ~ a) cn -c c a) -0 L •1► c O:3 . L I.L U (n 0)- (n a) cB p c -0 Y o 0 c -c a) . cu cp 0 m cn " cm a) -0 cu a) U = U U Q U) -0 -0 fa c (n 0 CU cm, cn CL co c: 3: Z ° (6 ) ° a c c o c6 c o a) N° O o c -0 0 c v x N CYY~ ~v c_ a) a) CU,~ 0 -c c a) o a° m ° c`a0 a- aa)) ~o aL) L° v - a) c c c L c 3: cu : 0 a a) -c ~ N L vi w O c cz cz -c "Fu - ~ W° c 3 a) c c c -Fu CL C:) -0 -Fu 3: E E~ can E a) c> wm c 0 0 0 m ° E mo c E co CL L O c n a) a) a) E O cn -c -c -c 0) CU U cB a) L c a) ca m cu o ° ; . O 0 C 0 CU • cn a) a) 0). v -c 0 a) a) rn - ca ° U Y a) c c cn S 3 c c c F ca 2 (n cn a 2-2 ~ .O 7 O c ~ L -0 a) a) c C•C~~ 4_. (n 4- ~C :G ~ ~ ~ (a c a) •~''a) -U O O in Y a) O .S O O c -0-0-0- 0 O (D r- 0^ >'U V 72 .2) U a) O U ° O c r- c a) c (D cu 0 a) 5 ~ Q) a°) O L V ~-0 3: cna N M ATTACHMENT # 2 TO REPORT # PD 3 ° a) rn cn E c ca N C p a - U (n a) cu c M C a) O O L m ca cu a) N N .0 = ~ -p -0 N C C O O CU 0 a) Q- c6 ca O E N ° E Q L M > U O O C 4- O CL cu 4 Cf) a) -0 C/) a) o C 0" C O a) a) a) 4- L- O CU p Rf O N -p O LL cn U) E N -p _ 0) c E a) C: 0) cn ' N U F O a O N .n E ° cu cu p .N O O •0 N U U u) L E tcr-0 ca ca +r U c U) 0 a) r- z a) LL -C cu a) a) a) c -6 U o a) ~ 4- O C Q O O a) p O 3 O O -0 U a) C EE, ca -C 4-1 O Q~p)0 _C 4- Q U) tn~C p C cn :3 p U ~ c • (n Y o a) cu L a) ~ -C Li cu -D (A o o V CU -0 C: 1- a) N O N Y a 0 +0 a) 30: c a) L :3 fB U) a) cm a) L- - 0 3: cn a) a U) 0 C: uj -0 U) -0 C 0 CU a) O O O U O .C p O a) > O O j o EO 3. Y ° a) O -O a O° 3 co 4- -a " a) C U) cu o a) c o .1.1 o -0 cn ° c o° L cu U) CL 0)° o a) a ~E ate) + 5 ° a) o a,U.°_ a?:~ ~ c ° -C + o ° N E c -c !E rn c o cm u) N Y 0 E °o E° N o v a) 'o L (D .0 c p 0- 4- 0o~UO c >~tc aiY~~°) cu c: °)•5~~ co)~a)0 -c IL a) U) cu cn 0 cu a) %-jj u -0 75 c: co a) E c o ca fa o a) E a~ ~E°cO E 0w-a00.~~- ° ° ooY~cnaDE E cE o a) L 0° c :2 c°> U rn~ N x x0 000 ~Q - E 30a 003:*a 3ca°'°- 0~E a~ ca aci U~-~ U ° a) _5 U 3 ~s ca > c O U U (6 4_ ~ N C O 0, 4O Y O U L m C 40 O O O p) i LP O C Q- U L) CU O U a) -O O L- a) CD -a -0 -0 CL O 7Ej L) C •C U) U -0 M ~ ATTACHMENT # TO 3 8 REPORT # PD !1-%© Lo a) a) .Y c o c cn (n a) O "c: a E p f~ L E2 O C c O- =3 t C (9 U c6 *0 a) a) E 0 (n U 4-- Nac) cco c~a) a)~ cn c a) a o~c cn 0) 0 CL a -0 a) 8 16 o a) 3: a) a) (n E O Q- c a) 0) o O cn c ~ v CL 0) a) 04-- Cj) oo~~ ~~~~rn~.~c c>a ,o~~ ca)ca~ a) co 0 rnrn Z-- r- > o-c a) = c v, p c c c - c 0) cn a) > v_ 4- a) c 0.1... :3 1- cu E CD 0 a) CU o a) -0 cn 4- ca c 0 Fu o) a) cn c O N 0 a c E cL ' Q ° o a) a) O I c a t6 v -p .o rn - , c Q O v c a)= cn a) L O t cu a) 3 'a c. L N N a) O O cn = -a a) 0 o-5 >%SVU ~mE c:3 ~~~a)cncu -c~~a)c~ ~.Eu) Ua)a)E -ca)a)~.0 °~v°io~cc~E ch 0) c4-- E cu a) 0 22 a) cu 5, *c: c 4- 0 c oo ~a~o U) CU>E c'a~,ccnc pcn a).~~a W r- o a).` co X o o o c a u, o-c O c c6 rn~ o o-a~ , c -0 L-a cu -0 ~F a) 0 E c: a- co 3: a) 0) Q M U U cv cn a) o c 0 = p cn O o s c6 o o ca °o c -0 a) ° -Fu c U) M co N o-c ° v a)~ ° c a~ o c~ a) Q0 °C 4- CU :3 :3 CL ~'°c)a)vi ca)>,a)of~0o~ aa)) -o°03 M° -ov ooY a) cu O~ -0 a) v L v o v~ > -0 0) > oa°)a) c~Ev~ ~cv~(a) o ~cac o~c ova a)JO0 a) ate:,=~ E o ~.`~U ~a~ NY Q v c a) cn 0) -c cu - - c 3 a) a) o 'a a s co b~ o O c c a) o 0 a) c a a > a) ca u) co cn a) 'p a? -v p c~ c o a) o voi o m ca cam= aiQO ~ - c 0 -a c 0 o).q a a) o o cn cl) E o Ea;,- a) a)cc vovca~-co.~E~-0 a)~cti >o EO~oc~o oco :3aa)ima a) uUa)o -a(D ~2E_ E c» a~Ecv v 3 cr Qcn c cNa No o c tp o c o E c 0 O = c-5 c-~~ v cam o'O uvi m o :1 t: > 0 c o rn o ~ o :3 c Co o ~ o -0 c O o cn c 0 cu aE E ~ U i ATTACHMENT # 2 TO 39 c u? af11 c c c~ 4- 0 a) IL cu c 0) L- 3: -C a) 1E a) cu cu -0 a) 0 CO O O O U a) CL cn V) a) 0-0 ~ c m 'a L rn C c6 O ,p c C O O O a) E c~ O 2 c p N a) c O Y ° O E co O p° Y p Q. O E -5 o a) c a) _0 0 -0 cu 4- -0 D) E 0 a) a) O -a c6 a) m a) ca a c 2:1 U -0 t -C (n -C cz ~ E E a) .-o c6 a) f6 a) . a) L>, c OQ U c a)p _0 c-2 a°)ic °caV Ncu -0E a) a)« 0Co a)~ca L O.N t J m ) O X U 2' ° N a) O 0 a O O U a) a) > N Q- CO c U 0) O m O c ±:3 O "O O O C _0 CU CU (n C O c ,p p -O c c O C L O O (6 'O O O c C W. o co L a ° _ E 0).c2 0 a) O O a) N• V 'a) c ~ c O U Y U c -v O N -C Z a a) Q. N a) a) 0) ca p C- 3 'p Y F a) a) U a) -p O /1 (~f U 4m- 4.1 Q li L 45 E a) E L 70 M -0 0 U O J O U co a) ca 0 x O c 0 Q) a) a) M S _r_ CD 0) F- G) CD U -0 -2 EL -0 c: Fn -C L- _r 40 T3 O L c w o a) C O O c O N. c M "5 0 CC 0 cn a) E 0-0 -0 a) c a) a) E 0) c 0) r- • ° L a) _ m C: C .0 co r- W N c _0 Q U L (n L CA C: L- m a) a) CD a) cu co c 0) E cu a) a) E- C a) c: a) Z -0 c a) Fn cu> c~ o. t- L- 3O c00-0m p -v_ a`)) ~O oc-c~a0) 0) C: c~ F-.c V- a)~L°EC: n(`.)~-Ccn ~4 U L O. E s c = 3 L- (nb > c cu m ~E m a) U O 0° O c 'L cz W a) c cv C a) °(1)= C F v Y U .O Y p O c co L ~ O -E • 0 Q CL 0 C 4-'D L c N 4- (6 N co cu - a) -C O L p) L O a) U N~ c 0 a) a) C ^ E^`` O) p t5 O c a) c: a) a) CD U) cu -0 O F. E 2): O 0 a) m w 0 .2g U> y W O W V L N L a) -r -5 c 0 U) -C V) 0 0 N-10, cu E Y 'a c am' U CL M -p 3 M U a) M O O S O~ a) c o (6 vO- r C) :3 0 cu c CC C: 0 a) a) 0 cu L a) a) m L- a) O cn C co a) "O C O _ O a) _0 Q C a) a) c: cuEC Ea) O O ~ U L n O ATTACHMENT TO `t REPORT # PD c rn m M CL 6m a) to O C N p E O U -aUN E` Of0 E Q 0) cNL6 N N +'r 4 O O) O C U U Y O M 0 :3 O) 0) O O c ~p (0 co C a) - c 0 Q- (a O E .c u I U U) M O f0 a) cu -o E Q- C C +r M U a) cn U O M i -p>•C U N ~ a)mM a)UC C cu a) a) C U +r C C U O M ) a)~ ~c ` M a) m 0 t. 0 0- cn 3 U 2 ` -0 (0 f4 "O 0-0 a)cc a)(n0 C: O O O a) C (n 0 w O 0 N O 0 7s~~ f6 Q 0 ~ O Q'.C .C (Q a) C a) a) ~ O ~ . C ~ M a) t a) Z7 C O O -0 Q C : a) a) c ~ E c a) O O 0 Call o~ Report to Planning & Development ICKERING Committee Report Number: PD 12-10 Date: May 3, 2010 41 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Everett Buntsma Director, Operations & Emergency Services Subject: West Rouge Canoe Club Request for Extension of Lease Agreement with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for Paddling Facility on West Spit of Frenchman's Bay Recommendation: 1. That the request of the West Rouge Canoe Club to extend its lease agreement with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for three years on an annual basis commencing with the period November 1, 2009, to October 31, 2010, and expiring October 31, 2012, to accommodate a temporary compound on the west spit of Frenchman's Bay for the storage, within trailers, of canoes and kayaks associated with the club's paddling facility, be supported by Council, and 2. Further, that the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PD 12-10 to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Executive Summary: In April 1994, the West Rouge Canoe Club (WRCC) established a paddling facility on the west spit of Frenchman's Bay on lands owned by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA). The "facility" consists of two trailers on wheels for the temporary storage of canoes and kayaks, and a parking area for three to five cars (see Attachment #1). The facility was introduced with the permission of TRCA, and the concurrence of City Council. Extensions to that approval have been granted by Pickering Council and TRCA from 1995 through 2009. The present lease agreement expired October 31, 2009. The City's approval for this temporary accommodation is required due to the current "R4" zoning of the land, which permits only residential use of the property. The WRCC have requested a lease extension from TRCA which has been forwarded to City staff (see Attachment #2). After reviewing the request, both Departments, Operations & Emergency Services and Planning & Development support the requested lease extension. If approved by City Council, TRCA staff will report to the TRCA Board recommending the lease extension. i Report PD 12-10 Date: May 3, 2010 Subject: West Rouge Canoe Club Page 2 42 City staff anticipates that this three year lease extension for the WRCC will be the last.prior to investigating opportunities to rezone the property and establish a permanent recreational facility/compound that are consistent with TRCA/Pickering waterfront policies and plans. Negotiations to discuss the proposed recreational facility/compound are ongoing between WRCC, TRCA and the City of Pickering. Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the lease extension. Sustainability Implications: This facility has had minimal environmental impact on the west spit during its operation and accommodates the continuation of healthy activities by West Rouge Canoe Club participants. Background: City staff has reviewed the request of the West Rouge Canoe Club (WRCC) and TRCA and have no objection to three annual extensions of the lease agreement between the WRCC and the TRCA, ending October 31, 2012. The paddling activity is consistent with environmentally friendly recreation activities which are suitable for the Bay, and with the current park operations. TRCA is expected to keep the road serving the West Spit open in order to provide continued access to the Canoe Club compound. TRCA staff, City staff and the WRCC are currently investigating opportunities for a permanent recreational facility/compound, consistent with TRCA/Pickering waterfront plans. A potential site location is being reviewed to relocate the WRCC further west of their current site to an area designated in the Rotary Frenchman's Bay West Park Development Plan for boat launching and public water access. Once a proposal has been received from WRCC, the matter will be considered by both the City and TRCA, involving the Waterfront Coordinating Committee. The Director, Operations & Emergency Services supports the lease extension request and does not anticipate any conflicts between waterfront trail construction and operation of the paddling facility. He advises that the facility has been operated without complaint from residents or park users. Attachments: 1. Facility Plan and Location Map 2. Email from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority dated April 8, 2010 conveying the request for lease extension from the West Rouge Canoe Club I Report PD 12-10 Date: May 3, 2010 Subject: West Rouge Canoe Club Page 3 43 Prepared By: Approved / Endorsed By: ~tllQ., 'ewo ` Ashley Y a od N ar _ RPP Planner Director, P in & D lopment Ross Pym, MCIP, Brett Bu sma, &vb, cmm (Acting) Manager, Development Review Director, Operations & Emergency Services AY/RP: jf Attachments Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Director, Operations & Emergency Services Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City C nc' /O Tho as J. Quinn, R MR., MM Chief Administra ' Office ATTACHMENT# --..M 4 4 REPORT# PD l a l a Frenchman's Bay Subject Land Parking Location of , ° Existing Trailers - _ - geachp~0 n t---- - - - - - P ro n-, e n d e _ - - - I City of Pickering Planning & Development Department DETAI L 'A' N SUNRISE AVEI FRENCHMAN'S BA)" 0 i See Detail 'N L O 1 G Q0` _ LAKE ONTARIO City of Pickering Planning & Development Department KEY MAP .71 N 1. i L ATTACHMENT#~TO From: Connie Pinto [mailto:CPinto@trca.on.ca] REPORT# PO >a -~0 45 Sent: April 8, 2010 1:54 PM To: Reynolds, Steve Subject: Fw: WRCC,r Lease agreement Steve, Please see the attached correspondence from the West Rouge Canoe Club. As discussed, City of Pickering will take this request to the Planning Committee is May, then to Council for approval. Once the City of Pickering has approved this request, TRCA will include the Council's decision in the report to our Board. Best regards, Connie Connie Pinto Project Manager, Waterfront Planning Toronto and Region Conservation Authority T: 416 661 6600 ext. 5387 cgpintogtrca.on.ca l~ www.trca.on.ca Forwarded by Lon Colussi /MTRCA on 04/08/2010 01:51 PM billynMEDrogers.com To Icolussiatrca.on.ca cc 02/23/2010 08:31 AM Subject Fw: WRCC - Lease agreement Dear Ms. Colussi: It has come to my attention that the land lease for the West Rouge Canoe Club expired this past October 31, 2009. Connie Pinto from the TRCA recommended that I send this letter to request a new land lease for a 3 year period (starting November 1, 2009) and renewable annually. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated Belinda Lyn, Commodore West Rouge Canoe Club Club Address: P.O. Box 187, 91 Rylander Blvd. Toronto, Ontario, M16 5M5 On Mon, 2/22/10, Connie Pinto <CPinto@trca.on.ca> wrote: From: Connie Pinto <CPinto@trca.on.ca> Subject: WRCC - Lease agreement To: billyn14@rogers.com Cc: sreynolds@cityofpickering.com, "Larry Field" <LField@trca.on.ca> Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, 6:23 PM Hello Belinda, Further to our meeting last week, I have talked to our property department regarding the extension of your lease. Lori Colussi informed me that you are now going month to month, as your lease expired October 31, 2009. In order to start of the lease agreement process, the Club needs to send a letter to Lori requesting a new lease for a period of 3 years (starting November.1, 2009), renewable annually. Once we receive your request, we will request that City of Pickering staff prepare a report for Council approval. Once approved, TRCA staff would take a report to our Board for approval. This will take a .couple of months based on the Council and Board meeting schedules. The lease would be back-dated to November 1, 2009 and expire October 31, 2012. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me or contact Lori Colussi directly.