HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 6, 2010
Planning & Development
Committee Agenda
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
PICKERIN Council Chambers
7:30 pm
Chair: Councillor. Pickles
PART "A" . PAGES
PLANNING INFORMATION MEETING
Information Report. No. 04 -10 1-20
SUBJECT; Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-15
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 17/09
Ontario Realty Corporation
Part Lot 18, Concession 3
City of Pickering
Information Report No. 05 -10 21-27
SUBJECT: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 03/10
Cosima Daniell
1979 Woodview Avenue
North Part of Lot 18, Plan 329
City of Pickering
Information Report No. 06 -10 28-35
SUBJECT: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 02/10
City Initiated Application
1167 and 1199 Kingston'Road
South Part of Lot 24, Concession 1
City of Pickering
Accessible For information related to accessibility requirements please contact
p IC KG C h ' V~ G Linda Roberts
f Phone: 905.420.4660 extension 2928
TTY: 905.420.1739
Email: Irobe rtsa.citvofpickerina.com
Ciry oo Planning & Development
Committee Agenda
_ Tuesday, April 6, 2010
PICKS ING Council Chambers
7:30 pm
Chair: Councillor Pickles
PART "B"
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORTS
1. Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 05-10 36-39
Mavij Homes Development Inc.
Plan of Subdivision 40M-2254
Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Report PD 05-10 of the Director, Planning & Development regarding the
final assumption of the works and services within Plan of Subdivision 40M-
2254 be received;
2. That the highways being Rougewalk Drive and Mahogany Court within Plan
40M-2254 be assumed for public use;
3. That the works and services required by the Subdivision Agreement within
Plan 40M-2254', which are constructed, installed or located on lands
dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent
thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City,
be accepted and assumed for maintenance, save and except from Blocks 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63,.64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 74, 75, 76, 77 and 78;
and
4. That the Subdivision Agreement and any amendments thereto relating to
Plan 40M-2254, save and except from Blocks 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 63, 64, 65,
66, 70, 74, 75, 76 and 77, be released and removed from title.
2. Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 07-10 40-51
Seaton Updates
-Neighbourhood Planning Review and Other Implementation Studies
RECOMMENDATION
That Report PD 07-10 of the Directors, Planning & Development and Office of
Sustainability, respecting a status update on the Seaton Neighbourhood Planning
Review and other implementation studies required under the Central Pickering
Development Plan, be received for information.
(II) OTHER BUSINESS
(III) ADJOURNMENT
Litq 4 Information Report
Report Number: 04-10
For Public Information Meeting of
PICKERING Date: April 6, 2010
01
In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements
of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter PA 3
Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-15
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 17/09
Ontario Realty Corporation
Part Lot 18, Concession 3
City of Pickering
1.0 Property Location and Description
- the subject lands are located on the east side of Brock Road, north of the
Hydro corridor and south of Old Taunton Road;
- a property location map is provided for reference (see Attachment,#1);
- the property was previously part of the Seaton Golf Course and the subject
lands were used this past summer for golf purposes;
- it is staffs understanding that the remaining portion of the Seaton Golf Course will
tie reconfigured and continue to operate in the future as a nine hole golf course;
- the majority of the subject property is a typical golf course containing
manicured turf grasses and mature trees;
- the subject property, is part of a larger holding of land owned by Ontario
Realty Corporation (ORC);
- the site's topography is relatively flat with a gentle slope to the east;
- surrounding land uses are:
north - a former portion of the Seaton Golf Course (this portion of the golf
course is approved for residential development, by Plan of
Subdivision SP-2008-08 by Lebovic Enterprises Limited);
south - ORC lands containing a Hydro One corridor and the parking lot for
the Seaton Golf Course;
east - Urfe Creek valley lands and the remainder of the Seaton Golf Course;
west - existing commercial and residential lands on the opposite side of
the future William Jackson Drive;
2.0 Applicant's Proposal
- the applicant has requested approval of a draft plan of subdivision in order to
create one block for an elementary school site that is 1.74 hectares in size;
- the application to amend the zoning by-law is to change the zoning on the
property from °02-GC"- Open Space - Golf Course to an appropriate zone
that would permit a school (see Applicant's Submitted Plan - Attachment #2);
- no specific site design or buildings are proposed by the applications.
Information Report No. 04-10 Page 2
02
3.0 Official Plan and Zoning
3.1 Provincial Growth Plan
- Places to Grow (the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden
Horseshoe) requires intensification of land uses within built-up area
boundaries of municipalities;
the Growth Plan guides infrastructure planning and strategic investment
decisions to support and accommodate forecasted population and economic
growth;
community infrastructure, which includes education facilities, should be
planned to meet the needs resulting from population changes and to foster
complete communities;
3.2 Durham Regional Official Plan
- the Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject lands as
"Living Areas", which are intended to be used predominantly for housing
purposes;
- "Living Areas" shall be developed in a compact form through higher densities
and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas;
- cultural and community facilities, such as schools are permitted in this
designation;
- the subject applications appear to conform to the Durham Region Official Plan;
3.3 Pickering Official Plan
- the Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Urban Residential
Areas - Medium Density Areas";
- permissible uses within the "Urban Residential Areas - Medium Density
Areas" designation include, among others, residential uses and community
and cultural uses as well as limited office commercial uses;
- community uses, such as schools are permitted in "Urban Residential Area -
Medium Density Areas";
- the subject lands are within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood of the
Official Plan;
- Schedule II of the Pickering Official Plan - "Transportation Systems"
designates the proposed abutting road (William Jackson Drive), which will
provide access to the property, as a "Collector Road";
- A "Collector Road" is designed to carry lower volumes of traffic at lower
speeds than high order arterial roads while providing access to properties;
- the City has adopted the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development
Guidelines that apply to the subject lands (see Section 3.4);
- , as required by the Official Plan an Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) for the
Duffin Heights Neighbourhood has been prepared and endorsed by City
Council, and the proposed school site must comply with the
recommendations of the ESP;
- the applications will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the
Pickering Official Plan during further processing of the applications;
Information Report No. 04-10 Page 3
03
3.4 Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines
the recently approved Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines
(NDG) provide design objectives for the neighbourhood;
the subject property is delineated as an elementary school on the Tertiary
Plan - Duffin Heights Neighbourhood;
- the NDG objectives include creating accessible pedestrian-oriented
residential areas, distinct in character and harmonious with the larger
neighbourhood;
- the NDG states that public/institutional uses form an important aspect of
community identity and provides location and design principles for such uses;
3.5 Zoning By-law 3036
- the subject lands are currently zoned "02-GC Open Space - Golf Course
by Zoning By-law 3037;
the existing zoning permits a golf course and a variety of open space
recreational uses;
- an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to allow the development of
the proposed plan of subdivision for a school site;
- the applicant has requested an appropriate zone that would permit the
proposed development.
4.0 Results of Circulation
4.1 Resident Comments
- none received in response to the circulation to date;
4.2 Agency Comments
- the following agencies or departments advised they have no objection to the
applications(see Attachments #3 to #9):
• Durham District School Board;
• Enbridge Gas Distribution;
• Rogers Cable;
• Hydro One Networks;
• Greater Toronto Airport Authority;
• Veridian Connections; and
• Bell;
4.3 Staff Comments
in reviewing the applications to date, the following matters have been
identified by staff for further review and consideration:
• reviewing the applications in terms of compliance with the City's Official
Plan and Development Guidelines-,
Information Report No. 04-10 Page 4
04
• ensuring that the proposed development is compatible with, and sensitive
to, existing and proposed surrounding development and provides
appropriate tree preservation and/or Natural Heritage Compensation;
• reviewing the applications in terms of their level of sustainable
development components which demonstrate how the site development
and building design/construction is consistent with the City's Sustainable
Development Guidelines
• concluding arrangements respecting the requirements of the ESP
including functional servicing and storm water management;
• securement of appropriate arrangements for the construction of trails on
lands owned by ORC that abut the draft plan of subdivision;
• reviewing supporting technical submissions and reports to ensure that
adequate information is provided, that technical requirements are met and
that the proposed development design does not impact on the ability of
abutting properties to develop in an appropriate fashion.
5.0 Procedural Information
- written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning
& Development Department;
- oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting;
- all comments received will be noted and used as input to a Planning Report
prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent
meeting of Council or a Committee of Council;
- any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal
Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts
any by-law or approves the draft plan of subdivision for this proposal;
- any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision
regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk.
6.0 Other Information
6.1 Appendix No. I
- list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City
Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing
this report;
6.2 Information Received
full scale copies of the plans and studies listed below are available for viewing
at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department-
the draft plan of subdivision;
• Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report,' prepared by Sernas
Associates, dated July 2009;
• Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by MMM Group Limited, dated
November 2007;
Information Report No. 04-10 Page 5
05
• Review of Sustainability Report, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated
June 19, 2009;
• Stage 2-3 Archaeological Assessment Report, prepared by Archaeological
Assessments Ltd., dated February 2005;
6.3 Owner/Applicant Information
- the owner of the subject lands is ORC;
- the applications have been submitted by Dayna Gilbert of Sernas Associates
on behalf of ORC;
- ORC representatives for these applications are Graham Martin and Ash
Kothiyal.
Ross Pym, MCIP, R
(Acting) Manager, Development Review
RP:Id
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
Appendix No. I to
06 Information Report No. 04-10
Commenting Residents and Landowners
(1) none received to date
Commenting Agencies
(1) Durham District School Board
(2) Enbridge Gas Distribution
(3) Rogers Cable
(4) Hydro One Networks
(5) Greater Toronto Airport Authority
(6) Veridian Connections, and
(7) Bell
Commenting City Departments
(1) none received to date
ATTACH€ ENT#-L -ro
07
n°w TAUNTo V
Pp
Fp~R0 k
i
tRE
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
CS
e~
O
- NOV CVITYRAL G
" ERSAN STREET
i
N
.City of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PART OF LOT 18, CONCESSION 3
OWNER ONTARIO REALTY CORPORATION DATE JULY 21, 2009 DRAWN BY JB
FILE No: SP2009-15 & A 017/09 SCALE 1:10000 CHECKED BY RP H
puttee:
0 T. 02005 t Enterprises Int. ontl ile euppiets..All right6 Reserved. Not o plan of -my. - PN'15
2005 MPAC and its suppliers. All ",h ts Reserved. Not o plpn of of Survey.
ATTACHMENT# 'TO
-ID
ORT#-
Q 8 INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S
SUBMITTED PLAN
ONATRIO REALTY CORPORATION
S P-2009-15 & A 01 W09
c Future R.O.W. Share
w
3 5P--2008
0 Existing
Commercial
a,
3
E
r- Future, R.0..W.. Share
_v - - Ultimate .
Existing R.O.W. Width -
Commercial 22.0rti
•E F U t U .
CATHOLIC SCHOOL
o BLOCK 1
o
Of - - (1.74 ha - 4.3 ac.)
v
. v Future R. 0. W. Shore
Existing
O Commercial
LL
03 ~
N o Future R.O.W. Share ~G
M
jV1 v Existing
L1J Residen tiol G
V ' .
E
- - ^ \ SENIOR 5
\ +
iota ock Rd cy,
-
ROW- 45. C - ^3C
x ^ ~
a \J
- 0
c4 O
O
m u a:
~0 3
r-TIT
N
FW SCALE COPIES OF THE APPLICANYS
SUBMITI£D PLAN ARE A✓ANABL£ FOR ✓IEWNG Ar
ME 07Y OF PICKERINC PLANNING & OE✓£LSPM£Nr OEPARrmENZ
MIS MAP WAS. PRODUCED BY RIE CNY OF PICKrR1NG
PLANNING d OEYELOPAIENr OEPARr1I£Nr•
INFORdURON & SUPPORT SERVICES
JULY 21, 2009.
i m-
iNForrt ATicm PcRT# 09
V,,CT SC
p$0 y00 August 6, 2009
Q RECEIVED
AUG 1 1 2009
The City of Pickering CITY NiNG & DECKERING
OPM wT
Pl'anning.Dept., Pickering Civic Centre DEPARTMENT
One The Esplanade
Pickering, ON
Facilities Services L1 V 6K7
400 Taunton Road East
Whitby, Ontario Attention: Mr. Ross Pym
L1R2K6
Telephone: (905) 666-5500
1-800-265-3968
Fax: (905) 666-6439 j
Dear Mr. Pym, -
RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-15
DCDSB Site
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A17/09
Ontario Realty Corporation
Part Lot 18, Concession 3
City of Pickering
Staff has reviewed the information on the above noted and, under the
mandate of the Durham District School Board, have no objections.
Yours truly,
e
Christine Nancekivell,
Senior Planner
1:IPROPLANIDATAIPLNGISUBISP2009-15:. OC -
.9 -16
10 k;2 .ENBR/DGE
ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC.
500 Consumers Road
North York ON M2J 1P8
AUGUST 20T", 2009
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 650
Scarborough ON M1K 5E3
ECE
ROSS PYM, MCIP, RPP
PRINCIPAL PLANNER tJ ' 2 I0,0 9
CITY OF PICKERING CITY OF Pgf- EKING
PICKERING CIVIC COMPLEX PLANNING; ?')EVELOPMENT
ONE THE ESPLANADE DEPARTMENT
PICKERING ON L1V 6K7
Dear Sirs:
RE: DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION SP-2009-15
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 17/09
ONTARIO REALTY CORPORATION
PART LOT 18 CONCESSION 3
CITY OF PICKERING.
Enbridge Gas Distribution has no objections to the development as proposed.
However, should the applicant consider the use -of natural gas for this
development, Enbridge requests the developer contact us at their earliest
convenience to discuss installation and clearance requirements for service and
metering facilities.
Yours truly,
Tony Ciccone
Manager, Network Analysis
Distribution Planning
(416) 758-7966
(416) 758-4374 - FAX
TC:
ATTMENT #-45-TO
ROGERSre
CABLE
July 29, 2009
Mr. Ross Pym
Planning & Development Department
City of Pickering,
Ontario
Dear Mr. Pym:
Re: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-15
Rogers Cable Communications Inc. ("Rogers") has reviewed the application for
the above Site Plan and has determined that it intends to provide cable and
telecommunications services. Accordingly, we request that municipal approval
be granted subject to the following conditions:
(1) Prior to Site Plan approval, the Developer/Owner will, at its own cost,
grant all necessary easements and maintenance agreements required by
those CRTC-licensed telephone companies and broadcasting distribution
companies intending to serve the Site Plan (collectively, the
"Communications Service Providers"). Immediately following
registration of the Site Plan , the Developer/Owner will cause these
documents to be registered on title.
(2) Prior to Site Plan approval, the Developer/Owner will, with consultation
with the applicable utilities and Communications Service Providers,
prepare an overall utility distribution plan that shows the locations of all
utility infrastructure for the Site Plan, as well as the timing and phasing of
installation.
In addition, we kindly request to, where possible, receive copies of the following
documents:
(1) the comments received from any of the Communications Service
Providers during circulation;
(2) the proposed conditions of draft approval as prepared by municipal
planners prior to their consideration by Council or any of its committees;
and
(3) the planners' report recommending draft approval before it goes to Council
or any of its committees.
ATTACH"eiT r b TO
1 J
j . Hydro One Networks Inc.
Faulities & Real Estate
P.O. Box 4300 ~Markham, OR 5Z5 www,HydroOn e.com Courier: hydro(,~a
one
185 Clegg Road
Markham, ON L6G 1 B7 .
September 2,'2009 Via E-mail Only
Mr. Ross Pym, Planner
Planning & Development Department
City of Pickering
Pickering Civic Complex
One The Esplanade
Pickering, ON L1V 6K7
Dear Mr. Pym
Draft Plani of Subdivision
Ontario Realty Corporation
Part of Lot 18, Conc 3
(Twp of Pickering) now
City of Pickering
File: SP-2009-15 (ZBA- A 17/09)
i
i
Please be advised that Hydro One Networks Inc. ("HONI") has no objection in principle to the proposed i
plan of subdivision, provided the following are included as conditions of draft approval:
1, Prior to final approval,a copy of the lot grading and drainage plan, showing existing and final
grades, must be submitted to HONI for review and approval.
2. Any development in conjunction with the subdivision must not block vehicular access to any
HONI facilities located on the right of way. During construction, there will be no storage of
materials or mounding of earth, snow or other debris on the right-of-way.
3. The subdivider shall make arrangements satisfactory to HONI for-the crossing of the hydro right-
of-way by any future walkways or paths. The proponent should contact Maria Agnew to discuss
such proposals. Maria can be reached at (905) 946-6275.
4. The costs of any relocations or revisions to HONI facilities which are necessary to
accommodate this subdivision will be borne by the developer.
5. The easement rights of HONI and its legal predecessors are to be protected and maintained.
In addition, it is requested that the following be added as a Note to the Conditions of Draft Approval.
I. The transmission lines abutting this subdivision operate at 500,000, 230,000 or 115,000 volts.
Section 186 - Proximity - of the Regulations for Construction Projects in the Occupational Health . e
and Safety Act, require that no object be brought closer than 6 metres (20 feet) to an energized 500
W conductor. The distance fohM kV conductors is 4.5 metres (15 feet), and for 115 kV
conductors it is 3 metres (10 feet). It is the proponent's responsibility to be aware, and to make all
personnel on site aware, that all equipment and personnel must come no closer than the distance
specified in the Act. They should also be aware that the conductors can raise and lower without
warning, depending on the electrical demand placed on the line.
cont'd
i
Main: 1-888-231-6657 Low Voltage Rights: 1-800-387-1946 .
r
{
i
i
2_
I trust this is satisfactory. If you have any questions please call me at your convenience at the number
below. -
Yours Truly
I
V
Laura Giunta
Real Estate Assistant-- Planning
Real Estate Services '
Hydro One Networks Inc.
905-946-6235
cc Maria.Agnew - Senior Real Estate Coordinator - Hydro One
r
i
i
V
i
ATTActlmr7nT -7-
oY_
Greater Toronto Airports Authority 15
Lester 6. Pearson international Airport
P.O. Box 6031, 3111 Convair Drive
Toronto AMF, Ontario, Canada L5P 1B2
GTAA
Airport Planning
Olga Smid
Superintendent, Land Use Planning
Tel: (416) 776-7355
Fax: (416) 776-4168
(Transmitted via Facsimile 905420-7648)
July 20, 2009
Mr. Ross Pym
Principal Planner - Development Review
City of Pickering - Planning & Development Department
Pickering Civic Complex
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario L 1 V 6K7
Dear Mr. Pym:
RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-15
Zoning By-lawn Amendment Application A. 17/09
Ontario Realty Corporation
Part Lot 18, Concession 3
City of Pickering
Thank you for providing the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) with a copy of the
above-noted applications.
We have reviewed the proposal to develop a Catholic Elementary school on the subject property
in an area that is designated as "Mixed Corridors, Medium Density Residential & Open Space"
in the Pickering Official Plan, and offer the following comments:
The GTA.A released its Draft Plan for the Pickering Airport Lands in November 2004. The Draft
Plan proposed that the prohibition of sensitive land uses be defined by the 25 NEF contour for
the GTAA's proposed runway configuration. This is consistent with Transport Canada's 2005
revision to its guideline for "Land Use in the Vicinity of Airports" (Publication TP 1247E) to
recognize the 25 NEF as the standard for new airports. The subject property is located outside of
the 25 NEF Noise contour for the proposed airport.
1
ATTACHMENT x 7 TO
Mr. Voss Pym
July 20, 2009
- Page 2.
GTAA
If the airport proceeds, further refinements to the runway configuration recommended in the
Draft Plan may be necessary as new environmental and operational/engineering information
becomes available, either through the environmental assessment process or during design of the
facilities. Such refinements could potentially alter the location of the 25 N'EF contour. However,
it is our position that the location of the property owned by Ontario Realty Corporation and
located on Part of Lot 18, Concession 3 in the City of Pickering, is unlikely to be impacted by
changes to the 25 N"EF contour resulting from potential refinements to the proposed runway
layout:
The GTAA therefore. has no objection to the future proposed development of a Catholic
Elementay school on the site.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Kathryn Tracey-Leitch, Senior Land Use.
Planner, at 416-776-4012.
Yours very truly,
GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY
~a
Olga Smid
Superintedent, Land Use Planning
0
Lo
FSC
Miked Soume
x Q
ATTd~CHkIFENT9-8 TO
ov -16
17
LRID1` N
U s DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVEEW1
utari-3 £ca1fi C=pord(- oa -Draft PLqn of ~ub:ii.~ Low j .Z_,on4 B7-L-w n-n~dm~t I
PROJECT T~AI►1L': p7ro•a03cIl :-21: -cEtsns - Sulua Sit_ I
ADDRLSSj PLAN: Ps_ t Lot 1 C;onsssim 5
MtU. ICIPAUTY: Pickc*?
1~:F 1V0 5P-200PLI5 dz !r 17j0') Si1BNMSION DATE: ltil- 1.5, 20 ,
33e f,3UO-xingis sa avr.-.Reso_ theb lseaiulr l~tti the Appdcant i> k'l:ei7to aicaie ord= -o ut-win a •-cwf4eir
de trcxl Fon er supply- s'lstem to ih~s az .nj a^_tbin (te sil a whcr_ suk•d-m=ica iz sunke For3t is inco_vc•J. T-I I
comments :)djw sre hated co, piclimamri in[omaton ony and sre xul-ject -o rn isiob k Al canes 7eri3iae's san ertl
C -xoditica; oFSer.ic? &cumutt wM ocf the ncuiv:Tnents, t!!rm.s sad co3c i(ia-.s fcs the pxovi3oa c-f r.lenu~c terc3ce_
=his re-,ew co°s nuI -nastitk(e an C}ffcr to Ctx n? at:
1 Elec=c smx4ze is not U=.MtI x7m,x131c oo he Pond Au accr.;s; ri t[7 adjscmi t:3 ti+, prnpx_rq.
Srrv;cing naid '-e fr..ir_ the propose] road a w.-Acre d-rev ad;pceat to the srht:•ol -And Verd3n's supply volh aRe
viA bt 9r 27.6'cV.
-fl-.c Applimar (rte weed tujvnmt;• plot ije wcommc-d•{l ion cn 6te for Vesician's taxdor c:fig
Ogtdcorpsjmo-att ins 5m ~ 6m elev arms tti(:s. arccesatl,le kyhear}' ~eltic_cs.
3. ,x separate mom -..;d: out de Icsss s Mgviied to acs ^+*'M0*Te 4 sidiso's Mc-.c:.
4. _31,igh vt~ ag_ c>ncrz[e cnc2sed liuc(ed rid a1 uudrxaund cshlc eyttem i5 =c,~ :1 fmm the deslg~atc{d supi:ly
pcirs(s) at the pxnosed adjacent iosd -o a ir"uts_ormer :ocaton(s) on L•rf Uro?erty, 31 11- tte Applicant'e oc•a1.
5. An direcliund lbortd or open cut u-ide_8r•7uad toad crossing -nay he requited the A:Tl-ant will b° =c•TT°r
to catoplesc 6i; wcwk and cover all costs astr•ciatcd wi h -tts requirement
E_ The Ap -Ncrnt mustmake c,ir ct *rpliwdoc to Viridian forrecaL-d sertrn3 ss socrr.as posshlt_ :in,d rerti
Eased o_ email =e.jf ear win Pit V rsdisa to ' )C& *.e -work aeoessery in identify s-xcf c iegtrir--mcau. and j
arrdrgemmts and xclated wurk fo_ •tl s -mc•j<es, ant t:: make m Oder to Cmmn ct. iZte ,#.p]can-i.3 strw0g, I
enaxrge•j tit engag_ a~ ~exaca] ~~:~1':nt oc a:ce~•iriatt ro ;:c ordinate serdic_ det~7s_ Th. sppli~rit Es ~
ceuiened 6et .e31v_-s, wnt_icts. cr w--vi they m..,v iuitivc prier a =baking an Offs to`C:riueu_ frnni
Vcadi" -nag :mate sAfikt3T66 Ilse i=tc orand dct Ls ofthe d=tdcvscrviocg =tt r:u-io Ex Offsto
Connect for -s3tic:i S'ect a cw tear no res ,cxtsibility.
7. -he eln:rrica_ i~5ta[lasionjs) &-un "NE FubEc road 3.1rwm.:: -qi to the senkc cu-mw& aLd allmerarng
~6nocns inus complg ~ Vsidi ac's Teq nrem: nt< ae d specifics inns and msg be su' g st to the
req-3i:en=ts of the Ekv siml Safs) ? ndtojit .
i
x
A
1 B ramff
a. '1.x A-jpli=ast v~Jl be xegciraE t3 aTt tzi Verldian a s=dald uc.-ipation mew, r2eistrred an ttie, Fa
'Tch i -x fm)
,wi -a< 21
9. Ptorto eneC& no any eew -iervkc,-I=_°_pElicfnt ru •a~2cr(s)/o npati(s) o[tbe fw-.d p exuise5 oust arpl* for
ax► C-Wl • accnwi[ is -aade_ to zec"-e electrical cnerg a_dtelrwd _<uviun en3 to estsalzk ocgo4 pal=-=t
aTTanxancnn.
I R. 'J&CXC cranes ar ME-C- l ]AIIdikg egc~meat O(-COr+rE must WOIC : n 13f--X tmit- to esisting a. echexd :fixes.
A!!r°.- h2r-- _f rijk of a im-&c:t cz con ing-A-Wiin tx licita of appoa•_h, *=_°-ppli cant Swl pay a, mxfts for Tha 11
,CM-3olwy Tdoeatlcn, bvriaOT utd=- :-IC-Coen [orihsnim, 0.R+.xIe.Y= other actin is dsmednoccsssnr h7
Z mr di.n to proviJe fnL waxker safety *a .d the sc•:uaT of ILe electrical system.
i .
11. Lwc:caping, bperificalI 7cea: Shruhs, and att.ers rhfAl telacated s:vay froon 7err'iam's 1-&-Ax- ttef%
sw.idgg, 9x to avciC i-ited>=ence,%~ mtipm:rt access. - 3
12 Vexidim wl. not attend t•hedii it Cty c•f I'inccring T) X- _Mmling 6r Illis Dc^-•-l•3pmcITt.
i{
i3. Vca•3ran has eo otjcctim In the propuse j jtve:opment. 'lease Airtct TlT_ Applicant 'o rmmc: Y; c idian as I
I;
_om as s=eirink!it co-=n3plsled NU-n tipr', pkE.%r forward a cow C•f firs( Subna:5dC( Cavil dEk2r- Tc
Vtyidiae. Tlemc nEtt A'-mt an C)fF=r o Coacccmus=be compkiedat karttsee /ds (6) mocil7x puo_ to
theztgrird ~cytica] S=Vizing+dite. ;
14. O-IS Fleacicsl i ]pplr M d is s:±-o•al blo:1 w1 bV oLsl be ixn_pcr ted zs par. o= o-r-ML elxtncal fermwk
or thi antra.
Te3rn: lfie~mewn:slice: Dem- Sam: d
T:le$.one: ET'ta 3261
rr!df
K~,TeTas`~llECek•P-nactlppli~ttior P.psi'w=M.Nfuniripa tes-Rc.ital]jd, V5 2jXB.doc
i.
19
Bdl
Development & Municipal Services Control Centre
Floor 5, 100 Borough Drive
Scarborough, Ontario
M1 P 4W2° C
Tel: 416-296-6291 Toll-Free: 1-800-748-6284
Fax: 416-296-0520
AUG 12 2009
August 6, 2009 C1'rYOF: P1C
Town of Pickering PLANNING & De N~ M! NAT
Planning Department
1 The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
L1V 6K7
Attention: Ross Pym
Dear Sir/Madam:
i
RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision
Brock Road
Your File No: SP-2009-15, A 17/09
Bell File No: 44609
Further to our comments of July 28, 2009 Bell Canada is pleased to provide the
following additional comments.
A detailed review of the Draft Plan of Subdivision has been completed.
The following paragraph(s) are to be included as Conditions of Draft Plan of .
Subdivision Approval:
1. The Developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work within
the Plan, the Developer must confirm that sufficient wire-line
communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available
within the proposed development to provide communication/telecommunication
service to the proposed development. In the event that such infrastructure
is not available, the Developer is hereby advised that the Developer may
be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of the existing
communication/telecommunication infrastructure. If the Developer elects
not to pay for such connection to and/or extension of the existing
communication/telecommunication infrastructure, the Developer shall be
required to demonstrate to the municipality that sufficient alternative
communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the.
proposed development to enable, at a minimum, the effective delivery of
communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services
(i.e., 911 Emergency Services).
2. The Owner shall agree in the Agreement, in words satisfactory to Bell
Canada, to grant to Bell Canada,any easements that may be required for
telecommunication services. Easements may be required subject to
final servicing decisions. In the event of any conflict with existing
Bell Canada facilities or easements, the owner/developer shall be
responsible for the relocation of such es or easements.
20
3. Bell Canada requires one or more conduit or conduits of sufficient size
from each unit to the room(s) in which the telecommunication facilities
are situated and one or more conduits from the room(s) in which the
telecommunication facilities are located to the street line.
Should you have any questions pl&zrse contact Janice M. McConkey at 416-296-6430.
Yours trulyq
Z '
nn La napelle, MC RPP
anager - Development & Municipal Services, Ontario
Information Report
Report Number: 05-10
ERING For Public Information Meeting of
PICK Date: Apri161. 2010
21
In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements
of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter PA 3.
Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 03/10
Cosima Daniell
1979 Woodview Avenue
(North Part of Lot 18, Plan 329)
City of Pickering
1.0 Property Location and Description
- the subject property is located on the east side of Woodview Avenue, south of
the intersection of Woodview Avenue and Finch Avenue (see Location Map,
Attachment #1);
- the subject property is approximately 0.65 hectare in area;
- a vacant, detached bungalow is currently located on the site;
- a portion of the Townline Provincially Significant Wetland is located on the
south-eastern portion of the lot;
- the wetland also occupies lands to the east and southeast of the subject
property;
- detached houses on lots with varying frontages and depths are located to the
north, west and south.
2.0 Applicant's Proposal
- the applicant has requested to amend the zoning by-law to permit four lots
with a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres; (see Applicant's Submitted Plan,
Attachment #2);
- the existing detached dwelling will be demolished prior to the redevelopment
of the land;
- the applicant has not submitted land severance applications to the Durham
Region Land Division Committee.
3.0 Official Plan and Zoning
3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan
- the Durham Regional Official Plan designates the majority of the subject
property as "Living Areas"; lands in this designation are to be used
predominantly for housing purposes;
Information Report No. 05-10 Page 2
2 22
- the provincially significant wetland located on the subject property is
designated "Major Open Space Areas"; the predominant use of lands
designated in the "Major Open Space Areas" is for conservation and
agricultural uses;
- the proposal appears to conform to the Durham Region Official Plan;
3.2 Pickering Official Plan
- the City of Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as "Urban
Residential - Low Density Areas" and "Open Space System - Natural Areas"
within the Rouge Park Neighbourhood; -
- "Urban Residential - Low Density Areas" are intended primarily for housing
purposes, while lands within the designation "Open Space System - Natural
Areas" are to be primarily used for conservation, environmental protection,
restoration, education, passive recreation, and similar uses;
- the Official Plan states that in order to protect and enhance the character of
established neighbourhoods such matters as building height, yard setback, lot
coverage, access to sunlight, parking provisions and traffic implications
should be considered;
- the City has adopted the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development
Guidelines (RPNDG) that apply to the subject lands (see Section 3.3);
- the proposal appears to conform with the policies of the Official Plan;
3.3 Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines (RPNDG)
- in the RPNDG the Townline Provincially Significant Wetland are located on
and adjacent to the subject property;
- the development proposed is located on lands delineated as the developable
areas shown on the tertiary plan included in the Guidelines;
- the Guidelines state that where appropriate, the conveyance of significant
environmental features and their buffers to the City or other public agency
may be required as a condition of development approval;
- the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Environmental Master Servicing Plan
(EMSP), being a companion document to the RPNDG, has been endorsed by
City Council;
- the EMSP outlines specific issues that are to be evaluated in the preparation
of environmental reports submitted in support of proposed development in the
area;
- the EMSP identifies the provincially significant wetland on and adjacent to the
subject property as having woodland and open pools for breeding
amphibians, fish habitat, riparian corridor and potential for area-sensitive
breeding birds;
- the EMSP identifies potential negative impacts of residential development on
the quality of the natural area;
- the EMSP recommends that buffers between the features and the
developable area be in public ownership and building setbacks be privately
owned;
Information Report No. 05-10 Page 3
23
3.4 Zoning By-law 3036
- the subject property is zoned "A" - Agricultural Zone;
- the current agricultural zoning uses and related performance standards are
now considered inappropriate for this area as it has transitioned into a
residential neighbourhood;
- an amendment to the existing zoning by-law is required to allow for land
severances creating four lots with a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres and
neighbourhood-appropriate setbacks, coverage and building heights.
4.0 Results of Circulation
4.1 Resident Comments
- none received to date;
4.2 Agency Comments
none received to date;
4.3 City Department Comments
none received to date;
4.4 Staff Comments
in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been.identified
by staff for further review and consideration:
• the applicant's submitted plan does not include the buffer distances
recommended by the Scoped Environmental Impact Study; the limits of
the buffer must be identified on the plan;
• the Scoped Environmental Impact Study states that the buffer lands can
be included in the rear yard setbacks of the proposed lots whereas the
buffers must be conveyed into public ownership along with the provincially
significant wetland;
• the buffer widths proposed in the Scoped Environmental Impact Study
must be reviewed and determined to be appropriate by the Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) or be revised to meet TRCA's
requirements;
• determination that the proposal meets the requirements of the
Neighbourhood Guidelines and the Environmental Master Servicing Plan;
• determination of an appropriate zone category including minimum
setbacks, and maximum coverage and height provisions to ensure that the
resultant development will be in keeping with the character of the
neighbourhood;
• consideration of comments from neighbouring residents;
• evaluation of the vegetation that may be lost through the redevelopment of
,the lands; and
• evaluation of the application in terms of its level of sustainable
development components.
Information Report No. 05-10 Page 4
24
5.0 Procedural Information
- written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning
& Development Department;
- oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting;
- all comments received will be noted and used as input to a Planning Report
prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent
meeting of Council or a Committee of Council;
- any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal
Council's decision, must provide comments to the City before Council adopts
any by-law for this proposal;
- any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision
regarding this proposal, must request such in writing to the City Clerk.
6.0 Other Information
6.1 Appendix No.
- list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City
Departments that have commented on the.applications at the time of writing
this report;
6.2 Information Received
- copies of the plans and studies listed below are available for viewing at the
offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department;
• Lotting Plan
• Planning Justification Letter prepared by applicant
• Sustainable Development Statement prepared by applicant
• Scoped Environmental Impact Study, dated December 2009, prepared by
Niblett Environmental Associates Inc.
6.3 Company Principal
- the owner of the subject property is Cosima Daniell;
- the applicant is Gary Daniell.
Isa Jan~ej Ross Pym, MCIP, P
Planner II (Acting) Manager, Development Review
IJ:jf
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
Appendix No. I to
Information Report No. 05-10 25
Commenting Residents and Landowners
(1) none received to date
Commenting Agencies
(1) none received to date
Commenting City Departments
(1) none received to date
ATTA MENT# L TO
26 INFORMATONFEIPORT
C.P.R.
PEEN TRAIL
NATURE N
FINCH AVENUE -
D
D
O I ~
Z ~
> S BJEC PLACE
PROPERTY
was
c~
CO
W
0
0
CR
SPNON0 Fscf NT v~~ o
a I.
S MELDRON
R ~
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Plan 329, North Part of Lot 18
OWNER C. Daniel DATE FEB. 18, 2010 DRAWN BY JB
FILE No. A03/10 SCALE 1:5000 CHECKED BY 1J
oT r elpEnterria a Inc. ontl its supplies.' All righta Reserved. Not a pion of a~rvey. PN-14
c 2005 MPACpontl ~ta au ppliera. All righta Rese rvetl. Not p plan of Survey.
ATTACH W1 9 NT # 2-TO
Ii 1F0€ 6ViATP f; N PZE, Powft U S- / D 27
Information Compiled from Applicants Submitted Plan -
C. Daniell
A 03/10
51.82m 52.12m
E E
0 0
Ln PROPOSED LOT 1 Ln
W
104.18m
Z
W PROPOSED LOT 2
Q
104.45m
E E
PROPOSED LOT 3 0
E y 104.72m
W PROPOSED LO 4 TREE m
4 00
0 w W
O N ° a°5M
O 105.55rn
3
iR E T
REE T EE
• N i
This map wos produced by the City o/ PWaring,
Planning & Development Deportment,
Information & Support Services,
February 2J. 2010
c~ o~ Information Report
Report Number: 06-10
For Public Information Meeting of
PICKERING Date: April 6, 2010
28
In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements
of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13
Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 2/10
City Initiated Application
1167 and 1199 Kingston Road
South Part of Lot 24, Concession 1
City of Pickering
1.0 Background
- in December 2008, the City passed Zoning By-law 6920/08 on the Brookdale
Centre Inc. (Brookdale) property located at 1105 Kingston Road to implement
a City-initiated amendment to the zoning by-law;
- this City-initiated zoning by-law amendment shifted the future road alignment
on the Brookdale property to indicate only 10.0 metres of the road be
illustrated on Brookdale's land with the remaining land for the road coming in
the future from the abutting property owned by Pentans Development Limited
(Pentans);
- Pentans appealed the by-law to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB);
- Minutes of Settlement between Brookdale, Pentans and the City of Pickering
were entered into in order to resolve the appeal before the OMB;
- the OMB issued its decision on February 12, 2010 and ordered that the
appeal be allowed, in part, based on the Minutes of Settlement
- the Minutes of Settlement included:
• that Brookdale be required to construct the realign public road and the
majority of the road be located on the Brookdale lands;
• a payment schedule for the cost sharing of the new municipal road;
• a timing schedule for Pentans to convey land to the City of Pickering
for public road allowance;
• that the City of Pickering initiate a zoning amendment for the Pentans
lands to permit additional commercial uses on the property;
2.0 Property Location and Description
- the subject property is located on the south side of Kingston Road east of the
intersection of Walnut Lane (see Location Map, Attachment #1);
- the subject property has frontage along, and access from Kingston Road (see
Applicant's Site Plan, Attachment #2);
- the subject property has a lot area of approximately 1.8 hectares;
there are two one storey buildings containing independent tenants used
predominantly for the purposes of an automobile service centre and
automobile sales,
Information Report No. 06-10 Page 2.
29
abutting uses surrounding the subject property are:
commercial plazas to the south, west and east,
residential and commercial buildings to the north on the opposite side
of Kingston Road.
3.0 Proposed Zoning
- one of the requirements of the Minutes of Settlement was that the City initiate
an amendment to the existing zoning by-law for the Pentans' property to
permit additional commercial uses;
- the existing zoning permits a garage, restaurant and financial institution uses
and these uses are to continue;
- the proposed additional commercial uses being put forward with this
application are:
business office;
convenience store;
furniture and major appliance store;
personal service shops;
professional office (non-medical);
service store, and;
• retail store;
the proposed zoning includes restrictions that no drive-thru uses will be
permitted and the combined total gross leasable floor area for all uses other
than a garage use shall not exceed 25 percent.
4.0 Official, Plan and Zoning
4.1 Provincial Growth Plan
- Places to Grow (the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden
Horseshoe) requires intensification of land uses within municipalities' built
boundaries;
- Kingston Road is being considered as an Intensification Corridor within the
City of Pickering;
Intensification Corridors will have the potential to provide a focus for high
density mixed use development;
4.2 Durham Regional Official Plan
- designates the subject lands as "Living Areas";
- areas designated as "Living Areas" are intended to be predominantly used for
housing purposes, and may include limited office, retail and personal service
uses;
in consideration of development applications in "Living Areas" the intent of the
Plan is to achieve a compact urban form, including intensive residential,
office, retail and service and mixed uses along arterial roads and in
conjunction with present and potential transit facilities;
l
Information Report No. 06-10 Page 3
30
- Kingston Road where it abuts the subject lands is designated as a "Type B
Arterial Road" and as a "Regional Corridor";
- the proposal appears to conform to the Durham Regional Official Plan;
4.3 Pickering Official Plan
- the Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Mixed Use Area -
Mixed Corridors";
- permissible uses within "Mixed Use Area - Mixed Corridors Area" include,
amongst others, a variety of uses including residential, retailing of goods and
services, offices and restaurants;
"Mixed Use Areas" are intended to have the widest variety of uses and
highest level of activities in the City when compared to other designations;
the subject lands are within the Town Centre Neighbourhood of the Official Plan;
the Pickering Official Plan encourages the highest mix and intensity of uses
and activities in the City to be in this neighbourhood;
- the subject lands are within a Detailed Review Area and the City has adopted
the Town Centre West Development Guidelines (see Section 4.4);
the Plan designates Kingston Road as a "Type B Arterial Road", which are
designed to carry moderate volumes of traffic at moderate speeds and have
some access restrictions;
- the Plan also recognizes Kingston Road as a transit spine, where a higher
level of transit service is to be encouraged within the City's urban area;
- the proposal to add additional commercial uses will be assessed against the
policies and provisions of the Pickering Official Plan as part of reviewing this
application;
4.4 Town Centre West Development Guidelines
- the Town Centre West Development Guidelines (TCWDG) envision a mixed-use
neighbourhood which is intended to result in a self-sustaining neighbourhood
over the long term;
- these uses include: residential, office, and retail commercial uses, as well as
public and natural open spaces;
- although the subject property is located within the TCWDG boundaries, the
subject property was not part of the original Town Centre West Study Area;
4.5 Zoning By-law 3036
- the subject property is zoned "C3(S)" - Highway Commercial Specific Zone
by By-law 652/77;
- uses permitted include a garage, restaurant and financial institution;
- the combined floor area of any restaurant and financial institution shall not
exceed 15 percent of the total gross floor area of all buildings on-site.
Information Report No. 06-10 Page4
31
5.0 Results of Circulation
5.1 Resident Comments
- none to date;
5.2 Agency Comments
none to date;
6.0 Discussion
as this application is a City initiated application as a result of Minutes of
Settlement to an appeal, the Planning & Development Department will
conclude its position on the application after it has received and assessed
comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public.
7.0 Procedural Information
- written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning
& Development Department;
- oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting;
- all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report
prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent
meeting of Council or a Committee of Council;
- any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal
Council's decision, you must provide comments to the City before Council
adopts any by-law for this proposal;
- any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision
regarding this proposal, you must request such in writing to,the City Clerk.
8.0 Other Information
8.1 Appendix No. I
list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City
Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing
report;
. i
I
Information Report No. 06-10 Page 5
32
8.2 Information Received
- as this application is a City initiated application as a result of Minutes of
Settlement of an OMB appeal no technical reports have been prepared for
this application;
- the need for additional information and/or technical reports will be determined
through the review and circulation of the application;
8.3 Company Principal
- the application is a City Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment;
- for information purposes, the owner of the subject property is Pentans
Developments Limited which is represented by Adrian Trembling;
- David C.K. Tang, of Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, is the solicitor
representing Pentans Developments Limited.
P~4~
Ashley Yea o Ross Pym
Planner I (Acting) Manager, Development Review
A :d
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
33
Appendix No. I to
Information Report No. 06-10
Commenting Residents and Landowners.
(1) none to date
.Commenting Agencies
(1) none to date
Commenting City Departments
(1) none to date
ATTACHMENT# / TO
3 4 INFO MATiON REPORT OL1L.
o
z
z J
Li O
J
" r~ F
w
J
U
bRATHMORE
cn 0
CD CRFc,G yQ~0 (E
Flo y
J
o~ Q CULROSS AVENUE
CRESCENT S~ORR\~G
O
COURT SOP
z w
O z
w
> a a
0 J
D
MEADOW
I ~
Q
N
w ~
u CRES.
z SUBJECT
o PROPERTY
G~-
ROAD
O
Q m
m
m ~FzyR~ ~
RTO o p0 O~
TED G~-00 •
RC
O
Q
O
w
401
AY
N\G",\N
STREET
NZER DOU
w ZP o
z
vo -
o m
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Concession 1 South Part Lot 24
OWNER Pentans Developments Ltd. DATE Mar. 2, 2010 DRAWN BY JB
FILE No. A02/10 SCALE 1:5000 CHECKED BY AY IV
~Teronetr~En'.'P';.., Inc. pntl .[a auppliera. All rignta Rea -d. Not o peon of a~r,.ey. PN-13
2005 .1AC -d . ra. All rights Rese rvetl. Nat o plan al Survey.
I
ATTAC9•!ME 1 TO 06-10
INFORIMTION REPO U 0._......~
Information Compiled from Site Plan 3 5
A 2/10
City of Pickering on Behalf of
Pentans Developments Ltd.
O
ON
~wr
T
L_ ZWU
~i 0P I r W
G -~I pm
I I I I f -
Ljj1 I I I I 'ia i
1 ~
This map was produced by The City Of Pickering Planning & Development Department,
Planning Information Services Division Mapping.And Design, Mar. 2, 2010
I
Report To
Planning & Development
PI C KERIN Committee
Report Number: PD 05-10
Date: April 6, 2010
36
From: Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject: Mavij Homes Development Inc.
Plan of Subdivision 40M-2254
Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision
Recommendation:
1. That Report PD 05-10 of the Director, Planning & Development regarding the
final assumption of the works and services within Plan of Subdivision 40M-2254
be received;
2. That the highways being Rougewalk Drive and Mahogany Court within Plan
40M-2254 be assumed for public use;
3. That the works and services required by the Subdivision Agreement within Plan
40M-2254, which are constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or
owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including
lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City, be accepted and
assumed for maintenance, save and except from Blocks 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 74, 75, 76, 77 and 78; and
4. That the Subdivision Agreement and any amendments thereto relating to Plan
40M-2254, save and except from Blocks 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 70,
74, 75, 76 and 77, be released and removed from title.
Executive Summary: The City entered into a Subdivision Agreement with the
above-noted developer for the development of Plan 40M-2254. As all works and
services within this plan have been completed to the satisfaction of City staff, it is
appropriate to assume the roads, works and services within this plan under the
jurisdiction of the City and release the developer from the provisions of the Subdivision
Agreement.
Financial Implications: There are no new financial implications to the City as a
result of this recommendation.
i
Report PD 05-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision Page 2
40M-2254 37
Sustainability Implications: The final assumption of the works and services within
this plan of subdivision is an administrative process that legally concludes the City's
acquisition of necessary roads and other infrastructure. It does not directly impact the
City's sustainability initiatives.
Background: The City entered into a Subdivision Agreement with the above-
noted developer for the development of Plan 40M-2254. As the developer has now
completed all works and services to the satisfaction of City staff, it is appropriate to
assume the roads, works and services within this Plan, save and except from Blocks
57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 74, 75, 76, 77 and 78.
Further, it is also appropriate to release the developer from the provisions of the
Subdivision Agreement with the City dated January 21, 2005 and registered as
Instrument No. DR397416 save and except from Blocks 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 63, 64, 65,
66, 70, 74, 75, 76 and 77.
Attachments:
1. 'Location Map - Plan 40M-2254
Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By:
\&JLI/
Denise By pervisor Neil Car , RPP
Property & Development Services Director, Planning & Development
DB:bg
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration
of Pickering CityC uncil s~
Thor s;d. Quinn, R R, C M
Chief Administrative fficer
Report PD 05-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision Page 3
3 8 40M-2254
Recommendation approved:
i
Chief Administrative Officer
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Director, Office of Sustainability
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Director, Planning & Development
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT# TO
REPORT# PD O l O
39
0
Q
O
Y
Z
Q
CO
w
In
O
C.P.R.
DRIVE
Ro~G~~PL~ ° RO
o NO
U
P~oGPNI
P~`PR~o
$ CT
FINCH AVENUE
FINCH AVENUE
w
(n W
m W
m TT ITITE
Q °
c z
z o
~R?10 o
G SQUARE
Q
O
D_
Y
Z AMBERLEA ROAD
Q
> w
(If In
° O
O DRIFTWO RD cR~~RcF0ti
w
°
J
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOTS 1-56 AND BLOCKS 72 & 73, PLAN 40M-2254 407\
OWNER VARIOUS DATE FEB. 1, 2010 DRAWN BY JB
FILE No. SUBDIVISION COMPLETION AND ASSUMPTION SCALE 1:5000 CHECKED BY DB N
e aTeron.t Enterprises Ins. and Its suppli- All right. Reserved. Not o plon of urvey. PN-14
c 2005 MPAC and it. eu Ilers. All right. Reserved. Not a Ian of Sum
Ciro Report to
- Planning Development
PICKERING Committee
Report Number: PD 07-10
40 Date: April 6, 2010
From: Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Thomas E. Melymuk
Director, Office of Sustainability
Subject: Seaton Updates
- Neighbourhood Planning Review and Other Implementation Studies
Recommendation:
1 That Report PD 07-10 of the Directors, Planning & Development and Office of
Sustainability, respecting a status update on the Seaton Neighbourhood
Planning Review and other implementation studies required under the Central
Pickering Development Plan, be received for information.
Executive Summary: On September 21, 2009, City Council considered Addendum
to Report CAO 05-09 and accepted the proposal of the consulting team lead by
Sorensen Gravely Lowes Planning Associates Inc. (SGL) to undertake the Seaton
Neighbourhood Planning Review.
This Report to the Planning & Development Committee provides an update on SGL's
progress. In addition, it provides an update on the other interrelated studies that are
required to be completed under the CPDP.
SGL is currently in the middle of the Background Studies part-of their work program.
Public consultation workshops are being scheduled on key topics related to the heritage
review of Whitevale Road, sustainability, and a broader session on the other findings
from the background review, and policy options to implement the background studies.
The Neighbourhood Planning Review requires the integration of relevant information
from a number of studies, some that are underway, and some that have been
completed. Studies currently underway include: the Province's Seaton
Implementation Plan; the Region's Class Environmental Assessment for Regional
Services for Central Pickering; the Seaton Landowners' Master Environmental Servicing
Plan; and the Seaton Landowners' Fiscal Impact Analyses for both the Region and the
City. For each of these studies, the City is represented by staff from one or more
Departments.
Report PD 07-10 April 6,.2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page 2 41
Studies that have been completed by the Province include: the Highway 407 (Seaton
Lands) Economic Development Study; the Natural Heritage System Management Plan
and Master Trails Plan; the Durham/TorontoNork Area Transportation Plan Study; the
Wetlands Water. Balance Evaluation; and the Highway 407 - Preliminary Functional
Planning Study for Two New Interchanges.
Studies not yet underway include the City's Development Charges Study and By-law for
Seaton; the Region's Development Charges Study and By-law for Seaton infrastructure
and transit; and the Region's conformity amendments to the Durham Regional Official
Plan.
Staff will continue to update Council on the progress. of the Neighbourhood Planning
Review and the other on-going studies.
Financial Implications: Not applicable.
Sustainability Implications: Receiving this Report provides information to members
of Committee and others and therefore relates to the objective of healthy society. The
Neighbourhood Planning Review, and the other required Seaton studies as a package
will implement many aspects of the sustainable objectives of the Central Pickering
Development Plan including: restoring the natural heritage system of Seaton; providing
a transportation network including active transportation alternatives such as walking and
cycling; offering parks and recreational opportunities for the future residents; creating
employment opportunities; and developing innovative, transit-supportive mixed use
neighbourhoods.
1.0 Background:
1.1 The Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) requires a number of
studies to be completed concurrent with or prior to the processing of the
plans of subdivision
Along with the preparation of Neighbourhood Plans for Seaton Community, the
CPDP requires other studies to be completed to bridge the gap between a plan
and the development of a community. In some instances, the CPDP identified
who is responsible to undertake a required study, and in other instances, it did
not.
The following sections of this Report identify and provide a status update on the
required studies, as well as on additional. implementation studies that are
underway or completed. The studies are grouped by who is leading the study:
the City; the Province; the Region; and the Seaton Landowners.
Report PD 07-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page 3
42
2.0 City - Led Studies
2.1 As required by the CPDP, the City retained a consulting team led by
Sorensen Gravely Lowes Planning Associates Inc. in 2009 to undertake the
Neighbourhood Planning Review
2.1.1 The consulting team was retained conditional upon execution of a funding
agreement between the City and Seaton landowners
On September 21, 2009, Council considered Addendum to Report Number
CAO 05-09 respecting the approach to completing the required Seaton
Neighbourhood Plans. Through Resolution #224/09, Council accepted the
recommendation to retain the services of Sorensen Gravely Lowes Planning
Associates Inc. (SGL), in association with The Planning Partnership, LEA
Consulting Inc., SCS Consulting Group Ltd., N. Barry Lyon Consultants Limited
(now replaced by Lapointe Consulting Inc. because of a conflict), Robin Dee &
Associates, and Bray Heritage.
The Proposal by SGL identified the following six modules to address the City's
requirements:
1. Background Studies (review of existing and on-going studies submitted by
the landowners, Region and the Province, and preparation of new studies as
required);
2. Conformity Amendments to the Pickering Official Plan (review of
landowners' submitted proposed neighbourhood plan policy, and preparation
of/revisions to official plan amendments as required);
3. Neighbourhood Plans (review of landowners' submitted 'proposed
neighbourhood plans and preparation of/revisions to official plan
amendments as required)
4. Development Guidelines (review of landowners' submitted proposed
guidelines and preparation of/revisions to the guidelines as required);
5. Approval of Amendments (finalize draft regional official plan amendment;
and finalize local official plan amendments and guidelines for statutory open
house, public information meeting, and consideration by Planning &
Development Committee and Council); and
6. Development Review (review of landowners' submitted proposed draft plans
and zoning by-law amendment applications, and recommend revisions to
comply with the Official Plan amendments).
Report PD 07-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page 4
43
2.1.2 The required funding agreement was executed on February 2, 2010
A draft funding agreement was included in Addendum to Report Number
GAO 05-09. The agreement, between the City and the landowners, including the
Province of Ontario, provides that the landowners fund modules one to five of
the work program. Further, the agreement acknowledges that the City will fund
module six from revenue received for the Seaton draft plans and zoning by-law
amendment applications.
2.1.3 The City's consulting team is about half way through the Background
Studies Module
There is a considerable amount of existing information that has been prepared to
date on Seaton. Accordingly, to start the Review, the consulting team is
reviewing:
• existing information and preparing new work where required to establish
sustainability performance measures and benchmarks to be incorporated into
the neighbourhood plans and used to review the development applications;
• existing studies on heritage to respond to Council's resolution on a potential
expansion of the Whitevale Heritage Conservation District designation;
• existing socio-economic, demographic and housing trends to identify an
affordable housing strategy;
• existing retail studies and preparing new work where required to address the
hierarchy, amount and location of retail uses in Seaton;
• the urban design of the submitted neighbourhood plans and development
applications at a variety of scales from community to neighbourhood to site;
• the Seaton landowners' submitted proposed neighbourhood plans and
studies;
• existing completed Provincial studies; and
• other information available to date and attending meetings respecting the
on-going studies.
2.1.4 An introductory Technical Group Meeting was held in December 2009
The Technical Group comprises City staff and external agency representatives
involved in reviewing, commenting and approving official plan amendments, draft
plans of subdivisions and zoning amendments. The landowners' consultants,
and the Province's consultants undertaking the Seaton Implementation Plan
(SIP) were also in attendance. The purpose of the meeting was to outline the
City's Neighbourhood Planning Review work program and schedule, and seek
initial input from the Group.
Report PD 07-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page 5
44
As a follow-up to the Technical Group meeting, the heritage consultant on the
City's consulting team met with the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee in
early March 2010. The purpose was to discuss preliminary observations, and
allow an exchange of information on how Heritage Pickering wishes to be
involved in the Neighbourhood Planning Review process.
2.1.5 Following public consultation sessions in mid to late April, draft reports
will be prepared and presented to the Technical Group and to Council in May
Three upcoming public consultation sessions are being organized and scheduled
for mid to late April. The topics of the sessions are as follows:
• the heritage review of Whitevale Road;
• sustainability; and
• other findings from the background review, and policy options to implement
the background studies.
Considering the results of the public consultation, draft reports will be prepared
on the Whitevale Heritage Conservation District Extension Review, a Retail
Analysis, an Affordable Housing Strategy, a Sustainability Actions Report and a
Summary of Consultation. The revised drafts will then be made available and
meetings will be held with the Technical Group, the landowners and Council.
Subsequently, the reports will be finalized.
The original schedule anticipated the background reports to be presented to
Council in March. The schedule was aggressive and the consultant's start-up
was delayed. The consultants are working ahead on other parts of the work
program, particularly the general policy amendments. However, further delays
are anticipated. Certain elements of the policy and design work will need to
incorporate information arising from other studies which are not yet in available
(such as the MESP and the SIP), and final interchange, arterial and collector
road locations and NHS crossings will affect detailed neighbourhood design.
2.1.6 First Nations consultation will be occurring through a process led by the
Province
As part of the Province's duty to consult with First Nations about activities on its
land, the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) is organizing the consultation
process respecting the potential location of infrastructure within the Natural
Heritage System (NHS), protection of significant archaeological sites within the
developable areas, and facilitating the First Nations involvement in the on-going
planning and development of Seaton, as set out in the CPDP.
Report PD 07-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page 6
45
Three on-going and interrelated studies, the Master Environmental Servicing
Plan (MESP), the Region's Class Environmental Assessment (EA) and the City's
Neighbourhood Planning Review, may result in recommendations for
infrastructure within the NHS. This could include roads, water pipes and sanitary
sewers and facilities, stormwater management facilities and utilities. In addition,
the arrangement of land uses could be instrumental in protecting and
commemorating significant sites and lands.
ORC is therefore organizing a coordinated approach to consulting with First
Nations (and Metis) involving the Region and its consultants undertaking the EA,
Sernas Associates undertaking the MESP, and the City and its consultants
undertaking the Neighbourhood Planning Review. This coordinated approach
will be more efficient and effective than if each study team were to undertake a
consultation on its own.
2.2 In the future, the City will need to undertake a Development Charges Study
& By-law for Seaton
The City's current DC By-law does not include Seaton. Information is required
through the Neighbourhood Planning Review before this study can be
undertaken.
The Seaton landowners have appealed the City's current DC By-law because it
does not include a development charge for Seaton.
3.0 Region - Led. Studies
3.1 The Region's Class EA for infrastructure and transit services for Central
Pickering is underway, and is expected to take 18 months (to mid 2011) to
complete
The Region of Durham retained a consulting team, led by GENIVAR Ontario Inc.,
to undertake the Class EA study for the provision of Regional services, including
water, wastewater, transportation, transit and service facility infrastructure to
service the lands identified for development in Seaton. The Notice of Study
Commencement was given in December 2009, and the first Public Information
Forum is anticipated in the spring of 2010.
The study area boundary extends beyond the boundary of the CPDP area to
identify and accommodate required Regional infrastructure for the Federal lands
and future development areas identified by the Region's Growth Plan
Implementation Study.
Report PD 07-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page 7
46
3.2 In the future, the Region will need to update its Development Charges
Study & By-laws to include provisions for Seaton with respect to water,
sewer and transit
The Region's current DC By-law includes a development charge for the soft
services and roads for Seaton, but not for water, sewer or transit. Additional
information is required through the EA process before this study can be
undertaken.
The Seaton landowners have appealed the Region's DC By-laws as they do not
completely address Seaton.
3.3 The Region will need to adopt conformity amendments to bring its Official
Plan into conformity with the CPDP
Part of SGL's work is to prepare a draft Regional Official Plan amendment to
implement the CPDP. Durham has been awaiting the outcome of the City's
Neighbourhood Planning Review prior to initiating amendments to its Official
Plan. In this manner, both the local and Regional amendments could be dealt
with as a package.
However, the Ministry,of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) recently
released a draft decision on.Regional Official Plan Amendment 128, which
implements the Provincial Growth Plan. In that draft decision, MMAH staff are
proposing some modifications to the amendment to the Regional Plan to
implement the CPDP. The_City will take into consideration the content and
status of the draft, modifications in deciding whether there is any need for SGL to
continue with that element of the work program.
4.0 Provincially - Led Studies
4.1 Although not identified as a required Provincial study under the CPDP, the
Province retained in the fall of 2009 a consulting firm led by BDP to
undertake a Seaton Implementation Plan (SIP)
This recent initiative of the Province is to prepare options and strategies that can
be implemented by all stakeholders in order to achieve the Province's vision for
Seaton. The Plan will constitute advice to the Province on a number of matters
including: energy initiatives such as the use of renewable energy sources;
innovative building standards and compact neighbourhood design; and
transportation and transit initiatives. A draft SIP report is expected this spring,
which will be subsequently circulated to various stakeholders, for review. City
staff is part of the Steering Committee led by ORC and the Ministry of Energy
and Infrastructure (MEI).
Report PD 07-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page 8
47
In undertaking the Neighbourhood Planning Review, the City's consulting team
will be considering the recommendations of the SIP, as well as any staff or
Council comments on that Study.
4.2 The Ministry of Transportation (MTO) recently released a detailed design
study for the two Highway 407 interchanges proposed at Sidelines 22
and 26
The CPDP indicates that the interchanges at Sidelines 22 and 26 and the
resultant spacing of them must meet applicable design, safety and operational
standards. In 2007, the MTO retained the consulting firm of Morrison Hershfield
to review the location of the two new interchanges at Sidelines 22 and 26. The
consultant's "Highway 407 - Preliminary Functional Planning Study for Two New
Interchanges" Final Report, dated December 2009, has been provided to the
City, the Region, ORC and the Provincial Ministries of MEI, MMAH, and Natural
Resources.
The consultant identified three alternative interchange locations and
configurations that vary somewhat from the locations shown in the CPDP. The
consultant selected a technically preferred alternative that in their evaluation has
the least impact on the natural environment and satisfies highway intersection
spacing criteria. If this is the Provincial position, the effect would be a westerly
shift of the Sideline 22 interchange by about 200 metres and a westerly shift of
the Sideline 26 interchange by about 400 metres.
City staff as well as other agencies are reviewing the consultant's Report. The
precise locations of the interchanges at Sidelines 22 and 26 are critical inputs to
moving forward with a number of required studies such as the MESP, the
Regional EA, and the City's Neighbourhood Planning Review.
4.3 As required by the CPDP, the Province retained AECOM (previously TSH) in
2006 to undertake the Durham/Toronto/York Area Transportation Plan Study
MMAH requested MTO to lead a strategic transportation study to support the
development of Seaton and the broader Durham/Toronto/York Study Area.
This Study, finalized in September 2009, identified the key transportation
investments that are required to address long term regional road and transit
network deficiencies. The Study findings and recommendations on
transportation and transit infrastructure investments for the area will serve as
advice to the Province. A copy of the Study is available on the City's website.
City staff was part of the Study Team along with representatives from the
Ministries of MEI and MMAH; ORC; Durham Region; York Region; and the City
of Toronto. City staff provided comments to MTO generally supportive of the
study's "transit-first" strategy for implementing new transit and road infrastructure
to support growth in Seaton and the surrounding area.
Report PD 07-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page ,9
48
In undertaking the Neighbourhood Planning Review, the City's consulting team
will be considering the recommendation of this Study, as well as the staff
comments on that Study.
4.4 As a requirement of the CPDP, the MMAH retained the consulting firm of
Schollen & Company in 2006 to prepare a Seaton Natural Heritage System
Management Plan and Master Trails Plan Study (NHSMP and MTP)
The Study, finalized in late October 2008, represents the consultant's advice to
the Province on how to restore the natural heritage system in Seaton, create a
complete trail network for walking and biking and a program to respect the
cultural heritage of Seaton. A full copy of the completed study is available at the
City of Pickering Planning & Development counter, and selected extracts are
available on the City's website.
In June 2009, Pickering Council passed Resolution #178/09 and adopted staff
recommendations that the Seaton NHSMP and MTP be supported as a detailed
guide to achieve a sustainable Seaton NHS consistent with the objectives of the
CPDP, and that the Seaton NHS remain in public ownership and its
implementation costs not be borne by existing Pickering taxpayers.
Council also requested the Ministers of Municipal Affairs.and Housing and
Energy and Infrastructure to expand the range of uses permissible within the
NHS to include recreational uses such as parks and playfields in those lands that
buffer the key natural heritage features. However, based on recent
conversations with Provincial staff, a policy change is not anticipated.
In undertaking the Neighbourhood Planning Review, the City's consulting team
will be considering the recommendation of this Study, as well as the Council
comments on that Study.
4.5 As a requirement of the CPDP, the Ontario Realty Corporation (OCR)
retained a consulting team led by Hemson Consulting in 2006 to prepare
the Highway 407 (Seaton Lands) Economic Development Study
The Study, finalized in April 2007, represents the consultants advice to the
Province, as the owners of the Employment Lands, on the following matters and:
the types of businesses that will be attracted to the area; marketing and servicing
strategies; and a land use concept and phasing plan to maximize the economic
value of the lands. A copy of this Report is available on the City's website.
One of the recommendations of the Study is that the Province take an active role
in marketing the lands in conjunction with the City and Region. During 2009,
ORC identified approximately 80 hectares, located between the two interchanges
at Sideline 22 and 26.for which ORC will be preparing a plan of subdivision.
Report PD 07-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page 10
49
In undertaking the Neighbourhood Planning Review; the City's consulting team
will be considering the recommendation of this Study, as well as the staff
comments on that Study.
4.6 Although not a requirement of the CPDP, the Province retained a
consulting team led by Morrison Environmental to undertake a Wetlands
Water Balance Evaluation
This Study, finalized in March 2008, monitored eight representative wetlands
over a three-year period, and resulted in a model for managing wetlands
elsewhere in Seaton. This technical Report is input to the MESP. A copy of the
Executive Summary is on the City's website.
5.0 Landowner - Led Studies
5.1 As a required study under the CPDP, the landowners retained a consulting
team led by Sernas Associates in 2007 to undertake a Master _
Environmental Servicing Plan (MESP)
The MESP will address a number of matters of City interest that are interrelated
with Neighbourhood Planning. These matters include: local road locations,
cross sections, and crossings of the NHS; the stormwater management system
including facilities; major community facilities and municipal services; major utility
locations; and phasing recommendations for infrastructure.
During 2009, a significant amount of field work was undertaken to complete
additional groundwater and wetland monitoring, to augment the information from
the Provincial Wetland Water Balance Evaluation. In addition, the scope of the
MESP work was expanded to include collection of baseline environmental
conditions for the expanded study area of the Regional EA.
During 2010, several meetings have taken place between the Sernas-led
consulting team, City staff, consultants for the City's Neighbourhood Planning
Review, the Regional EA staff and consultants, the Provincial SIP consultants,
other agencies and service providers on a number of issues related to the
MESP. Information was exchanged on the approach to stormwater
management, the location and size of major community facilities including
schools, and detailed road locations and crossings of the NHS. Discussions
continue.
To assist Sernas in completing the MESP, an Oversight Committee was
established, consisting of various stakeholders including City staff to provide
input on the results of the analyses at key milestones. Two Oversight Committee
meetings have been held to date. A third meeting scheduled for early April 2010
to discuss the work done to date, and seek consensus on information being
presented at the next the Public Information Centre (PIC). Sernas anticipates
scheduling the PIC later this spring and subsequently releasing the draft MESP
for comment over the summer.
Report PD 07-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page 11
In addition, the City is continuing to pursue landowner funding to cover the cost
of the technical assistance to review the MESP, specifically the stormwater
maragement and municipal infrastructure components. It should be noted that
preliminary information is suggesting an extensive stormwater management
system, including over 70 stormwater facilities as.well as a number of mitigation
measures to maintain water balance and/or drainage to natural features, and to
reduce in-stream erosion potential.
5.2 The landowners have retained IBI to undertake Fiscal Impact Analyses of
the development of Seaton on both the Region and the City
Although both these studies commenced in 2005, work has been concentrated
at the Regional level, developing and refining assumptions to be used in the
fiscal impact model. Little work has taken place at the local level. The results of
the Neighbourhood Planning Review will be a critical input to the modeling for
the City. The City has Watson Associates assisting us on the review of IBI's
work.
6.0 Next Steps
Staff will continue to update Council on the Neighbourhood Planning Review,
and other related Seaton implementation studies on a regular basis.
Report PD 07-10 April 6, 2010
Subject: Seaton Updates Page 12 51
Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By:
J
Grant McGregor, MCI , RPP Neil Carr P, RPP
Principal Planner - Policy Director, P anning & Development
611 AX,
R
Catherine Rose, MCiP, RPP Thomas E. M lym , P-,R- PP
Manager, Policy Director, Office of Sustainability
GM:CR:Id
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Recommended for the consideration
of Pickering Ci Co cil
zI ! )
as J. Qu' , RD MA, CMM III
Chief Administrative Officer
I
k