Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/12/1988 ~. "-' 'W '- I I I 2/88 4 PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. PRESENT: COUNCILLORS: w. Arthurs ~.1. Brenner S. Coburn B. ~1itche11 B. Morgan - Chairman A. Robertson ALSO PRESENT: N. C. ~,1arsha 11 B. T ay lor T. Magi N. Ca rro 11 1. Melymuk - Town f4anager - Town Clerk - Director of Planning - Manager - Current Operations Division - ~1anager - Policy and Information Division ABSENT: Mayor Anderson - (on vacation) (I) ADOPTION OF MINUTES Regular Meeting of January 19, 1988. (II) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-86064 AND REZONING APPLICATION A 53/86 SUBMITTED BY SANDBURY BUILDING CORPORATION AND DEKKEMA DEVELOPMENTS ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE, NORTH OF KINGSTON ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 4100 - 18T-86064 FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 53/86 In Planning Report 25/88, it is recommended that the draft plan of subdivision and rezoning application submitted by Sandbury Bui 1 di ng Corporati on and Dekkema Developments to permit residential development on the east side of Rougemount Drive, north of Kingston Road be approved. Referred back to staff for two weeks to prepare a plan that conforms to the present R3 zoning with consideration given to those lots backing onto the plaza and the special characteristics of the neighbourhood r'1r. Gerald Sayer, 1399 Rougemount Drive, stated that he opposes the draft plan of subdivision. He felt that the frontages of the lots in the draft plan of subdivision shoul d be consi stent with exi sti ng lots and trees must be preserved. He indicated that the owner has al ready demolished two houses on the subject lands. Mr. Sayer requested assurance that the i nfri ngment of development on the neighbourhood will stop. continued 2/88 5 1. Mr. Russ Dewar, 1387 Rougemount Drive, stated that the lots in the draft plan of subdivision should have 60 foot frontages to conform to other lots on Rougemount Drive. He stated that this area is a special policy area and felt that no changes should be allowed on Rougemount Drive. He indicated that most trees were removed from the subdivision on the west side of Rougemount Drive and therefore has no confidence that trees will be preserved in this subdivision. There is an increase in the level of noise when the trees are removed. ....... ~1r. Alex Lawrence, 1389 Rougemount Drive, stated that he opposes this draft plan of subdivision. The noise level in the neighbourhood is increasing as development increases and trees are being cut down. He bought his property based on the fact that the surroundi ng 1 ands were zoned R3 and this draft plan of subdivision should comply with this zoning. He felt there should have been more public input to this proposal. ...... Mr. Thomas Varoutas, 1372 Rougemount Drive stated that this deve 1 opment wi 11 alter the character of the nei ghbourhood. Thi s proposal is of no benefi t to the exi s ti ng res i dents and will only add more traffic to the street. Hrs. Eileen Philip, 1400 Rougemount Drive, stated that she is opposed to any change in zoning to permit the draft plan of subdivision. ~1r. John Holder, 1395 Rougemount Drive, stated that the neighbourhood has been designated as a special policy area and peopl e have bought houses in the area based on thi s designation. Urban development is creeping into the neighbourhood and this must be stopped or the character of the neighbourhood will change. Landowners at the north end of Rougemount Drive are creating new lots which make it difficult to refuse development at the south end. New developments tend to force out the exi sti ng resi dents and encourage more development. Mrs. Shirley Holder, 1395 Rougemount Drive, stated that trees have been cut on the commercial lands to the south of the subject property and more trees will have to be cut to allow this development. - Mrs. Gail Walker, 1465 Rougemount Drive, stated that she bought a house on Rougemount Drive because of the special characteristics of the area such as trees and valley 1 ands. The Petti coat Creek system has not been properly protected at Altona Road and consideration must be given to protecti ng it from thi s development. She stated that if this development is approved, it will provide for further development on 1 ands to the east and there is very 1 ittl e parkland available to these future residents. Mr. David Reid, 1415 Rosebank Road, representing the Rosebank Road and Area Ratepayers Association, asked if it would be possible for the existing R3 zoning to comply with the Low Density II designation in the District Plan. This proposed development is at the entrance to Rougemount Drive and will alter the character of the neighbourhood. 'W' Nrs. Diane Goffin, 1382 Rougemount Drive, stated that she is opposed to this draft plan of subdivision. The neighbourhood has many special characteristics and has been designated as a special policy area. She stated that houses have been demol i shed on the subject 1 ands pri or to the approval of the draft plan of subdivision. continued 2/88 6 '-' 1. Mr. Bert Dekkema, representi ng the Sandbury Bui 1 di ng Corporati on and Dekkema Developments, stated that he supports the staff1s alternative recommendation. One house was demolished on the subject lands because it was not habitable and the other house that was demolished was on the commerci all ands to the south. He has undertaken a tree preservation plan and will retain as many trees as possible. There has been more traffic on Rougemount Drive due to construction of the plaza but this could be alleviated if the Town prohibits heavy trucks on the street. He is constructing the plaza to the south of the subject 1 ands and thi s will be very architecturally pleasing as will be the houses he is proposing in this draft plan of subdivision. The development will have a density of six units per acre, which complies with the community p1 an and frontages will be a mi nimum of 52 feet. The valley lands to the east is for public use but at present there is no access to it. '-' Mr. Robert Hall, 414 Kingston Road, stated that he owns the property immedi ate1y east of the subject 1 ands and thi s proposal will allow him access to his land. He stated that the commercial plaza presently under construction is an improvement over the previ ous p1 aza and wi 11 enhance the neighbourhood. 2. REZONING APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY A. BRANCATO AND S. SPINELLO ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE, NORTH OF KINGSTON ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 34/86 In Planning Report 73/86, it is recommended that the rezoning application submitted by A. Brancato and S. Spi ne 11 0 to permi tal and severance to crea te two residential lots on the east side of Rougemount Drive, north of Kingston Road be approved. Application refused See Recommendation #1 'y Mr. Gerald Sayer, 1399 Rougemount Drive, stated that he is opposed to this application because it will not allow for the orderly development of the street. 3. REZONING APPLICATION A 53/87 SUBMITTED BY P. CARTER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE EAST OF ALTONA ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 53/87 In Planning Report 21/88, it is recommended that the rezoning application submitted by P. Carter to permit severance of 1 ands on the south side of Rougemount Dri ve east of A1tona Road to create two residential lots be refused. Approved See Recommendation #2 'W' 2/88 4. 7 LAND SEVERANCE APPLICATIONS LD 54/87 AND LD 55/87 SUBMITTED BY K. BECKBERGER ON LANDS FRONTING THE NORTH/SOUTH SECTION OF ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - LD 54, 55/87 ~ In a memorandum dated March 29, 1988, it is recommended that the Land Severance Applications submitted by K. Beckberger on lands fronting the north/south section of Rougemount Drive be considered. Approved See Recommendation #3 Mr. Kenneth Beckberger, 1460 Rougemount Drive, stated that he supports the recommendation of the Planning staff. 5. REZONING APPLICATION A 54/87 SUBMITTED BY G. GAZAREK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF KINGSTON ROAD, EAST OF MERRITTON ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 54/87 '-' In Planning Report 23/88, it is recommended that the rezoning application submitted by G. Gazarek to permit an automobile dealership and related sales and service uses on the north side of Kingston Road, east of Merritton Road be deferred. Application Approved See Recommendation #4 Mr. G. Gazarek stated that he supports the alternative recommendati on of the Pl anni ng staff and that he woul d agree to the removal of motels, hotels, home improvement centres, furniture and major appl i ance sal es outl ets and personal service uses as permitted uses. 6. REZONING APPLICATION A 23/87 SUBMITTED BY P. AND P. CAMPAGNA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF KINGSTON ROAD, WEST OF FAIRPORT ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 23/87 "" In Planning Report 26/88, it is recommended that the rezoni ng appl i cati on submi tted by P. and P. Campagna to permit the development of an offi ce bui 1 di ng, restaurant and automobile service station on the south side of Kingston Road, west of Fairport Road be approved. Approved See Recommendations #5 and #6 Mr. John Kokkotas, 898 Kingston Road, stated that he was led to believe that there would be no further service stations on Kingston Road. He asked how traffic will be controlled at the intersection of Fairport Road and Kingston Road if this application is approved. Mr. Hodges, 1795 Fairport Road, stated that traffic is very heavy at the i ntersecti on of Fai rport Road and Ki ngston Road and this development will make this problem worse. 'w. Mr. Edwards, 1795 Fairport Road, stated that there are already too many restaurants and service station along Kingston Road and this proposal will make traffic worse. Mr. Allen Birken, representing the applicant, stated that he supports the recommendations of the Planning staff. 2/88 8 7. REZONING APPLICATION A 77/87 SUBMITTED BY BRAMALEA LIMITED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROSEBANK ROAD, NORTH OF HIGHVIEW ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 77/87 '-" In Planning Report 22/88, it is recommended that the rezoning application submitted by Bramalea Limited to permi t severance of 1 ands on the east side of Rosebank Road, north of Hi ghvi ew Road for res i denti a 1 purposes be approved. Approved See Recommendation #7 Di ane Suter, representi ng Brama 1 ea Limi ted, asked for, and received clarification that she will be allowed to give cash-in-lieu for municipal improvements. 8. OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-73/P AND REZONING APPLICATION A 65/87 SUBMITTED BY INVAR CORPORATION AND BRI-JAN HOLDINGS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ORANGEBROOK COURT FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - OPA 87-73/P FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 65/87 '-" In Planning Report 24/88, it is recommended that the Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application submitted by Invar Corporation and Bri-Jan Holdings to permit a gymnastics facility on the north side of Orangebrook Court. Approved See Recommendations #8,#9 & #10 (III) ADJOURNMENT The Meeting adjourned at the hour of 10:25 p.m. -- ,.---:'1 ~-' j," '_---~\ .(~:..;;__.,_- C~~:f-'J ('>, l'Cj.'L~~. '. Chai rman,) , Da ted '-' TOWN OF PICKERING The Pl anni ng Committee of the Town of Pi ckeri ng ha vi ng met on Apri 1 12, 1988, presents its second report to Council and recommends: ~ 1. REZONING APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY A. BRANCATO AND S. SPINELLO ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE, NORTH OF KINGSTON ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 34/86 That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 34/86 submitted by A. Brancato and S. Spinello to change the zoning on lands being Part of Lot 25, Plan 228 from IR3" - One Family Detached Dwelling - Third Density Zone to IR4" - One Family Detached Dwelling - Fourth Density Zone be REFUSED. 2 REZONING APPLICATION A 53/87 SUBMITTED BY P. CARTER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE EAST OF ALTONA ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 53/87 '-' That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 53/87 submitted by P. Carter to change the zoni ng on 1 ands bei ng Part of Lot 15, Plan 228 from IR3" - One Family Detached Dwelling - Third Density Zone (minimum 18.0 metre lot frontage) to IR4" - One Family Detached Dwelling Fourth Density Zone (minimum 15.0 metre lot frontage) to permit severance of the subj ect property into two lots, each havi ng a mi nimum lot frontage of 15.24 metres be REFUSED. 3. LAND SEVERANCE APPLICATIONS LD 54/87 AND LD 55/87 SUBMITTED BY K. BECKBERGER ON LANDS FRONTING THE NORTH/SOUTH SECTION OF ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - LD 54, 55/87 '" That the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Pickering recommends the following with respect to Land Severance Applications LD 55/87 and LD 54/87 by K. Beckberger on Part of Lot 15, Plan 228, Town of Pickering: 1. That LD 55/87 be REFUSED. 2. That LD 54/87 be APPROVED subject to the following conditions: '-' (a) that the application is amended to reflect a minimum lot frontage of 21.34 metres; (b) that the owner satisfy the Town of Pickering through the submission of an Ontario Land Survey, in metric, that all buildings and structures on the proposed retained parcel comply with the provisions of the By-law; (c) that the owner satisfy the Town of Pickering wi th respect to the payment of an appropri ate lot development fee; and (d) that the owner sati sfy the Town of Pi ckeri ng with respect to the commutati on of outstandi ng local improvement charges. 2/88 2 4. REZONING APPLICATION A 54/87 SUBMITTED BY G. GAZAREK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF KINGSTON ROAD, EAST OF MERRITTON ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 54/87 "",. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 54/87 submitted by G. Gazarek, on behalf of the Corporation of the Town of Pickering, the Trustees of Pickering Gospel Hall and W. & P. Beregi, to change the zoning on lands being Part of Lot 25 and 26, Range 3, B.F.C. and Concession 1 from IISC-1211 Special Commercial (Limited) to an appropriate zone to permit the development of automobile dealership establishments and related sales and service uses in addition to special purpose commercial uses be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. That prior to the forwarding of an implementing by-law to Council, the owner: a) enter into an appropri ate si te/devel opment agreement with and to the sati sfacti on of the Town of Pickering which shall include, but not necessarily be limited tothe following requirements: "-' (i) in accordance with Council policy, the provision of full municipal improvements including curbs, sidewalks, landscaped boulevards, street 1 i ghti ng and storm drai nage across the frontage of the subject property adj acent to Hi ghway No. 2 (Ki ngston Road) to the sati sfacti on of the Director of Public Works; (ii) satisfy the Director of Public Works stormwater management facilities including the concerns of the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; b) receive site plan approval. 'r' 2. That the implementing zoning by-law: a) permit uses such as automobile dealerships, vehi cl e repai r shops, restaurants, offi ces and financial institutions; b) establish a minimum 2.6 metre by 5.3 metre parking stall size requirement; c) establ ish appropri ate parki ng standards for the permitted uses; d) establish a maximum gross floor area for all buil di ngs on the lot, to be determi ned through the site plan approval process. """ 2/88 5. 3 REZONING APPLICATION A 23/87 SUBMITTED BY P. AND P. CAMPAGNA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF KINGSTON ROAD, WEST OF FAIRPORT ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 23/87 ~ -- That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/87 submitted by V.W. Kuchar & Associates, on behalf of the owners P. & P. Campagna, to amend zoning By-law 3036, to rezone Part of Lot 27, Range 3, B.F.C. Town of Pickering to an appropriate zoni ng to permi t the development of an offi ce bui 1 di ng, restaurant and automobile servi ce stati on be APPROVED AS REVISED subject to the following conditions: 1. That prior to the forwarding of an implementing zoni ng by-l aw to Town Counci 1, the owner enter into an appropriate site/development agreement with and to the satisfaction of the Town of Pickering which shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following requirements: (i) in accordance with Council policy, the provision of full municipal improvements including curbs, sidewalks, landscaped boulevards, street lighting and storm drainage across the frontage of the subject property adjacent to Ki ngston Road (Highway No.2), to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works; (ii) the construction and maintenance of the Fai rport Road road allowance to standards acceptable to the Dirctor of Public Works to a distance determined through site plan approval; (iii) satisfy the Director of Public Works respecting the provision of appropriate stormwater management facilities, including the concerns of the Ministry of the Environment and the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. 2. That the owner receive site plan approval prior to third reading of an implementing zoning by-law. '-" 3. That the implementing zoning by-law (a) establish the following parking requirements: 8.0 spaces per 1000 square feet gross leasable area Service Station - 4.0 spaces (excluding servi ce bays) per 1000 square feet gross floor area Restaurant - Office Building - (i) for the first 10,000 square feet gross leasable area 4.5 spaces per 1000 square feet gross leasable area; (ii) for all leasable area in excess of 10,000 square feet - 2.5 spaces per 1000 sq. ft. gross leasable area; ......... 2/88 4 ",. (b) establish a 2.6 metre by 5.3 metre parking stall requirement; (c) establish a maximum height for each building on the site, in accordance wi th the approved site plan; (d) limit the number of restaurants on the site to one and the floor area of the restaurant to that in the approved site plan; (e) establish a maximum gross leasable floor area for all buildings on site; (f) prohibit outdoor display and storage. 6. REZONING APPLICATION A 23/87 SUBMITTED BY P. AND P. CAMPAGNA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF KINGSTON ROAD, WEST OF FAIRPORT ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 23/87 w That Town Council adopt the amendment to the Woodlands Development Plan, Part A as recommended in Appendix No. II to Planning Report No. 26/88. 7. REZONING APPLICATION A 77/87 SUBMITTED BY BRAMALEA LIMITED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROSEBANK ROAD, NORTH OF HIGHVIEW ROAD FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 77/87 ",. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 77/87, submitted by Brama 1 ea Limited to amend Zoni ng By-l aw 3036 to change the zoning on lands being Part of Lot 30, Concession 1 from "A" - Rural Agricultural Zone to "Sl" - Single Detached Dwelling Zone, (minimum 15.0 metre lot frontage), to permit severance of the subject property for resi denti al purposes be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Appendix No.1 to Planning Report No. 22/88 (1) That prior to forwarding of an implementing zoning by-law to Town Council the owner enter into an appropriate development agreement with and to the satisfaction of the Town of Pickering which shall include but not necessarily be limited to requirements respecting: (a) in accordance with Town Policy, the provision of full municipal improvements across the frontage of the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works; (b) the dedication to the Town of Pickering of a 3.048 metre widening across the Rosebank Road frontage of the subject property; (c) the payment of an appropri ate lot development fee shoul d severance of the property be approved; '-' 7. ...... 8. ...... 9. '" 1 O. ..... 2/88 5 (d) satisfying the Region of Durham and the Town of Pickering respecting the provision of municipal sanitary sewer service and municipal water supp ly pri or to the issuance of any bui 1 di ng permits for the subject property. (2) That the implementing zoning by-law establish a maximum 38 percent lot coverage within the IIS11l Single Detached Dwelling Zone. OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-73/P AND REZONING APPLICATION A 65/87 SUBMITTED BY INVAR CORPORATION AND BRI-JAN HOLDINGS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ORANGEBROOK COURT FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - OPA 87-73/P FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 65/87 That Town Council recommends to Regional Council that Official Plan Amendment Application 87-73/P submitted by Invar Corporation & Bri-Jan Holdings on Part of Lot 18, Range 3, B.F.C., Town of Pickering, to redesignate the subject property from IlLight Industrial" to an appropriate designation that permits a gymnastics facility of approximately 745 square metres be APPROVED as set out in Appendix No. I to Town Planning Report No. 24/88. OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-73/P AND REZONING APPLICATION A 65/87 SUBMITTED BY INVAR CORPORATION AND BRI-JAN HOLDINGS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ORANGE BROOK COURT FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - OPA 87-73/P FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 65/87 That Town Counci 1 adopt the amendment to the Brock Industrial Area Development Plan as recommended in Appendix No. II to Town Planning Report No. 24/88, and that the said amendment not become effective until the Ministry of r~uni ci pal Affai rs approves the correspondi ng amendment to the Brock Industrial Area Community Plan. OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-73/P AND REZONING APPLICATION A 65/87 SUBMITTED BY INVAR CORPORATION AND BRI-JAN HOLDINGS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ORANGEBROOK COURT FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - OPA 87-73/P FILE NUMBER - B 2310 - A 65/87 That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 65/87 submitted by Invar Corporation & Bri-Jan Holdings to change the zoning on the lands being Part of Lot 18, Range 3, B.F.C., Town of Pickering be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outl i ned in Appendi x No. I II to Town Pl anni ng Report No. 24/88. 10. ....... '-' '" ........ 2/88 6 1. That prior to the adoption of an implementing zoning by-law by Council, the following condition must be met: (a) That Official Plan Amendment Application 87-73/P be approved by Regional Council. 2. That any implementing zoning by-law: (a) establish a maximum gross leasable floor area of 745 square metres for the gymnastics faci 1 ity.