Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/25/1993 STATUTORY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING MINUTES A statutory Public Information Meeting was held on Thursday, March 25, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. '-' CHAIRMAN : Councillor R. Johnson ALSO PRESENT: N. Carroll L. Taylor C. Rose H. Gardiner J. Cole B. Avery A. Smith D. Kearns Director of Planning Manager, Current Operations Division Manager, Manager, Policy Division Planner 1 Planner 2 (Site Planning) Planner 1 Planner 1 Coordinator of council Services '-' (I) DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-92013 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 15/92 R. AND I. COZZI PART OF LOTS 1 - 4. PLAN 329 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report No. 8/93, was given by Heather Gardiner, Planner 1. 2. Peter Landolt, Barcana Consultants representing R. and I. Cozzi stated this application has been sent to the O.M.B. and it has been accepted for a hearing but if approval is received at the Town level they will withdraw it from the O.M.B. 3. a) Kathy Hubbard, 1839 Woodview Avenue representing herself and Faye Waugh stated their objection to the draft plan stating that twelve lots have been planned but there is a potential for fifteen. They object to lot frontages less than 15 metres and would like the lots kept to the character of the existing community. They also would like to see Pinegrove Avenue opened up to Altona Road before the application is approved. ~ b) Terry Mokedanz, 1875 Pinegrove Avenue asked if sewers are going along frontage of properties. 4. Peter Landolt, Barcana Const. stated that the sewers would be going along the frontage on Pinegrove Avenue and along Woodview to service the interior lots. 5. Lynda Taylor responded to all concerns stating that there are many requirements still to be met before this application would be given approval. (II) ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 22/92 PICKERING SQUARE INC. PART OF LOT 60. PLAN 509 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report No. 7/93, was given by Brendan Avery, Planner 1. ,.., 2. Mr. Richard Feldman representing the applicant stated he was in attendance to answer any questions that may arise. - 2 - '-' 3.a) Jim Closs, 1928 Valley Farm Road stated that he does not have an objection to the application but wished to address some relative concerns. One of his concerns relates to the natural overland water route, stating that if the elevation is changed this could cause the water to back-up onto adjacent properties. He is also concerned with the potential traffic congestion on Valley Farm Road if the present access is the one to be utilized. He questioned what type of tenants there would be in this building. b) Cameron Linton, representing the owners to the north spoke of their concerns with respect to the storm drain and the potential water back-up onto the green areas. He also stated a concern regarding the parking lot being designed to back onto the neighbouring backyards which could invite kits to enter private properties. c) Martin Herzog, of the Liverpool West Community Association stated his concern with the traffic flow. d) Erik Trantau, 1924 Valley Farm Road questioned the height that the lot would be filled. ...... e) Richard Ward stated his opposition to the application pointing out that there seems to be an abundance of this type of building with empty units. Also, he is displeased with the concessions granted to this landowner. 4. Mr. Feldman stated that discussions concerning the water situation and line. He also mentioned that this building. are already in progress the trees along the lot is a medical and office 5. Lynda Taylor assured the residents that the concerns with respect to drainage, access and grading are being addressed. (III) OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION 92-008/P F. MAIDA FAMILY INVESTMENT LIMITED, ET AL LOTS 122 AND 123. PLAN 1051 1. An explanation of Report No. 10/93, Planning) . the application, as outlined in Information was given by Jeff Cole, Planner 2 (Site ........ 2. Dave Giugovaz of the E.M.C. Group informed the Committee that this is a concept plan for discussion purposes only. 3.a) Martin Herzog, representing the Liverpool West Community Association stated their concern with this proposal and commended staff for identifying the same issues which their Association are concerned with. He pointed out that this application comes on the tail of a previous application and therefore has confused the residents. It is their feeling that a physical barrier is created with the new proposal backing onto the street requiring fencing as the existing properties face the street. Other concerns raised are the density, lot size and lack of facilities in area. b) Sandy Vanquickenborne, 1749 Appleview Road stated that she has a lot size of 1/4 acre and that townhomes do not match the present community. She is also concerned with the traffic which would be created. ""'"' - 3 - 4. Dave Giugovaz of the E.M.C. Group stated that the internal orientation of this proposal was to contain the parking of vehicles within the development and out of the line of traffic but that this could be changed. '-' 5. Lynda Taylor stated that there are a number of issues still to be pursued before application comes back. ( IV) OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION 92-009/P ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 27/92 ONTARIO HYDRO (904241 ONTARIO INC. - PICKERING PLAYING FIELDS) PART OF LOTS 19 AND wo. CONCESSION 1 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report No. 11/93, was given by Adrian Smith, Planner 1. 2. Doug Summers, co-owner of Pickering Playing Fields stated that this is a family oriented facility which they wish to develop but maintain as a family facility, not allowing loitering or gambling of any sort and all games will be restricted from any violence. He requested that the Pickering District Plan be changed to allow this application to become site specific. He stated that they try to work with the community and have not received any objections. '-" (V) ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 1/93 DANLU HOLDINGS, ET AL PART OF BLOCK 46, PLAN 40M-1S07 AND ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 6/93 TOWN INITIATED (ALTONA WEST) PART OF BLOCK 47. PLAN 40M-1S07 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report No. 9/93, was given by Brendan Avery, Planner 1. 2. Peter Landolt, Barcana Consultants representing Altona West Developments gave an explanation of the application. He stated that extensive opposition to the townhouses being built had been received, therefore, the proposal for quadruplex units was submitted. '-" 3. Heather Guscott, 298 Senator Street representing Al tona West Ratepayers Association stated that the existing community is made up of single family dwellings of 40' to 50' frontages and that they are totally opposed to townhouse units. She stated that the quadruplex units are a more desireable form of dwellings and that they have been guaranteed these homes will be 100% brick. Their concern is with 28 units being built rather than 20. They are also anxious to have the Valley View Park completed. ( II ) ADJOURNMENT OF STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING The meeting adjourned at the hour of 8:15 p.m. Dated /'1Aj(c;-/ 30 , /193 -- Clerk