HomeMy WebLinkAboutCS 31-08
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
I .
'I 1 f'<
!;()
Report Number: CS 31-08
Date: June 9, 2008
From:
Gillis A. Paterson
Director, Corporate SeNices & Treasurer
Subject:
2008 Assessment Appeals
Recommendations:
1. That Report CS 31-08 of the Director, Corporate SeNices & Treasurer regarding
2008 assessment appeals update be received;
2. That Council approve the filing of the assessment appeals by Municipal Tax Equity
for 2008 for the following roll numbers: 18-01-020-016-146-00, 18-01-030-020-
189-35, 18-01-030-020-189-90 and 18-01-030-020-202-00;
3. That the attached By-law providing for the confirmation of the filing of assessment
appeals be enacted;
4. That Council authorize the Director, Corporate SeNices & Treasurer to engage the
firm of Municipal Tax Equity and or Walker Poole Nixon LLP to represent the City
for the assessment appeals filed above; and,
5. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the
necessary actions to give effect thereto.
Executive Summary: The City has filed the assessment appeals for the properties
outlined above due to the fact their current value assessment (used for 2008 taxation
billing) bears little resemblance to the their sales price transaction value. Taxation
staff's goal is to have the property's assessment value revised and corrected so that
these properties do not benefit from the re-assessment phase-in proposed for 2009.
Financial Implications: The City has benefited financially from previous assessment
appeals (OPG). If the City is successful with these appeals, the increased property
taxation could be as high as $35,000 per year or $140,000 over a four year period.
Report CS 31-08
Date: June 9, 2008
Subject: 2008 Assessment Appeals
Page 2
;: n
Sustainability Implications: Approving the report will assist the City in maintaining
its short term and long term financial sustainability objectives.
Background: The City's property tax base funds approximately 64% of its
operating costs. In other words for every dollar in expenditures, sixty-four cents comes
from property tax payers. Taxation staff review's the assessment data base on an
annual basis to ensure that the City receives maximum economic benefit from this
major revenue source. As a result of this review in conjunction with the City's consultant
(Municipal Tax Equity or MTE), the City has appealed the four properties listed on Table
One. Our consultant has recommended that Council confirmation, in the form of a by-
law, approval is required for assessment appeals.
Table One
2008 Assessment Appeals
Roll/Numberl Tax Sale
Location Class Owner Amount OVA Difference
020 016 146 00 Vacant
Land Pickering
1856 Notion Rd Ind. Ridge Annex $4,800,000 $1,568,000 $3,232,000
030020 202 00
Altona Terraces
1870..Altona Rd. Res. Develop Corp. $1,600,000 $519,000 $1,081,000
030 020 189 35
Grossi Group
361 Chickadee Res Develop Inc. $720,000 $158,000 $562,000
030 020 189 90 Multi
Grossi Groqp
. Sparrow Cir. Res DevedQpJnc. $870,000 $216,000 $654,000
As the above table indicates, there appears to be a significant difference between the
sales price and current assessment value used for taxation purposes. In addition, the
assessment appeal is also questioning the tax class of the properties. If the City is
successful, the City would receive approximately $35,000 per year in additional property
tax revenues.
Assessment Appeals and City's Current Assessment Growth
As Members of Council are aware, since 1999, the City has been in a limited
assessment growth scenario. Unfortunately, it appears that this limited growth scenario
may continue until 2011 or 2012. As the chart below indicates the City's assessment
growth scenario compares unfavorably with its closest Durham Region neighbour.
Report CS 31-08
Date: June 9,2008
Subject: 2008 Assessment Appeals
Page 3
.-~ ,1 (1
Assessment Growth (2003 to 2007)
6.00%
5.00 %
4.00%
3.00 %
2.00%
1.00%
0.00 %
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
III Pickering . Ajax I
Assessment property tax base growth has the same characteristics as compound
interest over time. Over the last five years Pickering's assessment property tax base
has increased due to growth by 4.9% in contrast to Ajax which has increased its
property tax base by 30.5% - a difference of 25.6%. To put another way Ajax has
increased its total tax revenue base by approximately 1/3 through assessment growth
and not through property tax increases. With the City in its current and anticipated
future limited growth scenario, it appears that increasing the assessment property tax
base via assessment appeals is a viable prudent fiscal strategy.
Principle of Fairness to All City Taxpayers
The property tax system is based on the principle of every property owner paying their
fair share of taxes based on the assessed value of their property. Property owners may
disagree with the assessed value of their property but at least they understand that the
system is fair because everyone basically pays property taxes based on a fair
assessment property value. Where a property is under assessed and therefore pays
less in taxes - the other property owners have to pay more to offset the revenue
shortfall. The principle of fairness does not exist under this scenario. Property tax
owners expect the City to ensure that the principle of fairness is maintained and that all
taxpayers pay their fair share.
Report CS 31-08
Date: June 9, 2008
Subject: 2008 Assessment Appeals
Page 4
" '1
! ii !
Conclusion
Regardless of the fact that the City is in a "limited growth scenario," pursuing the
property appeals is an important function of the management of the assessment
property tax base and maintains the principle of property tax fairness. The limited
growth scenario the City finds its self today just emphasizes the importance of obtaining
the additional property tax revenue.
Attachments:
1 . Property Locations
2. By-law to Authorize Specific Complaints to the Assessment Review Board
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed By:
..~ .c---------~
./. ~.-
,
Stan Karwowski
Manager, Finance & Taxation
<?<:;~~_/
Gillis A. Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
GAP:vw
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City COli
A TT ACrlliH..;
'1 Il ?
, .t ...
I
., (,5" ';>1,., (.
n'" ~...~~__ _._). i ..} J
18-01-020-016-14600 1856 Notion Road
A~"'~
{>
~.,~
~cc'pyrig lit ceta iMd by M PAC a rId its su_ppli~rs
~
N
~o:;.
~~ ~
----1,..~
~
.?-
''t
\
~180102002201400
18-01-030-020-20200 1870 Altona Road
'1 11 'z,
\ )
180103<JO=1~.__\ 180103<JOZ(I1M05 .J
-.--\'",- .-~..-
Y\\\ \ \ -~'_ .////
'\ 18010300201\1804 //
~..)" \ \ \1$~10,3002~N80Z
18D1O:l{I02019809, \/.......
~;,()iO()~()~98;1 ).
..-.--' '\ \ \./~ //
18~~O()2()19810 ..<('"
..--..... . ;"'v$ .c#/< _ "',
. Gt"". ._~~18()1()300202024()
,1'" ~180103(102020243../^-
_--~, 180,03002020250/
'801OJOOZ0202t1(l\ 5'"
(""---1.80103002<)20;5,3,
'\.-. .....-~,,--_..
\1.~J()JO~()~0270
1.90103002020215
'$01030020Z0Z76
l8010300Z0Z0Z80
l80l030020202B1
l80103002()2()~5()
yo
.,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\ ---------
...----
\
\
\
\ lS01()SOOZ01noo
\
\.
\ ---
\.,-----
\
\
\
1801010(1210MOO
\
\
1\
.I \
.[..~-\
N
180 1(IJ0020 1 9 1(){1
\
..
't
,,- \
180 1 0300Z020283
1&010.3:002020290
\ '\ 180103{)()2{120291
\\ 18610J()o;;2'3~93 /\
\ "18()'i'030<;Z{l2()3(l() '~l
\ ..--r'--\ 18010100Z1074,~9
\ 9. lS0J~:~.:::;Z03~1 ___\18010100210749-5 ~0101'J{l21?7491 \
\ 1 o....1...'nO~020~O...- , \ \ . 1Ml'.O. 10()~.1<J7493 r /)"
. _ ',,;I... c "'~~~~ '- , v. \, 1801010H21074';:14_ / ",' i"f ..".:c-
Ct>~":{ri,~,ht rtt.18::J1010~:21':l7~'~918{l1{l1~021(l~4s:t{l \ /y -...~-<"" 1~1{)100.<.- l{ll.k 7
}'..-_...,..~"".,:"="",~,,,,-,--~-
'14<1
18-01-030-020-18935 361 Chickadee Crt.
-\
180103002018967
~
'i
'1;,
'l>
~
~
~
N
180103002019100
Copyright retained by MF'AC ar',d its supplier;,
_""""i"''''.'''''~~~_,,,,_
1 4 5
18-01-030-020-18990 Sparrow Circle
\ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ '180"103002018819-
18010J002018810, 180103002018815,~
180103002018808" \ \ 180103002018814
18010J00201880~~ -" C\,
~- Sp.......
e.,\o\<oOOO etl
18010~
~ \ 18010J002018~46
18010J002~18~5~ j \ '\
\ \ 1~010JOO~018~45
\ 1801 030020 18~48
180103002018~52
~
l!<
18010J00201~801 '\
t.
18010J002020000 \ 18010J002018~~5
Copyrig ht ~18010J002020150 a rod ,g su ppl;e':\.__--18010300201~000 \
18010J00201~100
'f'
J\CHMENT #.;.;;:;... TO r
. \'
'-..- ..,
l, ',- F
. '"
.1 ~ .-
l~ b
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. XX/08
Being a By-law to Authorize Specific Complaints to the
Assessment Review Board.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering (the "City"), may
complain in writing to the Assessment Review Board that it or another person was, in
respect of real property, assessed too high or too low, was wrongly placed on or omitted
from the assessment roll and/or was wrongly on or omitted from the role in respect of
school support pursuant to s.40 and s. 40.1 of the Assessment Act, R.S.O. 1990 c.
A.31, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the "Acf');
WHEREAS the Council of the City of Pickering deems it appropriate to enact this by-
law for the purposes of exercising its privileges under the Act,
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. In this By-law,
"property" means any property or portion of property that is or should be
identified on the assessment roll prepared in respect of the municipality; and
"delegate(s)" means any person or persons upon whom this By-Law confers
duties associated with complaints filed with the Assessment Review Board (ARB)
under sections 40 or 40.1 of the Act.
2. The City hereby authorizes and ratifies the filing of complaints to the Assessment
Review Board in respect of the assessment of the following persons and
properties:
Roll No. 1801 020 016 146 00
Roll No. 1801 030 020 202 00
Roll No. 1801 030020 18935
Roll No. 1801 030020 18990
3. In respect of the administration of any complaints authorized in paragraph 2 of
this By-law, the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer or designate hereby
authorized to sign on behalf of the City, and to participate in any associated legal
proceedings with respect thereto.
Il '7
!
4. Municipal Tax Equity Consultants Inc. shall be appointed on record as agent for
the City.
5. This By-law shall come into effect on the date it is finally passed and shall serve
to ratify all administrative tasks and responsibilities undertaken prior or
subsequent to that date in respect of any appeal authorized through this By-law.
By-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 16th day of June,
2008.
David Ryan, Mayor
Debi Wilcox, City Clerk