The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApril 7, 2008 Planning & Development Committee Agenda Monday, April 7, 2008 7:30 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Littley PART "A" PLANNING INFORMATION MEETING INFORMATION REPORT NO. 09-08 PAGES 1-7 SUBJECT: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 9/08 Fairport Inc. Lot 9 Plan 917 and Part of Lots 8 and 9 Plan 65 Front Road City of Pickerinq INFORMATION REPORT NO.1 0-08 SUBJECT: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 7/08 S. Golvin & JMPM Holdings Inc. North Part of Lot 19, Range 3 B.F.C. (Part 1, 40R-1 0527 & Part 1, 40R-8832) City of Pickerinq 8-14 PART "8" PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORTS 1. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 09-08 MPL Oakwood Holdings Ltd. Plan of Subdivision 40M-1538 15-22 Rulor Developments Limited Plan of Subdivision 40M-1604 Cougs Investments Ltd. Plan of Subdivision 40M-1689 Stolp Homes (Fairport Beach 1993) Inc. Plan of Subdivision 40M-1774 Final Assumption of Plans of Subdivision Planning & Development Committee Agenda Monday, April 7, 2008 7:30 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Littley 1. That Report PO 09-08 of the Director, Planning & Development regarding the Assumption of Plans of Subdivision 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774 be received; 2. That the highways being Acorn Lane and Canso Drive within Plan 40M-1538 be assumed for public use; 3. That the highways being Stover Crescent and Fawndale Road within Plan 40M-1689 be assumed for public use; 4. That the highway being Sandcastle Court within Plan 40M-1774 be assumed for public use; 5. That the services required by the Subdivision Agreements relating to Plans 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774, which are constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City, be accepted and assumed for maintenance, save and except from Blocks 23, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and the remainder of Block 24, Plan 40M-1538; Block 10, Plan 40M-1604; Block 33, Plan 40M-1689 and Blocks 32 and 33, Plan 40M-1774; and 6. That the Subdivision Agreements and any amendments thereto relating to Plans 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774 be released and removed from title. 2. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 10-08 23-26 Acquisition of Land by the City from Ontario Power Generation And Road Dedication -Completion of Sandy Beach Road/Bridqe Reconstruction Project RECOMMENDATION 1. That Report PO 10-08 of the Director, Planning & Development regarding the acquisition and dedication of lands by the City be received; 2. That Council authorize the acquisition of Part of Lot 20, Range 3, Broken Front Concession and Parts of Lot 1, Expropriation Plan XM-1, Pickering, designated as Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Plan 40R-24578 from Ontario Power Generation (OPG) for nominal consideration, subject to any utility/agency easements and to authorize the execution of all relevant documentation relating to the acquisition of these lands; and CiUI 0# Planning & Development Committee Agenda Monday, April 7, 2008 7:30 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Littley 3. That Council enact a By-law dedicating the acquired lands as public highway (Sandy Beach Road). 3. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 12-08 Comments on Rouge Park Alliance Draft Final Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan 27 -38 RECOMMENDATION 1. That Council request the Rouge Park Alliance to revise the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan, to acknowledge that a future Environmental Assessment will detail the cross-section, design and alignment for 14th Avenue through the Park; and 2. Further, that a copy of Report PO 12-08 be forwarded to Rouge Park Alliance, the Regional Municipalities of Durham and York, and the Town of Markham. 4. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 13-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/07 Whitevale Golf Club South Part of Lots 29 & 30, Concession 4 Parts 8 & 9, Plan 40R-18997 (East side of Golf Club Road; South of Fifth Concession Road) City of Pickerinq 39-55 RECOMMENDA TION 1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/07, submitted by the Whitevale Golf Club on the south Part of Lots 29 and 30, Concession 4, being Parts 8 & 9, Plan 40R-18997, to extend the temporary use zoning for the existing golf practice facility for an additional three-year period from July 29, 2008 to July 29, 2011, be approved, and; 2. Further, that the draft implementing by-law, included with Report PO 13-08 as Appendix I, be forwarded to Council for enactment, following confirmation from the Region of Durham that an extension agreement has been executed. " 'In }'," -,-"~'{"",, ''1'"'''''''~ t"' ~, 11' r - , ' " Planning & Development Committee Agenda Monday, April 7, 2008 7:30 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Littley 5. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 14-08 Draft Plan of Subdivision Appliciation SP-2002-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/02 Anthony DeBruin Part of Lots 5, 6 & 10, and Lots 7,8 & 9, Plan 820 & Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041 City of Pickerinq 56-126 1. That Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2002-04 submitted by Anthony DeBruin, on lands being Part of Lots 5, 6 & 10, and Lots 7, 8 & 9, Plan 820, and Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041, City of Pickering, to permit the development of a plan of subdivision, be approved, subject to the conditions outlined in Appendix I to Report PO 14-08, and; 2. Further, that Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/02 submitted by Anthony DeBruin, on lands being Part of Lots 5, 6 & 10, and Lots 7, 8 & 9, Plan 820, and Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041, City of Pickering, to establish performance standards to permit the development of a plan of subdivision for detached dwelling units, be approved generally as outlined in the draft by-law attached as Appendix II to Report PO 14-08. 6. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 15-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 10/07 2110843 Ontario Ltd. 1651 Quigley Street (North Part of Lot 19, Range 3 B.F.C., Part 3, 40R-11188) City of Pickerinq 127-154 RECOMMENDATION 1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 10/07 submitted by 2110843 Ontario Ltd. to amend the zoning of the subject property to permit a banquet facility and a restaurant in addition to uses currently permitted by the 1M2' - Industrial Zone on lands being on the North Part of Lot 19, Range 3 B.F.C., Part 3, 40R-11188 be approved; and 2. Further, that the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 10/07 as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 15-08 be forwarded to City Council for enactment. Planning & Development Committee Agenda Monday, April 7, 2008 7:30 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Littley (III) OTHER BUSINESS 1. Pickering Official Plan Review Consultation Proqram Discussion Staff from DRPA, the consulting firm assisting with development of a consultation program for the City's Official Plan Review, will present to and discuss with Planning & Development Committee Members a proposed Consultation Program to engage the general public and First Nations. (IV) ADJOURNMENT Calf {]~ 01 INFORMATION REPORT NO. 09-08 FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF April 7, 2008 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 SUBJECT: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 9/08 Fairport Inc. Lot 9 Plan 917 and Part of Lots 8 and 9 Plan 65 Front Road City of Pickering 1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION - the subject lands are located west of Front Road, with water frontage on Frenchman's Bay; a property location map is provided for reference (see Attachment #1); the subject lands contain one detached dwelling that is proposed to be removed if this application is successful; part of the subject land is used for a boat storage business; the topography of the lot is flat and the exist vegetation is typical urban residential landscape planting; - the surrounding land uses are: north - Waterpoint Street south - detached dwelling west - detached dwellings on the opposite side of Front Road east Frenchman's Bay 2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL - the applicant has submitted an application to amend the zoning by-law in order to facilitate a future severance to create two new lots for the construction of three detached dwellings; the proposed lots frontages are 10.3 metres for two lots and 31.6 metres for the third lot (see Attachment #2 - Submitted Plan); the actual lot width of the two small lots is 9.6 metres. ... ~ Information Report No. 09-08 D2 Page 2 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING 3.1 Durham Re~ional Official Plan the Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject lands as Greenland System Waterfront Areas, which are intended to be developed as people places; development shall not negatively impact key natural heritage or hydrologic features; Frenchman's Bay shore area is also designated as Waterfront Place which are intended to be developed as focal points; residential opportunities may be permitted and the scale of development shall be based on and reflect the characteristics of the Waterfront Place; the proposal appears to conform to the Durham Regional Official Plan; 3.2 Pickerin~ Official Plan the Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space System - Marina Area; permissible uses within the Open Space System - Marina Area designation include, among others, limited residential uses in conjunction with marinas and yacht clubs; the Open Space System - Marina Area designation also permits existing lawful residential dwellings and a new residential dwelling on a vacant lot; the zoning of any lands designated Open Space System - Marina Area shall apply appropriate performance standards restrictions and provisions; the subject lands are within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood of the Official Plan; the application will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the Pickering Official Plan during the further processing of the application; 3.3 Zonin~ By-law 2511 the subject lands are currently zoned "R4" - Detached Dwelling Zone and (H)OB3 - Waterfront Zone by Zoning By-law 2511; the "R4" zoning permits one detached dwelling per lot on a lot having a minimum lot area of 460 square metres and a lot frontage of 15.0 metres; the (H)OB3 zoning permits yacht club, marinas and a variety of recreational uses, all without buildings until the holding provision is lifted; an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to implement the applicant's proposed development. 4.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULATION 4.1 Resident Comments - no resident comments have been received to date; Information Report No. 09-08 Page 3 03 4.2 Agency Comments no agency comments have been received to date; 4.3 Staff Comments in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: · ensuring that the proposed development is compatible with, and sensitive to, existing surrounding development; · ensuring that the proposed lotting size and resulting house sizes are compatible and comparable to surrounding lots; · given the surrounding residential area is predominantly zoned 'R4' which requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres, the need to establish a similar zoning for new lots to ensure the character of the area is maintained; · reviewing that adequate information has been provided, that technical requirements are met and that the proposed development is appropriate at this location; · reviewing the application in terms of its level of sustainable development components; the Planning & Development Department will conclude its position on the application after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public. 5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department; oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Councilor a Committee of Council; if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding the zoning by-law amendment application, you must request such in writing to the City Clerk; if a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the City of Pickering in respect of the proposed zoning by-law amendment, does not make oral submissions at the public meeting or make written submissions to the City of Pickering before the zoning by-law is passed, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal; if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision of the proposed zoning by-law amendment application, you must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal. ''''''?1~'1~ 1 f" ~',,-,-, Information Report No. 09-08 Page 4 04 6.0 OTHER INFORMATION 6.1 Appendix No. I list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the application at the time of writing the report; 6.2 Information Received - full scale copies of the applicant's submitted plan are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department; - the need for additional information and/or technical reports will be determined through the review and circulation of the applicant's current proposal; 6.3 Owner I Applicant Information the owner of the subject lands is Fairport Inc.; Lee Gray is the principal of Fairport Inc. ROS~~ Principal Planner - Development Review ~!(6~J. /6::.,,- . Lynda 1- ylor, MCIP, PP Manager, Development Review RP:ld Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development 05 APPENDIX NO. I TO INFORMA TJON REPORT NO. 09-08 COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS (1) none received to date COMMENTING AGENCIES (1) none received to date COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS (1) none received to date .:;,....... ..~..., - ~- ~ ~ ~'l ''''''''.'\ ,,~.. ,"".~,,,..,., ,~ I "'i'. .?'lI ;>e ~ j;...~~~{~U;~~~~'~ j :1'1'__ ~ U 06 RE~~~-ORT 1~~ eM -or' w-------- ~~ I-- PATfv ~ I-- I'" DOUGLAS "" ~ ~ ,;(- ~ ~ ~ ~ PARK (j ~ I%? ~ ~ o - ~ c- ~ ~- 0 ~ r-- _I---- /s- <{ ~ :J _____ C 1> 0 /J ~>- ~ /'- 11:: ~ -1- - ~ ~ 11 )JL 2,:- - ~ I ~ u I - ~ ~ HALLER AVENUE ~ ~w --- ~ :J I ( z '\ ~ w > <( ~ / ~ ~ II ~ - - -! OLD ORCHA~D AVENUE 0 ~ - - 0 -- - (/] 0.. 5- 5 0:: - w w (J > I (/] 5- :J ~NICA ,COOK :::J 0:: - 0 ]I <i' - 0 I ( 0::'2 LL <(0:: - ) :::> 0 - ~ II ,--- I-- BROWNING AVE, (/] "" CJ(lf 3:w 11 \ L:J::o - ~ CLw ILONA PARK ~ - tmEffiE <L-:; \'f;;==J I ~ - - 'l - ~\ 1~1 ~l R ~25 ROAD z WATERPQ --j I, r t----- ~~l f-- ~ STR E1 ,--... f-- \1 f-- I~ L-- --.> \ COMMERCE STREET SUBJECT I-- J~ r- l.Ll 0 PROPERTIES t= w 1---'-- <( 0:: oC--- 1--' - O::f-- ~ ::'---r--~ (j] L-- I-- '0 z r- <( '(j] , <( ~ c--- w --' H f-- FRENCHMAN'S BAY 0.. ..JL-- ANNLAND or- A J of-- ~ V 1..--- (L 11:: ~- Flr-[ w f-- > -~ ..J L-- WHARF r- r-- - - -' ;0 ~ ? - ---, '-I = ==1 City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PLAN M-917 LOT 9 & PLAN 65 LOT 9 & PLAN 65, PT LOT 8, 40R-8654 PART 1,2 l' OWNER FAIRPORT INC. DATE FEB 12, 2008 DRAWN BY JB FILE No, A 009/08 SCALE 1 :5000 CHECKED BY CP tv a a .30UrC8S: PN-3 :? Teranet Enterpri:!le:!! Inc. and it:!! supplier:!!. All I'"ight:!!l Reserved. Not 0 pion of :'Iurvey. 2005 MPAC and its suppliers. AI! I'"ights Reserved. Not 0 plan of Survey. TO (,~ -uS - (, 7 J INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS SUBMITTED PLAN A 09/08 - L. GRAY WATERPOINT STREET .:;::;"<;:~rc-- --"'c;;;c .~.~~":- ...-" "~~ .1 T- '07.1'1' ,/ - - - -, I /1 ! -, r (<~~";./~_// ':; :-.' PROPOSED LOT 3 ~'- , I, . <, ~ ::.~~~:~~~ IZ ; -n ?J o Z -l ?J o )::> o FRENCHMAN'S BAY BUILDING ENVELOPE , THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, MARCH 4, 2008 ~- -~- --- - T-'-; UB ClUI ()~ INFORMATION REPORT NO.1 0-08 FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF April 7, 2008 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 SUBJECT: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 7/08 S. Golvin & JMPM Holdings Inc. North Part of Lot 19, Range 3 B.F.C. (Part 1, 40R-10527 & Part 1, 40R-8832) City of Pickering 1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION - the lands are located on the south side of Bayly Street, west of Brock Road; - the properties have frontage on Bayly Street and Dillingham Road; a property location map is provided for reference (see Attachment #1); - the site is currently vacant; primarily mixed industrial commercial uses exist to the north and west, an automobile dealership (Bessada Kia) abuts the property to the east; - the broader surrounding area is comprised of mixed employment uses consisting of retail, personal service, warehousing, trucking and manufacturing uses. 2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL - the applicant has requested to rezone the subject lands to permit the establishment of mixed employment uses including offices, personal service uses, limited retail sales and various light industrial uses; based on the conceptual plan submitted with the application, the applicant is proposing to develop six separate buildings on the subject lands with an aggregate gross floor area of 9300 square metres (100,000 square feet); - the applicant's submitted plan is provided for reference (see Attachment #2). Information Report NO.1 0-08 Page 2 nq 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan the Durham Region Official Plan designates the subject lands as Urban Areas - Employment Area; establishes that designated Employment Areas shall be used for manufacturing, assembly and processing of goods, service industries, research and development facilities, warehousing, and business parks; permits limited personal service uses, a limited number of uses for retailing of goods and services, and limited office uses; the subject application will be assessed against the policies and the provisions of the Durham Region Official Plan during the further processing of the application; 3.2 Pickering Official Plan the Pickering Official Plan designates the north portion of the subject lands fronting Bayly Street as Employment Area - Mixed Employment and the south portion of the subject lands as Employment Area - General Employment within the Brock Industrial Neighbourhood; permissible uses within the Mixed Employment designation include light manufacturing, warehousing, automotive vehicle sales and repair, offices, personal service uses, restaurants and limited retailing of goods and services serving the area; - permissible uses within the General Employment designation include manufacturing, warehousing, automotive vehicle sales and repair, offices, limited personal service uses, restaurants and limited retailing of goods and services as a minor component of an industrial operation; the applicant's proposal will be assessed against the policies and the provisions of the Pickering Official Plan during the further processing of the application; 3.3 Zoning By-law 2511 the north portion of the subject lands are zoned "M1" - Storage & Light Manufacturing Zone, and the south portion of the subject lands are zoned "M2" - Yard Storage and Heavy Manufacturing Zone by By-law 2511; a zoning by-law amendment is required to implement the applicant's proposed mixed industrial/commercial development on the property; the applicant has requested that Zoning By-law 2511 be amended to permit the establishment of mixed employment uses including offices, personal service uses, limited retail sales and various light industrial uses. 4.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULATION 4.1 Resident Comments no comments received to date; - Information Report No. 10-08 1 n , \... Page 3 4.2 Agency Comments no comments received to date; 4.3 Staff Comments in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: . reviewing the application in terms of its level of sustainable development components; . reviewing the proposed development in terms of compatibility with, and sensitivity to, surrounding lands; . reviewing the adequacy and location of on-site parking to support the proposed uses; . reviewing the proposed development to ensure that adequate information is provided, that technical requirements are met and that the proposed site design is appropriate; . what uses may be added to this site while maintaining the intent of the current Official Plan designations; . whether any floor area limitations may be required for the commercial uses proposed by the applicant; . as this development proposal is located outside of the Downtown Core, a Retail Impact Study to justify the retail floor space for retailing of goods and services and to demonstrate that the additional floor space will not adversely impact the viability of any lands designated or developed for retail uses in the Downtown Core may be required; . ensuring that the amount of floor area devoted to retail sales is limited to comply with official plan policies for the employment area; the Planning & Development Department will conclude its position on the application and its design after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public. 5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION this application has been deemed complete in accordance with the Planning Act; written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department; oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council and/or a Committee of Council; if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding either the proposed zoning by-law amendment application, you must request such in writing to the City Clerk; if you wish to reserve the option to appeal a decision of the City of Pickering, you must provide oral comments at the public meeting, or written comments to the City before Council adopts for this proposal any zoning by-law amendment; Information Report NO.1 0-08 Page 4 1 1 if a person or public body does not make oral submissions at the public meeting or make written submissions to the City of Pickering before the by-law is passed, such persons or public bodies are not entitled to appeal the decision of Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. 6.0 OTHER INFORMATION 6.1 Appendix No. I list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing report; 6.2 Information Received full scale copies of the Applicant's submitted plans are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department; a Traffic Impact Study prepared by Sernas Transtech was submitted with the subject application; a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by The Hazcon Group Ltd. , was submitted with the subject application; a Phase 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Advance Archaeology was submitted with the subject application; the need for additional information will be determined through the review and circulation of the applicant's current proposal; 6.3 Company Principal the subject lands are owned by Stu ;t Mark Galvin and JMPM Holdings Limited., in an equal partnership; the authorized agent is Kevin J. Tunney of Tunney Planning Inc. ( %' --- tl ,/ , f/ ,/ '- l"f Jt"%~../{:u.,. p...-. . Lynda Taylor, MCIP, PP Manager, Development Review RC:jf Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development ,...... :-..)....'..'1'... 'I '2 APPENDIX NO. I TO INFORMATION REPORT NO.1 0-08 COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS (1) none received to date COMMENTING AGENCIES (1) none received to date COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS (1) none received to date d q II I I I I 11 I !I I I I :1 ,I II 'I II Ir I ~ ----- .f City of Picf<ering [,--- OWNER S. GOLVIN & JMPM HOLDINGS INC. r FILE No. A 07/08 ~:rora-SoW"-C"'G; o Te..-ootlt Ent(lrprj~a~ Inc. ond a" supplier", All rights Re!5elrved. Not 0 plan 01 survey. ~ 2005 MPAC and it9 "upp!iel"~. All ri9ht~ Re~erved. N~t 0 plan of Survey. r'.<>_ ~--~~-~.......-~"'~...~ I t\n,~XiH~:"~:;::.~cr::f:~_1'O 'f;::::';:-:':JRrf~~ / (" ..- {l <6'" 1 3 ~/ i~ I i 110 ''''-.\ o CL o >- I PLUM\i!E,~ S~RE::J I I I I 0 <{ I 0 0::: I ! :>:: u 0 0:: CJ Ii :P Z () fTI ;<:; o :> o :>:: --1 <( Ul F/REHALL_~ No.5 " BAYLY STREET BAYLY ;- I I o <{ o IY '\ w ~ \ _ ~UBJECT \ ~ ) IJHIJPERTIE~ \\ ~ ct:: o o ct:: 0::: o U o <{ o IY ORANGEBROOK COURT DON BETR ARENA :2 <{ I-r-- () Z :J -1 0' o cr: o >--- I QUIGLEY STREET jj n:: "----- y U o 0:: m ---- -- Planning 8l Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PT. LT. 19, RANGE 3, B.F.C., 40R-10524, PART 1 40R.8832 -- '/' N DATE MAR. 3, 2008 SCALE 1 :5000 DRAWN BY JB -- CHECKED BY RC PN-4 1 4 ,~ J''''f"\''".''''' l~o~';.\n'''','r' ,/) "Il'~ ~H' ~,~:",:\i~"~:;;j~~'<":.JI;!] Ii r~\~___ ~y i .~ "."".,~,'iV,,\.q,,/~ /Ci. (' J';'.2',r',.',..;r'\\j ~?-="~ . ~ ' INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS SUBMITTED PLAN S. GOlVIN & JMPH HOLDINGS INC. A 007/08 "....~...~ 8A YL Y STREET BotOCK!J aleCK ~ A ~ o ". ',IUd '" ',701 sf 32630 ~ F or. U,95Stf 99~OO E I5TOR(YWAArn<!US[AREA ". 56,0511.1 76200 (N(RHOO TRUCK BAARlf:R € OVERI100 nlUC~ (l.O.llllldl ~1 500 ~ 5300 ~ DILLlNGHAtvl ROAD TO PERMIT MIXED EMPLOYMENT USES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY INCLUDING BUISINESS OFFICES, PERSONAL SERVICE USES, LIMITED RETAIL SALES AND A BROAD RANGE OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES THIS M,4p WAS PRODUCED BY nte CITY OF PICKERINe, PLANNING ct DEVELOPMCNT OrPARTAfCNr. INFORMAnON &: SUPPORT SF.RVlCES, MARCH 4, 2001. <> 1\ IV ." .~ r' REPORT TO PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Report Number: PO 09-08 Date: April 7, 2008 1 5 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: MPL Oakwood Holdings Ltd. Plan of Subdivision 40M-1538 Rulor Developments Limited Plan of Subdivision 40M-1604 Cougs Investments Ltd. Plan of Subdivision 40M-1689 Stolp Homes (Fairport Beach 1993) Inc. Plan of Subdivision 40M-1774 Final Assumption of Plans of Subdivision Recommendation: 1. That Report PO 09-08 of the Director, Planning & Development regarding the Assumption of Plans of Subdivision 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774 be received; 2. That the highways being Acorn Lane and Canso Drive within Plan 40M-1538 be assumed for public use; 3. That the highways being Stover Crescent and Fawndale Road within Plan 40M-1689 be assumed for public use; 4. That the highway being Sandcastle Court within Plan 40M-1774 be assumed for public use; 5. That the services required by the Subdivision Agreements relating to Plans 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774, which are constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City, be accepted and assumed for maintenance, save and except from Blocks 23, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and the remainder of Block 24, Plan 40M-1538; Block 10, Plan 40M-1604; Block 33, Plan 40M-1689 and Blocks 32 and 33, Plan 40M-1774; and 6. That the Subdivision Agreements and any amendments thereto relating to Plans 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774 be released and removed from title. - .- ii'']" --~k Report PO 09-08 April 7, 2008 Subject: Final Assumption of Plans of Subdivision 1 6 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774 Page 2 Executive Summary: The City entered into Subdivision Agreements with the above-noted developers for the development of Plans 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774. As all works and services within these plans have been completed to the satisfaction of City staff, it is appropriate to assume the roads and services within these plans under the jurisdiction of the City and release the developers from the provisions of the Subdivision Agreements. Financial Implications: There are no new financial implications to the City as a result of this recommendation. Sustainability Implications: The final assumption of these plans of subdivision is an administrative process that legally concludes the City's acquisition of necessary roads and other infrastructure. It does not directly impact the City's sustainability initiatives. Background: The City entered into Subdivision Agreements with the above-noted developers for the development of Plans 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774. As the developers have now completed all works and services to the satisfaction of City staff, it is appropriate to assume the roads and services within these Plans, save and except from: Plan 40M-1538 1. Blocks 23, 27 and 29 In the Region's ownership; 2. Remainder of Block 24 Future development; 3. Blocks 28 and 30 Reserves; and 4. Blocks 31, 32 and 33 Turning Circle Blocks. Plan 40M-1604 1. Block 10 In the ownership of Her Majesty the Queen. Plan 40M-1689 1. Block 33 In the Region's ownership. Plan 40M-1774 1. Blocks 32 and 33 Reserves. Report PO 09-08 April 7, 2008 Subject: Final Assumption of Plans of Subdivision 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774 Page 3 ,., 7 It should be noted that the roads fronting the lots within Plan 40M-1604 lie within an adjacent Plan of Subdivision. Accordingly, for the purposes of this report, authorization is being requested for the release and removal of the Subdivision Agreement and its amendments from title only. Further, it is also appropriate to release the developers from the provisions of their respective Agreements with the City as follows: 1 . Plan 40M-1538 Subdivision Agreement dated May 5, 1986 and registered as Instrument No. L T385921 ; 2. Plan 40M-1604 Subdivision Agreement dated April 3, 1989, registered as Instrument No. L T454295 and the Amending Subdivision Agreements dated September 18, 1989 and December 21, 1992, registered as Instrument Nos. L T 464222 and L T640225 respectively; 3. Plan 40M-1689 Subdivision Agreement dated August 7, 1991 and registered as Instrument No. LT583287;and 4. Plan 40M-1774 Subdivision Agreement dated November 15, 1993 and registered as Instrument No. L T690461. Accordingly, it is being recommended: 1. That the highways being Acorn Lane and Canso Drive within Plan 40M-1538 be assumed for public use; 2. That the highways being Stover Crescent and Fawndale Road within Plan 40M-1689 be assumed for public use; 3. That the highway being Sandcastle Court within Plan 40M-1774 be assumed for public use; 4. That the services required by the Subdivision Agreements relating to Plans 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774, which are constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City, be accepted and assumed for maintenance, save and except from Blocks 23, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33 and the remainder of Block 24, Plan 40M-1538; Block 10, Plan 40M-1604; Block 33, Plan 40M-1689 and Blocks 32 and 33, Plan 40M-1774; and t"p:;j ,,'~. i . '-~. ~_.i'_ i Report PD 09-08 April 7, 2008 Subject: Final Assumption of Plans of Subdivision 1 8 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774 Page 4 5. That the Subdivision Agreements and any amendments thereto relating to Plans 40M-1538, 40M-1604, 40M-1689 and 40M-1774 be released and removed from title. Attachments: 1. Location Map - Plan 40M-1538 2. Location Map - Plan 40M-1604 3. Location Map - Plan 40M-1689 4. Location Map - Plan 40M-1774 Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: 'l ,'" 1'0) ,1v3);-fJ Denise Bye; Supervisor Property & Development Services ,7' /"', .. P''') ,,:.,,", ,.../' ,,' /{'o/ " .. " ,- ..' " / ~'~,7/ ~~/6'I ~/ 1/ .-(. ~ C:.e,.t.l,./ Nei( Carrol~~le:RPP Director, Planning & Development DB:bg Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Coot1cil )( /' "., .- "'-'(.: /'. L.. )t..? / /l Recommendation approved: Director, Planning & Development "~/ /' <;1....t...,,-,.' //:S:22~~2:~t:_~22.._ ~ .----r;~ /1 '! ( ~_ " I "/~' ([ Ii: ~/? "-- -"-. ~,,'c"-;";;_,_ ,/;1' "--',,,-,.. <t;:.""--".....~~....T-."-'> >'iJ""'-- ~ ,jJ,-, 7~ ' ,.' "J" ,~I --. 1'7"'~........ ~ f__/~../" , ~~1- [/ l " ", ...-/ ,,- ,/ ~- " ,/"',.. -~,/ ,<' ,f/'" , / --c' e/ / _' "..__\.:.. /./-"'~'-l..r J Q~~-': ()C~\ l:\'\}',(~ I 7 ' Chief Administrative Officer Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Director, Office of Sustainability Director, Operations & Emergency Services City Clerk i. "-1 ,. "~'. ,""': 1 I} , 1"0' ,....,.;,."..,[,_.,-1...___. PD,.J.l1.::..92...._. ___ '19 I I I I I I IU-l I -- ~I I i ~= ) / i~ ~ STREET I JIVITF. CflURCH, :2 w I-- ~ ~ ~Ii- -=11 ~T '--'1 hJ'D i I I ~ ~1 JDS;PH'IT~TREET PI . Ga r- ==t--L1 I---~ I ,.~ I~_ HFNle I" ST "--- ~ c >---::;7-1" II-? mtJi I l~- ~-- ~:~ CENTRAL. :- -I ~ E1J1~- ~ It;:' - CLAREMONT == LJ PUBLIC SCHOC]Jf" 2: ~LlNGTON 5 f- J ~= cr: - - 2- - () CU1REMONT ;; - \ COMMUNITY CENTRE '- -, ! ~ ':-J f--,I I ~j ~ a d t-, ::r-1 WI CL ' ~ zl =:.Ji ~...J ~ I'. L '---' ~ 1ENT~ ~. , ! 0B (J ~ ~ f------- I-.. g- o () (5 !-.:. is J1: (J :---BLOCK 24 -----tJO"/.A"!-:V'I. ../ / ~ -~ - -- - FiREHALL No.4 z o tri- o z =2 -'1- /' ,..,., m )\ 1 LANE J : r/~> ffi BOVINGJV / / PLACE LEGION HALL CLAREMONT PARK -- "- ACORN '-- B Z 5t 2,( 4 JM 1 12 -"- l ~ I ~- I Planning & Deveiopment Department I ~I tv DRAWN BY JB City of Pickering PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 40M-1538 OWNER VARIOUS Lo~IL~~u~~~. SUBDIVISION COMPL.ETlON AND ASSUMPTION K'-~ Terontlt Entorprisos Inc. ond ita suppliers. AI! ri9hts RoaervCld. Not c pion 01 !lurvey. ~ 2005 MPAC on.. a~ suppliers. All riQhhs Rest'rved. Nol Q pion of Survey. DATE JAN 28, 2008 SCALE 1 :5000 CHECI<ED BY DB PN-RUR ~c n II !. ) ~.:'T'i'f:<.J'c::-"'IT# ~ T'" . .!"l...;I"..,,_n', '. . ,U ,.,",'.,.~' . P' r'l"(_ IC;g ""nj!-') ~. . D _~c.J..:...::_______..._.... I ('.:).\.~~- ~\jI u- = - _JD-/ III JL~ Y ~L---' ,------" .------ ~ / \ 71f::Y ~\\y. ~ ~ .. /~.--~ LJ ~ ) :J l / ~' 0i\~'{ /\ 0\G __ ~LI ROAD I I ~ f- -Q: :J o -u - - SUBJECT SUBDIVISION I ~?D ~ ~~;v~ r-- I--Z >- . -' w > ~----- .:;:. / / ,0' ________--t v4 ~~~:= CllR ::::i- f=:- z- 1.- u ~ I o <l: o Q: -~~L Q: 0- W f- f- w ~'\ \ P j .0 ~ <:<' % O~ \. \. \. '\ "- "- ~ >\~ ROUGE '~ ~, " ""~ @ouw " @[? \ , 'jj@OO@[i8'jj@ '\ '\ ~ . L '- ~ \. '. '. ,. ~)\ City of Pickering -~ - - ,-- r--~ ~ - COURT, II F I I w r--~ DRIVE ~ TOYNEVAlE = "" V/ -~~ - - - f-- i3r-- i;if--- w f--- 5- - 0- 8- cj- :2- - - /-- o~11 o o ~ y: <( o I I --.J /~ Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 40M-1604 OWNER VARIOUS FILE No. SUBDIVISION COMPLETION AND ASSUMPTION 0:0 ;;>ourcas; ~ Teronet Enterprises Inc:. end it. supplier.. All right. Reserved. Not CI pion of aurvoy. 2005 MPAC end its suppliers. All rights Re:u:,rvcd. Not c pion of Sur....ey. - I lI1 <l: - r--- ~~- f- -3 o -:2 . \. Y \ \ \ \ I DATE JAN. 18, 2008 DRAWN BY JB SCALE 1 :5000 CHECKED BY DB l' '" PN-1 1'4. acrr III II I Islnl'. " I :.:P-'" S TR t E T '-J --EHt-V I Nl ~ I---- OUR f-- I-- t---- 1- I-- , } ",,,";? .""~, .&_.' ,-,",.Q~l.-J..2t... c_' o o J~ I UJ -r- Iv i Y i f.-- ~\j\t.\N l~ I == = ~ I ,- - ST. MONICA '5 I '\, " == SEPARA TE SCflOOL ;; dITts~~f--[- T LlJ1JJ=jO ~CHARDSON STREET -- CRESCENT ~ 1----1 ~ rr 11(Ir~LEFORD I-- n:: I--- 0 ...." DJ?/v, (' 1-- >- w --' -' ;; n:: w > g .-' STOVER I~/ u-o I d ['( n:: ROUGE VALLEY PARK -- -0-- <(- CF~ESCENT ~ f- w f------- ~- z 3:: <(- LL Planning & Development Department 1'1 N I---- ROUGE ~ - --- -,-- _w ,~~~=~J Wr- ~\ r ~ ~ J<( ~ X~~OOL YN '\ tJ r 0. I ~r1lljl ~ (IREET \ ~ DRIVE ~ J PARK ICit~ Pickering I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 40M-1689 I OWNER VARIOUS DATE JAN. 18,2008 FILE No, SUBD!VISION COMPLETION AND ASSUMPTION SCALE 1 :5000 ::>oto ~OUrC8!i1: Ie Tl:'!ronet Enterpr':ll'IS Inc. and it. lIupplier-lI. All r'9hta Reserved, Not 0 pion of l5uf"vey. If:j 2005 MPAC and jt~ suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not c pion of S...rvey. - - r-- I---- -- !.-...-.... ',-- --- -- f----- I---- '- ~ 21 ~I ~ r ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE I---- ELIZABETH B. PHIN PUBLIC SCHOOL ! I FIDDLERS f--.- - ,- I-----l - - - - - T\ - TOI,1UN}20N CRT - I - nl_ ~f-- r~~ ~~ ll0, ~ DRAWN BY JB CHECKED BY DB PN-5 W~~f:~=E -lrrrll~[ITmTillH-g ~ I\\~F , RIITrT I ~- II Llllilll [m~S I ~- AMPTON COURT I ~ VICKI:3 Cl DRIVE II I UlIII FAIRPOR>T = ~ II II BEACH I--- u PUBLIC ~ w 0 SCHOOL I---- -----r-- ~ d _ --~ I 0 I ~ OKLAHOMA DR,VE OKLAHOMA II I r r-~ == - I.... I F- .1 -- ~ -'7 / I INGDON COURT T - S ~ tv TEe 0 5 4, L -;:0 f----,L----- i:! 1/ I ~ 1 v v - ~ =~ ~ ( 0 I I I 1/1/ - ROAD I \ 6 STONEBRIDGE'~ I \ \ T I -~ \:-G <:=~~~ LAN:- ~~ ~ \1::: :/ p::== ~ II t=w::=:~ I \\\\~ -g/ J I V/- ~-~ 1-- :;:: __ }> I-- - =:J ] II H~ ~~ / 0 ~ :ND'T(; ~ ~, /; COUR, / ==- ~_ _ I LOOKOUT :--J - I PO/NT - D PARK TULLO STREET It'/vc 11 I C0'CC1-V,rctr 1'-- ~ sJ#&t7flO' ~\ ~ w ==~ ;. /~ ~ ~\ =='==~ :;:;;~MELLO de If-~ :=- '6~ _ =~ = ......1/ r ;\\ ~J- = SURF AVENUE ~ f==1 I I ( T - r:= -! _I H == PETTICOAT I-- ---L - 0\'0\ H II II I ILfN I ~-=>- ~ 'OSt>-O~? ~l...,/~I / }-8~ -==~- ~ ~~ ~ ~f--g:1-- L I -_~ 1---- h ~LL V1_-0- Oc ~- 0i~ 8IWADGR"1 ~I I~ ~ :1 ~ /--- -- 7 ,>fi'>' r-''; -~ V' 22 d J.,~_..~""T .=~.,~. y'S~s;R.;._.... >- ---- ~ =:J >- OJ -~---U1 o ~ ~ ~ u << :> 2 I r I I I I - ''',-~ r ~ -L~lIIIDIIIrl] == I == F/?ENCI-IMAN '5 -- BA Y -- - -- > t= i ~- > I---- JUBUC SCHOO, I =~ II ==~ I - -- I-- ~ _w I ~ - -- ~ V1 ___- ~ MI ,_z I ~-- _2 _0..._1 -3- sUNA u LAKE ONTARIO City of Pickering PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 40M-1774 Planning & Development Department OWNER VARIOUS FILE No. SUBDIVISION COMPLETION AND ASSUMPTION DATE JAN 28,2008 DRAWN BY JB SCALE 1 :5000 CHECKED BY DB l' tv o 0 Sourcoll: Q Toranet Entl!lrpri15C18 Inc. and its suppliers, All riQhts Reserved. Not 0 pion of survey. 2005 ty1PAC end its :suppliers. All rights Ret'oerved. Not 0 pion of Survey. PN-2 Ciiq o~ REPORT TO PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Report Number: PO 10-08 Date: April 7, 2008 23 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Acquisition of Land by the City from Ontario Power Generation and Road Dedication Completion of Sandy Beach Road/Bridge Reconstruction Project File: L4640-013 Recommendation: 1. That Report PO 10-08 of the Director, Planning & Development regarding the acquisition and dedication of lands by the City be received; 2. That Council authorize the acquisition of Part of Lot 20, Range 3, Broken Front Concession and Parts of Lot 1, Expropriation Plan XM-1, Pickering, designated as Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Plan 40R-24578 from Ontario Power Generation (OPG) for nominal consideration, subject to any utility/agency easements and to authorize the execution of all relevant documentation relating to the acquisition of these lands; and 3. That Council enact a By-law dedicating the acquired lands as public highway (Sandy Beach Road). Executive Summary: The City recently concluded the reconstruction of a portion of Sandy Beach Road and the replacement of the bridge over Krosno Creek between Parkham Crescent and Montgomery Park Road. A review of the required works determined that a small portion of the road was located on OPG-owned lands. OPG agreed to convey the lands to the City for nominal consideration provided survey, closing and road dedication costs were covered by the City. The acquisition and dedication of these lands will legally conclude the requirements of this project. Financial Implications: The costs to complete this acquisition were accounted for in the overall budget for the project. Budget Item/Account Number: 5320.0612.6250 (Survey, Closing and Road Dedication Cost) $2,900.00 (Approximately) Sustainability Implications: The acquisition of these lands is an administrative process that legally concludes the requirements of this construction project. It does not directly impact the City's sustainability initiatives. 'IJi' f"'--~ Report PD 10-08 April 7, 2008 Subject: Acquisition of Land from OPG 24 Page 2 Background: In 2006, the Roads capital budget included the construction of a portion of Sandy Beach Road and the replacement of the bridge over Krosno Creek between Parkham Crescent and Montgomery Park Road. A review of the works determined that a small portion of the required road being reconstructed was located on OPG-owned lands. OPG agreed to convey the lands to the City for nominal consideration provided the City covers survey, closing and road dedication costs relating to the conveyance. Final costs to complete this acquisition and dedication are minimal and were accounted for in the overall budget for the project. As the reconstruction is now complete and the City is in receipt of the required survey, it is appropriate to effect the conveyance of the lands from OPG to the City and dedicate them as public highway (Sandy Beach Road). The acquisition of these lands and the dedication as a public highway will legally conclude the requirements of this project. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Draft Road Dedication By-law Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: ./7, ~ i).: . '\L: Ig Denise Bye, upervisor, Property & Development Services DB:bg Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Division Head, Municipal Property & Engineering Coordinator, City Development Recommended for the consideration of Pickering yity Council Ii i/ Ifj"7"""i'"r"IU~,,:1t:-:'1"T Jj. I rt~i ,-', lr!v~i;_,''<.~'-'''' tt_____- u fE:'(}p-r .~. Pi) ._J>:..~:'3:_._.- r--- I I Ii II I VENUE : I I I u I "RKHAfvl CRESCENT ~ ~ I ~ ALEX ROBERTSON PARK /1 / r-\/ City of Pickering PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARTS 1-5, 40R-24578 OWNER OPG ) \ /"., 7'CJ = - - ~I \ wILj~O!rl SIDE \--,u\!R i Si ~RTS 1 TO 5 o 40R-24578 0:::: I () <1: w m >- o Z <1: (f) FILE No. ACQUISITION & DEDICATION - SANDY BEACH ROAD (L4640-013) KINSMEN PARK () S ~~ ~ " i i I I I I I i I I I i I i I . Planning & Development Department DATE FEB 27,2008 DRAWN BY JB SCALE NTS CHECKED BY DB o 0 Sources: - Teronet Entorprises Inc. end ita suppliers. All rights Reaerved. Not 0 pion of aurvey. 2005 MPAC and its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not 0 pion of Survey. l' PN-3 Roadded.489 26 /") :;"1 # C-- TO JI;"' ~)D .._J:Q.:.:::..J:.;2::6..... THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING Being a By-law to dedicate Part of Lot 20, Range 3, Broken Front Concession and Parts of Lot 1, Expropriation Plan XM-1, Pickering, designated as Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Plan 40R-24578, as public highway (Sandy Beach Road). WHEREAS The Corporation of the City of Pickering is the owner of certain lands lying within Pickering and wishes to dedicate them as public highway. NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Part of Lot 20, Range 3, Broken Front Concession and parts of Lot 1, Expropriation Plan XM-1, Pickering, designated as Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Plan 40R-24578 are hereby dedicated as public highway (Sandy Beach Road). BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 21 st day of April, 2008. David Ryan, Mayor ,./ ,':..'..' Debi A.WilcOx, City Clerk Citq 0# REPORT TO PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Report Number: PO 12-08 Date: April 7, 2008 .. : 27 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Comments on Rouge Park Alliance Draft Final Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan File: 0-8100-007 Recommendation: 1. That Council request the Rouge Park Alliance to revise the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan, to acknowledge that a future Environmental Assessment will detail the cross-section, design and alignment for 14th Avenue through the Park; and 2. Further, that a copy of Report PO 12-08 be forwarded to Rouge Park Alliance, the Regional Municipalities of Durham and York, and the Town of Markham. Executive Summary: The Bob Hunter Memorial Park is located in Markham, adjacent to the Little Rouge River, and forms part of the Rouge Park. A location map is provided as Attachment #1. The Draft Final Bob Hunter Memorial Park Plan recommends a road design for the section of the 14th Avenue - Fifth Concession Road within the Park that may compromise its function as a Type B arterial road. Staff concurs that the design of a road should be sensitive to its context. However, the appropriate process for identifying the precise corridor location and design is the environmental assessment process. Thus, the Bob Hunter Park Plan and Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan should be revised to reflect that the precise road corridor . location and design will be identified through the environmental assessment process. Financial Implications: None Sustainability Implications: Sustainable development integrates environmental, social and economic objectives. It challenges proponents to find creative solutions to what may appear as competing objectives, rather than simply choosing one objective over the other. A road design that is sensitive to the Bob Hunter Memorial Park and Little Rouge Corridor while respecting the arterial road function of the proposed 14th Avenue - Fifth Concession Road can be found through the environmental assessment process. Report PO 12-08 April 7, 2008 Subject: Comments on Rouge Park Alliance Draft Final Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and :2 8 Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan Page 2 Background: The Rouge Park Alliance has released the Draft Final Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan and has requested their review and endorsement by member organizations, which includes the City of Pickering and the Region of Durham (see Letter, Attachment #2). Comments on these Plans are requested by March 31, 2008. On March 11, 2008, the Planning Committee of the Region of Durham adopted the recommendations of Commissioner's Report No. 2008-P-22 regarding these two Plans (see Report, Attachment #3). The recommendations request revisions to the Plans to acknowledge that the alignment and design of 14th Avenue arterial road will be determined by a future Environmental Assessment. City staff's findings and reasoning are the same as those set out in Regional Report No. 2008-P-22. With the exception of the proposed realignment, cross-section and design for 14th Avenue (in York Region), which is to connect to the Fifth Concession Road in Durham (Pickering), City staff generally agrees with the other recommendations contained in the two Plans. The Bob Hunter Park Plan illustrates a potential alignment and design for 14th Avenue through the Park that is intended to protect wildlife and accommodate hikers and cyclists within the Park. The Plan proposes: . a two-lane rural cross-section on a 20 metre right-of-way; . multi-use trails on both sides of the road; and, . traffic calming measures such as reduced speed limits, several curves in the realignment and speed bumps. Although wildlife protection and accommodation of cyclists and hikers need to be considered, the proposed alignment, cross-section, right-of-way and road design would compromise the intended function of 14th Avenue as a higher-order, four-lane arterial road. The Region of York, Region of Durham and City of Pickering's respective Official Plans and the Region of Durham Transportation Master Plan provide for a Type B, four-lane arterial road on 14 th Avenue and on the Fifth Concession Road with the detailed alignment and design to be determined through an Environmental Assessment. The Central Pickering Development Plan also shows this essential road connection between Seaton and York Region. Accordingly, it is recommended that Pickering City Council request the Rouge Park Alliance to revise the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan to acknowledge that a future Environmental Assessment will detail the cross-section, design and alignment for 14th Avenue through the Rouge Park, and that copies of Report PO 12-08 be forwarded to the Regions of York and Durham, the Town of Markham and the Rouge Park Alliance. Report PO 12-08 April 7, 2008 Subject: Comments on Rouge Park Alliance Draft Final Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan Page 3 ')0 A~_ ,j Attachments: 1. Map showing location of lands subject to the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan (map is from Regional Planning Commissioner's Report No. 2008-P-22). 2. Letter from Rouge Park Alliance requesting review and endorsement of the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan. 3. Report No. 2008-P-22 of the Region of Durham Commissioner of Planning Re: Rouge Park Alliance - Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan (text only). Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: 1~ ifJ- Steve Gaunt, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner ~.1?- Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Manager, Policy SG:jf Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering Ci Co Ii ..- ~'''Y'---iilI'''''' '. '1 . ,,__ Vi ~ ' ? . 30 Attachment 1: Map of Subject L~mds in RiOUg~ P~fi~ Legend hUt; Ii o Little Rouge Corridor Public Lands \ \ / \ \ ~ .~ ;\ . \\ : It"- . \ _ ~ _, - Greenbelt (includes Rouge -' ~~ . ~ " ;, j\^".~ , U . '~/\ ~\' ~\9~?<'iA(\ \\~''\\..... \~ ~ \\~\9~~; ~ "'" I V, ---: ...;- ,\,:1"". \ lA'\'lJ' \;\~\ \. ~~~~:~\}e I \ \DJ ;,/,f \\"~ . ~\' ,'",: "';~C?:q7>7>~~\~\}\\}le' \ .;' :;) ;\;*n~ (-:\\(,o~~~~~~~\'O\~\\(); , '4- \01 (/ , '__ . '-- . J t;::\C ,\?> ' \~\of\ ~ ~ ,.~!\.~~ \' ~ \ "\\\\,- j\\. ;'\ .. \ ' --("' , . '\----'... ..-\ ' ". /. 1........- \~~?(\~\ \--'\ \ \. ' '\ p..ve\\\le ,\ \ \ . ____ 'c'ie~ ' \ \ \ \__\..- j~/ \ \ \ /~~ \ .\ ," \ \ \ \\ ..-/ I,."",," \ \ .'~\..--\~ ~i '-_ W) ~~~~~;dliC'!1 \' ,/' \ "~I .~, 11Or(' '/' '\ ' \ f:ivt?tlj :{If;~'\, /"" ' , '.Gk'i ~-+, v /' --'r".1\d~:;'\r.i'L1 'I ~ \, ,,~ d-i hou(ji: ^f ....3rnpgfGUfiJ B (C') ""'.::/ 2007 Provincial Land Dedication Bob Hunter Memorial Park Rouge Parl( Lands Federal Green Space Lands __r- .... , ,-- \ --------- \ \ ...... / ---- J', / -\ -- , So~.cdapte" from map~Jng proviu\d by the Rougerarll Alliance \ \/ \ 't': r.OU9" &'Jch i, _ " ~ Roucre Park b ---~ -------=~':;':,:;:;:,,:;;:~~.'ffi~~, FU 50 31comir;grc(~ ~oad \Nest AurDra, Ontario, CJncca _4G 3G8 o~one 9C5.71J.6C38 Fax SC5.713.6G28 \N'Nw.rouge:':-3 rk.C:J m ~ " /""~..",, .--....,....~"~.-._. ,,~ .~_~~ :r!~~~~\" Wild in the City! , ''.-- -;;~l '-. v December 7, 2007 ') . ~ -I..'; Ms Debi Wilcox Clerk, City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L 1 V 6K7 (: :<.~, tJ.lVJSl'JN Dear Ms Wilcox: Re: Rouge Park Alliance Release of the Draft Final Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan & Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan for Review and Endorsement by March 31,2008 The Rouge Park Alliance is pleased to release the final draft of the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan to its member organizations for review and their endorsement by March 31,2008. The Rouge Park Alliance established a Steering Committee to guide the preparation of the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan, as mandated by the Rouge Park Alliance in the Rouge North Management Plan. ENVision-The Hough Group was retained as the prime consultant and draft versions of the management plan were prepared with significant public and stakeholder involvement. Extensive review and consultation took place at the Steering Committee and with key stakeholders among Rouge Park Alliance member organizations. During the preparation of the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan, the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area was added to Rouge Park by the Ontario Government, and funds were provided for Rouge Park Alliance staff to oversee a master plan for this area which would fit into the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan context. The same consultant team was retained to ensure continuity and integration. It is a more detailed plan with many exciting ecological restoration and visitor experience opportunities. The Rouge Park Alliance has also directed staff to develop a management plan for the Little Rouge East lands that is consistent with the guiding principles in the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master plan. This plan will involve consultation with partners and stakeholders to ensure the integration of all three plans. c..', ',.-C'_"'-' ',-- '.T1~'...,-_V,""" i~'; ~ t, .1 ~ ~"~;1 '..) j\l ~ Implementation of these plans will lead Rouge Park's growth and development over the next decade;"'] while remaining true to the spirit of the original Rouge Park Management Plan. (l994).JfJFHo,Lige.park'j ~Iliance will i~itiate discussions with individual partners and others in tr..~0~:~(futureji'(ci~~~i~~',Eb~-:~~':.,.C:"] L' ,1-) I tat f th I . - .. .!, "., I vlvr;:' _~'c..__ .."'--"" "-" I , Ie L c:V Imp emen Ion 0 e p ans. ..--:,___,.-.m"'--""~""~-:.-'-'-;-'---"-"-'''''1 l. .. . ) I, I It ri,vi" 'i' \ crJ'I I <-,-"-.'. ---T::...'---'--------..'..-l..'--., '-..--.."--.- --~,--,-.~-~.~,~.. i.':::~' 1!J,'d,._._.._ . ~JlUN. PHOi'. 2- lOi'9_.J \COrlP. SERVICES OPERATIONS .f-- ~-.._.__. tCULTUHE &REC. PLANNING & DEV. V CUST CARE PROJ, & POL. ECON, DEVEL. SUPPLY & SERVo FIRE HUMAN RES. t,; 1\t1O:.C:hmcY\t /\vCA\'lO-btc~ {Of ,""". ~' -, ~ i"", 32 .~,c _'~"""''''''",,'__",,'''J.~' 'i . l),; f PiJ~~LiL::.Qg'd' Page 2 of2 The Rouge Park Alliance welcomes your review and anticipates your endorsement of both the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan so we can quickly move forward with their ecological restoration and visitor experience initiatives. . If you have any questions on these plans, please contact Carolyn Woodland at 416-661-6600, extension 5214. Please forward your response to Gord Weeden, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, 50 Bloomington Road West, Aurora, ON, L4G 3G8, by March 31,2008. Sincerely, ) // / /1 . e' lV<.:' I.' t //iZ.-,,{:;L.e?/{.. ~..., .1/" i' 1,__' <o,'....~I,.;. or ,,. Gord Weeden Chair Rouge Park Alliance Ca I n Woodland Chair Little Rouge Corridor Steering Committee Enclosures (Plans & CD) cc: Councillor Jennifer O'Connell, City of Pickering (no enclosures) Tom Melymuk, City of Pickering (no enclosures) " - {.? - The Regional Municipality of Durham To: The Planning Committee From: Commissioner of Planning Report No.: 2008-P-22 Date: March 11, 2008 -, 7 ,).) SUBJECT: I' Rouge Park Alliance - Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan, File A01-50-02 Standing Committee Correspondence No. 2008-06 from Gord Weeden, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance, dated December 7, 2007 RECOMMENDA TIONS: a) THAT the Rouge Park Alliance be requested to revise the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan and Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan, by clearly acknowledging that a future Environmental Assessment undertaking will detail the cross-section, design and alignment for 14th Avenue through the Park; and b ) THAT a copy of Commissioner's Report No. 2008-P-22 be forwarded to the Rouge Park Alliance, the City of Pickering, and the Regional Municipality of York. REPORT: 1. PURPOSE 1.1. The purpose of this report is to: c Provide a historical overview of the Rouge Park and the various documents guiding the management of the Park lands; 01 Outline the key elements of the Little Rouge Corridor (LRC) Management Plan, and the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan; and lD Provide the Region's comments on the two plans. Regional staff participation in the development of these plans was limited given that the lands are wholly within the Region of York. As such, the Region's review was limited to examining the impact of the two plans on 14~ ,<>:'_---'-tfi f'rt ,"" '~'?':'-v 34 E--T:~C:':~,.'~E?J1*! ~i:~ rS)GP ii PD_.~~~:..~^:.2:_,..", Report No.: 2008-P-22 Page NO.2 facilitating cross-boundary transportation connections, and in particular, the realization of the Fifth Concession Road/14th Avenue connection across the Durham/York boundary. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 The Rouge Park traverses the Rouge River, Petticoat Creek and Duffins Creek watersheds (Attachment 1). In 1995, the Province established the Rouge Park Alliance, consisting of representatives from the watershed municipalities (including the Region of Durham and the City of Pickering) and other stakeholders (e.g. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority), with the mandate to ensure the protection, restoration and enhancement of the Park. 2.2 The management of the Rouge Park by the Alliance is currently guided by: . The Rouge Park Management Plan (1994), which serves as a guide to maintain and enhance the ecological and cultural integrity of the features with the Park, with specific emphasis on the management of lands southward from Steeles Avenue to Lake Ontario; and . The Rouge North Management Plan (2001), guiding the extension of the Park northward, from Steeles Avenue to the Oak Ridges Moraine. 2.3 From a transportation infrastructure point of view, the Rouge Park Management Plan prohibits new roads through the Park, south of Steeles Avenue. However, the Rouge North Management Plan recognizes the potential for transportation infrastructure improvements north of Steeles Avenue, and in fact provides guidelines and objectives to be considered for such improvements. Notwithstanding this recognition, in 2002, the Alliance adopted a resolution to discourage the use of any of the Park lands (including lands north of Steeles Avenue) for any new infrastructure. In response to the Alliance's resolution, in March 2003, Regional Council resolved: "THAT the Rouge Park Alliance, be advised that the Region of Durham supports the review and approval of municipal infrastructure projects through the Environmental Assessment Act, as it provides a rigorous and consistent process, which ensures that the values, goals, and objectives for the Rouge Park, expressed in its Management Plans, and alternatives 147 /' ? /j -() 2 .:'; l) "-.J \~/ Report No.: 2008-P-22 Page NO.3 for location are taken into account in the approval of infrastructure projects." 2.4 Since 2003, the Province has dedicated over 2,230 hectares (5,510 acres) of new land for Rouge Park purposes, including the following: . LRC lands (approximately 660 hectares or 1,630 acres), located north of Steeles Avenue - dedicated in 2004 (see Area A in Attachment 1); . . Bob Hunter Memorial Park lands (approximately 200 hectares or 495 acres), located west of the LRC lands and east of the CP Rail (Havelock) line - dedicated in 2005 (see Area B in Attachment 1); and . 2007 Provincial Land Dedication (approximately 600 hectares or 1,485 acres) located in east Markham, east of the LRC lands (see Area C in Attachment 1). With the addition of the above lands, Rouge Park now extends over an area of more than 4,700 hectares (11,600 acres). 2.5 In order to guide the restoration and integration of the LRC lands and the Bop Hunter Memorial Park lands respectively into the Park, the Alliance has prepared and released two Plans: the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan; and the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan. The Alliance is now seeking the Region's review and endorsement of these plans, by the end of March 2008 (Attachment 2). 3. LITTLE ROUGE CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN 3.1 The Management Plan for the LRC lands provides the guiding framework for the restoration and integration of these lands into the larger Park context. The Plan was prepared under the direction of a study Steering Committee, with input from concerned stakeholder groups, local residents and the general public. VVhile Regional Staffwere not part of the Steering Committee, staff provided input on elements of the Plan that have implications from an inter- regional transportation point of view. 3.2 In order for the lands to function as an ecological and recreational corridor, the LRC Management Plan recommends that active efforts be pursued to reduce further fragmentation resulting from road widenings, realignments and 14R ~,< ' ~ "" q. ~ 36 :3 /~ - () q' Report No.: 2008-P-22 Page No.4 other infrastructure improvements. Accordingly, the Plan proposes mitigation measures such as bridges/culverts for wildlife crossings, reduced travel speeds, and facilities to accommodate hikers and cyclists. Consistent with the previous resolution (of 2002) of the Alliance, the Plan discourages new infrastructure through the corridor. 4. BOB HUNTER MEMORIAL PARK AREA MASTER PLAN 4.1 The Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan acts in conjunction with the LRC Management Plan, to protect and restore diverse ecosystems, through the establishment of natural habitat and ecological connections. The Master Plan provides a site plan which details natural heritage features, trails and trailheads, park signage and infrastructure requirements. 4.2 The Master Plan illustrates a potential alignment for 14th Avenue that bisects the Park. Currently, there is a jog at 14th Avenue where it intersects Reesor Road. The Master Plan proposes the realignment of 14th Avenue to eliminate this jog, while improving its future intersection with the Markham By-Pass and the CP Rail crossing. The Plan proposes a two-lane rural cross-section for 14th Avenue in a 20 metre right of way, with multi-use trails on both sides of the road. In order to promote connectivity within the Park, traffic calming measures such as reduced speed limits, several curves in the realignment, and speed bumps, are also proposed. 5. COMMENTS 5.1 While the Region of Durham supports the efforts of the Alliance in the protection and enhancement of the Park, it is important to ensure that the Alliance's management plans do not preclude critical infrastructure projects, which are more appropriately addressed through the provisions of the Environmental Assessment (EA) Act. 5.2 Through the years, the Region has protected for the realignment of the Fifth Concession Road (in Durham) to connect with 14th Avenue (in York) by: . Designating the connection in the Regional Official Plan, as a Type B Arterial road; 149 :2 -,,' 37 [:?< !? Report No.: 2008-P-22 Page NO.5 . Confirming the need for the connection through the Transportation I'vlaster Plan and Development Charge background studies; and . Advocating the inclusion of the connection in the Central Pickering Development Plan, to support the development of the Seaton Community. 5.3 The realignment of the Fifth Concession Road is currently in the Region's Development Charges program, scheduled for implementation during the 2013-2021 timeframe. Also, the Region at York's 10-Year Capital Program includes the potential widening and realignment of 14th Avenue in a 36 metre. right-at-way. To this effect, York Region will soon be initiating an EA study for 14th Avenue between 9th Line and York-Durham Line. 5.4 In the absence of an EA. the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan is proposing a design for 14th Avenue that is inconsistent with Durham Region's position (i.e. that it provide an arterial connection to Fifth Concession Road in Durham). Although it is recognized that the north-south connections for wildlife and trails through the Park are important, and should be incorporated into the road design in some fashion, they should not compromise the intended function of 14th Avenue as a higher-order, four-lane arterial road. 6. CONCLUSION 6.1 Consistent with Regional Council's resolution of March 2003, the Region's position remains that infrastructure matters should be dealt with through the EA process. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Rouge Park Alliance be requested to revise the LRC Management Plan and the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Area Master Plan, by clearly acknowledging that a future Environmental Assessment undertaking will detail the cross-section, design and alignment for 14th Avenue through the Park. /r(;/ A.L Georgieff, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Planning 150 ".~ , - 38 :3 I~ -og Report No.: 2008-P-22 Page NO.6 RECOMMENDED FOR PRESENTATION TO COMMITTEE ~~ Garry H. Cubitt, M.S.W. Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: 1. 2. Map of Subject Lands in Rouge Park Standing Committee Correspondence No. 2008-06 H:\ 1_2\agendas\2008\03-11-08\Liltlerouge. doc 151 REPORT TO PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Report Number: PO 13-08 Date: April 7, 2008 39 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/07 Whitevale Golf Club South Part of Lots 29 & 30, Concession 4 Parts 8 & 9, Plan 40R-18997 (East side of Golf Club Road; South of Fifth Concession Road) City of Pickering Recommendation: 1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/07, submitted by the Whitevale Golf Club on the south Part of Lots 29 and 30, Concession 4, being Parts 8 & 9, Plan 40R-18997, to extend the temporary use zoning for the existing golf practice facility for an additional three-year period from July 29, 2008 to July 29, 2011, be approved, and; 2. Further, that the draft implementing by-law, included with Report PO 13-08 as Appendix I, be forwarded to Council for enactment, following confirmation from the Region of Durham that an extension agreement has been executed. Executive Summary: A zoning by-law amendment application has been submitted to extend the temporary use zoning of the existing golf practice facility on the Whitevale Golf Club site to allow the facility to continue to operate for an additional three-year period from July 29, 2008 to July 29, 2011 (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The golf practice facility use is compatible with the surrounding uses, and its operation will not adversely influence the future development of the site or the surrounding area. It is recommended that the existing temporary use zoning by-law be amended to extend the existing term from its expiry on July 29, 2008, for another three-year term to July 29, 2011, and that a by-law to this effect be forwarded to Council for enactment, following confirmation from the Region of Durham that an agreement has been executed. An appropriate draft amending temporary use zoning by-law is attached to this Report as Appendix I. Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the proposed temporary zoning by-law extension. j"r-'" '11 ~'~ tr- --~ Report PD 13-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Whitevale Golf Club (A 12/07) 40 , Page 2 Sustainability Implications: No negative impacts to water quality have been reported since the submission of the 1999 final environmental impact monitoring report undertaken for these lands. The temporary golf practice facility will continue to provide opportunities for active recreation within the municipality which contributes to a healthy lifestyle for its citizens. Background: 1.0 History The subject property is located southeast of the Hamlet of Whitevale. The subject lands currently support a golf practice facility during the golfing season, in compliance with the existing temporary use zoning by-law. Zoning by-law amendments in 1996, 1999, 2002 and 2005 approved a golf practice facility as a temporary use for three consecutive three-year periods. Whitevale Golf Club proposes to extend the three-year term of the temporary use by-law passed in 2005 for an additional three-year period. The City's Official Plan includes policies specifying when a temporary use by-law may be considered: when a use is intended to exist for a limited time period, when it is desirable to monitor a use for a period of time prior to considering it for permanent zoning; or to permit a use temporarily during the course of a land use study, provided the use will not influence the outcome of the study. A temporary use zoning by-law is considered to be an appropriate mechanism for this application as Durham Regional staff have expressed concern regarding the proximity to the subject lands of a future Type B arterial road connection (identified in the Durham Regional Official Plan) between Fifth Concession Road in the City of Pickering and Fourteenth Avenue in the Town of Markham. This interconnection would support future development in Seaton and the broader Durham area, and provide a bypass of the Hamlet of Whitevale. 2.0 Comments Received 2.1 At the February 4, 2008 Public Information Meeting (see text of Information Report and Meeting Minutes, Attachments #2 & #3) - no comments were received; 2.2 Written Public Submissions on the application - no comments were received; Report PO 13-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Whitevale Golf Club (A 12/07) Page 3 4 1 2.3 Agency Comments Regional Municipality of Durham no objection to the temporary use by-law provided the term of an existing agreement is extended to conform to the term of the temporary use by-law; the agreement permits the Region to purchase any necessary lands for a future arterial road; the execution of an extension agreement between the Region and Whitevale Golf Club is currently In process (see Attachment #4); Toronto and Region Conservation Authority no objections (see Attachment #5); 2.4 City Comments Development Control no comments; Municipal Property & Engineering no comments; No other agency or City department that provided any comments has any objection to the subject application. 3.0 Discussion 3.1 A temporary use by-law is appropriate as it maintains the option for the Region to locate a future arterial road across the subject lands The location of a new arterial road to connect the Fifth Concession Road in Pickering to Fourteenth Avenue in Markham, has not been concluded by the Region of Durham. A temporary use by-law maintains the option for the Region to locate a future road across the subject lands. The environmental assessment for the future Whitevale Road bypass will be incorporated within the Region of Durham's Environmental Assessment for all piped and road infrastructure for the Central Pickering Development Plan Area (Seaton lands). 3.2 Region requires extension of current agreement with Whitevale Golf Club The Region of Durham has requested that an extension agreement be executed between the Region and the Whitevale Golf Club, prior to Council's adoption of the by-law. The extension agreement will coincide with the timeframe of the temporary use by-law and will permit the Region to purchase any necessary lands for a future arterial road. ; ,'.. -i1rilr -,-~~ Report PO 13-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Whitevale Golf Club (A 12/07) 42 3.3 Amendments to the Pickering Official Plan and Permanent Zoning are premature until the location of the arterial road is finalized Page 4 The ultimate location of the Whitevale Road bypass will be determined through an environmental assessment process. Amendments to the Pickering Official Plan and Zoning By-law can be considered to permit the golf practice facility on a permanent basis upon completion of the Region's Environmental Assessment for the Central Pickering Development Plan Area. 3.4 Execution of Agreement required before By-law is forwarded to Council The attached draft by-law, included as Appendix I to this report, implements staff's recommendation to approve the requested "A(T-GPF) - Agricultural - Temporary Golf Practice Facility" Zoning for a further three-year period. It is recommended that, prior to the attached draft by-law being forwarded to Council for enactment, the Region provide confirmation to the Planning & Development Department that the extension agreement between the Region of Durham and Whitevale Golf Club has been executed. 4.0 Applicant's Comments The applicant concurs with the recommendations of this report. Appendix: Appendix I: Draft Implementing By-law Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Text of Information Report No. 06-08 3. Minutes of the February 4, 2008 Public Information Meeting 4. Comments of Regional Planning Department dated February 20, 2008 5. Comments of Toronto and Regional Conservation Authority dated January 17, 2008 Report PO 13-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Whitevaie Golf Club (A 12/07) Page 5 11 3 ~1' ~ Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: RiC~i~~ Planner II "1/ ~. .-; ,- /,- /- ~ - ',:-<rJl:(j~i(!! Neil Carrol r-~I'P, RPP Director, Planning & Development RC:ld Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Gpuncil /f // / i' .' ---......- ---""""""'----,~" "'-;""'1 44 ,__,_~~_ _ d ~ ~ ---=--.,'-': APPENDIX I TO REPORT PD 13-08 DRAFT BY-LAW ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 12/07 -;:;;,',"j THE CORPORATION OF THE CI~~rPICKERING ~ "'\!hl " "",","':"1" "'," ',','''''' ",I 'r'~ l'i ~ri, BY-LAW N U M ~'~R:z' i;;,f~Vj "', :<ii,,)! A "." e.#' ,iJ " Being a By-law to amend Temporary Use Zoning By-law 4825/96, as amended by By-law 6553/05, which amended Zoning By-law 3037, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham on Part of Lots 29 & 30, Concession 4 (Parts 8 & 9, Plan 40R-18997), in the City of Pickering, (A 12/07) 45 WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to extend the temporary three-year term of an existing golf practice facility on Part of Lots 29 & 30, Concession 4 (Parts 8 & 9, Plan 40R18997), in the City of Pickering; AND WHEREAS an amendment to Temporary Use Zoning By-law 4825/96, as amended by By-law 6553/05, which amended By-law 3037, is therefore deemed necessary; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. TEXT AMENDMENT Section 5 is hereby repealed and replaced with the following: 5. PROVISIONS Temporary Uses Permitted ("A(T-GPF)" Zone) Despite any provision of By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 3155/89, the lands designated "A(T -GPF)" and shown hatched on Schedule I attached to this By-law may be used for a golf practice facility until July 29, 2011. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This By-law shall come into force In accordance with the provIsions of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first, second, and third time and finally passed this 'i:.l 'I " ':1 :;' I day of ,2008. David Rya'n, Mayor ,,', !. \ ~~ J ,\ ,I I \ ,,: }j '; ":).) f \ Debi A. Wilcox, City Clerk "j ,-'M-T ~--~ 46 ATTACHMENT #, TO RE?ORT 1/ PO 13 -oB I ~ LA DS SUBJECT ]]0 ZO ING AMENDMt:.NT APPLlCA TION ' (A 12/07) EXISTING WHITEVALE GOLF COURSE o ~ y ~ ~ City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CON 4, S PT LOT 29,30, RP 40R-18997, PART 1,2 OWNER WHITEVALE GOLF CLUB FILE No. A12/07 DATE DEC. 20, 2007 SCALE 1 :5000 DRAWN BY JB CHECKED BY CP l' tv a 0 our-ces; Tcranet Enterpriscs Inc. end its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not 0 plan of survey. . 2005 MPAC and its suppliers. All rights Rescrved. Not 0 plan of Survey. PN-RUR 2. 1:,) Ii h; 47 CitJI 0# INFORMATION REPORT NO. 06-08 FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF February 4, 2008 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 SUBJECT: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/07 Whitevale Golf Club 2985 Golf Club Road South Part of Lots 29 & 30, Concession 4 (Parts 8 & 9, 40R-18997) City of Pickering 1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION - the property is located southeast of the Hamlet of Whitevale (see Attachment #1 - Location Map); - the site has an approximate area of 12 hectares, without road frontage; a golf practice facility has been operating on these lands during the golfing season for the last eleven years, in compliance with the existing temporary zoning by-law; - the property is surrounded by field crops to the north and west, and to the east are valley lands associated with a tributary of the Duffins Creek. 2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL - the applicant proposes to amend the zoning by-law to permit the continuance of a Golf Practice Facility for an additional three year period, as was previously approved through Temporary Use By-law 6553/05; - Whitevale Golf Club intends to seek a permanent rezoning and official plan amendment with the City of Pickering, to include an extension of the golf club and associated uses to the north, once the location of a Regional arterial road planned near the property has been resolved. i' ! .. .-0 n':i~U'n '7 "- Information Report No. 06-08 48 Page 2 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan designates the property as Living Area and Major Open Space; golf courses are permitted within these designations provided they are compatible with their surroundings and are sensitive to the environment by minimizing impacts on watercourses, wetlands, groundwater resources or other environmentally sensitive features; a future Regional arterial road connection is proposed through this property to improve east-west connections through Durham Region; Whitevale Golf Club entered into an agreement with the Region of Durham to use the portion of the lands required for the future Regional arterial road connection for use as a Golf Practice Facility which will be transferred to the Region when the road alignment has been determined - this agreement expires July 29, 2008; 3.2 Pickering Official Plan designates the property as Agricultural Areas; this designation does not permit golf courses and associated uses, however, the City's Official Plan policies for temporary use by-laws permit uses that do not conform to the land use policies of the Plan to operate for a period up to three years; 3.3 Zoning By-law 3037 the property is currently zoned "A(T-GPF)" - Agricultural - Temporary Golf Practice Facility Zone under By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6553/05; this zoning category permits a golf practice facility on a temporary basis until July 29, 2008; an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to extend the golf practice facility use for a further three year period. 4.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULA liON 4.1 Resident Comments no written resident comments have been received to date; 4.2 Agency Comments Toronto and Region Conservation Authority no objections (see Attachment #2); Information Report No. 06-08 Page 3 49 4.3 Staff Comments 4.3.1 Temporary Use By-law Provisions Section 15.20 of the Pickering Official Plan identifies that temporary use by-laws may be considered when a use is intended to exist for only a limited amount of time and establishes that prior to enactment of a temporary use by-law, City Council must be satisfied that the use will not prejudice the future development of the lands and the surrounding area; the City's Official Plan policies also establish that City Council may pass temporary use by-laws for a period up to three years to permit a specific use of land whether or not that use conforms to the Plan; the Environment Assessment for the future Whitevale Road bypass will now be incorporated within the Region of Durham's Environmental Assessment for all piped and road infrastructure for the Central Pickering Development Plan Area (Seaton lands) which could affect the land area of the Whitevale Golf Club; a temporary use zoning by-law is appropriate in this instance because it would be premature to consider permanent zoning and official plan amendment until the Region of Durham confirms the location of the proposed Type B arterial road connection between Fifth Concession Road in the City of Pickering and Fourteenth Avenue in the Town of Markham and the numerous environmental assessments have been completed; Staff require comments from the Region of Durham respecting the status of the agreement with the Region for use of a portion of the lands required for a future Regional arterial road connection; the Planning & Development Department will conclude its position on the application after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public. 5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department; oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Councilor a Committee of Council; if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal; if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you must request such in writing to the City Clerk. .:;-r- ~--- r ~ -'. -r - -~- 'r' 1" ::>l ~ ' - -j Information Report No. 06-08 ~O v 6.0 OTHER INFORMATION '1 . P-::-.. . . 3 ~n J, -l.!i{.) Page 4 6.1 Appendix No. I list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing report; 6.2 Information Received - full scale copies of the Applicant's submitted plan are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department; 6.3 Company Principal - the applicant advises that the President of Whitevale Golf Club is Walter Lemon. ORIGINAL SIG~~D 'BY ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Rick Cefaratti Planner II Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review RC:jf Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development 2- i.::,;~)Er ~ APPENDIX NO. I TO INFORMATION REPORT NO. 06-08 COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS (1) none received to date COMMENTING AGENCIES (1) Toronto and Region Conservation Authority - January 8, 2008 COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS (1) none received to date 5 1 '- I <or ,'-T" '," " "~, 'T fI' , ::< 'TO ,". ",-,.",i-I"..C.)\',t._",,~_' ;:::;.Jcm II PD~__.. Excerpts from the Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, February 4, 2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor O'Connell (I) PART 'A' - PLANNING INFORMATION MEETING 2. Information Report 06-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/07 Whitevale Golf Club 2985 Golf Club Road South Part of Lots 29 & 30, Concession 4 (Parts 8 & 9, 40R-18997) City of Pickerinq A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to an application submitted by Whitevale Golf Club for property municipally known as 2985 Golf Club Road. Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Meeting under the Planning Act. She also noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City before a by-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Rick Cefaratti, Planner II, gave an overview of zoning amendment application A 12/07. No members of the public in attendance at the public information meeting spoke in support or opposition to Application A 12/07. 1 The Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Deparlment 605 ROSSLAND ROAD E 4'" FLOOR PO BOX 623 WHITBY, ON L 1N 6A3 (905) 668-7711 Fax (905) 666-6208 E-mail: planning@ region.durham.on.ca www.region.durham.onca L' flu IJ.o8 53 February 20, 2008 Rick Cefaratti, Planner II Planning and Development Department City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L 1 V 6K7 Sent via email to: rcefaratti@citV.pickerinq.on.ca Mr. Cefaratti: Re: Zoning Amendment Application A 12/07 Applicant: Whitevale Golf Course Location: 2985 Golf Club road South Part of Lots 29 and 30, Concession 4 East of Golf Club Road; South of Concession 5 City of Pickering A.L. Georgieff, MCIP, RPP We have reviewed this application to permit the continuation of a driving Commissioner of Planning range as a temporary use on the Whitevale Golf Course property in Pickering. The following comments are offered. "Service Excellence for our Communities" In June of 2002, the Region of Durham entered into an agreement with the Whitevale Golf Club to address EA and other requirements associated with a potential alignment of a future Type B Arterial Road through the subject lands. The agreement stipulates that Whitevale Golf Club must obtain the Region's approval to initiate any Planning Act applications to amend the zoning and/or Official Plans affecting the subject lands site or apply for a building permit. The EA process and the preferred solution/design for the proposed road will determine whether the Region needs to acquire a road alignment through the subject site. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Region can purchase the required lands from Whitevale at a price that does not include the costs of land improvements associated with the driving range and/or the irrigation reservoir. An amendment to this agreement on January 1, 2006 allows the development of an irrigation reservoir on the affected lands. The amended agreement is scheduled to terminate on July 29, 2008, prior to the Region determining the need for the road alignment. We have no objection to the proposed temporary use by-law following an extension of the above noted Agreement between the Region and ,-, ,- ''/- -" ''''~~-11'ifl'il1:1 54 4 13 "'DB Whitevale Golf Club. The Regional Legal Department will proceed to execute an extension agreement with Whitevale Golf Club. Please contact me should you have any questions or require further information regarding this matter. O~m~Wl Dwayne Campbell, Project Planner Current Planning cc: Pete Castellan, Regional Works Department Cindy Boyd, Regional Legal Department (....~'.i"... r TORONTO AND RfG/ONt;y-. t/Lonserva Ion for The Living City 5 l3 --0 8 ~"~ 'W""" ?"lot""" J"'J. il"'" ..[" ""'., -' ,,", f'" ','I._~";;'''' ';~. 'ii"'~. j ] 4="", ~.L '...."", "'~ 5.5 i;\ \' 1 'j'" ;n *'" ; ~ ~. "- ~.J CITY OF PJCV:Eri!r.jG PL'\i'l!'!]:'iC; ,; DE"iELCP\'1E:JT OE?.-IRT.\IE,'lJT January 8, 2007 CFN 38708.08 X-REF CFN 36646.01 BY FAX AND MAIL Rick Cefaratti, Planner II City of Pickering One the Esplanade Pickering, ON L 1 V 6K7 Dear Mr. Cefaratti: RE: Zoning Amendment Application A 12/07 2985 Golf Club Road Whitevale Golf Course City of Pickering Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) acknowledges receipt of the above application. TRCA staff has reviewed the application and offer the following comments. It is our understanding of the application that the applicant is seeking permission to amend the zoning by- law to permit the continuance of a golf practice facility on a temporary basis. TRCA staff previously reviewed and commented on the temporary zoning by-law which was passed in 1999, and subsequent extension applications in 2002 and 2005. In review of the current zoning amendment application under TRCA's Ontario Regulation 166/06, the location of the golf practice facility is not located within the Regulated Area. However, TRCA staff would request review of any further expansion as there is a significant valley feature adjacent to the current facility. In light of the above, TRCA staff have no objection to the proposed zoning amendment application. We trust that this is of assistance. Please contact me should you have any further questions. 7;;J;Jfj d&rLon McNeill BA. BURPI Planner I Planning and Development Extension 5744 CJ/sm ..e(} Cc: 4eva,e Golf Course, Owner Steve Heuchert, TRCA f: \home \pu bl ic\development services\d urh am r%li8Ril[}3~e6ir g,~lY)JV~Ye!H AlHlf fYNrlri'(90c .".,pe==""~...~_.,.,.,..,-,,,..,__,.,,..ft,,,.'..n""=H~_~.....=..nu,=',,,~'''.''''''''_'n_=--~""~"~_-"-""~""""~",~~~-=''''''.''''''''''''~''-'_~=<<T~'''''''''-'''''''''--",,,,-,,,,,,,,,"""-",,",,,,"~_,>,"~="'~''''-'=-r-=r.''''',",'''~,'~~",_''''''''''-'' 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 1 S4 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on.ca a. ~~~\ --1 ,- -~ ~,-- ~ , ~ -. ~"-- '( 'J-' Cit'l 01 56 REPORT TO PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Report Number: PO 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2002-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/02 Anthony DeBruin Part of Lots 5, 6 & 10, and Lots 7, 8 & 9, Plan 820 & Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041 City of Pickering Recommendation: 1. That Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2002-04 submitted by Anthony DeBruin, on lands being Part of Lots 5, 6 & 10, and Lots 7, 8 & 9, Plan 820, and Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041, City of Pickering, to permit the development of a plan of subdivision, be approved, subject to the conditions outlined in Appendix I to Report PO 14-08, and; 2. Further, that Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/02 submitted by Anthony DeBruin, on lands being Part of Lots 5, 6 & 10, and Lots 7, 8 & 9, Plan 820, and Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041, City of Pickering, to establish performance standards to permit the development of a plan of subdivision for detached dwelling units, be approved generally as outlined in the draft by-law attached as Appendix II to Report PO 14-08. Executive Summary: The applicant proposes to develop a draft plan of subdivision consisting of 25 lots for detached dwelling units. The plan introduced a new internal road which will eventually connect to Wingarden Crescent. It is recommended that the applications be approved, and that the draft by-law include provisions which implement the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development & Design Guidelines. It is further recommended that the draft by-law be forwarded to City Council for enactment upon submission of a Draft 40M Plan to the Planning & Development Department which clearly identifies the property boundaries of the proposed subdivision. Report PO 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Page 2 r 7 ,) , Several supplementary information meetings, including a resident working group meeting, were held for this application. At the resident working group meeting held on March 6, 2008, consensus was achieved to include certain conditions of approval to address specific concerns of the residents. The recommended applications propose development that is compatible with the surrounding land uses and the lotting pattern is consistent with existing residential development in the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. The recommended development is considered appropriate as it implements the Official Plan. Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the proposed development, however, staff time will be required to monitor traffic movements following construction of the new road serving the proposed residential development. Sustainability Implications: This development proposal is an infill project that provides for residential intensification, makes efficient use of vacant lands, and takes advantage of existing infrastructure within the City's urban residential area. It is located in close proximity to public transit, and provides for connectivity to facilitate future infill development of the abutting lands to the north. The proposal further assists in the diversion of growth pressures away from non-urban designated lands. Background: 1.0 Introduction Anthony DeBruin submitted applications for approval of a draft plan of subdivision and an amendment to the zoning by-law in order to implement a proposed draft plan of subdivision on the subject lands (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The original draft plan of subdivision proposed the creation of up to 27 lots for detached dwellings (see Attachment #2, Original Draft Plan), however, the comments contained within this report pertain to a revised draft plan that would create up to 25 lots for detached dwellings. Four lots provide frontages of 15.0 metres and the remaining twenty-one lots provide frontages ranging between 12.5 and 13.5 metres. The draft plan proposes the creation of one new municipal street, being the southerly extension of Wingarden Crescent. All of the dwelling units will front onto a municipal street. The applicant's revised draft plan of subdivision and Staff's recommended plan is provided for reference (see Attachment #3). --"fli ~- UI~--", Report PO 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & 5 8 Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Page 3 2.0 Comments Received 2.1 At the February 20, 2003, Public Information Meeting Twelve area residents attended the meeting to voice their concern with issues related to the number of dwellings being proposed, consistency between the proposal and the Dunbarton Guidelines, drainage, increased vehicular traffic and suggested that Council consider how the development fits into the overall neighbourhood (see text of Information Report and Meeting Minutes, Attachments #4 and #5). The Ward Councillor recommended that an informal working group be arranged and directed staff to call a community meeting with the applicant to deal with concerns. 2.2 Additional meetings held following the Statutory Public Information Meeting Limited progress occurred on the subject applications between the period of the February 20, 2003 Statutory Public Information Meeting and May 1, 2007. Due to the length of time of inactivity on the applications, Planning & Development staff held a supplemental information meeting to advise the surrounding area residents on the progress of the applicant's proposal. Supplemental Information Meeting Held At the July 23, 2007, Supplemental Information Meeting, (see text of Supplemental Information Report and Meeting Minutes, Attachments #6 and #7) several area residents attended in objection to the proposed applications stating their concerns with increased traffic volumes, density and that some of the information or studies submitted were outdated. A number of written submissions in opposition to the subject applications were also submitted at this meeting. Community Meeting Held Following the Supplemental Information Meeting, the Ward Councillors organized a Community Information Meeting on February 5, 2008 to further update the residents of the progress of the applications. Nick Lazaridis of Louisville Homes attended and advised that he had entered into an agreement with Anthony DeBruin to purchase the subject lands. He advised he provided the City with updated traffic analysis information indicating that the intersection location of the proposed street with Goldenridge Road will function appropriately and staff concur with the findings of the updated report. He further noted that preliminary grading information requested by the Planning & Development Department was submitted for review. Report PO 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Page 4 59 The information demonstrates that the proposed development of these lands would not adversely impact adjacent properties and that Lots 10 to 16 can be developed as proposed while maintaining the City of Pickering's lot grading criteria and without excessive use of retaining walls or structures. Several area residents in attendance repeated their dissatisfaction with the lack of involvement in the planning process on these applications, traffic, construction management and the design of the proposed dwellings. Maurice Brenner, Community Advocate, recommended that traffic calming measures for Fairport Road and the intersection of the proposed street and Goldenridge Road be considered and implemented prior to any draft plan approval. Grant Morris of Grant Morris Associates attended on behalf of three property owners to the north of the proposed development expressing his objection to the proposed road pattern. Mr. Morris suggested that the road pattern proposed by the application differed from the conceptual proposed road connections illustrated in the Official Plan policies for the Dunbarton Neighbourhood and the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines (see Attachment #8). It was recommended that an informal working group, comprised of area residents and staff, be created to better address the various issues that were raised since the applications were submitted. Resident Working Group Meeting Held A resident meeting was held on March 6, 2008 to discuss the following issues raised by the Resident Working Group: consideration of a coordinated approach for development of all lands on the west side of Fairport Road including consistent design, interconnectivity of roadways and optimum traffic movement; ensuring that infill development in the neighbourhood conforms to potential future traffic calming plans; determining whether a portion of the required development charges can be earmarked/isolated for neighbourhood improvements including urban design improvements, traffic movement, park improvements; determining whether a tot lot or parkette could be integrated centrally into the development to serve all infill development on the West side of Fairport Road; demonstration of how a dwelling would be sited on the proposed flankage lot facing Fairport Road; grading plans demonstrating that drainage is managed on site without adversely impacting abutting property owners; "i' - ~'l>tt ~ ....... {'-tt '-';i", Report PO 14-08 Date: April 7,2008 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & , .. . 6 croning Amendment Application A 23/02 Page 5 requiring fencing adjacent to abutting properties and wooden fencing and landscaping along the south lot line of the development abutting Welrus Street; confirmation that Welrus Street can be used for temporary construction access; submission of a Tree Preservation Plan which maintains mature trees and replaces mature trees with similar ones where removal is required to facilitate the proposed subdivision; confirmation that the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Design Guidelines will be followed. A cooperative approach of addressing these matters occurred and compromises were achieved. Staff recommend that certain conditions of approval are required to address some specific matters while others were resolved. The details of staffs response to these issues are found in Section 3.0 of this report. 2.3 Agency Comments Region of Durham Planning Department the proposal is permitted by the policies of the Durham Region Official Plan; municipal water supply and sanitary sewer service can be provided; the applications have been screened in accordance with Provincial Interests and Delegated Review and there is no concern with the applications; the Region has no objection to the applications and has provided condition of approval (see Attachment #9); reviewed Noise Impact Study prepared by HGC Engineering Ltd., and found it to be generally acceptable; request that the Subdivision Agreement include provisions that will implement recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (see Attachment #10); Toronto and Region Conservation Authority the property is not located within the Authority's Fill Regulated Area; with exception to a limited amount of mature trees on the site for wildlife use, the site is not very well connected to other natural features and does not appear to be very high in quality; Report PO 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Page 6 61 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority ( continued) should forward a Stormwater Management Report to the TRCA for review; a preliminary analysis fee payment remains outstanding (see Attachment #11); CN Rail owner is required to insert a warning clause in all development agreements, offers to purchase, agreements of Purchase and Sale and in a Noise Impact Statement (see Attachment #12); Durham District School Board approximately 14 pupils could be generated by the proposed subdivision; no objections; Durham Catholic District School Board projected student yield is 4 students; no objections; No other agency that provided any comments has any objection to the subject applications. Certain technical issues and requirements related to the proposed use of the site can be addressed during the subdivision approval process, if this application is approved. 2.4 City Departments Development Control Servicing and Stormwater Management Report is required to address quality, quantity and erosion controls for this site and future upstream drainage; preliminary Grading Plan required that confirms Lots 11 to 17 can be developed as proposed maintaining City of Pickering lot grading criteria and without excessive use of retaining walls or structures (Note: since this comment was made, a preliminary grading plan was received which demonstrates Lots 10 to 16 can be developed without excessive use of retaining walls or structures); Geotechnical and Noise Attenuation Reports required; Sediment and Erosion Control Plan required; Report PO 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: 62 Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Page 7 Development Control (continued) Construction Management Plan required; applicant is required to enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the City that addresses, but is not limited to, roads, sidewalks, servicing, lot grading, fencing, tree planting, street lighting, utilities, stormwater management, construction management, cost sharing, cost recovery, financial obligations, securities, insurance, etc (see Attachment #13); Municipal Property & Engineering - Traffic Report prepared by Cansult has been reviewed and the proposed intersection meets the mInimum requirements for spacing and site distance (see Attachment #14); cash-in-lieu of Parkland required; Stormwater Management Report required (see Attachment #15); 3.0 Discussion The Proposed Density/Number of Dwelling Units is Appropriate The subject property is designated Urban Residential Area - Low Density Area in the Pickering Official Plan, which establishes a density range of up to and including 30 dwellings per net hectare. Based on the proposed 25 lots for detached dwellings and a site area of 1.2 hectares, the density for this development is 20.8 dwelling units per net hectare. The recommended applications comply with the Official Plan and represent an appropriate density of development for the subject lands. The Proposed Lot Frontages and Road Pattern are Compatible with the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development & Design Guidelines The frontages for the lots fronting the proposed internal road range between 12.0 metres and 15.0 metres which complies with the development standards outlined in the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development & Design Guidelines. The lot frontage for the flankage lot that fronts Fairport Road is proposed to be 13.5 metres. The Guidelines establish that a minimum lot frontage 15.0 metres is required for all new lots facing existing roads. As this lot is a corner lot where the functional frontage would be provided on the future street, staff consider the reduced frontage for one flankage lot to be acceptable without requiring an amendment to the Guidelines. Report PO 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Page 8 6,3 The resident working group expressed concerned with frontage on Fairport Road. However upon the applicant providing a site layout identifying access from the internal street, the residents were satisfied with the reduced frontage. The maps and schedules of the Official Plan and Compendium Document are conceptual and are provided for information purposes to assist the user to better understand the goals and objectives of the Plan. The Dunbarton Neighbourhood Map (see Attachment #16) in the Official Plan and the Concept Plan (see Attachment #17) within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development & Design Guidelines illustrate a future extension of Wingarden Crescent and Shademaster Drive southward to ultimately connect to Fairport Road. The intent of the illustrations is to ensure that a future connection of these roads is achieved. Based on a request by staff, the applicant submitted a conceptual plan to address how the road pattern would meet the intent of the Guidelines. Although the road pattern for the draft plan differs slightly from the road pattern shown in the Neighbourhood Plan, it does not prevent the extension of Wingarden Crescent or Shademaster Drive southward, and therefore does not affect the ability of the landowners to the north in developing their properties (see Attachment #18). Further, due to grading constraints, the proposed location of the north westerly portion of the future street proposed by the applicant would minimize the use of retaining walls or structures throughout that portion of the development. Consideration was given to a more westerly alignment of the north leg of the future street, to locate it further west along the rear yards of existing lots fronting Spruce Hill Road. However this option would require use of retaining walls and is not recommended by staff. Traffic Calming Plan for Fairport Road has not been Approved Resident concern has been voiced over traffic matters related to Fairport Road, including a request for traffic calming. Any traffic calming plan for Fairport Road would need to be reviewed and approved by Council prior to implementation. Staff are aware that a resident group has been organized in the Dunbarton Neighbourhood to investigate traffic calming measures, however, there are no current Council adopted/approved traffic calming measures for Fairport Road. Should Council establish a need to incorporate such elements in the future, Municipal Property & Engineering advise that no additional lands would be required from the applicant at the intersection of the proposed future street with Fairport Road. Condition 2.3.16 of the Recommended Conditions for Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 requires the applicant to satisfy the City financially and otherwise for a contribution to the cost of installation of future neighbourhood traffic related improvements should such measures be approved by Council prior to registration of the draft plan. <~t'r1'_p '1(R;-.~ '- ~I~ y'.-- Report PO 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 I I, 64 Page 9 Future Development Charges collected on this proposed plan of subdivision cannot be isolated for neighbourhood improvements The residentworking group recommended that development charges be isolated for improvement for this neighbourhood. Development charges collected at the building permit stage for the proposed plan of subdivision cannot be earmarked or isolated for specific neighbourhood improvements such as urban design improvements, traffic movement or park improvements. The Development Charge allocation is based on the recommendations from a Development Charge Study coordinated by the City's Finance Department. The Development Charge Study is prepared with input from the Planning & Development Department and other City Departments. Only projects listed in the Development Charge Study receive financial allocation. Development charges allow for the recovery of costs for services attributable to growth. Where the development of the land would increase the need for municipal services, the development charges allow the City to recover costs incurred as a result of this specific development. The integration of Tot lot or parkette not supported by staff The resident working group recommended the introduction of a tot lot. The Dunbarton Community Plan identifies a tot lot at Bonita Drive/Fairport Road and this tot lot has been constructed. Based on the size of the proposed subdivision and location of other existing larger parks in the surrounding area, introduction of a tot lot or parkette development area is not recommended by Municipal Property & Engineering Division. Preliminary Grading Plans demonstrate appropriate' storm water management measures Based on a preliminary grading plan reviewed by staff, site drainage can be appropriately managed without adversely impacting abutting property owners and minimizing the use of retaining walls, in accordance with the City of Pickering's Lot Grading Criteria. Prior to any development occurring on these lands, the applicant will be required to submit a formal grading and control plan to the satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development (see Recommended Conditions 2.3.2). Report PO 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Page 10 ~ r:-) '..- ~ Tree Preservation Plan Not Required The resident working group request a tree preservation plan. A tree inventory plan prepared by Owen Brother was reviewed by staff in February 2006. Based on the analysis of the findings, the majority of the trees that exist on this property are 30 year old White Ash and Manitoba Maple species. The majority of these trees are considered re-growth. With the exception of a limited amount of mature trees on the site for wildlife use, the site is not very well connected to other natural features and does not appear to be very high in quality. Although it may be beneficial to preserve some vegetation along the perimeter of this development for marketing purposes, a tree preservation plan is not warranted at this time. Based on discussions between the applicant and the resident working group at the meeting held March 6, 2008, the applicant has agreed to preserve any mature vegetation on the property, where possible. Applicant agrees to install wood privacy fencing abutting 1794 Fairport Road The applicant has agreed to install a wood privacy fence where the proposed subdivision abuts the rear and south lot lines of the property located at 1794 Fairport Road (see Attachment #3). 3.1 Technical Matters Fencing of the Site is Required Proposed residential lots will be required to be fenced where they abut Welrus Street and Lot 1 of the plan must be fenced in accordance with the recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (see Attachment #3). At the resident working group meeting, the area residents requested that the applicant and staff consider a landscapin~J treatment for Welrus Street similar to the Coughlin Homes-Pine Creek 1 development. Due to grading constraints and a smaller boulevard width, adjacent to Walrus Road, it is not practical to consider the same landscaping treatment for the north side of Welrus Street. However, it is recommended that a combination of landscaping and architectural board fencing be provided adjacent to Welrus Street. A landscape plan will be required to address fence details and planting details adjacent to Welrus Street (see Recommended Condition 2.3.10). ~_." ....~. " ~~ Report PD 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 66 Page 11 Welrus Street to be used for Temporary Construction Access Based on the existing grades along Welrus Street, temporary construction access on this street can be provided approximately 50 metres west of the centerline of the Fairport Road right-of-way. The exact location of the temporary construction access will be determined through a required Construction Management Plan (see Recommended Condition 2.3.6). Existing Traffic Control (Stop Sign) at the intersection of Welrus Street and Fairport Road to remain Municipal Property and Engineering staff advise that relocating the All-Way Stop controls further north to a new four way intersection of the future internal street, Goldenridge Road and Fairport Road is not warranted at this time, however it would assist current residents of Goldenridge Road and future residents of the new internal street with easier access to Fairport Road. Traffic controls will be monitored following completion of the subdivision. Subdivision Agreement will be required to Address Development A subdivision agreement between the City and the owner of the lands will be required as a condition of approval to ensure that all matters of interest to the City are protected. This required agreement, and several other development implementation matters, are incorporated into the recommended conditions of approval for this application and are found in Appendix I to this Report. Cash-in-Lieu of Parkland As there are no park blocks required within the draft plan, the City will require cash-in lieu from the subdivider in order to satisfy Section 42(1) of the Planning Act. Amending Zoning By-law The draft amending zoning by-law provided in Appendix II incorporates the development standards established in the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development & Design Guidelines and maintains building setbacks consistent with recent subdivision standards in the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. The applicant requests special consideration for the proposed flankage lot facing Fairport Road. A minimum lot frontage of 13.5 metres and a minimum front yard depth of 6.0 metres is proposed for the flankage lot, whereas the Development Guidelines establish a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres and a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres on existing roads. The amending zoning by-law incorporates this special consideration for the single flankage lot. Report PO 14-08 Date: ADril 7, 2008 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Page 12 67 The draft amending zoning by-law proposes a minimum lot frontage requirement of 12.0 metres for all lots fronting the future internal road, in accordance with the Development Guidelines, however, the staff recommended plan indicates that the proposed lot frontages would range between 12.5 metres and 15.0 metres. The draft amending by-law will not be forwarded to City Council until conditions of Draft Approval have been issued and the applicant submits a draft 40M Plan to establish the exact boundaries of the draft plan and establish frontages in accordance with the recommended plan. 4.0 Applicant's Comments The applicant has been advised of the recommendations of this report and supports the staff recommendation. APPENDICES: APPENDIX I: APPENDIX II: Recommended Conditions of Approval for SP-2002-04 Draft Implementing Zoning By-law for A 23/02 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Original Draft Plan of Subdivision 3. Revised Draft Plan of Subdivision 4. Text of Information Report - February 20, 2003 5. Minutes from February 20, 2003, Statutory Public Information Meeting 6. Text of Supplementary Information Meeting - July 23, 2007 7. Minutes from July 23, 2007 Council Meeting 8. Correspondence and proposed Concept Plan from Grant Morris Associates Ltd. 9. Agency Comments - Region of Durham Planning Department (March 12,2003) 10. Agency Comments - Region of Durham Planning Department (April 20, 2004) 11. Agency Comments - TRCA 12. Agency Comments - CN Rail 13. City Department Comment - Development Control 14. City Department Comment -- Municipal Property & Engineering (December 18, 2007) 15. City Department Comment - Municipal Property & Engineering (June 19, 2003) 16. Dunbarton Neighbourhood Map 17. Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines Chart and Concept Plan 18. Applicant's Conceptual Road Pattern 1"'1 '.. .- ~ Report PO 14-08 Date: April 7, 2008 6f) Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Page 13 Subject: Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: ~~-"-- " ;,1 /" ) , .<;~~{/ .,/'eP";l <.' ~.., /.:-..~... ......~ .-;. ....' ."// ;'::;;.;' I ~. . ..<-.(y(y{f~ ,. Neii Car' J"1CI8(~PP Director, Planning & Development RC:ld Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City/Council .-.;:::< // APPENDIX I TO REPORT PO 14-08 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION SP-2002-04 -q 6/ 7 J RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR i l_ DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION SP-2002-04 1.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.1 That this recommendation apply to the draft plan prepared by Politis Engineering Ltd., dated December 2007, on lands being Part of Lots 5, 6 and 10, and all of Lots 7, 8, and 9, Plan 820, and Part Lot.49, Plan 1041 City of Pickering, to permit the development of 25 detached dwellings on the subject lands. 2.0 PRIOR TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE PLAN: 2.1 That the owners submit a Draft 40M-Plan to be approved by the City's Planning & Development Department; 2.2 That the implementing by-law for Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/02 become final and binding; 2.3 That the owner enter into a subdivision agreement with and to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering to ensure the fulfillment of the City's requirements, financial and otherwise, which shall include, but not necessarily be limited to the following: 2.3.1 Storm Drainaqe (a) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting a stormwater drainage and management system to service all the lands in the subdivision, and any provisions regarding easements; (b) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department for contributions for down stream stormwater management; 2.3.2 Grading Control and Soils (a) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting submission and approval of a grading and control plan; (b) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting the submission and approval of a geotechnical soils analysis; (c) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting the submission and approval of an Archaeological Assessment; 2.3.3 Road Allowances (a) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting construction of roads with curbs, storm sewers, sidewalks and boulevard designs; - 2 - (b) Street A shall be named "\Ningarden Crescent" and signage to be 7 1 provided to the satisfaction of Municipal Property & Engineering Division; 2.3.4 Construction / Installation of City V'/orks & Services (a) satisfaction of the City respecting arrangements for the provision of all services required by the City; (b) satisfaction of the appropriate authorities respecting arrangements for the provision of underground wiring, street lighting, cable television, natural gas and other similar services; (c) that the cost of any relocation, extension, alteration or extraordinary maintenance of existing services necessitated by this development shall be the responsibility of the subdivider; 2.3.5 Dedications / Transfers I Conveyances (a) that the owner convey to the City, at no costs: (i) any easements as required; and; (ii) any reserves as required by the City; (b) that the subdivider convey any easement to any utility to facilitate the installation of their services in a location(s) to the satisfaction of the City and the utility; 2.3.6 Construction ManaQement Plan (a) that the owner make satisfactory arrangements with the City respecting a construction management plan, such Plan to contain, among other things: (i) details of erosion and sedimentation controls during all phases of construction and provide maintenance requirements to maintain these controls; (ii) addressing the parking of vehicles and the storage of construction and building materials during servicing and house construction, and ensuring that such locations will not impede the flow of traffic or emergency vehicles on either existing streets or the proposed public street; (iii) insurance that the City's Noise By-law will be adhered to and that all contractors, trades and suppliers are advised of this By-law; (iv) the provision of mud and dust control on all roads within and adjacent to the site; (v) type and timing of construction fencing; (vi) location of construction trailers; (vii) details of the temporary construction access to be located on Welrus Street; ......._^_. .. - 3 - ',72 I 'I t 2.3.8 Development Charqes (a) satisfaction of the City financially with respect to the Development Charges Act. 2.3.9 Coordinated Development (a) satisfaction of the City with respect to arrangements necessary to provide for coordination of services and roads with adjacent lands and any phasing of development that may be required; (b) satisfaction of the City with respect to the disposition of future development blocks and acquisition of abutting severed parcels prior to draft plan registration; 2.3.10 Fencinq (a) satisfaction of the City with respect to the provision of temporary fencing around the entire perimeter of the subject lands during construction, prior to the commencement of any works; (b) the owner agrees to submit a Landscape Fencing Plan, with respect to the provision of a fence and landscaping adjacent to Welrus Street, to the satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department; (c) the owner agrees to install a wood privacy fence where the subject lands abut the south and west lot lines of 1794 Fairport Road; 2.3.11 Street Tree Plantinq (a) the submission of a street tree planting plan to the satisfaction of the City; 2.3.12 Desiqn Planninq (a) satisfy the Director, Planning & Development respecting a report outlining siting and architectural design objectives for the development, and the submission of site plans and architectural drawings identifying how each unit meets the objectives of the report, prior to the issuance of any building permit for the construction of a residential unit on the lands; (b) the report outlining siting and architectural design objectives for the development must address building envelopes, building designs, siting, and streetscapes as well as garage designs, locations, massing, width, and projection from the main dwelling; - 4 - (c) that the owner satisfy the City respecting the provIsion of appropriate aesthetic details and design of all boundary fencing and noise attenuation fencing; 7' , ,) 2.3.13 Noise Attenuation (a) that the owner satisfy the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment regarding the approval of a noise study recommending noise control features to the satisfaction of the Region of Durham, and the City of Pickering; 2.3.14 Enqineerinq Drawinqs (a) that the owner satisfy the City respecting the submission of appropriate engineering drawings that detail, among other things, City services, roads, storm sewers, sidewalks, lot grading, streetlights, fencing and tree planting, and financially-secure such works; (b) that the engineering plans be coordinated with the architectural design objectives; 2.3.15 Other Approval Aqencies (a) that the subdivider satisfy all the requirements of the Region of Durham; (b) that the subdivider satisfy all the requirements of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; (c) that any approvals which are required from the Region of Durham or the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for the development of this plan be obtained by the subdivider, and upon request written confirmation be provided to the City of Pickering as verification of these approvals; 2.3.16 Contribution to Neiqhbourhood Traffic Improvements (a) That the subdivider satisfy the City respecting appropriate financial arrangements for the contribution to the cost of installation of future neighbourhood traffic related improvements at the intersection of the Goldenridge and the new street for this plan of subdivision, if such improvements are requested and approved by the City; 2.3.17 Parkland Dedication (a) that the subdivider provide to the City cash-in-Iieu of parkland dedications, to the satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development, in order to satisfy Section 42(1) of the Planning Act. ,"{'""~n"-:-"~- -:'"1 ".~ 74 APPENDIX II TO REPORT PO 14-08 DRAFT BY-LAW ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 23/02 .f THE CORPORATION OF THE;;CITY OF PICKERING ,~'\c' ~)'\~) ,. i . .,,' I ,\'1!~,',);''..\' BY-[AWNO. J . ...,} . ,Y' Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area Zoning By-law 3036, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, Part of Lots 5, 6 & 10, and all of Lots 7, 8, & 9, Plan 820 and Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041 , in the City of Pickering. (A 23/02) 7 c., , oJ WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to implement draft plan of subdivision S-P-2002-04 to permit 25 detached dwelling lots on the subject lands, Part of Lots 5, 6 & 10, and all of Lots 7, 8, & 9, Plan 820 and Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041, in the City of Pickering; AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 3036, is therefore deemed necessary; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCHEDULE I Schedule I attached to this By-law with notations and references shown thereon is hereby declared to be part of this By-law, 2, AREA RESTRICTED The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in the City of Pickering, designated "S2-15" on Schedule I attached to this By-law, 3, GENERAL PROVISIONS No building, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this By-law. 4. DEFINITIONS In this By-law, (1) (a) "Dwellin~:f' shall mean a building or part of a building containing one or more dwelling units, but does not include a mobile home or trailer; (b) "Dwellinq Unit" shall mean one or more habitable rooms occupied or capable of being occupied as a single, independent and separate housekeeping unit containing a separate kitchen and sanitary facilities; ; t. f.....j (2) (3) (4) (5) 'j-"";Mlf:iT, - 2 - ,",' >'~ '~c) "Dwellinq, Detached or Detached Dwellinq" shall mean a single dwelling which is freestanding, separate and detached from other main buildings or structures; (a) "Floor Area - Residential" shall mean the area of the floor surface contained within the outside walls of a storey or part of a storey; (b) "Gross Floor Area - Residential" shall mean the aggregate of the floor areas of all storeys of a building or structure, or part thereof as the case may be, other than a private garage, an attic or a cellar; (a) "Lot" shall mean an area of land fronting on a street which is used or intended to be used as the site of a building, or a group of buildings, as the case may be, together with any accessory buildings or structures, or a public park or open space. area, regardless of whether or not such lot constitutes the whole of a lot or block on a registered plan of subdivision; (b) "Lot Frontaqe" shall mean the width of a lot between the side lot lines measured along a line parallel to and 7.5 metres distant from the front lot line; (a) "Private Garaqe" shall mean an enclosed or partially enclosed structure for the storage of one or more vehicles, in which structure no business or service is conducted for profit or otherwise; (a) "Yard" shall mean an area of land which is appurtenant to and located on the same lot as a building or structure and is open, uncovered, and unoccupied above ground except for such accessory buildings, structures, or other uses as are specifically permitted thereon; (b) "Front Yard" shall mean a yard extending across the full width of a lot between the front lot line of the lot and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (c) "Front Yard Depth" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a front yard of a lot between the front lot line and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (d) "Rear Yard" shall mean a yard extending across the full width of a lot between the rear lot line of the lot, or where there is no rear lot line, the junction point of the side lot lines, and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; - 3 - '7 ~7 ! / "Rear Yard Deoth" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a rear yard of a lot between the rear lot line of the lot, or where there is no rear lot line, the junction point of the side lot lines, and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (f) "Side Yard" shall mean a yard of a lot extending from the front yard to the rear yard, and from the side lot line to the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (g) "Side Yard Width" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a side yard of a lot between the side lot line and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (h) "Flankaqe Side Yard" shall mean a side yard immediately adjoining a street or abutting on a reserve on the opposite side of which is a street; (i) "Flankaqe Side Yard Width" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a flankage side yard of a lot between the lot line adjoining a street or abutting on a reserve on the opposite side of which is a street, and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; U) "Interior Side Yard" shall mean a side yard other than a flankage side yard. 5. PROVISIONS (1 ) (a) Uses Permitted ("S2-15" Zone) No person shall, within the lands zoned "S2-15" on Schedule I attached to this By-law, use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure for any purpose except the following: (i) detached dwelling residential use (b) Zone Requirements ("S2-15" Zone) No person shall within the lands designated "S2-15" on Schedule I attached hereto use any lot or erect, alter or use any building except in accordance with the following provisions: (i) Lot Area (minimum): 350 square metres; (ii) Lot Frontage (minimum): 12.0 metres; (iii) Front Yard Depth (minimum): 6.0 metres for lots fronting Fairport Road, 4.5 metres for all other lots; -~ t ('rat - 4 - (iv) Rear Yard Depth (minimum): 7.5 metres; (v) Side Yard Width (minimum): 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other side; (vi) Flankage Side Yard Width 2.7 metres; (minimum): (vii) Building Height (maximum): 9.0 metres; (viii) Garage Requirements minimum one private garage per lot attached to the main building and vehicular entrance of which shall be located not less than 6.0 metres from the front lot line and not less than 6.0 metres from any side lot line immediately adjoining or abutting on a reserve on the opposite side of the street; (ix) Garage Projection (maximum): 3.0 metres beyond the wall containing the main entrance to the dwelling unit; (x) Uncovered steps and platform 1.5 metres for any uncovered projection into rear yard steps and platform not exceeding (maximum) 2.0 metres in height; (2) (a) Uses Permitted ("R4" Zone) (i) detached dwelling use subject to the provisions of Section 1 0 for By-law 3036; 6. MODEL HOMES (1) Despite the provIsions of Clause 6.1 of By-law 3036, a maximum of 3 Model Homes, together with not fewer than two parking spaces per Model Home, may be constructed on the lands set out in Schedule I attached to this By-law prior to the division of those lands by registration of a plan of subdivision; (2) For the purposes of this By-law, "Model Home" shall mean a dwelling unit which is not used for residential purposes, but which is used exclusively for sales, display, and marketing purposes pursuant to an agreement with the City of Pickering. - 5 - '7 0. '... ./ 7. BY-LAW 3036 By-law 3036, is hereby amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedule I attached hereto. Definitions and subject matter not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 3036, as amended. 8. EFFECTIVE DATE This By-law shall come into force In accordance with the provIsions of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this _ day 2008. Dave Ryan, Mayor '. .\ " '] '.~' 'l /! Debi A. Wilcox,Clerk :;len' ]" - r '-,' o <( o a: I i -----------~--------~ I 80 i ----------,----------;-------------------------------------------- I I I I _________J 1 I I : L____________________________________________ ----------1 I I I 1------------------------------------------------- ---------~ I I I I I I I _________~ f I I : i---------------------------------------------- _________J I I I I I I I _________J I I I I I I I ---------J-----------r------------------------------------------------- I I ---------------------~ I I ~ ~ I W U :J a: 0- U1 ----------T I I I I I I __________J 34.3 o ::j ~ ------------------- ;:j 22.6 / / / / / I , / \ \ ", \ \ ,/ , \ '.( \ \ \ '" , \ \" \ \ v" , \\ 1 __- ---L-...,---~--r-~ _-- I /~- I / I " // I _"",-- ,'/// r-- :>/ // ~~~/~/l------- ~ I / L------- JRT -----_~ , ~------- " I I \ .....,'..... L------- I \ ' f I \ '1 I \ I .I .4 .. 82-15 0 .... 1JO.5 'A' 137.8 82-15 '71 WELRUS STREET o <( o 0:: I I I I I ------------------------t----------------------- I I ~----------------------- I I I r----------------------- I I I ------------------------~-II--------------------- I I -1 -1 I w U :J n:: 0- (J) i,'j l' N ,2J":C\ SCHEDULE I TO 13,YtMVV l\ 'i~\-c'r1 ,ft };\ :"\ PASSED THIS>i.\..il;S\ if;';) DAY OF'.~ ..)A u, 2008 .. ..; ~ 1'1li! j~ii!riliG o <( o 0:: f- n:: o 0- n:: <{ LL ---r--r I I I I I I I I I I GOLDENRIDGI ROAD I I I I I I __1__-.1_ ':'~"'~'j'~'i /; p 1 TO fJl --(4.. b"?~ ..-._~~...._., 8 1 ST~c)UDS -!II Iii -~\\i II II: lii- -- ~,.. ".\'--' c~,. \ -- ~ 'U;cF~~E'JI \'~;;'L)j\~li' i I.__ I ! I I r:iR!vt1I i ir _L ~,.:.\\E i~h f-- ~.jn ~ ~= ,~ ---j ~ c I--L______ i ~ _~____ i -----I t-- c;; ~ ,---- L.J I . . L- 1-------.__ , }.._----" ,- 3: ~ - ' CJ -i ~--! ~ ~-_L --y-- en , "--- L-~ IT:;: 1-------_, L-.- < 'i ' , I~f ~~_ ~ f-___:l~\: r r~~' I- 1----- ___L_ ---~ I~v ~\~-,./'\./ L. t;~ \../ 1 ,__ I '\ \ I Mml i I f.... 18\\~ , Iv ~I ! II r-- y, '\ 'I i\ \ ~--- I. -_L_ r\ \ ~-- ~~- EROW PL f------ II I '- I-- I -0 -- <t i =~ I = -"== If---=' -- I--_ I I_ _'\ I I ~ f--+- ;=- IJ1o'tl.m,n .....u-f I f-- I I I t jl II ,-- --+-~ I~~II Ii -l-~ 11TI i I ~-= IJ ~=}, V w I ..\s, GOLDE~J'\'DGE I '\.: f~ :==>- J^CCUELlNE '?" r -------\ \. - I V! --- -- 0 ----. ( -- ~ I- f7A~ ~ r:: --------F.~---=--= c--- --- -i~ - --==- 8 ~ n_ / /:. <(- I _------- -- ------=--_ - -I- / ./ ~ ()~ r-' -____ _ __ ____ ____ _. Z -- -- , T--'"l() ,m SPR""/-- ITIDIDT g- .- -.S:'; It] =ts ,J~UZ.J=~_-_-_~ ~.~g~- .1.=iJ-= illl!L~;>j___. -~~~~=( IF - Wtlli~~---__= ~ -=L_~ f]7J2"~ -~ilJ I ~ !1!11TIll1 O.".R 1._. -----.'$J1. ... ._~;N[W'lON -_ . liUillillI[QJJillJIOlJIl]J-rr-TJ;~~f-- i ~rrr~ Af':lL '-.~cI. Av,~-,~::::I__ ~ r,;:'t:~1\J J::.... ....._1 I City of Pickering Planning l~1. Dt1VOlopment Department ~.' I--~--------_.------------------- - -----------------.--- ------ ~ PflOPERlY DESCRIPTiON P'lI.FiT OF LOT 5, C, l!~ m, ANi) u:rn:i 7, 0, ik [I, PV"-.I\j EtZtl .~ ~ .,~i OV'lNER A. UEBRUii~ ET. jr,.L .3". ATE -;iu~~.'"ii. 2I)~l{DRAwN Bv JB 1\ , FILE No. SP :lOOHJ4; A 'J'3/w" SCALE 1 :mi{!O J= CHECKED BY Be I", io~urces:' - -. Tl"Iranot ErllorprllllOlll Inc. and It. t1UFcPI16r3. All rlghtc RC'l!HHvad. Not 0 plan of llIurvoy. PN...7 200~ MPAc:. an~_~l:'~~:;~"d~~~~~~>1l>C-.a..~~-nv.l:r._~~~~;;;~;~~,np.~;;.;~~~..1 I_ I -!-.~-- ; i I ; I .1,11,---- Iii I , I I i "I'! I I r i ~ I I '.-'- o <t ~~ f--- I I I _. \ I -- \ " -"-,--- 1_ 1___ -~- ~ I :> L; ..J CL o <t o --_. c::: D.. <t i\:l 2Z 23 24 Z5 26 g: ~l 0 27 <( GOLDEN RIDGE 0 ROAD 0: STREET 'A' JO 9 8 6 5 " " I- 0: 0 0.. WELRUS STREET 0: <( LL r iI"1" t" "',-" 1/ 2 Tn '____.,1,.; .', .. \ I') ,__._L'i.::.f1B._".__ 82 INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS SUBMITTED PLAN - SP 2002-04; A23/02 ORIGINAL 27 LOT PROPOSAL ADDITIONAL LANDS SUBJECT TO A23/02 (PART OF LOT 49, PLAN 1041, PART 4, 40R-17802) j ~ l ~ fUTUR[ STREET LANDS SUBJECT TO SP 2002-04 & A23/02 (PART OF LOTS 5, 6 & 10 AND LOTS 7, 8 & 9, PLAN 820) 1 pt-~ l' THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, INFORMATION & SUPPORT SERVICES, JUNE 29, 2007. 3~ tJ i. 'W ,-, ". '" "-""~Z5 ' ., /11"0"":' "'.-_'," .",..-,.'::7~,"."~.,";...,,~:<,........,,~.,.,,,~~ INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS SUBMITTED PLAN - SP 2002-04; A23/02 APPLICANTS REVISED 25 LOT PROPOSAL & STAFF RECOMMENDED PLAN ADDITIONAL LA~DS SUBJ~~\ TO A23/02 \ (PART OF LOT 49. PLAN 1041, PfT 4. 40R-17802) i \ " \ \ \ f I I I I I I I I I I I / / / .... \ \ \ \ \ \ i --------------_/ \ \ _______m____oooom.~1 "- ~ "" .00-007--.00-00--- VINGARDEN CRESCENT - 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 1].5 8 '" 7 co 6 5 '" 4 '" ]00 2 ~ .... 1'i ~ ~ <0; f'i f'i 1'i '" USTIC FENC WELRUS STREET ",""'H",,""" :::.-- er= TO SP 20 2-04 & A23/ (PART OF LOTS 5, 6 & 10 AND LOTS 7, 6 & 9. PLAN 820) n ~ o ,... -l I 25 40.5 A=7.18-ii , , ---j- 1 1 , , " ,I I ------- ~ 1 1 , 1 1 1 , 1 ~ 1 , , 1 THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING. PLANNING &0 DEVFWPMENT DEPARTMENT, INFORMATION & SUPPORT SERVICES, JANUARY 24, 2008, " ~' y- -r "~',r If L/, 'T'f'" ;Jr, '~/-Zl~r7;7'" '/ ! -;.." ..,.,.,.~ ,_,"", _,___.~.:..;t..,;;:_'.~r~_"__~;'''''''' 84 INFORMATION REPORT NO. 04-03 FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF February 20, 2003 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 SUBJECT: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/02 Anthony DeBruin et al West side of Fairport Road, north of Welrus Street (Part of Lots 5, 6 and 10, Lots 7, 8 and 9, Plan 820) (Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041, Part 4, 40R17802) City of Pickering 1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION - the subject lands are comprised of 5 lots, located on the west side of Fairport Road, north of Welrus Street; - a property location map is provided for reference (see Attachment #1); - existing detached residential dwellings surround the subject lands. 2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL - the applicant proposes to establish 27 detached dwellings on lots with minimum lot frontages ranging from 12 metres to 15 metres fronting onto one new public street with access from Fairport Road; - the applicant's proposed subdivision plan is provided for reference (see Attachment #2); - the majority of the proposed lots on "Street A" as labelled on the applicant's submitted plan are proposed to provide lot frontages of approximately 12 metres, lot depths of approximately 30 metres and lot areas of approximately 360 square metres; - the proposed zoning by-law amendment would permit the 27 detached dwellings to be constructed, and would establish specific zoning standards for that development to adhere to; Information Report No. 04-03 11 l'i ~C"3. Page 2 Q 5 u ~ in addition, the proposed zoning by-law amendment would rezone the irregular shaped parcel (known as Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041, Part 4, 40R17802) located immediately to the west of the proposed draft plan for future residential development. 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan identifies the subject lands as being within a "Living Area", where development is intended to be predominantly for housing purposes; the proposal appears to conform to this designation; 3.2 Pickering Official Plan identifies the subject lands as being located within an "Urban Residential - Low Density Area" within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood; permissible uses within this designation include residential uses; the Plan establishes a density range for residential development within this designation of up to 30 units per net hectare; the proposed development would provide a net site density of approximately 23 units per hectare (based on the proposed 27 lots being developed on approximately 1.186 hectares of land); the applicant's proposal conforms to the policies of the Plan; 3.3 Dunbarton Neighbourhood Design Guidelines the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development and Design Guidelines, which are Council adopted policies intended to guide new development in the area in a manner which is compatible with the existing neighbourhood, state that, on new internal roads, only detached dwellings be permitted with minimum lot frontages of 12 metres, and on existing roads, only detached dwellings be permitted with minimum lot frontages of 15 metres; the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development and Design Guidelines indicate that new developments shall maintain building setbacks consistent with recent subdivision standards such as front yard depths of 4.5 metres, side yards widths of 1.2 metres and 0.6 metres; the guidelines provide additional information with respect to new development and the proposed road patterns for the Dunbarton Neighbourhood; the applicant is proposing an amendment to the future road pattern in the Dunbarton Neighbourhood by providing an Flccess point to Fairport Road in a location further south than was contemplatec / the guidelines; C'_. ,J "y- "-'~' iJ"Jt""" T-''tr'n- <f-''it--'j-'''-'' --,,-,,! ~'jn-lli-t--.. W"ii....~-t ']''1 t''' -II .~.. .. ..'. r:'j'-,- Information Report No. 04-03 ,II /I(-Cb Page 3 86 3.4 Zonin~ By-law 3036, as amended the lands subject to Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 are currently zoned "R3" - Detached Dwelling Residential Zone, by Zoning By-law 3036, as amended; the existing zoning permits detached dwellings with minimum lot frontages of 18 metres and minimum lot areas of 550 square metres; an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to allow the development of 27 detached dwelling units on lots with minimum lot frontages ranging from 12 metres to 15 metres; the irregular shaped parcel (known as Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041, Part 4, 40R 17802) located immediately to the west of the proposed draft plan is currently zoned "R4" - Detached Dwelling Residential Zone, by Zoning By- law 3036, as amended; the existing zoning permits detached dwellings with minimum lot frontages of 15 metres and minimum lot areas of 460 square metres. 4.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULATION 4.1 Resident Comments no resident comments have been received to-date; 4.2 A~ency Comments no agency comments have been received to-date; 4.3 Staff Comments in reviewing the application to-date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: . ensuring that the proposed development is compatible with, and sensitive to, surrounding existing residential development; · ensuring that the proposed internal road, placement of future development blocks, and lotting pattern does not prejudice the future development of other lots (overall development scheme) within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood; . ensuring that the proposed internal road alignment and access from Fairport Road will function appropriately for this site and future developments on Fairport Road; and that the future road connections to the north (Wingarden Crescent and Shademaster Drive) are not compromised; · ensuring that all lots fronting onto Fairport Road have a minimum lot frontage of 15 metres as per the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development and Design Guidelines; Information Report No. 04-03 Lj Iq-(,f Page 4 87 \. I · identifying the applicant's intent for the future development of the irregular shaped parcel (known as Part of Lot 49, Plan 1041, Part 4, 40R 17802) located immediately to the west of the proposed draft plan of subdivision; · a preliminary grading plan must be submitted and reviewed to identify potential grading issues, and the appropriate treatment of the rear yards of the lots that will abut \Nelrus Street; and · reviewing supporting technical submissions and reports to ensure that adequate information is provided, and that technical requirements are met. 5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department; oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Councilor a Committee of Council; if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding either the proposed plan of subdivision or zoning by-law amendment application, you must request such in writing to the City Clerk; if a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the City of Pickering in respect of the proposed draft plan of subdivision does not make oral submissions at the public meeting or make written submissions to the City of Pickering before the application is considered, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal; if a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision of the City of Pickering in respect of the zoning by-law amendment does not make oral submission at the public meeting, or make a written submission to the City of Pickering before the zoning by-law is passed, the Ontario Municipal Board may disrniss all or part of the appeal. if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision of the proposed zoning by-law amendment application, you must provide comments to the City befor~ Council adopts any by-law for this proposal. 6.0 OTHER INFORMATION 6.1 Appendices Appendix I - list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing this report; ,"-'" "~- -, rr"'M:M.l.rr"fj"""J _- -'''~r""'''-(i-' Information Report No. 04-03 I; FI-tH Page 5 () K 0,-, 6.2 Information Received full scale copies of the Applicant's submitted plan are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department; - the City of Pickering is in receipt of the following reports, which contain the following technical information for the draft plan of subdivision SP-2002-04: . a 'Planning Analysis: Proposed Subdivision at 1792 Fairport Road' report, prepared by Robert A. Martindale, MCIP, RPP, Principal of Martindale Planning Services, and dated September 17,2002; . a 'Permanent Access Road onto Fairport Road' review, prepared by George H. Horning, P. Eng., Vice President of Cansult: Engineers and Project Managers, and dated October 10, 2002; - the need for additional information and/or addendums to these reports will be determined through the review and circulation of the applicant's current proposal. 6.3 Company Principal Mr. Robert A. Martindale, of Martindale Planning Services, IS the agent working on behalf of Anthony DeBruin et al. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY ORIGINAL SIGNED nv Perry Korouyenis Planning Technician Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review PK:jf Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development Department 'I /10B APPENDIX I TO INFORMATION REPORT 04-03 ~9 <. . COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS (1) none to date COMMENTING AGENCIES (1) none to date COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS (1) Planning & Development Department ,~~"""<.'" ~'- 'T t""""f" ,-'", ~1iI!1 ' LiLij o~ , i,:, .", ;;~ Exceqts frem r:-. .._) iLl' Lif; Statutory Public Information ~ileeting Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:00 P.M. 90 ,Ill - The Manager, Development Review, provided an overview of the requirements of the Planning Act and the Ontario Municipal Board respecting this meeting and matters under consideration there at. (VI) DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDiVISION SP 2002-04 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 23/02 ANTHONY DEBRUIN ET AL WEST SIDE OF FAIRPORT ROAD, NORTH OF WELRUS STREET (PART OF LOTS 5, 6 AND 10, LOTS 7, 8 AND 9; PLAN 820) (PART OF LOT 49, PLAN 104LPART 4, 40R17802) 1. Perry Korouyenis, Planning Technician, provided an explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #04-03. 2. Bob Martindale, representing applicant, advised that he was present to answer any questions. 3. Judy Stapleton, 1834 Shadybrook Dr, questioned the total number of homes within the two Marshall Homes applications. She was advised that 56 homes were planned. 4. Joe Calata, 1775 Spruce Hill Road, questioned what the plans are for the north east corner of Welrus Street and Spruce Hill Road. The applicant advised that it is doubtful that a house can be built on that corner. 5. F{obert Hopkins, 1803 Spruce Hill Road, questioned the grading plans and the placement of the sidewalk on Welrus Street. He stated his concern that Spruce Hill Road would be used as another alternate for traffic. 6. Mel D'Mello, 1794 Fairport Road, stated his concern with the dead-end street advising that the Dunbarton Guidelines state that there shall be no dead-end streets. He questioned the rights of the residents and suggested a review of the wetlands. 7. Barry Hayward, 1792 Spruce Hill F\oad, advised that he concurs with pmvious comments and suggested that Council consider the overall package not one parcel at a time. - 1 - j-;" .,., ,,-:'" Excerpt; from 11.1 - Statutory Public Informatjon Meeting Thursday, February 20) 2003 7;00 P.M. 91 8. Glen Groff, 175'1 Spruce Hill Road, qL~estioned if the future road is to service future development or the present application only. 9. Heidi Groff, 1751 Spruce Hill Road, stated that the traffic on Fairport Road is already heavy and the planned developments will add to congestion. She stated that she believes the neighbourhood is being compromised and that the development should have 50' lots. She questioned why developers are allowed to patchwork Fairport Road after it is newly paved and are not responsible to leave it as found. She further questioned if more lights are planned to deal with increased traffic. ,.'. : 10. Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review, advised that a Traffic Study has been requested. 11. Greg McMaster, 1807 Spruce Hill Road, stated his concern with increased traffic, density, safety due to no sidewalks, and drainage due to steep grade of Welrus Street. 12. Petra Baiden, 816 Kates Lane, stated her displeasure with the leveling of the land. 13. Carol Kaake, 1746 Ada Crt., stated her concern with drainage. She questioned if the environmental aspects have been considered and if Council have a say in the size of lots. 14. Catherine Allen, 1794 Fairport Road, questioned the responsibility of the developer if damage occurs to their property and what recourse they have. She stated her concern WiUl the construction work and lack of fencing, the speed of traffic and possible increase of speed limit. 15. Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review, advised that the developer is responsible for one year after assumption but that assumption meJY not occur for a number of years. 16. Councillor Brenner advised of the slim chance of the speed on Fairpoli Road being increClsed. 17. Muriel Arbuckle, 1724 Ada Crt., stated her lov8 of the area and concern with increased traffic. - 2 - i 'f u" m'('iiI :.) :=:<cerpts from Statutory Public In'formation Meeting ILj-DB Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:00 P.M. 18. Bob Martindale, representing applicant, advised that he will do his best to resolve issues with staff and also that everything will be done to save the trees. 19. 'QgIM~ill.9DE3r.el1l1er"',$ugg(3.$J$ci;a tr~iDfQrm~r.WorkiQg,.ge9U p,ge';a rra.n,ged .ar1a , ~., ":-;: ,:,''''''''''\i_''- ,>:" <"'f-" ..\:, <', " :_':.' ~:> ,,:-,---,"'" . 'i':,.-,:_' :~" ~"~-'-'~"'''-'_ '"~I'_.-::-",,,,-: .-." , '/":" ii,; .:,-,-,:- ,c':',',: ::"-f.':,' -''' .' _.'-'_') i_,_'_':" ':: :1->':"",",- ",-.",:.,,; '-"'~,"f-~" ,:"-,.,,, :':~- :", '-1 :~ re~tea(:staffJo,'calla'C.9fnmu rilty' meeting "with 'a ppl ica nta ridsta Ff to. 0 eal..with' " n' ;~~~':"S;;;~H'" ".,..,," ..... ' ',', . " Cc;-rn ;' .' -." - - ;.~. " ':,:'. >, .... ,. 20. Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review, will organize a meeting to deal with concerns. - 3 - ~, . ILl -(:f!, Citlj .,# " ".\ ~1 v INFORMATION REPORT NO. 07-07 FOR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION MEETING OF July 23, 2007 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 SUBJECT: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application S-P-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Anthony DeBruin 1796 Fairport Road Lots 7, 8 & 9, Part of Lots 5, 6 & 10, Plan 820 City of Pickering 1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION - the property is located on the northwest corner of Fairport Road at Welrus Street; a property location map is provided for reference (see Attachment #1); - the site is currently vacant; single detached residential dwellings surround the subject lands to the north, south, east and west. 2.0 BACKGROUND - the required Statutory Public Information Meeting took place on February 20, 2003 regarding the applicant's request to change the zoning on the subject property to implement a proposed draft plan of subdivision application to permit 27 detached dwelling units; at the Public Meeting, several area residents attended and expressed concerns regarding the traffic impacts, lot sizes and drainage; limited activity occurred on the applicant's proposal following the Public Meeting in 2003; - the applications were recently re-activated by the owner. 3.0 PURPOSE OF SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION MEETING following re-activation of the applications, staff recommended, and the Ward Councillors concurred with a need to update the community on the status of the applications through re-circulation of the application and a Public Meeting process; -rr ".,f:ili.-......-........ ,'" 0" ~ ji,(jl Y" Information Report No. 07-07 b /4.'of' Page 2 ,.' 9 4 the Planning & Development Department has now received the requested preliminary grading information from the applicant which adequately demonstrates that the proposed lots can be developed in a manner which maintains the City's lot grading criteria without the use of excessive retaining walls or structures, and supports the proposed road configuration and lot depths proposed by the applicant; a Noise Impact Study prepared by HGC Engineering was reviewed by the Region of Durham Planning Department in 2004 and found to be acceptable subject to the implementation of the recommendations outlined in the Study; the study determined that the majority of the proposed lots would be subject to noise emissions which fall within the acceptable limits of the Ministry of Environment (MOE) guidelines; a Traffic Impact Study prepared by Cansult Limited was submitted to assess the operation of the proposed intersection of the new connecting road at Fairport Road; the conclusions derived from the study were that Fairport Road will have adequate capacity and a good level of service to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed development without extensive remedial measures; 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject lands as Urban Area - Living Area; establishes that the designated Living Area shall be used predominantly for housing purposes; the proposed use appears to conform to this designation; 3.2 Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as Urban Residential- Low Density Area within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood; permissible uses within this designation include residential uses; this designation establishes a density range for residential development of up to 30 units per net hectare; the applicant's proposal would provide a net site density of approximately 23 units per net hectare (based on the proposed 27 lots being developed on 1.2 hectares of land) (see Attachment #2); the applicant's proposal conforms to the policies of the Official Plan; 3.3 Dunbarton Neighbourhood Design Guidelines the lands are subject to the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development and Design Guidelines; these guidelines, which are Council adopted policies intended to guide new development in the area in a manner which is compatible with the existing neighbourhood, state that, on new internal roads, only detached dwellings be permitted with minimum lot frontages of 12 metres, and on existing roads, only detached dwellings be permitted with minimum lot frontages of 15 metres; I nformation Report No. 07-07 1.-, \1- fl.-foef], Page 3 95 the Dunbar:on Neighbourhood Development and Design Guidelines indicate that new developments shall maintain building setbacks consistent with recent subd:\fision standards SUC'l as front yard depths of 4.5 metres, side yards width~:; of 1.2 metres and O.b metres; the guidelin3s provide additional information with respect to new development and the proposed road patterns for the Dunbarton Neighbourhood; the applicant is proposing an amendment to the future road pattern in the Dunbarton Neighbourhood by providing an access point to Fairport Road in a location further south than was contemplated by the guidelines (see Attachment #3); 3.4 Zoning By~law 3036 the subject lands are currently zoned "R3" - Detached Dwelling Zone, by Zoning By-law 3036; permits detached dwellings having minimum lot frontages of 18.0 metres and minimum lot areas of 550 square metres; a zoning by-law amendment is required to implement the applicant's proposed development of 27 detached units on lots with minimum frontages ranging from 12.0 metres to 15.0 metres on the property. 4.0 Staff Comments the Planning & Development Department will conclude its position on the application and its design after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public. 5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department; oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Councilor a Committee of Council; if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal; if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you must request such in writing to the City Clerk. 6.0 Information Received full scale copies of the Applicant's submitted plans are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department; the City of Pickering has received a preliminary grading plan, a Noise Impact Study and a Traffic Impact Study on the proposed application; the need for additional information will be determined through the review and circulation of the applicant's current proposal; .-,#1" -- "~' ~. 'iif .~ r-.t'. illl , .~'-. - -n,'H.... .f-~t;tt""'"OI.:-J.jI.JlIi: Information Report No. 07-07 lP /'t- Page 4 96 6.1 Company Principal - the owner of the subject property is Anthony DeBruin. ~ ORIGINAL SIGNED ny ORIGINAL SIONED BY Rick Cefaratti Planner II Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review RC:ld Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development ~; ILf -00 APPENDIX NO. I TO INFORMATION REPORT NO. 07-07 COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS (1) none received to date COMMENTING AGENCIES (1) none received to date COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS (1) none received to date Q '7 .~ / 9B Ciilf O~ 7 /Lj-Ci[0 Excerpts from the Council Meeting Minutes Monday, July 23, 2007 7:30 PM Council Chambers (III) COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. INFORMATION REPORT NO. 07-07 SUBJECT: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application S-P-2002-04 & Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02 Anthony Debruin 1796 Fairport Road Lots 7, 8 & 9, Part of Lots 5, 6 & 10, Plan 820 City of Pickerinq A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to an application submitted by Anthony Debruin for property municipally known as 1796 Fairport Road. Ross Pym, Principal Planner - Development Review gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Meeting under the Planning Act. He noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City before a by-law is passed that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Rick Cefaratti, Planner provided a brief overview of Zoning Amendment Application A 23/02. Anthony DeBruin, the applicant, appeared before Council in support of the application and to answer questions that may arise. M. D'Mello, 1794 Fairport Road, appeared before Council in opposition to the application. He noted that at the last meeting the residents were told there would be an informal meeting with the applicant before the application came back to Council. Mr. O'Mello requested clarification on how many units would be built because he thought in the last report it was supposed to be 56 units. He also noted that studies would have to be redone because they would be too old. Tom Hunt, 1670 Goldenridge Road, noted that Goldenridge was a difficult street to get out of at this time and felt that if another street came off of it getting onto Fairport Road would be a nightmare. 1 7 J 1-1 - c.~~, (., Excerpts from the Council Meeting Minutes (~ q ./ j Monday, July 23, 2007 7:30 PM Council Chambers Edward Kudjerski, 1661 Goldenridge Road, also stated he was concerned with traffic trying to get out onto Fairport Road. He also questioned whether there would be sidewalks and signalization for the development. Pam Bendell, 1803 Spruce Hill Road, stated her concerns with tree preservation in the area and she also noted her concerns with what would happen to the wildlife. Ms. Bendell noted that the area had a speeding problem and traffic was already very heavy. E. Racioppa, 1668 Goldenridge Road, stated that he would like to see the street come out onto Welrus Street. G. McMaster, 1807 Spruce Hill Road, stated that he also thought there would be an informal meeting before this report came back to Council. He stated that the development in this area needed to be right and well planned because the rest of the area would take its lead from what happen on this site. He noted that roads had to be right, that the area needed sidewalks and that the whole track of land needed to be looked at with a long term approach being envisioned. Lorraine Bouvier-Germain, 1676 Goldenridge Road, appeared before Council and stated that since she has lived in the area she has seen a 100% increase in the volume of traffic and noted her concerns with the application adding to this problem. She stated that she did not want to see the development empty onto Fairport Road and noted her concern for the safety of children in the area. Kathleen Squissato, 1807 Fairport Road, also noted her concerns with the volume of traffic and the new street coming out onto Fairport Road. She stated that traffic was heavy and there was a lot of speeding. A number of written submissions in opposition to the subject application were submitted to the City Clerk for the official record. 2 cs /'-/-- Cy) gnm/ fPJ(H,iJ f,f//JJ~~J Uikl TOWN PLANNING · ARBITRATION · LAND MANAGEMENT · INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT I " 1 00 CANADA · USA. CARRIBBEAN GST NQ R1304-7754 File No. GR.55 2008 02 05 r~"=' ~;;,:~">'~""ji,i'",."",wc"J I ~"= ,1 'il 1! ,. C-cp 'I 8 2"0(' M ~ L.t.J U"j U'{) ~ .' CITY OF PI(~KEF1ING I [_~Ei:~~~~~rgE~.~~~,~:=J Mrs. Lynda Taylor Manager Planning Department City of Pickering One the Esplanade Pickering, ON L 1 V 6K7 Re: The Underdeveloped Lands on the West Side of Fairport Road Between Welrus Road and Wingarden Crescent and Proposed DeBruin/Lazaridis Concept Plan Dear Mrs. Taylor: 1.0 Introduction: About two years ago, I met with Bob Starr of the City to discuss the proposed DeBruin Plan of Subdivision (Bruin) just north of Welrus Road. At the time of my enquiry, I noted that the draft plan did not provide for the proper continuation of Shade Master Drive. In addition, the location of Wingarden Crescent did not allow for the efficient future development of 1796 and 1798 Fairport Road. Further, I spoke to the owner of the subdivision requesting a meeting. He advised that his plan of subdivision was approved by the City and that Staff was awaiting the Landscape Plan and the Grading Plan. He indicated that he would get back to me for a meeting. This meeting never materialized. I also spoke with you and was advised that the plan was not approved since there were a number of issues which still had to be addressed. I expressed my concern about the inadequacy of the draft plan particularly the lack of providing for the proper future development of the adjacent lands to the north which affected my clients' properties. SPECIALIZED PLANNIG & DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES 397 Sheppart- Ave.. Pickering. Ontario. Canada L 1V 1E6. Tel: Office/Fax (905) 420-3990 · Email: grantmorris@rogers.com ?,,(. .. ~7j,;''-' ?-- ~rrs. Lynda Taylor, Manager ~ ,j /7~DB 1 0 1 At that time I discussed a concept plan which I had prepared. Upon my request, you took my name and assured me that I would be noti tied of any future meetings called to discuss the Bruin Plan of Subdivision. I understand that subsequent to my meeting with you, the City held a meeting to discuss the Bruin Subdivision. I received no notification of that meeting. I did, hmvever, received notification for the meeting on February 5t\ 2008. You should be aware that none olmy clients received notice of this meeting. Upon receipt of this notice, r attended the office of the City's Planning Department to review the latest Bruin proposal. I was surprised to see a concept plan prepared by the developers which is contrary with the concept plan contained in the City's Official Plan. This developers' plan provides for two east-west roads which negatively affect my clients' properties. Nick Lazaridis and Tim Politis, the author of this Concept Plan, were both advised of my concerns. At the public meeting of February 5t\ 2008, a new Concept Plan was tabled. This shows the removal of the proposed east-west road from my client's property at 1822 Fairport road. This plan, however, does not provide for the continuation of Shade Master Drive in the vicinity of proposed Lot 22 of the Bruin/Lazaridis subdivision. 2.0 Plannin!! Instruments: 2.1 The Regional Official Plan designates the lands in this area as "Living Area". This designation allows for residential development. This provides guidance for the local Official Plan to refine the type of residential development best suited for the area. 2.2 The City of Pickering Official Plan, approved October 1997, designates the subject area as Low Density Residential on Schedule 1. These lands are underdeveloped lands within the Dunbarton neighbourhood. Map 17, Neighbourhood 7: Dunbarton and the Neighbourhood Development Guidelines and Concept Plan provide for the following: The upgrading of Fairport Road and Stroud's Lane to full urban standards and the presence of a large number of deep lots has resulted in opportunities for infill development within this area. To ensure development occurs in {/ manner that is appealing, orderly and consistent with the character of the neighbourhood, new development proposals must comply with the development and design guidelines described in the 2 Mrs. Lynda Taylor, Manager o () Iii- elf!; 1 02 accompanying chart and must be generally consistent with the attached Neighhourhood concept Plan. This neighbourhood plan makes provision for the future road layout for the lands in the area. Notably, it proposes two north-south roads in the area with two east- west roads being provided, one in the vicinity of the Bruin property while the other already exists as Wingarden Crescent. The property owners in the area were made aware of these proposed roads as part of the approval of the new Official Plan which sought to recognize the future development of one of the few remaining underdeveloped lands in this area of the City. About two years ago, my company was invited to provide planning consulting services to three of the nine owners in the area. As a result, I met with eight of the owners in the area. They were asked the following questions: 1) Are you interested in developing your property 2) Are you interested in selling your property for development 3) Are you interested in becoming involved with the preparation of a detailed coordinated plan for the area 4) Do you intend to keep your land in its present form. 3.1 1796 Fairport Road: This is an absentee owner who has not responded to date. 3.2 1798 Fairport Road: These owners are my clients. They indicated that they were happy with their property but would sell same and buy a piece of property in the rural area for the keeping of horses. To sell their property, they would have to get a high price for same. 3.3 1804 Fairport Road: The owner was in a nursing home and the property is being looked after by his son who has a trucking business on the property. The son was approached by a developer in the area about selling their property. The son has had past difficulties 3 Mrs. Lynda Taylor, Manager f; i4 - Ce 1 03 with the City's By-law Enforcement Officers. Neither the son nor the father has any interest in selling any part of the property but the son wishes to be left alone to carry on his trucking business. There is, however, a possibility that the westerly part of the property, in the vicinity of the extension ofvVingarden Crescent, could be made available for development. 3.4 1808 Fairport RoatfJ. The owners of this property indicated that they were approached by a developer about selling their property, but the offer infuriated them. They indicated that someday the property will be sold for the right price but they were not interested at that time in developing or selling any part of their property. 3.5 1812 Fairport Road: These owners are my clients. They have been approached by a developer in the area on several occasions. They have repeatedly informed the developer and his agents that they have no desire to sell the property. Their intent is to develop and build on the property themselves. They have a young son who is currently completing a course in Architectural technology. They will be developing and building themselves. Until Shade Master Drive and Wingarden Crescent are extended, they propose to construct two 3200 sq-foot houses fronting on Fairport Road. They will shortly be applying to the Region Land Division committee for consent. 3.6 1814 Fairport Road: These owners, the Lazaridis family, are developers/builders, who also own land backing onto the houses along Spruce Hill. To develop these lands they must await the extension of Wingarden Crescent. Because of the hold out of the owner of 1828 Fairport Road and others, it is anyone's guess when these lands will be available for development. 3.7 1816 Fairport Road: These owners were approached by a developer about selling their property. They are happy with their property and treasure the value of their land. I believe that an offer to sell is possible but will be difficult. I suspect that they can be persuaded to sell off part of their back lands for a high price. 4 Mrs. Lynda Taylor, Manager 1 U 4 3.8 1822 Fairport RoatJ:.. B jL/-tt: These owners are my clients. They were also approached by a developer about selling their property. They approached me some two years ago about developing a townhouse complex on their property. After consultation with Staff and the politicians, I indicated that it would be an uphill battle which would be opposed by the politicians, Staff and the property owners in the area. Such a proposal I was not interested in supporting as their consultant. They are interested in maxinlizing on their investment and intend to develop and build themselves. Because of the hold out of the owners to the north, in the interim, they intend to constnlct two houses fronting on Fairport Road. They will shortly be applying to the Region of Durham Land Division Committee for consent. They are strongly opposed to any north-south road on their property. 3.9 1828 Fairport Road: These owners are not interested in development at this time. They see the land as a nest egg for their grandchildren. They indicated that they are prepared to sell the road portion of Wingard en Crescent through their property for about $60,000 with services and service connections for three future lots fronting on this road at the developer's expense. Such an offer does make economic sense, particularly since the owners do not intend to contribute any money for this part of the development. With respect to the extension of Shade Master Drive, they take the position that this proposed road is too close to their existing house and they do not support this road extension. Unless there is a change of heart, I do not anticipate any road extension through this property in the near future. 4.0 Bruin/Lazaridis Draft Plan and Concept Plan: I am advised by the Planner for the City, who has carriage of this file, that this concept plan is merely the developers' concept for the area and it means nothing. Notwithstanding this, from my experience, matters which are not challenged have a way of gaining inconspicuous acceptance. Good land use planning dictates that any development proposal for the Bruin property must take into account the overall development of the area. This is particularly crucial since no provision has been made for the proper future extension of Shade Master Drive which is clearly shown on the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Plan which went through the proper planning process and which 5 l'v[rs. Lynda Taylor, Manager B /q -ce '1 0 [" I ,) provides for each of the nine owners to develop their respective properties sometime in the future. The proposal to connect Shade Ivfaster Drive through 1804 Fairport Road to 'vVingarden Crescent are both uneconomic and do not make efficient use of the land. In fact, it is difficult to understand why the affected propeliy owners would accede to the construction of this road connection at this location. Having said this, common sense dictates that this part of Shade Ivlaster Drive will never be built. This concept plan presupposes that all the lands in the area are owned by one person and fails to take into account the property owners' future intentions. While I have no qualTel with the Bruin/Lazaridis right to develop their property, it is my position that this Bruin/Lazaridis Plan does not provide for the orderly development or proper coordination of the lands to the north and is contrary to the intent of the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Plan. Further, any changes to the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Plan should be circulated to the property owners in the area. To do otherwise would be a blatant denial of natural justice. 5.0 Our Proposed Concept Plan: (See Schedule A attached) After taking into account the existing development in the area, the intentions of the existing property owners, the future services in the area and the directions of the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Plan as contained in the City's Official Plan, I submit that any concept Plan prepared for this area must recognize the existing ownership patterns in the area and must provide a fair opportunity of these property owners to develop their lands at a time of their choosing. Any plan for this area which fails to recognize this will have the effect of developing some properties at the expense of others and would have a lesser chance of succeeding. Further, any decision of the municipalities to alter the approved Concept Plan for the Dunbarton Neighbourhood should be circulated to the property owners in the area for review and comment. 6.0 Action Required to Satisfy Mv Clients' Concerns: To satisfy the concerns I have expressed above, a road connection should be left in the vicinity of proposed Lot 22 of the Bruin/Lazaridis subdivision. Wingarden Crescent in the south-west comer of the Bruin/Lazaridis property in the vicinity of proposed Lots 17, 18, 19 & 20, should be shifted ,vestward to provide sufficient land to allow 1796 and 1798 Fairport Road to develop future lots having minimum 6 -~'.' , Mrs. Lynda Taylor, Manager C.J, L/ / LI -Ce 1 06 lot depths of 30 metres (100 feet). These changes will allow the Bruin/Lazaridis subdivision to proceed without delay. 7.0 Fairport Road Observation:. I was surprised to hear the concerns expressed about Fairport Road. Fairport Road is not a residential street but a major collector road in the city and must be left alone to perform that function. I sincerely hope that the resident who spoke about traffic calming was not referring to this to be placed on Fairport Road. While I have no desire to enter into the traffic debate, any attempt to reduce Fairport Road to a residential street and to introduce traffic calming on that street will certainly arouse me from my slumber. Yours very truly, ~m\ ~~orris Planning Consultant Attachment c.c. Mayor Dave Ryan Councillor Bonnie Littley, Regional Councillor Ward 1 Councillor Jennifer O'Connell, City Councillor Ward 1 Owner of 1798 Fairport Road Owner of 1812 Fairport Road Owner of 1822 Fairport Road 7 / \ ~ \ // "... '\." ....-1-------------------------'---- " ,,\. ('_- I ----, /'<'" ", \____,_______,----: 1 1-------------------------, / " ',: I I I /~ , " J I I " " " :>-, I I I I / "', "... // ...,: I I! .( , ,~{, I J 1 / , " / I I I 1 1 //, ,,/ \ I I I J /', " // I I I r-J-----"";.---- y/ I I 1 __~__L-__L__ I ' I \ I I ~~ ............... f- W w I~ (f) ::> e::: ....J w 3 1796 I 1798 1804 WINGARGEN I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I ! 1 MAS!TER I DRIVE CRESCENT SHADE I J 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 -'- , I I I , , , 1----, : I I I I 1 ! I I I I I I I I I I 1828 I I I I I I L I 1808 18112 1814 IBI6 IBI22 FAIRPORT ROAD '!II I 1 1 I 1 1-- ~.~ ~~ I ('1 ~ SCHEDlJIE- A CONCEPTUAL PLAN SCALE; i: 500 GR{\N1 MORRIS ASSOCiATES LTD FEBRUARY 5, 2008 ~ c:J '-.J The Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department c; IL/-DE: :""'~ ,l""~ 1,'1 :n '1"" ;~; .'1 ':' -f'F.:Jf"":>.."'c1'\ .). ~i,;l -F ~ '-,~} ;Ii .-.'i ;i!.I:.&! ,{bJ. ~Li\n "j 7 ,,(,-,,', .j.~ LULL.) rvlr. N. Carroll Director of Planning Planning Department City of Pickering 1 The Esplanade Pickering, Ont. . L 1 V 6K7 CiTY OF PICKEi:;1iNG PLI1.NNING & CEVELCPIVIENT DEPARTMENT Dear Mr. Carroll: 1615 DUNDAS ST. E. 4TH FLOOR, LANG TOWER Re: WEST BUILDING' P,O, BOX 623 WHITBY, ON L 1 N 6A3 , (905) 728-7731 FAX: (905) 436-6612 ' , \I\^Nw,regionA1J.rha[l1~Qn,ca A.L. Georgieff, Me/p, RPP Commissioner of Planning Regional Review of an Application for Plan of Subdivision File No.: S-P-2002-04 , Cross Ref.: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A01/02 Applicant:" Anthony Debruin et al Location: Part Lot 27, Concession 1 Municipality: City of Pickering This application has been reviewed by the Region and the following comments are offered with respect to the Durham Regional Official Plan, Provincial policies, and the proposed method of servicing. Official Plan Conformity The subject property is located within the "Living Area" de,signation in the Durham Regional Official Plan. The predominant use of land within the Living 'Area designation is for residential purposes. The proposed plan of subdivision would appear to conform to the Plan. Provincial Interests and Delegated Review Responsibilities Potential noise imp'acts may be present due to the proximity of Fairport Road. In this regard, a Noise Impact StudyshoulQ be subl1}itted to address noise impact from Fairport Fload in accordance with Provincial criteria and Regianalpolicy. There are no other provincial interests or delegated review responsibilities applicable to this application. MUhiciQal Watgr SY.QQlY..and .~,!l)lt9ry $ewer Service Municipal water supply can be provided tathe subject dev'elopment from an existing 300mm. diameter watermain on Fairport Road. Sanitary sewer service is available and can be provided by connecting to an existing 375 mm. sanitary sewer on Fairport Road. "SERVICE EXCELLENCE for ollrCOMJIUNITY" @ '100% Post Consumer q ;ll - ( Regiona! records reveal tl;at th8 subject property is presently serviced bY_1 (J 9 four 1 9 mm. domestic warer service connections and four 100 mm. I sanitary service connections. Any service connections that are to be abandoned must be disconnected or plugged at full expense to the owner. Based on tile foregoing, the fiegion has no objection to draft approval of this plan. The attached conditions of approval are to be satisfied prior to clearance by the Region for registration of this plan. Please call Richard Szarek, Planner, if you should have any questions. Yours truly, "'--.., ~;3t; ,,"-..~....~ "' .--- 'l/~ . . '. ~ ~ . ~V\ 1m Blair, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director, Current Operations Branch Attach: Conditions of Draft Approval cc: Anthony Debruin et al Martindale Planning Services Regional Works Department N :\pi m \rs\s-p-2002 -04com ments .doc i . ."t 9 / '-I -Cf? Attachment to letter dated: March 10, 2003 1 1 0 Re: Plan of Subdivision S-P-2002n04 Anthony Debruin Et AI City of Pickering Region of Durham Conditions of Draft Approval 1. The Owner shall prepare the final plan on the basis of the approved draft plan of subdivision prepared by H.F. Grander Co. Ltd., identified as Project No. 6244, dated October 9, 2002, which illustrates 27 lots for single detached dwellings, blocks to be developed in conjunction with adjacent lands, a roadway, a road widening, and 0.3m. reserves. 2. The Owner shall hame any road allowances included within this plan to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham. 3. The Owner shall grant to the Region, any easements required to provide Regional services for this development and these easements shall be in locations and of such widths as determined by the Region. 4. The Owner shall submit plans showing any proposed phasing to the Region for review and approval, if this plan is to be developed through more than one registration. 5. The Owner shall provide for the extension of such sanitary sewer and water supply facilities which are external to, as well as within, the limits of this plan that are required to service this plan. In addition, the Owner shall provide for the extension of sanitary sewer and water supply facilities within the limits of the plan which are required to service other developments external to this plan. Such sanitary sewer and water facilities are to be designed and constructed according to the standards and requirements of the Regional Municipality of Durham. All arrangements, financial and otherwise, for said extensions, are to be made to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham, and are to be completed prior to final approval. 6. Prior to entering into a subdivision agreement, the Regional Municipality of Durham shall be satisfied that adequate water pollution control plant and water supply plant capacities are available for the proposed subdivision. 7. The Owner shall satisfy all requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Regional Municipality of Durham. This shall include, among others, the execution of a subdivision agreement between the Owner and the Region concerning the provision and installation of sanitary sewers, water supply, roads and other regional services. 1 Ili -{;'(3 o i 2 111 I I 8. The O'vvner shail submit to the Regiona! ~'llunicipality of Durham for review and approval, a noise report prepared by an acoLlstic engineer, based on projected traffic \/ciumes provided by the Region's Planning Department. recommending any necessary noise attenuation measures. The Owner shall provide the Region with a copy of the subdivision agreement containing such provisions prior to final approval of the plan. H :\2-4\s-p-2002-04 conditions The Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department 1615 DUNDAS ST. E. 4'" FLOOR, LANG TOWER WEST BUILDING PO BOX 623 WHITBY ON L 1 N 6A3 CANADA 905-728-7731 Fax: 905-436-6612 Email: planning@ region.durham.on.ca www.region.durham.on.ca .L. Georgieff, MCIP, RPP Commissioner of Planning "Service Excellence for our Communities" IT" (.J iLf-[f. 'RECEiVED April 16, 2004 'I 1 2 . - "r"\1 j j~;, P \-< '2 0 L) .J':' Y at: P1CKER1NG err ,~ & DE"cLCPtvlENT LANl\'\N\;I v'_ P I II DEPARTMEi'fT Ms. Sheeba Paul HGC Engineering 2000 Argentia Road, Plaza 1, Suite 203 Mississauga, Ontario L5N 1 P7 Dear Ms. Paul: Re: Draft Plan of Subdivision File Number: Owner: . Location: Municipality: S-P-2002-04 Anthony Debruin et al Part of Lot 27, Concession 1 City of Pickering We have reviewed the Noise Impact Study conducted by HGC Engineering Ltd. dated March 18, 2004 and find it generally to be acceptable. The analytical techniques are consistent with the Ministry of Environment recommended procedures for the analysis of noise impact. The calculations and resulting recommendations, however, remain the sole responsibility of the consultant. The barrier, along the rear and side of Lot 1 as shown in the noise study, would adequately attenuate sound levels from Fairport Road. Appropriate warning clauses are recommended to make future occupants aware of the potential noise situation in the Outdoor Living Areas for the affected units. The report also indicates that certain dwelling units abutting and in proximity to Fairport Road are to be equipped with a forced air heating system sized to accommodate central air conditioning, In this regard, an appropriate warning clause is recommended. Prior to final approval for this plan of subdivision, we would appreciate receiving a copy of the City of Pickering Subdivision Agreement, which should include provisions that will implement the recommendations of the Noise Impact Study. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Yours truly, 'llJ ~ Richard Szarek Planner Current Operations Branch cc: City of Pickering Planning Department r:\rs\noise58.let @ 100% Post Consumer iConseFvifiWn for The Living City /1 I Lf -LB (-\ I--;=; ,~:::, ~ .... ~ ,,", ri")lp II'" ,-" '\ i ,- r-" i,!.,. ,J.,! ~ ..(~; I:..: i \/, ',I I!~UJJII'-'..I !-J ~ - ...' '-:::l U' J-) - ! Iii: '\:)iJ'J"'1"n') J ' Li 1",,j' ,.~ i n. 1;.. j -.L Uu..,J C1TY O,F PJCX;::!:}J"'J-' aj~""~"" ....'llIU r l;,;"~i"NO, C;,frUiJi,:J 11 3 April 15, 2C03. CFN BY FAX AND MAIL "j Mr. Perry Korouyenis Planning and Development Department City of Pickering Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L 1 V 6K7 OTY erf::", L'c::~~~,;~~~;J:~\;~~ Fi_,:'\"'ij';l;\L:~;:__":"".,.."",,,,~,' . , , ~__ ,- i\_'ii:~i.r;- Dear ivlr. Korouyenis: Re: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP 2002-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/02 1792 Fairport Road West Side of Fairport Road and North of Welrus Street City of Pickering, Durham Region (Anthony DeBruin) This letter follows receipt of the above subdivision and zoning by-law amendment applications for 1792 Fairport Road (Lot 27, Concession 1), in the City of Pickering, Durham Region on January 22,2003. Staff at the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TF1CA) have had an opportunity to review the above applications and offer the following comments: The proposed subdivision application would create 29 residential lots on a site approximately 1.186 ha (2.93 acree;) insize. The subject property is not located within the Authority's Fill Regulated Area or witllin the RCSc:lllal Storm Floodplain. As such, a permit under Ontario Regulation 158 (Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways) will not be required. However, the submitted subdivision application included a planning analysis that indicated that the subject property was heavily wooded. An ecologist from the TriCA conducted a recent site walk of the property and notes the following: The site consists of a nUfnbe~ of upla;,d and lowland wooded stands and also includes a small cattail marsh in the centre of the block. The stand at the west end of the parcel is con,prised of old field upland vegetation that probably began regenerating approximately 30-40 years ago and consists of species including sugar maple, poplar, and buckthorn. E:ast of this stand, there is what likely was an old plantation consisting of similarly aged white pine, scot's pine and spruce, Further to the east, the topography becomes flatter and less well-drained, whidl has encouraged the pro/ifer.ation of cattails and this area may provide seasonal habitat for a small variety of marsh wildlife. Also, associated with this topographic depression is an ephemeral swamp consisting of a number of mature to very mature (> al)out 60 cm DOH) decadent trees that wil/likely provide fairly good habitat for cavity.nesting birds and rnarnmals in 5-1 0 years, S,lme incidrmtal signs of wildlife includin~J rabbit scat and an abandoned muskrat den was observed. There was also sOllle evidence of disturbance typical in woodlots adjacent to residential clevelopment, including dumping and the ricsence of invasive species. This site is small, not very well connected to other natural features and does not appear to be very Iligh in quality. Also, our records do not indicate the presence of any species of concern or species at risk. However there may be some opportunities for wildlife Lise of the site given the presence of sOllle mature trees. There may be additional benefits provided by the lowland areas in terms of flood attenuation and water purification, which cannot be properly explored without a detailed study, This site does also contribute to overall natural O"",...E:,\E' RS\K~\iiJl:JQZ\PldbJ Lc\ LZ~2J' ilirp() 'tCg rDJ]SJ,lJJ~,Y;'PJj",.,m, ~','"'"_ _"."""" "....." ',OJ", ...__.~.."...m-_,'c,"_,'-.~'"'' ",".,. .- 5 ShorehJnl Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 1 S1 (416) 661-6600 FAX 66'1-6898 www.trca,on,ca ..'..-.....".,'@" ~~ II /'f .--D6 1 1 4 Perry :-<orouyenis - 2 - April 15, 2003. cover and the City may wish to consider designating this parcel cf land as parkland/cpen space. Furtherrr.ore, the TRCA would encourage the applicant to address the issue of Stormwater Management on the site and specifically look at water quality and quantity. This report should be forNarded to the TRCA for review. At this time, the TRCA would be prepared to discuss options that will result in the protection of the entire, or parts thereof, of the woodlot on the subject property and would be prepared to meet with Pickering and the applicant in promotion of the same. Finally, by way of this letter, the TRCA asks that a new cheque be issued for the preliminary analysis of this subdivision application. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. We trust the above comments are of assistance. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Kevin Huang at extension 5307 or the undersigned. Yours truly, ,.If, "'J // I /"'-->[-i ) - . A ~ R u sse I WRtte' ----- Senior Planner Development Services Extension 5306 /KH c.c.: Kevin Huang, TRCA F:\PRS\Kevin307\Public\ 1792 Fairport Cornrnonts.wpd I ILI-cB Canadian National Rililway Properties 1!1C:. Proprif~t~5 fll!rroviaires du Canadien Nationai inc. 277 ':"cnt jtre~t ,Vest Froor 3 Toronll, Ontario MSV 2X7 2ij, ('.,le ~rontour;;! a' ~lage T~rQnto (Ontario) M5V 2.~7 -1 1 5 I I CN la!~p'or~: (415) 2 ii.6361 Faclm:lil: (415) 217.6743 relechone: (4' 6) 2 i 7-395' reieccpieu'; (4~ 6) 217-6743 VIA FAX: 905-420-7648 14 March 2003 Your File: SP-2002-04 and A 23/02 Our file: TZ-4500-P.02 Mr. Perry Korouyenis, Planning Technician Planning and Development Department City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering ON L 1 V 6K7 if;:} '$',"" C" i(': ~ '1J ~';",: [) rilf:. J\k:",H U ~""" MAR 1 4 2003 CITY OF PICKER1t1G Dear Mr. Korouyeni.s: PLANNING & DEVELOPMc.NT DEPARTMENT Re: Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision ",nd Zoning By-Law Amendment _,__West side of Fairport Road, north of Welrus Stre~t - Anthony DeBruin et al We have reviewed your letter dated 20 January 2003, regarding the above noted application and request that the following comment be included as a draft condition, to be cleared by eN: 1. The Owner is required to insert the following warning clause in all development agreements, offers to purchase, agreements of purchase arid Sale or Lease and include in a Noise Impact Statement: IIWarning: Canadian National RClilway (ornpqny or its assigns or successors in Interest has or havG a right-af-way within 300 metres from the land the subject hereof. There may be alterations to or expansions of the ri;'lil facilities on such right- of-way in th~ future including the possibility that the railway or its assigns or successors as afol'Gsaid may expand its operations, which expansion may affect the living environment of the residents in the vicinity, notwithstanding the inclusion of ,my noise and vibration qttenutlting m(~asure$ in the design of the development and individual dwelling(s). eNR will not be responsible for any complaints or c1airr'lS arising frorn use of such facilities and/or operations on, over or under the afol'esaid rig ht-of-way," In addition, v..;e recClrnmend that the Owner engaSIG a ccnst.J!tant to lwdertqke an analysis of noise and provide abaternent measures necessary to achieve the maxil'f1urn levellirnits set by the Ministry of Environment We WOl.lid appr'8ciatl:! tht~ opportunity to review the draft conditions prior to Clppmval, and ultimately, we n'qu8st rcceivin9 a copy (rr the Approvcld Draft Conditions and notice of the Amendment being approved. Should you have any "further CjlJestions, pleaso do not hesitate to contact the undersigned (1t (416) 2-1'1-696'1. Yours truly, " :d' 6 <--. ~ -."....~_..~r-- (-~.. / . <;:,;?)COr'::""'" ) t:f'~:':"'''---'<. " . ~(~-5 -,.(' Gecrff Woods, B,t.S. Development Review Coot'dinator A whul!y ownod subsldl;::y of (~nodlon N~tlon<ll nallw~y COMp"ny I Uno fili " I(J on proprl616 exclusive de I. Comp"9rtle rips chemins de fAr nntionJux du C"nJdJ I " -,::) j 9'c>8 '11 6 PLAN~I!NG & DEVELOPivlENT DEPARTfvlEi'lT I\JEI\10Rt..NDUM March 26, 2003 To: Perry Korouyenis Planning Technician From: Robert Starr Supervisor, Development Control Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A23/02 Anthony DeBruin et al. (West side of Fairport Road, North of Welrus Street) City of Pickering We have reviewed the above-noted application and provide the following comments: 1) A Servicing and Stormwater Management Report will be required for this development. It will need to address quality, quantity and erosion controls for this site and future upstream drainage. The drainage for this site and upstream areas drain to the Amberlea Watercourse. As this watercourse is experiencing excessive erosion problems downstream, this development will be required to implement and/or contribute to a stormwater strategy or project that will address these matters and/or requirements of the on-going studies related to this watercourse. 2) A Preliminary Grading and Drainage FJlan should be submitted that can confirm that development of Lots 11 to 17 can be developed as proposed maintainino City of Pickerino lot grading critel'ia and without excessive use of retaining walls or structures. (Lot 11 --. existinu ~Jrades front: to back exceed 4 metres) (Lot 16 -. existing grades front to back exceed 5 metres) This should be submitted for review prior to establishing road c()nfi~~uration and lot depth. 3ubject: Je3ruin at ai./SP-2C'J2-C4 J~~.') /L;. _(.,c' ,/ (-) 1\larcn 25, 20C3 Page 2 1 '1 7 3) A detailed plan should be required that can confirm whether it is feasible to develop Block 32. Servicing, grading/drainage and access issues will need to be addressed. 4) If Lots 16 and 17 require the additional lands to the rear to be developed, then these lots should be indicated as future development blocks until the land is acquired. 5) Access to Block 33 for maintenance purposes will need to be addressed if conveyance to adjoining lands is not concurrent with registration of this development. 6) Fencing will be required along the rear of Lots 1 to 12, inclusive... details to be determined during engineering review or dependant on the noise attenuation requirements. 7) A Noise Attenuation Report will be required. It should address Fairport Road and noise from Welrus Street, considering the existing road grade as compared to the lower rear yard activity area. (Lots 5 to 12) 8) We anticipate Street "A" will be named Wingarden Crescent as it appears it will eventually connect to that street which is existing in Plan 40M-1936. 9) Although final engineering may dictate sidewalk location, we anticipate it to be located on the south and west side of Street "A". 10) A temporary turninD circle will need to be constructed fronting Lots 17 t019 and Block 34. It will nem) to be constructed to permanent standards and cldditional lands may be required for road allowance until the road is continued in the future. 11) Additional details are required that will indicate the existing lands that will be used to forrn the future development of Block 34 and ensure the remaining lands are sustainable. 12) A Geotechnical F<.eport will bD required for this site. 13) A SedilTlent and E:rosion Control Plan will be required and must address the rnaintc-mance and inspection. 14) A Construction IVlanauement F)lan will be required that addmssos all phasc,:ls of the con~;tructioll and devellopmant of this site. .,.' '-.!Ii-~' .... . , ~---J:iii-H.- r Y" T SutJc:t: DeBr..in et aI./S?-2C02-,A 1 1 g /~ ;' Lf- cf.:; ~I 1 '-, - ...... '-", .....r". JV.arcn LO, .~LU~ Page 3 15) A Tree Preservation Plan is required and must be completed in conjunction with the detailed engineering. 16) A Boulevard Tree Planting Plan is required. 17) Approval and installation of utilities must be coordinated with the detailed engineering plans. 18) The development of this site will require the developer/owner to enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the City that addresses, but is not limited to, roads, sidewalks, servicing, lot grading, fencing, tree planting, street lighting, utilities, stormwater management, construction management, cost sharing, cost recovery, financial obligations, securities, insurance, etc. 19) Pregrading on this site should not be permitted without approvals as required by the City and/or other agencies. The City of Pickering has recently passed a Fill/Topsoil Regulation By-law. The attached copy should be forwarded to the applicant. ~.. F~obert Starr RS:bg J:\ADMIN\PAR\OCBSTAR~\memos\perry. de Druln,doc Attachment Copy: Coordinator, Development Approvals Technician, Development Approvals ILl l'i-ofj OPERATiONS & EJ\:lERGENCY Sc,::ZV;CES DE:)AP,T\1ENT fVlUNiCIPP.,L PROPERTY & ENGIN:::ER:rJG DIVISleN '1 1 q i\1 E rvl 0 RAN D U 0,1 December 18, 2007 Jo;.i":'~> il.J (i" 1 C\ ) 'i' 7 ~ . - ,~,~,.J/ O'"~ To: Rick Cefaratti Planner II GlTY () cRj~K, PLP)H,1:>,:C5. ~':"~~_~i r:.L()?;\J1E~fr CE.?,~j;T;\!=j\lT From: Richard Holborn, p, Eng. Division Head, Municipal Property & Engineering Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A23/02 Anthony Debruin et al (West side of Fairport Road, north of Welrus Street) City of Pickering The Municipal Property & Engineering Division is in receipt of and has reviewed the supplemental traffic information dated November 1, 2007 provided by UMA Engineering Ltd. This Division provides the following comments. 1. The information and values as quoted in paragraph 1 reflect staff studies completed as recent as fall 2007 and the conclusions drawn seem reasonable and appropriate. 2. Although municipal studies indicate unfactored daily vehicular volumes on Fairport Road (Dunbarton Street to Welrus Avenue) of 7988, well in excess of the data quoted in the original report and the above correspondence, the existing volumes are still within the theoretical operational parameters of the TAC functional guidelines for Type C arterial streets. 3. Staff calculations indicate that the existing I\II-Way Stop controls at the intersection of Welrus Street at Fairport I=\oad are unwarranted. Currently, Welrus Street generates a two hOLlr peak period with double di~Jit volumes (105 and 132 vehicles, I-9am) with the daily balance ranging from 40 to 60 vehicles. Municipal warrants' require a sustained !ninilllum hourly vehicular volume of 140. 4. Relocating the All-Way Stop controls further north to the /lew 4 way intersection (as mentioned ill paragraph 2 of UMA's lettcr) cun be accommodated but it to woulc1most likely not be warranted, although it may assist C;olderlr'idge F\oad and Fail'port Development residents with easier access/entry onto Fairport Road. Upon completioll of the subdivision, this will be considered. ,"'u-: IrJi:r~-I!i;- , Piar. of Subcivision SP-2 j02-i~4 ILl /LI-De Jecemcer18, 2CC 7 1 20 Page 2 5. The intersection spacing of 58 m from vVelrus Street is 2 m less than the minimum acceptable spacing, but is acceptable to the City. This situation is better than a 2 m jog at the intersecLon with Goldenridge Road. 6. Lot 27 is to have driveway access to Street A only and not Fairport Road, in order to protect for a future all way stop at the intersection. H:nw 1:ISITEPLANISP2002-04 A23-02.doc /;/ / Lj-C> B <1 2 '1 Clj=c:,~/~.TiO!\~:S 3... Ej\lt:j~C; CJ\J e'Y -3 =:<'./lC,::S =~=j:;I~,i::'; -;\;1'=. i ~. i'vIUj\jICIPAL PRJPERTY & ENG!!'iEERING DIViSiON 1 22 rvl E .'vl 0 RD.,i'J 0 U iVl 'C=' /'::J /t/-cb June 19, 2003 To: Perry Korouyenis Planning Technician From: Richard Holborn, P. Eng. Division Head, Municipal Property & Engineering Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2002-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A23/02 Anthony Debruin et al (West side of Fairport Road, north of Welrus Street) City of Pickering The Municipal Property & Engineering Division is in receipt of the above noted application. This Division provides the following comments. 1. Waste collection services provided by the City cannot be accommodated unless a temporary turning circle is provided at the terminus of Street "A". This is to be addressed through the draft plan of subdivision. 2. Consideration should be given to the requirement for traffic calming measures in this plan. 3. The traffic report prepared by Gansult has been reviewed. The new intersection meets the minimum requirements for spacing and site distance, and is being designed such that there is no offset with the east leg (Marshall Homes). The design must be able to accommodate either an all way stop or traffic control signals, as well as all utilities. 4. The future lot to be created from Block 32 must have access on Spruce Hill Road and not Welrus Street. Similarly, lot 17 must have access onto Street "AJJ only. 5. Cash in lieu of Parkland will be required. 6. A storm water management report will be requir'ed. ../".... .._.......~...~ i) / ._......... j .1 ..~--~",,"-~" .,/ ~ : \;/ i/ ~ ) ",/ I) '1/ i .,~~. - ,/ /; ~-:v )f!~:!1:fI(th(j i :/;uc::==:::::> _ Ri.~hard Hal b(jtTl , P. Eng. F~H:ds I! I Copy: Director, Operations & Emergen~.-<~ervices Supervisor, Development Control J: \S ITEPLAN\S P2002- 04_ A23-02 .dod un-03 ,/ t-' / Lf~ofj 1\L\P 17 NEIGHBOURIIOOD 7: DUNB.ARION '123 ~ooO "<o.~~:J r~o O<e "":1 I L .""K~;~"'''''''," NEW ROAD C:ONNt~CTIOI'JS (PROPOSt~D) r;:1j(~;j1~ NEIGH80URJ-IOOD BOUNDAHY SYlvlBOLS ~~ COMI~UNITY CfcNTRE LEGEND DETAILED REVIEW AREA b ,,:~'~~~ PLACE OF WOFcSHIP [~ PARI( LANDS f-OR WHICH COUNCIL HAS ADOPTE:D DEVELOPMENT GUIDEUhJES (REFER TO COMPEI'JDIUM DOCUMEl-JT) J L!!TI r:!] pnOPOSED PARK PUBLIC ELErdENTAf~Y SCHOOL @D ~~~MU [--17(-;'0 ~''', ~~ ./1 [EJ [Ill] r4~l l~ CEMETL:RY .../'v- KINGSTON ROAD COfmlDOR DEVELOPMENT GUIDEUI'J,-S (REFER TO COMf'ENDIUM DOCUMCNT) PEDESTRIAN{BICYClE CONNEClION (Pf<OPOSED S~::PARATE ELEMFNTAf\'Y SCHOOL ("m_'~~ fj SEPAF<ATC SEC(Jr..JD^r~Y SCHOOL S[NIOf~ CENH~E F.:lUOUC SECONDARY SCHOOL 1'lf<CHAll .11,(;. ~7{"~ HISTorn::: ViLlAGe lA'NN BOWLING SWIMMING POOL ClTY OF PIC~,[Rn\olr. PLANNING &: DEVELOPMEHr OEPAf\lM[NT DECEMBER, 200~:) ~';:~I~L "j.~~f):\~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~t~C~h1 :lcg:J0~2ll~I~t(~~/I~GIHE OlMErt SCHEDULES A.ND HIE leXl. G--------~------------J NOTE: LAND USE DESIGNMIOI,S ^Pf'[N~ ON SCHEDUI E I ,._~_.____.________p,,___'W___'._________'_"';:;-':=;:::::=::.::=-:.:;;:::;:.:.-.=:=:::=~.--=::;=-_-=-~ Plrl:'f'k'I"Ir.: nr-nrlAI PI AN FnlTln"IS" r:hnntp.I' ,ceVfm - Urban Neiahbourhoods 17[3 DUNBARTON NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN GUIDELINES --::. Existing Roads. New Internal Roads Neighbourhood Park Dunbarton Creek General Guidelines . permit only detached · permit only detached · locate on east side of . establ ish natural buffer . establish maximum dwellings dwellings Fairport Road, south of adjacent to the creek dwelling height of 9.0 Bonita Ave, as generally metres (calculated from . require minimum lot . require minimum lot shown on the . consider establishing the average grade at front frontages of 15.0 metres, frontages of 12.0 metres neighbourhood concept pedestrian/bicycle paths, of dwelling) except: plan connected to other paths · consideration will be in neighbourhood (to be · minimize garage 0 on Dunbarton Rd., given to minimum 10.0 . ensure at least 0.5 hectare explored through the projections from front wall where minimum metre lot frontages at the In area review of development of dwellings to ensure frontages may be 12.0 ends of cul-de-sac and appl ications) high quality residential metres; and other significant street . provide opportunity to streetscapes curvatures expand to incorporate . encourage continued 0 on Fairport Rd. north lands at the southeast "renaturalization" of the · permit detached garages in of the creek, where . maintain building setbacks corner of Fairport Road creek valley side or rear yards where minimum frontages consistent with recent and Bonita Ave. appropriate may be 13.5 metres subdivision standards (with larger than (front yard minimums of . integrate with the open · provide sidewalks on at minimum frontages 4.5 metres; side yard space corridor least one side of each encouraged in the minimums of 0.6/1.2 surrounding Dunbarton street vicinity of Bonita Ave.) metres) Creek · on Fairpol1 Road south of . encourage new roads to · consider establishing · discourage reverse frontage lots, except the creek, maintain larger connect with existing pedestrian/bicycle paths, where necessary due to lot depths (approximately streets to minimize dead connected to other paths grading constraints or for 40 metres), and larger ends, in locations as in neighbourhood other technical reasons building setbacks (front generally shown on yard 7.5 metres; side yards neighbourhood concept · encourage preservation 1.5 metres; flankage yard plan and planting of trees 4.5 metres) r-v -+::>- ............... -t......... ~, \Y.) j / /4 - cfj r::/-< FINCH ~J!Tr~nl" ~.l1&'~lJ ' 1- \ ~';^p'i:r<J ol,te=l ~, '. < U\ 1] ~;~ ! filll'l r'~.i . _ :!;i"A i ' I r".1 -~L I ~ III~~\::. ~~^ 1== I- PWUC"'" 'L. .ll"'/l ~ L ~~h:i-' mij' .~Il'I-Iii- :;y <,-- -".I " - 11 _ - ~ ' : iRtMiD :: - ~ HffinW~7IB ~ -i - 1'=~ t::mHlIID = P-- ->..;: - IT ~ t== -~ ~~ ~ 1-1 ~~~ ":.'I 0 i~ ~~~~:>..r ~ I,- ~-:-- ~~\Xt-b1~: 1 7Y ~~ 1= I-- 1'- _ t= t= 1-- [r,1f- -- J;:;f':: III!I I-- 1= -=i 1_-== -- l= !! ~ ) ~ Rj ~:i :=L t;: S:\=== ~ """'....... ~ -- 1=== ~t:= """ ft! ~ ~ r-- ~ &\-==; .X~~~~ ~Ej.-~ --~. ~~~SL~~===i~ rlpU: 1l\1~ .f l~ - 1- ;-..... ~.l~r~ ; ~~~~.~~~f ~~~~ -D[,~=- I~= :ll HUlliJllilJIJ:::1 p: 1J. Q:L1:~.-=- F- f= =~ ~);; ., - >_ J:L =7c _ 1.:1' ~~~IIII.~;JI/. ~~~~ I'-<\TlT[1TIT1TTTO ,\1 i I' ~;:: a< - ~~ :'!i, ,~ ~ ~- ~~ Im1\i~ mlUlJd~ >v II ]It ~ ~' .~ ~ i== r9 ~ I-- DUI,OARTON ~jEIGIIBOUrlHOOD DeVELOPMENT & DCSIGN GUIDELli,ES. NUGHOOURHCOD CONCfTT f'lJ\N !11;';;~.;rn ~6~c.t'..L ()[5IC~ PRECINCT f"~!,~ CONC(PTUAl.. ROAD f'ATTfRr..: [~ PAIr!{ ~ t~~~~:\~i~~ ru~~:~r F~l(:~~~"~:I~"I\) Ej3 oru. SPACE/VALLl~' LANDS ~~~.. WJ...l.I:W/.Y {;Ir.. Dr PICK(RH.G PI.J"-INlrlG !./',ID DE\,"ELOF'tAEh'T [l[Pl. tJ2000 Nol.: Tht! roor! paltlltrn lllufl.lroha;l fJn lho.:. pIon IE conC:17ptuol. Mirl0r ~<:,~Dn. can C1C~_~ilh~~~.-!..:,~_':.'~~,:___~~~r~~.~_~~~~~~~a;_~~.!'~~~ pion ._________________._.____ """'.."'-"."'_~,~_"""""""'_.._.__"'_....,~.,~..",..,...._..........^"""'_.no<>-....~.,.,.,.,~"_~'-_'_',..~""''''_...-..__.-.......-"=___...-"__.......,.~"-.......,._.._''"'....'''__..A_.._...._..._,...'''.._'''~..."..'"'..,-~r"""_...--n"""""'"....... ' 1 2 5 ,-J ~.~ /8 / L./ -(;6' INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS SUBMITTED PLAN - CONCEPTUAL ROAD PATTERN SP 2002-04; A23/02 1 26 -----1 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I FY' \ UNI)..... o C3 TO SP 2005-02 ~ a: fnO^t:T ::r\\~ '/ CRESCENT z w o t'~ ~~ w > ~ o ~ Cf) <l:: ~ w o <l:: I Cf) I I Z ....J 0 ....J i= () I w ~ 0 I () I z I W I 0 I ~ I (9 I Z , I--- :::; , 0 w f/) 0 a.. 0 a.. AJDIT'UI\.IA' J\NDS SUBJECT'" TO A23/ 2 (P 'T "" I nT 'Q no ^', . ," n WT 4 40R-17802) \ \ w o ::> a: (L Cf) LINE " l<v' ~ , , \/ /~ z o i= () w z '(5 I() '0:: :W 'f/) '<l:: :;2; '!:!:! <l:: I f/) o w ~ a.. o 0:: a.. 1\ \ ' \ ' \ ' \ ' \ I --------------_/ I , , , , I I I /' -' \ ~~ \ f~UfiO" , "~" \ \\\\ '~ .\ : ,~\~_..,,'.\ ~ ~~_. .~. ~". /\~'7.. I ,~,{ '/11. · . '. ! " \/ / / ~ II' I ilL l"UfiO 28 ...at ' ! WELRUS STREET -.-. 11 r-n-n--n----n~6-0fp~2~~~~o~~-f-----------------------------------ii i I I ~_u~ o <l:: o a: f- a: o (L a: <i: LL \ : j ~OLDENF /'~ 1 & A23/02 (PART OF LOTS 5, 6 & 10 AND LOTS 7, B & 9, PLAN 820) THIS MAP WAS PRODUCeD BY THe CITY OF PICKeRING, PLANNING &- DeVeLOPMeNT DePARTMeNT, INFORMATION &- SUPPORT SeRVICeS. JANUARY 24. 2008. Citlf o~ REPORT TO PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Report Number: PO 15-08 Date: April 7, 2008 127 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 10/07 2110843 Ontario Ltd. 1651 Quigley Street (North Part of Lot 19, Range 3 B.F.C., Part 3, 40R-11188) City of Pickering Recommendation: 1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 10/07 submitted by 2110843 Ontario Ltd. to amend the zoning of the subject property to permit a banquet facility and a restaurant in addition to uses currently permitted by the 'M2' - Industrial Zone on lands being on the North Part of Lot 19, Range 3 B.F.C., Part 3, 40R-11188 be approved and; 2. Further, that the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 10/07 as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 15-08 be forwarded to City Council for enactment. Executive Summary: The applicant proposes to amend the existing "M2' - Industrial zoning in order to add a banquet facility and a restaurant, as additional permitted uses on the subject property (see Location Map and Applicant's Initial Proposal, Attachments #1 and #2). Currently there are no buildings on the property, but the site is occupied with trucks and trailers. Approval of this application will permit the development of one building supporting a banquet facility and one ancillary restaurant. These uses are compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood and conform to the Pickering Official Plan. The City's requirements respecting development of the property will be addressed through conditions of Site Plan Approval and specific zoning provisions established through this application. It is recommended that this application be approved and the draft by-law be forwarded to City Council for enactment. Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the proposed development. '1,.... "'it.~ . -, Report PO 15-08 Subject: 2110843 Ontario Ltd. (A 10/07) 11 -1:2 8 Sustainability Implications: The proposed Zoning Amendment will provide the opportunity for residents to gather socially. A banquet facility and meeting rooms will also provide residents an alternative to host functions within the City of Pickering, without having to commute to other communities reducing the impact of fuel consumption and time spent traveling. April 7, 2008 Page 2 Background: 1.0 Comments Received 1.1 Before the Information Meeting none received to date 1.2 At the January 7, 2008, Information Meeting none received to date 1.3 Following the Information Meeting the Administrator for GTA Industrial Properties Inc. (940 Brock Road) submitted a letter to the City expressing objection to the application, noting concerns with parking and traffic associated with the proposed banquet facility and its negative impact on surrounding property owners and tenancies (see Location Map - Attachment #1 and Letter - Attachment #3). 1.4 City Department and Agency Comments Region of Durham - a banquet hall facility with meeting rooms may be permitted in Employment Areas; - a restaurant may be permitted as an ancillary use to the banquet hall facility (see Attachment #4); Toronto and Region Conservation Authority no objection (see Attachment #5); 2.0 Discussion: 2.1 Proposed meeting rooms and restaurant are both compatible ancillary uses to the banquet facility The proposed restaurant use will be accessory to the banquet facility within the building. It is recommended that the size of the restaurant be restricted to 10% of the gross leasable floor area of the building, being a maximum of 150 square metres. This will ensure the restaurant remains accessory to the banquet facility and will not generate significant parking demand. Further, it is recommended that only one restaurant be permitted. Report PO 15-08 April 7, 2008 Subject: 2110843 Ontario Ltd. (A 10/07) Page 3 129 The applicant has indicated that the hours of operation for the accessory restaurant will be primarily during the daytime. The restaurant is not intended to be in operation while a banquet is being conducted, since only one central kitchen is proposed to serve either the banquet facility or the restaurant. 2.2 Sufficient Parking will be provided on site for the proposed banquet facility, meeting rooms and restaurant It is important that this facility provide sufficient parking to meet demand and not create a parking problem on adjacent streets or properties. In considering this application staff reviewed parking standards applied to banquet facilities by other municipalities throughout the Greater Toronto Area. Standards ranged from 1 parking space per 10.8 square metres of gross floor area to 1 parking space per 18 square metres of gross floor area (see Attachment #8). It was determined that a parking ratio of 1 space per 12 square metres of gross leasable floor area is appropriate for a 'stand-alone' banquet facility. In applying this standard to the applicant's proposed gross leasable floor area of 2,050 square metres, it became apparent that the site was being overdeveloped and could not provide sufficient parking. However, by reducing the building's gross leasable floor area to 1,500 square metres, a total of 125 parking spaces can be provided which meets the recommended standard and is considered appropriate (see Applicant's Revised Proposal- Attachment #9). 2.3 A building envelope and a build-to-zone will ensure the building is located in close proximity to the street It is recommended that a building envelope be established in the by-law to maximize the area available for parking, landscaping, and to ensure that a part of the building will be situated in proximity to Quigley Street. To protect guests from the weather, the by-law will permit the option to construct a canopy in the front yard which may project up to 3 metres from the front property line. All site development matters concerning the City will be addressed through the Site Plan Approval process which will review items such as but not limited to zoning compliance, building massing, fac;ade improvements, outdoor lighting, landscaping, accessibility and parking. 2.4 By-law to be forwarded to Council A draft by-law is included as Appendix I to this resort which implements Staff's recommendation to approve the applicant's revised proposal. It is recommended that the attached by-law be forwarded to Council for enactment. All uses under the existing 'M2' zone will continue to be permitted on this site (see Attachment #10). 3.0 Applicant's Comments The owner is aware of and supports the recommendations of this Report. ~'. ,.., ...-' "j , ~-.~'- Report PO 15-08 April 7, 2008 Subject: 2110843 Ontario Ltd. (A 10/07) 130 Page 4 APPENDIX: Appendix I: Draft Implementing Zoning By-law 'A._...","....,...'.<=H____-_':_N""'R.-=''H-__,.""'~'_."',NH.._"W,~..___,.~__~N.~'........-..'N,_._"',_",w,.?,<"'~H"'....:..-'.<"'H_."^'..,,~~"HHH".~"'_'._.,....H_"n~..'N..''''Hm._''_"_~'''__H__....''''''''_,.,_""_.^_._H'~V.~_'''',_..><''.._~N'./dM~''H_WN.W~..,,'~~_._"'_'"'^''''~.'''...,._~,.___~__~,~,_",_~'_'M'''.'_~_,'',',~P<___''_'',,~?,_ Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Submitted Plan 3. Comments from GTA Industrial Properties Inc. 4. Agency Comments - Region of Durham 5. Agency Comments - Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 6. Information Report 7. Minutes from the Statutory Public Meeting' 8. Banquet Facility Parking Analysis 9. Applicant's Revised Proposal 10. M2 Zoning Requirements Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: , pp nning & Development '~ ./,- ,# ( YAt'CVC.:. /((1,,- . Lynd aylor, M0pp Manager, Deve opment Review AY:jf Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council U' ---~'-' APPENDIX I TO REPORT PO 15-08 1 3 1 DRAFT BY-LAW ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 10/07 -,<' :....n... .-,-.- -'~ ,;;,,~" THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING 132 BY-LAW NO. Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 2511, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering District Planning Area, Region of Durham, on North Part of Lot 19, Range 3 B.F.C., Part 3, 40R-11188 in the City of Pickering (A 10/07). WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to permit the development of a banquet facility and a restaurant within an Industrial Zone on North Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 3, 40R-11188 in the City of Pickering; AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 2511, as amended, is therefore deemed necessary; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCHEDULES I AND II Schedules I and II attached to this By-law with notations and references shown thereon are hereby declared to be part of this By-law. 2. AREA RESTRICTED The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands on North Part of Lot 19, Range 3 B.F.C., Part 3, 40R-11188 in the City of Pickering, designated "MC-20" on Schedule I attached hereto. 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS No building, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this By-law. 4. DEFINITIONS In this By-law, (1) "Adult Entertainment Parlour" shall mean a building or part of a building in which is provided, in pursuance of a trade, calling, business or occupation, services appealing to or designed to appeal to erotic or sexual appetites or inclinations; (2) "Assembly Hall" shall mean a building or part of a building in which facilities are provided for purposes such as civic, educational, political, religious or social meetings and which may include an auditorium or a banquet facility; - 2 - (3) "Banquet Facility" shall mean a building or part of a building used for the 1 3 3 purposes of catering to banquets, weddings, receptions or similar functions for which food and beverages are prepared and served on the premises which may include an assembly hall but shall not include a restaurant; (4) "Build-to-Zone" shall mean an area of land within which all or part of a building or buildings are to be located; (5) "Gross Leasable Floor Area" shall mean the aggregate of the floor areas of all storeys above or below established grade designed for owner or tenant occupancy or exclusive use only, but excluding storage areas below established grade; (6) (a) "Lot" shall mean an area of land fronting on a street which is used or intended to be used as the site of a building, or group of buildings, as the case may be, together with any accessory buildings or structures, or a public park or open space area, regardless of whether or not such lot constitutes the whole of a lot or block on a registered plan of subd ivision; (b) "Lot Coveraqe" shall mean the percentage of lot area covered by all buildings on the lot; (7) "Restaurant - Type A" shall mean a building or part of a building where food is prepared and offered or kept for retail sale to the public for immediate consumption on the premises or off the premises, or both, but shall not include an adult entertainment parlour as defined herein; 5. PROVISIONS (1) Uses Permitted ('MC-20' Zone) No person shall, within the lands zoned 'MC-20' on Schedule I attached to this By-law, use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure for any purpose except the following: (a) All uses permitted under 1M2' Zone (b) Banquet Facility (c) Restaurant - type A (2) Zone Requirements ('MC-20' Zone) No person shall within the lands designated 'MC-20' on Schedule I attached hereto use any lot or erect, alter or use any building except in accordance with the following provisions: 1 34 - 3 - (a) BUILDING RESTRICTIONS (i) Building Location and Setbacks: A Buildings and structures shall be located entirely within the building envelope illustrated on Schedule II attached to this By-law; B Buildings shall be located in such a manner that 50% of the length of the build-to-zone, as indicated on Schedule II attached to this By-law, contains all or part of a building or buildings; (ii) Building Height: minimum 6 metres maximum 12 metres; (iii) Open Storage: A All uses other than parking shall take place entirely within enclosed buildings or structures with no outside storage or display permitted; B Despite Section 5(2)(a)(iii)(A) of this By-law, Section 17.3 of By-law 2511 shall apply to uses permitted under the 'M2' Zone; (b) PARKING REQUIREMENTS (i) There shall be provided and maintained on the lot a minimum of 1 parking space for each 12 square metres of gross leasable floor area of the banquet facility and restaurant type 'A'; (ii) All uses under 'M2' are subject to the Minimum Off Street Parking Requirements under Section 5.21.1 (iii) Drive aisle widths shall be setback a minimum of 1.5 metres from the building wall; (iv) Where a drive aisle abuts a side lot line, there shall be a 1.5 setback therefrom; (v) Clauses 5.21.2a) to 5.21.2e) inclusive, of By-law 2511, as amended, shall not apply to the lands designated 'MC-20' on Schedule I attached hereto; (vi) Despite Clauses 5.21.2b) of By-law 2511, as amended, side yard parking shall be setback 1.5 metres from all side lot lines. (vii) Parking shall be setback 1.5 metres from all rear lot lines. Al?'" ' '~- "-;,.,. - 4 - 1 3 5 (viii) Despite Clauses 5.21.2g) and 5.21.2k) of By-law 2511, as amended, all entrance and exits to parking areas and all parking areas shall be surfaced with brick, asphalt, or concrete, or any combination thereof. (c) SPECIAL REGULATIONS (i) The maximum combined gross leasable floor area for all uses on the lands zoned 'MC-20' on Schedule I attached to this By-law shall be 1500 square metres; (ii) Only one restaurant with a maximum gross leasable floor area of 150 square metres is permitted on the lands zoned 'MC-20' on Schedule I attached to this By-law; (iii) One outdoor patio located at the rear of the building with a maximum area of 70 square metres is permitted; (iv) Despite Section 5.(2)(a)(i)A, a front yard canopy in connection with a banquet facility with a maximum height of 6 metres may encroach into the front yard, 12.5 metres beyond the building envelope; 6. BY-LAW 2511 By-law 2511, as amended, is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedule I attached hereto. Definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 2511, as amended. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE This By-law shall take effect from the day of passing hereof subject to the approval of the Ontario Municipal Board, if required. BY-LAW read a first, second, and third time and finally passed this ,2008. day of , \'l~\,~1;\1 David Ryan, Ma,yph Ir), '11f;\ fi';\V\ ~' \' Debi A. Wilcox, City Clerk ~,";i;ll!X tl'tfiif1 136 o <( o cr:: :2 <( I o Z ~ ~ o ~. "t QUIGLEY STREET 56.4 N N r-- o v v MC-20 ro r-- 55.8 1----------- 1--- - - - - - - - -- I 1 I I I I I l' N SCHEDULE I TO PASSED THIS DAY OF o <C o 0::: :2 <C I C') Z --.J --.J o . I \L 1 37 QUIGLEY STREET - t 15.5 5.0 ~ I , , , tCl, , " , ""' , "", , , , , , , , , , , , I I I I I I L________________J 1- ------------- ---------- ~ BUllD- TO-ZONE BUilDING ENVELOPE SCHEDULE n TO PASSED THIS DAY OF l' tv ~ r I$-Of;: I " 38 \ \\ 1/ cr:: 0 0 - cr:: cr:: ORANGEBROOK COURT 0 0 <( ~ U 0 0:: DON BEER ARENA 940 BROCK ROAD '\. QUIGLEY STREET 0 <( 0 0:: \ Sj. ~JECT / 2 PR PERTY <( I 0 G Z :>::: ~ :::; U 0 -' 0:: 0 0 m >- I / CLEMENTS ROAD / I I I City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION NORTH PART LOT 19, B.F.C., RANGE 3, PART 3, 40R-11188 l' OWNER 2110843 ONTARIO LTD. DATE DEC. 13, 2007 DRAWN BY JB FILE No. A 010/07 SCALE 1:5000 CHECKED BY AY ~o 0 ::>>our-ces: PN-4 Ter-onel Enlerprises Inc. and as suppliers. All riohls Reserved. Nol 0 plan of lIurve}'. 2005 MPAC and as suppliers. All rigMs Reserved. Nol 0 pion of Survey. . '~l' i':"," ....."l"T JJ ;; rf', !- . .-",f. ';"1_'-' vt ,U -.;F;T fi PC. __._f2_:..Q.f." INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS INITIAL PROPOSAL A 010/07 - 2110843 ONTARIO LTD. ,. _____...........__,.__......,....h_.".......~~.~.. QUIGLEY STREET ,f'~... _ ~..~~~)'~-r:'~~_j!:_ '~\'-:'f"=~-::;-~- , L/ ,3( I I ! I 1 I l I I l ! J I ! ~~.~,,"r 1{ PROPOSED ONE STOREY BANQUET HALL ~ 1\;::,.1 -::r :-1' ~~ , I rr 7t. Ir-~ !! 1 Iii (ei. e el\ ! l ~;~/: I ~'I 'I~""~=j ,II "_-h-n:1-! r" 'c;:--'------- I I '_.~"_"W I i !jlF_- I I i I t11 :;"'f''':_'I;~''1 I i t\1: I -IF-l~f' II 1.1, -tttr.", 11 I ,:;-1-\ - i 'Ii I I Ip 11 ' I" I If r-- ",--:J i III I,ll III II! I! : II i 1'1...11 Ii Ii n. ,I 'y,1llTT iI. " U..._II LUJJ-UL.... HiLl i ;1.' ._ j I I, llll fll i I: '11 ! II ,.,,"~.~.,"u i ~ ll~ li/trli'iin(I.I' i 11IJI"111 .:'....."""::;;"1~~~::::~;::;=~;:~"",.-~ '-::-,,:'~:::'~~r- -=-----1 II ".It 1. i'l.AA <J'~'C-I: ....)o.l>,....",.:,j.t,(l.'l :1 ! i I Lf I' I I - -f~.p<>:;;l'P~~~ ~ ij I I ~ .- I ~ ~ I ~ ~ _!"'''~....:U'-'<= '139 '~ THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, DEC. 13,2007. ~ 1.f :,"q ...3 /5~()?! 140 141 YORK MILLS ROAD. NORTH YORK, ONTARIO M2L 1 K4 TELEPHONE: (416) 225-0470 December 19, 2007 City of Pickering Corporate Services Dept Clerk's Division Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario LIV6K7 {c. :1!iSI, Attention: City Clerk, Oebi A. Wilcox Dear Ms. Wilcox, RE: Zoning By-Law Amendment Application - A 10/07 (2110843 Ontario Inc.l1651 Quigley Street) With respect to the referenced Application, we object and reserve the option to appeal a decision of the City of Pickering. It is our view that parking and traffic will be problematical at this location given the intended use as a banquet hall, restaurant, and meeting rooms. These issues will impact negatively on surrounding property owners and tenancies. We would ask we be kept apprised as to any future meetings on this matter, as well as the passing of a zoning by-law. Yours t // / /GTA Industrial / / , / AdministratQr A " / "------. / roperties Inc. .,~' J" \ ~ L<?") /~.- , / I .~... \ /' \ / ~/ .;IB~~~~'~if:' :-,C,jiC:::S OPERATIONS __" 1 _.1. PLANNING & DEV. T0 REC ' .::'~::;;:.:_::.::!\RE PROJ. & POL;....__1 U:L:~.:::U~EVEt. SUPPLY & SERV :: F:Hf~,.~~....~ ~HUr:.MN RES ___ t .' . -.jf....l-.-'; '7 I 0<<:; pc'6 ~ i"'k:..e:h r'\S" \_ (' .. I.?,-- r-rf'+ Wo, 01-\" o~ The Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department 605 ROSSLAND ROAD E 4 'H FLOOR PO BOX 623 V'/HITBY, ON L 1N 6A3 ''105) 668-7711 3X: (905) 666-6208 E-mail: planning@ regiondurham.on.ca www.region.durham.on.ca AL Georgieff, MeIP, RPP Commissioner of Planning "Service Excellence for our Communities" Ii- ;5-c ;:So 1 4 1 January 14, 2008 Ashley Yearwood, Planner I Planning and Development Department City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L 1V 6K7 Sent via emaiJ to: avearwood@citV.pickerinq.on.ca Mr. Yearwood: Re: Zoning Amendment Application A 10107 Applicant: 2110843 Ontario Limited Location: 1651 Quigely Street Municipality: City of Pickering We have reviewed this application to amend the zoning on the above noted property. The following comments are offered for your consideration. The purpose of the application is to permit a banquet hall facility, a restaurant and meeting rooms. Reqional Official Plan The lands subject to this application are designated "Employment Area" in the Durham Regional Official Plan. A banquet hall facility with meeting rooms may be permitted in Employment Areas. A restaurant may be permitted as an ancillary use to the banquet hall facility. Reqional Services Municipal water supply and sanitary sewer services are available to the subject property. Provincial Policies & Deleqated Review Responsibilities This application has been screened in accordance with the terms of the provincial plan review responsibilities. There are no other matters of Provincial interest applicable to this application. 1 42 Lj 15- (1 g Please contact me should you have any questions or require any additional information regarding this matter. a~m~Mv( Dwayne Campbell, Project Planner Current Planning Cc (via email): Regional Works Department - Pete Castellan ~onservatWn for The Living City 5' 15 -0 S-;- December 18, 2007 BY FAX AND MAIL Ashley Yearwood Planner I City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L 1 V 6K7 Dear Mr. Yearwood: RE: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A10107 1651 Quigley Street 2110843 Ontario Inc. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff has reviewed an application to amend the zoning by-law on the above referred property and offers the following comments. Background The subject property is located at 1651 Quigley Street, south of Bayly Street in the City of Pickering. It is our understanding that the applicant is requesting permission to amend the zoning by-law in order to permit a banquet hall facility. Site Specific Comments TRCA staff has reviewed the zoning amendment application and have determined that proposal does not appear to affect any of TRCA's programs or policies. Further, the subject property is not located within TRCA's area of interest. Recommendations In light of the above, we have no objections to the approval of zoning amendment A1 0/07. We trust that this is of assistance. Please contact me should you have any further questions. (IU~ill ~non McNeill BA, BURPI Planner I Planning and Development Extension 5744 CJ/s~ Cc: 2110843 Ontario Inc., bwner (905-837-2335) Steve Heuchert, TRCA f:lhomelpublicldevelopment servicesldurham r%li9mBi8~1sjng\dR~JA)~h1'aX 1JnrMJz>P 1 43 CFN 5 Sh()l'('ham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 (416) 661-6600 FAX 6Gl-6898 www.trca.on.ca .........:.'~~=""""'.""--.,""""""~""''''''''''''"''''"''-=-~_~~'''''''''''''"'.-..--~~n.....=''."..,...'''~....,.....",..,..,....,..,..-~~-''...,.,,,=,..,.".,~*"-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,--,,,,,",,-....,.,.....,...n><--"",,_-=,~"~'--""="""'''-'''' .(~J' ~~ b IS-- 1 <14 Citlf (1~ INFORMATION REPORT NO. 04-08 FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF January 7, 2008 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 SUBJECT: Zoning By-law Amendment - A 10/07 2110843 Ontario Inc. 1651 Quigley Street North Part of Lot 19, B.F.C. Range 3 Part 3, 40R-11188 City of Pickering 1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION - the subject property is located on the south side of Quigley Street, west of Brock Road, (see Location Map, Attachment #1); - the subject property has a lot frontage of 56.5 metres and a lot area of approximately 0.8 hectares (see Attachment #2); - there are no buildings on the subject property, however the site is currently being occupied with trucks and trailers; - the subject property is surrounded by industrial buildings in the immediate area. 2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL - the applicant has requested to amend the existing zoning by-law to allow for the creation of a one-storey banquet hall facility, a restaurant and meeting rooms on the subject property; if approved, the applicant intends to construct one building with a gross floor area of approximately 1500 square metres to accommodate all the uses mentioned above. Information Report No. 04-08 {; /,5',(, C Page 2 1 45 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING 3.1 Durham Re~ional Official Plan the Regional Plan designates the subject property Urban Areas - Employment Areas, which among other uses permits manufacturing, service industries, research and development facilities, limited personal service uses, and hotels; the subject application will be further reviewed to determine if it complies with the intent of the Regional Plan; 3.2 Pickerin~ Official Plan - the City of Pickering designates the subject property General Employment - Employment Areas within the Brock Industrial Neighbourhood; among other uses, these areas are intended for community, cultural and recreational uses and other uses with similar performance characteristics that are more appropriately located in the employment area; restaurants serving the area are also permitted; - the Plan designates Quigley Street as a Local Road which are generally designed to provide access to individual properties, to other local roads and to collector roads, which can carry local traffic, and generally have a right-of-way width up to 23 metres in industrial areas; the applicant's proposal to create a one-storey banquet hall and meeting rooms appears to conform with the policies of the City of Pickering's Official Plan; 3.3 . Zonin~ Bv-Iaw 3036 the subject property is currently zoned "M2' - Industrial Zone, which allows for some commercial uses and a variety of industrial uses; under 'M2' zoning, the front, side and rear yard requirements are 15 and 7.5 metres from the property line respectively; the applicant requests to amend the existing zoning on the subject property to permit a banquet hall facility, a restaurant and meeting rooms. 4.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULATION 4.1 Resident Comments none received to date; 4.2 A~encv Comments Toronto and Region Conservation Authority no objections (see Attachment #3); "tll /. lr;; Page 3 Information Report No. 04-08 1-46 / .5. () E" 4.3 Staff Comments in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: . a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Report is required; . to confirm the functionalities of the proposed restaurant on the subject property and to ensure the proposal complies with the City of Pickering and Region of Durham Official Plan; . to confirm the hours of operation for the restaurant, banquet hall and meeting rooms and their operational relationship within the building; . to ensure that the site has a sufficient amount of parking without impacting adjacent properties; . to review appropriate development requirements such as but not limited to building setbacks and parking requirements. 5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION - written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department; oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Councilor a Committee of Council; if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal; if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you must request such in writing to the City Clerk. 6.0 OTHER INFORMATION 6.1 Appendix No. I list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing report; 6.2 Company Principal - the owners of the subject property is 2110843 Ontario Ltd. and the applicant is Siva Sivagnanasundaram. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Ashley Yearwood Planner I AY:jf Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development Lynda Taylor Manager, Development Review L, I S cJ C '1 47 APPENDIX NO. I TO INFORMATION REPORT NO. 04-08 COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS (1) none received to date COMMENTING AGENCIES (1) Toronto and Region Conservation Authority COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS (1) none received to date 7 / 5 . () f? Excerpts from Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, January 7,2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Pickles (II) PART 'A' . PLANNING INFORMATION MEETING 4. Information Report No. 04-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 10/07 2110843 Ontario Inc. (1651 Quigley Street) North Part of Lot 19, B.F.C. Range 3 Part 3, 40R-11188 City of Pickerinq A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to an application submitted by 2110843 Ontario Inc. for property municipally known as 1651 Quigley Street. Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Meeting under the Planning Act. She also noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City before a by-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Ashley Yearwood, Planner I, gave an overview of zoning amendment application A 10/07. Siva Sivagnanasundaram, the applicant appeared before the Committee In support of the application. No members of the public in attendance at the public information meeting spoke in support or opposition to application A 10/07. A letter was submitted to the City Clerk dated December 19, 2007 from GTA Industrial Properties Inc. noting their objection to the application and requesting notification of any future meetings regarding this property. 1 tT'T ,i\CH:\mrr # S TO r~'1' ':"'1 Ji prl / S . (i 0 ',.,." VI', 1- ... ____._'.___..~'",.... Banquet Facility Parking Analysis: 1 49 Parking Requirements from other Greater Toronto Area Municipalities and Pickering I Banquet Facility Parking Ratio Parking Ratio Parking Ratio I Municipality (Parking Spaces Applied to 2,050m2 Applied to 1,500m2 per Square Building GLFA Building GLFA Metres of GFA) Oakville 1/18m2 114 , 84 I , I I I Mississauga 1/10.8m2 190 139 I Ajax 1/12m2 171 125 Pickering Markets *5.5/100m2 113 83 Site Staff Recommendation 1/12m2 171 125 for 1651 Quigley Street * Based on a Gross Leasable Floor Area calculation ,- I'u I- I l I ! I ,'r II I , I : " I!:IIII --__m~ .' 1--- --'1 I"! .... I~E' - l ----t-m----- I i _____ m ____ _ _ --1------------ ________ ____ ~, --------,-- ---- _____1_ ------- ==r= :-, , Fim~, i ; , =:::J= q-! , i ' -+- :::::E?-'~'''' l!~ ~ I ! ---- -------- ,iJt= =::t::::.. i. . ... ._--T-mm. L.. ----------- ~ i~i ~ . " H ~1 I I DIUJNGHAM ROAD II: --------------~-~--.:::il I I I I I Ii I ~I ~...... .m... .... ........... ..:~.="~.. .... ...... . . . .. ... ..... .... 0. , PAR~ :1. PLAN ~OR~'l1t>B \ \ ,.' U i; P'1NllI,.OV: lTl~-OOOI(HJ 0' f 1, I, - :- \ - I -~- n PART1,PL'J'l40R-9IH PIt<~Z7.00e6(,T} , ~ ~ r-- I I I m ~.~ i~i ~ :..---] i is; 122'-3-[372631 I I~ ~ .111'4. ~ II ~ !II ~ ~ . I) l~ I II \{-H!! I 'I I I ~:: I~: ~ '" .~ ! lfn.:-. l.; t::. b V ~.,': LlI \ \:E8 2 5 '2008 1 CITY OF PICf<ERING PLANNING /\~m DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <- --~ _..~ \ ! , I , I I I I I I . ~ I~ \ !! ~ ; .iO '5 I"'" I I' ~,E:; I ~ ~I ~ ~ --< ! !!~: lof I :~ ~~ I ;"' I ~ I I I I II r ii b ~ ii II !. . .. C "0 ::tl . 0 "0 0 C/) ~ r '- U\----C I c;... 00\ , ~ I I I I I L_ ~I PROPOSED ONE STOREY BANQUET HALL BUILDING AREA: +-1532.84 SO.M. (+-16.500 SO-FT.) ,- " ~ BOUNOARY AND TOPOGRA?t"\IC Su~VEr OF PART OF LOT 19.RANGE III BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION TOWN OF PICKERING RECIONAl MUNICI?A~iY or OURriAM ZONING: INJUSTRIAL-M:?' ;;;em" . ","''''''-~_'. ""'_'" ~'" :",'1."'] ~ "0 "0 r n ~ z -:! C/) ::tl m < C/) m '"~ 160.1 b I ..---------..- ---..---.......-...- -- ----..--..--...---- .---....:::..~-:::.::-...... -.........----..--- -...--"..--'--..-... ----..--..- n......__...=..~==..___.. csa Columbine Studios Architects Io6Co~AvtIIlIC TOltdQ ON CAN M4L lPS T: ('I~ 614-9630 F:(41ij694-4269 R:co~.ca REZONING APPLICATION 'O~SOC ~. " ~ 6 AROmcn ~ ~ ~,:yo,l:l..~V' u......oc.. ........7 TotAl En>i""""""tal Plannlna PICI<!:RlNG BANQUET CENTllE 1651 QUIGLEY STREET Pid<trt"l ON 'U/Feb/OS ~(i;~..- OI-KBB 1m PUM a SURVEY (~~:"""-, I'-A'~ 0 I '\..1 I AliOtS . . 1/1\ [ 1~-.(I'r4"48] [ ~I ~' ~I 0 ~I r ~IT ~ --=--------==::==~==:===:::____==_=:::::::~====~=o;---- =:::"=========::====:::======::=::===~========::=__====:"~==:::::=====_::::'~_==::Y--__ IASEMElfl' ~;r}- --~ omct l.. --rrr .1 L 1- ----Jll ROOFDESK -- - --.-- - ---,I ' .",0' ~I'i ~! I, -~' .i :il _ ~~ ~lgo:il . .1]"-0' K1 1 nllM ,~ ,.. ~Ii'f~"''l'''' ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 ~ ,. ~ ;! Il "', II- I"=' ,: , II UlIOY II ~ ii ~ l'~..lr---I--r--~ p-,,-LJe;=---nr ! I "~ 1 . , I ' !, I ! ! ~j F\l1lCl1O' :11 LL_~ III [ ~ """'" 122':r['01"262] - ~.r'==::~:::'::::::===::=::==:~===::~====~===-===::::=:::::=::====::::::=====:=:::=~===__--===_-"","__-=_=_=::.:_~:=:=_=_=::=~~ _ ~ _ WEMOO - --'-~ .1l'.q' +. r '1"'"< L 'II , : ~i : " ~ ''''<'1''''. : 41-1 """,M -I:.~~==:::~====:::~:::=::::':::::====-=':::::::=,::::::=~:::=:~---:-======-==-==-=__:::==-:::..:== ====::':_=:::=:::-:===:==:::::====::::=:====:::'::=::--;==::=~ ____~~?;-- r~~~~~-~l t\1P. '~F<-. "'~. -..".,., . 'l.~ t-.,. ~ ,iJ ~, ~ f.f~~i:~Y W \;/ U j Ii _ '"' - ., " i ~ \-1='8 L 5 IOu8 ! :.\l ~ s ~ ti ~ cl.....y 0'= rJi ,....'n=F"Ii\!G I ~ I . '- I !" I V ~'\. L -1 I' ~ PLMINING AND ~ DEVELOPMEf-.JT DEPARTMENT I ,,.,...4>>.'"".._...,,><""....;.........._~~...._~~,.., - .'-"'....__ _.,","c,...::..,<(_~ ~ '---1 . ~l ,. ~~--~-- fll.OhT (HORlM) EL!:VATlOW "- "- \'I\ --::J ~r~~~~~~=J~~ ...-....-..-------.......... ---..---...-....- ..........----"...---..- .-....--......---....-..- ----- -....----...--- -..--....---...-- --~_.....-....- -~-....._..._._--..,. _100__ csa Columbine Studio. Architects ~~Avlll1,lol Tt:rol1ll) ON CAN M4L ~ T:(416)~30 P:(416)ii94-4169 E:~llI@a~_Q EAST (SIDE) ELEVATlOW REZONING APPLICATION J,..,~:"=SO~"", o AQO,fltCT!. ~ ~ \"'~'~~" " I~E ......_~ Total Envfroomeotal PWUl/ne ?~,...:r- PICJ<ERlriG BANQUET CENm 1651 QUIGlEY STllffT Pld>.enJli ON '~':::l-"-J:-- ~, "U,/h:b/OlS i ....... K85/ CB <:fl''''Ks6 _nm_.'..._",""-----____ ___, O''''~i foil. REAl (SOO1ll) ELEVA1l0H PRfUMlHARY BUILDIWG El.fVA1l0WS L~1~:.r--:l"."'_IA3.0 11' I ~.... Al8C18 L!..'. '<--j:j- -, 152 41 r-T !\C~--:\'~r}~! 'f.,"' /l_{.) /~ () g- r-;--- ,~"7 PL. SECTION 17 - INDUSTRIAL ZONE _ "M2" The following provisions shall apply In all INDUSTRIAL ZONES "M2": No person shall hereafter use any building, structure or land nor erect any building or structure except in accordance with the follovling provisions: 17.1 USES PE~lITTED 17.1.1 RESIDENTIAL No residential uses shall be permitted exce~t for one dwelling unit for a caretaker, watchman or other similar person employed on the premises concerned. 17.1.2 COill1ERCIAL Amended By-law All of the commercial uses permitted in Section 16.1.2. 1 May 6' 17.1.3 INDUSTRIAL (al All of the Storage and Light Manufacturing uses permitted in Section 16.1.3. (b) A transport terminal for the loading and unloading of transport vehicles. (c) Manufacturing or Industrial uses carried on within wholly enclosed buildings or structures or requiring limited open storage as detailed in Section 17.3, except a junk or salvage yard, an automobile wrecking yard or any use in which the Public Health Act, R.S.O. 1960, Chapter 321, as amended or regulations thereunder, may be declared by the Medical Officer of Health or Council, to be a noxious or Dffensive trade, business or manufacture. 17.1.4 Retail stores and retail operations shall not be permitted and Section 5.19 of this By-law shall not be deemed to apply in order to permlt a retail store or retail operation to be construed as an accessory use. ~b By-law 128 New 4/7 4 17.2 AREA REQUIREMENTS 17.2.1 YARD REQUIREMENTS Front Yard (Minimum) - 15 metres - 30 metres when on the opposite side of the street is a -. Residential' Zone. Rear Yard (.I1inimum) - 7.5 metres but no rear yard shall be required where the rear lot.line abuts a railway. Side Yard (~inimum) - 7.5 metres - 18 metres when contiguous to a Residential Zone. - 30 metres when on the opposite side of the street is a Residential Zone. Added by 1508/82 7/82 Ie / 5-{) S- 17.3 1 53 CONTROLLED OPEN STORAGE AREA Controlled open storage areas are permitted if accessory and incidental to a commercial or In,''cstrial building as a principle use on the same lot, subjec~ to the following; (a) An open storage area shall be ~2rmitted only in a rear yard and not closer than 9,metres to any street lirie, provided that such storage area shall be so located that it is not visible from a street along any line that is perpendicular to such street. An BY-~d\ 1 1'-lay (b) An open storage area shall not extend over more than 30 percent of the lot area and such area shall be exclusi ve of parking S~Jaces required by Section 5.22, and shall not exceed the ground floor area of buildings upon the lot. (c) An open storage area can be used for only: (i) the temporary storage of products manufactured, assembled or used on the premls2S. (ii) the storage of tanks and ~ontainers of liquids, gases or other similar materials used in the commercial ~r manufacturing process. (iii) the storage of materials used in the industrial operation but excluding bulk open storage of sand, gravel, stone, coal and construction material or other similar materials or products. 17.4 EXCEPTIONS 17.4.1 PART OF LOT 18, CONCESSION 1 1. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Subsection "Vehicle Sales Shop" shall mean an establishment in which vehicles are displayed for sale, sold or both. (2) PROVISIONS In addition to the provisions of Section 17.1 hereof, the lands designated "M2-2" on Schedule "I" to By-law 1508/82 may be used for the purpose of a vehicle sales shop in accordance with Section 17.2 provided that the following requirements are met: (a) A vehicle sales shop may be' permitted only in combination with a motor vehicle repair shop on the site; (b) Not more than 20 ~ercenb of the aggregate of the gross floor areas of the motor vehicle repair shop and vehicle sales shop establishments shall be used for the display or sale of vehicles; (c) All vehicles for sale or being displayed shall be kept totally within an enclosed structure or structures on the lot. SCHEDULE "I" TO BY-LAW 1508/82 /D / S-(J Y 1 54 SECTION 16 - STORAGE & LIGHT MANUFACTURlNG ZONE - "MI" The following provisions shall apply in all STORAGE AND LIGHT MANUF ACTURlNG ZONES "MI": No person shall hereafter use any building, structure or land nor erect any building or structure except in accordance with the following provisions: 16.1 USES PERMITTED 16.1.1 RECREATIONAL Uses permitted in "01" and "02" Zones and in compliance with the provisions thereof and only when planned and constructed as integrated parts of an industrial subdivision and not intended to be a commercial establishment. Amended 16.1.2 by By-laws 3712 and 5030/97 COMMERCIAL Open air markets, public parking lots, a business office, a professional office. 16.1.3. STORAGE AND LIGHT MANUFACTURING The following uses shall be permitted only when carried on within enclosed structures: A service or repair shop, a warehouse or distributing depot, a garage, a dry- cleaning, pressing, laundry establishment, a creamery, a printing or duplicating shop, a bakery or a dairy. Light manufacturing or assembly of manufactured products such as: (a) apparel and finished textile or fabric product (b) paper and allied products (c) furniture and finished lumber products (d) light metal products such as precision instruments, watches and radios. 16.1.4. RAILWAY Railway trackage and loading facilities. Amended 16. I .5. by By-law 12 B /74 Retail stores and retail operations shall not be permitted and Section 5.19 of this By-law shall not be deemed to apply in order to permit a retail store or retail operation to be construed as an accessory use. 16.2 AREA REQUIREMENTS 16.2.1 YARD REQUIREMENTS Front Yard Minimum 40 feet; 100 feet when on the opposite side of the street is a Residential Zone. io-....