Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 2, 2008 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, February 4,2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor O'Connell PRESENT: Mayor Dave Ryan COUNCILLORS: D. Dickerson R. Johnson B. Littley B. McLean J. O'Connell D. Pickles ALSO PRESENT: N. Carroll T. Melymuk L. Taylor C. Rose S. Gaunt R. Cefaratti C. Pierini D. Shields - Director, Planning & Development - Director, Office of Sustainability - Manager, Development Review - Manager, Policy - Senior Planner - Planner II - Planner II - Deputy Clerk (I) PART 'A' - PLANNING INFORMATION MEETING 1. Information Report 05-08 Draft Plan of Subdvision SP-2007-01 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/07 Rosebank Properties Inc. Part of Lots 79 to 85, 110, 111, Plan 350 Lands located west of Rosebank Road, east of Oakwood Drive and south of Maitland Drive City of Pickerinq A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to an application submitted by Rosebank Properties Inc. for property being composed of Part of Lots 79 to 85, 110, 111, Plan 350. 1 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, February 4, 2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor O'Connell Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Meeting under the Planning Act. She also noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City before a by-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Carla Pierini, Planner II, gave an overview of zoning amendment application A 13/07. Dan Drummond, 482 Oakwood Drive, appeared in opposition to the application. Mr. Drummond stated that the Rosebank Community had a unique character within it and that all development should adhere to the 50 foot lot frontages to match the existing homes in the area. He questioned whether an environmental assessment had been completed on the property and if so when it was done. He noted that he was concerned with the additional traffic the development would create and construction traffic and noise while the development was being built. Steve Hann, 479 Rougemount Drive, appeared in opposition to the application. He noted that he had chose this neighbourhood for the maturity of it and wanted all future development to be low in density and also stated that the development must adhere to the 50 foot lot frontages. He also had concerns with the additional traffic and the speed of it. Andy Emmink, 385 Toynevale Road, appeared in opposition to the application and noted that the Rosebank Guidelines state that any new development has to follow these guidelines. He stated that the Rosebank area had a unique character and all new development must complement this character. He also had concerns with the additional traffic and reiterated the fact that there are only two roads in and out of the area and he was concerned with emergency vehicles accessing the area. Maurice Brenner, 711 Sunbird Trail, representing the Rosebank Community appeared in opposition to the application. Mr. Brenner noted that the new development did not blend with the character of the existing community. He also noted that another application was coming forward at the next Planning meeting within the Rosebank Community and felt all developments should be looked at together in order to see the full affect they would have on the Community. Mr. Brenner stated that the Community would like to create a working group so that they can work with the Municipality and Developers to help create development that fits with the character of the area. 2 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, February 4, 2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor O'Connell Taiwo Rainford, 1061 Moorelands Cresent, appeared in opposition to the application and noted that he had chosen this area for its uniqueness. He questioned whether the plan before them tonight was etched in stone or whether the Community could make recommendations. Mr. Rainford questioned how the development would affect taxes in the area and asked whether they could be given assurance that traffic would not affect the safety of the residents. He also questioned whether the development would include upgrading of utilities and roads. John McArthur, 545 Dahlia Cresent, appeared in opposition to the application. Mr. McArthur questioned what the traffic study said about the development creating additional traffic in the area and how it would affect the area. He also questioned how accurate the student ratio numbers were and how the next development would affect those counts. He also questioned how the additional houses would affect power, water, pumping stations and drainage in the area and whether the area would be able to handle this. Councillor Johnson left the Council Chambers on Municipal business. Robert Carriere, 444 Toynevale Road, appeared in opposition to the application. Mr. Carriere questioned why the developer was proposing houses out of the R4 zoning and stated that he wanted the lot sizes increased. Mr. Carrier also questioned what the tree preservation plan was. Alexander Keith, 448 Toynevale Road, appeared in opposition to the application. Mr. Keith stated that he wanted both development applications dealt with at the same time so they could see the whole picture and how it would affect the Community. He also noted that the Community wanted 50 foot lots and stated he would like to meet with the developer to discuss their concerns. Paul Krawczyk, 547 Oakwood Drive, appeared in opposition to the application. Mr. Krawczyk noted his concerns with construction traffic and how it would access the development. He stated he was concerned with the safety of the children in the area during construction. Mr. Krawczyk wanted to know why he did not receive notification of the meeting. Don Mackeracher, 501 Rosebank Road, appeared in opposition to the application. Mr. Mackeracher questioned when the Rosebank Guidelines were adopted and also noted that the school in the area was already using portables so 12 more children would affect the area. 3 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, February 4, 2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor O'Connell Doug Paul, 512 Oakwood Drive, appeared in opposition to the application. Mr. Paul noted that they already had a traffic and speeding problem in the area and that the additional development would make it worse. He stated that traffic calming devices should be looked at and more stop signs added if additional houses were going to be built. Norma Chittendem, 504 Rosebank Road, appeared in opposition to the application. He noted his concerns with the impact the two developments would have on the area and future development in the area. He stated traffic density and speeds were already a problem in the area. He also stated that there was a lot of wildlife in the area and was concerned with where it would go. Astrid Schyvenaars, 472 Rosebank Road, appeared in opposition to the application. She also noted the traffic concerns in the area and felt that traffic calming devices were needed. Ms. Schyvenaars stated that in the Spring the area had a drainage problem and that a small river flowed in her backyard and questioned what was going to be done about the drainage situation. She also noted her concerns with what would happen to the wildlife in the area. John Vonk, 460 Rosebank Road, appeared in opposition to the application and stated that they needed to make sure the proper infrastructure was in place before they continued to build more houses. He felt the density was already too high and noted that storm sewers need to be increased. Richard Fraser, 540 Rougemount Drive, appeared in opposition to the application and questioned whether there was pressure from the Province to infill areas. Mr. Fraser questioned whether any semi's would be built and stated he did not want to see semi's. Geraldine Goudie, 572 Rougemount Drive, appeared before the Committee and noted that the Community had worked hard to make sure the right type of housing goes into the area so that they complement the existing housing. Ms. Goudie questioned what bridge the construction traffic would be using and did not want to see construction traffic during peak hours. Cheryl Breckon, 711 Cowan Circle, appeared before the Committee and noted her concerns with regards to increased traffic and the safety of children. He noted that proper sidewalks were needed in the area and that road improvements needed to be done also. 4 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, February 4, 2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor O'Connell Allan Barless, 513 Oakwood Drive, appeared in opposition to the application and noted that traffic speeds in the area were incredible. Mr. Barless questioned how the process worked and how the City determined who was for or against the development. Norah Bates, 603 Cowan Circle, appeared in opposition to the application. She questioned what plan had been put in place for the preservation of trees and noted that the previous development still hadn't replaced the trees that were taken out when it was built. She stated that the watershed had to be taken into consideration and that additional green space was needed in the area if development was to continue. Debbie Carkner, 515 Oakwood Drive, appeared before the Committee and stated that she wasn't there to stop the development but she was there to make sure it was done right. She stated that there was lots of wildlife in the area, that the trees needed to be preserved and that the lots must be 50 foot frontages. Ms. Carkner also noted that all development proposed in the area should be looked at together so the big picture could be seen. Philip David, 507 Rougemont, appeared in opposition to the lot sizes. Debbie Krupa, 567 Oakwood Drive, appeared before the Committee and stated that her concerns were with the development of the area and the construction mess that came with it. She also stated that she was concerned with the wildlife, trees and additional traffic. Lorelie Jones, Planning Consultant for the applicant appeared before the Committee and stated that they had been noting the residents concerns. She indicated that they would be obtaining an Arborist report and that they would try and save as many trees as possible. She also stated that they would be looking at the traffic studies for the area and that they would be discussing the density in the area with the Planning Department. Mike Soos, 705 Houston Court, appeared before the Committee and stated that they needed to see all the proposed development in the area together so they could see the big picture. He stated that he was concerned with the additional traffic and the fact that there is only two entrance points into the area. 5 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, February 4, 2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor O'Connell Mike Brock, 524 Oakwood Drive, appeared before the Committee and noted that he had not moved in yet but questioned whether the City could land lock his land or designate his lot as greenspace so that if he chose to in the future he wouldn't be able to develop his land in the future. Mr. Brock also noted his concerns with the wildlife in the area. Councillor Johnson returned to the Council Chambers. 2. Information Report 06-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/07 Whitevale Golf Club 2985 Golf Club Road South Part of Lots 29 & 30, Concession 4 (Parts 8 & 9, 40R-18997) City of Pickerinq A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to an application submitted by Whitevale Golf Club for property municipally known as 2985 Golf Club Road. Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Meeting under the Planning Act. She also noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City before a by-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Rick Cefaratti, Planner II, gave an overview of zoning amendment application A 12/07. No members of the public in attendance at the public information meeting spoke in support or opposition to Application A 12/07. (III) PART 'B' - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORTS 1. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 05-08 Director, Operations & Emergency Services Request for Funding Support From Toronto and Region Conservation Authoritv for Petticoat Creek Watershed Plan 6 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, February 4, 2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor O'Connell RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Ryan Seconded by Councillor Dickerson 1. That Council Report PD 05-08 of the Director, Planning & Development and Director, Operations & Emergency Services, regarding the funding request from Toronto Region Conservation Authority be received; 2. That Council approve the request for funding assistance; and 3. Further, that the amount of $10,000 be charged to account #2195-2712 as a Joint Funded Environmental Project. CARRIED LATER IN THE MEETING Moved by Councillor Dickerson Seconded by Councillor Littley That the main motion be approved in principle and that a workplan be submitted to the City before the Council Meeting on February 19, 2008. MOTION DEFEATED The main motion was then CARRIED. 2. Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 06-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/06 Richard Gosling 425 Whitevale Road, Hamlet of Whitevale (Part of Lot 24, Lots 25 to 27, Plan 21) Parts 5 and 6, 40R-1139) City of Pickerinq RECOMMENDATION Moved by Councillor Johnson Seconded by Councillor McLean 7 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, February 4, 2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor O'Connell 1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/06 submitted by Richard Gosling, on lands being Part of Lot 24, Lots 25 to 27, Plan 21, City of Pickering, to amend the zoning to permit a bed & breakfast establishment, day spa and restaurant as additional uses on the lands being Part of Lot 24, Lots 25 to 27, Plan 21, City of Pickering, be approved, and; 2. Further, that the zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/06, and to remove the U(H)" Holding Symbol preceding the existing uHMC9" zone designation, as set out in Appendix II to Report PO 06-08, be forwarded to City Council for enactment. CARRI ED (IV) OTHER BUSINESS a) Pickerinq Official Plan Review Consultation Proqram Discussion Planning staff introduced the consulting team from Sorensen Gravely Lowes Planning Associates Inc. and DRPA. DRPA presented a number of options in regards to the consultation program the City of Pickering could use for the Pickering Official Plan Review process and the potential creation of a Community Advisory Committee and strategies to engage the community and First Nations. Councillor Johnson left the meeting at 10:35 pm. Councillor McLean left the meeting at 11:45 pm. Discussions ensued with regards to a consultation program for the Pickering Official Plan Review process. (V) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 12:05 am. 8