Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD 07-03 Ciú¡ o~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMITTEE Report Number: PO 07-03 Date: January 24, 2003 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 18/02 . Sandrea Barrett 1626 McBrady Crescent (Part of Lots 102 & 103, Plan 40M-1380) (Part 10, 40R-9291) Recommendation: 1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 18/02, be APPROVED as set out in the draft by-law attached as Appendix I to Report No. 07-03, to permit the establishment of a second dwelling unit in the main dwelling unit, submitted by Sandrea Barrett, on lands being Part of Lots 102 & 103, Plan 40M-1380, (Part 10, 40R-9291), City of Pickering, 2. That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 18/02, as set out in Appendix I to Report Number PO 07-03 be forwarded to City Council for enactment. Executive Summary: The applicant requests a change to the zoning by-law to permit the establishment of a second dwelling unit within their existing dwelling. The current zoning only allows one dwelling unit. The property is located on the west side of McBrady Crescent (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The existing house will continue to appear as a single dwelling unit, maintaining the visual impact and character of the neighbourhood. With the availability of parking in the two car garage and two spaces in the existing driveway, there is adequate parking for a second unit. It is recommended that the application be approved and the draft by-law be forwarded to Council for enactment. Financial Implications: proposed development. No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the Report PD 07-03 Date: January 24, 2003 Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 18/02 Page 2 Background: 1.0 Comments Received 1.1 At November 21, 2002 Information Meeting (see text of Information Report and Meeting Minutes, Attachments #2 and #3) From Residents Opposed - traffic concerns - parking increase on street From Applicant - wants a safe neighbourhood - requires space for her grown children - second units not in character with community - community safety concerns - property maintenance concerns - precedent setting 1.2 Following Information Meeting Residents Opposed: - no sense of community - lower standards of living - negative neighbour relations - increase parking on street - safety of children in area - (see Attachments #4 to #5) Agencies: Durham Planning Department - conforms with Regional Official Plan - no Provincial interests (see Attachment #6) City Departments: Fire Prevention - property would have to meet the requirements of the Ontario Building And Fire Codes (see Attachment #7). Report PO 07-03 Date: January 24, 2003 Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 18/02 Page 3 2.0 Discussion 2.1 Site-specific Zoning Application Won't Prejudice On-going City-Wide Zoning Review of Two-Unit Houses The City's Official Plan encourages a broad diversity of housing by form, location, size, tenure, and cost within the neighbourhoods and villages of the City, so that the housing needs of existing and future residents can be met as they evolve overtime. The City is in the process of completing a review Qf the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to establish criteria and standards for sècond units. Until such time as this review is complete it is appropriate that individual zoning amendments for second dwelling units be considered on their own merits. Approval of this application will not prejudice the City's second unit review process. 2.2 Existing House will Continue to Appear as a Single Dwelling This rezoning application was a result of a building inspection of an approved building permit for a below grade entrance. Upon inspection, it was discovered that a second dwelling unit existed. Upon being advised that a second unit was not permitted, the applicant submitted a Zoning By-law Amendment Application. The existing zoning of the lands is 'S3' - Single Detached Dwelling Residential Zone, which permits one dwelling unit per lot. The introduction of a second dwelling unit and associated construction within the existing dwelling, and its impact on the established streetscape, was reviewed to ensure that the existing dwelling will continue to appear as one dwelling. The main dwelling will have two units, with no indication of the existence of a second dwelling unit. The second unit can be accommodated within the building without detection from outside thereby visually maintaining neighbourhood character within the Brock Ridge Neighbourhood. 2.3 Existing Two-Car Driveway Provides Adequate Parking for Proposed Additional Unit The subject property currently supports two parking spaces in the existing attached garage and two in the driveway. Report PD 07-03 Date: January 24, 2003 Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 18/02 Page 4 Any increase in parking demand created by a second unit should be accommodated on-site, but may require the dedicated use of the garage for parking purposes. It is recommended, that a minimum of three parking spaces be maintained on the property at all times and that this requirement be established in the implementing zoning by-law. With four parking spaces currently in place, the site has adequate parking to accommodate the proposed second unit. The attached by-law, included as Appendix I to this report, implements Staff's recommendation to approve the establishment of a second dwelling unit in the main dwelling. 3.0 Applicant's Comments The applicant is aware of the contents of this report and has reviewed the draft by-law. Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Location Map Information Report Minutes from Public Information Meeting Letter from Dan & Pat Bates, 1625 McBrady Crescent E-Mail from Joanne Saagi, 1628 McBrady Crescent Comments from the Region of Durham Planning Department Comments from the City of Pickering, Operations & Emergency Services Report PD 07-03 Date: January 24, 2003 Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 18/02 Page 5 Prepared By: Approved I Endorsed By: ~~. Ge R anowskl Planning Technician , RPP ning & Development GXR: pbd Attachments Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council " APPENDIX I TO REPORTNUMBERPD07~3 DRAFT BY-LAW ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 18/02 THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING BY-lAW NO. Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2024/85 & 2099/85, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering District Planning Area, Region of Durham in Part of lots 102 & 103, Plan 40M-1380, (Part 10, 40R-9291), City.of Pickering. (A 18/02) WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to change the zoning of the lands to permit the establishment of a second dwelling unit within the existing dwelling, on the subject lands, being; Part of lots 102 & 103, Plan 40M~1380, (Part 10, 40R-9291), City of Pickering. AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2024/85 & 2099/85, is therefore deemed necessary; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCil OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOllOWS: 1. TEXT AMENDMENT SECTION 5. Provisions of By-law 2024/85 is hereby amended, as follows: (1) Clause 5. (1 )(a) is amended by adding the following subclause: (ii) Despite subclause 5.(1 )(b )(ix) or any other provision of this By-law, a detached dwelling unit on Part of lots 102 & 103, Plan 40M-1380 may include a second dwelling unit in the main dwelling; (2) Clause 5.(1 )(b )(x) is amended by adding the following paragraph: (a) where a detached dwelling is permitted to include a second dwelling unit, there shall be provided and maintained a minimum of three parking spaces on that lot. 2. BY. LAW 2024/85 By-law 2024/85 is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as set out in Section 1 above. Definitions and subject matter not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by the relevant provisions of By-law 3036, as amended. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE This By-law shall take effect from the day of passing hereof subject to the approval of the Ontario Municipal Board, if required. Wayne Arthurs, Mayor day of ,2003. Bruce Taylor, Clerk ATTACHMENT 1...1 TO REPORTIPD Dï-o3 FINCH AVENUE FINCH AVENUE City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PART OF LOTS 102 & 103, PLAN 40M-1380 NOW 40R-9291, PART 10 APPLICANT S. BARRETT DATE OCT. 3, 2002 DRAWN BY IB APPLICATION No. A18/02 SCALE 1:7500 CHECKED BY GR 1 FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY PN-13 PA- ATTACHMENT 1.:2 TO REPORT #' PO () 7 -(1 3 Ciú¡ 0# INFORMATION REPORT NO. 34-02 FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF November 21, 2002 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 SUBJECT: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 18/02 Sandrea Barrett 1626 McBrady Crescent Part Lots 102 & 103, Plan 40M-1380 Part 10, 40R-9291 . City of Pickering 1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION - the subject property is located on the west side of McBrady Crescent and is approximately 380 square metres in size with a lot frontage of 12.48 metres (see location map Attachment #1); - the subject property currently supports a detached dwelling; - the surrounding land uses are residential to the north, south, east and west. 2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL - the applicant proposes to amend the existing zoning on the subject lands to permit the establishment of a second dwelling unit in the main dwelling. 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan - the Durham Regional Official Plan identifies the subject lands as being designated "Living Area", where lands are to be used predominately for housing purposes; - the applicant's proposal appears to comply with this designation. 3.3 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Information Report No. 34-02 ATTACHMENT#~ TO REPORT I PO {', '7 - 0 "J, Page 2 3.2 PickerinQ Official Plan the subject property is designated "Urban Residential Area - Low Density Area" within the Brock Ridges Neighbourhood; this designation permits residential development up to and including 30 units per net hectare for developmet1t within an "Urban Residential Area - Low Density Area", the proposed development would provide a net density of 26.27 units per net hectare; Schedule II of the Pickering Official Plan - "Transportation Systems" designates McBrady Crescent as a Local Road; the applicant's proposal appears to conform to the applicable Official Plan policies. Zenina By-law 3036 the subject property is currently zoned "83" - Detached Dwelling Residential Zone by By-law 3036 as amended by By-law 2024/85 and 2099/85; - this zone permits the establishment of one detached dwelling unit on a lot with a minimum lot frontage of 12 metres and a minimum lot area of 350 square metres; an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to permit the establishment of a second dwelling unit within the existing main dwelling unit. RESULTS OF CIRCULATION Resident Comments - no written resident comments have been received to date; Agency Comments - no agency comments have been received to date; Staff Comments in reviewing the application to-date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: . the compatibility of the proposed development with the existing built form; . examination of the existing parking situation on-site, to determine its suitability in serving the proposed second dwelling unit. this Department will conclude its position on the application after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies and the public. Information Report No. 34-02 ATTACHMENT':;¿ TO REPORT # PO Q7 -0 3 Page 3 5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION - written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department; oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council; if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal; . if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you must request such in writing to the City Clerk. 6.0 OTHER INFORMATION 6.1 Appendix No. I list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing report; 6.2 Information Received - full scale copies of the Applicant's submitted plan are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department; 6.3 Property Principal - the principal of this property is Sandrea Barrett. ~. Ge . ff J'hanowski Planning Technician 'j "ý '~f#k~'b..,l(z~ét"./\.., . Lynda I ylor, MCIP ~PP Manager, Develo("ment Review GXR:td Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development ATTACHMENTI_~ TO REPORT # PO 07- c.J ~ APPENDIX NO. I TO INFORMATION REPORT NO. 34-02 COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS (1 ) none received to date; COMMENTING AGENCIES (1 ) none received to date; COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS (1 ) Planning & Development Department; 4. 5. Statutory Public Information Meeting =:? TThursday, November 21, 2002 ATTACHMENT #~- '0 REPORT # PO o7~o 3 ..-.> 7:00 P.M. The Manager, Development Review, provided an overview of the requirements of the Planning Act and the Ontario Municipal Board respecting this meeting and matters under consideration there at. (II) ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 18/02 SANDREA BARRETT 1626 MCBRADY CRESCENT PART LOTS 102 & 103, PLAN 40M-1380 PART 10, 40R-9291 1. Geoff Romanowski, provided an explanation of the application, as outlined in I nformation Report #34-02. 2. Sandrea Barrett, applicant, advised that this application is to provide an additional bedroom and separate entrance for her grown children. 3. Penny Giraudy, 1620 McBrady Cres, stated that she purchased in a single family development, paid extra to have more property and does not want to see basement apartments legalized which could possibly cause decreased assessment value. She has telephoned the by-law department about on-street parking and will continue to do so. She further stated that 1626 McBrady Cres. already had a three piece bathroom. Dan Bates, 1625 McBrady Cres., advised that they bought based on green space environment and schools. A second living unit in a home unfortunately causes increased garbage which, if not picked up, is thrown elsewhere, Renters are not concerned about the community and allowing basement apartments causes stress on relationships with neighbours. He stated his opposition to any additional basement apartments. Pat Bates, 1625 McBrady Cres., stated her disappointment with what is happening in her neighbourhood. Her concerns include increased traffic, value of their home, break-ins and other community problems. She further stated her concern that speaking out against basement apartments will cause ill feelings with neighbours. She doesn't understand the process or how this situation occurred. Statutory Public' Information Meeting Thursday, November 21, 2002 ATTACHMENT#-'----:-TO 7:00 P.M. REPORT 1/ PO 07-0 ~ 6. Geoff Romanowski, advised that the applicant submitted an application for a new entrance and upon inspection the inspectors noticed the apartment and a stop work order was given. The applicant was informed of the zoning requirements and therefore submitted a rezoning application. 7. Sandrea Barrett, applicant, confirmed that they are willing to comply with whatever the City requires. They are also concerned with safety, do not park on the road and there was no bathroom in the basement of this home when they purchased it. This apartment is only for their grown children when they come home from university and when the stop work order was issued, they immediately came in for a permit. . ~~-- It) JiL:r\Jtfl ti PO 07-0 ~ City Clerk, Mr. Bruce Taylor City of Pickering Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario LlV 6K7 email btaylor@city.pickering.on.ca Telephone (905) 420-4611 Fax (905) 420-9685 Mr. & Mrs. Bates 1625 McBrady Crescent Pickering, Ontario Canada LlX 2B7 email pmbates@rogers.com Telephone (905) 428-0056 FAX (905) 686-8912 Re: Zoning Amendment Application - A18/02 Dear Mr. Taylor, Weare writing to express that we are opposed to the proposal to change the existing zoning of 1626 McBrady Crescent to permit the establishment of a second unit in the main dwelling. We have lived in our home on McBrady Crescent since purchasing it in 1987 when the subdivision was originally developed. The key reasons for choosing our home were related to safety and neighbourhood environment. We paid a premium for our lot with no plans of ever moving because we valued the location. Over time we have seen the degradation of the neighbourhood. Because of this, our valued neighbours have left or are planning to move as soon as possible. Basement apartments are largely to blame for this problem. They tend to exist in this neighbourhood because people can not afford their homes. They fill the main dwelling with extended family and ftiends, then they rent out the basement to whoever they can get. They don't care about the neighbourhood, they simply need affordable housing. This neighbourhood has become known for this and the current house values and new purchasers reflect this. We have more than our fair share of people and basement apartments in this neighbourhood already. We have observed that the large majority of people living in those basement apartments demonstrate a lack of interest and care in our neighbourhood so there tends to be a increase in theft, litter, destruction of public and private property, and civil disturbances. There have been many times where police had to be called to houses on McBrady Crescent that have basement apartments. In one situation, neighbours had to deal with young offenders, who stole property, threatened mothers and assaulted one of the fathers. Fortunately the neighbourhood banded together to work with the Police and the Courts to expel the criminal element ftom their basement apartment. We do not need the added worry of having to deal with yet another basement apartment. If the City is trying to generalize the placement of basement apartments throughout Pickering then new apartments in our neighborhood should be stopped until the rest of Pickering catches up to the same density of units. McBrady Crescent should be a premium location in this neighbourhood because of low traffic and low population. The houses are spaced about 40' apart on average and there are no houses on the side of the crescent facing Brock Road or Dellbrook Plaza. Also, where there are houses on the outside of the crescent, there is no sidewalk. This means that under normal circumstances with single family residences only, cars should not be parked on the road. The only traffic should be for those living or visiting here, thus allowing children to play safely, they same as they would living on a court. The police said it should be easy to keep the street safe because it is not a through street and we should be able to recognize unknown people and vehicles. We can no longer do this because we don't even know who our neighbours are because there are so many and they change so often. On top of having to deal with negative experiences with uncaring tenants, we have also experienced stress in our relationships with some neighbours who bring in basement apartments. An issue that we may have with their tenants' behaviour becomes an issue with the landowner. As homeowners we must compromise and get along with our neighbours. A single-family residence means that there should be only one family ATTACHMENT' ¥ TO REPORT # PO 07~()3 per home to deal with, and that they should have a vested interest in their property. That is the reason why single family residences carry the highest premium of all home purchase options. We believe that there will be only negative implications in pennitting more dwelling units to be added to the existing houses in the neighbourhood. There does not seem to be any value to the neighbourhood for allowing second units in single-family dwellings, instead there will be a decrease in our quality oflife and the fmancial value of our property. The only benefit would be to the landlord in the form of rental income. We did not purchase our home in the subdivision designed for mid-sized single-family residential dwellings with the expectation that the City would then pennit changes that would significantly impact the ability of residents to use and enjoy their property and the neighbourhood as designed in the original plan. As per the specific situation with the home at 1626 McBrady Crescent, it is situated on the side of the street that has a sidewalk and it faces Brock Road. The driveway is already full so there would not be room for tenant vehicles. The applicant stated at the public meeting that her immediate neighbour at 1624 McBrady Crescent has a basement apartment that requires cars to be parked on the road, and that she has had problems with them. Both these homes have the same amount of parking space, yet the applicant appears to have more family living in her home, so we don't see how she won't add to the parking problem. This section of McBrady Crescent should have the least amount of traffic and parked vehicles and be the open area for children to play. The applicant applied for the rezoning after she had already installed the second dwelling without the necessary approvals. As basement apartments are illegal in the City of Pickering we would like the City to take the stance of all Municipalities included in Report No. 31-02 that boarder on Toronto and have the homeowner remove the illegal unit. By-laws need to be enforced in order for them to have meaning and deter illegal behaviour. Please prove WTong our neighbours who say it is pointless to voice their opinion because the City will not listen anyway, and even if the zoning is not approved that the applicant will still keep the apartment since the By-laws won't be enforced. Please reward people for their efforts when they take the time and risk to speak out. We request that the City turn down the application for the zoning amendment that would allow a second unit to be added to the main dwelling at 1626 McBrady Crescent. Sincerely, Dan & Pat Bates cc. Mayor Wayne Arthurs, mayor@.city.pickering.on.ca Regional Ward 3 Councillor Rick Johnson, riohnson@.citv.pickering.on.ca Ward 3 Councillor David Pickles, dpickles@.city.pickering.on.ca GeoffRomanowski, Planning Technician, gromanowski@citv.pickering.on.ca Page 1 of 1 Romanowski, Geoff \rr'\"H"\P['~!V.J. z:;' f" ,{,. t i} hll'::" , t! ..m../c,.._- . U 'iEf:'¡¡¡U # PD~._O 7=-q.3___,,-,",~.. .---- From: Taylor, Bruce Sent: November 29, 2002 2:04 PM To: Romanowski, Geoff Subject: FW: Application No. A18/02 For your information -----Original Message----- From: Joanne Saagi [mailto:JSAAGI@mccarthy.ca] Sent: November 28, 2002 10:50 AM To: Taylor, Bruce Subject: Application No. A18j02 1626 McBrady Crescent Pickering, Ontario Applicant: Sandrea BaITett I spoke with you earlier on this month with respect to this application. I am the direct neighbour at 1628 McBrady Crescent. I w ish to advise that I oppose this application in that this is a single family residential neighbourhood and I do not wish to have the problems associated with tenants. Thank you for your time, Joanne Saagi 1628 McBrady Crescent Pickering, Ontario LlX 2B5 905-427-4761 ---------------------- ---------------------- NOTE: This e-mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message, NOTE: Ce courriel est destiné exclusivement au(x) destinataire(s) mentionné(s) ci-dessus et peut contenir de I'information privilégiée, confidentielle etjou dispensée de divulgation aux termes des lois applicables, 51 vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, ou s'il ne vous est pas destiné, veuillez Ie mentionner immédiatement à I' expéditeur et effacer ce courrie!. ---------------------- ---------------------- 11/29/2002 The Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department 1615 DUNDAS ST. E. 4TH FLOOR, LANG TOWER WEST BUILDING P.O, BOX 623 WHITBY, ON L 1 N 6A3 (905) 728-7731 ""AX: (905) 436-,6612 ww:region,durham.on.ca A.L. Georgieft, MCIP, RPP Commissioner of Planning "SERVICE EXCELLENCE forour COMMUNITY" ' AHACH'MENT#~~~_TO ' ~ErORT # PD- tJ 7-{) ~ --~~~. November 7, ,2002 ",-, - R E, C, -, E I V ED,],,' I ' ',', '. \ NOV 1 -¡ 20021 I CITY OF PICKERING , PLANNING AND , j DEVELOPMENT f;1EPARTMENr Geoff Romanowski, Planning Technician Planning & DevelopmentDepartment. One the Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L 1V 6K7 Dear Mr. Romanowski: Re: Zoning Amendment Application A 18/02 . Applicant: Sandrea Barrett. ' Location: Part of Lot 19, Concession 2 Municipality: City of Pickering' We have reviewed this ,application and the following comments are offered with respect to compliance with the Durham Regional Official, . Plan, the proposed method of servicing and delegated provincial plan review responsibilities. ' , ' . The purpose of-the application is to amend the existing zoning on the subject lands to permit the establishment of a second dwelling unit in the main dwelling. ' ,The subject property is designated "Living Area" in the Durham Regional Official Plan. "Lands within this designation are to be used predominantly for housing purposes and shall be developed to incorporate the widest possible variety of housing types, sizes and tenl,Jre to provide living accommodations that address various socio-economicfactors. The , , proposed amendment is inconformitywiththe Durham Regional Official Plan. Municipal water supply and sanitary sewer services are available to the subject property. This a'pplication has, been scre~ned in accordance with the terms of the . provincial plan review responsibilities. No provincial interests appear to be affected by this proposal. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me. " 100% Post Consumer , If..__6~_-~¡u ir¿Unl II PD.,,< tJ 7-0 ~ --- Page 2 Yours truly" "/7:2). '/ ,'. '. ,/ / '. /'~<'4 "/ .~ 7' Ray Davies, Planner Current Operations Branch cc. Rob Roy, Durham Region Wo.rks Department R:\tralninglrdlzoning\pjckering a18-02.doè ATTACHMENT #_7__"".- TO ::~EF'mr¡ /I PD ..P? -°.3" Operations & Emergency Services Fire Prevention Date: Tuesday, November 05,2002 To: Geoff Romanowski Planning Technician From: Rex Heath Fire Prevention Officer File Type & Zoning Amendment Application - A 18/02 Number Owner/Applicant Property Location Proposal Fire Departments Requirements Reviewed by: Sandrea Barrett 1626 McBrady Crescent; West side of McBrady Crescent; Part Lots 102 & 103, Plan 40M-1380 (Part 10, 40R-9291) To change the existing zoning to permit the establishment of a second unit in the main dwellinq 1) The addition of an existing unit is clearly identified by a numbering/signage system that is easily recognizable from the street in the event of emergencies. (A new street numbering/signage by-law may have to be created for this application or the existing street numbering by-law may be able to be amended to accommodate such properties) 2) The property would have to meet the requirements of the Ontario Building and or Ontario Fire Code. 3) The applicant would be requested to submit a set of drawings to either the Building or Fire Departments for review and comment. 4) The applicant would be subject to an inspection by the Electrical Safety Authority to ensure that there are no electrical deficiencies in the house. I{PL~