The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutJuly 11, 2022 Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Members of the public may attend the meeting in person, or may observe the meeting proceedings by viewing the livestream. A recording of the meeting will also be available on the City’s website following the meeting. Page 1. Roll Call 2. Disclosure of Interest 3. Delegations Members of the public looking to provide a verbal delegation to Members of Council for items listed under Section 4 of the agenda, may do so either in person, or through a virtual audio telephone connection into the meeting. For more information, and to register as a delegate, visit www.pickering.ca/delegation, and complete the on-line delegation form or email clerks@pickering.ca. The list of delegates who have registered to speak will be called upon one by one by the Chair in the order in which they have registered. A maximum of 10 minutes shall be allotted for each delegation. Please be advised that your name and address will appear in the public record and will be posted on the City’s website as part of the meeting minutes. 4. Matters for Consideration 4.1 Director, Department, Report FIN 12-22 1 2022 Development Charge Background Study 2022 Community Benefits Strategy 2022 Parkland Conveyance By-law Recommendation: 1. That Report FIN 12-22 of the Director, Finance & Treasurer be received; 2. That the City of Pickering – Development Charges Background Study, dated May 11, 2022 as amended, prepared by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. as required under Section 10(1) of the Development Charges Act, 1997, be approved; Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 3. That Council approve the follow recommendations related to Development Charges as recommended by the Finance Department: a) That the Residential Development Charges for development on Seaton Lands be approved effective as of July 12, 2022 as per Table 1; Table 1 City of Pickering Development Charges – Seaton Lands Per Residential Dwelling Unit Effective July 12, 2022 Service Single or Semi- Detached Other Multiples Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor & 1 Bedroom Other Services Related to a Highway 746 575 434 266 Fire Protection Services 1,176 906 684 420 Parks and Recreation Services 13,273 10,224 7,719 4,737 Library Services 2,444 1,883 1,421 872 Growth-Related Studies 235 181 137 84 Stormwater Management 460 354 268 164 By-law Enforcement 103 79 60 37 Transportation - - - - Total 18,437 14,202 10,723 6,580 b) That the Residential Development Charges for development Outside of Seaton Lands be approved effective as of July 12, 2022 as per Table 2; Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Table 2 City of Pickering Development Charges – Outside of Seaton Lands Per Residential Dwelling Unit Effective July 12, 2022 Service Single or Semi- Detached Other Multiples Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor & 1 Bedroom Other Services Related to a Highway 746 575 434 266 Fire Protection Services 1,176 906 684 420 Parks and Recreation Services 13,273 10,224 7,719 4,737 Library Services 2,444 1,883 1,421 872 Growth-Related Studies 235 181 137 84 Stormwater Management 460 354 268 164 By-law Enforcement 103 79 60 37 Transportation 13,461 10,369 7,829 4,805 Total 31,898 24,571 18,552 11,385 c) That the Non-Residential (Commercial, Industrial and Institutional) Development Charges be approved effective as of July 12, 2022 as shown in Table 3; Table 3 City of Pickering Development Charges Non-Residential Effective July 12, 2022 Service Per Net Ha of Prestige Employment Land in Seaton Per ft2 of Total Floor Area Municipal Wide Services: Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Other Services Related to a Highway 11,695 0.34 Fire Protection Services 18,492 0.53 Parks and Recreation Services 35,927 1.03 Library Services 6,698 0.19 Growth-Related Studies 1,083 0.03 Stormwater Management 7,234 0.21 By-law Enforcement 1,564 0.04 Total Municipal Wide Services 82,693 2.37 Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation - 4.73 Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands - 4.73 Seaton 82,693 2.37 Rest of Pickering - 7.10 d) That the proposed capital programs contained in the Background Study be indicative of Council’s intention, to ensure that the studies and capital expenditures required to meet the increase in need for services related to the forecasted development will be met, as required under Paragraph 3 of subsection 5(1) of the Development Charges Act, 1997; Indexing e) That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be directed that residential and non-residential Development Charges be indexed annually on July 1 each year by applying the annual change in the Statistics Canada Quarterly “Construction Price Statistics” for the period ending March 31 of each year; Exemptions Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca f) That all exemptions and exceptions be as required under the Development Charges Act, 1997 and as defined in the proposed By-law; Administration g) That the City continue the Reserve established for the City’s share (i.e. the non-development charge portion) of the costs of services included in the Development Charges Study and that contributions be included in the Annual Current Budget for consideration by Council; h) That the originally proposed By-law has been modified since the public meeting on June 20, 2022, and Council confirms that no further public meeting under the Development Charges Act, 1997 (S.12) is necessary as a result; i) That the City Clerk be instructed to undertake the By-law passage notification provisions under the Development Charges Act, 1997 and Ontario Regulation 82/98; j) That the Development Charges By-law attached to this report be enacted at this meeting of Council; k) That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to revise the funding ratio’s for 2022 and prior budget approved development charge funded projects where applicable to reflect Council’s adoption of the 2022 Development Charges Background Study and Community Benefits Strategy, and any funding shortfall from development charges will be addressed when project proceeds; and, l) That the payments related to “10 percent Soft Services” as provided for by the Seaton Financial Impacts Agreement dated November 26, 2015, be increased by 17.3 percent, effective as of July 12, 2022; 4. That the City of Pickering – Community Benefits Strategy, dated May 20, 2022, and updated June 23, 2022, prepared by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. as required under Section 37 (9) of the Planning Act, be approved; Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 5. That Council approve the following recommendations related to the Community Benefits Charge (CBC) as recommend by the City Development Department and the Finance Department; a) That the Community Benefits Charge for applicable development or redevelopment be approved, effective as of September 30, 2022 as follows: Unit Type CBC Charge Apartments: 2 + bedrooms $1,070 Apartments: bachelor and 1 bedroom $657 b) That the draft by-law to establish a Community Benefits Charges and Reserve Fund, be finalized and enacted at this meeting of Council; c) That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be directed that Community Benefit Charges be indexed annually on July 1 each year by applying the annual change in the Statistics Canada Quarterly “Construction Price Statistics” for the period ending March 31 of each year; d) That the originally proposed By-law has been modified since the public meeting on June 20, 2022, and Council confirms that no further consultation under the Planning Act, 1990 (section 10) is necessary; e) That the City Clerk be instructed to undertake the By-law passage notification provisions under the Planning Act, 1990 and Ontario Regulation 509/20; f) That any funding shortfall for Administration Services - consulting costs due to the adoption of the 2022 Community Benefits Charge Strategy be addressed when the consulting work proceeds; and, Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca g) That the Public Benefits Reserve Fund By-law No. 7590/17 be repealed and the associated Reserve Fund be closed once the committed funds are spent. 6. That Council approve the following recommendations related to Parkland Conveyance By-law as recommended by the City Development Department: a) That the draft by-law to require the Conveyance of Land for Park or Other Public Recreational Purposes as a condition of development or redevelopment, or the subdivision of lands, be finalized and enacted at this meeting of Council; b) That the City Clerk be instructed to undertake the By-law passage notification provisions under the Planning Act, 1990 and Ontario Regulation 509/20; and, c) That the balance of funds in the Parkland Dedication Reserve Fund collected under By-law No. 7341/14 be combined with the newly established Parkland Conveyance By-law; 7. That the appropriate staff of the City of Pickering be authorized to give effect thereto. 4.2 Director, Finance & Treasurer, Report FIN 13-22 249 PARA Marine Search & Rescue Grant Request Recommendation: 1. That Report FIN 13-22 of the Director, Finance & Treasurer be received; 2. That Council approve a grant in the amount of $13,500 to PARA Marine Search & Rescue and this expense be funded from account 503040.11100; and, 3. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. 4.3 Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, Report CLK 04-22 260 Appointment of an Integrity Commissioner Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca - 2022 – 2026 Term of Council Recommendation: 1. That Report CLK 04-22, regarding Appointment of an Integrity Commissioner, be received; 2. That Council appoints Principles Integrity as Integrity Commissioner for the City of Pickering for the Term of Council commencing November 15, 2022, with the option to renew for an additional Council Term, subject to the Council of the Regional Municipality of Durham approving and authorizing the appointment of Principles Integrity in accordance with Section 223.3 of the Municipal Act as the Regional Municipality of Durham’s Integrity Commissioner; 3. That the draft By-law, included as Attachment #1 to Report CLK 04- 22 to confirm the appointment of Principles Integrity as the provider of Integrity Commissioner services for the City of Pickering, be enacted; 4. That subject to the enactment of the By-law to appoint Principles Integrity, that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement with Principles Integrity, for Integrity Commissioner Services for the City of Pickering, consistent with the draft by-law and on terms satisfactory to the City Clerk and Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor; and, 5. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this Report. 4.4 Fire Chief, Report FIR 03-22 267 Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services - Lakeridge Health Central East Prehospital Care Program (CEPCP) Recommendation: 1. That Report FIR 03-22 of the Fire Chief, regarding the Agreement to provide Medical Oversight Services between Pickering Fire Services and Lakeridge Health, be received; 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Agreement with Lakeridge Health Central East Prehospital Care Program Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca (CEPCP) to provide Medical Oversight and training to the Pickering Fire Department, set out in Attachment 1 to this report, subject to minor revisions as may be required by the Fire Chief and the Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor; and, 3. That appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions to implement the recommendations in this Report. 4.5 Director, Operations, Report OPS 17-22 296 Additional Funds for Pickering Heritage & Community Centre Pre-Construction Costs Recommendation: 1. That Report OPS 17-22 of the Director, Operations regarding additional costs for pre-construction work to be completed for the Pickering Heritage & Community Centre (PHCC) at the Pickering Museum Village be received; 2. That unspent funds provided by Reports CS 19-18 and CS 34-18 for architectural, landscape and engineering services for the Pickering Heritage & Community Centre at the Pickering Museum Village be re- allocated for the conversion of existing technical documents to meet Net-Zero Design criteria in accordance with the City’s Green and Inclusive Community Buildings (GICB) grant application and other related costs included in Recommendations 3 to 5 below, and as presented in Table 3; 3. That as per the proposal submitted by Hariri Pontarini Architects dated June 17, 2022, in the amount of $438,327.00 (HST included), and net cost of $394,727.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 4. That in accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 10.03 (c), proposal V 22024 dated June 17, 2022, as submitted by Vertical Stat-Up Commissioning in the amount of $67,992.00 (HST included), and a net cost of $61,229.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 5. That in accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 10.03 (c), proposal P22-007 dated June 17, 2022, as submitted by Independent Project Managers in the amount of $37,340.00 (HST Included), and a net cost of $33,626.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 6. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to finance the additional net costs of $576,078.00 from the unspent funds by applying the funding ratio as per 2022 Development Charges Background Study as follows: a) the sum of $99,765.00 by a transfer from the Rate Stabilization Reserve; b) the sum of $21,211.00 by a transfer from the DC City Share Reserve; c) the sum of $241,952.00 by a transfer from the Development Charges Reserve Fund – Parks & Recreation; d) the sum of $23,043.00 by a transfer from the Development Charges Reserve Fund – Library Services; e) the sum of $190,107.00 from the GICB grant; and, 7. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. 5. By-laws 5.1 By-law 7953/22 123 Being a By-law Regarding Development Charges. [Refer to Item 4.1 Report FIN 12-22] 5.2 By-law 7954/22 228 Being a By-law to Establish Community Benefits Charges for the City of Pickering and hereby establish the Community Benefits Charges Reserve Fund. [Refer to Item 4.1 Report FIN 12-22] 5.3 By-law 7955/22 246 Being a By-law to require the conveyance of land for park or other public recreational purposes as a condition of development or redevelopment, or the subdivision of lands. [Refer to Item 4.1 Report FIN 12-22] Special Council Meeting Agenda July 11, 2022 Hybrid Electronic Meeting Council Chambers 2:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 5.4 By-law 7956/22 264 Being a by-law to confirm the Appointment of Principles Integrity as the Integrity Commissioner for the City of Pickering. [Refer to Item 4.3 Report CLK 04-22] 5.5 By-law 7957/22 302 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, Part of Lot 18, Concession 1, Parts 1 to 20 and 22 to 40, Parts 21 and 41, 40R-26237 (Save and Except Parts 1 to 3, 40R-27791), City of Pickering (A 07/20) (SmartCentres) 6. Confirmation By-law 7. Adjournment Report to Council Report Number: FIN 12-22 Date: July 11, 2022 From: Stan Karwowski Director, Finance & Treasurer Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study 2022 Community Benefits Strategy 2022 Parkland Conveyance By-law -File: F-4920-001 Recommendation: 1.That Report FIN 12-22 of the Director, Finance & Treasurer be received; 2.That the City of Pickering – Development Charges Background Study, dated May 11, 2022 as amended, prepared by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. as required under Section 10(1) of the Development Charges Act, 1997, be approved; 3.That Council approve the follow recommendations related to Development Charges as recommended by the Finance Department: a)That the Residential Development Charges for development on Seaton Lands be approved effective as of July 12, 2022 as per Table 1; Table 1 City of Pickering Development Charges – Seaton Lands Per Residential Dwelling Unit Effective July 12, 2022 Service Single or Semi- Detached Other Multiples Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor & 1 Bedroom Other Services Related to a Highway 746 575 434 266 Fire Protection Services 1,176 906 684 420 Parks and Recreation Services 13,273 10,224 7,719 4,737 Library Services 2,444 1,883 1,421 872 Growth-Related Studies 235 181 137 84 Stormwater Management 460 354 268 164 By-law Enforcement 103 79 60 37 Transportation - - - - Total 18,437 14,202 10,723 6,580 - 1 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 2 b)That the Residential Development Charges for development Outside of Seaton Lands be approved effective as of July 12, 2022 as per Table 2; Table 2 City of Pickering Development Charges – Outside of Seaton Lands Per Residential Dwelling Unit Effective July 12, 2022 Service Single or Semi- Detached Other Multiples Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor & 1 Bedroom Other Services Related to a Highway 746 575 434 266 Fire Protection Services 1,176 906 684 420 Parks and Recreation Services 13,273 10,224 7,719 4,737 Library Services 2,444 1,883 1,421 872 Growth-Related Studies 235 181 137 84 Stormwater Management 460 354 268 164 By-law Enforcement 103 79 60 37 Transportation 13,461 10,369 7,829 4,805 Total 31,898 24,571 18,552 11,385 c)That the Non-Residential (Commercial, Industrial and Institutional) Development Charges be approved effective as of July 12, 2022 as shown in Table 3; Table 3 City of Pickering Development Charges Non-Residential Effective July 12, 2022 Service Per Net Ha of Prestige Employment Land in Seaton Per ft2 of Total Floor Area Municipal Wide Services: Other Services Related to a Highway 11,695 0.34 Fire Protection Services 18,492 0.53 Parks and Recreation Services 35,927 1.03 Library Services 6,698 0.19 Growth-Related Studies 1,083 0.03 Stormwater Management 7,234 0.21 By-law Enforcement 1,564 0.04 Total Municipal Wide Services 82,693 2.37 Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation - 4.73 Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands - 4.73 Seaton 82,693 2.37 Rest of Pickering - 7.10 - 2 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 3 d) That the proposed capital programs contained in the Background Study be indicative of Council’s intention, to ensure that the studies and capital expenditures required to meet the increase in need for services related to the forecasted development will be met, as required under Paragraph 3 of subsection 5(1) of the Development Charges Act, 1997; Indexing e) That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be directed that residential and non-residential Development Charges be indexed annually on July 1 each year by applying the annual change in the Statistics Canada Quarterly “Construction Price Statistics” for the period ending March 31 of each year; Exemptions f) That all exemptions and exceptions be as required under the Development Charges Act, 1997 and as defined in the proposed By-law; Administration g) That the City continue the Reserve established for the City’s share (i.e. the non-development charge portion) of the costs of services included in the Development Charges Study and that contributions be included in the Annual Current Budget for consideration by Council; h) That the originally proposed By-law has been modified since the public meeting on June 20, 2022, and Council confirms that no further public meeting under the Development Charges Act, 1997 (S.12) is necessary as a result; i) That the City Clerk be instructed to undertake the By-law passage notification provisions under the Development Charges Act, 1997 and Ontario Regulation 82/98; j) That the Development Charges By-law attached to this report be enacted at this meeting of Council; k) That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to revise the funding ratio’s for 2022 and prior budget approved development charge funded projects where applicable to reflect Council’s adoption of the 2022 Development Charges Background Study and Community Benefits Strategy, and any funding shortfall from development charges will be addressed when project proceeds; and l) That the payments related to “10 percent Soft Services” as provided for by the Seaton Financial Impacts Agreement dated November 26, 2015, be increased by 17.3 percent, effective as of July 12, 2022; - 3 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 4 4.That the City of Pickering – Community Benefits Strategy, dated May 20, 2022, and updated June 23, 2022, prepared by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. as required under Section 37 (9) of the Planning Act, be approved; 5.That Council approve the following recommendations related to the Community Benefits Charge (CBC) as recommend by the City Development Department and the Finance Department; a)That the Community Benefits Charge for applicable development or redevelopment be approved, effective as of September 30, 2022 as follows: Unit Type CBC Charge Apartments: 2 + bedrooms $1,070 Apartments: bachelor and 1 bedroom $657 b)That the draft by-law to establish a Community Benefits Charges and Reserve Fund, be finalized and enacted at this meeting of Council; c)That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be directed that Community Benefit Charges be indexed annually on July 1 each year by applying the annual change in the Statistics Canada Quarterly “Construction Price Statistics” for the period ending March 31 of each year; d)That the originally proposed By-law has been modified since the public meeting on June 20, 2022, and Council confirms that no further consultation under the Planning Act, 1990 (section 10) is necessary; e)That the City Clerk be instructed to undertake the By-law passage notification provisions under the Planning Act, 1990 and Ontario Regulation 509/20; f)That any funding shortfall for Administration Services - consulting costs due to the adoption of the 2022 Community Benefits Charge Strategy be addressed when the consulting work proceeds; and g)That the Public Benefits Reserve Fund By-law No. 7590/17 be repealed and the associated Reserve Fund be closed once the committed funds are spent. 6.That Council approve the following recommendations related to Parkland Conveyance By-law as recommended by the City Development Department: a)That the draft by-law to require the Conveyance of Land for Park or Other Public Recreational Purposes as a condition of development or redevelopment, or the subdivision of lands, be finalized and enacted at this meeting of Council; - 4 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 5 b) That the City Clerk be instructed to undertake the By-law passage notification provisions under the Planning Act, 1990 and Ontario Regulation 509/20; and c) That the balance of funds in the Parkland Dedication Reserve Fund collected under By-law No. 7341/14 be combined with the newly established Parkland Conveyance By-law; 7. That the appropriate staff of the City of Pickering be authorized to give effect thereto. Executive Summary: The recommended Development Charges and Community Benefit Charges represents the financial building blocks for the next five years. The capital projects included in the two studies reflects requests from “Council”, the professional opinion of senior staff and the local taxpayer through public consultation and/or conversations. Included in this year’s DC report is the new revenue tool (CBC fee) that allows municipalities to fund associated development-related capital infrastructure needs that are not already recovered from development charges. 1. Development Charges As required under the Development Charges Act, 1997, a complete review of development forecasts, servicing needs, financial implications and financing requirements, has been undertaken by the consultants: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., and staff of the City of Pickering. This has resulted in the identification of significant capital expenditures required for future development as contained in the Council approved Official Plan for the City of Pickering. Financing for these projects will come from Development Charges (“DC”) for the development related portion, and the tax levy, or other sources of revenue as may be available, for the portions attributable to existing development or for increases in the level of service. The DC rates set out in the Background Study are calculated on a cost recovery basis and represent what is allowed under the DC Act. The change from current rates is the result of revised growth forecasts, updated capital programs, updated project cost estimates, increase in historical level of service, and additional financing costs based on timing of expenditures and revenues and anticipated long-term debentures. The City received comments from the development industry community with regard to Seaton residential and non-residential employment land absorption rates that were presented in the May 11th version of the Background Study. In addition to the absorption rates, additional capital projects and updated construction cost estimates were identified after the May 11th version. Revisions to the absorption rates and updated capital costs have been made and reflected in the attached addendum. These revisions have resulted in a decrease in DC rates for non-residential land in the Seaton area. The non-residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land rate has decreased by $9,986 per net hectare, or 11 percent. The residential single dwelling for the Seaton area has increased slightly by $392 or 2 percent. - 5 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 6 In summary, the total increase for the Seaton residential DC rate for single detached unit is 65 percent or $7,265. For the rest of Pickering, a single detached unit has increased by 47 percent or $10,210. Pickering’s new DC rate is comparable with the neighbouring municipalities in the Durham Region. Lower Tier (Single Detached) DC Fees for Durham Lakeshore Municipalities as a Percentage of House Prices As the above chart indicates, Pickering’s proposed new DC fee rate is still very competitive as expressed as percentage of total house price. Pickering’s current DC fee rate represents 2.13 percent of estimated house price and increases to 3.11 percent for the proposed new rate. Even with this increase, the City of Pickering’s DC fees as expressed as a percentage of the total house price is equal to Ajax and Clarington and lower that Oshawa and Whitby. The non-residential DC rates are increasing by 61 percent for Seaton lands and 63 percent for the Prestige Employment Land in Seaton. For the rest of Pickering, the non-residential rate has increased by 60 percent. All residential and non-residential rates, being recommended continue to be one of the lowest, if not the lowest, in Durham Region. This positions the City of Pickering to be competitive and attractive for economic development. It is important to note that the Chief Administrative Officer, the Directors, and staff of all Departments providing services for new development have been involved in this Study, and concur with this report and its Recommendations. In addition, the By-law maintains the form of the previous By-law. 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% Clarington Oshawa Whitby Ajax Current Pickering Proposed Pickering - 6 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 7 2.Community Benefits Charges In 2020, legislative changes to the Planning Act replaced the density and height bonus provisions with a new financial tool, a Community Benefits Charge (“CBC”). A CBC is a financial contribution that is required to be paid when land is developed to contribute to the “capital costs of facilities, services and matters” incurred from development or redevelopment, and population growth. Single and lower tier municipalities may adopt a by-law to impose a CBC to recover the capital costs that may include: •land for parks or other public recreational purposes in excess of lands conveyed or funded by cash-in-lieu of parkland payments under Sections 42 and 51 of the Planning Act; •capital costs for services under subsection 2 (4) of the Development Charges Act that are not intended to be funded under a DC by-law; and •capital costs for municipal services ineligible for inclusion in a DC by-law. Preparation of a CBC Strategy is required to support a CBC By-law (see City of Pickering – Community Benefits Strategy, dated May 20, 2022, and updated June 23, 2022, prepared by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., Attachment #5). The Strategy identified the services to be funded through CBCs as follows: Arts, Culture and Museum; Animal Adoptions; and Administration. The Strategy did not recommend including parkland at this time. Following the release of the CBC Strategy on May 20, 2022, City staff further reviewed the eligible projects that could be funded from the CBC. This resulted in an increase in the total amount of costs that are recoverable from CBCs, and increase in the charge. For buildings meeting the required height, number of units, type of use, the CBC will require payment of $1,070 for each new apartment dwelling unit having 2 or more bedrooms, and $657 for apartment dwelling units that are bachelor or one bedroom. It is recommended that Council approve the CBC Strategy. A corresponding CBC By-law has been prepared (see Attachment #7). The CBC is payable on “apartment units”. The term “apartment unit” applies to the building typology, irrespective of tenure (rental; condominium; co-op; etc.). Additionally, for the purpose of the CBC, “apartment” includes a Stacked Townhouse development that has five or more storeys, and has ten or more units. Payment of CBCs, like DCs, is required at Building Permit issuance. Use of these funds for qualifying projects will be considered as part of the annual budgeting process. In response to the stakeholders consultation, changes were made to the By-law to add defined terms and to delay the effective date of the By-law to September 30, 2022. Additionally, provisions were added to establish the required CBC Reserve Fund, and administrative matters related to the Fund, such as investing, indexing, reporting, and allocating such monies collected. The CBC transition period, from By-law adoption to its effective date, is approximately 81 days and it is staff’s understanding that the length of the transition period is above average, compared to other municipalities. It is recommended the draft CBC By-law be finalized and enacted at this meeting of Council. - 7 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 8 As with the DC Study, the Chief Administrative Officer, the Directors, and staff of all Departments providing services for new development have been involved in the CBC Strategy, and concur with this report and its Recommendation. 3.Parkland Conveyance By-law As a result of recent changes in Provincial legislation, Pickering’s current Parkland Conveyance (“Parkland By-law”) By-law will expire on September 18, 2022. The new Parkland By-law contains all the provisions of the existing Parkland By-law respecting the collection of two percent of the land (or payment-in-lieu of land) for industrial and commercial purposes, and five percent of the land (or payment-in-lieu) for all other purposes. The new Parkland By-law also contains the provision of the existing By-law respecting the use of ‘alternative’ standards for high density development at the rate of up to one hectare of land for each 300 units. A new clause was added to conform with a 2015 change to the Planning Act, which established a new ‘alternate’ rate for collecting payment-in-lieu of land high density development calculated at a rate of up to one hectare of land for each 500 dwelling units. Consultation on the proposed By-law was undertaken simultaneously with the consultation for the DC Background Study and draft by-law, and the CBC Strategy and draft by-law. Staff received three sets of written comments on the new Parkland By-law from BILD and two developer groups (see Attachments #8 to #10). The stakeholders providing comments all acknowledged and accepted that the new Parkland By-law is in-keeping with the standard parkland rates provided in the Planning Act. In addition, the comments offered a variety of ideas and suggestions of how Pickering could consider innovating their collection of parkland (or payment-in-lieu) in the future. The suggestions can be addressed without changing the By-law. The only change made to the proposed Parkland By-law was to add an effective date of July 12, 2022. The proposed By-law is provided as Attachment #11. It is recommended that the draft By-law be finalized and enacted at this meeting of Council. Financial Implications: 1.Development Charges The proposed DC background study, as presented in Table 4 below, includes a gross capital program of $825 million, of which $542 million is to be recovered from DC’s. The residual amount of $283 million is more commonly referred to as “City Share” and this dollar amount will be funded from property taxes, senior level grant funding (such as Federal Gas Tax) or debt. The “City Share” funds the “benefit to existing” deduction and the post-period benefit. - 8 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 9 Table 4 Infrastructure Costs DC Recoverable and City Share Service Gross Capital Cost Less: Amount to be Recovered from DC’s City Share Other Services Related to a Highway $18,327,039 $19,773,436 ($1,446,397) Fire Protection Services 26,193,920 32,130,902 (5,936,982) By-law 9,659,844 2,849,355 6,810,489 Parks and Recreation Services 354,477,979 284,428,619 70,049,360 Library Services 107,035,016 54,961,537 52,073,479 Administration Studies 2,540,900 5,619,381 (3,078,481) Stormwater Management 64,828,700 13,181,293 51,647,407 Transportation 242,352,291 129,615,434 112,736,857 Total $825,415,689 $542,559,957 $282,855,732 As Table 4 indicates, for every dollar in growth related capital cost, the City has to fund 34 cents. This issue regarding the City total dollar cost was raised at the June 20th, 2022 statutory meeting by Council. One of the key tools in funding the City Share expense will be the use of long term debt, where appropriate, which will allocate the City Share capital cost basically over the life of the asset. Employing this strategy results in lowering the property tax increases and allocates the cost over the life of the asset and is funded by the local taxpayer who consumes and/or uses the asset. The other funding strategy is related to the City Centre project, whereby the City would sell its investment in Elexicon to pay for the City Share of the growth related capital costs. In addition, with Council approval, City staff would also consider using Casino revenue funds where appropriate. City staff will also, apply for all senior government grants to help reduce the taxpayer funding share. 2.Community Benefit Charges In developing the CBC Strategy, the following services and related capital costs were reviewed: Arts, Culture, and Museum Services; Animal Adoption Services; and Administration Services that includes capital funding for Civic Complex renovations. (A detailed list of capital projects that are being funded from the CBC fee can be found on page 4-4 of the document entitled “Community Benefits Strategy – City of Pickering, dated May 20, 2022, updated June 23, 2022” (see Attachment #5)). The City has identified a gross capital cost of $101.3 million, and the CBC will fund approximately $7.4 million due to the legislated restrictions (that is, that the charge is only on the high-density portion of new development). The CBC Strategy recommends that the City collect CBC revenues to help fund the City’s capital costs. Based on the 2022 Council approved budget, the City would have to increase property taxes by 10.1 percent to raise the equivalent amount from CBC fees. Therefore, it could be argued, that the introduction of the new revenue tool, has “in theory”, reduced future property tax increases. - 9 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 10 3.Parkland Conveyance By-law There will be no financial implications of enacting the new Parkland Conveyance By-law as the provisions have not changed. Discussion: 1.Development Charges In simplest terms, DC rates are calculated as follows: Growth-Related New Capital Costs Growth Forecast (Population) Growth-Related Capital Program The DC Capital program was developed by staff from all departments. Staff first reviewed the 2017 DC study, the 2019 and 2020 DC Updates, and removed projects that have been completed; then the timing and costs of projects that had not been completed were updated in the context of the new growth forecast or new/improved information that is now available. Lastly, projects were added to the program that are required to service the additional growth included in the 2022 Background Study. In the 2022 DC Background Study, some adjustments have been made to the service categories in order to better reflect our current growth-related needs and the most recent changes to the DC Act. The “Protective Services” category has been re-classified to two separate categories: Fire Protection Services and By-law Enforcement Services. Previously, the DC Act identified ineligible services such as museum and culture, but all other services were potentially eligible. As by-law enforcement and animal services were not listed as ineligible service, they could be included in a DC By-law and City staff included these two cost elements in the 2017 DC Study. When the Province, passed Bill 197, the COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, this legislation amended the DC Act, and only those services that are listed are eligible to be funded from DC fees. The eligible services include by-law enforcement but do not include Animal Services. Staff have now included funding for the animal shelter component in the new Community Benefits Charges (“CBC”), under the Animal Adoption Services category. Administrative Studies are no longer DC recoverable, and these costs have been transferred to the CBC Strategy as well. The guiding principle is to fund growth related expenditures whether permitted through DC fees or CBC fees in order to avoid transferring the cost to the local taxpayer. The Seaton Financial Impact Agreement (“FIA”) exempts the Seaton Development Area from the transportation component of the City-wide DC until Seaton has reached certain development targets as specified in the FIA. (It is anticipated that the Seaton landowners will reach these targets by 2031). This results in a lower overall DC rate for Seaton as compared to the rest of Pickering. - 10 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 11 Table 5 shows that the DC Eligible Costs in the 2022 Study have increased by 34.5 percent from the 2017 study. Table 5 Comparison of DC Funding Sources 2017 Study* ($M) 2022 Study ($M) Change % Gross Capital Costs 671.7 825.4 22.9 Less: DC Eligible Costs (403.5) (542.6) 34.5 Net City Share 268.2 282.8 5.4 *Includes annual indexing and 2019 & 2020 DC Updates The City share dollar amount of $282.8 million will be funded through property taxes, debt, and senior level government grants, such as Federal Gas Tax. The City’s current economic strategy focusing on industrial and commercial growth (taxation revenue) will assist the City in meeting its future growth related financial obligations. Comparison of DC Funding Sources As the above chart indicates, there has been a shift between funding sources, taxpayer to DC charges resulting in savings of approximately 5.7 percent or $46.8 million. Public Engagement Process On May 20th, staff reached out to the development industry by distributing the DC Background Study, dated May 11, 2022 and holding a stakeholder consultation on June 1, 2022. The City invited fourteen organizations and we had all fourteen organizations (24 individuals) attend the consultation. The City received comments from the development industry community with regard to Seaton residential and non-residential employment land absorption rates. 60.1%65.7% 39.9%34.3% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2017 DC Study 2022 DC Study Growth Funded (DC Charges)City Share - 11 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 12 Subsequent to this meeting, the City held a Statutory and Public Meeting on June 20, 2022. As a result of the input received at the stakeholders and public meetings, Watson & Associates has produced an Addendum to their May 11, 2022 Study, Attachment 1, which captures any changes resulting from the foregoing. Indexing Based on our current DC By-law, DC rates shall be adjusted annually as of July 1 each year based on the Non-residential Building Construction index in order to keep DC revenues current with construction costs. The previous indexing was done on July 1, 2021. As the current 2022 Background Study coincides with the July 1, 2022 indexing period, it is no longer necessary to index for the period of July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023. The capital costs are reflected at the 2022 values. DC rates to be approved in the current 2022 Background Study would be due for indexing on July 1, 2023. Transition Provision The proposed rates will come into effect on July 12, 2022. Any complete building permit applications received after July 11, 2022 will be subject to the new DC rate. The new DC rates shall not apply to those complete building permit applications received by July 11, 2022, whereby the building permit (or conditional building permit) is issued for all or part of the building on or before August 15, 2022. Financial Impact Agreement Soft Services-Indexing The FIA allows annual indexing for the soft services category. Traditionally, the annual indexing is calculated together with the DC indexing every July 1. As the City will not be doing the annual indexing for the DC rates due to the current 2022 Study, staff are including the annual indexing for the FIA soft services component in this report. See Attachment 4 for the detailed calculation. The soft services for a residential single unit has increased from $897 to $1,052 after applying the construction price index of 17.3 percent. Total FIA rate applicable for the same dwelling type after including non- indexed costs will be increased from $1,386 to $1,541 after indexing. 2.Community Benefits Charges 2.1 Background The CBC is a new growth funding tool, introduced by the Province in recent legislation. It allows municipalities to fund capital costs related to growth that are not already recovered from development charges and parkland provisions. The City of Pickering has recently completed a Community Benefits Strategy, as required by the legislation, to support the passing of a CBC By-law (see Community Benefits Strategy and By-law, Attachments #5 and #7). The CBC establishes a new charge on certain high density development to recover the capital costs relating to certain classes of services. The services identified to be supported are: Arts, Culture and Museum; Animal Adoptions; and Administration. - 12 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 13 The Strategy concluded that applying the charge on a per unit basis, based on the number of bedrooms in the apartment unit, was most appropriate, compared to an area wide charge. For the purpose of the CBC, “apartment unit” applies to the building typology, irrespective of tenure (rental; condominium; co-op; etc.). Additionally, for the purpose of the CBC, “apartment” includes a Stacked Townhouse development that has five or more storeys, and has ten or more units. Following the release of the draft CBC Strategy in May 2022, a further review of eligible projects, and all figures were double checked. Key updates to the CBC Strategy included the following services: •increasing the capital costs for Arts, Culture and Museum by $0.2 million for the inclusion of public art; •increasing the development related costs for Administration by $1.2 million to cover renovation costs for the Civic Complex; •decreasing the CBC eligible Animal Adoptions costs by $13,000. As a result, the proposed CBC charge increased. A comparison of the proposed charge and the revised charge are identified in the Table below: Table 6 Comparison of CBC Charges Unit Type May 20, 2022 Proposed Charge June 23, 2022 Revised Charge Apartments: 2 + bedrooms $910 $1,070 Apartments: bachelor and 1 bedroom $659 $657 2.2 Stakeholder Consultation As a result of stakeholder consultation, and a written submissions from Chestnut Hill Developments (see Attachment #6A) on the proposed CBC By-law, revisions have been made to the CBC By-law, since public meeting, as follows: •the ‘effective’ date of the CBC By-law was delayed from July 12 to September 30, 2022; •definitions for “Grade” and “Storey” were added; •the transition provisions regarding the waiving payment of CBCs upon submission of a complete building permit application by July 1, 2022, and issuance of a building permit by August 15th, was deleted to reflect the September 30, 2022 effective date of the by-law coming into force (with no grace period); •clauses were added relating the establishment of the CBC Reserve Fund, and administrative matters related to the Fund. A written submission was also received from BILD (see Attachment 6B). BILD indicated that they agree with many aspects of the City’s approach to CBC By-law and commended the City on work to date. BILD further requested clarification on the application of CBC charges to additions to buildings. Staff can confirm that, where an addition qualifies for CBCs, the CBC is payable only on the new units, not on the existing units in the building. Staff can also confirm that where an addition does not - 13 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 14 qualify for collection of CBCs, no payment would be required. This is addressed through the definitions of ‘development’, ‘redevelopment’, and section 2.4 (b) of the CBC By-law. It is recommended that Council approve the CBC Strategy, dated May 20, 2022, updated June 23, 2022, and that the draft CBC By-law be finalized and enacted in the Council Meeting. 3. Parkland Conveyance By-law 3.1 Background Bill 197 was enacted on September 18, 2020, and affected multiple pieces of legislation, including specific changes to Section 42 of the Planning Act (“Conveyance of land for park purposes”). The effect of Bill 197 was that all municipal Parkland By-laws, that contained an alternative rate for collecting parkland, will expire on September 18, 2022. As a result, municipalities are required to pass new Parkland By-laws in order to continue to collect parkland (or payment-in-lieu). The Planning Act allows a municipality to pass a by-law to require that land be conveyed to a municipality for park or other public recreational purposes at a rate of one hectare for each 300 dwelling units proposed or lower as specified in the by-law. As an alternative to collecting actual parkland, the Planning Act also allows municipalities to pass a by-law to enable the municipality to collect payment-in-lieu of parkland conveyance, calculated using a rate of one hectare for each 500 dwelling units proposed or lower as specified in the by-law. Prior to passing such a by-law for these alternative requirements, municipalities are required to consult with persons and public bodies that the municipality considers appropriate. 3.2 Comments Received In conjunction with the new DCs and CBCs, staff engaged with members of the development industry to receive their feedback on the proposed Parkland By-law. This engagement included a stakeholder meeting held virtually on June 1, presentation at a Public Meeting on June 20, 2022, as well as posting links to the proposed Parkland By-law on the Municipal website. Staff received three sets of written comments on the new Parkland By-law, from BILD and two developer groups. The stakeholders providing comments all acknowledged and accepted that the new Parkland By-law is in-keeping with the standard parkland rates provided in the Planning Act. In addition, the comments offered a variety of ideas and suggestions of how Pickering could consider innovating their collection of parkland (or payment-in-lieu). Amongst the suggestions received was a request from BILD that Pickering avoid using the funds from payment-in-lieu of parkland to supplement existing parkland deficiencies for existing residents. The purpose of colleting payment-in-lieu of parkland from new development is to allow the City to acquire new parkland in an area where it will serve the future residents of those developments. Several of the suggestions provided can already be considered and practically applied by staff without the need of revising the new Parkland By-law. All of these ideas and suggestions have been noted and will be taken under advisement when the City next undertakes a comprehensive review of - 14 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 15 its parkland conveyance policies. The new Parkland By-law is a legislated replacement of Pickering’s existing Parkland By-law and is not intended to be a comprehensive review of those policies. Future review of the City’s parkland collection practices may create the opportunity to explore innovative practices in the collection and payment of parkland. 3.3 Conclusion In keeping with Provincial legislation, Pickering’s current Parkland By-law will expire on September 18, 2022. The new Parkland By-law will replace the current By-law, and a new clause has been added indicating the By-law will be effective on July 12, 2022. It reflects the Planning Act’s standard requirements for the collection of parkland (or payment-in-lieu). Approval of the new Parkland By-law is necessary in order for the City to continue to acquire parkland (or payment-in-lieu) as a component of all new development approvals. It is recommended that the draft Parkland By-law be finalized and considered by Council for enactment later in the Council Meeting. Attachments: 1.Addendum to Development Charges Background Study 2022 dated June 21, 2022 2.Response to Questions Raised by Seaton Landowner’s Group dated June 17, 2022 3.Draft By-law Regarding Development Charges 2022 4.Financial Impact Agreement – Indexing July 12, 2022 5.Community Benefits Strategy, dated May 20, 2022, updated June 23, 2022 6A. Comments on Community Benefits By-law on behalf of Chestnut Hill Developments 6B. Comments on the Community Benefits By-law from BILD 7.Draft By-law Establishing a Community Benefits Charge and Reserve Fund 2022 8.Comments on the Parkland Conveyance By-law from BILD 9.Comments on the Parkland Conveyance By-law from Dorsay Development Corporation 10.Comments on the Parkland Conveyance By-law on behalf of Pickering Developments 11.Draft By-law Requiring the Conveyance of Land for Park or Other Public Recreational Purposes, 2022 - 15 - FIN 12-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: 2022 Development Charge Background Study, Community Benefits, Strategy, and Parkland Conveyance By-law Page 16 Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Jason Bekramchand Stan Karwowski Senior Financial Analyst – Debt & Director, Finance & Treasurer Capital Management Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Kyle Bentley, P. Eng. Chief Planner Director, City Development & CBO Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer Original Signed By:Original Signed By: Original Signed By:Original Signed By: Original Signed By: - 16 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 905-272-3600 June 21, 2022 info@watsonecon.ca Addendum to 2022 Development Charges Background Study City of Pickering ________________________ For Public Circulation and Comment Attachment #1 to Report FIN 12-22 - 17 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx Table of Contents Page 1.Summary of Revisions to the May 11, 2022 Development Charges Background Study ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................. 1-1 2. Discussion ....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Anticipated Development ........................................................................ 2-1 2.3 Transportation Services .......................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Parks and Recreation Services ............................................................... 2-2 2.5 Library Services ...................................................................................... 2-3 2.6 Fire Protection Services .......................................................................... 2-4 2.7 By-Law Protection Services .................................................................... 2-4 2.8 Other Services Related to a Highway ..................................................... 2-4 2.9 Stormwater Management Services ......................................................... 2-4 2.10 Growth-Related Studies .......................................................................... 2-4 2.11 By-Law Policies ...................................................................................... 2-5 2.12 Impacts on the Calculated D.C. .............................................................. 2-5 3.Changes to the D.C.B.S................................................................................... 3-1 4.Process for Adoption of the D.C. By-law ....................................................... 4-1 Appendix A Amended Pages .................................................................................. A-1 - 18 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx 1. Summary of Revisions to the May 11, 2022 Development Charges Background Study 1.1 Background Commensurate with the provisions of the Development Charges Act (D.C.A.), 1997, the City of Pickering (City) has undertaken a Development Charges Background Study (D.C.B.S.) and has distributed the study and draft by-law to the public. The following provides a summary of the key dates in the Development Charges (D.C.s) by-law process: • May 11, 2022 – Release D.C.B.S. and draft by-law • June 1, 2022 – Presentation of D.C. Background study and draft by-law to Development Industry Stakeholders • June 20, 2022 – Public Meeting of Council • July 11, 2022 – Anticipated passage of D.C. By-law The purpose of this addendum to the May 11, 2022 D.C.B.S. is to provide a for an update to the forecast of anticipated development, capital cost estimates, and increase in need for service for new development and to make other minor updates and housekeeping changes. Furthermore, this addendum also provides for additional transition provisions for the implementation of the new D.C. by-law. The refinements are detailed in the subsequent sections of this report and will form part of the D.C.B.S. for Council’s consideration and approval prior to adoption of the D.C. By-law. - 19 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx 2.Discussion 2.1 Introduction Updates have been made and for the following changes: •Update to forecast of anticipated development; •Revisions to costs that have been committed to the D.C. reserve fund for Transportation and Parks and Recreation Services; •Updates to costs and other deductions for projects within the Parks and Recreation, Stormwater Management, and Library services; and •Revisions to by-law implementation policies. The impacts are detailed by service area in the following subsections. 2.2 Anticipated Development The residential growth forecast has been updated to reflect information received pertaining to the timing and mix of residential dwelling units within Seaton. The impact of the changes results in a greater share of the high-density dwelling units with Seaton to develop towards the latter part of the 17-year forecast period. The non-residential growth forecast has also been updated to reflect information received pertaining to the amount and timing of non-residential development within Seaton. Based on the updated information received, the absorption of employment lands within Seaton has been updated to reflect a greater amount of development by 2039. Furthermore, updates have also been made to the amount of non-residential development within the Seaton community areas and other areas of the City outside of Seaton. The following table compares the forecast employment and non-residential G.F.A. for the 2022-2039 period within the May 11, D.C.B.S. and this addendum. - 20 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx Table 2-1 Comparison of Non-Residential Growth Forecast Based on the changes in the forecast of population and employment growth the allocation of net D.C. recoverable costs for services based on the relationship of forecast population and employment has been updated. The allocation of costs for Fire Protection, By-Law Enforcement, Other Services Related to a Highway, and Stormwater Management Services has been updated to 77% residential and 23% non-residential from 80% residential and 20% non-residential. The allocation of costs for Transportation Services imposed outside of Seaton has been updated to 83% residential and 17% non-residential from 85% residential and 15% non-residential. 2.3 Transportation Services The estimated mid-year D.C. reserve fund balance for Transportation services has been decreased by $1.6 million from $24.9 million to $23.1 million to reflect updated cost estimates for the following projects that are committed to the reserved: •Sandy Beach Road reconstruction; and •Wanut Lane Extension construction. This decrease in the estimated reserve fund balance of $1.6 million has a corresponding increase in the D.C. recoverable costs for Transportation Services. 2.4 Parks and Recreation Services The gross capital costs for the Beachfront Master Plan – Phase 2 have been increased from $2 million to $3.4 million to reflect the latest City budget estimates. Furthermore, Employment G.F.A. (sq.ft.)Employment G.F.A. (sq.ft.) 2022 31,769 31,769 2039 51,398 55,449 Seaton Community Area 5,945 2,763,800 6,813 3,167,400 Seaton Employment Lands 8,680 7,594,300 10,967 9,595,200 Total Seaton 14,625 10,358,100 17,780 12,762,600 Rest of Pickering 5,004 3,967,200 5,900 4,677,700 Pickering Total 19,629 14,325,300 23,680 17,440,300 Non-Residential1 Non-Residential1 Incremenal Growth (2022-2039) 1. Excludes No Fixed Place (NFPOW) of Work and Work at Home Time Horizon May 11, 2022 D.C.B.S. Addendum - 21 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx budget costs for a village green within Duffin Heights that was previously committed to the D.C. reserve fund have been increased from $190,000 to $300,000. Additional growth-related projects have also been identified by staff to provide services in response to new development, including: •Amberlea Tennis Court - $400,000; •William Jackson Drive Park - $110,000; and •Beachview Homes Park (Tot Lot) - $175,000 Furthermore, the costs for the proposed Community Centre being developed as part of the Pickering Heritage and Community Centre has been increased from $19.8 million to $26.6 million. With regard to this project the post period benefit deduction has been removed as the City is anticipating undertaking this project prior to 2026 and a deduction of $7.6 million has been made to reflect possible grants, subsidies, or other contributions that may apply. The benefit to existing deduction for the Waterfront trail between West shore Boulevard and Marksbury Road has been revised from 2.5% to 50% to be consistent with the treatment of other trails outside of the Seaton Lands. The aforementioned changes increase the total gross capital costs by $8.9 million and D.C. recoverable costs by $10.2 million. The historical level of service calculation has also been updated for the parkland component of Parks and Recreation Services to correctly calculate the increase in need for service over the 17-year forecast period to 2039. 2.5 Library Services Consistent with the changes identified above for the proposed Community Centre being developed as part of the Pickering Heritage and Community Centre, updates have also been made for the Library space being created within this facility. Gross capital costs have been increased from $1.5 million to $2.0 million. The post period benefit deduction has been reduced and possible grants, subsidies, or other contributions of $783,900 have also been deducted. - 22 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx The net D.C. recoverable cost remain unchanged at $54.9 million (including growth- related studies). 2.6 Fire Protection Services Based on changes that have been made to the non-residential growth forecast, revisions have been made to the post period benefit deductions for Fire Protection Services. D.C. recoverable costs included in the calculation of the charge have increased by $80,700. 2.7 By-Law Protection Services Minor reductions of $10,000 have been made to the D.C. recoverable costs for By-Law Enforcement Services to ensure the D.C. recoverable costs are within the historical level of service cap. 2.8 Other Services Related to a Highway Similar to Fire Protection Services, revisions have been made to the post period benefit deductions based on changes to the non-residential growth forecast. D.C. recoverable costs included in the calculation of the charge have increased by $718,600. 2.9 Stormwater Management Services The cost for Frenchman’s Bay Yacht Club Outfall Restoration have been increased to $1.7 million to reflect updated capital costs anticipated by the City. Furthermore, the post period benefit deduction has also been updated with regard to the growth forecast changes. The impact of these change results in an increase in the net D.C. recoverable costs of $795,500. 2.10 Growth-Related Studies Although no changes have been made to the Growth-Related Studies costs, the allocation of those costs to residential and non-residential development has been updated based on the updates to the total residential and non-residential cost allocation in the previous sections. - 23 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx 2.11 By-Law Policies The draft D.C. by-law has been revised to include provisions for developments where building permit applications were received prior to July 1, 2022 to pay the current City of Pickering D.C.s, provided: •the permit application is complete in terms of the applicant's submission requirements set out in the building code and the City's Building By-law; •applicable law approvals prescribed in the building code have been obtained or applied for; and •the building permit or a conditional building permit is issued for all or part of the building by August 15, 2022. Furthermore, other housekeeping edits have been made to the draft D.C. by-law. 2.12 Impacts on the Calculated D.C. The refinements presented herein results in the calculated D.C. per single detached dwelling unit to increase by $391 within the Seaton Lands and by $243 in the other areas of the City compared to the charges in the May 11, 2022 D.C.B.S. This increase represents less than a 2% increase in the calculated charge for Seaton and less than a 1% increase in other areas of the City. Table 2-2 presents the updated schedule of charges. - 24 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx Table 2-2 Amended Schedule of D.C.s Single and Semi- Detached Dwelling Other Multiples Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Seaton Prestige Employment Land Other Pickering Non- Residential 2 (per net hectare)(per sq.ft. of Gross Floor Area) Municipal Wide Services/Class of Service: Other Services Related to a Highway 746 575 434 266 11,695 0.34 Fire Protection Services 1,176 906 684 420 18,492 0.53 Parks and Recreation Services 13,273 10,224 7,719 4,737 35,927 1.03 Library Services 2,444 1,883 1,421 872 6,698 0.19 Growth-Related Studies 235 181 137 84 1,083 0.03 Stormwater Management Services 460 354 268 164 7,234 0.21 By-Law Enforcement Services 103 79 60 37 1,564 0.04 Total Municipal Wide Services/Class of Services 18,437 14,202 10,723 6,580 82,693 2.37 Outside of Seaton Lands 1 Transportation Services 13,461 10,369 7,829 4,805 4.73 Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands 13,461 10,369 7,829 4,805 - 4.73 Seaton 18,437 14,202 10,723 6,580 82,693 2.37 Rest of Pickering 31,898 24,571 18,552 11,385 7.10 RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL 2. Does not apply to prestige employment development in Seaton, as that development is subject to the per net Ha land area charge instead. 1. Subject to a separate agreement outside of the Development Charges Act concerning the provision of Transportation requirements in addition to other funding contributions Service/Class of Service - 25 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx 3.Changes to the D.C.B.S. Based on the foregoing, the following revisions are made to the pages within the May 11, 2022 D.C.B.S. Accordingly, the revised pages are appended to this report: •Chapter 3 and Appendix A – Re-issued to reflect changes described in Section 2.2 •Page 4-11 – Revised to reflect the changes to the D.C. reserve funds described in Sections 2.3 and 2.4 •Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 – Re-issued to reflect the changes identified in Sections 2.2 to 2.10 herein •Pages 7-5 to 7-8 – Updated to reflect the revised transition policies and subsequent page numbering. •Pages 8-3, 8-4, and D-3 – re-issued to reflect the impacts of the changes herein on the Asset Management Plan and long-term capital and operating costs •Pages B-14– Revised to reflect the change to the historical level of service described in Section 2.4 •Appendix C – Re-issued to reflect changes to the cash-flow calculation of the D.C.s •Appendix F – Draft by-law reissued to reflect the changes identified herein. - 26 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx 4.Process for Adoption of the D.C. By-law The revisions provided herein form the basis for the D.C. by-law and will be incorporated into the D.C.B.S. to be provided to Council prior to Council’s consideration and adoption of the proposed D.C. by-law. If Council is satisfied with the above noted changes to the D.C.B.S. and D.C. by-law, then prior to by-law passage Council must: •Approve the D.C.B.S., as amended; •Determine that no further public meetings are required on the matter; and •Adopt the new D.C. by-law. - 27 - Appendices - 28 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering Addendum #1.docx Appendix A Amended Pages - 29 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 3. Anticipated Development in the City of Pickering 3.1 Requirement of the Act Chapter 3 provides the methodology for calculating a D.C. as per the D.C.A. Figure 1-1 presents this methodology graphically. It is noted in the first box of the schematic that in order to determine the D.C. that may be imposed, it is a requirement of Section 5 (1) of the D.C.A. that “the anticipated amount, type and location of development, for which development charges can be imposed, must be estimated.” The growth forecast contained in this chapter (with supplemental tables in Appendix A) provides for the anticipated development for which the City of Pickering will be required to provide services, over a 10-year (mid-2022 to mid-2032) and longer-term (mid-2022 to mid-2039) horizon. 3.2 Basis of Population, Household and Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Forecast The D.C. growth forecast has been derived by Watson. The growth forecast provided herein builds on growth assumptions established in the Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022). In addition to the Regional Development Charge Background Study, the following information sources were consulted: • City of Pickering Official Plan (Edition 8); • Durham Region Growth Management Strategy Technical Reports (2021); • 2006, 2011 and 2016 population, household and employment Census data; • 2021 population and household Census data; • Historical residential and non-residential building permit data over the 2012 to 2021 period; • Residential supply opportunities as provided by the City of Pickering; and • Discussions with City staff regarding anticipated residential and non-residential development in the City of Pickering, and specifically the Seaton Community. - 30 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 3.3 Summary of Growth Forecast A detailed analysis of the residential and non-residential growth forecasts is provided in Appendix A and the methodology employed is illustrated in Figure 1-1. The discussion provided herein summarizes the anticipated growth for the City and describes the basis for the forecast. The results of the residential growth forecast analysis are summarized in Table 1-1 below, and Schedule 1 in Appendix A. As identified in Table 1-1 and Appendix A, Schedule 1, permanent population in Pickering is anticipated to reach approximately 158,100 by mid-2032 and 189,200 by mid-2039, resulting in an increase of approximately 51,000 and 82,100 persons, respectively over the 10-year and longer-term forecast periods.1 2 1 The population figures used in the calculation of the 2022 D.C. include the net Census undercount, which is estimated at approximately 3.8%. 2 The 2031 Official Plan population target of 225,670, less the growth allocation for Northeast Pickering of approximately 36,500 persons, results in an Official Plan population target of 189,200 by Mid 2039. - 31 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Figure 3-1 Population and Household Forecast Model Intensification Designated Lands Servicing Capacity Residential Units in the Development Process Employment Market by Local Municipality, Economic Outlook Local, region and Provincial Forecast of Residential Units Decline in Existing Population Net Population Increase Historical Housing Construction DEMAND SUPPLY Occupancy Assumptions Gross Population Increase - 32 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 3-1 The City of Pickering Residential Growth Forecast Summary Population Institutional Population Population Excluding Institutional Population Singles & Semi- Detached Multiple Dwellings2 Apartments3 Other Total Households 91,160 87,838 573 87,265 20,255 4,850 3,085 25 28,215 3.113 92,080 88,721 806 87,915 20,744 5,381 3,190 15 29,330 3.025 95,240 91,771 776 90,995 21,130 6,060 3,695 30 30,915 2.968 102,940 99,186 839 98,347 22,425 6,805 4,165 30 33,425 2.967 107,100 103,191 876 102,315 22,774 7,622 4,559 30 34,985 2.950 133,340 128,475 998 127,477 26,047 10,747 7,666 30 44,490 2.888 158,110 152,339 1,122 151,217 28,822 13,839 10,680 30 53,370 2.854 189,200 182,297 1,314 180,983 31,908 18,001 14,733 30 64,672 2.819 920 883 233 650 489 531 105 -10 1,115 3,160 3,050 -30 3,080 386 679 505 15 1,585 7,700 7,415 63 7,352 1,295 745 470 0 2,510 4,160 4,005 37 3,968 349 817 394 0 1,560 26,240 25,284 122 25,162 3,273 3,125 3,107 0 9,505 51,010 49,148 246 48,902 6,048 6,217 6,121 0 18,385 82,100 79,106 438 78,668 9,134 10,379 10,174 0 29,687 ¹ Census undercount estimated at approximately 3.8%. Note: Population including the undercount has been rounded. ² Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. ³ Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Mid 2022 - Mid 2032 Source: Derived from Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022), by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Mid 2022 - Mid 2039 Note: The 2031 Official Plan population target of 225,670, less the growth allocation for Northeast Pickering of approximately 36,500 persons, results in an Official Plan population target of 189,200 by Mid 2039 Population (Including Census Undercount)¹ Year Excluding Census Undercount Housing Units Person Per Unit (P.P.U.): Total Population/ Total Households Mid 2022 - Mid 2027 Hi s t o r i c a l Mid 2039 Fo r e c a s t In c r e m e n t a l Mid 2021 Mid 2016 - Mid 2021 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 Mid 2006 Mid 2011 Mid 2016 Mid 2022 Mid 2027 Mid 2032 Mid 2021 - Mid 2022 - 33 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Figure 3-2 The City of Pickering Annual Housing Forecast Source: Building permit data from 2011 to 2013 and 2021 from Statistics Canada. Building permits between 2014 and 2020 from the City of Pickering. Figure by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. 1 Growth forecast represents calendar year. 283 425 303 379 346 540 1,262 510 573 1,560 1,925 1,925 1,925 1,925 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,544 1,544 1,544 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Ho u s i n g U n i t s Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average - 34 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Provided below is a summary of the key assumptions and findings regarding the City of Pickering D.C. growth forecast: 1. Housing Unit Mix (Appendix A – Schedules 1 and 6) • The housing unit mix for the City was derived from the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022) • Based on the above indicator, the longer-term household growth forecast for the City is comprised of a unit mix of 31% low density units (single-detached and semi-detached), 35% medium density (multiples except apartments) and 34% high density (bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom apartments). 2. Geographic Location of Residential Development (Appendix A – Schedule 2) • Schedule 2 summarizes the anticipated amount, type, and location of development by the Seaton Community and the rest City of Pickering. • In accordance with forecast demand and available land supply, the amount and percentage of forecast permanent housing growth between 2022 and 2039 is summarized below. Development Location Approximate Amount of Housing Growth, 2022 to 2039 Percentage of Housing Growth, 2022 to 2039 Seaton 18,260 62% Rest of Pickering 11,420 38% City Total 29,680 100% 3. Planning Period • Short and longer-term time horizons are required for the D.C. process. The D.C.A. limits the planning horizon for certain services, such as parks, recreation and libraries, to a 10-year planning horizon. Services related to a highway, public works, fire, police, stormwater, water and wastewater services can utilize a longer planning period. - 35 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 4.Population in New Housing Units (Appendix A - Schedules 3, 4 and 5) •The number of new housing units to be constructed in the City of Pickering during the short- and long-term periods is presented in Figure 1-2. Over the ten- year forecast period, the City is anticipated to average 1,839 new housing units per year. •Institutional population1 is anticipated to increase by approximately 250 people between 2022 to 2032 and approximately 440 people between 2022 and 2039. •Population in new units is derived from Schedules 3, 4, and 5, which incorporate historical development activity, anticipated units (see unit mix discussion) and average persons per unit (P.P.U.) by dwelling type for new units. •Schedule 8 summarizes the average P.P.U. assumed for the new housing units by age and type of dwelling based on a 2016 custom Census data for the City of Pickering. The total calculated P.P.U. for all density types represents a 25-year forecast average. Average P.P.U.s by dwelling type are as follows: o Low density:3.561 o Medium density: 2.743 o High density 2:1.771 5.Existing Units and Population Change (Appendix A - Schedules 3, 4 and 5) •Existing households for mid-2022 are based on the 2021 Census households, plus estimated residential units constructed in 2021, assuming a 6-month lag between construction and occupancy (see Schedule 3). •The decline in average occupancy levels for existing housing units is calculated in Schedules 3 through 5, by aging the existing population over the forecast period. The forecast population decline in existing households over the 2022 to 2039 forecast period is approximately 350. 6.Employment (Appendix A, Schedules 10a, 10b, 10c, 11 and 12) •The employment projections provided herein are derived from the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022) and 1 Institutional includes special care facilities such as nursing home or residences for senior citizens. A P.P.U. of 1.100 depicts 1-bedroom and 2- or more bedroom units in these special care facilities. 2 Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2- or more bedroom apartments. - 36 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx based on the activity rate method, which is defined as the number of jobs in a City divided by the number of residents. Key employment sectors include primary, industrial, commercial/population-related, institutional, and work at home, which are considered individually below. • 2016 employment data 1 (place of work) for the City of Pickering is outlined in Schedule 10a. The 2016 employment base is comprised of the following sectors: o 140 primary (less than 1%); o 3,225 work at home employment (10%); o 11,840 industrial (36%); o 12,670 commercial/population related (39%); and o 4,885 institutional (15%). • The 2016 employment by usual place of work, including work at home, is approximately 32,760. An additional 4,690 employees have been identified for the City in 2016 that have no fixed place of work (N.F.P.O.W.).2 • Total employment, including work at home and N.F.P.O.W. for the City is anticipated to reach approximately 56,220 by mid-2032 and 70,700 by mid-2039. This represents an employment increase of approximately 15,960 and 30,450 respectively, over the forecast period.3 • Schedule 10b, Appendix A, summarizes the employment forecast, excluding work at home employment and N.F.P.O.W. employment, which is the basis for the D.C. employment forecast. The impact on municipal services from work at home employees has already been included in the population forecast. The need for municipal services related to N.F.P.O.W. employees has largely been included in the employment forecast by usual place of work (i.e. employment and gross floor area generated from N.F.P.O.W. construction employment). Furthermore, since these employees have no fixed work address, they cannot be captured in the non-residential gross floor area (G.F.A.) calculation. 1 2016 employment is based on Statistics Canada 2016 Place of Work Employment dataset by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 2 No fixed place of work is defined by Statistics Canada as "persons who do not go from home to the same work place location at the beginning of each shift". Such persons include building and landscape contractors, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc. 3 The 2031 Official Plan employment target of 71,800 is forecast to be achieved after 2039. An additional 4,900 jobs would be assumed for Northeast Pickering, in accordance with the Official Plan. - 37 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx •Total employment for the City of Pickering (excluding work at home and N.F.P.O.W. employment) is anticipated to reach approximately 43,930 by mid- 2032 and 55,450 by mid-2039. This represents an employment increase of approximately 12,160 and 23,680 respectively, over the forecast period. 7.Non-Residential Sq.ft. Estimates (G.F.A., Appendix A, Schedule 10b) •Square footage estimates were calculated in Schedule 10b based on the following employee density assumptions: o 1,100 sq.ft. per employee for industrial; o 400 sq.ft. per employee for commercial/population-related; and o 675 sq.ft. per employee for institutional employment. •The City-wide incremental Gross Floor Area (G.F.A.) is anticipated to increase by 8,684,400 sq.ft. over the 10-year period and 17,440,200 sq.ft. over the longer- term forecast period. •In terms of percentage growth, the 2022 to 2039 incremental G.F.A. forecast by sector is broken down as follows: o industrial – 61%; o commercial/population-related – 23%; and o institutional – 16%. 8.Geography of Non-Residential Development (Appendix A, Schedule 10c) •Schedule 10c summarizes the anticipated amount, type and location of non- residential development by servicing area for the City of Pickering by area. •In accordance with forecast demand, the amount and percentage of forecast total non-residential growth between 2022 and 2039 by development location is summarized below. - 38 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Development Location Amount of Non- Residential G.F.A., 2022 to 2039 Percentage of Non-Residential G.F.A., 2022 to 2039 Seaton 12,762,500 73% Rest of Pickering 4,677,700 27% City Total 17,440,200 100% - 39 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-11 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 4-2 City of Pickering Projected Uncommitted D.C. Reserve Fund Balances (July 1, 2022) 4.10 Deductions The D.C.A. potentially requires that four deductions be made to the increase in the need for service. These relate to: •the level of service ceiling; •uncommitted excess capacity; •benefit to existing development; and •anticipated grants, subsidies and other contributions. The requirements behind each of these reductions are addressed as follows: 4.10.1 Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling This is designed to ensure that the increase in need included in 4.3 does “…not include an increase that would result in the level of service (for the additional development increment) exceeding the average level of the service provided in the municipality over the 10-year period immediately preceding the preparation of the background study…” O. Reg. 82.98 (s.4) goes further to indicate that, “…both the quantity and quality of a service shall be taken into account in determining the level of service and the average level of service.” In many cases, this can be done by establishing a quantity measure in terms of units as floor area, land area or road length per capita, and a quality measure in terms of the Service Totals Other Services Related to a Highway ($1,614,679) Fire Protection Services ($8,403,069) Parks and Recreation Services $28,457,731 Library Services $6,061,637 Growth Studies ($3,929,051) Stormwater Management Services $546,096 By-Law Enforcement Services $0 Transportation Services $23,159,257 Total $44,277,923 - 40 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 5. Development Charge Eligible Cost Analysis by Service This chapter outlines the basis for calculating D.C. eligible costs for the D.C.s to be applied on a uniform basis. The required calculation process set out in s.5(1) paragraphs 2 to 8 in the D.C.A., 1997, and described in Chapter 4, was followed in determining D.C. eligible costs. The nature of the capital projects and timing identified in this chapter reflects Council’s current intention. However, over time, municipal projects and Council priorities change and, accordingly, Council’s intentions may be modified, and different capital projects (and timing) may be required to meet the need for services required by new growth. 5.1 Service Levels and 17-Year Capital Costs for City-wide D.C. Calculation This section evaluates the development-related capital requirements for select services and classes of service over the 17-year planning period (mid 2022 - mid 2039). Each service is evaluated on two format sheets: the average historical 10-year level of service calculation (see Appendix B), which “caps” the D.C. amounts; and the infrastructure cost calculation, which determines the potential D.C. recoverable cost. 5.1.1 Fire Protection Services Fire Protection Services in the City are provided through four fire stations totalling 35,700 sq.ft. of facility space. These services are further provided through the utilization of 28 vehicles and 1,332 equipment items. Based on the average per capita investment of $407 over the 2012 to 2021 period, and the forecast population growth of 79,106 persons over the 2022 to 2039 forecast period, the resulting maximum D.C.-eligible amount that could be included in the calculation is $32.0 million. The capital needs that are anticipated to provide service over the forecast period includes two additional fire stations and associated vehicles and equipment for fire fighters. These needs are estimated at a gross capital cost of $26.2 million. Of the total capital cost, $1.0 million has been deducted as a benefit to development beyond the forecast period. After accounting for the existing reserve fund deficit of $8.4 million, recognizing the benefit to development having already occurred, $32.1 million has been - 41 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx included in the calculation of the charge These D.C.-eligible costs have then been allocated to residential and non-residential development based on the share of population (78,668) and employment (23,680) growth (i.e. 77% residential and 23% non-residential). 5.1.2 By-Law Enforcement Services By-law Enforcement Services are currently provided through 3,700 sq.ft. of facility space and the operation of 8.6 vehicles (accounting for animal services vehicle usage not pertaining to by-law enforcement). This level of investment equates to an average per capita level of service over the past 10-years of $36. When applied to the forecast population growth over the 17-year forecast period, the maximum amount that could be included in the calculation of the charge is $2.9 million. Over the forecast period the City will be constructing a new Animal Shelter and By-law Enforcement facility as well as requiring addition By-law enforcement vehicles. 30% of the costs of the facility ($2.8 million) have been deducted to reflect the share of the facility not related to By-law Enforcement Services. Furthermore, $2.1 million and $1.8 million have been deducted for the benefit to development beyond the planning period and the benefit to existing development, respectively. Net D.C. recoverable costs of $2.9 million have been included in the calculation of the charge and have been allocated 77% to residential development and 23% non-residential development based on the share of incremental population and employment growth over the forecast period. 5.1.3 Other Services Related to a Highway The City provides operations services related to Transportation Services, defined by the D.C.A. as Services Related to a Highway. These services include roads operations facilities, vehicles, and equipment. These services are provided through the use of 185 vehicles and equipment items, and 61,200 sq.ft. of facility space. The average level of service provided over the historical 10-year period based on this inventory is $288 per capita. When applied to anticipated growth over the 2022 to 2039 forecast period, the per capita level of service produces a maximum D.C. eligible amount of $22.7 million. The gross capital cost included in the D.C. calculation for the forecast period to 2039 totals $18.3 million. The capital cost estimates include additional vehicles and equipment items, as well as the growth-related share of the new Operations Centre debt - 42 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx payments and the Northern Satellite Operations Centre (including land). After recognizing the current reserve fund deficit of $1.6 million, the benefit to existing development of $76,200 and the post period benefit of $92,100 , the resulting net growth-related capital cost of $19.8 million have been included in the D.C. calculation. The forecast growth-related costs have been allocated 77% to residential development and 23% to non-residential development based on the incremental growth in population and employment. 5.1.4 Parks and Recreation Services The City currently operates their Parks and Recreation Services utilizing 823 acres of developed and passive parkland, 25.1 km of trails, and 551,100 sq.ft. of facility space. The City also utilizes 192 vehicle and equipment items to provide services. Over the past 10-year years, the investments in these assets equate to an average per capita level of service of $5,156. Based on this level of investment and the anticipated growth in the 17-year forecast period, the maximum D.C.-eligible amount that could be included in the calculation of the charges is $405.6 million. The 17-year capital needs required to meet the needs of the anticipated development total $354.5 million, comprising future parkland and trail development, additional indoor recreation space needs, and additional parks maintenance vehicles and the share of operations facilities related to parks. Approximately $345,700 has been deducted as benefit to development beyond the period to 2039. Furthermore, $32.5 million has been deducted for the benefit to existing development. After accounting for the existing reserve balance of $28.5 million and possible grants, subsidies, and other contribution of $8.7 million towards the growth-related share of the costs, $284.4 million net D.C. recoverable costs have been included in the calculation of the charge. These costs are then allocated 95% to residential development and 5% to non- residential development as the residential population tends to be the predominant users of Parks and Recreation Services. 5.1.5 Library Services Library services are provided by the City through the provision of approximately 51,000 sq.ft. of facility space, 315,200 library collection material items, and one vehicle. The average level of service provided over the historical 10-year period based on this - 43 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx inventory is $692 per capita. When applied to anticipated growth over the 2022-2039 period, the per capita level of service produces a maximum D.C. eligible amount for library services of approximately $54.5 million. The gross capital cost included in the D.C. calculation for the 17-year forecast period are $107.0 million. The capital cost estimates include a new library branch in Seaton (including land and materials), a new Central Library Facility, and additional library space at the Pickering Heritage and Community Centre. Deductions for the benefit to existing development total $41.5 million. A further $3.7 million has been deducted to reflect the benefits to development beyond the 17-year planning period and $784,000 for possible grants, subsidies, and other contributions that could reduce the growth- related costs. There is a current reserve fund balance of $6.1 million, which when applied against the growth-related costs results in a net D.C. recoverable capital cost of $54.9 million (including growth-related studies) which has been included in the D.C. calculation. Similar to Parks and Recreation Services, the predominant users of Library Services tend to be residents of the City, as such the forecast growth-related costs have been allocated 95% to residential development and 5% to non-residential development. 5.1.6 Stormwater Management Services Stormwater management needs provided in the increase in need for service reflect those in addition to the local service requirements of development, and include erosion control works, conveyance control, new facilities, and water quality treatment. In total, the gross capital cost estimate for these needs over the 17-year planning period total $64.8 million. After deducting approximately $51.0 million for benefits to existing development, $69,600 for the post period benefit, and $546,100 for current reserve fund balances, the net D.C. eligible costs for inclusion in the calculation of the charge is approximately $13.2 million. Based on the incremental growth in population to employment, the net D.C.-eligible costs have been allocated 77% to residential and 23% to non-residential development within the City. - 44 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 5.1.7 Growth-Related Studies Class of Service The D.C.A. permits the inclusion of studies undertaken to facilitate the completion of the City’s capital works program. As discussed in Section 4.7, these studies have been included within a class of services based on each service to which the study relates. For planning related studies, a deduction of 10% has been applied to recognize the extent to which the studies relate to non-D.C.-eligible services. All studies have been allocated to the classes of services in the following manner: • Fire Protection – 8% • By-law Enforcement – 1% • Transportation – 5% • Parks and Recreation – 70% • Library – 13% • Stormwater Management – 3% The cost of the growth-related studies is $2.5 million of which $461,800 is a benefit to existing development. A deduction of $143,400 has been made to recognize the portion of planning studies related to D.C.-ineligible services, as mentioned above and $245,400 has been deducted as a post-period benefit. After accounting for the existing reserve fund deficit of $3.9 million net D.C.-eligible costs of $5.6 million over the 17-year forecast period are included in Table 5-7 below. The allocation of the net growth-related costs between residential and non-residential development is based on the residential and non-residential allocations for each service area. - 45 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-1 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Fire Protection Services Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj .No Residential Share Non-Residential Share 2022-2039 77%23% Facilities 1 Fire Station A (Seaton) - Design 2022 445,000 - 445,000 11,100 433,900 334,103 99,797 2 Fire Station A (Seaton) - Construction 2022 8,980,320 8,980,320 224,500 8,755,820 6,741,981 2,013,839 3 Fire Station B (Seaton) - Land and Design 2024 2,323,000 - 2,323,000 58,100 2,264,900 1,743,973 520,927 4 Fire Station B (Seaton) - Construction 2026 6,000,000 - 6,000,000 150,000 5,850,000 4,504,500 1,345,500 5 Training Centre 2022-2039 1,500,000 666,700 833,300 833,300 - - - Vehicles 6 1 Aerial (Seaton Station A)2022 1,752,300 - 1,752,300 43,800 1,708,500 1,315,545 392,955 7 Aerial (Fire Station B) (Seaton)2023 1,752,300 - 1,752,300 43,800 1,708,500 1,315,545 392,955 8 Small vehicle (2) (Seaton)2023 110,000 - 110,000 2,800 107,200 82,544 24,656 9 Pumper (Fire Station B) (Seaton)2023 1,200,000 - 1,200,000 30,000 1,170,000 900,900 269,100 Equipment 10 Equipment for 9 Firefighters incl. Bunker Gear and Breathing Apparatus (Station A)2022 251,900 - 251,900 - 251,900 193,963 57,937 11 Equipment for 20 Firefighters incl. Bunker Gear and Breathing Apparatus (Station A)2023 559,700 559,700 - 559,700 430,969 128,731 12 Equipment for 20 Firefighters incl. Bunker Gear and Breathing Apparatus (Station B)2024 559,700 559,700 - 559,700 430,969 128,731 13 Equipment for 20 Firefighters incl. Bunker Gear and Breathing Apparatus (Station B)2026 559,700 351,987 207,713 - 207,713 159,939 47,774 Studies 14 Fire Master Plan 2023 200,000 - 200,000 50,000 150,000 115,500 34,500 Reserve Fund Adjustment 8,403,069 6,470,363 1,932,706 Total 26,193,920 1,018,687 25,175,233 1,447,400 - 32,130,902 24,740,795 7,390,107 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) - 46 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-7 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-2 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – By-law Enforcement Services Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj .No Residential Share Non-Residential Share 2022-2039 77%23% Facilities 1 Animal Shelter & By-Law Services (Including Land Lease) 2023 9,438,000 1,918,845 2,831,400 4,687,755 1,838,400 2,849,355 2,194,003 655,352 Vehicles 2 Provision for additional By-law and Animal Services Enforcement Vehicles 2022-2039 221,844 216,298 5,546 5,546 - - - - - - Total 9,659,844 2,135,143 2,831,400 4,693,301 1,843,946 - 2,849,355 2,194,003 655,352 1. Other deductions include cost related to ineligible services Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Other Deductions Net Capital Cost - 47 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-8 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-3 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Other Services Related to a Highway Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj .No Residential Share Non- Residential Share 2022-2039 77%23% Roads Operations Fleet and Equipment 1 4 Ton Dump Truck/Snow Plow 2023 300,000 - 300,000 - 300,000 231,000 69,000 2 4 Ton Dump Truck/Snow Plow 2023 300,000 - 300,000 - 300,000 231,000 69,000 3 4 Ton Dump Truck/Snow Plow 2023 300,000 - 300,000 - 300,000 231,000 69,000 2 4 Ton Dump Truck/Snow Plow 2024 300,000 - 300,000 - 300,000 231,000 69,000 4 4 Ton Dump Truck/Snow Plow 2026 300,000 - 300,000 - 300,000 231,000 69,000 4 5 Ton Dump Truck/Snow Plow 2022 320,000 - 320,000 - 320,000 246,400 73,600 5 1 Ton Dump Truck (3)2022 210,000 - 210,000 - 210,000 161,700 48,300 6 1 Ton Dump Truck with Snow Plow 2022 300,000 - 300,000 - 300,000 231,000 69,000 7 SUV 2022-2026 40,600 - 40,600 - 40,600 31,262 9,338 8 Sweeper 2022-2026 394,300 - 394,300 - 394,300 303,611 90,689 9 Sidewalk Tractors 2023 175,000 - 175,000 - 175,000 134,750 40,250 10 Sidewalk Tractors 2026 175,000 - 175,000 - 175,000 134,750 40,250 11 Sidewalk Tractors 2026 175,000 - 175,000 - 175,000 134,750 40,250 12 Provision for Vehicles & Equipment 2031-2039 3,405,067 92,082 3,312,985 - 3,312,985 2,550,998 761,987 Roads Operations Facilities 13 New Operations Centre (NPV of Principal Payments)2022-2037 4,030,272 - 4,030,272 - 4,030,272 3,103,310 926,963 14 New Northern Satellite Operations Centre - Land 2023 3,840,000 - 3,840,000 - 3,840,000 2,956,800 883,200 15 New Northern Satellite Operations Centre - Design 2023 300,000 - 300,000 - 300,000 231,000 69,000 16 New Northern Satellite Operations Centre - Construction 2024 2,700,000 - 2,700,000 - 2,700,000 2,079,000 621,000 Studies 17 Transportation Demand Management Plan/Parking Management Plan (Seaton)2026 187,800 - 187,800 18,800 169,000 130,130 38,870 18 Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Measures 2022-2027 174,000 - 174,000 17,400 156,600 120,582 36,018 19 Transportation Master Plan 2022 400,000 - 400,000 40,000 360,000 277,200 82,800 Reserve Fund Adjustment 1,614,679 1,243,303 371,376 Total 18,327,039 92,082 18,234,957 76,200 - 19,773,436 15,225,546 4,547,890 Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) - 48 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-9 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-4 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Parks and Recreation Services Prj.No Parks Code Residential Share Non- Residential Share 95% 5% Parks 1 Parking lot expansion - Village East Park 2022-2027 125,100 - 125,100 93,800 31,300 29,735 1,565 2 Community Park - Greenwood Conservation Lands (ph 1)2025-2027 7,577,000 - 7,577,000 3,788,500 3,788,500 3,599,075 189,425 3 Community Park - Greenwood Conservation Lands (ph 2)2026-2029 4,380,600 - 4,380,600 1,414,400 2,966,200 2,817,890 148,310 4 Park - Krosno Creek valley - Hwy 401 to Bayly 2025-2027 350,000 - 350,000 35,000 315,000 299,250 15,750 5 Park - The Piazza - downtown south intensification 2024-2025 625,800 - 625,800 62,600 563,200 535,040 28,160 6 Skate Board Park - Community Size (Civic Centre)2022 850,000 - 850,000 425,000 425,000 403,750 21,250 7 Skate Board Park - Skate Spots (1 locations)2024 250,000 - 250,000 125,000 125,000 118,750 6,250 8 D.H. Neighbourhood Park (Dersan & Tillings Road)2022-2023 695,900 - 695,900 17,400 678,500 644,575 33,925 9 Stonepay Village Green 2023 960,000 - 960,000 24,000 936,000 889,200 46,800 10 Park Block at Old Ops Centre 2025-2027 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 475,000 25,000 11 New Neighbourhood Park in Clermont (Geranium Development)2027-2031 1,700,000 - 1,700,000 42,500 1,657,500 1,574,625 82,875 12 City Centre Urban Park (0.3ha)2025-2027 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 750,000 750,000 712,500 37,500 13 New Urban Park (phase 2 of the Smart Center redevelopment - 1899 Brock Rd)2028-2032 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 475,000 25,000 14 Beachfront Park Master Plan - Consulting Services for Detailed Design and Approvals 2022 500,000 - 500,000 250,000 250,000 237,500 12,500 15 Beachfront Park Master Plan - Phase 1 Construction 2023 4,500,000 - 4,500,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,137,500 112,500 16 Beachfront Park Master Plan - Phase 2 Construction 2024 3,400,000 - 3,400,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,615,000 85,000 17 WF trail between West Shore Boulevard and Marksbury Road 2022-2025 4,850,000 - 4,850,000 2,425,000 2,425,000 2,303,750 121,250 18 Park Development in the Hydro corridor, Kingston to Finch as part of Highmark Homes developme 2025-2028 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 50,000 1,950,000 1,852,500 97,500 19 Additional Gravel parking lot, Alex Robertson Park 2023 150,000 - 150,000 75,000 75,000 71,250 3,750 20 Outdoor Rink at Seaton Recreation Complex 2022-2027 4,000,000 - 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,900,000 100,000 21 Amberlea Tennis Club, Shaybrook Park (Additional Tennis Court)2023 400,000 - 400,000 300,000 100,000 95,000 5,000 22 Park - William Jackson Drive 2023 110,000 - 110,000 2,800 107,200 101,840 5,360 22 Park (Tot Lot) - Beachview Homes 2025-2028 175,000 - 175,000 4,400 170,600 162,070 8,530 Seaton Parkland 23 Village Green P-104 2023-2024 450,000 - 450,000 11,300 438,700 416,765 21,935 24 Village Green P-105 2022-2023 695,000 - 695,000 17,400 677,600 643,720 33,880 25 Village Green P-106 2023-2025 700,000 - 700,000 17,500 682,500 648,375 34,125 26 Neighbourhood Park P-107 2023-2025 1,650,000 - 1,650,000 41,300 1,608,700 1,528,265 80,435 27 Village Green P-108 2024-2026 575,000 - 575,000 14,400 560,600 532,570 28,030 28 Neighbourhood Park P-109 2024-2026 1,176,000 - 1,176,000 29,400 1,146,600 1,089,270 57,330 29 Village Green P-110 2024-2026 595,000 - 595,000 14,900 580,100 551,095 29,005 30 Village Green P-111 2024-2026 305,000 - 305,000 7,600 297,400 282,530 14,870 31 Village Green P-112 2022-2024 475,000 - 475,000 11,900 463,100 439,945 23,155 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Timing (year)Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development 1 Total - 49 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-10 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-4 (Cont’d) Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Parks and Recreation Services Prj.No Parks Code Residential Share Non- Residential Share 95% 5% 32 Village Green P-113 2022-2024 210,000 - 210,000 5,300 204,700 194,465 10,235 33 Community Park at Recreation Centre P-115 2024-2026 5,600,000 - 5,600,000 140,000 5,460,000 5,187,000 273,000 34 Village Green P-116 2026-2030 490,000 - 490,000 12,300 477,700 453,815 23,885 35 Neighbourhood Park P-117 2026-2030 1,152,000 - 1,152,000 28,800 1,123,200 1,067,040 56,160 36 Village Green P-118 2023-2025 490,000 - 490,000 12,300 477,700 453,815 23,885 37 Village Green P-119 2022-2024 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 25,000 975,000 926,250 48,750 38 Neighbourhood Park P-120 2025-2027 1,065,000 - 1,065,000 26,600 1,038,400 986,480 51,920 39 Village Green P-121 2022-2024 685,000 - 685,000 17,100 667,900 634,505 33,395 40 Neighbourhood Park P-122 2023-2025 1,255,000 - 1,255,000 31,400 1,223,600 1,162,420 61,180 41 Community Park P-123 2024-2025 3,755,000 - 3,755,000 93,900 3,661,100 3,478,045 183,055 42 Neighbourhood Park P-124 2023-2025 1,145,000 - 1,145,000 28,600 1,116,400 1,060,580 55,820 43 Village Green P-125 2023-2025 518,000 - 518,000 13,000 505,000 479,750 25,250 44 Village Green P-126 2023-2024 295,000 - 295,000 7,400 287,600 273,220 14,380 45 Village Green P-127 2023-2024 395,000 - 395,000 9,900 385,100 365,845 19,255 46 Neighbourhood Park P-128 2028-2031 1,255,000 - 1,255,000 31,400 1,223,600 1,162,420 61,180 47 Community Park at Recreation Centre II P-129 2028-2031 1,450,000 - 1,450,000 36,300 1,413,700 1,343,015 70,685 48 Village Green P-130 2026-2031 485,000 - 485,000 12,100 472,900 449,255 23,645 49 Neighbourhood Park P-131 2026-2031 1,264,000 - 1,264,000 31,600 1,232,400 1,170,780 61,620 50 Village Green P-132 2027-2039 485,000 - 485,000 12,100 472,900 449,255 23,645 51 Village Green P-133 2027-2039 445,000 - 445,000 11,100 433,900 412,205 21,695 52 Neighbourhood Park P-134 2024-2029 1,478,000 - 1,478,000 37,000 1,441,000 1,368,950 72,050 53 Neighbourhood Park P-135 2027-2039 1,184,000 - 1,184,000 29,600 1,154,400 1,096,680 57,720 54 Village Green P-136 2027-2039 498,000 - 498,000 12,500 485,500 461,225 24,275 55 Village Green P-137 2027-2039 485,000 - 485,000 12,100 472,900 449,255 23,645 56 Village Green P-138 2027-2039 484,000 - 484,000 12,100 471,900 448,305 23,595 57 Village Green P-139 2027-2039 642,000 - 642,000 16,100 625,900 594,605 31,295 58 Village Green P-140 2027-2039 575,000 - 575,000 14,400 560,600 532,570 28,030 59 Community Park P-141 2027-2039 5,933,000 - 5,933,000 148,300 5,784,700 5,495,465 289,235 60 Neighbourhood Park P-142 2027-2039 1,882,000 - 1,882,000 47,100 1,834,900 1,743,155 91,745 61 Village Green P-143 2027-2039 858,000 - 858,000 21,500 836,500 794,675 41,825 62 District Park (Phase 1)P-144 2030 12,500,000 - 12,500,000 312,500 12,187,500 11,578,125 609,375 63 District Park (Phase 2)P-144 2030-2032 12,500,000 - 12,500,000 312,500 12,187,500 11,578,125 609,375 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Timing (year)Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development 1 Total - 50 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-11 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-4 (Cont’d) Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Parks and Recreation Services Prj.No Parks Code Residential Share Non- Residential Share 95% 5% Trails 64 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-1 2022-2024 632,000 - 632,000 15,800 616,200 585,390 30,810 65 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 minor stream crossing T-2 2024-2026 386,000 - 386,000 9,700 376,300 357,485 18,815 66 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-4 2024-2027 530,000 - 530,000 13,300 516,700 490,865 25,835 67 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 2 major stream crossing T-5 2024-2027 975,000 - 975,000 24,400 950,600 903,070 47,530 68 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 2 major stream crossing T-6 2024-2027 1,125,000 - 1,125,000 28,100 1,096,900 1,042,055 54,845 69 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 2 major stream crossing T-8 2027-2031 898,000 - 898,000 22,500 875,500 831,725 43,775 70 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 minor stream crossing T-9 2025-2028 210,000 - 210,000 5,300 204,700 194,465 10,235 71 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-10 2025-2028 455,000 - 455,000 11,400 443,600 421,420 22,180 72 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-11 2027-2031 455,000 - 455,000 11,400 443,600 421,420 22,180 73 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-12 2032-2039 410,000 - 410,000 10,300 399,700 379,715 19,985 74 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-13 2032-2039 430,000 - 430,000 10,800 419,200 398,240 20,960 75 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-14 2032-2039 440,000 - 440,000 11,000 429,000 407,550 21,450 76 Multi-purpose trail - Duffin Heights (Mattamy dev't) to Ajax 2027-2031 625,800 - 625,800 312,900 312,900 297,255 15,645 77 Multi-purpose trail - Hydro Corridor (Liverpool to Whites)2026 1,139,000 - 1,139,000 569,500 569,500 541,025 28,475 78 Trail - Bayly Street from waterfront trail to Go Station 2024 625,800 - 625,800 312,900 312,900 297,255 15,645 79 Trail - Bayly Street from Go Station to Hydro Corridor 2025 438,000 - 438,000 219,000 219,000 208,050 10,950 80 Trail - Finch to Brockridge Park (45m bridge)2027-2031 1,200,000 - 1,200,000 600,000 600,000 570,000 30,000 81 Trail - Wharf Street to Sandy Beach Road 2026 500,700 - 500,700 250,400 250,300 237,785 12,515 82 Mulit-pupose trail - Hydro Corridor (Whites to Townline)2026-2031 1,877,400 - 1,877,400 938,700 938,700 891,765 46,935 Recreation Facilities 83 Seaton Recreation Complex 2024 12,930,000 - 12,930,000 323,300 12,606,700 11,976,365 630,335 2026 74,430,000 - 74,430,000 1,860,800 72,569,200 68,940,740 3,628,460 84 Community Centre 2024-2026 26,584,000 345,664 26,238,336 5,583,360 8,717,706 11,937,270 11,340,407 596,864 (Part of Pickering Heritage and Community Centre) 85 Youth & Seniors' Centre 2022-2024 80,068,162 - 80,068,162 2,001,700 78,066,462 74,163,139 3,903,323 86 Arts Centre (Community Uses)2022-2024 17,911,991 - 17,911,991 447,800 17,464,191 16,590,981 873,210 87 City Centre Land 2022 9,035,295 - 9,035,295 225,900 8,809,395 8,368,925 440,470 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Timing (year)Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development 1 Total - 51 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-12 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-4 (Cont’d) Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Parks and Recreation Services Prj.No Parks Code Residential Share Non- Residential Share 95% 5% Parks Operations Vehicles and Equipment 88 Area Mower 2023 140,000 - 140,000 - 140,000 133,000 7,000 89 Litter Picker Vacuum 2026 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 47,500 2,500 90 Garbage Packer 2023 260,000 - 260,000 - 260,000 247,000 13,000 91 Enclosed Trailers (2)2023-2026 45,000 - 45,000 - 45,000 42,750 2,250 92 Zero Turn Mower (6)2022-2026 180,000 - 180,000 - 180,000 171,000 9,000 93 Pickup Trucks (4)2022-2026 255,000 - 255,000 - 255,000 242,250 12,750 94 1 Ton Dump Trucks (6)2023-2026 480,000 - 480,000 - 480,000 456,000 24,000 95 SUV (2)2022-2026 90,000 - 90,000 - 90,000 85,500 4,500 96 4 Ton Dump Truck 2022-2026 350,000 - 350,000 - 350,000 332,500 17,500 97 Utility Vehicle 2022-2026 43,800 - 43,800 - 43,800 41,610 2,190 Parks Operations Facilities 98 New Operations Centre (NPV of Principal Payments)2022-2037 2,576,732 - 2,576,732 - 2,576,732 2,447,895 128,837 99 New Northern Satellite Operations Centre - Land 2023 2,560,000 - 2,560,000 - 2,560,000 2,432,000 128,000 100 New Northern Satellite Operations Centre - Design 2023 200,000 - 200,000 - 200,000 190,000 10,000 101 New Northern Satellite Operations Centre - Construction 2024 1,800,000 - 1,800,000 - 1,800,000 1,710,000 90,000 Studies Urban Forest Management Not eligible 102 Seaton Primary Trails IO EA Phase 1 & 2 Lands (including site walks, surveying, archaeology)2022-2039 463,900 - 463,900 - 463,900 440,705 23,195 103 Seniors Recreation Strategic Plan 2022-2039 87,000 - 87,000 43,500 43,500 41,325 2,175 104 Recreation Services Master Plan Update 2022-2039 197,200 - 197,200 49,300 147,900 140,505 7,395 105 Waterfront Park Needs Assessment 2022-2039 116,000 - 116,000 29,000 87,000 82,650 4,350 106 Whitevale Park Revitalization Study 2022-2039 92,800 - 92,800 23,200 69,600 66,120 3,480 Reserve Fund Adjustment (28,457,731) (27,034,844) (1,422,887) Total 354,477,979 345,664 354,132,316 32,528,260 8,717,706 284,428,619 270,207,188 14,221,431 1. Grants that have been applied for by the City. 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Timing (year)Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development 1 Total - 52 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-13 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-5 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Library Services Prj.No Residential Share Non- Residential Share 2022-2039 95% 5% Facilities 1 Central Library Facility 2022-2024 70,035,816 - 70,035,816 36,594,600 33,441,216 31,769,155 1,672,061 2 City Centre Land 2022 7,704,000 3,678,559 4,025,441 4,025,441 - - - 3 Seaton Regional Library, including land (including material 2024 5,100,000 - 5,100,000 127,500 4,972,500 4,723,875 248,625 2025 3,539,000 - 3,539,000 88,500 3,450,500 3,277,975 172,525 2026 18,044,000 18,044,000 451,100 17,592,900 16,713,255 879,645 4 Library Space 2024-2026 1,955,000 48,703 1,906,297 48,900 783,939 1,073,458 1,019,785 53,673 (Part of Pickering Heritage and Community Centre) Studies 5 Library-Facilities/Master Plan 2025 62,600 - 62,600 15,700 46,900 44,555 2,345 6 Library-Strategic Plan 2023 133,000 - 133,000 33,300 99,700 94,715 4,985 7 Library-Strategic Plan 2027 133,000 - 133,000 33,300 99,700 94,715 4,985 8 Library-Strategic Plan 2031 133,000 - 133,000 33,300 99,700 94,715 4,985 9 Library-Strategic Plan 2035 133,000 - 133,000 33,300 99,700 94,715 4,985 10 Library-Facilities/Master Plan 2035 62,600 - 62,600 15,700 46,900 44,555 2,345 Reserve Fund Adjustment (6,061,637) (5,758,555) (303,082) Total 107,035,016 3,727,261 103,307,754 41,500,641 783,939 54,961,537 52,213,460 2,748,077 1. Grants that have been applied for by the City. Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development 1 Total Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost - 53 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-14 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-6 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Stormwater Management Services Residential Share Non- Residential Share 77% 23% 1 Krosno Creek SWM Facility K12 - Design B-18 D SWM Facility at mouth of Hydro Marsh - Design 2023-2029 119,600 - 119,600 62,200 57,400 44,198 13,202 2 Krosno Creek SWM Facility K12 - Construction B-18 C SWM Facility at mouth of Hydro Marsh - Construction 2023-2029 1,100,000 - 1,100,000 572,000 528,000 406,560 121,440 3 Frenchman's Bay Yacht Club Outfall Restoration Sediment Forebay Facility - wetland restoration 2022-2024 1,747,200 - 1,747,200 1,310,400 436,800 336,336 100,464 4 Krosno Creek SWM Facility K16 - Design B-19 D SWM Facility at Hydro Marsh - Design 2023-2029 94,200 - 94,200 49,000 45,200 34,804 10,396 5 Krosno Creek SWM Facility K16 - Construction B-19 C SWM Facility at Hydro Marsh - Construction 2023-2029 935,000 - 935,000 486,200 448,800 345,576 103,224 6 Krosno Creek SWM Facility K19 - Design B-30 D SWM Facility - Krosno Creek (Hydro Corridor, west of Quigely St.) - Design 2023-2029 532,200 - 532,200 276,700 255,500 196,735 58,765 7 Krosno Creek SWM Facility K19 - Construction B-30 C SWM Facility - Krosno Creek (Hydro Corridor, west of Quigely St.) - Construction 2023-2029 2,041,400 - 2,041,400 1,061,500 979,900 754,523 225,377 8 Krosno Creek SWM Facility 17/18 - Design B-31 D SWM Facility - Krosno Creek (Hydro Corridor, west of Feldspar Crt.) - Design 2023-2029 376,500 - 376,500 195,800 180,700 139,139 41,561 9 Krosno Creek SWM Facility 17/18 - Construction B-31 C SWM Facility - Krosno Creek (Hydro Corridor, west of Feldspar Crt.) - Construction 2023-2029 1,820,100 - 1,820,100 946,500 873,600 672,672 200,928 10 Amberlea Creek SWM Facility A3 - Design A-8 D SWM Facility at outfall to tributary of Amberlea Creek - Design 2023-2029 149,700 - 149,700 118,500 31,200 24,024 7,176 11 Petticoat Creek Erosion Control - Design H-10 D Erosion assessment and fixing of erosion channel and banks 2023-2029 350,500 - 350,500 310,900 39,600 30,492 9,108 12 Petticoat Creek Erosion Control - Construction H-10 C Erosion assessment and fixing of erosion channel and banks 2023-2029 2,225,800 - 2,225,800 1,974,400 251,400 193,578 57,822 13 Pine Creek Erosion Control - Design Erosion assessment and fixing of erosion channel and banks 2023-2029 830,000 - 830,000 725,700 104,300 80,311 23,989 14 Pine Creek Erosion Control - Construction Erosion assessment and fixing of erosion channel and banks 2023-2029 5,926,800 - 5,926,800 5,181,800 745,000 573,650 171,350 15 14 Oil Grit Separators Installation install 2 units per year for water quality treatment 2023-2031 4,886,200 - 4,886,200 3,501,000 1,385,200 1,066,604 318,596 16 12 Oil Grit Separators Installation install 2 units per year for water quality treatment 2032-2039 4,188,200 - 4,188,200 3,000,900 1,187,300 914,221 273,079 17 Amberlea Creek Mouth SWM Facility - Design W-7 D SWM/Forebay Faciliy to FB - Design 2030-2039 824,400 - 824,400 717,200 107,200 82,544 24,656 18 Amberlea Creek Mouth SWM Facility - Construction W-7 C SWM/Forebay Faciliy to FB - Construction 2030-2039 9,233,000 - 9,233,000 8,032,700 1,200,300 924,231 276,069 19 Dunbarton Creek Mouth SWM Facility - Design W-8 D SWM/Forebay Faciliy to FB - Design 2030-2039 824,400 - 824,400 717,200 107,200 82,544 24,656 20 Dunbarton Creek Mouth SWM Facility - Construction W-8 C SWM/Forebay Faciliy to FB - Construction 2030-2039 9,233,000 - 9,233,000 8,032,700 1,200,300 924,231 276,069 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development 2022-2039 Prj.No Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost - 54 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-15 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-6 (Cont’d) Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Stormwater Management Services Residential Share Non- Residential Share 77%23% 21 Amberlea Creek SWM Facility A3 - Construction A-8 C SWM Facility at outfall to tributary of Amberlea Creek - Construction 2030-2039 1,566,400 - 1,566,400 1,239,900 326,500 251,405 75,095 22 Pine Creek SWM Facility P31 - Design L-20 D SWM Facility at outfall to Pine Creek at Glenanna Rd. - Design 2030-2039 160,900 - 160,900 140,000 20,900 16,093 4,807 23 Pine Creek SWM Facility P31 - Construction L-20 C SWM Facility at outfall to Pine Creek at Glenanna Rd. - Construction 2030-2039 1,693,200 - 1,693,200 1,473,100 220,100 169,477 50,623 24 Pine Creek SWM Facility P29 - Design B-33 D SWM Facility at outlet of Pine Creek at Fairview Ave. - Design 2030-2039 90,900 - 90,900 79,100 11,800 9,086 2,714 25 Pine Creek SWM Facility P29 - Construction B-33 C SWM Facility at outlet of Pine Creek at Fairview Ave. - Construction 2030-2039 811,000 - 811,000 705,600 105,400 81,158 24,242 26 Pine Creek SWM Facility P22 - Design L-21 D SWM Facility at outlet of Pine Creek at Cedarwood Crt. - Design 2030-2039 142,800 - 142,800 124,200 18,600 14,322 4,278 27 Pine Creek SWM Facility P22 - Construction L-21 C SWM Facility at outlet of Pine Creek at Cedarwood Crt. - Construction 2030-2039 1,488,200 - 1,488,200 1,294,700 193,500 148,995 44,505 28 Pine Creek SWM Facility P27 - Design L-22 D SWM Facility at outlet of Pine Creek at Storrington St. - Design 2030-2039 155,800 - 155,800 135,500 20,300 15,631 4,669 29 Pine Creek SWM Facility P27 - Construction L-22 C SWM Facility at outlet of Pine Creek at Storrington St. - Construction 2030-2039 1,635,700 - 1,635,700 1,423,100 212,600 163,702 48,898 30 Pine Creek Culvert Replacements - Design TC-23 D Replace Radom St culverts, Kingston Rd culvert, channel works 2030-2039 825,500 - 825,500 720,600 104,900 80,773 24,127 31 Pine Creek Culvert Replacements - Construction TC-23 C Replace Radom St culverts, Kingston Rd culvert, channel works 2030-2039 7,020,200 69,611 6,950,589 6,127,700 822,889 633,625 189,265 Studies 32 Brock Industrial Drainage Master Plan 2023-2032 347,900 - 347,900 34,800 313,100 241,087 72,013 33 Stormwater Management Study for Infill Development 2023-2032 250,300 - 250,300 62,600 187,700 144,529 43,171 34 Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master Plan Update 2023-2032 811,800 - 811,800 81,200 730,600 562,562 168,038 35 Pickering City Centre Stormwater Management Strategy Update 2022-2032 289,900 - 289,900 29,000 260,900 200,893 60,007 36 Pine Creek Erosion Assessment Municipal Class EA 2022-2032 100,000 - 100,000 87,300 12,700 9,779 2,921 Reserve Adjustment (546,096) (420,494) (125,602) Total 64,828,700 69,611 64,759,089 51,031,700 - 13,181,293 10,149,596 3,031,697 Net Capital Cost Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development 2022-2039 Prj.No Benefit to Existing Developmen t Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit - 55 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-16 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-7 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Growth-Related Studies Residential Share Non- Residential Share 2022-2031 92% 8% 1 Development Charges Background Study 2022 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 91,998 8,002 2 Development Charges Background Study 2027 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 91,998 8,002 3 Development Charges Background Study 2032 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 91,998 8,002 4 Development Charges Background Study 2037 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 91,998 8,002 5 Municipal Comprehensive Review 2024 579,900 - 43,490 536,410 145,000 391,410 360,089 31,321 6 Official Plan Review 2029 289,900 - 14,490 275,410 145,000 130,410 119,974 10,436 7 Facilities Management Plan 2022 174,000 - 13,050 160,950 43,500 117,450 108,052 9,398 8 Space Use Study 2022 40,600 - 1,800 38,800 22,600 16,200 14,904 1,296 9 Northeast Pickering (Veraine) Land Use Study 2022-2025 1,056,500 245,400 70,540 740,560 105,700 634,860 584,058 50,802 Reserve Fund Adjustment 3,929,051 3,614,645 314,406 Total 2,540,900 245,400 143,370 2,152,130 461,800 - 5,619,381 5,169,713 449,668 Net Capital Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj.No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Other Deductions (to recognize benefit to non-D.C. services) - 56 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-17 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 5.2 Service Levels and 17-Year Capital Costs for area- specific D.C. Calculation This section evaluates the development-related capital requirements for Transportation Services over the 17-year planning period (mid 2022 - mid 2039) outside of the Seaton Lands. The service is evaluated on two format sheets: the average historical 10-year level of service calculation (see Appendix B), which “caps” the D.C. amounts; and the infrastructure cost calculation, which determines the potential D.C. recoverable cost. 5.2.1 Transportation Services The City has a current inventory of 159 kilometres of rural, arterial and collector roads and 69 bridges and culverts. This historical level of infrastructure investment equates to a level of service of $5,110 per capita. Furthermore, the City also provides services through the maintenance of 325 kms of sidewalks and 27 traffic signals. In total, the average historical level of service provided is $6,138. When applied to the forecast population growth to 2039 (i.e. 28,660 incremental net-population growth outside of Seaton), a maximum D.C.-eligible cost of approximately $175.9 million could be expected to meet the future increase in needs for service. The review of the City’s transportation needs for the forecast period identified $242.4 million in gross capital costs. These capital needs include various road constructions and re-constructions, widenings, and extensions, sidewalks, traffic signals, and streetlighting projects. Recognizing the benefit to existing development, approximately $77.2 million has been deducted. $12.4 million has been deducted as a benefit to development beyond the planning horizon, and approximately $23.1 million has been deducted from the potential D.C. recoverable costs for existing reserve fund balances, accounting for funds already secured towards these future needs. As a result, approximately $129.6 million in capital costs have been included in the D.C. calculation. The net growth-related costs for transportation services have been allocated between future residential and non-residential development outside of Seaton on the basis of incremental population to employment growth over the forecast period (i.e. 83% residential, 17% non-residential). - 57 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-18 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-8 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Transportation Services Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj .No Residential Share Non- Residential Share 83%17% Roads 1 DH-13 William Jackson Drive (Old Taunton Road) - Road Reconstruction Urfe Creek to Taunton Road 3-lane Road Reconstruction, Rural, incl. pedestrian trail DH-13 2026 3,192,000 - 3,192,000 319,200 2,872,800 2,384,424 488,376 2 DH-14 William Jackson Drive (Old Taunton Road) - Culvert Replacemnent. EA, Design and Approvals. Urfe Creek Culvert Structure DH-14 2023 521,900 - 521,900 52,200 469,700 389,851 79,849 3 DH-14 William Jackson Drive (Old Taunton Road) - Culvert Replacement Urfe Creek Culvert Structure DH-14 2026 4,007,100 - 4,007,100 400,700 3,606,400 2,993,312 613,088 4 DH-1 Palmer Sawmill Road (Valley Farm Road) - Road Construction North of Third Concession to Tillings Road. 3-lane Road Construction, Urbanization, incl. storm and MUP DH-1 2027-2039 3,942,600 - 3,942,600 394,300 3,548,300 2,945,089 603,211 5 RO-3 Twyn Rivers Drive - Road Reconstruction Hoover Drive to West Boundary Limit. 2-lane Road Reconstruction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk RO-3 2027-2039 4,066,000 - 4,066,000 3,049,500 1,016,500 843,695 172,805 6 RP-4a Finch Avenue - Road Reconstruction Altona Road to Culvert Structure. 3-lane Road Reconstruction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk RP-4a 2026 1,457,000 - 1,457,000 364,300 1,092,700 906,941 185,759 7 RP-4b Finch Avenue - Road Reconstruction Culvert to Nature Haven Crescent. 3-lane Road Reconstruction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk RP-4b 2026 700,000 - 700,000 175,000 525,000 435,750 89,250 8 RP-4c Finch Avenue - Road Reconstruction Woodview Avenue to 190m West. 3-lane Road Reconstruction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk RP-4c 2026 554,000 - 554,000 138,500 415,500 344,865 70,635 9 RP-4d Finch Avenue - Road Reconstruction 190m West of Woodview Avenue to Townline. 3-lane Road Reconstruction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk RP-4d 2026 2,684,000 - 2,684,000 671,000 2,013,000 1,670,790 342,210 10 TC-5 Diefenbaker Court Extension - New Road Construction Current east Terminus of Dienfenbacker to TC-31. 2-lane Road Construction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk TC-5 2027-2039 869,800 - 869,800 652,400 217,400 180,442 36,958 11 WO-5 Sheppard Avenue - New Sidewalk Installation Whites Road to Rosebank Road (West Jog) (north side)WO-5 2027-2039 283,000 - 283,000 212,300 70,700 58,681 12,019 12 WO-9 Sheppard Avenue - New Sidewalk Installation Whites Road to Fairport Road (south side), incl. structure extension WO-9 2027-2039 458,100 - 458,100 343,600 114,500 95,035 19,465 13 RU-4 Audley Road (Sideline 2) - Road Reconstruction Fifth Concession Road to Hwy 7. 2-lane Road Reconstruction, Rural, incl. structures RU-4a 2024 5,155,000 - 5,155,000 2,577,500 2,577,500 2,139,325 438,175 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Roads Codes Net Capital CostTiming (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total - 58 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-19 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-8 (Cont’d) Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Transportation Services Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Pr j .No Residential Share Non- Residential Share 83%17% 14 RU-4 Audley Road (Sideline 2) - Culvert Replacement with Design and Approvals Fifth Concession Road to Hwy 7.RU-4b 2024 728,000 - 728,000 364,000 364,000 302,120 61,880 15 TC-31 New Arterial Road and Structure Connection - Feasibility Study & EA Bayly Street to Kingston Road (complete with overpass over Hwy. 401) TC-31 2027-2039 3,129,000 - 3,129,000 782,300 2,346,700 1,947,761 398,939 16 D-4 Dunbarton Walkway - New Walkway Installation Dunbarton Road to Rambleberry Avenue D-4 2027-2039 452,000 - 452,000 339,000 113,000 93,790 19,210 17 DH-2 Palmer Sawmill Road (Valley Farm Road) New Bridge Construction - EA & Design Over the Ganatsekiagon Creek DH-2 2027-2039 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 100,000 900,000 747,000 153,000 18 DH-2 Palmer Sawmill Road (Valley Farm Road) New Bridge Construction Over the Ganatsekiagon Creek DH-2 2027-2039 15,645,000 - 15,645,000 1,564,500 14,080,500 11,686,815 2,393,685 19 R-4a Oakwood Drive - Road Reconstruction Rougemount Drive to Mountain Ash Drive. 2-lane Road Reconstruction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk R-4a 2022-2026 1,665,100 - 1,665,100 832,600 832,500 690,975 141,525 20 R-4b Oakwood Drive - Road Reconstruction Mountain Ash Drive to Toynevale Road. 2-lane Road Reconstruction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk R-4b 2022-2024 1,042,000 - 1,042,000 521,000 521,000 432,430 88,570 21 R-5b Rougemount Drive - Road Reconstruction Toynevale Road to 200m South. 2-lane Road Reconstruction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk R-5b 2022-2026 948,000 - 948,000 474,000 474,000 393,420 80,580 22 R-5a Rougemount Drive - Road Reconstruction From 200m south of Toynevale Road to Oakwood Drive. 2-lane Road Reconstruction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk R-5a 2022-2026 3,695,000 - 3,695,000 1,847,500 1,847,500 1,533,425 314,075 23 RP-2 Finch Avenue - Culvert Replacement 275m West of Altona Road.RP-2 2022-2026 1,203,000 - 1,203,000 601,500 601,500 499,245 102,255 24 RU-7a Scarborough / Pickering Townline - Road Reconstruction CPR to Third Concession Road (Taunton/Steeles). 2-lane Road Reconstruction, Rural, incl. widening RU-7a 2024 5,534,000 - 5,534,000 2,767,000 2,767,000 2,296,610 470,390 25 RU-7b Scarborough / Pickering Townline - Culvert Replacement with Design and Approvals 60m South of Third Concession Road.RU-7b 2024 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 415,000 85,000 26 TC-13 Dixie Road - New Sidewalk Installation Kingston Road to South Limit (East side)TC-13 2027-2039 62,700 - 62,700 47,000 15,700 13,031 2,669 27 W-4a Granite Court - Upgrade Asphalt Sidewalk to Concrete Rosebank Road to the CNR Bridge (south side). Upgrade existing asphalt to 1.8m conrete W-4a 2022-2026 290,000 - 290,000 217,500 72,500 60,175 12,325 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Roads Codes Net Capital CostTiming (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total - 59 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-20 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-8 (Cont’d) Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Transportation Services Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj .No Residential Share Non- Residential Share 83%17% 28 W-4b Granite Court - from Bridge to Whites Road CNR Bridge to Whites (north side). Upgrade existing asphalt to 1.8m conrete W-4b 2022-2026 20,000 - 20,000 15,000 5,000 4,150 850 29 B-27 Plummer Street Extension - New Bridge Construction At Krosno Creek B-27 2022-2026 2,503,200 - 2,503,200 625,800 1,877,400 1,558,242 319,158 30 B-28 Plummer Street Extension - New Road Construction Krosno Creek to Bayly Street. 3-lane Road Construction, Urbanization, incl. storm and sidewalk. Oversizing to Collector B-28 2022-2026 62,600 - 62,600 15,700 46,900 38,927 7,973 31 L-17a Rosebank Road - Road Reconstruction CPR Overpass to Third Concession Road. 2-lane Road Reconstruction, Rural, incl. widening L-17a 2027-2039 4,462,000 - 4,462,000 1,115,500 3,346,500 2,777,595 568,905 32 L-17b Rosebank Road - Bridge Replacement with Design and Approvals 350m south of Third Concession Road L-17b 2027-2039 500,000 - 500,000 125,000 375,000 311,250 63,750 33 L-18 Rosebank Road - Road Reconstruction Third Concession Road to Taunton Road. 2-lane Road Reconstruction, Rural, incl. widening L-18 2027-2039 3,639,200 - 3,639,200 909,800 2,729,400 2,265,402 463,998 34 BI-21 Montgomery Park Road - Road Reconstruction Sandy Beach Road to Mckay Road. 3-lane Road Reconstruction, Rural, incl. full load base BI-21 2027-2039 4,302,700 - 4,302,700 2,151,400 2,151,300 1,785,579 365,721 35 Third Concession Rd. - Dixie Rd. To Whites Rd.Reconstruction/widen L-12 2027-2039 5,293,600 - 5,293,600 1,323,400 3,970,200 3,295,266 674,934 36 L-13a Third Concession Road - Road Reconstruction Whites Road to Rosebank Road (west leg)L-13a 2027-2039 2,382,000 - 2,382,000 595,500 1,786,500 1,482,795 303,705 37 L-13b Third Concession Road - Culvert Replacement East of Rosebank Road (east leg) 188m L-13b 2027-2039 443,000 - 443,000 110,800 332,200 275,726 56,474 38 L-13c Third Concession Road - Road Reconstruction Rosebank Road (west leg) to Altona Road L-13c 2027-2039 2,129,000 - 2,129,000 532,300 1,596,700 1,325,261 271,439 39 L-13d Third Concession Road - Culvert Replacement West of Rosebank Road (west leg) 340m L-13d 2027-2039 443,000 - 443,000 110,800 332,200 275,726 56,474 40 L-14 Third Concession Road - Road Reconstruction Altona Road to Scarborough / Pickering Townline L-14 2027-2039 5,293,600 - 5,293,600 1,323,400 3,970,200 3,295,266 674,934 41 L-15 Fairport Road - Road Reconstruction Lynn Heights Drive To Third Concession Road L-15 2027-2039 4,962,700 - 4,962,700 1,240,700 3,722,000 3,089,260 632,740 42 L-16 Dixie Road - Road Reconstruction Hydro Corridor Gossamer Drive to Third Concession Road L-16 2027-2039 4,631,800 - 4,631,800 1,158,000 3,473,800 2,883,254 590,546 43 B-24 Plummer Street - Road Reconstruction Brock Rd. To Salk Road Oversize to Collector Road B-24 2027-2039 574,400 - 574,400 143,600 430,800 357,564 73,236 44 B-25 Plummer Street - Road Construction Salk Road To Hydro Corridor (centre). New Collector Road B-25 2027-2039 459,500 - 459,500 114,900 344,600 286,018 58,582 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Roads Codes Net Capital CostTiming (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total - 60 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-21 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-8 (Cont’d) Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Transportation Services Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj .No Residential Share Non- Residential Share 83%17% 45 B-26A Plummer Street - Road Reconstruction Hyrdo Corridor (centre) to Sandy Beach Road. New Collector Road B-26A 2027-2039 1,129,000 - 1,129,000 282,300 846,700 702,761 143,939 46 EA Study - Plummer Street (B-24, B-25, B-26a) Legacy Reference A-8 / A-9 + A- 10 only 2027-2039 579,900 - 579,900 145,000 434,900 360,967 73,933 47 Notion Road/Squires Beach Road 401 Crossing 2022-2024 85,200,000 12,347,300 72,852,700 34,080,000 38,772,700 32,181,341 6,591,359 48 W-9 West Shore Boulevard - Road Reconstruction with on-street Parking Sunrise Avenue to south terminus. 2-lane Road Reconstruction, Urban (9.75m) incl. on-street parking (2.5m)and 2m Sidewalk W-9 2022-2026 1,579,000 - 1,579,000 394,800 1,184,200 982,886 201,314 49 Clements Road Extension - Road Construction (Oversizing) Dillingham to west side of Hydro Corridor. Oversizing from 9.75m to 11m 3-lane Road Construction, Urban (storm sewer / sidewalk streetlights already done) B-32a 2027-2039 109,935 - 109,935 11,000 98,935 82,116 16,819 50 Clements Road Extension - New Road Construction West side of Hydro Corridor to Sandy Beach Road. 3-lane Road Construction, Urban (11m) incl. storm sewer and sidewalk and Streetlights B-32b 2027-2039 1,767,256 - 1,767,256 176,700 1,590,556 1,320,161 270,395 51 Clements Road Extension - New Bridge and Culvert Installation West side of Hydro Corridor to Sandy Beach Road. Perphaps 2 Structures, Krosno Watercourse Bridge + Hydro Field Box Culvert B-32c 2027-2039 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 250,000 2,250,000 1,867,500 382,500 Streetlights and Sidewalks 52 DH-24 Brock Road - New Sidewalk Installation Forbrock Street to Taunton Road (both sides)DH-24 2023 96,000 - 96,000 48,000 48,000 39,840 8,160 53 TC-6 Valley Farm Road - New Sidewalk Installation Kingston Road to 100m South (east side). Sidewalk/Blvd. in conjunction with adjacent development. TC-6 2022 62,400 - 62,400 31,200 31,200 25,896 5,304 54 D-10 Finch Avenue - New Sidewalk Installation Darwin to Fairport Road (south side)D-10 2018-2024 293,400 - 293,400 146,700 146,700 121,761 24,939 55 V-12 Finch Avenue - New Multiple Use Path installation Brock Road to Hydro Corridor (west edge) (north side)V-12 2027-2039 625,000 - 625,000 312,500 312,500 259,375 53,125 56 W-5 Whites Road - New Sidewalk Installation Granite Court to Hwy 401 (west side)W-5 2022-2026 110,200 - 110,200 55,100 55,100 45,733 9,367 57 RU-8 Whites Road - New Sidewalk, Multi-use Path, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Third Concession Road north to Taunton Road.RU-8 2027-2039 4,400,000 - 4,400,000 220,000 4,180,000 3,469,400 710,600 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Roads Codes Net Capital CostTiming (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total - 61 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-22 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-8 (Cont’d) Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Transportation Services Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Pr j .No Residential Share Non- Residential Share 83%17% 58 L-19 Whites Road - New Sidewalk, Multi-use Path, and Streetlight installation (both sides) From Sunbird Trail / Craighurst Court to the Third Concession Road. L-19 2027-2039 2,580,000 - 2,580,000 258,000 2,322,000 1,927,260 394,740 59 A-10 Whites Road - New Sidewalks, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Finch Avenue to Sunbird Trail / Craighurst Court. Install new sidewalks, and streetlights (to infill both sides) A-10 2027-2039 420,000 - 420,000 42,000 378,000 313,740 64,260 60 RU-9 Whites Road - New Streetlights on structure Regional Bridge over West Duffins Creek (both sides).RU-9 2027-2039 938,700 - 938,700 46,900 891,800 740,194 151,606 61 BI-4 Brock Road - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (both sides) Bayly Street to Montgomery Road (both sides).BI-4 2027-2039 2,159,000 - 2,159,000 1,079,500 1,079,500 895,985 183,515 62 RU-12 Sideline 24 - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation Hwy 7 south to north limit of subdivision. Install new sidewalk, and streetlights (east side) RU-12 2022-2026 451,800 - 451,800 67,800 384,000 318,720 65,280 63 A-6 Whites Road at CPR Overpass Install new sidewalk (both sides), and streetlights on structure (one side) A-6 2027-2039 312,900 - 312,900 46,900 266,000 220,780 45,220 64 BI-1 Bayly Street - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (both sides) Sandy Beach Road to Brock Road. Install new sidewalk and streetlights (both sides) BI-1 2027-2039 260,000 - 260,000 130,000 130,000 107,900 22,100 65 BI-35 Bayly Street - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation Brock Road to Squires Beach Road Install new sidewalk (both sides) and streetlights (south side) BI-35 2027-2039 453,000 - 453,000 68,000 385,000 319,550 65,450 66 BI-36 Bayly Street - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (both sides) Squires Beach Road to Church Street (both sides)BI-36 2027-2039 696,000 - 696,000 104,400 591,600 491,028 100,572 67 RU-10 Hwy 7 - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (both sides) Brock Road to West Townline (both sides)RU-10 2027-2039 7,819,000 - 7,819,000 1,172,900 6,646,100 5,516,263 1,129,837 68 H1 Altona Road - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (both sides) Strouds Lane to North Side of Hydro Corridor (both sides)H1 2022-2026 1,507,700 - 1,507,700 753,900 753,800 625,654 128,146 69 L-6 Finch Avenue - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (north side) Fairport Road to Duncannon Drive (north side)L-6 2027-2039 206,000 - 206,000 103,000 103,000 85,490 17,510 70 L-7 Finch Avenue - New Sidewalk Installation (north side) Lynn Heights to 80m east (north side)L-7 2027-2039 46,400 - 46,400 23,200 23,200 19,256 3,944 71 L-9 Finch Avenue - New Sidewalk Installation (south side) Valley Farm Road to 600m west (south side)L-9 2027-2039 347,900 - 347,900 174,000 173,900 144,337 29,563 72 L-10 Finch Avenue - New Multi use Path Installation (north side) Valley Farm Road to 245m east (north side)L-10 2027-2039 174,000 - 174,000 87,000 87,000 72,210 14,790 73 RP-6 Finch Avenue - New Sidewalk Installation (south side) Altona Road to Rosebank Road (south side)RP-6 2027-2039 289,900 - 289,900 145,000 144,900 120,267 24,633 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Roads Codes Net Capital CostTiming (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total - 62 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-23 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-8 (Cont’d) Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Transportation Services Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Pr j .No Residential Share Non- Residential Share 83%17% 74 RP-5 Finch Avenue - New Sidewalk Installation (north side) Rosebank Road to 500m west (north side)RP-5 2027-2039 289,900 - 289,900 145,000 144,900 120,267 24,633 75 RP-8 Altona Road - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (west side) Finch Avenue south to Hydro Corridor (north limit), (west side)RP-8 2027-2039 174,000 - 174,000 87,000 87,000 72,210 14,790 76 RP-9 Altona Road - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (east side) Finch Avenue south to Hydro Corridor (north limit), (east side)RP-9 2027-2039 174,000 - 174,000 87,000 87,000 72,210 14,790 77 RP-10 Altona Road - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (west side) Finch Avenue north to CPR Tracks (west side)RP-10 2027-2039 174,000 - 174,000 87,000 87,000 72,210 14,790 78 RP-11 Altona Road - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (east side) Finch Avenue north to CPR Tracks RP-11 2027-2039 174,000 - 174,000 87,000 87,000 72,210 14,790 79 RU-11 North Road - New Sidewalk and Streetlight Installation (both sides) Hwy 7 to 1.35kms south (both sides)RU-11 2027-2039 1,537,000 - 1,537,000 230,600 1,306,400 1,084,312 222,088 80 RU-14 Whitevale Road - New Sidewalk, Multi-use Path, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Altona Road to York/Durham Townline (both sides)RU-14 2027-2039 2,665,000 - 2,665,000 399,800 2,265,200 1,880,116 385,084 81 RU-17 Taunton Road - New Sidewalk, Multi-use Path, and Streetlight installation (both sides) CPR Rail Structure to Church Street (Ajax) (both sides)RU-17 2027-2039 1,352,000 - 1,352,000 202,800 1,149,200 953,836 195,364 82 RU-18 Taunton Road - New Sidewalk, Multi-use Path, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Whites Road to West Townline (both sides)RU-18 2027-2039 2,870,400 - 2,870,400 430,600 2,439,800 2,025,034 414,766 83 BRT-1 Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Toronto Border to Altona Road BRT - Toronto Stage 5 (both sides)BRT-1 2022-2026 54,000 - 54,000 27,000 27,000 22,410 4,590 84 BRT-2a Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Altona Road to Rougemount Drive BRT - Durham Stage 2 (both sides)BRT-2a 2022-2026 232,000 - 232,000 116,000 116,000 96,280 19,720 85 BRT-2b Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Rougemount Drive to Rosebank Road BRT - Durham Stage 2 (both sides) BRT-2b 2022-2026 443,000 - 443,000 221,500 221,500 183,845 37,655 86 BRT-2c Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Rosebank Road to Steeple Hill BRT - Durham Stage 2 (both sides)BRT-2c 2022-2026 440,000 - 440,000 220,000 220,000 182,600 37,400 87 BRT-3a Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Steeple Hill to Delta Boulevard BRT - Durham Stage 1 (both sides)BRT-3a 2022-2026 132,000 - 132,000 66,000 66,000 54,780 11,220 85 BRT-3b Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Delta Boulevard Merriton Road BRT - Durham Stage 1 (both sides)BRT-3b 2022-2026 689,000 - 689,000 344,500 344,500 285,935 58,565 88 BRT-4 Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Merriton Road to Dixie Road BRT - Durham Stage 2 (both sides)BRT-4 2022-2026 892,000 - 892,000 446,000 446,000 370,180 75,820 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Roads Codes Net Capital CostTiming (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total - 63 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-24 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 5-8 (Cont’d) Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation – Transportation Services Less:Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj .No Residential Share Non- Residential Share 83%17% 89 BRT5a Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Dixie Road to Glenanna Road BRT - Durham Stage 1 (both sides)BRT-5a 2022-2026 1,057,000 - 1,057,000 528,500 528,500 438,655 89,845 90 BRT-5b Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Glenanna Road to Brock Road BRT - Durham Stage 1 (both sides)BRT-5b 2022-2026 814,000 - 814,000 407,000 407,000 337,810 69,190 91 BRT-5c Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Brock Road to Bainbridge Drive BRT - Durham Stage 1 (both sides)BRT-5c 2022-2026 188,000 - 188,000 94,000 94,000 78,020 15,980 92 BRT-6 Kingston Road - New Sidewalk, Cycle Track, and Streetlight installation (both sides) Bainbridge Drive to Notion Road BRT - Durham Stage 2 (both sides)BRT-6 2022-2026 338,000 - 338,000 169,000 169,000 140,270 28,730 93 BI-22 Squires Beach Road - New Sidewalk installation Bayly Avenue south to 335m Install new sidewalk (side to be determined) BI-22 2022-2026 105,000 - 105,000 52,500 52,500 43,575 8,925 Traffic Signals 94 TC-4 Traffic Signalization - Pickering Parkway at Glenanna Road Full Traffic Signals TC-4 2022-2026 350,000 - 350,000 35,000 315,000 261,450 53,550 95 D-8 Traffic Signalization - Glenanna Road at Fairport Road Full Traffic Signals D-8 2022-2026 350,000 - 350,000 35,000 315,000 261,450 53,550 96 D-12 Traffic Signalization - Welrus Street at Fairport Road Full Traffic Signals D-12 2022-2026 350,000 - 350,000 35,000 315,000 261,450 53,550 97 WO-8 Traffic Signalization and Road Realignment - Rosebank Road at Sheppard Avenue Jog Elimination and Full Traffic Signalization & EA WO-8 2022-2026 1,332,000 - 1,332,000 133,200 1,198,800 995,004 203,796 98 A-5 Traffic Signalization - Rosebank Road at Highview Road / Summerpark Crescent Full Traffic Signals A-5 2027-2039 350,000 - 350,000 35,000 315,000 261,450 53,550 99 A-7 Traffic Signalization - Strouds Lane at Aspen Road / Shadybrook Drive Full Traffic Signals A-7 2027-2039 350,000 - 350,000 35,000 315,000 261,450 53,550 100 RP-1 Traffic Signalization - Finch Avenue at Woodview Avenue Full Traffic Signals RP-1 2027-2039 350,000 - 350,000 35,000 315,000 261,450 53,550 101 W-9 Traffic Signalization - Oklahoma Drive at Eyer Drive Full Traffic Signals W-9 2027-2039 350,000 - 350,000 35,000 315,000 261,450 53,550 102 W-10 Pedestrian Signalization - West Shore Boulevard at Hillcrest Road Pedestrian Cross Over W-10 2022-2026 75,000 - 75,000 7,500 67,500 56,025 11,475 103 A-9 Pedestrian Signalization - Rosebank Road at Charnwood / Woodsmere Pedestrian Cross Over A-9 2022-2026 125,000 - 125,000 12,500 112,500 93,375 19,125 104 BR-16 Pedestrian Signalization - Major Oaks Road at Wildwood Crescent Pedestrian Cross Over BR-16 2022-2026 75,000 - 75,000 7,500 67,500 56,025 11,475 Reserve Fund Adjustment (23,159,257) (19,222,183) (3,937,074) Total 242,352,291 12,347,300 230,004,991 77,230,300 - 129,615,434 107,580,810 22,034,624 2022-2039 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Roads Codes Net Capital CostTiming (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total - 64 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 6.D.C. Calculation Tables 6-2 and 6-3 show the D.C. calculation for the municipal-wide and area-specific D.C.s assessed over the 17-year forecast period (2022-2039), respectively. The total D.C.-eligible costs in Table 6-e includes the attribution of growth-related studies identified in Table 5-7. Furthermore, as the calculations of the maximum D.C.s that could be imposed by Council have been undertaken based on a cash flow analysis to account for the timing of revenues and expenditures and the resultant financing needs, Tables 6-2 and 6-3 include the additional financing costs that are anticipated to be incurred over the forecast period. Detailed cash flow calculations are provided in Appendix C. The cash flow calculates interest paid/received on reserve fund balances to account for the differences in timing of projects and when development is anticipated to occur. In- year transactions are reduced by ½ to reflect D.C. contributions and expenditures occurring at different times throughout the year. For cash flow purposes, capital costs and D.C.s are indexed at 3% annually, debt associated with reserve fund deficits is calculated at 3% and investment return is calculated at 1%. Moreover, the cash flow calculations include the interest costs for long-term debentures that the City is anticipating issuing for projects within the next five years. The following table identifies the debt financing assumptions, consistent with the City’s 5-year financial plan. Table 6-1 Debt Financing Assumptions Table 6-4 provides the calculated schedule of charges using the cash flow method. The calculation for residential development is generated on a per capita basis and is based upon four forms of housing types (single and semi-detached, apartments 2+ bedrooms, apartments bachelor and 1-bedroom, and other multiples). The non-residential D.C. for Year Term Rate 2022 20 Years 2.17% 2023 20 Year s 2.92% 2024 20 Years 3.67% 2025 20 Years 4.42% 2026 20 Years 5.17% - 65 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx the Seaton prestige employment lands has been calculated on a per net hectare basis. The non-residential D.C. for development in all other areas of the City has been calculated on a per square foot of gross floor area basis. . Tables 6-5 and 6-6 compare the City’s existing charges to the charges proposed herein (Table 6-4), for single detached residential and non-residential development respectively. Table 6-2 D.C. Calculation Municipal-Wide Services 2022-2039 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost Residential Non-Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land Other Pickering Non- Residential SERVICE/CLASS S.D.U.per net hectare per sq.ft. $$$$$$ 1.Fire Protection Services 24,740,795 3,422,606 3,967,502 1,176 18,492 0.53 2.By-Law Enforcement Services 2,194,003 303,515 351,836 103 1,564 0.04 3.Other Services Related to a Highway 15,225,546 2,106,280 2,441,610 746 11,695 0.34 4.Parks and Recreation Services 270,207,188 6,586,420 7,635,011 13,273 35,927 1.03 5.Library Services 52,213,460 1,272,726 1,475,351 2,444 6,698 0.19 6.Stormwater Management Services 10,149,596 1,404,080 1,627,617 460 7,234 0.21 7.Growth-Related Studies 5,169,713 208,256 241,412 235 1,083 0.03 TOTAL $379,900,300 $15,303,885 $17,740,338 18,437 $82,693.000 2.37 Financing Costs $29,198,143 $757,975 $23,672,133 D.C.-Eligible Capital Cost $409,098,443 $16,061,860 $41,412,471 17-Year Gross Population/Net Hectares/GFA Growth (sq.ft.)79,015 194 17,440,200 Cost Per Capita/Non-Residential GFA (sq.ft.)$5,177.48 82,693 $2.37 By Residential Unit Type P.P.U. Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling 3.561 $18,437 Other Multiples 2.743 $14,202 Apartments - 2 Bedrooms +2.071 $10,723 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.271 $6,581 Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land Other Pickering Non- Residential - 66 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 6-3 D.C. Calculation Area-Specific Services (Outside of Seaton Lands) 2022-2039 Table 6-4 Schedule of Calculated D.C.s 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost SERVICE/CLASS Residential Non-Residential S.D.U.per sq.ft. $$$$ 8.Transportation Services 107,580,810 22,034,624 13,461 4.73 TOTAL $107,580,810 $22,034,624 $13,461 $4.73 Financing Costs $370,278 $69,786 D.C.-Eligible Capital Cost $107,951,088 $22,104,410 17-Year Gross Population/GFA Growth (sq.ft.)28,557 4,677,700 Cost Per Capita/Non-Residential GFA (sq.ft.)$3,780.20 $4.73 By Residential Unit Type P.P.U. Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling 3.561 $13,461 Other Multiples 2.743 $10,369 Apartments - 2 Bedrooms +2.071 $7,829 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.271 $4,805 Single and Semi- Detached Dwelling Other Multiples Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Seaton Prestige Employment Land Other Pickering Non- Residential 2 (per net hectare)(per sq.ft. of Gross Floor Area) Municipal Wide Services/Class of Service: Other Services Related to a Highway 746 575 434 266 11,695 0.34 Fire Protection Services 1,176 906 684 420 18,492 0.53 Parks and Recreation Services 13,273 10,224 7,719 4,737 35,927 1.03 Library Services 2,444 1,883 1,421 872 6,698 0.19 Growth-Related Studies 235 181 137 84 1,083 0.03 Stormwater Management Services 460 354 268 164 7,234 0.21 By-Law Enforcement Services 103 79 60 37 1,564 0.04 Total Municipal Wide Services/Class of Services 18,437 14,202 10,723 6,580 82,693 2.37 Outside of Seaton Lands 1 Transportation Services 13,461 10,369 7,829 4,805 4.73 Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands 13,461 10,369 7,829 4,805 - 4.73 Seaton 18,437 14,202 10,723 6,580 82,693 2.37 Rest of Pickering 31,898 24,571 18,552 11,385 7.10 RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL 2. Does not apply to prestige employment development in Seaton, as that development is subject to the per net Ha land area charge instead. 1. Subject to a separate agreement outside of the Development Charges Act concerning the provision of Transportation requirements in addition to other funding contributions Service/Class of Service - 67 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 6-5 Comparison of Current and Calculated D.C.s For Residential Single Detached Dwelling Units Service/Class of Service Current Calculated Change (%) Municipal Wide Services/Class of Service: Other Services Related to a Highway 498 746 50% Fire Protection Services 1,014 1,176 16% Parks and Recreation Services 7,720 13,273 72% Library Services 1,275 2,444 92% Growth-Related Studies 338 235 -30% Stormwater Management Services 326 460 41% By-Law Enforcement Services 103 n/a Total Municipal Wide Services/Class of Services 11,171 18,437 65% Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation Services 10,516 13,461 28% Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands 10,516 13,461 28% Seaton 11,171 18,437 65% Rest of Pickering 21,687 31,898 47% Residential (Single Detached) Comparison - 68 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 6-6 Comparison of Current and Calculated D.C.s For Non-Residential per net ha (Seaton Prestige Employment Lands), and Non- Residential per sq.ft.(Other areas of the City) Seaton Prestige Employment Land (per net hectare) Current Calculated Change (%) Municipal Wide Services/Class of Service: Other Services Related to a Highway 6,168 11,695 90% Fire Protection Services 13,039 18,492 42% Parks and Recreation Services 20,242 35,927 77% Library Services 3,048 6,698 120% Growth-Related Studies 4,353 1,083 -75% Stormwater Management Services 3,965 7,234 82% By-Law Enforcement Services 1,564 n/a Total Municipal Wide Services/Class of Services 50,815 82,693 63% Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation Services Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands - - Seaton 50,815 82,693 63% Rest of Pickering Other Pickering Non-Residential (per sq.ft. of Gross Floor Area) Current Calculated Change (%) Municipal Wide Services/Class of Service: Other Services Related to a Highway 0.18 0.34 86% Fire Protection Services 0.37 0.53 43% Parks and Recreation Services 0.60 1.03 72% Library Services 0.09 0.19 114% Growth-Related Studies 0.12 0.03 -74% Stormwater Management Services 0.11 0.21 89% By-Law Enforcement Services 0.04 n/a Total Municipal Wide Services/Class of Services 1.47 2.37 62% Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation Services 2.96 4.73 60% Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands 2.96 4.73 60% Seaton 1.47 2.37 62% Rest of Pickering 4.43 7.10 60% Service/Class of Service Non-ResidentialComparison Service/Class of Service - 69 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 7.3.5 Phase in Provision(s) The proposed D.C. By-law will come into effect on the date of by-law passage subject to Council’s direction. Notwithstanding the forgoing, where building permit applications were received prior to July 1, 2022 the D.C.s shall be calculated, paid, and collected at the current rates within the City of Pickering D.C. by-law, provided: • the permit application is complete in terms of the applicant's submission requirements set out in the building code and the City's Building By-law; • applicable law approvals prescribed in the building code have been obtained or applied for; and • the building permit or a conditional building permit is issued for all or part of the building by August 15, 2022. 7.3.6 Timing of Collection The D.C.s for all services are payable upon issuance of a building permit for each dwelling unit, building, or structure, subject to early or late payment agreements entered into by the City and an owner under s.27 of the D.C.A., 1997. As of January 1, 2020, rental housing and institutional developments will pay D.C.s in six equal annual payments commencing at occupancy. Non-profit housing developments will pay D.C.s in 21 equal annual payments. Moreover, the D.C. amount for all developments occurring within two years of a Site Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment planning application approval (for applications made after January 1, 2020), shall be determined based on the D.C. in effect on the day the Site Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment application was made. D.C.s determined at the time of Site Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment application are subject to annual interest charges as per the terms of the City’s D.C. Interest Rate Policy. For the purposes of administering the By-law, the following definitions are provided as per O. Reg. 454-19: “Rental housing” means development of a building or structure with four or more dwelling units all of which are intended for use as rented residential premises. - 70 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx “Institutional development” means development of a building or structure intended for use, a) as a long-term care home within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Long- Term Care Homes Act, 2007; b) as a retirement home within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Retirement Homes Act, 2010; c) by any of the following post-secondary institutions for the objects of the institution: i. a university in Ontario that receives direct, regular and ongoing operating funding from the Government of Ontario, ii. a college or university federated or affiliated with a university described in subclause (i), or iii. an Indigenous Institute prescribed for the purposes of section 6 of the Indigenous Institutes Act, 2017; d) as a memorial home, clubhouse or athletic grounds by an Ontario branch of the Royal Canadian Legion; or e) as a hospice to provide end of life care. “Non-profit housing development” means development of a building or structure intended for use as residential premises by, a) a corporation to which the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary object is to provide housing; b) a corporation without share capital to which the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary object is to provide housing; or c) a non-profit housing co-operative that is in good standing under the Co-operative Corporations Act. 7.3.7 Indexing All D.C.s will be subject to mandatory indexing annually on July 1, in accordance with provisions under the D.C.A for the most recently available annual period ending March 31. If a complete building permit application is received prior to July 1st and the complete or partial permit is issued by August 1 of that year, the D.C.s payable shall be those in place at the time the building permit application was made. - 71 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-7 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 7.3.8 D.C. Spatial Applicability There are four basic choices to be addressed when considering the geographic application of a D.C.: 1.the entire municipality for all services (which is the most commonly used approach); 2.part of the municipality for all services; balance of the municipality is exempt (because it is outside the service’s coverage area or can be served at little or no incremental cost); 3.different by-laws and charges in different municipal service areas (in order to recognize distinctly different servicing cost situations); and 4.a uniform municipal-wide charge with separate charge covering additional area- specific services (e.g. the coverage area for specific works). Subsection 2(9) of the D.C.A. may prescribe services for which a D.C. by-law must apply on an area-specific basis. For prescribed services, Council shall pass different D.C. by-laws for different parts of the municipality, in accordance with the prescribed criteria. Currently the Province has not prescribed services under this subsection of the D.C.A. For services that are not prescribed under s.s. 2(9) of the D.C.A., the background study must give consideration of the use of more than one D.C. by-law to reflect different needs for services in different areas. Area-specific charges have been reviewed with City staff. The City’s current D.C. policy provides for Transportation Services to be provided on an area-specific basis, with charges differentiated between the Seaton Lands and those lands within the City outside of Seaton. All other services are provided on a uniform City-wide basis. Based on current practice, and associated agreements, no changes are being recommended to the structure of the charges 7.4 Other D.C. By-law Provisions 7.4.1 Categories of Services for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes It is recommended that the City’s D.C. collections be contributed into eight (8)) separate reserve funds, including: •Fire Protection Services; - 72 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-8 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx • By-Law Enforcement Services; • Transportation Services; • Other Services Related to a Highway; • Parks and Recreation Services ; • Library Services; • Stormwater Management Services; and • Growth-Related Studies 7.4.2 By-law In-force Date The proposed by-law under D.C.A. will come into force at the time of by-law passage. 7.4.3 Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for Inter- Reserve Fund Borrowing The minimum interest rate is the Bank of Canada rate on the day on which the by-law comes into force (as per s.11 of O. Reg. 82/98). 7.5 Other Recommendations It is recommended that Council: “Approve the capital project listing set out in Chapter 5 of the D.C. Background Study dated May 11, 2022, subject to further annual review during the capital budget process;” “Approve the D.C. Background Study dated May 11, 2022" “Determine that no further public meeting is required;” and “Approve the D.C. By-law as set out in Appendix F.” - 73 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 8-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 8.2 Asset Management Plan In recognition to the schematic in Section 8.1, the following table (presented in 2022$) has been developed to provide the annualized expenditures and revenues associated with new growth. Note that the D.C.A. does not require an analysis of the non-D.C. capital needs or their associated operating costs so these are omitted from the table below. Furthermore, as only the present infrastructure gap has been considered at this time within the A.M.P., the following does not represent a fiscal impact assessment (including future tax/rate increases) but provides insight into the potential affordability of the new assets: 1. The non-D.C. recoverable portion of the projects which will require financing from City financial resources (i.e. taxation, rates, fees, etc.). This amount has been presented on an annual debt charge amount based on 20-year financing. 2. Lifecycle costs for the 2022 D.C. capital works have been presented based on a sinking fund basis. The assets have been considered over their estimated useful lives. 3. Incremental operating costs for the D.C. services (only) have been included. 4. The resultant total annualized expenditures are $79.9 million. Of this total, $13.8 million relates the annual debt payment costs for benefit to existing development and post period benefit of growth-related needs. 5. Consideration was given to the potential new taxation and user fee revenues which will be generated as a result of new growth. These revenues will be available to finance the expenditures above. The new operating revenues are $57.2 million. This amount, totalled with the existing operating revenues of $112.7 million, provides annual revenues of $169.9 million by the end of the period. 6. In consideration of the above, the capital plan is deemed to be financially sustainable. - 74 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 8-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table 8-1 Asset Management – Future Expenditures and Associated Revenues (2022$) Description 2039 (Total) Expenditures (Annualized) Annual Debt Payment on Non-Growth Related Capital1 13,832,922 Annual Debt Payment on Post Period Capital2 1,176,394 Lifecycle: Annual Lifecycle - Municipal-wide Services 13,432,868 Annual Lifecycle - Area-specific Services3 6,561,929 Sub-Total - Annual Lifecycle $19,994,797 Incremental Operating Costs (for D.C. Services)$44,872,068 Total Expenditures 79,876,181 Revenue (Annualized) Total Existing Revenue3 $112,664,638 Incremental Tax and Non-Tax Revenue (User Fees, Fines, Licences, etc.)$57,277,063 Total Revenues $169,941,701 3 As per Sch. 10 of FIR 1 Non-Growth Related component of Projects 2 Interim Debt Financing for Post Period Benefit - 75 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 1 The City of Pickering Residential Growth Forecast Summary Population Institutional Population Population Excluding Institutional Population Singles & Semi- Detached Multiple Dwellings2 Apartments3 Other Total Households 91,160 87,838 573 87,265 20,255 4,850 3,085 25 28,215 3.113 92,080 88,721 806 87,915 20,744 5,381 3,190 15 29,330 3.025 95,240 91,771 776 90,995 21,130 6,060 3,695 30 30,915 2.968 102,940 99,186 839 98,347 22,425 6,805 4,165 30 33,425 2.967 107,100 103,191 876 102,315 22,774 7,622 4,559 30 34,985 2.950 133,340 128,475 998 127,477 26,047 10,747 7,666 30 44,490 2.888 158,110 152,339 1,122 151,217 28,822 13,839 10,680 30 53,370 2.854 189,200 182,297 1,314 180,983 31,908 18,001 14,733 30 64,672 2.819 920 883 233 650 489 531 105 -10 1,115 3,160 3,050 -30 3,080 386 679 505 15 1,585 7,700 7,415 63 7,352 1,295 745 470 0 2,510 4,160 4,005 37 3,968 349 817 394 0 1,560 26,240 25,284 122 25,162 3,273 3,125 3,107 0 9,505 51,010 49,148 246 48,902 6,048 6,217 6,121 0 18,385 82,100 79,106 438 78,668 9,134 10,379 10,174 0 29,687 ¹ Census undercount estimated at approximately 3.8%. Note: Population including the undercount has been rounded. ² Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. ³ Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Mid 2022 - Mid 2032 Source: Derived from Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022), by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Mid 2022 - Mid 2039 Note: The 2031 Official Plan population target of 225,670, less the growth allocation for Northeast Pickering of approximately 36,500 persons, results in an Official Plan population target of 189,200 by Mid 2039 Population (Including Census Undercount)¹ Year Excluding Census Undercount Housing Units Person Per Unit (P.P.U.): Total Population/ Total Households Mid 2022 - Mid 2027 Hi s t o r i c a l Mid 2039 Fo r e c a s t In c r e m e n t a l Mid 2021 Mid 2016 - Mid 2021 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 Mid 2006 Mid 2011 Mid 2016 Mid 2022 Mid 2027 Mid 2032 Mid 2021 - Mid 2022 - 76 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Figure A-1 The City of Pickering Annual Housing Forecast Source: Building permit data from 2011 to 2013 and 2021 from Statistics Canada. Building permits between 2014 and 2020 from the City of Pickering. Figure by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. 1 Growth forecast represents calendar year. 283 425 303 379 346 540 1,262 510 573 1,560 1,925 1,925 1,925 1,925 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,554 1,554 1,554 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Ho u s i n g U n i t s Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average - 77 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 2 The City of Pickering Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed 2022 - 2027 2,584 2,823 913 6,320 18,563 -20 18,543 0 18,543 2022 - 2032 5,128 5,545 2,153 12,826 37,286 -18 37,268 0 37,268 2022 - 2039 6,229 7,163 4,871 18,263 50,458 -12 50,446 0 50,446 2022 - 2027 689 302 2,194 3,185 7,166 -547 6,619 122 6,741 2022 - 2032 920 672 3,968 5,559 12,143 -508 11,635 246 11,881 2022 - 2039 2,905 3,216 5,303 11,424 28,557 -335 28,222 438 28,660 2022 - 2027 3,273 3,125 3,107 9,505 25,729 -567 25,162 122 25,284 2022 - 2032 6,048 6,217 6,121 18,385 49,429 -526 48,903 246 49,149 2022 - 2039 9,134 10,379 10,174 29,687 79,015 -347 78,668 438 79,106 1 Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes accessory apartments, bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Development Timing Single & Semi- Detached Multiples1 Apartments2 Total Gross Population Existing Unit Net Population Increase, Excluding Institutional Institutional Population Net Population Including InstitutionalLocation Residential Units In New Units Population Change Rest of Pickering Seaton City of Pickering Source: Derived from Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022), by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. - 78 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 3 The City of Pickering Current Year Growth Forecast, Mid-2016 to Mid-2022 Mid 2021 Population 99,186 Occupants of Units (2)1,560 New Housing Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)2.710 Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 gross population increase 4,227 4,227 Occupants of New Units 33 Equivalent Institutional Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)1.100 Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 gross population increase 36 36 Decline in Housing Units (4)33,425 Unit Occupancy,multiplied by P.P.U. decline rate (5)-0.008 Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 total decline in population -258 -258 Population Estimate to Mid 2022 103,191 Net Population Increase, Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 4,005 (1)2016 and 2021 population based on Statistics Canada Census unadjusted for Census undercount. (2) (3)Average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) is assumed to be: Singles & Semi Detached 3.904 22%0.873 Multiples (6)2.882 52%1.509 Apartments (7)1.294 25%0.327 Total 100%2.710 ¹ Based on 2016 Census custom database ² Based on Building permit/completion activity (4)2016 and 2021 households taken from Statistics Canada Census. (5)Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6)Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7)Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note:Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Estimated residential units constructed, Mid-2021 to the beginning of the growth period assuming a six-month lag between construction and occupancy. Population Structural Type Persons Per Unit¹ (P.P.U.) % Distribution of Estimated Units² Weighted Persons Per Unit Average - 79 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 4a The City of Pickering Five-Year Growth Forecast, Mid-2022 to Mid-2027 Mid 2022 Population 103,191 Occupants of Units (2)9,505 New Housing Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)2.707 Mid 2022 to Mid 2027 gross population increase 25,729 25,729 Occupants of New Units 111 Equivalent Institutional Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)1.100 Mid 2022 to Mid 2027 gross population increase 122 122 Decline in Housing Units (4)34,985 Unit Occupancy,multiplied by P.P.U. decline rate (5)-0.016 Mid 2022 to Mid 2027 total decline in population -567 -567 Population Estimate to Mid 2027 128,475 Net Population Increase, Mid 2022 to Mid 2027 25,284 (1)Mid 2022 Population based on: (2)Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3)Average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) is assumed to be: Singles & Semi Detached 3.561 34%1.226 Multiples (6)2.743 33%0.902 Apartments (7)1.771 33%0.579 one bedroom or less 1.271 two bedrooms or more 2.071 Total 100%2.707 ¹ Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2016 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4)Mid 2022 households based upon 2021 Census (33,425 units) + Mid 2016 to Mid 2022 unit estimate (1,560 units) = 34,985 units. (5)Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6)Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7)Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note:Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. 2021 Population (99,186) + Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (1,560 x 2.71 = 4,227) + (33 x 1.1 = 36) + (33,425 x -0.008 = -258) = 103,191 Population Structural Type Persons Per Unit¹ (P.P.U.) % Distribution of Estimated Units² Weighted Persons Per Unit Average - 80 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-7 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 4b The City of Pickering 10-Year Growth Forecast, Mid-2022 to Mid-2032 Mid 2022 Population 103,191 Occupants of Units (2)18,385 New Housing Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)2.689 Mid 2022 to Mid 2032 gross population increase 49,428 49,428 Occupants of New Units 224 Equivalent Institutional Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)1.100 Mid 2022 to Mid 2032 gross population increase 246 246 Decline in Housing Units (4)34,985 Unit Occupancy,multiplied by P.P.U. decline rate (5)-0.015 Mid 2022 to Mid 2032 total decline in population -526 -526 Population Estimate to Mid 2032 152,339 Net Population Increase, Mid 2022 to Mid 2032 49,148 (1)Mid 2022 Population based on: (2)Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3)Average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) is assumed to be: Singles & Semi Detached 3.561 33%1.171 Multiples (6)2.743 34%0.928 Apartments (7)1.771 33%0.589 one bedroom or less 1.271 two bedrooms or more 2.071 Total 100%2.689 ¹ Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2016 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4)Mid 2022 households based upon 2021 Census (33,425 units) + Mid 2016 to Mid 2022 unit estimate (1,560 units) = 34,985 units. (5) (6)Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7)Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note:Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. Population 2021 Population (99,186) + Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (1,560 x 2.71 = 4,227) + (33 x 1.1 = 36) + (33,425 x -0.008 = -258) = 103,191 Structural Type Persons Per Unit¹ (P.P.U.) % Distribution of Estimated Units² Weighted Persons Per Unit Average - 81 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-8 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 5 The City of Pickering Longer-Term Growth Forecast, Mid-2022 to Mid-2039 Mid 2022 Population 103,191 Occupants of Units (2)29,687 New Ho using Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)2.662 Mid 2022 to Mid 2039 gross population increase 79,014 79,014 Occupants of New Units 399 Equivalent Institutional Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)1.100 Mid 2022 to Mid 2039 gross population increase 439 439 Decline in Housing Units (4)34,985 Unit Occupancy,multiplied by P.P.U. decline rate (5)-0.010 Mid 2022 to Mid 2039 total decline in population -347 -347 Population Estimate to Mid 2039 182,297 Net Population Increase, Mid 2022 to Mid 2039 79,106 (1)Mid 2022 Population based on: (2)Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3)Average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) is assumed to be: Singles & Semi Detached 3.561 31%1.096 Multiples (6)2.743 35%0.959 Apartments (7)1.771 34%0.607 one bedroom or less 1.271 two bedrooms or more 2.071 Total 100%2.662 ¹ Persons per unit based on Statistics Canada Custom 2016 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4)Mid 2022 households based upon 30,915 (2016 Census) + 1,560 (Mid 2016 to Mid 2022 unit estimate) = 34,985 (5)Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6)Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7)Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note:Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. 2016 Population (91,771) + Mid 2016 to Mid 2022 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (1,560 x = 4,086) + (30,915 x 0.2372 = 7,334) = 103,191 Population Structural Type Persons Per Unit¹ (P.P.U.) % Distribution of Estimated Units² Weighted Persons Per Unit Average - 82 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-9 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 6 Summary of Housing Potential by Seaton and the Rest of Pickering, December 2021 961 841 620 2,422 40% 35% 26%100% 4,543 5,256 2,136 11,935 38% 44% 18% 100% 1,126 1,565 2,141 4,832 23% 32% 44% 100% Total 6,630 7,662 4,897 19,189 % Breakdown 35% 40% 26% 100% 1 Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Source: City of Pickering Planning Department as of December 2021, derived by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Stage of Development Seaton Density Type Singles & Semi- Detached Multiples 1 Apartments2 Total Registered Not Built % Breakdown Draft Plans Approved % Breakdown % Breakdown Application Under Review - 83 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-10 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx 23 22 241 286 8% 8% 84% 100% 33 0 986 1,019 3% 0%97% 100% 162 726 10,074 10,962 1% 7% 92% 100% Total 218 748 11,301 12,267 % Breakdown 2% 6% 92% 100% 1 Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Source: City of Pickering Planning Department as of December 2021, derived by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. % Breakdown Rest of Pickering Stage of Development Density Type Singles & Semi- Detached Multiples 1 Apartments2 Total Registered Not Built % Breakdown Draft Plans Approved % Breakdown Application Under Review 984 863 861 2,708 36% 32% 32% 100% 4,576 5,256 3,122 12,954 35% 41% 24% 100% 1,288 2,291 12,215 15,794 8% 15% 77% 100% Total 6,848 8,410 16,198 31,456 % Breakdown 22% 27% 51% 100% 1 Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Source: City of Pickering Planning Department as of December 2021, derived by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. % Breakdown Registered Not Built % Breakdown Draft Plans Approved % Breakdown Application Under Review City of Pickering Total Stage of Development Density Type Singles & Semi- Detached Multiples 1 Apartments2 Total - 84 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-11 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 7 The City of Pickering Historical Residential Building Permits Years 2012 to 2021 Residential Building Permits Total 2012 237 46 0 283 2013 148 274 3 425 2014 180 98 25 303 2015 162 24 193 379 2016 286 54 19 359 Sub-total 1,013 496 240 1,749 Average (2012 - 2016)203 99 48 350 % Breakdown 57.9%28.4%13.7%100.0% 2017 202 114 30 346 2018 138 373 29 540 2019 278 727 257 1,262 2020 167 297 46 510 2021 130 51 392 573 Sub-total 915 1,562 754 3,231 Average (2017 - 2021)183 312 151 646 % Breakdown 28.3%48.3%23.3%100.0% 2012 - 2021 Total 1,928 2,058 994 4,980 Average 193 206 99 498 % Breakdown 38.7%41.3%20.0%100.0% 1 Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Source: Building permit data from 2011 to 2013 and 2021 from Statistics Canada. Building permits between 2014 and 2020 from the City of Pickering. Figure by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Singles & Semi Detached Multiples 1 Apartments 2 Year - 85 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-12 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 8 The City of Pickering Person Per Unit by Age and Type of Dwelling (2016 Census) Age of Singles and Semi-Detached Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 25 Year Average Adjusted 1-5 - - - 3.834 5.269 3.904 6-10 - - - 3.453 4.957 3.739 0.143 11-15 - - - 3.431 4.552 3.513 3.561 16-20 - - 1.933 3.337 4.154 3.399 3.561 20-25 - - - 3.272 4.574 3.484 3.561 25-35 - - 2.438 3.073 4.173 3.211 35+-1.500 1.942 2.795 4.066 2.835 3.561 Total -1.556 2.114 3.086 4.303 3.188 Age of Multiples1 Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 25 Year Average Adjusted 1-5 - - 1.750 2.968 - 2.882 6-10 - - 1.500 2.952 - 2.667 (0.166) 11-15 - - 1.706 2.654 - 2.566 2.743 16-20 - - 1.944 2.703 - 2.565 2.743 20-25 - - 1.647 3.026 - 2.832 2.743 25-35 -0.929 2.267 3.020 3.914 2.995 35+-1.211 2.000 2.666 3.966 2.605 2.743 Total -1.200 1.869 2.810 3.912 2.719 Age of Apartments2 Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 25 Year Average Adjusted 1-5 -1.135 1.519 - - 1.294 6-10 -1.083 1.571 2.933 - 2.116 0.065 11-15 -1.286 1.435 3.667 - 1.893 1.771 16-20 -1.250 1.660 3.000 - 1.901 1.771 20-25 -1.179 1.697 2.310 - 1.714 1.771 25-35 -1.275 1.679 2.627 - 1.908 35+-1.226 1.786 2.602 - 2.179 1.771 Total -1.212 1.655 2.636 3.706 1.899 Age of All Density Types Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 1-5 -1.211 1.659 3.469 4.967 3.138 6-10 -1.154 1.824 3.175 5.160 3.088 11-15 -1.273 1.702 3.198 4.303 2.983 16-20 -1.316 1.788 3.200 4.188 3.005 20-25 -1.234 1.884 3.175 4.610 3.034 25-35 -1.259 1.932 3.053 4.093 3.072 35+-1.261 1.989 2.744 3.989 2.729 Total 1.400 1.253 1.876 3.005 4.230 2.944 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 3 Adjusted based on 2001-2016 historical trends. Note: Does not include Statistics Canada data classified as 'Other' P.P.U. Not calculated for samples less than or equal to 50 dwelling units, and does not include institutional population. 1 Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. - 86 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-13 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 9 The City of Pickering Person Per Unit Structural Type and Age of Dwelling (2016 Census) 3.90 3.74 3.51 3.40 3.48 3.21 2.832.88 2.67 2.57 2.56 2.83 3.00 2.60 1.29 2.12 1.89 1.90 1.71 1.91 2.18 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 20-25 25-35 35+ Pe r s o n s P e r D w e l l i n g Age of Dwelling Singles and Semi-Detached Multiples Apartments P.P.U. data based on the City of Pickering. - 87 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-14 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 10a The City of Pickering Employment Forecast, 2022 to 2039 Employment Mid 2006 87,838 0.001 0.034 0.145 0.136 0.048 0.365 0.084 0.450 75 3,015 12,743 11,988 4,245 32,065 7,421 39,486 29,050 Mid 2011 88,721 0.001 0.034 0.134 0.144 0.056 0.368 0.074 0.443 75 2,995 11,903 12,763 4,940 32,675 6,592 39,267 29,680 Mid 2016 91,771 0.002 0.035 0.129 0.138 0.053 0.357 0.051 0.408 140 3,225 11,843 12,668 4,885 32,760 4,694 37,454 29,535 Mid 2022 103,191 0.001 0.035 0.122 0.133 0.051 0.343 0.047 0.390 140 3,604 12,619 13,757 5,254 35,373 4,884 40,257 31,769 Mid 2027 128,475 0.001 0.033 0.115 0.128 0.048 0.326 0.048 0.374 140 4,255 14,759 16,488 6,226 41,867 6,134 48,001 37,612 Mid 2032 152,339 0.001 0.032 0.113 0.126 0.048 0.321 0.049 0.369 140 4,899 17,255 19,182 7,350 48,825 7,391 56,216 43,926 Mid 2039 182,297 0.001 0.032 0.123 0.129 0.051 0.336 0.052 0.388 140 5,860 22,399 23,576 9,335 61,309 9,394 70,703 55,449 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 883 0.000 -0.001 -0.011 0.007 0.007 0.003 -0.010 -0.007 0 -20 -840 775 695 610 -829 -219 630 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 3,050 0.0007 0.0014 -0.0051 -0.0058 -0.0024 -0.0113 -0.0232 -0.0345 65 230 -60 -95 -55 85 -1,898 -1,813 -145 Mid 2016 - Mid 2022 11,420 -0.0002 -0.0002 -0.0068 -0.0047 -0.0023 -0.0142 -0.0038 -0.0180 0 379 776 1,089 369 2,613 190 2,803 2,234 Mid 2022 - Mid 2027 25,284 -0.0003 -0.0018 -0.0074 -0.0050 -0.0025 -0.0169 0.0004 -0.0165 0 651 2,140 2,731 972 6,494 1,250 7,744 5,843 Mid 2022 - Mid 2032 49,148 -0.0004 -0.0028 -0.0090 -0.0074 -0.0027 -0.0223 0.0012 -0.0211 0 1,295 4,636 5,425 2,096 13,452 2,507 15,959 12,157 Mid 2022 - Mid 2039 79,106 -0.0006 -0.0028 0.0006 -0.0040 0.0003 -0.0065 0.0042 -0.0023 0 2,256 9,780 9,819 4,081 25,936 4,510 30,446 23,680 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 177 0.00000 -0.00011 -0.00218 0.00148 0.00147 0.00065 -0.00204 -0.00139 0 -4 -168 155 139 122 -166 -44 126 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 610 0.0001 0.0003 -0.0010 -0.0012 -0.0005 -0.0023 -0.0046 -0.0069 13 46 -12 -19 -11 17 -380 -363 -29 Mid 2016 - Mid 2022 1,903 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0011 -0.0008 -0.0004 -0.0024 -0.0006 -0.0030 0 63 129 182 62 436 32 467 372 Mid 2022 - Mid 2027 5,057 -0.00005 -0.00036 -0.00148 -0.00100 -0.00049 -0.00338 0.00008 -0.00330 0 130 428 546 194 1,299 250 1,549 1,169 Mid 2022 - Mid 2032 4,915 -0.00004 -0.00028 -0.00090 -0.00074 -0.00027 -0.00223 0.00012 -0.00211 0 130 464 543 210 1,345 251 1,596 1,216 Mid 2022 - Mid 2039 4,653 -0.00003 -0.00016 0.00003 -0.00023 0.00002 -0.00038 0.00025 -0.00013 0 133 575 578 240 1,526 265 1,791 1,393 Source: Derived from Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022), by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Note: The 2031 Official Plan employment target of 71,800 is forecast to be achieved after 2039. An additional 4,900 jobs would be assumed for Northeast Pickering, in accordance with the Official Plan. ¹ Statistics Canada defines no fixed place of work (N.F.P.O.W.) employees as "persons who do not go from home to the same work place location at the beginning of each shift". Such persons include building and landscape contractors, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc. N.F.P.O.W.1 Activity Rate Period Population Primary Work at Home Industrial Commercial/ Population Related Institutional Total Employment Primary Total Total Employment (Including N.F.P.O.W.) Institutional Total (Excluding Work at Home and N.F.P.O.W.) Incremental Change Annual Average Total Including NFPOW N.F.P.O.W.1Work at Home Industrial Commercial/ Population Related - 88 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-15 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 10b The City of Pickering Employment and Gross Floor Area (G.F.A.) Forecast, 2022 to 2039 Mid 2006 87,838 75 12,743 11,988 4,245 29,050 14,016,800 4,795,000 2,865,400 21,677,200 Mid 2011 88,721 75 11,903 12,763 4,940 29,680 13,092,800 5,105,000 3,334,500 21,532,300 Mid 2016 91,771 140 11,843 12,668 4,885 29,535 13,026,800 5,067,000 3,297,400 21,391,200 Mid 2022 103,191 140 12,619 13,757 5,254 31,769 13,880,400 5,502,600 3,546,500 22,929,500 Mid 2027 128,475 140 14,759 16,488 6,226 37,612 16,234,400 6,595,000 4,202,600 27,032,000 Mid 2032 152,339 140 17,255 19,182 7,350 43,926 18,980,000 7,672,600 4,961,300 31,613,900 Mid 2039 182,297 140 22,399 23,576 9,335 55,449 24,638,400 9,430,200 6,301,100 40,369,700 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 883 0 -840 775 695 630 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 3,050 65 -60 -95 -55 -145 Mid 2016 - Mid 2022 11,420 0 776 1,089 369 2,234 853,600 435,600 249,100 1,538,300 Mid 2022 - Mid 2027 25,284 0 2,140 2,731 972 5,843 2,354,000 1,092,400 656,100 4,102,500 Mid 2022 - Mid 2032 49,148 0 4,636 5,425 2,096 12,157 5,099,600 2,170,000 1,414,800 8,684,400 Mid 2022 - Mid 2039 79,106 0 9,780 9,819 4,081 23,680 10,758,000 3,927,600 2,754,600 17,440,200 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 177 0 -168 155 139 126 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 610 13 -12 -19 -11 -29 Mid 2016 - Mid 2022 1,903 0 129 182 62 372 142,267 72,600 41,517 256,383 Mid 2022 - Mid 2027 5,057 0 428 546 194 1,169 470,800 218,480 131,220 820,500 Mid 2022 - Mid 2032 4,915 0 464 543 210 1,216 509,960 217,000 141,480 868,440 Mid 2022 - Mid 2039 4,653 0 575 578 240 1,393 632,824 231,035 162,035 1,025,894 Source: Derived from Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022), by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. 1 Square Foot Per Employee Assumptions Industrial 1,100 Commercial/ Population Related 400 Institutional 675 Not e: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Period Population Employment Gross Floor Area in Square Feet (Estimated)¹ Total Annual Average Primary Industrial Institutional Total Incremental Change Commercial/ Population Related Institutional Industrial Commercial/ Population Related - 89 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-16 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 10c The City of Pickering Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Non-Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed 2022 - 2027 1,815,000 934,000 433,300 3,182,300 4,627 2022 - 2032 3,792,800 1,862,400 857,900 6,513,100 9,375 2022 - 2039 7,912,300 3,339,600 1,510,600 12,762,500 17,780 2022 - 2027 539,000 158,400 222,800 920,200 1,216 2022 - 2032 1,306,800 307,600 556,900 2,171,300 2,782 2022 - 2039 2,845,700 588,000 1,244,000 4,677,700 5,900 2022 - 2027 2,354,000 1,092,400 656,100 4,102,500 5,843 2022 - 2032 5,099,600 2,170,000 1,414,800 8,684,400 12,157 2022 - 2039 10,758,000 3,927,600 2,754,600 17,440,200 23,680 1 Square feet per employee assumptions: Industrial 1,100 Com mercial 400 Institutional 675 2 Employment Increase does not include No Fixed Place of Work. *Reflects Mid 2022 to Mid 2039 forecast period Source: Derived from Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022), by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Seaton Development Location Timing Rest of Pickering Industrial G.F.A. S.F.1 Commercial G.F.A. S.F.1 Institutional G.F.A. S.F.1 Total Non- Residential G.F.A. S.F. Employment Increase2 City of Pickering - 90 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-17 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 11 The City of Pickering Non-Residential Construction Value Years 2007 to 2016 (000’s 2018 $) New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total 2007 10,760 2,663 0 13,423 5,603 5,979 0 11,583 0 1,234 2,528 3,762 16,364 9,877 2,528 28,768 2008 42,442 1,233 0 43,676 24,674 8,900 3,192 36,766 1,313 2,376 1,955 5,644 68,430 12,509 5,147 86,086 2009 36,439 766 3,805 41,010 4,034 8,703 0 12,737 0 627 0 627 40,473 10,097 3,805 54,374 2010 9,751 186 0 9,937 29,550 10,849 5,041 45,440 0 229 1,462 1,690 39,300 11,264 6,503 57,067 2012 17,165 4,314 1,793 23,272 1,313 13,242 2,502 17,058 33,681 1,179 4,819 39,679 52,159 18,735 9,114 80,009 2013 144,192 1,713 631 146,536 13,119 13,514 11,820 38,454 0 1,600 0 1,600 157,312 16,827 12,451 186,590 2014 118 3,446 0 3,563 8,782 7,095 4,429 20,307 23,994 372 2,064 26,430 32,894 10,912 6,493 50,300 2015 12,675 361 0 13,036 1,351 6,681 0 8,032 0 813 0 813 14,026 7,854 0 21,881 2016 629 175 0 803 2,487 15,796 5,354 23,637 90 1,477 0 1,567 3,205 17,449 5,354 26,008 Subtotal 274,481 16,757 6,665 297,903 99,675 99,778 51,910 251,362 59,350 10,614 12,828 82,792 433,506 127,150 71,402 632,058 Percent of Total 92% 6% 2% 100% 40% 40% 21% 100% 72% 13% 15% 100% 69% 20% 11% 100% Average 27,448 1,676 1,666 29,790 9,967 9,978 7,416 25,136 11,870 1,061 2,566 8,279 43,351 12,715 7,934 63,206 2007 - 2011 Period Total 110,692 143,875 12,704 267,271 2007 - 2011 Average 22,138 28,775 2,541 53,454 % Breakdown 41.4%53.8%4.8%100.0% 2012 - 2016 Period Total 187,211 107,487 70,088 364,787 2012 - 2016 Average 37,442 21,497 14,018 72,957 % Breakdown 51.3%29.5%19.2%100.0% 2007 - 2016 Period Total 297,903 251,362 82,792 632,058 2007 - 2016 Average 29,790 25,136 8,279 63,206 % Breakdown 47.1%39.8%13.1%100.0% Source: Statistics Canada Publication, 64-001-XIB Note: Inflated to year-end 2017 (January, 2018) dollars using Reed Construction Cost Index YEAR Industrial Commercial Institutional Total - 91 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-18 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Schedule 12 The City of Pickering Employment to Population Ratio by Major Employment Sector, 2006 to 2016 2006 2011 2016 06-11 11-16 Primary Industry Employment 11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 80 155 80 75 -75 21 Mining and oil and gas extraction 25 0 85 -25 85 Sub-total 105 155 165 50 10 Industrial and Other Employment 22 Utilities 5,355 5,575 4,360 220 -1,215 23 Construction 1,275 1,395 1,680 120 285 31-33 Manufacturing 3,055 2,410 3,100 -645 690 41 Wholesale trade 1,900 1,790 1,470 -110 -320 48-49 Transportation and warehousing 1,170 1,050 1,350 -120 300 56 Administrative and support 645 533 640 -113 108 Sub-total 13,400 12,753 12,600 -648 -153 Population Related Employment 44-45 Retail trade 5,205 4,865 4,805 -340 -60 51 Information and cultural industries 405 765 780 360 15 52 Finance and insurance 940 1,055 1,105 115 50 53 Real estate and rental and leasing 965 650 695 -315 45 54 Professional, scientific and technical services 2,035 2,355 2,440 320 85 55 Management of companies and enterprises 60 30 75 -30 45 56 Administrative and support 645 533 640 -113 108 71 Arts, entertainment and recreation 590 830 655 240 -175 72 Accommodation and food services 1,730 1,925 2,040 195 115 81 Other services (except public administration)1,360 1,490 1,560 130 70 Sub-total 13,935 14,498 14,795 563 298 Institutional 61 Educational services 1,815 2,025 1,970 210 -55 62 Health care and social assistance 1,945 2,295 2,360 350 65 91 Public administration 865 950 870 85 -80 Sub-total 4,625 5,270 5,200 645 -70 Total Employment 32,065 32,675 32,760 610 85 Population 87,838 88,721 91,771 883 3,050 Employment to Population Ratio Industrial and Other Employment 0.15 0.14 0.14 -0.01 -0.01 Population Related Employment 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 Institutional Employment 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.00 Primary Industry Employment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.00 -0.01 Source: Statistics Canada Employment by Place of Work Note: 2006-2016 employment figures are classified by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code NAICS Year Categories which relate primarily to industrial land supply and demand Categories which relate primarily to population growth within the municipality Employment by industry CommentsChange Categories which relate to local land-based resources - 92 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-14 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table B-13 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Parks and Recreation Services – Parkland Development Acres of Parkland Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/Acre) Village Green 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 $665,000 Neighbourhood Active 152 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 $410,000 Community Active 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 $410,000 District Active 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 $410,000 Passive Parkland 476 477 477 478 478 478 478 478 478 478 $73,300 Total 815 822 822 823 823 823 823 823 823 823 Population 89,039 89,373 90,142 90,505 90,995 92,196 93,401 96,046 97,318 98,325 Per Capita Standard 0.0092 0.0092 0.0091 0.0091 0.0090 0.0089 0.0088 0.0086 0.0085 0.0084 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.0089 Quality Standard $214,109 Service Standard $1,906 D.C. Amount (before deductions)17 Year Forecast Population 78,668 $ per Capita $1,906 Eligible Amount $149,907,381 - 93 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-1 Cash Flow Calculation Fire Protection Services Residential per capita Development Related Expe nditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Te rm Debt Development Related Long- Te rm Debt $330.20 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Ope ning Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Population Growth Per Capita per Year Inflate d at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (De ficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Inte re st Earnings/ (Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 (6,470,363) 8,585,592 8,585,592 430,411 2,573 330.20 849,575 6,741,981 (7,894,811) (215,478) (8,110,288) 2023 (8,110,288) 2,845,458 2,930,822 438,364 5,146 340.11 1,750,124 443,898 (9,285,451) (260,936) (9,546,387) 2024 (9,546,387) 2,174,942 2,307,396 468,234 5,146 350.31 1,802,628 2,307,396 (8,211,993) (266,376) (8,478,369) 2025 (8,478,369) - - 633,340 5,146 360.82 1,856,707 - (7,255,002) (236,001) (7,491,003) 2026 (7,491,003) 4,664,439 5,249,867 633,550 5,146 371.64 1,912,408 5,249,867 (6,212,145) (205,547) (6,417,692) 2027 (6,417,692) - - 1,060,584 4,943 382.79 1,892,111 - (5,586,165) (180,058) (5,766,223) 2028 (5,766,223) - - 1,060,614 4,740 394.28 1,868,876 - (4,957,962) (160,863) (5,118,825) 2029 (5,118,825) - - 1,060,970 4,740 406.11 1,924,942 - (4,254,853) (140,605) (4,395,458) 2030 (4,395,458) - - 1,060,873 4,740 418.29 1,982,690 - (3,473,641) (118,036) (3,591,677) 2031 (3,591,677) - - 1,061,059 4,740 430.84 2,042,171 - (2,610,565) (93,034) (2,703,599) 2032 (2,703,599) - - 1,060,746 4,694 443.76 2,083,006 - (1,681,339) (65,774) (1,747,113) 2033 (1,747,113) - - 1,060,671 4,648 457.08 2,124,454 - (683,330) (36,457) (719,787) 2034 (719,787) - - 1,060,799 4,648 470.79 2,188,188 - 407,602 (4,683) 402,919 2035 402,919 - - 1,060,342 4,648 484.91 2,253,833 - 1,596,411 9,997 1,606,407 2036 1,606,407 - - 1,060,212 4,648 499.46 2,321,448 - 2,867,644 22,370 2,890,014 2037 2,890,014 - - 1,060,380 3,910 514.44 2,011,724 - 3,841,357 33,657 3,875,014 2038 3,875,014 - - 1,060,064 3,173 529.88 1,681,326 - 4,496,276 41,856 4,538,133 2039 4,538,133 - - 5,426,593 1,587 545.77 865,883 - (22,578) 22,578 0 Total 18,270,432 19,073,678 - 20,757,807 79,015 33,412,093 14,743,143 (1,853,389) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 94 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-2 Cash Flow Calculation Fire Protection Services Non-Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land per net ha Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $18,492.10 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Net Hectares per net ha per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 (895,101) 1,187,719 1,187,719 59,542 4 18,492.098 64,722 932,676 (1,144,963) (30,601) (1,175,564) 2023 (1,175,564) 393,637 405,446 60,643 7 19,046.861 133,328 61,408 (1,446,916) (39,337) (1,486,254) 2024 (1,486,254) 300,878 319,202 64,775 7 19,618.267 137,328 319,202 (1,413,700) (43,499) (1,457,200) 2025 (1,457,200) - - 87,615 7 20,206.815 141,448 - (1,403,367) (42,909) (1,446,276) 2026 (1,446,276) 645,272 726,259 87,644 7 20,813.019 145,691 726,259 (1,388,229) (42,518) (1,430,747) 2027 (1,430,747) - - 146,720 11 21,437.410 229,548 - (1,347,918) (41,680) (1,389,598) 2028 (1,389,598) - - 146,724 11 22,080.532 241,826 - (1,294,496) (40,261) (1,334,758) 2029 (1,334,758) - - 146,773 11 22,742.948 249,080 - (1,232,450) (38,508) (1,270,958) 2030 (1,270,958) - - 146,760 11 23,425.237 256,553 - (1,161,165) (36,482) (1,197,647) 2031 (1,197,647) - - 146,785 11 24,127.994 264,249 - (1,080,183) (34,167) (1,114,351) 2032 (1,114,351) - - 146,742 12 24,851.834 289,455 - (971,638) (31,290) (1,002,928) 2033 (1,002,928) - - 146,732 12 25,597.389 315,934 - (833,726) (27,550) (861,275) 2034 (861,275) - - 146,749 12 26,365.310 325,412 - (682,613) (23,158) (705,771) 2035 (705,771) - - 146,686 12 27,156.270 335,175 - (517,282) (18,346) (535,628) 2036 (535,628) - - 146,668 12 27,970.958 345,230 - (337,067) (13,090) (350,157) 2037 (350,157) - - 146,691 16 28,810.086 473,319 - (23,529) (5,605) (29,135) 2038 (29,135) - - 146,648 21 29,674.389 608,783 - 433,000 2,019 435,020 2039 435,020 - - 750,707 10 30,564.621 313,523 - (2,164) 2,164 0 Total 2,527,505 2,638,625 - 2,871,605 194 4,870,604 2,039,545 (504,818) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 95 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-3 Cash Flow Calculation Fire Protection Services Non-Residential per ft² Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $0.53 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Sq. Ft. of Gross Floor Area per sq.ft. per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 (1,037,605) 1,376,809 1,376,809 69,022 170,996 0.531 90,741 1,081,163 (1,311,533)(35,237) (1,346,770) 2023 (1,346,770) 456,305 469,995 70,297 341,992 0.547 186,926 71,185 (1,628,951)(44,636) (1,673,586) 2024 (1,673,586) 348,780 370,020 75,087 341,992 0.563 192,534 370,020 (1,556,139)(48,446) (1,604,585) 2025 (1,604,585)- - 101,564 341,992 0.580 198,310 - (1,507,839)(46,686) (1,554,526) 2026 (1,554,526) 748,002 841,883 101,598 341,992 0.597 204,259 841,883 (1,451,864)(45,096) (1,496,960) 2027 (1,496,960)- - 170,078 378,767 0.615 233,011 - (1,434,027)(43,965) (1,477,992) 2028 (1,477,992)- - 170,083 415,543 0.634 263,303 - (1,384,772)(42,941) (1,427,713) 2029 (1,427,713)- - 170,140 415,543 0.653 271,202 - (1,326,651)(41,315) (1,367,967) 2030 (1,367,967)- - 170,124 415,543 0.672 279,338 - (1,258,753)(39,401) (1,298,153) 2031 (1,298,153)- - 170,154 415,543 0.692 287,719 - (1,180,589)(37,181) (1,217,770) 2032 (1,217,770)- - 170,104 438,507 0.713 312,727 - (1,075,147)(34,394) (1,109,541) 2033 (1,109,541)- - 170,092 461,471 0.735 338,978 - (940,656)(30,753) (971,409) 2034 (971,409)- - 170,113 461,471 0.757 349,147 - (792,374)(26,457) (818,831) 2035 (818,831)- - 170,039 461,471 0.779 359,621 - (629,249)(21,721) (650,970) 2036 (650,970)- - 170,019 461,471 0.803 370,410 - (450,579)(16,523) (467,102) 2037 (467,102)- - 170,045 668,229 0.827 552,461 - (84,687)(8,277)(92,964) 2038 (92,964)- - 169,995 874,988 0.852 745,101 - 482,142 1,946 484,088 2039 484,088 - - 870,223 437,494 0.877 383,727 - (2,408)2,408 0 Total 2,929,896 3,058,707 - 3,328,779 7,845,000 5,619,515 2,364,251 (558,675) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 96 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-4 Cash Flow Calculation By-law Enforcement Services Residential per capita Development Related Expe nditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Te rm Debt Development Related Long- Te rm Debt $28.75 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Ope ning Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Population Growth Per Capita per Year Inflate d at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (De ficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Inte re st Earnings/ (Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 - - - - 2,573 28.75 73,961 - 73,961 370 74,331 2023 74,331 2,194,003 2,259,823 - 5,146 29.61 152,360 2,259,823 226,692 1,505 228,197 2024 228,197 - - 150,774 5,146 30.50 156,931 - 234,353 2,313 236,666 2025 236,666 - - 150,774 5,146 31.41 161,639 - 247,531 2,421 249,952 2026 249,952 - - 150,774 5,146 32.35 166,488 - 265,666 2,578 268,244 2027 268,244 - - 150,774 4,943 33.32 164,721 - 282,191 2,752 284,943 2028 284,943 - - 150,774 4,740 34.32 162,699 - 296,867 2,909 299,776 2029 299,776 - - 150,774 4,740 35.35 167,579 - 316,582 3,082 319,663 2030 319,663 - - 150,774 4,740 36.41 172,607 - 341,496 3,306 344,802 2031 344,802 - - 150,774 4,740 37.51 177,785 - 371,812 3,583 375,395 2032 375,395 - - 150,774 4,694 38.63 181,340 - 405,961 3,907 409,868 2033 409,868 - - 150,774 4,648 39.79 184,948 - 444,042 4,270 448,312 2034 448,312 - - 150,774 4,648 40.99 190,497 - 488,034 4,682 492,716 2035 492,716 - - 150,774 4,648 42.21 196,212 - 538,153 5,154 543,307 2036 543,307 - - 150,774 4,648 43.48 202,098 - 594,631 5,690 600,321 2037 600,321 - - 150,774 3,910 44.79 175,134 - 624,681 6,125 630,806 2038 630,806 - - 150,774 3,173 46.13 146,371 - 626,403 6,286 632,689 2039 632,689 - - 711,218 1,587 47.51 75,381 - (3,148) 3,148 (0) Total 2,194,003 2,259,823 - 2,972,833 79,015 2,908,754 2,259,823 64,079 Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 97 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-5 Cash Flow Calculation By-law Enforcement Services Non-Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land per net ha Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $1,563.44 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Net Hectares per net ha per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 - - - - 4 1,563.435 5,472 - 5,472 27 5,499 2023 5,499 303,515 312,621 - 7 1,610.338 11,272 312,621 16,772 111 16,883 2024 16,883 - - 20,858 7 1,658.648 11,611 - 7,636 123 7,758 2025 7,758 - - 20,858 7 1,708.408 11,959 - (1,141)33 (1,108) 2026 (1,108)- - 20,858 7 1,759.660 12,318 - (9,648)(161)(9,809) 2027 (9,809)- - 20,858 11 1,812.450 19,407 - (11,260)(316)(11,576) 2028 (11,576)- - 20,858 11 1,866.823 20,445 - (11,988)(353)(12,342) 2029 (12,342)- - 20,858 11 1,922.828 21,059 - (12,141)(367)(12,508) 2030 (12,508)- - 20,858 11 1,980.513 21,691 - (11,675)(363)(12,038) 2031 (12,038)- - 20,858 11 2,039.928 22,341 - (10,555)(339)(10,894) 2032 (10,894)- - 20,858 12 2,101.126 24,472 - (7,279)(273)(7,552) 2033 (7,552)- - 20,858 12 2,164.160 26,711 - (1,699)(139)(1,838) 2034 (1,838)- - 20,858 12 2,229.085 27,512 - 4,817 15 4,832 2035 4,832 - - 20,858 12 2,295.957 28,338 - 12,311 86 12,397 2036 12,397 - - 20,858 12 2,364.836 29,188 - 20,727 166 20,893 2037 20,893 - - 20,858 16 2,435.781 40,017 - 40,052 305 40,357 2038 40,357 - - 20,858 21 2,508.855 51,470 - 70,969 557 71,526 2039 71,526 - - 98,389 10 2,584.120 26,507 - (356)356 0 Total 303,515 312,621 - 411,257 194 411,791 312,621 (533) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 98 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-7 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-6 Cash Flow Calculation By-law Enforcement Services Non-Residential per ft² Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $0.04 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Sq. Ft. of Gross Floor Area per sq.ft. per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 - - - - 170,996 0.045 7,678 - 7,678 38 7,716 2023 7,716 351,836 362,391 - 341,992 0.046 15,817 362,391 23,533 156 23,689 2024 23,689 - - 24,179 341,992 0.048 16,291 - 15,802 197 15,999 2025 15,999 - - 24,179 341,992 0.049 16,780 - 8,600 123 8,723 2026 8,723 - - 24,179 341,992 0.051 17,283 - 1,828 53 1,880 2027 1,880 - - 24,179 378,767 0.052 19,716 - (2,582)(11)(2,593) 2028 (2,593)- - 24,179 415,543 0.054 22,279 - (4,492)(106)(4,599) 2029 (4,599)- - 24,179 415,543 0.055 22,947 - (5,830)(156)(5,986) 2030 (5,986)- - 24,179 415,543 0.057 23,636 - (6,529)(188)(6,717) 2031 (6,717)- - 24,179 415,543 0.059 24,345 - (6,550)(199)(6,749) 2032 (6,749)- - 24,179 438,507 0.060 26,461 - (4,467)(168)(4,635) 2033 (4,635)- - 24,179 461,471 0.062 28,682 - (131)(71)(203) 2034 (203)- - 24,179 461,471 0.064 29,543 - 5,161 25 5,186 2035 5,186 - - 24,179 461,471 0.066 30,429 - 11,436 83 11,519 2036 11,519 - - 24,179 461,471 0.068 31,342 - 18,682 151 18,833 2037 18,833 - - 24,179 668,229 0.070 46,746 - 41,401 301 41,702 2038 41,702 - - 24,179 874,988 0.072 63,046 - 80,569 611 81,180 2039 81,180 - - 114,053 437,494 0.074 32,469 - (404)404 0 Total 351,836 362,391 - 476,732 7,845,000 475,488 362,391 1,243 Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 99 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-8 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-7 Cash Flow Calculation Transportation Services Residential per capita Development Related Expe nditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Te rm Debt Development Related Long- Te rm Debt $3,780.20 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Ope ning Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Population Growth Per Capita per Year Inflate d at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (De ficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Inte re st Earnings/ (Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 19,222,183 13,091,291 13,091,291 - 717 3,780.20 2,708,889 311,648 9,151,430 141,868 9,293,298 2023 9,293,298 13,495,086 13,899,939 19,374 1,433 3,893.60 5,580,312 320,998 1,275,295 52,843 1,328,138 2024 1,328,138 18,218,450 19,327,954 40,790 1,433 4,010.41 5,747,721 3,207,375 (9,085,510) (116,361) (9,201,870) 2025 (9,201,870) 2,194,138 2,397,594 269,950 1,433 4,130.72 5,920,153 340,547 (5,608,715) (222,159) (5,830,874) 2026 (5,830,874) 10,930,220 12,302,059 295,949 1,433 4,254.65 6,097,757 350,763 (11,980,361) (267,169) (12,247,530) 2027 (12,247,530) 5,297,985 6,141,817 324,502 1,214 4,382.28 5,321,408 - (13,392,441) (384,600) (13,777,040) 2028 (13,777,040) 5,297,985 6,326,071 324,502 995 4,513.75 4,492,990 - (15,934,624) (445,675) (16,380,299) 2029 (16,380,299) 5,297,985 6,515,854 324,502 995 4,649.17 4,627,779 - (18,592,875) (524,598) (19,117,472) 2030 (19,117,472) 5,297,985 6,711,329 324,502 995 4,788.64 4,766,613 - (21,386,691) (607,562) (21,994,253) 2031 (21,994,253) 5,297,985 6,912,669 324,502 995 4,932.30 4,909,611 - (24,321,813) (694,741) (25,016,554) 2032 (25,016,554) 5,297,985 7,120,049 324,502 1,338 5,080.27 6,795,389 - (25,665,716) (760,234) (26,425,951) 2033 (26,425,951) 5,297,985 7,333,651 324,502 1,680 5,232.68 8,789,894 - (25,294,209) (775,802) (26,070,012) 2034 (26,070,012) 5,297,985 7,553,660 324,502 1,680 5,389.66 9,053,591 - (24,894,583) (764,469) (25,659,052) 2035 (25,659,052) 5,297,985 7,780,270 324,502 1,680 5,551.35 9,325,198 - (24,438,625) (751,465) (25,190,090) 2036 (25,190,090) 5,297,985 8,013,678 324,502 1,680 5,717.89 9,604,954 - (23,923,316) (736,701) (24,660,017) 2037 (24,660,017) 5,297,985 8,254,088 324,502 2,844 5,889.42 16,747,042 - (16,491,565) (617,274) (17,108,839) 2038 (17,108,839) 5,297,985 8,501,711 324,502 4,007 6,066.11 24,309,010 - (1,626,042) (281,023) (1,907,065) 2039 (1,907,065) 5,297,985 8,756,762 1,827,130 2,004 6,248.09 12,519,140 - 28,183 (28,183) (0) Total 126,802,994 156,940,446 - 6,347,216 28,557 147,317,452 4,531,331 (7,783,304) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 100 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-9 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-8 Cash Flow Calculation Transportation Services Non-Residential per ft² Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $4.73 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Sq. Ft. of Gross Floor Area per sq.ft. per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 3,937,074 2,681,349 2,681,349 - 92,020 4.725 434,839 63,832 1,754,396 28,457 1,782,853 2023 1,782,853 2,764,054 2,846,975 3,968 184,040 4.867 895,769 65,747 (106,575) 8,381 (98,193) 2024 (98,193) 3,731,490 3,958,738 8,355 184,040 5.013 922,642 656,932 (2,485,711) (38,759) (2,524,470) 2025 (2,524,470) 449,402 491,073 55,291 184,040 5.164 950,321 69,751 (2,050,763) (68,628) (2,119,391) 2026 (2,119,391) 2,238,720 2,519,699 60,616 184,040 5.319 978,831 71,843 (3,649,032) (86,526) (3,735,558) 2027 (3,735,558) 1,085,129 1,257,962 66,464 217,130 5.478 1,189,467 - (3,870,518) (114,091) (3,984,609) 2028 (3,984,609) 1,085,129 1,295,701 66,464 250,220 5.642 1,411,861 - (3,934,914) (118,793) (4,053,707) 2029 (4,053,707) 1,085,129 1,334,572 66,464 250,220 5.812 1,454,217 - (4,000,526) (120,813) (4,121,340) 2030 (4,121,340) 1,085,129 1,374,610 66,464 250,220 5.986 1,497,843 - (4,064,571) (122,789) (4,187,359) 2031 (4,187,359) 1,085,129 1,415,848 66,464 250,220 6.166 1,542,779 - (4,126,893) (124,714) (4,251,607) 2032 (4,251,607) 1,085,129 1,458,323 66,464 262,689 6.351 1,668,251 - (4,108,143) (125,396) (4,233,539) 2033 (4,233,539) 1,085,129 1,502,073 66,464 275,159 6.541 1,799,863 - (4,002,214) (123,536) (4,125,750) 2034 (4,125,750) 1,085,129 1,547,135 66,464 275,159 6.737 1,853,859 - (3,885,490) (120,169) (4,005,659) 2035 (4,005,659) 1,085,129 1,593,549 66,464 275,159 6.940 1,909,475 - (3,756,198) (116,428) (3,872,626) 2036 (3,872,626) 1,085,129 1,641,356 66,464 275,159 7.148 1,966,759 - (3,613,687) (112,295) (3,725,981) 2037 (3,725,981) 1,085,129 1,690,596 66,464 420,231 7.362 3,093,805 - (2,389,237) (91,728) (2,480,965) 2038 (2,480,965) 1,085,129 1,741,314 66,464 565,303 7.583 4,286,703 - (2,041) (37,245) (39,286) 2039 (39,286) 1,085,129 1,793,554 374,231 282,651 7.811 2,207,652 - 581 (581) - Total 25,971,697 32,144,429 - 1,300,032 4,677,700 30,064,936 928,104 (1,485,652) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 101 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-10 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-9 Cash Flow Calculation Other Services Related to a Highway Residential per capita Development Related Expe nditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Te rm Debt Development Related Long- Te rm Debt $209.62 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Ope ning Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Population Growth Per Capita per Year Inflate d at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (De ficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Inte re st Earnings/ (Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 (1,243,303) 1,003,372 1,003,372 316,894 - 2,573 209.62 539,322 - (2,024,246) (49,013) (2,073,260) 2023 (2,073,260) 4,102,622 4,225,700 316,744 - 5,146 215.91 1,111,004 3,521,364 (1,983,336) (60,849) (2,044,185) 2024 (2,044,185) 2,397,072 2,543,053 315,611 234,944 5,146 222.38 1,144,334 2,450,679 (1,542,780) (53,804) (1,596,584) 2025 (1,596,584) 87,072 95,145 318,007 410,039 5,146 229.05 1,178,664 - (1,241,112) (42,565) (1,283,677) 2026 (1,283,677) 717,702 807,779 316,805 410,039 5,146 235.93 1,214,024 303,325 (1,300,952) (38,769) (1,339,722) 2027 (1,339,722) 20,097 23,298 316,477 434,731 4,943 243.00 1,201,139 - (913,089) (33,792) (946,881) 2028 (946,881) - - 316,323 434,731 4,740 250.29 1,186,389 - (511,546) (21,876) (533,422) 2029 (533,422) - - 316,219 434,731 4,740 257.80 1,221,981 - (62,392) (8,937) (71,329) 2030 (71,329) - - 316,150 434,731 4,740 265.54 1,258,640 - 436,430 1,826 438,256 2031 438,256 283,444 369,830 316,201 434,731 4,740 273.50 1,296,399 - 613,892 5,261 619,153 2032 619,153 283,444 380,925 315,972 434,731 4,694 281.71 1,322,322 - 809,847 7,145 816,992 2033 816,992 283,444 392,353 315,715 434,731 4,648 290.16 1,348,634 - 1,022,827 9,199 1,032,027 2034 1,032,027 283,444 404,124 315,543 434,731 4,648 298.86 1,389,093 - 1,266,722 11,494 1,278,216 2035 1,278,216 283,444 416,247 315,416 434,731 4,648 307.83 1,430,766 - 1,542,588 14,104 1,556,692 2036 1,556,692 283,444 428,735 315,441 434,731 4,648 317.06 1,473,689 - 1,851,474 17,041 1,868,514 2037 1,868,514 283,444 441,597 314,976 434,731 3,910 326.58 1,277,071 - 1,954,281 19,114 1,973,395 2038 1,973,395 283,444 454,845 - 434,731 3,173 336.37 1,067,330 - 2,151,149 20,623 2,171,772 2039 2,171,772 283,444 468,490 - 2,263,762 1,587 346.46 549,675 - (10,805) 10,805 - Total 10,878,933 12,455,495 5,058,497 8,535,554 79,015 21,210,478 6,275,368 (192,997) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 102 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-11 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-10 Cash Flow Calculation Other Services Related to a Highway Non-Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land per net ha Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $11,695.36 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Net Hectares per net ha per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 (171,997) 138,805 138,805 43,839 - 4 11,695.362 40,934 - (313,707) (7,286) (320,992) 2023 (320,992) 567,551 584,577 43,818 - 7 12,046.223 84,324 487,140 (377,923) (10,484) (388,407) 2024 (388,407) 331,607 351,802 43,661 32,502 7 12,407.609 86,853 339,023 (390,496) (11,684) (402,179) 2025 (402,179) 12,045 13,162 43,993 56,724 7 12,779.838 89,459 - (426,600) (12,432) (439,031) 2026 (439,031) 99,286 111,747 43,826 56,724 7 13,163.233 92,143 41,961 (517,225) (14,344) (531,569) 2027 (531,569) 2,780 3,223 43,781 60,140 11 13,558.130 145,178 - (493,534) (15,377) (508,911) 2028 (508,911) - - 43,760 60,140 11 13,964.874 152,943 - (459,868) (14,532) (474,399) 2029 (474,399) - - 43,745 60,140 11 14,383.820 157,531 - (420,753) (13,427) (434,181) 2030 (434,181) - - 43,736 60,140 11 14,815.334 162,257 - (375,799) (12,150) (387,949) 2031 (387,949) 39,211 51,162 43,743 60,140 11 15,259.794 167,125 - (375,869) (11,457) (387,326) 2032 (387,326) 39,211 52,697 43,711 60,140 12 15,717.588 183,066 - (360,808) (11,222) (372,030) 2033 (372,030) 39,211 54,278 43,676 60,140 12 16,189.116 199,813 - (330,310) (10,535) (340,845) 2034 (340,845) 39,211 55,906 43,652 60,140 12 16,674.789 205,808 - (294,735) (9,534) (304,269) 2035 (304,269) 39,211 57,583 43,634 60,140 12 17,175.033 211,982 - (253,644) (8,369) (262,013) 2036 (262,013) 39,211 59,311 43,638 60,140 12 17,690.284 218,341 - (206,760) (7,032) (213,791) 2037 (213,791) 39,211 61,090 43,573 60,140 16 18,220.993 299,352 - (79,243) (4,396) (83,639) 2038 (83,639) 39,211 62,923 - 60,140 21 18,767.622 385,026 - 178,325 473 178,798 2039 178,798 39,211 64,810 - 313,166 10 19,330.651 198,288 - (890) 890 (0) Total 1,504,976 1,723,075 699,785 1,180,796 194 3,080,423 868,125 (172,894) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 103 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-12 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-11 Cash Flow Calculation Other Services Related to a Highway Non-Residential per ft² Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $0.34 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Sq. Ft. of Gross Floor Area per sq.ft. per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 (199,379) 160,903 160,903 50,818 - 170,996 0.336 57,389 - (353,712) (8,296) (362,008) 2023 (362,008) 657,908 677,645 50,794 - 341,992 0.346 118,222 564,696 (407,529) (11,543) (419,072) 2024 (419,072) 384,401 407,811 50,612 37,676 341,992 0.356 121,769 392,998 (400,406) (12,292) (412,698) 2025 (412,698) 13,963 15,258 50,996 65,755 341,992 0.367 125,422 - (419,286) (12,480) (431,765) 2026 (431,765) 115,093 129,538 50,804 65,755 341,992 0.378 129,184 48,642 (500,036) (13,977) (514,013) 2027 (514,013) 3,223 3,736 50,751 69,715 378,767 0.389 147,368 - (490,847) (15,073) (505,919) 2028 (505,919) - - 50,726 69,715 415,543 0.401 166,527 - (459,834) (14,486) (474,320) 2029 (474,320) - - 50,710 69,715 415,543 0.413 171,522 - (423,222) (13,463) (436,685) 2030 (436,685) - - 50,699 69,715 415,543 0.425 176,668 - (380,431) (12,257) (392,687) 2031 (392,687) 45,454 59,307 50,707 69,715 415,543 0.438 181,968 - (390,448) (11,747) (402,195) 2032 (402,195) 45,454 61,086 50,670 69,715 438,507 0.451 197,785 - (385,881) (11,821) (397,702) 2033 (397,702) 45,454 62,919 50,629 69,715 461,471 0.465 214,387 - (366,577) (11,464) (378,041) 2034 (378,041) 45,454 64,806 50,601 69,715 461,471 0.479 220,819 - (342,345) (10,806) (353,151) 2035 (353,151) 45,454 66,751 50,581 69,715 461,471 0.493 227,443 - (312,754) (9,989) (322,743) 2036 (322,743) 45,454 68,753 50,585 69,715 461,471 0.508 234,266 - (277,529) (9,004) (286,533) 2037 (286,533) 45,454 70,816 50,510 69,715 668,229 0.523 349,405 - (128,169) (6,221) (134,390) 2038 (134,390) 45,454 72,940 - 69,715 874,988 0.539 471,240 - 194,196 299 194,495 2039 194,495 45,454 75,128 - 363,023 437,494 0.555 242,689 - (968) 968 0 Total 1,744,576 1,997,397 811,194 1,368,785 7,845,000 3,554,073 1,006,335 (183,652) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 104 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-13 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-12 Cash Flow Calculation Parks and Recreation Services Residential per capita Development Related Expe nditure s Development Related Expenditure s Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term De bt $3,727.28 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New De bt Population Growth Per Capita per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Intere st Earnings/ (Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 27,034,844 41,947,530 41,947,530 249,967 - 2,573 3,727.28 9,589,918 38,620,299 33,047,564 300,412 33,347,976 2023 33,347,976 41,664,482 42,914,417 249,848 2,372,854 5,146 3,839.10 19,755,230 33,859,575 41,425,661 373,868 41,799,529 2024 41,799,529 59,731,399 63,369,041 248,955 4,631,950 5,146 3,954.27 20,347,887 46,613,547 40,511,018 411,553 40,922,570 2025 40,922,570 15,197,654 16,606,887 250,844 7,962,382 5,146 4,072.90 20,958,324 - 37,060,781 389,917 37,450,698 2026 37,450,698 81,823,716 92,093,313 249,896 7,962,382 5,146 4,195.09 21,587,073 77,593,410 36,325,590 368,881 36,694,471 2027 36,694,471 7,009,425 8,125,845 249,638 14,278,740 4,943 4,320.94 21,357,967 - 35,398,215 360,463 35,758,679 2028 35,758,679 4,776,063 5,702,868 249,516 14,278,740 4,740 4,450.57 21,095,686 - 36,623,240 361,910 36,985,149 2029 36,985,149 4,118,449 5,065,173 249,434 14,278,740 4,740 4,584.08 21,728,557 - 39,120,359 380,528 39,500,887 2030 39,500,887 18,623,318 23,591,462 249,380 14,278,740 4,740 4,721.61 22,380,413 - 23,761,718 316,313 24,078,031 2031 24,078,031 6,741,022 8,795,505 249,420 14,278,740 4,740 4,863.25 23,051,826 - 23,806,192 239,421 24,045,613 2032 24,045,613 5,105,213 6,860,979 249,239 14,278,740 4,694 5,009.15 23,512,774 - 26,169,428 251,075 26,420,504 2033 26,420,504 1,150,838 1,593,029 249,036 14,278,740 4,648 5,159.43 23,980,633 - 34,280,331 303,504 34,583,835 2034 34,583,835 1,150,838 1,640,820 248,901 14,278,740 4,648 5,314.21 24,700,052 - 43,115,426 388,496 43,503,922 2035 43,503,922 1,150,838 1,690,044 248,801 14,278,740 4,648 5,473.64 25,441,053 - 52,727,390 481,157 53,208,547 2036 53,208,547 1,150,838 1,740,746 248,820 14,278,740 4,648 5,637.84 26,204,285 - 63,144,525 581,765 63,726,291 2037 63,726,291 1,150,838 1,792,968 248,454 14,278,740 3,910 5,806.98 22,708,142 - 70,114,270 669,203 70,783,473 2038 70,783,473 1,150,838 1,846,757 - 14,278,740 3,173 5,981.19 18,978,646 - 73,636,622 722,100 74,358,723 2039 74,358,723 1,150,838 1,902,160 - 82,600,510 1,587 6,160.63 9,774,003 - (369,944) 369,944 (0) Total 294,794,137 327,279,545 3,990,149 276,874,959 79,015 377,152,468 196,686,830 7,270,511 Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 105 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-14 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-13 Cash Flow Calculation Parks and Recreation Services Non-Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land per net ha Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $35,927.01 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Net Hectares per net ha per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 658,986 1,022,490 1,022,490 6,093 - 4 35,927.012 125,745 941,387 697,535 6,783 704,318 2023 704,318 1,015,590 1,046,058 6,090 57,839 7 37,004.823 259,034 825,342 678,706 6,915 685,621 2024 685,621 1,455,979 1,544,649 6,068 112,906 7 38,114.967 266,805 1,136,226 425,029 5,553 430,582 2025 430,582 370,450 404,800 6,114 194,087 7 39,258.416 274,809 - 100,390 2,655 103,045 2026 103,045 1,994,489 2,244,815 6,091 194,087 7 40,436.169 283,053 1,891,374 (167,521) (967) (168,489) 2027 (168,489) 170,858 198,071 6,085 348,051 11 41,649.254 445,974 - (274,722) (6,648) (281,370) 2028 (281,370) 116,419 139,010 6,082 348,051 11 42,898.731 469,826 - (304,686) (8,791) (313,477) 2029 (313,477) 100,389 123,466 6,080 348,051 11 44,185.693 483,921 - (307,153) (9,309) (316,462) 2030 (316,462) 453,952 575,052 6,079 348,051 11 45,511.264 498,439 - (747,206) (15,955) (763,161) 2031 (763,161) 164,315 214,394 6,080 348,051 11 46,876.602 513,392 - (818,294) (23,722) (842,015) 2032 (842,015) 124,442 167,239 6,075 348,051 12 48,282.900 562,361 - (801,020) (24,646) (825,665) 2033 (825,665) 28,052 38,831 6,070 348,051 12 49,731.387 613,807 - (604,810) (21,457) (626,268) 2034 (626,268) 28,052 39,996 6,067 348,051 12 51,223.329 632,221 - (388,160) (15,216) (403,377) 2035 (403,377) 28,052 41,196 6,065 348,051 12 52,760.029 651,187 - (147,500) (8,263) (155,763) 2036 (155,763) 28,052 42,431 6,065 348,051 12 54,342.829 670,723 - 118,413 (560) 117,853 2037 117,853 28,052 43,704 6,056 348,051 16 55,973.114 919,579 - 639,620 3,787 643,408 2038 643,408 28,052 45,016 - 348,051 21 57,652.308 1,182,762 - 1,433,104 10,383 1,443,486 2039 1,443,486 28,052 46,366 - 2,013,424 10 59,381.877 609,122 - (7,182) 7,182 - Total 7,185,738 7,977,584 97,262 6,748,950 194 9,462,758 4,794,329 (92,278) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 106 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-15 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-14 Cash Flow Calculation Parks and Recreation Services Non-Residential per ft² Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $1.03 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Sq. Ft. of Gross Floor Area per sq.ft. per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 763,900 1,185,275 1,185,275 7,063 - 170,996 1.032 176,514 1,091,260 839,336 8,016 847,352 2023 847,352 1,177,277 1,212,596 7,060 67,048 341,992 1.063 363,618 956,741 881,008 8,642 889,650 2024 889,650 1,687,778 1,790,564 7,034 130,881 341,992 1.095 374,526 1,317,119 652,815 7,712 660,527 2025 660,527 429,427 469,246 7,088 224,986 341,992 1.128 385,762 - 344,969 5,027 349,996 2026 349,996 2,312,022 2,602,201 7,061 224,986 341,992 1.162 397,335 2,192,490 105,573 2,278 107,851 2027 107,851 198,059 229,605 7,054 403,462 378,767 1.197 453,263 - (79,006) 144 (78,862) 2028 (78,862) 134,953 161,141 7,050 403,462 415,543 1.233 512,190 - (138,325) (3,258) (141,583) 2029 (141,583) 116,371 143,122 7,048 403,462 415,543 1.270 527,556 - (167,660) (4,639) (172,298) 2030 (172,298) 526,223 666,604 7,047 403,462 415,543 1.308 543,382 - (706,028) (13,175) (719,203) 2031 (719,203) 190,475 248,527 7,048 403,462 415,543 1.347 559,684 - (818,556) (23,066) (841,622) 2032 (841,622) 144,254 193,865 7,043 403,462 438,507 1.387 608,332 - (837,659) (25,189) (862,849) 2033 (862,849) 32,518 45,013 7,037 403,462 461,471 1.429 659,395 - (658,965) (22,827) (681,792) 2034 (681,792) 32,518 46,363 7,033 403,462 461,471 1.472 679,177 - (459,473) (17,119) (476,592) 2035 (476,592) 32,518 47,754 7,030 403,462 461,471 1.516 699,552 - (235,286) (10,678) (245,964) 2036 (245,964) 32,518 49,187 7,031 403,462 461,471 1.561 720,539 - 14,895 (3,466) 11,429 2037 11,429 32,518 50,662 7,020 403,462 668,229 1.608 1,074,672 - 624,957 3,182 628,139 2038 628,139 32,518 52,182 - 403,462 874,988 1.656 1,449,405 - 1,621,900 11,250 1,633,150 2039 1,633,150 32,518 53,748 - 2,333,971 437,494 1.706 746,444 - (8,125) 8,125 - Total 8,329,743 9,247,655 112,746 7,823,416 7,845,000 10,931,348 5,557,610 (69,040) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 107 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-16 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-15 Cash Flow Calculation Library Services Residential per capita Development Related Expe nditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Te rm Debt Development Related Long- Te rm Debt $686.35 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Ope ning Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Population Growth Per Capita per Year Inflate d at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (De ficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Inte re st Earnings/ (Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 5,758,555 10,589,718 10,589,718 - 2,573 686.35 1,765,913 10,589,718 7,524,468 66,415 7,590,884 2023 7,590,884 10,684,433 11,004,966 658,306 5,146 706.94 3,637,781 10,907,410 10,472,802 90,318 10,563,121 2024 10,563,121 15,653,522 16,606,821 1,386,043 5,146 728.15 3,746,914 16,246,191 12,563,362 115,632 12,678,994 2025 12,678,994 3,662,458 4,002,067 2,546,797 5,146 749.99 3,859,322 3,581,932 13,571,384 131,252 13,702,636 2026 13,702,636 17,053,183 19,193,508 2,820,256 5,146 772.49 3,975,101 - (4,336,027) 46,833 (4,289,194) 2027 (4,289,194) 94,715 109,801 2,820,256 4,943 795.67 3,932,913 - (3,286,338) (113,633) (3,399,971) 2028 (3,399,971) - - 2,820,256 4,740 819.54 3,884,616 - (2,335,611) (86,034) (2,421,644) 2029 (2,421,644) - - 2,820,256 4,740 844.13 4,001,154 - (1,240,746) (54,936) (1,295,682) 2030 (1,295,682) - - 2,820,256 4,740 869.45 4,121,189 - 5,251 (19,356) (14,105) 2031 (14,105) 94,715 123,582 2,820,256 4,740 895.53 4,244,825 - 1,286,882 6,364 1,293,246 2032 1,293,246 - - 2,820,256 4,694 922.40 4,329,705 - 2,802,695 20,480 2,823,174 2033 2,823,174 - - 2,820,256 4,648 950.07 4,415,858 - 4,418,776 36,210 4,454,986 2034 4,454,986 - - 2,820,256 4,648 978.57 4,548,333 - 6,183,063 53,190 6,236,253 2035 6,236,253 139,270 204,523 2,820,256 4,648 1,007.93 4,684,783 - 7,896,258 70,663 7,966,920 2036 7,966,920 - - 2,820,256 4,648 1,038.17 4,825,327 - 9,971,991 89,695 10,061,686 2037 10,061,686 - - 2,820,256 3,910 1,069.31 4,181,538 - 11,422,968 107,423 11,530,391 2038 11,530,391 - - 2,820,256 3,173 1,101.39 3,494,779 - 12,204,913 118,677 12,323,590 2039 12,323,590 - - 14,184,712 1,587 1,134.43 1,799,811 - (61,311) 61,311 0 Total 57,972,015 61,834,986 - 55,439,187 79,015 69,449,863 41,325,251 740,504 Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 108 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-17 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-16 Cash Flow Calculation Library Services Non-Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land per net ha Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $6,698.02 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Net Hectares per net ha per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 140,367 258,129 258,129 - 4 6,698.017 23,443 258,129 163,810 1,521 165,331 2023 165,331 260,438 268,251 16,046 7 6,898.958 48,293 265,873 195,200 1,803 197,002 2024 197,002 381,562 404,799 33,785 7 7,105.927 49,741 396,008 204,168 2,006 206,174 2025 206,174 89,274 97,552 62,079 7 7,319.104 51,234 87,311 185,087 1,956 187,043 2026 187,043 415,679 467,850 68,745 7 7,538.678 52,771 - (296,781) (1,646) (298,427) 2027 (298,427) 2,309 2,676 68,745 11 7,764.838 83,145 - (286,704) (8,777) (295,481) 2028 (295,481) - - 68,745 11 7,997.783 87,592 - (276,634) (8,582) (285,216) 2029 (285,216) - - 68,745 11 8,237.717 90,219 - (263,742) (8,234) (271,976) 2030 (271,976) - - 68,745 11 8,484.848 92,926 - (247,795) (7,797) (255,592) 2031 (255,592) 2,309 3,012 68,745 11 8,739.393 95,714 - (231,636) (7,308) (238,944) 2032 (238,944) - - 68,745 12 9,001.575 104,843 - (202,846) (6,627) (209,473) 2033 (209,473) - - 68,745 12 9,271.623 114,434 - (163,783) (5,599) (169,382) 2034 (169,382) - - 68,745 12 9,549.771 117,867 - (120,260) (4,345) (124,604) 2035 (124,604) 3,395 4,985 68,745 12 9,836.264 121,403 - (76,931) (3,023) (79,954) 2036 (79,954) - - 68,745 12 10,131.352 125,046 - (23,653) (1,554) (25,207) 2037 (25,207) - - 68,745 16 10,435.293 171,441 - 77,488 261 77,750 2038 77,750 - - 68,745 21 10,748.352 220,507 - 229,512 1,536 231,048 2039 231,048 - - 345,759 10 11,070.802 113,561 - (1,149) 1,149 (0) Total 1,413,094 1,507,255 - 1,351,355 194 1,764,180 1,007,321 (53,259) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 109 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-18 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-17 Cash Flow Calculation Library Services Non-Residential per ft² Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $0.19 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Sq. Ft. of Gross Floor Area per sq.ft. per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 162,715 299,225 299,225 - 170,996 0.192 32,891 299,225 195,605 1,792 197,397 2023 197,397 301,901 310,958 18,601 341,992 0.198 67,755 308,201 243,795 2,206 246,001 2024 246,001 442,308 469,245 39,164 341,992 0.204 69,788 459,055 266,434 2,562 268,997 2025 268,997 103,487 113,083 71,963 341,992 0.210 71,882 101,212 257,044 2,630 259,674 2026 259,674 481,857 542,334 79,690 341,992 0.216 74,038 - (288,311) (430) (288,741) 2027 (288,741) 2,676 3,103 79,690 378,767 0.223 84,460 - (287,073) (8,637) (295,711) 2028 (295,711) - - 79,690 415,543 0.230 95,440 - (279,960) (8,635) (288,595) 2029 (288,595) - - 79,690 415,543 0.237 98,303 - (269,982) (8,379) (278,361) 2030 (278,361) - - 79,690 415,543 0.244 101,252 - (256,798) (8,027) (264,825) 2031 (264,825) 2,676 3,492 79,690 415,543 0.251 104,290 - (243,717) (7,628) (251,345) 2032 (251,345) - - 79,690 438,507 0.259 113,355 - (217,680) (7,035) (224,716) 2033 (224,716) - - 79,690 461,471 0.266 122,870 - (181,536) (6,094) (187,630) 2034 (187,630) - - 79,690 461,471 0.274 126,556 - (140,764) (4,926) (145,689) 2035 (145,689) 3,935 5,779 79,690 461,471 0.282 130,352 - (100,806) (3,697) (104,503) 2036 (104,503) - - 79,690 461,471 0.291 134,263 - (49,930) (2,316) (52,246) 2037 (52,246) - - 79,690 668,229 0.300 200,251 - 68,315 80 68,396 2038 68,396 - - 79,690 874,988 0.309 270,077 - 258,784 1,636 260,420 2039 260,420 - - 400,805 437,494 0.318 139,090 - (1,295) 1,296 - Total 1,638,065 1,747,218 - 1,566,497 7,845,000 2,036,911 1,167,692 (53,603) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 110 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-19 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-18 Cash Flow Calculation Stormwater Management Services Residential per capita Development Related Expe nditure s Development Related Expenditure s Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term De bt $129.10 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New De bt Population Growth Per Capita per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Intere st Earnings/ (Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 420,494 131,264 131,264 - 2,573 129.10 332,172 - 621,402 5,209 626,611 2023 626,611 844,059 869,381 - 5,146 132.98 684,274 - 441,504 5,341 446,845 2024 446,845 844,059 895,463 - 5,146 136.97 704,802 - 256,185 3,515 259,700 2025 259,700 731,947 799,819 - 5,146 141.08 725,946 - 185,827 2,228 188,055 2026 188,055 731,947 823,813 - 5,146 145.31 747,725 - 111,966 1,500 113,466 2027 113,466 731,947 848,528 - 4,943 149.67 739,789 - 4,728 591 5,319 2028 5,319 731,947 873,983 - 4,740 154.16 730,704 - (137,960) (1,990) (139,950) 2029 (139,950) 731,947 900,203 - 4,740 158.78 752,625 - (287,528) (6,412) (293,940) 2030 (293,940) 592,263 750,261 - 4,740 163.55 775,204 - (268,997) (8,444) (277,441) 2031 (277,441) 592,263 772,769 - 4,740 168.45 798,460 - (251,750) (7,938) (259,688) 2032 (259,688) 588,029 790,262 - 4,694 173.51 814,426 - (235,523) (7,428) (242,951) 2033 (242,951) 474,059 656,209 - 4,648 178.71 830,632 - (68,529) (4,672) (73,201) 2034 (73,201) 474,059 675,895 - 4,648 184.07 855,551 - 106,455 166 106,621 2035 106,621 474,059 696,172 - 4,648 189.59 881,217 - 291,666 1,991 293,658 2036 293,658 474,059 717,057 - 4,648 195.28 907,654 - 484,254 3,890 488,144 2037 488,144 474,059 738,569 - 3,910 201.14 786,556 - 536,131 5,121 541,252 2038 541,252 474,059 760,726 - 3,173 207.17 657,375 - 437,901 4,896 442,797 2039 442,797 474,059 783,548 - 1,587 213.39 338,548 - (2,203)2,203 0 Total 10,570,090 13,483,922 - - 79,015 13,063,660 - (233) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 111 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-20 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-19 Cash Flow Calculation Stormwater Management Services Non-Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land per net ha Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $7,233.76 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Net Hectares per net ha per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 58,171 18,159 18,159 - 4 7,233.756 25,318 - 65,330 618 65,947 2023 65,947 116,766 120,269 - 7 7,450.769 52,155 - (2,166) 319 (1,847) 2024 (1,847) 116,766 123,877 - 7 7,674.292 53,720 - (72,004) (1,108) (73,112) 2025 (73,112) 101,257 110,646 - 7 7,904.520 55,332 - (128,426) (3,023) (131,449) 2026 (131,449) 101,257 113,965 - 7 8,141.656 56,992 - (188,423) (4,798) (193,221) 2027 (193,221) 101,257 117,384 - 11 8,385.906 89,795 - (220,810) (6,210) (227,020) 2028 (227,020) 101,257 120,906 - 11 8,637.483 94,598 - (253,329) (7,205) (260,534) 2029 (260,534) 101,257 124,533 - 11 8,896.607 97,435 - (287,631) (8,222) (295,854) 2030 (295,854) 81,933 103,790 - 11 9,163.506 100,359 - (299,285) (8,927) (308,212) 2031 (308,212) 81,933 106,904 - 11 9,438.411 103,369 - (311,747) (9,299) (321,046) 2032 (321,046) 81,347 109,324 - 12 9,721.563 113,229 - (317,141) (9,573) (326,713) 2033 (326,713) 65,581 90,779 - 12 10,013.210 123,587 - (293,905) (9,309) (303,214) 2034 (303,214) 65,581 93,502 - 12 10,313.606 127,295 - (269,421) (8,590) (278,011) 2035 (278,011) 65,581 96,307 - 12 10,623.014 131,114 - (243,205) (7,818) (251,023) 2036 (251,023) 65,581 99,197 - 12 10,941.705 135,047 - (215,172) (6,993) (222,165) 2037 (222,165) 65,581 102,173 - 16 11,269.956 185,153 - (139,184) (5,420) (144,604) 2038 (144,604) 65,581 105,238 - 21 11,608.055 238,144 - (11,697) (2,345) (14,042) 2039 (14,042) 65,581 108,395 - 10 11,956.296 122,644 - 207 (208) - Total 1,462,251 1,865,346 - - 194 1,905,287 - (98,112) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 112 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-21 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-20 Cash Flow Calculation Stormwater Management Services Non-Residential per ft² Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $0.21 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Sq. Ft. of Gross Floor Area per sq.ft. per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 67,432 21,050 21,050 - 170,996 0.208 35,508 - 81,890 747 82,636 2023 82,636 135,356 139,416 - 341,992 0.214 73,146 - 16,366 495 16,861 2024 16,861 135,356 143,599 - 341,992 0.220 75,341 - (51,397) (518) (51,915) 2025 (51,915) 117,377 128,261 - 341,992 0.227 77,601 - (102,576) (2,317) (104,893) 2026 (104,893) 117,377 132,109 - 341,992 0.234 79,929 - (157,073) (3,929) (161,003) 2027 (161,003) 117,377 136,072 - 378,767 0.241 91,179 - (205,896) (5,503) (211,399) 2028 (211,399) 117,377 140,154 - 415,543 0.248 103,033 - (248,520) (6,899) (255,419) 2029 (255,419) 117,377 144,359 - 415,543 0.255 106,124 - (293,654) (8,236) (301,890) 2030 (301,890) 94,977 120,314 - 415,543 0.263 109,308 - (312,896) (9,222) (322,118) 2031 (322,118) 94,977 123,923 - 415,543 0.271 112,587 - (333,454) (9,834) (343,287) 2032 (343,287) 94,298 126,729 - 438,507 0.279 122,373 - (347,643) (10,364) (358,007) 2033 (358,007) 76,021 105,231 - 461,471 0.287 132,645 - (330,593) (10,329) (340,922) 2034 (340,922) 76,021 108,388 - 461,471 0.296 136,625 - (312,686) (9,804) (322,490) 2035 (322,490) 76,021 111,640 - 461,471 0.305 140,723 - (293,406) (9,238) (302,645) 2036 (302,645) 76,021 114,989 - 461,471 0.314 144,945 - (272,689) (8,630) (281,319) 2037 (281,319) 76,021 118,439 - 668,229 0.324 216,183 - (183,575) (6,973) (190,548) 2038 (190,548) 76,021 121,992 - 874,988 0.333 291,565 - (20,975) (3,173) (24,147) 2039 (24,147) 76,021 125,652 - 437,494 0.343 150,156 - 357 (357) 0 Total 1,695,049 2,162,319 - - 7,845,000 2,198,973 - (104,086) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 113 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-22 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-21 Cash Flow Calculation Growth-Related Studies Residential per capita Development Related Expe nditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Te rm Debt Development Related Long- Te rm Debt $66.10 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Ope ning Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Population Growth Per Capita per Year Inflate d at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (De ficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Inte re st Earnings/ (Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 (3,614,645) 360,968 360,968 - 2,573 66.10 170,077 - (3,805,535) (111,303) (3,916,838) 2023 (3,916,838) 146,014 150,395 - 5,146 68.09 350,359 - (3,716,874) (114,506) (3,831,380) 2024 (3,831,380) 506,103 536,925 - 5,146 70.13 360,870 - (4,007,435) (117,582) (4,125,017) 2025 (4,125,017) 146,014 159,554 - 5,146 72.23 371,696 - (3,912,876) (120,568) (4,033,444) 2026 (4,033,444) - - - 5,146 74.40 382,846 - (3,650,598) (115,261) (3,765,858) 2027 (3,765,858) 91,998 106,651 - 4,943 76.63 378,783 - (3,493,726) (108,894) (3,602,620) 2028 (3,602,620) - - - 4,740 78.93 374,132 - (3,228,488) (102,467) (3,330,955) 2029 (3,330,955) 119,974 147,553 - 4,740 81.30 385,356 - (3,093,152) (96,362) (3,189,514) 2030 (3,189,514) - - - 4,740 83.74 396,916 - (2,792,598) (89,732) (2,882,329) 2031 (2,882,329) - - - 4,740 86.25 408,824 - (2,473,505) (80,338) (2,553,843) 2032 (2,553,843) 91,998 123,637 - 4,694 88.84 416,999 - (2,260,482) (72,215) -2,332,697 2033 (2,332,697) - - - 4,648 91.50 425,296 - (1,907,400) (63,601) -1,971,002 2034 (1,971,002) - - - 4,648 94.25 438,055 - (1,532,947) (52,559) -1,585,506 2035 (1,585,506) - - - 4,648 97.07 451,197 - (1,134,309) (40,797) -1,175,106 2036 (1,175,106) - - - 4,648 99.99 464,733 - (710,374) (28,282) (738,656) 2037 (738,656) 91,998 143,330 - 3,910 102.99 402,729 - (479,257) (18,269) (497,526) 2038 (497,526) - - - 3,173 106.08 336,586 - (160,940) (9,877) (170,817) 2039 (170,817) - - - 1,587 109.26 173,342 - 2,525 (2,524) - Total 1,555,068 1,729,013 - - 79,015 6,688,794 - (1,345,136) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 114 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-23 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-22 Cash Flow Calculation Growth-Related Studies Non-Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land per net ha Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $1,083.27 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Net Hectares per net ha per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 (145,612) 14,541 14,541 - 4 1,083.268 3,791 - (156,362) (4,530) (160,892) 2023 (160,892) 5,882 6,059 - 7 1,115.766 7,810 - (159,140) (4,800) (163,940) 2024 (163,940) 20,388 21,629 - 7 1,149.239 8,045 - (177,525) (5,122) (182,647) 2025 (182,647) 5,882 6,427 - 7 1,183.716 8,286 - (180,788) (5,452) (186,240) 2026 (186,240) - - - 7 1,219.228 8,535 - (177,705) (5,459) (183,164) 2027 (183,164) 3,706 4,296 - 11 1,255.805 13,447 - (174,014) (5,358) (179,372) 2028 (179,372) - - - 11 1,293.479 14,166 - (165,205) (5,169) (170,374) 2029 (170,374) 4,833 5,944 - 11 1,332.283 14,591 - (161,727) (4,982) (166,708) 2030 (166,708) - - - 11 1,372.252 15,029 - (151,680) (4,776) (156,455) 2031 (156,455) - - - 11 1,413.419 15,480 - (140,976) (4,461) (145,437) 2032 (145,437) 3,706 4,981 - 12 1,455.822 16,956 - (133,461) (4,183) (137,645) 2033 (137,645) - - - 12 1,499.496 18,507 - (119,137) (3,852) (122,989) 2034 (122,989) - - - 12 1,544.481 19,063 - (103,927) (3,404) (107,330) 2035 (107,330) - - - 12 1,590.816 19,635 - (87,696) (2,925) (90,621) 2036 (90,621) - - - 12 1,638.540 20,224 - (70,398) (2,415) (72,813) 2037 (72,813) 3,706 5,774 - 16 1,687.696 27,727 - (50,860) (1,855) (52,715) 2038 (52,715) - - - 21 1,738.327 35,663 - (17,052) (1,047) (18,099) 2039 (18,099) - - - 10 1,790.477 18,366 - 267 (267) - Total 62,644 69,651 - - 194 285,320 - (70,057) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 115 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-24 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table C-23 Cash Flow Calculation Growth-Related Studies Non-Residential per ft2 Development Related Expenditures Development Related Expenditures Development Related Long- Term Debt Development Related Long- Term Debt $0.03 1% / 3% Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Nominal Project Cost Project Cost Inflated at 3% Existing Debt Payments Debt Payments for New Debt Sq. Ft. of Gross Floor Area per sq.ft. per Year Inflated at (3%) Starting in 2022 Anticipated Revenues Proceeds from Issuance of New Debt Annual Surplus/ (Deficit) D.C. Reserve Fund Interest Earnings /(Cost) D.C. Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Interest 2022 (168,794) 16,856 16,856 - 170,996 0.031 5,316 - (180,334) (5,237) (185,571) 2023 (185,571) 6,818 7,023 - 341,992 0.032 10,952 - (181,642) (5,508) (187,151) 2024 (187,151) 23,634 25,073 - 341,992 0.033 11,280 - (200,943) (5,821) (206,765) 2025 (206,765) 6,818 7,451 - 341,992 0.034 11,619 - (202,597) (6,140) (208,737) 2026 (208,737) - - - 341,992 0.035 11,967 - (196,770) (6,083) (202,853) 2027 (202,853) 4,296 4,980 - 378,767 0.036 13,652 - (194,181) (5,956) (200,137) 2028 (200,137) - - - 415,543 0.037 15,427 - (184,710) (5,773) (190,483) 2029 (190,483) 5,602 6,890 - 415,543 0.038 15,889 - (181,484) (5,579) (187,063) 2030 (187,063) - - - 415,543 0.039 16,366 - (170,697) (5,366) (176,064) 2031 (176,064) - - - 415,543 0.041 16,857 - (159,206) (5,029) (164,236) 2032 (164,236) 4,296 5,774 - 438,507 0.042 18,322 - (151,687) (4,739) (156,426) 2033 (156,426) - - - 461,471 0.043 19,860 - (136,565) (4,395) (140,960) 2034 (140,960) - - - 461,471 0.044 20,456 - (120,504) (3,922) (124,426) 2035 (124,426) - - - 461,471 0.046 21,070 - (103,357) (3,417) (106,773) 2036 (106,773) - - - 461,471 0.047 21,702 - (85,072) (2,878) (87,949) 2037 (87,949) 4,296 6,693 - 668,229 0.048 32,368 - (62,274) (2,253) (64,528) 2038 (64,528) - - - 874,988 0.050 43,654 - (20,874) (1,281) (22,155) 2039 (22,155) - - - 437,494 0.051 22,482 - 327 (327) - Total 72,618 80,740 - - 7,845,000 329,239 - (79,705) Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding - 116 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\2022 Development Charges Background Study - City of Pickering - Office Consolidation.docx Table D-1 Operating and Capital Expenditure Impacts for Future Capital Expenditures ANNUAL LIFECYCLE EXPENDITURES ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES 1.Other Services Related to a Highway 670,459 943,774 1,614,232 2.Fire Protection Services 1,021,764 13,175,944 14,197,708 3.Parks and Recreation Services 10,083,454 17,351,905 27,435,360 4.Library Services 1,242,579 5,374,431 6,617,010 5.Growth-Related Studies - - - 6.Stormwater Management Services 320,229 294,178 614,407 7.By-Law Enforcement Services 94,382 5,815,231 5,909,613 8.Transportation Services 6,561,929 1,916,605 8,478,534 Total 19,994,797 44,872,068 64,866,865 SERVICE/CLASS - 117 - Memorandum Address Contact Information Filepath 2233 Argentia Rd. Suite 301 Mississauga, Ontario L5N 2X7 Office: 905-272-3600 Fax: 905-272-3602 www.watsonecon.ca H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Stakeholder Consulation\Memo - Response to Grimes.docx To Stan Karwowski, City of Pickering From Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Date June 17, 2022 Re: Comments on Behalf of the Seaton Landowner’s Group Fax ☐Courier ☐Mail ☐Email ☒ This memorandum has been prepared to respond to the following questions on the City of Pickering 2022 D.C. Background Study prepared by Randy M. Grimes Enterprises Ltd. Based on the responses to questions 1 and 2 the City will be releasing an addendum to the May 11, 2020 D.C. Background Study. The addendum will also address additional capital revisions identified by City staff. 1.Seaton Residential Absorption/Yield Please explain the Seaton residential absorption schedule as indicated in Schedule 2 Page, A.4 which approaches a maximum of approximately 1,377+/- units per annum in light of previous forecasts which anticipated up to 1,750+/- units per annum at a maximum. The slow absorption rate will have cash flow (higher interest implications) in the calculation of the residential development charge quantum. Further it appears that the growth/mix of units allocated to Seaton of 18,263 for the period 2002 – 2035 does not correspond exactly with the latest yield information prepared for the Landowners. This information has been previously shared with WAE as part of the Region of Durham FIS update. •The overall growth outlook for Seaton has changed since the last forecast iteration. The previous forecast did not challenge the assumption that Seaton’s residential growth target of 61,000 people would be achieved in 2031. Since the release of this forecast, the growth has not materialized in Seaton at a pace that could achieve the 61,000 target by 2031. Accordingly, the timing of residential development has been reassessed which achieves the 61,000 population target in Seaton by 2039. •When examining the residential unit mix within the context of the overall residential unit absorption, the Envision Durham 2022 forecast (i.e. the basis of the Pickering D.C. growth forecast) anticipates that the demand for apartment dwellings will be strong across the forecast period to 2039. . These assumptions Attachment #2 to Report FIN 12-22 - 118 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2 Memo - Response to Grimes in mix of residential units was informed by development applications in Seaton, as provided by the Region of Durham. According to development application data from Durham Region, the residential unit mix in Seaton would comprise of 35% low density, 40% medium density, and 25% high density units. Comparatively, information provided by the North Pickering Landowners Group on January 25th reports a residential unit mix of 34% low density, 41% medium density, and 25% high density Watson received updated residential absorption assumptions from the North Pickering Landowners Group respecting residential unit counts on May 4, 2022. This information identifies a unit mix in Seaton of 32% low density, 39% medium density, and 29% high density. This information was not incorporated in the Pickering D.C. growth forecast due to the timing of receipt. •Also informative to the timing of the residential absorption is the available water servicing capacity for 9,800 SDE Units. Preliminary residential absorption assumptions from the North Pickering Landowners Group estimates achieving this threshold by 2027. The Envision Durham 2022 forecast assumes this threshold is reached by 2029. The Region’s Capital Budget and Forecast assumes the timing for the expansion of the Ajax WTP to be 2021 Design, 2027 Construction, 2029 assumed completion. •In accordance with the recent data from the North Pickering Landowners group, Watson has revised the timing of unit growth by type within Seaton so that high- density dwellings account for a smaller share of residential development within the 10-year forecast horizon. In regard to the servicing capacity threshold of 9,800 SDE units, the overall SDE unit growth assumptions in the Pickering D.C. growth forecast remain unchanged. •These revisions to the residential development absorption will be reflected in the forthcoming D.C. Addendum. 2.Seaton – Employment Land Absorption and Mix of Uses Please explain the absorption rate of prestige employment land in Seaton as included in the cash flow schedule e.g., Table C-10, Page C-11 where the indicated absorption rate is 10 ha/per annum or less. Under this scenario not all of the Seaton employment land is absorbed within the 17 year horizon period in the DC Study. This rate of Seaton employment land absorption is significantly lower than previous forecasts, and also not consistent with the recent Dillon Employment Land Study for the City of Pickering which forecast full absorption of the Seaton employment industry within a 10 - 15-year period - 39 – 51 acres per person. Again, this slower absorption schedule has cash flow/DC quantum implications. •The recent Dillon Employment Land Study for the City of Pickering assumes an absorption of 21 net hectares per year. Assuming a net supply of 224 hectares (as reported in the Dillion ELS), the full absorption of Seaton will occur in 11 years. While this work utilizes the Region’s MCR work, it makes two high-level assumptions to arrive at an absorption forecast for Seaton. First it is assumed - 119 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3 Memo - Response to Grimes that Southern Durham’s share of forecast Employment Area demand will be 80% of the Regional forecast, and of this share, Seaton will account for 30% of the Employment Area land demand. By simply allocating land demand through this top-down approach, the analysis does not consider the expected employment yields across Durham Region, based on varying density assumptions by Employment Area. •As reported in Table 5-5 of the Dillon Employment Land Study, this absorption forecast would result in 18,800 jobs between 2019 and 2031. This level of absorption would result in 60% of all forecast job growth (31,200) on Durham Region Employment Areas being allocated to Seaton between 2019 and 2031. Furthermore, with an intensification assumption of 20% on Regional Employment Area job growth, this absorption forecast would account for 75% of new Employment Area employment growth (25,000) across Durham Region being accommodated within Seaton. While the outlook for Seaton is positive, the assumed absorption within Seaton is overstated in our opinion. •There has been minimal absorption of the Seaton employment lands to date. Based on the May 2022 North Pickering Landowners Group absorption/phasing estimates, only 47.4 gross hectares of employment lands within Seaton are expected to be absorbed by year-end 2026. Based on a gross-to-net ratio of 75%, this results in a net annual absorption of approximately 7 hectares. •Based on further discussion with representatives of the North Pickering Landowners Group Watson has reassessed the annual absorption estimate for the Seaton employment lands. The buildout of these lands is now forecast to occur by approximately 2041. Assuming that the pace of absorption in Seaton increases after the 2026 period as identified by the North Pickering Landowners Group, the rate of absorption within Seaton would be approximately 7 net hectares per year to 2026 and 13 net hectares annually between 2026 and 2041. •These revisions to the non-residential development absorption will be reflected in the forthcoming D.C. Addendum. 3.Historic Level of Service - Parks and Recreation Please justify the historic level of service replacement costs for Community Centres/Senior Recreation Centres at $738 sq ft (Table B-15, Page B17). This is more than double the replacement cost used in the 2017 DC Study ($291/sq ft) and significantly higher than other similar jurisdictions. •The replacement cost for Community Centres/Senior Recreation Centres is based on the anticipated per sq.ft. cost of the Seniors’ and Youth Centre within the City Centre development. These replacement costs have been used for existing Community Centres/Senior Recreation Centres as the replacement of these facilities would occur at a similar level of service. Furthermore, these replacement values are similar to recent replacement costs witnessed within the GTA. For example, the building value for recreation facilities within the Town of Ajax 2018 D.C. Background Study is $728 per sq.ft. (indexed to 2022 values). - 120 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4 Memo - Response to Grimes 4.Historic Level of Service – Library Services Please justify the level of service replacement value for the library buildings (Table B- 16, Page B-18). With the exception of the basement storage facility, the 2022 Study uses a uniform replacement value of $771/sq ft which is not consistent with the 2017 Background Study where differentiated rates were used. More significantly, the value of $771/sq ft is substantially higher than the replacement value used with the 2017 Study ($259-$568/sq ft). •The replacement cost for library buildings is based on the anticipated per sq.ft. cost of the library facility within the City Centre development. These replacement costs have been used for existing library facilities as the replacement of these facilities would occur at a similar level of service. Furthermore, these replacement values are similar to recent replacement costs witnessed within the GTA. For example, the building value for library facilities within the Town of Caledon 2019 D.C. Background Study is $808 per sq.ft. (indexed to 2022 values). 5.Debt Financing Assumption Can you explain the basis of the assumption for the 20-year debt financing rates particularly for the years 2025 (4.42%) and 2026 (5.17%)? •The debt financing assumptions for the 2022-2026 period were developed by the City for the purposes of their 5-year financial plan prepared in 2021. The interest rates were forecast to increase over the 5-year period to account for future Bank of Canada rate increases. Based on the amount and timing of when the long- term debt would be issued over the 2022-2026 period, the weighted average rate of interest within the 2022 D.C. Background Study for new long-term debt with a 20-year amortization period is 3.7%. The Region of Durham has recently provided the City with updated interest rates of 4.45% for a 20-year amortization period. This would suggest that the City’s debt financing assumptions used in the 2022 D.C. Background Study are conservative by comparison. 6. Cash Flow Projections Can you explain the reasoning behind use of the 3% inflation factor for discounting the outstanding debt at year 2039 rather than using the cost of capital? •Based on the assumption that debt financing would be issued with a 20-year amortization period, there would be principal and interest payments beyond 2039 for capital needs that were of a benefit to development within the 2022-2039 forecast period. As such, the payments beyond 2039 have been discounted within the cashflow D.C. calculation to a 2039 value to recognize the future indexing of the subsequent debt payments. The discount rate applied is the assumed rate of annual capital inflation (i.e. 3%) used for indexing the D.C.s. - 121 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5 Memo - Response to Grimes The indexing rate has been used for discounting future payments to align the capital costs with the revenues that would be generated to recover those costs. •As an alternative to discounting the post-2039 debt payments, the cash flow D.C. calculation could be revised to show the 2039 reserve fund balance that would be required to fund these obligations, with annual interest accumulating on the post 2039 reserve fund balance. The annual interest earned on positive balances is assumed to be 1% annually in the cash flow calculation. As this rate is less than the annual discount rate being applied in the 2022 D.C. Background Study, this alternative approach would require a greater reserve fund balance to 2039 and therefore place further upward pressure on the calculation of the charge. 7.Accounting for Deferrals/Exemptions Can you provide information on how the City accounts for the Development Charges otherwise payable for statutory and discretionary exemptions as well as deferred DCs that would otherwise be payable? •The opening reserve balances used in the calculation of the D.C. have been increased by approximately $2.9 million to account for exemptions to the payment of D.C.s that have occurred over the period of the last D.C. by-law (i.e. 2018 to 2021). - 122 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7953/22 Being a By-law Regarding Development Charges Whereas pursuant to subsection 2(1) of the Development Charges Act, 1997 (the Act), the council of a municipality may by by-law impose development charges against land to pay for increased capital costs required due to increased needs for servicing arising from development of the area to which the By-law applies; Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering approved the City of Pickering Development Charge Background Study, dated May 11, 2022, as amended, prepared by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd; Whereas the Council has made the Background Study and proposed Development Charges By- law available to the public at least sixty days prior to by-law passage and two weeks prior to the public meeting and has given notice in accordance with Section 12 of the Act of its development charges proposal and a public meeting was held on June 20, 2022; Whereas the Council has heard all persons who applied to be heard in objection to, or in support of, the proposed Development Charge By-law at such public meeting, and provided a subsequent period for written communications to be made; Whereas the Council in adopting the Development Charge Background Study directed that development charges be imposed on land under development or redevelopment within the geographical limits of the municipality as hereinafter provided. Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: Part I Application 1.(1)Subject to subsection (2), this By-law applies to all lands whether or not the land or use is exempt from taxation under Section 3 of the Assessment Act. (2)This By-law shall not apply to land that is owned by and used forthe purposes of, (a)a board of education as defined under subsection 1(1) of the Education Act; (b)any municipality or local board thereof; (c)the development of a non-residential farm building used for bona fide agricultural purposes; Attachment #3 to Report FIN 12-22 - 123 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 2 (i)Notwithstanding subsection 2(c) the exemption will not apply to the development charges calculated with respect to Transportation Services, Fire Protection Services, and Other Services Related to a Highway; (d)a building or structure that is used in connection with a place of worship and is exempt from taxation under the Assessment Act as a result; (e)development where: (i)no additional dwelling units are being created; or (ii)no additional non-residential gross floor area is being added; or (f)nursing homes and hospitals. (g)Land vested in or leased to a university that receives regular and ongoing operating funds from the government for the purposes of post-secondary education if the development is intended to be occupied and used by the university (3)An owner who has obtained a demolition permit and demolished an existing dwelling unit or a non-residential building in accordance with the provisions of the Building Code Act shall not be subject to the development charge under subsection (1) with respect to the development· being replaced, provided that: (a)the building permit for the replacement residential units or non-residential area is issued not more than 5 years after the date of demolition; (b)the building permit for those properties that do not have municipal services that include sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain for the replacement residential units or non-residential area is issued not more than 10-years after the date of demolition; (c)the applicant has provided proof that the building being demolished was subject to, and paid a development charge under a prior by-law, or a lot levy under by-law 3322/89; and (d)any dwelling units or additional non-residential floor area created in excess of what was demolished shall be subject to the development charge calculated under Sections 6 and 11, respectively. 2.(1)Subject to subsection (2), development charges shall apply, and shall be calculated, paid, and collected in accordance with the provisions of this By-law, in respect of land to be developed for residential use, non-residential use, or both where the development requires, (a)the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by-law under Section 34 of the Planning Act; (b)the approval of a minor variance under Section 45 of the Planning Act; - 124 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 3 (c)a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50(7) of the Planning Act, applies; (d)the approval of a plan of subdivision under Section 51 of the Planning Act; (e)a consent under Section 53 of the Planning Act; (f)the approval of a description under Section 50 of the Condominium Act; or (g)the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, in relation to a building or structure. (2)Subsection (1) shall not apply in respect of: (a)local services related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates, to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under Section 51 of the Planning Act; (b)local services to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under Section 53 of the Planning Act. (3)Notwithstanding subsection (1), development charges for rental housing and institutional developments are due and payable in 6 installments commencing with the first installment payable on the date of occupancy, and each subsequent installment, including interest, payable on the anniversary date each year thereafter. (4)Notwithstanding subsection (1), development charges for non-profit housing developments are due and payable in 21 installments commencing with the first installment payable on the date of occupancy, and each subsequent installment, including interest, payable on the anniversary date each year thereafter. (5)Notwithstanding subsections (1) to (4), where the development of land results from the approval of a Site Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment received on or after January 1, 2020, and the approval of the application occurred within 2 years of building permit issuance, the Development Charges under Section 2 shall be calculated based on the rates set out in Schedule “C” on the date of the planning application, including interest. Where both planning applications apply, Development Charges under Section 2 shall be calculated on the rates, including interest, set out in Schedule “C” on the date of the later planning application. (6)Interest for the purposes of subsections (3) to (5) shall be determined as set out in the City of Pickering Development Charge Interest Rate Policy # FIN 09-20, as amended from time to time. (7)For the purposes of subsection (3) “institutional development” means development of a building or structure intended for use: (a)as a long-term care home within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Long Term Care Homes Act, 2007; - 125 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 4 (b)as a retirement home within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Retirement Homes Act, 2010; (c)by any institution of the following post-secondary institutions for the objects of the institution: (i)a university in Ontario that receives direct, regular, and ongoing operation funding from the Government of Ontario; (ii)a college or university federated or affiliated with a university described in subclause (i); or (iii)an Indigenous Institute prescribed for the purposes of section 6 of the Indigenous Institute Act, 2017; (d)as a memorial home, clubhouse, or athletic grounds by an Ontario branch of the Royal Canadian Legion; or (e)as a hospice to provide end of life care; (8)For the purposes of subsection (3) “Rental housing” means development of a building or structure with four or more dwelling units all of which are intended for use as rented residential premises; (9)For the purposes of subsection (4) “Non-profit housing development” means development of a building or structure intended for use as residential premises by: (a)a corporation to which the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 210 applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary objective is to provide housing; (b)a corporation without share capital to which the Canada Not-for-profit Corporation Act applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary objective is to provide housing; or (c)a non-profit housing co-operative that is in good standing under the Co- operative Corporations Act; 3.(1)Where two or more of the actions described in subsection 2(1) are required before land to which a development charge applies can be developed, only one development charge shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with the provisions of this By-law. (2)Notwithstanding subsection (1), more than one development charge by-law may apply to the same area and if two or more of the actions described in subsection 2(1) occur at different times, and if the subsequent action has the effect of increasing the need for services as designated in Sections 5 and 10, an additional development charge shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with the provisions of this By-law. - 126 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 5 Part II Residential Development Charges 4.In this Part, (a)"apartment building" means a residential building or the residential portion of a mixed-use building consisting of more than 3 dwelling units, which dwelling units have a common entrance to grade, but does not include a triplex, duplex, or townhouse. Notwithstanding the forgoing an Apartment Building includes a Stacked Townhouse; (b)“apartment” means a dwelling unit in an apartment building; (c)“bedroom” means any room used, or designed or intended for use, as sleeping quarters; (d)“development charge” means residential development charge; (e)"dwelling unit" means a room or suite of rooms used, or designed or intended for use by one person or persons living together, in which culinary and sanitary facilities are provided for the exclusive use of such person or persons; (f)"garden suite" means a one-unit detached, temporary residential structure containing bathroom and kitchen facilities that is ancillary for an existing residential structure and that is designed to be portable; (g)"grade" means the average level of finished ground adjoining a dwelling at all exterior walls; (h)"gross floor area" means the total floor area, measured between the outside of exterior walls or between the outside of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing the building from another building, of all floors above the average level of finished ground adjoining the building at its exterior walls; (i)"hospital" means land, buildings or structures used, or designed or intended for use as defined in the Public Hospitals Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.40 as amended; (j)"Live Work unit" is as defined in the City's zoning by-laws; (k)"nursing home" means a building owned and operated on a non-profit basis but excluding any building or part of a building which is comprised of dwelling units; (l)"residential use" means lands, buildings or structures used, or designed or intended for use as a home or residence of one or more individuals, and shall include, but is not limited to, a single detached dwelling, a semi- detached dwelling, a townhouse, a plex, a stacked townhouse, an apartment building, a mobile home, a retirement residence and a residential dwelling unit accessory to a non-residential use; - 127 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 6 (m)"retirement residence" means a residential building or the residential portion of a mixed-use building which provides accommodation for persons of retirement age, where common facilities for the preparation and consumption of food are provided for the residents of the building, and where each unit or living accommodation has separate sanitary facilities, less than full culinary facilities and a separate entrance from a common hall; (n)"retirement residence unit" means a unit within a retirement residence; (o)"semi-detached dwelling" means one pf a pair of dwelling units attached together horizontally above or below grade or both above and below grade; (p)"single-attached dwelling" means one of a group of not less than three adjacent dwelling units attached together horizontally by above grade common walls; (q)"single-detached dwelling" means a single dwelling unit which is free-standing, separate and detached from any other building or structure. (r)“stacked townhouse” means a building, other than a plex, townhouse, or apartment building, containing at least 3 dwelling units, each dwelling unit separated vertically and/or horizontally and each dwelling unit having a separate entrance to grade; (s)“townhouse” means a building, other than a plex, stacked townhouse, or apartment building, containing at least 3 dwelling units, each dwelling unit separated vertically from the other by a party wall and each dwelling unit having a separate entrance to grade; 5.Development charges against land to be developed for residential use shall be based upon the services designated in Schedule "A", which are provided by the City. 6.(1)Subject to the provisions of this Part, development charges against land to be developed for residential use shall be calculated, paid and collected at the rates per residential unit set out in Schedule "C"; (2)Residential development located within Seaton lands, as shown in Schedule “B”, is subject to the Seaton Transportation funding arrangement and not to the Transportation charge applicable to development in the rest of Pickering; (3)The development charges imposed on a retirement residence unit under subsection (1) shall be payable at the rate applicable to an apartment of one bedroom and smaller; (4)Development charges against land to be developed for a Live Work unit shall be subject to the-residential rates. (5)Notwithstanding this Section, development charges against land to be developed for residential use, where building permit applications were received prior to July 12, 2022 shall be calculated, paid, and collected at the rates set out in Schedule "D", provided: - 128 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 7 (a)the permit application is complete in terms of the applicant's submission requirements set out in the building code and the City's Building By-law; (b)applicable law approvals prescribed in the building code have been obtained or applied for; and (c)the building permit or a conditional building permit is issued for all or part of the building by August 15, 2022. 7.(1)Subject to subsections (2) and (3), Section 6 shall not apply in respect of a renovation, addition or installation which involves the creation of: (a)one or two additional dwelling units in an existing single-detached Dwelling or ancillary structure thereto, subject to prescribed regulations; or (b)an additional dwelling unit in any other existing residential building or ancillary structure thereto, subject to prescribed regulations. (2)Notwithstanding clause (1)(a) of this Section, development charges shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with Section 6 where the total gross floor area of the additional unit or units is greater than the total gross floor area of the existing dwelling unit. (3)Notwithstanding clause (1)(b) of this Section, development charges shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with Section 6 where the additional unit has a gross floor area greater than, (a)in the case of a semi-detached dwelling or single attached dwelling, the gross floor area of the dwelling unit already in the building; or (b)in the case of any other residential building; the gross floor area of the smallest dwelling unit contained in the residential building. (4)Section 6 shall not apply in respect of the creation of a second dwelling unit in prescribed classes of proposed new residential buildings, including structures ancillary to dwellings, subject to the following restrictions: - 129 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 8 Item Name of Class of Proposed New Residential Buildings Description of Class of Proposed New Residential Buildings Restrictions 1 Proposed new detached dwellings Proposed new residential buildings that would not be attached to other buildings and that are permitted to contain a second dwelling unit, that being either of the two dwelling units, if the units have the same gross floor area, or the smaller of the dwelling units. The proposed new detached dwelling must only contain two dwelling units. The proposed new detached dwelling must be located on a parcel of land on which no other detached dwelling, semi- detached dwelling or row dwelling would be located. 2 Proposed new semi-detached dwellings or row dwellings Proposed new residential buildings that would have one or two vertical walls, but no other parts, attached to other buildings and that are permitted to contain a second dwelling unit, that being either of the two dwelling units, if the units have the same gross floor area, or the smaller of the dwelling units. The proposed new semi-detached dwelling or row dwelling must only contain two dwelling units. The proposed new semi-detached dwelling or row dwelling must be located on a parcel of land on which no other detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling or row dwelling would be located. 3 Proposed new residential buildings that would be ancillary to a proposed new detached dwelling, semi- detached dwelling or row dwelling Proposed new residential buildings that would be ancillary to a proposed new detached dwelling, semi- detached dwelling or row dwelling and that are permitted to contain a single dwelling unit. The proposed new detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling or row dwelling, to which the proposed new residential building would be ancillary, must only contain one dwelling unit. The gross floor area of the dwelling unit in the proposed new residential building must be equal to or less than the gross floor area of the detached dwelling, semi- detached dwelling or row dwelling to which the proposed new residential building is ancillary. 8.(1)Where non-residential floor area is to be converted to residential space, a charge shall be paid for any new residential units created, less the amount of the charge which would be payable if the existing non-residential space being converted were being constructed, but in no case shall the net charge be less than zero. (2)Notwithstanding subsection (1), development charge credits for the conversion of an existing building from one principal use to another will only be provided where the applicant has provided proof of payment of a development charge under a previous by-law or a lot levy under by-law 3322/89 with regard to the building to be converted. - 130 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 9 Part III Non-Residential Development Charges 9.In this Part, (a)"agricultural use" means lands, buildings, or structures, excluding any portion thereof used as a dwelling unit or for a commercial use, used or designed or intended for use for the purpose of a bona fide farming operation including, but not limited to, animal husbandry, dairying, livestock, fallow, field crops, removal of sod, forestry, fruit farming, greenhouses, horticulture, market gardening, pasturage, poultry keeping, and equestrian facilities; (b)"development charge'' means non-residential development charge; (c)"grade" means the average level of finished ground adjoining a building at all exterior walls; (d)"existing industrial building" means a building used for or in connection with: (i)manufacturing, producing, processing, storing, or distributing something; (ii)research or development in connection with manufacturing, producing, or processing something; (iii)retail sales by a manufacturer, producer, or processor of something they manufactured, produced, or processed, if the retail sales are at the site where the manufacturing, production or processing takes place; or (iv)office or administrative purposes if they are: (1)carried out with respect to manufacturing, producing, processing, storage or distributing or something, and In or attached to the building or structure used for that manufacturing, producing, processing, storage, or distribution; (2)in or attached to the building or structure used for that manufacturing, producing, processing, storage, or distribution; (e)"gross floor area" means the total floor area, measured between the outside of exterior walls or between the outside of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing the building from another building, of all floors above the average level of finished ground adjoining the building at its exterior walls; (f)"net hectare" means the area in hectares of a parcel of land exclusive of the following: (i)lands conveyed or to be conveyed to the City of Pickering or a local board thereof or the Region or a local board thereof; (ii)lands conveyed or to be conveyed to the Ministry of Transportation for the construction of provincial highways; - 131 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 10 (iii)hazard lands conveyed or to be conveyed to a conservation authority as a condition of development; (iv)lands identified as "Natural Heritage System" pursuant to the Central Pickering Development Plan; and (v)storm water management facility areas; (g)"non-residential" means designed, adapted, or used for any purpose other than a dwelling unit or dwelling units, or accessory uses or spaces to a dwelling or dwellings; (h)"total floor area" means the sum total of the areas of the floor whether above or below grade, measured between the exterior faces of the exterior walls of the building or structure or from the centre line of a common wall separating two uses; and (i)includes the area of mezzanine as defined in the Ontario Building Code; and (ii)excludes those areas used exclusively as mechanical areas or for parking garages or structures. 10.Development charges against land to be developed for non-residential use shall be based upon the services designated in Schedule "A", which are provided by the City. 11.(1)Subject to the provisions of this Part, development charges against land to be developed for non-residential use shall be calculated, paid, and collected at the rates set out in Schedule "C": (2)Non-residential development located within Seaton Lands in Schedule B is subject to the Seaton Transportation funding arrangement and not to the Transportation charge applicable to development in the rest of Pickering. Further, non-residential development located within the Seaton Prestige Employment Lands is subject to the charge per net hectare set out in Schedule "C"; (3)The development charges in subsection (2) shall be calculated based on the number of net hectares of the entire parcel of land on which development will occur. (4)If a development includes the enlargement of the gross floor area of an existing industrial building, the amount of the development charge that is payable ln respect of the enlargement will be determined as follows: (a)if the gross floor area is enlarged by 50 percent or less, the amount of the development charge in respect of the enlargement is zero; and (b)if the gross floor area is enlarged by more than 50 percent, the amount of the development charge in respect of the enlargement is the amount of the development charge that would otherwise be payable multiplied by the fraction determined as follows: - 132 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 11 (i)determine the amount by which the enlargement in gross floor area exceeds 50 percent of the gross floor area lawfully constructed at the time of building permit application; and (ii)divide the amount determined under paragraph (i) by the amount of the enlargement. (c)for the purposes of calculating the floor area of the existing industrial building, floor area created by a previous enlargement shall not be included. (5)Notwithstanding this Section, development charges against land to be developed for non-residential use, where building permit applications were received prior to July 12, 2022 shall be calculated, paid, and collected at the rates set out in Schedule "D", provided: (a)the permit application is complete in terms of the applicant's submission requirements set out in the building code and the City's Building By-law; (b)applicable law approvals prescribed in the building code have been obtained or applied for; and (c)the building permit or a conditional building permit is issued for all or part of the building by August 15, 2022. 12.(1)Where residential floor area is to be converted to non-residential floor area, a charge shall be paid for any new non-residential space created, less the amount of the charge which would be payable if the existing residential units being converted were being constructed, but in no case shall the net charge be less than zero. (2)Notwithstanding subsection (1), development charge credits for the conversion of an existing building from one principal use to another will only be provided where the applicant has provided proof of payment of a development charge under a prior by-law or a lot levy under by-law 3322/89 with regard to the building to be converted. Part IV Administration 13.Development charges against land to be developed for residential uses, non-residential uses, or both, shall be calculated, paid, and collected as follows: (a)development charges against that portion of the land to be developed for residential use shall be calculated, paid and collected on a per dwelling unit of residential use basis in accordance with Part II and Schedule "C" of this By-law; (b)development charges against that portion of the land to be developed for non- residential use shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with Part Ill and Schedule "C" of this By-law; and - 133 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 12 (c)development charges against land to be developed for both residential and non- residential uses shall be calculated, paid and collected (in the case of the residential component, on a per dwelling unit basis), in accordance with Parts II and III and Schedule “C” of this By-law. 14.(1)Development charges shall be payable in full on the date that the building permit is issued in relation to a building or structure on land to which a development charge applies, except as provided in section 2(4) hereof. (2)No building permits shall be issued by the City for the construction of any building or structure on land to which a development charge applies until the applicable development charge has been paid in full to the City. (3)Where an owner has paid to the City, prior to the enactment of this By-law, in relation to a building or structure on land to which a development charge applies, (a)a charge against development pursuant to an obligation to do so in a subdivision agreement, condominium agreement, development agreement or other agreement with the City; (b)a fee as a condition of obtaining a consent to create a lot, other than the application fee; or (c)a lot levy pursuant to By-law 3322/89, and the building permit for that building or structure has not been issued prior to the enactment of this By-law, the owner shall be credited with the amount so paid, up to the amount of the development charge payable, as part of the development charge payable hereunder when the building permit is issued. 15.(1)Monies received from payment of development charges shall be maintained in a separate reserve fund for each service designated in Schedule "A", plus interest earned thereon. (2)Monies received for the payment of development charges shall be used only in accordance with the provisions of s.35 of the Act. (3)The amounts contained in the reserve funds established under this Section shall be invested, with any income received credited to the development charge reserve funds in relation to which the investment income applies. 16.(1)The development charges referred to in Sections 6 and 11 shall be adjustedannually, without amendment to this By-law, as of July 1 each year, (a)The rates in Schedule “C” shall be adjusted annually in accordance with the change in the index for the most recently available annual period ending March 31 for the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index for Toronto (2)The indexed development charges rates effective July 1 each year shall not apply to permit applications received prior to the July 1 effective date, provided: - 134 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 13 (a)the permit application is complete in terms of the applicant's submission requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code and the City's Building By- law; (b)applicable law approvals prescribed in the Ontario Building Code have been obtained or applied for; and (c)the building permit or a conditional building permit is issued for all or part of the building by the date set out in the Region of Durham’s annual report on the indexing of Development Charges. 17.Development charges are payable by electric funds transfer or certified cheque at the applicable rates or as otherwise may be approved by Council. 18.Council may consider allowing a person to perform work that relates to a service to which this By-law relates and, if it agrees, shall give the person a credit towards the development charge otherwise payable in exchange for the related work. 19.This By-law shall be administered by the Finance Department and applied by the Chief Building Official. 20. The following schedules to this by-law form an integral part of this by-law: Schedule "A" - Designated Municipal Services Under this By-law. Schedule "B" - City of Pickering and Seaton Lands. Schedule "C" - Schedule of Development Charges Effective July 12, 2022. 21.This By-law shall come into force and effect at 12:01 am on July 12, 2022 for a term not to exceed five years from the date it comes into force, unless it is repealed at an earlier date. 22.By-law No. 7595/17, as amended, shall be repealed as of the date this By-law comes into force. By-law passed this 11th day of July, 2022. ________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 135 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 14 Schedule “A” Designated Municipal Services and Classes of Service Under this By-law (a)Fire Protection Services; (b)By-law Enforcement Services; (c)Transportation Services; (d)Other Services Related to a Highway; (e)Parks and Recreation Services; (f)Library Services; (g)Stormwater Management Services; and (h)Growth-Related Studies - 136 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 15 Schedule “B” City of Pickering Seaton Lands - 137 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 16 Schedule “C” City of Pickering Schedule of Development Charges Effective July 12, 2022 Single and Semi- Detached Dwelling Other Multiples Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Seaton Prestige Employment Land Other Pickering Non- Residential 2 (per net hectare)(per sq.ft. of Gross Floor Area) Municipal Wide Services/Class of Service: Other Services Related to a Highway 746 575 434 266 11,695 0.34 Fire Protection Services 1,176 906 684 420 18,492 0.53 Parks and Recreation Services 13,273 10,224 7,719 4,737 35,927 1.03 Library Services 2,444 1,883 1,421 872 6,698 0.19 Growth-Related Studies 235 181 137 84 1,083 0.03 Stormwater Management Services 460 354 268 164 7,234 0.21 By-Law Enforcement Services 103 79 60 37 1,564 0.04 Total Municipal Wide Services/Class of Services 18,437 14,202 10,723 6,580 82,693 2.37 Outside of Seaton Lands 1 Transportation Services 13,461 10,369 7,829 4,805 4.73 Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands 13,461 10,369 7,829 4,805 - 4.73 Seaton 18,437 14,202 10,723 6,580 82,693 2.37 Rest of Pickering 31,898 24,571 18,552 11,385 7.10 RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL 2. Does not apply to prestige employment development in Seaton, as that development is subject to the per net Ha land area charge instead. 1. Subject to a separate agreement outside of the Development Charges Act concerning the provision of Transportation requirements in addition to other funding contributions Service/Class of Service - 138 - By-law No. 7953/22 Page 17 Schedule “D” City of Pickering Schedule of Development Charges Applicable to Building Permit Applications Received Prior to July 12, 2022 as per Section 6(5) and 11(5) of this By-law Single and Semi- Detached Dwelling Other Multiples Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom (per net Ha of Prestige Employment Land in Seaton) (per sq.ft. of Gross Floor Area) Municipal Wide Services/Classes: Other Services Related to a Highway 498 403 315 223 6,168 0.18 Fire Protection Services 1,014 820 640 454 13,039 0.37 Parks and Recreation Services 7,720 6,231 4,877 3,456 20,242 0.60 Library Services 1,275 1,030 806 571 3,048 0.09 Growth-Related Studies 338 274 214 151 4,353 0.12 Stormwater Management 326 264 206 146 3,965 0.11 Total Municipal Wide Services/Classes:11,171 9,022 7,058 5,001 50,815 1.47 Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation 1 10,516 8,490 6,644 4,706 2.96 Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands 10,516 8,490 6,644 4,706 - 2.96 Seaton 11,171 9,022 7,058 5,001 50,815 1.47 Rest of Pickering 21,687 17,512 13,702 9,707 4.43 Service/Class RESIDENTIAL 1. Subject to a separate agreement outside of the Development Charges Act concerning the provision of Transportation requirements in addition to other funding contributions 2. Does not apply to prestige employment development in Seaton, as that development is subject to the per net Ha land area charge instead. - 139 - Attachment #4 to Report FIN 12-22July 12 2022 Seaton Lands Financial Impact Agreement (FIA) Article 5 ** Per Residential Dwelling Unit by Type Non-Residential Charges July 1,2021-July 11, 2022 Single and Semi- Detached Dwelling Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Other Multiples Non-Residential per ft² of Total Floor Area 2 (per net Ha of Prestige Employment Land in Seaton) Service Category Total Soft Services* Non Indexed: Municipal Buildings Community Uses 897 189 300 409 86 137 409 86 137 710 150 238 0.104 n/a n/a 0.104 n/a n/a Total SLG FIA 1,386 632 632 1,098 0.104 0.104 July 12, 2022 - June 30, 2023 Indexed at 17.3% Total Soft Services* Non Indexed: Municipal Buildings Community Uses 1,052 189 300 480 86 137 480 86 137 833 150 238 0.122 n/a n/a 0.122 n/a n/a Total SLG FIA 1,541 703 703 1,221 0.122 0.122 * This contribution is to be indexed with the construction price index prescribed by the DC Act. Per FIA s4.2 ** FIA dated Nov. 26, 2015 subsection 5.1 and 5.2 permits the City to charge an additional charges to compensate for the 10% soft services deduction. - 140 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 905-272-3600 May 20, 2022 (Updated June 23, 2022) info@watsonecon.ca Attachment #5 to Report FIN 12-22 Community Benefits Strategy City of Pickering ________________________ For Public Circulation and Comment - 141 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... i 1.Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of this Document ....................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Legislative Context ................................................................................. 1-2 1.2.1 Bill 197 - COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, 2020 ................... 1-2 1.3 Current Policies ...................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Summary of the Process ......................................................................... 1-5 2.Anticipated Development................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Requirement of the Act ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Basis of Population, Household and Employment Forecast ................... 2-1 2.3 Summary of Growth Forecast ................................................................. 2-2 2.4 Land Valuation ...................................................................................... 2-11 3.The Approach to the Calculation of the Charge ........................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Anticipated Development and Redevelopment ....................................... 3-2 3.3 Services Potentially Involved .................................................................. 3-2 3.4 Increase in the Need for Service ............................................................. 3-2 3.5 Capital Forecast ...................................................................................... 3-3 3.6 Deductions .............................................................................................. 3-3 3.6.1 Reduction for Excess Capacity .................................................. 3-4 3.6.2 Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development .......................... 3-4 3.6.3 Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions .............................................................................. 3-5 3.7 Municipal-wide vs. Area Rating ............................................................... 3-5 3.8 Land Valuation Analysis .......................................................................... 3-6 3.9 Calculation of the Community Benefit Charge ........................................ 3-6 4.C.B.C.-Eligible Cost Analysis ......................................................................... 4-1 - 142 - Table of Contents (Cont’d) Page Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Allocation of Costs to C.B.C.-eligible Development ................................ 4-1 4.3 C.B.C.-eligible Cost Analysis .................................................................. 4-2 5.C.B.C. Calculation ........................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Anticipated Funding Recovery ................................................................ 5-1 6.C.B.C. Policy Recommendations and C.B.C. By-law Rules ......................... 6-1 6.1 C.B.C. Policies ........................................................................................ 6-1 6.2 C.B.C. By-law Rules ............................................................................... 6-1 6.2.1 Payment in any Particular Case ................................................. 6-1 6.2.2 Maximum Amount of the Community Benefit Charge ................ 6-2 6.2.3 Exemptions (full or partial) ......................................................... 6-2 6.2.4 Timing of Collection ................................................................... 6-3 6.2.5 In-kind Contributions .................................................................. 6-4 6.2.6 The Applicable Areas ................................................................. 6-4 6.2.7 Special Account ......................................................................... 6-4 6.2.8 Credits ....................................................................................... 6-5 6.2.9 By-law In-Force Date ................................................................. 6-5 6.3 Recommendations .................................................................................. 6-5 7.By-law Implementation ................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 7-1 7.2 Public Consultation Process ................................................................... 7-1 7.2.1 Required Consultation ............................................................... 7-1 7.2.2 Interested Parties to Consult ...................................................... 7-1 7.3 Implementation Requirements ................................................................ 7-2 7.3.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 7-2 7.3.2 Notice of Passage ...................................................................... 7-2 7.3.3 Appeals ...................................................................................... 7-3 7.3.4 In-Kind Contributions ................................................................. 7-3 7.4 Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development ................................. 7-5 7.5 Ongoing Application and Collection of C.B.C. funds ............................... 7-5 7.5.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 7-5 7.5.2 Overview of Process and Appraisals ......................................... 7-5 7.5.3 Special Reserve Fund Account .................................................. 7-6 7.6 Transitional Matters ................................................................................ 7-9 7.6.1 Existing Reserves and Reserve Funds ...................................... 7-9 7.6.2 Credits under Section 38 of the Development Charges Act ....... 7-9 7.6.3 Continued Application of Previous Section 37 Rules ................. 7-9 Appendix A Background Information on Residential and Non-Residential Growth Forecast ............................................................................................. A-1 - 143 - Table of Contents (Cont’d) Page Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Appendix B Proposed C.B.C. By-law ...................................................................... B-1 - 144 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym Full Description of Acronym B.U.A. Built-Up Area C.B.C.Community Benefits Charge C-I-L Cash-in-lieu D.C.Development charge D.C.A.Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended N.F.P.O.W.No fixed place of work OLT Ontairo Land Tribunal O.Reg.Ontario Regulation P.P.U.Persons per unit sq.ft.square foot sq.m square metre - 145 - Executive Summary - 146 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE i H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Executive Summary 1. The report provided herein represents the Community Benefits Charge (C.B.C.) Strategy for the City of Pickering required by the Planning Act, as amended. This report has been prepared in accordance with the methodology required under the Planning Act. The contents include the following: • Chapter 1 –Introduction and overview of the legislative requirements of the Act; • Chapter 2 – Summary of the residential and non-residential growth forecasts for the City; • Chapter 3 – Approach to calculating the C.B.C.; • Chapter 4 – Review of eligible capital costs; • Chapter 5 – Calculation of the C.B.C.; • Chapter 6 – C.B.C. policy recommendations and rules; and • Chapter 7 – By-law implementation. 2. The Planning Act is the statutory basis to recover these charges. C.B.C.s can be imposed to recover the costs for: • land for parks or other public recreational purposes in excess of lands conveyed or funded by cash-in-lieu of parkland payments under sections 42 and 51 of the Planning Act; • capital costs for services under subsection 2 (4) of the Development Charges Act (D.C.A.) that are not intended to be funded under a development charges (D.C.) by-law; and • capital costs for municipal services ineligible for inclusion in a D.C. by-law. In accordance with the Planning Act, capital costs included under a development charges by-law or parkland funded through a cash-in-lieu (C.I.L.) of parkland by- law cannot be recovered from C.B.C.s. Furthermore, the act places restrictions on the application of the charges, i.e., a C.B.C. may not be imposed with respect to: • development or redevelopment of fewer than 10 residential units, and in respect of buildings or structures with fewer than five storeys; • a building or structure intended for use as a long-term care home; • a building or structure intended for use as a retirement home; - 147 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE ii H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx • a building or structure intended for use by a university, college, or an Indigenous Institute; • a building or structure intended for use as a memorial home, clubhouse or athletic grounds by an Ontario branch of the Royal Canadian Legion; • a building or structure intended for use as a hospice to provide end-of-life care; or • not-for-profit housing. 3. O. Reg. 509/20 specifies that a maximum charge of 4% of the value of land at the time of building permit issuance may be imposed. A municipality must undertake a C.B.C. strategy and follow the required public procedure to enact and C.B.C. by- law. The C.B.C. by-law is appealable to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT). 4. The methodology is detailed in Chapter 4; a simplified summary is provided below. 1) Identify amount, type and location of eligible growth. 2) Identify servicing needs to accommodate growth. 3) Identify capital costs to provide services to meet the needs. 4) Deduct: • Excess capaicty; • Grants, subsidies and other contributions; and • Benefit to existing development. 5) Net costs are then allocated between eligible and ineligible development types. 6) Net costs compared to 4% of land value to inform the amount of the charge i.e. rationalize if the maximum C.B.C. rate can be imposed. 5. The City is undertaking a C.B.C. public process and anticipates passing a new by- law on July 11, 2022. A stakeholder consultation meeting was held on June 1, 2022 to consult with the development industry stakeholders and receive input on the matter followed by a public meeting of Council on the matter on June 20, 2022. 6. The growth forecast (Chapter 2) on which the City-wide C.B.C. is based, projects 80% of the population in high density developments will live in C.B.C.-eligible units. Average land values of $3.9 million per hectare were determined based on historical appraisals received for C.I.L. of parkland purposes. Based on the - 148 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE iii H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx anticipated number of C.B.C. eligible dwelling units and assumed density, a total forecast land value of $321.9 million was esitmated. Residential High Density Gross Residential Population Growth % of Gross Population in High- Density Units Eligible High Density 14,423 80% Ineligible High Density 3,595 20% Total Residential High-Density Forecast 18,018 100% 7.The study considered needs relating to Arts, Culture, and Museum Services, Animal Adoption Services, and Adminstration Services. The study also considered costs relating to parkland acquistion beyond what can be conveyed under the Planning Act, however, the CIty will be further examing those needs before considering their inclusion in a future C.B.C. strategy and by-law. In total, the gross capital costs of the needs being considered in the C.B.C. is $101.3 million of which the C.B.C. eligible cost is $7.4 million 8.Table ES-1 summarizes the calculation of the C.B.C. The C.B.C. calculation shows a maximum amount of 2.3% of land value would be necessary to fund the increase in need for services. It is recommended that the charge be implemented on a per unit basis, consistent with the City’s D.C. structure for apartments of 2 bedrooms and greater and 1 bedroom and bachelor. The per unit charge structure will also assist with the ease of administration and implementation of the charges. The proposed C.B.C. would be $1,070 per unit for apartments of two bedrooms and greater and $657 for less than one bedroom and bachelor apartment units. - 149 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE iv H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Table ES-1 Summary of Growth-Related Capital Costs 9.Considerations by Council – This Strategy represents the service needs arising from growth over the forecast period and the costs that can be recovered from C.B.C.s. Council will consider the findings and recommendations provided in the report and, in conjunction with public input, approve such policies and rate it deems appropriate. These directions will refine the draft C.B.C. by-law which is appended in Appendix B. These decisions may include: •adopting the charges and policies recommended herein; and •considering additional exemptions to the by-law. Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Non-C.B.C. Eligible Share C.B.C. Eligible Share Arts, Culture, and Museum Services 80,727,932 44,846,824 1,980,057 28,022,240 5,878,810 Animal Adoption Services 2,831,400 459,590 2,038,443 333,368 Administration Services 17,746,000 9,780,669 6,725,449 1,239,882 A Total 101,305,332 55,087,083 1,980,057 36,786,132 7,452,060 B Anticipated C.B.C. Residential Dwelling Units (2022-2039)8,144 C Density Assumption (units per hectare)100 D (B/C)Land Area for Residential Dwelling Unit Forecast (hectares)81 E Estimated Average Land Value ($/hectare)3,952,000 F (D*E)Total Estimated Land Value 321,850,880 G (F*4%)Maximum Prescribed Value (4% of Land)12,874,035 H (A/F)Total C.B.C. Required to Fund Needs (% of Land Value)2.3% Total Proposed C.B.C. I Gross Population in New C.B.C. Eligible Development 14,423 J (A/I)Cost Per Capita 517 By Residential Unit Type P.P.U. Apartments - 2 Bedrooms +2.071 1,070 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.271 657 Less:Growth-Related Capital Cost Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Description - 150 - Report - 151 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Chapter 1 Introduction - 152 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this Document This strategy report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, 1990, (section 37) and, accordingly, recommends the imposition of a Community Benefits Charge (C.B.C.) and associated policies for the City of Pickering (City). The City retained Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. (Watson), to undertake the C.B.C. strategy process. Watson worked with City staff preparing the C.B.C. analysis and policy recommendations contained within this strategy. The C.B.C. strategy report, containing the proposed C.B.C. by-law, will be distributed to members of the public to provide interested parties the background information on the legislation, the recommendations contained herein, and an outline of the basis for these recommendations. This report has been prepared, in the first instance, to meet the statutory requirements applicable to the City’s C.B.C. strategy, as summarized in Chapter 3. It also addresses the requirement for “rules” (contained in Chapter 6) and the proposed by-law to be made available as part of the approval process (included as Appendix C). In addition, the report is designed to set out sufficient background on the legislation (Chapter 3) and the policies underlying the proposed by-law, to make the exercise understandable to those who are involved. Finally, the report addresses post-adoption implementation requirements (Chapter 7) which are critical to the successful application of the new policy. The chapters in the strategy report are supported by Appendices containing the data required to explain and substantiate the calculation of the charge. A full discussion of the statutory requirements for the preparation of a strategy and calculation to support the C.B.C. rate is provided herein. - 153 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 1.2 Legislative Context 1.2.1 Bill 197 - COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, 2020 The COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act received Royal Assent on July 21, 2020. Schedule 17 of the Act amends the Planning Act with respect to the provisions of community benefits and parkland dedication. These amendments were proclaimed and came into effect on September 18, 2020. Municipalities with agreements for community benefits have two years after the date of proclamation (i.e., September 18, 2022) to transition to the new rules under s.37 of the Planning Act. Eligible municipalities also have the ability to impose a C.B.C. under this authority. Single-tier and lower-tier municipalities may adopt a by-law to impose a C.B.C. against land to pay for the capital costs of facilities, services and matters required because of development or redevelopment in the area to which the by-law applies. The capital costs to be recovered through a C.B.C. may include: •land for parks or other public recreational purposes in excess of lands conveyed or funded by cash-in-lieu of parkland payments under sections 42 and 51 of the Planning Act; •capital costs for services under subsection 2 (4) of the D.C.A. that are not intended to be funded under a D.C. by-law; and •capital costs for municipal services ineligible for inclusion in a D.C. by-law. There are restrictions on the application of the charges. A C.B.C. may be imposed only with respect to development or redevelopment that requires: •the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by-law under section 34; •the approval of a minor variance under section 45; •a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50 (7) applies; •the approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51; •a consent under section 53; •the approval of a description under section 9 of the Condominium Act, 1998; or •the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 in relation to a building or structure. - 154 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx As discussed later, the regulations limit the charge relative to the value of land at the time of building permit issuance thus, imposing the charge at the time of development requiring the issuance of a building permit would be prudent. The Planning Act limits the imposition of the C.B.C. to certain types of development. Under subsection 37 (3), a C.B.C. may not be imposed with respect to: • development or redevelopment of fewer than 10 residential units, and in respect of buildings or structures with fewer than five storeys; • a building or structure intended for use as a long-term care home; • a building or structure intended for use as a retirement home; • a building or structure intended for use by a university, college, or an Indigenous Institute; • a building or structure intended for use as a memorial home, clubhouse or athletic grounds by an Ontario branch of the Royal Canadian Legion; • a building or structure intended for use as a hospice to provide end-of-life care; or • not-for-profit housing. Before adopting a C.B.C. by-law a municipality must prepare a C.B.C. Strategy that identifies the facilities, services and matters that will be funded with the charges. The municipality must consult with such persons and public bodies as the municipality considers appropriate while preparing the Strategy. Further, Ontario Regulation 509/20 specifies the methodology that must be followed in the Strategy. This includes: 1. An estimate of the anticipated amount, type and location of development and redevelopment with respect to which community benefits charges will be imposed; 2. Estimates of the increase in the need for facilities, services and matters attributable to the anticipated development and redevelopment to which the C.B.C. by-law would relate; 3. For the facilities, services, and matters included above, an identification of excess capacity and estimates of the benefit to existing development; 4. Estimates of the capital costs necessary to provide the facilities, services and matters; and - 155 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 5.Identification of any capital grants, subsidies and other contributions made to the municipality or that the council of the municipality anticipates will be made in respect of the capital costs. Once the by-law is passed, the municipality must give notice of passage in accordance with the regulations and the by-law may be appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) within 40 days of by-law passage. The amount of the charge can not exceed an amount equal to the prescribed percentage of the value of the land on the date of building permit issuance. At present, the prescribed value is set by regulation at 4% of land value. Moreover, if the landowner is of the view that the amount of the C.B.C. exceeds the prescribed value, the landowner may pay the charge under protest. In this circumstance there is an obligation of the landowner to provide an appraisal. If the municipality disputes the value of the land identified in the landowner’s appraisal, the municipality must also provide the owner with an appraisal within the prescribed time period. Moreover, there is a requirement that the municipality maintains a registry of at least three land appraisers. A municipality may allow the landowner to provide in-kind contributions towards the facilities, services or matters in lieu of paying a C.B.C. Revenue collected under a C.B.C. by-law must be maintained in a special account and used for the purposes that the charge was imposed. A municipality must report on the activity of the special account annually. 1.3 Current Policies Historically, the City has imposed charges related to community benefits under the prior Planning Act section 37 provisions. The charges were typically levied to provide for park improvements and other community services in response to increased intensification and density allowances. At the time of writing, all financial commitments relating to prior section 37 agreements have been fulfilled. - 156 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 1.4 Summary of the Process Prior to passing a C.B.C. by-law, subsection 37 (10) of the Planning Act requires the City to consult with the public and such persons and public bodies as the City considers appropriate. As such, a meeting has been set for June 1, 2022 with representatives from the development industry to present the strategy and allow for feedback on the strategy. The meeting is also being held to present the strategy’s purpose, approach, and proposed C.B.C. by-law. Figure 1-1 provides an outline of the schedule to be followed with respect to the C.B.C. strategy and by-law adoption and implementation process. Figure 1-1 City of Pickering Schedule of Key Dates in the C.B.C. Strategy Process Item Date 1. Data collection, land valuation analysis, growth forecast development, capital needs assessment December 2021 to April 2022 2. Presentation of draft and final CBC calculations and policies to City Staff, study process, and preliminary growth projections to Development Industry Stakeholders April 2022 to May 2022 3. Release of C.B.C. Strategy Report and proposed by-law May 20, 2022 4. Presentation of CBC Strategy and by-law to Development Industry Stakeholders June 1, 2022 5. Public Meeting of Council June 20, 2020 6. Updated C.B.C. Strategy Report and proposed by-law June 23, 2022 7. Council considers adoption of C.B.C. strategy and passage of by-law July 11, 2022 8. Notice given of by-law passage No later than 20 days after passage 9. Last day for by-law appeal 40 days after passage - 157 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Chapter 2 Anticipated Development in the City of Pickering - 158 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 2. Anticipated Development 2.1 Requirement of the Act Chapter 3 provides the methodology for calculating a C.B.C. as per the Planning Act. Figure 3-1 presents this methodology schematically. It is noted in the first box of the schematic that in order to determine the C.B.C. that may be imposed, it is a requirement of subsection 37 (9) of the Planning Act and O. Reg. 509/20 that “the anticipated amount, type and location of development and redevelopment, for which a C.B.C. can be imposed, must be estimated.” The growth forecast contained in this chapter (with supplemental tables in Appendix A) provides for the anticipated development for which the City will be required to provide services over a 17-year (mid-2022 to mid-2039) time horizon. 2.2 Basis of Population, Household and Employment Forecast The C.B.C. growth forecast has been derived by Watson. The growth forecast provided herein builds on growth assumptions established in the Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022). In addition to the Regional Development Charge Background Study, the following information sources were consulted: • City of Pickering Official Plan (Edition 8); • Durham Region Growth Management Strategy Technical Reports (2021); • 2006, 2011 and 2016 population, household and employment Census data; • 2021 population and household Census data; • Historical residential and non-residential building permit data over the 2012 to 2021 period; • Residential supply opportunities as provided by the City of Pickering; and • Discussions with City staff regarding anticipated residential and non-residential development in the City of Pickering, and specifically the Seaton Community. - 159 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 2.3 Summary of Growth Forecast A detailed analysis of the residential and non-residential growth forecasts is provided in Appendix A and the methodology employed is illustrated in Figure 2-1. The discussion provided herein summarizes the anticipated growth for the City and describes the basis for the forecast. The results of the residential growth forecast analysis are summarized in Table 2-1 below, and Schedule 1 in Appendix A. As identified in Table 2-1 and Appendix A, Schedule 1, permanent population in Pickering is anticipated to reach approximately 189,200 by mid-2039, resulting in an increase of approximately 82,100 persons, respectively over the longer-term forecast period.1 2 1 The population figures used in the calculation of the 2022 D.C. include the net Census undercount, which is estimated at approximately 3.8%. 2 The 2031 Region of Durham Official Plan population target of 225,670 for Pickering, less the growth allocation for Northeast Pickering of approximately 36,500 persons, results in an Official Plan population target for Pickering of 189,200 by Mid-2039. - 160 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Figure 2-1 Household and Population Forecast Model - 161 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Table 2-1 City of Pickering Residential Growth Forecast Summary Population Institutional Population4 Population Excluding Institutional Population Singles & Semi- Detached Multiple Dwellings2 Apartments3 Other Total Households 91,160 87,838 573 87,265 20,255 4,850 3,085 25 28,215 3.113 92,080 88,721 806 87,915 20,744 5,381 3,190 15 29,330 3.025 95,240 91,771 776 90,995 21,130 6,060 3,695 30 30,915 2.968 102,940 99,186 839 98,347 22,425 6,805 4,165 30 33,425 2.967 107,100 103,191 876 102,315 22,774 7,622 4,559 30 34,985 2.950 189,200 182,297 1,314 180,983 31,908 18,001 14,733 30 64,672 2.819 920 883 233 650 489 531 105 -10 1,115 3,160 3,050 -30 3,080 386 679 505 15 1,585 7,700 7,415 63 7,352 1,295 745 470 0 2,510 4,160 4,005 37 3,968 349 817 394 0 1,560 82,100 79,106 438 78,668 9,134 10,379 10,174 0 29,687 ¹ Census undercount estimated at approximately 3.8%. Note: Population including the undercount has been rounded. ² Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. ³ Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. 4 Institutional includes special care facilities such as nursing home or residences for senior citizens. Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 Mid 2006 Mid 2011 Mid 2016 Mid 2022 Mid 2021 - Mid 2022 Hi s t o r i c a l Mid 2039Fo r e c a s t In c r e m e n t a l Mid 2021 Mid 2016 - Mid 2021 Population (Including Census Undercount)¹ Year Excluding Census Undercount Housing Units Person Per Unit (P.P.U.): Total Population/ Total Households Source: Derived from Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022), by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Mid 2022 - Mid 2039 Note: The 2031 Official Plan population target of 225,670, less the growth allocation for Northeast Pickering of approximately 36,500 persons, results in an Official Plan population target of 189,200 by Mid 2039 - 162 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Figure 2-2 City of Pickering Annual Housing Forecast[1] Source: Building permit data from 2011 to 2013 and 2021 from Statistics Canada. Building permits between 2014 and 2020 from the City of Pickering. Figure by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. 1 Growth forecast represents calendar year. 283 425 303 379 346 540 1,262 510 573 1,560 1,925 1,925 1,925 1,925 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,544 1,544 1,544 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Ho u s i n g U n i t s Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average - 163 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Provided below is a summary of the key assumptions and findings regarding the City of Pickering C.B.C. growth forecast: 1.Housing Unit Mix (Appendix A – Schedules 1 and 5) •The housing unit mix for the City was derived from the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022) •Based on the above indicator, the longer-term household growth forecast for the City is comprised of a unit mix of 31% low density units (single-detached and semi-detached), 35% medium density (multiples except apartments) and 34% high density (bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom apartments). 2.C.B.C.-Eligible Units •Subsection 37 (4) of the Planning Act establishes the criteria for a development to be C.B.C. eligible. A C.B.C. may be imposed if: o Development of a proposed building or structure has five or more storeys at or above ground and has 10 or more residential units; o Redevelopment of an existing building or structure that will have five or more storeys at or above ground after redevelopment and proposes to add 10 or more residential units to an existing building or structure; or o Such types of development or redevelopment as prescribed. 2020, c. 18, Sched. 17, section 1. •The C.B.C.-eligible unit forecast is derived based on the established criteria above and a detailed review of historical Census housing trends, historical development activity (as per Schedule 5), active residential development applications and discussions with City staff regarding anticipated C.B.C.-eligible developments. •Based on the above indicators, the City is forecast to accommodate 8,144 C.B.C.-eligible household units over the 17-year forecast period. This translates to 80% of all high-density units, including accessory apartments, being C.B.C. eligible from mid-2022 to mid-2039. Table 2-2 and Schedule 2 summarizes the anticipated amount, type, and location of development for the City by development location. 3.Geographic Location of C.B.C.-Eligible Residential Development (Appendix A – Schedule 2) - 164 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-7 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx • Schedule 2 summarizes the anticipated amount, type, and location of C.B.C.-eligible development by area for the City. • In accordance with forecast demand and available land supply, the amount and percentage of forecast C.B.C.-eligible housing growth between mid-2022 and mid-2039 by development location is summarized in Table 2-2. Table 2-2 City of Pickering Residential High-Density Growth by Development Area Development Location Total High- Density Housing Growth, mid-2022 to mid-2039[1] C.B.C.- Eligible Share C.B.C.- Eligible Housing Growth, mid-2022 to mid-2039 Seaton 4,871 80% 3,897 Rest of Pickering 5,303 80% 4,247 Total City of Pickering 10,174 80% 8,144 [1] High density includes accessory apartments, bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 4. Planning Period • A 17-year planning horizon has been used, recognizing the anticipated timing of when the current Regional Official Plan population target for Pickering for 2031 would be achieved. 5. Population in New Units (Appendix A – Schedules 3 and 4) • The number of new housing units to be constructed in the City of Pickering during the 17-year planning period is presented in Figure 2-2. Over the 17-year forecast period, the City is anticipated to average 1,746 new housing units per year. - 165 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-8 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx •Institutional population 1 is anticipated to increase by approximately 440 people between 2022 and 2039. •Population in new units is derived from Schedules 3 and 4, which incorporate historical development activity, anticipated units (see unit mix discussion) and average persons per unit (P.P.U.) by dwelling type for new units. •Schedule 6 summarizes the average P.P.U. assumed for the new housing units by age and type of dwelling based on a 2016 custom Census data for the City of Pickering. The total calculated P.P.U. for all density types represents a 25-year forecast average. Average P.P.U.s by dwelling type are as follows: o Low density:3.561 o Medium density: 2.743 o High density 2:1.771 6.Existing Units and Population Change (Appendix A – Schedules 3 and 4) •Existing households for mid-2022 are based on the 2021 Census households, plus estimated residential units constructed in 2021, assuming a 6-month lag between construction and occupancy (see Schedule 3). •The decline in average occupancy levels for existing housing units is calculated in Schedules 3 to 4, by aging the existing population over the forecast period. The forecast population decline in existing households over the 2022 to 2039 forecast period is approximately 350. 7.Employment (Appendix A – Schedule 7) •The employment projections provided herein are derived from the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022) and based on the activity rate method, which is defined as the number of jobs in a City divided by the number of residents. Key employment sectors include primary, industrial, commercial/population-related, institutional, and work at home, which are considered individually below. 1 Institutional includes special care facilities such as nursing home or residences for senior citizens. A P.P.U. of 1.100 depicts 1-bedroom and 2- or more bedroom units in these special care facilities. 2 Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2- or more bedroom apartments. - 166 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-9 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx • 2016 employment data 1 (place of work) for the City of Pickering is outlined in Schedule 10a. The 2016 employment base is comprised of the following sectors: o 140 primary (less than 1%); o 3,225 work at home employment (10%); o 11,840 industrial (36%); o 12,670 commercial/population related (39%); and o 4,885 institutional (15%). • The 2016 employment by usual place of work, including work at home, is approximately 32,760. An additional 4,690 employees have been identified for the City in 2016 that have no fixed place of work (N.F.P.O.W.).2 • Total employment, including work at home and N.F.P.O.W. for the City is anticipated to reach approximately 70,700 by mid-2039. This represents an employment increase of approximately 30,450 over the forecast period.3 • Schedule 7, Appendix A, summarizes the employment forecast, excluding work at home employment and N.F.P.O.W. employment, which is the basis for the C.B.C. employment forecast. The impact on municipal services from work at home employees has already been included in the population forecast. The need for municipal services related to N.F.P.O.W. employees has largely been included in the employment forecast by usual place of work (i.e., employment and gross floor area generated from N.F.P.O.W. construction employment). • Total employment for the City of Pickering (excluding work at home and N.F.P.O.W. employment) is anticipated to reach approximately 55,450 by mid- 2039. This represents an employment increase of approximately 23,680 over the forecast period. Based upon the above information, the following summaries are provided for use in the calculations presented in chapter 4, as follows: 1 2016 employment is based on Statistics Canada 2016 Place of Work Employment dataset by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 2 No fixed place of work is defined by Statistics Canada as "persons who do not go from home to the same work place location at the beginning of each shift". Such persons include building and landscape contractors, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc. 3 The 2031 Official Plan employment target of 71,800 is forecast to be achieved after 2039. An additional 4,900 jobs would be assumed for Northeast Pickering, in accordance with the Official Plan. - 167 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-10 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx • The services to be provided are either of a primarily residential benefit and have been allocated a nominal 5% non-residential cost share or are of a benefit to both residential and non-residential development and have been allocated a 23% non-residential cost share (Table 2-3). • Of the residential portion of the costs, 23% of the population is forecast to reside in high-density residential units (Table 2-4). • Of those whose reside in high density residential units, 80% are forecast to reside in units to which the C.B.C. may be imposed (Table 2-5). Table 2-3 Residential and Non-Residential Growth Share Based on Incremental Growth in Population and Employment Over the Mid-2022 to Mid-2039 Forecast Period Residential Population and Non-Residential Employment Growth Population/ Employment Growth Residential/ Non- Residential Growth % Residential Net Population Growth 78,668 77% Employment Growth (net of Work at Home & N.F.P.O.W.) 23,680 23% Total Population & Employment Growth 102,348 100% Table 2-4 Low/Medium-Density Growth and High-Density Growth Share Over the Mid-2022 to Mid-2039 Forecast Period Residential Density Gross Residential Population Growth % of Gross Population in New Units Low/Medium Density 60,996 77% High Density 18,018 23% Total Residential Forecast 79,014 100% - 168 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-11 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Table 2-5 C.B.C. Eligible and Ineligible High-Density Growth Share Over the Mid-2022 to Mid-2039 Forecast Period Residential High Density Gross Residential Population Growth % of Gross Population in High-Density Units Eligible High Density 14,423 80% Ineligible High Density 3,595 20% Total Residential High Density Forecast 18,018 100% 2.4 Land Valuation As the C.B.C. rate is applied against the value of land the day before a building permit is issued, average land values are required to be assessed in various locations throughout the City where the anticipated development and redevelopment is anticipated. These land values assist in calculating the eligible C.B.C. rate, which can not exceed the maximum 4% prescribed rate. Table 2-2 demonstrates that the majority of the forecast C.B.C.-eligible high-density development will be located outside of the Seaton Lands. Average land values for this area were estimated based on the City’s historical cash-in-lieu parkland appraisals of $3.95 million per hectare. Based on an assumed density of 100 units per hectare this development would produce an equivalent land valuation of $321.9 million (8,144units / 100 units per hectare = 81.44 hectares x $3.95 million/hectare). - 169 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Chapter 3 Approach to the Calculation - 170 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 3. The Approach to the Calculation of the Charge 3.1 Introduction This chapter addresses the requirements of subsection 37 (9) of the Planning Act and sections 2 and 3 of O. Reg. 509/20 with respect to the establishment of the need for service which underpins the C.B.C. calculation. These requirements are illustrated schematically in Figure 3-1. Figure 3-1 The Process of Calculating a Community Benefits Charge under the Planning Act Anticipated Development & Redevelopment 1. Estimated Increase in Need for Service C.B.C. Eligible Capital Costs By Service Less: Excess Capacity Less: Benefit To Existing Development Less: Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions C.B.C. By-law Spatial Applicability Net Costs Recoverable from C.B.C. Charge Amount of the Charge Financing and Investment Considerations 3. 6. 7. 10. 13. 8. 9. 4. 5. Analysis of Municipal Services & Needs 2. Eligible Services/ Needs Ineligible Services/ Needs Tax Base, User Rates, etc. A.Historical s. 37 Capital Services B.Non-D.C.-Eligible Services C.Parkland Development in Excess of What is Provided Through Parkland Dedication/C.I.L. C.B.C. Maximum Allowable Amount Test (4% of Land Value)11. Land Valuation Analysis D.Possible D.C.-Eligible Services Not Included in the D.C. C.B.C.-Eligible Growth 12. - 171 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 3.2 Anticipated Development and Redevelopment The anticipated development and redevelopment forecast is provided in chapter 2 (with supplemental tables in Appendix A). This chapter provides for the anticipated overall growth within the City over a 17-year (mid-2022 to mid-2039) time horizon and then estimates the residential units eligible to be considered as per subsection 37 (4) of the Planning Act. 3.3 Services Potentially Involved As per subsection 37 (5) of the Planning Act, a C.B.C. may be imposed for services that do not conflict with services or projects provided under a municipality’s D.C. by-law or parkland dedication by-law. Hence, the service provided under the C.B.C. would be defined as follows: (a) land for parks or other public recreational purposes in excess of lands conveyed or funded by cash-in-lieu of parkland payments under sections 42 and 51 of the Planning Act; (b) capital costs for services under subsection 2 (4) of the D.C.A. that are not intended to be funded under a D.C. by-law; and (c) capital costs for municipal services ineligible for inclusion in a D.C. by-law. Examples of services not provided by a D.C. or Parkland Dedication by-law include (but are not limited to) capital facilities and equipment for municipal parking, airports, municipal administration building expansions, museums, arts centres, public art, heritage preservation, landfill, public realm improvements, community gardens, space for non-profits, etc. 3.4 Increase in the Need for Service The C.B.C. calculation commences with an estimate of “the increase in the need for service attributable to the anticipated development,” for eligible services to be covered by the by-law. There must be some form of link or attribution between the anticipated development and the estimated increase in the need for service. While the need could - 172 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx potentially be expressed generally in terms of units of capacity, a project-specific expression of need would appear to be most appropriate. 3.5 Capital Forecast Subsection 37 (2) of the Planning Act provides that, “The council of a local municipality may by by-law impose C.B.C.s against land to pay for the capital costs of facilities, services and matters.” The Act does not define what capital costs may be included within the charge. The Act provides that the C.B.C. charge could include capital costs for eligible D.C. services that are not intended to be funded under a municipal D.C. by- law. This provision suggests that capital costs may be defined in an equivalent manner as the Development Charges Act (D.C.A.). Hence, based on this relationship with the D.C.A., capital costs may include: (a)costs to acquire land or an interest therein (including a leasehold interest); (b)costs to improve land; (c)costs to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures; (d)costs to acquire, lease or improve facilities, including rolling stock (with a useful life of 7 or more years), furniture and equipment (other than computer equipment), materials acquired for library circulation, reference, or information purposes; (e)interest on money borrowed to pay for the above-referenced costs; (f)costs to undertake studies in connection with the above-referenced matters; and (g)costs of the C.B.C. Strategy study. 3.6 Deductions The section 2 of O. Reg. 509/20 potentially requires that three deductions be made to the capital costs estimates. These relate to: •excess capacity; •benefit to existing development; and - 173 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx •anticipated grants, subsidies, and other contributions. The requirements behind each of these reductions are addressed below. 3.6.1 Reduction for Excess Capacity Subsection 2 (c) of O. Reg. 509/20 requires the identification of the excess capacity that exists in relation to the facilities, services and matters referred to in clause 2 (b) suggesting the need for a potential deduction to the capital. “Excess capacity” is undefined, but in this case, the excess capacity must be able to meet some or all of the increase in need for service, in order to potentially represent a deduction. The deduction of excess capacity from the future increase in the need for the service would normally occur as part of the conceptual planning and feasibility work associated with justifying and sizing new facilities, e.g., if a new landfill site to accommodate increased solid waste generated by the new growth is not required because sufficient excess capacity is already available, then a landfill site expansion would not be included as an increase in need, in the first instance. 3.6.2 Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development Subsection 2 (c) of O. Reg. 509/20 of the D.C.A. provides that the capital estimates identify extent to which an increase in a facility, service or matter referred to in clause 2 (b) of the regulation would benefit existing development. The general guidelines used to consider benefit to existing development included: •the repair or unexpanded replacement of existing assets; •the elimination of a chronic servicing problem not created by growth; and •providing services where none previously existed (for example, extending garbage pickup to the rural area which previously did not receive the municipal services). Where existing development has an adequate service level which will not be tangibly increased by an increase in service, no benefit would appear to be involved. For example, where expanding existing garbage collection vehicles for future development simply replicates what existing residents are receiving, the existing developments receive very limited (or no) benefit as a result. - 174 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx In the case of services such as cultural facilities, the service is typically provided on a municipal-wide system basis. For example, facilities of the same type may provide different services (i.e., visual art vs. performance art), different programs (i.e., art classes vs. acting classes), and different time availability for the same service (i.e., art classes available on Wednesdays in one facility and Thursdays in another). As a result, residents will travel to different facilities to access the services they want at the times they wish to use them, and facility location generally does not correlate directly with residence location. Even where it does, displacing users from an existing facility to a new facility frees up capacity for use by others and generally results in only a very limited benefit to existing development. Further, where an increase in demand is not met for a number of years, a negative service impact to existing development is involved for a portion of the planning period. 3.6.3 Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions This step involves reducing the capital costs by capital grants, subsidies, and other contributions made or anticipated by Council and in accordance with various rules such as the attribution between the share related to new vs. existing development. That is, some grants and contributions may not specifically be applicable to growth or where Council targets fundraising as a measure to offset impacts on taxes. Although specific grants, subsidies and/or other contributions may not be currently identified and reduced in the calculations, due diligence will be undertaken by municipal staff during the annual budget process to net off any future identified funding from these other sources. 3.7 Municipal-wide vs. Area Rating This step involves determining whether all the subject costs are to be recovered on a uniform municipal-wide basis or whether some or all are to be recovered on an area- specific basis. There is no mandatory requirement to consider area rating of services (i.e., providing charges for specific areas and services); however, the legislation does not prohibit area rating. There may be instances where Council may consider varying rates to align with other policies or possible incentives in the development area. - 175 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Through the C.B.C. strategy process, discussions with municipal staff took place related to structuring the charge on a municipal-wide vs. area specific basis. As the services being provided in the strategy are not restricted to one specific area and are anticipated to be used by all residents within the municipality, the charges have been provided on a municipal-wide basis. Although the charges are to be calculated and imposed on a municipal-wide basis, consideration of location of the projects will take place through the annual budget process. 3.8 Land Valuation Analysis To facilitate the rate calculation provided in section 3.9, an estimate of the market value of the land related to the anticipated applicable development/redevelopment presented in section 3.2, needs to be undertaken. It is noted that the land values may vary based on a number of factors including location, zoning density, parcel size, etc., however, these values should estimate the land value the day before building permit issuance. This data may be available from municipal resources, or the municipality may consider engaging the assistance of a professional land appraiser. 3.9 Calculation of the Community Benefit Charge Subsection 37 (32) of the Planning Act provides that the amount of the Planning Act provides that the maximum charge which can be imposed is prescribed by the regulations. O. Reg. 509/20, section 3, provides that the maximum charge is to be 4%. To calculate the rate, the net capital cost (as provided by netting the deductions set out in section 3.6 from the capital presented in section 3.5) are divided by the land values related to the anticipated applicable development/redevelopment. This calculation produces a percentage of the capital cost relative to the land value of development. This rate can not exceed the maximum prescribed rate of 4% of land value. Alternatively, a municipality may choose to impose a rate on another basis. For example, the charge could be calculated on a per dwelling unit basis similar to a development charge (D.C.). This calculation would be facilitated by dividing the net capital cost by the forecast incremental gross population growth to arrive at a C.B.C. per capita. This rate would then be applied to the person per unit occupancy assumptions for high-density residential dwelling units to determine the charge. Moreover, the - 176 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-7 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx charge could be denominated based on land area, where the net capital costs would be divided by the amount of land anticipated to be occupied by the forecast residential dwelling units constructed over the forecast period. - 177 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Chapter 4 C.B.C.-Eligible Cost Analysis - 178 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 4.C.B.C.-Eligible Cost Analysis 4.1 Introduction This chapter outlines the basis for calculating eligible costs to be recovered through a C.B.C. by-law, which are to be applied on a uniform municipal-wide basis. In each case, the required calculation process set out in O. Reg. 509/20 subsections 2 (a) through 2 (f) to the Planning Act and described in Chapter 3 was followed in determining C.B.C.-eligible costs. In undertaking the C.B.C. Strategy, following services was considered: •Anticipated capital costs of parkland acquisition beyond those available under the provisions of the Planning Act; •Administrative Services, including growth-related studies not eligible under the D.C.A. and corporate services technology; •Animal Adoptions Services; and •Arts, Culture, and Museum Services While the City does anticipate capital costs of parkland acquisition beyond those available under the provisions of the Planning Act, the City will be undertaking a parks needs assessment in the near future to better understand those requirements before including those costs for recovery in a C.B.C. Strategy. 4.2 Allocation of Costs to C.B.C.-eligible Development To determine the C.B.C.-eligible capital costs for the City, the gross capital costs were estimated based on the City’s capital budget and forecast and discussions with City staff. Having estimated the capital costs for each project, deductions related to excess capacity, benefit to existing development, and grants, subsidies, or other contributions were assessed. The resultant net growth-related costs were then allocated to the C.B.C.-eligible share of the anticipated development based on the following: •Net capital costs for Animal Adoptions Services and Administrative Services were apportioned between residential (77%) and non-residential development (23%) based on the incremental population and employment growth over the - 179 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx forecast period (Table 2-3). The net capital costs for Arts, Culture, and Museum Services were allocated 95% residential development and 5% non-residential development, reflective of the increase in need for service from these types of development. This allocation approach between residential and non-residential development is consistent with the City’s practice within its D.C. background study. • The net capital costs associated with residential development were subsequently allocated between low-density and medium-density development types (77%) and high-density development (23%) over the forecast period, based on the respective population growth forecast for these dwelling unit types (Table 2-4). • Finally, the net capital costs assigned to high-density development were apportioned to the C.B.C.-eligible development, i.e., buildings with a minimum of five storeys and at least 10 residential dwelling units. As summarized in Table 2- 5, this type of development accounts for 80% of all high-density residential dwelling units over the forecast period. Based on the foregoing, for services allocated between the total population and employment growth over the forecast period, the net capital cost share attributable to C.B.C.-eligible development is 14.6%. For Arts, Culture, and Museum Services, the cost share attributable to C.B.C.-eligible development is approximately 16.3%. The costs related to undertaking the C.B.C. Strategy Study are 100% attributable to the C.B.C.-eligible development. 4.3 C.B.C.-eligible Cost Analysis This section provides for the evaluation of development-related capital requirements over a 2022 to 2039 planning horizon. The capital cost related to the increase in need for service are summarized in Table 4-1 and as follows: • Arts, Culture, and Museum Services – The City’s capital budget identifies a new Performing Arts Centre as part of the City Centre development and Museum space within the Pickering Heritage and Community Centre. Further additional costs for Public Art have also been included. The gross capital costs of these projects totals $80.7 million. $44.8 million has been deducted for the benefit to existing development and $2.0 has been deducted for possible grants, subsidies and other contributions towards the capital costs, resulting in $33.9 - 180 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx million net growth-related costs. After accounting for the benefit of these needs to non-residential development (i.e. $1.7 million), low/medium density residential development (i.e. $24.9 million), and ineligible high density residential development (i.e. $1.5 million), the potential C.B.C. recoverable costs total $5.9 million. •Administration Services – The City’s Capital Budget and Forecast identify growth related study costs that are not eligible for inclusion within the D.C. background study, costs of undertaking the C.B.C. strategy and future updates, corporate services technology costs related to the City’s financial system, and growth-related renovations to the Civic Complex. The total costs of the needs are $17.7 million. After deducting the share of the costs that are a benefit to existing development and non-CBC eligible development, $1.2 million has been considered within the calculation of the charge. •Animal Adoption Services – The City is constructing a new Animal shelter that will primarily be utilized in relation to municipal by-law enforcement but will also contain space related to Animal Adoptions Services. The share of the capital costs related to Animal Adoptions Services is $2.8 million. Of those costs, $459,600 has been deducted as benefit to existing development based on the replacement of the existing animal adoptions facility space. Of the growth- related costs of $2.4 million, $333,400 is related to the CBC eligible development after accounting for the non-residential share and non-CBC eligible residential share of the growth-related costs. Based on the calculations and allocations to C.B.C.-eligible high-density growth, the City has identified $7.4 million in eligible net growth-related costs to be included within the C.B.C. calculations. - 181 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Table 4-1 Capital Costs to be Recovered through Community Benefit Charges Total Low / Medium Density Residential Total High Density Residential Ineligible High Density Residential Eligible High Density Residential 2022-2039 % $ % $77%23%20%80% Arts, Culture, and Museum Services 1 Performing Arts Centre 66,422,932 36,899,961 29,522,971 5% 1,476,149 95% 28,046,823 21,651,090 6,395,733 1,276,129 5,119,604 2 Museum (Part of Pickering Heritage and Community Centre)10,555,000 5,863,624 1,980,057 2,711,319 5% 135,566 95% 2,575,753 1,988,384 587,369 117,197 470,172 3 Public Art 3,750,000 2,083,239 - 1,666,761 5%83,338 95% 1,583,423 1,222,343 361,080 72,046 289,034 Total - Arts, Culture, and Museum Services 80,727,932 44,846,824 1,980,057 33,901,051 1,695,053 32,205,998 24,861,816 7,344,182 1,465,371 5,878,810 Animal Adoption Services 4 Animal Shelter - Adoption Space 2,831,400 459,590 2,371,810 23% 545,516 77% 1,826,294 1,409,830 416,464 83,096 333,368 Total - Animal Adoption Services 2,831,400 459,590 - 2,371,810 545,516 1,826,294 1,409,830 416,464 83,096 333,368 Administration Services 5 Community Benefits Strategy (2022)35,000 - 35,000 0%- 100% 35,000 - 35,000 35,000 6 Community Benefit Strategy (2027)35,000 - 35,000 0%- 100% 35,000 - 35,000 35,000 7 Community Benefit Strategy (2032)35,000 - 35,000 0%- 100% 35,000 - 35,000 35,000 8 Community Benefit Strategy (2037)35,000 - 35,000 0%- 100% 35,000 - 35,000 35,000 9 South Pickering Heritage Inventory 62,600 34,776 27,824 23%6,399 77% 21,424 16,539 4,886 975 3,911 10 Community Improvement Plans for Durham Live Lands and for City Centre Lands 174,000 96,662 77,338 23% 17,788 77% 59,550 45,970 13,580 2,710 10,870 11 Seaton Corporate Energy Plan Update 58,000 32,221 25,779 23%5,929 77% 19,850 15,323 4,527 903 3,623 12 Pickering Climate Adaption Plan 174,000 96,662 77,338 23% 17,788 77% 59,550 45,970 13,580 2,710 10,870 13 Natural Capital Asset Evaluation 87,000 48,331 38,669 23%8,894 77% 29,775 22,985 6,790 1,355 5,435 14 Fair Minded Pricing Policy 70,400 39,109 31,291 23%7,197 77% 24,094 18,600 5,494 1,096 4,398 15 Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Corporate Strategic Plan: 89,000 49,442 39,558 23%9,098 77% 30,459 23,514 6,946 1,386 5,560 16 New Financial System -SAP HR System-Recruiting & Onboard Module-Phs 2 480,000 266,655 213,345 23% 49,069 77% 164,276 126,815 37,461 7,475 29,987 17 New Financial System - SAP HR System-Learning Mgmt Module-Phs 3 290,000 161,104 128,896 23% 29,646 77% 99,250 76,617 22,633 4,516 18,117 18 New Financial System-SAP Fleet Module 475,000 263,877 211,123 23% 48,558 77% 162,565 125,494 37,071 7,397 29,674 19 New Financial System-SAP Budget & Salary Module 600,000 333,318 266,682 23% 61,337 77% 205,345 158,519 46,826 9,343 37,483 20 Integrated Community Sustainability Plan 35,000 19,444 15,556 23%3,578 77% 11,978 9,247 2,732 545 2,187 21 Measuring Sustainability Report 41,000 22,777 18,223 23%4,191 77% 14,032 10,832 3,200 638 2,561 22 5-year Capital and Operating Cost Financial Impact Analysis 35,000 19,444 15,556 23%3,578 77% 11,978 9,247 2,732 545 2,187 23 Civic Complex Rennovations 14,935,000 8,296,847 - 6,638,153 23% 1,526,775 77% 5,111,378 3,945,791 1,165,587 232,567 933,019 Total - Administration Services 17,746,000 9,780,669 - 7,965,331 1,799,826 6,165,505 4,651,463 1,514,042 274,160 1,239,882 Total 101,305,332 55,087,083 1,980,057 44,238,192 4,040,395 40,197,797 30,923,109 9,274,688 1,822,628 7,452,060 Prj. No Potential C.B.C. Recoverable Cost Residential ShareNon-Residential Share Net Growth-Related Cost Net Residential Cost Share Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Less: Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development - 182 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Chapter 5 C.B.C. Calculation - 183 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 5. C.B.C. Calculation 5.1 Anticipated Funding Recovery To summarize the calculation of the charge, the following has been undertaken: 1) Anticipated Development: As presented in Chapter 2, the 17-year growth forecast provides for 8,144 eligible high-density units (i.e., in buildings containing a minimum of five storeys and a minimum of 10 residential units). 2) Land Valuation: Estimated land values were based on land appraisals for payment in lieu of parkland. 3) Identification of a Services: A number of services were considered including Arts, Culture, and Museum, Animal Adoptions, and Administration Services. 4) C.B.C.-eligible Costs: Capital needs related to the identified services were provided by City staff and through the City’s capital budget. Gross costs of the capital projects were assessed for the portion of the projects that would benefit the existing community versus the future growth. The growth-related costs were then allocated amongst all types of growth to calculate the amount that is associated with the C.B.C.-eligible high-density units. 5) Total Land Value: Based on the growth forecast (section 2.4), density assumptions, and land valuation assessment, the total land value for C.B.C.- eligible high-density units was calculated to equal approximately $321.9 million. 6) Maximum C.B.C.: As per the Planning Act, the maximum a municipality can impose for a C.B.C. is equal to 4% of the land value of a property, the day before building permit issuance. Based on the total land value, the estimated maximum potential C.B.C. recovery for the City equates to $12.9 million for the 17-year forecast period. The City has identified capital costs attributable to eligible high-density growth of $7.4 million which are within the calculated maximum allowable amount of $12.9 million. - 184 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Table 5-1 provides the calculated charges on a per unit basis. The calculation is generated on a per capita basis and is based upon two forms of housing types (apartments 2+ bedrooms and apartments bachelor and 1-bedroom). The per unit charge structure aligns with the City’s D.C. structure for apartment dwelling units and will assist with the ease of administration and implementation of the charges. The proposed C.B.C. would be $1,070 per unit for apartments of two bedrooms and greater and $657 for less than one bedroom and bachelor apartment units. Table 5-1 Summary of C.B.C. Calculation Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Non-C.B.C. Eligible Share C.B.C. Eligible Share Arts, Culture, and Museum Services 80,727,932 44,846,824 1,980,057 28,022,240 5,878,810 Animal Adoption Services 2,831,400 459,590 2,038,443 333,368 Administration Services 17,746,000 9,780,669 6,725,449 1,239,882 A Total 101,305,332 55,087,083 1,980,057 36,786,132 7,452,060 B Anticipated C.B.C. Residential Dwelling Units (2022-2039)8,144 C Density Assumption (units per hectare)100 D (B/C)Land Area for Residential Dwelling Unit Forecast (hectares)81 E Estimated Average Land Value ($/hectare)3,952,000 F (D*E)Total Estimated Land Value 321,850,880 G (F*4%)Maximum Prescribed Value (4% of Land)12,874,035 H (A/F)Total C.B.C. Required to Fund Needs (% of Land Value)2.3% Total Proposed C.B.C. I Gross Population in New C.B.C. Eligible Development 14,423 J (A/I)Cost Per Capita 517 By Residential Unit Type P.P.U. Apartments - 2 Bedrooms +2.071 1,070 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.271 657 Less:Growth-Related Capital Cost Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Description - 185 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Chapter 6 C.B.C. Policy Recommendations and C.B.C. By-law Rules - 186 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 6.C.B.C. Policy Recommendations and C.B.C. By- law Rules 6.1 C.B.C. Policies Planning Act, section 37 and O. Reg. 509/20 outline the required policies that must be considered when adopting a C.B.C. by-law. The following subsections set out the recommended policies governing the calculation, payment and collection of C.B.C.s in accordance with the legislation. 6.2 C.B.C. By-law Rules 6.2.1 Payment in any Particular Case In accordance with the Planning Act, subsection 37 (3), a C.B.C. may be imposed only with respect to development or redevelopment that requires one of the following: (a)“the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by- law under section 34 of the Planning Act; (b)the approval of a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act; (c)a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50 (7) of the Planning Act applies; (d)the approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act; (e)a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act; (f)the approval of a description under section 9 of the Condominium Act, 1998; or (g)the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 in relation to a building or structure.” - 187 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 6.2.2 Maximum Amount of the Community Benefit Charge Subsection 37 (32) of the Planning Act states that the amount of a C.B.C. payable in any particular case shall not exceed an amount equal to the prescribed percentage of the value of the land as of the valuation date. Based on section 3 of O. Reg. 509/20, the prescribed percentage is 4%. 6.2.3 Exemptions (full or partial) The following exemptions are provided under subsection 37 (4) of the Planning Act and section 1 of O. Reg. 509/20: •Development of a proposed building or structure with fewer than five storeys at or above ground; •Development of a proposed building or structure with fewer than 10 residential units; •Redevelopment of an existing building or structure that will have fewer than five storeys at or above ground after the redevelopment; •Redevelopment that proposes to add fewer than 10 residential units to an existing building or structure; •Such types of development or redevelopment as are prescribed: o Development or redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a long-term care home within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Long-Term Care Homes Act, 2007. o Development or redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a retirement home within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Retirement Homes Act, 2010. o Development or redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use by any of the following post-secondary institutions for the objects of the institution: i.a university in Ontario that receives direct, regular and ongoing operating funding from the Government of Ontario, ii.a college or university federated or affiliated with a university described in subparagraph i, iii.an Indigenous Institute prescribed for the purposes of section 6 of the Indigenous Institutes Act, 2017. - 188 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx o Development or redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a memorial home, clubhouse or athletic grounds by an Ontario branch of the Royal Canadian Legion. o Development or redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a hospice to provide end-of-life care. o Development or redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as residential premises by any of the following entities: i. a corporation to which the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 applies that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary object is to provide housing, ii. a corporation without share capital to which the Canada Not-for- profit Corporations Act applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary object is to provide housing, iii. a non-profit housing co-operative that is in good standing under the Co-operative Corporations Act. In addition to the exemptions noted above, the C.B.C. will not apply to buildings or structures owned by and used for the purposes of any municipality, local board, or Board of Education. 6.2.4 Timing of Collection The C.B.C.s imposed are calculated, payable, and collected upon issuance of a building permit for eligible development or redevelopment. Notwithstanding the forgoing, the new C.B.C. rates proposed herein shall not apply to building permit applications received prior to July 1, 2022, provided: • the permit application is complete in terms of the applicant's submission requirements set out in the building code and the City's Building By-law; • applicable law approvals prescribed in the building code have been obtained or applied for; and • the building permit or a conditional building permit is issued for all or part of the building by August 15, 2022. - 189 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 6.2.5 In-kind Contributions A municipality that has passed a C.B.C. by-law may allow the landowner to provide to the municipality: facilities, services, or matters required because of development or redevelopment in the area to which the by-law applies. Prior to providing these contributions, the municipality shall advise the landowner of the value that of the in-kind contributions that will be attributed to them. This value shall be deducted from the amount the landowner would otherwise be required to pay under the C.B.C. by-law. 6.2.6 The Applicable Areas The C.B.C. by-law will apply to all lands within the City. 6.2.7 Special Account All money received by the municipality under a C.B.C. by-law shall be paid into a special account. The money contained within the special account: • may be invested in securities in which the municipality is permitted to invest under the Municipal Act, 2001, and the earnings derived from the investment of the money shall be paid into a special reserve fund account; and • must have at least 60 percent of the funds spent or allocated at the beginning of the year. In addition to the monies collected under a C.B.C. by-law, transitional rules for transferring existing reserve funds are provided in subsection 37 (51) of the Planning Act. These rules apply for any existing reserve funds related to a service that is not listed in subsection 2 (4) of the D.C.A., as well as reserve funds established under section 37 of the Planning Act prior to Bill 197. 1. If the municipality passes a C.B.C. by-law under this section before the specified date, the municipality shall, on the day it passes the by-law, allocate the money in the special account or reserve fund to the special account referred to in subsection (45) of the Planning Act. 2. If the municipality has not passed a C.B.C. by-law under this section before the specified date, the special account or reserve fund is deemed to be a general - 190 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx capital reserve fund for the same purposes for which the money in the special account or reserve fund was collected. 3.Despite paragraph 2, subsection 417 (4) of the Municipal Act, 2001 (a provision which requires the funds raised for a reserve fund must only be used for the intended purpose) and any equivalent provision of do not apply with respect to the general capital reserve fund referred to in paragraph 2. 4.If paragraph 2 applies and the municipality passes a C.B.C. by-law under this section on or after the specified date, the municipality shall, on the day it passes the by-law, allocate any money remaining in the general capital reserve fund referred to in paragraph 2 to the special account referred to in subsection (45) of the Planning Act. Based on the above, there are not existing D.C. reserve funds that would be transferred to the C.B.C. special account. 6.2.8 Credits Subsection 37 (52) of the Planning Act indicates that any credits that were established under section 38 of the D.C.A. and that are not related to a service that is listed in subsection 2 (4) of the D.C.A., may be used by the holder of the credit with respect to a charge that the holder is required to pay under a C.B.C. by-law. 6.2.9 By-law In-Force Date A C.B.C. by-law comes into force on the day it is passed, or the day specified in the by- law, whichever is later. 6.3 Recommendations It is recommended that Council: “Adopt the C.B.C. approach to calculate the charges on a uniform City-wide basis;” “Approve the capital project listing set out in Chapter 4 of the C.B.C. Strategy dated June 10, 2022, subject to further annual review during the capital budget process;” - 191 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx “Create a special reserve fund account which will contain all C.B.C. monies collected;” “Use C.B.C.s collected to fund Parkland Acquisition and C.B.C. Strategy needs only;” “Impose the C.B.C. of $1,070 per 2 bedroom and greater apartment dwelling unit and $657 per bachelor and one bedroom apartment dwelling unit on the day before a building permit is issued;” “Approve the C.B.C. Strategy dated May 20, 2022 as updated on June 23, 2022;" and “Approve the C.B.C. By-law as set out in Appendix B” - 192 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Chapter 7 By-law Implementation - 193 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 7.By-law Implementation 7.1 Introduction This chapter addresses the public consultation process and by-law implementation requirements for the imposition of a C.B.C. by-law. Figure 7-1 provides an overview of the process. 7.2 Public Consultation Process 7.2.1 Required Consultation In establishing the policy for which a C.B.C. strategy and by-law will be based, subsection 37 (10) of the Planning Act requires that: “In preparing the community benefits strategy, the municipality shall consult with such persons and public bodies as the municipality considers appropriate.” As there is no specific guidance as to which parties the municipality shall consult with, municipalities may establish their own policy for public consultation. The policy for public consultation should be designed to seek the co-operation and participation of those involved, in order to produce the most suitable policy. Municipalities may consider a public meeting, similar to that undertaken for D.C. study processes (however, this is not a mandated requirement). This could also include a presentation to Council and the public (including development industry stakeholder) on the findings of the C.B.C. strategy, advanced notice of the meeting, and consideration for delegations from the interested parties. 7.2.2 Interested Parties to Consult There are three broad groupings of the public who are generally the most concerned with municipal C.B.C. policy. 1.The first grouping is the residential development community, consisting of land developers and builders, who will typically be responsible for generating the majority of the C.B.C. revenues. Others, such as realtors, are directly impacted by C.B.C. policy. They are, therefore, potentially interested in all aspects of the charge, - 194 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx particularly the percentage applicable to their properties, projects to be funded by the C.B.C. and the timing thereof, and municipal policy with respect to development agreements and in-kind contributions. 2. The second public grouping embraces the public at large and includes taxpayer coalition groups and others interested in public policy. 3. The third grouping is the non-residential mixed-use development sector, consisting of land developers and major owners or organizations with significant construction plans for mixed use developments. Also involved are organizations such as Industry Associations, the Chamber of Commerce, the Board of Trade, and the Economic Development Agencies, who are all potentially interested in municipal C.B.C. policy. Their primary concern is frequently with the percentage charge applicable to their lands, exemptions, and phase-in or capping provisions in order to moderate the impact. As noted in section 1.4, through the C.B.C. strategy process, the City’s consultation process includes meetings with the development community and Council. 7.3 Implementation Requirements 7.3.1 Introduction Once the City has calculated the charge, prepared the complete strategy, carried out the public process, and passed a new by-law, the emphasis shifts to implementation matters. These include notices, potential appeals and complaints, in-kind contributions, and finally the collection of revenues and funding of projects. The sections that follow provide an overview of the requirements in each case. 7.3.2 Notice of Passage In accordance with subsection 37 (13) of the Planning Act, when a C.B.C. by-law is passed, the clerk of the municipality shall give written notice of the passing and of the last day for appealing the by-law (the day that is 40 days after the day it was passed). - 195 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Such notice must be given no later than 20 days after the day the by-law is passed (i.e., as of the day of newspaper publication or the mailing of the notice). Section 4 of O. Reg. 509/20 further defines the notice requirements which are summarized as follows: •notice shall be given by publication in a newspaper which is (in the clerk’s opinion) of sufficient circulation to give the public reasonable notice, or by personal service, fax or mail to every owner of land in the area to which the by- law relates; •subsection 4 (2) lists the persons/organizations who must be given notice; and •subsection 4 (5) lists the seven items that the notice must cover. 7.3.3 Appeals Subsections 37 (13) to 37 (31) of the Planning Act set out the requirements relative to making and processing a C.B.C. by-law appeal as well as an OLT hearing in response to an appeal. Any person or organization may appeal a C.B.C. by-law to the OLT by filing a notice of appeal with the clerk of the municipality, setting out the objection to the by-law and the reasons supporting the objection. This must be done by the last day for appealing the by-law, which is 40 days after the by-law is passed. The municipality is carrying out a public consultation process, in order to address the issues that come forward as part of that process, thereby avoiding or reducing the need for an appeal to be made. 7.3.4 In-Kind Contributions Subsections 37 (6) to 37 (8) provide the rules for in-kind contributions. An owner of land may provide the municipality facilities, services, or matters required because of development or redevelopment in the area to which the by-law applies. Prior to providing these contributions, the municipality shall advise the owner of the land of the value that will be attributed to the contributions. The value of the contributions shall be deducted from the amount the owner of the land would otherwise have to pay under the C.B.C. by-law. - 196 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Figure 7-1 The Process of Required for Passing a Community Benefits Charge By-law under the Planning Act - 197 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 7.4 Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development The establishment of sound C.B.C. policy often requires the achievement of an acceptable balance between two competing realities. The first is that increased residential development fees (such as a C.B.C.) can impact project feasibility in some cases (e.g., rental apartments). Secondly, C.B.C.s or other municipal capital funding sources need to be obtained in order to help ensure that the necessary infrastructure and amenities are installed. The timely installation of such works is a key requirement in providing adequate service levels and in facilitating strong economic growth, investment, and wealth generation. 7.5 Ongoing Application and Collection of C.B.C. funds 7.5.1 Introduction Once the municipality passes a C.B.C. by-law, development or redevelopment that meets the requirements of the C.B.C. by-law will pay a C.B.C. based on the value of their land. The following sections describe the overall process and discusses the approach to appraisals and use of the special account as set out in the Planning Act. 7.5.2 Overview of Process and Appraisals Figure 7-2 provides an overview of the process for application of the C.B.C. by-law and collection of C.B.C. funds. Once the C.B.C. by-law is in place, as development or redevelopment that meets the eligibility criteria proceeds (i.e., prior to issuance of a building permit), the municipality collects C.B.C.s based on the per unit charge as set out in the by-law and C.B.C. strategy. If the landowner is of the view that the amount of the C.B.C. exceeds the prescribed value of 4% of their land value on the day before building permit issuance, the landowner may pay the charge under protest. In this circumstance there is an obligation of the landowner to provide an appraisal. If the municipality disputes the value of the land identified in the landowner’s appraisal, the municipality must also provide the owner with an appraisal within the prescribed time period. - 198 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx If the City agrees with the landowner’s appraised value, then the owner pays their C.B.C.s based on 4% of the land value to the City and the funds will then be deposited into the special account. If the City does not agree with the appraisal provided by the owner, the City has 45 days to provide the owner of the land with their own appraisal value. Then: • If no appraisal is provided to the owner within 45 days, the owner’s appraisal is deemed accurate and the difference in the amounts shall be refunded to the owner. • If the municipality’s appraisal is within 5% of the landowner’s appraisal, the landowner’s appraisal is deemed accurate, and the municipality shall refund the difference in the amounts to the owner. • If the appraisal is more than 5% higher than the landowner’s appraisal, the municipality shall request an appraisal be undertaken by an appraiser, selected by the landowner, from the list of approved appraisers provided by the municipality. This must be undertaken within 60 days. This final appraisal is deemed accurate for the purposes of calculating the applicable C.B.C. • In regard to the last bullet, subsection 37 (42) and 37 (43) require the municipality to maintain a list of at least three persons who are not employees of the municipality or members of Council and have an agreement with the municipality to perform appraisals for the above. This list is to be maintained until the C.B.C. by-law is repealed or the day on which there is no longer any refund that could be required (whichever is later). 7.5.3 Special Reserve Fund Account All funds collected under the C.B.C. by-law are to be deposited into a special account. Subsections 37 (45) to 37 (48) of the Planning Act outline the rules with respect to the special reserve fund account. As noted in subsection 6.2.7, these rules are as follows: • All money received under a C.B.C. by-law shall be paid into a special account; • The money in the special account may be invested in securities (as permitted under the Municipal Act) and the interest earnings shall be paid into the special account; • In each year, a municipality shall spend or allocate at least 60 percent of the monies that are in the special account at the beginning of the year; and - 199 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-7 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx •The municipality shall provide reports and information as set out in section 7 of O.Reg. 509/20 •In regard to the third bullet, it is suggested that the annual capital budget for the City directly list the works which are being undertaken and/or to which monies from this fund are being allocated toward. As per this C.B.C. strategy, the growth-related services (as outlined in Chapter 4), form the anticipated capital needs required to service growth over the 17-year forecast period. Other services, however, may be considered by Council in the future and are subject to approval by resolution and inclusion in the annual budget process. Furthermore, any additional services approved and funded from C.B.C. revenue in the future will be reported on through an annual C.B.C. reserve fund statement, which will form part of the City’s overall year-end statements. During the annual budget process, the use of C.B.C. funding will be reviewed, and the capital costs associated with each eligible service and capital project will be confirmed and identified for approval of Council. - 200 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-8 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Figure 7-2 City of Pickering Community Benefits Charge Application and Calculation Process Building Permit Issuance Collect C.B.C.s Payment Under Protest. If the land owner disputes the C.B.C.s exceed the 4% of land value, the land owner is to provide the municipality with an appraisal within 30 days. No Refund Required Appraisal Provided? No Yes Yes Municipal Consideration of Appraisal Agree Municipality to Undertake Appraisal Within 45 Days Disagree Land Owner and Municipal Appraisals Within 5%? Yes No The land owner shall select a person from a list of appraisers to perform a final appraisal within 60 days, third appraisal (binding). Determination of the Community Benefits Charge (C.B.C.) Deposit Funds into Special Account No Notify the Land Owner The municipality shall immediately refund the difference in C.B.C.s as a result of appraisal, if any. - 201 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-9 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx 7.6 Transitional Matters 7.6.1 Existing Reserves and Reserve Funds The Planning Act, subsection 37 (49) to subsection 37 (51) provides transitional provisions for: 1.A special account established under the previous section 37 rules; and 2.A D.C. reserve fund for which services are no longer eligible. With respect to item 1, funds collected under previous s.37 agreements have been spent or are committed against the needs they were collected for and there are no further financial obligations. With respect to item 2, the service areas for which the City’s existing D.C. reserve funds apply continue to be eligible for inclusion within a D.C. by-law. 7.6.2 Credits under Section 38 of the Development Charges Act The Planning Act (subsection 37 (52)) provides that, if a municipality passes a C.B.C. by-law before September 18, 2022, any credits held for services that are no longer D.C. eligible, may be used against payment of a C.B.C. by the landowner. The City does not currently hold credits related to the services which are no longer D.C. eligible, therefore, there are no adjustment against future payments of a C.B.C. to apply. 7.6.3 Continued Application of Previous Section 37 Rules Subsection 37.1 of the Planning Act provides for transitional matters regarding previous section 37 rules. Any charges that are currently in place under the previous rules, may remain in place until the municipality passes a C.B.C. by-law or September 18, 2022, whichever comes first. - 202 - Appendices - 203 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Appendix A Background Information on Residential and Non- Residential Growth Forecast - 204 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Schedule 1 City of Pickering Residential Growth Forecast Summary Population Institutional Population Population Excluding Institutional Population Singles & Semi- Detached Multiple Dwellings2 Apartments3 Other Total Households 91,160 87,838 573 87,265 20,255 4,850 3,085 25 28,215 3.113 92,080 88,721 806 87,915 20,744 5,381 3,190 15 29,330 3.025 95,240 91,771 776 90,995 21,130 6,060 3,695 30 30,915 2.968 102,940 99,186 839 98,347 22,425 6,805 4,165 30 33,425 2.967 107,100 103,191 876 102,315 22,774 7,622 4,559 30 34,985 2.950 189,200 182,297 1,314 180,983 31,908 18,001 14,733 30 64,672 2.819 920 883 233 650 489 531 105 -10 1,115 3,160 3,050 -30 3,080 386 679 505 15 1,585 7,700 7,415 63 7,352 1,295 745 470 0 2,510 4,160 4,005 37 3,968 349 817 394 0 1,560 82,100 79,106 438 78,668 9,134 10,379 10,174 0 29,687 ¹ Census undercount estimated at approximately 3.8%. Note: Population including the undercount has been rounded. ² Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. ³ Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 Mid 2006 Mid 2011 Mid 2016 Mid 2022 Mid 2021 - Mid 2022 Hi s t o r i c a l Mid 2039Fo r e c a s t In c r e m e n t a l Mid 2021 Mid 2016 - Mid 2021 Population (Including Census Undercount)¹ Year Excluding Census Undercount Housing Units Person Per Unit (P.P.U.): Total Population/ Total Households Source: Derived from Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022), by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Mid 2022 - Mid 2039 Note: The 2031 Official Plan population target of 225,670, less the growth allocation for Northeast Pickering of approximately 36,500 persons, results in an Official Plan population target of 189,200 by Mid 2039 - 205 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Figure A-1 City of Pickering Annual Housing Forecast[1] Source: Building permit data from 2011 to 2013 and 2021 from Statistics Canada. Building permits between 2014 and 2020 from the City of Pickering. Figure by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. 1 Growth forecast represents calendar year. 283 425 303 379 346 540 1,262 510 573 1,560 1,925 1,925 1,925 1,925 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,805 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,660 1,554 1,554 1,554 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Ho u s i n g U n i t s Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average - 206 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Schedule 2 City of Pickering Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Residential Development for Which Community Benefits Charges Can Be Imposed Seaton 2022 - 2039 6,229 7,163 974 3,897 4,871 23,134 50,458 -12 50,446 0 50,446 Rest of Pickering 2022 - 2039 2,905 3,216 1,056 4,247 5,303 16,727 28,557 -335 28,222 438 28,660 2022 - 2039 9,134 10,379 2,030 8,144 10,174 29,687 79,015 -347 78,668 438 79,106 1 Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes accessory apartments, bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Development Timing Single & Semi- Detached Multiples1 Total Location Residential Units In New Units Population Change Gross Population Existing Unit Net Population Increase, Excluding Institutional Institutional Population Net Population Including Institutional Source: Derived from Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022), by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. City of Pickering Apartments2 Units in C.B.C. Ineligble Buildings Units in C.B.C. Eligble Buildings Total Apartment Buildings - 207 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Schedule 3 City of Pickering Current Year Growth Forecast Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 Mid 2021 Population 99,186 Occupants of Units (2)1,560 New Housing Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)2.710 Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 gross population increase 4,227 4,227 Occupants of New Units 33 Equivalent Institutional Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)1.100 Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 gross population increase 36 36 Decline in Housing Units (4)33,425 Unit Occupancy,multiplied by P.P.U. decline rate (5)-0.008 Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 total decline in population -258 -258 Population Estimate to Mid 2022 103,191 Net Population Increase, Mid 2021 to Mid 2022 4,005 (1)2016 and 2021 population based on Statistics Canada Census unadjusted for Census undercount. (2) (3)Average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) is assumed to be: Singles & Semi Detached 3.904 22%0.873 Multiples (6)2.882 52%1.509 Apartments (7)1.294 25%0.327 Total 100%2.710 ¹ Based on 2016 Census custom database ² Based on Building permit/completion activity (4)2016 and 2021 households taken from Statistics Canada Census. (5)Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6)Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7)Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note:Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Estimated residential units constructed, Mid-2021 to the beginning of the growth period assuming a six-month lag between construction and occupancy. Population Structural Type Persons Per Unit¹ (P.P.U.) % Distribution of Estimated Units² Weighted Persons Per Unit Average - 208 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Schedule 4 City of Pickering Growth Forecast Mid 2022 to Mid 2039 Mid 2022 Population 103,191 Occupants of Units (2)29,687 New Housing Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)2.662 Mid 2022 to Mid 2039 gross population increase 79,014 79,014 Occupants of New Units 399 Equivalent Institutional Units,multiplied by P.P.U. (3)1.100 Mid 2022 to Mid 2039 gross population increase 439 439 Decline in Housing Units (4)34,985 Unit Occupancy,multiplied by P.P.U. decline rate (5)-0.010 Mid 2022 to Mid 2039 total decline in population -347 -347 Population Estimate to Mid 2039 182,297 Net Population Increase, Mid 2022 to Mid 2039 79,106 (1)Mid 2022 Population based on: (2)Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3)Average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) is assumed to be: Singles & Semi Detached 3.561 31%1.096 Multiples (6)2.743 35%0.959 Apartments (7)1.771 34%0.607 one bedroom or less 1.271 two bedrooms or more 2.071 Total 100%2.662 ¹ Persons per unit based on Statistics Canada Custom 2016 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4)Mid 2022 households based upon 30,915 (2016 Census) + 1,560 (Mid 2016 to Mid 2022 unit estimate) = 34,985 (5)Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6)Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7)Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note:Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Weighted Persons Per Unit AverageStructural Type Persons Per Unit¹ (P.P.U.) % Distribution of Estimated Units² 2016 Population (91,771) + Mid 2016 to Mid 2022 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (1,560 x = 4,086) + (30,915 x 0.2372 = 7,334) = 103,191 Population - 209 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-7 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Schedule 5 City of Pickering Historical Residential Building Permits Years 2012 to 2021 Residential Building Permits Total 2012 237 46 0 283 2013 148 274 3 425 2014 180 98 25 303 2015 162 24 193 379 2016 286 54 19 359 Sub-total 1,013 496 240 1,749 Average (2012 - 2016)203 99 48 350 % Breakdown 57.9%28.4%13.7%100.0% 2017 202 114 30 346 2018 138 373 29 540 2019 278 727 257 1,262 2020 167 297 46 510 2021 130 51 392 573 Sub-total 915 1,562 754 3,231 Average (2017 - 2021)183 312 151 646 % Breakdown 28.3%48.3%23.3%100.0% 2012 - 2021 Total 1,928 2,058 994 4,980 Average 193 206 99 498 % Breakdown 38.7%41.3%20.0%100.0% 1 Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Singles & Semi Detached Multiples 1 Apartments 2 Year Source: Building permit data from 2011 to 2013 and 2021 from Statistics Canada. Building permits between 2014 and 2020 from the City of Pickering. Figure by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. - 210 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-8 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Schedule 6 City of Pickering Person Per Unit by Age and Type of Dwelling (2021 Census) Age of Singles and Semi-Detached Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 25 Year Average Adjusted 1-5 - - - 3.834 5.269 3.904 6-10 - - - 3.453 4.957 3.739 0.143 11-15 - - - 3.431 4.552 3.513 3.561 16-20 - - 1.933 3.337 4.154 3.399 3.561 20-25 - - - 3.272 4.574 3.484 3.561 25-35 - - 2.438 3.073 4.173 3.211 35+-1.500 1.942 2.795 4.066 2.835 3.561 Total -1.556 2.114 3.086 4.303 3.188 Age of Multiples1 Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 25 Year Average Adjusted 1-5 - - 1.750 2.968 - 2.882 6-10 - - 1.500 2.952 - 2.667 (0.166) 11-15 - - 1.706 2.654 - 2.566 2.743 16-20 - - 1.944 2.703 - 2.565 2.743 20-25 - - 1.647 3.026 - 2.832 2.743 25-35 -0.929 2.267 3.020 3.914 2.995 35+-1.211 2.000 2.666 3.966 2.605 2.743 Total -1.200 1.869 2.810 3.912 2.719 Age of Apartments2 Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 25 Year Average Adjusted 1-5 -1.135 1.519 - - 1.294 6-10 -1.083 1.571 2.933 - 2.116 0.065 11-15 -1.286 1.435 3.667 - 1.893 1.771 16-20 -1.250 1.660 3.000 - 1.901 1.771 20-25 -1.179 1.697 2.310 - 1.714 1.771 25-35 -1.275 1.679 2.627 - 1.908 35+-1.226 1.786 2.602 - 2.179 1.771 Total -1.212 1.655 2.636 3.706 1.899 Age of All Density Types Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 1-5 -1.211 1.659 3.469 4.967 3.138 6-10 -1.154 1.824 3.175 5.160 3.088 11-15 -1.273 1.702 3.198 4.303 2.983 16-20 -1.316 1.788 3.200 4.188 3.005 20-25 -1.234 1.884 3.175 4.610 3.034 25-35 -1.259 1.932 3.053 4.093 3.072 35+-1.261 1.989 2.744 3.989 2.729 Total 1.400 1.253 1.876 3.005 4.230 2.944 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 3 Adjusted based on 2001-2016 historical trends. Note: Does not include Statistics Canada data classified as 'Other' P.P.U. Not calculated for samples less than or equal to 50 dwelling units, and does not include institutional population. 1 Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. - 211 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-9 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Schedule 7 City of Pickering Employment Forecast, Mid-2022 to Mid-2039 Mid 2006 87,838 0.001 0.034 0.145 0.136 0.048 0.365 0.084 0.450 75 3,015 12,743 11,988 4,245 32,065 7,421 39,486 Mid 2011 88,721 0.001 0.034 0.134 0.144 0.056 0.368 0.074 0.443 75 2,995 11,903 12,763 4,940 32,675 6,592 39,267 Mid 2016 91,771 0.002 0.035 0.129 0.138 0.053 0.357 0.051 0.408 140 3,225 11,843 12,668 4,885 32,760 4,694 37,454 Mid 2022 103,191 0.001 0.035 0.122 0.133 0.051 0.343 0.047 0.390 140 3,604 12,619 13,757 5,254 35,373 4,884 40,257 Mid 2039 182,297 0.001 0.032 0.123 0.129 0.051 0.336 0.052 0.388 140 5,860 22,399 23,576 9,335 61,309 9,394 70,703 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 883 0.000 -0.001 -0.011 0.007 0.007 0.003 -0.010 -0.007 0 -20 -840 775 695 610 -829 -219 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 3,050 0.0007 0.0014 -0.0051 -0.0058 -0.0024 -0.0113 -0.0232 -0.0345 65 230 -60 -95 -55 85 -1,898 -1,813 Mid 2016 - Mid 2022 11,420 -0.0002 -0.0002 -0.0068 -0.0047 -0.0023 -0.0142 -0.0038 -0.0180 0 379 776 1,089 369 2,613 190 2,803 Mid 2022 - Mid 2039 79,106 -0.0006 -0.0028 0.0006 -0.0040 0.0003 -0.0065 0.0042 -0.0023 0 2,256 9,780 9,819 4,081 25,936 4,510 30,446 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 177 0.00000 -0.00011 -0.00218 0.00148 0.00147 0.00065 -0.00204 -0.00139 0 -4 -168 155 139 122 -166 -44 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 610 0.0001 0.0003 -0.0010 -0.0012 -0.0005 -0.0023 -0.0046 -0.0069 13 46 -12 -19 -11 17 -380 -363 Mid 2016 - Mid 2022 1,903 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0011 -0.0008 -0.0004 -0.0024 -0.0006 -0.0030 0 63 129 182 62 436 32 467 Mid 2022 - Mid 2039 4,653 -0.00003 -0.00016 0.00003 -0.00023 0.00002 -0.00038 0.00025 -0.00013 0 133 575 578 240 1,526 265 1,791 Source: Derived from Durham Region Growth Management Strategy (ongoing) and the Region of Durham Regional Transit Development Charge Background Study (2022), by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Note: The 2031 Official Plan employment target of 71,800 is forecast to be achieved after 2039. An additional 4,900 jobs would be assumed for Northeast Pickering, in accordance with the Official Plan. ¹ Statistics Canada defines no fixed place of work (N.F.P.O.W.) employees as "persons who do not go from home to the same work place location at the beginning of each shift". Such persons include building and landscape contractors, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc. N.F.P.O.W.1 Activity Rate Period Population Primary Work at Home Industrial Commercial/ Population Related Institutional Total Employment Primary Total Total Employment (Including N.F.P.O.W.) Institutional Incremental Change Annual Average Total Including NFPOW N.F.P.O.W.1Work at Home Industrial Commercial/ Population Related - 212 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-1 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\Pickering 2022 CBC Strategy - Updated - June 23.docx Appendix B Proposed C.B.C. By-law - 213 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-2 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\CBC By-law - Draft-Updated.docx The City of Pickering By-law Number ____/22 A By-Law to Establish Community Benefits Charges for the City of Pickering and herby establish the Community Benefits Charges Reserve Fund WHEREAS The City of Pickering (the “City”) will experience growth through development and re-development; AND WHEREAS Council desires to impose Community Benefits Charges against land to pay for the capital costs of facilities, services and matters required because of development or redevelopment in the area to which the by-law applies; AND WHEREAS the Planning Act, 1990 (the “Act”) provides that the council of a municipality may by by-law impose Community Benefits Charges against higher density residential development or redevelopment; AND WHEREAS a Community Benefits Charge strategy report, dated May 20, 2022 and updated on June 23, 2022, has been completed which identifies the facilities, services and matters that will be funded with Community Benefits Charges and complies with the prescribed requirements; AND WHEREAS the City has consulted with the public and such persons and public bodies as the City considers appropriate; AND WHEREAS on July 11, 2022, Council for the City of Pickering approved Report No. FIN-2022-XXXX, dated June XX, 2022, in which certain recommendations were made relating to the Community Benefits Strategy and By-law. The Council of the City enacts as follows: 1.INTERPRETATION 1.1 In this By-law, the following items shall have the corresponding meanings: “Act” means the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.13; “Apartment” means a dwelling unit in an apartment building; "Apartment Building" means a residential building or the residential portion of a mixed-use building consisting of more than 3 dwelling units, which dwelling units have a common entrance to grade, but does not include a triplex, duplex, or townhouse. Notwithstanding the forgoing an Apartment Building includes a Stacked Townhouse; - 214 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-3 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\CBC By-law - Draft-Updated.docx “Bedroom” means any room used, or designed or intended for use, as sleeping quarters “Building” means any structure or building as defined in the Ontario Building Code (O Reg 332/12 under the Building Code Act, but does not include a vehicle; “Building Code Act” means the Building Code Act, 1992, SO 1992, c 23 as amended; “Capital Costs” means growth-related costs incurred or proposed to be incurred by the City or a Local Board thereof directly or by others on behalf of, and as authorized by, the City or Local Board, (a)to acquire land or an interest in land, including a leasehold interest, (b)to improve land, (c)to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures, (d)to acquire, construct or improve facilities including, (i)furniture and equipment, and; (ii)rolling stock; (e)to undertake studies in connection with any of the matters referred to in clauses (a) to (d) above, including the Community Benefits Charge strategy study, required for the provision of Services designated in this By-law within or outside the City, including interest on borrowing for those expenditures under clauses (a) to (e) above; “City” means The City of Pickering or the geographic area of the municipality, as the context requires; “Community Benefits Charge” means a charge imposed pursuant to this By-law; “Council” means the Council of the City of Pickering; “Development” means the construction, erection, or placing of one or more Buildings or structures on land or the making of an addition or alteration to a building or structure that has the effect of increasing the size or usability thereof or any development requiring any of the actions described in subsection 2.4 (a), and includes Redevelopment; "Dwelling Unit" means a room or suite of rooms used, or designed or intended for use by one person or persons living together, in which culinary and sanitary facilities are provided for the exclusive use of such person or persons; - 215 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-4 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\CBC By-law - Draft-Updated.docx “Grade” means the average level of proposed or finished ground adjoining a building at all exterior walls; “Land” (or “Lot”) means, for the purposes of this By-law, the lesser of the area defined as: (a)The whole of a parcel of property associated with the Development or Redevelopment and any abutting properties in which a person holds the fee or equity of redemption in, power or right to grant, assign or exercise a power of appointment in respect of, or; (b)The whole of a lot or a block on a registered plan of subdivision or a unit within a vacant land condominium that is associated with the Development or Redevelopment; But not including any hazard lands, natural heritage features, or ecological buffers identified in the City’s Official Plan, an approved Secondary Plan, or through an environmental impact study accepted by the City. “Owner” means the owner of Land or a person who has made application for an approval for the Development of land for which a Community Benefits Charge may be imposed; “Prescribed” means prescribed in the regulations made under the Act; “Redevelopment” means the construction, erection or placing of one or more Buildings on Land where all or part of a Building on such Land has previously been demolished, or changing the use of a Building from a Non-Residential Use to a Residential Use, or changing a Building from one form of Residential Use to another form of Residential Use and including any development or redevelopment requiring any of the actions described in subsection 2.4 (a); “Residential Unit” means a room or suite of rooms used, or designed or intended for use by one person or persons living together, in which culinary and sanitary facilities are provided for the exclusive use of such person or persons; “Residential Use” means lands, buildings or structures used, or designed or intended for use as a home or residence of one or more individuals, and shall include, but is not limited to, a single detached dwelling, a semi detached dwelling, a townhouse, a plex, a stacked townhouse, an apartment building, a mobile home, a retirement residence and a residential dwelling unit accessory to a non-residential use; “Service” means a service designated in subsection 1.3, and “Services” shall have a corresponding meaning; “Stacked Townhouse” means a building, other than a duplex, triplex, townhouse, or apartment building, containing at least 3 dwelling units, each dwelling unit - 216 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-5 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\CBC By-law - Draft-Updated.docx separated vertically and/or horizontally and each dwelling unit having a separate entrance to grade; “Storey” means the portion of a building, excluding roof top enclosure space used for no other purpose than roof top access, and/or elevators and other building service equipment, that is: (a)that is situated between the top of any floor and the top of the floor next above it, or (b)that is situated between the top of the floor and the ceiling above the floor, if there is no floor above it. “Valuation date” means, with respect to land that is the subject of development or redevelopment, (a)the day before the day the building permit is issued in respect of the development or redevelopment, or (b)if more than one building permit is required for the development or redevelopment, the day before the day the first permit is issued. “Zoning By-Law” means any by-laws enacted by the City under section 34 of the Planning Act. 1.2 The reference to any applicable statute, regulation, by-law, or to the Official Plan in this Community Benefits Charge By-law shall be deemed to refer to the statute, regulation, by-law, and/or Official Plan as they may be amended from time to time and shall be applied as they read on the date on which Community Benefits Charges are due to the City. DESIGNATION OF SERVICES 1.3 A Community Benefits Charge may be imposed in respect of the following: (a)Land for park or other public recreational purposes in excess of lands dedicated or cash-in-lieu payments made under section 42 or subsection 51.1 of the Planning Act. (b)Services not provided under subsection 2 (4) of the Development Charges Act. (c)As per the May 20, 2022, Community Benefits Charges Strategy, the City intends to recover Capital Costs relating to the following services through this by-law:: (i)Arts, Culture, and Museum (ii)Animal Adoptions; and (iii)Administration - 217 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-6 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\CBC By-law - Draft-Updated.docx 2.PAYMENT OF COMMUNITY BENEFITS 2.1 Community Benefits Charges shall be payable by the Owner of Land proposed for Development in the amounts set out in this By-law where: (a)the Land proposed for Development is located in the area described in subsection 3.2; and (b)the proposed Development requires any of the approvals set out in subsection 2.4 (a). Area to Which By-law Applies 2.2 Subject to subsection 2.3, this By-law applies to all lands in the City. 2.3 This By-law shall not apply to lands that are owned by and used for the purposes of: (a)The City or a Local Board thereof; (b)a Board of Education; (c)The Region of Durham, or a Local Board thereof. Approvals for Development 2.4 (a)A Community Benefits Charge shall be imposed only with respect to Development that requires one or more of the following approvals: (i)the passing of a Zoning By-Law or of an amendment to a Zoning By-Law under section 34 of the Planning Act; (ii)the approval of a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act; (iii)a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50 (7) of the Planning Act applies; (iv)the approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act; (v)a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act; (vi)the approval of a description under section 9 of the Condominium Act, 1998, SO 1998, c 19, as amended, or any successor thereof; or (vii)the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 in relation to a building or structure. (b)Despite subsection 2.4 (a) above, a Community Benefits Charge shall not be imposed with respect to: - 218 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-7 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\CBC By-law - Draft-Updated.docx (i)Development of a proposed building or structure with fewer than five storeys at or above ground; (ii)Development of a proposed building or structure with fewer than 10 residential units; (iii)Redevelopment of an existing building or structure that will have fewer than five storeys at or above ground after the redevelopment; (iv)Redevelopment that proposes to add fewer than 10 residential units to an existing building or structure; or (v)such types of Development or Redevelopment as are prescribed. (c)For the purposes of this section, the first Storey at or above ground is the Storey that has its floor closest to Grade and its ceiling more than 1.8m above Grade. Exemptions 2.5 Notwithstanding the provisions of this By-law, Community Benefits Charges shall not be imposed with respect to: (a)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a long-term care home within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Long-Term Care Homes Act, 2007 (b)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a retirement home within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Retirement Homes Act, 2010; (c)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use by any of the following post-secondary institutions for the objects of the institution: (i)a university in Ontario that receives direct, regular and ongoing operating funding from the Government of Ontario; (ii)a college or university federated or affiliated with a university described in subparagraph (i); (iii)an Indigenous Institute prescribed for the purposes of section 6 of the Indigenous Institutes Act, 2017. (d)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a memorial home, clubhouse or athletic grounds by an Ontario branch of the Royal Canadian Legion.; (e)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a hospice to provide end-of-life care; - 219 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-8 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\CBC By-law - Draft-Updated.docx (f)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as residential premises by any of the following entities: (i)a corporation to which the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary object is to provide housing; (ii)a corporation without share capital to which the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary object is to provide housing; (iii)a non-profit housing co-operative that is in good standing under the Co-operative Corporations Act. Amount of Charge 2.6 The amount of a Community Benefits Charge payable in any particular case shall be determined based on the charges set out in Schedule “A” to this by-law. In-Kind Contributions 2.7 The City may, at its discretion, allow an Owner of Land to provide to the City facilities, services or matters required because of Development or Redevelopment in the area to which the By-law applies in lieu, or partially in lieu of a Community Benefits Charge that would otherwise be payable. 2.8 For in-kind contributions pursuant to the preceding subsection to be considered, an application for consideration of in-kind contributions must be submitted to the City with supporting documentation as to the suggested value thereof no less than 180 days prior to the first building permit being granted for the proposed Development or Redevelopment. 2.9 In-kind contributions pursuant to subsection 2.7 shall only be accepted as if the same are approved by resolution of Council. The determination of Council as to whether in-kind contributions shall be accepted in full or partial satisfaction of Community Benefits Charges shall be final and binding. 2.10 The value attributed to an in-kind contribution under subsection 2.7 shall be as determined by Council, based on one or more third-party valuations to the satisfaction of Council. Council’s determination of the value to be attributed to any in-kind contribution shall be final and binding. Time of Payment of Community Benefits Charges 2.11 Community Benefits Charges imposed under this By-law shall be payable prior to the issuance of any building permit for the proposed Development or Redevelopment. - 220 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-9 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\CBC By-law - Draft-Updated.docx 2.12 Notwithstanding subsection 2.11, Community Benefit Charges shall not apply to building permit applications received prior to July 1, 2022, provided: (a)the permit application is complete in terms of the applicant's submission requirements set out in the building code and the City's Building By-law; (b)applicable law approvals prescribed in the building code have been obtained or applied for; and (c)the building permit or a conditional building permit is issued for all or part of the building by August 15, 2022. Interest on Refunds 2.13 If it is determined that a refund is required, the City shall pay interest on a refund in accordance with subsections 37 (28) and 37 (29) of the Act at a rate not less than the prescribed minimum interest rate, from the day the amount was paid to the municipality to the day it is refunded. Indexing 2.14 The Community Benefits Charges referred to in Section 2.6 shall be adjusted annually, without amendment to this By-law, as of July 1 each year. (a)The rates in Schedule “A” shall be adjusted annually in accordance with the change in the index for the most recently available annual period ending March 31 for the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index for Toronto. (b)The indexed Community Benefits Charges effective July 1 each year shall not apply to building permit applications received prior to the July 1 effective date, provided: (i)the permit application is complete in terms of the applicant's submission requirements set out in the building code and the City's Building By-law; (ii)applicable law approvals prescribed in the building code have been obtained or applied for; and (iii)the building permit or a conditional building permit is issued for all or part of the building by the date set out in the Region of Durham’s annual report on the indexing of Development Charges. 3.SEVERABILITY 3.1 If, for any reason, any provision of this By-law is held to be invalid, it is hereby declared to be the intention of Council that all the remainder of this By-law shall continue in full force and effect until repealed, re-enacted, amended or modified. - 221 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-10 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\CBC By-law - Draft-Updated.docx DATE BY-LAW IN FORCE 3.2 This By-law shall come into effect at 12:01 A.M. on July 12, 2022. Passed this 11th day of July 2022. MAYOR CITY CLERK - 222 - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-11 H:\Pickering\2022 DC and CBC\Report\CBC By-law - Draft-Updated.docx Schedule “A” Schedule of Community Benefits Charges Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom C.B.C. by Dwelling Unit Type 1,070 657 Description Residential - 223 - Attachment #6A to Report FIN 12-22 June 24, 2021 City Development Department City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, ON, L1V 6K7 Attn: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO RE: Proposed Community Benefits Charge Strategy and By-law – Universal City F-4920-016 and L-2000-011 City of Pickering We are the planning agents representing Unique AT Holding Corporation, Universal City One Developments Inc., Universal City Two Developments Inc., Universal City Three Developments Inc., Universal City Six Developments Inc., and Universal City Seven Developments Inc. (collectively “Chestnut Hill Developments”) the registered owner of the lands municipally identified as 1480 Bayly Street (UC1), 1435 Celebration Drive (UC2), 1455 Celebration Drive (UC3), 1470 Bayly Street (UC4-UC5), 1010 Sandy Beach Road (UC6), and Part Lot 21, Concession 1 (UC7), (collectively “Universal City”) in the City of Pickering. We have reviewed the proposed Community Benefits Charge Strategy and the proposed Community Benefits Charge By-law (the “CBC”), as well as Council Report PLN 32-22 presented at the Special Meeting of Council held on June 20, 2022 with respect to this matter and have concerns with the lack of transition policies that should be applicable to existing, well advanced development applications that have secured various development approvals and have undergone a lengthy review and approvals process. The opportunity for municipalities to enact and apply a CBC was granted through Bill 197 as referenced in the CBC Strategy and staff report; however, the precursor and concept for a CBC was originally conceived of in Bill 108, the More Homes, More Choices Act (2019). One of the primary purposes of this legislation was to enact amendments to the Planning Act that would ensure stability and certainty for the development industry in the calculation and application of development levies for cost forecasting purposes, among addressing other provincial priorities. Although we do not oppose the general intent and purpose of the CBC, nor a municipality’s right to utilize such revenue tools as may be available to them, we do have concerns that the current draft of the CBC lacks appropriate transition regulations. We would be happy to engage in further discussions with City staff regarding the implementation of the CBC. We request to be notified of all future meetings, reports and decisions regarding this matter, and reserve the right to provide further comments as it relates to the CBC. - 224 - 2 Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at extension 252 or Ryan Guetter at extension 241 if you require any additional information. Yours truly, Weston Consulting Per: Michael A. Vani, BURPI, MCIP, RPP Associate c.Chestnut Hill Developments Friedman Law Professional Corporation - 225 - Attachment #6B to Report FIN 12-22 - 226 - - 227 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7954/22 Being a By-law to Establish Community Benefits Charges for the City of Pickering and hereby establish the Community Benefits Charges Reserve Fund. Whereas the City of Pickering (the “City”) will experience growth through development and re-development; and Whereas Council desires to impose Community Benefits Charges against land to pay for the capital costs of facilities, services and matters required because of development or redevelopment in the area to which the by-law applies; and Whereas the Planning Act, 1990 (the “Act”) provides that the council of a municipality may by by-law impose Community Benefits Charges against higher density residential development or redevelopment; and Whereas a Community Benefits Charge Strategy report, dated May 20, 2022, and updated June 23, 2022, has been completed which identifies the facilities, services and matters that will be funded with Community Benefits Charges and complies with the prescribed requirements; and Where as the City has consulted with the public and such persons and public bodies as the City considers appropriate; and Whereas on July 11, 2022, Council for the City of Pickering approved Report FIN 12-22, dated July 11, 2022, in which certain recommendations were made relating to the Community Benefits Strategy and By-law; and Whereas the Municipal Act, SO, 2001, as amended, section 417 (1), the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering may establish and maintain a reserve fund for any purpose for which it has authority to expend funds; Now therefore the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1.Interpretation In this By-law, the following items shall have the corresponding meanings: “Act” means the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter P.13; “Apartment” means a dwelling unit in an apartment building; Attachment #7 to Report FIN 12-22 - 228 - By-law No. 7954/22 Page 2 “Apartment Building” means a residential building or the residential portion of a mixed-use building consisting of more than 3 dwelling units, which dwelling units have a common entrance to grade, but does not include a triplex, semi-detached duplex, semi-detached triplex, and townhouse. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for the purpose of applying the Community Benefits Charges, an Apartment Building includes a Stacked Townhouse; “Bedroom” means any room used, or designed or intended for use, as sleeping quarters; “Building” means any structure or building as defined in the Ontario Building Code (O Reg. 332/12 under the Building Code Act, but does not include a vehicle; “Building Code Act” means the Building Code Act, 1992, SO 1992, c 23 as amended; “Capital Costs” means growth-related costs incurred or proposed to be incurred by the City or a Local Board thereof directly or by others on behalf of, and as authorized by, the City or Local Board: (a)to acquire land or an interest in land, including a leasehold interest; (b)to improve land; (c)to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures; (d)to acquire, construct or improve facilities including; (i)furniture and equipment; and (ii)rolling stock; (e)to undertake studies in connection with any of the matters referred to in clauses (a) to (d) above, including the Community Benefits Charge strategy study; required for the provision of Services designated in this By-law within or outside the City, including interest on borrowing for those expenditures under clauses (a) to (e) above; “City” means The City of Pickering or the geographic area of the municipality, as the context requires; “Community Benefits Charge” means a charge imposed pursuant to this By-law; “Council” means the Council of the City of Pickering; “Development” means the construction, erection, or placing of one or more Buildings or structures on land or the making of an addition or alteration to a building or structure that has the effect of increasing the size or usability thereof or any development requiring any of the actions described in subsection 2.4 (a), and includes Redevelopment; - 229 - By-law No. 7954/22 Page 3 "Dwelling Unit" means a room or suite of rooms used, or designed or intended for use by one person or persons living together, in which culinary and sanitary facilities are provided for the exclusive use of such person or persons; “Grade” means the average level of proposed or finished ground adjoining a building at all exterior walls; “Land” (or “Lot”) means, for the purposes of this By-law, the lesser of the area defined as: (a)The whole of a parcel of property associated with the Development or Redevelopment and any abutting properties in which a person holds the fee or equity of redemption in, power or right to grant, assign or exercise a power of appointment in respect of; or (b)The whole of a lot or a block on a registered plan of subdivision or a unit within a vacant land condominium that is associated with the Development or Redevelopment; but not including any hazard lands, natural heritage features, or ecological buffers identified in the City’s Official Plan, an approved Secondary Plan, or through an environmental impact study accepted by the City; “Owner” means the owner of Land or a person who has made application for an approval for the Development of land for which a Community Benefits Charge may be imposed; “Prescribed” means prescribed in the regulations made under the Act; “Redevelopment” means the construction, erection or placing of one or more Buildings on Land where all or part of a Building on such Land has previously been demolished, or changing the use of a Building from a Non-Residential Use to a Residential Use, or changing a Building from one form of Residential Use to another form of Residential Use and including any Development or Redevelopment requiring any of the actions described in subsection 2.4 (a); “Residential Unit” means a room or suite of rooms used, or designed or intended for use by one person or persons living together, in which culinary and sanitary facilities are provided for the exclusive use of such person or persons; “Residential Use” means lands, buildings or structures used, or designed or intended for use as a home or residence of one or more individuals, and shall include, but is not limited to, a single detached dwelling, a semi-detached dwelling, a townhouse, a plex, a stacked townhouse, an apartment building, a mobile home, a retirement residence and a residential dwelling unit accessory to a non-residential use; “Service” means a service designated in subsection 1.3, and “Services” shall have a corresponding meaning; - 230 - By-law No. 7954/22 Page 4 “Stacked Townhouse” means a building, other than a duplex, triplex, townhouse, or apartment building, containing at least 3 dwelling units, each dwelling unit separated vertically and/or horizontally and each dwelling unit having a separate entrance to grade; “Storey” means the portion of a building, excluding roof top enclosure space used for no other purpose than roof top access, and/or elevators and other building service equipment: (a)that is situated between the top of any floor and the top of the floor next above it, or (b)that is situated between the top of the floor and the ceiling above the floor, if there is no floor above it; “Valuation date” means, with respect to land that is the subject of Development or Redevelopment; (a)the day before the day the building permit is issued in respect of the Development or Redevelopment, or (b)if more than one building permit is required for the Development or Redevelopment, the day before the day the first permit is issued; “Zoning By-Law” means any by-law enacted by the City under section 34 of the Planning Act. 1.2 The reference to any applicable statute, regulation, by-law, or to the Official Plan in this Community Benefits Charge By-law shall be deemed to refer to the statute, regulation, by-law, and/or Official Plan as they may be amended from time to time and shall be applied as they read on the date on which Community Benefits Charges are due to the City. Designation of Services 1.3 A Community Benefits Charge may be imposed in respect of the following: (a)Land for park or other public recreational purposes in excess of lands dedicated or cash-in-lieu payments made under section 42 or subsection 51.1 of the Planning Act; (b)Services not provided under subsection 2 (4) of the Development Charges Act; (c)As per the June 20, 2022, and updated June 23, 2022 Community Benefits Charges Strategy, the City intends to recover Capital Costs relating to the following services through this by-law: (i)Arts, Culture, and Museum; (ii)Animal Adoptions; and (iii)Administration. - 231 - By-law No. 7954/22 Page 5 2.Payment of Community Benefits 2.1 Community Benefits Charges shall be payable by the Owner of Land proposed for Development in the amounts set out in this By-law where: (a)the Land proposed for Development is located in the area described in subsection 3.2; and (b)the proposed Development requires any of the approvals set out in subsection 2.4 (a). Area to Which By-law Applies 2.2 Subject to subsection 2.3, this By-law applies to all lands in the City. 2.3 This By-law shall not apply to lands that are owned by and used for the purposes of: (a)The City or a Local Board thereof; (b)a Board of Education; (c)The Region of Durham, or a Local Board thereof. Approvals for Development 2.4 (a) A Community Benefits Charge shall be imposed only with respect to Development that requires one or more of the following approvals: (i)the passing of a Zoning By-Law or of an amendment to a Zoning By-Law under section 34 of the Planning Act; (ii)the approval of a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act; (iii)a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50 (7) of the Planning Act applies; (iv)the approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act; (v)a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act; (vi)the approval of a description under section 9 of the Condominium Act, 1998, SO 1998, c 19, as amended, or any successor thereof; or (vii)the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 in relation to a building or structure. (b)Despite subsection 2.4 (a) above, a Community Benefits Charge shall not be imposed with respect to: - 232 - By-law No. 7954/22 Page 6 (i)Development of a proposed building or structure with fewer than five storeys at or above ground; (ii)Development of a proposed building or structure with fewer than 10 residential units; (iii)Redevelopment of an existing building or structure that will have fewer than five storeys at or above ground after the redevelopment; (iv)Redevelopment that proposes to add fewer than 10 residential units to an existing building or structure; or (v)such other types of Development or Redevelopment as are prescribed by Regulation. Exemptions 2.5 Notwithstanding the provisions of this By-law, Community Benefits Charges shall not be imposed with respect to: (a)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a long-term care home within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Long-Term Care Homes Act, 2007; (b)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a retirement home within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Retirement Homes Act, 2010; (c)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use by any of the following post-secondary institutions for the objects of the institution: (i)a university in Ontario that receives direct, regular and ongoing operating funding from the Government of Ontario; (ii)a college or university federated or affiliated with a university described in subparagraph (i); (iii)an Indigenous Institute prescribed for the purposes of section 6 of the Indigenous Institutes Act, 2017. (d)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a memorial home, clubhouse or athletic grounds by an Ontario branch of the Royal Canadian Legion; (e)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as a hospice to provide end-of-life care; (f)Development or Redevelopment of a building or structure intended for use as residential premises by any of the following entities: - 233 - By-law No. 7954/22 Page 7 (i)a corporation to which the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary object is to provide housing; (ii)a corporation without share capital to which the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary object is to provide housing; (iii)a non-profit housing co-operative that is in good standing under the Co-operative Corporations Act. Amount of Charge 2.6 The amount of a Community Benefits Charge payable in any particular case shall be determined based on the charges set out in Schedule “A” to this by-law. In-Kind Contributions 2.7 The City may, at its discretion, allow an Owner of Land to provide to the City facilities, services or matters required because of Development or Redevelopment in the area to which the By-law applies in lieu, or partially in lieu of a Community Benefits Charge that would otherwise be payable. 2.8 For in-kind contributions pursuant to the preceding subsection to be considered, an application for consideration of in-kind contributions must be submitted to the City with supporting documentation as to the suggested value thereof no less than 180 days prior to the first building permit being granted for the proposed Development or Redevelopment. 2.9 In-kind contributions pursuant to subsection 2.7 shall only be accepted if the same are approved by resolution of Council. The determination of Council as to whether in-kind contributions shall be accepted in full or partial satisfaction of Community Benefits Charges shall be final and binding. 2.10 The value attributed to an in-kind contribution under subsection 2.7 shall be as determined by Council, based on one or more third-party valuations, to the satisfaction of Council. Council’s determination of the value to be attributed to any in-kind contribution shall be final and binding. Time of Payment of Community Benefits Charges 2.11 Community Benefits Charges imposed under this By-law shall be payable prior to the issuance of any building permit for the proposed Development or Redevelopment. Interest on Refunds 2.12 If it is determined that a refund is required, the City shall pay interest on a refund in accordance with subsections 37 (28) and 37 (29) of the Act at a rate not less than the prescribed minimum interest rate, from the day the amount was paid to the municipality to the day it is refunded. - 234 - By-law No. 7954/22 Page 8 Indexing 2.13 The Community Benefits Charges referred to in Section 2.6 shall be adjusted annually, without amendment to this By-law, as of July 1 each year as follows: (a)The rates in Schedule “A” shall be adjusted annually in accordance with the change in the index for the most recently available annual period ending March 31 for the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index for Toronto; (b)The indexed Community Benefits Charges effective July 1 each year shall not apply to building permit applications received prior to the July 1 effective date, provided: (i)the permit application is complete in terms of the applicant's submission requirements set out in the building code and the City's Building By-law; (ii)applicable law approvals prescribed in the building code have been obtained or applied for; and (iii)the building permit or a conditional building permit is issued for all or part of the building by the date set out in the Region of Durham’s annual report on the indexing of Development Charges. 3.Administration 3.1 That the Community Benefits Charge Reserve Fund be established in pursuant to subsections 37 (45) to 37 (48) of the Planning Act. 3.2 Interest earned on the investment of fund balances shall form part of this reserve fund. 3.3 Monies received for the payment of Community Benefits Charges may be invested in securities (as permitted under the Municipal Act) and the interest earnings shall be paid into the special account. 3.4 The monies contained in the reserve funds established under this Section shall be invested in securities (as permitted under the Municipal Act), with any income received credited to the Community Benefits Charge reserve funds, in relation to which the investment income applies. 3.5 In each year, the municipality shall spend, or allocate, at least 60 percent of the monies that are in the special account at the beginning of the year. 3.6 The municipality shall provide reports and information as set out in section 7 of O.Reg. 509/20 under the Planning Act. 3.7 Community Benefits Charges are payable by electronic funds transfer or certified cheque, at the applicable rates, or as otherwise may be approved by Council. - 235 - By-law No. 7954/22 Page 9 4.Severability 4.1 If, for any reason, any provision of this By-law is held to be invalid, it is hereby declared to be the intention of Council that all the remainder of this By-law shall continue in full force and effect until repealed, re-enacted, amended or modified. Date By-law In Force 4.2 This By-law shall come into effect at 12:01 am on September 30, 2022. Passed this 11th day of July 2022. ___________ _____________________ David Ryan, Mayor ___________ _____________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 236 - By-law No. 7954/22 Page 10 Schedule “A” Schedule of Community Benefits Charges Residential Description Apartments – 2 Bedrooms + Apartments – Bachelor and 1 Bedroom C.B.C. by Dwelling Unit Type 1,070 657 - 237 - Attachment #8 to Report FIN 12-22 - 238 - - 239 - - 240 - - 241 - - 242 - Attachment #9 to Report FIN 12-22 - 243 - Attachment #10 to Report FIN 12-22 Toronto Montréal Calgary Ottawa Vancouver New York Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Box 50, 1 First Canadian Place Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5X 1B8 416.362.2111 MAIN 416.862.6666 FACSIMILE Error! AutoText entry not defined. June 22, 2022 Sent By Electronic Mail Paul Wirch City of Pickering 1 The Esplanade S, Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Dear Mr. Wirch: Proposed Changes to the Parkland Conveyance By-law We act on behalf of Pickering Developments Inc., the owners of properties located north of Bayly Street, east of Squires Beach Road, south of the 401 and west of Church Street South (the “Subject Properties”). The Subject Properties are the location of the Durham Live entertainment and tourist district. In addition to the existing hotel and casino, the Subject Properties are zoned through a Minister’s Zoning Order for a range of uses including high density residential, film studios and office and other employment uses. Our client has a direct interest in ensuring that the City’s proposed parkland conveyance by-law not only reflects the requirements of the Planning Act, but also is consistent with and conforms to the broader planning policy regime in Ontario, and we make the following submissions on its behalf. It is our client’s submission that providing parkland is an important element of ensuring quality of life for residents, visitors and employees in Pickering, and is also an important part of the review and approval of development applications. However, the conveyance of parkland cannot be at the expense of ensuring that development is affordable both to potential homeowners as well as businesses looking to come to Pickering. The proposed by-law simply reflects the requirements of the Planning Act, and does not provide for any ability for either the City or landowners to provide flexibility in the delivery of parkland or cash in lieu in order to ensure adequate park facilities are provided while not jeopardizing affordability. A number of approaches can be taken to provide for flexibility and cost certainty. In particular, our client submits that the following tools should be used by the City in the parkland by-law: •A broad definition of what can be included in providing parks, and for which credit is given. The delivery of strata parks, Privately Owned Public Space (POPS), smaller (sometimes called “pocket” parks) as well as the dedication of woodlands LEGAL_1:74998393.1 - 244 - Page 2 with recreational trails all serve to provide for a broad range of park and recreational facilities. The City should be including in the by-law a broad definition of what kinds of dedications qualify for full credit; • Fixed rates based on units and unit types. Where cash in lieu is provided, the setting of reasonable fixed rates (as opposed to imposing the maximum rates available under the Act) will give landowners certainty, while at the same time ensuring that maximum rates. • A percentage cap consistent with the recent changes to the Planning Act, with a 10% cap for sites less than 5 ha and 15% for sites larger than 5 ha. Our client urges the City to examine all possible tools to ensure that parkland is delivered in a cost effective manner. We look forward to seeing the report to Council with a revised version of the by-law. Yours truly, Chris Barnett Partner CB:s c: Pickering Developments Inc. LEGAL_1:74998393.1 - 245 - Attachment #11 to Report FIN 12-22 The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law Number 7955/22 Being a By-law to require the conveyance of land for park or other public recreational purposes as a condition of development or redevelopment, or the subdivision of lands. Whereas Sections 42, 51(25), 51.1, and 53 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13, provide that the Council of a local municipality may by by-law require that land be conveyed to the municipality for park or other public recreational purposes as a condition of development or redevelopment or the subdivision of lands; Whereas Sections 42 and 51.1 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13, provide for an alternate parkland rate for residential purposes of one hectare for each 300 dwelling units proposed for development provided the municipality has an official plan that contains specific policies dealing with the provision of lands for park or other public recreational purposes at such a rate; Whereas Sections 42 and 51.1 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13, provide that municipalities may require payment in lieu of land for park or other public recreational purposes at an alternate rate of one hectare for each 500 dwelling units proposed for development provided the municipality has an official plan that contains specific policies dealing with the alternate rate for the provision of lands for park or other public recreational purposes. Whereas the use of an alternate parkland rate for conveyance (1 hectare: 300 dwelling units) and an alternate rate for payment in lieu (1 hectare: 500 dwelling units) will provide the City with increased versatility in providing parkland that efficiently serves the needs of the community; Whereas the City’s Parkland Conveyance By-law 7341/14 will expire on September 18, 2022, and a new Parkland Conveyance By-law is required; Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1.For the purposes of interpretation of this by-law, the following definitions shall apply: (a)“Development” means the construction, erection or placing or one or more buildings or structures on land or the making of an addition or alteration to a building or structure that has the effect of substantially increasing the size or usability thereof; - 246 - By-law No. 7955/22 Page 2 (b)“Redevelopment” has the same meaning as Development; (c)“Subdivision” means the process referred to in Section 50 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13. 2.This By-law shall apply to the whole City of Pickering. 3.As a condition of Development or Redevelopment of lands for any purpose other than commercial or industrial, Council shall require that land be conveyed to the City, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, for park or other public recreational purposes in the amount of five percent (5%) of the land for such Development. 4.As a condition of subdivision of lands for any purpose other than commercial or industrial, Council shall require that land be conveyed to the City, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, for park or other public recreational purposes in the amount of five percent (5%) of the land proposed for such development. 5.As an alternative to Sections 3 and 4 above, as a condition of Development or Redevelopment or in the case of subdivision of land as a condition of approval of subdivision of lands for development in High Density Residential Areas and Mixed Use Areas in accordance with the City of Pickering Official Plan, Council may require that land be conveyed to the City for park or other public recreational purposes at a rate of one hectare for each 300 dwelling units proposed. However, in no case shall the parkland dedication be less than that required in Sections 3 and 4 above. 6.As an alternative to Section 5 above, Council may require a payment in lieu of a portion or all of the land otherwise to be conveyed under this by-law, calculated by using a rate of one hectare for each 500 dwelling units proposed. 7.As a condition of Development or Redevelopment of lands for commercial or industrial purposes, Council shall require that land be conveyed to the City, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, for park or other public recreational purposes in the amount of two percent (2%) of the land proposed for such development. 8.As a condition of subdivision of lands for commercial or industrial purposes, Council shall require that land be conveyed to the City, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, for park or other public recreational purposes in the amount of two percent (2%) of the land proposed for such development. 9.As an alternative to Sections 3, 4, 7 and 8 above, Council may require a payment in lieu of the land otherwise to be conveyed under this by-law, or such combination of land and money as Council may require. - 247 - By-law No. 7955/22 Page 3 10.This by-law shall at all times be subject to the provisions of Section 42, 51.1, 51(25), and 53 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13, as amended from time-to-time, or any successor thereto. 11.By-law 7341/14 of the Corporation of the City of Pickering being a by-law “To require that land be conveyed to the City for park or other public recreational purposes as a condition of development or redevelopment, or the subdivision of lands” is hereby repealed. 12.This By-law shall come into effect as 12:01 am on July 12, 2022. By-law passed this 11th day of July, 2022. ________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ___________ _____________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 248 - Report to Council Report Number: FIN 13-22 Date: July 11, 2022 From: Stan Karwowski Director, Finance & Treasurer Subject: PARA Marine Search & Rescue Grant Request - File: F-4800-001 Recommendation: 1.That Report FIN 13-22 of the Director, Finance & Treasurer be received; 2.That Council approve a grant in the amount of $13,500 to PARA Marine Search & Rescue and this expense be funded from account 503040.11100; and 3.That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. Executive Summary: PARA Marine Search & Rescue (PARA) is a volunteer based organization that provides a valuable service to the waterfront communities of Pickering, Ajax and Whitby. This organization is frequenting called upon for Search and Rescue missions due to the enhanced capabilities of its rescue vessel. It’s crews are on call 24 hours a day to respond to any marine emergency and provides a quick response to any watercraft user that may be experiencing challenges and or difficulties. Recently, PARA’s boat has experienced mechanical challenges when operating in Frenchman’s Bay due to the “weeds”. As a result of the weed build-up, its rescue vessel has been experiencing a substantial loss of operational effectiveness due to the fact the weeds are causing one of its engines to overheat. Once the engine overheats, the engine is shut down and the vessel is no longer operational and has to return to base. The overheating engine occurred on June 10th and again on June 17th. On June 19th, the vessel was relocated to the Port of Whitby until the weed harvesting is completed in Frenchman’s Bay. PARA has researched a solution recommended by the engine manufacturer that requires the installation of a new water intake cooling system at an approximate cost of $13,500. The recommended mechanical solution has been implemented by the Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) on two of its boats and MECP staff have verbally confirmed with PARA staff that the mechanical solution is working well. The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s approval of a grant in the amount of $13,500 to PARA Marine Search & Rescue for the purchase of new water intake cooling system to be installed on the PARA boat. - 249 - FIN 13-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: PARA Grant Request Page 2 Financial Implications: Since 2014, PARU has received Community grants from the City each year to help PARU purchase various capital equipment items over the years. As part of the 2022 Budget, Council approved a grant for $6,000 to PARU to purchase an automatic identification system to be attached to a search marker, an onboard computer for its search vessel, a portable tent for community events and a towing bridle to be used in rescues. PARU’s additional request for $13,500 will be funded from the general government grants account (503040) and from under expenditures in other general government current accounts. Discussion: PARA Marine Search & Rescue (PARA) is a volunteer based organization that provides Search and Rescue missions to the waterfront communities of Pickering, Ajax and Whitby. Their effectiveness is directly contingent on the capabilities of its rescue vessels which has been comprised, in recent weeks, by the weeds in Frenchman’s Bay. On June 10th and June 17th, the engines overheated, shut down and the vessel was returned to base. On June 19th, the vessel was relocated to the Port of Whitby until the weed harvesting is completed in Frenchman’s Bay. Unfortunately, the Eurasian Water-Milfoil has been an issue at Frenchman’s Bay for many years. This weed is a fast growing, non-native, invasive aquatic weed that causes problems for boaters and “Bay” users. Starting 2013, the City invested funds in trying to control this invasive and fast growing aquatic weed through the milfoil weevil (marine insect) program. Most recently in 2021, the City invested $50,000 as a pilot project in a partnership with Pickering Harbour Company to remove these invasive weeds in some areas of Frenchman’s Bay. The 2022 budget includes $50,000 for weed removal with an additional $50,000 being available if required to advance the project’s goals of managing the weed problem in Frenchman’s Bay by clearing channels. Despite these efforts, the weeds will still exist to some degree and due to their fast growing nature and the expenditure request of $13,500 should be viewed as an investment in the safety of Pickering residents. When there is a watercraft or boater safety issue, time becomes an important factor in contributing to a positive outcome and this investment will ensure that PARA can continue to maintain their response times. In addition, PARA will continue to require this equipment for this year and future years to sustain operating out of Frenchman’s Bay. For these reasons, staff recommend that Council approve a grant of $13,500 to PARA Marine Search & Rescue for the purchase of new water intake cooling system. Attachments: 1.Special Grant Request dated June 24, 2022 2.New Equipment Proposal dated June 24, 2022 3. Toronto Yacht Services Estimate - 250 - FIN 13-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: PARA Grant Request Page 3 Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: James Halsall Stan Karwowski Division Head, Finance Director, Finance & Treasurer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer Original Signed By:Original Signed By: Original Signed By: - 251 - PARA Marine Search and Rescue is a Registered Canadian Charity, 86802 0843 RR 0001 PARA Marine Search and Rescue 682 Hillview Crescent Pickering, ON L1W 2R7 para-rescue.org | info@paramarinesar.ca Attachment #1 to Report FIN 13-22 24 June 2022 City of Pickering c/o One - The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Re: Special Grant Application for PARA Marine Search and Rescue PARA Marine SAR operational capabilities in Frenchman’s Bay have been significantly reduced in the past couple of weeks due to the increased weed growth. Just recently, we have been forced to relocate the vessel to Port Whitby Marina as a home base for the foreseeable future. Please find attached a proposal approved by our board, that will implement a change to our engine cool- ing system which allows the vessel to operate more effectively within weedy conditions. Once installed it will allow us to return to our home base at Frenchman’s Bay Yacht Club and continue maintaining a pres- ence in the bay during the remainder of this summer. We are looking to the City of Pickering to help fund the implementation cost of this change. Please feel free to contact myself for further information. Thanks in advance. Yours Aye Colin Thomson 905-409-7354 colin.thomson@paramarinesar.ca “Volunteers providing excellence in marine search & rescue” Commodore - PARA Marine Search & Rescue | Unit Leader - Unit 1 CCGA C&A www.paramarinesar.ca - 252 - Attachment #2 to Report FIN 13-22 PARA Marine Search and Rescue 682 Hillview Crescent Pickering, ON L1W 2R7 para-rescue.org | info@paramarinesar.ca FOR APPROVAL by the Board of Directors _________________________________________________________________________________ 24 June 2022 Changes to engine cooling system: raw water intake relocation to reduce weed intake DECISION REQUIRED The PARA Marine Search and Rescue executive are requesting approval to install a new raw water intake cooling system at the approximate cost of $13,000. This maintenance can be scheduled by the vendor for a late July 2022 installation. Given the significant cost, we are looking to identify an additional funding source to avoid leveraging the long-term vessel replacement savings. ISSUE / HIGHLIGHTS With the increase in weeds within Frenchman’s Bay this season, our rescue vessel, PARA Marine, is experiencing a significant issue from the ingestion of weeds into the outdrive raw water intakes. For context, the cooling system works by taking water up through the outdrive lower leg (approx. 12 inches below the hull of the vessel) then passes through a 3-inch hose with an oil cooler (simple in- line heat exchanger pipe) connected to the hose before emptying into the weed basket. The weeds we are ingesting into the system are being compacted and thus getting caught in the oil cooler (internal diameter is smaller than the hose diameter) before reaching the weed basket. The compacted weeds restrict or stop raw water intake, resulting in the engine overheating at speeds of 15 knots or higher which in-turn activates the engine’s high temperature alarm. When this occurs, the starboard engine must be shut down and the vessel forced to return to base on one engine. At this time, the vessel is unavailable for search and rescue operations until the weeds can be removed once back alongside. An added complication is the starboard engine, the engine experiencing this issue, controls power steering resulting in an additional limitation on the vessel manoeuvrability and handling. As noted above, this issue is occurring only with our starboard engine and not the port engine. The vessel has been lifted out of the water this week and both outdrives have been inspected with no visible signs of damage or missing parts It is also important to note, that this is limited to operation within weedy areas such as Frenchman’s Bay. Operating out on the lake and within other harbours has not been an issue with both engines running within normal parameters at both low and high speed. TIMELINES •This issue first occurred on Friday June 10 and repeated on Saturday June 11 at which time the vessel was taken out of service. •On Sunday June 12 the vessel was transited to Toronto’s Outer Harbour Marina (at low speed) where Toronto Yacht Services (TYS) diagnosed the issue and discovered compacted weeds in the intake lines. The weeds were removed with a total cost of this repair approximately $1,000 •On Tuesday June 14th, the vessel returned to Pickering, including full sea trail on the way, and was put back into service. - 253 - 2 •The issue resurfaced on Thursday June 17 again, and weeds were removed with phone support from Toronto Yacht Service on Friday June 18. •As of Saturday June 19, the vessel was relocated to Port Whitby Marina with the intention to operating from Whitby until weed harvesting is completed in Frenchman’s Bay. o NOTE: This harvesting is expected to be done with the first 2 weeks of July. However, given the rate of growth this is expected to only be a temporary measure as weeds will return thereafter. •On Tuesday June 21, during preventive maintenance checks, we removed some additional weeds out of the intake system •On Wednesday June 22, the vessel was tasked to Pickering to assist a paddleboarder off the Pickering power station. After recovering the person, the vessel was required to enter Frenchman’s Bay East Shore to transfer the individual to Pickering Fire for treatment. During this transit and following a decision to dock further out from the shore, we picked up more weeds. On transit back to Whitby, the high temperature alarms activated, and the starboard engine was shut down. Upon return to Whitby, the removal of the weeds was performed. •As of Friday June 24, we have restricted our crews from operating in Frenchman’s Bay unless tasked by JRCC. This will reduce the probability of a reoccurrence, but it is only a temporary measure. ANALYSIS As this issue has forced the relocation of the vessel from its home port, a more permanent solution is required. After consultation with Toronto Yacht Services, they are recommending a Volvo endorsed solution that closes off the intake on the outdrives and relocates the raw water intakes through the hull. This would have its own strainer and then connect back to the main raw water intake hose before the oil cooler. The intention is that any weeds pulled into the new intakes would be caught via the new strainer basket before they reach the oil cooler. COST: The attached quote has the required labour and parts descriptions. This is the only solution available from the OEM and vendor. SCHEDULE: This can be scheduled for late July 2022 subject to the vendor availability. IMPACT TO SERVICE: A potential week of downtime may be required to perform the install. RISKS Risk Title Description Inherent Risk Mitigation Residual Risk There is a risk this is not a supported solution by the OEM: Volvo As a result of the change, there is the risk of potential additional issues being introduced given the change in design. Medium The solution is supported by Volvo and the kits to block the outdrive water are sold by Volvo. Low There is a risk the outdrives will not be sufficiently cooled given the change. The outdrives require cooling as does any mechanical device operating at high temperatures. Medium The outdrives will still have the native cooling solution of water being brought into the outdrives. Low There is a risk this is an unproven solution for operating in a weedy Given the solution is intrusive to the vessel (i.e., through hull fittings being installed) there is a risk of Medium The Ontario Ministry of Environment (MoE) has installed this solution on 2 of their vessels operating on the Great Lakes. Their mandate is to perform near shore Low - 254 - 3 environment (in harbour) and at high speeds (on the lake). not providing sufficient raw water intake when operating in both environments. operations and as such operate in very weedy conditions. A phone reference was conducted and MoE indicated that this solution was performing very well and has eliminated engine overheating due to weed intake. MoE highly recommended the solution. The MoE solution was installed by TYS as well. RECOMMENDATION / RESOLUTION / CONCLUSIONS That the Board of Directors approve the expenditure of $13,000 and that we approach the City of Pickering as a potential funding source. Recommended by: Ivan Barsby Cyril Wellman Jason Brown Vice Commodore Safety Officer Maintenance Officer Approved for submission to the Board of Directors by: Yours Aye Colin Thomson Commodore APPENDICES 1.Photos of the MoE Install. Courtesy of Ministry of Environment cont act: Bryan Thorburn (brian.thorburn@ontario.ca) 2.(Attached) Toronto Yacht Service Quote: 79979823 – 13 June 2022 - 255 - APPENDIX 1: PHOTOGRAPHS OF MOE INSTALL - 256 - Attachment #3 to Report FIN 13-22 Estimate #79979823 475 Unwin Ave Toronto On M4M 3M2 (416) 886-9992, Jon@torontoyachtservices.com CUSTOMER PARA Marine Search and Rescue DATE 07/01/2022 DESCRIPTI ON Install Thru Hulls and Strainers for Main Engines Raw Water Intakes Estimate Description Qty Rate Tax Total Fabricate and install aluminum brackets to mount strainers to stringer. Mount strainers to brackets and bolt brackets to stringers. Drill holes in hull and install thru hulls using fabricated delrin plastic rings on inside/outside of hull to electrically isolate stainless steel ball thru hulls and ball valves from aluminum hull. Install ball valves and tailpiece on thru hull fittings. Route and connect hose from thru hull to strainer and engines. Install block off plates on transom shield water inlets. Water test boat to ensure proper functioning of cooling system. 26.00 $208.00 13.00%$6,111.04 Molded 180 degree silicone hose 2.00 $144.00 13.00%$325.44 Stainless Steel Ball Valve 2"2.00 $176.49 13.00%$398.87 Stainless steel tailpiece 2"4.00 $44.65 13.00%$201.82 Bronze 90 degree elbow 2"4.00 $94.78 13.00%$428.41 Groco Bronze ARG series strainer 2"2.00 $688.96 13.00%$1,557.05 Raw water exhaust hose 2"16.00 $20.10 13.00%$363.41 T bolt stainless steel hose clamps size #36 18.00 $13.91 13.00%$282.93 Misc Stainless fasteners 1.00 $60.00 13.00%$67.80 Custom aluminum 1/4" plate with bent 90 degree ends 2.00 $170.00 13.00%$384.20 SS thru hull fitting 2"2.00 $125.00 13.00%$282.50 Volvo water intake block off kit 3807366 2.00 $398.55 13.00%$900.72 3M 4200 fast cure black cart - 06560 1.00 $57.67 13.00%$65.17 Haulout, blocking, relaunch and one week's land storage Toronto Outer Harbour Marina 1.00 $1,550.00 13.00%$1,751.50 Shop Supplies 1.00 $140.00 13.00%$158.20 HST 13.00%$1,527.68 Estimate Total: $13,279.05 1 - 257 - Pre-Work Signature Signed By 2 - 258 - Terms Of Service Terms of Service- Toronto Yacht Services Inc. (TYS) Please read these terms of service carefully before using TYS repair services. 1. Services and Products. 1.1 Services Estimates Repair estimates are subject to change due to concealed or unknown conditions at the time that the estimate was written. The customer will be contacted for approval if the cost of repairs will exceed the original estimate by more than 15% (parts and labour). This estimate assumes that the customer approves all increases up to 15% of the original estimate (parts and labour) plus applicable taxes. All estimates are valid for thirty days. All labor is warranted for ninety (90) days. A signed copied of the estimate must be returned and a deposit (equal to the total cost of parts) received prior to the commencement of any work. 1.2 Service For service orders, TYS will service your vessel as described to you in the estimated charges stated. Unless otherwise stated, TYS will provide repair and replacement services to address the reported faults with your vessel and all work is to be performed to accepted and proven marine practices and standards. you hereby authorize TYS personnel to operate your vessel in connection with repair work quoted. All labor is warranted for ninety (90) days. 1.3 Products All materials are subject to the warranty of the manufacturers. For repair work a deposit of 50% of the total estimate is required at time of acceptance and prior to the commencement of any work, with progress billing at two (2) week intervals until work is complete. With the final payment collected at completion of repair. In addition to initial deposit any individual parts or parts packages exceeding $500.00 will require 100% payment prior to the order being placed. All prices are non-negotiable. 2. Payment 2.1 Payment TYS requires a customer credit card on file before any repairs are carried out. TYS only accepts credit card payments. TYS will not bill your credit card or process a transaction under your credit card until your repair or order is processed. All fees are due upon receipt of invoice. Payments are processed to your credit card on file within one week of the issued invoice if we have not received direction from you otherwise.If invoiced fees are not paid, you acknowledge that pursuant to the repair and storage liens act, a lien may be secured against your vessel for nonpayment of the above quoted repair work. Parts Only Sales Terms and Conditions Please read the terms and conditions for a Parts Only Sale. 1.1 Minimum Order There are minimum order requirements for all customers. Any single order placed through Toronto Yacht Services (TYS) must amount to not less than $50.00 per order. 1.2 Pricing Prices are subject to change without notice. Orders will be billed at prices in effect at time of ordering. No orders are subject to discounts or special rates. 1.3 Payment Terms TYS requires a customer credit card on file before any parts orders are placed. All quotes- once signed and approved will be subject to payment IN FULL before the parts order is placed and parts are received at the dealership location. TYS shall not be required to sell any products unless the payment for such products owed to TYS are paid in full. All other fees are due upon receipt of invoice. If invoice amounts are not paid in full, TYS may terminate this agreement. 1.4 Shipping An additional fee for shipment will be the buyer’s responsibility if the buyer requests shipment of the parts to a residential or commercial address. Prices for shipment can only be provided once the dealership location has received the parts and generated a courier quote. The buyer understands a second bill for freight will be added. 1.5 FINAL SALE The buyer understands that all Parts Only Requests are final sale. All parts bought through TYS are non-refundable and non-exchangeable. 1.6 Cancelation Policy The buyer can cancel a parts purchase up until the transaction has been confirmed. Upon payment confirmation a parts purchase can no longer be cancelled, and the buyer is henceforth responsible for the parts purchased. 1.7 Disclaimer The buyer understands that failure to supply TYS with a valid Volvo Penta/Yanmar Engine Serial Number and/or a valid Volvo Penta/Yanmar Part Number may be subject to incorrect and/or non-compatible parts purchases. TYS will not be held accountable for incorrect parts sold without being supplied a valid Volvo Penta Engine Serial Number and/or a valid Volvo Penta Part Number. You acknowledge that failure to provide a valid serial number or part number may result in a non-compatible parts purchase. You acknowledge and agree to all of the above listed terms and conditions. By signing above you are aware and agree to all the listed terms and conditions. 3 - 259 - Report to Council Report Number: CLK 04-22 Date: July 11, 2022 From: Paul Bigioni Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor Subject: Appointment of an Integrity Commissioner -2022 – 2026 Term of Council -File: A-1440 Recommendation: 1.That Report CLK 04-22, regarding Appointment of an Integrity Commissioner, be received; 2.That Council appoints Principles Integrity as Integrity Commissioner for the City of Pickering for the Term of Council commencing November 15, 2022, with the option to renew for an additional Council Term, subject to the Council of the Regional Municipality of Durham approving and authorizing the appointment of Principles Integrity in accordance with Section 223.3 of the Municipal Act as the Regional Municipality of Durham’s Integrity Commissioner; 3.That the draft By-law, included as Attachment #1 to Report CLK 04-22 to confirm the appointment of Principles Integrity as the provider of Integrity Commissioner services for the City of Pickering, be enacted; 4.That subject to the enactment of the By-law to appoint Principles Integrity, that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement with Principles Integrity, for Integrity Commissioner Services for the City of Pickering, consistent with the draft by-law and on terms satisfactory to the City Clerk and Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor; and, 5.That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this Report. Executive Summary: The appointment of an Integrity Commissioner is a statutory requirement of the Municipal Act. Currently. The City retains Fasken Martineau Dumoulin LLP for its Integrity Commissioner services and the current contract expires at the end of this Term of Council on November 14, 2022. To ensure that Pickering has an Integrity Commissioner in place once the term of the current Integrity Commissioner expires, staff seek Council’s approval to appoint Principles Integrity for the 2022-2026 Term of Council, with the option to renew for an additional Term, subject to the Council of the Regional Municipality of Durham approving the appointment at that time. - 260 - CLK 04-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: Appointment of Integrity Commissioner Page 2 Financial Implications: Principles Integrity charges an hourly rate of $275.00, with a $1,250.00 annual retainer fee to cover minor administrative costs and record keeping. The hourly rate is in line with what the City currently pays for Integrity Commissioner services, and staff are satisfied that it is commensurate with the level of experience and expertise that Principles Integrity will provide. There is no specific budget line item within the approved 2022 Current Budget for Integrity Commissioner services, however, funds in the General Government Contingency Account would be available should there be a need to engage the services of the Integrity Commissioner. To date, the City has incurred few expenses related to the Integrity Commissioner. Should there be an increase in the usage of the services, staff will review and consider the budgetary requirements for inclusion in the 2023 and 2024 Current Budgets for the City. Discussion: Pursuant to Subsection 223.3(1) of the Municipal Act, the Integrity Commissioner reports to Council and is responsible for performing, in an independent manner, the functions assigned by the municipality. Integrity Commissioners carry out a range of functions for municipalities and their local boards. They assist in the development of the municipality’s ethical framework by suggesting content or commentary for codes of conduct and conduct education and training for Members of Council. Integrity Commissioners also provide advice and guidance to Members of Council to help sort out ethical grey areas arising from the Code of Conduct or to confirm activities that support compliance, including those under with the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act (MCIA). Additionally, the Integrity Commissioner investigates allegations against Members of Council for non-compliance with the Code of Conduct or the MCIA. In 2016, the Region of Durham and some area municipalities undertook an RFP process for the selection of an Integrity Commissioner. As a result of that process, Guy Giorno, Fasken Martineau Dumoulin LLP, was selected as the Integrity Commissioner for the Regional Municipality of Durham and the City of Pickering, for a term beginning on January 1, 2017 and terminating at the end of the current term of Council (November 14, 2022). With the current Integrity Commissioner contract expiring at the end of the Term of Council, it was necessary to conduct a selection process to ensure that Integrity Commissioner services are in place for the next Term. The Region of Durham, and local municipalities, have once again partnered on this initiative and are seeking approval to appoint Principles Integrity to carry out Integrity Commissioner services for the 2022 -2026 Term of Council. The process to secure Integrity Commissioner services for the next term of Council followed the Durham Region’s Consultant and Professional Services Contracting Procedure. Invitations to enter into a consulting and professional services contract with the Region and local municipalities were sent to six individuals/firms. Three proposals were received and evaluated by the Region. Respondents also participated in presentation and interview sessions which were evaluated by the Region, with the addition of the Municipal Clerks from Oshawa, Pickering and Whitby. The successful submission was made by Principles Integrity. - 261 - CLK 04-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: Appointment of Integrity Commissioner Page 3 Established in early 2017, Principles Integrity is a partnership operated by its principals Jeffrey Abrams and Janice Atwood-Petkovski, experienced municipal leaders, with over 35 years of experience working for municipalities in the fields of municipal law and governance, and now as Integrity Commissioners. Ms. Atwood-Petkovski previously worked as City Solicitor for two large Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area municipalities and Mr. Abrams as a Municipal Solicitor and Clerk in the Greater Toronto Area. Through its submission to the Region, Principals Integrity summarized its mandate as Integrity Commissioner as follows: “The emphasis of our firm is to help public bodies enhance their ethical foundations through the drafting of effective codes of conduct and other policies governing ethical behaviour, through the provision of meaningful education related to such policies, providing pragmatic binding advice to elected officials seeking clarification on ethical issues and governance issues, and by seeking to resolve matters when allegations of transgression are made. Where appropriate and necessary, formal investigations are conducted under the tenets of procedural fairness, with a keen focus on what best serves the public interest. We exercise our authority in a manner that promotes good governance and effective, ethical solutions. When responding to a complaint, we exercise restraint and apply a solutions-oriented perspective, favouring teaching opportunities over sanctions. We have substantial expertise in the application of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act and have compiled an effective codification of statutory and common law that assists elected officials in avoiding both real and apparent conflicts of interest while enabling them to carry out the duties for which they were elected.” The appointment of an Integrity Commissioner was a coordinated effort among the Region of Durham and area municipalities. Appointing the same Integrity Commissioner as the Region allows the Region and City to undertake coordinated efforts to review the Council Codes of Conduct, and for the Mayor and Regional Councillors to seek advice from one source for matters that may come before both the City and Regional Councils. Staff are seeking approval to appoint Principles Integrity for the 2022-2026 Term of Council, with the option to renew for an additional Term, subject to the Council of the Regional Municipality of Durham approving the appointment at that time. Should Council approve the appointment of Principles Integrity, the By-law will take effect on November 15, 2022. Attachments: 1.Draft By-law to Appoint Principles Integrity as the City of Pickering’s Integrity Commissioner - 262 - CLK 04-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: Appointment of Integrity Commissioner Page 4 Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Susan Cassel Paul Bigioni City Clerk Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer Original Signed By:Original Signed By: Original Signed By: - 263 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7956/22 Being a by-law to confirm the Appointment of Principles Integrity as the Integrity Commissioner for the City of Pickering Whereas Section 223.3 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, authorizes a municipality to appoint an Integrity Commissioner who reports to Council and who is responsible for performing in an independent manner the functions assigned by the municipality; And Whereas the current contract for Integrity Commissioner services for the City of Pickering will expire on November 14, 2022; Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1.That Principles Integrity is hereby appointed as the Integrity Commissioner for the City of Pickering; and, 2.That the agreement with Principles Integrity as the City of Pickering’s Integrity Commissioner provide the following roles and services: Role: The role of the Integrity Commissioner is: (a)The application of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council and for members of local boards; (b)The application of any procedures, rules and policies of the City and local boards governing the ethical behaviour of Members of Council and local boards; (c)The application of sections 5, 5.1, and 5.2 of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act to Members of Council and local boards; (d)Respond to requests from Members of Council and of local boards for advice respecting their obligations under the Code of Conduct applicable to the member; (e)Respond to requests from Members of Council and of local boards for advice respecting their obligations under a procedure, rule or policy of the City or of a local board, governing the ethical behaviour of members; (f)Respond to requests from Members of Council and of local boards for advice respecting their obligations under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act; and, (g)Provide educational information to Members of Council and local boards. Attachment #1 to Report CLK 04-22 - 264 - By-law No. 7956/22 Page 2 Duties: The Integrity Commissioner shall cause to perform, in an independent manner, the functions of an Integrity Commissioner pursuant to Part V.1 of the Municipal Act, with respect to the application of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council and of local boards, of the City of Pickering, including any legislation, procedures, rules and policies of the City governing the ethical behaviour of the Members. The mandate of the Integrity Commissioner will include: (a)Provisions of advice and education upon request by a Member or by Council or the local board as a whole, regarding ethical obligations and responsibilities under their Code of Conduct, and any other legislation, rules or policies governing their ethical behaviour; (b)Receiving, assessing and investigating where appropriate, complaints may by Council, a Member of Council, a local board, a member of a local board, a member of staff, or a member of the public respecting an alleged breach of the City’s Code of Conduct through the provisions of the Code of Conduct and Procedures for Complaints; (c)Receiving, assessing and conducting an inquiry, where appropriate, with respect to requests for inquiry made by an elector, or a person demonstrably acting in the public interest concerning an alleged contravention of section 5, 5.1, or 5.2 of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act; (d)Giving advice on policy issues and the workings of the City’s Integrity Commissioner’s office; and, (e)All advice being provided in writing in accordance with the requirements of Section 223.3(2.2) of the Municipal Act. Reporting to Council: (a)The Integrity Commissioner will report directly to Pickering City Council with a report containing the results of investigations and one annual report summarizing the year’s activities, observations, and any resulting general recommendations; and, (b)The Integrity Commissioner may recommend that City Council impose penalties in accordance with the Municipal Act if in the opinion of the Integrity Commissioner, a Member has contravened the Code of Conduct. Other General Provisions: (a)That should the Integrity Commissioner conduct an investigation or provided any other service, it shall do so in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement executed between it and the City of Pickering and shall adhere to all applicable laws, applicable statutes, and established City Policies; (b)That should the City of Pickering desire any further services from the Integrity Commissioner outside what is outlined in this By-law, the Integrity Commissioner may oblige in providing such other services, so long as City Council has passed a - 265 - resolution to authorize the Integrity Commissioner to provide such other service. If authorized to do so, the Integrity Commissioner will charge the hourly fee in accordance with the Agreement for such other services; and, (c)All services provided by the Integrity Commissioner conform to all the statutory requirements of Section 223.3 to 223.8 of the Municipal Act. 3.That By-law 7684/19 be repealed effective November 14, 2022. 4.That this By-law shall come into effect as of November 15, 2022. By-law passed this 11th day of July, 2022. ________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 266 - Report to Council Report Number: FIR 03-22 Date: July 11, 2022 From: Steve Boyd Fire Chief Subject: Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services -Lakeridge Health Central East Prehospital Care Program (CEPCP) -File: A-1440-001-22 Recommendation: 1.That Report FIR 03-22 of the Fire Chief, regarding the Agreement to provide Medical Oversight Services between Pickering Fire Services and Lakeridge Health, be received; 2.That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Agreement with Lakeridge Health Central East Prehospital Care Program (CEPCP) to provide Medical Oversight and training to the Pickering Fire Department, set out in Attachment 1 to this report, subject to minor revisions as may be required by the Fire Chief and the Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor; and, 3.That appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions to implement the recommendations in this Report. Executive Summary: The purpose of Report FIR 03-22 is to seek Council’s approval to extend the Agreement, set out in Attachment 1, between the City of Pickering and Lakeridge Health Central East Prehospital Care Program to provide Medical Oversight and Training to the Pickering Fire Department. This is a three year extension of an existing program between both parties that provides the required training and certification to Fire Services staff responding to a range of medical calls. Financial Implications: As approved in the 2022 Current Budget, under Emergency Medical Training (501110), the total annual cost for the three year agreement is estimated to be $42,500.00 per year. Discussion: Pickering Fire Service staff respond to a range of medical calls, including but not limited to, cardiac arrest, VSA (vital signs absent), uncontrolled bleeding, unconscious individuals, motor vehicle accidents, and other medical emergencies as required. Through these responses, Fire Services staff utilize the skills they have acquired through EMR Direct Delivery Program training in first aid, CPR, AED (automatic external defibrillator) use, and symptom relief (epi-pen and Naloxone) administration. - 267 - FIR 03-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services Page 2 Fire Services staff are required to recertify in these areas on an annual basis, and must be signed off under the medical oversight of the Physician heading the Lakeridge Health Central East Prehospital Care Program. Lakeridge Health CEPCP base hospital services currently provides this training and oversight to all Pickering Fire Services staff on an annual basis, and also provide training to all new recruit hires with Fire Services. This agreement provides a three year extension to the program currently in place. Attachment: 1. Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024 Prepared/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Steve Boyd Fire Chief SB:jm Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Original Signed By: Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer - 268 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 1 of 27 Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services Between Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and Lakeridge Health January 1 st 2022 to December 31 st 2024 Attachment #1 to Report FIR 03-22 - 269 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 2 of 27 Contents 1. RECITALS ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. DEFINITIONS........................................................................................................................................ 3 3. INTERPRETATION ............................................................................................................................... 6 4. AGREEMENT........................................................................................................................................ 7 5. MEDICAL EDUCATION ........................................................................................................................ 8 6. MEDICAL ADVICE RELATING TO PATIENT CARE ........................................................................... 8 7. TRAINING ............................................................................................................................................. 9 8. AUTHORIZATION AND RE-AUTHORIZATION ................................................................................... 9 9. QUALITY ASSURANCE ..................................................................................................................... 10 10. INFORMATION SHARING .............................................................................................................. 10 11. SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................ 11 12. RESEARCH .................................................................................................................................... 11 13. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION ......................................................................................... 12 14. TERM AND TERMINATION ............................................................................................................ 14 15. GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................................................................................................ 14 SCHEDULE A - Designated Representatives............................................................................................. 20 SCHEDULE B – Training Programs ........................................................................................................... 21 SCHEDULE C – Standard First Aid ............................................................................................................ 23 SCHEDULE D – Fees & Payment for Services .......................................................................................... 25 SCHEDULE E – Quality Assurance ............................................................................................................ 26 SCHEDULE F – Controlled Acts and Advanced Medical Procedures ........................................................ 27 - 270 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 3 of 27 AGREEMENT BETWEEN: Pickering Fire and Emergency Services –and – Lakeridge Health (“LH”) 1.RECITALS WHEREAS Pickering Fire and Emergency Services provides patient care when called to provide assistance to the residents of the City of Pickering; AND WHEREAS Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and the Central East Prehospital Care Program (“CEPCP”) located at LH wish to enter into an agreement for the provision of Medical Oversight subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions set out below. NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the respective covenants and agreements contained in this AGREEMENT and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties acknowledge, Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and LH hereby agree as follows: 2.DEFINITIONS In this AGREEMENT, in addition to the terms defined above, the following terms shall, unless the context otherwise requires, have the respective meanings set out below: a.“AED” means Automated External Defibrillation. b.“AGREEMENT” means this agreement as the same may be amended or restated from time to time and includes all schedules and all uses of the words “hereto”, “herein”, “hereof”, ‘hereby” and “hereunder” and similar expressions refer to this AGREEMENT and not to any particular section or portion of it. c.“Applicable Law” at any time and in respect of any Person, property, transaction or event, means all laws including statutes, regulations, treaties, judgments and decrees then applicable to that Person, property, transaction or event and, whether or not having the force of law, all applicable official directives, rules, consents, approvals, authorizations, guidelines, bullet ins, orders and policies of any Governmental Authority then having or purporting to have authority over that Person, property, transaction or event. d.“Approved” means something that has been reviewed and/or sanctioned by LH. e.“Business Day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or any statutory or civic holiday observed by one or both Parties. - 271 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 4 of 27 f.“Call Report” means a record of patient care in paper or electronic form. g.“Case Review” means the routine review of call reports submitted by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and performed by LH. h.“CEPCP Standards” means the standards of CEPCP related to the provision of Medical Oversight and prehospital emergency care developed by the Medical Advisory Board of the CEPCP and based on best practices and evidenced based medicine. i.“CME” means continuing medical education that is provided to the individual firefighter. j.“Controlled Act” has the meaning ascribed to it in the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, (Ontario), S.O. 1991, c.18. k.“CPSO” means the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. l.“CPR” means a potentially lifesaving procedure, that combines chest compressions and ventilations to partially restore oxygenated blood flow to the essential organs. m.“CPSO Policy” means the CPSO policy for the Delegation of Controlled Acts and Guidelines for teaching Controlled Acts under Section 28 of the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 and under the Medicine Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 30. n.“Data” has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 9 herein. o.“Designated Representative” is the designated representative of a Party as set out in SCHEDULE A . p.“Direct delivery” is when the training program provided is delivered by staff of the CEPCP. q.“EFR” Emergency First Responder is a program that authorizes a firefighter in CPR and the Controlled Acts and Advanced Medical Procedures (SCHEDULE E ) following an initial authorization course (duration of up to 24 hours depending on individuals skill level) and maintains their authorization through approximately 8 hours of CME delivered annually. r.“EMR” Emergency Medical Responder is a program that authorizes a firefighter in CPR and the Controlled Acts and Advanced Medical Procedures (SCHEDULE E ) following an initial authorization course (duration up to 120 hours) and maintains their authorization through approximately 16 hours of CME delivered annually. s.“Firefighter” is a person currently employed by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services, and has the meaning ascribed to it under the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, c. 4. t.“Governmental Authority” means any domestic or foreign government including any federal, provincial, state, territorial or municipal government and any domestic or foreign government agency, board, commission, tribunal or other authority exercising executive, legislative, judicial, regulatory or administrative function of, or pertaining to, government. u.“Host Hospital” means Lakeridge Health (LH). v.“Including” means “including without limitation” and shall not be construed to limit any general statement which it follows to the specific or similar or matters immediately following it. w.“Instructor” is a person trained and approved by CEPCP to deliver training. x.“Investigation” means the process of review arising from a concern regarding patient care provided by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services. - 272 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 5 of 27 y.“Medical Advisory Board” means the Physicians that comprise the Medical Advisory Board of the CEPCP that provides medical oversight. z.“Medical Oversight” has the meaning described in section 4.2. aa. “Medical Director” means a physician appointed to the Medical Advisory Board of the CEPCP. bb. “Medical Education” has the meaning described in section 5. cc.“Order” means a direction from a CEPCP Medical Advisory Board physician with legislative ordering authority that permits performance of a procedure by another. dd.“Paramedic” has the meaning ascribed to it under the Ambulance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. A.19 and any regulations thereunder; ee. “Parties” means Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and LH; and “Party” means either one of them. ff. “Patient” is any person who has suffered a medical or traumatic emergency and receives medical attention, care, or treatment by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services. gg. “Person” shall be broadly interpreted and includes an individual, body corporate, partnership, joint venture, trust, association, unincorporated organization, the Crown, any Governmental Authority or any other entity recognized by law. hh. “Personal Health Information” has the meaning ascribed to it in the Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004,(Ontario), S.O. 2004, c.3, Sch. A. ii.“PHIPA” means the Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004, (Ontario), S.O. 2004, c.3 Sch. A. jj. “Purposes” has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 9.1. kk. “Self delivered” is when the training program provided is delivered by CEPCP trained and approved staff of the service named in this contract. ll.“Standard First Aid” (SFA) means a standardized program created by CEPCP and approved by the Worker’s Safety Insurance Board (WSIB) designed to provide immediate assistance to a person suffering illness or injury. mm.“Standards” means all industry accepted standards of practice relating to the provision of Medical Oversight and prehospital emergency care in the Province of Ontario. nn. “Term” has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 14. - 273 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 6 of 27 3.INTERPRETATION 3.1. Statutes Unless specified otherwise, reference in this AGREEMENT to a statute refers to that statute as such statute may be amended from time to time, or to any restated or successor legislation of comparable effect, and refers to any regulations then in force and effect thereunder. 3.2. Headings The division of this AGREEMENT into articles, sections and schedules and the insertion of headings are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of this AGREEMENT. The article, section and schedule headings in this AGREEMENT are not intended to be full or precise descriptions of the text to which they refer and are not to be considered part of this AGREEMENT. Reference to an Article, Section or Schedule refers to the applicable article, section or schedule of this AGREEMENT. 3.3. Number and Gender In this AGREEMENT, words in the singular include the plural and vice-versa and words in one gender include all genders. 3.4. Entire Agreement This AGREEMENT constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, negotiations, discussions and understandings, written or oral, express or implied, between the Parties related thereto. There are no representations, warranties, conditions, other agreements or acknowledgements, whether direct or collateral, express or implied, that form part of or affect this AGREEMENT, or which induced any Party to enter into this AGREEMENT or on which reliance is placed by any Party, except as specifically set forth in this AGREEMENT. 3.5. Amendment This AGREEMENT may be amended, modified or supplemented only by a written agreement signed by each Party. 3.6. Waiver of Right Any waiver of, or consent to depart from, the requirements of any provision of this AGREEMENT shall be effective only if it is in writing and signed by the Party giving it, and only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which it has been given. No failure on the part of any Party to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right under this AGREEMENT shall operate as a waiver of such right. No single or partial exercise of any such right shall preclude any other or further exercise of such right or the exercise of any other right. 3.7. Governing Law This AGREEMENT shall be governed by, and interpreted and enforced in accordance with, the laws in force in the Province of Ontario (excluding any rule or principle of the conflict of laws which might refer such interpretation to the laws of another jurisdiction). Each Party irrevocably - 274 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 7 of 27 submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Ontario with respect to any matter arising hereunder or related hereto. 3.8. Performance on Holidays If any action is required to be taken pursuant to this AGREEMENT on or by a specified date that is not a Business Day, then such action shall be valid if taken on or by the next succeeding Business Day. 3.9. Schedules The Schedules to this AGREEMENT are as follows: SCHEDULE A - Designated Representatives SCHEDULE B – Training Programs SCHEDULE C – Standard First Aid SCHEDULE D – Fees & Payment for Services SCHEDULE E – Quality Assurance SCHEDULE F – Controlled Acts and Advanced Medical Procedures 4.AGREEMENT 4.1. General LH, through its Medical Advisory Board of the CEPCP, agrees to provide Medical Oversight to Pickering Fire and Emergency Services, who hereby agrees to the provision of such Services, subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this AGREEMENT. 4.2. MEDICAL OVERSIGHT The Parties hereby agree that LH shall provide to Pickering Fire and Emergency Services the following (collectively hereinafter referred to as “Medical Oversight”): (a)authorization to qualified Firefighters to perform the specified controlled acts as per section 8; (b)provide medical advice to Pickering Fire and Emergency Services to ensure a smooth and medically sound transfer of care from Pickering Fire and Emergency Services to Paramedics; (c)provide quality assurance information to Pickering Fire and Emergency Services as per SCHEDULE E 4.3. The Parties agree that Pickering Fire and Emergency Services will provide the resources necessary to act as a designate of the Medical Director, and at the sole discretion of a Medical Director, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this AGREEMENT. - 275 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 8 of 27 4.4. The Parties agree that LH, at its sole discretion, will utilize the Medical Director and/or LH program staff as required, subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this AGREEMENT. 4.5. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services will, where possible, provide LH with the use of a desk and private meeting space, and make available to LH access to electrical power in order to facilitate the provision of Medical Oversight pursuant to the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT including Section 7.3 herein. 5.MEDICAL EDUCATION 5.1. LH, through its Medical Advisory Board of the CEPCP, and a Medical Director shall establish policies and procedures to support Medical Education to Pickering Fire and Emergency Services in accordance with applicable laws, standards and the CPSO policy. LH shall review such policies, procedures, and Medical Education materials as required and will advise Pickering Fire and Emergency Services of any changes as necessary. 5.2. LH, through its Medical Advisory Board of the CEPCP will develop and review all training and delivery of Medical Education provided to Pickering Fire and Emergency Services. These programs will comply with Applicable Law, applicable Standards and the CPSO Policy. 5.3. Qualifications of Physicians LH, through the Medical Advisory Board of the CEPCP, shall ensure that the program Medical Directors maintain current and valid certificate of registration with the CPSO and a current certificate of professional conduct from the CPSO or such other documents as may be issued by the CPSO to evidence that the Medical Director has the appropriate registration, status, qualifications, skills, experience and training to perform the role of Medical Director. 6.MEDICAL ADVICE RELATING TO PATIENT CARE 6.1. LH, through the Medical Advisory Board, may at its sole discretion, provide advice and guidance to Pickering Fire and Emergency Services with respect to the Fire Service’s policies and procedures as it pertains to Medical Education and Medical Oversight. 6.2. LH will provide written medical directives for controlled acts to Pickering Fire and Emergency Services. 6.3. Where the Patient care provided by a Firefighter does not meet the applicable Standards, LH will so advise Pickering Fire and Emergency Services including by providing feedback (as per SCHEDULE E ) regarding the nature and type of Patient care provided by the Firefighter(s) and the nature of the identified Patient care issue. 6.4. An annual meeting between Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and LH will be scheduled for a mutually agreeable time and may be supported by additional meetings as requ ired or requested. - 276 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 9 of 27 7.TRAINING 7.1. Training records will be maintained by the delivery agent – either the Fire Service or LH. Upon request the training records for each Firefighter who is authorized to receive Medical Oversight will be shared with the other party. 7.2. LH will be responsible for ensuring that the training content for the Firefighters to receive Medical Oversight is in accordance with Applicable Law, the applicable Standards and CPSO Policy. 7.3. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services agrees to reimburse LH for additional costs incurred for additional training beyond that prescribed in the schedule(s). 7.4. Where required, scheduling will be done by LH in consultation with Pickering Fire and Emergency Services. 7.5. All training is mandatory to maintain authorization. 8.AUTHORIZATION AND RE-AUTHORIZATION 8.1. LH will provide appropriate authorization to eligible candidates identified by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services will ensure that eligible candidates have met the following criteria: (a)are either employed by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services on an indefinite or fixed term basis or have received an offer of employment from Pickering Fire and Emergency Services that has not expired, AND; (b)have successfully completed all LH required training and evaluation. 8.2. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services will advise LH of any changes in the status of a Firefighter that may affect his/her authorization. 8.3. LH will contact Pickering Fire and Emergency Services immediately upon identification that a Firefighter requires remedial training to continue to receive authorization. LH is responsible for the development of remedial training (as required) and that training may be delivered by LH or Pickering Fire and Emergency Services. 8.4. The Parties agree that LH may oversee the Controlled Act and Advanced Medical Procedure (SCHEDULE F) training and testing of eligbile Pickering Fire and Emergency Services staff. 8.5. The Parties agree that each Firefighter receiving Medical Oversight will complete a LH approved annual re-authorization process. - 277 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 10 of 27 9.QUALITY ASSURANCE 9.1. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and LH acknowledge and agree that: (a)LH must receive all of the information contained in the Call Report (the ”Data”) in order to facilitate its quality assurance obligations under this AGREEMENT; (b)LH is a Health Information Custodian (HIC) as defined in the Ontario Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 (“PHIPA”), and therefore is required to comply with PHIPA, and as such is required to take steps that are reasonable in the circumstances to ensure that Personal Health Information, including the Data, in LH’s custody or control is protected against theft, loss and unauthorized use or disclosure and to ensure that the records containing such personal information are protected against unauthorized copying, modification or disposal; (c)where the Data contains Personal Health Information, Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and LH further agree to collect, hold and disclose Personal Health Information pursuant to the provisions of PHIPA as Health Information Custodians (HIC) and Section 19 of the Act as applicable; (d)in light of the foregoing, Pickering Fire and Emergency Services agrees to provide LH with access to the Data for the purposes set out in (a) above and as otherwise required or permitted by Applicable Law (the “Purposes”); (e)Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and LH shall each notify the other of any problem with or errors in the Data of which such party may become aware. 9.2. LH shall develop and implement a quality assurance program consistent with applicable Standards including: (a)monitoring the delivery of patient care related to Medical Oversight provided by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Firefighters through Case Reviews; 9.3. LH will provide annual biomedical services for the AEDs used in EMR and EFR programs. 10.INFORMATION SHARING 10.1. Issues Resulting from Information Sharing (a)Case Reviews will be performed by LH, through the Medical Advisory Board, on all patient care calls involving a controlled act provided by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Firefighters, (b)All concerns received by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services pertaining to Medical Oversight issues will be forwarded to LH for Investigation and action and LH will notify Pickering Fire and Emergency Services of the results of its Investigation within two Business Days of completion of the Investigation. 10.2. Investigations (a)LH will be lead investigative organization in the case of any/all investigations involving Medical Oversight. The final report will be provided to Pickering Fire and Emergency Services from LH and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services will be responsible for - 278 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 11 of 27 communicating the report and its findings to any external parties to the extent Pickering Fire and Emergency Services deems appropriate. (b)LH may draw on any internal resources or personnel of the other Party that may assist the lead investigator in conducting and concluding investigations. (c)In the event an investigation has both service delivery as well as Medical Oversight issues as a component of the overall scope of the investigation Pickering Fire and Emergency Services shall remain the lead investigative authority, but will have LH address the Medical Oversight issues as a co-investigation organization or upon mutual agreement separate the oversight issues for investigation by LH. 10.3. Information To Be Shared between the Parties To the extent requested, the following shall be shared between the Parties during an Investigation: (a)All relevant written/typed incident reports; (b)All relevant audio recordings; (c)All relevant Call reports pertaining to an Investigation or Case Review; (d)Contact information of individuals involved in the Investigation; and (e)Other details as deemed appropriate by the parties. 11.SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT 11.1. LH and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services will collaborate regarding the supply, use and evaluation of equipment and supplies specific to Medical Oversight. 12.RESEARCH 12.1. LH will obtain the approval in writing of Pickering Fire and Emergency Services for all LH research proposals involving Pickering Fire and Emergency Services. If applicable, LH will obtain the approval of the Director of the Emergency Health Regulatory and Accountability Branch, Ministry of Health. 12.2. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services, at its discretion, may agree to support research conducted by LH with in-kind resources, if acceptable to LH, or financial resources. Any such support jointly agreed to by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and LH shall be included in the budget of each study protocol. 12.3. Each Party will seek advice and input from the other for all publications relating to research described in Section 12.1 or 12.2 at least 30 days prior to submission for publication without peer review or, when applicable, for submission of the manuscript for peer review. The Parties each agree to keep confidential prior to publication all information contained in a publication or manuscript that has been submitted by the other for advice and input. - 279 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 12 of 27 12.4. Authorship on any document submitted for publication will be granted in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Uniform Requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals (NEJM Vol.336 (4); 1997: pp309-315) as regularly updated and published. 12.5. Each Party will acknowledge the other Party’s contributions to the study and/or publicatio n in any publication or presentation derived from the study, if the other Party’s contribution does not meet the Uniform Requirements for authorship. 13.INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 13.1. Insurance of Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Pickering Fire and Emergency Services shall, at its own expense, obtain and maintain in full force during the Term, all insurance that would be necessary and appropriate for a prudent Person in the same business. Such insurance shall include the following: (a)commercial general liability insurance on an occurrence basis for third party bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, to an inc lusive limit of not less than $10,000,000 per occurrence and the policy shall include LH as an additional insured with respect to liability arising in the course of performance of the Services or under or in connection with this AGREEMENT. Such policy shall include but not be limited to the following: i.products and completed operations; ii.personal injury; iii.cross liability; iv.contractual liability; v.30-days’ prior written notice of change to the policy, cancellation, and/or non - renewal. (b)errors and omissions liability insurance insuring for liability for errors and omissions in the performance of or failure to perform its obligations under this AGREEMENT, in an amount not less than $10,000,000 per claim. (c)Network Security and Privacy Liability Coverage of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) and underwritten by an insurer licensed to conduct business in the Province of Ontario. Coverage shall include unauthorized access, electronic security breaches, theft or destruction of data within Provider’s computer network or other electronic information system. The Privacy Liability coverage shall include the theft of private personal information and include the failure to comply with privacy laws and their respective regulations regarding the collection, access, transmission, use and accuracy. Coverage shall be extended to include the costs associated with notification of affected parties as well as any fines or penalties imposed as a result of the breach. 13.2. Insurance of LH LH shall, at its own expense, obtain and maintain in full force during the Term, all insurance that would be necessary and appropriate for a prudent Person in the same business. Such insurance shall include the following: - 280 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 13 of 27 (a) commercial general liability insurance on an occurrence basis for third party bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, to an inclusive limit of not less than $10,000,000 per occurrence and the policy shall include Pickering Fire and Emergency Services as an additional insured with respect to liability arising in the course of performance of the Services or under or in connection with this AGREEMENT. Such policy shall include but not be limited to the following: i. products and completed operations; ii. personal injury; iii. cross liability; iv. contractual liability; v. 30-days’ prior written notice of change to the policy, cancellation, and/or non-renewal. (b) errors and omissions liability insurance insuring for liability for errors and omissions in the performance of or failure to perform its obligations under this AGREEMENT, in an amount not less than $10,000,000 per claim. (c) Network Security and Privacy Liability Coverage of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) and underwritten by an insurer licensed to conduct business in the Province of Ontario. Coverage shall include unauthorized access, electronic securit y breaches, theft or destruction of data within Provider’s computer network or other electronic information system. The Privacy Liability coverage shall include the theft of private personal information and include the failure to comply with privacy laws and their respective regulations regarding the collection, access, transmission, use and accuracy. Coverage shall be extended to include the costs associated with notification of affected parties as well as any fines or penalties imposed as a result of the breach. 13.3. Indemnification by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Pickering Fire and Emergency Services agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, LH and its officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives (the “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages and expenses, causes of action, actions, claims, demands, lawsuits or other proceedings (“Claims”) which the Indemnified Parties, or any of them, may suffer or incur as a result of LH entering into this AGREEMENT. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services shall not however be responsible for any such Claims to the extent it is solely caused by the negligence or misconduct of LH. 13.4. Indemnification by Lakeridge Health LH agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, City of Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and its officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives (the “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages and expenses, causes of action, actions, claims, demands, lawsuits or other proceedings (“Claims”) which the Indemnified Parties, or any of them, may suffer or incur as a result of City of Pickering Fire and Emergency Services entering into this AGREEMENT. LH shall not however be responsible for any such Claims to the extent it is solely caused by the negligence or misconduct of Pickering Fire and Emergency Services. - 281 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 14 of 27 14. TERM AND TERMINATION 14.1. Term This AGREEMENT shall commence on/as of January 1st, 2022 and shall continue for the period of 3 years, expiring on December 31st, 2024 or as terminated pursuant to this Article 15 (the “Term”). 14.2. Termination by Either Party Either Party may, at any time, and for any reason, terminate this AGREEMENT upon giving 30 days’ prior written notice to the other Party. 14.3. Effective Date of Termination The effective date of the termination of this AGREEMENT shall be the last day of the notice period or such other date as the Parties agree. 14.4. Consequences of Termination Upon termination of this AGREEMENT the provisions which by their nature are intended to survive beyond such termination will remain in effect. The termination of this AGREEMENT shall not relieve either of the Parties of their respective obligations or rights accrued up to and including the date of such termination. 14.5. Force Majeure Notwithstanding anything contained in this AGREEMENT, neither Party shall be liable for any failure or delay on its part to perform any of the terms, conditions, covenants or obligations of this AGREEMENT to the extent that such failure or delay is the result of a cause beyond its reasonable control including such things as unavailability of material, equipment, utilities, services, an act of God, a fire, an act of the public enemy, an act of Her Majesty in her sover eign capacity, laws, a flood, a quarantine restriction, an epidemic, a labour dispute, a riot, a civil commotion, vandalism, malicious mischief or other similar cause beyond its control and not avoidable by the exercise of reasonable foresight (excluding the inability to pay for the performance of such obligation) and which occurs without the default or negligence of the Party seeking relief. The Party being delayed shall be entitled to extend the time for fulfillment of such obligation by a time equal to the duration of such delay and the other Party shall not be entitled to any compensation for any loss or inconvenience occasioned thereby. The Party delayed shall however, use its best efforts to fulfill the obligation in question as soon as reasonably possible. 15. GENERAL PROVISIONS 15.1. Co-operation Pickering Fire and Emergency Services shall co-operate with and provide assistance to LH as reasonably required by LH to facilitate the provision of LH’s obligations under this AGREEMENT. - 282 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 15 of 27 15.2. Confidentiality LH shall not disclose to any third party any trade secret of or confidential information about Pickering Fire and Emergency Services that LH may acquire through the use of the Data. Confidential information is Data and information which is designated as such by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services (“Confidential Information”). LH shall use Confidential Information only for the Purposes. LH shall limit disclosure of Confidential Information within its own organization to its directors, officers, employees, agents, consultants and other representatives having a need to know and shall not disclose Confidential Information to any third party (whether an individual, corporation, or other entity) without the prior written consent of Pickering Fire and Emergency Services The parties herein mutually agree that the confidentiality covenant herein shall survive the termination or discharge of this AGREEMENT. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services shall not disclose to any third party any trade secret of or confidential information about LH that Pickering Fire and Emergency Services may acquire through the use of the Data. Confidential information is Data and information which is designated as such by LH (“Confidential Information”). Pickering Fire and Emergency Services shall use Confidential Information only for the Purposes. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services shall limit disclosure of Confidential Information within its own organization to its directors, officers, employees, agents, consultants and other representa tives having a need to know and shall not disclose Confidential Information to any third party (whether an individual, corporation, or other entity) without the prior written consent of LH, except where required by law. LH acknowledges that Pickering Fire and Emergency Services and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services are subject to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.M.56, The parties herein mutually agree that the confidentiality covenant herein shall survive the termination or discharge of this AGREEMENT. 15.3. Nature of Relationship Nothing contained in this AGREEMENT shall be construed as making the Parties (or their respective successors or permitted assigns), partners or joint venturers or construed as m aking any Party, its directors, officers, employees, volunteers, agents or other representatives an agent of any other Party. For greater certainty, none of the employees, principals, shareholders or independent contractors of Pickering Fire and Emergency Services shall be or be deemed to be employees of LH. 15.4. Assignment Neither this AGREEMENT, nor any rights or obligations hereunder, may be assigned by LH or Pickering Fire and Emergency Services without the prior written consent of the other Party and any purported assignment done without such consent shall be of no force or effect. This AGREEMENT is binding upon and shall enure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns and shall not be enforceable by or otherwise enure to the benefit of any other Person. 15.5. Invalidity If any provision of this AGREEMENT is determined to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions of this AGREEMENT shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby so long as - 283 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 16 of 27 the economic or legal substance of the matters contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to either Party. 15.6. Costs Each Party shall bear its own costs with respect to the drafting, negotiation and interpretation of this AGREEMENT. All other costs are outlined as per SCHEDULE C of this AGREEMENT. 15.7. Notices Any notice, demand or other communication (in this Section 16.6 a “Notice”) required or permitted to be given or made hereunder shall be in writing and shall be well and sufficiently given or made if it is: (a) delivered in person during normal business hours on a Business Day and left with a receptionist or other responsible employee of the relevant Party at the applicable address set forth below; (b) sent by prepaid first class mail; or (c) sent by any electronic means of sending messages, including facsimile transmission, which produces a paper record (an “Electronic Transmission”); in the case of LH, addressed to it at: Lakeridge Health 1 Hospital Ct Oshawa, ON L1G 2B9 Attn: Chief Financial Officer Fax: 905-721-4862 Tel: 905-576-8711 and in the case of Pickering Fire and Emergency Services addressed to it at: Pickering Fire Services 1616 Bayly Street Pickering, ON L1W 3N2 Attn: Fire Chief Fax: 905.839.6327 Tel: 905.839.9968 Any Notice given or made in accordance with this Section shall be deemed to have been given or made and to have been received: (a) on the day it was delivered, if delivered as aforesaid; (b) on the third Business Day (excluding each day during which there exists any general interruption of postal services due to strike, lockout or other cause) after it was mailed, if mailed as aforesaid; and - 284 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 17 of 27 (c)on the day of sending if sent by Electronic Transmission during normal business hours of the addressee on a Business Day and, if not, then on the first Business Day after the sending thereof. Any Party may from time to time change its address for notice by giving Notice to the other Party in accordance with the provisions of this Section. 15.8. Further Assurances Each Party shall do such acts and shall execute and deliver such further agreements, documents, conveyances, deeds, assignments, transfers and the like, and shall cause the doing of such acts and the execution and delivery of such further it as are within its power and as the other Party may in writing at any time and from time to time reasonably request, in order to give full effect to the provisions of this AGREEMENT. 15.9. Remedies Cumulative The rights and remedies under this AGREEMENT are cumulative and in addition to, and not in substitution for, any other rights and remedies, available at law or in equity or otherwise. No single or partial exercise by a Party of any right or remedy precludes or otherwise affects the exercise of any other right or remedy to which that Party may be entitled. 15.10. Counterparts and Facsimile Execution This AGREEMENT may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument and receipt of a facsimile version of an executed signature page of this AGREEMENT by a Party shall constitute satisfactory evidence of execution of this AGREEMENT by such Party. 15.11. Dispute Resolution/Consultation and Negotiation (a)In the event of a dispute between the Parties, each Party’s Designated Representative shall meet to attempt to resolve the Dispute. Each Party acknowledges that it is in their mutual interest to have their respective Designated Representative resolve all matters by mutual agreement and each agrees to act reasonably and in good faith to permit and encourage their respective representatives to do so. (b)If such Designated Representatives are not able to resolve any Dispute referred to them within 15 Business Days, the matter shall be referred to the Director of LH and the Fire Chief or his designate of Pickering Fire and Emergency Services, each of whom shall be fully briefed on the matter and shall have the authority to negotiate on behalf of and bind their respective Party. If such senior representatives are not able to resolve any Dispute referred to them within 15 Business Days (the “Resolution Date”) of such referral, then the matter shall be referred to arbitration as provided for herein. 15.12. Dispute Resolution/Arbitration (a)If the Parties do not reach a solution pursuant to Section 16.10 by the Resolution Date, the Dispute shall be arbitrated and finally resolved, pursuant to the National Arbitration Rules of the ADR Institute of Canada, Inc., as amended from time to time, by a single arbitrator appointed pursuant to Rule 14(d) of the said Rules. The place of arbitration shall be Toronto, Canada. The language of the arbitration shall be English. - 285 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 18 of 27 (b)Judgment upon the award rendered in any such arbitration may be entered in any cou rt having jurisdiction thereof, or application may be made to such court for a judicial acceptance of the award and an enforcement, as the law of such jurisdiction may require or allow. - 286 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 19 of 27 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have duly executed on the day of , 2021. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: LAKERIDGE HEALTH By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: - 287 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 20 of 27 SCHEDULE A - Designated Representatives LH Jennifer Shanley, Manager Office Operations Lakeridge Health 1 Hospital Ct Oshawa, Ontario L1G 2B9 Tel: 905-433-4370 Fax: 905-721-4737 Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Steve Boyd, Fire Chief Pickeirng Fire Services 1616 Bayly Street Pickering, Ontario L1W 3N2 Tel: 905-839-9968 Fax: 905-839-6327 - 288 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 21 of 27 SCHEDULE B – Training Programs Emergency First Responder – Self Delivery Core Program Description “EFR” Self Delivery Self delivered program by LH trained and approved internal candidates HSFO CPR certification Controlled Act and Advanced Medical Procedure certification (see SCHEDULE F ) Medical directives Access to CEPCP Learning Management System Medical liability coverage Quality assurance – call reviews Remediation programs as required Annual meeting Annual Biomedical service for AEDs Approximately 8 hours annual training In-house instructor(s) provide(s) all training (initial, maintenance and remedial) Annual Instructor certification (up to 8 hours, CPR instructor annual renewal) Options “EFR” New Instructor training Direct delivery by LH 40 hour course HSFO CPR Instructor and Controlled Act certification Medical directives Emergency First Responder – Direct Delivery Core Program Description “EFR” Direct Delivery Program training delivered by LH staff CPR certification Controlled Act and Advanced Medical Procedure certification (see SCHEDULE F ) Medical directives Access to CEPCP Learning Management System Medical liability coverage Quality assurance – call reviews Remediation programs as required Annual meeting Annual Biomedical service for AEDs Approximately 8 hours annual training Includes one new hire certification class (maximum 8 participants) per year Options “EFR” Additional New Hire certification Direct delivery by LH Up to 24 hours of training CPR certification Controlled Act and Advanced Medical Procedure certification (see SCHEDULE F ) Medical directives (maximum class size 8) - 289 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 22 of 27 Emergency Medical Responder – Direct Delivery Core Program Description “EMR” Direct delivery Program training delivered by LH staff CPR certification Controlled Act and Advanced Medical Procedure certification (see SCHEDULE F ) Medical directives Access to CEPCP Learning Management System Medical liability coverage Quality assurance – call reviews Remediation programs as required Annual meeting Annual Biomedical service for AEDs EMR manual (digital) per participant Approximately 16 hours annual training Includes one new hire certification class (maximum 8 participants) per year Options “EMR” Additional New Hire certification Direct delivery by LH Up to 120 hour course CPR certification Controlled Act and Advanced Medical Procedure certification (see SCHEDULE F ) Medical directives EMR manual (digital) per participant (maximum class size 8) Emergency Medical Responder – Self Delivery Core Program Description “EMR” Self delivery Self delivered program by LH trained and approved internal candidates HSFO CPR certification Controlled Act and Advanced Medical Procedure certification (see SCHEDULE F ) Medical directives Access to CEPCP Learning Management System Medical liability coverage Quality assurance – call reviews Remediation programs as required Annual meeting Annual Biomedical service for AEDs EMR manual (digital) per participant Approximately 16 hours annual training In-house instructor(s) provide(s) all training (initial, maintenance and remedial) Annual Instructor certification (up to 8 hours, CPR instructor annual renewal) Options “EMR” New Instructor training Direct delivery by LH 40 hour course HSFO CPR Instructor and Controlled Act certification Medical directives EMR manual (digital) per participant - 290 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 23 of 27 SCHEDULE C – Standard First Aid Program Delivery Fire Department agrees to deliver all Standard First Aid (SFA) training following the Lakeridge Health (LH) program as written and in its entirety using only materials created or approved by LH. All delivered courses will meet all requirements set out by W SIB including but not limited to; (a) Standard First Aid courses must be a minimum of 16 hours in duration with a minimum of 13 hours of instructional time. (b) Emergency First Aid courses must be a minimum of 8 hours in duration with a minimum of 6.5 hours of instructional time. (c) Standard First Aid recertification courses must be a minimum of 8 hours in duration with a minimum of 6.5 hours of instructional time. i. Recertification courses may only be taught to those participants who originally took the LH program ii. Participants may only complete one re-certification course and then must take the complete course (the cycle would be to take the complete course, 3 years later take the re-certification courseand then 3 years later take the complete course again) (d) The participant instructor ratio must not exceed 12 participants per one instructor. (e) The participant manikin ratio must not exceed 2 participants per one manikin. (f) Each participant must be provided a copy of the LH Standard First Aid Participant Manual and on successful completion of the course a LH approved wallet card and wall certificate. (g) Courses must be delivered in facilities with sufficient space and appropriate for the delivery of a SFA program. (h) All courses delivered by Fire Department will be to Fire Department employees. Equipment (i) All equipment utilized in the delivery of courses will be the responsibility of the Fire Department. Equipment needs for each course must be in accordance with the LH list of course equipment. Materials LH will provide the Fire Department with an electronic copy of all printed materials including the Standard First Aid Participant Manual required for the delivery of SFA courses. The Fire Department will be responsible for the printing of sufficient copies of these materials for each SFA course delivered under this agreement. The Fire Department agrees that reprinting of any of these materials for purposes not covered by this agreement is prohibited. - 291 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 24 of 27 Instructor Training LH will deliver instructor training to Fire Fighters selected by The Fire Department on a schedule and at a location agreeable to both parties. On successful completion of the instructor training and having been monitored during the delivery of a SFA program by LH staff the Fire Fighters will be designated as SFA Instructors. Instructor training will be a minimum of 16 hours in length Instructor candidates will be provided a copy of an Instructor manual by LH On completion of Instructor training, each Instructor candidate must be monitored during their delivery of a SFA program course a minimum of once by LH staff prior to being designated a SFA Instructor. Documentation The Fire Department will provide LH with complete rosters of all courses delivered by The Fire Department under this agreement within 30 days of the course completion. These rosters will include; Course date Course Type Course Length Client group Instructor names Participant names Course Progress Report Participant Skill Tracking Sheet - 292 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 25 of 27 SCHEDULE D – Fees & Payment for Services Item Frequency Amount Initial Selection 2021 2022 2023 EFR Direct delivery program Annual $140 per firefighter $140 per firefighter $140 per firefighter EFR Additional New Hire As required $1200 per course (max 8 participants) $1200 per course (max 8 participants) $1200 per course (max 8 participants) EFR Self delivered program Annual $110 per firefighter $110 per firefighter $110 per firefighter EMR Direct delivery program Annual $275 per firefighter $275 per firefighter $275 per firefighter EMR Additional New Hire As required $1200 per course (max 8 participants) $1200 per course (max 8 participants) $1200 per course (max 8 participants) EMR Self delivered program Annual $240 per firefighter $240 per firefighter $240 per firefighter EFR/EMR Additional New Instructor As required $3000 per instructor $3000 per instructor $3000 per instructor SFA Participant administration and registration Per course $15 per participant $15 per participant $15 per participant Instructor Training As required $2000 per instructor training course, (max 8 instructor candidates) $2000 per instructor training course, (max 8 instructor candidates) $2000 per instructor training course, (max 8 instructor candidates) Instructor Monitoring/ Auditing As required $500 per day $500 per day $500 per day Notes: LH will invoice Pickering Fire and Emergency Services once annually by December 31st for: 1.the total number of Firefighters who receive medical oversight from the Medical Advisory Board of CEPCP, at any point during the calendar year. 2.any additional items required by Pickering Fire and Emergency Services The Parties agree to negotiate and append additional fee structures for work not described in this AGREEMENT. - 293 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 26 of 27 SCHEDULE E – Quality Assurance It is recognized that the quality assurance requirements will need to be reviewed regularly to ensure that the needs of both Parties are being met and in fulfillment of the terms of this AGREEMENT. Data Requirements: Data will be provided to LH as described in the AGREEMENT. The minimum data required are to be captured in a form mutually agreed to by both Parties. Case reviews: LH will audit all calls where a Call Report for patient care involving controlled act(s) is received by LH from Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Fire Department, using a standardized audit tool. The results of a chart audit will be available no later than five weeks following the commencement of the audit. The Parties agree to the following process: LH will issue individual case feedback forms when clarification is required. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services will make reasonable efforts to encourage a response within 3 weeks of receipt. An additional 2 weeks may be added where the Firefighters are reasonably unavailable to complete the request, or where it is likely that the feedback form was not received. Report Requirements: LH will provide the following minimum reports to Pickering Fire and Emergency Services. If additional reports are required they will be negotiated and appended to this AGREEMENT: Case Review reports: Semi-annual. - 294 - Agreement to Provide Medical Oversight Services CEPCP and Pickering Fire and Emergency Services Page 27 of 27 SCHEDULE F – Controlled Acts and Advanced Medical Procedures Pickering Fire and Emergency Services requests authorization to perform the following Controlled Acts and Advanced Medical Procedures, in accordance with CEPCP’s Fire Services Medical Directives, Policies and Guidelines. Pickering Fire and Emergency Services to initial beside each item they are requesting delegation to perform. Directive and Controlled Act and Advanced Medical Procedures Fire Service Initials Cardiac Arrest General Medical Directive Use of AED and provide defibrillation Medical Cardiac Arrest Medical Directive Use of AED and provide defibrillation Hypothermia Cardiac Arrest Directive Use of AED and provide defibrillation Trauma Arrest Medical Directive Use of AED and provide defibrillation Foreign Body Airway Obstruction Cardiac Arrest Medical Directive Use of AED and provide defibrillation Neonatal Resuscitation Medical Directive Advanced medical procedures Anaphylaxis Medical Directive Administer Epinephrine, IM Opioid Toxicity Medical Directive Administer Naloxone, IN Emergency Bandage Application Medical Directive Medical grade tourniquet application - 295 - Report to Council Report Number: OPS 17-22 Date: July 11, 2022 From: Brian Duffield Director, Operations Subject: Additional Funds for Pickering Heritage & Community Centre Pre-Construction Costs -File: A-1440 Recommendation: 1.That Report OPS 17-22 of the Director, Operations regarding additional costs for pre- construction work to be completed for the Pickering Heritage & Community Centre (PHCC) at the Pickering Museum Village be received; 2.That unspent funds provided by Reports CS 19-18 and CS 34-18 for architectural, landscape and engineering services for the Pickering Heritage & Community Centre at the Pickering Museum Village be re-allocated for the conversion of existing technical documents to meet Net-Zero Design criteria in accordance with the City’s Green and Inclusive Community Buildings (GICB) grant application and other related costs included in Recommendations 3 to 5 below, and as presented in Table 3; 3.That as per the proposal submitted by Hariri Pontarini Architects dated June 17, 2022, in the amount of $438,327.00 (HST included), and net cost of $394,727.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 4.That in accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 10.03 (c), proposal V 22024 dated June 17, 2022, as submitted by Vertical Stat-Up Commissioning in the amount of $67,992.00 (HST included), and a net cost of $61,229.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 5.That in accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 10.03 (c), proposal P22-007 dated June 17, 2022, as submitted by Independent Project Managers in the amount of $37,340.00 (HST Included), and a net cost of $33,626.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 6.That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to finance the additional net costs of $576,078.00 from the unspent funds by applying the funding ratio as per 2022 Development Charges Background Study as follows: a)the sum of $99,765.00 by a transfer from the Rate Stabilization Reserve; b)the sum of $21,211.00 by a transfer from the DC City Share Reserve; c)the sum of $241,952.00 by a transfer from the Development Charges Reserve Fund – Parks & Recreation; d)the sum of $23,043.00 by a transfer from the Development Charges Reserve Fund – Library Services; - 296 - OPS 17-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: Additional Funds for Pickering Heritage and Community Centre Page 2 Pre-Construction Costs e)the sum of $190,107.00 from the GICB grant; and, 7.That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. Executive Summary: Design of the PHCC began with the approval of Report CS 19-18 on June 18, 2018 through Resolution #455/18, and was originally envisioned as a phased project. Report CS 34-18, approved on December 10, 2018 through Resolution #08/18, expanded the project scope to include design of the entire facility for construction as a whole. The project has since been submitted for building permit and site plan review, and was placed on hold in mid-2021, when Council approved Report CS 27-21 through Resolution #612/21 endorsing additional funds for the preparation and application for funding to the Green and Inclusive Community Buildings (GICB) grant program. At the time, a high level review was also underway to determine the financial viability and prioritization of various major building projects and the PHCC project was put on hold. The City’s GICB grant application included provisions to convert existing designs to meet the Net-Zero Design criteria, as set out by the Canadian Green Building Council (CaGBC). Version 2 of this standard was used as part of the application. A new version has since been released and projects must be registered by September 2022 to be grandfathered under the older iteration of the standard. The project must be registered with CaGBC, with direction to proceed with conversion to Net-Zero Design, to protect the integrity of the City’s grant application. Repurposing existing funds approved as part of Reports CS 34-18 and CS 27-21 will enable the project consultant team to revise all drawings and specifications to meet Net-Zero Design requirements and be ready to tender for construction. The City will register the project with CaGBC before the version change deadline and obtain certification within the timelines allowed for as part of this transition. Consulting fees pertaining to contract administration, previously included in Report CS 34-18, will be deferred and re-introduced as part of a future report related to award for project construction. Financial Implications: 1.Approved Funding as per CS 34-18, CS 27-21 CS 34-18 Approved Funds $1,503,779.00 (adjusted award of RFP-6-2018 for phases 1 & 2) CS 27-21 Approved Funds 126,691.00 (additional work for GICB application) Total Approved Budget $1,630,470.00 - 297 - OPS 17-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: Additional Funds for Pickering Heritage and Community Centre Page 3 Pre-Construction Costs 2.Actual and Additional Costs CS 34-18 Costs Incurred to Date CS 27-21 Costs Incurred to Date $992,266.00 60,210.00 Sub-Total Incurred to Date $1,052,476.00 Fund Remaining Available $577,994.00 Additional Costs: HPA Proposal Commissioning Agent Canadian Green Building Council Costs Contingency 387,900.00 60,170.00 10,000.00 75,000.00 Total Project Costs (excluding taxes) HST (13%) Total Gross Additional Costs $566,114.00 73,595.00 $639,709.00 HST Rebate (11.24%) Total Net Additional Costs (63,631.00) $576,078.00 Under/(Over) Approved Funds $1,916.00 3.Breakdown of Additional Costs and Funding Sources Canadian Green Project Building HPA Mgmt. (IPM Council Costs Proposal Proposal) Comm. Costs Cont. Total Funding Ratio-2022 DC Study Project Cost 387,900 33,044 60,170 10,000 75,000 566,114 HST 13% 50,427 4,296 7,822 1,300 9,750 73,595 Total Gross Costs 438,327 37,340 67,992 11,300 84,750 639,709 HST Rebate11.24% (43,600) (3,714) (6,763) (1,124) (8,430) (63,631) Total Net Project Costs 394,727 33,626 61,229 10,176 76,320 576,078 Funding Sources DC RF-Parks & Recreation 165,785 14,123 25,716 4,274 32,054 241,952 42% DC RF-Library 15,789 1,345 2,449 407 3,053 23,043 4% Grant 130,260 11,097 20,206 3,358 25,186 190,107 33% - 298 - OPS 17-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: Additional Funds for Pickering Heritage and Community Centre Page 4 Pre-Construction Costs Costs HPA Proposal Project Mgmt. (IPM Proposal) Comm. Canadian Green Building Council Costs Cont. Total Funding Ratio-2022 DC Study City Share/Rate Stabilization 82,893 7,061 12,858 2,137 16,027 120,976 21% Total 394,727 33,626 61,229 10,176 76,320 576,078 100% 4. Approved Source of Funds Approved Code Source of Funds Funds Available Funds Required C10220.2011 R-Rate Stabilization $271,755.00 $239,046.00 C10220.2011 R-DC City’s Share 21,211.00 17,918.00 C10220.2011 RF-DC Parks & Rec 88,012.00 76,748.00 C10220.2011 RF-DC Library 197,016.00 175,113.00 GICB Grant 0.00 190,107.00 Total Funds $577,994.00 $576,078.00 Project Cost under (over) approved funds by $1,916.00 Modifying the existing PHCC design to meet Net-Zero Design targets enhances the original intent declared in Report CS 19-18, where it was noted that the building would be designed to be energy efficient and with modern construction materials in order to control future building operating costs. Discussion: The GICB grant program requires related construction projects to meet prescribed sustainable design and energy conservation targets. The City’s application proposed to convert the existing PHCC design to meet Net-Zero Design targets, as set by the CaGBC and in accordance with version 2 of the Net-Zero Design requirements. CaGBC recently released and is gradually transitioning to version 3, which carries different technical criteria. In order to preserve the integrity of the City’s grant application, as submitted, the PHCC project must be registered with CaGBC by no later than September 29, 2022, and certification of the designs must be completed no later than September 29, 2024. Certification is based on construction-ready drawings and specifications, without requiring actual construction of the building. Hariri Pontarini Architects (HPA) had largely completed the design of PHCC when the GICB grant opportunity arose. The building permit was ready for issue and site plan application was in the final stages of resolution. Report CS 27-21 requested additional funding to explore how to convert the existing designs to meet the Net-Zero Design in order to support the City’s grant submission. This work included a roadmap, but not the actual conversion of technical documents. In order to minimize financial impact to the City, existing approved funding from - 299 - OPS 17-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: Additional Funds for Pickering Heritage and Community Centre Page 5 Pre-Construction Costs reports CS 34-18 and CS 27-21 are proposed to be re-purposed to cover the costs of conversion to Net-Zero Design. This approach avoids any immediate increase above and beyond approved budgets. Funding approval is also requested for pre-construction project management services, to be provided in accordance with item 10.03 (c) of the Purchasing Policy, to retain Independent Project Managers (IPM). IPM provided similar services to the City during the pre-tender design development of the City’s new Operations Centre, and supplemented existing staff resources by assisting with scheduling, cost and quality control. By involving them in the project prior to tender, IPM can assist with technical coordination and help mitigate post-tender contractor claims. Costs for any project management services required during the construction stage of the project would be submitted as part of a future report to award the construction contract, and are not included in this report. Systems commissioning is a common part of any major building project, and typically focused around the final stages of construction. It is good practice to also involve the commissioning agent prior to tender in order to review and refine the quality of the technical drawings and specification, avoiding as many coordination issues as possible prior to award. PHCC would be the City’s first Net-Zero project. In addition to the benefits stated above, early review and oversight of HVAC and other key systems by a commissioning agent will assist staff in understanding and preparing for the operational needs of new technologies. Approval is requested to retain Vertical Start-Up Commissioning (VSC), in accordance with item 10.03 (c) of the Purchasing Policy, to provide these services. By re-allocating existing approved funds, no additional funding will be required to complete the work required to convert PHCC’s design to meet the Net-Zero Design standard. The integrity of the City’s submission to the GICB grant program will also be maintained by registering the project with CaGBC prior to the sunset deadline for version 2 of this standard. Additional funding will be required, at the time of construction tender award, to recapture cost associated with contract administration services to be provided by HPA and IPM, adjusted to reflect the increased scope and complexity of a Net-Zero building. Subject to receipt and approval of all submittals required, the proposals submitted by HPA, IPM and VSC, all dated June 17, 2022, are recommended for approval, to be funded from existing approved and unspent funds from Reports CS 34-18 and CS 27-21, to proceed with conversion of PHCC design and construction documents to meet Net-Zero Design requirements. Attachments: None. - 300 - OPS 17-22 July 11, 2022 Subject: Additional Funds for Pickering Heritage and Community Centre Page 6 Pre-Construction Costs Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Brian Duffield Stan Karwowski, MBA, CPA, CMA Director, Operations Director, Finance & Treasurer Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Vince Plouffe, OAA, RAIC Sarah Douglas-Murray Manager, Facilities Capital Projects Director, Community Services BD:vp Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Original Signed By: Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer - 301 - Memo To: Susan Cassel July 5, 2022 City Clerk From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Copy: Chief Planner Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Subject: Amending By-law for Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 07/20 Calloway REIT (Pickering) Inc. (SmartCentres) Northwest corner of Pickering Parkway and Brock Road Part of Lot 18, Concession 1, Parts 1 to 20 and 22 to 40, Parts 21 and 41, 40R-26237 (Save and Except Parts 1 to 3, 40R-27791) Amending By-law 7957/22 Statutory Public Meeting Date November 2, 2020 Planning & Development Committee Date June 6, 2022 Purpose and Effect of By-law To permit a phased high-density, mixed-use development consisting of 5 towers with building heights ranging between 25 to 32 storeys, containing a total of approximately 1,599 residential units and 4,568 square metres of commercial space at grade, located at the northeast corner of Pickering Parkway and Brock Road. Council Meeting Date July 11, 2022 Note On June 6, 2022, the Planning & Development Committee endorsed staff’s recommendation that the proposed zoning provisions contained in Appendix II to Report PLN 30-22, be finalized and forwarded to Council for enactment. Original Signed By Kyle Bentley CC:ld J:\Documents\Development\D-3100 Official Plan Amendments (OPA Applications)\2020\OPA 20-003P, A007-20, S 06-20 - Calloway REIT (SmartCentres)\By-law\By-law Chart Memo.docx Attachments By-law Text Schedules I, II, III & IV - 302 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7957/22 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, Part of Lot 18, Concession 1, Parts 1 to 20 and 22 to 40, Parts 21 and 41, 40R-26237 (Save and Except Parts 1 to 3, 40R-27791), City of Pickering (A 07/20) Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering received an application to rezone the subject lands being Part of Lot 18, Concession 1, Parts 1 to 20 and 22 to 40, Parts 21 and 41, 40R-26237 (Save and Except Parts 1 to 3, 40R-27791), in the City of Pickering to permit a high-density, mixed-use development; And whereas an amendment to Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5511/99, is therefore deemed necessary; Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1. Schedules I, II, III and IV Schedules I, II, III and IV to this By-law with notations and references shown thereon are hereby declared to be part of this By-law. 2. Area Restricted The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands being Part of Lot 18, Concession 1, Parts 1 to 20 and 22 to 40, Parts 21 and 41, 40R-26237 (Save and Except Parts 1 to 3, 40R-27791), in the City of Pickering, designated “BP-MU-1” and “(H) BP-MU-1”, on Schedule I to this By-law. 3. General Provisions No building, structure, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this By-law. 4. Definitions In this By-law, (1) “Amenity Space” means the total passive or active recreational area provided on a lot for the personal, shared or communal use of the residents of a building or buildings, and includes balconies, patios, rooftop gardens and other similar features, but does not include indoor laundry or locker facilities. (2) “Art Gallery/Studio” means a premises used for the creation, exhibition, collection and/or preservation of works of art for public viewing and sale and may include educational classes. - 303 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 2 (3) “Balcony” means an attached covered or uncovered platform projecting from the face of an exterior wall, including above a porch, which is only directly accessible from within a building, usually surrounded by a balustrade or railing, and does not have direct exterior access to grade. (4) “Bay Window” means a window with at least three panels set at different angles to create a projection from the outer wall of a building, and includes a bow window. (5) “Block” means all land fronting on one side of a street between the nearest streets, intersecting, meeting or crossing said street. (6) “Build-to-Zone” shall mean an area of land in which all or part of a building elevation of one or more buildings is to be located. (7) “Building” means a structure occupying an area greater than 10 square metres and consisting of any combination of walls, roof and floor but shall not include a mobile home. (8) “Building, Main” means a building in which is carried on the principal purpose for which the lot is used. (9) “Building, Mixed Use” means a building containing residential uses and at least one non-residential use permitted by this By-law. (10) “Car Share Service” means a service that provides motor vehicles solely for the shared use of members of that service, and does not include an automobile rental establishment or automobile dealership. (11) “Commercial Use” means any permitted use the primary purpose of which is to sell, lease or rent a product of service directly to the public, including but not limited to retail sales, entertainment services and personal or professional services, but shall exclude residential uses. (12) “Commercial Fitness/Recreational Centre” means a commercial establishment that has been designed for conduct of sport, athletic and leisure activities such as squash courts, swimming pools, exercise classes and other similar indoor recreational facilities are provided and operated for gain or profit. (13) “Community Centre” means a multi-purpose facility that offers a variety of programs or a recreational, cultural, day care, social, community service, informational or instructional in nature. (14) “Day Care Centre” means: i) indoor and outdoor premises where more than five children are provided with temporary care and/or guidance for a continuous period but does not provide overnight accommodation and are licensed in accordance with the applicable Provincial Act; or - 304 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 3 ii) indoor and outdoor premises in which care is offered or supplied on a regular schedule to adults for a portion of a day but does not provide overnight accommodation. (15) “Daylight Triangle” means an area free of buildings, structures, fences and hedges up to 0.9 metres in height and which area is to be determined by measuring, from the point of intersection of street lines on a corner lot, the distance required by this By-law along each such street line and joining such points with a straight line. The triangular-shaped land between the intersecting street lines and the straight line joining the points the required distance along the street lines is the daylight triangle. (16) “Development Agreement” means an executed contract between a developer/property owner and the City of Pickering that is required in order to implement development and may include a subdivision agreement, site plan agreement, or other similar agreements for development. (17) “District Energy Facility” means a centrally located facility or linked facilities that generates and distributes thermal energy (steam and/or hot and cold water) to end users through an underground pipeline distribution system and generates electricity, including electricity for supply to the grid. (18) “Dwelling” includes: a) “Accessory Dwelling Unit” means a separate dwelling unit subsidiary to and located in the same building as an associated principal dwelling unit; and its creation does not result in the creation of a semi-detached dwelling, duplex dwelling, three-unit dwelling or converted dwelling. b) “Apartment Dwelling” means a residential use building containing four or more principal dwelling units where the units are connected by a common corridor or vestibule, other than a townhouse dwelling or stacked dwelling. c) “Block Townhouse Dwelling” means a residential use building containing three or more attached principal dwelling units divided vertically, and where all dwelling units are located on one lot and accessed from a private street, laneway or common condominium aisle. d) “Dwelling Unit” means a residential unit that: i) consists of a self-contained set of rooms located in a building or structure; ii) is used or intended for use as a residential premises; iii) contains kitchen and bathroom facilities that are intended for the use of the unit only; and iv) is not a mobile home or any vehicle. - 305 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 4 e) “Stacked Dwelling” means a residential use building of four or fewer storeys in height containing three or more principal dwelling units where the units are divided horizontally and vertically, and in which each dwelling unit has an independent entrance to the interior. (19) “Existing” means existing as of the date of the enactment of the provision that contains that word. (20) “Financial Institution” means a building or portions of a building used for the purposes of administering or providing financial services to the public, other than exclusively through an automated banking machine. (21) “Floor Area” means the total area of all floors of a building within the outside walls. (22) “Floor Area, Net” means the total area of all floors of a building measured from the interior faces of the exterior walls or demising walls, but does not include the following areas: (a) Motor vehicle parking and bicycle parking below established grade; (b) Motor vehicle parking and bicycle parking at or above established grade; (c) Loading spaces and related corridors used for loading purposes; (d) Rooms for storage, storage lockers, washrooms, electrical, utility, mechanical and ventilation; (e) Indoor amenity space required by this By-law; (f) Elevator, garbage and ventilating shafts; (g) Mechanical penthouse; and (h) Stairwells in the building. (23) “Floor Space Index” means the total net floor area of all buildings on a lot divided by the total area of the lot. (24) “Food Store” means a premises that sells food and other non-food items, primarily on a self-service basis. (25) “Grade” or “Established Grade” means the average elevation of the finished level of the ground adjoining all exterior walls of a building. (26) “Gross Floor Area” means the total area of each floor whether located above, at or below grade, measured between the exterior faces of the exterior walls of the building at each floor level but excluding any porch, veranda, cellar, mechanical room or penthouse, or areas dedicated to parking within the building. For the purposes of this definition, the walls of an inner court shall be deemed to be exterior walls. (27) “Gross Leasable Floor Area” means the total floor area designed for tenant occupancy and exclusive use, including basements, mezzanines and upper floor areas if any; expressed in square metres and measured from the centre line of joint partitions and from outside wall faces. - 306 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 5 (28) “Ground Floor” means the floor of a building at or first above grade. (29) “Ground Floor Area” means the gross floor area only on the ground floor. (30) “Height” means the vertical distance between the established grade, and in the case of a flat roof, the highest point of the roof surface or parapet wall, or in the case of a mansard roof the deck line, or in the case of a gabled, hip or gambrel roof, the mean height level between eaves and ridge. When the regulation establishes height in storeys, means the number of storeys. The height requirements of this By-law shall not apply to roof top mechanical penthouses. (31) “Landscaped Area” means an outdoor area on a lot comprising trees, plants, decorative stonework, retaining walls, walkways, or other landscape or architectural elements, excluding aisles and areas for loading, parking or storing of vehicles. (32) “Lane” means a thoroughfare not intended for general traffic circulation that provides means of vehicular access to the rear of a lot where the lot also fronts or flanks onto a street, or where a lot fronts onto public or private open space. The lane may be maintained by a condominium corporation as a private road condominium or by a government authority. (33) “Loading Space” means an unobstructed area of land which is provided and maintained upon the same lot or lots upon which the principal use is located and which area is provided for the temporary parking of one commercial motor vehicle while merchandise or materials are being loaded or unloaded from such vehicles. (34) “Lot” means a parcel of land fronting on a street, whether or not occupied by a building or structure. (35) “Lot Area” means the total horizontal area of a lot. (36) “Lot Line” means a line delineating any boundary of a lot. (37) “Main Wall” means a primary exterior front, rear or side wall of a building, not including permitted projections. (38) “Office” means a building or part thereof, where administrative and clerical functions are carried out in the management of a business, profession, organization or public administration but shall not include a medical office. (39) “Office, Medical” means a premises designed and used for the diagnosis, examination, and medical, surgical or physiotherapeutic treatment of human patients, and which may include pharmacies and dispensaries, waiting rooms, treatment rooms and blood testing clinics, but shall not include overnight accommodation for in-patient care. - 307 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 6 (40) “Park, Private” means an area of land not under the jurisdiction of a public authority that is designed or maintained for active or passive recreational purposes. (41) “Park, Public” means an area of land under the jurisdiction of a public authority that is designed or maintained for active or passive recreational purposes and other uses authorized through an agreement with the City. (42) “Parking Area” means one or more parking spaces, including related aisles, for the parking or storage of vehicles. (43) “Parking Garage” means a building, or part thereof, used for the parking of vehicles and may include any permitted use in the first storey, but shall not include any area where vehicles for sale or repair are kept or stored. A parking garage includes underground parking and a parking structure. (44) “Parking Lot” means a lot or portion thereof provided for the parking of motor vehicles accessory or incidental to the main use. (45) “Parking Space” means an unobstructed area of land that is accessible by an aisle, having access to a street or lane that is reserved for the purpose of the temporary parking or storage of one motor vehicle. (46) “Parking Space, Bicycle” means an area used exclusively for parking or storing a bicycle. (47) “Parking Structure” means a building or portion thereof, containing one or more parking spaces. (48) “Patio” means an outdoor area where seating accommodation can be provided and/or where meals or refreshments are served to the public for consumption. (49) “Personal Service Shop” means a premises used to provide personal grooming services or for the cleaning or care of apparel. (50) “Place of Amusement” means a premises which are devoted to the offering of facilities for the playing of any game for the amusement of the public such as a billiard or pool rooms, bowling alleys, electronic games, indoor playground, miniature golf courses or roller skating rinks. (51) “Podium” means the base of a building, structure or part thereof located at or above established grade that projects from the tower portion of the building. (52) “Porch” means a roofed deck or portico structure with direct access to the ground that is attached to the exterior wall of a building. (53) “Premises” means the whole or part of lands, buildings or structures, or any combination of these. - 308 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 7 (54) “Primary Entrance Door” means the principal entrance by which the public enters or exits a building or individual retail/commercial unit or the resident enters or exits a dwelling unit. (55) “Restaurant” means a building or part of a building where the principal business is the preparation of food and drinks for retail sale to the public for immediate consumption on or off the premises, or both on and off the premises but shall not include a night club. (56) “Retail Store” means a premises in which goods and merchandise are offered or kept for retail sale or rental to the public. (57) “School, Commercial” means a building, or part thereof, where instruction of a skill is provided for profit and may include instruction in a trade, business, art, music, dance, cooking, athletic skill or any other specialized instruction but does not include a commercial fitness/recreational centre or a post-secondary school. (58) “Setback” means the distance between a building and a lot line. In calculating the setback the horizontal distance from the respective lot line shall be used. (59) “Storey” means that portion of a building other than a basement, cellar, or attic, included between the surface of any floor, and the surface of the floor, roof deck or ridge next above it. (60) “Storey, First” means the storey with its floor closest to grade and having its ceiling more than 1.8 metres above grade. (61) “Street” means a public highway but does not include a lane or a King’s Highway (Highway 401). Where a 0.3 metre reserve abuts a street, or where a daylight triangle abuts a street, for the purposes of determining setbacks the street shall be deemed to include the 0.3 metre reserve and/or the daylight triangle, however, nothing herein shall be interpreted as granting a public right of access over the 0.3 metre reserve or as an assumption of the 0.3 metre reserve as a public highway for maintenance purposes under the Municipal Act. (62) “Street Line” means the dividing line between a lot and a street. (63) “Street, Private” means: a) a right-of-way or roadway that is used by vehicles and is maintained by a condominium corporation; b) a private road condominium, which provides access to individual freehold lots; c) a roadway maintained by a corporation to provide vehicular and pedestrian access to parking lots and individual retail/commercial units; - 309 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 8 d) a private right-of-way over private property, that affords access to lots abutting a private road; but is not maintained by a public body and is not a lane. (64) “Structure” means anything that is erected, built or constructed of parts joined together with a fixed location on the ground, or attached to something having a fixed location in or on the ground and shall include buildings, walls or any sign, but does not include fences below six feet in height or in ground swimming pools. (65) “Temporary Sales Office” means a building, structure, facility or trailer on the lot used for the purpose of the sale of dwelling units to be erected on the lot. (66) “Tower” means the storeys within that portion of a building or structure or part thereof located above the podium. (67) “Tower Floor Plate” means the average floor area of all storeys within that portion of a building or structure or part thereof located above the podium, measured to the exterior faces of exterior walls of each storey of a building or structure. (68) “Uncovered Platform” means an attached or freestanding structure not covered by a roof, which is located on the same level as or lower than the first storey of the building associated with the platform. (69) “Veterinary Clinic” means a building or part of a building providing the services of a veterinarian, and facilities for the medical treatment, examination, surgery, diagnosis, grooming, general health care, and observation of domestic animals and birds. 5. Permitted Uses and Zone Regulations (1) Permitted Uses (“BP-MU-1 Zone”) No person shall within the lands zoned “BP-MU-1” on Schedule I to this By- law, use any lot or erect, alter, or use any building or structure for any purpose except the following: a) Apartment Dwelling b) Block Townhouse Dwelling c) Stacked Dwelling d) Community Centre e) Commercial Fitness/ Recreation Centre f) Car Share Service g) Day Care Centre h) District Energy Facility i) Financial Institution j) Food Store k) Office l) Office, Medical - 310 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 9 m) Park, Private n) Park, Public o) Personal Service Shop p) Retail Store q) Restaurant r) School, Commercial s) Veterinary Clinic (2) Zone Regulations (“BP-MU-1 Zone”) No person shall within the lands zoned “BP-MU-1” on Schedule I to this By- law, use any lot or erect, alter, or use any building or structure except in accordance with the following provisions: a) Floor Space Index (FSI) i) minimum 0.75 FSI ii) maximum 5.0 FSI iii) the area shown on Schedule II to this By- law, shall be deemed to be a lot for purposes of calculating FSI b) Number of Dwelling Units i) minimum 228 units ii) maximum 1,600 units c) Building Height i) minimum 10.5 metres ii) the maximum height of a building wholly located within the dashed lines, is specified by the number following the HT symbol as shown on Schedule IV to this By-law d) Podium Requirements i) minimum height of podium – 10.5 metres ii) maximum height of podium – 25.0 metres e) Building Location and Setbacks i) no building or part of a building, or structure shall be erected outside of a building envelope, as shown on Schedule III to this By-law ii) no building or portion of a building or structure shall be erected within the building envelope, unless a minimum of 60 percent of the entire length of the build-to-zone, as shown on Schedule III to this By-law iii) notwithstanding 2 e) i) and ii) above, the total frontage of a private park/public park along Pickering Parkway shall be excluded from the requirements of Section 2 e) ii) above f) Setback for Below Grade Parking Structures i) minimum – 0.0 metres - 311 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 10 g) Tower Floor Plate i) maximum tower floor plate for a residential building – 865 square metres ii) notwithstanding 2 g) i) above, balconies shall be excluded from the calculation of tower floor plate iii) notwithstanding 2) g) i) above, the first floor of a residential tower located above the podium shall have a maximum tower floor plate size of 4,300 square metre for any portion of a building located within the diagonal hatched area as shown on Schedule IV to this By-law h) Building Separation i) minimum – 11.0 metres, except that the separation may be reduced to 3.0 metres if there are no primary windows or balconies on the wall facing the adjacent flanking building ii) minimum – 25.0 metres for any portion of a building greater than 37.5 metres in height, which shall be measured from the main wall of each building, but shall exclude balconies i) Main Wall Stepback for Buildings greater than 37.5 metres i) minimum main wall stepback - 3.0 metres from the main wall of a point tower and the main wall of a podium on any building face abutting a street line j) Balcony Requirements i) minimum area – 3.0 square metres k) Amenity Space Requirements for Apartment Dwellings i) minimum – 2.0 square metres of indoor amenity space is required per apartment dwelling unit ii) minimum – 2.0 square metres of outdoor amenity space is required per apartment dwelling unit (a minimum contiguous area of 40.0 square metres must be provided in a common location) l) Landscaped Area i) minimum 10 percent of the land area m) Non-Residential Uses i) minimum 4,500 square metres of GLFA, shall be located on the lands, as shown on Schedule II to this By-law ii) minimum 2,200 square metres of GLFA shall be located within Phase 1 lands, as shown in diagonal hatching on Schedule IV to this By-law - 312 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 11 n) Private Park / Public Park i) minimum 2850 squares metres shall be located on the lands, as shown on Schedule II to the By-law ii) minimum 35 metres of frontage along Pickering Parkway (3) Permitted Encroachments No part of the building envelope shall be obstructed except as follows: i) Projections such as awnings, canopies, window sills, chimney breasts, fireplaces, belt courses, cornices, pilasters, eaves, piers, eave troughs, and other similar architectural features may be permitted to project a maximum of 2.5 metres beyond the building envelope as illustrated on Schedule III to this By-law, but shall maintain a minimum setback of 0.5 metres to a lot line. ii) Any stairs, including to a porch or any associated landing, uncovered platform, covered platform, and any unenclosed ramp for wheelchair access may encroach beyond the building envelope no closer than 0.3 metres from a lot line. iii) A balcony, porch, uncovered platform or covered platform may encroach beyond the building envelope to a maximum of 2.0 metres or half the distance, whichever is less. iv) A bay, box or bow window, with or without foundation, having a maximum width of 4.0 metres may encroach beyond the building envelope to a maximum of 0.6 metres or half the distance, whichever is less. (4) Yards Abutting Daylight Triangles Where a lot abuts a daylight triangle, the setback provisions shall be measured as if the daylight triangle did not exist, provided all buildings are setback 0.6 metres from the daylight triangle with the exception of window sills, belt courses, cornices, eaves, eave troughs and architectural elements, such as the architectural projections from the podium and canopies, which may project to within 0.3 metres of the daylight triangle. (5) Vehicular Parking Regulations: a) Minimum Parking Requirements: Residential Uses Apartment Dwelling 0.85 spaces per dwelling unit and an additional 0.15 of a space per dwelling unit for visitors Block Townhouse Dwelling 1.75 spaces per dwelling unit 0.15 of a space per dwelling unit for visitors - 313 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 12 Residential Uses Stacked Dwelling 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit 0.15 of a space per dwelling unit for visitors Non-Residential Uses Day Care Centre 1.0 space per employee plus 3.0 spaces and an additional 1.0 space per classroom Office 2.5 spaces per 100 square metres of GLFA Financial Institution, Food Store, Retail Store, Commercial School, Personal Service, Office Medical, Veterinary Clinic and Restaurant less than 465 square metres of GLFA 3.5 spaces per 100 square metres of GLFA Commercial Fitness Centre 4.5 spaces per 100 square metres of GLFA Restaurant over 465 square metres of GLFA 5.0 spaces per 100 square metres of GLFA b) Accessible Parking Requirements To be provided on-site in accordance with the requirements of the Traffic and Parking By-law 6604/05 as amended, or any successor thereto. c) Parking for Multiple Uses on One Lot: A shared parking formula may be used for the calculation of required parking for multiple uses on a lot. Shared parking is to be calculated in compliance with Table 1 – Shared Parking Formula. All required parking spaces must be accessible to all uses participating in the shared parking arrangement and may not be reserved for specific users. The initial step in determining required parking for multiple uses on a lot is to calculate the parking requirement for each use in the development as if these uses were free-standing buildings. The parking requirement for each use is then multiplied by the percent of the peak period for each time period (i.e. noon), contained in Table 1 – Shared Parking Formula. Each column is totaled for weekday and weekend. The highest figure obtained from all time periods shall become the required parking for the development. - 314 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 13 Table 1 – Shared Parking Formula Type of Use Percentage of Peak Period (Weekday) Morning Noon Afternoon Evening Financial Institution/Office/Office, Medical 100 90 95 10 Food Store/Personal Service Shop/Retail Store 65 90 90 90 Restaurant, less than 465 square metres of GLFA 20 100 30 100 Residential – Visitor 20 20 60 100 Type of Use Percentage of Peak Period (Saturday) Morning Noon Afternoon Evening Financial Institution/Office/Office, Medical 10 10 10 0 Food Store/Personal Service Shop/Retail Store 80 100 100 70 Restaurant, less than 465 square metres of GLFA 20 100 50 100 Residential – Visitor 20 20 60 100 d) Parking Off-Site: Required parking spaces for any non-resident use may be located on another lot provided that the parking spaces are no further than 500 metres from the northerly and easterly limits of the subject lands as identified on Schedule II to the By-law, and where a legal easement or an agreement exists. e) Parking Structures i) Above grade parking structures located adjacent to any street line shall comply with the provisions for the main building. ii) Parking structures constructed completely below established grade are permitted to encroach below public and private right- of-ways and public parkland. iii) Stairs associated with a parking structure are not permitted between a street line and the main wall of a building. iv) Air vents constructed in association with an underground parking structure are permitted to project to a maximum of 1.2 metres above established grade no closer than 1.2 metres to a street line. - 315 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 14 (6) Bicycle Parking Space Requirements: a) Minimum number of bicycle parking spaces: 0.5 of a space per dwelling unit. b) A maximum of 50 percent of the required bicycle parking spaces may be vertical spaces; the rest of the required spaces must be horizontal spaces. c) Where the number of bicycle parking spaces exceeds 50 spaces, a minimum of 25 percent of the total required must be located within: i) a building or structure; ii) a secure area such as a supervised parking lot or enclosure; or iii) bicycle lockers. d) Where four or more bicycle parking spaces are provided in a common parking area, each space must contain a parking rack that is securely anchored to the ground and attached to a heavy base such as concrete. e) Dimensions: i) if located in a horizontal position (on the ground): a minimum length of 1.6 metres and a minimum width of 0.6 metres; ii) if located in a vertical position (on the wall): a minimum length of 1.5 metres and a minimum width of 0.5 metres; iii) if stacked: a minimum length of 1.5 metres and a minimum width of 0.45 metres. (7) Loading Standards Where a loading space is provided, the following regulations apply: a) the minimum dimensions of a loading space are 3.5 metres in width and 12.0 metres in length, with a minimum vertical clearance of 4.2 metres; b) a loading space shall abut the building for which the loading space is provided; c) an unenclosed loading space located above established grade shall be set back a minimum of 10.0 metres from a street line; d) an enclosed loading space located above established grade shall not be located beyond the building envelope as shown on Schedule III to this By-law. (8) Noise Attenuation Notwithstanding Section 5.2 d) related to Podium Requirements for Buildings greater than 37.5 metres, structures for noise attenuation purposes may exceed the maximum podium height of 25.0 metres. - 316 - By-law No. 7957/22 Page 15 6. Provisions (“(H) BP-MU-1” Zone) (1) Permitted Uses (“(H) BP-MU-1” Zone) Until such time as the “(H)” Holding Provision is lifted, the lands shall not be used for any purposes other than the existing lawful uses, located on the land or in existing buildings or structures, provided such use continue in the same manner and for the same purpose for which they were used on the day this by-law was passed. (2) Zone Requirements (“(H) BP-MU-1” Zone) The “(H)” Holding Symbol shall be removed from the “BP-MU-1” zone until the completion of the following: a) The owner has satisfied all the requirements of the Regional Municipality of Durham with respect to the provision of sewer and water services, Regional roads, and entered into any necessary agreements in this regard, including front funding or cost sharing agreements; b) The owner has entered into any necessary agreement for the design, construction and conveyance of sufficient road allowances for the future east-west street and the north-south street to the City of Pickering; and c) The owner has entered into any necessary agreement for the design, construction and conveyance of a minimum of 2,850 square parcel of land for a Public Park to the City of Pickering. The final location of the Public Park, along with the detailed design of the park are to be determined and finalized through a future site application to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering. 7. By-law 3036 By-law 5511/99, is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedule I to this By-law. Definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 3036. 8. Effective Date That this By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. By-law passed this 11th day of July, 2022. ___________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ___________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 317 - Br o c k R o a d Pickering Parkway i N 18 3 . 8 m Clerk Mayor Schedule I to By-Law Passed This Day of 7957/22 11th July 2022 84 . 2 m 165.7m 72.3m 14 7 . 5 m (H) B P - M U - 1 BP-MU-1 2.0m 14.1m 90.7m75.0m 10 0 . 1 m 8.5m 61 . 0 m 36. 6 m 156.5 m - 318 - Br o c k R o a d Pickering Parkway i N 18 3 . 8 m Clerk Mayor Schedule II to By-Law 7957/22 Passed This 11th Day of July 2022 36. 6 m 165.7m 156. 5 m 14 7 . 5 m 2.0m 14.1m 2.85 Ha - 319 - Br o c k R o a d Pickering Parkway i N 12 5 . 4 m Clerk Mayor Schedule III to By-Law 7957/22 Passed This 11th Day of July 2022 8. 3 m Building Envelope Build to Zone (minimum width of 5m) 20m 12 m 5m 5 m 5m 16 3 . 3 m 148.7m 25.6m 125.9m - 320 - Br o c k R o a d Pickering Parkway i N 12 5 . 4 m Clerk Mayor Schedule IV to By-Law 7957/22 Passed This 11th Day of July 2022 148.7m 73.0m 8. 3 m 25.6m 52 . 9 m 16 3 . 3 m 70 . 0 m 42 . 4 m 10 0 . 0 m 63 . 3 m 78.6m 63 . 3 m 78.6m70.1m 40 . 6 m 40 . 6 m 70.1m 50 . 3 m 78.6m 50 . 3 m 34 . 5 m HT: 98 metres (29-storeys) HT: 107 metres(32-storeys) HT: 95 metres (28-storeys) HT: 86 metres (25-storeys) HT: 107 metres (32-storeys) 125.9m Building Height Locations Building Envelope - 321 -