The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFebruary 10, 2021- Revised C4 6� PICKERING Revised Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 2 Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 C. o� Agenda O Committee of Adjustment PICKERING Wednesday, February 10, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting Page Number 1. Disclosure of Interest 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Adoption of Minutes from January 13, 2021 1-12 4. Report 4.1 Tabled at the December 9, 2020 meeting 13-21 P/CA 65/20 4AMCA Enterprises Ltd. 606 Annland Street 4.2 Deferred at the January 13, 2021 meeting 22-33 P/CA 02/21 C. & J. Cagna 2615 Cerise Manor 4.3 P/CA 03/21 34-39 C. & L. Eliopoulos 737 Aspen Road 4.4 P/CA 06/21 40-51 B. & N. Sukra & W. Bain 312 Dyson Road 4.5 P/CA 07/21 52-56 V. & V. Joshi 1519 Avonmore Square 4.6 P/CA 08/21 57-61 P. Therucheelvam 2150 Saffron Drive 4.7 P/CA 09/21 62-66 S. Muthulingam 945 Third Concession Road 4.8 P/CA 10/21 67-72 1329575 Ontario Inc. 1030 Salk Road 4.9 P/CA 11/21 73-80 Nuteck Homes Ltd. 516 Oakwood Drive 5. Adjournment For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Samantha O'Brien Telephone: 905.420.4660, extension 2023 Email: sobrien@pickering.ca C4o� Committee of Adjustment V r4 Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland — Vice-Chair David Johnson — Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary-Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer 1. Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. 2. Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Denise Rundle That the agenda for the Wednesday, January 13, 2021 meeting be adopted. Carried Unanimously 3. Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the minutes of the 10th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, December 9, 2020 be adopted as amended. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 12 -1 - o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting 4. Reports 4.1 P/CA 16/19 1155886 Ontario Inc. 425 Whitevale Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 2677/88, 5629/00 and 6828/08, to permit: • a maximum of two dwelling units on the property, whereas the By-law permits a maximum of one dwelling unit on the property; and • a professional office that is not a component of a day spa use or included in the gross leasable floor area calculation of the day spa use, whereas the By-law permits a professional office as a component of a day spa use, and shall be included in the gross leasable floor area calculation of the day spa use. The applicant requests approval of these variances to recognize two existing uses that are not permitted in the current zoning. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services expressing there are currently a number of open building permits for this property. If these variances are granted, the applicant will need to submit a revision to Building Permit 14-101231 that reflects the proposed and current uses of the building. To be approved, any building permit revision will need to be in compliance with both the Building Code and the approved zoning (including any approved minor variances). Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) expressing no objections with the proposal. We understand that the existing building contains a number of uses from residential to commercial, etc. Through our review of the site via desktop exercise, TRCA can conclude that a portion of the existing building is within the limits of a Regional Storm Floodplain. As the proposed second dwelling unit will be confined within the existing building footprint, TRCA staff can accept the proposal in principle. We will work with the landowner and their retained consultant to ensure this dwelling unit is appropriately flood proofed to the Regional Storm Floodplain elevation through our review of the forthcoming Permit Application. With respect to the professional office, we understand this use will also be maintained within the existing building footprint. As such, we have no objections to the professional office use which will be consistent with the existing pattern of commercial businesses Page 2 of 12 -2- o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting present on the property. An Ontario Regulation 166/06 Permit Application will be required for the proposed additional dwelling unit and any proposed regrading or fill placement as a result of the landscaping being proposed (ex. driveway improvements). Written comments were received from Pickering Heritage expressing the property is located within the Whitevale Heritage Conservation District and designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. This property does not have historical or architectural significance within the District guidelines. This is a change in use and therefore no heritage permit is required, nor is circulation to the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee. Exterior alterations to the building or site may require a heritage permit. Rick Gosling, applicant, was present to represent the application. Theresa McCarthy of 3185 Factory Street was present in objection to the application. Sharon Murdoch of 22 Belton Court, Whitby, was present for the application. Rick Gosling stated that no modifications are being made to the building; the floor that is being included in as a residence is zoned as a bed & breakfast and will be reducing the number of parking spaces that will be required. Sharon Murdoch stated she has no questions or concerns. Theresa McCarthy expressed several concerns with parking and what the additional office use space will be used for. Theresa McCarthy provided a history of the subject property and indicated it is right across the street from her residence; Factory Street is a one lane road; she has had to install hedges and window film in the hopes of reducing the problems; she stated during the construction of the 407 there were as many as 10 large vehicles parking along Factory Street; headlights shining into her residence in the early mornings and evenings; exhaust from vehicles being started remotely; City By-law services have been called out to the subject property on more than one occasion in the past and questions how an additional use can be accommodated. Theresa McCarthy stated if it was not for the parking across from her residence she would have no objection to the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Theresa McCarthy stated that the ideal solution would be to eliminate the 4 parking spaces along Factory Street. In response to concerns from the resident, Rick Gosling stated the parking along Factory Street has not be utilized since the trucking company had left about a year ago; the application is not adding additional uses, it will be reducing the uses by taking the space that is currently a bed & breakfast and converting it into a 1 bedroom apartment that will reduce the number of parking spaces. Rick Gosling stated they have occupied the site for over 25 years; and they are continuing to maintain the heritage and hamlet nature of the community. In response to questions from Committee Members, Rick Gosling stated there are 2 doctors' offices on the first floor; a small office at the front of the building; residence in the basement; and will be converting the 3rd floor into a 1 bedroom apartment instead of a bed & breakfast; and that revised site plan and floor plans will be submitted. Page 3 of 12 -3- o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting After considering the City Development's report, hearing from the neighbour; understanding this building has mixed-uses; recognizing that there have been a number of attempts to provide different uses within the building, and that the amount of parking will vary for each permitted use; acknowledging that the owner has heard the neighbours concerns and will try to address them; feeling that the owner is aware of his role within the community and that the application appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act; Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application P/CA 16/19 by 1155886 Ontario Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances to permit an additional dwelling unit and a professional office as an independent use, are minor in nature, in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a maximum of two dwelling units shall be permitted within the subject building. 2. That the professional office on the ground floor have a maximum gross leasable floor area of 115 square metres. 3. That the professional office on the second floor have a maximum gross leasable floor area of 140 square metres. 4. That the applicant submit revised site plan and floor plans for the subject building, including an Ontario Building Code & Zoning matrix, within three months of this decision becoming Final and Binding. 5. That the applicant obtain a change of use permit for the ground floor professional office within three months of this decision becoming Final and Binding. Carried Unanimously 4.2 P/CA 66/20 Trillium Housing Oak Non-Profit Corporation 2635 William Jackson Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 7706/19, to permit: • air conditioner units to be located between the front wall of a building or a dwelling and a street, whereas the By-law states air conditioner units shall not be located between the front wall of a building or a dwelling and a street. Page 4 of 12 -4- o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain site plan approval for stacked townhouses. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) expressing the proposed air conditioner units located between the front main wall of the building and the street are all located outside of the TRCA area of interest (further to the east). TRCA staff confirm there are no objections to this variance being requested. Kelly Graham, agent, was present to represent the application. Kerron Williams of 2418 Earl Grey Avenue in objection to the application. Kerron Williams expressed concerns with the noise that will be generated from the air conditioner units; and stated Earl Grey Avenue is very narrow and will become very busy and noisy during construction. In response to concerns from the resident, Kelly Graham indicated that every effort has been made to make sure the air conditioning units are low volume. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Kelly Graham stated the air conditioning units that will have the decorative metal screening will be on the balconies only. After considering the City Development's report and hearing the comments from the neighbour on the noise; decorative metal screening will be put into place; and that the application meet the four tests of the Planning Act; Sean Wiley moved the following motion: Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 66/20 by Trillium Housing Oak Non-Profit Corporation, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law (refer to Exhibit 1 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated January 13, 2021). Carried Unanimously Page 5 of 12 -5- o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting 4.3 P/CA 01/21 M. & M. Henry 1044 Moorelands Crescent The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 3132/89, to permit: • a minimum front yard depth of 4.1 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 6.0 metres; • a minimum rear yard depth of 6.1 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres; • a maximum lot coverage of 41 percent; whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent; • a maximum of two dwelling units per lot, whereas the By-law permits a maximum of one dwelling unit per lot, provided a) a total of three parking spaces are provided on the property where the accessory dwelling unit is located, b) the maximum floor area of an accessory dwelling unit shall be one hundred (100) square metres, and c) a home-based business is prohibited in either dwelling units on this lot; and • a minimum of one private garage per lot attached to the main building, any vehicular entrance of which shall be located not less than 5.3 metres from the front lot line, whereas the By-law requires a minimum of one private garage per lot attached to the main building, any vehicular entrance of which shall be located not less than 6.0 metres from the front lot line. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for an addition to a semi-detached dwelling, including an addition to the front and rear of the dwelling, an extension to the length of the attached garage, an addition of a front second-storey terrace, an addition of an accessory dwelling unit in the basement and an addition of a rear ground-floor deck. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department stating to ensure reduced front/rear yard depth and additional percentage of lot coverage does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot. Consideration for rain harvesting or other Low Impact Development measures should be made at the Building Permit stage if increasing the imperviousness of the lot surface. Page 6 of 12 -6- C4o� Committee of Adjustment V r4 Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting Written comments were received from the owners of 1046 Moorelands Crescent, 1048 Moorelands Crescent, 1052 Moorelands Crescent, 1031 Morrelands Crescent and 1042 Moorelands Crescent expressing no objections to the application. Melanie Henry, applicant, Imran Kahan, agent and Troy Royer, applicant's contractor were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Troy Royer stated that the driveway will not be widened, the garage will be brought forward slightly; the driveway will be large enough to have 1 car in the garage and 2 cars on the driveway. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That application P/CA 01/21 by M. & M. Henry, be Approved on the grounds that the variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed addition to the semi-detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4 & 5 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated January 13, 2021). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed accessory dwelling unit as determined by Building Services. Carried Unanimously 4.4 P/CA 02/21 C. & J. Cagna 2615 Cerise Manor The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364/14, as amended, to permit a maximum driveway width of 6.0 metres, whereas the By-law established a maximum driveway width of 3.0 metres for lots having lot frontages less than 9.0 metres with attached private garages associated with a residential use that are accessed only by a driveway from a street. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to widen the driveway. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending refusal. Page 7 of 12 -7- o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department objecting to the application for the following reasons: 1. Widening the driveway will increase the impermeable area of the lot having a negative impact on the overall stormwater management scheme for the development. 2. The proposal includes widening within the City's road allowance, which is not permitted. 3. Widening the driveway will require the removal of a City owned boulevard tree. Written comments were received from the owner of 2617 Cerise Manor and 2613 Cerise Manor in support of the application. Michael Annanlli, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Michael Annarilli outlined widening of the driveway is required to allow 2 vehicles to park side by side. Mr. Annarilli and his partner suffer from medical conditions that are aggravated when required to move their vehicles that are parked in a tandem arrangement on the driveway. He noted he is agreeable to design concessions in order to obtain approval of the variance required to facilitate the driveway widening. He cited the following reasons for the Committee to approve the requested minor variance and the following responses to comments contained in the staff report: • Does not agree that there is a consistent streetscape as a number of single detached and townhouse dwellings exist with driveway widths equal to or greater than 6.0 metres within the block; • Does not agree that the increase in impermeable area would have an impact on the subdivision's stormwater management, and that any increased stormwater created by the 12 square metres driveway widening is manageable through permeable paving, he is willing to install an infiltration gallery in the rear yard if necessary (details have been provided to the Members); • Agrees to minor design alterations to provide proper setbacks to City property and an existing tree including the provision of a security deposit for the tree, and ensures greater setbacks will not impact the functionality of widening, and • Two adjacent neighbours have provided support of the driveway widening in writing. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Michael Annarilli stated that a minimum 3.0 metre widening is required to accommodate vehicles parked side by side and opening of doors. Page 8 of 12 -8- o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting After considering City Development's report and the applicant's comments to the Committee, Sean Wiley moved the following motion: Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 02/21 by C. & J. Cagna, be Deferred to the next Committee of Adjustment meeting on February 10, 2021 to allow the applicant time to submit a revised plan. Carried Unanimously 4.5 P/CA 04/21 M. & J. Crokidas 1869 Woodview Avenue The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1545/82, to recognize: • an accessory building (cabana) with a maximum height of 4.8 metres, whereas the By-law states no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone; • the total lot coverage of all accessory buildings excluding private detached garages, to not exceed 6.8 percent of the lot area, whereas the By-law states the total lot coverage of all accessory buildings excluding private detached garages, shall not exceed 5 percent of the lot area; and • a maximum lot coverage of 44 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for an existing accessory structure (cabana). The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to a condition. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department stating to ensure additional percentage of lot coverage does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot. Consideration for rain harvesting or other Low Impact Development measures should be made at the Building Permit stage if increasing the imperviousness of the lot surface. Downspouts for the cabana should be directed to the front of the structure so they do not outlet directly towards the rear neighbour. Page 9 of 12 -9- o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting Written comments were received from the owners of 1870 Woodview Avenue, 1900 Pine Grove Avenue and 1873 Woodview Avenue expressing no objections to the proposal. John Crokidas, applicant, and Albert Yerushalmi, agent, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Albert Yerushalmi stated the cabana will be located at the rear of the subject property and the property in behind is currently vacant; have received 3 letters of support from the surrounding neighbours and agrees with staff's report. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Albert Yerushalmi explained construction on the cabana had been started without a permit and there is currently a stop work order. In response to questions from Committee Members, John Crokidas explained the cabana is being constructed by a family member who is a freelance carpenter; confirmed there will be a washroom within the cabana to accommodate a future swimming pool; and there will be no kitchen or bedroom. After considering the owner's and agent's comments; hearing it will be outdoor living space and not habitable space; and that the application meets the four tests of the Planning Act; Tom Copeland moved the following motion: Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 04/21 by M. & J. Crokidas, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing accessory structure (cabana), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4 & 5 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated January 13, 2021). Carried Unanimously 4.6 P/CA 05/21 J. Soo & S. Tam 1860 Glendale Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit: Page 10 of 12 -10- o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting • a minimum north side yard setback of 0.6 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum side yard of 1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for an addition to an attached garage. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to a condition. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department stating to ensure garage addition does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot. Consideration for rain harvesting or other Low Impact Development measures should be made at the Building Permit stage if increasing the imperviousness of the lot surface. Written comments were received from the owners of 1862 Glendale Drive expressing no objections to the proposal. Jimmy Soo, applicant, and Godfrey Defreitas, agent, were present to represent the application. John DeSouza of 1862 Glendale Drive was present in favour of the application. In response to questions from Committee Members, Godfrey Defreitas stated the addition is to widen the garage to provide tandem parking in the garage and access to the rear yard; stone and gravel is to be installed on the north side to alter the drainage pattern; there is access to the rear yard on the south side as well and there will be a garage door at the north side of the garage in order to provide access to the rear yard. After considering the City Development's report and the comments provided by the agent regarding sufficient room between the abutting property and the structure providing appropriate drainage, maintenance of the dwelling and appropriate access to the rear yard; and that the property owner to the north not having any objections; Sean Wiley moved the following motion: Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Tom Copeland That application P/CA 05/21 by J. Soo & S. Tam, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: Page 11 of 12 -11 - o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes PICKERINGWednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated January 13, 2021). Carried Unanimously 5. Adjournment Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the 1 st meeting of the 2021 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:22 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, February 10, 2021. Carried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Page 12 of 12 -12- CdY 4 Report to PICKERINGCommittee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 65/20 Date: February 10, 2021 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 65/20 4AMCA Enterprises Ltd. 606 Annland Street Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18, to: • recognize a minimum lot frontage of 8.6 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15 metres; • recognize a minimum lot area of 130 square metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum lot area of 460 square metres; • permit a minimum front yard setback of 2.3 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres; • permit a minimum rear yard setback of 1.7 metres; whereas the By-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres; • permit a minimum east side yard setback of 0.3 metres, and a minimum west side yard setback of 1.3 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres on one side, 2.4 metres on the other side; • permit a maximum lot coverage of 52 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent; and • permit an uncovered platform (front porch) not projecting more than 6.9 metres into the required front yard, whereas the By-law requires uncovered steps and platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard and not more than 1.0 metres into any required side yard. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for a detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department recommends that Minor Variance Application P/CA 65/20 be Deferred to the March 10, 2021 Committee of Adjustment Meeting to allow the applicant to revise the submitted site plan to include a 5.0 metre radius corner rounding at the intersection of Annland Street and Pleasant Street, to be conveyed to the City of Pickering. -13- Report P/CA 65/20 February 10, 2021 Page 2 Background The Committee of Adjustment tabled this application at the December 9, 2020 Committee of Adjustment meeting to allow the applicant to consider design elements that address the Urban Design Guidelines for Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhood Precincts. The original proposal included a 3-storey, flat roof dwelling, with rear wall windows at all three floors. The revised proposal includes a 3-storey dwelling with a combination of a flat and gable roof, with rear wall windows at the first and second-floors only. The revised proposal also reduces the size of the windows along the west side wall, and reduces the size of the roof terrace. Existing Conditions The subject property and existing dwelling do not conform to the zoning provisions in the By-law. For the property and existing dwelling to conform to the By-law, variances would be required for lot area, lot frontage, front, rear and side yard setbacks, and lot coverage. Encroachment Agreement There appears to be a registered Encroachment Agreement (V9705) on title with the subject property, as the existing dwelling is located beyond the east property boundary and encroaches onto a City-owned right of way. Comments In accordance with comments received from Engineering Services (see Input from Other Sources), the City requires a corner rounding, with a radius of 5.0 metres, to be provided at the intersection of Annland Street and Pleasant Street. The conveyance of a corner rounding was not included on the submitted site plan, nor taken into account when identifying variances for lot coverage, yard setbacks, etc. The conveyance of a corner rounding is expected to alter the requested variances to lot coverage and yard setbacks. As such, City staff recommend that this application be deferred to the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment to allow the applicant to revise the submitted site plan to include a corner rounding. Please note, public notice requirements for this minor variance application were fulfilled prior to receiving comments from Engineering Services. -14- Report P/CA 65/20 February 10, 2021 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Building Services • No comments on the application. Engineering Services . Ensure reduced front/side/rear yard depth and additional percentage of lot coverage does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot. Consideration for rain harvesting or other low impact development measures should be made at the Building Permit stage if increasing the imperviousness of the lot surface. The City requires a corner rounding, with a radius of 5 metres, to be provided at the intersection of Annland Street and Pleasant Street. The applicant will be required to provide a draft R-Plan showing the corner rounding and will then need to pay all the fees associated with conveyance of the lands to the City for road dedication purposes. Date of report: February 4, 2021 Comments prepared by: Isabel Lima Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration IL:so J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2020\PCA 65-20\7.Report\PCA 65-20 Report-Deferred-Feb 10.doc Attachments A 5- Exhibit 1 Commerce Street E Broadview Street Progress S m Frenchman's °�r m Bay East Park o a �a M 0 Of 0 0 a Annland Street Subject Lands Wharf Street TM N -A-\ I Location Map C ad File:P/CA 65/20 PICKERING Applicant:4AMCAEnterprises Ltd. City Development Property Description: Part of Lot 12, Block E, Plan 65 Department (606 Annland Street) I Date: Oct. 27, 2020 TM1e Corporation of th,Cly of Pickering Produced(in part)under lice se fro @ Qu,An,Printer,Ontario MlnistrY of Natural Resources. SCE: I E: 1:x1,000 All rightsreserved.',OHer McJesytlie Queen in Rlgh—Canada,Departrn totN-ral Resources_All rig-reserved.', JVf1L I G Tea net Enternas lnc.antl its su hers silo dts resarvetl_;B rAssessm ent Coro antl ltssu hers alldhlsra—d.: THIS IS NOTA PLAN OF SURVEY. L'.rPLANNING\g1-MapFlles\PCA\2020\PCA 66-2g JAMCA Enterprises Ltd\PCA66-2g Location Map mxd Exhibit 2 to permit a minimum west side yard setback of 1.3 metres .o� J a 9g to permit a maximum lot /� ,� „N; to permit mum a to permit a , n` coverage of 52 percentx ✓ minimum lot j rear yard � � �� . �� setback of area of titi \ 1.7 metres 130 square \ O metres - \ \ Area ofVOL x Proposed to permit a minimum lot .• �; Dwelling 4^ frontage of 8.6 metres 9ti \ z�ox, Q o to permit a minimum east side <� to permit an uncovered Eyard rmit a minimum front yard setback of 0.3 of a metre platform (front porch) not setback of 2.3 metres projecting more than 6.9 metres into the �� required front yard PLS SEN _ i Submitted Site Plan �1�� File No: P/CA 65/20 Applicant: 4AMCA Enterprises Ltd. City Development Property Description: Part of Lot 12, Block E, Plan 65 Department 606 Annland Street CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: ,Jan 21, 2020 Exhibit 3 3/4' LAMINATED GLASS T-6' HIGH RAILING ENGINEERED AS PER O.B.C. REOUIREMENTS PREFIN- METAL CAP FLASHING FIN. CEILING 3/4' LAMINATED GLASS 3-6' HIGH RAILING ENGINEERED e AS PER O.B.C. REOUIREMCNTS !Y PREFIta METAL PANEL - p - jj FIN. 3RD FL. N N '4 - - ---- ---- - ----- FIN. 2ND FL. N IST FL, N FIN. GRADE e t BUILDING E E CEMENT PARGING EINICOMPOSIX DRAINAGE LAYER ---------- FIN. i i a, OVER IED CONC. ...... FOUNDATTIONION WALL t FIN. BASEMENT _—.-----'—---------— -- ——— G PDURED [OriC.F00TING FR❑NT CS❑UTH) ELEVATION Submitted Front Elevation Plan File No: P/CA 65/20 P I C KE R I NG Applicant: 4AMCA Enterprises Ltd. City Development Property Description: Part of Lot 12, Block E, Plan 65 Department (606 Annland Street) CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL Date: Jan 21, 2021 COPIES OF THIS PLAN. -18- Exhibit 4 PREPIN. METAL CAP FLASHING FIN. CEILING P E 1P1. T L 0 3/4' LAMINATED GLASS 3'-6' HIGH RAILING ENGINEERED AS PER O.B.C. REQUIREMENTS FIN. 3RD FL. 1,- co r4 N rF-c- O FIN. 2ND FL. PREFIN -------- METAL PANEL - - ---------- - N F.G. N ul G ry - FIN_IST FL. ____ - __ - - _ - - =--- - - n u� f -- --------- - ----- - p FIN. GRADE e Y BUILDING - COMPOSITE DRAINAGE LAYER OVER ID'POURED CONC. FOUNDATION WALL FIN, BASEMENT E _ 6' POURED CONC.FOOTING REAR CN❑RTH) ELEVATI❑N Submitted Rear Elevation Plan File No: P/CA 65/20 P I C KE R1 NG Applicant: 4AMCA Enterprises Ltd. City Development Property Description: Part of Lot 12, Block E, Plan 65 Department (606 Annland Street) CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL Date: Jan 21, 2021 COPIES OF THIS PLAN. -19- Exhibit 5- 3/4'LAMINATED GLASS T-6' NIGH RAILING ENGINEERED A$PER BBC REOVIRGCNTS PREr IN. METAL AP FLASHING ---'---- - ------------ ------- 10P DF ROOF rfN. CEILING I MIDPOIN Of T,E R Va ti— d i . o N PRE IN K TAL s n1 rA$ IA s TT£ BRICK .-- � FIM. RD FL. PPEFIN. METAL PAW.C! C C t � rn Lf) O C O O }— --.-i N LFA FIN PND FL. --- j _ U? o6 ___ ____ ____________ _ _ __ _ .___ cn 1 N - Q —------ - F]N. IST FL. _ ,;- _ _ __ ______ _ _ _ _ ___ __ _ _ _ __ _ -- - -- - - - ------ rIN. GRADE P BUILDING ! —� i �COMPUSITE DRAINAGE LAYER DVCR 1 =T'" 10' POURED CONE, FOUNDATION MALL IN. BASEMENT 6' POLMRCD LONC.fDOTING .....................:_ ._.............._ ..... ....................... EAST SIDE ELEVATI❑N 4Submitted East Side Elevation Plan �,��E R� �� File No: P/CA 65/20 Applicant: 4AMCA Enterprises Ltd. City Development Property Description: Part of Lot 12, Block E, Plan 65 Department (606 Annland Street) CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: .Jan 21, 2020 Exhibit 6- 3/4'LAMINATED GLASS 3-6'HI(e RAILING EWINTERI D AS PER O&C.REDUIRE:ENTS --- ------------.--------....... —___ .--.---- '.ti._.-._....._..., --'-.- 'c--.-.-C FIN. EILI._._NG._.— 21.76 SiT. 9.33 o. FT. H O. r I. l - n PRErIN 1(IAL PANEL_ n IN. 3RD rL. I_ ?I 7N d:E] N E to permit an uncovered platform Cq -- -. -------- '--'-'-'—'---------------'-'---'-'-------'-'-- rIv ZN:) rL 00 (front porch) not O_ -------- projecting more than 6.9 metres into the required N N front yard ' �r IN. 1ST-FL_-- N ----------------------- rJN PA DUILDING I I _.-..._._...... CddPOSIIE DRAINAGE LAYER OVER ID' POURED CONC.FOUNDATidV WALL 1 7 ---__--_ _FIN. BASEMENT_ 61 POURED CDNCFG071NG WEST SIDE ELEVATIDN Submitted West Side Elevation Plan �l��E�� File No: P/CA 65/20 Applicant: 4AMCA Enterprises Ltd. City Development Property Description: Part of Lot 12, Block E, Plan 65 Department (606 Annland Street) CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: Jan 21, 2020 CdY 4 Report to PICKERINGCommittee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 02/21 Date: February 10, 2021 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 02/21 C. & J. Cagna 2615 Cerise Manor Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364/14, as amended, to permit a maximum driveway width of 6.0 metres, whereas the By-law established a maximum driveway width of 3.0 metres for lots having lot frontages less than 9.0 metres with attached private garages associated with a residential use that are accessed only by a driveway from a street. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to widen the driveway. Recommendation Should the Committee of Adjustment see merit in the requested variance, the City Development Department recommends any approval be subject to the following condition: 1. That the variance only apply to the proposed driveway widening be located entirely within private property, be setback 1.0 metre from the existing municipal tree and constructed with permeable paving to the satisfaction of Engineering Services, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2). Background At the January 13, 2021 meeting, City staff recommended refusal of the proposed variance as in staff's opinion it did not meet the four tests of a minor variance (see Attachment 1, P/CA 02/21 Report (January 13, 2021)). The Committee of Adjustment deferred application P/CA 02/21 to the February 10, 2021 meeting to allow the applicant time to submit a revised plan (see Attachment 2, Draft Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes, January 13, 2021, Excerpt). The applicant has submitted a revised plan to address the concerns from City Engineering Services (Exhibit 2) .The revised proposal presents the entire driveway on private property, sets the driveway back 1.0 from the tree in the municipal right-of-way, and has permeable paving. The revised plan was reviewed by both City Development and Engineering Services, and is the basis the conditions recommended by City Development should the Committee see merit in approving the requested variance. -22- Report P/CA 02/21 February 10, 2021 Page 2 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services We have reviewed the updated plans submitted in support of the above application and provide our comments: 1. Original Comment: Widening the driveway will increase the impermeable area of the lot having a negative impact on the overall stormwater management scheme for the development. Response to Updated Submission: The applicant is proposing the use of permeable pavers for the driveway widening, which addresses our stormwater management concerns. 2. Original Comment: The proposal includes widening within the City's road allowance, which is not permitted. Response to Updated Submission: The widening is now located entirely on private property. 3. Original Comment: Widening the driveway will require the removal of a City owned boulevard tree. Response to Updated Submission: The driveway located on private property ensures the required minimum 1.0 metre clearance to the tree is provided. Based on the applicant's response to our previous comments, we have no further engineering related concerns with this application. Date of report: February 3, 2021 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration FC:jc J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2021\PCA 02-217.Report\PCA 02-21 Report(Feb.10).docxAttachments Attachments Attachment 1 — P/CA 02/21 Report (January 13, 2021) Attachment 2 — Draft Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes, January 13, 2021, Excerpt Exhibits -23- Attachment #1 Cr o� Report to PICKERINGCommittee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 02/21 Date: January 13, 2021 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 02/21 C. & J. Cagna 2615 Cerise Manor Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364/14, as amended, to permit a maximum driveway width of 6.0 metres, whereas the By-law established a maximum driveway width of 3.0 metres for lots having lot frontages less than 9.0 metres with attached private garages associated with a residential use that are accessed only by a driveway from a street. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to widen the driveway. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to not be desirable for the appropriate development of the land and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan Pickering's Official Plan designated the property as "Urban Residential Areas — Medium Density Areas" within the Lamoreaux Neigbourhood. Land within this designation is intended to accommodate residential uses including townhouse dwellings. Does not conform to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The property is zoned "LD1-T" as per Zoning By-law 7364/14. The intent of the maximum driveway width of 3.0 metres for lots having lot frontages less than 9.0 metres is to ensure a consistent streetscape and to provide an adequate landscaped area. Presently, two parking spaces are provided for the townhouse dwelling, one space in the attached garage, and one space on the driveway in front of the garage. This meets the minimum parking requirement of two spaces per dwelling unit. The neighbouring townhouses within the same block consistently have one parking space in the attached garage, and one parking space in front of the attached garage. Expanding the driveway width to accommodate a total of three parking spaces (one space in the garage and two spaces in the driveway in front of the dwelling) creates a streetscape inconsistent with the townhouse block and reduces the landscape area. -24- Attachment #1 Report P/CA 02/21 January 13, 2021 Page 2 The subject property is the end unit of the townhouse block. The neighbouring properties to the north of the subject property consist of detached dwellings on lots larger than the townhouse lots. The detached dwellings have attached garages accommodating two vehicles. The detached dwelling lots adequately accommodate double wide driveways and maintain adequate landscaped area in the front yard. Not Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Not Minor in Nature The subject proposal is not desirable for the appropriate development of the land and not minor in nature. Widening the driveway to 6.0 metres on a lot less than 9.0 metres of frontage would not provide an adequate landscaped area in the front yard to provide for a consistent streetscape or for permeable area for stormwater management purposes. Engineering Services objects to the requested variance as driveway widening would increase the impermeable area of the lot and have a negative impact on stormwater management for the area. Expanding the driveway width by 3.0 metres would not be minor in nature as it covers a significant percentage of the front yard with additional impermeable surfaces. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a maximum driveway width of 6.0 metres, whereas the by-law established a maximum driveway width of 3.0 metres for lots having lot frontages less than 9.0 metres is not desirable for the appropriate development of land, does maintains the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and is not minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services We object to this application for the following reasons: 1. Widening the driveway will increase the impermeable area of the lot having a negative impact on the overall stormwater management scheme for the development. 2. The proposal includes widening within the City's road allowance, which is not permitted. 3. Widening the driveway will require the removal of a City owned boulevard tree. Date of report: January 7, 2021 Comments prepared by: elli Felix Chau Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration FC:jc \\FS\CSDC\Amanda\docs\templates\CA\programmed\CA Report.doc Attachments -25- Attachment #1 Exhibit 1 Cameo gtreet Chateau Court gkyrid9e Boulevard L � � J NO j C - � Q L Y a a 0 PZalea Avenue Ca�,J ID aT er aOe eat J� �o i 4r�h0 iaer�ri� e �a o� Subject Qom` Lands �ryQh ea cre Sc est Seaia S44are T /ore��/fie N Ai aQe Location Map o� File: P/CA 02/21 PICKERING Applicant:C. & J. Cagna City Development froperty PropertyDescription: Pt Blk 240, 40M-2625 Now Pt 7, 40R-30331 Department (2615 Cerise Manor) I Date: Dec. 11, 2020 The—p-1—f-atyefPlckedng—doedonpan?nnderncenae fl—oGneenaPdmepomade M'm lenyef Naw'al ReeO es. SCALE: 1:4,000 All rights reserved.;©Har Majesty the Gueen In Right of Canada.Cepadment of Natural Resources.All hghte reserved.; Te—t Enter hses Inc.and Its su Mars all rl h[s reserved: art Assessment Cor oration and Its su liars all ri hts reserved.: THIS IS NCT A PLAN CF SURVEY. L\PLANNING\01-MapFlles\PCA\2021\PCA 02-21 C.&J.Cagna\PCA02-21_Loca1ionWP-.1 Attachment #1 Exhibit 2 N 41221:1 - ' ! ''r 11'ti'• 1 ' _ � - 2 1 r I r � •� r _ r � R k ' aA- Aerial Photo File No: P/CA 02/21 P I C KE R1 NG Applicant: C. & J. Cagna City Development Property Description: Pt Blk 240, 40M-2625 Now Pt. 7, 40R-30331 Department (2615 Cerise Manor) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Dec 15 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. -27- Exhibit 3 Cerise Manor .. { to permit a maximum �r`r driveway width of 6.0 metres II k¢aseN F�uxpTrwl 1``�\ q �� I I UT] I I • � '} ` j , -'6' , read^{ ALZI,36 T4 J W I 4 L I' � : I .^\\. I i L I `- I .\� t * 09 O� 1.S aiY+ y l Q I w QJ�� F r+ xs Q 1 I Q Ir '4•f '�;M 0_ ---------------- .• 2 TO y X w. Lu x CD O rf 17- e .}!:-)k'jL� i *}#l4'. Cr R•4�71NCa +54sii U1�VE4]� yip+ W rPSN iN C- ."LApY Yui-�M1� �.aeh�lau' X615[sliuLE uAN¢; �*arx a Leda ON U'. 'X 94.Rq-Ex-riAV i IN viC1 F74CrP, _ i, „ _rcY CO!}1FER4]S i ?m4rca TRP-r. ( fAxcls h-'•' :a:9FXa�5E �6 f3 C6Qf5� 2615 �F'�lS� —_ Submitted Plan ��E��i File No: P/CA 02/21 Applicant: C. & J. Ca na City Development Property Description: Pt Blk 240, 40M-2625 Now Pt. 7, 40R-30331 Department 2615 Cerise Manor FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Dec. 15, 2020 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Attachment #2 Excerpt of Draft Meeting Minutes C� o� Committee of Adjustment 4 Wednesday, January 13, 2021 PICKERING 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting P/CA 02/21 C. & J. Cagna 2615 Cerise Manor The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364/14, as amended, to permit a maximum driveway width of 6.0 metres, whereas the By-law established a maximum driveway width of 3.0 metres for lots having lot frontages less than 9.0 metres with attached private garages associated with a residential use that are accessed only by a driveway from a street. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to widen the driveway. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending refusal. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department objecting to the application for the following reasons: 1. Widening the driveway will increase the impermeable area of the lot having a negative impact on the overall stormwater management scheme for the development. 2. The proposal includes widening within the City's road allowance, which is not permitted. 3. Widening the driveway will require the removal of a City owned boulevard tree. Written comments were received from the owner of 2617 Cerise Manor and 2613 Cerise Manor in support of the application. Michael Annanlli, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Michael Annarilli outlined widening of the driveway is required to allow 2 vehicles to park side by side. Mr. Annarilli and his partner suffer from medical conditions that are aggravated when required to move their vehicles that are parked in a tandem arrangement on the driveway. He noted he is agreeable to design concessions in order to obtain approval of the variance required to facilitate the driveway widening. He cited the following reasons for the Committee to approve the requested minor variance and the following responses to comments contained in the staff report: • Does not agree that there is a consistent streetscape as a number of single detached and townhouse dwellings exist with driveway widths equal to or greater than 6.0 metres within the block; Page 1 of 2 _29_ Attachment #2 Excerpt of Draft Meeting Minutes C4� o� Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, January 13, 2021 7:00 pm PICKERING Electronic Meeting • Does not agree that the increase in impermeable area would have an impact on the subdivision's stormwater management, and that any increased stormwater created by the 12 square metres driveway widening is manageable through permeable paving, he is willing to install an infiltration gallery in the rear yard if necessary (details have been provided to the Members); • Agrees to minor design alterations to provide proper setbacks to City property and an existing tree including the provision of a security deposit for the tree, and ensures greater setbacks will not impact the functionality of widening, and • Two adjacent neighbours have provided support of the driveway widening in writing. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Michael Annarilli stated that a minimum 3.0 metre widening is required to accommodate vehicles parked side by side and opening of doors. After considering City Development's report and the applicant's comments to the Committee, Sean Wiley moved the following motion: Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 02/21 by C. & J. Cagna, be Deferred to the next Committee of Adjustment meeting on February 10, 2021 to allow the applicant time to submit a revised plan. Carried Unanimously Page 2 of 2 -30- Exhibit 1 Cameo gtreet Chateau Court gkyrid9e Boulevard L � � J N E O C - � Q L Y a a 0 PZalea Avenue Ca�,J aT er aOe eat J� �o i 4r�h0 iaer�ri� e �a o� Subject Qom` Lands �ryQh ea cre Sc est Seaia S44are T /ore��/fie N Ai aQe Location Map o� File: P/CA 02/21 PICKERING Applicant:C. & J. Cagna City Development froperty PropertyDescription: Pt Blk 240, 40M-2625 Now Pt 7, 40R-30331 Department (2615 Cerise Manor) I Date: Dec. 11, 2020 The ce�pe�atmn et me aty et-kedng Pmdnedonp 0nIderncenae fl—o Gneena Pdmep omade Mlnlshy et Naw�ai Res—e' SCALE: 1:4,000 All rig h[s reserved.;©Har Majesty the Gueen in Right of Canada.�epadmen[of Na[uml Resources.All dg hts reserved.; Terane[Ener dses Inc.and Its su Mars all rl h[s reserved:©Munk al Pm art Assessmen[Cor oration and Its su liars all ri hts reserved.: THIS IS NWAPLAN OF SURVEY. L\PLANNING\01-MapF'iles\PCA\2021\PCA 02-21 C.&J.Cagna\PCA02-21_LocationMap.mxd Exhibit 2 �'I 22':� 2;; r, - - ---- ---- -y ■ - r r 2 i r - _ I — IL _ e 2-T1 r •�. I r _ k F I - •I .'�- M1 I• '. - I�' ` -or k+. my pie � Aerial Photo File No: P/CA 02/21 P I C KE R1 NG Applicant: C. & J. Cagna City Development Property Description: Pt Blk 240, 40M-2625 Now Pt. 7, 40R-30331 Department (2615 Cerise Manor) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Dec 15 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. -32- Exhibit 3 Cerise Manor to permit a maximum driveway width of 6.0 metres 1X! ------------- (D 3 CA Fh- < %E P P Ln rWTP4 X }mIUc Lu 10 99-11) Tlr,%4LJ V T F.n . I % "r-r� 7 PDFA3H si��ko L ",;q K C�*V Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 02/21 PICKERING Applicant: C. & J. Cagna City Development Property Description: Pt Blk 240, 40M-2625 Now Pt. 7, 40R-30331 Department (2615 Cerise Manor) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Date: Feb. 2, 2021 4 Report to PICKERINGCommittee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 03/21 Date: February 10, 2021 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 03/21 C. & L. Eliopoulos 737 Aspen Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 942/79: • to permit a platform less than 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 7.3 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the By-law requires establishes a maximum projection of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard; • to permit a platform less than 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 1.0 metre into the required southerly side yard, whereas the By-law establishes a maximum projection of 0.5 of a metre into the required side yard. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to recognize an existing rear yard deck. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the uncovered platform, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3). Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan Pickering's Official Plan designates this property as "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Amberlea Neighbourhood. Lands within this designation are intended to accommodate residential uses including single detached dwellings and accessory structures (decks). -34- Report P/CA 03/21 February 10, 2021 Page 2 Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The intent of the provision that requires uncovered platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 0.5 metres into the required side yard and the provision that requires uncovered platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 1.5 metres into the required rear yard is to protect the privacy of abutting properties, to ensure an adequate buffer space between buildings and to ensure an adequate landscaped area within the rear yard is provided. Adequate landscaped area is maintained in the rear yard north of the deck. Given the 0.5 of a metre maximum height of the deck, it will not have an adverse impact on the separation of buildings and structures between abutting properties. A potential issue is maintaining the privacy of neighbours as the deck has a 0.2 of a metre setback from the south side yard and the rear yard. Adequate fence screening must be maintained in order to maintain the privacy of neighbouring properties. The applicant has received letters in support of this application from the property owners of 756 Pebble Court and 735 Aspen Road which are the abutting properties to the rear and the south respectively. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The uncovered platform serves as an enhancement to the rear yard amenity area. There will be no adverse impact on the drainage patterns on this lot. As previously mentioned, the applicant has received letters in support of this application from the two property owners most impacted by the projection of the uncovered platform. The application is desirable for the appropriate development of the land and minor in nature. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services . The deck is slightly elevated which should not cause any drainage issues. We have no concerns with this application. Building Services . No comments on the application. Owners of 756 Pebble Court and . In support of the application. 735 Aspen Road =35= Report P/CA 03/21 February 10, 2021 Page 3 Date of report: February 4, 2021 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration FC:DW:so J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2021\PCA 03-217.Report\PCA 03-21 Report(Feb 10).doc Attachments -36- m III III � imn i UNION _ im Exhibit 2 to permit a platform less than 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 1.0 metre into the required southerly side yard NACHED110 TIN2 STORY WELLING Cs xo�n ASP FE?KEtEN RD _ J FE710E SIDE�1kE PROPEM UNE PRUIERW urE ra - II o� I I wdt�-- I I II 1116 II ` II II j II p EXIBTINGFDFr ' II II M UNDSCAFE - . ' � � E%IfT7l6E�fLAE SCAFE E3e rMG.'.7�"A006 PROPETYLT€ Ei(1�:�NGGSTE r'Fn7rERi3`UNE rTN-C'IN5EEC=-~� F- Exlsn—NG 2—S roRr DETACHM DWELLING 739,ASPEN R4 , to permit a platform less than 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 7.3 metres into the required rear yard Submitted Plan �i�� File No: P/CA 03/21 Applicant: C. & J. Elio oulos City Development Property Description: Pt Lot 2, 40M-1323 Now Pt 9,10, 40R-8767 Department 737 Aspen Road FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Jan 26, 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Exhibit 3 pier.��sle Emzr. erEr� Maximum height of PR°acZaw:41DEX existing deck: 0.58 metre EXW.GDW.PAD BW E-er7r- r SE TION AT DECK 1 : 1.25 Submitted Elevation ��E�� File No: P/CA 03/21 Applicant: C. & J. Elio oulos City Development -Property Description: Pt Lot 2, 40M-1323 Now Pt 9,10, 40R-8767 Department 737 Aspen Road FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Jan 26, 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. CdY 4 Report to PICKERINGCommittee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 06/21 Date: February 10, 2021 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 06/21 B. & N. Sukra & W. Bain 312 Dyson Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18 to permit a maximum building height of 11.35 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 9.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for a detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6). Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas within the Rosebank Neighbourhood. Detached dwellings are a permitted use within the designation and a built form within the Rosebank Neighbourhood. City Council has recently endorsed the recommendations of the Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study, which provides direction on the future evolution of the City's identified established neighbourhood precincts so that neighbourhood precinct character is properly considered through the development and building approval processes. In addition, Council adopted Urban Design Guidelines for Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhood Precincts to support and enhance neighbourhood precinct characteristics. City staff are preparing an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment to implement the recommendations of the Study to help ensure that the redevelopment of residential lots are consistent with the existing neighbourhood precinct character. -40- Report P/CA 06/21 February 10, 2021 Page 2 Staff have reviewed and made comment on the proposal using the Urban Design Guidelines for Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhood Precincts Checklist, which can be found as Attachment 1 to this report. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The subject site is zoned R4 within Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18. The requested variance is to permit a dwelling height of 11.35 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 9.0 metres. The intent of this provision is to minimize the visual impact of new buildings on the existing streetscape and to ensure new development is compatible with the surrounding residential neighbourhood. The subject property is located at the south end of Dyson Road. The abutting properties to the south and west are vacant lands owned by Parks Canada. Further to the south and west is Lake Ontario. To the east, on the other side of Dyson Road, is also vacant lands owned by Parks Canada. Further east is a rail corridor and additional vacant lands owned by Parks Canada. The only abutting residential property is to the north, which has an existing three-storey dwelling on the lot, with a gabled roof design. The proposed dwelling for the subject property is also a three-storey dwelling, with a flat roof design. Within By-law 2511, building height is measured as the vertical distance between the established grade and, for a flat roof, to the highest point of the roof surface and, for a gabled roof, to the mid-point of the roof. The highest point of the proposed flat roof dwelling is 11.35 metres. In comparison, the mid-point of the gabled roof for the existing dwelling to the north is 11.8 metres (see Exhibit 7). As such, from the street, the existing dwelling to the north will appear to be taller than the proposed dwelling on the subject property. The proposed dwelling meets all other regulations within the By-law, including a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres. The dwelling tapers as it moves upwards, with the second floor being smaller in area than the first-floor, and the third-floor being smaller than the second-floor (see Exhibit 2). The large front yard setback and tapered design lessens the visual impact of the dwelling from the street. Additionally, there is a mix of flat and gabled/hipped roof dwellings along Dyson Road that vary between 1, 2 and 3 storeys. As such, the proposed dwelling is considered to be in keeping with the dwellings along Dyson Road. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The subject property is located at the end of the street, and abuts only one other residential lot, which has a dwelling that is 11.8 metres in height. Considering the established building height at the south end of Dyson Road is taller than the permitted height of 9.0 metres, the proposed dwelling is considered to be compatible with the abutting residential dwelling. Staff consider the size of the proposed dwelling to be appropriate for the subject property, and therefore considers the requested variance to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land and minor in nature. -41 - Report P/CA 06/21 February 10, 2021 Page 3 Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit the construction of a detached dwelling is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services No comments on the application. Building Services No comments on the application. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) TRCA staff have been working with the landowners at 312 Dyson Road regarding this new build. The landowners have satisfied all of TRCA's requirements and are waiting for these variances to be reviewed to receive a TRCA permit. TRCA staff have no objections to the variance pertaining to building height as it does not impact the TRCA's policies or programs. Parks Canada As of the date of writing this report, comments were not received from Parks Canada. Date of report: February 4, 2021 Comments prepared by: c I4 Isabel Lima Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration IL:jc J'\Documents\Development\D-3700 Committee of Adjustment(PCA Applications)\2021\PCA 06-21 B.&N.Sukra&W.Bain\7.Report\PCA 06-21 Report.doc Attachments -42- Attachment 1 Urban City of Pickering Design Established Guidelines Neighbourhood Precincts AppendixA Urban Design Guideline Checklist City of Pickering Established Neighbourhood Precincts Urban Design Checklist Please note, if you mark "no" below please provide your rational in the adjacent "Comments" section either supporting, or not supporting the proposal. YES NO Comments 1. Does the proposed dwelling have a sloped 1 &2. The applicant is proposing a flat roof design.There p p 9 p is a mix of flat and gabled/hipped roof dwellings along Dyson 0 X roof proposed such as a Hip, Gable, Mansard or Road currently,that vary between 1, 2 and 3-storeys.The proposed dwelling is consistent with the established Gambrel? (see Figure 5) streetscape. 2. Is the proposed dwelling height and roof pitch X 0 similar/compatible with the surrounding dwellings? (see Section 2.1: Guideline 1) The only abutting dwelling to the north is 3-storeys with a 3. For dwellings with a height greater than 8.5 height of 11.8 metres to the mid-point of the roof.The O x metres - is the dwelling a maximum two storeys with to the top oosed f the roof.This e established buith a ild ng height at theht of 11.35 a sloped roof back from the adjacent dwellings? south end of Dyson Road is taller than the permitted height (see Section 2.1: Guideline 2) of 9.0 metres. x 0 4. Does the front entrance have 6 or less steps? (see Section 2.2: Guideline 1) x 0 5. Is the main entrance visible from the street? (see Section 2.2: Guideline 2) 6. Is the design of the main entrance consistent with X 0 the architectural style of the dwelling? (Section 2.2: Guidelines 3 and 4) 7. Does the main entrance include a porch, portico X 0 or other weather protection in keeping with the design of the dwelling? (see Section 2.2: Guideline 4) 8. Are the stairs to the main entrance designed as X 0 an integral component of the front fagade? (Section 2.2: Guideline 7) 9. Does the design of the front entrance reduce X 0 the visual dominance of the garage and driveway? (Section 2.2: Guideline 9) 10. Does the proposed dwelling have a similar X 0 Dwelling Depth to the adjacent dwellings along the street? (see Section 2.3: Guideline 2) -43- Urban City of Pickering Desin Established Appendix A Guidelines Neighbourhood Urban Design Checklist Cont'd Precincts YES NO Comments 11. Does the proposed dwelling have a similar Side X 0 Yard Setback to the adjacent dwellings along the street? (see Figure 15) 12. Has shadow on adjacent dwellings been X 0 mitigated with greater setbacks? (Section 3.1: Guideline 2) 00 13. If a projecting garage is permitted, does it have a Not applicable; the garage is not projecting. sloped roof? (see Section 3.2: Guidelines 2 and 4) 14. If a double car garage is proposed, does it Not applicable; a single-car garage is proposed. 00 have 2 single doors or is it designed to look like 2 separate doors? (see Section 3.2: Guideline 3) X 0 15. Is the garage flush or recessed from the main front wall? (see Section 3.2: Guideline 5) 16. Is the proposed driveway width the same as the X 0 permitted garage width? (see Section 3.3: Guideline 1) The applicant has stated that permeable paving and an 17. Are sustainable design features or resilient extensive'green roof system will be utilized to reduce the landscaping proposed as part of the site design? impact of the proposed development.The existing bank will also be stabilized using native grass/flower mixed to be (Section 3.3: Guideline 2 and Section 4.1: Guideline specified by a landscape architect at a later date. 5) 18. The applicant has stated that no private trees or trees in X0 18. Does the plan preserve existing trees? (see the municipal right-of-way should require replacing due to the �C proposed development.An arborist will assess the health of Section 4.1: Guideline 1) the trees on site and provide recommendations for any trees that may require pruning or removal for safety reasons.There 0 X 19. Does the plan include tree planting on private are also two small sections of privacy bushes along the property? (see Section 4.1: Guideline 2) existing driveway that will be removed to re-align the new driveway. X 0 20. Does the plan include one or more native 19. The applicant has stated that there is limited space to �C species street trees? (Section 4.2) plant any additional trees on the property, however any trees that require removal for safety reasons will be replaced with a species native to the area. The landscape architect/arborist will provide these recommendations at building permit stage. 20. The applicant has stated that any additional trees planted will be native species to the area.The existing street trees on site are not proposed to be removed for the planned construction. Si; -44- d$ .0 Exhibit 1 Rougemount Drive �• P fon • � COurt f Nomad Road c 5 a 0 0 Y C � (6 NEWN O Q o Rosebank ` 0 South °v Park C � • Rodd AVenue J� 14 Q1 W v N 0 Subject n.� Lands City of Toronto ■ Lake Ontario N 4 Location Map -OZyad File: P/CA 06/21 PICKERING Applicant:B. & N. Sukra & W. Bain City Development Property Description: Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 274 Department (312 Dyson Road) Date: Dec. 29, 2020 TM1c Corporation d-Cly d Plckcring Produced(In part)under Ilea se 1—1 Queens Primer,Ontario MI,-y of--1 Resources_ SCALE: /�I CS I.A'000 All rig Ms reserved.',O Her McJesy Ne Qu een In Rlghtof Canada,Departrn tot NeW rat Resources_AII rIgMs reserved.', Jl.if1LL I Y (c Tea net Enters es lnc.antl l�sau hers all n tits resarced_,A r Aaseasrnent Coro and its- hers alld Ms ra —d.. THIS IS NOTAPLAN OF SURVEY. L'.W LANNING\01-MapPl ll WI1PCA 06-21 B.&N.5ukra&W BainTCA06-21_LocationMap.—d Exhibit 2 EXISTING 3 STOREY BRICK DWELLING NO. 314 N I I Mvzo PROPER-!LRIE NORTH -----••7 ,1.58 m.� -�.----•----..--- — — 1.5 m------ , ProposedF t Third 7�5 m - �'� ` Floor Z oq Proposed e�m O SecondFIooR 6.6 m Lands Owned by �Zy�'1 Proposed Parks Canada MV3.0] `� Ground i �� Floor � •,` °'a � o to permit a maximum `•.� �f ;® building height of 11.35 metres . r so•\ , Mv1 - I •\ j Lands Owned by \ ! 1 SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN Parks Canada ` ? �\MUl J Scale:1:150 Submitted Site Plan File No: P/CA 06/21 P I C KE R I NG Applicant: B. & N. Sukra & W. Bain City Development Property Description: Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 274 Department (312 Dyson Road) CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL Date: Jan 21, 2021 COPIES OF THIS PLAN. -46- Exhibit 3 T.G.ROOF E FIEF-GEMENT PgIN5CFEEN I;IACUINYi C SYSTEM OH N&7AL S11A FMMING co E N O N 00 E%TFVCEDALIJMINIVMFPAMED acaraV 9775 } N aN vn EEEa FINISHWTH wc MN(BDILDRIGHEIGHT AXDAAW2411 97.19 1 – ata.cLLncrv�rvEEN—.1.—.1.SvsEM 30O RAOR FFE E A A NCEcaum»wl rr rwETAlsHtu ON METaL STuo F—WFPAMINc W MINIUM EPSCW TO M4iCH IYINVDW FRAMING. O mposl cTuwu E Eh GUMPOErtE ME1. rvRL�rvI� �B � �VEPIIGLBDPRD i\ I _ STONE tIlE ON 51EK HONE"CCMd �.I 1 p') _ DaIENranoN \ � DAaaNG,�s�NlcTURAusrsrEM. 2ND FLOOR FFE _ E ro i �i�l� � ll l ER En ECGRNEF ERIC NLIGM' EiIFAIOR WALL SCONCES AT OWN 9=AA1�5 I �.Ias'SiAwM�NIVM �I L. LEVEL 1 FF E 1 BB48LI- ... -- MAN ENTRY FFE i — 28.75 E ' ` � - Jf AVERAGE GRA E BASEMENTFFE to permit a maximum building ELEVATION FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE height of 11.35 metres SCALE: 1:100 Submitted Front Elevation Plan East Side ��IIVL! File No: P/CA 06/21 Applicant: B. & N. Sukra & W. Bain City Development Property Description: Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 274 Department (312 Dyson Road) CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: ,Jan 21, 2021 Exhibit 4 ,�DMINI�M �NN(yPaPnPET WP.iO I.wn;M� /00,09` mnoowxAaERAMIN¢m -- T.O.ROOF - -E M E 81.75. N FIFE RAZED EIFS SYSTEM xrPueEonwMwlVM munEo wwouwwAu�utrAiN wALL EanMiNc vnnl MAX BUILDING HEIGHT aFevwv��I / woacmeaP FEvureF ewsH + nj 3RD FLOOR FFF � .� — FIEERCfMfNT MINSCREEN CUDDING SYSLfM GN METALSIW FRAMING -IP.EPS+'S�EM IXJ IFTiLL SNDFAAMNG I_ M -RE TILE GN STEELHgdEYGGM6 . - SEAMLESS GIASJPLJNYIrNM PNLINC 94.19' M snavnG.srRucrunAls,slu�. --- 2ND FLOOR FIFE C T O — AacHITEcnFUL coMrosiTE r�ru rauElswPrl woocvErlEw Elwsr+vEPncu 0') E LnaRD ax¢drarrn 99.79 I' LEVEL i FFE 99,49.,. _ MAIN ENTRY ME 88.75 AYUMEOWE x,.09 co BASEMENT FEE 1 ELEVATION FROM NORTH PROPERTY LINE to permit a maximum building 2'SCALE , Toe height of 11.35 metres Submitted North Side Elevation Plan �l��E�� File No: P/CA 06/21 Applicant: B. & N. Sukra & W. Bain City Develapment Property Description: Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 274 Department 312 Dyson Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: ,Jan 21, 2021 Exhibit 5 ,oaoe. TO.ROOF C FIHLH.vnt�aelN:xPEF�cu�arvcss�E,n ov C 3WLESiVIIIIIUNaM ME1�L SrW FRNAING M PN '�\ CV � / Frl�i�ne�rnNNs:aFr�crenowl;sYs�nonu�nLs�L,o I MAX ABUILDING HEIGHT aP avLa'•v esrl D7 19 19:1 - — - - - 2RD RAGa FFE s,�N=_,�a=>EEL IrrIIlII E>n�En�Lr,MrNINM F�,Mm F�NHow F�Au��r,HraN v aLL FpNEYCOM9—z` —I �+, FPAMINCW9rH FPG PCRVN4P-R &N]JNPSrRUCiU1NL9v5f_M - If 0 — FPfNMSnFL 1-11 111 '- � �J - � SFatit=SSGu55�awMINNM PUNNG _ CCPNGI�PAFET UFPAM NAIATH _ X94.19 � 24D FLOOR FFE ML - - MCrIrE�JPeL "M" l O J WI—NEER FIN191-VEP.L �I— — ARCHHECIUHKCuM1IPOS1EMEfP1 AN¢S WITH NYIOW-NEER FINI54 V6111C.�eCPPP ONEMATAN aNwnePlFNranoN E /�79 � - �gr�uminluM a�nur�� LEVEL E HE MNNENTRTFFE — — •1 I, __ _ AVERAGE GRADE _-� —77A' 197.x'. - J � -- 61�SEMENi FFe V I I I I- N � I_V i i } � I I LI —i� l �IIITIIII I- iTilli i�ll.ii- �iiil �ITIIIIITI�� I77 i 2 ELEVATION FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE to permit a maximum building vscpLe ,:,00 height of 11.35 metres Submitted Rear Elevation Plan West Side �1�� File No: P/CA 06/21 Applicant: B. & N. Sukra & W. Bain City Development -Property Description: Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 274 Department 312 Dyson Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: ,Jan 21, 2021 Exhibit 6 FlBEFLEMENT PNNSCFEEN CEAWING$NSTEM ON ME'At STUB >• f3i4MING 100.061, T.O.ROOF IXTR M VVEVAWMININM-INfN]W WALI/CVRTPM WNL FANAING WTM PPG hCR iAP PEWFEA KNISH N SEAM�[cc CIAS$�PEUMINIIAI _ 97.75 N W PAI- - AIA%BUILOINGHE1GHTnmBruws� + NTF I 97.19 8R0 FLOOR FEE HEEPCEMENT wuNEEPEEN cuoolNc—W ON METAL S ONE TIES QMSEEEHUYEVCNMB -- _ STuvl,MING ge�KINCJ$YNUCIVRAL$Y5tEM. �` � - Q PHEFlNSHEO PLUMINNM CGPING�PARAPEI GP.TO MATCW GL ALVMINIVMR LNG NGGVWALL IN iYP. M ti" THAM c - E: I =.4 19', M z:,D FLOOR FFF ANCHrtECtUHAE COMPOS;TE MErAI, iANEl.6"+ITR wpppvFNECR RNISIF—/ Q VEAPCRL EGARV ORIENTATION C �� GuSCIAWMINNM RANNG I aPCNTIECNR9LLOMPo 17 NE PANELSNTH sEAMM,ss _ -` IIrOOWENEEN FINI�-V ICAL BO UMIENTAMN C�74 1,'LL 1 FFE III I MAIMEVVFFE �- AVERAGE GRADE 67�49 ENT FF£ 7777 R - ASfLI O CLEVE OM SOUTH PROPERTY LINE to permit a maximum building ZALE 1 loo height of 11.35 metres n� Submitted South Side Elevation Plan �� File No: P/CA 06/21 Applicant: B. & N. Sukra & W. Bain City Development Property Description: Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 274 Department 312 Dyson Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: Jan 21, 2021 Exhibit 7 OUTLINE OF PROPOSED DWELLING APPROX HEIGHT OF - LEGALLY EXISTING 2.5 i STOREY DWELLING '•a Dove Proposed Dwelling ?J' 1 N Height o EXISTING 3 STOREY BRICK DWELLING 314 DYSON ROADj,, Max. Building Height (;. 0 Z O 1.6m 1.6m .t r a1 . 4 _ O • m z o � asr Avg.Grade 9 Ctt� Submitted Schematic Elevation ��E��i File No: P/CA 06/21 Applicant: B. & N. Sukra & W. Bain City Development Property Description: Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 274 Department 312 Dyson Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: Feb 2, 2021 4 Report to PICKERINGCommittee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 07/21 Date: February 10, 2021 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 07/21 V. & V. Joshi 1519 Avonmore Square Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7553/17, as amended, to permit a total of 2 parking spaces on a property where an accessory dwelling unit is located, whereas the By-law requires a total of three parking spaces provided on a property where an accessory dwelling unit is located. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to permit an accessory dwelling unit within a street townhouse dwelling with two parking spaces on the lot. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the subject property, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed accessory dwelling unit as determined by Building Services. Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject site is designated Mixed Use Areas — City Centre within the City Centre Neighbourhood. High density residential is a permissible use within the City Centre designation. Policy 12.101(c) of the Official Plan states that within the City Centre a reduction in the number of required car parking spaces may be considered where transportation demand management measures are provided. Transportation Demand Management means a coordinated series of actions aimed at maximizing the people-moving capability of the transportation system, through means such as travelling more often by non-driving alternatives. The City Centre Neighbourhood is a designated public transit mobility hub, in accordance with the Regional Transportation Plan for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton area. -52- Report P/CA 07/21 February 10, 2021 Page 2 The subject property is not located within one of the established Neighbourhood Precincts in which the Urban Design Guidelines for the Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study applies. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The subject site is zoned CCR1 within Zoning By-law 7553/17, as amended. An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) is permitted within a street townhouse dwelling, provided: • a total of three parking spaces are provided on the property where an ADU is located; • the maximum floor area of an ADU is 100 square metres; and • a home-based business is prohibited in either dwelling unit of a dwelling containing an ADU. The purpose of requiring three parking spaces for an ADU is to ensure sufficient parking is provided for both dwelling units, and to ensure on-street parking is avoided. The applicant requests a variance to permit a total of two parking spaces for an ADU. The applicant has indicated that they will rent to a tenant without a car. The City Centre is a public transit mobility hub, with connections to Durham Region Transit, GO Transit, bicycle lanes and pedestrian pathways. The subject property is located 350 metres from a Durham Transit bus stop, 750 metres from the Pickering Town Centre Mall, less than 2.0 kilometres from the Pickering GO Station, 600 metres from the Pickering Public Library, and is within a 1.0 kilometre radius of numerous commercial and retail businesses. The subject property is fully accessible to the community without the need for a car. As such, staff is of the opinion that sufficient parking is provided for both dwelling units. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature Staff support ADUs as an affordable housing option within the City Centre. The subject property is well connected to transit and is within walking-distance to numerous services. The applicant has stated they will rent to a tenant without a car. As such, Staff anticipate no issues with on-street parking as a result of permitting an ADU at the subject property. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a total of two parking spaces on the property where an accessory dwelling unit is located is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services No comments on the application. Building Services No comments on the application. Ministry of Transportation (MTO) No concerns with the application. =53= Report P/CA 07/21 February 10, 2021 Page 3 Date of report: February 3, 2021 Comments prepared by: Isabel Lima Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration ILJc JADocuments\Development\D-3700 Committee of Adjustment(PCA Applications)\2021\PCA 07-21 V.&V.Joshi\7.Report TCA 07-21 Report.doc Attachments -54- Exhibit 1 oad Glengrove Road a M 0 3 a� s uace Oce S4 P�ortn a 0 z F ii Diana Princess Of Wales Park Subject Lands Recreation Complex The Esp\aaade� Esplanade Park Diefenbaker Court eS -the Esp�anad m 0 � N Way c� ark P\cke6n9 P Location Map o� File: P/CA 07/21 PICKERING Applicant:V. & V. Joshi City Development froperty PropertyDescription:,Pt Blk 30 Plan 40M-2089, Now Part 5,6 Department Plan 40R-21267 (1519 Avonmore Square) Date: Jan. 04, 2021 AlThe cerperatmn erme atvet Plcxednd Produced pn paa�underncen�e nem:©—IR P,_N1 g Mln lstry of Nawral Reseorcas, SCALE: 1:4,000 All rig h[s reserved.;©Har Majesty the Gueen In Right of Canada.Department of Natural Resources.All rights reserved.; Terane[Enter rises Inc.and Itsph—all ri-reserved.: iff ert Assessment Cor oration and Its su hers all rl hts reserved.. THIS IS NCTAPLAN OF SURVEY. L\PLANNING\01-MapFlles\PCA\2021\PCA 0]-21 V.&V.Joshi\PCAO]-21_Location Map.mxd Exhibit 2 Ex. No. 1517 EXISTING EXISTING PARKING PARKING 2 STOREY SPACE#1 SPACE#2 to permit a total of two $RICK DWELLING parking spaces on the "'— 6 m property where the 1.26. STONE 6.0 accessory dwelling unit XISTING is located LmS11NG DECK N ASFI VFWAY a. E No_ 1 a No- 1519 rp+000�Gn 3,B3M Existing two-storey street townhouse dwelling .� SODDED FLOWLK ULU INTERLOCK STONE 9.54. 1.41 m / f/. eAsl GROSS FLOOR AREAS 3 •�• —BSMT FL. EXIST c 69 06.'(74138 S.F.) •�• —1S7 FL. EXIST.: 74.01.' 796.61 S.F.) -GRG. EXIST.: 15,73m'(169.41 S. F,) AREA = 0,033 HA 1q —2ND FL. EXIST.: 85.93m' (925.03 S.F.) •/- / EXISTING TOTAL GFA: 244.73.' (2.634 43 S.F) /• —2ND UNIT PROP: 61.5614'(662,63 S F.) tit i,- Submitted Site Plan �i��E�� File No: P/CA 07/21 Applicant: V. & V. Joshi City development Property Description: Pt Blk 30 Plan 40M-2089, Now Part 5,6, Plan 40R-21267 Department 1519 Avonmore Square) CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: ,Jan 22, 2021 4 Report to PICKERINGCommittee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 08/21 Date: February 10, 2021 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 08/21 P. Therucheelvam 2150 Saffron Drive Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7384/14: • to permit an uncovered platform less than 1.0 metre in height to project 0.6 of a metre into the south side yard, whereas the By-law establishes a maximum projection of 0.5 of a metre into an required side yard; • to permit an uncovered platform less than 1.0 metre in height to project 4.7 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the By-law establishes a maximum projection of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard; • to permit an accessory building 3.15 metres in height to be set back 0.1 of a metre from the rear lot line, whereas the By-law establishes a minimum setback of 1.0 metre from all lot lines; and • to permit an accessory building 3.15 metres in height to be set back 0.1 of a metre form the flankage (north) lot line, whereas the By-law establishes a minimum setback of 1.0 metre from all lot lines. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain building permits to recognize an existing platform (deck) and an accessory building (shed). Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the platform (deck) and accessory building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). -57- Report P/CA 08/21 February 10, 2021 Page 2 Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan Pickering's Official Plan designates this property as "Urban Residential Areas — Medium Density Areas" within the Brock Ridge Neighbourhood. Lands within this designation are intended to accommodate residential uses including single detached dwellings. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The property is zoned S4-11 as per Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7384/14. Single detached dwellings and accessory structures on the same lot or as part of the main building are permitted uses within the zone. Projection of Uncovered Platform into Side and Rear Yard Variances The intent of the provision that requires uncovered platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 0.5 metres into the required side yard is to protect the privacy of abutting properties. Due to the drop in grade from south to north in this yard, the owner has constructed a deck that projects 0.6 metres into the required side yard in order to maximize the usable amenity space in the rear yard. The highest point of the deck is approximately 0.5 metres above grade and it is located towards the north end of the deck. The deck will not have an impact on the views into the abutting properties to the south and west. The intent of the provision that requires uncovered platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 1.5 metres into the required rear yard is to ensure an adequate buffer space between buildings and to ensure an adequate landscaped area within the rear yard is provided. The 4.7 metre projection into the required rear yard leaves approximately 2.3 metres of landscaped area between the edge of the deck and the rear property. This setback adequately supplies space between neighbouring buildings and maintains landscaped area in the rear yard. Accessory Building Encroaching into Flankage and Rear Yard Variances The intent of the provision that requires accessory buildings to have a minimum 1.0 metre setback from all property lines is to provide an adequate buffer space between accessory buildings and street activity, and to maintain adequate separation between buildings on neighbouring properties. The existing shed is setback 0.1 of a metre from the flankage and rear lot lines. With regards to the flankage lot line, there is still a setback of at least 3.0 metres from the nearest wall of the accessory building to the street. As such, the accessory building will not be a hindrance to street activity. Regarding the rear property line, the dwelling on the property abutting to the rear is at least a 7.0 metre setback from the subject accessory building. Adequate space is currently maintained between all buildings on the lots. =58= Report P/CA 08/21 February 10, 2021 Page 3 Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The uncovered platform serves as an enhancement to the usable amenity area space in the rear yard of the lot. As mentioned previously, the deck will provide a more level amenity area in the rear yard due to the slope towards the south side yard. The shed provides additional storage for the residential use of the property. The requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land. Additionally, the requested variances will not have a significant adverse impact on the surrounding properties and are therefore minor in nature. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintain the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and are minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Ensure reduced rear/side yard setbacks do not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot. The resident should be aware that they may be held liable for any damages to adjacent properties caused by blocked drainage. Building Services No comments on the application. Date of report: February 4, 2021 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Deborah Wylie; MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration FC:jc J:\Documents\Development\D-3700 Committee of Adjustment(PCA Applications)\2021\PCA 08-21 P.Therucheelvam\7.Report\PCA 08-21 Report.doc Attachments =59- Exhibit 1 U N N U T c6 Subject Lands Major Oaks Road -o 0 0 Tm� U O CO � N O d' > - CY �! 0 c6 30 O ; Jade Street j ) U U) U — � , E 711' 411* Ar Brockridge Community Park N Location Map o� File: P/CA 08/21 PICKER1 NG Applicant:P. Therucheelvam City Development froperty PropertyDescription: Lot 60, Plan 40M-2571 Department (2150 Saffron Drive) Date: Jan. 04, 2021 rTM1 —P—t- f-C,tyef-k-,gPmduced(,P 0unde,ke,-f— Q--PM1tec0nt,, Mlnlsty fAat,,,Resesmes, SCALE: 1:4,000 All rig M1ts reserved.;©Har Majesty-Queen In Right of Canada.Cepadment of Na[umI Resources.All hghts reserved.; Teranet Enter hses Inc.and Its....hers all rl hts reserved: art Assessment Cor oration and Its su liars all rl hts reserved.. THIS IS NCT A PLAN OF SURVEY. L\PLANNING\01-MapFlles\PCA\2021\PCA 08-21 P.TM1eruc M1eelvam\PCA08-21_LocationMap.mxd Exhibit 2 rto permit an uncovered platform to permit an uncovered platform less than 1.0 metre in height to less than 1.0 metre in height to project 0.6 of a metre into the project 4.7 metres into the south side yard required rear yard �r 3 LOT 59 �., 2148 SAFFRON DRIVE i m i i to permit an accessory building 3.15 metres in 20 height to be set back - �PRKKG [:O:�AOE °; LOT 60 0.1 of a metre from the i � 2,56 SAFFRON DRIVE z Q; fE(K rear lot line ,r, a - .es v LOT 35 1 ' C . m I L 1 ' Iq4f,� FFM w 5 5 xs 1.5rM SIDE�1A o .4 4 to permit an accessory building `} 3.15 metres in height to be � k setback 0.1 of a metre from the 4SAFFRONDRIVEflankage (north) lot line Submitted Plan ��E��i File No: P/CA 08/21 Applicant: P. Therucheelvam City Develapment Property Description: Lot 60, Plan 40M-2571 Department 2150 Saffron Drive FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Jan 27, 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. CdY 4 Revised Report to PICKERINGCommittee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 09/21 Date: February 10, 2021 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 09/21 S. Muthulingam 945 Third Concession Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 10.5 percent, whereas the By-law establishes a maximum lot coverage of 10.0 percent. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department recommends that Minor Variance Application P/CA 09/21 be Tabled until an amendment to Minister's Zoning Order 154-03 is obtained through the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH), or arrangements are made to the satisfaction of the MMAH. Background The subject property is within Minister's Zoning Order 154-03 (MZO). Minister's Zoning Orders are enacted as regulation under the Planning Act and supersede any municipal zoning by-law that may apply to the subject area. Landowners may apply to amend or remove a MZO from their property by making an application to the Ministry. The primary purpose of the MZO is to prohibit new development within the Greenbelt Plan Area, except Greenbelt Conservation Uses and any buildings or structures necessary for flood and erosion controls. On Monday, February 8, 2021, City staff received comments from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) that an amendment to the MZO is required for the subject proposal. For this reason, staff are revising our recommendation of conditional approval from the Report to Committee of Adjustment dated February 3, 2021 and instead, recommend tabling the subject application until the applicant satisfies the MMAH's request. - 62 - Revised Report P/CA 09/21 February 10, 2021 Page 2 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services . No comments on the application. Building Services . No comments on the application. Property owner south-west of the • Concerns with the requested variance. subject site (2365 Fairport Road) • The proposed dwelling would be the largest dwelling along Third Concession and would not conform to the average lot size of homes along the street. • Property recently changed ownership and the public notice for this information was received less than two weeks from the scheduled Committee of Adjustment date — there is little opportunity to discuss the proposal with neighbours or the Committee due to COVID-19 restrictions. Date of report: February 9, 2021 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration FC:DW:so J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2021\PCA 09-21\7.Report\PCA 09-21 Report.doc Attachments - 63 - Exhibit 1 Third Concession Road Subject Lands CO Hydro Hydro Corridor Corridor flo; L1 N I A Location Map 4File: P/CA 09/21 PICKERING Applicant:& Muthulingam City Development froperty PropertyDescription:,Pt Lt 36 Con 2 N, Now Pt 1 40R-19689 Department (945 Third Concession Road) I Date: Jan. 13, 2021 o, ce�pe�anenermecityerPlckedngPmd,ced(Inpart�,nde�n,enaeo-ers:oo,eenaPdnt"'O'tdeM"t'yefNaw�alReae,�,ea. SCALE: 1:5,000 All rlghta reaerved.;0 Har Ma�aety the O,een In Rightdf Canada,Departmentof Natural Resources.All fights reserved.; O Teranet Enter daea Inc.and Its au hers all rl hta raaerved: art Asseaament Cor oration and Ida a, Vert all rl h.r.a... THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. L\PLANNING\Ot-MapFllea\PCA\20211PCA O-21 S.Muth,Ilngam\PCAOO-21_L..t,.nMap.m%d Exhibit 2 Third Concession Road k to permit a maximum lot coverage f l J of 10.5 percent Submitted Plan �,��Rl�� File No: P/CA 09/21 Applicant: S. Muthulin am City Development -Property Description: Pt Lt 36 Con 2 N, Now Pt 1 40R-19689 Department 945 Third Concession Road FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Jan 26, 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Exhibit 3 I i I I ® 4 to � t IUD ® t 0 R O 'Ell, 0u MID D I 1 I rF--r 1 - �� I 1 n� Submitted Elevation �� File No: P/CA 09/21 Applicant: S. Muthulin am City Development Property Description: Pt Lt 36 Con 2 N, Now Pt 1 40R-19689 Department 945 Third Concession Road FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Jan 26, 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. CdY 4 Report to PICKERINGCommittee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 10/21 Date: February 10, 2021 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 10/21 1329575 Ontario Inc. 1030 Salk Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a trucking terminal and associated outdoor storage, whereas in the By-law a trucking terminal and associated outdoor storage is not listed as a permitted use within the M1 Zone. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to recognize an existing trucking terminal and associated outdoor storage of vehicles on the subject property. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance apply only to the existing trucking terminal and associated outdoor storage on the subject property, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). Background Site Plan Application S 23/89 was previously approved for the subject property to permit an addition to the existing metal clad building. The landowner has confirmed that the approved additions were never constructed and therefore do not exist on the site. Exhibit 3 has been revised to address this matter. No site alteration or new development is proposed for the subject property as part of this variance application. Minor Variance Application P/CA 81/89 was previously approved for the subject property to permit a reduced front yard setback of 5.4 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 12.0 metres. - 67 - Report P/CA 10/21 February 10, 2021 Page 2 Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject site is designated as Employment Areas — General Employment within the Brock Industrial Neighbourhood. Transportation facilities are a permissible use with the General Employment designation. The existing use conforms to the Official Plan. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law Section 45.2(b) of the Planning Act allows the Committee of Adjustment, where the uses of land, buildings or structures permitted in the by-law are defined in general terms, to permit the use of any land, building or structure for any purpose that, in the opinion of the Committee, conforms to the uses permitted in the By-law. The subject site is zoned M1 within Zoning By-law 2511, as amended. Permitted uses in the M1 Zone include various storage and light manufacturing uses (service or repair shop, warehouse or distributing depot, garage, etc.), light manufacturing or assembly of manufactured products, and railway trackage and loading facilities. The existing trucking terminal use primarily involves the storage of trucking trailers and shipping containers on the subject property, for the purpose of transport and distribution. A number of uses permitted in the M1 Zone similarly involve the open storage of vehicles on site and the distribution of goods and services. Additionally, several similar uses exist in the surrounding area such as freight transfer and transportation facilities due to the site's close proximity to the CN railway line and Highway 401. As such, the existing trucking terminal use and associated outdoor storage of vehicles is compatible with the uses permitted in the M1 Zone. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature Several similar industrial uses are located within the surrounding area, including an auto sales and leasing centre, various auto repair shops, as well as a number of trucking terminals located on the south-side of Bayly Street. There are several freight transfer and transportation facilities within the surrounding area due to the site's close proximity to the CN railway line and Highway 401. The trucking terminal use is desirable for the location of the property. No site alteration or new development is proposed for the subject site as part of the requested variance. The applicant has indicated that the trucking terminal use and associated outdoor storage of vehicles has existed on the subject property since approximately 1973. The requested variance is considered to be minor in nature. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a trucking terminal use and associated outdoor storage is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. - 68 - Report P/CA 10/21 February 10, 2021 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services The drawings that have been provided show two proposed additions to the existing building. However, the applicant has indicated these additions were not constructed and there is no intent to construct them. Engineering Services has reviewed this application based on the aforementioned information. Based on the above, we have no comments. Building Services No comments on the application. Ministry of Transportation (MTO) No concerns with the application. Date of report: February 4, 2021 Comments prepared by: Isabel Lima Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration ILJc J:\Documents\Development\D-3700 Committee of Adjustment(PCA Applications)\2021\PCA 10-21 1329575 Ontario Iri Report\PCA 10-21 Report.doc Attachments - 69 - Exhibit 1 M9h`"av q0 1 as �o Plummer Street 0 U 'O O (6 m O Of N C (6 Q Subject Lands Bayly Street Dillingham Road N I Location Map C ad File:P/CA 10/21 PICKERING Applicant:1329575 Ontario Inc. City Development Property Description: Pt Lt 19, Con 1, Now Part 1, 40R1000 Department (1030 Salk Road) I Date: Jan. 15, 2021 ©The Corporation pfthe Cly of Pickering Produced(in part)under Ilce se from'.©Queens Printer,Ontario M'mistry of Natural Resources. SCALE: I C� A:A'000 All rightsreserved.',OHer McJesy M e Queen in RlgM1t'f"" a.De a tot NeNral Re-urces_AII rIgMs reserved.', JVf1LG I `4 Tea net Enters as lnc.antl its su hers ells M1ts re —d_;c r Assassin ent Coro antl ltssu hers all rl Msraserve tl.: THIS IS NOTAPLAN OF SURVEY. L'.rP CANNING1 -MapPll-11A-1RPCA 10-21 1329575 Ontario I n6PS--21_Lc 1--p.mxd N r r77, C NO - fTl N fill K —i Fr NV 311S N x w O �' o �s ob - - x„„ - 00�'JV7VS„ e O c6 O a a o xi ❑ 1'l tlad 6V B NOLl Df s 6 ssl-e+ i'B J-e I a + ��ae ra ee A' da :N ir' _��” tlHtl6tl m O ea �: L--- LL p y`{ - ia3w3nva' sasoaoaa L �`� \ Z LU S0 2 „ Of qqoxoa d s ,pec 0. a:zv asaa ,. z r W .�aa: .. ..- aaas; seo]..3 n.ai vk+ + � - � ❑ d l3AtlY] eOe 16 I �° c_� natl96'z ''.e'se O Z � ° . x 3L81— - anx%3 LLJLL 36Y9 w a C OJ LU Is.FcJ a xz - -I vice ce ca } �u73AV80Of 1�4Hi6`/ c ve 1N 1 I°. 4 - G I larrt IE tl� .. t f0 i I i _ d1-e¢ \V i W a e I <I. oa ah. La.n I • v O a O -U a I� � � (6 N V I I ♦/� z a co V/ O O J (B —� , I (D _ a O os c ♦g,♦ y�r �i/� L) (6 _ iso Axa si\'?`r .cr a�Ie `_—�, O L VJ LL Z-sLL-oMn 336 s413o Z /�� O (�O L axi exv J - - I eols ifs O �,or. + .+.-!^-�--: + ' t. —..0 3aaNivNon m. O .Q cz coa In, YA CL a6tl la tlsbla� sa a j O z a y�r L °t :x ` + j02lO�AH 1 �LN �� 1 / . .. O � i tom^ 00 o O N 71 O /1� / e t y--. y--. ,.n crcrv. eaenx+� �s.e ePA .real »o+ ..1'.. as ee =e.c ,a rF .e.+ civ+ nu+ ss S•+ ... w Q3 ` a) SONt/7 oyca N 0/LL/V A/0 �� ' Exhibit 3 �gpppK�.. -.EX NI G --YbPl36fr Additions approved through site plan were -- -' J not constructed and dor a .., not exist on the lot Li L- --� North Elevation (South Elevation Similar) r+Er<L GL..00i� �• r� I "al �I i ill" ( •. West Elevation -- n=om"uo �1r � L 1 ¢A��w — Z�b,�� DilcyLruos. Au" Sign Elevation ------------ I gy — I — I 44 I kw=111 East Elevation Submitted Elevation Plans P1�KER1�� File No: P/CA 10/21 Applicant: 1329575 Ontario Inc. City Development Property Description: Pt Lt 19, Con 1, Now Part 1, 40R1000 Department (1030 Salk Road) CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date; Jan 22, 2021 4 Report to PICKERINGCommittee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 11/21 Date: February 10, 2021 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 11/21 Nuteck Homes Ltd. 516 Oakwood Drive Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a minimum side yard depth of 1.0 metre on the northerly side yard, whereas the by-law requires 1.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to facilitate a Land Division application through the Region of Durham's Land Division Committee. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). 2. That this variance only apply should a Land Division application generally reflecting the applicant's submitted plans be approved by the Region of Durham Land Division Committee (refer to Exhibit 2). Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering's Official Plan designates the property as "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Rosebank Neighbourhood. Lands within this designation are intended to accommodate residential uses including single detached dwellings. Map 11 (Neighbourhood 1: Rosebank) of the Official Plan shows a future road connection with the extension of Mountain Ash Drive connecting onto Oakwood Drive, as demonstrated in Exhibit 5. This future extension is immediately south the proposed lot, and will result in the interior lot becoming a corner lot. However, since the road currently does not exist, the lot must only adhere to interior lot zoning standards, and shall be deemed legal non-confirming should any corner lot provisions be more restrictive once Mountain Ash Drive is extended. - 73 - Report P/CA 11/21 February 10, 2021 Page 2 The property is subject to the Rosebank Neighbourhood Development Guidelines. The property is located within Design Precinct No. 1 which limits residential development to single detached dwellings only. All new lots created in this precinct shall have lot frontages of approximately 15 metres and minimum lot depths ranging between approximately 33 metres and 60 metres. The proposed lot has a lot frontage of 15.24 metres and is approximately 60 metres in depth. The property is zoned R4 as per Zoning By-law 2511, as amended. The intent of the minimum side yard width provision is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties in order to maintain a pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading, drainage and other residential services. The proposed 1.0 metre side yard will adequately maintain separation with the abutting structure to the north, and will not create any adverse impacts on pedestrian access around the property or on the accommodation of drainage or the installation of residential services. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The proposed detached dwelling maintains a consistent built form along Oakwood Drive. The dwelling is proposed to be similar in size and scale to the neighbouring properties. As previously mentioned, the proposed lot size and detached dwelling are consistent with the Rosebank Neighbourhood Development Guidelines. The proposed reduction from 1.5 metres to 1.0 metre is will have a minimal impact on the functionality of the side yard, and will maintain adequate distance from the neighbouring dwelling to the north. As such, the proposed variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the land and is minor in nature. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a side yard depth of 1.0 metre is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Ensure the reduced side yard setback does not adversely affect the drainage patterns of the lot or limit the requirement for a side yard swale with the building permit. Consideration for rain harvesting or other LID measures should be made at the Building Permit stage if increasing the imperviousness of the lot surface. Building Services No comments on the application. - 74 - Report P/CA 11/21 February 10, 2021 Page 3 Date of report: February 3, 2021 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration FC Jc JADocuments\Development\D-3700 Committee of Adjustment(PCA Applications)\2021\PCA 11-21 Nuteck Homes Ltd\7.Report\PCA 11-21 Report.doc Attachments - 75 - Exhibit 1 r 0 U 0 S J <ekn-0 c o U N O C (p � N N L � V1 Q U C -0 � o 0 C U O 'AJC a o � 0 0 3 � O o of a c m 7 0 so Staghorn Road 0 Subject Lands 0 I F. [LI o_ �C c c �cJ P Al -J Location Map GZy File: P/CA 11/21 PICKERING Applicant:Nuteck Homes Ltd. City Development Property Description: Lt 55 & Pt Lt 56, Plan 350, Now Parts 3 &4, 40R18920 Department (516 Oakwood Drive) Date: Jan. 15, 2021 T'TM1C Corporl—d-CIry oI PlckcrinOProducnd(Inp-)unticr I---t Queens Printer,On�erlo M;n r"of Neural Resources_ SC ALE: 1:4,000 All righls reserved.',O Her McJesy N e Qu ee n In Right o f Canad a.De a tot NeNral Re sources_AII rIgMs reserved.', Jl.if1LL I Y ©Tera net Enters eslnc.antl its su hers ells M1ts reaervetl_;c rAssessment Coro antl ltssu hers all rl Msrase—d THIS IS NOTAPLAN OFSURVEV. L'.WLANNING\01-MapFlles\PCA\2021\PCA 11-21 Nuleck Homes Ltd\PCA11-21 Location Map mxtl Exhibit 2 to permit a minimum side yard depth of Q] 1.0 metres on the northerly side yard N ' ur MJF 57 w Hasa � a - - -- i ..I –Y 26303 4 L O T' 5 6 ' F P&26309 - am 71 F-A w eJ r ' ` 3 1.0m � PMT p a Ao� FAM _�c3Er3.79 � 0100 R?l 1!44 7-7 C� x L 0 T 5 5 yLd 60.36 4 F_ wa LL w lam IMAY f J LOT 54 f PM 28309 Mw aum - AC�k z M 5 � u N 4 Submitted Plan �l��E�l�� File No: P/CA 11/21 Applicant: Nuteck Homes Ltd. City Development Property Description: Lt 55 & Pt Lt 56, Plan 350, Now Parts 3 & 4, 40R18920 Department 516 Oakwood Drive FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Jan 26, 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Exhibit 3 Pp ASPtPL,9,Wkj8 1 �e YOP OF'PLA TOP OF PL-Arr Flk.EGGOf� FIN.SECON[]rLvvlF ._ ...-.... In,mi y III II 11111, I TTTT'.Y Drt r'.1.L=11'11 If FRL FIRST FLDOR HN.FMT FLO li ___ IN SIR'WL.3[IIP SOIi IIG _ oxOa�>�iar RTf� flml g TOP OF 6168 TOP OF ----------- Front _____.....Front Elevation Rear Elevation Elevations �,��E�l�� File No: P/CA 11/21 Applicant: Nuteck Homes Ltd. City Development Property Description: Lt 55 & Pt Lt 56, Plan 350, Now Parts 3 & 4, 40R18920 Department 516 Oakwood Drive FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Feb. 2, 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Exhibit 4 ea rmAY MfO XM-fe ren .[��R3 1 •sro.vo-nr 0 0 XVAA®(rei �.-�Qlb 120A! South Side - - - - - - Elevation p111J 1 °© (e9tla Irq.WIiJ X:i North Side Elevation - .-- .-- En --Cl 0 - - -..w-ulax as,t me xx�,roW iG TOr Li N.rC Elevations ��E�1�� File No: P/CA 11/21 Applicant: Nuteck Homes Ltd. City Development Property Description: Lt 55 & Pt Lt 56, Plan 350, Now Parts 3 & 4, 40R18920 Department 516 Oakwood Drive FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Feb. 2, 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Exhibit 5 I Y — r Existing Mountain Ash Drive cul-de-sac Future Mountain Ash •I Drive Road Connection Af s * , R{- I%J F_h LAH hK 4;7-* J" 4� :•v ` I I I I fit ; _" I I I I O I IP I �A I I j I I �.0 � r I I I a I I I I I I I I I • � I I I r Oakwood Drive Submitted Plan — Proposed Extension of Mountain Ash Drive ��E�l�� File No: P/CA 11/21 Applicant: Nuteck Homes Ltd. City Development Property Description: Lt 55 & Pt Lt 56, Plan 350, Now Parts 3 & 4, 40R18920 Department 516 Oakwood Drive FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING Date: Feb. 2, 2021 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.