Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 11, 2020DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 3 Date: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 pickering.ca Cfy �f DICKERING Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, March 11, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers 1. Disclosure of Interest 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Adoption of Minutes from February 12, 2020 4. Reports 4.1 P/CA 12/20 M. Hurman 548 Lekani Court 4.2 P/CA 13/20 B. Zekri 1841 Woodview Avenue 4.3 P/CA 14/20 Lakeridge Health 1690 Dersan Street 4.4 P/CA 15/20 M. Brady & G. Fortin 811 Fairview Avenue 4.5 P/CA 16/20 C. MacMillan 971 Mink Street 5. Adjournment For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Samantha O'Brien Telephone: 905.420.4660 extension 2023 Email: sobrien@pickering.ca Page Number 1-16 17-22 23-26 27-32 33-37 38-42 cry 4 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland — Vice -Chair David Johnson — Chair Eric Newton (arrived at 7:05 pm) Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary -Treasurer Samantha O'Brien, Assistant Secretary -Treasurer 1. Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. 2. Adoption of Agenda Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Denise Rundle That the agenda for the Wednesday, February 12, 2020 meeting be adopted. Carried 3. Adoption of Minutes Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Denise Rundle That the minutes of the 1st meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, January 8, 2020 be adopted. Carried Page 1 of 16 cry 4 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers 4. Reports 4.1 (Deferred from the January 8, 2020 Meeting) P/CA 03/20 — Revised 9004807 Canada Inc. (Stonepay) Tillings Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 7710/19, to permit air conditioning units in the front yard between the front wall of the building or a dwelling and a street. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain site plan approval for Stacked Townhouses with air conditioning units located between the front main wall of a building and a street. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section stating their recommendation of the placement for the proposes air conditioning (A/C) units on balconies greater than 600 mm above grade, to be placed no closer than 300 mm from the edge of the A/C unit to the guard. Written comments were received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority stating no objections to the application. Mike Pettigrew, agent with the Biglieri Group Ltd., was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. It was confirmed that Council Resolution #203-19 (see Attachment #2 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020 for P/CA 03/20) allowing minor variance applications during the 2 -year 'time out' period applies to the full Stonepay subdivision. In response to a question posed by a Committee Member regarding construction, Mike Pettigrew indicated the number of residential units with air conditioning units located between the building and the street have not yet been determined. In addition, the location of the air conditioning units on the balconies and the design of the balcony guard will be addressed based on the requirements of the Ontario Building Code. One Committee Member indicated they will abstain from voting, having arrived after P/CA 03/20 by 9004807 Canada Inc. (Stonepay) for Tillings Road was heard. Page 2 of 16 -2- cry 4 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers Given the staff recommendation report, the recirculation of the new Notice of Public Hearing, the confidence that the Site Plan process will address necessary features of the proposal and that the application appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application P/CA 03/20 by 9004807 Canada Inc. (Stonepay), be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. Carried 4.2 (Deferred from the January 8, 2020 Meeting) P/CA 04/20 G. Slater 1305 Luna Court The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended by By-law 406/76 to permit a rear yard setback of 6.6 metres, whereas the by-law requires 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for an existing covered platform. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from two property owners of Luna Court in support of the application. Gregory Slater, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to questions from Committee Members, Gregory Slater indicated his property is a semi-detached house where rear yards are separated by a fence. Page 3 of 16 3 cry DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers He stated that as previously approved by the Committee of Adjustment for P/CA 67/19, the 0.3 of a metre between the covered platform and the fence is enough space for proper yard maintenance. Gregory Slater noted that the deck existed when he first purchased the dwelling in 2014 and he added the covering himself. After hearing the applicant's comments and taking into consideration the support given by adjacent neighbours, as well as the application appearing to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Sean Wiley moved the following motion: Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 04/20 by G. Slater, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the covered platform, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by January 8, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 4.3 P/CA 05/20 Noir Investment Holdings Inc. 5321 Brock Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06, to permit: • a minimum lot area of 0.29 of a hectare, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 0.8 of a hectare; and • a minimum lot frontage of 51.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 60 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances to recognize the deficient lot area and lot frontage, in order to obtain a building permit for a new detached dwelling. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval. Page 4 of 16 4 cry DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority who have no objections to P/CA 05/20. They also indicated a TRCA permit is required and has received approval as of November 29, 2019. Written comments were received from the Durham Region Health Department stating no objections to the proposed application; further comments will be required at the building permit stage. Written comments were not received from CP Rail prior to the meeting. Albert Yuen, agent with Noir Design, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. After consideration of the Recommendation Report to the Committee of Adjustment from City staff, the approval received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), the input received from other sources, and the application appearing to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Sean Wiley moved the following motion: Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 05/20 by Noir Investment Holdings Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the minimum lot area of 0.29 of a hectare and a minimum lot frontage of 51.0 metres, are in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and are minor in nature. Carried Unanimously 4.4 P/CA 06/20 K. Job 1117 Pine Glen Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4113/92 to permit: • an uncovered platform and steps measuring 1.4 metres in height above grade to project 3.7 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 1.5 metres into the required rear yard; and Page 5 of 16 -5- cry DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers • an uncovered platform and steps measuring 1.4 metres in height above grade to project 2.5 metres into the required (south) side yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 0.5 metres into the required side yard. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to recognize two non -conforming uncovered platforms (decks). The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing the applicant should ensure there are 0.6 metre offset from both side yards to the edge of the uncovered platforms. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section stating a complaint regarding construction in the rear yard was received. Inspectors investigated and determined a building permit had not been applied for. Subsequently, Building Permit #19-110403 was applied for. Review of the application has determined Committee of Adjustment clearance is required. At this time, a permit has not yet been issued for the construction. Written comments were received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) expressing no objections to the application. Kirk Job, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to questions from Committee Members, Kirk Job stated the structures were built approximately in October 2019 by a hired contractor for replacement of the previously existing uncovered platforms. Kirk Job indicated the contractor did not apply for a building permit and he was unaware one would be required for this type of work. After hearing the responses from the applicant, reviewing the staff Recommendation Report to the Committee of Adjustment and the application appearing to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Tom Copeland moved the following motion: Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 06/20 by K. Job, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: Page 6 of 16 -6- cry DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers 1. That these variances apply only to the uncovered platforms, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 11, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 4.5 P/CA 07/20 Marshall Homes (Copperfield) Ltd. 395 Frontier Court (Lot 3) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18 to permit a rear yard setback of 5.4 metres, whereas the by-law requires 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a single detached dwelling. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no concerns with the application. Written comments were received from a resident of Rougemount Drive expressing some concerns with the application. The resident would like compensation and/or planting of new trees or shrubs along the fence line to accommodate the loss of privacy from the reduced rear yard setback. Discussion between the applicant and the concerned resident of Rougemount Drive has taken place prior to the meeting, where the applicant has agreed to coordinate tree planting with the resident. Samantha Bateman, agent with Marshall Homes, was present to represent the application. Silvan Murray of Toynevale Road was present in opposition to the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Silvan Murray stated privacy concerns with the subject site, specifically regarding the proposed height and window placements for the dwelling. Page 7 of 16 -7- cry DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers In response to the privacy issues raised by Silvan Murray, Samantha Bateman indicated the height of the proposal is in conformity with the zoning by-law requirements. Furthermore, there will be no changes to the windows or design of the dwelling. Samantha Bateman stated a willingness to work with the concerned neighbours of Toynevale Road, adjacent to the subject site. In response to questions posed by Committee Members, Samantha Bateman stated the changes to the building permit included the addition of the loggia. She added that the applicant would be willing to plant trees on the subject site, however with it being freehold ownership, future landowners have the ability to alter such landscaping. When asked about future plans or potential to enclose the rear yard balcony, Samantha Bateman indicated no desire to alter the design at this time. After consideration of the neighbour's concerns, the overlook and distance from the proposed dwelling to adjacent properties, responses and the additional vegetation plans agreed to by the applicant, and the application appearing to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application P/CA 07/20 by Marshall Homes (Copperfield) Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the detached dwelling and second storey balcony, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to the Revised Exhibit 2 attached to P/CA 07/20 Decision dated February 12, 2020). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 11, 2022, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 4.6 P/CA 08/20 V. Rudik 1855 Rosebank Road (Lot 6) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1929/84 to permit an interior side yard width of 0.6 of a metre, whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 1.2 metres. Page 8 of 16 8 cry DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a single detached dwelling. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no concerns with the application. Written comments were received from a resident of Dencourt Drive in objection to the application. Samantha Bateman, agent with Marshall Homes, was present to represent the application. Victor Rudik, applicant, was also in attendance. Kim O'Reilly of Dencourt Drive and David Sanderson of Charnwood Court were present to address concerns at 1855 Rosebank Road, most specifically related to P/CA 09/20 (1855 Rosebank Road, Lot 8), and P/CA 10/20 (1855 Rosebank Road, Lot 9). No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In support of the application, Samantha Bateman advised the lot configuration and size has been approved and supported by the Region of Durham Land Division Committee, subject to conditions. In response to questions from Committee Members, Samantha Bateman indicated the purpose for the fifty per cent reduction of interior side yard width for Lot 6 is due to the unique "FlexHouz" dual suites design that is difficult to reduce and narrow the floorplan to meet the by-law requirement. When questioned about the possibility for air conditioning (A/C) units and fireplace installation, Samantha Bateman advised the placement of the A/C units are typically located at the rear of the dwellings. She indicated the lots allow for a small encroachment of a fireplace chimney permitted through zoning. Samantha Bateman described the design of the "FlexHouz" to include 1 single garage for the accessory suite and 1 double garage for the main portion of the dwelling. Furthermore, she stated the drawings labeled "Elevation A" for P/CA 08/20 for 1855 Rosebank Road, Lot 6 are in fact mirror images of what was submitted (refer to Exhibit 3 contained in P/CA 08/20 staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). After reviewing the staff Report and understanding that the greater side yard abuts a reduced yard, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Page 9 of 16 9 cry DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 08/20 by V. Rudik, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 11, 2022, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Vote Tom Copeland in favour David Johnson in favour Eric Newton in favour Denise Rundle in favour Sean Wiley opposed 4.7 P/CA 09/20 V. Rudik 1855 Rosebank Road (Lot 8) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1929/84 to permit a lot frontage minimum of 11.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 13.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a single detached dwelling. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department indicating a minimum side yard width of 0.6 of a metre to be maintained on the north side Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no concern with the application. Page 10 of 16 -10- cry DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers Written comments were received from a resident of Dencourt Drive in objection to the application. Samantha Bateman, agent with Marshall Homes, was present to represent the application. Victor Rudik, applicant, was also in attendance. Kim O'Reilly of Dencourt Drive and David Sanderson of Charnwood Court were present in opposition to the application P/CA 09/20 located at 1855 Rosebank Road, Lot 8. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In support of the application Samantha Bateman advised the property south of Lot 8 maintains the same built form and architectural design of what is purposed. Moreover the requested lot frontage of the property is similar to those in the neighbourhood with irregular lot shapes. Kim O'Rielly spoke in opposition to the application reiterating her submitted written comments. She stated she is unhappy with the submitted elevation drawings. Kim O'Rielly believes the proposed development is not compatible with the existing neighbourhood for the following reasons: • Existing dwellings in the neighbourhood have one driveway and front entrance to the dwelling, the proposed has two driveways and front entrances. This would increase the risk associated with additional vehicular use and storage, • The proposal results in a differing streetscape than the existing neighbourhood and is reducing greenspace in the community, • The 3 -storey proposal is believed to be inconsistent with the neighbourhood that is mainly 2 -storey dwellings which has a large impact on the existing streetscape, • Increased paving to accommodate additional driveway access of the proposal will result in increased drainage issues for the property and adjacent lands, • The proposal is designed to accommodate multi -generational living that is not the common built form and architectural design of the neighbourhood; and • The proposal advertises the dwellings to be over 4,000 square feet which would be some of the largest in the neighbourhood. A reduced design would allow for the by-law frontage requirements to be met. Prior to the Hearing, Samantha Bateman provided a letter responding to the concerns raised by Kim O'Rielly. The Committee Members and staff also received a copy of this letter. David Sanderson spoke in opposition to the application stating he believes it does not meet the four tests of the Planning Act where it is not "minor in nature" and "desirable for the appropriate development of the land". Page 11 of 16 -11- cry 4 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers He noted two prior Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) Hearing cases that he believed to have similar concerns: March 28, 1989 (North York) and 1994 (Toronto). David Sanderson indicated the requested by-law variances would not be required if the drawings were revised and one dwelling removed to allow for additional space between lots. When asked about the square footage of the dwellings, Samantha Bateman stated they range from approximately 3,500 to 4,000 square feet, with the in-law suites approximately 600 square feet in compliance with the Ontario Building Code (OBC). She continued to describe the design of the "FlexHouz" as tailored to families with a dependent child, grandparent, accessible, and multi -generational living situation. Additionally, the frontage of Lot 8 is measured through the existing easement which is for access to the rear yard catch basin. In response to questions from the Committee Members, the Secretary -Treasurer stated the proposed dwellings do comply with the zoning provisions for lot coverage. When questioned about current setbacks for existing dwellings in the neighbourhood, the Secretary -Treasurer indicated a detailed analysis has not been completed to comparatively evaluate the lots. When questioned by Committee Members about the possibility to convert the accessory suite into an "Airbnb" or rental unit, Samantha Bateman advised these dwellings are Freehold and it would be difficult for Marshall Homes to impose restrictions. In response to whether or not Marshall Homes would consider adding limitations through a list of their conditions on title, Samantha Bateman advised it could be taken under consideration and require review by their legal team. After listening to the comments and concerns addressed from two opposing parties, hearing the responses from the applicant, reviewing the staff Report and receiving additional information at the Hearing, Tom Copeland moved the following motion: Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 09/20 by V. Rudik, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the subject dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). Page 12 of 16 -12- cry DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 11, 2022, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 4.8 P/CA 10/20 V. Rudik 1855 Rosebank Road (Lot 9) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1929/84 to permit: • a minimum lot frontage of 11.3 metres, whereas the by-law requires 13.5 metres; • a minimum interior side yard width of 1.0 metre on the south side yard, whereas the by-law requires 1.2 metres; and • a minimum rear yard depth of 5.7 metres, whereas the by-law requires 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a single detached dwelling. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no concern with the application. Written comments were received from a resident of Dencourt Drive in objection to the application. Samantha Bateman, agent with Marshall Homes, was present to represent the application. Victor Rudik, applicant, was also in attendance. Kim O'Reilly of Dencourt Drive and David Sanderson of Charnwood Court were present in opposition to the application P/CA 09/20 located at 1855 Rosebank Road, Lot 8. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Kim O'Rielly and David Sanderson advised they would like to reiterate their comments and concerns from the previous application P/CA 09/20 for 1855 Rosebank Road (Lot 8), as they also apply to this application P/CA 10/20 for 1855 Rosebank Road (Lot 9). Page 13 of 16 -13- cry DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers In support of the application, Samantha Bateman advised that the dwelling proposed for Lot 9 has a standard 2 car garage design. She elaborated on the layout and that it 3 - storeys. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Samantha Bateman advised the deck encroaches into the rear yard which is the reason for the associated requested variance. After consideration of the comments received, noting the oppositions, and the applicant's responses as well as the application appearing to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Tom Copeland moved the following motion: Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 10/20 by V. Rudik, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the subject dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 11, 2022, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 4.9 P/CA 11/20 Kubota Canada Ltd. 1155 Kubota Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364/14, as amended by By-law 7659/18, to permit: • a primary entrance door to be incorporated into the wall of the building facing the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a primary entrance door to be incorporated into the front wall of the building facing the front lot line, • a maximum front yard depth of 53.5 metres, whereas the by-law requires a maximum front yard depth of 5 metres, Page 14 of 16 -14- C44 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers • parking between a building and the front lot line, whereas the by-law states in no case shall parking be permitted between a building and the front lot line; and • loading spaces in the front yard, whereas the by-law states no loading space shall be permitted in the front yard of any zone. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain site plan approval for a head office/assembly building. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to a condition. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) expressing no objection to the application. Mike Pettigrew, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Mike Pettigrew stated the subject site is at the site planning stage with the City of Pickering who is looking to develop a road network. When asked about the number of parking spot allocated to the front of the subject site, Mike Pettigrew indicated there to be approximately 8 dedicated parking spaces. Given that the application appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act and after listening to the applicant's responses, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application P/CA 11/20 by Kubota Canada Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the head office/assembly building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). Carried Unanimously Page 15 of 16 -15- C44 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers 5. Adjournment Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Tom Copeland That the 2nd meeting of the 2020 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:26 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, March 11, 2020. Date Chair Assistant Secretary -Treasurer -16- Carried Unanimously Page 16 of 16 GGZ 4 DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 12/20 Date: March 11, 2020 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 12/20 M. Hurman 548 Lekani Court Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 4622/95 to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 5.4 metres, whereas the by-law requires 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to facilitate the construction of an uncovered platform (deck). Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance apply only to the uncovered platform (deck), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, & 4). Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering's Official Plan designates the subject lot as "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Rosebank Neighbourhood. Lands within this designation are intended to accommodate residential uses including detached dwellings. The property is zoned "R4-6" within Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 4622/95. The intent of the minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres is to ensure that a useable amenity space is provided in the rear yard. The requested variance is intended to facilitate an uncovered platform that will contribute towards the total useable amenity space in the rear yard. -17- Report P/CA 12/20 March 11, 2020 Page 2 Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The proposed variance intends to enhance the outdoor amenity area at the rear of the dwelling. The subject by-law does not provide for allowable encroachments of platforms into the rear yard, however sufficient outdoor amenity space will be maintained beyond the proposed platform. Moreover, the platform will provide access from the elevated main floor of the dwelling into the rear yard. The proposed 5.4 metre rear yard setback for an uncovered deck will not impose any adverse impacts or privacy concerns on abutting property owners. The deficient rear yard setback is a function of the irregular shape of the lot. As such, majority of the proposed platform complies with the existing zoning by-law, however a portion of the southwest corner of the proposed platform encroaches into the required depth (refer to Exhibit 2). Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 5.4 metres for an uncovered platform (deck) is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Building Services Date of report: March 4, 2020 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Planner I FC:DW:so J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2020\PCA 12-20\7. Report\PCA 12-20 Report.doc Attachments • No comments on the application. • No comments on the application. 2 Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration -18- Exhibit 1 L\PLANNING\01-MapFlles\PCA\2020\PCA 12-20 M. Hurman\PCA1Z-Z0_Locati nMap.mxd 0 woad j e, m ° Q / N\9r�ay �p1 [ 41 iii _ ..._ .000 Frontier Court T \ 0 // U Toynevale Road 111 , 0 Ct m __ > - 11111 011 _ _ 0 • •• 1 0 _- F ♦.I > J 0 — 11 0 Ct pplIF r T- ��� Subject c°\,� V . Lands 1 4 41 cu Oakwood D Mcleod Cresce Mountain Ash D Ili N 0 A, 1 , I Location Map C44 File: P/CA 12/20 PICKERING Applicant: M. Hurman City Development Property Description: Lot 17, Plan 40M-1866 Department (548 Lekani Court) Date: Feb. 10, 2020 The Corporation of the CIty of Plckedng Produced on part)under ncense from :© Queens PMtepOntano Ministry of Natural Resources. i© rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All hghts reserved.; Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppllert all rights reserved.; ©N�.1 perty Assessment Corporation and Its suppliers all rights reserved„ SCALE: 1:4,000 THIS IS NOTA PLAN OF SURVEY. L\PLANNING\01-MapFlles\PCA\2020\PCA 12-20 M. Hurman\PCA1Z-Z0_Locati nMap.mxd L Y c) L O o (6 N -o a) a) CL L C C C C E O 7:30) a) C • O Q O >` - c Ex C0e''0,EU P0xcw WN'KWA+'I -iNILt. - II; t CD N N U_ 0 O z LL Date: Feb 25, 2020 0 z uJ 0 U IL 0 U W 0 Z_ uJ W J Sc_ W co i K zI Z Lu dg UX I- d IL W O D wz d W O2 U0 O J ¢> 0o J } U -U -20- M t W 1 - N N 0 0 z d LL Date: Feb 25, 2020 O Z w W U a LL 0 } U H U ce 0 LL m g a . z� gZ ag a W 0 OD W Z 2 Oa UO Q W (0o J } J 1- Li- 0 -21- 16 W East Elevation West Elevation .-.l• � ..E Y 3i I f c co a 2 E N O N N_ Q 0 0 Z it Date: Feb 25, 2020 -22- GGZ 4 DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 13/20 Date: March 11, 2020 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 13/20 B. Zekri 1841 Woodview Avenue Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum south side yard of 1.4 metres, whereas the by-law states where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, the minimum required side yard shall be 1.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to recognize a deficient side yard setback. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the subject dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). Background In 2010, a building permit was issued for the construction of a two-storey detached dwelling on the subject lands. During construction of the dwelling, an error was made with the south side yard and therefore the property requires relief from Zoning By-law 3036, to recognize a deficient side yard setback. Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law The subject site is designated "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Area" within the Highbush Neighbourhood. Detached dwellings are the primary built -form in the Highbush Neighbourhood. -23- Report P/CA 13/20 March 11, 2020 Page 2 The subject site is zoned "R4" within Zoning By-law 3036. A detached dwelling is permitted within the R4 zone. Although the existing detached dwelling is permitted within the R4 zone, the dwelling does not achieve the minimum south side yard setback. The purpose of the side yard setback is to provide appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties, accommodate drainage, and provide sufficient room for maintenance of the dwelling. The abutting property to the south currently has a detached dwelling which is setback more than 5 metres from the north property line, therefore there is sufficient room between the structures on the abutting properties to accommodate drainage, and for maintenance of each dwelling. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature Given the detached dwelling was constructed with a building permit in 2010, and is consistent with development along Woodview Avenue (all detached dwellings), staff consider the development appropriate. In addition, the request to vary the south side yard by 0.05 of a metre is considered a minor variation to the required side yard setback. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a south side yard setback of 1.4 metres is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Building Services Date of report: March 4, 2020 Comments prepared by: i4 r`✓y —� Tanjot Bal, MCIP, RPP Planner I TB:DW:so J9 Documents \Development\D-3700\2020\PCA 13-20\7. Report\PCA 13-20 Report.doc Attachments • No comments on the application. • No concerns with the application. Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration -24- Exhibit 1 Pinegrove Park J Rouge Forest Crescent Pine Grove Avenue cdrti PICKERING City Development Department • Sandhurst Crescent • 1 Subject — Lands 0 o o` U• O Prohill Street oodview Avenu a) 0 a) c 0 0 0 2 *Z. id Mossbroo MIME 1 =WWMUM MEI=1 == .IMMIMI !II11111 11111111 MEM Westcreek Public School Valleyview Park E11-71 LLyi Lan crest Street Location Map File: P/CA 13/20 Applicant: B. Zekri Property Description: Pt Lot 11, Plan 282, Now Part 1, 40R-25431 (1841 Woodview Avenue) Date: Feb. 10, 2020 The Cerperatlen of the CIty of P lckedng Produced (In part) under ricanse from :©Queens Pdmer.Ontado Mlnnay of Natural Resources. SCALE: 1:4,000 iII rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All hghts reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its su papers all rights reserved.; ©perty Assessment Corporation and Its suppliers all rights reserved„ THIS IS NOTA PLAN OF SURVEY L \PLANNING\01-MapFiles\PCA\2020\PCA 13-20 B. Zekrl\PCA13-20_LocationMap.mad Exhibit 2 W00DVIEW AVENUE (BY REGISTERED PLAN 282) PIN 25367 - DDDi N18'18'10"W 1. 2r3 15.24 m 15.24(P1AM) 59.13 2865 to permit a minimum south side yard of 1.4 metres 1.45 m 1.51 m LFRAME DECK 0.59 REGISTERED PLAN 282 CHAIN l/NK FENCE 1525 6 N1858' 0"W PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 13/20 Applicant: B. Zekri Property Description: Pt Lot 11, Plan 282, Now Part 1, 40R-25431 (1841 Woodview Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Date: Feb 25, 2020 -26- GGZ DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 14/20 Date: March 11, 2020 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 14/20 Lakeridge Health 1690 Dersan Street Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 7191/12: • to permit a building to be erected on a lot where a minimum of 87 percent of the length of the build -to -zone along the Brock Road frontage contains a building or part of a building, whereas the By-law requires a minimum of 90 percent; • to permit a building to be erected on a lot where a minimum of 44 percent of the length of the build -to -zone along the Dersan Street frontage contains a building or part of a building, whereas the By-law requires a minimum of 60 percent; • to permit a total of 207 parking spaces whereas the By-law requires a minimum of 4.0 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross leasable floor area; • to permit a maximum aggregate gross leasable floor area for medical professional offices of 55 percent of the maximum permitted gross leasable floor area (totaling 5,435.0 square metres) whereas the By-law requires a maximum of 50 percent. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to facilitate the construction of a medical office building. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the subject property, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). -27- Report P/CA 14/20 March 11, 2020 Page 2 Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering's Official Plan designates the subject property as "Mixed Use Areas — Mixed Corridors" within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood. Permitted uses within this designation include, but are not limited to, residential, retailing of goods and services generally serving the needs of the surrounding neighbourhoods, and offices. The property is zoned "(H)MU-23" as per Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 7191/12. The holding provision for this zone is not to be removed until such time a development agreement with the City of Pickering is executed to ensure that all the requirements for the development of the lands have been complied with. Build -to -Zone Variances A build -to -zone is a defined area on a lot where a portion of all of the front facade of a building is required to be located within. The intention of the build -to -zone provision of the By-law is to create an architecturally pronounced, vibrant and pedestrian -friendly corridor by bringing the facade of a building closer to the street and pedestrian activity. The applicant requests permission for a building to be erected on a lot where a minimum of 87 percent of the length of the build -to -zone along the Brock Road frontage contains a building or part of a building, whereas the By-law requires a minimum of 90 percent. The 3 percent reduction represents a deficiency of 1 metre along the Brock Road build -to -zone. As such, the intent of the By-law provision is maintained. The applicant also requests to permit a building to be erected on a lot where a minimum of 44 percent of the length of the build -to -zone along the Dersan Street frontage contains a building or part of a building, whereas the By-law requires a minimum of 60 percent. The 16 percent reduction of the Dersan Street build -to -zone represents a 7.9 metre deficiency. The reduction is a result of facilitating a functional site and building design, and to facilitate adequate separation from the proposed entrance to the building. The intent of the By-law will continue to be maintained as the facade of the building abuts the Brock Road and Dersan Street intersection. Parking Reduction Variance The applicant proposes to reduce the required number of parking spaces for the site to 207 spaces. The By-law requires a minimum of 4.0 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross leasable floor area, which amounts to 218 spaces based on the proposed gross leasable floor area of 5,433.5 square metres. The intention of the requirement for a minimum number of parking spaces for a property is to ensure the functionality of the proposed use. The reduction of 11 parking spaces is minimal and a sufficient number of parking spaces will be maintained to ensure adequate parking spaces will be provided for future medical professional office uses. -28- Report P/CA 14/20 March 11, 2020 Page 3 Aggregate Gross Leasable Floor Area for Medical Professional Offices The By-law permits a maximum of 50 percent of the total allowable gross leasable floor area of the property (10,000 square metres) for medical professional office uses. The applicant is proposing a building of 5,435 square metres, which will be entirely occupied by medical professional office uses. As such, the applicant requests an increase of the maximum percentage of allowable medical professional office use to 55 percent. The intent of the By-law to permit a maximum of 50 percent of the maximum permitted gross leasable floor area for medical professional offices is to provide a diversity of uses to support neighbourhood and City functions. An increase to 55 percent of the maximum permitted gross leasable floor area for medical professional offices will not significantly overwhelm or restrict the potential for other uses at this property. This variance would not prohibit future development of the site to the maximum allowable gross leasable floor area. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The proposed variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land given the location of this property at the Brock Road and Dersan Street intersection in conjunction with the site design. The proposed building will occupy a sufficient amount of the required build -to -zone ensuring the fagade of the building will address both Brock Road and Dersan Street, and frame the intersection. The proposed variances will not result in any significant adverse impact on the surrounding properties. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintain the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and are minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Building Services Date of report: March 4, 2020 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Planner I FC:DW:so J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2020\PCA 14-20\7. Report\PCA 14-20 Report.doc Attachments • No comments on the application. • No comments on the application. 2 Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration -29- Exhibit 1 L \PLANNING\01-MapFiles\PCA\2020\PCA 14-20 Lakeridge Health \PCA14-20_ ocationMap.mad U a) ,7.---„,_-_,-..-, a U IIC.D IY l o _ to IS m lc, z Adirondack i hese L J creeks,„, Pink I _ _. . `/ o` tire, ' e — ' `■1111■ — Subject ■1111■ - Hayden Lane 7,1 Lands 3 11111■ OHM �� eouleva d Misthollow Drive • riatris D Street William Jackson Drive Dersan 7 , CP CI) o CP = IIIIIIII' ,- 11111111, N IIIIIIIIIC Location Map C44 File: P/CA 14/20 PICKERING Applicant: Lakeridge Health City Development Property Description: Lot 10, Plan 585 Department (1690 Dersan Street) Date: Feb. 11, 2020 The cerperahen of the Chy of Pickering Produced on part) under ovens, from: @ Queens Printer, Gntane Ministry of Natural Resources. �II rig h[s reserved.;© Her Majesty [he Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Na[uml Resources. All fights reserved.; O Terane[ En[erprlses Inc. and Its su ppllert all rlgh[s reserved.; O (p�perty Assessment Corporation and Its suppliers all rights reserved„ SCALE: 1:4 ,000 THIS IS NOTA PLAN OF SURVEY. L \PLANNING\01-MapFiles\PCA\2020\PCA 14-20 Lakeridge Health \PCA14-20_ ocationMap.mad 0)108 )132 '9 xrta - [rumor 31402 .OL nom Sari awuune To O .( O CD 0) O L O _a c a • 0 f) 0) a) E o E • N E co oo a] a) co cz• cnO a) O7 co E E .Xco co L L O a) O -1▪ 7) CO a) co cp °' E Q Li) 0) o© ▪ (I) • U E M O O_ in 4— a) Q y-+ a) 0 co Q O 0) "0 5 c- o O a) N 0 Date: Feb 26, 2020 U W U a 0 H U LLIS F U u_ W Lu z� ¢z a 2 ¢ d W 0 00 W z a_— Lu 0 U°- O JJ w (-) J } J F C E 0. N Q C CD a ❑ w ❑ U -31- M 16 t w 1- -t- 1 z 1 o -- 0-i 2 1- qui lir- g 13 I I I }^TtF-�-�ff-T•- 0- 0- 0- 1 • o-� —►, 11f elf f h i d! d; di d di gi 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- o -- 0-- I 1- '�IE;�fl9E d 6 z Y E a 2 E a N N VJ co L 0 0 O 0) (0 ear5i7alP ir211yI1, -32- GGZ 4 DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 15/20 Date: March 11, 2020 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 15/20 M. Brady & G. Fortin 811 Fairview Avenue Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18 to permit a total lot coverage of all accessory structures excluding private detached garages, of 6.1 percent, whereas the by-law requires the total lot coverage of all accessory buildings excluding private detached garages, shall not exceed 5 percent of the lot area. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for a shed. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the existing shed, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law The subject site is designated as "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Area" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood. Residential uses are permitted within the Low Density Area designation and detached dwellings are a primary built form within the Neighbourhood. The construction of a shed as an accessory structure to a detached dwelling conforms with the intent and purpose of the Official Plan. The subject site is zoned "R4" within Zoning by-law 2511, amended by By-law 7610/18. Within the general provisions of Zoning By-law 2511, it states accessory structures, excluding private detached garages, may cover the maximum of 5 percent of the total lot area. This provision is in place to ensure there is sufficient amenity space in the rear yards of residential properties. -33- Report P/CA 15/20 March 11, 2020 Page 2 Since the shed is located 1 metre away from the rear lot line and the south side yard, there is sufficient amenity space to the north and west of the shed. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance conforms to the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The surrounding land uses are all single detached dwellings, and some of which have sheds within the rear yards of their properties. Staff is of the opinion that permitting an increase in the total lot coverage for accessory structures, will result in an appropriate development of land. In addition, increasing the maximum lot coverage by accessory structures from 5 percent to 6.1 percent, is considered minor in nature. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a total lot coverage for all accessory structure/buildings, excluding a private detached garage, of 6.1 percent is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • No comments on the application. Building Services • This structure was constructed without the benefit of a building permit. Building services was notified in late August 2019. As a result, an Order to Comply was issued for this construction. The building permit application is currently under review. Date of report: March 4, 2020 Comments prepared by: Tanjot Bal, MCIP, RPP Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I TB:DW:so JADocuments\Development\D-3700\2020\PCA 15-20\7. Report \PCA 15-20 Report.doc Attachments Manager, Zoning & Administration -34- Exhibit 1 L\PLANNING\01-MapFlles\PCA\2020\PCA 15-20 M. Brody & G. Fortin\PCA15-20_LocationMap.mad Douglas Par ' ,, ,, , Douglas Park 1)-11110' 40 41111111pp Co m -A i c Q o Q co _c U m Halle Avenue rview Avenue 0 a D c, T / Old Orchard Avenue i Liverpool Road / i�i�i�i P. Monica Cook Place ) -- Subject — , Lands Browning Avenue L I\ Ilona Park Road — \)\ — m— o - - c— o — LL Frenchman's Bay _ _ Commerce Street - Progress I I N Frenchman's Bay East Park =— CID — 0 CL I Location Map C44 File: P/CA 15/20 PICKERING Applicant: M. Brady & G. Fortin City Development Property Description: Lot 22, Plan 814 Department (811 Fairview Avenue) Date: Mar. 04, 2020 to The Corporation of Me City of Pickering Produced (In part) under license from: @ Queens Punter, Ontano Ministry of Natural Resources. IOII rig tits reserved.;© Her Majesty [he Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Na[uml Resources. All fights reserved.; Terane[ En[erprses Inc. and Its su ppllert all rgh[s reserved.; 0 (pperty Assessment Corporation and Its suppliers all rights reserved„ SCALE: .4 '000 J THIS IS NOT ;PLAN OF SURVEY. L\PLANNING\01-MapFlles\PCA\2020\PCA 15-20 M. Brody & G. Fortin\PCA15-20_LocationMap.mad V) ? —1 i00 ico Cam M 43 Et w N CO O 'a-1 -cn2 ,00'05 WbZ'Sl 3N1l AJ 3d02Id 1Sd3 w z 0_ 0: al ct ml I 0 wl 'ci 0 01 N z ZZ 101 O N )1aoq}0s Wp'� O w M [w993r] .0—,9I. w E ( cn is 0 � 07E 00 0 � X17 .1— .1— Cf) [w99'L] ,91./L Z - Y 0 CO 0 0 w caD VaN� z LL E cn ccLI x 0 co co U.1 LL m 0 z 45'-10 5/8" [13.99m] ,SZ • �[Wap•ti] E 40 M. 0 �2 00 UCL 1 EXIST. DRIVE 0 E m E o; SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ,00'OS WtbZ'Sl 3NI1 AL2J3d02Jd JS3M E O co O SITE AREA 595.9m2 N E co co E n z 0 H 0 E (0 E (0 z X w E co O E N N O DESCRIPTION LOT COVERAGE GROSS FLOOR AREA N LC) 0 z Il Date: Feb 25, 2020 0 z 0 0 0 H 0 Q 0 ce k 2a 1-a LL W co z u — LL0 - 36 - -36- Exhibit 3 7.04 I I I I( I I I I I 1 I I I WEST ELEVATIO\ RT1 u Co CV 2x6 COLLAR TIES 1 WALL TYPE 1 PAINTED 3/8' PLYWOOD 2x4 STUDS AT 16" O/C R12 BATT INSULATION 5/8" PRE—FINISHED HARDBOARD CLADDING 11'-5 3/4" [3.50m] 11'-5 3/4" [3.50m] 4" SLAB—ON—GRADE 5-8% AIR ENTRAINMENT 1/2" DIA. RE—BAR AT 16" B/W 4" COMPACTED GRANULAR unicipal Housing NATION THE UNDERSIGNED HAS REVIEWED ANO TAKES RESPONSIBIIITV FOR THIS DESIGN AND HAS THE QUALIFICATIONS AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS SET OUT IN THE ONT. BUILDING CODE 70 BEA DESIGNER. SLAB EDGE THICKENING SEE SECTIONS CROSS SECTIO\ PICKERING City Development Department Elevations of Proposed Shed File No: P/CA 15/20 Applicant: M. Brady & G. Fortin Property Description: Lot 22, Plan 814 (811 Fairview Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Date: Feb 25, 2020 -37- GGZ 4 DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 16/20 Date: March 11, 2020 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 16/20 C. MacMillan 971 Mink Avenue Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent, whereas the by-law requires a maximum of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to facilitate a rear yard deck and sunroom. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance apply only to the subject dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering's Official Plan designates the property as "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the City of Pickering's Official Plan. Lands within the designation are intended to accommodate residential uses including single detached dwellings. The property is zoned "RM1" as per Zoning By-law 2520, as amended. The intent of the maximum lot coverage requirement of 33 percent is to maintain an appropriate amount of amenity area uncovered by buildings on a lot and to regulate the scale and size of the building. The two percent deficiency is a result of a proposed sunroom attached to the rear of the dwelling. The sunroom will provide access to the rear yard of the property and will contribute as a covered amenity area at the rear of the property. -38- Report P/CA 16/20 March 11, 2020 Page 2 The subject dwelling is a semi-detached dwelling. The sunroom is located on the side furthest away from the neighbour with the shared wall to the west. It will maintain a 3.6 metre side yard setback from the east property line and will have no adverse impact on the immediate neighbours. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land The proposed lot coverage increase is intended to enhance the amenity area of a residential property and is considered appropriate development of the land. The two percent increase is minor in nature. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • No comments on the application. Building Services Date of report: March 4, 2020 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Planner I FC:DW:so J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2020\PCA 16-2017. Report\PCA 16-20 Report.doc Attachments • In September 2019, Building Services was notified on construction of a sunroom and ramp without a building permit. In November 2019, a building permit application was submitted for review. Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration -39- Exhibit 1 0 Frenchman's Bay Public School 4) 0 CO 0 1 0 E 0 U Oklahoma D ive 0 Mink Street Sunrise Avenue Rotary Frenchman's Bay West Park Leaside Subject Lands Bruce Hanscombe Park Frenchman's Bay Lake Ontario C Location Map File: P/CA 16/20 a/ PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: C. MacMillan Property Description: Pt Lot 797, Plan M19 E (971 Mink Avenue) Date: Feb. 25, 2020 ©The Corporation of the City of Plckenng Produced on pad) under license from ©Queens Punter, Ontano Ministry of Natural Resources- All rights reserved.© Her Majesty the Queenln Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved., © Teranet Enterpnses Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.; © Myaigirlipperty Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.', SCALE. �.YA'000 C THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY L\PLANNING\01-MapFllea\ PCA \2019\ PCA 62-19 C. MacMlllan\PCA62-19_Loc tionMap.mxd Exhibit 2 ••� �•- MINK AVENUE EXISTING SEAM DETACH DWELLING 1, EXISTING DECK EXISTING ONE STOI?EY DWELLING SEMI DETACI-I REM0VB OLD T.V. ANTENA TOWER 1 1 1 1 1 .411 O -.Z1 t c ] l; goz. c f 1 simmt LOT 797 .4/I o -.5E '1 1O 1'11- S' f 1 } LOT 798- to permit a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 16/20 Applicant: C. MacMillan Property Description: Pt Lot 797, Plan M19 E (971 Mink Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Date: Feb 26 2020 -41 - Exhibit 3 (ZArpe 1 I I 1 1 1, J I I I I I LJ SIDE ELEVATION OF DECK PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 16/20 Applicant: C. MacMillan Property Description: Pt Lot 797, Plan M19 E (971 Mink Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Date: Feb 26 2020 -42-