HomeMy WebLinkAboutInformation Report 04-10Information Report
Report Number: 04-10
For Public Information Meeting of
PICKERING Date: April 6, 2010.
01
In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements
of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter PA 3
Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2009-15
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 17/09
Ontario Realty Corporation
Part Lot 18, Concession 3
City of Pickering
1.0 Property Location. and Description
the subject lands are located on the east side of Brock Road, north of the
Hydro corridor and south of Old Taunton Road;
a property location map is provided for reference (see Attachment #1);
the property was previously part of the Seaton Golf Course and the subject
lands were used this past summer for golf purposes;
it is staffs understanding that the remaining portion of the Seaton Golf Course will
tie reconfigured and continue to operate in the future as a nixie hole golf course;
the majority of the subject property is a typical golf course containing
manicured turf grasses and mature trees; '
the subject property, is part of a larger holding of land owned by -Ontario
Realty Corporation (ORC);
the site's topography is relatively flat with a gentle slope to the east;
surrounding land uses are:
north - a former portion of the Seaton Golf Course (this portion of the golf
course is approved for residential development, by Plan of
Subdivision SP -2008-08 by Lebovic Enterprises Limited);
south - ORC lands containing a Hydro One corridor and the parking lot for
the Seaton Golf Course;
east - Urfe Creek valley lands and the remainder of the Seaton Golf Course;
west - existing commercial and residential lands on the opposite side of
the future.William Jackson Drive;
2.0 . Applicant's Proposal
- the applicant has requested approval of a draft plan of subdivision in order to
create one block for an elementary school site that is 1.74 hectares in size;
- the application to amend the zoning by-law is to change the zoning on the
property from "02 -GC"— Open Space — Golf Course to an appropriate zone
that would permit a school (see Applicant's Submitted Plan — Attachment #2);
- no specific site design or buildings are proposed by the applications.
Information Report No. 04-10
3.0 Official Plan and Zoning
3.1 Provincial Growth Plan
Page 2
Places to Grow (the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden
Horseshoe) requires intensification of land uses within built-up area
boundaries of municipalities;
the Growth Plan guides infrastructure planning and strategic investment
decisions to support and accommodate forecasted population and economic
growth;
community infrastructure, which includes education facilities, should be
planned to meet the needs resulting from population changes and to foster
complete communities;
3.2 Durham Regional Official Plan
- the Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject lands as
"Living, Areas", which are intended to be used predominantly for housing
purposes;
- "Living Areas" shall be developed in a compact form through higher densities
and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas;
- cultural and community facilities, such as schools are permitted in this
designation;
- the subject applications appear to conform to the Durham Region Official Plan;
3.3 Pickering Official Plan
- the Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Urban Residential
Areas — Medium Density Areas'
- permissible uses within the "Urban Residential Areas — Medium Density
Areas' designation include, among others, residential uses and community
and cultural uses as well as limited office commercial uses;
- community uses, such as schools are permitted in "Urban Residential Area —
Medium Density Areas;
- the subject lands are within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood of the
Official Plan;
- Schedule II of the Pickering Official Plan —'Transportation Systems'
designates the proposed abutting road (William Jackson Drive), which will
provide access to the property, as a "Collector Road'
- A "Collector Road" is designed to carry lower volumes of traffic at lower
speeds than high order arterial roads while providing access to properties;
- the City has adopted the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development
Guidelines that apply to the subject lands (see Section 3.4);
- as required by the Official Plan an Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) for the
Duffin Heights Neighbourhood has been prepared and endorsed by City
Council, and the proposed school site must comply with the
recommendations of the ESP;
the applications will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the
Pickering Official Plan during further processing of the applications;
Information Report No. 04-10
3.4 Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines
Page 3
the recently approved Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines
(NDG) provide design objectives for the neighbourhood;
the subject property is delineated as an elementary school on the Tertiary
Plan - Duffin Heights Neighbourhood;
the NDG objectives include creating accessible pedestrian -oriented
residential areas, distinct in character and harmonious with the larger
neighbourhood;
the NDG states that public/institutional uses form an important aspect of
community identity and provides location and design principles for such uses;
3.5 Zoning By-law 3036
- the subject lands are currently zoned "02 -GC"— Open Space — Golf Course
by Zoning By-law 3037;
- the existing zoning permits a golf -course and a variety of open space
recreational uses;
- an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to allow the development of
the proposed plan of subdivision for a school site;
the applicant has requested an appropriate zone that would permit the
proposed development.
4.0 Results of Circulation
4.1 Resident Comments
- none received in response to the circulation to date;
4.2 Agency Comments
the following agencies or departments advised they have no objection to the
applications (see Attachments #3 to #9):
• Durham District School Board;
Enbridge Gas Distribution;
• Rogers Cable;
.. Hydro One Networks;
Greater Toronto Airport Authority;
• Veridian Connections; and
• Bell;
4.3 Staff Comments
in reviewing the applications to date, the following matters have been
identified by staff for further review and consideration:
• reviewing the applications in terms of compliance with the City's Official
Plan and Development Guidelines;
03
Information Report No. 04-10
Page 4
04
. ensuring that the proposed development is compatible with, and sensitive
to, existing and proposed surrounding development and provides
appropriate tree preservation and/or Natural Heritage Compensation;
reviewing the applications in terms of their level of sustainable
development components which demonstrate how the site development
and building design/construction is consistent with the City's Sustainable
Development Guidelines;.
concluding arrangements respecting the requirements of the ESP
including functional servicing and storm water management;
securement of appropriate arrangements for the construction of trails on
lands owned by ORC that abut the draft plan of subdivision;
reviewing supporting technical submissions and reports to ensure that
adequate information is provided, that technical requirements are met and
that the proposed development design does not impact on the ability of
abutting properties to develop in an appropriate fashion.
5.0 Procedural Information
- written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning,
& Development Department;
- oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting;
- all comments received will be noted and used as input to a Planning Report
prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent
meeting of Council or a Committee of Council;
- any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal
Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts
any by-law or approves the draft plan of subdivision for this proposal;
- any member -of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision
regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk.
6.0 Other Information
6.1 Appendix No. I
- list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City
Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing
this report;
6.2 Information Received
full scale copies of the plans and studies listed below are available for viewing
at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department:
the draft plan of subdivision;
Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report' prepared by Sernas
Associates, dated July 2009;
.Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by MMM Group Limited, dated
November 2007;
Information Report No. 04-10
Page 5
05
Review of Sustainability Report, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated
June 19, 2009;
Stage.2-3 Archaeological Assessment Report, prepared by Archaeological
Assessments Ltd., dated February 2005;
6.3 Owner/Applicant Information
- the owner of the subject lands is ORC;
- the applications have been submitted by Dayna Gilbert of Sernas Associates
on behalf of ORC;
- ORC representatives for these applications are Graham Martin and Ash
Kothiyal.
Ross Pym, MCIP, R
(Acting) Manager, Development Review
RP:Id
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
06
Commenting Residents and Landowners
(1) none received to date
Commenting Agencies
(1) Durham District School Board
(2) Enbridge Gas Distribution
(3) Rogers Cable
(4) Hydro One Networks
(5) Greater Toronto Airport Authority
(6) Veridian Connections, and
(7) Bell
Commenting City Departments
(1) none received to date
Appendix No. I to
information Report No. 04-10
ATTACHMENT# -LTO
INFORMw+°'OVREPCRTd&-Lil�
07
�
TAUNipry
.
' x
. pf 111111HIHH1�
�HHNH,HIIH1
IHIHHI
h
1
..
suerEcr
PROPERTY
O
Twp
O
Sip f.
i
.City of Pickering
Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PART OF LOT 18, CONCESSION
_
OWNER ONTARIO REALTY CORPORATION
DATE JULY 21, 2009
FDFZN BY JB
.
FILE No; SP2009-15 & A 01710.9
SCALE 1:10000
CHECKED SY RP.
Eni.m.... .... ... n..°ppr..... .,w .rom. n..m°t, npi p pmn p..prv.>.
2005 W. ant 11. .-PP'-'--. MI M1t. Peaerv.J. Npl ° ppn pl 5ury
PN -15
ATTACHMENT# '2- TO /D
yr �rilnh'
08 INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS
SUBMITTED PLAN
ONATRIO REALTY CORPORATION "
SP. -2009-15 &A 017/09
Future R.O.W. Share '
}:
SP -2 08—'
a
$ 'Existing ..
Commercial '
is Existing R,O.W. Width
Commercial
zz am
CATHOLIC SCHOOL
.. BLOCK 1
tt (1.]4 ho — 4.3 C.)
3.
' 'Future-R.O.W. Share '
Q Existing
�r
Q// Commercial
nL
.� .
e 'Future'R.O.W. Shoreexisting
lG��
M z C�Jv
} " Residen Vol.
E
SENIOR 5
4 I<\. + ..
gab R L)O
ROW ISm 9C .. Q��L_ C J
K ..�} ..
U
0
.. N(4 scue mutes or A/e APPelrwrr
rYr9Nrl£e RGR APE nvu OA Nr NE1 N Ar
. .. n/f blY OF PKKfMNA PLNWWa d &Y WEPan, aLPARM G
. IMS .WP W15. PMJafM(n BY R/f fJIY aF %CxERWG
• PLWRMa d aEYfLOPYFM aR
' C6oxu.,nox t swrSK=
JULY 11.,ZOA
.
,�VL1CT SC
o`er y°o
�s
a U3
�. a
�O O�
Facilities Services
400 Taunton Road East
Whitby, Ontario
L1R2K6
Telephone: (905) 666=5500
1-800-265-3968
Fax: (905) 666.6439
ATTACF 1RENT#f.- .To
1NF0Rk4AT10NREP0RT# by -IO
August 6, 2009
The City of Pickering
Pfanning.Dept:, Pickering Civic Centre
One The Esplanade
Pickering, ON
L1V 6K7
Attention: Mr. Ross Pym
Dear Mr. Pym,
RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2009-15
DCDSB Site
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A17/09
Ontario Realty Corporation
Part Lot 18, Concession 3.
City of Pickering
M
AUG 1 1 2609 .
CITY OF PICKRING
PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
Staff has reviewed the information on the above noted and, under the
mandate of the Durham District School Board, have no objections.
Yours truly,
Christine Nancekivell,
Senior Planner
LAPROPLAMDATAIPLMOISUHISP2009-1S..�OC
ATTA04MENT#' 0
O N€IjRTlt7S1RfPCRT#
AUGUST 20TH, 2009
ROSS PYM, MCIP, RPP.
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
CITY OF PICKERING
PICKERING CIVIC COMPLEX
ONE THE ESPLANADE
PICKERING ON L1V 6K7
Dear Sirs:
NBRIDGE
ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC.
500 Consumers Road
North York ON M2J 1P8
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 650
Scarborough ON MIK 5E3
RE: DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION SP -2009-15
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 17/09
ONTARIO REALTY CORPORATION
PART LOT 18 CONCESSION 3
CITY OF PICKERING.
IRECEIVED
AUG 2 5 20.09
CITY OF PICKERING
PLANNING 8, DEVCLOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
Enbridge Gas Distribution has no objections to the development as proposed.
However, should the applicant consider the use•of natural gas for this
development, Enbridge requests the developer contact us at their earliest
convenience to discuss installation and clearance requirements for service and
metering facilities.
Yours truly,
Tony Ciccone
Manager; Network Analysis
Distribution Planning
(416) 758-7966
(416) 758-4374 — FAX
TC:
ATTACHMlFNT#� .To
INFO MA'PON nE.PoRT
RO G E RS-
� ►� - CABLE
July 29, 2009
Mr. Ross Pym
Planning & Development Department
City of Pickering,
Ontario
Dear Mr. Pym:
Re: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2009-15
Rogers Cable Communications Inc. ('Rogers") has reviewed the application for
the above Site Plan and has determined that it intends to provide cable and
telecommunications services. Accordingly, we request that municipal approval
be granted subject to the following conditions:
(1) Prior to Site Plan approval, the Developer/Owner will, at its own cost,
grant all necessary easements and maintenance agreements required by
those CRTC -licensed telephone companies and broadcasting distribution
companies intending to serve the Site Plan (collectively, the
"Communications Service Providers"). Immediately following
registration of the Site Plan , the Developer/Owner will cause these
documents to be registered on title.
(2) Prior to Site Plan approval, the Developer/Owner will, with consultation
with the applicable utilities and Communications Service Providers,
prepare an overall utility distribution plan that shows the locations of all
utility infrastructure for the Site Plan, as well as the timing and phasing of
installation.
In addition, we kindly request to, where possible,, receive copies of the following
documents:
(1) the comments received from any of the Communications Service
Providers during circulation;
(2) the proposed conditions of draft approval as prepared by municipal
planners prior to their consideration by Council or any of its committees;
and
(3) the planners' report recommending draft approval before it goes to Council
or.any of its committees.
1 T.
ATTACHMENT# b To
INIr®Iv' ATIMFLEPORTw 9`/"/D
Hydro.One Networks Inc. -
Faalities & Real Estate - -
13
P.O. Box A300
Markham, ON L3R 5Z5 r
w ,HvdroOnexom hyd r'O(L
Courier:' One
185 Clegg Road '
Markham, ON L6G 187.
September 2;20b9 Via E-mail Onlv
Mr. Ross Pym, Planner
Planning & Development Department
City of Pickering
Pickering Civic Complex .
doe The Esplanade
Pickering, ON Li V 6K7
Dear Mr. Pym.
Draft Plata of Subdivision
Ontario Realty Corporation'
Part of Lot 18, Cone 3..
(Twp of Pickering) now
' City of Pickering
File: SP -2009-15 (ZBA- A 17/09)
Please be advised that Hydro One Networks Inc. ("HONI") has no objection in principle to the proposed
plan of subdivision, provided the following are included as conditions of draft approval:
I. Prior to final approval, a copy ofthe lot grading and drainage plan, showing existing and final '
grades, must be submitted io HONI for review and approval.
2. Any development in conjunction with the subdivision must not block vehicular access'to any
HONI facilities.located on the right of way. During construction, there will be no storage of
materials or mounding of earth, snow or other debris on the right-of-way.
3. The subdivider shall make arrangements satisfactory to HONI for.the crossing of the hydro right-
'. of -way by any future walkways or paths. The -proponent should contact Maria Agnew to discuss
such proposals. Mnria can be reached et (905) 946-6275.
4. The costs of any relocations or revisions to HONI facilities which are necessary to' .
accommodate this subdivision will be borne by the developer..
5. The easement rights of HONI and its legal predecessors are to be protected sand maintained. .
In addition., it is requested1hat the following be added as a Note to the Conditions of Draft Approval.
1'. - The transmission lines abutting this subdivision operate at 500,000, 230,000 or 115,000 volts. .;
Section 186 — Proximity— of the Regulations for Construction Projects in the Occupational Health.
and Safety Act, require that no object be brought closer than 6metres (20 feet) to an energized 500
kV conductor. The. distance fo,I230 kV conductors is 4.5metres (15 feet), and for 115 kV
conductors it is 3 metres (10 feet). It is the proponent's responsibility to be aware, and to make all
personnel on site aware, that all equipment and personnel must come no closer than the distance '
specified in the Act. They should also be aware that the conductors can raise,and lower without
warning, depending on the electrical demand placed on the line.
Main: 1-888-231-6657
cont'd
Low Voltage Rights: 1-800-387.1946..
AgTpTACHIMERTO TO n� /D
IlriULII�SPi i i IUlil i•V:.f UP1! iY
2
I trust this is satisfactory. If you have any questions please call me at your convenience at the number
below.
Yours Truly
I Laura Giunta .
Real Estate Assistant-- Planning .
Real Estate Services
Hydro One Networks Inc.
905-94676235
cc Maria. Agnew - Senior Real Estate Coordinator - Hydro One
/ I
i
ArAcHMiENTi#-.To
imrow.r-.TiIDNF:tiF`0RT#. OY /6
R9, Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2009-15
'Zoning By-lawr'Ainendwent Application A.17/09.
Ontario Realty Corporation
.Part Lot 18, Concession 3
City of Pickering
Thank you for providing the Greater Toronto' Airports Authority (GTAA) with a copy of the
above -noted applications,
We have reviewed the proposal to develop a Catholic Elementary school on the subject.property
in an area that is designated as "Mixed Corridors, Medium Density Residential & Open Space"
in the Pickering Official, Plan, and offer the following comments:
The GTAA released its Draft Plan for the Pickering Airport Lands inNovember 2004, The Draft
Plan proposed that the prohibition of sensitive land uses be defined by the 25 NEF contour for
the GTAA's proposed runway configuration. This is consistent with TransportCanada's 2005.
revision to its guideline for "Land Use in the Vicinity of Airports" (Publication TP 1247E) to
recognize the 25 NEF as the standard for new airports. The subject property is located outside of
the 25 NEP Noise contour for the proposed airport.
Greater Toronto Airports Authority 15
Lester B. Pearson International Airport
Box 3111 Cda airU
to Ontario,
Toronto AMF, Ontario, Canada UP 1B2
112
GTAA
Airport Planning
Olga Smid
Superimendent, Land Use )'.tanning
Tel: (416) 776-7355
Fax: (416) 776-4168
(Transmitted via Facsimile 905-420-7648)
July 20, 2009
Mr. Ross Pym
Principal Planner — Development Review
City of Pickering — Planning & Development Department -
Pickering Civic, Complex
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7
Dear Mr.'Pym: .
R9, Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2009-15
'Zoning By-lawr'Ainendwent Application A.17/09.
Ontario Realty Corporation
.Part Lot 18, Concession 3
City of Pickering
Thank you for providing the Greater Toronto' Airports Authority (GTAA) with a copy of the
above -noted applications,
We have reviewed the proposal to develop a Catholic Elementary school on the subject.property
in an area that is designated as "Mixed Corridors, Medium Density Residential & Open Space"
in the Pickering Official, Plan, and offer the following comments:
The GTAA released its Draft Plan for the Pickering Airport Lands inNovember 2004, The Draft
Plan proposed that the prohibition of sensitive land uses be defined by the 25 NEF contour for
the GTAA's proposed runway configuration. This is consistent with TransportCanada's 2005.
revision to its guideline for "Land Use in the Vicinity of Airports" (Publication TP 1247E) to
recognize the 25 NEF as the standard for new airports. The subject property is located outside of
the 25 NEP Noise contour for the proposed airport.
ATTAOMMEN T { �' TO
b INFORMATIC'NR2rOr2T# 0af-/0
Mr. Ross Pym'
July 20, 2009
- Page 2.
GTAA'
If the airport proceeds,. further refinements to the runway configuration recommended in the
Draft Plan may be necessary as new environmental and operational/engmeering iriformation
becomes available, either. through the environmental assessment process or during design of the
facilities. Such refinements could potentially alter the location of the 25 NEF contour; However,
it is our position that the location of the property owned by Ontario Realty Corporation and'
located on Part of Lot 18, Concession 3 in the City of Pickering, is unlikely to be impacted by
changes to the 25 NEF contour resulting from potential refinements to.the proposed runway
layout:
The GTAA therefore. has no objection to the future proposed' development of a Catholic
Elementay school on the site.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Kathryn Tracey -Leitch, Senior Land Use
Planner, at 416-776-4012.
Yours very truly,
GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY
Olga Smid
Superintedent, Land Use Planning
N
FSC
' Mncd SeuRu
x
ATTACHMENT N -B TO
li�F(7E: jta7iQN r'FPv�2i " Of1 �y 17
::r� tJ lr 11 V DEVELOPMENT "PLICATION REVIEW
PHOIHCT WAMFt Oatitao&Wiry Cr.Iporal'on—DuFtPlan afSubji.i.nai 7un4B7-kwnnmdm.=t
Yroaoa4l CathalcFJra'c - Schco: Sit_
AD2nsiPLAN: Ps:t Lot l 3, Cma u in 5
W.-NICIPALITY: Pidcria'? ,
MFNG--
S? 2UOP-15 &x k 17%0'3 SVBRff55ION DATE: Iufy i•.iy 2037
Ile fo wMingis as ovr.-•.ieao'tE:cSeatraL'Iniuiravmts the QFp"vnat i; hl:dF to mr..ric order :o 4:t2ia a ccwp)ete
ele:.trcal FonermpFl} system to Iles tiz aa3 u•_thin the tiie+.che[es•Ikd,•r=icaLsunre Fot3iiaeo'ved. Tx I
mmmcns'sbw are Lased on prdimioxry in[orsatoa oaty and srt rufct ro re:tisiod k all esses'taidiar's savtEsrd
C;mditicat ofSer.¢ce document mm out f3c e_euhm-.ents, tis avd coodidws 4t the provi row of eleoEc eeseiu- .
i
_n(S IC`YCF CiOMWl M,aSilfite an C.'ffU to Curntrt.
S Elec do sm4z: is ant Cnr mtt 11. BLNII)e oa the D=dEmd7 z4s: t to Eris pnapc_cl.
t
8c.mz' ag aV be,fr,.a: the pmpmcl rmd aZl mace d-recs adl'iecnt to the srhuul and T'eetlan'a supFly wllage
via be 9r27.6k�. r
Z
-fl-.c Appluar (csac ee63 to%mmt• protide xcoameJ'.iioa an Eire for :reel n's L", ndm Ccfs}
Qv[tlnorpsimrant in aSmX6m clew asa[.1:a .a aceesttbin kryheaey��ehiccei.
3. .1 eepmtc room uid: outsdc sczess s reatviied w ac -a O:Lve V�idiaa's mc:r_.
4. _3 bWih 4'2gc concretes -.d dueledrtlal mdugaannd cable system is-equkW fmm the desiro wpj:ly
pciet(s) at the prr;tomd adiweaeroad ro a tcuts_auner:ocaeon(s) on I:m ptoaeny, ill r rte AppU=t'E cost.
3. Pn diieclinnal bored of ooca en[u'�dcgeaunj n:sd rreasirt3 :nap be mgaircd 111EA-T&fi twmb--_eq roE
to eamp)ese tss w rm:x and cows aU mate a —dated wi$ jus requirement
E- The ?pplicant mvetmakc rimmmr vppliatioc m Paridiaa fortes -.1m1 ieritst� ss sacn, as poasible.::'sm:telt,
Eased o: ^"••,7_4p:esr amRp�rcVaidiaa ht sEgm t{:eu<1SkaC:YSeery 7nldrnitfy saecdlclegmrcsnrets and
anu•.gemstts and related xvrl- !o_'t}is au+jeet, and iv nvtke as 03er/e Coanccr. The Applk -is sttmtgly
ehctsuagc3 ht engage as jzsiea) ma<�I:znt or eeeaidw co .i ordinate setvic detaSs. The sppSant is
ceuioned tsst tende-s, mat -acts, cr work toeym:.r iuiC:te plot b =b -aiming as Offs tot6acer. fmat
Vtsdis�:nap-ra¢snllictat<iia llv:naat<oian3 dc�:s uftUee.L•Yedcai xrtiticg eel na-ia fx Offsto
Connect for +ici Teedla can tear no rc,• oasibilit^.
.. "_Ue elstrici i•wt-dlstiani s) Fi<>m I su FvSLc acad aleasss�x 3' sn• the setTice ca>:emx avd sIlme2ma �
:ate+zm[a� mus' coaplgaith V �dit�'s req'.nremrn>< aed sp�fca•iens>,d mrd sko be su'rjl[ta'$e i
regaensts of the E)torirzl Saf�,3orhoi>r.
i
1 8 MAMONT S �0 oy-id
AppU us vil be regcireE tz MM61 b Vendian a st .d=d ueipatio� eaw.sceal;'r isteor on tire, Cm
vitc]yvsr (5:a tits .
9. P,,G t EYC[�+;=:ue a7j LCA'.Y.ICXe,-I= "PElic nt m ve�ex(s)/o�eupaes(s) oEt)w fwo pacmix_ r t nPpl• for
w eacxy,7• accousu is ride_ io recene deCtdcd caeCgy u:dStlMd srsaices M5 r3 ea[s31A acgomg pa_mmt
arranxmca[t.
Ig- VJtcte canes uc ma evl iaadkiagegcy.neat ar`roraeg�uecwou:a pr..ximit' to C ting aweshcad :Tires.
sh 3r__s risk DEC.a;tet ox eomingwWlin tae ED:=ofaPEsoah,rh-'ppli csut S�vl ply A0;lts Foxhe
xm�osary *<locatica, bvr��,or otS¢�no2•ctica nClhsnires, o:ataicvs atLes action"i: damedvrccasary IT
t eddian 10 p:ovile fac c -tke satEtj w:d the lv vliT of lht ekadcA spitem.
11. laac:capiap, ep-c tcalr maces; shrubs, sni 3tken sb(AIE telxaud rray hos'jclic 's i-usfiacc
sw.tr-b-gm to a TIE i�[ed>oYnct+Aici vipaz:nt aatss. "
12 Veddiao tali nntattead thcdulnl, Gfy' efPlckes:.ag D9A= _tfeefing Ear ibis Dcvelopment.
U 11cddiivn has eo otiectsoo a:• the proposed dtv6PPmeat. couma Vrsiiien as
sox as s,iaag is eo.�mm&J,d \'fLniapil3q, plesac foC Ud a wW cd firs[ Mbmissicm c:vi1 des{i� ro
TtAdia . piease =It laat ae OEfa :o CnnLce. murbe comldetcd at ]ear:lfser: L?•) /sis (o) maths pro= to
Am xcgtprej AD=:icil sxeiing daft.
14. Ojs�: Flrrtdczl;zj.+pl* Mthis stool blo:i ur%b_J oust to ixaprrted arpsr. o= octal' elscdcs] sexcirinF
=oe thi cern.
Te3nical Rcaesen:a live: Deb�Snmvd
T1e�kunt: F,xt 9:.d1 "
I
PP!df
Kt,Torras\llsilcT.n�tl ppli.'a¢or. z.- nw= hD Mtmicipa.itcs-Rcrosel Aj-15,3KB.doc
4TT1,04MEHT##-2-Y0
Development & Municipal Services Control Centre
Floor 5, 100 Borough Drive
Scarborough, Ontario
MIP 4W2
Tel: 416-296-6291 Tall -Free: 1-800-748-6284
Fax: 416-296-0520
August 6, 2009
Town of Pickering
Planning Department
1 The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
L1V 6K7
Attention: Ross Pym
Dear Sir/Madam:
RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision
Brock Road
Your File No: SP -2009-15, A 17/09
Bell File No: 44609
19
Rec�,VE®
AUG 12 2009
PP�ANw� aoevE�aR)NG
DEPpgTMENT MENT
0
Further to our comments of July 28, 2009 Bell Canada is pleased to provide the
following additional comments.
A detailed review of the Draft Plan of Subdivision has been completed.
The following paragraph(s) are to be included as Conditions of Draft Plan of
Subdivision Approval:'
1
F
The Developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work within
the Plan, the Developer must confirm that sufficient wire -line
communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available
within the proposed development to provide communication/telecommunication
service to the proposed development. In the event that such infrastructure
is not available, the Developer is hereby advised that*the Developer may
be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of .the existing
communication/telecommunication infrastructure. If the Developer elects
not to pay for such connection to and/or extension of the existing
communication/telecommunication infrastructure, the Developer shall be
required to demonstrate to the municipality that sufficient alternative
communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the.
proposed development to enable, at a minimum, .the effective delivery of
communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services
(i.e., 911 Emergency Services). _
The Owner shall agree in the Agreement, in words satisfactory to Bell
Canada, to grant to Bell Canada.any easements that may be required for
telecommunication services. Easements may be required subject to
final servicing decisions. In the event of any conflict with existing
Bell Canada facilities or easements, the owner/developer shall be
responsible for the relocation of such'fa,;i;r;es or easements.
20 IP1tCttl3it3i1lFi.'E+i
3. Sell Canada requires one or more conduit or conduits of sufficient size
from each unit to the room(s) in which the telecommunication facilities
are situated and one or more conduits from the room(s) in which the _
telecommunication facilities are located to the street line.
'Should you have any questions plegse contact.Janice M. McConkey at 416-296-6430.'
Yours ttruly
n La Chapelle, MC RPP
anager - Development & Municipal Services, Ontario
0
0