Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutInformation Report 04-10Information Report Report Number: 04-10 For Public Information Meeting of PICKERING Date: April 6, 2010. 01 In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter PA 3 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2009-15 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 17/09 Ontario Realty Corporation Part Lot 18, Concession 3 City of Pickering 1.0 Property Location. and Description the subject lands are located on the east side of Brock Road, north of the Hydro corridor and south of Old Taunton Road; a property location map is provided for reference (see Attachment #1); the property was previously part of the Seaton Golf Course and the subject lands were used this past summer for golf purposes; it is staffs understanding that the remaining portion of the Seaton Golf Course will tie reconfigured and continue to operate in the future as a nixie hole golf course; the majority of the subject property is a typical golf course containing manicured turf grasses and mature trees; ' the subject property, is part of a larger holding of land owned by -Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC); the site's topography is relatively flat with a gentle slope to the east; surrounding land uses are: north - a former portion of the Seaton Golf Course (this portion of the golf course is approved for residential development, by Plan of Subdivision SP -2008-08 by Lebovic Enterprises Limited); south - ORC lands containing a Hydro One corridor and the parking lot for the Seaton Golf Course; east - Urfe Creek valley lands and the remainder of the Seaton Golf Course; west - existing commercial and residential lands on the opposite side of the future.William Jackson Drive; 2.0 . Applicant's Proposal - the applicant has requested approval of a draft plan of subdivision in order to create one block for an elementary school site that is 1.74 hectares in size; - the application to amend the zoning by-law is to change the zoning on the property from "02 -GC"— Open Space — Golf Course to an appropriate zone that would permit a school (see Applicant's Submitted Plan — Attachment #2); - no specific site design or buildings are proposed by the applications. Information Report No. 04-10 3.0 Official Plan and Zoning 3.1 Provincial Growth Plan Page 2 Places to Grow (the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe) requires intensification of land uses within built-up area boundaries of municipalities; the Growth Plan guides infrastructure planning and strategic investment decisions to support and accommodate forecasted population and economic growth; community infrastructure, which includes education facilities, should be planned to meet the needs resulting from population changes and to foster complete communities; 3.2 Durham Regional Official Plan - the Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Living, Areas", which are intended to be used predominantly for housing purposes; - "Living Areas" shall be developed in a compact form through higher densities and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas; - cultural and community facilities, such as schools are permitted in this designation; - the subject applications appear to conform to the Durham Region Official Plan; 3.3 Pickering Official Plan - the Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Urban Residential Areas — Medium Density Areas' - permissible uses within the "Urban Residential Areas — Medium Density Areas' designation include, among others, residential uses and community and cultural uses as well as limited office commercial uses; - community uses, such as schools are permitted in "Urban Residential Area — Medium Density Areas; - the subject lands are within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood of the Official Plan; - Schedule II of the Pickering Official Plan —'Transportation Systems' designates the proposed abutting road (William Jackson Drive), which will provide access to the property, as a "Collector Road' - A "Collector Road" is designed to carry lower volumes of traffic at lower speeds than high order arterial roads while providing access to properties; - the City has adopted the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines that apply to the subject lands (see Section 3.4); - as required by the Official Plan an Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) for the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood has been prepared and endorsed by City Council, and the proposed school site must comply with the recommendations of the ESP; the applications will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the Pickering Official Plan during further processing of the applications; Information Report No. 04-10 3.4 Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines Page 3 the recently approved Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines (NDG) provide design objectives for the neighbourhood; the subject property is delineated as an elementary school on the Tertiary Plan - Duffin Heights Neighbourhood; the NDG objectives include creating accessible pedestrian -oriented residential areas, distinct in character and harmonious with the larger neighbourhood; the NDG states that public/institutional uses form an important aspect of community identity and provides location and design principles for such uses; 3.5 Zoning By-law 3036 - the subject lands are currently zoned "02 -GC"— Open Space — Golf Course by Zoning By-law 3037; - the existing zoning permits a golf -course and a variety of open space recreational uses; - an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to allow the development of the proposed plan of subdivision for a school site; the applicant has requested an appropriate zone that would permit the proposed development. 4.0 Results of Circulation 4.1 Resident Comments - none received in response to the circulation to date; 4.2 Agency Comments the following agencies or departments advised they have no objection to the applications (see Attachments #3 to #9): • Durham District School Board; Enbridge Gas Distribution; • Rogers Cable; .. Hydro One Networks; Greater Toronto Airport Authority; • Veridian Connections; and • Bell; 4.3 Staff Comments in reviewing the applications to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: • reviewing the applications in terms of compliance with the City's Official Plan and Development Guidelines; 03 Information Report No. 04-10 Page 4 04 . ensuring that the proposed development is compatible with, and sensitive to, existing and proposed surrounding development and provides appropriate tree preservation and/or Natural Heritage Compensation; reviewing the applications in terms of their level of sustainable development components which demonstrate how the site development and building design/construction is consistent with the City's Sustainable Development Guidelines;. concluding arrangements respecting the requirements of the ESP including functional servicing and storm water management; securement of appropriate arrangements for the construction of trails on lands owned by ORC that abut the draft plan of subdivision; reviewing supporting technical submissions and reports to ensure that adequate information is provided, that technical requirements are met and that the proposed development design does not impact on the ability of abutting properties to develop in an appropriate fashion. 5.0 Procedural Information - written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning, & Development Department; - oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; - all comments received will be noted and used as input to a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council; - any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law or approves the draft plan of subdivision for this proposal; - any member -of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk. 6.0 Other Information 6.1 Appendix No. I - list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing this report; 6.2 Information Received full scale copies of the plans and studies listed below are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department: the draft plan of subdivision; Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report' prepared by Sernas Associates, dated July 2009; .Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by MMM Group Limited, dated November 2007; Information Report No. 04-10 Page 5 05 Review of Sustainability Report, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated June 19, 2009; Stage.2-3 Archaeological Assessment Report, prepared by Archaeological Assessments Ltd., dated February 2005; 6.3 Owner/Applicant Information - the owner of the subject lands is ORC; - the applications have been submitted by Dayna Gilbert of Sernas Associates on behalf of ORC; - ORC representatives for these applications are Graham Martin and Ash Kothiyal. Ross Pym, MCIP, R (Acting) Manager, Development Review RP:Id Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development 06 Commenting Residents and Landowners (1) none received to date Commenting Agencies (1) Durham District School Board (2) Enbridge Gas Distribution (3) Rogers Cable (4) Hydro One Networks (5) Greater Toronto Airport Authority (6) Veridian Connections, and (7) Bell Commenting City Departments (1) none received to date Appendix No. I to information Report No. 04-10 ATTACHMENT# -LTO INFORMw+°'OVREPCRTd&-Lil� 07 � TAUNipry . ' x . pf 111111HIHH1� �HHNH,HIIH1 IHIHHI h 1 .. suerEcr PROPERTY O Twp O Sip f. i .City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PART OF LOT 18, CONCESSION _ OWNER ONTARIO REALTY CORPORATION DATE JULY 21, 2009 FDFZN BY JB . FILE No; SP2009-15 & A 01710.9 SCALE 1:10000 CHECKED SY RP. Eni.m.... .... ... n..°ppr..... .,w .rom. n..m°t, npi p pmn p..prv.>. 2005 W. ant 11. .-PP'-'--. MI M1t. Peaerv.J. Npl ° ppn pl 5ury PN -15 ATTACHMENT# '2- TO /D yr �rilnh' 08 INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS SUBMITTED PLAN ONATRIO REALTY CORPORATION " SP. -2009-15 &A 017/09 Future R.O.W. Share ' }: SP -2 08—' a $ 'Existing .. Commercial ' is Existing R,O.W. Width Commercial zz am CATHOLIC SCHOOL .. BLOCK 1 tt (1.]4 ho — 4.3 C.) 3. ' 'Future-R.O.W. Share ' Q Existing �r Q// Commercial nL .� . e 'Future'R.O.W. Shoreexisting lG�� M z C�Jv } " Residen Vol. E SENIOR 5 4 I<\. + .. gab R L)O ROW ISm 9C .. Q��L_ C J K ..�} .. U 0 .. N(4 scue mutes or A/e APPelrwrr rYr9Nrl£e RGR APE nvu OA Nr NE1 N Ar . .. n/f blY OF PKKfMNA PLNWWa d &Y WEPan, aLPARM G . IMS .WP W15. PMJafM(n BY R/f fJIY aF %CxERWG • PLWRMa d aEYfLOPYFM aR ' C6oxu.,nox t swrSK= JULY 11.,ZOA . ,�VL1CT SC o`er y°o �s a U3 �. a �O O� Facilities Services 400 Taunton Road East Whitby, Ontario L1R2K6 Telephone: (905) 666=5500 1-800-265-3968 Fax: (905) 666.6439 ATTACF 1RENT#f.- .To 1NF0Rk4AT10NREP0RT# by -IO August 6, 2009 The City of Pickering Pfanning.Dept:, Pickering Civic Centre One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Attention: Mr. Ross Pym Dear Mr. Pym, RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2009-15 DCDSB Site Zoning By-law Amendment Application A17/09 Ontario Realty Corporation Part Lot 18, Concession 3. City of Pickering M AUG 1 1 2609 . CITY OF PICKRING PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Staff has reviewed the information on the above noted and, under the mandate of the Durham District School Board, have no objections. Yours truly, Christine Nancekivell, Senior Planner LAPROPLAMDATAIPLMOISUHISP2009-1S..�OC ATTA04MENT#' 0 O N€IjRTlt7S1RfPCRT# AUGUST 20TH, 2009 ROSS PYM, MCIP, RPP. PRINCIPAL PLANNER CITY OF PICKERING PICKERING CIVIC COMPLEX ONE THE ESPLANADE PICKERING ON L1V 6K7 Dear Sirs: NBRIDGE ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. 500 Consumers Road North York ON M2J 1P8 Mailing Address P.O. Box 650 Scarborough ON MIK 5E3 RE: DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION SP -2009-15 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 17/09 ONTARIO REALTY CORPORATION PART LOT 18 CONCESSION 3 CITY OF PICKERING. IRECEIVED AUG 2 5 20.09 CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING 8, DEVCLOPMENT DEPARTMENT Enbridge Gas Distribution has no objections to the development as proposed. However, should the applicant consider the use•of natural gas for this development, Enbridge requests the developer contact us at their earliest convenience to discuss installation and clearance requirements for service and metering facilities. Yours truly, Tony Ciccone Manager; Network Analysis Distribution Planning (416) 758-7966 (416) 758-4374 — FAX TC: ATTACHMlFNT#� .To INFO MA'PON nE.PoRT RO G E RS- � ►� - CABLE July 29, 2009 Mr. Ross Pym Planning & Development Department City of Pickering, Ontario Dear Mr. Pym: Re: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2009-15 Rogers Cable Communications Inc. ('Rogers") has reviewed the application for the above Site Plan and has determined that it intends to provide cable and telecommunications services. Accordingly, we request that municipal approval be granted subject to the following conditions: (1) Prior to Site Plan approval, the Developer/Owner will, at its own cost, grant all necessary easements and maintenance agreements required by those CRTC -licensed telephone companies and broadcasting distribution companies intending to serve the Site Plan (collectively, the "Communications Service Providers"). Immediately following registration of the Site Plan , the Developer/Owner will cause these documents to be registered on title. (2) Prior to Site Plan approval, the Developer/Owner will, with consultation with the applicable utilities and Communications Service Providers, prepare an overall utility distribution plan that shows the locations of all utility infrastructure for the Site Plan, as well as the timing and phasing of installation. In addition, we kindly request to, where possible,, receive copies of the following documents: (1) the comments received from any of the Communications Service Providers during circulation; (2) the proposed conditions of draft approval as prepared by municipal planners prior to their consideration by Council or any of its committees; and (3) the planners' report recommending draft approval before it goes to Council or.any of its committees. 1 T. ATTACHMENT# b To INIr®Iv' ATIMFLEPORTw 9`/"/D Hydro.One Networks Inc. - Faalities & Real Estate - - 13 P.O. Box A300 Markham, ON L3R 5Z5 r w ,HvdroOnexom hyd r'O(L Courier:' One 185 Clegg Road ' Markham, ON L6G 187. September 2;20b9 Via E-mail Onlv Mr. Ross Pym, Planner Planning & Development Department City of Pickering Pickering Civic Complex . doe The Esplanade Pickering, ON Li V 6K7 Dear Mr. Pym. Draft Plata of Subdivision Ontario Realty Corporation' Part of Lot 18, Cone 3.. (Twp of Pickering) now ' City of Pickering File: SP -2009-15 (ZBA- A 17/09) Please be advised that Hydro One Networks Inc. ("HONI") has no objection in principle to the proposed plan of subdivision, provided the following are included as conditions of draft approval: I. Prior to final approval, a copy ofthe lot grading and drainage plan, showing existing and final ' grades, must be submitted io HONI for review and approval. 2. Any development in conjunction with the subdivision must not block vehicular access'to any HONI facilities.located on the right of way. During construction, there will be no storage of materials or mounding of earth, snow or other debris on the right-of-way. 3. The subdivider shall make arrangements satisfactory to HONI for.the crossing of the hydro right- '. of -way by any future walkways or paths. The -proponent should contact Maria Agnew to discuss such proposals. Mnria can be reached et (905) 946-6275. 4. The costs of any relocations or revisions to HONI facilities which are necessary to' . accommodate this subdivision will be borne by the developer.. 5. The easement rights of HONI and its legal predecessors are to be protected sand maintained. . In addition., it is requested1hat the following be added as a Note to the Conditions of Draft Approval. 1'. - The transmission lines abutting this subdivision operate at 500,000, 230,000 or 115,000 volts. .; Section 186 — Proximity— of the Regulations for Construction Projects in the Occupational Health. and Safety Act, require that no object be brought closer than 6metres (20 feet) to an energized 500 kV conductor. The. distance fo,I230 kV conductors is 4.5metres (15 feet), and for 115 kV conductors it is 3 metres (10 feet). It is the proponent's responsibility to be aware, and to make all personnel on site aware, that all equipment and personnel must come no closer than the distance ' specified in the Act. They should also be aware that the conductors can raise,and lower without warning, depending on the electrical demand placed on the line. Main: 1-888-231-6657 cont'd Low Voltage Rights: 1-800-387.1946.. AgTpTACHIMERTO TO n� /D IlriULII�SPi i i IUlil i•V:.f UP1! iY 2 I trust this is satisfactory. If you have any questions please call me at your convenience at the number below. Yours Truly I Laura Giunta . Real Estate Assistant-- Planning . Real Estate Services Hydro One Networks Inc. 905-94676235 cc Maria. Agnew - Senior Real Estate Coordinator - Hydro One / I i ArAcHMiENTi#-.To imrow.r-.TiIDNF:tiF`0RT#. OY /6 R9, Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2009-15 'Zoning By-lawr'Ainendwent Application A.17/09. Ontario Realty Corporation .Part Lot 18, Concession 3 City of Pickering Thank you for providing the Greater Toronto' Airports Authority (GTAA) with a copy of the above -noted applications, We have reviewed the proposal to develop a Catholic Elementary school on the subject.property in an area that is designated as "Mixed Corridors, Medium Density Residential & Open Space" in the Pickering Official, Plan, and offer the following comments: The GTAA released its Draft Plan for the Pickering Airport Lands inNovember 2004, The Draft Plan proposed that the prohibition of sensitive land uses be defined by the 25 NEF contour for the GTAA's proposed runway configuration. This is consistent with TransportCanada's 2005. revision to its guideline for "Land Use in the Vicinity of Airports" (Publication TP 1247E) to recognize the 25 NEF as the standard for new airports. The subject property is located outside of the 25 NEP Noise contour for the proposed airport. Greater Toronto Airports Authority 15 Lester B. Pearson International Airport Box 3111 Cda airU to Ontario, Toronto AMF, Ontario, Canada UP 1B2 112 GTAA Airport Planning Olga Smid Superimendent, Land Use )'.tanning Tel: (416) 776-7355 Fax: (416) 776-4168 (Transmitted via Facsimile 905-420-7648) July 20, 2009 Mr. Ross Pym Principal Planner — Development Review City of Pickering — Planning & Development Department - Pickering Civic, Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7 Dear Mr.'Pym: . R9, Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2009-15 'Zoning By-lawr'Ainendwent Application A.17/09. Ontario Realty Corporation .Part Lot 18, Concession 3 City of Pickering Thank you for providing the Greater Toronto' Airports Authority (GTAA) with a copy of the above -noted applications, We have reviewed the proposal to develop a Catholic Elementary school on the subject.property in an area that is designated as "Mixed Corridors, Medium Density Residential & Open Space" in the Pickering Official, Plan, and offer the following comments: The GTAA released its Draft Plan for the Pickering Airport Lands inNovember 2004, The Draft Plan proposed that the prohibition of sensitive land uses be defined by the 25 NEF contour for the GTAA's proposed runway configuration. This is consistent with TransportCanada's 2005. revision to its guideline for "Land Use in the Vicinity of Airports" (Publication TP 1247E) to recognize the 25 NEF as the standard for new airports. The subject property is located outside of the 25 NEP Noise contour for the proposed airport. ATTAOMMEN T { �' TO b INFORMATIC'NR2rOr2T# 0af-/0 Mr. Ross Pym' July 20, 2009 - Page 2. GTAA' If the airport proceeds,. further refinements to the runway configuration recommended in the Draft Plan may be necessary as new environmental and operational/engmeering iriformation becomes available, either. through the environmental assessment process or during design of the facilities. Such refinements could potentially alter the location of the 25 NEF contour; However, it is our position that the location of the property owned by Ontario Realty Corporation and' located on Part of Lot 18, Concession 3 in the City of Pickering, is unlikely to be impacted by changes to the 25 NEF contour resulting from potential refinements to.the proposed runway layout: The GTAA therefore. has no objection to the future proposed' development of a Catholic Elementay school on the site. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Kathryn Tracey -Leitch, Senior Land Use Planner, at 416-776-4012. Yours very truly, GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY Olga Smid Superintedent, Land Use Planning N FSC ' Mncd SeuRu x ATTACHMENT N -B TO li�F(7E: jta7iQN r'FPv�2i " Of1 �y 17 ::r� tJ lr 11 V DEVELOPMENT "PLICATION REVIEW PHOIHCT WAMFt Oatitao&Wiry Cr.Iporal'on—DuFtPlan afSubji.i.nai 7un4B7-kwnnmdm.=t Yroaoa4l CathalcFJra'c - Schco: Sit_ AD2nsiPLAN: Ps:t Lot l 3, Cma u in 5 W.-NICIPALITY: Pidcria'? , MFNG-- S? 2UOP-15 &x k 17%0'3 SVBRff55ION DATE: Iufy i•.iy 2037 Ile fo wMingis as ovr.-•.ieao'tE:cSeatraL'Iniuiravmts the QFp"vnat i; hl:dF to mr..ric order :o 4:t2ia a ccwp)ete ele:.trcal FonermpFl} system to Iles tiz aa3 u•_thin the tiie+.che[es•Ikd,•r=icaLsunre Fot3iiaeo'ved. Tx I mmmcns'sbw are Lased on prdimioxry in[orsatoa oaty and srt rufct ro re:tisiod k all esses'taidiar's savtEsrd C;mditicat ofSer.¢ce document mm out f3c e_euhm-.ents, tis avd coodidws 4t the provi row of eleoEc eeseiu- . i _n(S IC`YCF CiOMWl M,aSilfite an C.'ffU to Curntrt. S Elec do sm4z: is ant Cnr mtt 11. BLNII)e oa the D=dEmd7 z4s: t to Eris pnapc_cl. t 8c.mz' ag aV be,fr,.a: the pmpmcl rmd aZl mace d-recs adl'iecnt to the srhuul and T'eetlan'a supFly wllage via be 9r27.6k�. r Z -fl-.c Appluar (csac ee63 to%mmt• protide xcoameJ'.iioa an Eire for :reel n's L", ndm Ccfs} Qv[tlnorpsimrant in aSmX6m clew asa[.1:a .a aceesttbin kryheaey��ehiccei. 3. .1 eepmtc room uid: outsdc sczess s reatviied w ac -a O:Lve V�idiaa's mc:r_. 4. _3 bWih 4'2gc concretes -.d dueledrtlal mdugaannd cable system is-equkW fmm the desiro wpj:ly pciet(s) at the prr;tomd adiweaeroad ro a tcuts_auner:ocaeon(s) on I:m ptoaeny, ill r rte AppU=t'E cost. 3. Pn diieclinnal bored of ooca en[u'�dcgeaunj n:sd rreasirt3 :nap be mgaircd 111EA-T&fi twmb--_eq roE to eamp)ese tss w rm:x and cows aU mate a —dated wi$ jus requirement E- The ?pplicant mvetmakc rimmmr vppliatioc m Paridiaa fortes -.1m1 ieritst� ss sacn, as poasible.::'sm:telt, Eased o: ^"••,7_4p:esr amRp�rcVaidiaa ht sEgm t{:eu<1SkaC:YSeery 7nldrnitfy saecdlclegmrcsnrets and anu•.gemstts and related xvrl- !o_'t}is au+jeet, and iv nvtke as 03er/e Coanccr. The Applk -is sttmtgly ehctsuagc3 ht engage as jzsiea) ma<�I:znt or eeeaidw co .i ordinate setvic detaSs. The sppSant is ceuioned tsst tende-s, mat -acts, cr work toeym:.r iuiC:te plot b =b -aiming as Offs tot6acer. fmat Vtsdis�:nap-ra¢snllictat<iia llv:naat<oian3 dc�:s uftUee.L•Yedcai xrtiticg eel na-ia fx Offsto Connect for +ici Teedla can tear no rc,• oasibilit^. .. "_Ue elstrici i•wt-dlstiani s) Fi<>m I su FvSLc acad aleasss�x 3' sn• the setTice ca>:emx avd sIlme2ma � :ate+zm[a� mus' coaplgaith V �dit�'s req'.nremrn>< aed sp�fca•iens>,d mrd sko be su'rjl[ta'$e i regaensts of the E)torirzl Saf�,3orhoi>r. i 1 8 MAMONT S �0 oy-id AppU us vil be regcireE tz MM61 b Vendian a st .d=d ueipatio� eaw.sceal;'r isteor on tire, Cm vitc]yvsr (5:a tits . 9. P,,G t EYC[�+;=:ue a7j LCA'.Y.ICXe,-I= "PElic nt m ve�ex(s)/o�eupaes(s) oEt)w fwo pacmix_ r t nPpl• for w eacxy,7• accousu is ride_ io recene deCtdcd caeCgy u:dStlMd srsaices M5 r3 ea[s31A acgomg pa_mmt arranxmca[t. Ig- VJtcte canes uc ma evl iaadkiagegcy.neat ar`roraeg�uecwou:a pr..ximit' to C ting aweshcad :Tires. sh 3r__s risk DEC.a;tet ox eomingwWlin tae ED:=ofaPEsoah,rh-'ppli csut S�vl ply A0;lts Foxhe xm�osary *<locatica, bvr��,or otS¢�no2•ctica nClhsnires, o:ataicvs atLes action"i: damedvrccasary IT t eddian 10 p:ovile fac c -tke satEtj w:d the lv vliT of lht ekadcA spitem. 11. laac:capiap, ep-c tcalr maces; shrubs, sni 3tken sb(AIE telxaud rray hos'jclic 's i-usfiacc sw.tr-b-gm to a TIE i�[ed>oYnct+Aici vipaz:nt aatss. " 12 Veddiao tali nntattead thcdulnl, Gfy' efPlckes:.ag D9A= _tfeefing Ear ibis Dcvelopment. U 11cddiivn has eo otiectsoo a:• the proposed dtv6PPmeat. couma Vrsiiien as sox as s,iaag is eo.�mm&J,d \'fLniapil3q, plesac foC Ud a wW cd firs[ Mbmissicm c:vi1 des{i� ro TtAdia . piease =It laat ae OEfa :o CnnLce. murbe comldetcd at ]ear:lfser: L?•) /sis (o) maths pro= to Am xcgtprej AD=:icil sxeiing daft. 14. Ojs�: Flrrtdczl;zj.+pl* Mthis stool blo:i ur%b_J oust to ixaprrted arpsr. o= octal' elscdcs] sexcirinF =oe thi cern. Te3nical Rcaesen:a live: Deb�Snmvd T1e�kunt: F,xt 9:.d1 " I PP!df Kt,Torras\llsilcT.n�tl ppli.'a¢or. z.- nw= hD Mtmicipa.itcs-Rcrosel Aj-15,3KB.doc 4TT1,04MEHT##-2-Y0 Development & Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5, 100 Borough Drive Scarborough, Ontario MIP 4W2 Tel: 416-296-6291 Tall -Free: 1-800-748-6284 Fax: 416-296-0520 August 6, 2009 Town of Pickering Planning Department 1 The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7 Attention: Ross Pym Dear Sir/Madam: RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision Brock Road Your File No: SP -2009-15, A 17/09 Bell File No: 44609 19 Rec�,VE® AUG 12 2009 PP�ANw� aoevE�aR)NG DEPpgTMENT MENT 0 Further to our comments of July 28, 2009 Bell Canada is pleased to provide the following additional comments. A detailed review of the Draft Plan of Subdivision has been completed. The following paragraph(s) are to be included as Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval:' 1 F The Developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work within the Plan, the Developer must confirm that sufficient wire -line communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available within the proposed development to provide communication/telecommunication service to the proposed development. In the event that such infrastructure is not available, the Developer is hereby advised that*the Developer may be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of .the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure. If the Developer elects not to pay for such connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure, the Developer shall be required to demonstrate to the municipality that sufficient alternative communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the. proposed development to enable, at a minimum, .the effective delivery of communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services (i.e., 911 Emergency Services). _ The Owner shall agree in the Agreement, in words satisfactory to Bell Canada, to grant to Bell Canada.any easements that may be required for telecommunication services. Easements may be required subject to final servicing decisions. In the event of any conflict with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements, the owner/developer shall be responsible for the relocation of such'fa,;i;r;es or easements. 20 IP1tCttl3it3i1lFi.'E+i 3. Sell Canada requires one or more conduit or conduits of sufficient size from each unit to the room(s) in which the telecommunication facilities are situated and one or more conduits from the room(s) in which the _ telecommunication facilities are located to the street line. 'Should you have any questions plegse contact.Janice M. McConkey at 416-296-6430.' Yours ttruly n La Chapelle, MC RPP anager - Development & Municipal Services, Ontario 0 0