Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout May 30, 2018city PICKERING Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 7 Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 pickering.ca DICKERING cdrii Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, May 30, 2018 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from May 9, 2018 1-7 (III) Reports 1. (Tabled at the May 9, 2018 meeting) 8-14 P/CA 34/18 & P/CA 35/18 E. Whitney 1284 Commerce Street 2. (Deferred at the May 9, 2018 meeting) P/CA 38/18 & P/CA 39/18 Pinnacle Custom Homes 540 Oakwood Drive 3. P/CA 40/18 G. Sirilas 1598 Oakburn Street 4. P/CA 41/18 D. Sherman 1783 Track Street 5. P/CA 42/18 to P/CA 44/18 M. Malik-Qasim/10221058 Canada Ltd. 560 & 562 Marksubry Road 6. P/CA 45/18 & P/CA 46/18 J. Greig 5061 William Street (IV) Adjournment 15-19 20-24 25-31 32-45 46-49 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Lesley Dunne T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 Email Idunne@pickering.ca DICKERING cetrii Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 9, 2018 7:02 pm Main Committee Room Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland — Vice -Chair David Johnson — Chair Eric Newton Sean Wiley Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary -Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary -Treasurer Absent Denise Rundle (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the agenda for the Wednesday, May 9, 2018 meeting be adopted. Carried Unanimously (II) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the minutes of the 5th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, April 18, 2018 be adopted as amended. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 7 DICKERING cetrii Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 9, 2018 7:02 pm Main Committee Room (111) Reports Tom Copeland, stated that he will abstain from voting on application P/CA 33/18 as he has a conflict of interest. 1. (Deferred at the April 18, 2018 meeting) P/CA 33/18 R. Gupta 130 Woodview Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended: • to permit a minimum front yard setback of 5.3 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the construction of an addition to the existing single detached dwelling. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. David Deir, agent, was present to represent the application. Ruth Sutton of 105 Woodview Drive was present in objection to the application. David Deir stated the house design is traditional and fits within the neighbourhood and in his opinion the variances are minor in mature. David Deir also stated construction has come to a halt until the variance application is dealt with by the Committee of Adjustment. Ruth Sutton stated she would like the Committee to uphold the Official Plan in order to maintain the nature of the neighbourhood. Ruth Sutton also expressed a concern and questioned how the foundation can already exist. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Sean Wiley That application P/CA 33/18 by R. Gupta, be Refused on the grounds that the requested variances are major variances that are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and is not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. Carried Page 2 of 7 DICKERING cetrii Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 9, 2018 7:02 pm Main Committee Room David Johnson, Chair stated that he will abstain from voting on Items 2, 3 and 4 of the agenda for the Wednesday, May 9, 2018 Committee of Adjustment meeting in order to prevent a tie vote. 2. P/CA 34/18 & P/CA 35/18 E. Whitney 1284 Commerce Street Application P/CA 34/18 The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 9.1 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum lot area of 407 square metres; whereas the by-law requires minimum lot area of 460 square metres • to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 of a metre on the other; whereas the by-law requires minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum height of 11.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires maximum building height of 9.0 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent, whereas the by-law requires maximum lot coverage of 33 percent Application P/CA 35/18 The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 9.1 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum lot area of 407 square metres; whereas the by-law requires minimum lot area of 460 square metres • to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 of a metre on the other; whereas the by-law requires minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum height of 10.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires maximum building height of 9.0 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 45 percent, whereas the by-law requires maximum lot coverage of 33 percent The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to facilitate Land Severance Application LD 057/18. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending the applications be tabled. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the applications. Written comments were received from Councillor McLean, Regional Councillor, Ward 2 in objection to the applications. Page 3 of 7 DICKERING cetrii Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 9, 2018 7:02 pm Main Committee Room Neither the applicant nor agent were present to represent the application. Thomas Dalzell of 1285 Commerce Street and Marjan Strasic of 724 Front Road were present in objection to the applications. Thomas Dalzell of 1285 Commerce Street submitted detailed comments in objection to the applications. In the correspondence submitted, Thomas Dalzell indicated support of the City's efforts regarding the local condo development to the south, they would like a firm stand on the height limit of 9.0 metres and urge the Committee of Adjustment to support the height limit that Council has approved. He also stated the City has commissioned a study of the local community scale and character which will be achieved over the next couple of years. Thomas Dalzell also expressed a concern that a detailed site plan was not provided with the circulation Notice; that there is currently no on street parking on the subject property side of Commerce Street and plans for the development should include onsite parking. Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That applications P/CA 34/18 & P/CA 35/18 by E. Whitney, be Tabled to allow for the applicant to provide additional details such as a planning rationale brief, a building siting plan, and conceptual elevations. Carried 3. P/CA 36/18 M.A. Asgary 681 Front Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18 to permit a maximum height of 12.1 metres, whereas the by-law requires a maximum building height of 9.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a detached dwelling. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending refusal. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from Councillor McLean, Regional Councillor, Ward 2 in objection to the application. Written comments were received from the residents of 1279 Commerce Street, 1281 Commerce Street, 627 Liverpool Road, 661 Front Road, 671 Front Road and 677 Front Road expressing no objection to the 12.1 metre height. Page 4 of 7 DICKERING cetrii Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 9, 2018 7:02 pm Main Committee Room In correspondence received from the resident of 1303 Wharf Street in objection to the application, they expressed a concern that new construction appears without thought or consideration to the vision plan that the City of Pickering has presented many years ago. They also indicated that it seems like each development is to capture the best lake view by building bigger than the neighbour. Mir Asgary, applicant, was present to represent the application. Thomas Dalzell and Jill Adams of 1285 Commerce Street and Marjan Strasic of 724 Front Road were present in objection to the application. Mir Asgary explained the history of the property and stated a minor variance application was submitted in November 2017 and that staff supported the height, side yards and lot coverage and therefore he withdrew the application. Mir Asgary also stated he was not notified of the zoning by-law to restrict building height to 9.0 metres; and the third floor will not be livable space it will be a patio and used for storage and utilities. Mir Asgary also indicated support from 9 to 10 neighbours. Jill Adams asked the Committee to uphold the 9.0 metre height restriction in order to preserve the character of the neighbourhood. Jill Adams expressed a concern with the height blocking the lake views. Thomas Dalzell expressed a concern with the height and explained some examples of homes that are out of scale and character to the neighbhourhood. He also expressed a concern the proposed dwelling will block others' view of the water; questioned the number of steps to the front door and feels this is a 4 storey proposal not a 3 storey. Marjan Strasic expressed a concern that the development does not fit in with the neighbourhood and that the community has worked with the City to have a restriction on the height of 9.0 metres. Marjan Strasic asked the Committee Members to please consider the 9.0 metres height restriction. In response to questions from Committee Members, Mir Asgary stated the size of the proposed dwelling is approximately 3,200 square feet and that it does not include the third floor as it is not livable space; the basement is approximately 1,200 to 1,300 square feet; and the proposed dwelling is a modern home with a flat roof patio with glass railings. He also stated he was not aware of the community character engagement process and height by-law and explained that a notice was not required to be given to all owners within an "R4" zone. Mir Asgary explained these are the same variances that were previously applied for in November 2017 and withdrawn after his planner spoke with City staff and City staff advised the by-law had no height restrictions and that the other variances would need Committee of Adjustment approval. Due to consideration of the community character and By-law 7610/18 recently passed by Council, Tom Copeland moved the following motion: Page 5 of 7 DICKERING cetrii Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 9, 2018 7:02 pm Main Committee Room Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Sean Wiley That application P/CA 36/18 by M.A. Asgary, be Refused on the grounds that the maximum height of 12.1 metres is a major variance that is not desirable for the appropriate development of the land and is not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Carried 4. P/CA 38/18 & P/CA 39/18 Pinnacle Custom Homes 540 Oakwood Drive P/CA 38/18 (Proposed Severed Lot) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to permit a minimum south side yard setback of 0.9 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres P/CA 39/18 (Proposed Retained Lot) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to permit a minimum north side yard setback of 0.9 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to facilitate a single detached dwelling on each of the two proposed lots associated with the Region of Durham Land Division Application LD 006/18. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Nigel O'Neill, agent, was present to represent the applications. Paul Harrison of 544 Oakwood Drive and John Hubbarde were present in objection to the applications. Paul Harrison expressed several concerns that the two proposed dwellings will: be viewed as one large block; look even closer together due to the eave troughs; cast shadows on the north side causing the loss of 10 to 15 hours of daylight a month; impair the streetscape; and highly impact his family and neighbourhood, and decrease property values. Page 6 of 7 DICKERING cetrii Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 9, 2018 7:02 pm Main Committee Room John Hubbarde stated that this is a sneaky way to build larger dwellings. In response to concerns and questions from the Committee Members, Nigel O'Neill stated the elevation drawings have not been completed yet; the two 50 foot lots were created through Region of Durham Land Division Committee; will maintain the 1.5 metre side yard setback on the north side, the variances are only for the interior side yards to be 0.9 metres; there will be livable space (a bedroom) above the porte cochere; and the square footage will be approximately 4,000 square feet. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Sean Wiley That applications P/CA 38/18 and P/CA 39/18 by Pinnacle Custom Homes, be Deferred to the next Committee of Adjustment meeting to allow the Committee Members to visit the subject property. Carried (IV) Adjournment Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the 6th meeting of the 2018 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:58 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, May 30, 2018. Carried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretary -Treasurer Page 7 of 7 DICKERING C4 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: P/CA 34/18 & P/CA 35/18 Date: May 30, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications P/CA 34/18 & P/CA 35/18 E. Whitney 1284 Commerce Street Application P/CA 34/18 The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 9.1 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum lot area of 407 square metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 460 square metres • to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 of a metre on the other side; whereas the by-law requires minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum height of 10.3 metres; whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 9.0 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 3.5 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard • to permit a covered second -storey balcony and an uncovered third -storey balcony to project a maximum of 3.0 metres and 2.4 metres, respectively, into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard Application P/CA 35/18 The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 9.1 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum lot area of 407 square metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 460 square metres • to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 of a metre on the other side; whereas the by-law requires minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum height of 9.5 metres; whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 9.0 metres Report P/CA 34/18 & P/CA 35/18 May 30, 2018 Page 2 • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 45 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 3.5 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard • to permit a covered second -storey balcony and an uncovered third -storey balcony to project a maximum of 3.0 metres and 2.4 metres, respectively, into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to facilitate the creation of one additional lot through Land Division Application LD 057/18 and obtain building permits for the construction of two single detached dwellings. Recommendation P/CA 34/18 & P/CA 35/18 The City Development Department recommends that Minor Variance Applications P/CA 34/18 and P/CA 35/18 be Tabled until City staff have had a further opportunity to review the revised applications and submitted supporting materials. Background In November 2016, City Council adopted Resolution 236/16 to commence a community engagement process to establish guidelines to encourage developers and builders to be mindful of established community character. Through community consultation, maximum building height was identified as one of the key criteria in ensuring compatibility of replacement housing in established neighbourhoods. In 2017, the City initiated Zoning By-law Amendment in order to implement a 9.0 metre height limit for lands zoned "R3" and "R4" within Zoning By-law 2511. By-law 7610/18 was passed by Council on March 12, 2018 and is now in force and in effect. The subject property is zoned "R4" under Zoning By-law 2511. On May 9, 2018, the Committee of Adjustment tabled Minor Variance Applications P/CA 34/18 and P/CA 35/18, at the request of City staff. Staff requested the applications be tabled until the applicant submitted a planning rationale brief, a building siting plan, and conceptual elevations to support the requested variances. On May 15, 2018, the applicant submitted the above -noted information requested by City staff in support of Minor Variance Applications P/CA 34/18 and P/CA 35/18. In submitting the requested information, the applicant revised their applications by reducing the overall building height requested under P/CA 34/18 from 11.0 metres to 10.3 metres and reducing the overall building height requested under P/CA 35/18 from 10.0 metres to 9.5 metres. In addition, variances for both P/CA 34/18 and P/CA 35/18 were requested in order to permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 3.5 metres into the required front yard, and to permit a covered second -storey balcony and an uncovered third -storey balcony to project a maximum of 3.0 metres and 2.4 metres, respectively, into the required front yard. Report P/CA 34/18 & P/CA 35/18 May 30, 2018 Page 3 Due to the nature of the requested variances, the revisions proposed, and the information submitted in support of the subject applications, staff require additional time to review the applications and determine whether the proposed variances are appropriate for the subject property and would not negatively impact the surrounding properties. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: May 24, 2018 Comments prepared by: Cody Morri o Planner — CM:DW:jc • no comments on the applications Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:iDocuments1Development1D-3700\2018\PCA 34-18 & PCA 35-181Report'PCA 34-18 & 35-18 Report Tabled (May 30-18).doc Attachments Exhibit 1 t 0 Fairview Avenue 0 c m > rn m rn 0 0 0 0 m s Haller Avenue 1 Old Orchard Avenue onIca LIPMI1111111 Brown nq Avenue ui,p 1111111111111 EMI 11111111110 X11111111111111 PF Frenchman's Bay rpoint ee Ilona Park Road 11111111111 Subject Lands 4) 0) Naroch Boulevard �IIII��� Luna Court mak ' 1'■ .111■ Fox love Avenue _► �/1111�1 '1111111- 111111111111 111111111111 0 > Commerce Street 11111111111111111 Broadview Street Whart Street Annland Street C2 Location Map File: P/CA 34/18 & P/CA 35/18 o4 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: E. Whitney Property Description: Part of Lot 4 and 5, Block B, Plan 65 (1284 Commerce Street) Date: Mar. 26, 2018 et The Corporation of the City of Prckenng Produced (In pan) under license from Q Queers Porter, Ontario Men sfry of Natural Resources. All OTeranet Enterprises Inch and lh¢ suppliers all rightsireserveda®M rdclpal Propearty Assessment Corpoati nand Its step§ers a§ngtts reserved; OOO THIS IS SCALE:ALAT+ OFSURVEY I Exhibit 2 to permit a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent to permit a maximum building height of 10.3 metres to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 of a metre on the other side to permit a minimum lot area of 407 square metres to permit a minimum lot frontage of 9.1 metres Commerce Street to permit a covered second -storey balcony and uncovered third - storey balcony to project a maximum of 3.0 metres and 2.4 metres, respectively, into the required front yard to permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 3.5 metres into the required front yard T c/4 PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 34/18 Applicant: E. Whitney Property Description: Part of Lot 4 & 5, Block B, Plan 65 (1284 Commerce Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 16, 2018 9.145 II LOT AREA 1R [b ;:al T 1761 aooz Proposed Severed Parcel I II L T -.________i_____+ 12844'A' J -STAR .%S -.rr SEO Y 1101/S2 it 9.145 I .�` N vi Commerce Street to permit a covered second -storey balcony and uncovered third - storey balcony to project a maximum of 3.0 metres and 2.4 metres, respectively, into the required front yard to permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 3.5 metres into the required front yard T c/4 PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 34/18 Applicant: E. Whitney Property Description: Part of Lot 4 & 5, Block B, Plan 65 (1284 Commerce Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 16, 2018 Exhibit 3 to permit a covered second -storey balcony and uncovered third - storey balcony to project a maximum of 3.0 metres and 2.4 metres, respectively, into the required front yard to permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 3.5 metres into the required front yard ommerce tree to permit a maximum lot coverage of 45 percent to permit a minimum lot area of 407 square metres to permit a maximum building height of 9.5 metres to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 of a metre on the other side to permit a minimum lot frontage of 9.1 metres PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 35/18 Applicant: E. Whitney Property Description: Part of Lot 4 & 5, Block B, Plan 65 (1284 Commerce Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 16, 2018 9.145 LOT AREA 4136.q It 40771 54 I �Proposec Retained Parcel 5-1 J L 065 grit' 1284'B' PROPOSED J -STOREY HOUSE \ — --1_ _ _1 4 .n u`J II III I UI 0. v d' 9.145 ommerce tree to permit a maximum lot coverage of 45 percent to permit a minimum lot area of 407 square metres to permit a maximum building height of 9.5 metres to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 of a metre on the other side to permit a minimum lot frontage of 9.1 metres PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 35/18 Applicant: E. Whitney Property Description: Part of Lot 4 & 5, Block B, Plan 65 (1284 Commerce Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 16, 2018 Exhibit 4 • n O J(� O �I Q• Qo —� n —., op op �■� 11 = 1 _.._. _. 1 _ r TSA CPM LpM 1111 ■ 11 — - lin — —=— _I 1 al loom 11•/1 .. Rill ll: .I' O■ UN IN 111 �� �� �� �� ■�� - 1 i �� 11 .. m■■ k g t I I --dill ��'/:Ili1 I1I I 'II �:a I"::: ^ �� /� �■ —11:1111: 111 ■� iu"in l ll 1 l l 1 l 1 1: -.:� .1 iki lig Bili �1111� 1111 1111::' g /( {� _.._,_ oil IN F_�_ �_ ' fs ,t TOP OP ifi�M90M pE ■ 1111 4 4 �� ; _. __� ■111 • = 1 : ; � -.ex O 1 IO C� i TCP off, M�WM _ — _ iIi1iii:: ' �� OKOMMill 4 •�,� L `53 Ili in ■i■ = , ■ umnili s i 1. 111111 • - MU :i 1,'::! Ma !ll!!lEi1!I1JIt1I! Ni' 11111111 I Ink MARPtA ill ----7=-.... ill ��� 111 �..1 - - 1 M�I�•lM E.:: _.: 11 11 '.- :_. ----{ — I. ■Ifs M �_. �•• — -': �' ❑ ❑ ■ n �� ��I �_I 1 _ PIK en�cel FORA G �: 1—gm ial JII1T.I '' — =: __Jr: „plcMAX EXISTING ADJACENT HOUSE FRONT ELEVATION 'A' FRONT ELEVATION 'B' Submitted Front Elevations 0* 4 File No: P/CA 34/18 and P/CA 35/18 PICKERING Applicant: E. Whitney Property Description: Part of Lot 4 & 5, Block B, Plan 65 City Development (1284 Commerce Street) Department • FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 16, 2018 L:\Planning\Core8Plan ningWpps\PCA\201 B DICKERING c4 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: P/CA 38/18 & P/CA 39/18 Date: May 9, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications P/CA 38/18 & P/CA 39/18 Pinnacle Custom Homes 540 Oakwood Drive Applications P/CA 38/18 (Proposed Severed Lot) The applicant requests relief from Zoning .By-law 2511, as amended: • to permit a minimum south side yard setback of 0.9 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres P/CA 39/18 (Proposed Retained Lot) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to permit a minimum north side yard setback of 0.9 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to facilitate a single detached dwelling on each of the two proposed lots associated with the Region of Durham Land Division Application LD 006/18. Recommendations (P/CA 38/18 & P/CA 39/18) The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the single detached dwellings proposed on the severed and the retained lot, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (Exhibit 2). 2. That the applicant obtain building permits for the proposed construction by May 10, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 38/18 & P/CA 39/18 May 9, 2018 Page 2 Additional Information On January 15, 2018, the Regional Municipality of Durham Land Division Committee conditionally approved Land Division Application LD 006/18 which considered the creation of a new lot on the subject property. The applicant will be required to fulfill the conditions of approval prior to the Land Division being finalized and the new lot being legally created. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Rosebank Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511 — "R4"- Residential Fourth Density Zone Appropriateness of the Applications North and South Side Yard Setback Variances The intent of a minimum side yard setback requirement is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties, provide sufficient space to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. The zoning by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres on one side and 2.4 metres on the other side, however where agarage or carport is erected as a part of the dwelling, a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres is required on both sides. The applicant has requested a reduction in the north side yard setback from 1.5 metres to 0.9 metres to facilitate a future dwelling on the retained lot and a reduction of the south side yard setback from 1.5 metres to 0.9 metres to facilitate a future dwelling on the severed lot. Both future dwellings are proposed to have an attached garage. The north and south side yard setback proposed to be reduced on the retained and severed lots, respectively, will directly abut one another. The proposed reduction of the interior side yard setbacks will provide an appropriate separation between the future dwellings and the mutual property line to accommodate pedestrian access, grading, drainage, and residential utility services. The reduced side yards of 0.9 metres will only apply to a small section of the proposed dwellings. More significant side yard setbacks will be provided for majority of the dwellings on the retained and severed lots. This significant setback will create a courtyard between the parte cochere (covered entranceway for vehicles and pedestrians) at the front of the dwelling and the attached garage at the rear of the dwelling, as indicated on Exhibit 2. These courtyards will provide a substantial amount of separation between the proposed dwellings on the abutting lots. Report P/CA 38/18 & P/CA 39/18 May 9, 2018 Page 3 The proposed side yard setbacks of 0.9 metres will be located within the interior side yard of both the severed and retained lot. Therefore, the reduced setbacks will not result in a negative visual impact on the abutting properties immediately north or immediately south of the subject lands. The proposed dwellings will maintain the required side yard setback 1.5 metres within the exterior side yards and will maintain all other requirements of the zoning by-law, including building height, lot coverage, front yard setback, and rear yard setback. Therefore, the proposed dwellings will maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. The requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the general intent of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: May 3, 2018 Comments prepared by: Cody Planner I CM:DW:bs • no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:1DocumentslDevelopmenttD-3700\20181PCA 38-18 to PCA 39-18 Pinnacle Custom Homes\Repod\PCA 38-18 to PCA 39-18 Report.doc Attachments Exhibit 1 0 U 0 1 '3O ou Toynevale Road =Drive Subject Lands I I M174111MIlk 3117 Air City of Toronto 0 a 0 0 c 0 N O -o O O 0 11 0 Staghorn Road 0 0 0 di Gillmoss Road , c4 Location Map File: P/CA 38/18 & P/CA 39/18 0 PICKERI NG City Development Department Applicant: Pinnacle Custom Homes Property Description: Part of Lot 61, Plan 350 (540 Oakwood Drive) Date: Apr. 24, 2018 A The Cerparaoon of the City of Pickering Produced(10 pan) under license from: aJ Owers Porter, Ontario Minsoyot Nahral Resources. All rights reserved.© Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Dep advi merd of Natural Resoces. Al tights resensE ; ATeranot Enterprises Inc. and Its wagers all rights reserved.;®Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers el rigtds reserved.; SCALE. 1:5,000 THIS IS NOT A PIAN OF SURVEY. _ Exhibit 2 L:\Planning\Corel\Planning \App s\PCA\2018 P/CA 38/18 To permit a minimum south side yard setback of 0.9 metres V i / / / i ! /J_1_/JJ i ( I II II rig 49.13 11.1 = r 1 u f0 z! ® i II „ ry =L'pll;1llll 11147 _ j Severed Lot 1 i 11 II I I I I lK I I 11 III ll g ji pcal LL' cal Retained Lot I1 i I II I1 II O 49.13 _ _ _ •" � ' sozr -C-' ,a�wiiiniiu� _ - -+` .. I 1I It M I IIS II P/CA 39/18 - - � �E To permit a minimum N north side yard setback of 0.9 metres �� ��, Submitted Plan (4 4 File No: P/CA 38/18 & P/CA 39/18 PICKERING Applicant: Pinnacle Custom Homes Property Description: Part of Lot 61, Plan 350 City Development (540 Oakwood Drive) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Apr. 24, 2018 L:\Planning\Corel\Planning \App s\PCA\2018 cty ,h DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 40/18 Date: May 30, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 40/18 G. Sirilas 1598 Oakburn Street Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit an accessory structure located within the rear yard to be setback a minimum of 0.0 metres from the north lot line and setback a minimum of 0.0 metres from the west lot line, whereas the by-law requires accessory structure greater than 10.0 square metres to be setback a minimum of 1.0 metres from all lot lines. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to permit an uncovered and partially enclosed accessory structure to be located within the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers an existing accessory structure located within the rear yard setback 0.0 metres from the north lot line and setback 0.0 metres from the west lot line, to be a major variance, that is not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. If the applicant were to request that the application be amended to permit the accessory structure to be setback 0.6 of a metre to the north and west lot lines the following recommendation would apply: The City Development Department considers an existing accessory structure setback of 0.6 of a metre from the north and west lot lines, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following condition: 1. That the applicant obtain zoning compliance through the relocation of the accessory structure by October 30, 2018. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Highbush Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 — "R4" — Residential Fourth Density Zone Report P/CA 40/18 May 30, 2018 Page 2 Appropriateness of the Application Reduction of the Minimum Setback Requirement for Accessory Structures The intent of the minimum 1.0 metre setback requirement for accessory structures, greater than 1.8 metres in height and 10.0 square metres in size, is to ensure that adequate space is available for maintenance, grading and drainage, that overhangs do not encroach on adjacent properties, that roof drainage stays on the subject property, and that the visual and privacy impact on adjacent properties is minimized. The owner is requesting to allow for an existing accessory structure setback 0.0 metres from the north lot line and 0.0 metres from the west lot line. The accessory structure (platform) was constructed in May 2016. Following the construction of the structure an area resident expressed concern to the City's Building Service Section that it was constructed without a permit. Following a site visit from a City Building Inspector, it was determined that a building permit was not required, however due to the location of the structure, the City's By-law Services was notified. A City By-law Officer conducted a site visit and determined that the structure did not maintain the appropriate setbacks from the rear and side lot lines and had advised the owner that the structure must be brought into compliance with the zoning by-law. The existing structure is an uncovered platform with a partial pergola, that is partially enclosed on the north and west sides. The remainder of the platform is open and accessible from the rear yard of the subject property. The structure includes bench seating and garden beds for flowers. The existing structure is located entirely on the subject property. No portion of the structure overhangs onto the adjacent properties to the north or west. No drainage is directed off the subject lands by a roof or eaves, as the structure only has a partial pergola and does not have a roof or require eaves. City Engineering Services staff have commented that this lot receives drainage from the adjacent lots to the north and west and requested that the deck be relocated a minimum of 0.6 of a metre from the lot lines to accommodate this drainage. The existing height of the accessory structure at its highest point on the north and west side is 2.6 metres, which is only 0.6 of a metre higher than the maximum permitted fence height. As a result, the structure will not result in a negative visual impact on the adjacent properties to the north or west. A setback of 0.6 of a metre to the north and west lot lines will further minimize any negative visual impact of the structure on adjacent properties. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is not minor in nature, does not meet the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and Official Plan, and is not desirable for the appropriate development of the land. Report P/CA 40/18 May 30, 2018 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: May 24, 2018 Comments prepared by: Cody\ Planner CM:DW:jc J:1DocumentslDevelopment\D-3700120181PCA 40-18\Report\RCA 40-18 Report.doc Attachments • this lot receives drainage from the adjacent lots to the north and west • the deck is to be relocated a minimum of 0.6 of a metre from the lot lines to accommodate this drainage Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Exhibit 1 Valley Ridge -r ;seen J West Lane t Crescent EMI Pine Grove Avenue o Prohill Street 0 Jai '� S '�J (44 PICKERING City Development Department Location Map File: P/CA 40/18 Applicant: G. Sirilas �11111111111111 �IIIIII►iE o�� um=� o =� 1111 MINN i1N 111 Subject `Lands m 0 Butternut l Lancrest Street 0 a> a) a) Starview 0 LL Property Description: Plan 282, Part of Lot 12 Now Part 2, 40R21413 (1598 Oakburn Street) g The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (In part) under license from. O Oueens Porter, Orteno Ilan say of Natural Resources. All rghtsreserved.9 Ner Majesty the O uee n 1n Right ofCanada, Department of Natant Resources. M dolts reserved; ro wren. Enterprises Inc. a Date: May. 01, 2018 SCALE: 1:5,000 suppliers ail nem reserved.;® Murudpal Prop en), Assessmentorporeoonard Its sippaers aengras resenea.; ,'(HIS IS NOTA PLAN OFSURVEY. Exhibit 2 V-eoce (D3a6k yar To permit an accessory structure located within the rear yard to be setback a minimum of 0 metres from the north lot line and 0 metres from the west lot line. 2. LQr Scq(e P1a,+Corm s c4- \ -\o Cy,f PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 40/18 Applicant: G. Sirilas Property Description: Plan 282, Part of Lot 21 Now Part 2, 40R-21413 (1598 Oakburn Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 7, 2018 Cts 6/ DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 41/18 Date: May 30, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 41/18 D. Sherman 1783 Track Street Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06 to permit a minimum rear yard setback of 1.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 9.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a second storey addition over an existing attached garage to facilitate an accessory dwelling unit with a total floor area of 88 square metres. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a minimum rear yard setback of 1.0 metre to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (Exhibit 2). That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 1, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Background In June 1977, the Committee of Adjustment approved Minor Variance Application P/CA 41/77, which recognized a dwelling on a lot that does not front a publicly maintained road, a minimum front yard setback of 1.5 metres and a minimum rear yard setback of 6.0 metres. Report P/CA 41/18 May 30, 2018 Page 2 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Rural Settlements - Oak Ridges Moraine Rural Hamlets" within the Claremont Settlement Area. Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06 — "ORM-R5" Appropriateness of the Application Minimum Rear Yard Setback Variance The intent of the minimum rear yard setback is to ensure adequate amenity space is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting properties and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage. The zoning by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 9.0 metres. The applicant has requested a minimum rear yard depth of 1.0 metre to accommodate a second storey addition to the existing dwelling in order to facilitate an accessory dwelling unit. The proposed second storey addition will be constructed over an existing attached garage that currently provides a rear yard setback of 1.0 metre. The proposed addition will maintain this existing rear yard setback. The requested setback will continue to maintain the necessary separation distance to provide appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage. The proposed development will maintain an appropriate amount of useable amenity space left uncovered by buildings on the lot. Useable amenity space will be provided in the east side yard where a side yard setback in excess of 30.0 metres will be maintained. Additionally, the dwelling will cover a maximum of 14 percent of the entire lot, leaving the remaining 86 percent of the lot uncovered for usable amenity space. The proposed rear yard setback will not have a negative impact on the privacy of abutting property to the south as the addition will be two -storeys in height and will be partially screened by existing vegetation along the south lot line. The requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Report P/CA 41/18 May 30, 2018 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Toronto & Region Conservation Authority • no objection to the application Date of report: May 22, 2018 Comments prepared by: Cody Mo Planner I CM:DW:bs Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:1Documents\DevelopmenttD-3700‘2018\PCA 41-18 D. Sherman\Report\PCA 41-18 Report.doc Attachments Exhibit 1 (1) c 0 X O p_ands 0 Ir� a) 64 Location Map File: P/CA 41/18 o61 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: D. Sherman Property Description: Plan 94, Part Lots 2, 3, 6 & 7 (1783 Track Street) Date: May. 04, 2018 Q The Corpora of the CM of Plckemy Produced(m part) under L ense from ®Queens Pnnter,Ontano tAmistry of Natural Resources, na rights reserved.;® Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; 8 Tera net Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers a®rights reserved;® Munklpal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers ad rights reserved.; SCALE: 1:5,000 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. Exhibit 2 . . skteek' To permit a minimum rear yard setback of 1.0 metre. PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 41/18 Applicant: D. Sherman Property Description: Plan 94, Part of Lots 2, 3, 6 & 7 (1783 Track Street) FULL SCALE'COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 8, 2018 L:\Planning\Co rel\Pla n ni n glApps\PCA\201 B Exhibit 3 • XX/57.1C I \Vv S'7-pY 1�pbtu �"I 4.^-- DV 4 NNh .... test elevation :50.F.oN / ;:7.--- x- ._ ,. ... _... _..... _ ._.. ,_ - A ,. 111. C- � — � { - _ _ s _. '511.2y-4,07,o/e0.mJo;rib.--.-- L )-1._J_ - — r - Ij— f—i—I LJJ �� L, LLIq j�� C ,h c W 4' ��� � � ,I,I 1.7. I��II •. . {�j�j���p� � �L� M �_ - �, - - INr I II, i -- . - - = fX 4 ./fe SYS/ n/E,Y'S/ilLfL*.iYORV'TO.wH -. - - ".=_Z 4-rT,� Y -sin . . ,. — 1 � l �, t, ,_ ILI Jr -- - ...o -.. 2�F=5'�9..�.Lro.. _._..z�':G-12-f=63!'. f 1 . - 1 enrosen ADGiiauT T;R ..Y ,�,...,.L.... .y._ ... Submitted West and East Elevations C4 File No: P/CA 41/18 60/ PICKERING Applicant: D. Sherman Property Description: Plan 94, Part of Lots 2, 3, 6 & 7 City Development (1783 Track Street) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 8, 2018 L:\Planning\Corel\Planning W pps\PCA\2018 Exhibit 4 L:\Planning\Corel\Pla n n in g\Ap ps\PCA\2D 18 I r‘". - .. i • •orS2D ---••7-; . • . f a,k•✓�.lhar://a4 l/ -Y •-740,5finlG 671;�� 1¢ Y t --_.._..__._;.1--- —$65_ _ .... .. ., �. _,-.,.- f! _ ...,K. :X,4.,kp_: ilt0:1"'",-77=-,-1:..--..,-.1.<" : -_ AV - j..< . • -._...9'=1 .... J.1;.87.PN....: •` South Elevation j . Submitted South Elevation c4 4 File No: P/CA 41/18 PICKERING Applicant: D. Sherman Property Description: Plan 94, Part of Lots 2, 3, 6 & 7 City Development (1783 Track Street) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 8, 2018 L:\Planning\Corel\Pla n n in g\Ap ps\PCA\2D 18 cdy oh DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18 & P/CA 44/18 Date: May 30, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18 & P/CA 44/18 M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. 560 & 562 Marksbury Road Applications P/CA 42/18 (560 Marksbury Road) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 14.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum north side yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent P/CA 43/18 (562 Marksbury Road) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 14.7 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum south side yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a minimum flankage yard setback of 3.5 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 4.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the flankage yard, whereas the by-law does not permit uncovered steps or platforms to project into the flankage yard P/CA 44/18 (Proposed Lot 3) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18: • to permit a minimum east side yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit a maximum building height of 9.5 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 9.0 metres Report P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18 & P/CA 44/18 May 30, 2018 Page 2 The applicant requests approval of these minor variance applications in order to facilitate the creation of one additional lot through the Region of Durham's Land Division Committee (File Numbers LD 042/18 & LD 043/18) and to obtain building permits for the construction of three single detached dwellings. Recommendation P/CA 42/18 The City Development Department considers a minimum lot frontage of 14.2 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance subject to the following condition: 1. That the applicant obtain a final clearance for Land Division Applications LD 042/18 & LD 043/18 by June 1, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. and The City Development Department considers a minimum north side yard setback of 1.2 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land,, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (Exhibit 2). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 1, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. P/CA 43/18 The City Development Department considers a minimum lot frontage of 14.7 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance subject to the following condition: 1. That the applicant obtain a final clearance for Land Division Applications LD 042/18 & LD 043/18 by June 1, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. and The City Development Department considers a minimum south side yard setback of 1.2 metres, a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent, a minimum flankage yard setback of 3.5 metres, and a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the flankage yard to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (Exhibit 4). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 1, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18 & P/CA 44/18 May 30, 2018 Page 3 P/CA 44/18 The City Development Department considers a minimum east side yard setback of 1.2 metres, a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent and a maximum building height of 9.5 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (Exhibit 6). 2. That a minimum west side yard setback of 1.8 metres is provided. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 1, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Background On May 5, 2018, the applicant submitted Minor Variance Applications P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18, and P/CA 44/18, which requested a maximum building height of 9.15 metres for 560 Marksbury Road, 9.28 metres for 562 Marksbury Road and 9.5 metres for the proposed lot fronting Surf Avenue. At the request of City staff, the applicant revised the proposals for 560 and 562 Marksbury Road in order reduce the overall building height to conform to the 9.0 metre restriction prescribed by the zoning by-law. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the West Shore Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18 — "R4" — Residential Fourth Density Zone Appropriateness of the Applications Frontage Variance (P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18) The intent of the minimum lot frontage requirement is to ensure a usable lot size that is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood. The zoning by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres. Report P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18 & P/CA 44/18 May 30, 2018 Page 4 Currently, 560 and 562 Marksbury Road have lot frontages of 13.7 metres and 15.2 metres, respectively. Through Land Division Applications LD 042/18 & LD 043/18, the applicant is proposing to convey a portion of 562 Marksbury Road to 560 Marksbury Road, which will result in a minimum lot frontage of 14.7 metres for 562 Marksbury Road and a minimum lot frontage of 14.2 metres for 560 Marksbury Road. The applicant's proposal will result in two adjacent lots fronting Marksbury Road that will be similar in size as opposed to a wider and more narrow lot that currently exist. The relocation of the mutual property line will assist in making both properties at 560 and 562 Marksbury Road a more usable size while continuing the established lot frontage pattern along Marksbury Road, which ranges between 9.0 metres and 20.0 metres. Increased Coverage Variance (P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18 & P/CA 44/18) The intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings are appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot. The by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant has requested to increase the maximum lot coverage to 37 percent for all three lots. All three detached dwellings proposed will maintain both the required front and rear yard setbacks of the zoning by-law, which is a minimum of 7.5 metres. Therefore, a generous amount of usable amenity space will be maintained on all three lots within the front and rear yards. The requested increase in coverage from 33 percent to 37 percent does not negatively impact the usable amenity space provided on all 3 lots. The front, rear, side and flankage yard setbacks proposed for the properties at 560 Marksbury Road, 562 Marksbury Road, and proposed Lot 3, will ensure that the size and location of the proposed dwellings are appropriate for their respective lot size. Accessory buildings are not proposed on any of the three lots. Side Yard Setback Variances (P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18 & P/CA 44/18) The intent of the minimum side yard setback requirement is to ensure an appropriate separation distance between structures on abutting properties is maintained for pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters, and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. The by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres on both sides, where a garage is erected as part of the detached dwelling. The applicant has requested a minimum north side yard setback of 1.2 metres for the future dwelling at 560 Marksbury Road, a minimum south side yard setback of 1.5 metres for the future dwelling at 562 Marksbury Road and a minimum east side yard setback for the future dwelling on proposed Lot 3. Report P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18 & P/CA 44/18 May 30, 2018 Page 5 The north and south side yard setback proposed to be reduced on the properties at 560 and 562 Marksbury Road, respectively, will directly abut one another. Therefore, the reduced setbacks will not result in a negative privacy or visual impact on the abutting property immediately south of the subject properties. Additionally, the reduced east side yard setback proposed for Lot 3 will directly abut the rear yards of 560 and 562 Marksbury Road. This variance is required as, the applicant is providing an increased setback of 1.8 metres on the west side in order to give a greater buffer between the new development on the subject lands and the existing residential dwelling to the west. Therefore, the proposed setbacks will not result in a negative visual or privacy impact on the abutting property immediately west. The proposed side yard setback of 1.2 metres within one side yard of each of the dwellings will ensure an appropriate separation distance is maintained between abutting structures to accommodate pedestrian access to the rear yard as well as grading, drainage and residential services. The proposed dwellings at 560 Marksbury Road and proposed Lot 3 will maintain the required side yard setback of 1.5 metres where the yards abut existing lots and will maintain the front yard and rear yard setbacks. The proposed dwelling at 562 Marksbury Avenue will maintain the required rear and front yard setbacks of the zoning by-law. Previous variance applications to reduce the minimum side yard setback requirement from 1.5 metres to 1.2 metres have been approved for properties along Marksbury Road and the immediately surrounding area. As a result, the proposed dwellings will maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. Flankage Yard Setback and Covered Porch Projection Variance (P/CA 43/18) The intent of the minimum flankage yard setback and limiting projections into the flankage yard is to ensure an adequate buffer space between buildings and street activity is provided, a sufficient landscaped area within the flankage yard is maintained, and a consistent building setback is provided to maintain the character of the surrounding area. The applicant has requested a reduction in the minimum flankage yard setback from 4.5 metres to 3.5 metres and has requested a maximum projection of 2.0 metres in order to accommodate a covered porch and associated steps for a second entrance to the property at 562 Marksbury Road. The proposed flankage yard setback represents a reduction of 1.0 metre from the requirements of the zoning by-law. The proposed reduction will be consistent with the character of the surrounding area, as other dwellings within the immediately surrounding area have been approved to have a reduced flankage yard setback of less than 3.5 metres. The covered porch and associated steps are proposed to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the proposed 3.5 metre flankage yard setback. Therefore, a 1.5 metre setback will be maintained between the flankage lot line and the edge of the porch's steps. The 1.5 metre setback proposed will provide an appropriate setback from the street activity and the covered porch and will not result in a significant loss of landscaped space within the flankage yard. The existing landscaped municipal boulevard abutting the property immediately to the north is approximately 5.0 metres in width, which will provide an additional buffer for the dwelling and covered porch from the street line and street activity. Report P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18 & P/CA 44/18 May 30, 2018 Page 6 Increased Height Variance (P/CA 44/18) The intent of the maximum building height is to minimize the visual impact of the main building on abutting properties and on the streetscape, and to ensure that the size and scale of the building is compatible with the character of the surrounding area. The by-law permits a maximum building height of 9.0 metres. The applicant has requested a maximum building height of 9.5 metres for the future dwelling proposed on Lot 3. The applicant has requested this variance in order to accommodate a two-storey dwelling that includes a useable loft space located above the second floor. The zoning by-law outlines that building height shall be calculated from the established grade to the mid -point of the roof, in the case of a peaked roof. The established grade of a property is determined by taking the average elevation of the ground where it meets the front exterior of the building. The applicant has outlined that the grade at the.front of the property is not flat but rather slopes west to east and that the grade difference between the west corner of the future dwelling and the east corner is 0.75 of a metre. The applicant has identified that as a result of the significant grade difference, the established grade is calculated to be much lower than what actually exists, which in turn results in a dwelling height that exceeds the 9.0 metre restriction. The proposed variance will provide for the proposed dwelling, without having to significantly alter the grade along the east side of the lot. The requested increase in building height represents a difference of 0.5 of a metre from the permitted maximum of the zoning by-law. The proposed increase in building height will not result in a negative visual impact on the streetscape as the proposed dwelling will appear to be a two-storey dwelling from the streetline and will maintain the required front yard setback. The applicant has proposed a west side yard setback of 1.8 metres, which exceeds the minimum required setback of 1.5 metres. Additionally, the proposed dwelling will maintain the minimum required rear yard setback. Therefore, the proposed dwelling will not result in a negative visual impact on the abutting property immediately to the west or south. The proposed building height of 9.5 metres will be compatible with the character of the surrounding area as the dwelling abutting the property immediately to the west is two -storeys in height while the dwelling located directly to the north, on the north side of Surf Avenue is 10.2 metres in height. The proposed building height is also similar to zoning performance standards applied to the newer development directly to the west, which front onto portions of Park Crescent and Cliffview Road, which range from 9.0 metres to 10.7 metres in height. Based on the foregoing, staff are of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintain the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Maurice Brenner, City Councillor, Ward 1 • no comments on the applications • oppose any variances to the 9.0 metre building height restriction Report P/CA 42/18, P/CA 43/18 & P/CA 44/18 May 30, 2018 Page 7 Date of report: May 24, 2018 Comments prepared by: Cody leo ison Planner I CM:DW:jc Deborah Wylie, M % IP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:tDocuments\DevelopmenPD-3700t20181PCA 42-18 to PCA 44-18\ReporttPCA 42-18, PCA 43-18 & PCA 44-18 Report doc Attachments Exhibit 1 111111.11.1.11 MEI Oklahoma Drive AMEN IMMO m 0 �=HIM MIMEO MEM _ IMMO MOM AIME -momnom_ immiNNIN w OM=� Sandcastle T-) 0 Erni MEW VI -a 0 0 0 Tullo Street m 0 tv 0 rn 1 0 il. ifin (1) III Mink Street vammuum �111� MI1111111111 hh ME Sunrise Avenue 1 Avenue mono in =- Subject Lands' 1 1 1P 7 Lake Ontario 64 Location Map File: P/CA 42/18 to P/CA 44/18 t,11 DICKERING City Development Department Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 (560 & 562 Marksbury Road) Date: Ma . 17, 2018 orporaVano - rtyo •I h enne •ro•uce. pnparpu •er -nae em: e . e� •n er ..ne ,aye �ahaa •eaett<ea. All rghts reserved.,® Het Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Oepadmert of Natural Re settees AI notts re send.; 2 Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers all rights reserved.; ® Mun!clpal Property Assessmert Corporation art Its suppters at netts reserved; SCALE: 1:5,000 THIS IS NOT A PIAN OF SURVEY. Exhibit 2 L:\Planning\Corel\Planning \Apps\PCA\2D1 B To permit a minimum north side yard setback of 1.2 metres 477 @ 2.6290 � 7.96 @4.27% {� - •';t4 1 U Qt > ad, N "N 186.60 7 0 1,04 EI o –. c6 r 1 R 14R 186.851 I- PROI OSED 2 STOREY 15.34 ESTABLISH GRADE • • rl `� 3 CURB TO REMP Ty Road , i i T . / 186.401 A�, o_:3 N fill co Y IN 26311-+ = +SCLT) Pdo.S 0 c. 7.51 o I-WFT. RND 87.00 _ n ci o [24'-7 1/2"] �- c 4)6 FIN. BSMNT [83.90 1R -1 z = 4R o m ru mN N6.73 —� ( 86R10R.� o K .. '�� 3641 i , CXISTII G PROPOSED CURB CUT CURB CUT TO REMAIN Mar ,r--1-.6-3;- (35.761 e. O 186.601 r _ I C� \ ri 16.04 m (05.48 90 �/ :' _ o 8.37 L 13.97r ---I 4R I .UCD Tr I 1 - J ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 10.41 - ow N [2T-5 1/21 3R+ 1 �– 186.151in 1R i ,186.03] 0 LW NI & / — PEMI n 0 0geNro 22.34 ci 2.77% n 10.42 @ 3.16% 73 C' 86 37.. � Lci c7 C G - ero BF 32.76 a m C iv 48,76n o ` 107'-5 1 ' `n [N 26311-0807CLT) — . �i 9.37 �I m c v n GI To permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent To permit a minimum lot frontage of 14.2 metres N Submitted Plan C zy 4 File No: P/CA 42/18 PICKERING Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 City Development (560 Marksbury Road) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 16, 2018 L:\Planning\Corel\Planning \Apps\PCA\2D1 B Exhibit 3 • r TOP OF RCOF - 'Tiia ;LI U.S.LOFT CEILING 1^.I SHINGLE ROOF - \ ` MID. OF ROOF • PREFII. METAL 3 FASCIA. GUTTER I § \\ \ \t VENTED SOFFIT CTYP 1 I I 5, n LOFT FLOUR TRIM I:01II-11� I AND SURROUND ARCHITECTURAL ago E ARCHITECTURAL—"- STONE VENEER . " her t�'+ N STONE VENEER '"FIN. SECOND FLOOR �,`� t.3"sr FINISH PORCH ... -`W 00 1 1 I - II 10'HIGH PRECAST - n�f--.g�'q g7� r';', f s CONC.HEAOER Wi 10 = p, - o KEYSTONE M.I..1.111. E_ IEEE MEM MEM r_ 'r FN. GROUND 67.00 1. 3 \o,\ ESTABLISHED GRADE 00.0 - 66.00 $''-G 6 7 4 0,'1-1 GARAGE DOOR— I ' 10 P.EFRENCE 7 EASEMENT FLOOR 64.10 10-_1L—L---L ] \ Submitted Elevation Cts O File No: P/CA 42/18 PICKERING Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 City Development (560 Marksbury Road) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. . DATE: May 16, 2018 L:\Planning\Corel\Pla nning\Apps\PCA\2018 Exhibit 4 . L:\Planning\Corel\PlanningVApps\PCA\2018 To permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 To permit a flankage yard setback of 3.5 metres Surf Avenue To permit a covered porch and associated steps to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the flankage yard percent N74°00`00'E(P) N71'40'50'E(Meas ,� 48,76(P&Se c '• E �,� 41,14tP Set) _ _ _ '&Set _ __ 186.351 (NJLOT GI_ADINGT 4R o AIN `� 9,;',, o -a Ni m 0 UNDIST RBED it: . ` + t� 0 ` o 86.60 (87.051 186.50 r 1 •�A ��4, (, , 188 58 PROPOSED 2 STOREY 1R)'\Q' Q �J z L a 1 Z DWELLING {� = v 7.65 \,,ao to °DNo.562 N 0 N o 2R FIN. GRNDlI 87.20 .� ..-.-.v4 3R [25'-11 al CD .-c o o to' FIN. BSMNT 84.10 87.05 86 ; ESTABLISH GR, PE 87 00 . v ;� kt. PU T \ NY 7.64 / 1 }` - 1 R 86.281 4 o �r \ 7.95 w P A n1 J r�_m -i LOT 2 3R [26'-1' 1 Q` .r di tEl .22, -� I 6.70 86.55 13.56m , '.45% r �� q�/ r o R 1J ASPHALT D• WAY J a6 I L ,. 6.02 .6 -J / 5.64 -0 i sze v)se' iro 1 r • �' ',,Gj — 86.68Viii 24.77 @ 2.629'0 r 7.96 @ 4.279'0 fah,411 , td �'-fir ^ C To permit a minimum south side yard setback of 1.2 metres - To permit a minimum lot frontage of 14.7 metres Submitted Plan city 4 File No: P/CA 43/18 PICKERING Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 City Development (562 Marksbury Road) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 16, 2018 . L:\Planning\Corel\PlanningVApps\PCA\2018 Exhibit 5 TOPOFROOF SHWGLE ROOF X U.S.IOFT CEILING 12 1 12 T.O. PLATE 20 1^ 20 1 �20A MIDDLE OF THEROD_ F � MID.OF P.00F 1PREFIN METAL 1 1 cFASCIA, GUTTER &VENTED II SOFFITMT' 1 I1\r ,\ `� LOFF FLOOR II I C \ I \ TRIM AND SURROUND �- N g - E ARCHITECTURAL I „r � n 9 STONE VENEER Y 11 10 H 1 I i 0 I ` U II I II i n 12 .1 ---LUL � ", FIN. SECOND FLOOR y1 36 - METAL ROOF ----• - STUCCO FINISH PORCH ^IF�1�I 10"HIGH PRECAST - L J — CONC. HEADER NJ KEYSTONE t — u L u 1 - t \ FIN. GROUND 8720 f 3 I t•R F�\ E ~ b " W ESTABLISHED GRADE 86.59 , REFREIICE 36.00 _L 7 - L—1• _ 71 10 m L BASEMENTFLOOR 84.10 L — 1 J 1 \ L C _ Submitted Elevation 6'4 File No: P/CA 43/18 U PICKERING Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 City Development (562 Marksbury Road) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 16, 2018 L:\Planning\Co re l\P l a n n i n gW pps\PCA\2018 Exhibit 6 Surf Avenue 5 3 co To permit a maximum lot coverage of 37 percent %OO'ZV� OZ'$ L - N cV To permit a minimum east side yard setback of 1.2 metres % l9'£ g SL'OZ Zo dl co L9'9 a w OS'L .&VM3A1 01lVHdSV %00'£ i wl0'bl. COCO CV 6) CD < o z U-J ) - o2f o w �Tzz l- w w 0 CO CO [,Z- Sg' IA7] COCO 00. CO CO CO CO Zl J- 0 ti0'9 • z 0 J w w (n 0 CT BUSH 3,05 CD&Meas) 15,24(D&Meas) 1B,29CP&Set_)) 960'Z ZS(�J L e— D3— 7781-70 t7t7 N18'23'10"W(Meas) N16'00'00"W(P) \\\\\\\\\\"\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\� 8,29CP&Set) L SHED w ID 4 7,i 1 To permit a maximum building height of 9.5 metres City4 PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 44/18 Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 (560 & 562 Marksbury Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 16, 2018 L:\Planning\Corel\PlanningW pps\PCA\2016 Exhibit 7 TOP OF ROOF _ SHINGLE ROOF .^ US.LOFT[SUNG 2 \ to T.O. PLATE MBI.OFROOF b b PREFIN. METAL FASCIA, GUTTER& - VENTED SOFFn GTE) _ s b FDL LOFT FLOOR \ I I rrI n TPoNI AND SURROUND � � t � - - E Y_ A (i N ARCHITECTURAL STONE VENEER I I 1 I1 �� _ FIN. SEOONO FLOOR • \\\ ry g STUCCO FINISH PORCH 1 \ ^.yl s 10" HIGH PRECAST Y % �` METAL ROOF \\\I CONC. NEADERYH �, w_� KEYSTONE I❑ � - I}I{II I 1 I § I 1 -"HIV Tr '� ®® FIR GROUND FLOOR 6692 f f—r ^>2. ,, j`ESTABLISH GRADE !7.118 \ — J IL RFFRENCE �AR�. 5 F II r 1 II I II II BASEMENT FLOOR a.7) I I Submitted Elevation • (4 4 File No: P/CA 44/18 PICKERING Applicant: M. Malik-Qasim & 10221058 Canada Ltd. Property Description: Part Lot 21, 22, Plan 270 City Development (560 & 562 Marksbury Road) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 16, 2018 L:\Planning\Corel\Plan n ing\Apps\PCA\2018 C4 of DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: P/CA 45/18 & P/CA 46/18 Date: May 30, 2018 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 45/18 & P/CA 46/18 J. Greig 5061 William Street Applications P/CA 45/18 (Proposed Retained Lot) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06 to permit a minimum lot area of 0.19 hectares, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 0.3 hectares. P/CA 46/18 (Proposed Severed Lot) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06 to permit a minimum lot area of 0A9 hectares, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 0.3 hectares. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to facilitate the creation of one additional lot for a detached dwelling through the Region of Durham's Land Division Committee. Recommendation (P/CA 45/18 & P/CA 46/18) The City Development Department recommends that Minor Variance Applications P/CA 45/18 and P/CA 46/18 be Tabled until the Region of Durham Health Department has the opportunity to review the proposed development and provide comments regarding compliance with the Lot Sizing Policy of the Region of Durham. Comment The subject property is supported by a private sewage system and the proposed severed and retained parcels are proposed to be supported by private services. As a result, the proposed lots are required to maintain the requirements of the Region of Durham Drilled Well and Lot Sizing Policies as Applied to Consents (Severances) and Draft Plans of Subdivision. The subject applications have not yet been reviewed by the Region of Durham Health Department to determine compliance with the Lot Sizing Policy of the Region of Durham. Report P/CA 45/18 & P/CA 46/18 May 30, 2018 Page 2 City staff will further assess the appropriateness of the applicant's proposal following the receipt of the Regional Health Department comments on the proposed minor variance applications and their compliance with the Lot Sizing Policy of the Region of Durham. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Region of Durham Health Department • no comments received at the time of writing Residents of 5088 Brock Road • oppose the applications as they do not meet the four tests for a minor variance application • it is unclear if the application maintains the integrity and purpose of the official plan as the property is part of a past plan of subdivision, that at the time represented infill development • the proposal does not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law • the proposal is not desirable in nature for the neighborhood or is appropriate as severing this parcel of land into a much smaller lot size in this neighborhood would alter the characteristics of the existing subdivision and create a precedent for future lots much smaller in nature than originally perceived • the proposal is not minor in nature as the relief sought is close to a 50 percent reduction in required lot area • close to a 50 percent reduction in lot size is major • would alter the integrity of the general area to the detriment of the current landholders surrounding the proposed development Date of report: May 24, 2018 Comments prepared by: Cody MQrriso Planner I CM:DW:Id Deborah Wyle, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:tDocumentstDevelopment0D-3700'.2018WCA 45-18 & PCA 46-18\Reporl'PCA 45-18 & PCA 46-18 Reportdoc Attachments Exhibit 1 Subject Lands Central Street 1191 D U. U (6 N N C44 Location Map File: P/CA 45/18 & P/CA 46/18 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: J. Greig Property Description: Lot 6, Plan 40M-1482 (5061 William Street) Date: May. 07, 2018 .D The Corporation of the City of Pickering Pmducedtin part) under license from: Na Queers Printer, Catena lAnstry ofttatval Resources. rights reserved.A Her Maksy Departmenth the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Mehra] Resources. At tights reserved ATeranetEnters rises Int. and Its suppliers all rights reserved,;® Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its scpp(ers at ngMs reserved.; SCALE. 1:5,000All THIS IS tiOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. Exhibit 2 P/CA 46/18: To permit a minimum lot area of 0.14 ; a hectare's yo41As Ok, cGG Rr EXISTING RESIDENTIAL P/CA 45/18: To permit a minimum lot area of 0.19 �.-P- hectares EXISTING RESIDENTIAL WILLIAM STREET 71 0315E .. ^" • \ • ((s.\•• �y lv .3' '•\ i/ EXISTING -6 ./ '' 4` SEPTIC c1- 5 TILE BED N r° LOT 6 • • • • • APPROXIMATE LOCATION for SEPTIC SYSTEM and TILE BED N7I4505E R131 ,1 — 33.15 74504. • 11'.02 O CONCEPTUAL DWEWNG FOOTPR87T 205.45m. (2857.2801 2.00 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL Ci�/ PICKERING City Development Department Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 45/18 & P/CA 46/18 Applicant: J. Greig Property Description: Lot 6, Plan 40M-1482 (5061 William Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 8, 2018 L:\Planning\Corel\Plan n i ng\Apps\PCA\2018