Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 29, 2017 pickering.ca Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 4 Date: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Lesley Dunne T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 Email ldunne@pickering.ca Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, March 29, 2017 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from March 8, 2017 1-8 (III) Reports 1. (Deferred at the March 8, 2017 meeting) P/CA 02/17 P. & L. Gonsalves 970 Rambleberry Avenue 9-13 2. P/CA 13/17 A. & J. Caiata 889 Pike Court 14-18 3. P/CA 19/17 V. & V. Joshi 1665 Avonmore Square 19-23 4. P/CA 20/17 B. Knight 826 Fairview Avenue 24-30 5. P/CA 21/17 1703198 Ontario Inc. 1980 Rosefield Road 31-35 6. P/CA 22/17 & P/CA 23/17 G. Skidmore 1804 & 1806 Woodview Avenue 36-40 (IV) Other Business 1. Appointment of Assistant Secretary-Treasurer (V) Adjournment -~b~­ PJCKERJNG Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland -Vice-Chair David Johnson '"'" Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present Committee of Adjustment 1 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 8, 2017 7:05pm Main Committee Room Nilesh Surti, Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Lesley Dunl)e, Assistanl Secretary-Treasurer Absent Ross Pym, Secretary-Treasurer (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the agenda for the Wednesday, March 8, 2017 meeting be adopted. (II) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland Carried Unanimously That the minutes of the 2nd meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, February 15, 2017 be adopted. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 8 2 (Ill) Reports 1. PICA 02117 P. & L. Gonsalves 970 Rambleberry Avenue Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 8, 2017 7:05pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1998185 to recognize an existing second-storey uncovered balcony and associated steps not exceeding 2.5 metres in height above grade to project 4.5 metres into the required rear yard and to permit a platform (deck) not exceeding 0.8 of a metre in height above grade to project a maximum ·of 6.1 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law permits, uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to permit a second-storey uncovered balcony in the rear yard, and obtain a building permit for a deck in the rear yard. The Manager, Development Review & Urban Design outlined that at the February 15, 2017 meeting the Committee Approved the variance to recognize the second-storey uncovered balcony and associated steps not exceeding 2.5 metres in height projecting a maximum -of 4.5 metres into the required rear yard. The Manager, Development Review & Urban Design also stated that a motion to Approve the platform (deck) not exceeding 0.8 of a metre in height above grade projecting a maximum of 6.1 metres into the required rear yard, resulted in a in a tie _ vote and the motion was defeated. He also stated the reason this application is before the Committee is because there was no clear decision made by the Committee on this variance. Peter Gonsalves, applicant, was present to represent the applic;ation. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Eric Newton Second~d by Sean Wiley That application PICA 02/17 by P. & L. Gonsalves, be Deferred to the next Committee of Adjustment meeting to allow a Committee Member to vi~it the subject property. Carried Unanimously Page 2 of 8 2. (Deferred at the February 15, 2017 meeting) PICA 11117 B. Gairey 538 West Shore Boulevard Committee of Adjustment 3 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 8, 2017 7:05pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to recognize an existing lot frontage of 12.1 metres; whereas the by~law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling • to permit a minimum front yard depth of 5.8 metres; whereas the by-law requires a . minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a detached dwelling with a porte cochere attached garage. The Manager, Development Review & Urban Design outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were also received from residents at 546 West Shore Boulevard stating the. requested variance to reduce the minimum front yard depth of 5.8 metres will impact their view of the water front. Peter Jaruczik, agent, was present to represent the application. Emelie Lamothe of 540 West Shore Boulevard was presentto obtain additional information on the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, the Manager, Development Review & Urban Design explained that the applicant submitted a revised plan increasing the front yard setback from 5.8 metres to 9.3 metres and increasing the north side yard width from 1.2 metres to 1.5 metres to address concerns from an area resident. As a resuit of these changes, the requested variances to reduce the minimum front yard depth and minimum north yard width are no longer required. Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 11/17 by B. Gairey, be Approved on the grounds that the existing lot frontage of 12.1 metres, and a minimum south side yard width of 1.2 metres, · where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land .and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: Page 3 of 8 ~---~~--------------------------------------------- 4 -04;bf- P1CKER1NG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 8, 2017 7:05pm Main Committee Room 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans, dated March 1, 2017. 2. That t~e applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 8, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. PICA 14/17 C. & J. Spicer 1488 Old Forest Road Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to permit a minimum flankage yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum .flankage yard setback of 4.5 metres. . The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for a new two-storey detached dwelling. The Manager, Development Review & Urban Design outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending the application be tabled. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department stating the City does not support the use of a reverse grade driveway due to concern with flooding from the roadway during a major storm event and suggests the applicant consider a driveway entrance from High bush Trail and a garage entrance from the rear of the dwelling. Written comments were also received from residents at 1476 Highbush Trail in support of the application and stated the minor setback will not have any adverse effect on the surrounding neighbourhood. David Brown, agent, was present to represent the application. Marianne Yazbeck of 1490 Old Forest Road was present in objection to the application. David Brown stated a Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan is being prepared to submit to the City for their review. Marianne Yazbeck expressed a concern with the fence line and the impact on her property. Page 4 of 8 Moved by Eric Newton Seconded byTom Copeland Committee of Adjustment 5 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 8, 2017 7:05pm Main Committee Room That application PICA 14117 by C. & J. Spicer, be Tabled until a Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan prepared by a qualified Arborist or Environmental Consultant is submitted to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering. 4. PICA 15117 & PICA 16117 Glen Rouge Homes (Brock) Inc. 2115 & 2117 Brock Road PICA 15117 (2115 Brock Road) Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7384114: • to permit a minimum lot depth of 22.7 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot depth of 23.0 metres • to permit a minimum front yard depth of 1.8 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 3.0 metres PICA 16117 (2117 Brock Road) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7384114, to permit a minimum lot depth of 20.2 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot depth of 23.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain building permits for two units within a seven unit townhouse block. The Manager, Development Review & Urban Design outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Brian Moss, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objectron to the application. Brian Moss agreed with the staff recommendations and in response to a question from a Committee Member, he stated that the daylight triangle is required. Page 5 of 8 Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Denise Rundle Committee of Adjustment · Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 8, 2017 · 7:05pm Main Committee Room · That application PICA 15117 by Gleri Rouge Homes (Brock) Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed townhouse unit, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed· construction by March 8, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. That application PICA 16117 by Glen Rouge Homes (Brock) Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 8, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. 5. PICA 17117 J. Uher & M. Boodhoo 5250 Sideline 4 Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106: • to permit an accessory building (detached garage) to be erected in the front yard; whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building to be erected in the rear yard • to permit an accessory building (detached garage) having a maximum area of 54 square metres; whereas the by-law requires that no accessory building shall. exceed 10 square metres in area The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a detached garage in the front yard. · · The Manager, Development Review & Urban Design outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineerin!g Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Page 6 of 8 -01bf- P1CKER1NG Committee of Adjustment 7 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 8, 2017 7:05pm Main Committee Room Michelle Boodhoo, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Michelle Boodhoo stated·they have been working closely·with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to obtain the required approvals. In response to a question for a Committee Member, Michelle Boodhoo stated that no trees are being removed. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton Given the size, shape and grading of the subject lot, together with the greater distance between the proposed garage and the front lot line, that application PICA 17/17 by J. Uher & M. Boodhoo, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1 . That these variances apply only to the proposed detached garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction py · March 8, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. 6. P/CA18/17 J. Toner & K. Manley 968 Timmins Gardens Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended, to permit an uncovered porch to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard; whereas, the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in ·height above grade may project a maxi"mum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct an uncovered porch in the front yard. The Manager, Development Review & Urban Design outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Jason Toner, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Page 7 of 8 8 CiJ;of-Commiittee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 8, 2017 7:05pm Main Committee Room PJCKERJNG Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Tom Copeland ·-That application PICA 18/17 by J. Toner & K. Manley, be Approved on the grounds that the uncovered porch projecting a maximum of 1.5 metre into the required front yard, is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-:-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed uncovered porch, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. · 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 8 ,2018, or this decision shall become null and void. · Carried Unanimously (IV) Adjournment Date Chair Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Sean Wiley That the 3rd meeting of the 2017 Committee of Adjustment bB adjourned at 7:35 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, ~arch 29, 2017. Carried Unanimously Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Page 8 of 8 -04'bf- P1CKER1NG From: Melissa MC:~rkham, MCIP, HPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 02117 Date: January 25, 2017 Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Application Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 02117 P. & L. Gonsalves 970 Rambleberry Avenue The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1998/85 to recognize an existing second:..storey uncovered balcony and associated steps not exceeding 2.5 metres in height above grade to project 4.5 metres irito the required rear yard and to permit a platform (deck) not exceeding 0.8 of a metre in height of above grade to project a maximum of 6.1 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law permits, uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the. required rear yard. · The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to permit a second-storey uncovered balcony in the rear yard, and obtain a building permit for a deck in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a second-storey uncovered balcony and associated steps not exceeding 2.5 metres in height projecting a maximum of 4.5 metres into the required rear yard to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the ·official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: · 1. That this apply only to the existing second-storey balcony and associated steps, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. and The .• City Development Department considers a platform (deck) not exceeding 0.8 of a metre in height of above grade projecting a maximum of 6.1 metres into the required rear yard, tb be a major variance, that is not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. 9 1 CReport PICA 02/17 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law January 25, 2017 Page 2 Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas" within the Liverpool Neighbourhood ·Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1998/85 -"S2" -Single Residential Appropriateness of the Application · Uncovered Balcony and Associated Steps Projection into the Required Rear Yard Variance • the intent of this provision is to ensure an adequate outdoor private amenity area is provided. within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks. are provided to protect the privacy of abutting property owners and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage • the by-law permits uncovered platforms and steps not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the require!d rear yard • the applicant is requesting an uncovered platform (balcony) and associated steps not exceeding 2.5 metres in height above grade to project a maximum ofA.5 metres into the required rear yard • the uncovered balcony and associated steps were constructed approximately 20 years ago • the existing balcony projects 3.5 metres into the required rear yard, while the stairs project an additional 1.0 metre, for a total projection of 4.5 metres • the existing balcony maintains the required south and north side yard setback requirements and is setback 3.1 metres from the rear lot line • the existing balcony offers additional outdoor amenity area for the dwelling and will continue to allow an adequate amount of soft landscaped space to be provide at grade in the rear yard . • staff are of the opinion that the existing uncovered balcony and associated steps are sufficiently setback from all property lines and do not negatively impact abutting property owners • the requested variance is minor in nature and maintains the intent of the Official Plan ·and Zoning By-law and desirable for the appropriate development of the land Deck Projecting into the Required Rear Yard Variance • the intent of this provision is to ensure an adequate outdoor private amenity area is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provide~d to protect the privacy of abutting property owners and allow appropriate access for ma!intenance, lot grading and drainage • the by-law permits uncovered platforms and steps not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard • the applicant is requesting an uncovered platform (deck) not exceeding 0.8 metres in height above grade to project 6.1 metres into the required rear yard ------- Report PICA 02/17 • the proposed uncovered· deck is currently .under construction January 25, 2017 Page 3 • an accessory building (shed) has been constructed on top of the southern portion of the deck • the proposed deck is located approximately 1.5 metres from the rear lot line • the subject property is located substantially higher in grade than the properties to the west • due to the significant grade differential at the rear of the property, staff are of the opinion that the proposed deck will result in a substantial visual and privacy impact on the abutting property owners to the west • the requested variance is not minor in nature, not desirable and appropriate for the development of the land and does not meet the general intent of Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department • no comments. on the application Date of report: January 19, 2017 ·~odyMo~ ?lan_ner I _.> --- Melissa.Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review CM:MM:Id J:\Documents\Develapment\D-3700\2017\PCA 02-17\Report\PCA 02-17 Report.docx Attachments 11 1-------4!---'----------lgf-----1 1-1----------le::: T--------f~ 1------,---,----/ 't:-----------1 > 1-----1 r--'\--------1 ~ 1---r--L----r-..v H:--------1 ft -~o~­ PJCKERJNG City Development Department <( f----f-----1 The Corporntian of the City of Pidcertng uced (In part) under lc:ense from: Cl Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resour:;es. tights resef'tled.:C Her Majesty the Queen In Right of canada, Deparbnent of Natural Resources. AD rights reserved.; Ten~ net Enterorises Inc. and Its Dllers aw riah!s reserved.: C Munlcloal PrcDe Assessment Co rallon and Its . L:\PLANNING\ARCVIEV\1\Map files\location Maps\2017\CofA PN-12 -------------------------------------------------------___} . !\' 17.7 m 't~--~------------------------~\ 20.0 m .. ·. J . , I J J I ,___, ----~---~ '' 4.0 m "' 1 E . 3.5 m I ~' ,_ _______ 1\ ~----------------~ \ to permit a platform( deck), not exceeding 0.8 of a metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 6.1 metres into the required rear yard J ol I 18 J..- ·l RAMBLEBERRY AVE Submitted Plan File No:·· P/CA 02/17 --~D~-­ PlCKERlNG Applicant: P. & L Gonsalves City Development ... Property Description: Lot 118, Plan 40M1467 Department . : (970 Rambleberry Avenue) to recognize an existing second storey balcony and associated steps not exceeding 2.5 metres in height to project 4.5 metres into the required rear yard ·. :F.ULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. I DATE: Jan. 05, 2017 .. L:\PLANNINGICOREL\PLANNING\APPS\PCA\2017 13 14 --at:; ~f-- PJCKERJ'NG From: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Report to CommitteE~ of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 13117 Date: March 29, 2017 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Subject: Application Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 13117 A. & J. Caiata 889 Pike Court The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a minimum south side yard width of 1.2 metres to an existing detached dwelling on a proposed retained lot fronting onto Pike Court; whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain zoning compliance for an existing detached dwelling on the retained lands created through Land Division Application (LD 19117). Recommendations. The City Development Department considers the minimum south side yard width of 1.2 metres to an existing detached dwelling to be minor in nature, desirable fdr the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose ofthe Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the existing detached dwelling on the retained lot, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans and Land Division Application LD 19117. 2. That the applicant finalizes Land Division Application LD 19117 by February 23, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. Background On June 12, 2013, the City of Pickering Committee of Adjustment approved Minor Variance Application PICA 31113 to reduce the minimum north side yard width from 1.5 metres to 1.2 metres to facilitate the construction of a detached dwelling (bun!Jalow with associated loft). On February 13, 2017, the Region of Durham Land Division Committee conditionally approved Land Division Application LD 19117 to sever the subject lands to create new lots fronting Pike Court and another new lot fronting the future southerly extension of Pike Court. Report PICA 13/17 March 29, 2017 15 Page2 To achieve zoning compliance for the existing detached dwelling, the applicant is requesting to reduce the south side yard width in order to finalize the severance of the subject lands. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential-Low Density Area" within the Rosebank Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511, as amended -"R4"-Fourth Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application South Side Yard Width Variance • the intent of a minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties, provide for sufficient access to rear yard, and accommodate grading, drainage, and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the Zoning By-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres on one side and 2.4 metres on the other side, however where a garage is erected as part of the dwelling, a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres is required on both sides • the proposed 1.2 metre south side yard width provides an adequate separation distance between the dwelling and the property line to the south to accommodate pedestrian access, grading, drainage, and residential utility services • the requested variance to reduce the minimum south side yard width is consistent with previous Committee of Adjustment approvals within the surrounding neighbourhood along Pike Court and Oakwood Drive • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of Report: March 23, 2017 Comments Prepared By: ~~ Lalita Paray, M&'P, RPP Planner I LP:NS:Ic J:\Documents\Developrnent\D-3700\2017'PCA 13-17\Report\PCA 13-17 Report.docx Attachments • no objection to the application \j Nilesh rti, M IP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design -ats~I­ PJCKERJNG City Development Department PN-12 ----------------" ..... ,... .. --. . ; .. ' ··t: . :~:· : .•. ±:_! _7.6 ,. I. ~v . ~ . . .. .. . , ' : . . :· ~ .. I .. ~ . !· 1'\,J •. ... -('\! : I -.. '. -·.GARAGE .. . . : 22.5 . c· r:-__ .J -~ I ! ... ' -7'"" ,_ ' .. I ~-.I 26309 -~ I ~ .. ! ~rPORC~ BR f CK HOUS£ .._ : 7.5 .., . • . ~i::E ·l ... I 1'\ji • C!:l:) . • • . I .J: . 22.5 ·' . • ,. ~="§' . .. . ' lt'l: ~ 1:.< ' . ~3 1~ • : c:::'i--,. . : II")• · ·· ' ,. nrF.9 : -. ~ ('\! _IUL. ..1 . .. -. , ., .. ·I ~ L_ ., • • 1 I ::J. r'l • ... .__.. .. .. . ··'···· . -.. ~6.4. . '.!=·!:i .. -. ·--~ . -I To permit a minimum south side yard width of 1.2 metres I '· 1' N Submitted Plan ~,, FILE No: P/CA 13/17 PlCKERlNG APPLICANT: A. .& J. Caiata PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part Lot 113, 114 Plan 350, RP 40R27556 Part 5 and RP 40R27924 Part 1 City Development {889 Pike Court) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING I DATE: Mar. 14,2017 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLANNING\APPS\PCA\2017 -· -Ofuoi-·-PlCKERlNG City Development Department ··....:---a--.:. -, ~-------------------i2.&"~----------------~~ · FRONT(WEST) ELEVATION i 1. E ~ SIDE (SOUTH) ELEVATION Submitted Plan FILE No:-P/CA 13/17 APPLICANT: A. & J. Caiata i' i i ~· '""'-"'u;~~-··--! iJ ___J_ lt. ... ~.J ,-: : ~=---==~u~ ...__.=rr,,, ' -:5 "41 1 · • r~~r----\,;,o:::r-===----... -::.-:il . REAR(EAST) ELEVATION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part Lot 113, 114 Plan 350, RP 40R27556 Part 5 and RP 40R27924 Part 1 (889 Pike Court) I I FULL scALE coPIES oF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE ciTY oF PICKERING 1 DATE: Mar. 13, 2017 II 00 II I CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. • .--L:IPLANNINGICOREL\PLANNING\APPS\PCA\2017 From: Subject: Application Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP 19 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 19117 Date: March 29, 2017 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 19117 V. & V. Joshi 1665 Avonmore Square The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5891102 and By-law 5955102, to permit an accessory dwelling unit within q single attached dwelling; whereas the by-law does not permit accessory units in single attached dwellings. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit for an accessory dwelling unit in the single attached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the construction of an acce~sory dwelling unit by March 29, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. Background The Notice of Public Hearing r11ailed on March 15, 2017 included a variance to permit a total of two parking spaces on the property where the accessory dwelling unit is located; whereas the by-law requires a total of three parking spaces to be provided on the property where the accessory dwelling unit is located . . Staff has determined through the review of this application that the applicant is able to meet · the required total number of parking spaces for an accessory dwelling unit as required by Zoning By-law 3036, as amended. The existing driveway has a width of approximately 5.2 metres, which is of sufficient width to park two vehicles side by side. With the two parking spaces available on the driveway and one space provided within the garage, a total of three parking spaces can be accommodated on the prope.rty. 20 Report PICA 19/17 March 29, 2017 Page2 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Mixed Use Areas -City Centre" Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5891/01 and By-law 5955/02-"SA-8" Appropriateness of the Application Accessory Dwelling Unit within a Single Attached Dwelling Variance • the intent of limiting accessory dwelling units to single dweHing!S and semi-detached dwellings is to ensure adequate living space can be provided within the dwelling to accommodate two dwelling units, a sufficient number of parking spaces can be provided on the property, and the additional unit will not adversely impact the streetscape or surrounding neighbourhood • the zoning by-law permits accessory dwelling units to be locate~d within detached dwellings and semi-detached dwellings • the applicant is requesting a variance to permit an accessory dwelling unit within a single attached dwelling (townhouse unit) • the dwelling is located on a corner unit abutting Avonmore Square to the east and south, and abutting Valley Farm Road to the west • . the dwelling has three entrances located on the east, south, and west sides of the dwelling; with the accessory dwelling unit being accessed from the entrance to the west, and the main dwelling unit being accessed from the south and east • as a result of being located on a corner unit, the dwelling is wider and has a larger gross floor area than most single attached dwellings in the neighbourhood • the accessory dwelling unit will have a floor area of approximately 42 square metres, which is less. than the maximum gross floor area required in the zoning by-law • the accessory dwelling unit is subordinate to-the main dwelling1 unit and there will be no adverse impact on the streetscape or existing street trees within the boulevard • the property functions as a residential property which is in character with the surrounding neighbourhood . • the applicant has demonstrated that the driveway is wide enough to accommodate one additional vehicle; providing a total of three parking spaces on the property · • staff are of the opinion th~t the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the lands, and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application -----------------------------------------, Report PICA 19/17 Date of Report: March 23, 2017 Comments Prepared By: ~~ Rory McNeil Planner I RM:NS:Ic J:\Documents\Deve\opment\D-3700\2017\PCA 19-11\Report\PCA 19-17 Report.docx Attachments Nilesh S rti, M IP, RPP March 29, 2017 21 Page 3 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design -~fl-. PICKERING City Development Department · Location Ma File: PICA 19/17 PN-9 "C ns 0 a: E 1.. ca LL >. Cl) -~. to permit an accessory. dwelling unit within a single attached dwelling 25.2 (PART 41 25.5 (PART 31 (PART 21 (PART lj' ! I IP"ORcHf-· ,__-~r ~' __ , . ~ Avonmore Sqaure --Oit;D/-- Pl(KERJNG Submitted Plan File No: P/CA 19/17 Applicant: V. & V. Joshi 7.2 (l) ... ::::s . ca . C" U) e 0 E r::: 0 ~ to permit a total of two(2) parking spaces on the property where the accessory dwelling unit is located City Development Department Property Description: Part Block 24 RP 21537, Plan 40M-2089 (1665 Avonmore Square) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. L:IPLANNINGICOREL\PLANNING\APPSIPCA\2017 DATE: Mar. 10,2017 24 __ 04~f-- P1CKER1NG From: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 20117 Date: March 29, 2017 Manage, Development Review & Urban Design Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 20117 B. Knight . . 826 Fairview Avenue Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to recognize an existing minimum front yt:ud depth of 5.6 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres • to permit a minimum east side yard width of 0.8 of a metre; whereas, the by-law requires· a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres • to recognize an existing accessory structure (Shed A) setback 0.3 of a metre from the west lot line, and to recognize an existing accessory structure (Shed B) setback 0.5 of a metre from the north lot line; whereas the by-law requires accessory structures, greater than 1.8 metres in height to be setback a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a second storey addition, a carport, and to recognize two existing accessory structures (sheds) in the side and rear yards. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the existing minimum front yard depth of 5.6 metres, and a minimum east side yard width of 0.8 of a metre to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keepin~~ with the general intent and purpose ofthe Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefor~e recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed second storey addition and carport to the existing detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the! applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 29, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void. and Report PICA 20/17 March 29, 2017 25 Page2 The City Development Department considers an existing accessory structure (Shed A) with a setback 0.3 of a metre from the south lot line, and an existing accessory structure (Shed B) with setback 0.5 of a metre from north lot line, to be major variances, that are not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed· variances. or If the applicant were to request that the application be amended to permit accessory structures with a maximum height of 1.8 metres to be setback 0.6 of a metre to all lot lines the following recommendation would apply: The City Development Department considers an accessory structure with a maximum height of 1.8 metres to be setback 0.6 of a metre from all lot line, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following condition: ·1. That the applicant either relocate the existing sheds (sheds A and B) to 0.6· of a metre from any lot line, or remove the sheds by June 29, 2017, or this d~cision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Area" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511, as amended-"R4"-Fourth Density Residential Zone. Appropriateness of the Application Minrmum Front Yard Depth into the Front Yard Variance • the intent of a minimum front yard depth is to ensure that an adequate landscaped area, parking area and separation distance is provided between the dwelling and the front lot line · • the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres • the applicant has requested a variance to recognize an existing minimum front yard depth of 5.6 metres to a covered vestibule and porch • the existing dwelling, covered vestibule and porch was constructed in 1934 prior to the enactment of Zoning By-law 2511 on -January 3, 1963 • the requested variance will bring the existing legal non-complying building into compliance with the Zoning By-law • the reduced front yard depth is generally ·in keeping with the established front yard setbacks and streetscape along Fairview Avenue 2 6 Report PICA 20/17 March 29, 2017 • an adequate landscaped area and parking area will be maintained on .the subject property Page3 • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the general intent of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan Side Yard Width Variance • · the intent of a side yard width is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties in order to maintain pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility metres • the Zoning By-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres on one side and 2.4 metres on the other side, however where a garage or carport is erected as part of the dwelling, a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres is requined on both sides • as noted above, the existing single storey dwelling was constructed in 1934 and is currently setback 0.8 of a metre from the east lot line • the side yard width of 0.8 of a metre on the ground floor is an e!xisting condition, which maintains an adequate separation distanc;e between the dwelling and the north lot line • the applicant intends to construct a second storey addition on top of the existing dwelling, with the proposed second floor having a side yard width of 0.8 of a metre • the prQposed side yard width of 0.8 of a metre to the second floor is generally in keeping with similar zoning performance standards applied to newer developments in the general area the requested variance is minor in nature, is desirable for the appropriate development of the property and maintains the. purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Reduction of the Minimum Setback Requirement for Accessory Structures • the intent of the minimum 1.0 metre setback requirement for accessory structures, greater than 1.8 metres in height, is to ensure that adequate space is available for maintenance, that the eaves/overhangs do not encroach on adjacent properties, that roof drainage stays on the subject property, and that the visual impaGt on adjacent properties is minimized • the owner is requesting to permit two existing accessory structures with a hei,ght of 1.8 metres to remain within the side and rearyards · • Shed A was erected in 2008 with a partial roof for added storage and is setback 0.5 of a metre from the south lot line • Shed B was erected in the 1950's by the previous _homeowner and is 0.3 of a 111etre from the north east lot line • the current location of the existing sheds does not appear to provide adequat'e space for maintenance, and roof drainage to stay on the subjectproperty • staff is of the opinion that a minimum setback of 0.6 of a metre from all property lines would ensure adequate space is available for maintenance, drainage, and that eaves/overhangs would not encroach on adjacent properties • staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are not minor in nature; do not meet the intent of the Zoning By-l?tw, and .are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land Report PICA 20/17 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Building Services Date of report: March 23, 2017. Comments prepared by: d~ Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP Planner I LP:NS:so J:\Documents\Development\0-3700\2017\PCA 20-17\Report\PCA 20-17.docx Attachments · March 29, 2017 27 • no objection to the apprication • no objection to the application r; ) Nilesh urti, MCIP, RPP Page 4 · Manager, Development Review & Urban Design SUBJECT PROPERTY -~D~­ PJCKERJNG City Development Department Plan 814 Date: Mar. 14, 2017 P!'\1-RU To recognize an existing accessory structure (Shed B) setback 0.5 metres from the north lot line To permit a minimum north side yard width of 0.8 metres --.·-----c .mo··L -· ~ ·r----~--------: ---~_;· . .~ ·-~ I ·~-1 I ~: tul "'I I ~ To recognize an existing accessory structure (Shed A) setback 0.3 metres from the s9uth lot line -~o/­PJCKERJNG Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 20/17 ·APPLICANT: B. Knight ('!) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Plan 814 City Development Department (826 Fairview Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLANNING\APPS\PCA\2017 ~A------·.-To permit a minimum front setback of 5.6 metres w ~ 5: w ~ ~ 1'· IV N DATE: Mar. 14,2017 co --~~":';~ .r;:,-,-~mlf~-~~:;''l'~~t~ ~ =1-. . .... '• '. . '· .11"1-.-.-.-· ..... ·•=--=;Tt~;T'!.:llr.mfl_ b !_'ij:J_J 1 ';· '-2--;~ ;I;=:!,;;::! r-o i'=IJ!:'=d :.:..r-, ~ :-:::-5-!-c~!:'~=\~\;:t--~-:~>EF.lLf -'-"7.': ~ s.am,~ ---. h==~1:1 ~~7t(~f-1:1,Sttr· t:~ _1,..J.I,"~ .. Z P.h . .-·-· 7. -' "'":. . .... ' =:c .. I'-'-~ ~:llt:::;JI:~:fJit{P;L:::_:::=-~~tt::~==~tii~-~ -~ -Cdt; Df-,--. -PICKERING City Development Department Submitted· Elevations FILE No: P/CA 20/17 APPLICANT: B. Knight PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Plan 814 (826 Fairview Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. L:\PLANNING\CORELIPLANNING\APPS\PCA\2017 0 DATE: Mar. 14,2017 ----------~---- From: Subject: Application Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP 31 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 21117 Date: March 29, 2017 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 21117 1703198 Ontario Inc. 1980 Rosefield Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 307175: • to permit a minimum two-way traffic aisle width of 6.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum traffic aisle width of 6.5 metres • to permit a parking area abutting a road allowance to be setback a minimum of 0.5 of a metre, whereas the by-law requires a parking area abutting a road allowance to be · setback a minimum of 3.0 metres The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain site plan approval for the expansion of an existing parking area. · · Recommendations The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: · 1. That the variances apply only to the proposed parking area, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed construction by March 29, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas" within the Liverpool Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 307175-"C1"-Local Commercial Zone 32 Report PICA 21/17 Appropriateness of the Application Traffic Aisle Width Setback Variance March 29, 2017 Page 2 • the intent of the minimum traffic aisle width requirement is to ensure that vehicles can gain minimal two-way access to parking areas located on-site in an efficient and safe manner, and to allow vehicles to ingress and egress a site safely without adversely impacting traffic operations • the by-law requires a minimum two-way traffic aisle width of 6.!5 metres • the applicant has requested a minimum two-way traffic aisle width of 6.0 metres for a proposed traffic aisle that will be oriented in an east-west direction, along the northern portion of the subject site • the proposed traffic aisle will provide access to ten additional parking spaces, proposed generally between the existing building and Finch Avenue • the reduced traffic aisle width will only apply to the new traffic aisle • the existing traffic aisle, which is oriented in a north-south direction on the east side of the subject site, will continue to meetthe minimum required aisle width of 6.5 metres • the proposed traffic aisle width will provide an adequate amount of space for vehicles to access the new parking area in an efficient and safe manner Parking Area Setback Variance • the intent of the minimum setback requirement for parking areas abutting a road allowance is to provide for a landscaped area in order to minimize the views of the parking area from the street • the proposed parking area abuts Finch Avenue • the applicant has requested to reduce the ·minimum parking area setback from the road allowance from 3 metres to 0.5 of a metre in order to expand an existing par-king area • the applicant has proposed a 5 metre-wide landscaped island to be incorporated within the proposed parking area in order to minimize the visual impact of the parking area on street activity • soft landscaping elements such as trees and shrubs could be accommodated within the municipal boulevard in order to screen the proposed parking area from Finch Avenue • the proposed parking area will maintain the minimum required setback from the abutting residential property to the west • an application for Site Plan Approval will be required to permit the expansion of the , existing parking area • landscaping details will be further reviewed through the Site Plan Approval process to ensure that the streetscape along Finch Avenue is enhanced and the proposed parking area is appropriately screened The .requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Report PICA 21/17 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Region of Durham Date of Report: March 21, 2017 · Comments Prepared By: ~ -~ ~son Planner I CM:NS:Ic ' J:\Documents\DevelopmenftD-3700\2017\PCA 21-17\Report\PCA 21-17 Repcrt.docx Attachments · March 29, 2017 33 Page 3 • no comments.on the application • the parking lot extension/vehicle overhang cannot encroach within the sight triangle at the intersection of Rosefield Road and Finch Avenue or the Finch Avenue right-of-way Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design f.--- -- ..._....._ r---:- -Oft;c/- P1CKER1NG City Development Department SUBJECT PROPERTY Location Ma File: P/CA21/17 The Corpor.allon oft he City of Pickering Produced {In part) under license from: Cl Quoen• Printer, Ontario Ministry of Nature I Rasourcn. rights reserved.;C Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Rnourcee.AII rights reserved.; Terenet Enterprises Inc. and lis suppliers a I rights resorved.; C Municipal Property Assesam•nt Corporation and b suppiJ.rs all rlgt b rtserved.; ____.:._ I I I PN-RU ~ ~ ·~ EXISTING 1 STOREYPLAZA r: ~~~ ~ ~ i ~ 5.5 . :s:: 0 ~-EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY ~ .. ,........--11-j __ ......... .JL_ -o o J.:.'L . -. + -~0-~ -044-P1CKER1NG City Development Department Rosefield Road Submitted Plan FILE No: PICA 21/17 APPLICANT: 1703198 Ontario Inc. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan M997 Part Block A, C 40R3535 Part 1 (1980 Rosefield Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLANNING\APPS\PCA\2017 To permit a parking area abutting a road allowance to be setback a minimum of 0.5 metres CD ::J c CD ~ .!: (.) c u::: To permit a minimum two-way traffic aisle width of 6.0 metres ~~ DATE: Mar. 09, 2017 (.L) CJ1 ·' From: Subject: Applications Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 22117 & PICA 23117 Date: March 29, 2017 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 22117 & PICA 23117 G. Skidmore 1804 & 1806 Woodview Avenue PICA 22117 (1804 Woodview Avenue) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum north side yard width of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of. 1.5 metres. PICA 23117 (1806 Woodview Avenue) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum · south side yard width of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain building permits for the construction of a two-storey detached dwelling on each property. Recommendation PICA 22117 (1804 Woodview Avenue) The City Development Department considers a minimum north side yard width of 1.2 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 29, 2018, ' or this decision shall become null and void. Report PICA 22117 & PICA 23117 Recommendatio~ PICA 23/17 (1806 Woodview Avenue) March 29, 2017 3 7 Page 2 The City Development Department considers a minimum south side yard width of 1.2 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping · with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following·conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 29, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void: Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan-"Urban Residential Areas -Low DensitiAreas" within the · Highbush Neighbourhood · · Zoning By-law 3036-"R4"-Fourth Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Applications 1 • the intent of a minimum side yard width requirement is to provide an appropriate separation distance between structures on abutting properties in order to ensure compatibility with the existing neighbourhood, provide appropriate pedestrian access between dwellings, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services • the Zoning By,..law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres • the applicant has requested to reduce the minimum north side yard at 1804 Woodview Avenue and reduce the minimum south side yard width at 1806 Woodview Avenue from 1.5 metres to 1 .2 meres · • the proposed side yard widths of 1.2 metres maintains the character of the existing residential community as other properties along Woodview Avenue have been approved to have a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres • the proposed side yard Widths will provide an adequate separation between the dwellings and the mutual property line to accommodate pedestrian access, grading, drainage and residential utility services . • the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of . the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 3~eport PICA 22117 & PICA 23117 March 29, 2017 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Date of report: March 21 , 2017 Comments prepared by: Nilesh Surti, M IP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design CM:NS:so J:\Documents\Develapment\D-3700\2017\PCA 22-17 & PCA 23-17\Repart\PCA22-17 & PCA 23-17 Repart.dacx Attachments X ,...._V /7 I I J------L------lT I - - ~~~~ __./~,U T= l ~ _E -~ "'/,----0 _.-L--'----,---J 1---+-'-----~ =-:= rnB~~-----t PROHILL STREET I --/ a ========~ ~(/I ~:=_="j:_='=: = 1 n I r ~ 1----+---1 "':-:-::~J.,-1-..J....I.....L...I....L...I..JID....,. '---WESTCREEK DRIVE Cf} 1-------+---1 ~ I I ~ -------' - r--- ~ 1-------r'---J I-~ 1-------+----J ltll-~----{~-,---lr-r--r-.--- ..---r- 1-----, o::'--1'\.-~ r---~====:==~~~N ·~ ~ L!J LIJIL f-I-r-----,----'--~ ::lJ------i---1 ~ ~ J----,---J--,.----1 ~<(Ill --I T ' -I-en 1--w 1----l-----l -,.... ~ ,--1--------1 ~ susJEcr~-::L!==Ji~Zi::> 0 "-----1-----l I f-1= ~ROPERT/ES ~""""""' ! f-~:= ...... C::l------l-----1 ~ wl----11--== w·IJ]~ g t-----l--1--l 5 ~ ,.... ,....~1--,..._ 0 I ::JI--r-------JCJ ~ WATERFORD GATE r-f-::!:; 1--w > r----r---. .-....., ~ 1--ll ~ ~ w 1-----1----1 =: WEST LANE ~~==i=~~> 1--------t------'-t -r-I T ,..__---.I.J..._--1~ 1------.--~----~ ---...... -_ L-~-----~~__,or-~-----1 --1--------.jf------IQ t---t-----'1 ----~ -~.__"---r---1 r-1:Jtu ~ ~ l:=::::::::;;:::::;:;;tt=-iu I t==::i_~O,<.< ~ ~ ~H H ~ ---S _ou t== ~ ~~~~ -w -> ,----~ _$ ;--~,. .___ I--t---/ HOGARTH STREET ,__ __ ,-~-1 _ _, 1---I' I--I I vv A\ l= I I--~~ 1-,-,...L,-l,-l,-1......./f ...... .,____, 0:: ~ r ~,Yi ~~ ~;rrm~r- ;--•ft ~ LAWSON STREET 1 II Ill _ I I' I I I ..__ __ ---TWYN RIVERS DRIVE Location Mao File: PICA 22117 & PICA 23117 _. -at, t>/-. - P1CKER1NG. Applicant: G. Skidmore ~ City Development Department Prooertv Description: Plan 282 Part Lot 4, 40R25121 Pa-rts 23 & 25 (1804 & 1806 Woodview Avenue) Date: Mar. 07, 2017 n:~=~o;;~:r~e0!;~~~!=n~~~~(:f~artJa:~~=~e~~~:!t':~=~=~.~~~~=:~.~~ural Resources. SCALE: 1 :S,QQQ Teranel Ent~~rises Inc. and rtS SlmD11ers aD rf hts reserved.; c Municipal p,;,-~rtV-Assessmenl CorJXJratlon and Its simD11ers an ri hts reserved.: ~~~-~~ ~~~~I AN n~ ~Ill PN-R u' _..... 0 PICA 23117: To permit a minimum south side yard width of 1.2 metres 61.111 M /_ ~~ I ~ w ,. · I ,l ~~ ::::> 29.1 M z :L _ V 18.3 I ____ N 40R-25121 ::E w /! 1B06 WOCOVI" "' LJI•R (") lD PART 23 ~ ..... If) "' PROPOSED N2:W ~ ,_, . 2 STOREY HOUSE Ull.1M-LLI Cl -4000 SO/Fl' 60.9 M oil .... I~ ~ 60.9 M ... ;I ]; 1804 WOODVIEW AVE w v.~ PROPOSED NEW -40R-25121 "" 114R ::E > C> 2 STOR:OY HOUSE :L N' ;---4000 SO/FT N PART 25 ..,. If) Cl N I = -ll'l . -· _, 0 29.1 M , .. ,r 10.1 M-I a:k!l et-a: 0 uo:: "" NL:> ~I " ~ I 6!11.9 M I PICA 22117: To permit a minimum north side yard width 1' of 1.2 metres N Submitted Plan OftJ cf FILE No: P/CA 22/17 and P/CA 23/17 PlCKERlNG APPUCAN~ G.S~dmore PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 282 Part Lot 4, 40R25131 Parts 23 & 25 City Development (1804 & 1806 Woodview Avenue) Departm-ent FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING I DATE: Mar. 09, 2017 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLANNING\APPS\PCA\2017