The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNovember 16, 2016 pickering.ca Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 14 Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Lesley Dunne T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 Email ldunne@pickering.ca Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from October 26, 2016 1-5 (III) Reports 1. (Deferred at the October 26, 2016 meeting) P/CA 62/16 H. Kasim 1854 Woodview Avenue 6-13 2. P/CA 64/16 Averton (Brock) Limited Block 2, 40M-2568 14-20 3. P/CA 65/16 N. Hubley & A. Roy 345 Whitevale Road 21-27 (IV) Other Business 1. Adoption of 2017 Meeting Schedule 28 (V) Adjournment Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland-Vice-Chair David Johnson -Chair Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present Melissa Markham, Secretary-Treasurer Lesley Dunne,· Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Absent Eric Newton (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Sean Wiley Committee of Adjustment 1 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:00pm Council Chambers That the agenda for the Wednesday, October 26, 2016 meeting be adopted. (II) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Sean Wiley Carried Unanimously That the minutes of the 12th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, October 5, 2016 be adopted. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 5 2 -C~()f p](KER1NG (Ill) Reports 1. PICA 59116 Y. Rahman & M. Kamal 3320 Greenburn Place Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:00pm Council Chambers The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 2044185, to permit a 10 square metre accessory building (shed) in the front yard, whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings which c:~re not part of the main building to be erected in the rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to permit an accessory building (shed) in the front yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no comments on the application. Yussria Rahman, applicant, was pr~sent to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. ~ Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Denise Rundle . That application PICA 59116 by Y. Rahman & M. Kamal, be Approved on the grounds that the 10 square metre shed in the front yard is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed 10 square metre shed, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. PICA 60116 · P. Varga 1 060 Longbow Drive Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1998/85, to permit an uncovered platform (deck) and associated steps not exceeding 1.5 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.1 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps and platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade· to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard. , Page 2 of 5 -Ct%of- P1CKER1NG Committee of Adjustment 3 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:00pm Council Chambers The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an uncovered platform (deck) and associated steps in the rear yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no comments on the application. Petru Varga, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Petru Varga stated that the proposed deck is slightly larger than the existing deck. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Tom Copeland That application PICA 60116 by P. Varga, be Approved on the grounds that the uncovered platform (deck) and associated steps not exceeding 1.5 metres in height above grade projecting a maximum of 1.1 metres into the required rear yard is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed deck and associated steps, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by April 26, 2017 or this decision shall become null and void. 3. PICA 61116 J. & L. Clarke 5360 Sideline 32 Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106, to permit a 50 square metre accessory building (detached garage) to be erected in the front yard, whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building to be erected in the rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a detached garage in the front yard. Page 3 of 5 4 c~ of--'--- P1CKER1NG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:00pm Council Chambers The Secretary-Tre<;~surer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department ~xpressing no comments on the application. James Clarke, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. James Clarke stated that the garage cannot be erected in the side or rear yard due to an existing septic bed. In response to a question from a Committee Member, James Clarke stated that the proposed detached garage will be constructed to match the design ·of the dwelling and that the garage will only be used for storage purposes. Moved by Tom Copeland Secon?ed by Denise Rundle That application PICA 61116 by J. & L. Clarke, be Approved on the grounds that the 50 square metre accessory building (detached g;3rage) to be erected in the front yard is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed detached garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by October 26,2017, or this decision shall become null and void. 4. PICA 62116 H. Kasim 1854 Woodview Avenue Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum rear yard setback of 6.8 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent, whereas the by-law permits a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a single-storey addition in the rear yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no comments on the application. Page 4 of 5 -C~()f .P1(KER1NG Committee of Adjustment 5 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:00pm Council Chambers Alexandra Aodesh and Matt Jacewicz, agents, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Matt Jacewicz requested that the application be deferred in order to submit a revised application to include an accessory building (shed) currently existing in the rear yard. The existing shed was not included on the submitted site plan and does not comply with the required setbacks. Moved by.Tom Copeland Seconded by Sean Wiley That application PICA 62/16 by H. Kasim, be Deferred until the next Committee of Adjustment meeting to allow the applicant to revise their application. Carried Unanimously (IV) Adjournment Date Chair Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That the 13th meeting of the 2016 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:13 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, November 16, 2016. Carried Unanimously Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Page 5 of 5 6 -C~~~ pJ(KERJNG From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment.· Application Number: PICA 62116 Meeting Date: November 16, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Revised . Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 62116 H. Kasim 1854 Woodview Avenue Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to: • recognize an existing accessory structure setback 0.2 of a metre from the north and west lot line; whereas the by-law requires all accessory structures less than 1.8 metres in height and less than 10.0 square metres in area to be setback 0.6 of a metre from all lot lines • permit a minimum rear yard setback of 6.8 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres • permit a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to recognize an existing shed in the rear yard and to obtain a building permit to construct a single-storey addition in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a minimum rear yard setback of 6.8 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the . Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the maximum lot coverage variance apply to the existing accessory structure (shed) and the proposed one-storey addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. · 2. That the minimum rear yard setback variance apply only to the proposed one-storey addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by October 26, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. and Report PICA 62116 November 16, 2016 7 Page 2 The City Development Department considers an existing accessory structure (shed) setback 0.2 of a metre from the north and west lot line to be a major variance, that is not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommenos Refusal of the proposed variance. Background On October 26, 2016, the Committee of Adjustment deferred application PICA 62116 at the request of the applicant in order to revise the application to include additional variances required for an existing 5.4 square metre shed, located in the rear yard. Revised notice of the application was mailed on November 2, 2016 to include a variance to reduce the required setbacks from the north and west lot line. After the revised notice was mailed City Staff recognized that the maximum lot coverage, including the proposed one-storey addition and existing shed, was 35.7 percent. The notice reflected a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent had been requested, however it has now been revised to a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential-Low Density Areas" within the High bush Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 -"R4" -Fourth Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application Reduction in Required Rear Yard Setback Variance • the intent of the minimum rear yard setback is to ensure adequate amenity space is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting property owners and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage • the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres • the applicant has requested a minimum rear yard setback of 6.8 metres to accommodate a single-storey addition • the proposed development will maintain an appropriate amount of useable amenity space left uncovered by buildings in the rear yard • the proposed variance will. have minimal impact on the privacy of abutting property owners as the addition is only one,..storey and has a greater setback from the south side yard than the existing dwelling • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 8 Report PICA 62/16 Maximum Lot Coverage Variance November 16, 2016 Page 3 • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings is appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot • the original application included a one-storey addition to the existing dwelling, however an existing accessory structure (shed) was not shown on the submitted drawing • an increase in lot coverage from 33 percent to 35 percent was required for the one-storey addition, an additional 1 percent is required to recognize an existing 5.4 square metre shed, for a total maximum lot coverage of 36 percent • the increase in lot coverage will provide for the appropriate development of the land as the size and massing of the proposed addition and existing accessory structure will be in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the proposed development will maintain a sufficient amount of outdoor amenity area that will remain uncovered and unobstructed on the lot • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Reduction of the Minimum Setback Requirement for an Existing Accessory Structure • the intent of the minimum 0.6 of a metre setback requirement for accessory structures, less than 1.8 metres in height and 10 square metres in area, is to ensure that adequate space is available for maintenance, that the eaves/overhangs do not encroach onto adjacent properties, that roof drainage stays on the subject property, and that the visual impact on adjacent properties is minimized • the owner is requesting to allow for an existing accessory structure (shed) setback 0.2 of a metre from the north and west lot line • the current location of the shed does not appear to provide for adequate space to maintain the accessory structure • the existing setbacks and eaves/overhangs do not ensure that roof drainage stays on the subject property • staff is of the opinion that a minimum 0.6 metre setback from all property lines would ensure adequate space is available for maintenance and that eaves/overhangs would not encroach on adjacent properties • staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is not minor in nature, does not meet the intent of the Zonirig By-law, and is not desirable for the appropriate development of the land Report PICA 62/16 Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department Date of report: November 10, 2016 Comments prepared by: rtV{rn![~ ~Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:so J:\Documents\Development\0·3700\2016\PCA 62-16\Report\Revised PCA 62-16 Report.doc Attachments November 16,2016 9 Page4 • no comments on the application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review ( v r-----,wt------r---1 ..... r-----:-:::l t---z t------f------1 r-----;wt------t------1 ~ ~t------f------1 ~ o~t------r---; .... z_ I"'"'~ _r-----;ffi t----t-----1 ffi -w t----i----1 r---0:: z t----t---, 0 ~t----i----1 f-1... g 1--~ t----!-----1 f--a: 1--~ t-----t------f ~ f--8 r---t------f :J r---I o t---:----!-----1 ~ ~r---t------f r---~-~0~--r--; t----~---l~t---~----1 1--- - r----h--,-.,----1 -11~ r-~..o WEST LANE §HI I- -~of pJ(KERJNG City Development Department L I I I Location Map FILE: PICA 62/16 APPLICANT: H. Kasim PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 8 Plan 40M1739 1(1854 Woodview Avenue) ~-:h~::e~':d~;~ ~; ':]!;:e~:e:~U:ght(:f~~~~~~~~:;:;:,:N~::;e;:so::~ ~7~~:~:~-~atunu tte50Urt:eS. Ter.net Enterprises lne. •nd Is suppliers an right~. reserved.: C Uunlcipal Property Auenment Corpor.tlon and Its •uppr~ers •0 right. re.erved.; Date: Sep 29 2016 SCALE: 1 :5,000 PN-12 THIS IS NOf A PLAN OF SURVEY. To pe r m i t an ex i s t i n g ac c e s s o r y st r u c t u r e to be se t b a c k 0. 2 of a me t r e fr o m th e no r t h an d we s t lo t li n e . E N ~ 0. 2 m U_ : J I 68 m / IE ~L 0 ui ... . . . . PR O P O S E D AD D I T I O N 9. 7 m Su b m i t t e d Pl a n · E LO .... . . . FI L E No : P/ C A 62 / 1 6 To pe r m i t a mi n i m u m re a r ya r d se t b a c k of 6. 8 me t r e s _3 1 O m / / ~/ / EX I S T I N G DW E L L I N G // / / / ~ / 31 . 0 m ' " ' - - - - - - - C ~ o / Pl ( K E R l N G AP P L I C A N T : H. Ka s i m E LO ... . . . . E ~ ... . . . . 8. 1 m 8. 1 m 8. 1 m To pe r m i t a ma x i m u m lot co v e r a g e of 36 pe r c e n t PR O P E R T Y DE S C F U P T I O N : Lo t 8, Pl a n 40 M - 1 7 3 9 (1 8 5 4 Wo o d v i e w Av e n u e ) Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . .1 w > a: El 0 C! s ~ w > 0 0 0 s 1'' "' .) ..... DATE: Oct,. 4, 2016 ..... - O i t ; c f - Pl ( K E R l N G Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n 3'0 ' ' 1 0 . 9 1 ) r- - - - t FI L E No : PI C A 62 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : H. Ka s i m ii i "-~JI L J L . J I ~ I' - - ' ' - - ' I 4'. ( ) ' 1 1 . 2 2 ) ~[td ~D O NO R T H (S I D E ) ELEVATION - 2'- 4 ' 1 0 . 7 1 1 ~ . . ft t d PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Lo t 8, Pl a n 40 M - 1 7 3 9 (1 8 5 4 Wo o d v i e w Av e n u e ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VIE W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . DATE: Oct,. 4, 2016 N ro o DO DO 1~· 1 1 112 ~ [3 . 9 5 1 111 c: it c 1r - ..., . . 11 ._ . . . an - - - - - - - - - - " ' l' - 4 . {1 . 0 2 ] . . 11~i s 1\ , 1d: ; 11 :~~ s miO I ] i ij ~ ~ 0> :3 ' - Q ' • [1 . 0 4 1 ~ ~~ I ~~ ... rn o · ~ nn - a i p D / - P1 C K E R 1 N G Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : PI C A 62 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : H. Ka s i m PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Lo t 8, Pl a n 40 M - 1 7 3 9 (1 8 5 4 . W o o d v i e w Av e n u e ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E GIT Y OF PIC K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . C O l c !! ~ .. IJj <c .... ~ s l:: :5 ~ DATE: Oct,. 4, 2016w 14 __ c~(Jf . P1CKER1NG From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 64116 Meeting Date: November 16, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Application Commi~tee of Adjustment Application PICA 64/16 Averton (Brock) Limited Block 2, 40M-2568 The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 7444/15: • to permit an accessory building (water meter building) to be located outside the building envelope; whereas, the by-law does not permit any building, part of a building, or structure to be erected outside of the building envelope illustrated on Schedule II • to permit an accessory building (water meter building) with a maximum height of 4.6 metres; whereas the by-law states that rio accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain Site Plan approval and a building permit to construct a one-storey water meter building on the subject lands . . Recommendation The City Development Department considers an accessory building (water meter building) located outside of the building envelope, with a maximum height of 4.6 metres, to be minor in nature, desirable· for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subj~ct to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed accessory building (water meter building), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed building by November 16, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed accessory building (water meter building) by November 16, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. Report PICA 64/16 Background November 16, 2016 15 Page 2 A Draft Plan of Subdivision and a Zoning By-law Amendment were approved by Council on July 14, 2014 to facilitate a residential condominium development. Subsequ.ently, the applicant submitted a Site Plan Application providing further details of the development. Upon review of the application, staff identified that minor variances were required in order to facilitate the development of this proposal. The proposed relief from the by-law deals with specific requirements to allow a water meter building to be located outside the building envelope with a greater height that permitted. · Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan-"Mixed Use Areas-Mixed Corridors" within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 7444/15-"MU-MD-1"-Mixed Use-Medium Density Zone, which permit a mixed use development consisting of stacked townhouses, back-to-back stacked townhouses, back-to-back townhouses and apartment buildings that contain ground floor commercial uses. · Appropriateness of the Application Requested variances to permit an accessory building outside of the building envelope and with an increase in height • the intent of the by-law in requiring a building envelope is to maintain certain setbacks from new development to streets and abutting properties • the intent of the by-law in permitting a maximum accessory building height of 3.5 metres in a residential zone is to minimize the visual impact that these structures may have on abutting properties and oh the streetscape, to ensure other yards are not significantly obstructed by these structures on the property, and to further ensure that accessory buildings do not become the dominant buildings on residential properties • the by-law requires a building envelope as shown on Schedule II to the By-law (7444/15), which illustrates a 10.0 metre setback along the north property line • the applicant is proposing to permit an accessory building (water meter building) outside the building envelope along the north property line • the applicant is proposing to permit a 22.5 square metre accessory building, 4.6 metres in height, to be setback a minimum of 1.6 metres from the north property line and 2.2 metres from the east property line along William Jackson Drive • an adequate buffer space between the proposed accessory building and the street (William Jackson Drive) will be maintained 1 6 Report PICA 64/16 November 16, 2016 Page 3 • fast growing deciduous shrubs with a maximum height of between 1.8 metres and 2.4 metres, are proposed in the landscaped area between the north property line and the building containing the water meter room to provide a buffer that will screen and reduce the visual impact on abutting properties, a 1.8 metre wood privacy fence will also be constructed along the north property line • staff are of the opinion that the requested variance to locate an accessory building (water meter building) outside of the building envelope and with an increase in height will not have any adverse impact on surrounding properties or the usability of the subject property • staff are of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for- the appropriate development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department Date of report: November 10, 2016 Comments prepared by: Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP Planer I LP:MM:so J:\Documents\Development\0·3700\2016\PCA 64-16\Report\PCA 64·16.doc Attachments • no comments on the application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner~ Development Review _( ZENTS DRIVE f J~. 1-------t""~ {.) ~ CD LIATRIS DRIVE -§~ /' .W~f-- /_ ~=w r-!;1;=<== / /-r IIIII =g5 w~- 111111 g-0.~/;).,...,..."T""'T""'T...,....,.........,........,r-rl Hfffi =~ I I -CJ) ~ ~ MISTH~O~L.,L,LO~W~D~R~IV~E...I...U...I...U...J...J..J.j !=::;!; I--t= :::l ct-----=:Jo~.-Yr-lr+Hr'r-1--t+Nr+++n++-H-n+-ll ~s: 1--~ L-~~L~I~~R~IS~D~R*IVE~~~ DERSAN STREET -------P-;-:....~L.J I Ill I -~~ P1CKER1NG City Development Department Location Mao File: PICA 64/16 Applicant: Averton (Brock) Limited Property Description: Block 2 Plan 40M2568 1731 Adirondack Chase Date: Nov 02 2016 c The Corporation of the CUy of Pickering Produced Qn part) under license from: C Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. SCALE 1 · 5 QQQ ~~~':~:~~Z~ri! ~~~ ~~:: th!~:r:~l~rl R~htr:~C~~~~ ~e~=n~:~~u~~~:~~e~o~~~::::~~;~ppl!ers all rirJhls reserved.; THIS IS NOT A :PI A~ 1 ~ ~11g\1cv p N-12 10 - · 0 4 J o t - PJ C K E R J N G Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n Fi l e No : P/ C A 64 / 1 6 Ap p l i c a n t : Av e r t o n (B r o c k ) Li m i t e d Pr o p e r t y De s c r i p t i o n : Bl o c k 2 Pl a n 40 M 2 5 6 8 (1 7 3 1 . A d i r o n d a c k Ch a s e ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VIE W I N G AT TH E CI 1 Y OF PI C K E R I N G CI 1 Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . to permit an accessory building (water meter building) to be located outside the building envelope ----Building Envelope 1' DATE: Nov. 2, 2016 - 0 4 ; 4 - P1 C K E R 1 N G Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t f. \j ., to permit an accessory · ·· building (water meter BO U N D A R Y I · ~ :~ building) to be located __ _ , r - _ _ _ ... . ,_ . . r ;-, outside the building envelope - - - - '- < - · SN O W S" ( O R A G E WA . l i E R . . -~· . =::~ 1ii& il ~' ' BU I I d m g En v e l o p e , I . . .' : . ~::>••:; . :: ; , ¥ :~:,::: - - - - - ~~ . o r; . , ; ::r . · : • ; ·: .. ~Vt; o,r, i : ; : · _ . , ~\ 0 \, · · . lE = :; -- - - ! 1 ~~ :.. ;; ) f . • I .1 . U il :: I . iU~';". 'r.:~; - " ' ' 1 • · ' ' , . ~. ~• ' · ! <._ , : : · · ·i o % .. , \ : iZ~ : :· -< x § : i l~;;i_ ~/-~"' 'Ill-~-- · . :t: • · • ; • : • ~0-'·. ") ( . . e.~ ~·:::.: . , .. · ·-~-! "'l )( '5 i . Su b m i t t e d Pl a n • '. ' -~-~ - 1, - *~~ C5 ~ii i ~ 1 27 - , l ·',-E N T R \ ' S t . t _ ~ ; ) . 11, e.~- · ·- ~i-' ~ , '*~ 2 '( a ' • POUf i E O [ ~ ~ L A r e ~ . ~ , ... ··- ~\1. : '· ~ -±' @)~ ~ ! - ~ )(;~ ,-- . : ;: (/) · : ~ ~" , ,· " g "'N « ; I , ~ ~ ~ .13:5 •' I o· ' -~·· · ~~- , !j' ? . ; , ~ \ t ; ~ t b & '" -- - --~.. -~1 ·:. ij ~a; : ~~: ~ ~ ~ t - ~ - ~ - - - . . I ::1 :s · .. :~ "' I - -•u J ; z ~ ' cr t ' I uNrr P A Y r : : ~ ;.· . " :, -- : . ·" ' ttu: : ~ : -- - - x - ,_ , . . -1 · · - o . s :;\ c· ,< : > 8 ,_ " '· 0 ~ ~·- - - - - ; . , i "1 ' <C · -: · • . , I " .': . ·. - · ··~:: z 3~ ~ ·. ~:·! __ ;.~; ! _ a : 1 ~ - - - - - - ' " : - - - .. - ~ -~~- : ~:~1 :l . · -j ( ·" . - " • , d~• \!: ~ -' • \ "'" ENTRYS 1 \ ~ 1 r 1 < ... . ""' " . . "'" ~~·- ~ - - -- · y x : . ?35~ o - · :· eooR E O : ' ~ " ~ ' ' ' " C D '.: ; ~- ., . ..£ ! : , · · .. . , : __ :'~i3 . : ~ . . , § - i ~ ~ t ~ ~ - , . : ; ; ; - - ~ - · - - : . r f - ' l I ·:.~i *- - 6.4 . -r - - - :-: · 1 $ g - u! 11 W '<I"~ • 3.7 ', I ~., - - ~ · · • · · · ~.' Ji ~ · , ~ ~ ~ a ! ~ I~ , - - - - - - :~~ @~ ' o~ 1:t, N O i o ] ) , ' ' )( 1 • • o'! ... . .. . ., , . , ' "' ''-' - " ' " ' ~ 1 6 ~ "1 . ,' .·. ' . .... . . ... ~-i·· ~ :·.- . · g . ;~~ u . ! ~., ~ : l (X : . ~i( . ~-- UNI1"~ • ~ r e R NC O • ~~: ;· i f i i { , C : ' 4,Q~~ :: ; ~:(l · ' .. . c;g '. ~ ~ S"' :i' ·: . :_::. -x~~ :~---r· ~ -- : j { -~-~-i -.-- .. ---~,-- ::f~i; : .. -u N i i J l . ' • • -C ' !Il l ~f : ; j )( - .. . -:. - · · \ 1 , ~ -·, . e ; ~ : -= i! .. O:: X ... . ~ ·.: ... . ·" - .: g ~· f; - z. y - . " ... ;. -- • " ' " ' ; t " " f:; . · .J ' ! ' t . ·c. x~- ... . . ':·i n i ~ : ~ . L ~ ~ % i t ' x: : l -- - L. :: •au • t"C E Fi l e No : P/ C A 64 / 1 6 Ap p l i c a n t : Av e r t o n (B r o c k ) Li m i t e d .. Pr o p e r t y De s c r i p t i o n : Bl o c k 2 Pl a n 40 M 2 5 6 8 (1 7 3 1 Ad i r o n d a c k Ch a s e ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VIE W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . ----Building Envelope ~~ T DATE: Nov. 2, 2016 ~ E NO R ! l : H EL E V A 11 1 0 N ... to pe r m i t an ac c e s s o r y bu i l d i n g (w a t e r me t e r bu i l d i n g ) wi t h a ma x i m u m he i g h t of 4. 6 me t r e s SO U i H EL E V A T I O N - ~ D ~ P1 C K E R 1 N G Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n Fi l e No : P/ C A 64 / 1 6 Ap p l i c a n t : Av e r t o n (B r o c k ) Li m i t e d Pr o p e r t y De s c r i p t i o n : Bl o c k 2 Pl a n 40 M 2 5 6 8 (1 7 3 1 Ad i r o n d a c k Ch a s e ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CIT Y OF PIC K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . . 0 EA S T RE V A:O O H · WES T ElE V AT ! O N DATE: Nov. 2, 2016 -~bf P1CKER1NG From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to. 21 Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 65116 Date: November 16, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 65116 N. Hubley & A. Roy . 345 Whitevale Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 2677188, to permit an accessory building (detached garage) with a maximum height of 5.2 metres in a residential zone, whereas the by-law states that no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an accessory building (detached garage) in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers an accessory building (detached garage) with a maximum height of 5.2 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the · Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following con<;litions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed detached garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by November 16, 2018, or this decision shall become· null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Rural Hamlets" within the Whitevale Settlement Area Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 2677188-"HMR3"-Hamlet Residential Single Detached 2 2 Report PICA 65/16 Additional Information November 16, 2016 Page 2 The subject property is located within the Whitevale Heritage Conservation District and is protected under Part V of the Ontario Hedtage Act. A Heritage Permit is required for any new construction or demolition on the property. On August 24, 2016, the applicant submitted a Heritage Permit Application to demolish an existing garage and construct a one-and-a-half-storey garage with a storage loft. An architectural firm was retained by the City to assist in the review of the Heritage Permit Application and provide advice on the appropriateness of the proposal in relation to the Whitevale Heritage Conservation District Guidelines. Following this review, it was recommended that the pitch of the roof be reduced to match the roof profile of the main house. The applicant revised their proposal to reflect the comments of the consultant and City staff. As a result, th'e proposed height of the detached garage increased from 4.7 metres to 5.2 metres. On September 28, 2016, Heritage Pickering reviewed the revised Heritage Permit Application and a motion was carried stating that Heritage Pickering does not object to the construction of the proposed garage (revised plan dated September 22, 2016). Appropriateness of the Application Increase in Accessory Building Height Variance • the intent of the maximum height of 3.5 metres for accessory buildings in a residential zone is to minimize the visual impact that these structures may have on abutting properties and on the streetscape, to protect the privacy of abutting property owners and to ensure that accessory buildings do not become the dominant buildings on residential properties • the applicant has requested a variance to permit an accessory building (detached garage) to have a maximum height of 5.2 metres ' • the applicant is proposing to demolish an existing detached garage and construct a new detached garage that will be accessory to the principal residential dwelling • the proposed detached garage will have minimal impact on the streetscape as it will be located in the rear yard in a similar location to the existing garage, approximately 7.6 metres setback from the rear wall of the heritage house • the proposed increase in height will have minimal impact on abutting properties and privacy of abutting property owners as it will be screened by mature trees to the east and maintains a minimum setback of 1.2 metres from the east lot line • · the requested variance is minor in nature and maintains the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and is desirable for the appropriate development of the land Report PICA 65/16 Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department ) Heritage Pickering Committee Date of report: November 10, 2016 Comments prepared by: CM:MM:so J:\Documents\Development\0·3700\2016\PCA 65-16\Report\PCA 65-16.docx Attachments. November 16, 2016 23 Page 3 • no comments on the application • does not object to the construction of the proposed garage Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review WHITEVALE ~-------------+-----....... ___ .........~, _____ . 1--~----~---·-·-·-------lu .---~1~!!1---+---r-"'---T--1 I r -Cdpr>/- PJCKERJNG City Development Department 0 <5 0:: <( z ~ :....J <( Location Map FILE: PICA 65/16 APPLICANT: N. Hublev &A Rov ) ·I \ 1---r--'- PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 5 Pt Lot 6, Plan 21, Part 3, 40R-2311 345 Whitevale Road Date: Oct 18 2016 --01;;()1-- PlCKERlNG City Development Department 22.5m . 1'1'10POSED 6.0 m x 12.1m · f'OOL I I 2.9m m ~HITEYALE ROAD Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 65/16 APPLICANT: N. Huble PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 5 Part Lot 6 Plan 21 RP 40R2311 Part 3 345 Whitevale Rd FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.· . DATE: Oct. 21·, 2016 25 --Cdy()t-- PlCKERlNG City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 65/16 APPLICANT: N. Huble PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 5 Part Lot 6 Plan 21 RP 40R2311 Part 3 345 Whitevale Rd FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CllY OF PICKERING CllY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Oct. 21,2016 City Development Department I i i : i I . ' I ' I I I _l_ ~===~~~=======~c=~=·==~ RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION n -- I I I I I b I I I I I I I I i: i i I u ~==dl=====dl==r===s REAR ELEVATION ~ . . //-~ '==== I I i : I I u c!::====================:S . LEFT SIDE ELEVATION Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 65/16 APPLICANT: N. Hubley & A. Roy PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 5 Part Lot 6 Plan 21 RP 40R2311 Part 3 (345 Whitevale Rd) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I DATE: Oct. 21,2016 28 Last Day for Filing Committee of Adjustment Tentative Meeting Schedule for 2017 Sign Posting Meeting Date Due Date Thursday, December 29 January 13 January 25 Friday, January 20 February 3 February 15 Friday, February 10 February 24 March 8 Friday, March 3 March 17 March 29 Friday, March 24 April? April19 Thursday, April 13 April28 May10 Friday, May 5 May 19 May31 Friday, May 26 June 9 June 21 Friday, June 16 June 30 July 12 Friday, July 7 July 21 August2 Friday, July 28 August 11 August23 Friday, August 18 September 1 September 13 Friday, September 8 September 22 October 4 Friday, September 29 · October 13 October 25 Friday, October 20 November 3 November 15 Friday, November 10 November 24 DecemberS