Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 30, 2016Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 4 Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from March 9, 2016 (Ill) Reports 1. PICA 14116 Louisville Homes Limited 1820 Fairport Road 2. PICA 15116 A. Sparks 1885 Spruce Hill Road 3. PICA 16116 S. & H. Sparks 1891 Spruce Hill Road 4. PICA 17116 N. Ganeshan 343 Finch Avenue 5. PICA 18116 P. & M. Buerschaper 4 7 4 Rosebank Road 6. PICA 19116 R. & 0. Slobojan 1975 Lodge Road 7. PICA 20116 B. & L. Woodbine 305 Toynevale Road (IV) Adjournment Committee of Adjustment Agenda Wednesday, March 30, 2016 7:00pm Main Committee Room Page Number 1-9 10-15 16-18 19-21 22-25 26-31 32-37 38-43 Accessible •--For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Lesley Dunne PICKE~G T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 TTY 905.420.1739 Email ldunne@pickering.ca Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland -Vice-Chair David Johnson -Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present Melissa Markham, Secretary-Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer (I) Adoption of Agenda . Moved by David Johnson Seconded by Sean Wiley Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 9, 2016 7:_pm Council Chambers That the agenda for the Wednesday, March 9, 2016 meeting be adopted. (II) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by David Johnson Carried Unanimously That the minutes of the 2nd meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday,.February 17, 2016 be adopted. Carried Page 1 of 9 1 2 Committee of Adjustment (Ill) Reports 1. (Deferred from the January 27, 2016 meeting) PICA 06/06 2450734 Ontario Inc. (Marshall Homes) 1555 & 1575 Kingston Road Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 9, 2016 7:_pm Council Chambers The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6172/03: • to permit a minimum building height of 12.0 metres and 4 storeys; whereas the by-law states that no building, part of a building, or structure that is less than 16.0 metres and 6 storeys in height, or greater than 35.0 metres and 12 storeys in height, shall be erected on the lands • to permit buildings to be located outside the building envelope having a minimum setback of 1.8 metres from the Kingston Road lot line; whereas the by-law states that all buildings and structures shall be located entirely within the building envelope having a minimum setback of 4.5 metres from the . Kingston Road lot line • to permit buildings to be located outside the building envelope having a minimum setback of 0.8 of a metre from the west lot line; whereas the by-law states that all buildings and structures shall be located entirely within the building envelope having a minimum setback of 4.5 metres from the west lot line • to permit any portion of a building or structure in excess of 11.0 metres in height, to be setback a minimum of 17.0 metres from the southern limits of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone; whereas the by-law states that any portion of a building or structure in excess of 11.0 metres in height, shall be setback a minimum of 20.0 metres from the southern limits of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone • to permit a minimum of 1.0 parking space per dwelling unit for residents be provided both above and below grade; whereas the by-law states that for each multiple dwelling vertical there shall be provided and maintained a minimum 1.2 parking spaces per dwelling unit for residents; all resident parking is to be provided in a below grade structure· · • to permit a minimum of 0.2 of a parking space per dwelling unit for visitors; whereas the by-law states that for each multiple dwelling vertical there shall be provided and maintained a minimum of 0.3 of a parking space per dwelling unit for visitors Page 2 of9 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 9, 2016 7:_pm Council Chambers • to permit at grade parking lots to be no closer than 2.5 metres from the southern limit of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone; whereas the by-law states that at grade parking lots shall be permitted no closer than 3.0 metres from the limits of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone - • to permit at grade parking lots to be 0.0 metres from the western limit of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone; whereas the by-law states that at grade parking lots shall be permitted no closer than 3.0 metres from the limits of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone • to permit at grade parking lots to be no closer than 2.7 metres from the eastern limit of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone; whereas the by-law states that at grade parking lots shall be permitted no closer than 3.0 metres from the limits of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone The applicant is requesting approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain Site Plan Approval for a residential development consisting of 136 stacked townhouse units. Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton To dispense reading of the application. Carried Unanimously The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Comments were received from Site Plan Committee expressing no objections to the requested variances. Written comments were received from David Pickles, Regional Councillor, Ward 3 in support of the application. Maria Gatzios, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Maria Gatzios explained that the proposed parking located along the lane to the west of the subject lands are currently not owned by the applicant and are therefore not included in the proposed parking for the site. Maria Gatzios stated that when the lands are under the ownership of the applicant the parking along the lane will increase the number of visitor parking spaces above the requested 0.2 parking spaces per dwelling unit for visitors. Page 3 of9 3 4 Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes ·Wednesday, March 9, 2016 7:_pm Council Chambers That application PICA 06116 by 2450734 Ontario Inc. (Marshall Homes), be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the variances apply only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed development by March 9, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. 2. PICA 11116 SR & R Bay Ridges (Plaza II) Ltd. Bayly Street Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended by By-law 6705106, 6786107 and 7006109: • to permit covered and unenclosed porches, platforms and stairs to project a maximum of 2.4 metres outside the building envelope (along Bayly Street), as illustrated on Schedule II to By-law 6705106, as amended; whereas the by-law states that buildings and structures shall be located entirely within the building envelope as illustrated on Schedule II to By-law 6705106, as amended • to permit a building to be located outside the bt,Jilding envelope with a minimum setback of 3.0 metres from the south lot line, as illustrated on Schedule II to By-law 6705106, as amended; whereas the by-law states that buildings and structures shall be located entirely within the building envelope as illustrated on Schedule II to By-law 6705106, as amended • for multiple dwelling-vertical buildings located within the "RHIMU-2" Zone and within the build-to-zone, any portion of a building or structure in excess of two storeys in height, be setback a minimum of 0.0 metres from the main wall of the building or structure; whereas the by-law states that for multiple dwelling-vertical buildings located within the "RHIMU-2" Zone and within the build-to-zone, any portion of a building or structure in excess of two storeys in height, shall be setback a minimum of 3.0 metres from the main wall of the building or structure Page 4 of 9 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 9, 2016 7:_pm Council Chambers • to permit below grade structures beyond the limits of the building eiwelope identified on Schedule II to By-law 6705/06, as amended, with a 0.0 metre setback from the limits of the lands; whereas the by-law states that below , grade structures shall be permitted beyond the limits of the building envelope identified on Schedule II to By-law 6705/06, as amended, but no closer than 0.5 metres from the limits of th~ lands • to permit the minimum aggregate gross leasable floor area for all non-residential uses to be 1,630 square metres; whereas the by-law states the minimum aggregate gross leasable floor area for all non-residential uses shall be 2,41 0 square metres which can be built in three phases with the first phase having a minimum of 1 ,300 gross leasable floor area non-residential uses The applicant is requesting approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain Site Plan Approval for a 23-storey apartment building containing 214 units and a 3-storey building containing 22 stacked units along Bayly Street. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from lhe City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Comments were received from the Site Plan Committee expressing no objections to the approval. Written comments were received from Bill Mclean, Regional Councillor, Ward 2 in support of the application. Written comments were received from David Pickles, Regional Councillor, Ward 3 in support of the application. Written comments were received from Maurice Brenner, City Councillor, Ward 1 in support of the application. Correspondence received from John-Paul Dysangco of 1250 St. Martins Drive expressed several concerns such as concerns about the build quality of the new apartment buildings, falling debris from the building during construction on the adjacent playground, increased traffic, decrease in property values in the surrounding neighbourhood and the height of the proposed 23-storey apartment building. Ryan Guetter, agent, was present to represent the application. John-Paul Dysangco of 1250 St. Martins Drive was present in objection to the application. Ryan Guetter stated that the owner was proceeding with the next phase of development at this location. He stated that the original site specific zoning by-law set out general parameters for development, however now that the site plan has been fine-tuned variances are required to implement the siting and built form for the site. Page 5 of 9 5 6 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 9, 2016 7:_pm Council Chambers John-Paul Dysangco expressed a concern with the quality of the construction and stated that the proposed development will attract more rental units which could create issues with property cleanliness and maintenance. John-Paul Dysangco also spoke to the correspondence that was previously submitted in opposition to the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Ryan Guetter explained the requested variance for the projection of covered and unenclosed porches, platforms and stairs to project outside the building envelope along Bayly Street. Moved by David Johnson Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 11116 by SR & R Bay Ridges (Plaza II) Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the variances apply only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed development by March 9, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. PICA 12116 & PICA 13116 Marshall Homes (Copperfield) Ltd. 1423 Rougemount Drive PICA 12116 (Proposed Retained Parcel) Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 as amended, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling. PICA 13116 (Proposed Severed Parcel) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 as amended, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling. Page 6 of 9 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 9, 2016 7:_pm Council Chambers The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to create one additional lot through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee and obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed parcel and to replace an existing dwelling with a new two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed retained parcel. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Brian Moss, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in obj~ction to the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Brian Moss explained the dates provided in the conditions for approval recommended by the City Development Department are in keeping with the Land Division application deadlines associated with these appl·ications. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by David Johnson That application PICA 12/16 by Marshall Homes (Copperfield) Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres for the proposed retained parcel and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1 .. That the variance apply only to the proposed lot configuration for the proposed retained parcel, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2.. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application LD 086/12 by October 24, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant submit a preliminary site plan indicating proposed driveway locations to the satisfaction of the City's Engineering & Public Works Department. Page 7 of 9 7 8 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 9, 2016 7:_pm Council Chambers 4. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction on the proposed retained parcel by February 18, 2017, or this decision affecting the proposed detached dwelling shall become null and void. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by David Johnson Carried Unanimously That application PICA 13/16 by Marshall Homes (Copperfield) Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres for the proposed severed parcel and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan arid the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the variance apply only to the proposed lot configuration for the proposed severed parcel, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2~ That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application LD 086/12 by October 24, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant submit a preliminary site plan indicating proposed driveway locations to the satisfaction of the City's Engineering & Public Works Department. 4. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction on the proposed retained parcel by February 18, 201_7, or this decision affecting the proposed detached dwelling shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 8 of 9 Committee of Adjustment 9 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, March 9, 2016 7:_· pm Council Chambers (IV) Adjournment Date Chair Moved by David Johnson Seconded by Eric Newton That the 3rd meeting of the 2016 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:30 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, March 30, 2016. Carried Unanimously Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Page 9 of 9 10 From: Subject: Application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP ·Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 14116 Meeting Date: March 30, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 14/16 Louisville Homes Limited 1820 Fairport Road The applicant requests relieffrom Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7378114, to permit a maximum garage projection of 9.8 metres beyond the wall containing the main entrance to the dwelling unit; whereas the by-law permits a maximum garage projection of 2.0 metres beyond the wall containing the main entrance to the dwelling unit. The applicant requests approval of this minor· variance application. in order to obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling with an attached three-car garage projecting into the front yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a maximum garage projection of 9.8 metres beyond the wall containing the main entrance to t~e dwelling unit to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general · intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 30, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -Urban Residential Areas-Low Density Areas within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7378114-"R3"-Third Density Residential Zone Report PICA 14/16 Appropriateness of the Application March 30, 2016 Page2 Garage Projection beyond the Wall containing the Main Entrance to the Dwelling Unit • the intent of the maximum 2.0 metre garage projection requirement is to encourage a style of development on the subject property which is similar and. compatible with existing development on Fairport Road by preventing the establishment of an attached garage significantly projecting beyond the front of the dwelling • the intent is also to maintain an adequate buffer space between structures on a property and street activity, as well as avoiding any adverse impact on the streets cape • the site specific by-law for the subject property includes a provision that the garage cannot project 2.0 metres beyond the wall containing the main entrance to the dwelling unit • the applicant is proposing a maximum garage projection of 9.8 metres beyond the wall containing the main entrance to the dwelling unit • the proposed development will maintain the minimum required front yard depth of 7.5 metres, which will provide an adequate buffer space between the dwelling and street activity • the proposed development is consistent with the character of the neighbourhood as dwellings along Fairport Road consist of a variety of custom built homes of similar design, including a garage projecting from the main entrance to the dwelling • the proposed orientation of the garage doors in addition to residential floor space above the garage will blend in with the residential character of the street • proposed windows along the front elevation of the garage facing Fairport Road will minimize the appearance of an extended garage projection • staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in 'nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Date of report: March 22, 2016 Comments prepared by: AV, _ . .., .. -~-~:> .. ( 1}~-y. . _,/'' ~ 0 ~alii~/Paray, MCIP, RPP Planner I LP:MM:Id J:\Documents\Devefopment\0-3700\2016\PCA 14-16\Report\PCA 14-16.doc Enclosures Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review 11 STREET UNA w 1---+----l 0 1---+----l ~ 1---+----l [L 1--t----lUl ,--I - ==~wrNJ.RDEN I CRE~ckNT -I II~ II . I-z 0 w 0 0::: Ul w w I- 0::: Ul 0 <{ :::;;: z w ~ w 0 0 0::: <{ f---r---<{ I C) Ul ""'-z ~ f--s: _,L 1/ -I t--t--SUBJECT PROPERTY ~1----+..--j 1--T-------1 ~1----+..--j ~----~------1 ~if--------1---j _l '---1--'1-r-----\-r-----l [L City Development Department ~~ ' Cl ~ ·~ ~'/ :1 ;;N I I CRESCENT / Location Map FILE No: PICA 14/16 APPLICANT: Louisville Homes Limited. Data Sources: Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Ita suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not c plan of aurvey. 2013 MPAC and Jta suppliers. All riohts Reserved. Not c plan of Survey. \---~--1 <{f------+1 DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 SCALE 1:5000 PN-7 I! ) I! ) .., . . . . . 44 . 0 ~ to pe r m i t a ma x i m u m ga r a g e pr o j e c t i o n of 9. 8 me t r e s be y o n d th e wa l l co n t a i n i n g th e ma i n en t r a n c e to th e dw e l l i n g un i t \ ~ \ \ 9. 8 1~ 1 1 { / ~- - - - + - - - - - - 2 4 . 5 r -1 12 . 1 PR O P O S E D 2 ST O R E Y DW E L L I N G 0 11 . 9 '= : I r s 1 .1 . 7 1 I 44 . 0 Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 14 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : Lo u i s v i l l e Ho m e s Li m i t e d . PR O P O S E D GA R A G E PR O P O S E D DR I V E W A Y Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Lo t 3, Pl a n 40 M - 2 5 5 2 (1 8 2 0 Fa i r p o r t Ro a d ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . 7.5 I!) Lri ..,..... -· 0 <( 0 0:::: ~ 0 a.. 0:::: ~ 1' I DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 ~ Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t ~ ~ ~IP t r ' 11 1 " ~. I I H I I I L. l . I I · ·. • = I E§l l 0 [ 111 5§ FR O N T (W E S T ) EL E V A T I O N Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 14 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : Lo u i s v i l l e Ho m e s Li m i t e d . PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Lo t 3, Pl a n 40 M - 2 5 5 2 (1 8 2 0 Fa i r p o r t Ro a d ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CIT Y OF PIC K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t SI D E (S O U T H ) EL E V A T I O N Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 14 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : Lo u i s v i l l e Ho m e s Li m i t e d . PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Lo t 3, Pl a n 40 M - 2 5 5 2 (1 8 2 0 Fa i r p o r t Ro a d ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CIT Y OF PIC K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . r·-__. DATE: Mar. 6, 2016c.n 16 Report to Committee of Adjustment · Application Number: PICA 15116 Meeting Date: March 30, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 15116 A. Sparks 1885 Spruce Hill Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent; whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. · The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed parcel (fronting Grayabbey Court) which will be created through Land Division application LD 029116. Recommendation The City Development Department recommends that minor variance application PICA 15116 be Deferred in order to allow staff to review the concurrent Land Division application and for the applicant to provide conceptual building elevations and floor plans. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan-Urban Residential Areas-Low Density Areas within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036-"R4", Fourth Density Residential Zone Date of report: March 22, 2016 Comments prepared by: L;_)/ ;tat(;. Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP Planner I LP:MM:Id J:\Documents\Developmen"D-3700\2016\PCA 15-16\Report\PCA 15-16_defferal.doc Enclosures Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review City Development· Department McPHERSON PARK r-~--~~r-----~ 1--t--------l::::J TAPLIN r-~----lg: t-----r-------r--------1 r-~----1(/) 1-----rrr~ohr----t--------1 ~==~==~~r-~--~ 1'----f----'1 ~r----.-'---1 :::2: Location Map FILE No:P/CA 15/16 APPLICANT: A. Sparks PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:RCP Lot 72, Plan 1041 (1885 Spruce Hill Road) DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 SCALE 1 :5000 PN-7 17 0 ~ 0 0::: E ... . J ~ ... . J N :r : N w ( ) ::: > 0::: a.. C/ ) Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t . 51 . 3 m AR E A TO BE RE T A I N E D PA R C E L 1- A I __ JJ 11 7 6 SQ U A R E ME T R E S 38 . 1 m (/ ) w 0:: O m I - Q w , W E o: : - - : - : 2 : 1- w . . . J w en ~> W e : : N r -; I 1: I I E N PROPOSED to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres E en N N ~ :::> 0 () >-w w w o ~ N 0: : C J ) O : : = : l ~w o : : C o I BU I L D I N G ENVELOPE a:l a:l ~ .I GARA~ , - Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 15 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : A. Sp a r k s c: l o . . : C J ) 1.0 f'. . . 00 38 . 1 m ~- I to pe r m i t a ma x i m u m lo t co v e r a g e of 38 pe r c e n t __ l.L~ E N ..-- PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : RC P Lo t 72 , Pl a n 1 04 1 (1 8 8 5 Sp r u c e Hi l l Road) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . >-w 0::: <.9 1' DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 CD Report to Committee .of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 16116 Meeting Date: March 30, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 16116 S. & H. Sparks 1891 Spruce Hill Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent; whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed parcel (fronting Grayabbey Court) which will be created through Land Division application LD 030116. Recommendation The City Development Department recommends that minor variance application PICA 16116 be Deferred in order to allow staff to review the concurrent Land Division application and for the applicant to provide conceptual building elevations and floor plans. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended -"R4", Fourth Density Residential Zone Date of report: March 23, 2016 Comments prepared by: dA~· Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP Planner I LP:MM:Id J:\Documents\Development\0-3700\2016\PCA 16-16\Report\PCA 16-16_defferal.doc Enclosures Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review 19 20 City Development . Department J. McPHERSON PARK Location Map ~-4--~~~----~ t------1---I:::J ~---~---1~~---,~~-------+--------~ ~-4---1~~---4~~~----~--------~ t==~==j~r-~---1 ~-T--~~~~---1 :::;; FILE No:P/CA 16/16 APPLICANT: S. & H. Sparks PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:RCP Lot 73, Plan 1041 (1991 Spruce Hill Road) DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 SCALE 1 :5000 PN-7 · 0 ~ 0:: : _ J _ J :c w u ::: : > 0:: : a.. Cl ) 15 . 1 ' E co N N Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t to permit a · · . yard width ~~~~~um side E N 51 . 3 m 1 - EX I S T I N G AR E A TO AB O V E G R O O N D II \ ' " 1 r• 4 8 . 1 m - __ f: ! , st' DW E L L L I N G BE RE T A I N E D PO O L .P A R C E L 1 A ~I 4 : 11 7 2 SQ U - . AR E ME T R E S o m l - I o w , w I 1- o : : . . . - - : : 2 : I <C~ u : J w CD ww o O : : 1 PROPOSE t .... . ·~ (/ ) 0:: :3 . BUILDING ENV~LOPE I w [f o I Il l (/ ) ff i I I 00 ---r--, 51 . 3 m ~A 1rn ... to pe r m i t a ma x i m u m co v e r a g e of 38 lo t pe r c e n t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 16 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : S. & H. Sp a r k s PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : RC P Lo t 73 , Pl a n 10 4 1 (1 9 9 1 Sp r u c e Hi l l Road) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VIE W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . · metres I I E I ""'" ~I I I I I ' 1' DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 ~ 22 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment ' Application Number: PICA 17116 Meeting Date: March 30, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Application Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 17116 N. Ganeshan 343 Finch Avenue The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum east side yard width of 1.5 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 3.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to construct an addition to an existing detached dwelling for an attached garage. Recommendation The City Development Department ·considers a minimum east side yard width of 1.5 metres to a proposed attached garage to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 30, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan-Urban Residential Areas-Low Density Areas within the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 -"A" -Rural Agricultural Zone Report PICA 17/16 March 30, 2016 Page2 Appropriateness of the Application Side Yard Width Variance • the intent of a minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate separation distance between structures on abutting properties in order to maintain pedestrian access, to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility metres and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the applicant has requested a variance to reduce the minimum side yard width from 3.0 metres to 1.5 metres from the east lot line for a proposed addition • the proposed side yard setback will provide an adequate separation between the dwelling and the property line to accommodate pedestrian access, grading, drainage and residential utility services • the proposed side yard setback will maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood as the future redevelopment of the properties to the east, along Finch Avenue, have been approved to have minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Durham Region Environmental • Health Division a site plan indicating the location of the private sewage system (tank and leaching bed), all structures, well(s) and any bodies of water and all clearance distances from the above mentioned attributes will be required through the building permit process Engineering & Public Works Date of report: March 22, 2016 Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:Id J:\Oocuments\Development\0-3700\2016\PCA 17-16\Report\PCA 17-16.docx Enclosures • all water must be contained on the applicants property, and not negatively affect adjacent property to the east · · • this will be reviewed through the building permit process Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review 23 City Development Department 0 <t 0 ~ <t z 0 ~ <t Location Map FILE No:P/CA 17/16 APPLICANT: N. Ganeshan AVENUE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Lot 7, Plan 566, Part 1 Plan 40R-2543, (343 Finch Avenue) Data Sources: Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not o plan of survey. 2013 UPAC and Its supl)liera. All ri hts Reserved. Not a pion of Survey. DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 SCALE 1 :5000 PN-14 City Development Department FINCH AVENUE I I I I I I I I I I I El "":I "t"""l 0)1 I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING GARAGE TOBE DEMOLISHED I I~ I • . ld'; I I I I· I I I I L ___ _1_2.8~-_ _j Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 17/16 APPLICANT: N. Ganeshan To permit a minimum east side yard width of 1.5 metres PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Plan 566, Part 1 Plan 40R-2543, (343 Finch Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 26 From: Subject: Application Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 18/16 Meeting Date: March 30, 2016 Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP · Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 18/16 P. & M. Buerschaper 474 Rosebank Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent; whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a one-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed parcel (fronting Pike Court) which will be created through Land Division application LD 135/15. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and iri keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed detached dwelling on the proposed severed parcel (fronting Pike Court) as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan. 2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application LD 135/15, or this decision shall become mill and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 30, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan-Urban Residential-Low Density Areas within the Rosebank Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511 -"R4"-Fourth Density Residential Zone Report PICA 18/16 March 30, 2016 Page 2 Appropriateness of the Application Side Yard Setback Variance • the intent of a minimum side yard setback is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties in order to maintain pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the applicant has requested a variance to reduce the minimum side yard width from 1.5 metres to 1.2 metres for a one-storey detached dwellfng • the proposed side yard setbacks will provide an adequate separation between the dwelling and the property line to accommodate pedestrian access, grading, drainage and residential utility services • the proposed side yard setbacks will maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood Maximum Lot Coverage Variance • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings, are appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot • the Zoning By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • the ownerhas requested a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent to accommodate a one-storey dwelling • the proposed lot coverage is appropriate for the development of the lands as the size and massing of the proposed dwelling will. be compatible with the existing character of the surrounding neighbourhood Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sou·rces Engineering & Public Works Date of report: March 22, 2016 Comments prepared by: ~~~- Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP Planner I LP:MM:Id J:\Documents\Developmen"D·3700\2016\PCA 18·16\Report\PCA 18·16.doc Enclosures • the proposed grading will be reviewed through the building permit process !hi( .~ty~ Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review 27 28 ©OW ©I? City Development Department (!) t---t----l w t---+---1 t---t-----15 ~t---t----1 ~ r=-=J iT t---t----l I t---+----1 t----+---r(§ t---t----1 Ill ~ , n 1"3r::l-f 0:: :::l -,.. '~., . 0 0 .L ' I I ll. t I .l 1 P/l IR I0/10 r---- I I I rr Location Map FILE No: PICA 18/16 1---t----l ~ r-~ r-1-----1---1 z z r--t----- 1----t--1 :5 -~ ~~----_,----, w ,.----(!) .-----t----1 t---+--1~ ~~--~~ o _ o.-------j...---1 t------t----12 r-- r-- APPLICANT: P. & M. Buerschaper PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:North Part of Lot 113, Plan 350 DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 SCALE 1 :5000 PN-1 ~ :: J 0 () UJ ~ a_ Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t E N ... . . . . . ~ 56 . 1 m ·E {: ' ! 1.{ ) i ~-t l J ( · ~ PR O P O S E D l! = = l l DW E L L L I N G -· - · - 1 PR O P O S E D DR I V E W A Y I ~:= : - _ _ ) -l ~ to pe r m i t a ma x i m u m lo t co v e r a g e of 38 pe r c e n t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 18 / 1 6 ~v lr / 4 E "' ! ... . . . . to pe r m i t a mi n i m u m si d e ya r d wi d t h of 1. 2 me t r e s AP P L I C A N T : P. & M. Bu e r s c h a p e r 11 I I= : ! ~=. : . . 56 . 1m PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : No r t h Pa r t of Lo t 11 3 , Pl a n 35 0 (4 7 4 Ho s e b a n k Road) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CIT Y OF PIC K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . 1' E N 1.{) ...--, DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 ~ Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t E (S O U T H ) EL E V A T I O N Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 18 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : P. & M. Bu e r s c h a p e r PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : No r t h Pa r t of Lo t 11 3 , Pl a n 35 0 (4 7 4 Ro s e b a n k Road) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CIT Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 FR O N T (W E S T ) EL E V A T I O N RE A R (EAST) ELEVATION Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 18 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : P. & M. Bu e r s c h a p e r Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : No r t h Pa r t of Lo t 11 3 , Pl a n 35 0 (4 7 4 Ro s e b a n k Road) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . . M (.o) DATE: ar. 6, 2016_.. 32 From: Subject: Application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 19116 Meeting Date: March 30, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 19116 R. & 0. Slobojan 1975 Lodge Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 230175 to permit a private garage setback not less than 4.6 metres from a streetline, whereas the by-law states that each dwelling shall have at least one private garage setback not less than 6.0 metres from a street. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct an addition to an existing two-storey detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a private garage setback 4.6 metres from a streetline to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and. in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 30, 2017 or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -Urban Residential Areas-Low Density Areas, within the Liverpool Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 230n5 -"S2"-Single Detached Dwelling Zone Report PICA 19/16 March 30, 2016 Page 2 Appropriateness of the Application Private Garage Setback from the Streetline Variance • the intent of the zoning by-law in requiring a minimum setback from a private garage to the streetline is to ensure that an adequate parking area and separation distance is provided between a dwelling and the street . • the by-law requires a minimum setback of 6.0 metres from a private garage to the streetline • the applicant is requesting to reduce the required setback from 6.0 metres to 4.6 metres in order to construct an addition to an existing dwelling • the reduced setback to the garage will still maintain an adequate landscaped area and a parking area between the dwelling and the street • the proposed setback between the private garage and streetline is 10.4 metres • the reduced setback will not obstruct the streetview of abutting property owners and will not impact the character of the streetscape along Poppy Lane • the requested variance is minor in nature desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the intent of the zoning by-law and Official Plan Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Date of report: March 22, 2016 Comments Rrepared by: Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:Id J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2016\PCA 19-16\Report\PCA 19-16.docx Enclosures • no concerns Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review 33 34 GLENGROVE PUBLIC SCHOOL Location Map FILE No: P/CA 19/16 APPLICANT: R. & 0. Slobojan 0::: 0 0 0::: 0::: 0 u 0 0::: 0 >-::r:: 0::: 0 0 0::: 0::: 0 u ~NA /iJ City Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: lot 7, Plan M1079 (1975 Lodge Road) DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 SCALE 1 :5000 PN-9 E I.() 47 . 2 m ......: ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ = ~ - - - ~ ~ 19 . 4 m r RE A R SE T BA C K I .I E'l "''I I. ( ) ... . . . . ·~~~~ . f . % t 0 ~)i? . ~ ; ~ : S ? : ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ : % % 8 ~ . < ; % ? ~ ~ % . % ~ ~ % % / - ~ . ~ § 3 W d 5 . ,,~, ~ ~ - : , : ; ; / / / / " ., , , / / // . "/ / § : / ... - .· 1 ' / , ' · X " ' / 0{:_ ~ } ! ; } · · · ( / / / ' _ : ; / - X · / ·"/<./>··///·· ·{.-;.~ ~~~~ ~ " . ~ :::: : : . ; : } : ; 0.? {~~~~ 0 w ( ) : ; : : . /;~/: : - : . - / : : : . % · x : : . ; ~ ~ ~ ~ r t { ~ ~ < : 0 1 ' ~ ; ; : ; : S . : : ; : < ~ ; . , I"'" ~ ~ · . ·· / / / [ /% · : ; ? . » , . /: v:; · / · ~ ; : · ~ ~ & ~ / / ' / / / / ;;.;; ~~\~? : . · ; ; ; ; : % ~ ? : / : ? ? ' ; ~ : : : ~ . ~ - · · ~ ) i f >00> 1 ; t / k { : > i ~ ~ . J X : : . : : .:.- ,. > ,~ ... ·:-- . "~: ~ : ·> / : ; 0 ··· _. "/ / / . '//.Z · : / " / / · ~ / : . , . . . . : % < / r /./~·/.-' .. /·%-Z ~~) ~ >%.:% · % ~ > ? , ] % ; ; , ; _ ; : EX I S T I N G ~.;~·;/!f ; l % & / ) ; f < / . / f / J / : ~ : : 0 · · ~ : < . { ; { / ~ . ;r;}; ~~ ~""" /~/; / . ' /~/. · .. ... m· -: ' X . DW E L L L I N G // , . /. / / . . ; ; : ; ; ; ; ; / ;-: //• / /,./•/..-.· .. '";~ ; , ,: . · 0 - ' / / •.·· .' / / .. :/ / ; ; ( ; ·; : : - : .-?: / ~ " ... .--: : /. · ' ; . . : ; X ' i : '/'":.>0.1./·' • .. · . ..-/.·:0"-'/;/. .. //. ~~~ ~ : ~ ;, · : .. !;.; . : ~ ~ / ; . ; / / f - 0 ' ? , f;%- J ; f ; ; ' / , ~ : ~ ; } . " l ; : . - - : ; . < / ;:.:. ~~~. ~ . ~ ~ - ; - ' . » ; : ; ? J { # . · ~/}~: j , ' ) ( . ~ ; , ; . / / . / ' / X - ' / : : ' / ; / ' ) .. j/ ; ; ; ; ) / ' / ; / j ' ; J 8 . .. •. ~>;)/ ~~·~ : , \ " ' ~ · . ; ; . - _ ; . ) / / ~ ~ ; / . { : : : : : : : : : / ' ) ' : / ; / ; · : " f < / : : < : . - : : > - < · ) ~ / ; w ; : ; . : ; ~ ; : > _ . ; ; _ . ~ 1%'~ ~ ~ ~ <<:. r : W . i : : : . { : i w / : : 7 . : < : } { ~ & ; · ~ · . 0 : : : : j < / z ~ 0 : : i : ; > ... ::;;;:.:::::. f~~} : ~ ~ . : ; R ~ b ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ?f; , : ? f / j f % ; ; ? ! ; { . : ; : ,_ "::;(;f¥~q~~2(G~ ~~~~* ~ : ~ ~ ~ AD D I T l O N ~~.~ ~ @ : ~ 0 / ;/>~ : , % ? " ~ ' ;; /; : } ; . ' /.;;;{f:?';:;;~. ·~ ,.;.",:~-% " ,, , _ , , , __ ., . _ , · . • • " , . , , •• -.~ ~ ~ .• • !' . / . • / - / J ~//.~0'~~--::.:(;..': ~:·;;:;,:.;. I - - ~ ; ; - ~ ~ - - E .. . . . . . . . . ., . . E "~~ ~ ~> m . ~ -~ I "" " .., j - l:l ! i l g J L _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _ _ _ .4 2 = - 6 . ! ! L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : PI C A 19 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : R. & 0. Sl o b o j a n PO P P Y LA N E to pe r m i t a pr i v a t e garage se t b a c k no t le s s than 4.6 me t r e s fr o m a streetline PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Lo t 7, Pl a n M1 07 9 (1 9 7 5 Lo d g e Ro a d ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PIC K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T 6.9m FRONT SET BACK 1 I ~I Cl <C 0 or 0:: ....... [ w (.!) Cl 0 _J I ) / / / ---1' I DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 ~ I I I I I ) ..., / I . I I r I j ·I ~II j~ ~ - = t - J Jt Ill II~ I If II II II .,. . , . _ HC R I Z O O A t SD N C ' ·f I- I I I Ill Ill Ill G IN i l O W S - "' <II E I a. .. · Rl l . . - - - - - - - - - · · . · - _ · - - _ _ _ : _ _ , R E A R (N O R T H ) EL E V A T I O N ... , I I I I < I . ) 1T, ' ' ' / / / D D · o o D c = J Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FR O N T (S O U T H ) EL E V A T I O N FI L E No : P/ C A 19 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : R. & 0. Sl o b o j a n .. fF I I I . ' I I N ' J l AI. SIOIHG 1 0 - Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Lo t 7, Pl a n M1 0 7 9 (1 9 7 5 Lo d g e Ro a d ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VIE W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T 0') r I I I I ~ ' 0 I= C= :== i= I= t;::; ~ I iUNl Lfjj li ;I· !1 $ROUND FlOOR lEVE flTil rrrrn-DATE: Mar. 6, 2016 we PR E F I N . V1N ' t L HO R I Z O N T A L siD I N ' 'R E F I N . VIN ' t l . : HO R I Z O N T A L SID I N G . RY I \ . SI D E (W E S T ) EL E V A T I O N SI D E (E A S T ) ELEVATION Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 19 / 1 6 AP P L I C A N T : R. & 0. Sl o b o j a n PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Lo t 7, Pl a n M1 0 7 9 (1 9 7 5 Lo d g e Ro a d ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VIE W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . .... DATE: Mar. 6, 2016~ 38 From: Subject: Application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 20116 Meeting Date: March 30, 2016 Principal Planner-Development Review Commit~ee of Adjustment Application PICA 20116 B. & L. Woodbine 305 T oynevale Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended to permit uncovered steps and a platform (deck) to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law does not permit uncovered steps or platforms to project into the required rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a deck in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers uncovered steps and a platform (deck) to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed uncovered steps and deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 30, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Background On August 26, 2015, the Committee of Adjustment approved Minor Variance Application PICA 96115 for the subject property, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres, a minimum lot area of 460 square metres, minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, and a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Rosebank Neighbourhood. Zonin'g By-law 2511 -"R3"-Third Density Residential Zone Report PICA 20/16 March 30, 2016 Page2 Appropriateness of the Application Uncovered Steps and Platform Projecting into the Required Rear Yard Variance • the intent of restricting projections into the required rear yard is to ensure an adequate amenity space is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting property owners and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage • the by-law does not permit uncovered steps and platforms to project into the required rear yard • the applicant is proposing a deck and associated steps to project into the rear yard; the deck is a total of 2.4 metres, although only 1.5 metres of the deck projects into the required rear yard (7.5 metres) • there does not appear to be any adverse impacts on adjacent neighbours due to the proposed deck • an adequate buffer space between the proposed deck and the rear lot line as well as from abutting property owners will be maintained • the proposed deck will provide for additional outdoor amenity area and maintains an adequate soft landscaped area in the rear yard • staff are of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the property, and maintains the intent of the Pickering Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Date of report: March 22, 2016 Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:Id J:\Documents\Development\0-3700\2016\PCA 20-16\Report\PCA 20_16.doc Enclosures • no comments !YJI{ .rw{addraJvl Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review 39 ROUGE. City Development Department Location Map FILE No: PICA 20/16 APPLICANT: B. & L. Woodbine PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Pt Lot 28,Pian 350,Part 2, Plan 40R-28820 (305 Toynevale Road) DATE: Mar. 9, 2016 oa;,c;,.;~~rcE~ierprlsee Inc. and Its suppliers. All ·rtghta Reserved. Not a plan of survey. SCALE 1 :5,QQQ PN .. 1 2013 t.APAC and Its suppliers. All ri hts Reserved. Not a plan of Surve . > cp - 1.5m--. I , - TOYNEVALE AVENUE . ! "-.. 15.2' I I • 'fl - : , ! v I 1.5m~ b I I I I L--------'"'-t---PRQPQSEO NEW 2 STOREY DWELUNG .J 1 I -~~~~~~~~--~------------- 1 _-1 iTfA 'o lr----------..-1~---r-~ IIIII o:: .It~ \ j I to permit uncovered steps and a platform( deck) to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard i ~~ I~ ~ 2.4m E [5~ =tc .x; LO 0:: ra -~1- - Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 20/16 ....... ::::>~ ~ z ~ APPLICANT: B. & L. Woodbine -~- i PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 350, Pt Lot 28, 40R-28820 Part 2 City Development Department (305 Toynevale Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. / DATE: Mar. 9, 2016 4 City Development Department I I ! ! DDDDDD DDDDDD DDDDDD DDDDDD DDDDDD I I I l I I ~ l FRONT (NORTH) ELEVATION REAR (SOUTH) ELEVATION Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 20/16 APPLICANT: B. & L. Woodbine I I l l PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 350, Pt Lot 28, 40R-28820 Part 2 (305 Toynevale Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Mar. 91 2016 I I I I I I ! ! ! ! I I I I I I I I I I I I SIDE (EAST) ELEVATION Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 20/16 APPLICANT: B. & L. Woodbine PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 350, Pt Lot 28, 40R-28820 Part 2 City Development Department (305 Toynevale Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PlAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Mar. 9, 2016