Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLN 06-14 ear c0 ` Report to Council PICKERING Report Number: PLN 06-14 Date: January 27, 2014 From Thomas Melymuk Director, City Development Subject: Intention to Designate under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act - 2865 Sideline 16 (Walter Percy House) Recommendation: 1. That Report PLN 06-14 of the Director, City Development, regarding the heritage designation of 2865 Sideline 16 (Walter Percy House), be received; 2. That Council endorse the recommendations of the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee to designate 2865 Sideline 16 (Walter Percy House); 3. That 2865 Sideline 16 (Walter Percy House), be designated under Part IV, of the Ontario Heritage Act; 4. That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve Council's Notice of Intention to Designate in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act; 5. That if there are no.objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, that the designation by-law be forwarded to Council for enactment; and 6. Further, that a copy of this Report and Council's Resolution be forwarded to the Minister of Infrastructure, Infrastructure Ontario, and Del Management Solutions. Executive Summary: This report recommends that Council state its intention to designate the property at 2865 Sideline 16 (Walter Percy House) under Part IV, of the Ontario Heritage Act. The subject property is located at the south end of Sideline 16, in the Brock-Taunton Neighbourhood of Seaton. The property is not listed on the City's Municipal Heritage Register. Del Management Solutions, on behalf of Infrastructure Ontario, inquired if the City had any heritage interest in three properties in Seaton, as Infrastructure Ontario intended to demolish the buildings on the lands located at 325 Highway 7, 1710 Whitevale Road and 2865 Sideline 16. In October 2013, the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee passed a motion recommending a heritage evaluation be prepared to assess the heritage features and historic value of the three properties. The heritage evaluation recommended listing, or designation, of 2865 Sideline 16 would be appropriate mechanisms to retain the building. 47 A Report PLN 06-14 January 27, 2014 Subject: Intention to Designate 2865 Sideline 16 Page 2 On January 9, 2014, a motion was passed at a special Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee recommending City staff prepare a Report to Council for the designation of the property at 2865 Sideline 16 under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Staff concur with the recommendation of Heritage Pickering. Accordingly, staff recommend Council endorse the designation of the property and authorize staff to commence the required process by publishing the Notice of Intent to Designate in the local newspaper, and notifying the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust. If no objections are received within the 30 day notice period, staff will prepare the designating by-law containing the reasons for designation and forward it to Council for passing. Financial Implications: Not Applicable Background Del Management Solutions advised the City that Infrastructure Ontario intends to demolish three buildings located in Seaton Del Management Solutions, on behalf of Infrastructure Ontario inquired if the City had • any heritage interest in properties located at 325 Highway 7, 1710 Whitevale Road and 2865 Sideline 16 (see Location Maps, Attachment#1, #2 and #3). Del Management Solutions advised that Infrastructure Ontario intends to demolish the buildings located on these properties and did not provide a reason for the demolitions. The properties are not listed on the City's Municipal Heritage Register. At the October 24, 2013 Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee Meeting, the Committee recommended that staff proceed with a heritage review of the properties to assess the heritage features and historic value of the buildings. The firm of Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects was retained by the City and prepared heritage evaluation reports for the three properties. The preliminary heritage reviews prepared for 325 Highway 7 and 1710 Whitevale Road concluded that these properties were of diminished heritage interest. The City's Heritage Consultant recommended 2865 Sideline 16 be listed or . designated The City's Heritage consultant prepared a detailed building heritage assessment for 2865 Sideline 16 (see Building Heritage Assessment, Attachment#5). The assessment documented and determined the heritage value or interest of the subject property. In the consultant's opinion, it was recommended that the property be listed on the City's Municipal Heritage Register or designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act to retain the modest stone farmhouse from the late 19th century. 48 Report PLN 06-14 January 27, 2014 Subject: Intention to Designate 2865 Sideline 16 Page 3 The property is located at the south end of Sideline 16 in Seaton's Brock-Taunton Neighbourhood. The lands are approximately 10 hectares in size and are surrounded by a natural area. The lands are within the Seaton Natural Heritage System. The house is a one-and-a-half-storey, three-bay stone farmhouse built between 1875 and 1885 in the Gothic revival style and was owned by the Percy family. The house is an interesting example of its kind and type, particularly due to the masonry work. The unique detailing and style of the stonework of the house was carried over to the current gates of the Brougham Christian Pioneer Cemetery. Walter Percy is said to be the mason who constructed a cairn in 1932, which also appears to have been of a similar stonework style. This type of building is increasing rare. However, it is in only fair condition and many of the key historical elements are missing, particularly the original windows, doors and chimneys. It is suggested that the work should be done to repurpose the building while retaining the memory of heritage features. It is also suggested that work be done to secure the site to ensure that water, vermin and vandals are kept out and that the foundations are not impacted. A use should be found for the property to ensure its continued occupancy as the best means for preserving the property. The Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee recommended designation of 2865 Sideline 16 At the January 9, 2014 Special Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee Meeting, a motion was passed recommending Council's approval to designate the property municipally know as 2865 Sideline 16 under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act(see Draft Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee Minutes, Attachment#4). Staff concur with the recommendation of the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee The property is worthy of designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value. The property meets the criteria for municipal designation prescribed by the Ontario Heritage Act under the three categories of design, associative and contextual value. The reasons for designation are provided as Attachment#6. The property is owned by Infrastructure Ontario. Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act which allows municipalities to designate properties does not apply to provincially owned lands. Therefore, should Council pass a designation by-law, Infrastructure Ontario is not obligated to comply with the by-law. Should Council support Heritage Pickering's request, the City Clerk will commence the designation procedures. This includes serving the Notice of Intent to Designate to the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust, and placing an advertisement in the local newspaper. If no objections are received within 30 days, a designation by-law will be forwarded to Council for enactment describing the reasons for designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act. 49 Report PLN 06-14 January 27, 2014 Subject: Intention to Designate 2865 Sideline 16 Page 4 The Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee is interested in investigating the 'designation of significant Heritage properties located in Seaton The Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee is considering investigating the designation. of other significant heritage properties located in Seaton which are currently owned by Infrastructure Ontario. The lots are predominately located along Whitevale Road and do not form part of the Seaton subdivision plans. It is anticipated that the research to justify the designations will occur this year, with funding coming from the Seaton. Development Application Revenue reserve. A subsequent Report to Council on this matter will be forwarded to Council later this year. Attachments: 1. Location Map, 325 Highway 7 2. Location Map, 1710 Whitevale Road 3. Location Map, 2865 Sideline 16 4. Draft January 9, 2014 Special Heritage Committee Meeting Minutes 5. Building Heritage Assessment 6. Reasons for Designation Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: kLy Cristina Celebre, MCIP, RPP Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner— Development Review Chief Planner & He itage • Ni esh urti, MCIP, RPP Thomas MelymutIMCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Director, City Development Urban Design CC:Id Recommended for the consideration of Pickering C'ty Council / "iii jeut . 23, 20/4 Tony Prevedel, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer ATTACHMENT I_—TO REPORT# • PLfs Ob-ILi �- J / 1---- . ) ( - -cm_ jr-------------- h M • C v J - 1 GREEN RIVEN .� LowJuw' CENTRE a.�v>Kr ryauaLN - `HIGHWAY 7 _. —� L y4---- r -111\G ' EN , SUBJECT PROPERTY R t ° aI1-uI1 ) z1 ' a PH ' • •\ s 1 -■_____, T 1 \ ` H Location Map City°i _ •- APPLICANT: Del Management Solutions Inc. z *. _– PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:325 Highway 7 (Con 5, Part of Lot 32) vceclusizit City Development DATE:Jan.20,2014 onto so�r«z: 3 2e073 4 x eapnd nc p aed r ci f>A l eR.eAe vre9dH. N Rt e a eaOn S a a rvpy o W,yey SCALE 1:10,000 PN-RU 51 ATTACHMENT# 2 TO REPORT 1/ PAN c6--i'/ \ . o / 0 1 i ( ,. 1 • •UBJECT P•OPERTY i ATTACHMENT# 3 TO REPORT# PIA Ob.-ii-/ • . )-____. 4111• • i U • I 4 f L,,t r------\ ,A • • • 0 ..• ��• ° ° i°ii �;. PRO � . �; • °• ° •❖� • ■ •_ . 4 • i / ao� . TAUNT- 1 �ia P �pv* � 1. 5-00!••••''' I■- .............. t.," ill -,42--.ND • .,..rra r I II , ,ir III 1 , , / ® :i ' wok, N A Location Map City 4 " APPLICANT: Del Management Solutions Inc . ' ��--_ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:2865 Sideline 16 (Con 4, South Part of Lot 16) City Development DATE:Jan.20,2014 Data Sources: Q Teronet Enterprise% Inc and Its suppliers- All rights ReaerveC. Na[ a pion of survey. SCALE 1:10,000 PN-RU �2013 MPAC onC its aupplien. All rights ReaerveC. Not a plan of Survey- ' 53 • • A rTRCH NfiENT# 4/ TO :PORT # PLN Excerpts from the City o Minutes Special Heritage Pickering --44,1°: Fll — —. Advisory Committee Meeting PI KERING January 9, 2014 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Attendees: Councillor Rodrigues T. Besso D.Joyce T. Reimer D. Rundle E. Mason M. Sawchuck C. Sopher S. Sheehan J. Van Huss C. Celebre, Senior Planner, Development Review & Roberts, Recording Secretary ✓„ Absent: S. lyer W. Jamadar kt:: Item/ Details & Discussion Conclusion Action Items'/ :Ref# (summaryyof discussion) ' Status lr (include dead ne as a ppropriato)..l' y 2 0 ;325 Hi hwa 7, 1710 Whitevale;Road &>2865:Sideline;16 9 Y C Celebre provided ah overview of tfe three properties proposed for demolition. She noted that as discussed at the November meeting beenfdetermined that a more extensive ew' revi f;.2865 Sideline 16 be'prepared in order for the Committee;to review and;determine how to proceed. C. Celebre.reviewed the:'recommendations provided in the above noted reports with_the committee members and a discussion period ensued with`tfe following points noted; • Why is demolition being considered as an option if not required — C: Celebre noted no reasons for demolition were given • Possibility of renting out properties and difficulties with respect to property standards concerns • Does the City have authority to request Del to rent or sell properties as opposed to demolition • How much of the committee budget should be incorporated into listing properties, or should the committee concentrate solely on those worthy of designation 54 Page 1 ATTACHMENT t! REPORT (:)& Item 1 Details & DiscUssion & Conclusion Action Items I Ref# (summary of discussion) : Status (include deadline as „a0prOpriate).-':=T --•'. • Why is funding for Seaton heritage properties not part of City Development budget • What about using these properties for affordable housing • Consideration of a by-law specific to heritage properties to incorporate the heritage attributes, giving an extra layer of protection Further discussion ensued with respect to the option of either listing 2865 Sideline 16 or going straight to designation. It was also questioned whether we could add additional properties such as those on Brock Road for:0141g at the same time as this property. C. Celebre noted that it Waspart of the plan to designate the heritage lots identified in the.-S.6:Aon lands in 2014. She noted that City,Development is currently working on a strategy to this effect she would updateIthe Committee. M. Sawchuck noted properties already identified would be less involved to pursue for desigtiations and expenses would be down. = C. Celebre noted she would peak to i4e-ctsypeorge:./at the C. Celebre to Pickering Library with to conducting a historical review action for 325 Hijhway 7 and1710 Whiteval:e-C-Road. It was felt the report prow. ed was sufficient to move forward with'a'd0$ignatiowft-gi2865'SAeline 16; It was questioned 01-ikher'iliqe,pould'kkadditiOfiglOropei-ties connected to the farnilii*woiikf be worth looking into. It was noted this property is Unique, making a strong argument for designation. E. Mason noted concerns that the owners could move forward with aehlolition if designation was pursued. Moved by E4Masori',F-A.,-, Seconded by M. Provided it is determined that 325 Highway 7 and 1710 Whitevale Road have no historical cultural significance, the Committee has no interest in pursuing these properties for listing or designation. Carried 55 Page 2 ATTACHMENT# 7 10 nEpoR' 4c N off,i y Item% Details & Discussion;,811. Conclusior Action=.Items I°`:" Ref# ; (summary of discussion) Status a , include deadline as . appropriate). Moved by C. Sopher C. C'elebre to • Seconded by E. Mason action 1. That staff,prepare a report to bring forward to Council for the designation of 2865 Sideline 16, pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act; 2. That Del Management/Infrastructure Ontario be advised of • the Committee's decision; and _ 2. That staff provide the Committee with timelines;forthe designation of this property. 'x:_:4=;;;4 Carried ;<< y'" -i'_i• ` a,i 56 Page 3 . . ATTACHMENTS 5 TO REPORTS PLA 0 ta°ILI 6BcA ......, ,,.,, .. .,,....,. __ • . . . ... _., ........,....._ .. . .... '.............. . . ••-,„ , ,•..- . - .,_.. . ,11111111111110*,„ , 1 . __ • - ., . -_ • f±." ........ -7.-if--.1„, .--,.. , . . , 13ttii(lill P- I 1 El. tk111L.' A SS(1-4,SS111(.3=1-i t , . 1 ..... -...-47,:k(*- ,, . - • ..---.. .. ,, „ . ,.,..... ....,, , , , ,.. r1 ,.. .„........., , . f • •- I ,, '-„---.-,---y„„-.,-,...„.-.-.. , -, A-,• 5 , • . . . • . i •• .-4,--- ' - • 4.. I ( ' . .. . .. . '„ • . _ . . . ''',•,• .. 1 ..' ,•, '.:', . , . - ,...• „.,,•.;4,,,,„ , , . i . 1 . -4. • • ,,... - ,., .' , ;., ',...„:„. .. .-,...-0,7".. ..„„:„.,,;'-'1':;1.,•.71'1:-'-- .4.4,----.'-':'-'"tr'l. -'1'- ,, .. _ ...' ''„'',,_ 4- ... 4 4.200-• 11: • . ...L. 414 -.- L<,,,,.., L.t . IF— • ,..... . ..,,... 6"Idsm"Bm 2865 1ft i (feline, Pickering, It:.t.4,'; &Company Lid. Ardifteds .' - . for • .....,- - - . ito 362 Davenport Rd. , . . . ... . .„. Suite 100 Cit. '1, ,!•• -' ,-4-1,ii''.., . •-,_ _. _-, --.. 1 • , ,.-fff-f vg:: -,,-,:„...fi_ _ ., Toronto.Ontario , . ;:', .1. 40. ,.. ft*,,f4", -' ?15R 1E6.Canada ' IS Deco) ,' ,, ., „ l•415 929 t' - `4.1 I.._ 57 ATTACHMENT# 5 TO REPUR1 ft Pi-t1 Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Parameters Goldsmith Borgal &Co. Ltd.Architects(GBCA)was requested in the fall of 2013 to prepare an assessment of the property listed as 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering, Ontario. A study has been deemed to be required to determine the heritage importance and condition of this structure and to its recommended disposition. The site was visited on 14 November 2013. 1.2 Assumptions • Assumptions for the work: • • Investigations were limited to visual inspection.We did not conduct any destructive testing nor was the examination done in detail. No building elements were moved during the inspection in deference to health and safety concerns—parts of the structure were infested with bees and fecal material from vermin. • Conservation mitigation work that we may propose is intended to conform to the highest conservation standards and result in the retention of as much historic building material as possible. • Where we suggest that some of the building elements may be removed or significantly changed,we recommend that the general arrangement of the features be recorded and documented in a manner that documents the evolution of the overall structure. 2 58 ATTACHMENT# 5 TO REPORT 0 PL.t' p -iq Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 2. SITE BACKGROUND 2.1 History The subject site(red circle) is documented in the J.J. Beers&Co. Ontario County Atlas, Pickering Twp., of 1877 to the east and south of the hamlet of Brougham seen in the image below(red arrow). • The subject building is located on the property indicated as being owned by D. McBrady in 1877. The property is not listed by the municipality. I Typically, only the residential structures are illustrated in the County Atlas- outbuildings were not generally indicated. In the 1895 pain, the property and the adjacent properties appear to be owned by the Percy family, of which Walter Percy(whose name appears on `iii'1 l•i e ,1 I x �-+—' ° x , t i. •`.1 tc •w e i s ''-'11''''"C"i`i s� A_.•_..-. L•,M� t. •}r k _• i_4 a4Lti.L___ al, Li ' ti- . D a�v .:rd °— - • . " Z • m' % '11, •1 to 1! -. 'a1 ; ATTACHMENT# 5 TO REPORT# Pt_h1 [fib j Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 which allowed J. ;- f ` °'''� g. Mt r: 3` ` ".., F:n -;...e l‘EtF7QLk A ds 5 I r Percy to t _f x, ,r G ,� r . r, ,, „ ; ,,rte acquire the ,i- ,.,�, ,.",7°,; ,._` ,�_,... subject P 1 ,f1� - no : ,:�. -1 property, it is -.' 1, `_. s. k' 1 4 ; ;. reasonable to Vit.- ,r-"4 '``r u t ', 3 1 k assume that a :�_ _ . ,'; `.,,. ▪�,ks new house , G 1, t., - :; I was y, _'1 r '*=,,ro .,N it A .$',.. constructed, �i _Y�aa -. - , f/ c _ j sometime f q ti I : , ki after 1877- s or roughly __ S 1 ''P y 1<r t 4%t , t between ' �: 1 1 t m '} I �' '% 1880 and .-/f i 1r4 I - _+ If* I t,� -:�; '"2.1• t 1890. The , _ _ _,: 1 evidence of •• ' r �'* , r ` ;" I \ , the original ! t `, t .,c, ; v 4,- house "I ;*�1 i �,' =:. ; i=` I I „. appears to i N e +,st-•r � support this L . 0°.' �r 1. idea. ,;,' i`_ x , ° , 't One other 1 V i f ��1stior) ,,t a` t i, ; figure then i; s� 4 ,3 • •' ,�. ' 1 `a 1 ( . pops up. That ' ;`,:;:g. ,''"4',� _ c'r,.�`a , , ., • '5 :.• is the enigma > d . h ,,, { Z' n t. of the 1 M * .` ' � " concrete ; .,.- - e It plaque on the ,i » � front wall of `,- _• , .1 ,.,4., • the house. This is tied in with the unusual masonry work on the house. Due to the limited nature of this current report,our research could not be exhaustive. However,Walter Percy crops up in the memorial service document for the Brougham Union Cemetery(see following page). As this cemetery is listed as being on lot 19 in Brougham, it can reasonably be assumed that this site is now named the Brougham Pioneer Cemetery. Of interest is that the Union Cemetery brochure has,on its cover, an image of a Cairn of which a Walter Percy is • said to have been the builder. Percy is stated in the brochure to have constructed the cairn in 1932 when he was 71 years of age. Assuming this is so,Walter Percy would have been born in 1861 and would have been approximately 20 to 30 years of age when the subject house was constructed. Although the image on the cover of the pamphlet is poor, the pattern of stonework matches the style of the stonework in the subject house which is, in itself, interesting and quite unique in its detailing. What is even more of interest is that the current gates to the Pioneer cemetery also _ match the style of the cairn and appear to be by the same hand. At the time 4 60 ATTACHMENT it 5 TO REPORT# PLIA Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 ANNUAL MEMORIAL DECORATION SERVICE BROUGHAM UNION CEMETERY 71r or,r.��-ea .L. SUNDAY, JUNE 21, 1959 la...a.+.....L.7rrr 11r..1, .r 2.30 pan. sm.Y ma Ow tlsr—YHq i b.4.. Cr.d1.Cr. 71.M L i.J/N .Mi.Y se.mead. ,.. .w Om i.Y V,i.I C...,r4 W r.i. li ft - tVb.rY.. ? , Meek le ye.* r..I.r..ty Q.N.. r.ai) 71..an w.w•11O y M.•W .Peen 11.W 1..a . iP1A1 N. 1[V.C.I.)OC[1i1 L.U.r,rtl..Of IN Ceara;n.& L dr that the subject house was constructed,Walter Percy could heve been the mason for the project and appears to have carried his unique style forward over the decades to other sites in Pickering. It would be useful for further research to be undertaken to determine of other examples of his work could be found locally or whether he confined his efforts to those sites to which he had specific and particular affiliation. rv; . z0-"•. 1 �£. I l I —� a iN — �a iv • late:c 1,ift �� :.� & n ". ' 61 ATTACHMENT# TO REPORT# 21 Oto.-I'/ Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 2.2 Location The subject building is located at the south end of 16th sideline(the road does not go through to Taunton Road, south of Whitevale Road(A) southeast of the current termination of hwy 407 (B), in Pickering, Ontario. The site is illustrated below and consists only of a stone farmhouse which we have determined to have likely been constructed between 1875 and 1900. Refer to the images below. ]`), r�r yI � i0� Jt t F i t . '.£is A '2365 ( 'Sideline i F+K. b 62 ATTACHMENT, TO REPORT# , O ,-I Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 3. GENERAL DESCRIPTION 3.1 The House-General Comment The main house is of modest size and is a three bay(front door and flanking windows)front with a kitchen wing or"tail"at the rear. Given the settlement period of this area,this could be the original house on the site. The 1877 Atlas indicates a residence in approximately the same location as the subject building is found. Therefore,the building may have • been extant as early as that date although the details we observed could represent a building built at any time up to the turn of the twentieth century. Our historical research is included in the next section,and conclusions are drawn using this material as further evidence to date the structure. /if '',*7---.1-;97:J.--4,M-4-14:kr:* 'W'w - 01r;iffh ,, - 11 4 i , Photograph 1:The south,or front,elevation-east elevation to the right. The house sits on a rise and would have originally had a long vista to Taunton Road and Lake Ontario in the distance and a view from Sideline 16 from the west.The unusual stonework is a rarity in Ontario and is discussed later in this report. Photograph 1, above, is taken from the southeast and illustrates the main (south)elevation. Note the Gothic window at the centre of the gable-such centre gables are seen throughout Ontario and eastern Canada, and their roots extend back(in Canada) into the late eighteenth century. In this case,the gable is modest which suggests a later dating but the remaining "drop" (which is the opposite of a "finial" under the centre of the gable)suggests that the building may have originally had more extensive ornate barge board decoration which would may date the building to an earlier period.The change in stonework at the foundation I 63 ATTACHMENT# S TO REPORT# PAN Q�i I Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 strongly suggests that a full-width porch was a part of the original design- the porch would have hidden the cobble wall construction below the door sill line. The large corner blocks, or quoins, at either end of what would have been the ends of the porch both added strength to the corners and visually finished the detail. Unusually,these quoins are not found further up the corners. it • } 1 I k `� • 1. a iff r' Photograph 2:The north and the east elevations. In photograph 2,above, note that the east and north elevations of the tail are composed of rubble walls which appear more of a German rather than Scottish tradition in their composition-the stones are more uniform and of relatively small size and do not have the snecks or junipers seen in Scottish work. Large quoin stones are, however, used irregularly to reinforce the. corners. The front section, south east and west walls, appears to be more Scottish or Irish in style with small squared stones interposed with larger jumpers. Field stone was readily available in southern Ontario as it is typically mixed with the native soils as a result of glacial deposition. During the winter, particularly in the early days of farming the area,the winter frost would push these rocks to the surface and would have to be regularly removed to 8 64 • n"EPUt8t Pi-N 0k-/SI Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 permit ploughing and used for building materials, perimeter fences or simply disposed Of. The material, scraped from rocky outcrops by glaciers during the ice age, is composed of a wide variety of rock and, typically, only the hardest,was used as building stones. This material includes gneiss, granite, and quartzite and typically sized for handling by one or two workers.As they were rolled and tumbled in the glaciers, they are typically rounded in profile The west elevation is obscured by bush and could not be photographed. The later porch at the east side of the tail probably dates to the late 1950's or 1960's.The west porch is earlier but a dating could not be established. The chimney at the rear of the tail is offset from the peak. Traditionally, a chimney in this location would be centred on the peak as is the remnants of the chimney at the west end of the main roof ridge(see Photograph 1). The external chimney on the east is a twentieth century add-on possibly dating to the 1960's or 70's(based on the style of brick used). The traditional pattern of chimneys would be to have one at each of the three gables. Since there is no evidence of original fireplaces,even with the three chimneys, it is probable that the original heating system was in the form of wood stoves which places the possible date of the house towards the end of the 19th century. Although many houses in this area were of frame construction,the more prosperous properties constructed stone houses as far back as the mid 1800's. The source of the prosperity may have, in the earlier buildings, been the result of the establishment of a farmstead by an already prosperous individual while the later sites were the result of a reasonable successful farming operation. By the late 1800's,wealthy farmsteads were constructing much larger homes than earlier dates, particularly where they were required to house larger families and using the wealth created by prosperous farming operations. In this case, it is suggested that at the time of its construction,the family could have been considered of modest size and the prosperity of the farm as modest but comfortable. Creation of a stone house can also be the result of a desire to express one's heritage, as is typical of Irish and Scottish settlers whose homes tended to be of stone when this material could be afforded. 3.2 The House-Main and Second Floor Plans On the following pages are sketch plans of the main floor and second floor of the house. 9 65 • _ — ATTACHMENT iiir,5t,.. . .TO, REPORT 0 N 00-'4( __,......, Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 . . , l ' . -— 1 rfg" 4 !4 1 . 10 cr,,,gr.ef, A 1?-1410 m ti r-CA4 1 .a.. ■ VA II' ( 1 1 If 10 gM WIR),./. Ali .At 0, v/..cofe■Mil, . A MN _ I 1 ....mii............a- ill' . - ...t IL ,y1 Piewi. fl—oitz, F-. 45. K- -1zyN 4 C1/24114Z4 0 5Koeirc.44 FLAN Z4:17 5.,, q mat4,51or4 s, 4 Løc71 cinis Attrgehot,0ATE Alain Floor Plan IC) 66 • ATTACHMENT# S TO REPORT# PL.M 04v,-* Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 i ter: .., • — -r � - ' E L 5 i �,, if Y 0 , f , ;:,, t . 0, 1 , j- , .04 ....„6„, _ ,...,--7,„ .„,„ , -iiir, ior 10,,,,,,,„, , 00..... -i--...- .- ,— . P� 4 I ', GoNp f- ee. l 1"\c-K0144-44, Or►-t+94 0 pi n t - i orks * Loc- - ,o 4 5 A 7(1 t` "M Second Floor Plan 11 67 r i� i PtN 06J-/Lf --- Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 4. DETAILED EXAMINATION 4.1 Exterior 4.1.1 Foundations As with the main walls, the foundation is constructed of native fieldstone. The stones are laid roughly fitted and bonded with lime-based mortar. Typically,the core of these walls is composed of smaller rocks between the larger face stones.Also typically, the inside face of the foundation in the basement as painted with limewash which both provided a better level of light and reduced the development of mould. 1 Photograph 3-at right shows d r A.41.te, a -; / ,� , y, the foundation wall around the 11i° r `` basement window on the east elevation to the south of the chimney.Note the smaller ` ., a !" squared stones used to frame the window opening. The `• piping includes both water and oil services to the basement. • Stone foundation walls ended after the WW I with the higher availability of poured concrete which was easier with which to build. The basement under the main house would have provided some an area for the storage of root vegetables and fruit during the winter months. 4.1.2 Exterior Walls As noted above, the tail walls of the house are of the same unrefined stonework as used in the basement although somewhat larger in size and augmented at the corners with larger squared stones.The front, east and west elevations, however, are altogether different as the stones there have been worked approximately square to create a much more refined and formal appearance for these elevations-the best work was reserved for the front, or south wall. It is common in Ontario to have the front wall of a house done in a more refined manner than the side and rear walls-some historians suggest that the tradition may go back to mediaeval times in Europe where houses were built in rows along the street and only the front walls were visible. Regardless, even relatively recent houses in rural and urban areas exhibit this feature. 12 68 ATTACHMENT#—.1L—TO REPORT # PUA Q10-4 Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 Of note, however, is that the west wall of the main house was also tuckpointed in the same manner as the front or south wall. While this corresponds to the location of the parlour at the southwest corner of the house,one can only guess at the reasons for this workmanship as it is very unusual.As the south and west corners of the house would have been a pleasant location for outdoor activities in summer, it is possible that an archeological investigation may turn up evidence of a wrap-around porch or garden feature that would have architecturally responded to the elaborate construction of the exterior walls. In photograph 4, below, Note the roughly squared stones which are visually amended with the surrounding mortar which is in turn "tuckpointed"with a white inlay to give the appearance of very refined stonework. Note also the careful selection of stones which include a wide variety of material including Gneiss(A)and Granite(B)among others. Note also the careful selection and patterning of the stone voussoir(window head arch)to give a patterned effect. Finally, note the smaller stones set in groups of three between the larger ones to provide a unique stone pattern which is highly unusual. Photograph 4 above shows a detail of the front wall masonry at a window head. The west wall and east walls,as seen below in detail, are a bit cruder in execution than the south wall but of much greater refinement than the walls of the tail or the north wall-note the selected stones over the window in the lower portion of the image. Here, the jointing is less precise than the front wall and filler stones were used to complete the spaces between some un-squared larger stones resulting the the"V"shaped patterns seen here. 13 69 ATTACHMENT# S TO REPORT# PL44MA_,_,., Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 Note also the beaded trim on the soffit board where it abuts the stone in the wall.The variable width g ap between the soffit board and the stone was packed with mortar. v / r /` r In ■ / / / a • 11; / /` gip' � `" •f Photograph 5-Detail of the west wall PIP 01.110.1.1.1111111..... Photograph 6-Late 19th century plug and feather evidence. Field stones were split in a variety of ways. In some cases, striking the stones with a chisel along a grain line, where present, could cause an 14 70 • I ATTACHMENT# TO REPORT# P 010-/"I Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 immediate fracturing of the stone and a clean split. Plug and feather methods saw holes drilled at either end of a stone, then a round set of wedges installed and an iron plug hammered into the hollowed faces between the plugs. Early methods also included the use of the flat wedge process where a groove was chiseled along the grain line and then wedges hammered into the groove between shims of sheet iron. Later in the 19th century(c 1878 and later),the plug and feather method was amended with holes drilled every six to eight inches along the proposed fracture line and smaller plugs and feathers used to split the stone. Of interest is a stone in the front wall of the structure(west of the main entrance door)which exhibits the mark of this later plug and feather method(Photograph 6 above). The term "tuckpointing" is frequently used by modern masons in relation to the process of damaged masonry joints by cutting out and replacing the damaged mortar.This is a misnomer, however,as the correct term is "repointing". Tuck pointing is a specific process where a groove is incised into a soft intact masonry joint(see photograph 7 below)and a bead of white(or other coloured) mortar is set into the joint.The objective is, as viewed from a few feet away,to create an impression of squared and refined joining of the kind found in • 1 Photograph 7-Incised areas below the tuck pointing walls constructed of cut stone.Of interest is that the south and west walls have been "tuck pointed" in white mortar to create a more refined effect. In photographs 5 and 6,the wider and more irregular joints can be seen behind the white mortar work. Tuck pointing in the mid-nineteenth century was typically quite fine,with the white bead being narrow as would be typical of fine ashlar masonry of the day. The pointing of the subject building is much wider, and the undersigned has seen examples of this extending into the 1930's or 40's-the later variants tend to be flatter and 15 71 ATTACHMENT# 5 TO REPORT# L1�1 Ob,✓ Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 wider. Thus, the date of this work cannot be conclusively established but remains unusual in terms of regional masonry work. It appears to be a late embellishment of the original stonework.Without the tuckpointing,the masonry detailing of the east and west walls of the main house would be similar. 4.1.3 Roof The roofs are framed with full dimension cut lumber. Due to restrictions in access, it could not be definitively determined if the rafters are tapered or straight, but they appeared to be tapered which would be expected in a building of the assumed vintage. Photograph 8-rafter visible over second floor bathroom Photograph 9-Rafter ends over rear wing 8 4 16 72 ATTACHMENT# 5 TO REPORT# Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 The roof is sheathed with rough sawn pine planks cut from early old-growth material. The planks are 1"thick and of variable width ranging up to 1 foot in width.This type of lumber was typically used to sheath roofs and was also commonly used to sheath the walls of barns-it is still called barnboard. The rafters are packed with bricks over the rear or tail of the house to stop draughts-this is an unusual detail but appears to be of modern mortar and may date to the twentieth century renovation. We could not determine if the rafter ends of the main house are also packed. In Photograph 9, the 1" thick and wide roof planks can be seen together with the remnants of nails, some of which are square(cut iron rather than hand forged nails)which suggests the roof was originally sheathed with cedar shingles. The current roof sheathing is of asphalt shingles which appear to be relatively . lightweight and which have exceeded their service life of approximately 15 to 20 years. The roof trim is of interest, particularly the detail of the soffit where it abuts the stone work(see photograph 5 above and 10 below).The join includes a bead and this is supplemented on the facades with an inner trim board over the stone junction. In the image, note too the decorative fascia board at the gable which is in an "ogee"format with a lower square bead. This has been displaced by the metal gutters visible to the left and right of the gable fascia. t` polo\ '/ / 1,--.;.; i. '101,:..A. —3.--- - —\-:- _ _ ,/, N.-\ , Photograplx 10-Detail of front gable 17 73 •tCI•r tJT; 5 TO Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 • Of interest, too, is the presence of the "drop"at the gable peak. It would be unusual for this rather spare piece of decoration to be present in the absence of additional decorative features. Due to weathering and rot,such decorative roof elements are frequently removed during later roofing repairs. Presence of simple decorative trim of this type(a finial and drop, without evidence of an elaborate system of bargeboards or heavy decoration) is suggestive of the late nineteenth century. As can be seen in Photograph 1, the roof slope ends at the lower gable without a"return"which would be expected of a mid-nineteenth century roof.A simplified 20th century example of a return is illustrated at -right. The absence of such a return suggests a later 19th century date of construction. 4.1.4 Windows Original windows in the house have been replaced with aluminum windows of a pattern which does not match the original tradition for a house of this vintage. These can be seen in the previous photographs. Based on a probable dating of the late 19th century, the original window pattern would most likely have been double hung sash with each sash having two panes(known as a 2/2 pattern). If it is determined that the house was constructed prior to 1870, it is more likely that the pattern would have been 6/6 -window panes were available in standard sizes and the window openings can be calculated using the standard pane size in combination with the probable dimensions of the muntins(spacers between panes), stiles(vertical elements)and rails forming each sash. The sills were constructed of pine and are generally still present, although in only fair to poor condition. Sills inside the porches on each side of the tail are in much better condition as they have been protected from the weather for as much as 50 years or more. Photograph 11 illustrates the sill in the east porch. A drip cut,to cause water to drip free rather than run down the wall (potentially causing damage to the masonry) can be clearly seen. The windows in the east side porch are set into wood frames which is typical of 1960's construction.The use of varnished plywood for the ceilings , the dark stain, and the window design are also typical of the period (photograph 12). 18 74 A i `ACC-IiMENT Ir T•0 i-r,oriT# O i�{ Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 1, 4'°'Y' t.' 1; . . f t t# _ " ,. H , 'N i *14,,,'' } i , i , .,. ... it Y .,r C 1 ors : ,, kie.01,,P , 'A ti ti 1#1t -. t t r t' ' T: Photograph 11-Showing sill inside east porch. Note the drip cut • 19 75 ATTACHMENT REPORT# N jazzy . Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 I Photograph 12 at right and 13 below-Details of the east wall illustrating the windows of the main house and the east porch. Note the detailing of the i stone on this wall which echoes the work on the west wall. e , t 4 1 '4, ,i : , tom. is . , 1 sit n e, I , \ ` 20 76 ATTACHMENT# 5 TO REPORT# ... N Ob-/4' Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 4.1.5 Exterior doors Original windows in the house,have been replaced with modern doors dating to the 1960's and 1980's. They have minimal heritage value.The front door is framed with sidelights and a transom light(see Section 4.2 below)which remains, although damaged. Unlike houses of an earlier vintage, the front door and frame is placed flush with the exterior wall rather than being recessed into the stone from the outside. 4.1.6 Chimneys As noted earlier,the three chimneys are of variable date. There remains a stump of an original chimney at the west end of the gable of the roof (Photograph 16). The eastern chimney, which services the basement furnace, appears to date to the 1950's or 1960's renovations due to its use of rug-faced brick. The North chimney,over the fireplace in the family room in the tail, is likely to be of similar or newer vintage and contemporary with the fireplace itself and may be contemporary with the east chimney. d s Photographs 14,15,and 16-east chimney above,north chimney at right,and the ruinous stump of the west chimney,made from much earlier masonry,below. 21 77 ATTACHMENT S TO REPORT 4 -d .,. Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 4.1.7 Front Porch A small front porch is constructed of concrete blocks of relatively crude manufacture. Site-cast concrete blocks were popular in the 1900 to the late 1940's period and it is probable that this porch was constructed in that time frame, possibly the 1940's and thus would be contemporary with the concrete plaque on the wall.The quality of the concrete topping also suggests such a dating. Evidence of an attached handrail exists at the edge of the steps. 4 le CT S � k Photographs 17 and 18-Front porch.Concrete appears to be same aging as the plaque on the front wall(see below).Note the evidence of handrails, �+ ' 78 ATTACHMENT TQ REPU111 # -�4' Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 4.1.8 Wall Plaque An unusual feature of this building is a wall plaque cast in concrete and bonded to a stone on the west end of the front wall. The name inscribed, Walter Percy, is that of a previous owner of the house and, based on the evidence, Percy appears to have been a stone mason who was probably in his early 20's when this structure was constructed. The date may be significant in that Germany capitulated in May of 1945 and Victory Europe Day(VE Day)took place a few days later on 8 May 1945. Whether this t AliftAte mk Photograph 19-Concrete Plaque plaque was installed to commemorate that event, the possible loss of a family member,or simply as a commemoration of the date of work completed cannot be fully determined with the present level of research. Certainly, Percy would have been 84. in 1945 and this plaque could commemorate his demise. Further information searches may add to this story. The plaque was cast in sand with the inscriptions apparently made with a template or guide but by hand and then bonded to the wall. It cannot be determined whether mechanical fasteners were drilled into the stone as a part of the bonding process. 23 79 A T TACHvirJT f1 TO REPORT# Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 4.2 Interior Sketch plans of the interior main floor and second floors are included in Section 3.2. Annotated images of the interior features are included following the descriptions for each area. 4.2.1 The Basement The basement of the house is confined to the area under the main building. The exterior walls of the basement are rough stonework which was, at some point in the past,treated with limewash. The basement is accessed via a stair under the main central stair of the house and via the east porch addition via a stair to a door cut through the stone wall. Unlike mid-nineteenth century houses, the walls either side of the main hall on the main and upper floors are carried on a central beam rather than on masonry walls extending through the basement. t ` ^ z 1=t; is f , Photograph 20-View of Basement framing. The central beam is supported on the north and south by the foundation walls and is hand-hewn. The floor joists frame into the central beam with a"seat"notched into the beam at each joists. The joists and floor boards are radial sawn.Note the whitewash on the walls and underside of the floor. However,the morticing of the main hand-hewn beam to carry the joist ends suggests barn-framing techniques and places the building from between 1 870 and 1 890 in vintage. 80 ATTACHMENT 5 To REPORT 0 R.14 a12-/V Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 .t `a r 'fir i ate* ` a : r b e e i2 .q{, 3i�s; i Photograph 21-Radial saw pattern clearly visible on the sides of the joists. The radius of the radial saw used to cut the lumber can be calculated and this can be compared with the dimension of saws historically in use in the area to further narrow the earliest potential date of construction. The basement was found to be dry and there was minimal evidence of wood borers. 4.2.2 The Main Floor The main house is typical in plan to many houses constructed in the latter half of the nineteenth century. The main,or front portion of the house, is of 1-1/2 storey construction' as is the rear portion, save that the rear wing floors are lower than the corresponding floors in the main floor as the rear wing is set lower than the front portion of the house and has no basement. The main floor has a centre hall plan with a central stair running from the front door to the second floor hall.Flanking the hall on the main floor were originally four rooms. These consisted of two rooms at the front of the house,with the finer room(parlour)at the west side of the south end of the main floor including fine trim,and deep floor-length paneled returns at the two windows. The ceiling of the parlour includes a simply moulded plaster escutcheon around what would have originally been a hook for a chandelier-probably consisting of oil lamps in its original incarnation. A one and a half storey house has a full height main floor(in this case approximately 9')with lower second floor height which isaestricted at the lower slopes of the roof as the celings descer a to the sides of the rooms. 25 81 • ATTACHMENT'' _l11 REPORT# 1-,--/ Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 ., • , ` 1,4., .4 '; f'' n of Photograph 22 and 23-The central staircase at the main floor is Located in the centre hall. The turned newels are typical of the latter years of the z ? nineteenth century. The floor tiles are set on •7` °•I , underlay over the original floors and probably .F. 1 date to renovations in the 1980's or later.The rt ' ,•, door to the parlour,at left,is of modern vintage �, , .! as is the hardware. f N 4 N , fr 1144N, � s x Y 'A : , 1 li I 1:ti.4 ' P j i i V _ i . _ , a ,, too /.� r`` kg' a 26 82 ATTACHMENT#_____-.5.........:10 REPORT# RA Ob-/(i Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering ,4 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 w • 4 4f Isis 01V. -v • Photographs 24,25 and 26-The main living room on the east side of the main floor has been made from two original rooms opened into one. At right, note the hardwood flooring which runs at right angles to the original flooring and likely dates to R' * 1960's renovations. Note the two sizes of base-at left,the base is consistent with a slip room of lesser importance to the front room which has a deeper base. Below can be seen the enlarged arch opening into the central hall which is also a change from the I original which would have been a single door. ? 3R S 1 i if �,t '. ' 1 A'8 irk ° i L `�� : 27 83 . ATTACHMENT 0 aN o6-/y Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 • q °i 4'; 6 kV ` fr qe-iu (3 j c �qat , . , crf, Photographs 27 and 28-Above is the south west corner of the parlour with the west facing window at right and the south facing window at the left. Below,the ornate trim around the ceiling fan which would have originally been an ornate lighting fixture. This room was probably converted to use as a dining room with installation of the kitchen in the slip room immediately to the north and the renovations to form the room on the east side of the main floor-possibly in the 1960's. The flooring is the original pine floor boards which were sanded and finished. Note the ornate two piece base boards and the panelled insets for the windows which,in going to the floor,suggests the potential for french doors. The moulding around the window apertures is also very heavy being stepped and with a rounded and beaded backband. ..i 28 84 24A1 Y Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 On the east side of the hall,there were also two rooms although the slip room was larger and may have been used as a servery to the front room which may have originally been a dining room. However, renovations, possibly in the 1960's based on the details of the trim, saw the partition between the front and back rooms removed(save for a small stub at each side)to create a much larger living area. In addition,the original door from the front hall at the bottom of the stairs was considerably enlarged to open the space between the enlarged room and the front door area. Changes are visible in the baseboard trim-some of the original was re-used and supplemented with new trim of a different dimension. To the north of the parlour was located a slip room, a narrow room originally used for storage or as a sleeping room. It was typical that such a 60..`;',/r,3 narrower room was installed at the back of �" the main floor in centre hall plan houses from the mid 19th century.Of interest is the installation of a galley kitchen in this room, possibly in the late 1950's or the 1960's `41% based on the style of the cupboards and fittings. The rear wing of a house lib of this type was, in the • , mid-nineteenth century, used as the kitchen. As a s new fieldstone fireplace F: has been installed at the north end of this room, it is unlikely that an original brick fireplace existed. y, This strongly suggests a Photograph 29-Kitchen installed in the slip room on later nineteenth century the west side of the main house north of the parlour. construction date as the kitchen would have used a cast iron stove in the location of the present fireplace.The floor of this area, as noted earlier, is two steps lower(about 16 inches)than that of the main floor. Unlike the main house, there is no basement under this area. The rear wing was accessed from the east and west sides by doors at the north end of each of the east and west walls. The west door opens into an enclosed porch which was inaccessible at the time of the visit. It was 29 85 ATTACHMENT#. 5 TO REPORT# fx/!� 06-141 Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 common to install an early washroom in the porch opposite the main access point at the rear of the house and it is possible that this area was so configured. The porch at the east side of the rear wing is much more recent that the west porch and probably constructed in the late 1950's or 1960's based on the materials used and its detailing. Photographs 30,31 and 32-Image above illustrates the step,approximately 12"in height,between the level of the main floor of the main house and the floor in the rear tail. Note the parquet which,with the stone fireplace and cupboard details,suggest a major renovation in the 1960's or later-roughly contemporary with the east rear porch.The image at the lower left illustrates the backband trim detail of the windows in the tail area-they are contemporary with the bulk of the trim in the main house and suggests that the tail and these windows are original to the house.The detail of the trim is found in houses from the 1860's through to the end of the 19th century. • •s �.._ 44 e am r.., • q_ z Y # l 30 86 TACHMENT# 5 TO REPOR1 # i $4 Ob-41 Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 4.2.3 The Second Floor The main stair extends to the upper hallway which also extends down the centre of the main house. The stairway is open to the hall and was originally protected by the continuation of the stair banister which wrapped around the opening to form a rail.The rail is missing as can be seen in the photographs. $ k � ,,224 1 i 22,2. 2 4 ) x € a 9a � { r " t � . Photograph 33-The upper hall.Note the mortices for the banister pickets. The entrance to the washroom is immediately to the right with entrances to the three bedrooms visible. All doors and trim are original.This picture is looking south to the front gable. As with the original layout of the main floor,the second floor was divided into four rooms. These include a master bedroom at the southwest corner (over the original parlour) and two bedrooms on the west side of the second floor. The partitions correspond to the original partition layout of the main floor. The north room on the west side was a slip room which corresponded to the slip room on the main floor. As with the room on the main floor which was converted to a kitchen,the second floor room was converted to a bathroom, possibly in the 1960`s and contemporary with the major renovations of that time although the toilet appears to date from approximately 30 years later. To the north of the main hail is found a larger room over the tail or original kitchen. This includes a small gable window facing west. The floor,as with that of the room below, is lower than the upper floor level by approximately 12". 31 87 ATTACHMENT TO REPORT �-"' _, Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 ',T= , i g¢ Pus`.4"-. s � ..JP£�mks C+ 3 j ""a ,:,a. r'. ,-.:.( f::: ::,.-- '_ ' -' k, '. 'ft Y I' tr { {t -.3y' ♦fiy �q' t� fi d r�'S° ..�,tor f: P era t • Photograph 34--Upstairs bathroom. Note the cut lath on the stud wall which is typical for the overall building-this typically dates to after the mid-point of the 19th century. 32 88 ATTACHMENT REPORT# ,__.__Pe Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 t . Photographs 35 and 36-Above,the south room on the east side and below the south room on the west side which is larger. w . 33 89 ATTACHMENT# �C) REPORT N 7:1"1:1"7-6.5 fa-� !F r N Barn and Outbuildings Assessment _ For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 ! 1 . Ft 001110 Photograph 37-View into upper room over tail. Note the difference in floor levels.The door and trim are original. 34 90 I ACHMEUT fr TO REPORT f! 06—I — Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 4.2.4 Interior doors Some of the original doors and trim remain as noted previously. The frame sidelights and transom of the front door remains intact(see below)although the front door is of recent vintage. The door to the basement would have originally been a four panel door although a window had been cut into it during earlier renovations. Doors to the bedrooms and bathrooms on the second floor are original and include some original hardware, although mismatched. As noted earlier, the renovations to the main floor included the enlargement of the entrance to the west main floor room and the door opposite, into the parlour, is of modern panel construction. Images below illustrate these comments. Photograph 38-The front door entrance. The sidelights and transom light are mostly present(the lower panel on the right or west side was found beside the fireplace in the tail wing). Note the coloured glass in the left sidelight-houses in the 1880's 1. ' frequently had solid coloured glass, .. sometimes in red and blue - combinations which created a purple appearance rather funereal to today's I ov jtaste. s i!!! i I: .. t 91 A U REPORT# AC4,�.�x Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 • c '1 Photograph 39-The basement door. The window replaces the upper two original panels. Four panel doors are typical of the later 19th vt, century and early 20th century and replaced the earlier 6 panel"cross and bible"pattern. t .x> + Photograph 40-Hardware on the inside of the bathroom door on the second floor. The cast bronze doorknob and rose is a replacement for an qty; earlier knob(which would have been oval ceramic or wood)and would have been found on more formal doors on the main floor,possibly on the doors into the front rooms. The rim lock is typical hardware for the period of the building- such locks can still be acquired from specialty hardware suppliers. The paint scheme probably dates to 1960's renovations. 36 92 ATTACHMIENT# TO REPORT# tti O& -/4' Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 5. Heritage Impact 5.1 General Comments There is sufficient information to permit,at some time in the future, a restoration of the building to its original appearance. However,this is not recommended. Rather, a good use should be found for the house if demolition is not found to be necessary. 5.2 Contextual The house forms a part of the context of the area and represents an evolution the individual local farmsteads into larger holdings. The acquisition of the property by the Percy family sometime after 1877 is consistent with this notion. Given the probable dating of the house in the later years of the nineteenth century,there are a variety of scenarios that support the idea that the house was constructed as a new residence with the acquisition of the property shortly after 1877. The suggested scenario is that the property was acquired and a new house constructed and occupied following the removal of earlier and less adequate buildings. Further research at the Registry Office would establish the date of acquisition of the property and an increase in taxes may establish the date of construction of the house and improvements to the property. However,the house is located on the site in close correlation to that depicted on the 1877 atlas. Archeological investigation may turn up other foundations on the site. 5.3 Historical While the building does not appear to have significant historical associations,the presence of a plaque bearing the name of Walter Percy provides an historical connection with a family and individual who owner the property over several decades. Further archival research may establish that Percy,who was 71 in 1932, may have passed away in May of 1945 or that the month in which WWII ended was commemorated together with Percy's name. As a preliminary assessment,we suggest a date for the house between 1875 and 1885 based on the details of its construction. Renovations were most certainly done in the late 1950's or 1960's and further more modest renovations were most certainly completed in the 1980's. 5.4 Current heritage status The house is not currently listed in the City of Pickering Heritage Inventory. There are no associated outbuildings. 37 93 ATTACHMENT# TO REPORT 11 } AI o(2-/if Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline, Pickering 18 December 2013 5.5 Heritage Impact Statement While the loss of heritage structures is regrettable, not every structure can be retained. In the case of the subject site, however, there are some interesting and unique features in terms of the stonework and particularly the commemorative plaque. Re-use of this structure for a future use is possible. Properly stabilized, the building could support municipal or park functions or provide, for example, a low cost rentable site for private schooling or an NGO.Therefore, listing or designation of the site would be appropriate to retain this interesting example of a modest stone farmhouse from the late 1 9th century. Should it be determined that the building is not sufficiently valuable to retain or designate, it is our opinion that it is essential to mitigate the heritage impact of its loss to the City of Pickering. This could be done by recording the building by drawings in accordance with known documentation standards, photographs keyed to the drawings, and salvage of important structural components for display and interpretation in the community. Photograph 41-Original framing is seen imbedded in the stonework to which is nailed the vertical strapping which carried the lath and plaster. Due to the irregularities of the stud <w, framing of the period and the interior faces of the exterior walls,the door trim and baseboards were installed at the same time as the plaster lath and then the plaster was tapered to flatten the finished 's t surfaces. #10 • •>• ,„ ";� 17 1111,„N y 1 ^1 38 94 ATTACHMENT# .5 TO REPORT# f.L■S Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 6. Discussion and recommendations 6.1 General Comments This house is an interesting example of its kind and type particularly due to the masonry work and the site's historical associations. Such a building is increasingly rare as development spreads across the region However, it is in only fair condition and many of the key historical elements are missing -particularly the original windows, doors and chimneys. 4.2 Recommendations The house at 286516th Sideline should be recorded in detail,in a manner which is outside of the scope of this current report. A set of measured and dimensioned drawings should be prepared with keyed photographs to document the structure for posterity. "' The house should be placed on the list of heritage properties for the City of Pickering. Reference to the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada should be made for any modifications or updates to the building. This should not preclude changes to the building rather the standards should guide any work done to repurpose the building q. - while retaining the memory of heritage features. Work should also be done to secure the site to ensure that water,vermin and vandals are kept out and the foundations do not heave. A use should be found for the property or a rental agreement reached to ensure its continued use and occupancy.:This is the best means'of preserving properties of historic value for the future. ' I A i E - 39 95 El ATTACHMENT# 5 TO REPORT# 14 Qb-� Barn and Outbuildings Assessment For the City of Pickering 2865 16th Sideline,Pickering 18 December 2013 7. Closure This report has been written by the Consultants(Goldsmith Borgal&. Company Ltd.Architects(GBCA)for the benefit of the client to whom it is addressed. The information and data contained herein represent the Consultants'best professional judgment in light of the knowledge and information available to the consultants at the time of preparation. Except - as required by law,this report and the information and data contained herein are to be treated as confidential and may be used and relied upon only by the client, its officers and employees. The Consultants deny any liability whatsoever to other parties who may obtain access to this report for any injury, loss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, or reliance upon,this'report or any of its contents without the express written consent of the Consultants and the client The Consultants have prepared this report in accordance with the Scope of Services agreed with the Client . If you have any questions regarding the information contained herein, please contact the undersigned: l . Yours sincerely Golds " h Bor Co.Ltd.Architects • Christophe orgal OAAMR C CARP Principal 40 96 • ATTACHMENT# 6 TO Reasons for Designation: 2865 Sideline 16 (Walter Percy House) Description of Property The property located at 2865 Sideline 16 is a one-and-a-half-storey, three-bay stone farmhouse built between 1875 and 1885 in the Gothic revival style. It is located on the south end of Sideline 16, in the City of Pickering's Seaton Brock-Taunton Neighbourhood. Statement of Cultural Value or Interest The property is located south east of the Hamlet of Brougham. In 1877 it was owned by D. McBrady. By 1895, the property and adjacent properties were owned by the Percy family in which Walter Percy was a member. The farmhouse was built between 1875 and 1885. The unique detailing and style of the stonework of the house was carried over to the current gates of the Brougham Christian Pioneer Cemetery. Walter Percy is said to be the mason who constructed a cairn there in 1932 which also appears to have been of a similar stonework style. This one-and-a-half-storey stone house offers exterior details reflective of the Gothic revival style. The house features a gothic window located in the central gable above the main door, an unusual and unique pattern of stonework which includes roughly squared stones, elaborate voussoirs, indented tuck-pointed white mortar and fieldstone material's which include Gneiss and Granite. The unique masonry work, detailing and pattern of the stonework are rare in Ontario but appear to be associated with Walter Percy. The house sits on a rise and would have originally had a long vista to Taunton Road and Lake Ontario in the distance. It is located in a pastoral setting with surrounding - natural space. The house forms part of the context of the area and represents an evolution of the individual local farmsteads into more prosperous holdings. Description,of Heritage Attributes The heritage attributes of the Walter Percy House are: • the overall Gothic revival style house with symmetrical three-bay main façade • Gothic window located in the central gable above the main door • pattern of stone cladding • roughly squared stones tuck-pointed with a white mortar inlay • use of a variety of fieldstone types including•Gneiss and Granite • commemorative cast plaque bearing the name Walter Percy • location in a pastoral setting 97