HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 17, 2011- ...L,� ,-��_, --
/ `-'�-Sti. i .�: � ..m ��a:3'i�...
�1N\��\�l
(I)
(II)
(III)
(IV)
Adoption of Agenda
Adoption of Minutes from July 27, 2011
Reports
1. P/CA 30/11 — Plaza 23 Inc.
713 Krosno Blvd.
(Plan M15, Block S)
City of Pickering
2. P/CA 35/11 & P/CA 36/11 — G. Osgood
720 & 722 Front Road
(South and West Part Lot 2, Plan M90)
City of Pickering
3. P/CA 37/11 — R. Peters
584 Marksbury Road
(South Part Lot 43, Plan 311)
City of Pickering
Adjournment
Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Page Number.
1-6
7-10
11-14
15-18
ACCe55ible For information related to accessibility requirements please contact
p•n' Lesley Dunne
P �� K E i�.� G T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024
TTY 905.420.1739
, Email Idunne@cityofpickering.com
., -=
im :
�, u.�Ej����� -,
�� . ,�, � , .�., ��.� v
_�� �������
Pending Adoption
Present:
Tom Copeland
David Johnson — Chair
Eric Newton — Vice-Chair
Shirley Van Steen
Also Present:
Mita Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Absent:
Ross Pym, Secretary-Treasurer
Bill Utton
(I)
(II)
Adoption of Agenda
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
That the agenda for the Wednesday, July 27, 2011 meeting be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
Adoption of Minutes
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Tom Copeland
That the minutes of the 9th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held
Wednesday, July 6, 2011 be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
1
��
„ -
1 m.�:
l . �r-” �� �v_��"��� 1 '.-::�
-.. ��
- - =
_����1���_ ��
(III) Reports
(Deferred from the July 6,
P/CA 25/11 — K. Kwapich
1296 Commerce Street
2011 meeting)
Committee of Adjustment
(Part Lot 4, Block C, Plan 65, Part 3, 40R-11704)
City of Pickering
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit a front yard
depth of 4.6 metres to a proposed addition to an existing detached dwelling,
whereas the by-law requires a front yard depth of 7.5 metres.
Th� applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit for a proposed addition to the existing detached dwelling.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Oevelopment Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Kamil Kwapich, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
That revised application P/CA 25/11 by K. Kwapich, be Approved on the
grounds that the front yard depth of 4.6 metres to the proposed one-storey
addition is a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of
the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan
and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
That this variance apply only to the proposed one-storey addition, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs revised submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 26, 2013 or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
2
� ' • � •
� '
�
N1
�a-�+���l���a��i ' � • . 1 �
'. .
_��� /���_'�� 11 �
• '�•
• • - • : '- •
1952 Calvington Drive
(Part of Block 5, 40M-2339)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
6585/05 to permit a rear yard depth of 4.1 metres to a proposed raised deck and
a side yard width of 0.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a rear yard depth of
6.0 metres and a side yard width of 0.6 metres.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building
permit for the proposed raised deck.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending refusal for a
side yard width of 0.0 metres and recommending approval subject to conditions
and to amend the side yard width to 0.5 metres. Written comments were received
from the City's Development Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Wriitten comments were also received from the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority indicating the owner obtains a permit from TRCA prior to
any development taking place within the Regulated Area on the subject lands
and has no objection to the application.
Anil Persaud, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 27/11 by A. Persaud & C. Jairam-Persaud, be Approved
on the grounds that the rear yard depth of 4.1 metres and the amended side
yard width of 0.5 metres to the proposed raised deck are minor variances that
are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with
the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law,
subject to the following conditions:
That these variances apply only to the raised deck, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans.
That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 26, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
• ' � � •
s -`
�
m •a �, ��
� � ��+c,-. ��'��� � 1 :.� " � � . � •
.i� �7ll+z..� -' -:. .a.�..
. ��� /���1,� 11 �
• '�•
3. P/CA 28/11 — S. Gokool
1599,Kelvinway Lane
(Lot 31, Plan 40M-1467)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
1998/85 to permit a rear yard depth of 5.9 metres to a proposed raised deck,
whereas the by-law requires a rear yard depth of 7.5 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit to replace the existing raised deck with the proposed raised deck.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Sandra Gokool, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Tom Copeland
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 28/11 by S. Gokool, be Approved on the grounds that the
rear yard depth of 5.9 metres to a proposed raised deck is a minor variance that
is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to
the following conditions:
That this variance apply only to the proposed raised deck, as generally sited
and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans.
That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 26, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
�
,. =-
N
o ��ei����� -:,
�a ,.,,-�„—, �s�.�r
-�_
�_��� �■������
4. P/CA 29/11 — E. & V. Camara
1918 Fairport Road
(Lot 38, Plan 818)
City of Pickering
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to permit the replacement
of an existing garage with a proposed two storey detached garage partially located
in the side yard, and having a garage height of 6.0 metres and to recognize a side
yard width of 0.3 metres to an existing shed, whereas the by-law requires all
accessory structures not part of a main building to be erected in the rear yard, a
maximum accessory structure height of 3.5 metres, a minimum side yard width
to an accessory structure of 0.6 metres.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain zoning
compliance and a building permit for the proposed garage.
M.'Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Emanuel Camara, owner, was present to represent the application. Sophie Irwin
of 1914 Fairport Road was present in objection to the existing shed location.
Emanuel Camara agrees to staff recommendations. In response to questions
from Committee Members, Emanuel Camara explained the flooding problem is
an existing situation, the proposed two storey garage will be used for storage and
the location of the garage will not affect the current swale.
Saphie Irwin expressed concerns with the Iocation of the existing shed, the
gr�ding and drainage problems that maybe affecting her property. Sophie Irwin
provided a report and pictures of her property for the Committee Members to
review the flooding problem. Sophie Irwin indicated a new swale would improve
the drainage and flooding problems.
In response to a question from a Committee Member, M. Yeung, Assistant
Se�cretary-Treasurer, explained the grading and drainage will be reviewed during
th� Building Permit process.
5
O5
, , --
. -. �.
,
.
.r�, aW�wi���� � �. - � • . 1
Ea ,�, .—�. , 5�� •' : +ra.� v
—����.���!�� 11 �
• '�•
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application P/CA 29/11 by E. & V. Camara, be Approved on the grounds
that the proposed two storey detached garage partiaily located in the side yard,
and having a garage height of 6.0 metres, and to recognize a side yard width of
0.3 metres to an existing rear yard shed are minor variances that are desirabie
forthe appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general
intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the
folfowing conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed garage and existing shed, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this
application.
2. As part of the building permit submission, the applicant ensures that no
habitable space is proposed within the proposed detached garage.
3. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 26, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
(IV) Adjournment
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Eric Newton
That the 10th meeting of 2011 the Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at
7:30 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on
Wednesday, August 17, 2011.
Carried Unanimously
��- -.-�,
Chair
Assistant' Secretary-Treasurer
0
c��r �4! Report to
; ; Committee of Adjustment
I E Application Number: P/CA 30/11 �%
Meeting Date: August 17, 2011
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 30/11
Plaza 23 Incorporated
713 Krosno Boulevard
(Block S, Plan M-15)
City of Pickering
Application:
The appliCant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520 as amended by By-law 5580/99
to permit a total gross leasable floor area of 439 square metres for restaurant — type A
uses, whereas the By-law permits a maximum gross leasable floor area of 300 square
metres for restaurant — type A uses plus a restaurant patio space of 53 square metres.
The appli�ant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain an interior building
permit for an expanded restaurant.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department considers the request to permit an increase
in the gro�s leasable floor area of 439 square metres for restaurant — type A plus a
restaurant patio space of 53 square metres to permit an expansion to the existing
restaurant to be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of
the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the
Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject
to the following conditions:
That this variance apply only to the proposed restaurant expansion, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this
application.
2. That the area of the restaurant expansion be limited to a maximum of
101 square metres.
3. That the applicant obtains an interior building permit for the proposed
construction by August 16, 2013, or this decision shall become null and void.
1�
Report P/CA 30/11
Comment:
Official P�an and Zoning By-law
August 17, 2011
Page 2
Pickering Official Plan —"Mixed Use Area — Local Node" within the Bay Ridges
Neighbourhood — subject to The Liverpool Road Waterfront Node — Liverpool Road
Corridor �evelopment Guidelines
Zoning By-law 2520, as amended by By-law 5580/99 —"LCA-10" Commercial
Appropriateness of the Application
• the intent of the by-law is to ensure restaurant uses do not become the
prominent use of the plaza
•,the proposed size and location of the proposed restaurant expansion will not
' negatively impact the parking area for the existing commercial uses on the
property
• the proposed restaurant expansion will fill currently vacant space in the plaza
• the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Input From Other Sources
Development Control Manager
Date of report: August 10, 2011
Comments prepared by:
� ',a.�eo
Isa J me' , MCIP, RPP
Planne
IJ:RP:Id
co�erceoonvzm v�ao-n.mc
Enclosures
. no comment
/ �. o-� ��
Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
oo���s
�
�
�
� •
„",""'
"""11"
'�•�
City of Pickering
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION p10� M15, BIOGk S
OWNER Pli�za 23 Inc.
FILE No. PfCA 30/17
�1:�0 :i`c�i.rem.. m�. a�a n. .�onn.... �u rany n...�...
r.
NOL Y
REDEEMER
SEPARATE
STREET
PARK
af �uvy.
�
BALSDON
PARK
�� Q 9
Planning & Development Department
DATE JUIy 25, 2011
SCALE 1:5,000
DRAWN BV JB �
CHECKE� 8Y Rp N
PN3
�0
�
�,, I
LS� \
I �
�: \�"
Q C \ I !
�� � i�,'.� ! \ ��
� ' �
Cl'' �a e\ �� � (� `
�' � i � ��
u�, `� � ��_
�Y�`- ��/�;'"°
��
i � _�
�Y :�
' ,,.' �✓r-� , ; °
'� � ' �
� i x
f
%� 7�� � ; —
< ''I
� -,. nas�f rx
Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
P/CA 30111
Plaza 23 Inc.
�.
� permit maximum
oss leasable floor area
439 m' for all
staurants Type'A' on
: subject property
� �:
;i �✓
.\
..
.\
`
", � \
�
�
. ��
f y. . _
/j; �•'Q �
�' `� �; �`�����.
/� ~ � \ \
��� � � � � �
� �� � / � � \ �
� �t� /��•��� \,\\
Jr � � j� ,��
�
i ��/ ' � �
1 / � � �/ �( �i. .
� �� X � /\ •
� ;, ., /i, �'.
���' � �•'1 %�i� `�.
' i',� ��, j i i
l' �'.'..'.( ...
.{ :
.,��« .�.n..� .�_ .i
r "\ ��
a�� � {�;�� `\
, i , r .s�•. , .
�u .. '��G �i
�1F ��.i I
I,f�` �.'E�,
\'
\
F
N
This map was produced by Ihe Ciry of Pickering Planning 8 Development Department,
Planning In(ormalion Services Mapping antl �esiqn, Juty 26. 2011.
c�tv ��! Report to 1 �
; ; Committee of Adjustment
I 1�1 Application Number: P/CA 35/11 & P/CA 36/11
Meeting Date: August 17, 2011
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications P/CA 35/11 & P/CA 36/11
Georgina Osgood
720 & 722 Front Road
(South and West Parts Lot 2, Plan M90)
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit minimum lot frontages
of 14.4 metres and minimum lot areas of 435 square metres for two proposed lots for
detached dwellings, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres
and a minimum lot area of 460 square metres.
The appliCant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a proposed land
severance and to obtain building permits.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department considers the lot frontages of 14.4 metres
and lot areas of 435 square metres for two proposed lots to be minor variances that are
desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general
intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore
recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions:
That these variances apply only to the proposed severed properties, as
generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this
application.
2. That the applicant receives approval and finalize the application to the Region
of Durham Land Division Committee for the proposed lots by August 16, 2013
or this decision shall be null and void.
Report P/CA 35/11 & P/CA 36/11
�2
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
August 17, 2011
Page 2
Pickering a�cial Plan —"Urban Residential — Medium Density Area" within the Bay
Ridges Neighbourhood
Although the proposed severance with the proposed minimum lot frontages and lot
areas does not meet the medium density requirements of the Offcial Plan, the plan also
provides that in establishing performance standards for Urban Residential Areas, City
Council may limit the residential densities below the minimums set out in the Official
Plan if it can be demonstrated to the City's satisfaction that the design, site layout,
blocking, and/or phasing of the project can be intensified over time.
Zoning By-law 2511 —"R4" — Fourth Density Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Lot Frontage and Lot Area Variances
. the intent of the minimum 15.0 metres lot frontage requirement in the by-law
is to establish a lot width that will ensure compatibility of housing forms and
an attractive streetscape for an area
. the proposed lot frontages of 14.4 metres will be compatible with the existing
lots fronting onto Front Road
• opportunity still exists to achieve medium density on the residential block
through future development in the area
• the proposed Iot areas of 435 square metres will be compatible with the
existing lots fronting onto Front Road
• the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Date of r�port: August 10, 2011
Comments prepared by:
�,� av�eA
Isa Ja es, MCIP, RPP
Planner
IJ:RP:Id
coia�reponzrzonrpce?s-ii a pnoo-naoc
Enclosures
/�p�/J l�
Ross Pym, MCIP,"RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
13
1�
Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
P/CA 35/11 8 P/CA 36/11
G. Osgood
�
Q
0
�
�
z
�
�
LL
�
This map was pmducetl by tAe Ci�y of PiAering Plannirg 8 Developmenl Department,
Planning In(ortnation Services Mapping antl Design, July 26, 2011.
c��y °� � Report to � `�
; ; Committee of Adjustment
I ERI Application Number: P/CA 37/11
Meeting Date: August 17, 2011
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner— Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 37/11
R. Peters
584 Marksbury Road
(South Part Lot 43, Plan 311)
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to recognize an existing
accessory structures Iot coverage of 7.6 percent, whereas the by-law permits a
maximum,accessory structures lot coverage of 5 percent.
The appliGant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning compliance.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department considers the existing accessory structures
lot coverage of 7.6 percent to be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the
Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the existing accessory structures in the rear
yard, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans.
Background:
In 2008, an application to the Committee of Adjustment (P/CA 25/08) was submitted in
order to obtain a building permit for a proposed one storey addition to the rear of the
existing dwelling. A number of minor variances were requested for the proposed
constructiqn and to recognize the existing structures including accessory buildings. The
owner of the property is now requesting a minor variance to recognize an existing
situation that was missed in the original minor variance application made in 2008.
Report P/CA 37/11
�_ �
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
August 17, 2011
Page 2
Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residential Area — Low Density Area" within the West
Shore Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 2511 —"R4" — Fourth Density Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
• the intent of the 5 percent maximum accessory structures lot coverage is to
ensure the maintenance of an appropriate amount of amenity area uncovered
by buildings and to regulate the maximum size and mass of accessory
buildings on a lot
• the proposed 7.6 percent maximum accessory building lot coverage is an
existing situation that have been recognized by the Committee of Adjustment
in a previous minor variance application that allowed the accessory structures
• the proposed accessory building lot coverage appears to have no adverse
impact on the surrounding neighbours
• the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Date of report: August 10, 2011
Comments prepared by:
a��
Mila Yeung
Planner I
MY:RP:Id
coie�repomrzonip.aazn eo�
Enclosures
� `
o�
Ross Pym, M , RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
1� Information Compiled from ApplicanYs
Submitted Plan
P/CA 37/11
R. Peters
MARKSBURY DRIVE
�V'
Thls map was pmducetl by Ne City of Pickering Planning 8 Oevelopment �epartment,
Planning Iniorma�ion Servires Mappng antl Design, July 26, 2011.