HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 6, 2011Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Meeting Number:9
Date:Wednesday,July 6,2011
Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Wednesday,July 6,2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Page Number
(I)Adoption of Agenda
(II)Adoption of Minutes from June 15,2011
(III)Reports .
1.(Deferred at the June 15,2011 meeting)
PICA 21/11 -D.Burger
550 Ashfield Court
(Lot 34,Plan 40M-1419)
City of Pickering
2.PICA 22/11 -Whitevale Golf Club
2952 Golf Club Road
(South Part Lot 29 &30,Concession 4,
Part Lot 1 &2,40R-18997)
City of Pickering
3.PICA 23/11 -J.&J.Will
1881 Spruce Hill Road
(Lot 70,RCP Plan 1041,Part 1,40R-25049)
City of Pickering
4.PICA 24/11 -E.Mason
434 Churchwin Street
(Lot 67,Plan 21)
City of Pickering
5.PICA 25/11 -K.Kwapich
1296 Commerce Street
(Part Lot 4,Block C,Plan 65,Part 3,40R-11704)
City of Pickering
6.PICA 26/11 -U.&D.Schorn
1760 Finch Avenue
(South Part of Lot 18,Concession 2,Part 2,40R-8590)
City of Pickering
(IV)-Adjournment
1-6
7-10
11-15
16-19
20-24
25-28
29-33
Accessible •__
PICKE~_G
For information related to accessibility requirements please contact
Lesley Dunne
T.905.420.4660,extension 2024
TIY 905.420.1739
Email Idunne@cityofpickering.com
Pending Adoption
Present:
Tom Copeland
David Johnson -Chair
Eric Newton -Vice-Chair
Bill Utton
Shirley Van Steen
Also Present:
Ross Pym,Secretary-Treasurer
Mila Yeung,Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Lesley Dunne,Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
(I)Adoption of Agenda
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Eric Newton
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday,June 15,2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
01
That the agenda for the Wednesday,June 15,2011 meeting be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
(II)Adoption of Minutes
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
That the minutes of the 7th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held
Wednesday,May 25,2011 be adopted as amended.
Carried Unanimously
1
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday,June 15,2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
(III)Reports
1.PICA 18/11 -Loblaw Properties Ltd.
1792 Liverpool Road
(South Part Lot 23,Concession 1)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036,as amended by By-laws
1680/83,1727/83,5238/98 and 7061/10 to permit a 1,583 square metre
temporary outdoor garden centre to operate from April 1st to August 31st of every
calendar year generally located in the centre of the parking lot,whereas the
by-law allows for a 430 square metre temporary outdoor garden centre to operate
from April 1st to June 30th of every calendar year generally located in the north-west
corner of the parking lot.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit.
The Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of
Pickering Planning &Development Department recommending approval subject
to conditions.Written comments were receiyed from the City's Development
Control Manager expressing no concerns.Written comments were also received
from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority indicating no objection to
the application.
Ian Rutledge,agent,was present to represent the application.No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen.
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application PICA 18/11 by Loblaw Properties Ltd.,be Approved on the
grounds that the proposed temporary outdoor garden centre generally located in
the centre of the parking lot,having a maximum area of 1,583 square metres to
operate from June 15,2011 to August 31,2011 are minor variances that are
desirable for the appropriate development of the land,and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law,subject to
the following conditions:
1.That these variances apply only to the outdoor garden centre,as generally
sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan with this application.
2
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday,June 15,2011 03
,7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
2.That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction or
this decision shall become null and void.
3.That these variances are null and void after September 30,2011.
Carried Unanimously
2.PICA 19/11 -P.&W.Moss
609 Beckworth Square
(Part of Block 119,40M-1232,Parts 1 &2,40R-7265)
City of Pickering
,
The applicants request relief from Zoning By-law 3036,as amended by By-law
1289/81 to permit a rear yard depth of 4.0 metres to a proposed uncovered deck,
whereas the by-law requires a minimum 7.5 metres rear yard depth.
The applicants request approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning
compliance..
The Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of
Pickering Planning &Development Department recommending approval subject
to conditions.Written comments were received from the City's Development
Control Manager expressing no concerns.Written comments were also received
from J.&P.Voves of 700 Beckworth Square indicating no objections the
application.
Wayne Moss,owner,was present to represent the application.No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
In response to a question from a Committee Member,Wayne Moss indicated the
proposed uncovered deck will be constructed of wood and will be at 20 inches
above grade..
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
That application PICA 19/11 by P.&W.Moss,be Approved on the rear yard
depth of 4.0 metres to a proposed uncovered deck is a minor variance that is
desirable for the appropriate development of the land,and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law,subject to
the following conditions:
3
04
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday,June 15,2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
1.That this variance apply only to the proposed uncovered deck,as generally
sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans with this application.
2.That the applicant constructs the proposed uncovered deck by June 14,2013,or
this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
3.PICA 20/11 -LJ Salem Farms Inc.
Seventh Concession Road
(South Part Lot 15,Concession 7)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037,to permit a lot area of
3.38 hectares for an existing lot,whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area
of 4.0 hectares.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building
permit for the erection of a dwelling,barn and workshop on the subject lands.
The Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of
Pickering Planning &Development Department recommending approval subject
to conditions.Written comments were also received from the City's
Development Control Manager expressing no concerns.
Lee Gray,owner,was present to represent the application.No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Tom Copeland
That application PICA 20/11 by LJ Salem Farms Inc.,be Approved on the
grounds that the request to permit a lot area of 3.38 hectares is a minor variance
that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land,and in keeping with
the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law,
subject to the following conditions:
1.That the owner obtains approval for the application 18-Z0-00111 0-01 to
amend the Minister's Zoning Order -Regulation Number 102/72.
4
Committee of Adjustment
Me-eting Minutes
Wednesday,June 15,2011 0"5
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
2.That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by
June 14,2013,or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
4.PICA 21/11 -D.Burger
550 Ashfield Court
(Lot 34,Plan 40M-1419)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036,as amended by By-law
1543/82 to permit a 0.1 metre side yard width to an existing shed located in the
side yard,whereas the by-law requires a 1.0 metre side yard width and that all
accessory buildings be located in the rear yard.
The applicants request approval of this variance in.order to obtain zoning
compliance.
The Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of
Pickering Planning &Development Department recommending refusal.Written
comments were also received from the City's Development Control Manager
expressing no concerns.
David Burger,owner,was present to represent the application.No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
David Burger explained the shed was built in June 2010 and is currently not
finished due to receiving a Notice to Comply.The shed will be finished with
cedar siding on the outside in order to match the existing shed in the rear yarq.
In response to questions from Committee Members,David Burger explained an
eaves trough will be installed and connected to the rear yard storm drain;the
shed has a door in the front and rear giving the ability to walk through thereby
providing access to the reejr yard,and the shed is used to store materials.David
Burger indicated it will be expensive to relocate the shed into the rear yard.The
.shed would either have to be disassembled or raised in order to move it.
5
06
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday,June 15,2011
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application PICA 21/11 by D.Burger,be Deferred until the next meeting in
order to give the Committee Members an opportunity to visit the site.
Carried
Vote
Tom Copeland
David Johnson
Eric Newton
Bill Utton
Shirley Van Steen
opposed
in favour
in favour
in favour
opposed
(IV)Adjournment
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Eric Newton
That the 8th meeting of 2011 the Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at
7:26 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on
Wednesday,July 6,2011.
Carried Unanimously
Date
Chair
Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
6
From:
Subject:
Application:
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number:PICA 21/11
Meeting Date:July 6,2011
(Deferred from the June 15,2011 Meeting)
Ross Pym,MCIP,RPP
Principal Planner -Development Review
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 21/11
D.Burger
550 Ashfield Court
(Lot 34,Plan 40M-1419)
City of Pickering
07
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036,as amended by By-law 1543/82
to permit a 0.1 metre side yard depth to an existing shed located in the side yard,
whereas the by-law requires a 1.0 metre side yard depth,and that all accessory
buildings be located in the rear yard.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning compliance.
Recommendation:
The Planning &Development Department considers the 0.1 metre side yard depth and
the location of the existing shed in the side yard to be major variances that are
undesirable for the appropriate development of the land,and not in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law,and therefore recommends Refusal of
the proposed variances.
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential Area -Low Density Area"within the
Amberlea Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036,as amended by By-law 1543/82 -"S1"-Single Residential Zone
Background:
The subject application was deferred at the June 15,2011 Committee of Adjustment
meeting in order to allow Committee Members to conduct a site check.The Committee
conducted a site check on Wednesday June 22,2011.
Report PICA 21/11
(Deferred from the June 15,2011 Meeting)
08
July 6,2011
Page 2
Appropriateness of the Application
Accessory Structure in the Side Yard Variance
•the intent of the requirement for accessory structures to be located in the rear
yard is to preserve the openness in the front and side yard from a public
viewing perspective,maintain adequate buffer space between buildings on a
property and street activity,to allow access into a rear yard,and avoid
adverse impact on the streetscape
•the location of the existing shed does not provide an adequate buffer space
between buildings that is in character with the existing neighbourhood
•the shed completely eliminates access to the rear yard for the east side yard
•the location of the existing shed creates an adverse impact on the streetscape
and a visual distraction that is intrusive to neighbouring residences
•the shed could be relocated to the rear yard in compliance with the zoning
by-law
•the applicant has provided no land-use planning rationale for allowing the
shed in the side yard
•the intent of the,zoning by-law would not be maintained,and the variance is
considered major
Accessory Structure Side Yard Depth Variance
•the intent of the zoning by-law in requiring accessory structures to provide a
minimum 1.0 metre setback from lot lines is to ensure that adequate space is
available for maintenance,that the eaves/overhangs do not encroach on
adjacent properties,that roof drainage stays on the subject property,and to
minimize their visual impact on adjacent properties
•the existing setback of 0.1 metre to the east side lot line does not provide
adequate space for maintenance of the existing shed and would not contain
roof water runoff
•the existing shed does not contain an eavestrough (within the property limits)
to ensure that proper roof drainage is contained on the subject property
•the intent of the zoning by-law would not be maintained,and the variance is
considered major
Date of Report:June 29,2011
Comments prepared by:
,'l£L
AY:RP:ld
cofaJreports/2011ipca21.11 Deferred.doc
Enclosures
1uw~
Q Ross Pym,MCIP,RPP
~'\Principal Planner,Development Review
09
-
..•...
r
I----------
f-
I -
;;:----,ST.MARY
CATHOLIC
HIGH SCHOOLt--~
---:;:CRESCENT0>---./.~--V/Irn
~I'
PARK
AMBERLEA
BRAEBURN
r--
.-----.
f--z_ti-
(f)f---
~I-
U f---
l-t---
~
DRIVE
I
0-!;2 -_f-
()-~-
~
/
ROSEBANK
RESERVOIR
-//
I
~_l~I -S;C'Iyt--,::5-~~~
-"'-\Y==8_lJ~i~~~1J..J'v~'
-~;;:-~~ROAD~:>(IT .....,--..o ----l l--r-r----
~/":_---j r--r-r-tJ ~1
SPRINGVIEW
P -00:-1--0::r-=(f)=~
;;:f5uL-1--==w ===!Z w w ,m L -'--'---'"'--w ->>"0 l --::5--
~>---~0::--CRESCENT ==:::!~=w --0:-/1 -->r--0::g:_I----r--
U (f)f--ARCADIA ~.......SQUARE
..-~~~t=I I II II\"""//I ,"""---\.CRESCENT
.-r-I -~I
COURT i /=z -=::J-\...~-'-'--'C-o -~~_
~~~~~~~~k~~~
-:-~f 'f1i(J 7 I--H eJ ~
RI-J(---'ASHFIELD t:::=~I--
o_~CRT.V «~
/PRESBYTERIAN "I::
I U'CHURCH '--
~LANE
~~~g ==~\III 1/'a ~
.,~S _0::"be-:-:-.........:::t ~.
Ov _w '--f-.~&0::~
S'\~::::::1 ~~--~t--\~('",A -//~Cb VQ.~-y ~=/.~_'\.,<,,:'1 =
HIGHBUSH ~'1l~""<;~PUBLIC SCHOOL ~(('~.~
~z~~I ~~o ~L
~~~~j III II I ==
-SQUARE .J::-FLAVELLE COURT =
//I \\~lE:U)~\I /=~~~==~'-U I-
---1 8."'-~-
-I ->--.--~rF"/E;-
/-f-W --I -......(D ~...--==~0::r---."'Sf.'"""~-~::3f-_gf-fID GA
()f----~~~f--
:;0 -m --i
W
-l
~Z
I--W_W
_-0::-'"'----I=1
I I
CHARNWOOD
I I
f---~_-a...
I II
a«o0::
~z«mw
U)ocr
-
NE
-
-
-
--
--
-
f----
""ORE5
)CHOC
:>(_-z-~w
(f)of--_O::r-
I--
I--
:rON
OL
Planning &Development DepartmentCityofPickering
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Plan 40M-1419,Lot 34
OWNER D.Burger
FILE No.PICA 21/11
DATE May 19,2011
SCALE 1 :5,000
DRAWN BY JB
CHECKED BY RP l'
PN.11
,I 10
~wwn::
~(J)
~«zn::w
LL
Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 21/11
D.Burger
16.5m
2Am
I ~.~EXISTING
~SHED..•..'
E
E
~
('I')
4.6m
o.u-c.
.,'
EXISTING
DWELLING
1.8m
To permit a 0.1 metre side
ard width to an existing
hed,in the side yard
t
8.501
Eo
f'-.
ASHFIELD COURT
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning &Development Department,
Planning Information Services Mapping and Design,May 31,2011.
Report to,
Committee of Adjustment'
Application Number:PICA 22/11
Meeting Date:July 6,2011
11
From:
Subject:
Application:
Marg Wouters,MCIP,RPP
Manager,Development Review &Urban Design
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 22/11
Whitevale Golf Club
2985 Golf Club Road '
(South Part Lo~29 &30,Concession 4,Part lot 1 &2,40R-18997)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037,as amended by By-law 3155/89,
4825/96 and 6847/08 to permit a golf practice facility,whereas the by-law permits a golf
practice facility use until July 29,2011,after which only agricultural uses are permitted.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to continue the operation of a
golf practice facility.
Recommendation:
The Planning &Development Department considers a temporary golf practice facility
use to be a minor var!ance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land,
and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning
By-law,and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance,subject to the
following conditions:'
1.That this variance apply only to the area zoned as "A(T-GPF)"in By-law 3037
as amended by By-laws 4825/96 and 6847/08,as generally sited and outlined
on the applicant's submitted plans.
2.That the variance shall apply for the period July 29,2011 to December 31,2012,
and that this decision shall become null and void on January 1,2013.
3.That the applicant satisfies the requirements of the Region of Durham,financial
and otherwise.
Report PICA 22/11
12
Background:
July 6,2011
Page 2
The subject lands are part of the Whitevale Golf Club property,which is located
southeast of the Hamlet of Whitevale.The Golf Course is within the limits of the future
Seaton Community.The golf practice facility has been permitted on a temporary basis
since 1996.A temporary use permission was considered appropriate until such time as
major road alignments for the future Seaton Community,which affect the golf course
lands,could be confirmed.The current zoning permission expires on July 29,2011.
An Environmental Assessment to confirm road alignments in Seaton is currently
underway by the Region of Durham.Whitevale Golf Club intends to seek permanent
zoning permissions,to include an extension of the golf club and associated uses over
the subject lands,onc~the Environmental Assessment is completed.
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan -Agricultural Areas
Zoning By-law 3037 as amended by By-law 3155/89,4825/96 and 6847/08 -"A(T-GPF),
AfGC &02/GC"
Appropriateness of the Application
•the intent of the zoning by-law is to provide uses that are appropriate for the
subject lands
•a golf practice facility use is currently permitted on the subject lands and no
changes to the subject property are proposed
•the continuance of a golf practice facility on a temporary basis does not
appear to have any adverse effects on the surrounding area,and will not
compromise the ongoing Environmental Assessment process
•the applicant intends to submit a zoning amendment application for
permanent golf course uses on the subject lands once road alignments are
confirmed through the ongoing Seaton Environment Assessment process
•an extension of the golf practice facility use for 18 months is considered
appropriate to allow for continued use until the completion of the Seaton
Environmental Assessm"ent
•the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Report PICA 22/11
Date of report:June 29,2011
Comments prepared by:
~~
Mila Yeung\~~\)
Planner I
MY:MW:ld
cofaireportsJ2011Jpca22-11.doc
Enclosures
July 6,2011
Page 3 13
~W~
Marg Wouters,MCIP,RPP
Manager,Development Review &
Urban Design
"14
City of Pickering
SUBJECTPROPERTY
Planning &Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION South Part Lot 29,30,Concession 4,40R-18997,Part 1,2
OWNER Whitevale Golf Club
FILE No.PICA 22/11
DATE May 27,2011
SCALE 1:10,000
DRAWN BY JB
CHECKED BY RP
PN-RUR
15
Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 22/11
Whitevale Golf Club
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning &Development Department,
Planning Information Services Mapping and Design,June 20,2011.
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number:PICA 23/11
Meeting Date:July 6,2011
From:
Subject:
Application:
Marg Wouters,MCIP,RPP
Manager,Development Review &Urban Design
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 23/11
J.&J.Will
1881 Spruce Hill Road
(Lot 70,RCP Plan 1041,Part 1,40R-25049)
City of Picke(ing
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036,to permit a side yard width of
0.5 metres to an existing shed,whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width
of 1.0 metre for an accessory structure.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning compliance.
Recommendation:
The Planning &Development Department considers 1he 0.5 metre side yard width to an
existing shed to be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of
the land,and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the
Zoning By-law,and therefore recommends Appro,val of the proposed variance,subject
to the following condition:
1.That this variance apply only to the existing shed,as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plan.
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential Area -Low Density Area"within the
Dunbarton Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036 -"R4"-Fourth Density Residential
Report PICA 23/11
Appropriateness of the Application
Accessory Structure Side Yard Width Variance
July 6,2011
Page 2 17
•the intent of the zoning by-law in requiring accessory structures to provide a
minimum 1.0 metre setback from lot lines is to ensure that adequate space is
available for maintenance,that the eaves/overhangs do not encroach on
adjacent properties,that roof drainage stays on the subject property,and to
minimize their visual impact on adjacent properties
•the location of the storage shed is an existing condition and does not appear
to have a negative visual impact on the adjacent properties
•the owner has ensured there is adequate space for maintenance and lot
drainage between the side property line and existing shed
•roof water runoff from the accessory structure does not appear to impact
adjacent properties and can be maintained on the subject property
•the intent of the zoning by-law is maintained
Date of report:June 29,2011
;:5\5 ~i-=:I;
~~a~RPp
Planner I
AY:MW:ld
cofaireports/2011/pca23-11.dOC
Enclosures
11J...-w~
Marg Wouters,MCIP,RPP
Manager,Development Review &
Urban Design
-------------------------------------~-------------
18
o«ofr:
>ii:o
wU::Jfr:
Q..
(f)
'::::fr:o
-
GLENANNA
-1
-1:::<
~z
~~/}~
~I ,I,PJ=~\\
~-~GABLEHURST~J=::
I II I I I I
CRESCENT
II ~
="'"I l ==~........•.......,COURT Y ~
~6 ~~ri0::------~-~o-/c--fr:
-[IJ-I-1_~-
AVENUE
I~
-
-
BONITA
BO/'v,ITA _
-
L---J r-PA~-~
~---.....,~_3:&--«---LL_...".......,.
-0--_0-
----'_0
-r-,-~-
--.-0
--1 _~
-\---«
----,LL==\'
)"/
)
LANE
(
WINGARDEN CRESCENTffj~V~~~rrf
r-:
(f)
\
\.
"-"-\
\\
\
\
\
..-
:::<d\SUBJEt'::r'JTV
o«ofr:
wU::Jfr:
Q..
(f)
~
STROUDS
I'~~II =~
----
---
woii)
~"---(f-
I I I \
\
\
\n'\I \\
\.\"\
ROAD
PARK
~ZSI
COURT _
GANDA TSETIAGON
PUBLIC SCHOOL
UNA
J.McPHERSON
I
I I
---
-
-
~---
--::j
"'"
\I
MILLBANK
Planning &Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Plan 1041,RCP Lot 70,RP 40R-25049,Part 1
OWNER J.&J.Will DATE June 7,2011
FILE No.PICA 23/11 SCALE 1 :5,000
HEDGEROW PL.
/1--
~-
-0-~
'SHA::::OOK ==fr:
City of Pickering
---
I--
I
oH~
<
(
\"
DRAWN BY JB
CHECKED BY RP l'
PN-11
19
Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 23/11
J.&J.Will
o permit a 0.5 metre side
ard width to an existing
shed,in the side yard
E
lC)
o
1~-vtv:Ml:t.DO m::o::a:::;=====«'07.7;
-"I chain link fence ~~.a.,
EXISTING
SHED
.~I'~
"•..~.-'~,,,,,,..
"•
EXISTING.
DWELLING
--1.110 mo
7.8CJ m
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning &Development Department,
.Planning Information Services Mapping and Design,June 20,2011.
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number:PICA 24/11
Meeting Date:July 6,2011
From:
Subject:
Application:
Marg Wouters,MCIP,RPP
Manager,Development Review &Urban Design
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 24/11
E.Mason
434 Churchwin Street
(Lot 67,Plan 21)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037 as amended by By-law 2677/88,
to permit an existing lot area of 1,006 square metres,a side yard width of 1.2 metres to
the existing dwelling and proposed addition,a front yard depth of 8.8 metres to the
proposed covered porch and a front yard depth of 4.9 metres to the existing dwelling,
whereas,the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 3,000 square metres,a side yard
width of 2.4 metres and front yard depth of 9.0 metres.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a Heritage District
Permit,building permit and zoning compliance for a proposed two storey addition to the
existing dwelling.
Recommendation:
The Planning &Development Department considers the a lot area of 1,006 square
metres,a side yard width of 1.2 metres to the existing dwelling and proposed addition,a
front yard depth of 8.8 metres to the proposed covered porch and a front yard depth of
4.9 metres to the existing dwelling to be minor variances that are desirable for the
appropriate development of the land,and in keeping with the general intent and purpose
of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law,and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variances,subject to the following conditions:
1.That these variances apply only to the existing dwelling and proposed
addition as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2.That the applicant obtains a Heritage District Permit and a building permit for
the proposed construction by July 5,2013,or this decision shall become null
and void.
Report PICA 24/11 July 6,2011
Page 2 21
Background:
The subject property is located within the Whitevale Heritage District,and therefore a
Heritage District Permit is required for changes to the dwelling.
The Committee of Adjustment has approved a number of minor variances on the subject
property over the years.Since the notice of the public hearing,a variance for a front yard
depth of 4.9 metres to the existing dwelling and for a front yard depth of 8.8 metres to the
proposed covered porch,have been added to this application to recognize the existing
dwelling and a proposed porch addition.
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan -Rural Settlements -Rural Hamlets
Zoning By-law 3037 as amended by By-law 2677/88 -"HMR3"
Appropriateness of the Application
Lot Area Variance
•the intent of the minimum lot area requirement is to ensure a usable lot size
that is compatible with the surrounding area
•the lot area of 1 ,006 square metres is an existing condition,in keeping with
the character and size of existing lots within the surrounding area
•the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Side Yard Width Variance
•the intent of the minimum side yard width of 2.4 metres is to provide an
appropriate buffer space between structures on abutting properties
•the side yard width of 1.2 metres to the existing dwelling is an existing
situation
•the proposed side yard width of 1.2 metres to the proposed addition is
considered appropriate as it is consistent with the existing dwelling as no
development is contemplated on the abutting property to the west,given its
designation as "Open Space System -Natural Areas"in the Official Plan
•the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Report PICA 24/11
22
Front Yard Depth Variance
July 6,2011
Page 3
•the intent of the front yard depth requirement is to provide an adequate buffer
space between a building and street activity,and to provide an adequate
landscaped area at the front of the property
•the proposed 4.9 metre front yard depth to the existing dwelling is an existing
condition,recognized through previous variances
•the proposed 8.8 metre front yard depth to the proposed covered porch will
provide adequate buffer space between street activity and provide an
adequate landscaped area within the front,of the property
•the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Date of report:June 29,2011
Comments prepared by:~ch
Mila Yeung
Planner I
MY:MW:ld
cofaJreports/20111pca24~11.doc
Enclosures
.1u.(/)~j)
Marg Wouters,MCIP,RPP
Manager,Development Review &
Urban Design
23
~/'
WHIT EVAL]~L:.J
~-~SUBJECT ,..:IPROPERTY(f)
01 \ST IEET ------....WH/TEVALE
UN/TED
CHURCHII\
It
-l
I I-l~
WHITEVALE ROADJI,..:
(f)
T r--
z WH/TEVALE i?COMMUNITY I i~,CENTRE ..--&PARK LJ 0«
-WH/TEVAU 0
Il::"'-PUBLIC
~
~
LIBRARY -
[
(
.~
i..L
-l0G
City of Pickering Planning &Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 67,Plan 21 l'OWNER E.Mason DATE June 9,20.11 DRAWN BY JB
FILE No.PICA 24/11 SCALE 1 :5,0.0.0.CHECKED BY RP
o~a ~ourc ••:PN.RUR~~~~;e~p:o.nJe~n~8~~81~~'DD~~c:,,!t~ua':fcp~~':.nlRe~~~egd~t.N~e~e~:'od~~?ts~~I:.n ot survey.
24 Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 24/11
E.Mason
zc:"-'~rC7.~,
~:~y;~~;.~
(-.I"
To permit a 4.9 metre front
.yard depth to an existing
dwelling
To permit an 8.8 metre
front yard depth to a front
porch addition
-"'-~.••"1;;.---n
ENo
I.()
i!
I'P
;F'
/i;,",;//.W:/.~_."'1Z'.
20.401
I
J.
:~,
CHURCHWIN STREET
:~lfj[
')J'\,."
To permit a lot area of
1006 square metres
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning &Development Department.
Planning Information Services Mapping and Design.June 20,2011.
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number:PICA 25/11
Meeting Date:July 6,2011
25
From:
Subject:
Application:
Marg Wouters,MCIP,RPP
Manager Development Review &Urban Design
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 25/11
K.Kwapich
1296 Commerce Street
(Part Lot 4,Block C,Plan 65,Part 3,40R-11704)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit a front yard depth of
4.6 metres and an east side yard width of 0.7 metres to a proposed one and two-storey
addition to an existing detached dwelling,whereas the by-law requires a front yard
depth of 7.5 metres and a side yard width of 1.5 metres.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit
for a proposed additipn to the existing detached dwelling.
Recommendation:
The Planning &Development Department considers the side yard width of 0.7 metres to
a two-storey addition to an existing detached dwelling to be a major variance that is not
desirable for the development of the land,and not in keeping with the general intent and
purpose of the Zoning By-law,and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed
variance.
And
The Planning &Development Department considers the front yard depth of 4.6 metres
to the proposed one-storey addition to be a minor variance that is desirable for the
appropriate development of the land,and in keeping with the general intent and purpose
of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law,and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variance,subject to the following conditions:
1.That this variance apply only to the proposed one-storey addition,as
generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2.ThaUhe applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 5,2013 or this decision shall become null and void.
Report PICA 25/11
26
Comment:
July 6,2011
Page 2
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan -Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas
Zoning By-law 2511 -"R4"-Fourth Density Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Front Yard Depth Variance
•the intent of the front yard depth of 7.5 metres is to provide an adequate
buffer space between the building and street activity,and to provide an
adequate Jandscaped area at the front of the property
•the variance for a 4.6 metre front yard depth would apply only to the proposed
one-storey addition at the front of the house,which comprises only
approximately 50 percent of the front fac;ade of the existing dwelling;the
proposed variance would maintain the neighbourhood character on
Commerce Street,provide an appropriate buffer space and provide an
adequate landscaped area within the front yard of the property
•the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
East Side Yard,Width Variance
•the intent of the minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres on both sides of a
dwelling are to provide an appropriate buffer space between structures on
abutting properties and to provide appropriate access to the rear yard
•the proposed side yard width of 0.7 metres to the proposed two-storey
addition on the east side of the house would not provide an appropriate buffer
between the existing dwelling and the abutting property,and would have an
adverse effect on the character of the neighbourho9d on Commerce Street
•the proposed two-storey addition eliminates access to the rear yard on the
east side yard of the subject property
•the intent of the zoning by-law would not be maintained
Date of report:June 29,2011
Comments prepared by:
~~nn
Planner I
MY:MW:ld
cofa/reports/2011/pca25-11 ,doc
Enclosures
'1«(;J Q1J1:LlL/
Marg Wouters,MCIP,RPP
Manager Development Review &Urban Design
-I=~
~-r ~~f
SHEARER _~
LA~E ~~
f--
-w--::>-z__w_~-----
27
-
-
DRIVE
STREET
I--
-r-I--
AVENUE
I_f'T'I-~_0
_Z
.---
STREET
HOLY
REDEEMER
SEPARATE
pCHOOL
o '::OMMERCE
«-STREET
~1--PARK
COMMERCE
I
~ll
OLD ORCHARD AVENUE 6
~I ~
'"'>8 ~NICA COOK....I II 12'/,
=i 1li ~qL IUINA ~RT~
AVE."1*
~\'\I FOXGLOVEI'---.ILONA PARK ~-nn~
ROAD
L r-'
~
I---
BROWNING
--
PARk~/~~~
~~~"'W-
~\~__C-?~_
~~....1-_
~0-__==rrrrill ~'r-
_w I I I I.J--LL-HALLER AVENUE-~I I-w-~---
~I P 1'1'1 r-'I"~'I i8i~.-s-\COMMERCE STREET
PRO ESS t=:=~-ll
FRENC N'-tii---
~--BROADVIEWBAYSTtJ:1-~<5
PA ~_0-w~0..~-1 To::-
ANNLAND ~
~~,L--J -l=
FRENCHMAN'S BAY ~r---_
WHARF STREET
\\I Jlill ~~---1
~-II J~~.
,~"\..__0 ~
City of Pickering
-c-
hi I
~t I~ViI
TERP~}~
STR:.y:..1
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Plan 65,Block C,Part Lot 4,40R-11704,Part 3
OWNER K.Kwapich DATE June 13,2011
FILE No.PICA 25/11 SCALE 1 :5,000
DRAWN BY JB
CHECKED BY RP l'
PN.2
28 Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 25/11
K.Kwapich
19.1m
To permit a 4.6 front yard
depth
iI.
_~UNE!I.I
i
BUiL01NGUNB
ReAAym ~~:~j'
I
I~se I
~!I~0
~'"II.~""~
~I
I
-"---:31"''.a.7mII[Q]~"E'I ~--:!:--~~--1!~I ~!E~.,..I
111
tniJ i co~,I ~;!~,.-"".f ~I
J I1
COMMERCE STREET
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning &Development Department,
Planning Information Services Mapping and Design,June 20,2011.
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number:PICA 26/11
Meeting Date:July 6,2011
29
From:
Subject:
Application:
Marg Wouters,MCIP,RPP
Manager,Development Review &Urban Design
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 26/11
U.&D.Schorn
1760 Finch Avenue
(South Part of Lot 18,Concession 2,Part 2,40R-8590)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036,to permit a 28 square metre
addition to an existing guest house located in the Greenbelt Zone,whereas the by-law
does not permit residential uses in the Greenbelt Zone..
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit.
Recommendation:
Consideration of the application to permit a 28 square metre addition to an existing
guest house is premature until staff confirms the legal status of the guest house and
determines whether the addition is appropriate,and comments are received from the
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.Therefore it is recommended that the
application be Tabled until such information is available to the Planning &Development
Department.
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Medium Density Areas"within the Village
East Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law -3036 -"R3 -Third Density Residential Zone""G -Greenbelt Zone"
Residential development within an area zoned "Greenbelf'is not permitted within this
zoning by-law.
Report PICA 26/11
30
Appropriateness of the Application
July 6,2011
Page 2
The subject property is situated within a flood plain Special Policy Area.Development
is permitted in these areas with appropriate flood protection measures.The property
contains a dwelling and a number of accessory buildings,one of which is being used as
a guest house.
Further research "is required to confirm the legal.status of the guest house and the
appropriateness of expanding the guest house for residential uses.
In addition,the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)requires the
applicant to provide evidence that the proposed addition to the guest house can be
adequately flood-proofed prior to considering this application.
Input From Other Sources
Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority
Date of report:June 29,2011
AY:MW:ld
cofaJreports/2011Jpca26-11.doc
Enclosures
•recommend that the application be tabled
until further technical submissions are
submitted to TRCA to determine the
technical feasibility of the proposal
•a TRCA permit is required prior to building
construction
.itt UJ o():trM~
Marg Wouters,MCIP,RPP
Manager,Development Review &
Urban Design
31
~11 II H I ~/),',,-..•<~<///)\
PICKERING ,,-//\!#CRESCENT 0 BAPTIST (CD '\/--<\I
iJL «COMMUNITY \_.-1
0 CHURCH \:~;-\L III 0::l---~-'J\\~-J
ROAD -'-'-\-,.\~.~\1/
_.
~~_.--"
1:::.\'I
~,-<:...\'...-----/
.///t:!r 1=t-~Z UW
U 0
,-w ~Ul Il:::If---~--w £Il
f--Il:::-Il:::,f--a z u PICKERINGf--0
f--~ISLAMICI---Z -CENTREf---£Il -W
f---~-w.I-...J-I ~I~L~H
Il:::
V Lr~
~r--
'v!UNITY PARK
::::::---~---...----/~:\
~--,
~
~~ra:-~CRESC;L"illIIrrrr-Ili~v ::/PRcptl 'h aJ::.1 Il:::
~~~
iiiw::>...J
I £Il TTrmnff mn\\\\\\11111111
FINCH AVENUE FINCH AVENUE
r"""--'B~\rDURHA tf
ROAD
I--I--REGION.L
~~
I'f---POLICE:f...-a 25rh 1/f---«'--1$2 DIVISIO V ~t-
f--~:;:::::;w III>1--f--?~t---f--E::
-,~-~w ==>--ik::=-a -~--w f--
-...JI-----J ('w >>-It--
~
ik:-::>a 0 --Ul -
W --~-a --
Il:::-W --
£Il -=...::azUl I---I -«z -£Il I---Il:::\(::>1TI,\CD L-
City'of Pickering Planning &Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Concession 2 South Part Lot 18,40R-8590,Part 2 l'OWNER U.&D.Schorn DATE June 16,2011 DRAWN BY JB
.FILE No.PICA 26/11 SCALE 1 :5,000 CHECKED BY RP
a~a ::tource.:PN.2~~b6;e~p~cie::~s~~.1~~"nn~r.c:..~t~lIe':ff~~~raR.~~':e~~taN~e~e~::,dri~:,ts~~~.n of Burve)'_
32
Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 26/11
U.&D.Schorn
EXISTING //
DWELLING .'
To permit a 28 square metre addition
to an existing guest house located in
the Greenbelt zone
..•.,.
N
~I
...•.,.
f""------,--~.•...-:...'----n
I //.~."'}..;-:~;,~<:',~.
!1/i ./
\.'
"/
~\\,
Eo
0)
CD
I
24.3m
FINCH AVENUE
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning &Development Department,
Planning Information Services Mapping and Design,June 20,2011.
I"-------------------
33--
Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 26/11
U.&D.Schorn
-----r-'-=.~_,-,----._..,,:..--~:.-._"-'-~
4.8m_J _o ill
8SOUTH ELEVATION -9EST ELEVATION
E('f)
OJ
UTILITIES Etc BED 1
KITCI-£
7.5m
8GROUND FLOOR'
I I BED 3IIII
I I
I
I -rooI IIjII LANDING
III
I I
I I
I I BED 2
DECK
..-
8UPPER FLOOR
.This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning &Development Department,
Planning Infonnation Services Mapping and Design,June 20,2011.